Membrane-Permeable Octanoyloxybenzyl-Masked cNMPs As Novel Tools for Non-Invasive Cell Assays

Abstract

Adenine nucleotide (AN) 2nd messengers, such as 3′,5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), are central elements of intracellular signaling, but many details of their underlying processes remain elusive. Like all nucleotides, cyclic nucleotide monophosphates (cNMPs) are net-negatively charged at physiologic pH which limits their applicability in cell-based settings. Thus, many cellular assays rely on sophisticated techniques like microinjection or electroporation. This setup is not feasible for medium- to high-throughput formats, and the mechanic stress that cells are exposed to raises the probability of interfering artefacts or false-positives. Here, we present a short and flexible chemical route yielding membrane-permeable, bio-reversibly masked cNMPs for which we employed the octanoyloxybenzyl (OB) group. We further show hydrolysis studies on chemical stability and enzymatic activation, and present results of real-time assays, where we used cAMP and Ca²⁺ live cell imaging to demonstrate high permeability and prompt intracellular conversion of some selected masked cNMPs. Based on these results, our novel OB-masked cNMPs constitute valuable precursor-tools for non-invasive studies on intracellular signaling.

1. Introduction

Among cNMPs, the ubiquitous second messengers 3′,5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and 3′,5′-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) constitute the most prominent examples, but further cNMPs, such as 3′,5′-cyclic uridine monophosphate (cUMP), have been reported as related to signaling processes [1]. Signaling by cNMPs proceeds via two general pathways. The first relies on direct binding and regulation of distinctive cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) ion channels. The second mechanism is based on the activation of protein kinases A (PKA) or G to further transduce the signal [1,2,3,4]. Activated PKA/G promotes phosphorylation of a variety of proteins, which can be involved in the regulation of metabolic processes, muscle contraction, and gene transcription [4]. In contrast, signaling through CNG channels allows a faster processing and implementation of increased cNMP levels. The ion channels are generally non-selective for cations. However, the entry of sodium ions (Na⁺) depolarizes the membrane which promotes the combined influx of Ca²⁺. Additionally, voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels open in response to membrane depolarization and thus enhance the Ca²⁺ signal further [2,3]. Signals of cAMP and cGMP are ceased through their degradation by phosphodiesterase to AMP and GMP, respectively [2,3].

Based on the ubiquitous involvement in cellular processes, the role of cNMP signaling in the context of inflammation and regulation of immune response constitutes a research field of rising interest. It was, for example, found that regulatory T cells (T_reg) exert their suppressive effect on effector T cells (T_eff) through increasing concentrations of cAMP. The rise of cAMP levels in T_eff could either be induced via a paracrine mechanism, or by a direct transfer of cAMP via gap junctions between T_reg and T_eff [5,6]. However, the transfer of cAMP between a pair of T cells cannot yet be visualized directly, and the underlying mechanisms allowing T_reg cells to produce such significantly higher cAMP levels than T_eff cells have not been elucidated to date. A loss of the immuno-suppressive mechanism could contribute to the generation of autoimmune reactions. Understanding the role of cNMPs in inflammation and T cell regulation and identifying the associated molecular pathways thus could enable the identification of novel targets in the treatment of autoimmune disease.

However, cell-based studies on 2nd messengers are in our experience difficult to perform as application of the highly polar compounds is carried out via effortful, single-cell preparative methods like electroporation, microinjection, or patch clamp. These methods require highly trained staff, careful preparation and significant amounts of time in advance of each experiment. At the same time, the invasive application raises the potential for interfering artefacts or false-positives [7]. Thus, membrane permeable, bio-reversibly modified chemical derivatives of second messengers are highly desirable compounds to circumvent these drawbacks.

First reports on phosphate-protected cNMPs by Gillen and Nagyvary on alkyl phosphotriesters of cAMP were followed by Engels et al. who prepared cAMP and cGMP derivatives carrying different benzyl groups including photo-cleavable moieties at the phosphate (Figure 1) [8,9,10,11]. Hughes et al. reported the synthesis and biologic evaluation of N⁶,O²-dibutyryl cAMP-acetoxymethyl (AM) ester (Figure 1) [12]. The synthesis started from N⁶,O²′-dibutyryl cAMP, which was converted with AM bromide (AM-Br) under DIEA-basic conditions in CH₃CN over 4 days at room temperature (rt) to give the desired product in low yield after demanding chromatography [12]. The obtained masked nucleotide was used in whole-cell incubation studies where an activation of PKA proceeded, but only 15 min after the addition of di(Bu)cAMP-AM (10 µM) to the cell medium [12]. In a further study, Schultz et al. synthesized cAMP-AM [13]. Despite a PKA activating effect of cAMP-AM, the researchers found that cAMP-AM was less potent than di(Bu)cAMP-AM and was metabolized so rapidly that it gave only transient signals [13]. The synthesis of AM-esters of cCMP and cUMP has also been reported [14]. However, cNMP-AMs are in our experience not applicable for all cell types, seemingly due to their insufficient chemical stability. Further, the variability of the described synthesis approaches, which started from the respective cNMP, is limited by the availability of these.

The acyloxybenzyl (AB) group constitutes another successfully applied bio-reversible masking group apart from AM esters. It was introduced originally for nucleoside monophosphate (NMP) prodrugs and transferred on nucleoside diphosphates (NDPs) and nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs) [15,16,17,18,19]. The respective prodrugs were shown to efficiently diffuse across cell membranes and release the corresponding nucleotide intracellularly upon enzymatic activation [16]. Further, the concept was expanded on compound classes like sugar nucleotides [20]. The broad synthetic applicability of the AB masking group is complimented by meeting the essential features of a prodrug concept: (i) high chemical stability; (ii) efficient enzymatic activation; and (iii) sufficient lipophilicity to enable the passage through cell membranes. Moreover, the two-part composition of the AB-masks allows variation of e.g., lipophilicity or enzymatic cleavability which adds further versatility to the concept [15,16,17,21,22,23]. Consequently, the AB-concept was investigated for expansion on cNMPs to provide tools for studies on cellular effects, e.g., calcium signaling in bulk settings on a variety of cells and without the need for example of microinjection. As a first example, an octanoyloxybenzyl (OB)-mask was used here since previous studies showed a good chemical stability and sufficiently high lipophilicity of respectively masked di- and triphosphates (Figure 1) [13,14,15].

2. Results and Discussion

Inspiration for the synthesis approach towards OB-masked cNMPs was drawn from own studies on the synthesis of non-symmetric phosphoramidites (PAs) that included an unprotected nucleoside moiety. In these cases, side reactions were repeatedly observed amongst which the formation of phosphites was prominent. These phosphites were concluded to result either from an intermolecular or an intramolecular substitution of the remaining N-diisopropyl group by a second nucleosidic hydroxy-group. In the latter case, a cyclic nucleoside phosphite would constitute the reaction product, and further oxidation would result in a cyclic nucleoside monophosphate derivative.

Based on this hypothesis, we set up a synthesis involving different nucleosides and an OB-masked phosphordiamidite (OBPA₂).

