Next Article in Journal
Microwave Irradiation Assists the Synthesis of a Novel Series of bis-Arm s-Triazine Oxy-Schiff Base and Oxybenzylidene Barbiturate Derivatives
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of 1-(para-methoxyphenyl)tetrazolyl-Substituted 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydroisoquinolines and Their Transformations Involving Activated Alkynes
Previous Article in Journal
Antitumor Effect of the Essential Oil from the Leaves of Croton matourensis Aubl. (Euphorbiaceae)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Esterification of Aryl/Alkyl Acids Catalysed by N-bromosuccinimide under Mild Reaction Conditions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 23
Issue 11
10.3390/molecules23112975
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Immobilized Gold Nanoparticles Prepared from Gold(III)-Containing Ionic Liquids on Silica: Application to the Sustainable Synthesis of Propargylamines

by
Raquel Soengas
*,
Yolanda Navarro
,
María José Iglesias
and
Fernando López-Ortiz
*
Área de Química Orgánica, Research Centre CIAIMBITAL, Universidad de Almería, Carretera de Sacramento s/n, 04120 Almería, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2018, 23(11), 2975; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23112975
Submission received: 16 October 2018 / Revised: 31 October 2018 / Accepted: 13 November 2018 / Published: 14 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Synthesis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A cycloaurated phosphinothioic amide gold(III) complex was supported on amorphous silica with the aid of an imidazolium ionic liquid (IL) physisorbed in the SiO2 pores (SiO2–IL) and covalently bonded to the SiO2 (SiO2@IL). Gold(0) nanoparticles (AuNPs) were formed in situ and subsequently immobilized on the SiO2–IL/SiO2@IL phase. The resulting catalytic systems Au–SiO2–IL and Au–SiO2@IL promoted the solvent-free A3 coupling reaction of alkynes, aldehydes, and amines in high yields under solvent-free conditions with very low catalyst loading and without the use of additives. The Au–SiO2@IL catalyst showed good recyclability and could be reused at least five times with yields of propargylamines of ≥80%. This synthetic method provides a green and low cost way to effectively prepare propargylamines. Additionally, 31P high resolution magic angle spinning (HRMAS) NMR spectroscopy is introduced as a simple technique to establish the Au loading of the catalyst.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Propargylamines are versatile synthetic intermediates and important structural elements of numerous natural and synthetic products that show a wide range of biological activities [1,2,3,4,5]. Traditionally, these compounds have been synthesized by the nucleophilic attack of metal acetylides on imines or their derivatives, but these reagents are used in stoichiometric amounts, are highly moisture sensitive, and require strictly controlled reaction conditions [6]. An alternative atom-economical procedure for the synthesis of propargylamines is the one-pot, three-component, metal-catalyzed reaction of an alkyne, an aldehyde, and an amine, the so-called A3 coupling [7]. Homogeneous catalysts based on a large number of transition metal ions have been used for the A3 coupling reaction, including Cu [8,9,10,11,12], Ag [13,14,15,16], Cu/Ru bimetallic systems [17,18], Zn [19,20,21], Fe [22,23], In [24,25], Ir [26,27], Hg [28], Ni [29], Rh [30], Mn [31], Co [32], Bi [33], and Cd [34]. Over the past few years, increasing attention has been paid to the catalytic performance of Au in promoting the A3 coupling reaction, including Au(I) and Au(III) salts and organic Au complexes [35,36,37,38]. Despite cationic Au species showing very high catalytic activity, their rapid reduction under alkyne activation conditions is an important drawback [39,40,41]. It should also be noted that homogeneous catalysts suffer from the difficulty of catalyst separation and reuse as well as the problem of product contamination with the metal. The contamination of products with metals is a major problem in pharmaceutical development, since trace amounts of metal contamination could have unwanted effects on biological systems. In order to overcome these limitations, the use of heterogenizing homogeneous Au catalysts in organic synthesis has attracted a large amount of attention because the advantages of both homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis can be gathered in the system [42,43,44]. In this regard, a few heterogeneous and recyclable gold catalysts have been reported for A3 coupling reactions [45,46]. During the last decade, supported gold(0) nanoparticles (AuNPs) have been explored as sustainable and competitive alternatives to gold complexes for A3 coupling reactions [47,48,49]. Despite AuNPs promoting the A3 coupling in their pure form, they tend to agglomerate, which limits their efficiency in catalytic processes [48]. On the contrary, supported AuNPs enhance the activity and selectivity of reactions and could be easily heterogenized [48,49]. Several nanocatalysts based on AuNPs and different supports have successfully been employed in A3 coupling reactions. Thus, clays [50,51,52], nanocomposites [53,54], graphenes [55], metal-organic frameworks [56,57,58,59], resins [60], polymeric materials [61], magnetic supports [62,63,64], and biomaterials [65,66] have been used in this reaction. However, there is still much room for improvement, as some of the reported procedures require the use of harmful organic solvents, long reaction times, or a laborious and time-consuming support preparation process.
In recent years, ionic liquids [67,68] have attracted much recent interest in transition metal catalysis, since they can act as co-catalysts and enhance the activity of metallic species present in catalytic systems [69]. As a consequence of their pre-organized structure with hydrogen bonds connecting cations and anions, the enhanced catalytic activity and stability of metal complexes and nanoparticles in ionic liquids (ILs) is related to the surface electronic stabilization of imidazolium aggregates forming protective layers. In recent years, the concept of supported ionic liquid phase catalysis (SILPC) has gained much attention. In this regard, it has been proven that a thin film of the ionic liquid supported on a porous material is suitable for the stabilization of catalytically active complex or metal nanoparticles [70,71]. Grafting ILs onto the surfaces of solid materials not only reduces the use of the relatively expensive ILs, but also immobilizes the metal complexes or nanoparticles, facilitating their recovery and recycling [72,73,74]. SILP catalysts have been widely applied in palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions, but only very limited study has been done on SILP gold catalysis. A recent report described the immobilization of gold(III) on poly(ionic liquid) coated on magnetic nanoparticles to produce a highly active, stable, and recoverable catalyst for the synthesis of propargylamines via A3 coupling reactions carried out with water as a solvent [75]. Gold(III) nanoparticles supported on periodic mesoporous silica containing ionic liquid proved to be an efficient catalyst for the A3 synthesis of propargylamines with chloroform as a solvent at a loading of 0.2 mol% of gold [76]. Interestingly, under solvent free conditions, the reaction yield decreased to 50%. Furthermore, the performance of the analogous reaction using gold(0)-supported nanoparticles showed a conversion of less than 15%. Despite the evident interest in performing the reaction under solvent-free conditions from a sustainability point of view, there are very limited examples in the literature [77,78,79]. AuCl4− dispersed over ionic liquids grafted on MCM-41 catalyst was used as a catalyst to promote the solvent-less A3 coupling reaction [80]. However, the procedure suffered from a significant decrease in the catalytic activity in successive reaction cycles. This result can be explained on the basis of gold leaching. To sum up, the synthesis of propargylamines using eco-friendly and reusable catalysts under solvent-free conditions is still a thrust area in the chemical field.
We have previously reported the solvent-less synthesis of propargylamines via A3 coupling using a gold(III) cycloaurated phosphinothioic complex as the pre-catalyst [81]. The real catalysts were identified as Au(I) nanoparticles. Attempts to isolate the Au(I)NPs produced their reduction to Au(0)NPs and deactivation. We reason that the immobilization of gold nanoparticles in supported ionic liquids would offer unique possibilities for the Au-catalyzed A3 coupling reaction. In the work herein presented, we describe the stabilization of Au(0)NPs generated from a cycloaurated phosphinothioic complex on an imidazolium ionic liquid supported on amorphous silica. The in situ formed Au–SiO2@IL maintains their catalytic activity in the solvent-free three-components synthesis of propargylamines. Moreover, the AuNPs can be easily recovered from the catalytic mixture and reused with almost unchanged activity for five cycles. In addition, the use of 31P HRMAS NMR spectroscopy to study the pre-catalytic system is introduced for the first time.

2. Results and Discussion

Previous results from our group showed that the ortho-substituted phosphinothioic amide (dppta) gold(III) complex 1 acts as a pre-catalyst in the highly efficient synthesis of propargylamine 5 via A3 coupling reactions under very mild, solvent-free conditions [81]. During the course of the reaction, the Au(III)-complex was transformed into the Sonogashira-type o-alkynylphosphinothioic amide 6 with generation of Au(I) nanoparticles, which are the real catalysts (Scheme 1). In order to reuse the catalysts, the NPs were isolated through solvent washing in the air and centrifugation. This procedure led to Au(0)NPs showing a large decrease in activity in the A3 coupling synthesis of 5 (yield < 20%). To overcome this limitation, we proposed that the SILPC methodology could be applied to prepare highly-active AuNPs stabilized by the immobilized ionic liquid. The resulting heterogeneous catalysts would facilitate the recyclability. Immobilization of the ionic liquid was studied using two different approaches: (i) physical adsorption of ionic liquids and (ii) covalent bonding via the attachment of ionic liquid fragments to the support.

2.1. Physical Confinement of the Ionic Liquid and Complex 1 on the Silica Surface

We started our study by investigating a facile physical immobilization of the Au catalyst in an ionic liquid in silica pores for use in sustainable A3 coupling reactions. The procedure of immobilization was quite simple [82]; a suspension of spherical amorphous silica in a solution of (dppta)AuCl2 complex 1 in [bmim]PF6 and CH3CN was evaporated to dryness and washed with diethyl ether to afford a powdery and free-flowing immobilized catalyst. The system formed by pre-catalyst 1 and the SiO2–IL support [(dppta)AuCl2–SILP] was characterized by IR spectroscopy and HRMAS NMR.
Infrared analysis (IR) showed the characteristic bands of the silica support at 3459 cm−1 and 1094 cm−1, belonging to the Si−OH stretch and the Si−O−Si stretch, respectively. In addition, the bands at 835 cm−1 and 1642 cm−1, assigned to the stretching vibrations of PF6− and C=N respectively, clearly indicated the presence of the ionic liquid [bmim]PF6 within the silica support (Figure S1). Blümel and co-workers demonstrated that HRMAS methods can be applied to the acquisition of 1H, 13C, and 14N NMR spectra of ionic liquids immobilized on silica, including two-dimensional 1H, 1H COSY and 1H, 13C HMQC correlations [83]. The 1H HRMAS NMR spectrum of a DMSO-d6 suspension of the supported Au(III) complex (1% wt) showed reasonably well-resolved signals for the IL protons and the isopropyl groups of complex 1 if one considers the large amount of silica (1 g) compared with the IL (100 mg) and complex 1 (11 mg) used (Figure S2). Interestingly, the presence of 1 could be also detected in the 13C HRMAS NMR spectrum despite the small amount present (Figure S3). The analysis of these spectra in combination with the 1H, 1H COSY (Figure S4) and 1H, 13C HSQC-edited (Figure S5) correlations provided the assignment of the 1H and 13C signals of IL and 1 (see experimental). The phosphorus-containing complex 1 and ionic liquid [bmim]PF6 allowed the use of 31P-NMR spectroscopy as a simple tool to determine the loading of gold into the solid support. Figure 1a shows the 31P HRMAS NMR spectrum of (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2–[bmim]PF6 measured in DMSO-d6. The integrals of the singlet arising from 1 and the septuplet originated by the PF6- moiety (1JPF = 706.2 Hz) provided a 1:IL ratio of 1:19, which was in excellent agreement with the experimental mass balance used. Interestingly, and in sharp contrast to the 1H HRMAS NMR signals (Figure S2), relatively narrow signals were obtained for both pre-catalyst 1 and the counteranion of the IL. These features can be attributed to differences in mobility between species. Broad signals in the 1H HRMAS NMR spectrum arose from restricted mobility due to the grafting of the IL to the silica (short transverse relaxation times, T2), whereas the higher mobility of 1 and PF6− made it feasible to obtain high resolution 31P HRMAS NMR signals [84]. Furthermore, it was possible to measure a 1H, 31P HRMAS HMQC spectrum optimized for the detection of long-range scalar couplings. The expected correlations of the 31P signal of 1 with aromatic protons and the methine protons of the isopropyl groups were easily detected (Figure 1b). To the best of our knowledge, these are the first examples of the application of 31P HRMAS NMR techniques to characterize dispersed substrates in ILs. Solid-state 31P MAS NMR studies of a number of SILP catalysts have been reported [85,86].
First, the synthesis of propargylamines under the supported catalyst was assessed in various conditions, and the results are compiled in Table 1. Thus, 1 equiv of benzaldehyde 2a was allowed to react with 1 equiv of piperidine 4a and 1.5 equiv of trimethylsilylacetylene 3a in the presence of variable amounts of the supported catalyst under solvent-free conditions at 60 °C for 6 h under a nitrogen atmosphere to afford propargylamine 5a. The reactions proceeded with excellent conversions (Table 1, entries 1–2), similar to those reported for the unsupported phosphinothioic amide gold(III) complex; these are included in Table 1 for comparison (entries 4 and 5). Using 1 mol% of supported catalyst afforded a quantitative yield of 5a (Table 1, entry 1). Decreasing the catalyst loading to 0.5 mol% gave an excellent yield of 98% of 5a (Table 1, entry 2). The catalyst loading could be further decreased to 0.1 mol% as long as the reaction time was increased to 8 h. Under such conditions, propargylamine 5a was formed with a 97% yield (Table 1, entry 3).
The work-up procedure was very simple: the supernatant liquid was separated and the remaining solid was thoroughly washed with n-pentane. As expected, the 31P-NMR spectra of the crude reaction mixtures showed only one signal at δ 62.8 ppm, corresponding to the Sonogashira product 6a (R2 = tetramethylsilane (TMS) in Scheme 1), indicating that complex 1 was fully transformed in situ to the catalytically active Au nanoparticles, which were efficiently immobilized by the supported ionic liquid phase.
In order to prove this hypothesis, we achieved the characterization of the solid using the scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) methods.
Adsorption of the IL (bright spots) on the pores of the silica was readily observed in the SEM images of Au–SiO2–IL system (Figure 2a,b). The TEM image showed the AuNPs immobilized on an amorphous matrix with a narrow size distribution with a diameter of about 7.6 nm (Figure 2c,d). A similar pattern was observed in the Au(I)NPs formed in the absence of the SiO2–IL support [81].
In the full XPS spectrum of AuNPs generated in the synthesis of 5a after one catalytic run, the peaks corresponding to Au 4f, C 1s, Cl 2s, N 1s, O 1s, and Si 2p and 2s were clearly observed (Figure S6). The XPS spectrum of the N 1s core level region for the supported AuNPs showed a peak at 401.9 eV, which corresponds to the bonding energy of the quaternary nitrogen of the ionic liquid (Figure 3a and Figure S7) [87]. In addition, the high-resolution Si 2p XPS spectrum displayed a peak at 102.2 eV that was attributed to the Si–O–C bonds (Figure 3b and Figure S8) [88]. Finally, the XPS spectrum in the Au 4f region showed two intense doublets at 82.7 and 86.4 eV for Au 4f7/2 and Au 4f5/2, respectively (Figure 3c and Figure S9), comprising the only Au species in the material and confirming that, during the catalysis, the Au(III) complex was fully reduced, leading to the real catalysts, i.e., the Au(0)NPs, being dispersed on the supported ionic liquid phase of [bmim]PF6 encapsulated in silica (Au–SILP). As mentioned previously, Au(I)NPs were identified as the active catalysts in the unsupported A3 synthesis of 5a [81] (see Scheme 1), and the manipulation of the NPs in the air led to deactivated Au(0)NPs. The results above indicate that the deactivation most probably arose from agglomeration [48], a process inhibited when the Au(0)NPs were generated in the supported IL.
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we extended our studies to different combinations of aldehydes, amines, and alkynes (Table 2). The electron-withdrawing nature of the chlorine of p-chlorobenzaldehyde did not have any effect on the reaction rate, so 94% conversion to 5b was achieved in 8 h (entry 2). However, the electron-donating group of p-methoxybenzaldehyde slowed the reaction significantly, as evidenced by the formation of 5c with 83% conversion in 14 h (entry 3). Phenylacetylene reacted slightly more slowly to give 5d with 94% conversion in 8 h (entry 4). Electron-withdrawing groups in the alkyne also produced a decrease in the reaction rate. The use of 4-fluorophenylacetylene as the alkyne provided 5e with a conversion of 86% in 14 h (entry 5), while 2-methoxyphenylacetylene afforded 5f with a conversion of 90% in 14 h (entry 6). On the other hand, the use of 3-methylphenylacetylene as the alkyne gave propargylamine 5g with a conversion of 93% in 8 h (entry 7). In the reaction of benzaldehyde, 1,3-diethynylbenzene, and piperidine in the presence of Au–SILP (0.1 mol% Au) at 60 °C over 8 h, only the monopropargylamine 5h was formed (83% conversion, entry 8). Morpholine proved to be as reactive as piperidine. The coupling of this amine with benzaldehyde and trimethylsilylacetylene over 8 h furnished 5i with 97% conversion (entry 9), whereas the analogous reaction using phenylacetylene as the alkyne formed propargylamine 5j with a conversion of 98% (entry 10). Chiral propargylic amines 5k,l were synthesized with high levels of conversion and excellent diastereoselectivity using (S)-2-(methoxymethyl)pyrrolidine as a chiral reagent. Thus, 5k and 5l were obtained with conversions of 99% (de 97%, entry 11) and 87% (de 98%, entry 12), respectively.
The catalyst was easily reused up to five times without taking any precautions after taking up the supernatant layer and washing with n-pentane. As shown in Table 3, a steady decrease in catalytic activity was observed after every cycle. This result might have arisen from the partial removal of the gold-containing IL layer from the silica surface or the Au(0)NPs from the SiO2–IL support.
To check this hypothesis, the supernatant layer was filtered through a membrane filter (pore diameter of 7 µm) after the reaction had been completed, and the mixture was analyzed with ICP-MS. The analysis showed that a very small amount of Au (3.14 ppb) was released in the reaction medium. This result is not consistent with the loss of activity of the catalyst due to gold leaching, but instead supports the partial elimination of the IL from the solid support as being the major responsible of the conversion decrease after every reaction cycle [82].
A tentative reaction mechanism for the synthesis of propargylamine 5 through the condensation of an aldehyde, an acetylene, and an amine involving the immobilized AuNPs is shown in Scheme 2. The nanoparticles may activate the alkyne to generate the corresponding supported alkynyl–gold complex, which, upon addition to the iminium ion proceeding from the in situ reaction between the aldehyde and the secondary amine, would provide propargylamine 5 and regenerate the catalyst for a new cycle.

2.2. Covalent Bonding Via Ionic Liquid Fragments Attached to the Support

In order to avoid the detachment of the ionic liquid layer from the silica surface in the subsequent reaction cycles, we next investigated the provision of strong attachment of the ionic liquid to the silica surface via covalent bonds. According to the procedure described in the literature [89], the (EtO)3Si modified IL, either with chloride or with hexafluorophosphate anions, was immobilized on the silica by the reaction of an alkoxy group bonded to the Si atom of the IL with an Si–OH group of the silica material, forming covalent –Si–O–Si– bonding (Scheme 3). Then, a suspension of the silica with the covalently attached IL (SiO2@IL) in a solution of (dppta)AuCl2 complex 1 in CH3CN was evaporated to dryness and washed with diethyl ether to give a powdery immobilized catalyst. The supported Au(III) complex on SiO2@IL(PF6) [(dppta)AuCl2-SiO2@IL(PF6)] was characterized by IR and HRMAS NMR spectroscopy.
The IR spectrum revealed the presence of bands at wavelengths of 3442 cm−1 and 1132 cm−1 assigned to the Si−OH stretch and the Si−O−Si stretch, respectively. The presence of the ionic liquid is clearly indicated by the bands at 3117 cm−1 and 3165 cm−1, attributed to the C−H ring stretching vibration of the imidazolium, and also by the bands at 1632 cm−1 and 846 cm−1, assigned to the C=N stretching vibration and to the stretching vibration of PF6−, respectively (Figure S10). The 1H and 13C HRMAS NMR spectra of (dppta)AuCl2-SiO2@IL(PF6) measured with DMSO-d6 as the solvent showed the same features as the Au physisorbed catalyst (Figures S11 and S12). The 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra could be assigned without difficulty (see experimental section). The very broad 1H and 13C signals observed for the CH2SiO moiety reflect a decrease in mobility, which support the formation of an Si–O bond with the solid support. More importantly, although the IL:1 ratio (moles) of 85:1 in (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2@IL(PF6) was much bigger than that in the SILP system, the 31P HRMAS NMR spectrum could be used to establish the loading of 1 into the IL. The integrals of the signals of PF6- and (dppta)AuCl2 indicated that complex 1 was quantitatively dispersed into the IL (Figure S15). Due to the high dilution of complex 1 into the IL, 8192 scans were accumulated over a period of 5 h to achieve an acceptable signal-to-noise ratio.
In order to compare the performance of the Au catalyst immobilized on the ionic liquid and covalently grafted to the silica surface (Au–SiO2@IL) vs. the physically adsorbed analogue (Au-SILP), we carried out the A3 coupling reaction of benzaldehyde, piperidine, and phenylacetylene at 60 °C for 8 h with a catalyst loading of 0.1%. Under these conditions, the corresponding propargylamine was obtained with 98% conversion, which is comparable to the results with the confined catalyst. In order to check the reusability, the catalyst was repeatedly filtered out and subjected to a new reaction batch without any further treatment. The recyclability of a catalyst is highly dependent on the counter anion of the IL. Thus, for the chloride IL, a sharp decrease in catalytic activity was observed in the second reaction cycle. In the third cycle, the chloride catalyst hardly showed any activity, whereas the hexafluorophosphate catalysts showed only a very small decrease in the benzaldehyde conversion (Table 4). The dependence of the physicochemical properties and activity of the imidazolium ILs on the anion is not surprising and has been widely reported in the literature [90,91].
The catalytic activity of the hexafluorophosphate catalyst was high over five reaction cycles, so the recyclability of the covalently grafted supported phase catalyst was clearly superior to the physically adsorbed support (Figure 4).
The Au–SiO2@IL(PF6) catalyst was characterized using transmission electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy methods. The TEM image showed the AuNPs immobilized on the IL-coated silica (Figure 5) with a narrow size distribution with a diameter of about 7.8 nm, comparable to the physically adsorbed supported system (Figure 2).
In the full XPS spectrum of the Au–SiO2@IL(PF6) catalyst, the expected peaks corresponding to Au 4f, C 1s, Cl 2s, N 1s, O 1s, and Si 2p and 2s were observed (Figure S16). The XPS spectrum of the N 1s core level region for Au–SiO2@IL(PF6) showed a peak at 400.0 eV, corresponding to the bonding energy of the quaternary nitrogen of IL that was clearly observed (Figure 6a and Figure S17). The high resolution Si 2p XPS spectrum of the Au–SiO2@IL(PF6) could be split into two sublevels. The first one at 101.6 eV was assigned to the Si–O–C bonds, while the other one at 102.9 eV corresponded to the silicon participant from the siloxane network (Si–O–Si) (Figure 6b and Figure S18). Finally, the XPS spectrum in the Au 4f region showed two intense doublets at 83.6 and 87.3 eV, comprising the only Au species in the material and confirming that, during the catalysis, the ionic Au(III) species were reduced (Figure 6c and Figure S19).

3. Conclusions

In summary, we developed an environmentally benign, economically friendly, and sustainable A3 coupling reaction of alkynes, aldehydes, and amines by employing a cycloaurated phosphinothioic amide gold(III) complex immobilized in a silica-supported ionic liquid. During the course of the reaction, gold(0) nanoparticles were formed in situ and were subsequently confined to the SiO2–IL phase. The AuNPs immobilized in this way maintained good catalytic activity for 3–4 cycles, but then a decrease in conversion was observed. This loss of activity can be attributed to the progressive detachment of the ionic liquid from the silica surface. In order to overcome this limitation, the ILs were grafted onto the silica surface by means of covalent bonds. Due to the more robust anchors that prevented Au–IL leaching from the silica support, the reusability of the resulting Au–SiO2@IL catalyst was clearly enhanced, maintaining high activity for up to five reaction cycles. In addition, 31P HRMAS NMR spectroscopy was used for the first time to establish the loading of Au into the ionic liquid phase.

4. Materials and Methods

Benzaldehyde, piperidine, morpholine, phenylacetylene, and trimethylsilylacetylene were obtained through commercial suppliers and purified by distillation before use. The rest of the reagents were commercially purchased and used without further purification. Amorphous silica from Merck was used as solid support (spherical for flash column chromatography; 40~50 mm diameter; 5~7 nm pore size; 0.80~1.00 mL/g pore volume; 600~700 m2/g surface area). Compounds 5a, [92] 5b [81], 5c [81], 5d [93], 5e [94], 5f [95], 5g [95], 5h [81], 5i [9], 5j [94], 5k [81], and 5l [81] have been described previously. NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker Avance III HD 300 (1H, 300.13 MHz; 13C, 75.47 MHz; 31P, 121.49 MHz) and Bruker Avance III HD 500 (1H, 500.13 MHz; 13C, 125.76 MHz; 31P, 202.46 MHz). Chemical shifts are given in ppm using tetramethylsilane (TMS) for 1H and 13C and 85% H3PO4 for 31P as internal standards. Unless otherwise stated, 1H- and 31P-NMR spectra were acquired from all crude reaction mixtures, in CDCl3 as solvent. Diastereoselectivities were determined by integration of the 1H-NMR spectra of the crude reaction mixtures. The following abbreviations are used to indicate the multiplicity of signals: bs, broad signal; h, heptuplet. Regarding HRMAS NMR spectroscopy, the spectra were acquired using a 4 mm 1H/13C/31P HRMAS probehead on a Bruker Avance III HD 500. The MAS rate used was 4600 Hz. A typical 1H HRMAS NMR spectrum consisted of 32 transients using 52 K data points over a 11,000 Hz spectral width. For 13C HRMAS NMR spectra, 16,000 transients were acquired using 64 K data points over 25,252 Hz spectral widths. 31P HRMAS NMR spectra were acquired using 64 K data points over 59,524 Hz spectral widths and an accumulation of 2–8 K. The 1H, 31P HMQC spectrum was acquired using the “hmqcgpqf” pulse program. Selected spectral parameters were as follows: spectral width, 8711 Hz for 1H and 30,748 Hz for 31P; 128 increments recorded; cnst2 nJPH = 8.3 Hz; and 1024 scans per increment in F1. Two-dimensional double quantum-filtered 1H, 1H COSY45° spectra were recorded using the pulse program “cosy45gpqf” with 128 increments and 64 scans. An edited two-dimensional 1H, 13C HSQC spectrum was acquired using the “hsqcedetgpsp.3” pulse program including adiabatic pulses for selection with 160 increments and 128 scans.

4.1. TEM and XPS Measurements

The size and distribution of AuNPs formed in the reaction were studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a JEOL-2100 TEM (Peabody, MA, USA) instrument operating at 200 kV fitted with an Orius SC 200 Model 830 (Gatan Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA) camera. Samples were prepared by placing ca. 15 μL of the solution onto a Formvar- and carbon-coated copper grid. The samples were allowed to dry and introduced in the instrument. For the statistical particle size analysis, 524 nanoparticles were analyzed using the measurement tools of the Digital Micrograph v2.31.734.0 (Gatan Microscopy Suite, Gatan Inc., Pleasaton, CA, USA) software package. Data processing and statistical studies were performed with Excel Office 2010 (Microsoft Corporation., Redmond, WA, USA). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was carried out on an ESCAPlus Omicron spectrometer (Omicron Nanotechnology, Taunusstein, Germany) using a monochromated Mg X-ray source (1253.6 eV). The binding energy scale was calibrated by setting the C 1s transition to 284.7 eV. Data were analyzed using the Multipak XPS software package (Physical Electronics Inc., Chanhassen, MN, USA).

4.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was done on a Hitachi S-3500N (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) operated at 15 kV with a tungsten filament. Powder from each sample was placed on a stub and coated with a 10 nm gold layer using a BAL-TEC SCD 005 Sputter Coater (BalTec Corporation, Canonsburg, PA, USA) to obtain the images using a secondary electron detector.

4.3. Representative Procedure for Catalyst Preparation

Method A: Silica powder (1 g) was added to a stirred solution of (dppta)AuCl2 complex 1 (12 mg) in [bmim]PF6 (0.1 g) and CH3CN (10 mL). After being stirred for 90 min at room temperature, CH3CN was evaporated to dryness to give a light yellow dry powder which was rinsed with diethyl ether and dried in vacuo to afford the Au-supported catalyst (~1% wt based on weight gain and 31P HRMAS NMR). Spectroscopic data for the pre-catalyst (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2–[bmim]PF6 was as follows (molar ratio Au:IL 1:19, the (dppta)AuCl2 was assigned with the aid of 2D HRMAS NMR experiments): 1H HRMAS NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 0.85 (bs, 3H, CH2CH3), 1.14 (bs, 6H, CH(CH3)2), 1.19 (bs, 6H, CH(CH3)2), 1.73 (bs, 2H, CH2), 3.65 (bs, 6H, CH(CH3)2), 3.80 (bs, 3H, NCH3), 4.1 (bs, 2H, CH2N), 7.39 (bs, 1H, NCHC) 7.43 (bs, 1H, NCHC), 7.43 (bs, 1H, ArH), 7.46 (bs, 1H, ArH), 7.62 (bs, 1H, ArH), 7.70 (bs, 2H, ArH), 7.74 (bs, 1H, ArH), 8.13 (bs, 2H, ArH), 8.17 (bs, 1H, ArH), 8.43 (bs, 1H, NCHN) ppm; 13C HRMAS NMR (125.8 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 13.6 (CH3), 19.2 (CH2), 23.0 (CH(CH3)2), 31.7 (CH2), 36.1 (NCH3), 49.0 (NCH2), 50.7 (CH(CH3)2) 122.7 (CHN), 123.9 (NCH), 128.4 (CHAr), 129.9 (CHAr), 132.8 (CHAr), 129.9 (2 × CHAr), 133.2 (CHAr), 133.3 (2 × CHAr), 134.9 (CHAr), 135.1 (CHAr), 136.8 (NCN) ppm; 31P HRMAS NMR (202.5 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = −144.1 (h, 1JPF 706.2 Hz), 68.9 ppm.
Method B: 1-(Triethoxysilylpropyl)-3-methyl-imidazolium chloride and hexafluorophosphate were prepared as reported in the literature [96]. Subsequently, the ILs were grafted over the silica surface giving rise to SiO2@IL(Cl) and SiO2@IL(PF6), respectively. The procedure used was as follows: 1 g of the silica was placed into a round-bottom flask and firstly heated under reduced pressure with a heat-gun; then, a solution containing 1.5 g of ionic liquid in 5 mL of dry toluene was added and the mixture was stirred at 90 °C for 16 h. After cooling, the solid was filtered. Then, to a stirred solution of (dppta)AuCl2 complex 1 (12 mg) in CH3CN (10 mL), 1.1 g of either SiO2@IL(Cl) or SiO2@IL(PF6), was added. After being stirred for 90 min at room temperature, CH3CN was evaporated to dryness to give a light yellow dry powder which was rinsed with diethyl ether and dried in vacuo to afford the Au-supported catalysts Au–SiO2@IL(Cl) and Au–SiO2@IL(PF6), respectively (~1% wt based on weight gain and 31P HRMAS NMR). The spectroscopic data for the pre-catalyst (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2@IL(PF6) was as follows (molar ratio Au:IL 1:85, not possible to assign the signals of the (dppta)AuCl2 complex due to the very low relative proportion): 1H HRMAS NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 0.51 (bs, 2H, SiCH2), 1.78 (bs, 2H, CH2), 3.88 (bs, 3H, NCH3), 4.16 (bs, 2H, CH2N), 7.69 (bs, 1H, NCHC) 7.84 (bs, 1H, NCHC), 9.36 (bs, 1H, NCHN) ppm; 13C HRMAS NMR (125.8 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 8.8 (SiCH2), 23.9 (CH2), 36.1 (NCH3), 51.2 (NCH2), 122.5 (CHN), 123.8 (NCH), 136.9 (NCN) ppm; 31P HRMAS NMR (202.5 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = −144.1 (h, 1JPF 706.2 Hz), 68.8 ppm.

4.4. General Procedure for the Gold-Catalyzed, Three-Component Coupling

A mixture of aldehyde (1.97 mmol), amine (1.97 mmol), acetylene (2.95 mmol), and the corresponding supported Au catalyst (1% wt, 60 mg, 0.002 mmol) was heated at 60 °C for 8 h, after which time the solution was cooled and the catalyst was removed by filtration. The filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure to afford propargylamine 5. Yields were determined by integration of the 1H-NMR spectra of the crude reaction mixtures. After separation and washing with n-pentane, the catalyst was reused intact for the next reaction without any further pre-treatment. Representative examples of the isolated products are as follows.
1-(1-Phenyl-3-(trimethylsilyl)prop-2-ynyl)piperidine (5a). Prepared according to the general procedure. Purified by column chromatography on silica gel (3% EtOAc in hexanes). Colorless oil, 81% yield (0.432 g, 1.59 mmol). 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.29 (s, 9H), 1.43−1.49 (m, 2H), 1.56−1.67 (m, 4H), 2.48−2.52 (m, 4H), 4.63 (s, 1H), 7.29−7.40 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.61 (d, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz, ArH).
1-(3-(2-Methoxyphenyl)-1-phenylprop-2-yn-1-yl)piperidine (5f). Prepared according to the general procedure. Purified by column chromatography on silica gel (5% EtOAc in hexanes). Colorless oil, 82% yield (0.492 g, 1.61 mmol). 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.48−1.53 (m, 2H), 1.62−1.68 (m, 4H), 2.63−2.66 (m, 4H), 3.94 (s, 3H), 4.91 (s, 1H), 6.92-6.99 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.31−7.43 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.52−7.56 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.75 (d, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz, ArH).
1-(3-(3-Ethynylphenyl)-1-phenylprop-2-ynyl)piperidine (5h). Prepared according to the general procedure. Purified by column chromatography on silica gel (5% EtOAc in hexanes). Colorless oil, 80% yield (0.478 g, 1.58 mmol). 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.46−1.49 (m, 2H), 1.60−1.65 (m, 4H), 2.56−2.60 (m, 4H), 3.12 (s, 1H), 4.82 (s, 1H), 7.29−7.42 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.46−7.53 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.64−7.68 (m, 3H, ArH).
(S)-2-(Methoxymethyl)-1-(1-phenyl-3-(trimethylsilyl)prop-2-yn-2-yl)pyrrolidine (5k). Purified by column chromatography on silica gel (5% EtOAc in hexanes). Colorless oil, 81% yield (0.486 g, 1.59 mmol). 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 0.26 (s, 9H), 1.59−1.75 (m, 3H), 1.89−1.98 (m, 1H), 2.49−2.53 (m, 1H), 2.63−2.71 (m, 1H), 3.20−3.28 (m, 1H), 3.39−3.54 (m, 2H), 3.43 (s, 3H), 5.11 (s, 1H), 7.25−7.38 (m, 3H, ArH), 7.58−7.61 (m, 2H, ArH).

Supplementary Materials

The Supplementary Materials are available online. Figure S1: IR spectrum of the pre-catalyst (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2–[bmim]PF6. Figure S2: 1H HRMAS NMR spectrum of the pre-catalyst (dppta)AuCl2-SiO2-[bmim]PF6. Figure S3: 13C HRMAS NMR spectrum of the precatalyst (dppta)AuCl2-SiO2–[bmim]PF6. Figure S4: 1H, 1H COSY HRMAS NMR spectrum of the pre-catalyst (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2–[bmim]PF6. Figure S5: 1H, 13C HSQC-Edited HRMAS NMR spectrum of the pre-catalyst (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2–[bmim]PF6. Figure S6: Full XPS spectrum of the catalyst Au–SiO2–[bmim]PF6. Figure S7: Core level region XPS spectra of N 1s of the catalyst Au–SiO2–[bmim]PF6. Figure S8: Core level region XPS spectra of Si 2p of the catalyst Au–SiO2–[bmim]PF6, Figure S9: Core level region XPS spectra of Au 4f of the catalyst Au–SiO2–[bmim]PF6, Figure S10: IR spectrum of the pre-catalyst (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2@IL(PF6), Figure S11: 1H HRMAS NMR spectrum of the pre-catalyst (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2@IL(PF6), Figure S12: 13C HRMAS NMR spectrum of the pre-catalyst (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2@IL(PF6), Figure S13: 1H, 1H gCOSY HRMAS NMR spectrum of the pre-catalyst (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2@IL(PF6), Figure S14: 1H, 13C HSQC-edited HRMAS NMR spectrum of the pre-catalyst (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2@IL(PF6), Figure S15: 31P HRMAS NMR spectrum of the pre-catalyst (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2@IL(PF6), Figure S16: Full XPS spectrum of the catalyst Au–SiO2@IL(PF6), Figure S17: Core level region XPS spectra of N 1s of the catalyst Au–SiO2@IL(PF6), Figure S18: Core level region XPS spectra of Si 2p of the catalyst Au–SiO2@IL(PF6), Figure S19: Core level region XPS spectra of Au 4f of the catalyst Au–SiO2@IL(PF6).

Author Contributions

F.L.O. and R.S. conceived and designed the research. R.S. and Y.N. performed the experiments. M.J.R. guide the experiments and supervised the data. F.L.O. and R.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript and approved the final version.

Funding

This research was funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO) grant number CTQ2014-57157-P and FEDER program.

Acknowledgments

We thank the MINECO and FEDER program for financial support. YNG thanks Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades for a Ph.D. fellowship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Peshkov, V.A.; Pereshivko, O.P.; Nechaev, A.A.; Peshkov, A.A.; Van der Eycken, E.V. Reactions of Secondary Propargylamines with Heteroallenes for the Synthesis of Diverse Heterocycles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 3861–3898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Arshadi, S.; Vessally, E.; Edjlali, L.; Hosseinzadeh-Khanmiri, R.; Ghorbani-Kalhor, E. N-Propargylamines: Versatile Building Blocks in the Construction of Thiazole cores. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017, 13, 625–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Amit, T.; Bar-Am, O.; Mechlovich, D.; Kupershmidt, L.; Youdim, M.B.H.; Weinreb, O. The Novel Multitarget Iron Chelating and Propargylamine Drug M30 Affects APP Regulation and Processing Activities in Alzheimer’s Disease Models. Neuropharmacology 2017, 123, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vessally, E.; Hosseinian, A.; Edjlali, L.; Bekhradnia, A.; Esrafili, M.D. New Page to Access Pyrazines and their Ring Fused Analogues: Synthesis from N-Propargylamines. Curr. Org. Synth. 2017, 14, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vessally, E.; Soleimani-Amiri, S.; Hosseinian, A.; Edjlali, L.; Bekhradnia, A. New Protocols to Access Imidazoles and their Ring Fused Analogues: Synthesis from N-propargylamines. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 7079–7091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lauder, K.; Toscani, A.; Scalacci, N.; Castagnolo, D. Synthesis and Reactivity of Propargylamines in Organic Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 14091–14200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Peshkov, V.A.; Pereshivko, O.P.; Van der Eycken, E.V. A walk around the A3-coupling. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3790–3807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cammarata, J.R.; Rivera, R.; Fuentes, F.; Otero, Y.; Ocando-Mavrez, E.; Arce, A.; Garcia, J.M. Single and Double A3-coupling (Aldehyde-Amine-Alkyne) Reaction Catalyzed by an Air Stable Copper(I)-phosphole Complex. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017, 58, 4078–4081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shi, L.; Tu, Y.-Q.; Wang, M.; Zhang, F.-M.; Fan, C.-A. Microwave-Promoted Three-Component Coupling of Aldehyde, Alkyne, and Amine via C−H Activation Catalyzed by Copper in Water. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1001–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Huma, H.Z.S.; Halder, R.; Kalra, S.S.; Das, J.; Iqbal, J. Cu(I)-Catalyzed Three Component Coupling Protocol for the Synthesis of Quinoline Derivatives. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 6485–6488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ohno, H.; Ohta, Y.; Oishi, S.; Fujii, N. Direct Synthesis of 2-(Aminomethyl)indoles through Copper(I)-Catalyzed Domino Three-Component Coupling and Cyclization Reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2295–2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Guo, N.; Ji, J.-X. A Novel and Convenient Copper-Catalyzed Three-Component Coupling of Aldehydes, Alkynes, and Hydroxylamines leading to Propargylamines. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 4797–4801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wei, C.; Li, Z.; Li, C.-J. The First Silver-Catalyzed Three-Component Coupling of Aldehyde, Alkyne, and Amine. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4473–4475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Reddy, K.M.; Babu, N.S.; Suryanarayana, I.; Prasad, P.S.S.; Lingaiah, N. The Silver Salt of 12-Tungstophosphoric Acid: An Efficient Catalyst for the Three-Component Coupling of an Aldehyde, an Amine and an Alkyne. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 7563–7566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, Y.; Santos, A.M.; Herdtweck, E.; Mink, J.; Kuhn, F.E. Organonitrile Ligated Silver Complexes with Perfluorinated Weakly Coordinating Anions and their Catalytic Application for Coupling Reactions. New J. Chem. 2005, 29, 366–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Z.; Wei, C.; Chen, L.; Varma, R.S.; Li, C.-J. Three-Component Coupling of Aldehyde, Alkyne, and Amine Catalyzed by Silver in Ionic Liquid. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 2443–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, C.J.; Wei, C. Highly Efficient Grignard-type Imine Additions via C-H Activation in Water and under Solvent-Free Conditions. Chem. Commun. 2002, 268–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lo, V.K.Y.; Liu, Y.; Wong, M.K.; Che, C.M. Gold(III) Salen Complex-Catalyzed Synthesis of Propargylamines via a Three-Component Coupling Reaction. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1529–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lee, K.Y.; Lee, C.G.; Na, J.E.; Kim, J.N. Alkynylation of N-Tosylimines with Aryl Acetylenes Promoted by ZnBr2 and N,N-diisopropylethylamine in Acetonitrile. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ramu, E.; Varala, R.; Sreelatha, N.; Adapa, S.R. Zn(OAc)2·2H2O: A Versatile Catalyst for the One-Pot Synthesis of Propargylamines. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 7184–7190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kantam, M.L.; Balasubrahmanyam, V.; Kumar, K.S.; Venkanna, G.T. Efficient One-Pot Synthesis of Propargylamines using Zinc Dust. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 7332–7334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, P.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L. Iron-Catalyzed Ligand-Free Three-Component Coupling Reactions of Aldehydes, Terminal Alkynes, and Amines. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 2045–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chen, W.W.; Nauyen, R.V.; Li, C.J. Iron-Catalyzed Three-Component Coupling of Aldehyde, Alkyne, and Amine under Neat Conditions in Air. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 2895–2898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Y.; Li, P.; Wang, M.; Wang, L. Indium-Catalyzed Highly Efficient Three-Component Coupling of Aldehyde, Alkyne, and Amine via C−H Bond Activation. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 4364–4367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jadav, J.S.; Reddy, B.V.S.; Gopal, A.V.H.; Patil, K.S. InBr3-Catalyzed Three-Component Reaction: A Facile Synthesis of Propargylamines. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 3493–3496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fischer, C.; Carreira, E.M. Direct Addition of TMS-acetylene to Aldimines Catalyzed by a Simple, Commercially Available Ir(I) Complex. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 4319–4321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Afraj, N.S.; Chinpiao, C.; Lee, G.H. Manganese(II) Chloride Catalyzed Highly Efficient One-Pot Synthesis of Propargylamines and Fused Triazoles via Three-component Coupling Reaction under Solvent-free Conditions. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 26301–26308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hua, L.P.; Lei, W. Mercurous Chloride Catalyzed Mannich Condensation of Terminal Alkynes with Secondary Amines and Aldehydes. Chin. J. Chem. 2005, 23, 1076–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Samai, S.; Nandi, G.C.; Singh, M.S. An Efficient and Facile One-Pot Synthesis of Propargylamines by Three-Component Coupling of Aldehydes, Amines, and Alkynes via C–H Activation Catalyzed by NiCl2. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 5555–5558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bonfield, E.R.; Li, C.J. Efficient Preparation of the Isoindoline Framework via a Six Component, Tandem Double A3-Coupling and [2+2+2] Cycloaddition Reaction. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 370–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, W.W.; Bi, H.P.; Li, C.J. The First Cobalt-Catalyzed Transformation of Alkynyl C-H Bond: Aldehyde-Alkyne-Amine (A3) Coupling. Synlett 2010, 475–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Teimouri, A.; Chermahini, A.N.; Narimani, M. A Simple and Efficient One-Pot Three-Component Synthesis of Propargylamines Using Bismuth (III) Chloride. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2012, 33, 1556–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Raghuvanshi, D.S.; Singh, K.N. Highly Efficient Cadmium-Catalyzed Three-Component Coupling of an Aldehyde, Alkyne, and Amine via C-H Activation under Microwave Conditions. Synlett 2011, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ramu, V.G.; Bordoloi, A.; Nagaiah, T.C.; Schuhmann, W.; Muhler, M.; Cabrele, C. Copper Nanoparticles Stabilized on Nitrogen-doped Carbon Nanotubes as Efficient and Recyclable Catalysts for Alkyne/Aldehyde/Cyclic Amine A3-type Coupling Reactions. Appl. Catal. A 2012, 431, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, F.; Lai, Q.; Shi, X.; Song, Z. Triazole-Gold (TAAu) Catalyzed Three-Component Coupling (A3 Reaction) towards the Synthesis of 2,4-Disubstituted Quinoline Derivatives. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Price, G.A.; Brisdon, A.K.; Randall, S.; Lewis, E.; Whittaker, D.M.; Pritchard, R.G.; Muryn, C.A.; Flower, K.R.; Quayle, P. Some Insights into the Gold-Catalyzed A3-Coupling Reaction. J. Organomet. Chem. 2017, 846, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Grirrane, A.; Alvarez, E.; Garcia, H.; Corma, A. Preparation of Tremorine and Gemini Surfactant Precursors with Cationic Ethynyl-Bridged Digold Catalysts. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 2792–2801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Li, J.; Rudolph, M.; Rominger, F.; Xie, J.; Hashmi, A.; Stephen, K. A Gold-Catalyzed A3 Coupling/Cyclization/Elimination Sequence as Versatile Tool for the Synthesis of Furfuryl Alcohol Derivatives from Glyceraldehyde and Alkynes. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Corma, A. Attempts to Fill the Gap between Enzymatic, Homogeneous, and Heterogeneous Catalysis. Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 2004, 46, 369–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Widenhoefer, R.A.; Han, X. Gold-Catalyzed Hydroamination of C–C Multiple Bonds. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 4555–4563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, X.; Corma, A. Efficient Addition of Alcohols, Amines and Phenol to Unactivated Alkenes by AuIII or PdII Stabilized by CuCl2. Dalton Trans. 2008, 3, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Haruta, M. When Gold Is Not Noble: Catalysis by Nanoparticles. Chem. Rec. 2003, 3, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Stratakis, M.; García, H. Catalysis by Supported Gold Nanoparticles: Beyond Aerobic Oxidative Processes. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 4469–4506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Corma, A.; Serna, P. Chemoselective Hydrogenation of Nitro Compounds with Supported Gold Catalysts. Science 2006, 313, 332–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kantam, M.L.; Prakash, B.V.; Reddy, C.R.V.; Sreedhar, B. Layered Double Hydroxide-Supported Gold Catalyst for Three-Component Aldehyde-Amine-Alkyne Coupling. Synlett 2005, 2329–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, X.; Corma, A. Supported Gold(III) Catalysts for Highly Efficient Three-Component Coupling Reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4358–4361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Li, G.; Jin, R. Catalysis by Gold Nanoparticles. Carbon-carbon Coupling Reactions. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2013, 2, 529–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nasrollahzadeh, M.; Sajjadi, M.; Ghorbannezhad, F.; Sajadi, S.M. A Review on Recent Advances in the Application of Nanocatalysts in A3 Coupling Reactions. Chem. Rec. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Saha, T.K.; Das, R. Progress in Synthesis of Propargylamine and Its Derivatives by Nanoparticle Catalysis via A3 coupling: A Decade Update. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 147–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Borah, B.J.; Borah, S.J.; Saikia, K.; Dutta, D.K. Efficient One-pot Synthesis of Propargylamines Catalysed by Gold Nanocrystals Stabilized on Montmorillonite. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014, 14, 4001–4009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Moghaddam, F.M.; Pourkaveh, R. Efficient Synthesis of Propargylamines in Aqueous Media Catalyzed by Au Nanoparticles under Ambient Temperature. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 2053–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gholinejad, M.; Bonyasi, R.; Najera, C.; Saadati, F.; Bahrami, M.; Dasvarz, N. Gold Nanoparticles Supported on Imidazole-Modified Bentonite: Environmentally Benign Heterogeneous Catalyst for the Three-Component Synthesis of Propargylamines in Water. ChemPlusChem 2018, 83, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Feiz, A.; Bazgir, A. Gold Nanoparticles Supported on Mercaptoethanol Directly Bonded to MCM-41: An Efficient Catalyst for the Synthesis of Propargylamines. Catal. Commun. 2016, 73, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Loni, M.; Yazdani, H.; Bazgir, A. Gold Nanoparticles-Decorated Dithiocarbamate Nanocomposite: An Efficient Heterogeneous Catalyst for the Green A3-Coupling Synthesis of Propargylamines. Catal. Lett. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hussain, N.; Das, M.R. Magnetically Recoverable Graphene-Based Nanocomposite Material as an Efficient Catalyst for the Synthesis of Propargylamines via A3 Coupling Reaction. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 12756–12766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lili, L.; Xishi, T.; Guanglin, Y.; Huanmei, G.; Qingguo, M. Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Supported on Metal-organic Frameworks: A Highly Active Catalyst for Three-component Coupling Reaction. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2016, 32, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liu, L.; Tai, X.; Zhou, X. Au3+/Au0 Supported on Chromium(III) Terephthalate Metal Organic Framework (MIL-101) as an Efficient Heterogeneous Catalyst for Three-Component Coupling Synthesis of Propargylamines. Materials 2017, 10, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Liu, L.; Tai, X.; Zhang, N.; Meng, Q.; Xin, C. Supported Au/MIL-53(Al): A Reusable Green Solid Catalyst for the Three-component Coupling Reaction of Aldehyde, Alkyne, and Amine. Reac. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 2016, 119, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lili, L.; Xin, Z.; Shumin, R.; Ying, Y.; Xiaoping, D.; Jinsen, G.; Chunming, X.; Jing, H. Catalysis by Metal–organic Frameworks: Proline and Gold Functionalized MOFs for the Aldol and Three-component Coupling Reactions. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 13093–13107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhao, X.-B.; Ha, W.; Jiang, K.; Chen, J.; Yang, J.-L.; Shi, Y.-P. Efficient Synthesis of Camptothecin Propargylamine Derivatives in Water Catalyzed by Macroporous Adsorption Resin-supported Gold Nanoparticles. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 1399–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gholinejad, M.; Hamed, F.; Nájera, C. Gold Nanoparticles Supported on Polyacrylamide Containing a Phosphorus Ligand as an Efficient Heterogeneous Catalyst for Three-Component Synthesis of Propargylamines in Water. Synlett 2016, 27, 1193–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Gholinejad, M.; Zareh, F.; Najera, C. Iron Oxide Modified with Pyridyl-triazole Ligand for Stabilization of Gold Nanoparticles: An Efficient Heterogeneous Catalyst for A3 Coupling Reaction in Water. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zohreh, N.; Hassan, S.H.; Jahani, M.; Xaba, M.S.; Meijboom, R. Stabilization of Au NPs on Symmetrical Tridentate NNN-Pincer Ligand Grafted on Magnetic Support as Water Dispersible and Recyclable Catalyst for Coupling Raction of Terminal Alkyne. J. Catal. 2017, 356, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Aghahosseini, H.; Rezaei, S.J.T.; Tadayyon, M.; Ramazani, A.; Amani, V.; Ahmadi, R.; Abdolahnjadian, D. Highly Efficient Aqueous Synthesis of Propargylamines through C–H Activation Catalyzed by Magnetic Organosilica-Supported Gold Nanoparticles as an Artificial Metalloenzyme. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 22, 2589–2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mallampati, R.; Valiyaveettil, S. Eggshell Membrane-Supported Recyclable Catalytic Noble Metal Nanoparticles for Organic Reactions. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 855–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bhargavaa, A.; Jaina, N.; Gangopadhyayb, S.; Panwar, J. Development of Gold Nanoparticle-Fungal Hybrid Based Heterogeneous Interface for Catalytic Applications. Process Biochem. 2015, 50, 1293–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Claus, J.; Sommer, F.O.; Kragl, U. Ionic liquids in Biotechnology and Beyond. Solid State Ionics 2018, 314, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Karimi, B.; Tavakolian, M.; Akbari, M.; Mansouri, F. Ionic Liquids in Asymmetric Synthesis: An Overall View from Reaction Media to Supported Ionic Liquid Catalysis. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 3173–3205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Li, J.; Yang, S.; Wu, W.; Jiang, H. Recent Advances in Pd-Catalyzed CrossCoupling Reaction in Ionic Liquids. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 11, 1284–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Riisager, A.; Fehrmann, R. Imidazolium-based Ionic Liquids Grafted on Solid Surfaces. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7171–7187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. He, Z.; Alexandridis, P. Ionic liquid and Nanoparticle Hybrid Systems: Emerging applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 244, 54–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Yao, N.; Wu, Y.P.; Zheng, K.B.; Hu, Y.L. Applications of Supported Ionic Liquids. Curr. Org. Chem. 2018, 22, 462–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Haumann, M.; Wasserscheid, P. SILP and SCILL Catalysis. In Catalysis in Ionic Liquids: From Catalyst Synthesis to Application; Hardacre, C., Parvulescu, V., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 410–432. [Google Scholar]
  74. Moghaddam, F.M.; Ayati, S.E.; Hosseinib, S.H.; Pourjavadi, A. Gold Immobilized onto Poly(ionic liquid) Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles: A Robust Magnetically Recoverable Catalyst for the Synthesis of Propargylamine in Water. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 34502–34510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Karimi, B.; Gholinejad, M.; Khorasani, M. Highly Efficient Three-component Coupling Reaction Catalyzed by Gold Nanoparticles Supported on Periodic Mesoporous Organosilica with Ionic Liquid Framework. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 8961–8963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Dhondge, A.P.; Afraj, S.N.; Nuzlia, C.; Chen, C.; Lee, G.-H. A Facile Synthesis of 4,6,7,8,8a,9-Hexahydropyrrolo[1,2a][1,2,3]triazolo[1,5-d]pyrazines by a Three-Component Coupling Reaction Followed by Intramolecular 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 19, 4119–4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ananda, N.; Ramudua, P.; Reddya, K.H.P.; Raoa, K.S.R.; Jagadeeshb, B.; Babub, V.S.P.; Burri, D.R. Gold Nanoparticles Immobilized on Lipoic Acid Functionalized SBA-15: Synthesis, Characterization and Catalytic Applications. Appl. Catal. A 2013, 454, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Cheng, M.; Zhang, Q.; Hu, X.-Y.; Li, B.-G.; Ji, J.-X.; Chan, A.S.C. Gold-Catalyzed Direct Intermolecular Coupling of Ketones, Secondary Amines, and Alkynes: A Facile and Versatile Access to Propargylic Amines Containing a Quaternary Carbon Center. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 1274–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Huang, J.-L.; Gray, D.G.; Li, C.-J. A3-Coupling Catalyzed by Robust Au Nanoparticles Covalently Bonded to HS-Functionalized Cellulose Nanocrystalline Films. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013, 9, 1388–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Bobadilla, L.F.; Blasco, T.; Odriozola, J.A. Gold(III) Stabilized over Ionic Liquids Grafted on MCM-41 for Highly Efficient Three-component Coupling Reactions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 16927–16934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Belmonte-Sánchez, E.; Iglesias, M.J.; El Hajjouji, H.; Roces, L.; García-Granda, S.; Villuendas, P.; Urriolabeitia, E.P.; López-Ortiz, F. Cycloaurated Phosphinothioic Amide Complex as a Precursor of Gold(I) Nanoparticles: Efficient Catalysts for A3 Synthesis of Propargylamines under Solvent-Free Conditions. Organometallics 2017, 36, 1962–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hagiwara, H.; Sugawara, Y.; Isobe, K.; Hoshi, T.; Suzuki, T. Immobilization of Pd(OAc)2 in Ionic Liquid on Silica: Application to Sustainable Mizoroki-Heck Reaction. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2325–2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Brenna, S.; Posset, T.; Furrer, J.; Blümel, J. 14N NMR and Two-Dimensional Suspension 1H and 13C HRMAS NMR Spectroscopy of Ionic Liquids Immobilized on Silica. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 2880–2888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Hayamizu, K.; Tsuzuki, S.; Seki, S. Molecular Motions and Ion Diffusions of the Room-Temperature Ionic Liquid 1,2-Dimethyl-3-propylimidazolium Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)amide (DMPImTFSA) Studied by 1H, 13C, and 19F NMR. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 12027–12036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Shylesh, S.; Hanna, D.; Werner, S.; Bell, A.T. Factors Influencing the Activity, Selectivity, and Stability of Rh-Based Supported Ionic Liquid Phase (SILP) Catalysts for Hydroformylation of Propene. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Shah, F.U.; Holmgren, A.; Rutland, M.W.; Glavatskih, S.; Antzutkin, O.N. Interfacial Behavior of Orthoborate Ionic Liquids at Inorganic Oxide Surfaces Probed by NMR, IR, and Raman Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 19687–19698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Movahed, S.K.; Esmatpoursalmani, R.; Bazgir, A. N-Heterocyclic Carbene Palladium Complex Supported on Ionic Liquid-Modified Graphene Oxide as an Efficient and Recyclable Catalyst for Suzuki Reaction. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 14586–14591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Li, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Ji, J.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, F.; Fan, X. Cooperative Catalysis by Acid–Base Bifunctional Graphene. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 13655–13658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mehnert, C.P.; Cook, R.A.; Dispenziere, N.C.; Afeworki, M. Supported Ionic Liquid Catalysis—A New Concept for Homogeneous Hydroformylation Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12932–12933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Brauer, U.G.; de La Hoz, A.T.; Miller, K.M. The effect of counteranion on the physicochemical and thermal properties of 4-methyl-1-propyl-1,2,4-triazolium ionic liquids. J. Mol. Liq. B 2015, 210, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Alvim, H.G.O.; Pinheiro, D.L.J.; Carvalho-Silva, V.H.; Fioramonte, M.; Gozzo, F.C.; da Silva, W.A.; Amarante, G.W.; Neto, B.A.D. Combined Role of the Asymmetric Counteranion-Directed Catalysis (ACDC) and Ionic Liquid Effect for the Enantioselective Biginelli Multicomponent Reaction. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 12143–12153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Villaverde, G.; Corma, A.; Iglesias, M.; Sánchez, F. Heterogenized Gold Complexes: Recoverable Catalysts for Multicomponent Reactions of Aldehydes, Terminal Alkynes, and Amines. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wei, C.; Li, C.-L. A Highly Efficient Three-Component Coupling of Aldehyde, Alkyne, and Amines via C−H Activation Catalyzed by Gold in Water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9584–9585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Chang, L.L.; Yang, J.; Wei, Y.; Yinga, J.Y. Transition Metal-Catalysed, Direct and Site-Selective N1-, C2- or C3-Arylation of the Indole Nucleus: 20 Years of Improvements. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 2887–2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Chen, H.-B.; Zhao, Y.; Liao, Y. Aldehyde–Alkyne–Amine (A3) Coupling Catalyzed by a Highly Efficient Dicopper Complex. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 37737–37741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Cruz, P.; Pérez, Y.; del Hierro, I.; Fernández-Galán, R.; Fajardo, M. ε-Caprolactone Polymerization Using Titanium Complexes Immobilized onto Silica Based Materials Functionalized with Ionic Liquids: Insights into Steric, Electronic and Support Effects. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 19723–19733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 5 are available from the authors.
Molecules 23 02975 sch001 550
Scheme 1. A3 coupling reaction catalyzed by Au(III) complex 1.
Scheme 1. A3 coupling reaction catalyzed by Au(III) complex 1.
Molecules 23 02975 sch001
Molecules 23 02975 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) 31P HRMAS NMR (202.46 MHz) and (b) 1H, 31P HRMAS HMQC (500.13 MHz) spectra of (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2–[bmim]PF6.
Figure 1. (a) 31P HRMAS NMR (202.46 MHz) and (b) 1H, 31P HRMAS HMQC (500.13 MHz) spectra of (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2–[bmim]PF6.
Molecules 23 02975 g001
Molecules 23 02975 g002 550
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (a,b) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (c,d) images of AuNPs formed in the A3 synthesis of 5a in the presence of 0.1 mol% of (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2–[bmim]PF6 under solvent-free conditions.
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (a,b) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (c,d) images of AuNPs formed in the A3 synthesis of 5a in the presence of 0.1 mol% of (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2–[bmim]PF6 under solvent-free conditions.
Molecules 23 02975 g002
Molecules 23 02975 g003 550
Figure 3. Core level regions X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of the supported AuNPs for (a) N 1s, (b) Si 2p, and (c) Au 4f.
Figure 3. Core level regions X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of the supported AuNPs for (a) N 1s, (b) Si 2p, and (c) Au 4f.
Molecules 23 02975 g003
Molecules 23 02975 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Suggested mechanism for the A3 coupling synthesis of propargylamine 5 catalyzed by Au–SILP.
Scheme 2. Suggested mechanism for the A3 coupling synthesis of propargylamine 5 catalyzed by Au–SILP.
Molecules 23 02975 sch002
Molecules 23 02975 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Grafting of the ionic liquid (IL) onto the silica surface and preparation of the immobilized catalyst.
Scheme 3. Grafting of the ionic liquid (IL) onto the silica surface and preparation of the immobilized catalyst.
Molecules 23 02975 sch003
Molecules 23 02975 g004 550
Figure 4. Recyclability as a function of the catalyst. Blue: Au–SILP; green: Au–SiO2@IL(Cl); yellow: Au–SiO2@IL(PF6).
Figure 4. Recyclability as a function of the catalyst. Blue: Au–SILP; green: Au–SiO2@IL(Cl); yellow: Au–SiO2@IL(PF6).
Molecules 23 02975 g004
Molecules 23 02975 g005 550
Figure 5. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (a) and (b) (larger surface area) images of AuNPs formed during the A3 synthesis of 5a in the presence of 0.1 mol% of (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2@IL(PF6) under solvent-free conditions.
Figure 5. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (a) and (b) (larger surface area) images of AuNPs formed during the A3 synthesis of 5a in the presence of 0.1 mol% of (dppta)AuCl2–SiO2@IL(PF6) under solvent-free conditions.
Molecules 23 02975 g005
Molecules 23 02975 g006 550
Figure 6. XPS spectra of the core level regions of Au–SiO2@IL(PF6) for (a) N 1s, (b) Si 2p, and (c) Au 4f.
Figure 6. XPS spectra of the core level regions of Au–SiO2@IL(PF6) for (a) N 1s, (b) Si 2p, and (c) Au 4f.
Molecules 23 02975 g006
Table
Table 1. Optimization of the A3 coupling reaction of benzaldehyde, trimethylsilylacetylene, and piperidine.
Table 1. Optimization of the A3 coupling reaction of benzaldehyde, trimethylsilylacetylene, and piperidine.
Molecules 23 02975 i001
EntryCatalystn (mol%)Time (h)Conv. (%) a
1(dppta)AuCl2–SILP1699
2(dppta)AuCl2–SILP0.5698
3(dppta)AuCl2–SILP0.1897
4(dppta)AuCl21697
5(dppta)AuCl20.1899
a Determined by 1H-NMR analysis of the reaction crude.
Table
Table 2. A3 coupling reaction catalyzed by Au–SILP.
Table 2. A3 coupling reaction catalyzed by Au–SILP.
Molecules 23 02975 i002
EntryR1R2R3XmTime (h)5Conv. (%) a
1PhTMSHCH218a97
24-ClC6H4TMSHCH218b94
34-OMeC6H4TMSHCH2114c83
4PhPhHCH218d94
5Ph4-FC6H4HCH2114e86
6Ph2-OMeC6H4HCH2114f90
7Ph3-MeC6H4HCH218g93
8Ph3(C≡C)C6H4HCH218h83
9PhTMSHO18i97
10PhPhHO18j98
11PhTMSCH3CH208k98(97) b
12PhPhCH3CH208l87(98) b
a Conversion (conv.) determined by 1H-NMR analysis of the crude reaction. b Values in parentheses indicate diastereomeric excesses, de. SILP: supported ionic liquid phase catalysis.
Table
Table 3. Reusability of the Au–SILP catalyst.
Table 3. Reusability of the Au–SILP catalyst.
EntryCycleConv. (%) a
1197
2290
3381
4475
5562
a Determined by 1H-NMR analysis of the reaction crude.
Table
Table 4. A3 coupling reaction catalyzed by Au–SiO2@IL and the recycling of the catalyst.
Table 4. A3 coupling reaction catalyzed by Au–SiO2@IL and the recycling of the catalyst.
Molecules 23 02975 i003
EntryCatalystConversion (%) a
Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5
1Au–SiO2@IL(Cl)97320--
2Au–SiO2@IL(PF6)9896918685
a Determined through 1H-NMR analysis of the reaction crude.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Soengas, R.; Navarro, Y.; Iglesias, M.J.; López-Ortiz, F. Immobilized Gold Nanoparticles Prepared from Gold(III)-Containing Ionic Liquids on Silica: Application to the Sustainable Synthesis of Propargylamines. Molecules 2018, 23, 2975. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23112975

AMA Style

Soengas R, Navarro Y, Iglesias MJ, López-Ortiz F. Immobilized Gold Nanoparticles Prepared from Gold(III)-Containing Ionic Liquids on Silica: Application to the Sustainable Synthesis of Propargylamines. Molecules. 2018; 23(11):2975. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23112975

Chicago/Turabian Style

Soengas, Raquel, Yolanda Navarro, María José Iglesias, and Fernando López-Ortiz. 2018. "Immobilized Gold Nanoparticles Prepared from Gold(III)-Containing Ionic Liquids on Silica: Application to the Sustainable Synthesis of Propargylamines" Molecules 23, no. 11: 2975. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23112975

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop