Next Article in Journal
Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel Osimertinib-Based HDAC and EGFR Dual Inhibitors
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis, Physicochemical Properties, and Biological Activities of 4-(S-Methyl-N-(2,2,2-Trifluoroacetyl)Sulfilimidoyl) Anthranilic Diamide
Previous Article in Journal
Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Improves the Biological Features of Mouse Bone Marrow-Derived EPCs Partially through PI3K/AKT/eNOS/NO Pathway
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 24
Issue 13
10.3390/molecules24132405
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of 6,12-Disubstituted Methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocins: Pyrrolidine Catalyzed Self-Condensation of 2′-Hydroxyacetophenones

by
Benedicta Assoah
1,*,
Vesa Riihonen
1,
João R. Vale
1,2,
Arto Valkonen
3 and
Nuno R. Candeias
1,*
1
Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 8, 33101 Tampere, Finland
2
Instituto de Investigação do Medicamento (iMed.ULisboa), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal
3
Department of Chemistry, University of Jyvaskyla, P.O. Box 35, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(13), 2405; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24132405
Submission received: 14 June 2019 / Revised: 26 June 2019 / Accepted: 28 June 2019 / Published: 29 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development of New Methods of Synthesis of Heterocycles)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The preparation of unprecedented 6,12-disubstituted methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocins from pyrrolidine catalyzed self-condensation of 2′-hydroxyacetophenones is herein described. This method provides easy access to this highly bridged complex core, resulting in construction of two C–O and two C–C bonds, a methylene bridge and two quaternary centers in a single step. The intricate methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin compounds were obtained in up to moderate yields after optimization of the reaction conditions concerning solvent, reaction times and the use of additives. Several halide substituted methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocins could be prepared from correspondent 2′-hydroxyacetophenones.

1. Introduction

Heterocyclic compounds possess fascinating complex structural architecture and are key structural motifs in an array of biologically active natural products and pharmaceutically active compounds [1], which drives the development of improved and new synthetic methodologies [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. In recent years, cascade reactions [10,11,12,13,14,15,16] and bio-inspired technologies [17,18,19,20,21,22,23] have been employed to access structural complexity in compounds of biological importance.
Methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin is a highly strained bridged polycyclic skeleton present in numerous biologically active natural products and pharmaceuticals (Scheme 1). Some of these natural products exhibit inhibition against β-amyloid aggregation, antibacterial activity, potent anti- methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) activity, etc. [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. After Nair et al. [29] reported that cyanomaclurin, a compound isolated from the heartwood of Artocarpus integrifolia (jackwood) [36], possessed a methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin core, considerable attention was paid to its construction. Hennis and co-workers obtained the neutral 6H,12H-6,12-methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin and its derivatives after a condensation reaction of either o-vinylphenol or o-coumaric acid and salicylaldehyde under acidic conditions [37,38].
The catalytic preparation of the methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin core has been recently explored (Scheme 2a). A bioinspired cascade sequence of ethylenediaminediacetic acid (EDDA)-catalyzed olefin isomerization/hemiacetalization/dehydration/[3+3]-type cycloaddition driven by an in situ generated chromenylium intermediate has been reported by Liu et al. in the synthesis of methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin flavonoids from phloroglucinol and 2-hydroxycinnamalaldehyde [39]. Du and co-workers explored o-quinone methide and electron rich phenols as reactants in a silver triflate catalyzed tandem process for the construction of such a core. The formation of alkynyl o-quinone methide catalyzed by silver triflate triggers the following intermolecular cascade: 1,4-conjugate addition/6-endo cyclization/1,3-aryl shift/intramolecular 1,4-conjugate addition, providing the 2-substituted methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin [40]. Notwithstanding these recent developments, more synthetic strategies to access this intricate polycyclic ring system are worth pursuing as accessing [1,5]-dioxocins with different substituents in the bridgehead carbons is still an open issue. Likely due to the limited synthetic methodologies available, the methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin motif has received little attention as a structural scaffold in drug design.
In our previous endeavor towards the development of a reductive amination protocol for the synthesis of tertiary alkylphenolmethyl amines [41] using a recently developed pinacol-derived chlorohydrosilane (PCS) [42], we were intrigued by the absence of the desired reductive amination product under our hydrosilylation conditions with 2′-hydroxyacetophenone and pyrrolidine (Scheme 2b). Despite the successful use of such a protocol for the synthesis of several tertiary alkylphenolmethyl amines, careful inspection of a reaction mixture containing pyrrolidine and the ketone showed the formation of a 2′-hydroxyacetophenone self-condensation product.
Aware of the limitations of the available methods for the preparation of methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin, and intrigued by the singular reactivity of pyrrolidine in promoting the self-condensation reaction, we set out to investigate and optimize the reaction conditions to efficiently construct such a polycyclic core from the self-condensation of three 2′-hydroxyacetophenone molecules. Importantly, previously reported attempts to dimerize β-hydroxy ketones using acidic/dehydrating conditions proved unsuccessful, although 6H,12H-6,12-epoxydibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocins could be obtained from the dimerization of salicylaldehydes [43,44].

2. Results and Discussion

We began our synthetic efforts to optimize the reaction conditions after obtaining methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin 1 at a 9% yield in a failed attempt to aminate 2′-hydroxyacetophenone with pyrrolidine under hydrosilylation conditions, followed by crystallization and unambiguous characterization of the product through single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis (Table 1). The crystal structure of 1 showed an intramolecular hydrogen bond and similar geometric features of the methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin core to 7,9-dimethoxy-6H,12H-6,12-methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin-4-ol [26], except for the interplanar angle between benzene rings. The interplanar angle was almost ten degrees higher value in 1, which was rather close to orthogonality (~88°) and corresponded to the value found from (E)-2-(4-((12-methyl-6H,12H-6,12-methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin-6-yl)methylene)-4H-chromen-2-yl)phenol [45].
Using 2-hydroxyacetophenone as substrate, we investigated the reaction conditions in the hydrosilylation protocol and their effect on the formation of compound 1 (Table 1). The initial use of stoichiometric amounts of 2′-hydroxyacetophenone and pyrrolidine in refluxing acetonitrile gave compound 1 with a 24% yield (Table 1, entry 1). The importance of pyrrolidine and molecular sieves (MS) was verified after not detecting the desired product when running the reaction in the absence of any of these components (entries 2 and 3). Replacing pyrrolidine with anhydrous p-toluenesulfonic acid, or use of pyrrolidine as a solvent led to similar outcomes (entries 4 and 5). Decreasing the amount of pyrrolidine to 0.3 equiv. had a positive effect on the formation of 1, with a yield of 42% (entry 6). Harsher reaction conditions, namely using a sealed tube at 80 °C in the absence of solvent and increased reaction times, allowed formation of product with up to 59% yield (entry 7). Decreasing the amount of the pyrrolidine catalyst did not improve the yield of the desired product (Table 1, entries 8–10). Other reaction conditions tested, including use of additives such as acetic acid or Cu(OAc)2, replacing molecular sieves beads with powder and using different amounts of sieves, invariably led to lower yields.
At this point, the best conditions identified were the use of 30 mol% pyrrolidine to catalyze the transformation and a solvent-free protocol. While the model compound tested is liquid at room temperature, many 2′-hydroxyacetophenones are solid, which could likely pose reproducibility, heat and mass transfer issues in a solvent free process. Furthermore, after considerable product formation, it is solidified in the mixture, trapping the molecular sieves and hampering efficient stirring of the reaction mixture. Due to this, we decided to search for solvents suitable for the reaction, which would solubilize the starting materials and prevent decomposition of the product. With the aim of getting both the starting material and product soluble in the reaction media, more polar solvents were initially tested in both vessel types, sealed tube and round bottom flask, under argon (Table 2). Interestingly, ethanol, the only protic solvent tested, failed to provide any of the product, and dichloroethane did not provide more than a 15% yield of 1 after 24 h. Other polar solvents, such as acetonitrile and methyl tert-butylether, could provide the product in yields of up to 43%, but slightly better yields could be obtained for hexane, while toluene and dioxane were comparable. From the reaction optimizations so far, it appeared that hexane as a solvent favored the yield of compound 1 compared to the others screened in both closed and reflux reaction conditions. A more dilute reaction media in hexane did not affect the yield of 1 considerably (Table 2, entry 7). Thus, we identified the use of 0.3 equiv. of pyrrolidine as a catalyst in refluxing hexane to be the optimal reaction conditions for the synthesis of 1 based on the optimization reactions carried out and also our quest to avoid reactions under neat conditions.
With the established optimal reaction conditions in hand, we proceeded to expand the substrate scope to other substituted 2′-hydroxyacetophenones (Scheme 3). Notwithstanding the modest yields, we were pleased to observe the formation of methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin derivatives 2–7 without the need to use any metals or strongly acidic conditions. The protocol was demonstrated to be suitable for obtaining alkyl-substituted methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin 2, the halide substituted derivatives 3–6 or the electron rich methoxy derivative 7. When attempting to verify the suitability of this method for strongly electron-withdrawing groups, nitro substituted 2′-hydroxyacetophenones were tested, resulting only in the isolation of traces of the reduced aniline and unreacted starting material. Also, all attempts to obtain the methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin analogue of other 2′-hydroxyketones, such as 2′-hydroxypropiophenone or 2′-hydroxy-3-phenylpropiophenone proved futile, therefore limiting this protocol to pyrrolidine catalyzed self-condensation of 2′-hydroxyacetophenones.
Although the details of the mechanisms involved require full clarification, the absence of similar dioxocin products when employing other cyclic secondary amines, such as indoline, morpholine and tetrahydroquinoline, using our hydrosilylation protocol, suggests that an enamine is likely to be involved. Pyrrolidine derived enamines are known to be more reactive that other cyclic amines [46,47], and the protocol for reductive amination from 2′-hydroxyacetophenone and this amine starts with iminium formation at room temperature under neat conditions [48]. Moreover, the same amine was previously reported to promote the formation of 4-chromanones from 2′-hydroxyacetophenones and aliphatic aldehydes and ketones [49].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Considerations

All syntheses were carried out in oven-dried glassware under an inert atmosphere. All solvents used were left standing over 3 Å molecular sieves and used without further drying. All other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich or TCI and used without further purification. Reactions were monitored through thin-layer chromatography (TLC) with commercial silica gel plates (Merck silica gel, 60 F254). Visualization of the developed plates was performed under UV lights at 254 nm and by staining with cerium ammonium molybdate and vanillin. Flash column chromatography was performed on silica gel 60 (40–63 µm) as stationary phase. NMR spectra were recorded with JEOL ECZR 500 instruments using CDCl3 as solvent. Chemical shifts (δ) were reported in ppm and referenced to the CDCl3 residual peak (δ 7.26) or tetramethylsilane (TMS) peak (δ 0.00) for 1H NMR and to CDCl3 (δ 77.16) for 13C NMR. The following abbreviations were used to describe peak splitting patterns: s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet and m = multiplet. Coupling constants, J, were reported in hertz (Hz). High-resolution mass spectrometry spectra were recorded on a Waters ESI-TOF MS spectrometer.

3.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Substituted Methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]Dioxocin Derivatives 1–7

In a 10 mL round bottom flask equipped with a condenser, the corresponding 2′-hydroxyacetophenone (6.22 mmol) was heated in hexane (5 mL) for 5–10 min to dissolve completely, after which pyrrolidine (2.08 mmol, 0.33 equiv) and molecular sieves (3 Å beads, 362 mg) were added while stirring under argon. The resulting mixture was refluxed at 80 °C for 24–48 h and then allowed to cool to room temperature. After cooling to room temperatute (r. t.), ethyl acetate was added to the reaction mixture, followed by saturated NH4Cl (15 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 20 mL) and the combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered out and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was then purified by flash column chromatography on silica (Hexane:EtOAc 98:2) to give the desired product. 1H and 13C spectra of all compounds, 1–7 is available in the supplementary material.
1-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-2-(12-methyl-6H,12H-6,12-methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin-6-yl)ethan-1-one (1). Following the general procedure, 2′-hydroxyacetophenone (845 mg, 6.22 mmol) and pyrrolidine (170 µL, 2.08 mmol) in hexane (1.5 mL) refluxed for 24 h. The purified product was obtained as a pale yellow crystalline solid at a 53% yield (406 mg, 1.09 mmol). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 12.12 (s, 1H, OH), 8.08 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H. ArH), 7.44–7.55 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.40 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.06–7.16 (m, 2H, ArH), 6.93–7.01 (m, 2H, ArH), 6.78–6.92 (m, 3H, ArH), 6.71 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, ArH), 4.16 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.79 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.68 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.26 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 1.87 ppm (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 202.6, 162.6, 154.0, 152.8, 136.6, 130.7, 129.9, 129.7, 126.5, 125.5, 124.2, 122.7, 120.8, 120.6, 119.9, 118.8, 118.4, 117.4, 116.9, 72.1, 70.3, 45.1, 38.7, 25.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calculated for C24H21O4 [M + H]+ 373.1440. Found 373.1411.
1-(2-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)-2-(2,8,12-trimethyl-6H,12H-6,12-methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin-6-yl)ethan-1-one (2). Following the general procedure, 2′-hydroxy-5′-methylacetophenone (934 mg, 6.22 mmol) and pyrrolidine (170 µL, 2.08 mmol) in hexane (5 mL) refluxed for 48 h. The purified product was obtained as a pale yellow crystalline solid at a 40% yield (341 mg, 0.82 mmol). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 11.94 (s, 1H, OH), 7.86 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.31 (dd, J = 8.6, 2.3 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.26 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.15 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H, ArH), 6.89–6.95 (m, 2H, ArH), 6.87 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H, ArH), 6.69 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, ArH), 6.60 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, ArH), 4.09 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.80 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.64 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.38 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.22 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.19 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.15 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 1.83 ppm (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 202.8, 160.8, 152.1, 150.9, 137.9, 131.0, 130.8, 130.7, 130.2, 129.9, 128.1, 127.0, 125.9, 124.2, 122.7, 119.9, 118.4, 117.3, 116.8, 72.2, 70.5, 45.6, 39.1, 25.6, 20.9, 20.8, 20.7. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calculated for C27H27O4 [M + H]+ 415.1909. Found 415.1850.
1-(4-bromo-2-hydroxyphenyl)-2-(3,9-dibromo-12-methyl-6H,12H-6,12-methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin-6-yl)ethan-1-one (3). Following the general procedure, 4′-bromo-2′-hydroxyacetophenone (192 mg, 0.90 mmol) and pyrrolidine (24 µL, 0.3 mmol) in hexane (1 mL) refluxed for 48 h. The purified product was obtained as a white crystalline solid at a 37% yield (68 mg, 0.11 mmol). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 12.09 (s, 1H, OH), 7.86 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.32 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.17–7.22 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.13 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.7 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.03 (dd, J = 8.3, 2.0 Hz, 1H, ArH), 6.96–7.00 (m, 2H, ArH), 6.86 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H, ArH), 4.06 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.69 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.64 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.20 (d, J = 14.3 Hz, 1H, CH2), 1.82 ppm (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 201.7, 163.3, 155.1, 153.7, 131.7, 131.6, 128.2, 127.0, 124.7, 124.4, 123.7, 123.4, 123.3, 122.8, 122.0, 121.6, 121.0, 120.3, 118.9, 72.6, 70.9, 45.1, 38.5, 25.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calculated for C24H16Br3O4 [M − H]− 606.8580, 608.8561. Found 606.8564, 608.8533.
2-(3,9-difluoro-12-methyl-6H,12H-6,12-methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin-6-yl)-1-(4-fluoro-2-hydroxyphenyl)ethan-1-one (4). Following the general procedure, 4′-fluoro-2′-hydroxyacetophenone (959 mg, 6.22 mmol) and pyrrolidine (170 µL, 2.08 mmol) in hexane (3 mL) refluxed for 48 h. The purified product was obtained as a yellow crystalline solid at a 23% yield (199 mg, 0.47 mmol). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 12.39 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H, OH), 8.06 (dd, J = 9.2, 6.3 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.44 (dd, J = 8.6, 6.3 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.30–7.39 (m, 1H, ArH), 6.56–6.74 (m, 4H, ArH), 6.51 (dd, J = 9.7, 2.9 Hz, 1H, ArH), 6.41 (dd, J = 10.0, 2.6 Hz, 1H, ArH), 4.09 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.69 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.65 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.23 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 1.85 ppm (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 201.2, 167.8 (d, 1JC-F = 258.3 Hz), 165.6 (d, 3JC-F = 13.9 Hz), 163.6 (d, 1JC-F = 249.5 Hz), 163.4 (d, 1JC-F = 246.9 Hz), 155.7 (d, 3JC-F = 12.6 Hz), 154.3 (d, 3JC-F = 12.6 Hz), 133.4 (d, 3JC-F = 12.6 Hz), 128.3 (d, 3JC-F = 10.1 Hz), 127.2 (d, 3JC-F = 10.1 Hz), 120.4 (d, 4JC-F = 3.8 Hz), 118.8 (d, 4JC-F = 3.8 Hz), 117.3 (d, 4JC-F = 2.5 Hz), 108.9 (d, 2JC-F = 21.4 Hz), 108.6 (d, 2JC-F = 21.4 Hz), 107.6 (d, 2JC-F = 23.9 Hz) 105.3 (d, 2JC-F = 23.9 Hz), 104.7 (d, 2JC-F = 23.9 Hz), 104.1 (d, 2JC-F = 23.9 Hz), 72.7, 71.0, 45.3, 38.7, 25.4. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calculated for C24H16F3O4 [M − H]− 425.1001. Found 425.0961.
1-(3,5-dibromo-2-hydroxyphenyl)-2-(2,4,8,10-tetrabromo-12-methyl-6H,12H-6,12-methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin-6-yl)ethan-1-one (5). Following the general procedure, 3′,5′-dibromo-2′-hydroxyacetophenone (1.83 g, 6.22 mmol) and pyrrolidine (170 µL, 2.08 mmol) in hexane (5 mL) refluxed for 48 h. The purified product was obtained as a green crystalline solid at a 19% yield (332 mg, 0.39 mmol). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 12.67 (s, 1H, OH), 8.29 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.92 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.59 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.55 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.51 (dd, J = 4.0, 2.3 Hz, 2H, ArH), 4.38 (d, J = 14.9 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.37 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.57 (d, J = 14.3 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.18 (d, J = 14.3 Hz, 1H, CH2), 1.90 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 201.5, 158.7, 150.3, 149.0, 142.5, 136.9, 136.4, 133.5, 129.0, 127.8, 126.8, 125.1, 121.5, 114.1, 113.5, 113.4, 113.1, 112.6, 111.1, 73.4, 71.9, 45.5, 37.8, 25.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calculated for C24H13Br6O4 [M − H]− 842.5875, 844.5855, 846.5837, 848.5820. Found 842.6132, 844.5813, 846.5826 and 848.5784.
1-(5-chloro-2-hydroxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-(2,8-dichloro-3,9,12-trimethyl-6H,12H-6,12-methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin-6-yl)ethan-1-one (6). Following the general procedure, 5′-chloro-2′-hydroxy-4′-methylacetophenone (1.15 g, 6.22 mmol) and pyrrolidine (170 µL, 2.08 mmol) in hexane (5 mL) refluxed for 48 h. The purified product was obtained as a brown crystalline solid at a 43% yield (464 mg, 0.90 mmol). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 11.90 (s, 1H, OH), 8.00 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.39 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.24–7.31 (m, 1H, ArH), 6.86 (s, 1H, ArH), 6.67 (s, 1H, ArH), 6.60 (s, 1H, ArH), 4.06 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.59 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.55 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.38 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.22 ((s, 3H, CH3), 2.21 ((s, 3H, CH3), 2.13 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 1.80 ppm (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 201.1, 161.3, 152.6, 151.3, 146.5, 138.5, 138.3, 130.6, 126.8, 126.4, 125.8, 124.5, 123.3, 121.8, 120.7, 119.9, 119.3, 119.0, 72.1, 70.6, 45.4, 38.4, 25.4, 21.0, 20.1, 20.0. HRMS (ESI) m/z: Calculated for C27H22Cl3O4 [M − H]− 515.0583, 517.0559. Found 515.0589, 517.0613.
2-(3,8-dimethoxy-12-methyl-6H,12H-6,12-methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin-6-yl)-1-(2-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)ethan-1-one (7). Following the general procedure, 2′-hydroxy-4′-methoxyacetophenone (1.03 g, 6.22 mmol) and pyrrolidine (170 µL, 2.08 mmol) in hexane (5 mL) refluxed for 48 h. The purified product was obtained as a yellow crystalline solid at a 38% yield (365 mg, 0.79 mmol). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ = 12.69 (s, 1H, OH), 7.96 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.36 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.29 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H, ArH), 6.49–6.53 (m, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H, ArH),) 6.41–6.47 (m, 2H, ArH), 6.40 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, ArH), 6.30 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, ArH), 6.21 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H, ArH), 4.06 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.69 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.68 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.57 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.58 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 2.20 (d, J = 13.2 Hz, 1H, CH2), 1.82 ppm (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 126 MHz): δ = 200.9, 166.4, 165.9, 161.0, 160.9, 155.6, 154.4, 132.8, 127.6, 126.7, 117.0, 115.6, 114.6, 108.5, 108.2, 107.9, 101.4, 101.3, 100.9, 72.7, 71.0, 55.7, 55.3, 55.2, 45.1, 39.2, 25.6. Calculated for C27H25O7 [M − H]− 461.1600 Found 461.1604.

