Testimonials

"I have been invited to publish a paper in a special issue, after submission of the manuscript I have been impressed by the very fast and competent review process and the high speed of publication of the journal. Review process was efficient and comments and suggestions by editors greatly enhanced manuscript content. The editorial team is very efficient and professionnal, and the online submission system is user friendly.

Article in Antioxidants: Polyphenols Attenuate Highly-Glycosylated Haemoglobin-Induced Damage in Human Peritoneal Mesothelial Cells

Less

"As a matter of fact, we believe that perhaps one of the keys to the success of “ANTIOXIDANTS” is the efficient labour of the editors on one hand and the quick and exhaustive review process carried out by the reviewers on the other. We acknowledge very much to the reviewers for their helpful comments that have contributed greatly to the improvement of our paper through the all revision process. Thank you very much to both editors and reviewers for their rigor, professionalism, consideration and help. We would like to highlight the fluent relation with the Assistant Editor, who was always, at any time, available to support and solving doubts. We promise to “ANTIOXIDANTS” the best of futures."

Article in Antioxidants: State of the Art of Anthocyanins: Antioxidant Activity, Sources, Bioavailability, and Therapeutic Effect in Human Health

Less

"First of all, we would like to thank the editors and reviewers who provided us valuable comments and support to improve the quality of our publications. Our research team published in a special issue of the MDPI journal Antioxidants. The overall process of submission, reviewing and acceptance for publication was fast, efficient and fair, and the support of the editor assigned to our work was very impressive. Working with the editorial team of Antioxidants has been a great experience for us, we will definitely recommend it to our colleagues."

Article in Antioxidants: An Anthocyanin-Enriched Extract from Vaccinium uliginosum Improves Signs of Skin Aging in UVB-Induced Photodamage

Less

"First of all, we would like to thank the editorial team for their rapid assistance in the manuscript publishing process. We do thank all reviewers for their feedback and comments on improving the manuscript. Their feedback was positive and effective during revision, publication, and proofreading. Also, during the publication process, the assistant editor was available to send us prompt and very successful feedback."

Article in Antioxidants: Chebulic Acid Prevents Methylglyoxal-Induced Mitochondrial Dysfunction in INS-1 Pancreatic β-Cells

Less

"We are very grateful to the editorial team of "Antioxidants" for their excellent ability and efficiency in the process of reviewing and publishing papers. We were deeply impressed by the process of dealing with manuscripts by editors, reviewers, and editorial departments. The constructive comments of editors and reviewers have undoubtedly improved the quality of our manuscripts. Overall, we are very satisfied with the experience of publishing papers on Antioxidants, and we will consider this journal for submission of our upcoming work."

Article in Antioxidants: Hippuric Acid Promotes Renal Fibrosis by Disrupting Redox Homeostasis via Facilitation of NRF2–KEAP1–CUL3 Interactions in Chronic Kidney Disease

Less

"Here we like to take an opportunity to highly thank and appreciate the entire editorial team of "Antioxidants". I would also like to specially mention the efficient role of Ms. Molly Xia, the assistant editor, for her immediate response and kind cooperation throughout the entire process of reviewing and publishing the paper on time. The constructive and valuable comments from the reviewers further enhanced the quality of our manuscript. We are deeply impressed with the smart and precise timeline in the evaluation process and definitely would like to consider this journal for the submission of our forthcoming research article."

Article in Antioxidants: Mature Twin Neonates Exhibit Oxidative Stress via Nitric Oxide Synthase Dysfunctionality: A Prognostic Stress Marker in the Red Blood Cells and Umbilical Cord Vessels

Less

"This journal is one of the most satisfying journals I have ever submitted. It was a pleasure to publish in the Antioxidants, MDPI. The review process is fast and helpful. If I have good research results, I will choose to publish in this journal again. I am really satisfied with my publication experience. We would like to thank the editors and reviewers who provided us valuable comments to improve the quality of our publications. "

Article in Antioxidants: Plant Extracts as Possible Agents for Sequela of Cancer Therapies and Cachexia

Less

"It is our first paper in "Antioxidants". I'm really satisfied with the speed and efficiency in the process of revision and publication. The process was fast, and fair, since we received comments from 3 judges, all of which were very constructive and helpful in giving adapted advice for manuscript improvement. It was a pleasure to collaborate with the staff and editor. The assigned editor and staff were very helpful in all steps even from submission till the final acceptance. The online submission and handling system was easily understandable. We wish to thank the entire journal's editorial team and the reviewers for this great opportunity."

Article in Antioxidants: Preharvest Salicylate Treatments Enhance Antioxidant Compounds, Color and Crop Yield in Low Pigmented-Table Grape Cultivars and Preserve Quality Traits during Storage

Less

"Publishing in Antioxidants is a very exciting experience. The platform for uploading files is easy to use. The Editorial Staff provides full and clear information on the ongoing reviewing process. The Editors and Editorial Board is fully open to take into considerations opinions of the Authors when they disagree with criticisms raised by reviewers. The reviewing process is incredibly well conducted and fast, leading to decision af acceptance/revision/rejection in 2-3 weeks from submission. Revision of resubmitted manuscript is accomplished in 7-10 days and, once accepted, the manuscript is published in less than a week. And this fast process is accompanied by rigorous analysis by reviewers of the submitted manuscripts, thus allowing Antioxidants to increase yearly its I.F. and rank in the category of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Journals. It is worth underlining that the aforementioned characteristics are common the the other scientific MDPI Journals we experienced with. We will certainly continue to submit our manuscript to Antioxidants and other MDPI Journals."

Article in Antioxidants: Antioxidant-Based Therapies in Male Infertility: Do We Have Sufficient Evidence Supporting Their Effectiveness?

Less

"This journal is among the most satisfying in which I have presented a research article. I am really happy with the speed and efficiency in the review and publication process. The quality of the reviewers' comments has greatly improved our manuscript. I would also like to thank the assigned editor and the entire staff who were very helpful in all the steps, for their competence, availability and kindness. I hope to have the chance to publish on Antioxidants again."

Article in Antioxidants: The Impact of Oxidative Stress in Human Pathology: Focus on Gastrointestinal Disorders

Less

"I am really happy to have published again in Antioxidants. Efficiency in the review and publication process is very appreciable. The quality of the reviewers' comments has greatly improved our manuscript. I would also like to thank the assigned editor and the entire staff who were very helpful in all the steps, for their competence, availability and kindness. I hope to have the chance to publish on Antioxidants again."

Article in Antioxidants: Sickle Cell Disease: Role of Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Therapy

Less

"I thought the service is great, I an so glad with the experience with Micromachines."

Article in Micromachines: Improved Morphological Filter Based on Variational Mode Decomposition for MEMS Gyroscope De-Noising

Less

"My first experience in submitting a paper to the journal Micromachines has been proven an absolute pleasure. The editors Mr. Mars Tu and and Ms. Mandy Wendy are very nice and handled my manuscript timely. Three reviewer reports were provided with a great deal of professional comments which helped me improve the manuscript during the revision. Considering the growing impact of this journal and fast publication, I will definitely consider submitting future articles to Micromachines again."

Article in Micromachines: Progress in Photo-Responsive Polypeptide Derived Nano-Assemblies

Less

"My publication experience when submitting to the Micromachines journal was efficient and of a very high quality. All correspondence was addressed in a timely manner and by very helpful journal staff. The peer-review process was swift, but with structured, solid feedback enabling constructive inputs to be made to the publication."

Article in Micromachines: CD-Based Microfluidics for Primary Care in Extreme Point-of-Care Settings

Less

"Our publication experience with Micromachines was very positive. The reviewing procedure went fast and smooth, with clear instructions and constructive criticism. Following the acceptance of our paper, our paper was ready for proof reading - and then available online - extraordinarily fast. Communication with the editorial office was also always very helpful."

Article in Micromachines: Fiber-Based, Injection-Molded Optofluidic Systems: Improvements in Assembly and Applications

Less

"We are very happy that our latest research work was published in Special Issue “Centrifugal (Compact-Disc) Microfluidics for Extreme POC”, Micromachines. The editors responded to our inquiry promptly and efficiently, and the peer reviewer feedback helped to improve the quality of our manuscript significantly."

Article in Micromachines: Numerical Investigation of Cell Encapsulation for Multiplexing Diagnostic Assays Using Novel Centrifugal Microfluidic Emulsification and Separation Platform

Less

"It is a great pleasure for me to testimony my positive experience to work with the Journal Office of Micromachines for my paper entitled ‘Allergy Testing and Drug Screening on an ITO-Coated Lab-on-a-Disc’. I enjoyed very much the process for my submission and publication in this Journal. The reviewing time is short and efficient. Officers in the editorial board were very responsible and helpful. With high standard of the Journal and quality of the papers, it is expected that Micromachines will be a leading journal in the field of micro-scaled machines and nanomachinery."

Article in Micromachines: Allergy Testing and Drug Screening on an ITO-Coated Lab-on-a-Disc

Less

"I had a very positive experience publishing my research article in Micromachines. In February I received an invitation from Micromachines to submit a manuscript or a review from my research. I agreed to do it and it turned out to be one of my best decisions. The review process was very short and communications with editors were very quick and efficient. From this positive experience I will consider Micromachines for the publication of my manuscripts."

Article in Micromachines: Holographic Fabrication of Designed Functional Defect Lines in Photonic Crystal Lattice Using a Spatial Light Modulator

Less

"I have been invited to contribute a manuscript for a special issue published by Micromachines. This became my first occasion to experience publishing in this journal. The simple-to-use online system for manuscript submission, the short waiting period until receiving the referees’ reports, and the instantaneous online publication after acceptance of the manuscript all contributed to the pleasant experience made. I would also like to mention the high quality support provided by the editorial office, which immediately responded to all of my queries without any delays."

Article in Micromachines: High-Resolution Microfluidic Paper-Based Analytical Devices for Sub-Microliter Sample Analysis

Less

"I have to admit that publishing in Micromachines turned out to be a much better experience than what I expected. Receiving three detailed reviewers’ reports less than one month after the initial submission (of a 36 pages long document) already positively impressed me, but what was really exceeding my expectations was the detailed analysis in the post-acceptance phase. Careful figure controls, copyright checks, acronyms verifications, etc… Everything was verified and fine-tuned to optimize the manuscript. After this experience I will definitely consider the journal for future submissions!"

Article in Micromachines: A Comprehensive Review of Optical Stretcher for Cell Mechanical Characterization at Single-Cell Level

Less