2.1. Preparation of AB-Masked cNMPs

2.1.1. Synthesis of Starting Materials

The synthesis of bis(N,N-diisopropylamino)-4-octanoyloxybenzyl phosphordiamidite (OBPA₂) was adapted from Weinschenk et al. who used the building block for the synthesis of non-symmetric phosphoramidites [24]. The reaction was performed as described in the literature starting from bis(N,N-diisopropylamino)chlorophosphine 1 and 4-(hydroxymethyl)phenyloctanoate 2, and yielded OBPA₂ 3 in 71% (Scheme 1).

The nucleosides adenosine (A, 4), 2′-deoxyadenosine (dA, 5), and guanosine (G, 6) were mono-N-butyrylated to add further lipophilicity to the envisaged OB-cNMPs. N⁶-Butanoyl-adenosine 7 was synthesized starting from adenosine 4 via transient silylation of all hydroxy-groups to selectively introduce the butyryl moiety at the N⁶-position [25]. The desired protected nucleoside 7 was obtained in 61% yield after automated RP flash column chromatography following the procedure described in the literature [25]. The yield was limited by the formation of N,N-diacylated adenosine and partial cleavage of the glycosidic bond during concentration of the crude reaction mixture. Analogously, N⁶-butanoyl-dA 8 and N²-butanoyl-G 9 were synthesized starting from the respective nucleosides and obtained in yields of 32% and 48%, respectively (Scheme 2).

2.1.2. Syntheses of OB-cNMPs

First, a model system was set up to study course and outcome of the phosphitylation in more detail. For this served the reaction towards octanoyloxybenzyl-masked cUMP (OB-cUMP, 10) since syntheses involving uridine commonly go along with little or no side reactions and complications.

The starting conditions for the synthesis of OB-cUMP 10 were adapted from the approaches towards non-symmetric phosphoramidites [24]. 4,5-Dicyanoimidazole (DCI, 0.25 M in acetonitrile (CH₃CN)) was used as activator for the PA-coupling, and tBuOOH (5.5 M in n-decane) served as oxidizing agent. The reaction was carried out in a mixture of CH₃CN and DMF due to the limited solubility of uridine 11 in CH₃CN (Scheme 3).

In the first attempt, a solution of nucleoside 11 and OBPA₂ 3 was treated with 2.2 equivalents of DCI that were added dropwise at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to rt and stirred 30 min more before tBuOOH was added for oxidation. After further 30 min, all volatile components were removed under high vacuum and the crude reaction mixture was purified by automated RP flash column chromatography. The masked cyclic nucleotide 10 was obtained as a mixture of two diastereomers in a yield of only 13% (Scheme 3).

Prompted by the surprisingly low yield, the reaction course was studied ³¹P-NMR spectroscopically (Figure 2). Interestingly, upon just mixing uridine 11 and OBPA₂ 3, the diamidite was converted almost quantitatively and a signal at 13.2 ppm formed (Figure 2). Comparison with literature-data indicated that this signal likely corresponded to an activated amidite [26]. Furthermore, signals in the range of phosphoramidites (148.4 & 148.3 ppm) and phosphites (141.3 & 141.1 ppm) were formed already as well (Figure 2, top). The addition of DCI then promoted the formation of the intermediate phosphoramidite (middle and bottom), but formation of the anticipated cyclic phosphite seemed to occur only at low proportion. Steric hindrance in the attack of the 3′-hydroxy group on the phosphorous atom or an insufficient nucleophilicity may be the reasons that led to an insufficient formation of the cyclic phosphite.

The synthesis of OB-cUMP 10 consequently was repeated with several changes to the protocol in order to evaluate the influence of the reaction conditions and in particular the impact of the activator (Scheme 3).

In a second approach, the ratio between CH₃CN and DMF was altered to 5:1 and the mode of addition of reagents was changed. This time, the nucleoside was placed in the reaction flask and dissolved in CH₃CN/DMF 5:1. A separate solution of OBPA₂ 3 in CH₃CN and one equivalent of DCI were added slowly and dropwise to nucleoside 11 at rt. Once the addition was completed, a second equivalent of DCI was added, and the reaction mixture stirred at rt for 60 min. After the successive oxidation and final purification, OB-cUMP 10 was obtained in 15% yield. Consequently, the outcome of the reaction was almost identical to that of the attempt before.

Next, the activator was changed to 5-(benzylthio)-1H-tetrazole (BTT) which displays a higher acidity and lower nucleophilicity than DCI, and the reaction protocol was varied as follows: uridine 11 was dissolved in CH₃CN/DMF 5:1 and successively treated with a solution of OBPA₂ 3 in CH₃CN and one equivalent of DCI. Both reagents were added in small portions over a period of 30 min. Upon completed addition, the reaction mixture was stirred another 30 to 120 min at rt. Then, one equivalent of BTT was added slowly and dropwise over 10 min, and the reaction was kept stirring for further 15 to 60 min. After the subsequent oxidation and final purification, OB-cUMP 10 was isolated in yields between 13–19% which again constituted no significant improvement of the reaction outcome. Lastly, an alternative activator-system composed of saccharine and 1-methylimidazole was tested as it was reported to efficiently mediate reactions between PAs and poorly nucleophilic alcohols like tertiary alcohols [27]. For this, saccharine and 1-methylimidazole were dissolved in a 1:1 ratio in CH₃CN prior to the reaction to generate the activating salt. Simultaneously with OBPA₂ 3, one equivalent of the activator salt was added to a solution of uridine 11 in CH₃CN/DMF 5:1. Upon completion of the first addition, the reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min, then treated with a second equivalent of the activator solution and successively stirred for another 60 min to 72 h. After oxidation and automated RP column chromatography, the desired product 10 was obtained in yields between 16–19%. Monitoring of the reaction course via ³¹P-NMR spectroscopy indicated an incomplete activation of OBPA₂ 3 even after 72 h. Further, the activated intermediates were again not converted efficiently to the desired phosphite as concluded from the persistence of the respectively attributed phosphorous signals [27]. This alternative approach thus constituted no improvement in comparison to the previous protocols. In summary, the isolation of OB-cUMP 10 succeeded repeatedly despite low yields, and thus the reaction protocols were transferred on the N-butyrylated nucleosides 7–9 (Scheme 4).

The N-butyrylated OB-cNMPs 12–14 were prepared following the synthesis protocols b. and c. described above. The yields obtained for OB-N(Bu)-cAMP 12 and OB-N(Bu)-c(dAMP) 13 were in a similar range as found for OB-cUMP 10 with 14% and 13%, respectively (Scheme 4). The reaction towards OB-N(Bu)-cGMP 14 proceeded to a lower extent and accordingly, the desired product was isolated in a comparably low yield of 4% (Scheme 4). Interestingly, in the case of 14, the formation of only one of the two possible diastereomers seemed favored as crude ³¹P-NMR spectra indicated. Here, only one of the possible two phosphate signals was prominent, and consequently, OB-N(Bu)-cGMP 14 was isolated as a single diastereomer. Additionally, to the N-acylated derivative 12, the NH₂-unmodified OB-cAMP 15 was prepared. The synthesis was performed analogously to OB-cUMP 10 starting from nucleoside 4 and following synthesis variant a. in which a stepwise addition of the in total applied 2.4 equivalents DCI was performed (Scheme 5).

In summary, despite the need of further yield optimization, five different OB-cNMPs were successfully and reliably synthesized. With regard to the overall similar outcomes of the various preparations, the scope of the reaction can likely be expanded on further nucleosides and/or differently masked phosphoramidites. This makes the chosen approach very flexible, particularly in contrast to the previously reported procedures involving AM esters.

Concluding the syntheses, the functional evaluation of selected OB-cNMPs was performed next.

2.2. Functional Evaluation of Selected OB-cNMPs

Ideally, masked precursors of bio-active compounds are biologically inactive and display a stability in physiologic media that on the one hand exceeds their specific activation significantly, and on the other hand guarantees sufficient time for their approximation to their respective target structure. Once activated, the previously inactive compound regains its biologic activity back and should accordingly displays respective effects from target interaction. These demands applied for the prepared OB-cNMPs equally as e.g., for nucleotide prodrugs. Consequently, the chemical stability of the OB-cNMPs under physiologic conditions as well as the efficiency of the enzymatic activation of the OB-mask by an exemplary esterase was evaluated. In complementation, the masked nucleotides were applied in various cell assays to analyze their biologic effects e.g., in the context of Ca²⁺ mobilization and cell activation.

2.2.1. Investigation of Chemical Stability and Enzymatic Activation by PLE

Stability determinations for OB-cNMPs 10, 12, and 13 (as 5 mM stock sol. in DMSO) were performed in PBS (50 mM, pH 7.3) as a physiologic pH mimic. The compounds (2 mM, final conc. in PBS/DMSO) were incubated for 120 to 200 h at 37 °C. Hydrolysis samples were taken at distinctive times and analyzed via HPLC/MS (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The recorded HPLC chromatograms and ESI mass spectra showed that the OB-cNMPs released only the respective parent cNMP caused by the cleavage of the OB-mask without the formation of further cleavage byproducts (Figure 4).

It was found that after approximately 8 h, 50% of the OB-cNMPs were hydrolyzed (10: t_½ = 8.6 h, 12: t_½ = 7.4 h, 13: t_½ = 7.5 h) (Figure 3). This half-life implied a stability of the OB-cNMPs that should facilitate convenient setups of cell-based assays and allow experimental set-ups to run, for example, even (pre-)incubation experiments with the masked nucleotides. The hydrolysis behavior of 10, 12, and 13 was assessed further, and the relative areas of signals for OB-cNMP and cNMP were determined (in percent). These values were normalized and then averaged for all three hydrolyses under determination of their standard deviation. By this procedure, the individual hydrolysis courses were compared with another since the progress of hydrolyses was expected to be similar as the dissociation of the OB-mask should constitute the determinant process.

The average deviation of the hydrolysis progress for OB-cNMPs 10, 12, and 13 at the time points measured was 5% with a single value maximum of 12%. From these calculations, it was deduced that the hydrolysis course was indeed analog for all OB-cNMPs tested and subject to the pace of the cleavage of the masking group and was almost independent of the nucleotide.

After successfully probing the chemical stability of the OB-cNMPs, their enzymatic activation by pig liver esterase (PLE) as a model esterase was evaluated. The incubations of OB-cNMPs 10, 12, and 13 (2 mM final conc. in PBS/DMSO) with PLE were carried out with 0.05 u PLE per hydrolysis sample (V = 20 µL) which enabled good traceability of the enzymatic conversion (Figure 5). Again, no further cleavage products except the corresponding cNMPs were detected. The N-butyryl group of 12 and 13 was not cleaved by PLE, even at longer incubation times (up to 60 min), as expected. The chromatograms were processed as described for the chemical hydrolysis to compare the progress of the incubations with PLE (Figure 6).

Half-lives of the studied OB-cNMPs were found to be around 5 min under the applied conditions, which, however, depended significantly on the amount of esterase present. More importantly in this context, the enzymatic activation of OB-cNMPs proceeded even at low PLE concentrations significantly faster than their decomposition in PBS by a factor of approximately 100. In addition, the enzymatic hydrolyses showed analog progression as indicated by a mean deviation of normalized signal areas for OB-cNMPs and cNMPs of 4% with a maximum deviation of 9% for single time point values (Figure 6). This lead again to the conclusion that the enzymatic reaction was almost independent of the type of nucleotide and relied on the OB-mask applied.

In summary, the results of both hydrolysis studies under chemical or enzymatic conditions went well along with the initial criteria as they showed that the stability of the OB-cNMPs was significantly higher than the rate of enzymatic activation. Further, the masked nucleotides proved to be stable enough for application in cell-based assays as their stabilities allow for incubations even over several hours.

Encouraged by the promising hydrolysis properties, the ability of the OB-cNMPs to cross cellular membranes as well as their potential to induce cellular processes was studied next.

2.2.2. Performance of Selected OB-cNMPs in Cell-Based Settings

Primary mouse cardiomyocytes carrying a FRET-sensor with a cAMP binding site were used to examine the membrane-permeability of OB-N(Bu)-cAMP 12 in particular. The binding of intracellular cAMP to the FRET sensor is indicated by a decreasing FRET-signal and an increasing fluorescence ratio between cyan-fluorescent protein (CFP) and yellow-fluorescent protein (YFP) [28]. FRET-sensors carrying mouse cardiomyocytes were incubated with OB-N(Bu)-cAMP 12 (20 mM DMSO stock sol., 20 µM final conc. in DMSO/buffer, at t ≈ 60 s) (Figure 7A,B). Immediately after addition of 12 to the extracellular medium, the ratio between CFP and YFP started to increase and reached a steady maximum state at circa 50 s (Figure 7A) which was comparable with the previously well-established cell permeable cAMP analogue 8-Br-2′-O-Me-cAMP-AM (Figure 7B) (Figure 7A,B) [28]. Likewise, the concentration–response dependencies were largely comparable for both analogues and reached the maximum at 20 µM (Figure 7C). These results imply that OB-N(Bu)-cAMP 12 instantaneously crossed the cell membrane and was also rapidly activated by intracellular esterases. Further, the product of the activation process was successfully recognized by the cAMP binding site of the FRET sensor. For the studied substrate, OB-N(Bu)-cAMP 12, this implicated that the N⁶-butyryl group was either removed by enzymatic hydrolysis, or that its presence had no detrimental effect on the FRET biosensor interaction. Indeed, as expected from 6-monobutyryl derivatives of cAMP, incubation of cardiomyocytes with 12 led to almost instantaneous of phospholamban phosphorylation by the cAMP dependent protein kinase (Figure 7D). These immunoblots suggest that OB-N(Bu)-cAMP might activate phospholamban phosphorylation in a reversible manner. It can be expected from the chemical structure of 6-N(Bu)-cAMP that it should be degradable by intramolecular phosphodiesterases, in a way that high activity of these enzymes in cardiomyocytes leads to a gradual decline of cAMP dependent protein kinase substrate phosphorylated over time.

In a second setup, Jurkat T cells were loaded with the Ca²⁺-sensitive fluorescent dye Fura-2. Upon intracellular elevation of Ca²⁺, the absorption ratio between the two excitation wavelengths of Fura-2 at 340 nm and 380 nm increases. This effect correlates directly with the amount of free cytosolic Ca²⁺. Jurkat T cells loaded with Fura-2 were stimulated with OB-cNMPs 10, 12, and 13 (20 µM in DMSO, at t ≈ 120 s) added to their extracellular medium (Figure 8). The Fura-2 ratio rose rapidly almost immediately after addition of OB-N(Bu)-cAMP 12, and reached its maximum after approximately 200 s. Then, the Ca²⁺ signal slowly decreased as indicated by the degression of the signal. A similar trend was observed for OB-cUMP 10 but the induced Ca²⁺ signal was significantly reduced compared to 12 (Figure 8). In the case of OB-N(Bu)-c(dAMP) 13, no initial increase of the intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration was measured. However, the ratio seemed to increase slightly over time (Figure 8).

The results confirmed again that the OB-masked cNMPs were able to cross the cell membrane and, importantly, immediately triggered cellular responses. In this context, it was concluded that de-masked cNMPs promoted the observed effects based on the results of the previous hydrolysis studies and the substrate specify Ca²⁺ signaling events display.

The hydrolysis product of 12 acted as would be expected for cAMP, supporting the assumption that the N⁶-butyryl group was either removed enzymatically, too, or that its presence did not impede the FRET sensor activation.

Comparison of the measured effects with those evoked by NH₂-unmodified OB-cAMP 15 and, e.g., further nucleobase derivatives of adenosine or uridine in combination with incubation studies in cell homogenate could help to finalize the analysis and clarify whether the N⁶-butyryl group is cleaved or the interacting receptors and binding sites lack selectivity in the corresponding region. Studies along these lines are currently being performed in our laboratories.

In summary, the performed cell assays confirmed excellent membrane-permeability of the selected OB-cNMPs. Further, the cellular effects observed allow the conclusion that the bio-reversible protection at the phosphate was removed rapidly and efficiently. A fast enzymatic activation of the prepared OB-cNMPs was shown analogously in hydrolysis studies using pig liver esterase. The esterase cleaved the OB-mask even at low concentration within very short time, so that similar effects can be expected to proceed in cells. Finally, the observed FRET-sensor binding site interaction and induced Ca²⁺ mobilization proved that biologically active compounds were released out of the masked cNMPs. Moreover, the masked nucleotides triggered processes like those attributed to their parent cNMPs (if existent in nature/identified yet).

3. Materials and Methods

All reactions involving water-sensitive reagents were conducted under anhydrous conditions and a dry atmosphere of nitrogen. Reagents were used as purchased from commercial suppliers. Anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) was purchased and stored over 4 Å molecular sieves. All other anhydrous solvents were purified and dried using a solvent purification system (MB SPS-800 from Braun) and stored over appropriate molecular sieves. Solvents for normal phase (NP) chromatography were distilled prior to use. Acetonitrile was purchased in HPLC grade for reversed phase (RP) chromatography and HPLC. Evaporation of solvents was performed under reduced pressure on a rotary evaporator or using a high vacuum pump. Reactions were monitored via thin layer chromatography (TLC) carried out on pre-coated Macherey-Nagel TLC plates Alugram^® Xtra SIL G/UV₂₅₄, and compounds stained with Vanillin (Vanillin (5 g), 1000 mL MeOH/AcOH 9:1, 35 mL H₂SO₄) under heating. For automated NP or RP chromatography two flash systems (Interchim Puriflash 430 (Montlucon, France) or Büchi Sepacore^® Flash System (Essen, Germany), combined with Macherey-Nagel Chromabond^® Flash RS 80 SiOH (NP) or RS40 C₁₈ ec (RP) columns (Düren, Germany)) were used. For purifications of phosphordiamidites, a chromatotron (Harrison Research 7924T) with glass plates coated with 2 or 4 mm layers of VWR60 PF₂₅₄ silica gel containing a fluorescent indicator (VWR no. 7749) was used. Analytical RP-High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (RP-HPLC/MS) was performed with an Agilent 1260 Infinity instrument, Waldbronn, Germany (pump G1311B, autosampler G1329B, column compartment G1316A, diode array detector G4221B, column Agilent Poroshell 120 EC-C18, 2.7 mm, 4.6 × 50 mm) coupled with single-quad MS (Advion expression^L CMS, Harlow, U.K.). Ultrapure water was generated by a Sartorius Arium^® pro unit (Sartopore 0.2 µm, UV, Göttingen, Germany). As elution buffer served a tetra-n-butylammonium acetate solution (10 mM, pH 7.2). HPLC/MS runs were performed according to the following method: 0–15 min: water/acetonitrile gradient (2–98% B) with a flow of 0.5 mL/min, 20 °C column temperature and UV detection at 259 nm and 270 nm, MS scans from 150 to 1100 m/z. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded at room temperature on Bruker Fourier 300 (300 MHz for ¹H acquisitions), Bruker AMX 400 (Karlsruhe, Germany) (400 MHz for ¹H 101 MHz for ¹³C and 152 MHz for ³¹P acquisitions) or Bruker AVIII 600 (Karlsruhe, Germany) (600 MHz for ¹H and 151 MHz for ¹³C acquisitions) spectrometers in automation mode. All chemical shifts (δ) are given in parts per million (ppm) with the solvent resonance as internal standard. Coupling constants J are given in Hertz (Hz). Two-dimensional NMR experiments (HSQC, HMBC) were used for the assignment of quaternary carbons. For mass spectrometric (MS) analysis, spectra were acquired on an Agilent 6224 ESI-TOF spectrometer (Waldbronn, Germany) in positive and negative mode as required. Infrared spectroscopy (IR) was carried out with a Bruker Alpha P FT-IR (Bremen, Germany) in attenuated total reflection (ATR) mode at room temperature ranging from 400 cm⁻¹ to 4000 cm⁻¹. For FRET measurements, primary mouse ventricular cardiomyocytes were isolated from Epac1-camps biosensor expressing transgenic mice [29] as described [28] and plated onto laminin coated glass cover slides. Measurements were performed 1–2 h after plating using a Nikon Ti microscope based FRET imaging system containing pE-100 440 nm light source (CoolLED), DV2 Dual View and ORCA-03G charge-coupled device camera (Hamamatsu, Japan), and analyzed as described [28]. Cells were kept in a buffer containing 144 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO₄, 1 mM CaCl₂, 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.3) and stimulated with OB-cNMPs or 8-Br-2′-O-Me-cAMP-AM (purchased from BIOLOG Life Science Institute, Bremen, Germany) dissolved 1:1000 in the same buffer from a freshly made 20 mM DMSO stock solution. For Ca²⁺ mobilization assays, Jurkat T cells were incubated with the membrane-permeable AM ester of the Ca²⁺ dye Fura-2 (4 µM, Calbiochem). Therefore, about 2 × 10⁶ cells were centrifuged at 500 g for 5 min and resuspended in 1 mL of freshly supplemented RPMI medium containing Fura-2 AM. Cells were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. After centrifugation, cells were washed and resuspended in Ca²⁺ buffer (140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO₄, 1 mM CaCl₂, 20 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 1 mM NaH₂PO₄, 5 mM glucose) and kept for 20 min at rt for de-esterification. Cells were added on prepared coverslips and allowed to adhere before measurement. Slides were mounted onto a Leica IRBE microscope (100-fold magnification) and after 120 s the respective OB-cNMPs (20 µM) or DMSO (as control) were added. As positive control, Thapsigagarin (1.67 µM, Calbiochem) was added after 900 s. A Sutter DG-4 was used as a light source, and frames were acquired with an electron-multiplying charge-coupled device camera (C9100-13, Hamamatsu). Images (512 × 512 pixels) were acquired in 16-bit mode with the following filter sets (AHF Analysentechnik) (excitation (ex), beam splitter (bs), and emission (em), all in nanometers): Fura-2 (ex, HC 340/26, HC 387/11; bs, 400DCLP; em, 510/84).

For immunoblot analysis, freshly isolated cardiomyocytes sedimented in stop buffer without serum were preincubated for 30 min either with vehicle or with 10 µM H-89 (Sigma). Next, 20 µM of OB-N(Bu)-cAMP were added to various time points (30, 90, and 180 s), after which cells were lysed and processed for immunoblot analysis. Homogenized proteins were quantified using BCA Protein Assay (Pierce). Samples (20 µg protein per lane) were boiled at 95 °C for 5 min to disrupt phospholamban pentamers, loaded onto 15% SDS–polyacrylamide gel and immunoblotting using the anti-P-Ser16 phospholamban (Badrilla 1:5.000), and total anti-PLN A-1 antibodies (Badrilla).

3.1. General Procedures

GP I: N-butanoylation of nucleosides via transient TMS-protection:

The respective nucleoside (adenosine, guanosine, or 2′-deoxyadenosine) was co-evaporated three times and then dissolved in anhydrous pyridine (2–5 mL/mmol), and diluted either with the same volume of THF or double the volume of CH₂Cl₂. At 0 °C, TMSCl (2.1–9.0 equiv.) was added. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm up to rt and stirred for 5–18 h. Successively, butyryl chloride (1.1 equiv.) was added slowly and the reaction mixture stirred for another 6 h at rt. Cleavage of TMS ethers was promoted by the addition of either 1 M HCl (0.5 mL/mmol) under vigorous stirring for 5 min, or methanol (2–5 mL/mmol) and stirring at rt for further 12 h. The reaction was terminated by removal of all volatile components under high vacuum. The crude residue was co-evaporated with toluene and CH₂Cl₂ several times, and then taken up in acetonitrile/demin. water. Purification was performed by means of automated RP flash column chromatography on C₁₈ modified silica gel with an acetonitrile gradient in water (0% to 100%).

GP II: 3′,5′-Phosphorylation of nucleosides to their OB-masked cNMP analogues:

Under an atmosphere of nitrogen, the respective nucleoside was dissolved in DMF/CH₃CN (25 mL/mmol). In a separate flask, bis(N,N-diisopropylamino)-4-octanoyloxybenzyl phosphoramidite (1 equiv.) was dissolved in acetonitrile (25 mL/mmol total volume). The phosphor diamidite solution and DCI (0.25 M in CH₃CN, 1.3–1.5 equiv.) were added slowly and dropwise in five to ten portions to the nucleoside solution. The addition of more DCI (0.25 M in CH₃CN, 1.2–1.5 equiv.) or 5-(benzylthio)-1H-tetrazole (BTT, 0.3 M in CH₃CN, 1.3 equiv.) followed, and the reaction mixture was stirred 1 h further. Then, tBuOOH (5.5 M in n-decane, 1.5 equiv.) was added and the solution stirred for 10 min more. Successively, all volatile components were removed in vacuum, and the obtained residue was taken up in CH₃CN/demin. water and purified by means of an automated RP flash column chromatography on C₁₈ modified silica gel with an CH₃CN gradient in water (0% to 100%).

3.2. Syntheses

3.2.1. Synthesis of bis(N,N-diisopropylamino)-4-octanoyloxybenzyl phosphordiamidite 3

1.00 g (3.75 mmol) bis(N,N-diisopropylamino)chlorophosphine 1 were dissolved in 15 mL anhydrous THF. In a separate flask, 0.68 mL (4.87 mmol, 1.3 equiv.) NEt₃ and 0.94 g (3.75 mmol, 1 equiv.) 4-(hydroxymethyl)phenyloctanoate 2 were mixed with 7 mL anhydrous THF, and the mixture was added dropwise to the chlorophosphine. The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 20 h, then filtrated and the filtrate concentrated to dryness in vacuum. The remaining residue was purified by NP chromatography on silica gel with PE/TEA 98:2 as eluents, and the desired product obtained as colorless syrup.

Yield: 1.28 g (2.67 mmol, 71%).

¹H-NMR (600 MHz, chloroform-d): δ [ppm] = 7.36 (d, ²J_H,H = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.14–6.95 (m, 2H), 4.63 (d, ²J_H,H = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.66–3.51 (m, 4H), 2.54 (t, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.75 (p, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.51–1.23 (m, 8 H), 1.21 (d, ²J_H,H = 2.7 Hz, 12H), 1.20 (d, ²J_H,H = 2.8 Hz, 12H) 0.88 (t, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.3 Hz, 3H); ¹³C{¹H}-NMR (151 MHz, chloroform-d): δ [ppm] = 172.6, 149.7, 138.2, 127.9, 121.5, 65.8, 44.69, 44.56, 34.6, 31.8, 29.2, 29.1, 25.1, 24.8, 24.7, 24.1, 24.0, 22.75, 14.22; ³¹P{¹H}-NMR (162 MHz, chloroform-d): δ [ppm] = 123.5. IR (ATR): ṽ in [cm⁻¹] = 2963.3, 2927.8, 2861.4, 2079.0, 2025.5, 1761.3, 1607.8, 1507.4, 1457.5, 1416.5, 1390.1, 1361.6, 1300.3, 1194.2, 1184.8, 1162.9, 1140.3, 1116.2, 1045.2, 1016.9, 952.7, 916.5, 866.3, 779.6, 748.7, 706.7, 642.7, 566.1, 527.6. MS (MALDI): m/z [M-H] calcd. for C₂₇H₄₈N₂O₃P^-: 479.340, found: 479.245.

3.2.2. Synthesis of 6-N-butanoyl-adenosine 7

In accordance with GP I, 1.40 g (5.26 mmol) adenosine 4 were dissolve in 34 mL pyridine/THF 1:1 and converted with 2.11 mL (16.5 mmol, 3.2 equiv.) TMSCl and 0.60 mL (5.78 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) butyryl chloride. After 6 h stirring at rt, 2.5 mL 1 M HCl (aq.) was added to cleave the TMS ethers, and after 5 min, all volatile components were removed under vacuum. Upon final purification of the crude product via automated RP flash column chromatography on C₁₈ modified silica gel with an CH₃CN gradient in water (0% to 100%), the product was obtained as colorless powder.

Yield: 1.09 g (3.22 mmol, 61%).

¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆): δ [ppm] = 10.63 (s, 1H), 8.69 (s, 1H), 8.65 (s, 1H), 6.01 (d, ³J_H,H = 5.8 Hz, 1H), 5.53 (d, ³J_H,H = 5.8 Hz, 1H), 5.23 (d, ³J_H,H = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 5.12 (t, ³J_H,H = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.63 (q, ³J_H,H = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 4.19 (q, ³J_H,H = 4.3 Hz, 1H), 3.98 (q, ³J_H,H = 3.9 Hz, 1H), 3.76–3.64 (m, 1H), 3.58 (ddd, ²J_H,H = 11.9 Hz, ³J_H,H = 6.1 Hz, ³J_H,H = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 2.55 (t, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.63 (h, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 0.94 (t, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.4 Hz, 3H); ¹³C-NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d₆): δ [ppm] = 171.5, 151.7, 151.6, 149.7, 142.7, 123.9, 87.6, 85.7, 73.7, 70.3, 61.3, 38.0, 18.2, 13.5. IR (ATR): ṽ in [cm⁻¹] = 3273.2, 2963.3, 2934.0, 2875.0, 1716.3, 1685.0, 1613.3, 1587.0, 1521.9, 1460.3, 1409.0, 1356.6, 1327.0, 1224.3, 1124.1, 1082.2, 1056.7, 984.6, 902.4, 866.3, 799.6, 745.0, 704.7, 643.7, 547.3. MS (ESI-HR): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd. for C₁₄H₂₀N₅O₅⁺: 338.1459, found: 338.1469.

3.2.3. Synthesis of 6-N-butanoyl-2′-deoxyadenosine 8

Following GP I, 1.14 g (4.24 mmol) 2′-deoxyadenosine 5 were dissolve in 24 mL pyridine/CH₂Cl₂ 1:2. At 0 °C, 1.13 mL (8.91 mmol, 2.1 equiv.) TMSCl were added, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 18 h at rt. Successively, 0.48 mL (4.67 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) butyryl chloride were added. After further 3 h stirring at rt, the TMS ethers were removed by addition of 8 mL CH₃OH at 0 °C. After further 5 h at rt, the reaction was terminated by removing all volatile components under vacuum. The crude product was taken up in water containing little amount of CH₃CN and purified via automated RP flash column chromatography on C₁₈ modified silica gel with an CH₃CN gradient in water (0% to 100%) to afford the desired product as colorless powder.

Yield: 0.43 g (1.35 mmol, 32%).

¹H-NMR (400 MHz, methanol-d₄): δ [ppm] = 8.66 (s, 1H), 8.62 (s, 1H), 6.61–6.52 (m, 1 H), 4.64 (dt, ³J_H,H = 6.1 Hz, ³J_H,H = 3.1 Hz, 1H), 4.10 (q, ³J_H,H = 3.4 Hz, 1H), 3.88 (dd, ²J_H,H = 12.2 Hz, ³J_H,H = 3.4 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (dd, ²J_H,H = 12.2 Hz, ³J_H,H = 3.9 Hz, 1H), 2.88 (ddd, ²J_H,H = 13.4 Hz, ³J_H,H = 7.4 Hz, ³J_H,H = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 2.67 (t, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.51 (ddd, ²J_H,H = 13.5 Hz, ³J_H,H = 6.2 Hz, ³J_H,H = 3.3 Hz, 1H), 1.82 (h, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.08 (t, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.4 Hz, 3H); ¹³C{¹H}-NMR (101 MHz, methanol-d₄): δ [ppm] = 174.4, 152.9, 150.7, 144.3, 123.2, 89.7, 86.7, 72.7, 63.4, 41.5, 39.9, 19.6, 14.0. IR (ATR): ṽ in [cm⁻¹] = 3336.8, 2964.6, 2933.1, 2875.3, 2592.1, 2330.9, 1682.2, 1612.5.1585.9, 1522.5, 1459.6, 1402.8, 1354.8, 1329.2, 1223.8, 1093.3, 1058.5, 993.8, 941.1, 867.1, 799.6, 749.6, 984.8, 644.4, 585.3, 561.2, 542.4, 527.4, 509.6, 464.7. MS (ESI-HR): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd. for C₁₄H₂₀N₅O₄⁺: 322.1510, found: 322.1521.

3.2.4. Synthesis of 2-N-butanoyl-guanosine 9

According to GP I, 1.55 g (5.48 mmol) guanosine 6 were co-evaporated with pyridine three times and then dissolved in 81 mL pyridine/CH₂Cl₂ 1:2. At 0 °C, 6.28 mL (49.4 mmol, 9 equiv.) TMSCl were added, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 4 h at rt. Successively, 0.62 mL (6.03 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) butyryl chloride were added. After 3 h stirring at rt, the cleavage of the TMS ethers was induced by addition of 27 mL CH₃OH, and after further 12 h at rt, the reaction was terminated and all volatile components were removed under vacuum. The crude residue was taken up in water containing little amount of CH₃CN and finally purified via automated RP flash column chromatography on C₁₈ modified silica gel with an CH₃CN gradient in water (0% to 100%) to afford the desired product as colorless powder.

Yield: 0.92 g (2.61 mmol, 48%).

¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆): δ [ppm] = 12.07 (bs, 1H), 11.71 (bs, 1H), 8.26 (s, 1 H), 5.80 (d, ³J_H,H = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 5.47 (d, ³J_H,H = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 5.17 (d, ³J_H,H = 4.5 Hz, 1H), 5.03 (t, ³J_H,H = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 4.43 (d, ³J_H,H = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 4.20–4.05 (m, 1H), 3.90 (q, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H), 3.64 (dt, ²J_H,H = 11.9 Hz, ³J_H,H = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 3.55 (dt, ²J_H,H = 11.9 Hz, ³J_H,H = 4.7 Hz, 1H), 2.45 (t, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.62 (h, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 0.92 (t, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.5 Hz, 3H); ¹³C{¹H}-NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d₆): δ [ppm] = 176.2, 154.8, 148.8, 148.0, 137.6, 120.1, 86.6, 85.3, 73.9, 61.1, 37.8, 17.9, 13.4. IR (ATR): ṽ in [cm⁻¹] = 3364.4, 3279.5, 2968.3, 2941.1, 1680.2, 1608.8, 1564.3, 1554.1, 1536.0, 1481.4, 1469.2, 1449.9, 1402.5, 1251.7, 1204.2, 1179.4, 1127.9, 1089.0, 1060.2, 993.3, 976.4, 901.1, 863.3, 818.6, 801.0, 762.7, 737.4, 717.0, 680.4, 643.7, 607.0, 589.1, 562.3, 510.2, 484.2. MS (ESI-HR): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd. for C₁₄H₁₉N₅O₆⁺: 354.1408, found: 354.1400.

3.2.5. Synthesis of Uridine-3′,5′-(4-octanoyloxybenzyl)cyclophosphate 10

According to GP II, 26 mg (0.11 mmol) uridine 10 were dissolved in 2 mL DMF and reacted with 57 mg (0.12 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) OB-PA₂ 3, dissolved in 2.5 mL CH₃CN, in the presence of 0.54 mL (0.13 mmol, 1.3 equiv.) DCI (0.25 M in CH₃CN) and 0.45 mL (0.13 mmol, 1.3 equiv.) BTT (0.3 M in CH₃CN). The addition of 32 µL (0.16 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) tBuOOH (5.5 M in n-decane) followed successively. After purification by automated RP flash column chromatography on C₁₈ modified silica gel with a CH₃CN gradient in water (0% to 100%) and lyophilization, the product was obtained as colorless cotton and in two fractions containing each of the stereoisomers.

Yield: 11 mg (0.02 mmol, 19%).

¹H-NMR (400 MHz, methanol-d₄): δ [ppm] = 7.66–7.51 (m, 2H), 7.47 (d, ³J_H,H = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.22–7.08 (m, 2H), 5.69 (d, ³J_H,H = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.64 (d, ³J_H,H = 0.9 Hz, 1H), 5.24–5.14 (m, 2H), 4.64 (ddd, ³J_H,P = 22.5 Hz, ²J_H,H = 9.3 Hz, ³J_H,H = 4.6 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (ddd, ³J_H,H = 10.2, ²J_H,H = 9.4, ³J_H,H = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 4.35–4.25 (m, 2H), 4.25–4.10 (m, 1H), 2.58 (t, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.73 (p, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.53–1.22 (m, 8H), 1.05–0.82 (m, 3H)

and

7.63 (d, ³J_H,H = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.53–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.19–7.10 (m, 2H), 5.73 (d, ³J_H,H = 1.2 Hz, 1H), 5.71 (d, ³J_H,H = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 5.19 (d, ²J_H,H = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 4.81 (ddd, ³J_H,P = 9.8 Hz, ³J_H,H = 5.1 Hz, ³J_H,H = 1.0 Hz, 1H), 4.67 (ddd, ³J_H,P = 14.2 Hz, ²J_H,H = 9.2 Hz, ³J_H,H = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 4.62–4.47 (m, 2H), 4.42 (td, ²J_H,H = 10.1, ³J_H,H = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 2.60 (t, ^2,3J_H,H 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.74 (p, ^2,3J_H,H 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.50–1.26 (m, 8H), 1.02–0.84 (m, 3H); ¹³C{¹H}-NMR (101 MHz, methanol-d₄): δ [ppm] = 173.8, 165.9, 151.5, 150.1, 143.7, 134.3, 131.2, 123.3, 103.0, 97.5, 80.1, 72.4, 71.5, 71.2, 70.3, 35.0, 32.9, 30.2, 30.1, 25.0, 23.7, 14.4

and

172.8, 164.9, 151.7, 150.5, 143.5, 133.0, 130.2, 122.8, 103.1, 97.7, 79.3, 72.4, 71.2, 71.1, 70.6, 35.0, 32.8, 30.2, 30.1, 26.0, 23.7, 14.4; ³¹P{¹H}-NMR (162 MHz, methanol-d₄): δ [ppm] = −3.93, −5.01. MS (ESI-HR): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd. for C₂₄H₃₁N₂O₁₀PNa⁺: 561.1609, found: 561.1445.

3.2.6. Synthesis of 6-N-butanoyl-adenosine-3′,5′-(4-octanoyloxybenzyl)cyclophosphate 12

According to GP II, 48 mg (0.14 mmol) 6-N-butanoyl-adenosine 7 were dissolved in 4 mL DMF and treated with a solution of 76 mg (0.16 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) OB-PA₂ 3 in 4 mL CH₃CN and 0.97 mL (0.24 mmol, 1.7 equiv.) DCI (0.25 M in CH₃CN) as well as 0.62 mL (0.19 mmol, 1.3 equiv.) BTT (0.3 M in CH₃CN). Then, 43 µL (0.21 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) tBuOOH (5.5 M in n-decane) were added. After purification by automated RP flash chromatography on C₁₈ modified silica with a CH₃CN gradient in water (0% to 100%), the product was obtained as colorless cotton and mixture of two diastereomers.

Yield: 13 g (0.02 mmol, 14%).

¹H-NMR (400 MHz, methanol-d₄): δ [ppm] = 8.68, 8.58 (2× s, 2H), 8.49, 8.38 (2× s, 2H), 7.62–7.56, 7.55–7.49 (2× m, 4H), 7.17–7.12, 7.13–7.06 (2× m, 4H), 6.20, 6.12 (2× s, 2H), 5.47 (dd, ³J_H,P = 9.1 Hz, ³J_H,H = 5.1 Hz, 1H) 5.23 (2× d, ²J_H,H = 10.4 Hz & 8.1 Hz, 4H), 5.05 (ddd, ³J_H,P = 9.6 Hz, ³J_H,H = 5.1 Hz, ³J_H,H = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 4.89–4.86 (m, 1H), 4.73–4.34 (m, 7H), 2.71–2.55 (m, 6H,), 2.51 (t, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.86–1.70 (m, 6H), 1.68–1.57 (m, 2H), 1.53–1.25 (m, 16H), 1.05 (2× t, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.4 Hz, 6H), 0.98–0.95 (m, 6H); ¹³C{¹H}-NMR (151 MHz, methanol-d₄): δ [ppm] = 173.8, 173.6, 152.8, 152.4, 150.8, 143.1, 133.3, 133.2, 130.7, 130.6, 124.5, 123.1, 123.0, 88.8, 81.7, 80.4, 69.3, 69.2, 68.5, 59.8, 39.9, 34.5, 31.8, 29.2, 29.1, 25.0, 22.8, 18.5,14.2, 13.9; ³¹P{¹H}-NMR (162 MHz, methanol-d₄): δ [ppm] = −3.80, −4.90. MS (ESI-HR): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd. for C₂₉H₃₉N₅O₉P⁺: 632.2848, found: 632.2848.

3.2.7. Synthesis of 6-N-butanoyl-2′-deoxyadenosine-3′,5′-(4-octanoyloxybenzyl)cyclophosphate 13

According to GP II, 50 mg (0.15 mmol) 6-N-butanoyl-2’-deoxyadenosine 8 were dissolved in 4 mL DMF and reacted with 82 mg (0.17 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) OB-PA₂ 3, dissolved in 4.3 mL CH₃CN, in the presence of 1.60 mL (0.40 mmol, 2.6 equiv.) DCI (0.25 M in CH₃CN) in total and 50 µL (0.25 mmol, 1.6 equiv.) tBuOOH (5.5 M in n-decane). After purification by automated RP flash column chromatography on C₁₈ modified silica gel with a CH₃CN gradient in water (0% to 100%) and lyophilization, the product was obtained as colorless cotton and mixture of two diastereomers.

Yield: 12 mg (0.02 mmol, 13%).

¹H-NMR (400 MHz, methanol-d₄): δ [ppm] = 8.69 (s, 1H), 8.61 (s, 1H), 8.47 (s, 1H), 8.37 (s, 1H), 7.65–7.57, 7.55–7.48 (2× m, 2H), 7.19–7.10 (m, 4H), 6.59 (dd, ³J_H,H = 9.0 Hz, ³J_H,H = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.55 (dd, ³J_H,H = 6.7 Hz, ³J_H,H = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 5.64 (q, ³J_H,H/P = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 5.33 (q, ³J_H,H/P = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 5.23 (2× d, ²J_H,H = 13.1 Hz & ³J_H,H = 12.9 Hz, 4H), 4.70–4.40 (m, 4H), 4.22 (td, ³J_H,H = 9.9 Hz, ³J_H,H = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.08 (td, ³J_H,H = 9.9 Hz, ³J_H,H = 4.7 Hz, 1H), 2.98 (ddd, ²J_H,H = 13.1 Hz, ³J_H,H = 7.7 Hz, ³J_H,H = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 2.83–2.70 (m, 3H), 2.69–2.57 (m, 6H), 2.54 (t, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.90–1.70 (m, 6H), 1.66 (q, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.51–1.26 (m, 16H), 1.06 (2 x t, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.4, 6H), 0.98–0.86 (m, 6H); ¹³C{¹H}-NMR (101 MHz, methanol-d₄): δ [ppm] = 174.5, 174.4, 173.8, 173.6, 153.4, 153.2, 152.8, 152.7, 152.4, 152.3, 150.8, 150.7, 144.6, 144.5, 134.4, 134.3, 131.1, 130.7, 123.2, 123.1, 122.6, 85.8, 85.6, 79.3, 79.2, 75.7, 75.6, 71.7, 71.6, 71.4, 71.3, 40.0, 39.9, 35.0, 34.9, 32.8, 30.1, 30.0, 25.9, 25.9, 23.7, 19.7, 19.6, 14.4, 14.1, 14.0; ³¹P{¹H}-NMR (162 MHz, methanol-d₄): δ [ppm] = −4.14, −5.50. MS (ESI-HR): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd. for C₂₉H₃₉N₅O₈P⁺: 616.2531, found: 616.2534.

3.2.8. Synthesis of 2-N-butanoyl-guanosine-3′,5′-(4-octanoyloxybenzyl)cyclophosphate 14

In accordance with GP II, 52 mg (0.15 mmol) 6-N-butanoyl-guanosine 9 were dissolved in 4 mL DMF and treated with a solution of 77 mg (0.16 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) OB-PA₂ 3 in 4 mL CH₃CN, 1.75 mL (0.44 mmol, 3 equiv.) DCI (0.25 M in CH₃CN) in total and finally, 44 µL (0.21 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) tBuOOH (5.5 M in n-decane). After purification by automated RP flash column chromatography on C₁₈ modified silica gel with a CH₃CN gradient in water (0% to 100%) and lyophilization, the product was obtained as colorless cotton and a single diastereomer.

Yield: 4 mg (5.6 µmol, 4%).

¹H-NMR (400 MHz, methanol-d₄): δ [ppm] = 7.92 (s, 1H), 7.56 (d, ³J_H,H = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.07 (d, ³J_H,H = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 6.01 (s, 1H), 5.23 (d, ²J_H,H = 11.6 Hz, 2H), 4.69 (ddd, ³J_H,H = 22.2 Hz, ³J_H,P = 9.4 Hz, ³J_H,H = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 4.55 (t, ³J_H,H = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.35 (dd, ³J_H,H = 10.0 Hz, ³J_H,H = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (d, ³J_H,H = 4.7 Hz, 1H), 4.18 (dd, ³J_H,P = 9.9 Hz, ³J_H,H = 4.7 Hz, 1H), 2.51 (t, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.46 (t, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.74 (h, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.62 (t, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.49–1.25 (m, 8H,), 1.02 (t, ^2,3J_H,H = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 0.98–0.86 (m, 3H); ¹³C{¹H}-NMR (101 MHz, methanol-d₄): δ [ppm] = 177.7, 173.6, 152.2, 150.0, 149.8, 137.5, 134.4, 131.4, 123.3, 120.2, 93.4, 80.3, 73.3, 71.6, 71.5, 70.5, 39.4, 34.8, 32.9, 30.1, 25.8, 23.7, 19.3, 14.4, 13.9; ³¹P{¹H}-NMR (162 MHz, methanol-d₄): δ [ppm] = −4.93. MS (ESI-HR): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd. for C₂₉H₃₉N₅O₁₀P⁺: 648.2429, found: 648.2720.

3.2.9. Synthesis of adenosine-3′,5′-(4-octanoyloxybenzyl)cyclophosphate 15

Following GP II, 21 mg (78 µmol) adenosine were dissolved in 2 mL DMF and treated with a solution of 41 mg (85 µmol, 1.1 equiv.) (OB)PA₂ 101 in 2 mL CH₃CN as well as 0.74 mL (0.19 mmol, 2.4 equiv.) DCI (0.25 M in CH₃CN). Lastly, 23 µL (0.12 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) tBuOOH (5.5 M in n-decane) were added for oxidation. After purification by automated RP flash column chromatography on C₁₈ modified silica gel with a CH₃CN gradient in water (0% to 100%) and lyophilization, the product was obtained as a colorless cotton and mixture of two diastereomers.

Yield: 5 mg (10 µmol, 12%).

¹H-NMR (400 MHz, acetonitrile-d₃): δ [ppm] = 8.19 (s, 1H), 8.09 (s, 1 H), 7.93 (s, 1H), 7.88 (s, 1H), 7.55–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.45–7.41 (m, 2H), 7.12–7.02 (m, 4H), 5.99 (bs, 4H), 5.98 (s, 1H), 5.93 (s, 1H), 5.47 (dd, ³J_H,P = 9.1 Hz, ³J_H,H = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 5.27 (ddd, ³J_H,P = 9.4 Hz, ³J_H,H = 4.9 Hz, ³J_H,H = 1.0 Hz, 1H), 5.19 (ddd, ³J_H,P = 9.3 Hz, ³J_H,H = 5.0 Hz, ³J_H,H = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 5.14–5.06 (m, 4H), 4.72 (d, ³J_H,H = 4.9 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (d, ³J_H,H = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 4.58–4.14 (m, 6H), 2.50 (2 x t, ³J_H,H = 7.5 Hz, 4H), 1.64 (h, ³J_H,H = 7.6 Hz, 4H), 1.47–1.14 (m, 16H), 0.89–0.78 (m, 6H); ¹³C{¹H}-NMR (151 MHz, acetonitrile-d₃): δ [ppm] = 173.3, 156.9, 153.9, 151.3, 149.4, 140.9, 133.3, 130.6, 130.7, 123.1, 119.8, 93.6, 81.0, 72.7, 71.5, 69.4, 34.7, 32.4, 29.6, 25.5, 23.3, 20.1, 14.3; ³¹P{¹H}-NMR (162 MHz, acetonitrile-d₃): δ [ppm] = −4.37, −6.03. MS (ESI-HR): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd. for C₂₅H₃₃N₅O₈P⁺: 562.2061, found: 562.2068.

4. Conclusions

In sum, although the yields still need improvement, we have identified a flexible and reliable synthesis approach towards membrane-permeable, bio-reversibly masked cNMPs and prepared OB-cNMPs that fulfilled all requirements in terms of synthetic flexibility of the approach, chemical stability, and enzymatic activation to be valuable new tools for the setup of novel cellular assays.