3.3. Single Crystal X-Ray Diffraction

The crystal data for 1 were collected on an Agilent SuperNova single-source diffractometer equipped with an Eos CCD detector at 120(2) K using mirror-monochromated Mo-Kα (λ = 0.71073 Å) radiation. Data collection (ω scans) and reduction was performed using the program CrysAlisPro [50]. The analytical face-indexing-based absorption correction method was applied. The structure was solved by intrinsic phasing methods [51] and refined by full-matrix least squares on F2 using SHELXL-2018/1 [52]. Anisotropic displacement parameters were assigned to non-H atoms. All hydrogen atoms (except O–H) were constrained to their idealized positions and refined using riding models with Ueq(H) of 1.5Ueq(C) for terminal methyl groups and of 1.2Ueq(C) for other groups. Hydrogen atoms bonded to O atoms were found from the electron density maps, restrained to their ideal distance (0.84 Å) from the parent atom and refined with Ueq(H) of 1.5Ueq(O). Deposition Number CCDC-1922829 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe Access Structures service www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures.
Crystal data for 1: C24H20O4 (M = 372.40 g/mol), triclinic, space group P-1 (no. 2), a = 6.8635(3) Å, b = 8.5812(4) Å, c = 16.4282(7) Å, α = 84.240(4)°, β = 82.066(4)°, γ = 72.435(4)°, V = 911.86(7) Å3, Z = 2, ρcalc = 1.356 g/cm3, 14,061 reflections measured (3.4° ≤ θ ≤ 29.9°), 4703 unique (Rint = 0.0329, Rsigma = 0.0351, I > 2σ(I) = 3781) which were used in all calculations. The final R1 was 0.0467 (I > 2σ(I)) and wR2 was 0.1222 (all data).

4. Conclusions

We have developed a simple, metal-free synthetic route to the highly complex methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin skeleton from the self-condensation of readily available 2′-hydroxyacetophenones catalyzed by pyrrolidine. Notwithstanding the moderate yields and narrow scope of the transformation, this strategy furnishes, in one-pot, unprecedented 6,12-disubstituted methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin derivatives with potential usefulness in medicinal chemistry or in the development of bioactive substances.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. 1H and 13C spectra of compounds 1–7.

Author Contributions

B.A. and N.R.C. conceived and designed the experiments. B.A., J.R.V. and V.R. performed the experiments. A.V. performed the X-ray crystallographic studies. B.A. prepared the manuscript and N.R.C. revised it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Academy of Finland, grant numbers 326487, 326486 and 314343. The APC was funded by 326486.

Acknowledgments

The academy of Finland is duly acknowledged for financial support to N.R.C. (Decisions No. 326487 and 326486) and to A.V. (No. 314343). J.R.V. acknowledges Fundacão para Ciência e Tecnologia for financial support (SFRH/BD/120119/2016. We thank Lijo George (Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, TAU) for HRMS measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khan, I.; Ibrar, A.; Shehzadi, S.A. Building molecular complexity through transition-metal-catalyzed oxidative annulations/cyclizations: Harnessing the utility of phenols, naphthols and 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 380, 440–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Clardy, J.; Walsh, C. Lessons from natural molecules. Nature 2004, 432, 829–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Davies, H.M. Organic chemistry: Synthetic lessons from nature. Nature 2009, 459, 786–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Davies, H.M.L.; Sorensen, E.J. Rapid complexity generation in natural product total synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 2981–2982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hamann, L.G. Synthetic strategy: Natural products on demand. Nat. Chem. 2014, 6, 460–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jones, S.B.; Simmons, B.; Mastracchio, A.; MacMillan, D.W. Collective synthesis of natural products by means of organocascade catalysis. Nature 2011, 475, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Pellissier, H. Stereocontrolled domino reactions. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 442–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Razzak, M.; De Brabander, J.K. Lessons and revelations from biomimetic syntheses. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7, 865–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Trost, B.M. The Atom Econoomy-A search for Synthetic Efficiency. Science 1991, 254, 1471–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Anderson, E.A. Cascade polycyclisations in natural product synthesis. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 3997–4006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ardkhean, R.; Caputo, D.F.; Morrow, S.M.; Shi, H.; Xiong, Y.; Anderson, E.A. Cascade polycyclizations in natural product synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 1557–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Grondal, C.; Jeanty, M.; Enders, D. Organocatalytic cascade reactions as a new tool in total synthesis. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kim, J.; Movassaghi, M. Biogenetically inspired syntheses of alkaloid natural products. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 3035–3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, X.W.; Nay, B. Transition metal-promoted biomimetic steps in total syntheses. Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 31, 533–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nicolaou, K.C.; Chen, J.S. The art of total synthesis through cascade reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 2993–3009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Nicolaou, K.C.; Edmonds, D.J.; Bulger, P.G. Cascade reactions in total synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2006, 45, 7134–7186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Day, A.J.; Lam, H.C.; Sumby, C.J.; George, J.H. Biomimetic Total Synthesis of Rhodonoids C and D, and Murrayakonine D. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 2463–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Han, Y.X.; Jiang, Y.L.; Li, Y.; Yu, H.X.; Tong, B.Q.; Niu, Z.; Zhou, S.J.; Liu, S.; Lan, Y.; Chen, J.H.; et al. Biomimetically inspired asymmetric total synthesis of (+)-19-dehydroxyl arisandilactone A. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kotammagari, T.K.; Gonnade, R.G.; Bhattacharya, A.K. Biomimetic Total Synthesis of Angiopterlactone B and Other Potential Natural Products. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 3564–3567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lachkar, D.; Denizot, N.; Bernadat, G.; Ahamada, K.; Beniddir, M.A.; Dumontet, V.; Gallard, J.F.; Guillot, R.; Leblanc, K.; N’Nang, E.; et al. Unified biomimetic assembly of voacalgine A and bipleiophylline via divergent oxidative couplings. Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 793–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Newton, C.G.; Tran, D.N.; Wodrich, M.D.; Cramer, N. One-Step Multigram-Scale Biomimetic Synthesis of Psiguadial B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2017, 56, 13776–13780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Reichl, K.D.; Smith, M.J.; Song, M.K.; Johnson, R.P.; Porco, J.A., Jr. Biomimetic Total Synthesis of (+/−)-Griffipavixanthone via a Cationic Cycloaddition-Cyclization Cascade. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 14053–14056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Song, L.; Huang, F.; Guo, L.; Ouyang, M.A.; Tong, R. A cascade Claisen rearrangement/o-quinone methide formation/electrocyclization approach to 2H-chromenes. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 6021–6024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bam, M.; Ferreira, D.; Brandt, E.V. Novel cyanomaclurin analogue from Peltophorum africanum. Phytochemistry 1988, 27, 3704–3705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bhatia, G.D.; Mukerjee, S.K.; Seshadri, T.R. Synthesis of (±) trimethyl cyanomaclurin and its acetate. Tetrahedron 1966, 22, 531–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cui, Y.M.; Wang, H.; Liu, Q.R.; Han, M.; Lu, Y.; Zhao, C.Q. Flavans from Iris tenuifolia and their effects on beta-amyloid aggregation and neural stem cells proliferation in vitro. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 4400–4403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Eastmond, R.; Gardner, R.J. [14C]epicatechin and [14C]procyanidins from seed shells of Aesculus hippocastanum. Phytochemistry 1974, 13, 1477–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lin, C.-N.; Lu, C.-M.; Huang, P.-L. Flavonoids from Artocarpus heterophyllus. Phytochemistry 1995, 39, 1447–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nair, P.M.; Venkataraman, K. Cyanomaclurin. Tetrahedron Lett. 1963, 4, 317–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rashid, M.A.; Armstrong, J.A.; Gray, A.I.; Waterman, P.G. Tetra− and pentacyclic 6-c-monoterpenyl-5,7-dioxycoumarins from Eriostemon brucei and e. Brucei subspecies cinereus. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 3583–3588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sasaki, H.; Kashiwada, Y.; Shibata, H.; Takaishi, Y. Prenylated flavonoids from Desmodium caudatum and evaluation of their anti-MRSA activity. Phytochemistry 2012, 82, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Waterman, P.G.; Mahmoud, E.-H.N. Unusual flavonoids from Lonchocarpus orotinus seeds. Phytochemistry 1987, 26, 1189–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, X.Q.; Jing, Y.; Wang, G.C.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, H.N.; Ye, W.C. Four new flavonoids from the leaves of Morus mongolica. Fitoterapia 2010, 81, 813–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mayer, W.; Goll, L.; Arndt, E.M.V.; Mannschreck, A. Procyanidino-(-)-epicatechin, ein zweiarmig verknüpftes, kondensiertes proanthocyanidin aus aesculus hippocastanum. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966, 7, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sun, Y.; Feng, X.; Liu, X.; Qian, C.; Che, X.; Cao, F.; Jin, S.; Meng, D. Caudatan A, an undescribed human kidney-type glutaminase inhibitor with tetracyclic flavan from Ohwia caudata. Phytochemistry 2018, 152, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Perkin, A.G.; Cope, F. XCV—The constituents of Artocarpus integrifolia. Part I. J. Chem. Soc. Trans. 1895, 67, 937–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hennis, H.E.; Thompson, L.R.; Wang, C.-S.; Priddy, D.B. 6H,12H-6,12-Methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocines from the reactions of o-alkenylphenols and salicylaldehydes. J. Org. Chem. 1970, 35, 3127–3129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hennis, H.E.; Wang, C.-S. 6H,12H-6,12-methanodibenzo[b,f] [1,5]dioxocins from the reactions of o-coumaric acids and salicylaldehydes. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34, 1907–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Guo, X.; Huo, L.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, W.; Qiu, S.; Yang, B.; Tan, H. A Bioinspired Cascade Sequence Enables Facile Assembly of Methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin Flavonoid Scaffold. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 546–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Du, J.Y.; Ma, Y.H.; Meng, F.X.; Chen, B.L.; Zhang, S.L.; Li, Q.L.; Gong, S.W.; Wang, D.Q.; Ma, C.L. Lewis Acid Catalyzed Tandem 1,4-Conjugate Addition/Cyclization of in Situ Generated Alkynyl o-Quinone Methides and Electron-Rich Phenols: Synthesis of Dioxabicyclo [3.3.1]nonane Skeletons. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 4371–4374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Assoah, B.; Veiros, L.F.; Candeias, N.R. Pinacol-Derived Chlorohydrosilane in Metal-Free Reductive Amination for the Preparation of Tertiary Alkylphenolmethyl Amines. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 1402–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Assoah, B.; Vale, J.R.; Kalenius, E.; Veiros, L.F.; Candeias, N.R. Lewis Base Catalyzed Intramolecular Reduction of Salicylaldehydes by Pinacol-Derived Chlorohydrosilane. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 2018, 2910–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ragot, J.P.; Prime, M.E.; Archibald, S.J.; Taylor, R.J.K. A Novel Route to Preussomerins via 2-Arylacetal Anions. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1613–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kulkarni, V.S.; Hosangadi, B.D. A Facile Synthesis of Anhydro-dimers of o-Hydroxybenzaldehydes. Synth. Commun. 1986, 16, 191–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, J.R.; Yang, D.Y. Design and synthesis of an o-hydroxyphenyl-containing spiropyran thermochromic colorant. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1769–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Husch, T.; Seebach, D.; Beck, A.K.; Reiher, M. Rigorous Conformational Analysis of Pyrrolidine Enamines with Relevance to Organocatalysis. Helv. Chim. Acta 2017, 100, e1700182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kempf, B.; Hampel, N.; Ofial, A.R.; Mayr, H. Structure-nucleophilicity relationships for enamines. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 2209–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Deb, M.L.; Dey, S.S.; Bento, I.; Barros, M.T.; Maycock, C.D. Copper-catalyzed regioselective intramolecular oxidative alpha-functionalization of tertiary amines: An efficient synthesis of dihydro-1,3-oxazines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2013, 52, 9791–9795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kabbe, H.-J.; Widdig, A. Synthesen und Umsetzungen von 4-Chromanonen. Angew. Chem. 1982, 94, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. CrysAlisPro, version 1.171.38.43; Rigaku Oxford Diffraction: Yarnton, UK, 2015.
  51. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT—Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. A Found. Adv. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. C Struct. Chem. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 1–7 are available from the authors.
Molecules 24 02405 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Selected reported biologically relevant methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocins.
Scheme 1. Selected reported biologically relevant methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocins.
Molecules 24 02405 sch001
Molecules 24 02405 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Previously reported catalytic methods for the synthesis of methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocins (a) and our enamine catalyzed approach (b).
Scheme 2. Previously reported catalytic methods for the synthesis of methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocins (a) and our enamine catalyzed approach (b).
Molecules 24 02405 sch002
Molecules 24 02405 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Synthesis of substituted methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin derivatives.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of substituted methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin derivatives.
Molecules 24 02405 sch003
Table
Table 1. Initial optimization of reaction conditions.
Table 1. Initial optimization of reaction conditions.
Molecules 24 02405 i001
Entry bPyrrolidine (equiv.)SolventConditionsTime (h)Yield (%) c
11CH3CNReflux d1824
21CH3CNReflux d, no MS18n.d. e
3noneCH3CNReflux d18n.d. e
4noneCH3CNdry p-TSA (0.2 equiv) d48n.d. e
5-Pyrrolidine gReflux21n.d. e
60.3CH3CNReflux2442
70.3noneSealed tube 2441 (59) f
80.15noneSealed tube2429
90.15CH3CNSealed tube2436
100.05CH3CNSealed tube2425
a Thermal ellipsoid diagram of the molecular structure of 1-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-2-(12-methyl-6H,12H-6,12-methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocin-6-yl)ethan-1-one (1). b Unless otherwise noted, 2′-hydroxyacetophenone (6.22 mmol) in refluxing CH3CN (0.75 mL), 3 Å molecular sieve (MS, 362 mg) c Isolated yield. d 1 mL of solvent used. e not detected f after 72 h. g Pyrrolidine used as solvent (2 mL).
Table
Table 2. Solvent screening.
Table 2. Solvent screening.
Molecules 24 02405 i002
EntrySolventIsolated Yield (%)
Sealed TubeOpen Vessel
1CH3CN 2942
2EtOHn.d. a-
3DMSO28-
4MTBE3243
51,4-Dioxane-30
6DCEtrace15
7Hexane44 b (39) c53 (50) d
8Toluene31 e27
9Heptane-45
a not detected, 2 mL of EtOH used. b same yield obtained after 48 h. c Using 1.5 mL of hexane. d Using 5 mL of hexane and 48 h. e Powder 3 Å MS and 1.5 mL of toluene were used.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Assoah, B.; Riihonen, V.; Vale, J.R.; Valkonen, A.; Candeias, N.R. Synthesis of 6,12-Disubstituted Methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocins: Pyrrolidine Catalyzed Self-Condensation of 2′-Hydroxyacetophenones. Molecules 2019, 24, 2405. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24132405

AMA Style

Assoah B, Riihonen V, Vale JR, Valkonen A, Candeias NR. Synthesis of 6,12-Disubstituted Methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocins: Pyrrolidine Catalyzed Self-Condensation of 2′-Hydroxyacetophenones. Molecules. 2019; 24(13):2405. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24132405

Chicago/Turabian Style

Assoah, Benedicta, Vesa Riihonen, João R. Vale, Arto Valkonen, and Nuno R. Candeias. 2019. "Synthesis of 6,12-Disubstituted Methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocins: Pyrrolidine Catalyzed Self-Condensation of 2′-Hydroxyacetophenones" Molecules 24, no. 13: 2405. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24132405

APA Style

Assoah, B., Riihonen, V., Vale, J. R., Valkonen, A., & Candeias, N. R. (2019). Synthesis of 6,12-Disubstituted Methanodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocins: Pyrrolidine Catalyzed Self-Condensation of 2′-Hydroxyacetophenones. Molecules, 24(13), 2405. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24132405

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop