Next Article in Journal
Modelling of Mechanical Behavior of Biopolymer Alginate Aerogels Using the Bonded-Particle Model
Previous Article in Journal
Marine Organisms as Potential Sources of Bioactive Peptides that Inhibit the Activity of Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

NMR Based Metabolomics Comparison of Different Blood Sampling Techniques in Awake and Anesthetized Rats

1
College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
3
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
4
School of Human and Social Sciences, University of West London, Middlesex TW89GA, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Same contribution to the work.
Molecules 2019, 24(14), 2542; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24142542
Submission received: 14 June 2019 / Revised: 9 July 2019 / Accepted: 11 July 2019 / Published: 12 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Analytical Chemistry)

Abstract

:
The composition of body fluids has become one of the most commonly used methods for diagnosing various diseases or monitoring the drug responses, especially in serum/plasma. It is therefore vital for investigators to find an appropriate way to collect blood samples from laboratory animals. This study compared blood samples collected from different sites using the NMR based metabolomics approach. Blood samples were collected from the saphenous vein (awake state), tail vein (awake and anesthetized states after administration of sevoflurane or pentobarbital) and the inferior thoracic vena cava (ITVC, anesthetized state). These approaches from the saphenous and tail veins have the potential to enable the collection of multiple samples, and the approach from ITVC is the best method for the collection of blood for the terminate state. The compositions of small molecules in the serum were determined using the 1H-NMR method, and the data were analyzed with traditional correlation analysis, principle component analysis (PCA) and OPLS-DA methods. The results showed that acute anesthesia significantly influenced the composition of serum in a very short period, such as the significant increase in glucose, and decrease in lactate. This indicates that it is better to obtain blood samples under the awake state. From the perspective of animal welfare and multiple sampling, the current study shows that the saphenous vein and tail vein are the best locations to collect multiple blood samples for a reduced risk of injury in the awake state. Furthermore, it is also suitable for investigating pharmacokinetics and the effects of drug intervention on animals.

1. Introduction

For clinical applications, the composition of body fluids has become a commonly used standard for diagnosing various diseases or monitoring of drug responses. There are several kinds of body fluids, such as urine [1], blood plasma [2], serum [3], cerebrospinal fluid [4] etc. Among these samples, blood/serum measurements are the cornerstone of clinical testing; thus, numerous investigations into the analysis of blood serum composition exist.
Rodents are the most popular animal model for pre-clinical studies; hence, it is very important to get blood samples as few animals as possible, and to improve data evaluation. Currently, there are many common sites for blood collection in rodents, such as the tail vein (easy for catheterization), retro-orbital sinus, facial vein, saphenous vein, heart or the inferior thoracic vena cava (ITVC) [5,6]. For terminal stage studies, blood collection sites from the heart or ITVC are preferred, due to the good quality volume of blood from animals. For the collection of multiple blood samples over a short period of time, the approaches of retro-orbital sinus, tail vein, or saphenous vein are appropriate. For the approach of retro-orbital sinus, the operator should be well trained, and the animal needs to be anaesthetized, or else this simple operation could seriously hurt the animal, resulting in, for instance, blindness [7,8]. Furthermore, it should be noted that anesthetics could alter the biochemical and hematological composition [9]. For tail vein collection, the operator should also be well trained, since some researchers just cut off the tail [10,11], which could seriously injure the animal, and the blood might be obtained from both vein and artery. Among these methods, the blood collection approaches-lateral saphenous vein/tail vein catheterization are relatively quick ways of collecting blood from all strains of rodents. Furthermore, the animal does not need to be anesthetized, but just needs slight restraining by hand. Thus, it is proposed that this is the best way of collecting multiple blood samples.
The protein compositions in the blood serum hold a wealth of information about the health status of patients. Furthermore, there is an increasing tendency towards studying the composition of small molecules, such as metabolites, due to the fact that their levels can be significantly influenced by many diseases, the administration of drugs, or by toxins [12,13]. Thus, blood measurements of metabolites have a wide range of applications [14] using various technologies, such as proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-NMR) [15], mass spectroscopy (MS) [16] and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [17], etc. Among these methods, 1H-NMR is the most often utilized to provide chemical and structural information of biological molecules [18] in a sample without any damage. The 1H-NMR spectra of blood serum are dominated by broad resonances from proteins and lipoproteins decorated by sharper resonances from small molecules. Aside from lipids, the dominant small molecule in the 1H-NMR spectrum of serum/plasma is glucose [19]. Furthermore, a number of amino acids and some organic acids are routinely detected, such as alanine, glutamine, leucine and histidine, lactate, citrate and succinate, etc. Concentrations of these metabolites are influenced by the brain state of the animal and the approach used of blood collection from the animal.
Thus, metabolomics studies of different blood collection approaches were investigated in the current study, i.e., different bleeding sites: saphenous vein/tail vein/ITVC; different brain states: awake/anesthesia; and different anesthetics: sevoflurane/pentobarbital. The chemical compositions of the serum from these different kinds of approaches were compared. This study verified that acute anesthesia could have an effect on blood compositions and that the bleeding site is also an influencing factor, especially for ITVC. Furthermore, this study provided efficient and convenient approaches for collecting multiple blood samples in a short period of time from awake animals.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

The experimental protocols were approved by the animal care and use committee in Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, the Chinese Academy of Sciences. All male rats (n = 9; 8 weeks old) were ordered from VITAL RIVER (Beijing, China) and kept in SPF (Specific pathogen Free) animal residence (Wuhan, China). Rats were housed in plastic cages in a climate-controlled room with 12 h of light-dark illumination cycle at 25 ± 1 °C and relative 50 ± 10% humidity. During the experiment, all rats were allowed free access to laboratory standard food and water. To minimize stress on the day of the experiment, animals were weighed and handled daily for a week, including mildly touching the skin/hair, catching the animal, and holding the animals in the hand for about one minute. Operations of sample preparation can be found in the Supplementary Materials.

2.2. Blood Collection

In order to compare the efficiency of blood collection methods from different bleeding sites, the brain states, and the anesthetized states under different anesthetics, six groups of blood samples were collected from the same animal: two from the saphenous vein under awake state (BSV0: n = 9; BSV10: n = 8); three from the tail vein under awake (BTVA: n = 6) and different anesthesia states (BTVS: n = 9 and pentobarbital-sample BTVP: n = 7); and the last one from the inferior thoracic vena cava (ITVC) under anesthetized state (pentobarbital sodium, BITVC: n = 8). The whole experimental procedure and operation methods are illustrated in Figure 1. One animal died during the anesthesia procedure, and the blood collection operation was ceased after three attempts.
For saphenous vein (Blood samples: BSV0 and BSV10): The rat was first restrained by hand, and the hair on the tarsal joint was shaved. Then the hind limb was extended straight prior to blood collection, and the skin was smeared with Vaseline to avoid the blood spreading onto the skin and to facilitate the formation of blood clots. Using a fine 23 G needle, the first puncture was performed on the saphenous vein to collect the blood sample. Normally once is enough for bleeding, and the puncture times should not exceed three in one attempt, in line with animal care protocols. The bleeding was stopped by pressing a gauze or tissue on the puncture site. The animal was return to the home cage after the bleeding was totally stanched. The steps of blood collection are shown in Video 1 (Supplemental Materials).
For tail vein under awake state (Blood sample: BTVA): A plastic animal holder and a specially designed syringe were needed for this approach. The syringe (1 mL) was connected to a fine 23G needle through a short length (~20 cm) of PE50 (O.D. 0.97 × I.D. 0.58 mm/L1.0m). At first, the awake animal was restrained in the plastic animal holder. Then, the tail vein catheterization was completed in the lateral tail vein with the special syringe (requiring more practice to achieve skilled operation) and the sample (~200 µL) was collected by withdrawing the blood with the syringe. The steps of the blood collection are illustrated in Video 2 (Supplemental Materials).
For tail vein under anesthesia state (Blood samples: BTVS and BTVP): Two different anesthetics were utilized in the current study: A: Sevoflurane (3–4%); B: 1% Pentobarbital (0.7 mL/100 g). In this step, the rats did not need to be restrained by the animal holder, and the level of anesthesia was verified by the loss of righting reflex, such as lack of withdrawal response to a foot pinch. Blood samples were directly collected from the lateral tail vein. The detailed steps are demonstrated in Video 3 (Supplemental Materials).
For ITVC (Blood sample: BITVC): At this point, a terminal procedure yielding maximal blood volume was performed. After completing the blood collection from the lateral tail vein in the anesthetized rat with pentobarbital, the rat chest was immediately opened to collect blood from the ITVC. At the end, ~200 μL blood sample was collected for further analysis.
Detailed information about the materials, appliance, bleeding rates and blood volume for different bleeding sites and brain states are illustrated in Table 1.

2.3. Sample Preparation

The collected blood samples were immediately centrifuged at 6000× g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant serum withdrawn by pipette and temporally stored on ice. After all the samples had been collected, the ice-cold serum (50 μL) was transferred to a 5 mm NMR tube, and mixed with 50 μL D2O (contained 5 mM formate) and 400 μL phosphate buffer (0.2 M Na2HPO4/NaH2PO4, pH 7.2). The samples were uniformity mixed by vortex and kept at −20 °C for further NMR analysis.

2.4. H-NMR Detection

To detect the small molecular weight metabolites, 1H-NMR spectra of the serum samples were obtained with Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill (CPMG) pulse sequence in a Bruker AVANCE III 600 MHz CryoProbes NMR spectrometer (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany). The acquisition parameters were set as following: size of FID: 32 k; number of scans: 256; number of dummy scans: 4; spectral width: 20 ppm; 90° pulse length: 14.2 μs; spin-echo delay: 350 μs, number of loops: 80; and relaxation delay: 3.4 s.

2.5. NMR Spectra Processing

All NMR spectral data were analyzed with the commercial software Topspin 2.1 (Bruker Biospin, GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany) and a home-made software NMRSpec [20] in MATLAB (R2018b, Mathworks Inc. 2018,) (Freely available from the author upon request: [email protected]).
All the FID signals of 1H-NMR spectra were converted by adding the exponential window function with a width increasing factor of 1Hz before the Fourier transformation (Topspin). Then the phase and baseline correction were performed manually in Topspin, and the chemical signals were calibrated with the inner standard-formate signal.
Furthermore, the NMR spectra data were imported to NMRSpec for peak alignment and integration. Then, continuous even spectral bucketing (0.004 ppm) and the areas of the whole peaks [20] in all spectra were automatically integrated in NMRSpec, and all bucketed spectra data and the peak areas were normalized using the probabilistic quotient normalization (PQN) method which was implemented in MATLAB [21] before comparing the total concentration differences.
Due to the overlapped signals in the 1H-NMR spectra, the relative concentrations of these metabolites were calculated based on the following procedures: the average chemical related peak area in the NMR spectra of SSV0 samples was set as the reference ‘1’. The areas of the same peaks in all samples were normalized using this reference, and the relative chemical concentration was calculated by averaging the normalized peak areas in the same locations of the NMR spectra in the same group.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

In order to initially compare the differences of the metabolites in these different types of blood collection approaches, the correlation of the metabolites in the NMR spectra were analyzed using the PQN normalized areas of the peaks in the NMR spectra.
Then, the normalized data was imported into the SIMCA-p + software package (v11.0, Umetrics, Malmö, Sweden) for multivariate statistical analysis. With the adoption of UV standardization of pre-processing method, Principal component analysis (PCA) is mainly used for the observation of sample clustering of the whole situation and the existence of outliers.
Then, the difference between these three different kinds of serum samples were analyzed with the help of PLS-DA method (Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis). The PLS-DA method is a classification algorithm based on partial least squares algorithm. Its function is to use the mathematical model established by X to predict the classification of unknown samples in Y, at the same time maximizing the separation of the two groups, which is helpful to find out the metabolites that contribute to the classification. The significant varying metabolites were extracted from OPLS-DA correlation coefficient color coded loading plots.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Blood Collection Methods

Many blood collection methods have been reported [5,22]. As stated in the introduction, most of these methods have adverse effects such as tissue damage and contamination from the glands [8,23] in awake animals. In order to avoid these problems, the animal could be anesthetized, which could influence the metabolic components in the serum. Furthermore, most of these methods could not be utilized with multiple sample collections from the same animal under an awake state. The saphenous vein and tail vein blood collection methods have the minimum adverse effects on the animals; this approach could be selected as the best representative of peripheral blood samples for potential multiple samples collection in the same animal.
At first, three animals were appropriately anesthetized with sevoflurane during the second blood collection. The rats showed a reduction in heart rate and blood pressure following sevoflurane anesthesia. The blood vessels contracted and the rate of bleeding significantly decreased (almost no bleeding) after puncture. Thus, the blood samples from the saphenous vein were only collected under the awake state.
To demonstrate the effect of different brain states and body sites on the blood sampling procedure in rats (n = 9), various blood collection methods were implemented under different conditions in the current study, such as blood collections from different sites-saphenous vein/tail vein/ITVC, different brain states-awake/anesthesia, different anesthetics-sevoflurane/pentobarbital.

3.2. Variation of 1H-NMR Spectra of Blood under Different Blood Collection Methods

An example of 1H–NMR spectra of the serum is shown in Figure 2A and Figure 3-Blood. The peak assignments and chemical shifts of the signals in 1H-NMR are illustrated in Table 2. The nuclear magnetic signals of the metabolite were attributed to the laboratory data based on the two-dimensional spectrum COSY, TOCSY, JRES, HSQC and HMBC, as well as the related literature [12,13,15,18,24,25,26] and public databases (HMDB). These spectra mainly include the NMR signals of organic acid, amino fatty acid and creatinine as well as other metabolites such as choline metabolite ethanolamine purine and pyrimidine metabolites.
In order to evaluate the stability of these different blood collection methods, the average and the standard error of the mean (SEM) of the 1H-NMR spectrum in every group were calculated point by point after the spectral peak alignment was achieved (Figure 2B) [27]. The major metabolites in the blood sample are more stable with the blood collection methods in the awake animal from the saphenous vein (0 day-SSV0 or 10 days later-SSV10) or tail vein (STVs or STVA). The anesthesia could contribute to the variation of the components especially for pentobarbital (STVP). Furthermore, the bleeding site of ITVC could be used to obtain blood samples as often as necessary; however, the metabolic components are too varied, especially for glucose (SITVC).
To initially evaluate the differences of the serum samples under various blood collection methods, differences of the 1H-NMR spectra for blood samples under different conditions were calculated, and are illustrated (Figure 3A–F), such as blood collection sites, brain states and anesthetics. This figure shows the tendency of the small metabolites and lipids among different samples. The major metabolic components in the blood sample are almost the same as those in the same brain state and blood collection site in the close period (Figure 3A, 10 days’ difference, except for lactate and lipids), even for the different blood collection sites (Figure 3B). The anesthesia state could influence the compositions of the blood samples (Figure 3D,E), and different anesthetics have different effects (Figure 3(F)). The blood collection method from the ITVC had the most significant influence on the metabolites in the blood sample, especially for glucose (Figure 3C). Without the involvement of standard deviation, it was not possible to illustrate the statistical difference among the samples; thus, it was very important to do the statistical analysis in order to describe the difference and estimate the effect of anesthesia on the blood composition.

3.3. Correlations of 1H-NMR Spectra of Blood Samples from Different Blood Collection Methods

To further explore the effects of different brain states, anesthetics and blood collection sites, correlations of 1H-NMR spectra of different blood samples were compared. Here, the average PQN normalized peak areas in the same group were utilized for calculation.
The correlations of various blood samples were calculated and illustrated (Figure 4A–F), such as same site (different periods), different sites (Saphenous vein/tail vein in awake state or Tail vein/ITVC in pentobarbital induced anesthesia state), awake and anesthesia state (sevoflurane/pentobarbital) or different anesthetics (sevoflurane/pentobarbital).
Comparing the blood samples from the saphenous vein under awake state in different periods, the major metabolic components of the blood samples were almost similar, except for lipids, which is far from the central line (y = x, Figure 4A, r = 0.9884,). Furthermore, lipids are also the major different component in different blood collection sites (saphenous vein vs. tail vein, Figure 4B) under awake state, however, the other small metabolites were almost similar (R = 0.9555). It was more stable under the anesthesia state induced by pentobarbital (Tail vein vs. ITVC, Figure 3(C)), especially for lipids. Under different anesthetics, the major metabolic components were varied (Figure 3(D–F)), especially for pentobarbital (R: 0.9087 for pentobarbital vs. 0.9549 for sevoflurane). Pentobarbital is a liquid anesthetic; thus, it probably changes the components of the blood sample more significantly. In order to check the contribution of the metabolites to the discrimination, further statistical analyses were implemented in the next section.

3.4. Principle Component Analysis

To determine whether it was possible to distinguish the samples from different blood collection methods and screen the possible outliers, the unsupervised pattern recognition method PCA was performed on the PQN normalized NMR data. The normalized continuous even spectral bucketing data were utilized for analysis, and PCA was used to reduce the dimensions of the variables by dropping the unnecessary data. The principle components were calculated with the combination of the major variables.
For all the samples, the top three principle components were calculated, which made 43.7%, 19.5% and 8.7% contribution to the total component, respectively. These three principle components made up a total of 71.9% of the variance and may play major roles. The loading plot of the samples with these three major components is illustrated in Figure 5. It should be noted that there was a separation trend for some samples, such as BITVC v.s. BSV0 or BSV10 or BTVS, BTVA v.s. BTVP, etc. Some samples were difficult to distinguish, such as BSV0 v.s. BSV10 or BTVA. Most of the samples were overlapped in the 3D-space; thus, the PCA analysis for two difficult kinds of samples were implemented in the next step.
At the end, the first two components (PC1 and PC2) were calculated for six pairs of two different kinds of samples, which are shown in Figure 6. The total contributions of the first two components were higher than 50% of the variance of all variables and played major roles in the discrimination analysis. The loading plots of PCA results indicated that there were no outliers among the serum samples obtained from different approaches, as demonstrated by the clustering observed in the PCA results (Figure 6A–E). There was a separation tendency for group discrimination in every comparison. Thus, these preliminary results indicate that there could be some different metabolites in various blood samples, even from the same site on different days.

3.5. OPLS-DA Analysis

In order to specifically screen the different characteristics of serum collected using different methods, OPLS-DA models were constructed for further analysis. Parameters of R2X and Q2 are the main parameters for the model validation, R2X is used to explain the difference between the models, and Q2 reflects the ability of the prediction of the models. Results of R2X and Q2 for six different discriminate classification models are shown in Table 3, including the same bleeding site in different periods (SSV0 vs. SSV10), different bleeding sites under awake/anesthesia state (SSV10 vs. STVA and STVP vs. SITVC), different anesthesia states induced by sevoflurane/pentobarbital (SSV10 vs. STVS; SSV10 vs. STVP and STVS vs. STVP).
The results of these six different pattern recognition analyses are represented as score scatter plots (Figure 7A1–F1), which show the inherent clustering trends of the samples. The coefficient-coded loading plots established by MATLAB script were employed to identify the significant contributing metabolites among the serum samples from the saphenous vein and inferior thoracic vena cava (Figure 7A2–F2).
The loading plots indicate that there were significant differences for the metabolites in these six pairs of blood samples. For the awake state, the small molecules were almost similar from the same site in different periods or different sites in the same periods. However, the lipids and lactate were different in these two comparisons (Figure 7A2,B2). For the comparison of different bleeding sites under the anesthesia state, the lipids are more stable, but the glucose was increased (Figure 7C2). Anesthetics could change both small molecules and lipids (Figure 7D2,E2), such as increasing glucose, alanine, glycerol and arginine, and decreasing lactate, lipid and glutamine, especially pentobarbital (Figure 7E2). However, different anesthetics have different effects (Figure 7F2). Among these metabolites, it is noticeable that the metabolites of glucose, lipid and lactic acid were the most significant components. Thus, these metabolites were extracted for comparison in the next section.

3.6. Metabolites in Different Kinds of Blood Samples

According to the results of OPLS-DA, the most significant different metabolites were lipids, lactate and glucose. The relative concentrations of these metabolites were calculated (Figure 8).
Glucose was almost similar in the serum under awake condition from different sites or at close period (10 days’ difference). It was significantly increased under the anesthesia state [28], even for a very short period in the current study. Comparing both anesthetics, pentobarbital influenced glucose more significantly, especially for the ITVC group, which might be caused by a longer time under anesthesia. Former studies have shown that sevoflurane anesthesia could inhibit pancreatic β-cells secreting insulin, which may be caused by the continuous activation of adenosine triphosphate–sensitive potassium channels in β-cells [29]. Insulin can induce the synthesis of glucokinase and promote glycolysis in the liver. When the concentration of insulin decreases, the hepatic glucose homeostasis shifts from glycogenolysis/gluconeogenesis to glycogen synthesis via insulin signaling, which increases the concentration of glucose in blood [29]. In the meanwhile, there is an extensive inhibition of substrate oxidation in muscle mitochondria, which reduces glucose uptake. In fat tissue, a main effect of insulin is the suppression of lipolysis and the reduced release of non-esterified fatty acids. In addition, lipolysis and the concentration of fatty acid increase with the inhibition of insulin secretion.
Lipids and lactate were varied among different samples, even from the same site under different periods or different sites on the same day. Thus, the influential factors could be very complicated for these components, and it could be very difficult to verify the influence of a single factor in other studies.
The purpose of this study was to identify whether there was any difference in the samples obtained using different sampling ways, such as the same bleeding site in different periods, different bleeding site under awake/anesthesia state, or different anesthesia state induced by sevoflurane/pentobarbital. Among these various samples, the ITVC group showed the most changes in metabolites, and probably should not be used for the metabolic analysis in animal studies. Furthermore, Bernardi et al. also found that the total leucocytes, absolute neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were significantly higher in the samples collected from the peripheral sites than those samples collected from ITVC [30].

3.7. Characteristics of Blood Collection Methods

Comparing these six different kinds of serum samples, the metabolites were varied, even from the same method under different periods. Thus, we suggest that blood samples should be obtained on the same day using the appropriate blood collection method.
Among various blood collection methods, the bleeding site from the saphenous vein is the most convenient choice, even without any training. In the current study, there was no failed experiment; however, the total blood volumes were varied at different times. For the tail vein, the operator should be well trained, especially for awake animals. There was one failure in the anesthesia state (17 times in total) and two in the awake state (8 times in total). However, more blood samples could be obtained employing this method, even more than 0.5 mL per time, and the bleeding rate is much faster than with the saphenous vein method. Both methods could be used for multiple blood collection. For the method of ITVC, the terminal procedure yielded maximal blood volume; however, it was used only once. Furthermore, the changes of the metabolites using this method should be considered, as the blood components were different from the other site when the animal was under the same anesthesia condition (BTVP vs. BITVC).

4. Conclusions

The current study compared the metabolites in blood samples using various blood collection methods, including different bleeding sites, i.e., saphenous vein/tail vein/ITVC, awake/anesthetized rats, and sevoflurane/pentobarbital induced anesthesia. The metabolic components in the blood were influenced by the brain state of the animal, and anesthesia could significant increase the glucose concentration and decrease the lactate concentrations, especially from ITVC. Therefore, the choice of the most suitable sampling site should be selected according to the experimental requirements. From the perspective of animal welfare and multiple sampling, saphenous vein blood collection is a simpler, more convenient and appropriate method. Furthermore, the tail vein blood collection method is another suitable method for sufficient volume blood collection, but the operator needs to be skilled. Both of these two methods are suitable for multiple blood collections, pharmacokinetics and for studying the effects of drug interventions on animals.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Video 1: Operations of blood collection from saphenous vein; Video 2: Operations from tail vein under awake state; Video 3: Operations from tail vein under anesthesia state.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.D., F.X. and J.W.; methodology, H.D., S.L, F.X. and J.W.; validation, S.L., H.L., and J.W.; formal analysis, H.L., S.L. and J.W.; investigation, S.L., Y.Z., H.G., and L.W.; data curation, S.L., H.G., and L.W.; writing—original draft preparation, S.L. and J.W.; writing—review and editing, H.D., S.L., A.M. and J.W; supervision, F.X. and J.W.; project administration, S.L., H.G. and L.W.; funding acquisition, H.D. and J.W.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 31772047 and 31771193 and Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences, grant number: Y6Y0021004.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Pingping An for her help in housing the animals.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fan, Y.F.; Liu, S.F.; Chen, X.D.; Feng, M.R.; Song, F.Y.; Gao, X.X. Toxicological effects of Nux Vomica in rats urine and serum by means of clinical chemistry, histopathology and H-1 NMR-based metabonomics approach. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 210, 242–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Vion-Dury, J.; Favre, R.; Sciaky, M.; Kriat, M.; Confort-Gouny, S.; Harlé, J.R.; Grazziani, N.; Viout, P.; Grisoli, F.; Cozzone, P.J. Graphic-aided study of metabolic modifications of plasma in cancer using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. NMR Biomed. 2010, 6, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tiziani, S.; Emwas, A.H.; Lodi, A.; Ludwig, C.; Bunce, C.M.; Viant, M.R.; Gunther, U.L. Optimized metabolite extraction from blood serum for 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Anal. Biochem. 2008, 377, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Govindaraju, V.; Young, K.; Maudsley, A.A. Proton NMR chemical shifts and coupling constants for brain metabolites. NMR Biomed. 2015, 28, 923–924. [Google Scholar]
  5. Donovan, J.; Brown, P. Blood Collection. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 1995, 15, 1.7.1–1.7.8. [Google Scholar]
  6. Harikrishnan, V.S.; Hansen, A.K.; Abelson, K.S.P.; Sorensen, D.B. A comparison of various methods of blood sampling in mice and rats: Effects on animal welfare. Lab. Anim.-Uk 2018, 52, 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yang, J.; Zhao, D.; Ning, L.; Wu, C.; Ning, Z.; Hao, Y.; Han, C. Influence of recombinant bovine PrP~c protein on hamster mRNA expression by injection in brain. J. China Agric. Univ. 2005, 6, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  8. Van Herck, H.; Baumans, V.; Van der Craats, N.R.; Hesp, A.P.; Meijer, G.W.; Van Tintelen, G.; Walvoort, H.C.; Beynen, A.C. Histological changes in the orbital region of rats after orbital puncture. Lab. Anim. 1992, 26, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Boretius, S.; Tammer, R.; Michaelis, T.; Brockmöller, J.; Frahm, J. Halogenated volatile anesthetics alter brain metabolism as revealed by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of mice in vivo. NeuroImage 2013, 69, 244–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Van Ryn, J.; Schurer, J.; Kink-Eiband, M.; Clemens, A. Reversal of Dabigatran-induced Bleeding by Coagulation Factor Concentrates in a Rat-tail Bleeding Model and Lack of Effect on Assays of Coagulation. Anesthesiol. J. Am. Soc. Anesthesiol. 2014, 120, 1429–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ayala, J.E.; Samuel, V.T.; Morton, G.J.; Obici, S.; Croniger, C.M.; Shulman, G.I.; Wasserman, D.H.; McGuinness, O.P.; Co, N.M.M.P.C. Standard operating procedures for describing and performing metabolic tests of glucose homeostasis in mice. Dis. Model. Mech. 2010, 3, 525–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Feng, J.H.; Li, X.J.; Pei, F.K.; Chen, X.; Li, S.L.; Nie, Y.X. H-1 NMR analysis for metabolites in serum and urine from rats administrated chronically with La(NO3)3. Anal. Biochem. 2002, 301, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Musharraf, S.G.; Siddiqui, A.J.; Shamsi, T.; Choudhary, M.I.; Rahman, A.U. Serum metabonomics of acute leukemia using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Sci. Rep-Uk 2016, 6, 30693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Reo, N.V. NMR-based metabolomics. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 25, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mika, A.K. Critical evaluation of 1H NMR metabonomics of serum as a methodology for disease risk assessment and diagnostics. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2008, 46, 27–42. [Google Scholar]
  16. Nagana Gowda, G.A.; Djukovic, D.; Bettcher, L.F.; Gu, H.; Raftery, D. NMR-Guided Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Quantitation of Human Blood Metabolites. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 2001–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Doležal, R.; Karásková, N.; Musil, K.; Novák, M.; Maltsevskaya, N.V.; Maliňák, D.; Kolář, K.; Soukup, O.; Kuča, K.; Žďárová Karasová, J. Characterization of the Penetration of the Blood–Brain Barrier by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Using a Stationary Phase with an Immobilized Artificial Membrane. Anal. Lett. 2018, 51, 2401–2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sheedy, J.R. Metabolite analysis of biological fluids and tissues by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013, 1055, 81–97. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Keun, H.C.; Athersuch, T.J. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)-Based Metabolomics. In Metabolic Profiling; Humana Press: Passaic County, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 321–334. [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu, Y.; Cheng, J.; Liu, H.; Deng, Y.; Wang, J.; Xu, F. NMRSpec: An integrated software package for processing and analyzing one dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectra. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2017, 162, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dieterle, F.; Ross, A.; Schlotterbeck, G.; Senn, H. Probabilistic Quotient Normalization as Robust Method to Account for Dilution of Complex Biological Mixtures. Application in 1H NMR Metabonomics. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 4281–4290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mahl, A.; Heining, P.; Ulrich, P.; Jakubowski, J.; Bobadilla, M.; Zeller, W.; Bergmann, R.; Singer, T.; Meister, L. Comparison of clinical pathology parameters with two different blood sampling techniques in rats: Retrobulbar plexus versus sublingual vein. Lab. Anim.-Uk 2000, 34, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Herck, H.V.; Baumans, V.; Brandt, C.J.W.M.; Boere, H.A.G.; Hesp, A.P.M.; Lith, H.A.V.; Schurink, M.; Beynen, A.C. Blood sampling from the retro-orbital plexus, the saphenous vein and the tail vein in rats: Comparative effects on selected behavioural and blood variables. Lab. Anim.-Uk 2001, 35, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nicholson, J.K.; Foxall, P.J.; Spraul, M.; Farrant, R.D.; Lindon, J.C. 750 MHz 1H and 1H-13C NMR spectroscopy of human blood plasma. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 793–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. An, Y.; Xu, W.; Li, H.; Lei, H.; Zhang, L.; Hao, F.; Duan, Y.; Yan, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, J.; et al. High-fat diet induces dynamic metabolic alterations in multiple biological matrices of rats. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 3755–3768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Deja, S.; Porebska, I.; Kowal, A.; Zabek, A.; Barg, W.; Pawelczyk, K.; Stanimirova, I.; Daszykowski, M.; Korzeniewska, A.; Jankowska, R.; et al. Metabolomics provide new insights on lung cancer staging and discrimination from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2014, 100, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, T.; He, Z.; Tian, X.; Kamal, G.M.; Li, Z.; Liu, Z.; Liu, H.; Xu, F.; Wang, J.; Xiang, H. Specific patterns of spinal metabolites underlying α-Me-5-HT-evoked pruritus compared with histamine and capsaicin assessed by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (Bba)-Mol. Basis Dis. 2017, 1863, 1222–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brown, E.T.; Umino, Y.; Loi, T.; Solessio, E.; Barlow, R. Anesthesia can cause sustained hyperglycemia in C57/BL6J mice. Vis. Neurosci 2005, 22, 615–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hoyer, K.F.; Nielsen, T.S.; Risis, S.; Treebak, J.T.; Jessen, N. Sevoflurane Impairs Insulin Secretion and Tissue-Specific Glucose Uptake In Vivo. Basic Clin. Pharm. 2018, 123, 732–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bernardi, C.; Monetal, D.; Brughera, M.; Salvo, M.D.; Lamparelli, D.; Mazué, G.; Iatropoulos, M.J. Haematology and clinical chemistry in rats: Comparison of different blood collection sites. Comp. Haematol. Int. 1996, 6, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Figure 1. Flow chart of the whole experimental procedure (A) and demonstrations of the blood collection from the saphenous vein and the tail vein under awake/anesthesia states (B). Note: B: blood; SV0 or SV10: Blood collection from the saphenous vein after 0th or 10th day. TVA, TVS or TVP: Blood collection from the tail vein under awake or anesthesia state induced by sevoflurane or pentobarbital; ITVC: Blood collection from the inferior thoracic vena cava.
Figure 1. Flow chart of the whole experimental procedure (A) and demonstrations of the blood collection from the saphenous vein and the tail vein under awake/anesthesia states (B). Note: B: blood; SV0 or SV10: Blood collection from the saphenous vein after 0th or 10th day. TVA, TVS or TVP: Blood collection from the tail vein under awake or anesthesia state induced by sevoflurane or pentobarbital; ITVC: Blood collection from the inferior thoracic vena cava.
Molecules 24 02542 g001
Figure 2. 1H-NMR Spectra of blood samples. (A) Peak assignments of 1H-NMR spectroscopy of one random blood sample; (B) Averaged 1H-NMR spectra plus its’ SEM values point by point for various blood samples from different collection methods. Note: S: 1H-NMR signals of various blood samples; Subscript: Please see Figure 1; Labels in Figure 2A are demonstrated in Table 2.
Figure 2. 1H-NMR Spectra of blood samples. (A) Peak assignments of 1H-NMR spectroscopy of one random blood sample; (B) Averaged 1H-NMR spectra plus its’ SEM values point by point for various blood samples from different collection methods. Note: S: 1H-NMR signals of various blood samples; Subscript: Please see Figure 1; Labels in Figure 2A are demonstrated in Table 2.
Molecules 24 02542 g002
Figure 3. Differences of the average 1H–NMR spectra of blood samples from different approaches. A) Difference in blood samples from the same blood collection site (saphenous vein) under awake state in different periods (SSV0-SSV10); B): Effect of different blood collection sites under awake state (SSV10-STVA); C): Effect of different blood collection sites in anesthesia state (STVP-SITVC); D): Effect of sevoflurane on blood composition (SSV0-STVS); E): Effect of pentobarbital on blood composition (SSV10-STVP); F): Effect of different anesthetics on blood compositions (STVS-STVP). Note: CS: chemical shift.
Figure 3. Differences of the average 1H–NMR spectra of blood samples from different approaches. A) Difference in blood samples from the same blood collection site (saphenous vein) under awake state in different periods (SSV0-SSV10); B): Effect of different blood collection sites under awake state (SSV10-STVA); C): Effect of different blood collection sites in anesthesia state (STVP-SITVC); D): Effect of sevoflurane on blood composition (SSV0-STVS); E): Effect of pentobarbital on blood composition (SSV10-STVP); F): Effect of different anesthetics on blood compositions (STVS-STVP). Note: CS: chemical shift.
Molecules 24 02542 g003
Figure 4. Correlations of different kinds of blood samples, including same site under different periods (A), different sites under various brain states (B,C), and different kinds of anesthetized states (DF).
Figure 4. Correlations of different kinds of blood samples, including same site under different periods (A), different sites under various brain states (B,C), and different kinds of anesthetized states (DF).
Molecules 24 02542 g004
Figure 5. Loading plots of principal component analysis (PCA) of the NMR spectral data for all serum samples. Note: Every sample is represented by a unique pattern.
Figure 5. Loading plots of principal component analysis (PCA) of the NMR spectral data for all serum samples. Note: Every sample is represented by a unique pattern.
Molecules 24 02542 g005
Figure 6. Loading plots of principal component analysis (PCA) of the NMR spectral data from various blood samples. Note: Every sample is represented by a unique pattern. Note: (A): BSV0 vs. BSV10; (B): BSV10 vs. BTVA; (C): BIVP vs. BITVC; (D): BSV0 vs. BTVS; (E): BTVP vs. BSV10; (F): BTVS vs. BTVP.
Figure 6. Loading plots of principal component analysis (PCA) of the NMR spectral data from various blood samples. Note: Every sample is represented by a unique pattern. Note: (A): BSV0 vs. BSV10; (B): BSV10 vs. BTVA; (C): BIVP vs. BITVC; (D): BSV0 vs. BTVS; (E): BTVP vs. BSV10; (F): BTVS vs. BTVP.
Molecules 24 02542 g006
Figure 7. Score plots (A1F1) and coefficient-coded loadings plots (A2F2) from the results of OPLS-DA derived from 1H-NMR spectra of the serum samples from six different comparisons A: SSV0 vs. SSV10; B: SSV10 vs. STVA; C: STVP vs. SITVC; D: SSV10 vs. STVS; E: SSV10 vs. STVP; F: STVS vs. STVP. Note: The serial number of the metabolite signal is shown in Table 1.
Figure 7. Score plots (A1F1) and coefficient-coded loadings plots (A2F2) from the results of OPLS-DA derived from 1H-NMR spectra of the serum samples from six different comparisons A: SSV0 vs. SSV10; B: SSV10 vs. STVA; C: STVP vs. SITVC; D: SSV10 vs. STVS; E: SSV10 vs. STVP; F: STVS vs. STVP. Note: The serial number of the metabolite signal is shown in Table 1.
Molecules 24 02542 g007
Figure 8. Relative concentrations of the lipids, lactate and glucose in six different serum samples. Note: Different letters represent significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 8. Relative concentrations of the lipids, lactate and glucose in six different serum samples. Note: Different letters represent significant differences at p < 0.05.
Molecules 24 02542 g008
Table 1. The surgical materials for different kinds of blood sample collection approaches.
Table 1. The surgical materials for different kinds of blood sample collection approaches.
Bleeding SiteMaterialsApplianceAnimal StateBleeding RateBlood Volume
Saphenous veinNeedles (23G), VaselineElectric shaverAwake3.66 ± 0.72 μL/s~400 μL
Tail veinNeedles (23G), Syringe
(1 mL), PE50 tubing
Rat holder,
Tweezer
Awake8.50 ± 1.70 μL/s~400 μL
Tail veinNeedles (23G), Syringe
(1 mL), PE50 tubing
(0.058 cm × 0.097 cm)
TweezerAnesthetic (sevoflurane/pentobarbital sodium)8.50 ± 1.70 μL/s~500 μL
Inferior thoracic vena cavaSyringe (2 mL)ScissorAnesthetic (pentobarbital sodium) ~2 mL, even more
Table 2. The NMR related information of the related proton signals in the small molecules in the serum samples.
Table 2. The NMR related information of the related proton signals in the small molecules in the serum samples.
MetabolitesMoieties1H Shift(δ)Peak NumStructure
LipidCH30.891(t)1
CH3CH2CH21.210(m)
(CH2)n1.221(m)
CH3CH2(CH2)n1.232(m)
CH2 CH2CO1.590(m)
CH2C=C2.018(m)
CH2COO2.238(m)
C=CCH2C=C2.742(m)
C=CCH2C=C2.749(m)
C=CCH2C=C2.761(m)
IsoleucineδCH30.943(t)2 Molecules 24 02542 i001
βCH31.000(d)
Γ′CH31.008(d)
γCH21.284(m)
γCH21.459(m)
βCH1.961(m)
LeucineδCH30.955(d)3 Molecules 24 02542 i002
δ′CH30.965(d)
δCH30.975(d)
γCH1.691(m)
βCH21.707(m)
αCH3.685(dd)
αCH3.753(d)
Valineγ′CH30.988(d)4 Molecules 24 02542 i003
CH31.020(d)
CH31.040(d)
γCH31.052(d)
βCH2.285(m)
αCH3.570(d)
αCH3.617(d)
IsobutyrateCH31.361(d)5
3-hydroxybutyrateγCH31.200(d)6 Molecules 24 02542 i004
αCH22.293(m)
αCH22.380(m)
βCH4.131(m)
LactateβCH31.341(d)7 Molecules 24 02542 i005
αCH4.108(q)
Lysinehalf δCH21.434(m)8 Molecules 24 02542 i006
half δCH21.689(m)
γCH21.719(m)
half βCH21.886(m)
half βCH21.897(m)
εCH23.031(t)
αCH3.767(t)
AlanineβCH31.480(d)9 Molecules 24 02542 i007
γCH21.492(m)
αCH3.783(q)
NAGCH32.041(s)10
ArginineγCH21.681(m)11 Molecules 24 02542 i008
γCH21.730(m)
βCH21.926(m)
δCH23.257(t)
αCH3.774(m)
AcetateCH31.914(s)12 Molecules 24 02542 i009
AcetoacetateCH32.273(s)13 Molecules 24 02542 i010
CH23.441(s)
OAGCH32.140(s)14
GlutamineγCH22.411(m)15 Molecules 24 02542 i011
γCH22.465(m)
αCH23.677(t)
ThreonineγCH31.329(d)16 Molecules 24 02542 i012
αCH3.487(d)
αCH3.593(d)
PyruvateCH22.318(s)17 Molecules 24 02542 i013
CH32.372(s)
GlutamateβCH22.077(m)18 Molecules 24 02542 i014
γCH22.351(m)
αCH3.786(t)
SuccinateCH22.395(s)19 Molecules 24 02542 i015
2-ketoglutarateαCH22.437(t)20 Molecules 24 02542 i016
MethionineαCH23.858(m)21
βCH22.166(t)
γCH22.657(t)
δCH22.142(s)
Citratehalf CH22.523(d)22 Molecules 24 02542 i017
half CH22.657(d)
Tyrosinehalf βCH23.058(dd)23 Molecules 24 02542 i018
half βCH23.158(dd)
β′CH23.199(dd)
αCH3.951(dd)
Asparaginehalf βCH22.836(dd)25 Molecules 24 02542 i019
half βCH22.941(dd)
βCH22.948(dd)
αCH3.997(dd)
DimethylglycineN-CH32.930(s)26 Molecules 24 02542 i020
CH23.723(s)
2-ketoisovalerateγCH31.111(d)27 Molecules 24 02542 i021
βCH3.020(m)
CreatineCH33.040(s)28 Molecules 24 02542 i022
CH23.938(s)
CreatinineCH33.051(s)29 Molecules 24 02542 i023
CH24.066(s0
PhenylalanineβCH23.119(dd)30 Molecules 24 02542 i024
B′CH23.260(dd)
αCH3.962(dd)
αCH3.991(dd)
CholineN(CH3)33.208(s)31 Molecules 24 02542 i025
NCH23.657(m)
OCH4.072(m)
PhosphocholineN(CH3)33.218(s)32 Molecules 24 02542 i026
N CH23.585(m)
OCH24.142(m)
GlycerophosphochlineN(CH3)33.233(s)33
α-glucoseH43.429(t)35 Molecules 24 02542 i027
H23.542(dd)
H33.708(t)
half CH2-C63.732(dd)
H53.822(dd)
H63.840(dd)
β-glucoseH23.242(dd)35
H43.398(t)
H53.468(dd) Molecules 24 02542 i028
H33.503(t)
H63.743(dd)
H63.898(dd)
BetaineN(CH3)33.271(s)36
OCH23.915(s)
TaurineCH2SO33.271(t)37 Molecules 24 02542 i029
CH2SO33.414(t)
Scyllo-inositolCHOH3.355(s)38 Molecules 24 02542 i030
GlycineCH23.558(s)39 Molecules 24 02542 i031
Glycerolhalf CH23.552(dd)40 Molecules 24 02542 i032
half CH23.649(dd)
CH3.795(m)
TriglyceridesCH2O4.072(m)41 Molecules 24 02542 i033
Note: The peak assignments were identified based on former publications [12,13,15,18,24,25,26].
Table 3. Statistical parameters of OPLS-DA analysis for different samples.
Table 3. Statistical parameters of OPLS-DA analysis for different samples.
Statistical ParameterSSV0 vs. SSV10SSV10 vs. STVASTVP vs. SITVCSSV0 vs. STVSSSV10 vs. STVPSTVS vs. STVP
R2X0.6010.6130.6450.4590.4080.589
Q20.6250.5220.6720.6720.7590.418

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Du, H.; Li, S.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, H.; Wu, L.; Liu, H.; Manyande, A.; Xu, F.; Wang, J. NMR Based Metabolomics Comparison of Different Blood Sampling Techniques in Awake and Anesthetized Rats. Molecules 2019, 24, 2542. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24142542

AMA Style

Du H, Li S, Zhang Y, Guo H, Wu L, Liu H, Manyande A, Xu F, Wang J. NMR Based Metabolomics Comparison of Different Blood Sampling Techniques in Awake and Anesthetized Rats. Molecules. 2019; 24(14):2542. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24142542

Chicago/Turabian Style

Du, Hongying, Shuang Li, Yingfeng Zhang, Huiling Guo, Liang Wu, Huili Liu, Anne Manyande, Fuqiang Xu, and Jie Wang. 2019. "NMR Based Metabolomics Comparison of Different Blood Sampling Techniques in Awake and Anesthetized Rats" Molecules 24, no. 14: 2542. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24142542

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop