Next Article in Journal
Osteopathic Manipulation Treatment Improves Cerebro–splanchnic Oximetry in Late Preterm Infants
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Passion Fruit Oil Adulteration by Chemometric Analysis of FTIR Spectra
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cross-Coupling Reaction of Allylic Ethers with Aryl Grignard Reagents Catalyzed by a Nickel Pincer Complex
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 24
Issue 18
10.3390/molecules24183222
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Fluorine-Substituted Arylphosphine for an NHC-Ni(I) System, Air-Stable in a Solid State but Catalytically Active in Solution

by
Kouki Matsubara
*,
Takahiro Fujii
,
Rion Hosokawa
,
Takahiro Inatomi
,
Yuji Yamada
and
Yuji Koga
Department of Chemistry, Fukuoka University, 8-19-1 Nanakuma, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(18), 3222; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24183222
Submission received: 22 August 2019 / Revised: 2 September 2019 / Accepted: 3 September 2019 / Published: 4 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nickel Complexes for Catalysis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Monovalent NHC-nickel complexes bearing triarylphosphine, in which fluorine is incorporated onto the aryl groups, have been synthesized. Tris(3,5-di(trifluoromethyl)-phenyl)phosphine efficiently gave a monovalent nickel bromide complex, whose structure was determined by X-ray diffraction analysis for the first time. In the solid state, the Ni(I) complex was less susceptible to oxidation in air than the triphenylphosphine complex, indicating greatly improved solid-state stability. In contrast, the Ni(I) complex in solution can easily liberate the phosphine, high catalytic activity toward the Kumada–Tamao–Corriu coupling of aryl bromides.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Recent developments in the field of nickel catalysis have opened up possibilities of new catalytic processes directly involving monovalent nickel complexes in organometallic chemistry [1,2,3,4,5,6] along with those involving conventional zerovalent nickel catalysts. Although limited to the structures of specific ligands and complexes, monovalent nickel complexes are thermally stable and isolable [7]. Several studies have used well-defined nickel(I) complexes as catalyst precursors [8,9,10,11,12,13,14], and reactions where nickel(I) complexes are the key intermediates have been proposed based on theoretical calculations [15,16,17,18,19,20]. Recently, experimental results have also supported the catalyst chemistry of nickel(I) [21,22,23]. One of the current bottlenecks in nickel(I) catalysis research is developing catalytically active, air-stable nickel(I) catalyst precursors. It is safe to say that a breakthrough here would go a long way in furthering our knowledge about nickel catalyst chemistry.
To date, phosphines with fluorine-substituted aryl groups have been frequently used due to their attractive features in many catalytic reactions [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. The induced electron-withdrawing property of fluorine increases the π-acceptor nature of the phosphorus ligand, and it is expected that the back-donation from the metal stabilizes the electron-rich, low-valent metal center. Cone-angles relatively larger than those of phosphite ligands also provide kinetic stabilization. It may be noted that tris(3,5-di(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)phosphine (P(Arm-CF3)3) has additional unique properties in metal complexes [24,25,26,27,28]. In this case, fluorine atoms can induce unique CF···π interactions between CF3 groups and aromatic rings of ligand molecules to form solid ligand structures that stabilize unsaturated metal complexes such as the “superstable” Pd(0) catalyst, [Pd(P(Arm-CF3)3)3] [29].
Recently we have synthesized three-coordinated mononuclear nickel(I) complexes [Ni(IPr)Cl(L)] (IPr = 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene) by adding various monodentate or bidentate ligands L to the dinuclear nickel(I) complex, [Ni(IPr)Cl]2 [32,33,34]. The series of complexes shown in Scheme 1 works efficiently under mild conditions in cross-coupling reactions, such as Buchwald–Hartwig amination, Kumada–Tamao–Corriu coupling, and Suzuki–Miyaura coupling [33,34]. These mononuclear complexes can regenerate the dinickel(I) halide complex in solution, which can generate coordinatively unsaturated active intermediate, mononuclear Ni(I) NHC complex, [Ni(NHC)X] [21]. When using weakly coordinating pyridine as the stabilizing ligand, the stability of Ni(I) proved to be insufficient, whereas strongly withdrawing phosphite, P(OPh)3, lowered its catalytic performance [34]. The complexes containing usual phosphines like PPh3 were also smoothly oxidized even in the solid state. Therefore, to construct more stable and active nickel(I) complexes, investigation of alternative ligands, such as the m-CF3-substituted arylphosphine (P(Arm-CF3)3), is necessary. However, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no report on well-defined nickel complexes bearing this phosphine ligand.
In the course of our research, we have found a desirable ligand (fluorine-substituted monodentate phosphine) to stabilize three-coordinated nickel(I) complex. Intriguingly, when using P(Arm-CF3)3, the obtained monovalent nickel complex in the crystalline state did not suffer air oxidation for some minutes, while simultaneously maintaining the catalytic activity in the Kumada–Tamao–Corriu cross-coupling reaction in solution under an inert-gas atmosphere. Here, we have reported the synthetic procedure, structures, and properties of the nickel(I) complexes and results in a Kumada–Tamao–Corriu cross-coupling reaction. This is the first example of a well-defined nickel complex bearing the m-CF3-substituted triarylphosphine.

2. Results

2.1. Preparation and Characterization of Ni(I) Complexes

The bromide analogue of [Ni(IPr)Cl]2 reported in the literature [35] is expected to be more stable than its chloride analogue and can be transformed into mononuclear nickel(I)-IPr complex in conjunction with the phosphorus ligand. The reactions of [Ni(IPr)Br]2 (1) with triarylphosphines, triphenylphosphine (PPh3), tris(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)phosphine (P(Arp-CF3)3), tris(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)phosphine (P(Arm-CF3)3), and tris(pentafluorophenyl)phosphine (P(C6F5)3) were conducted in a tetrahydrofuran (THF) solution at room temperature. As expected, the corresponding mononuclear nickel(I) complexes, [NiBr(IPr)(PAr3)] (PAr3 = PPh3 (2a), P(Arp-CF3)3 (2b), and P(Arm-CF3)3 (2c)), were successfully obtained in 42, 46, and 57% yields (Scheme 2), respectively, after recrystallization. However, P(C6F5)3 did not coordinate to nickel, resulting in the complete recovery of the starting materials under the reaction conditions. This may be attributed to steric repulsion between a pair of diisopropylphenyl groups of the IPr ligand and pentafluorophenyl groups of P(C6F5)3, where the cone angle (184°) is greater than that of P(Arm-CF3)3 (160°).
The obtained Ni(I) complexes were paramagnetic and the EPR resonances were observed even at room temperature (see Supporting Information), similar to the previous chloride analogue, [NiCl(IPr)(PPh3)] [33]. Moreover, a SQUID (superconducting quantum interference device) measurement of 2c showed a favorable value of χMT = 0.47 cm3·K·mol−1 at 50 K, assigned as S = 1/2. The value did not change over the temperature range until 300 K, according to Curie′s rule. The previous study also showed similar values (χMT = 0.35–0.52 cm3·K·mol−1), which are somewhat higher than the theoretical value of 0.375 cm3·K·mol−1 when S = 1/2, attributed to spin-orbital angular momentum.
The 1H-NMR spectral measurement for the crystals of 2a–2c dissolved in C6D6 revealed a partial regeneration of the starting complex 1 accompanied by free triarylphosphine from these products. A similar phenomenon is observed in a solution of the previous Ni(I) chloride analogues, suggesting the existence of coordination-elimination equilibrium of weakly coordinating triarylphosphine in solution [34]. It is notable that the ratio of the regenerated complex 1 from the mononuclear complex 2c was only slightly smaller than the ratio from 2a.

2.2. X-ray Crystallography and Theoretical Studies

The structures of complexes 2a, 2b, and 2c were confirmed by X-ray crystallography by using single crystals after recrystallization. Figure 1 shows representative examples of the structures of 2a and 2c. The result from the crystal of 2b was insufficient to discuss the detailed structure, unfortunately. There were no significant differences between the 2a and 2c structures, as far as the bond lengths and angles of nickel–bromine bonds are concerned. (Table 1). On the other hand, some differences were observed in the bond lengths between the nickel–phosphorus and the nickel–carbene carbon atoms: Ni(1)–P(1), 2.201(1) (2a) and 2.182(1) (2c); Ni(1)–C(1), 1.918(5) (2a), and 1.936(3) Å (2c). Similar differences between the metal–phosphorus atom in platinum(II) complexes bearing PPh3 and P(Arm-CF3)3 were reported as ca. 0.02 Å [36]. The extension of the nickel–carbon bond in 2c appears to be in balance with the strength of the back-donation to the nickel–phosphorus bond.
A space-filling model of 2c was depicted in Figure 1c,d to show the coordination sphere of nickel. The substituents of P(Arm-CF3)3 largely occupied the remaining spaces other than IPr and bromine around nickel. In particular, one CF3 on the aryl group is sandwiched between the two isopropyl groups contained in the two wingtip groups of IPr, which hampers the free rotation of the Ni–P axis. If so, the 19F signals from the CF3 groups could not be equivalently observed. The averaged equivalent 19F signal of 2c may be provided by the fast equilibrium of elimination and the coordination of phosphine. Because this complex has only one phosphine ligand, intramolecular CF···π interaction between phosphine ligands did not exist in the crystal structure.
The distribution of the single electron-occupied molecular orbital (SOMO) of 2a and 2c was investigated by performing single-point density functional theory (DFT) calculations (B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level) implemented in the Gaussian 16 program package [37] at the fixed geometries given by the crystallographic coordinates. Similar electron distributions were given in both complexes as shown in Figure 2a,b. The unpaired electron in SOMO is distributed mainly in one d orbital of nickel, resulting in the formation of two σ*(d-nσ) orbitals with σ-type non-bonding orbitals (nσ) of the phosphorus atom and the NHC unit, and the π*(d-p) orbital between nickel and bromine. Because of the electron-withdrawing property of the CF3 groups, the acceptor ability of the arylphosphine may be enhanced in 2c. The ratio of the unpaired electron in the nickel d-orbital was 34.9% in 2c, lower than that of 2a (41.4%), whereas that in the phosphorus atom was 12.4% and 10.6% in 2c and 2a, respectively. Interestingly, in the case of bromine, the figure was much larger in 2c (28.3%) than that in 2a (21.7%). The reason for this may be the fact that the energy level of NHC–Ni–PPh3 unit in 2c providing the main component of SOMO is lower-shifted upon the substitution of the CF3 group into arylphosphine to become closer to the 4p orbital of bromine. This can lead to a greater occupation of the 4p orbital in the Ni–Br π*-orbital component of SOMO as compared to that of 2a.

2.3. Oxidation Potentials

It was found that the stability of 2c in air was improved more than that of 2a. In fact, in the solid state, it had not been degraded by oxidation for a period of time: the surface crystal color of 2c began to change gradually after several minutes upon oxidation in air, whereas 2a was oxidized as soon as it was exposed to air. On the other hand, the resistance to oxidation could be evaluated by cyclic voltammogram (CV), which was measured with THF solutions of 2a or 2c, an excess amount of free phosphine (2 equiv), and Bu4NPF6. The free phosphine (PPh3 for 2a and P(Arm-CF3)3 for 2c) was added in order to suppress the generation of the Ni(I) dimer 1 with the liberation of phosphine in equilibrium. As shown in Figure 3, in the CV measured using Ag/AgCl as a reference electrode, the one-electron oxidation potential of 2a was 1.0 V, and that of 2c was higher, 1.3 V. These were not oxidation potentials of the free phosphines. Therefore, it is believed that the oxidation resistance of the nickel center is shown to be improved by the fluorine-substituted phosphine, which may also be reflected in the stability in the solid state, along with the fluorine-derived inter- or intramolecular interactions.

2.4. Catalytic Performance for Cross-Coupling Reaction

The Kumada–Tamao–Corriu coupling of aryl bromides using complexes 2a, 2b, and 2c were representatively conducted under the same reaction conditions. Because the equilibrium ratio of the regenerated dimer 1 observed in the 1H-NMR spectrum was only slightly different between 2a and 2c, it is expected that the catalytic activity of these complexes will not change. As shown in Scheme 3, 0.5 mol% of 2a–2c were added to the reaction media in the presence of 5 equiv of the corresponding triarylphosphine, and the mixture was stirred under an inert gas atmosphere at room temperature for 18 h. The addition of the excess amount of triarylphosphine can shift the ligand-elimination equilibrium from the dimer 1 toward the mononuclear complexes 2. In the reaction of 4-bromotoluene with phenylmagnesium bromide, the product 1-methyl-4-phenylbenzene was successfully obtained in excellent yields (86, 94, and 89% using 2a, 2b, and 2c, respectively). More inactive substrate (4-bromoanisole) also produced 1-methoxy-4-phenylbenzene in high yields (76, 79, and 91% with 2a, 2b, and 2c, respectively). These results indicated that the reactions proceeded efficiently under these conditions, regardless of the nature of triarylphosphines, as expected.

3. Discussion

As noted above, apparently 2c is more stable in air than 2a in the crystalline state. It is believed that the stability in the crystalline state is derived from several factors. One of them is a steric effect. X-ray crystallography demonstrated that the bulky meta-CF3 substituted phosphine buried the coordination sphere around the nickel center other than those of the NHC and bromine, kinetically blocking the facile access of small molecules such as dioxygen. As is supportde by the discussion above, more hindered, ortho-fluorine substituted P(C6F5)3 was difficult to coordinate to nickel. Additionally, the increase in the oxidation potential from Ni(I) to Ni(II) for 2c should lead to the resistance of the nickel center to oxidation in air, compared with 2a. However, in solution, the stability of the complex derived from the phosphine should be greatly reduced by its facile elimination to form the Ni(I) dimer 1, enabling a similar catalyst performance of 2c to that of 2a in Kumada–Tamao–Corriu coupling of aryl bromides via the dinickel reaction pathway [9].
As indicated in the literature, the presence of intermolecular interactions in the crystals formed with fluorine atoms may not be negligible [29]. This hypothesis for the specific intermolecular interactions was strongly supported by the results of X-ray crystallography. It should be noted that there are characteristic, multiple short contacts involving fluorine atoms between 2c molecules, such as the F···H interaction observed with hydrogens of aryl para-C–H in phosphine and isopropyl CH3 groups in IPr, as well as many F···F interactions (Figure 4b and ESI). Such F···F interactions have been visualized as a strong dispersed interaction (i.e. van der Waals interaction) in perfluoropolymers [38] and perfluoroalkanes [39]. Interestingly, such short contacts were mostly distributed in layers, suggesting that these interactions could be a driving force to induce and subsequently stabilize the crystal packing. In this packing structure, the CF···π interaction was not observed, in contrast to the palladium chemistry [29]. On the other hand, in a crystal of 2a, the fewer intermolecular short contacts were observed only between C–H groups (Figure 4a and ESI). It was difficult to evaluate the strength of the intermolecular interactions experimentally, because thermal measurements such as differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) or thermo gravimeter (TG) may break the metal–phosphorus and metal–carbon bonds more easily. However, it is believed that the higher oxidation potential and these steric and electronic factors specifically derived from meta-CF3 substituted phosphine contribute to the air-stable nature of 2c in the solid state compared with that of 2a, at present.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

Super-dehydrated grade THF, toluene, and hexane were used as solvents as purchased from WAKO Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. Benzene-d6 was distilled from sodium benzophenone ketyl and stored under a nitrogen atmosphere. Organic reagents used for coupling reactions were distilled just before use or used as purchased. N-Heterocyclic carbene (IPr) [40] and nickel dimer, [Ni(IPr)(μ-Br)]2 (1) [35], were prepared according to the literature methods.

4.1.1. Ni(IPr)(PPh3)Br (2a)

Complex 1a (66.5 mg, 0.0630 mmol) and PPh3 (33.0 mg, 0.126 mmol) were dissolved in THF (1 mL) at room temperature, and the mixture was stirred for 5 min to give a light-yellow solution. Hexane (4 mL) was then added to the obtained solution, and the solution was stored at −30 °C. Yellow crystals were obtained in a 42% yield (42.0 mg) after filtration. 1H-NMR (C6D6): δ 11.0 (brs), 8.5 (brs), 4.5 (brs), 1.7 (brs). Anal. calcd. for C45H51N2PNiBr: C 68.46%, H 6.51%, N 3.55%; Found: C 67.78%, H 6.47%, N 3.51%.

4.1.2. Ni(IPr)(PAr(p-CF3)3)Br (2b)

Complex 1a (52.5 mg, 0.0500 mmol) and PAr(p-CF3)3 (46.9 mg, 0.100 mmol) were dissolved in THF (1 mL) at room temperature, and the mixture was stirred for 5 min to give an orange-red solution. Hexane (4 mL) was then added to the obtained solution, and the solution was stored at −30 °C. Orange crystals were obtained in a 57% yield (63.7 mg) after filtration. 1H-NMR (C6D6): δ 11.0 (brs), 8.4 (brs), 4.5 (brs), 1.8 (brs). 19F-NMR (C6D6): δ −53.6. Anal. calcd. for C48H48N2F9PNiBr: C 58.03%, H 4.87%, N 2.82%; Found: C 58.48%, H 4.48%, N 2.72%.

4.1.3. Ni(IPr)(PAr(m-CF3)3)Br (2c)

Complex 1a (44.0 mg, 0.418 mmol) and PAr(m-CF3)3 (62.0 mg, 0.835 mmol) were dissolved in THF (1 mL) at room temperature, and the mixture was stirred for 5 min to give an orange-red solution. Hexane (4 mL) was then added to the obtained solution, and the solution was stored at −30 °C. Orange crystals were obtained in a 57% yield (63.7 mg) after filtration. 1H-NMR (C6D6): δ 8.3 (brs), 8.0 (brs), 7.5 (brs), 4.5 (brs), 2.0 (brs). 19F-NMR (C6D6): δ −63.1. 31P-NMR (C6D6): No signal. Anal. calcd. for C51H45N2F18PNiBr: C 51.15%, H 3.79%, N 2.34%; Found: C 51.61%, H 4.02%, N 2.29%.

4.2. Methods

All experiments were carried out under an inert gas atmosphere using standard Schlenk techniques and a glove box (MBraun UniLab, München, Germany) unless otherwise noted. Column chromatography of organic products was carried out using silica gel (Kanto Kagaku, silica gel 60 N (spherical, neutral), Tokyo, Japan). The 1H-NMR spectra were taken with a Bruker Avance-III400 Y plus 400 MHz spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Billerica, MA, USA) at room temperature. Chemical shifts (δ) were recorded in ppm from the solvent signal. The magnetic properties of the materials were investigated using a Quantum Design MPMS-5S superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer (Quantum Design Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The elemental analysis was carried out with J-Science CHN Corder JM-11 (J-Science Lab Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan), equipped with AUTO-SAMPLER, using tin foil, where the samples were held in a glove box. The X-band EPR measurements were collected with a Bruker EMX Plus spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Billerica, MA, USA) equipped with a continuous flow N2 cryostat.

4.2.1. Kumada–Tamao–Corriu Coupling of Aryl Bromides

In a typical example, 4-bromotoluene (136.8 μL, 0.80 mmol), triphenylphosphine (5.3 mg, 0.020 mmol), and 2a (4.1 mg, 2.0 μmol) were dissolved in THF (1 mL). After stirring for 5 min, phenyl magnesium chloride THF solution (0.60 mL, 1.2 mmol) was added to the solution. After 18 h, water (20 mL) was added. The organic layer was extracted with dichloromethane (20 mL × 4). The residual product was purified with silica gel column chromatography eluting with hexane to give 4-methoxybiphenyl (white solid; 115.6 mg, yield 86%).

4.2.2. X-ray Crystallography

Single crystals of 2a, 2b, and 2c for X-ray diffraction were grown at −30 °C from toluene/hexane (2a) and THF/hexane (2b and 2c) solutions. All the data were obtained at 125 (2a), 151 (2b), and 180 K (2c) using a Rigaku Saturn CCD diffractometer with a confocal mirror and graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71070 Å). Data reduction of the measured reflections was performed using the software package CrystalStructure [41]. The structures were solved by direct methods (SHELXT-2014) [42] and refined by full-matrix least-squares fitting based on F2, using the program SHELXL-2014 [43]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. All hydrogen atoms were located at ideal positions and included in the refinement but were restricted to riding on the atom to which they were bonded. Unfortunately, the refinement for the crystal 2b cannot be completed, and only the preliminary structure was shown in the supporting information. CCDC 1947417–1947418 contains the supplementary crystallographic data of 2a and 2c for this paper. A copy of the data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/cgi-bin/catreq.cgi.

4.2.3. Theoretical Details

All the DFT calculations were performed utilizing the GAUSSIAN 16 Rev. A.03 program package (Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA) [37]. The B3LYP functional was employed with a standard split valence-type basis set, 6-31G(d,p). The single-point calculations to obtain SOMOs were carried out using crystallographic coordinates without geometry optimization, and done with a tight self-consistent field (SCF) convergence criterion. All the computation was carried out using the computer facilities at Research Institute for Information Technology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

4.2.4. Electrochemistry

The cyclic voltammogram of 2a and 2c were recorded on an ALS/chi electrochemical analyzer Model/610A with a platinum working electrode, a silver wire reference electrode, and a platinum wire counter electrode, with a scan rate of 50 mV·s−1. The analyte solutions of these complexes were prepared with a 0.1 M solution of tetra-n-butyl ammonium perchlorate in acetonitrile. Ferrocene was used as an internal standard and the potential reported here is referenced to the ferrocene/ferricinium couple.

5. Conclusions

In summary, the Ni(I)-IPr complex bearing meta-CF3 substituted triarylphosphine ligand was successfully isolated. Although the “superstable” Pd(0) catalyst has been derived using palladium and phosphine, such a triarylphosphine complex using nickel has been determined here for the first time. In the solid state, steric bulk, appropriate electron-withdrawing properties, and the presence of intermolecular interactions make nickel less susceptible to oxidation in air where the triarylphosphine is coordinated. Particularly, intermolecular multiple interactions including those between F and H, and F and F were found to be gathered in layers in the crystalline state. On the other hand, it is possible to maintain the same catalytic activity as the analogous PPh3 complex, since the phosphine can be easily eliminated in solution, resulting in the generation of active species. In the future, we plan to work on the development of other useful catalytic reactions and detailed mechanistic research using this Ni(I) complex.

Supplementary Materials

The supplementary materials are available online. Figure S1–S8: NMR spectra for the complexes, Figure S9: χmolT vs T plot, Figure S10: ESR spectrum, Figure S11–S12: Packing views of the complexes (expanded views), details of the Kumada coupling reactions including NMR spectra of products.

Author Contributions

T.F. and T.I. conceived and designed the experiments; R.H. performed the experiments; Y.K. analyzed the data; Y.Y. contributed theoretical calculations; K.M. managed this research and wrote the paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. 19K05489. The authors specially thank Shinji Kanegawa, Kyushu University, for conducting SQUID measurement of the nickel(I) complexes.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tasker, S.Z.; Stanley, E.A.; Jamison, T.F. Recent advances in homogeneous nickel catalysis. Nature 2014, 509, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Gu, J.; Wang, X.; Xue, W.; Gong, H. Nickel-catalyzed reductive coupling of alkyl halides with other electrophiles: Concept and mechanistic considerations. Org. Chem. Front. 2015, 2, 1411–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tobisu, M.; Chatani, N. Cross-Couplings Using Aryl Ethers via C–O Bond Activation Enabled by Nickel Catalysts. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 1717–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ritleng, V.; Henrion, M.; Chetcuti, M.J. Nickel N-Heterocyclic Carbene-Catalyzed C–Heteroatom Bond Formation, Reduction, and Oxidation: Reactions and Mechanistic Aspects. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 890–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zimmermann, P.; Limberg, C. Activation of Small Molecules at Nickel(I) Moieties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 4233–4242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Inatomi, T.; Koga, Y.; Matsubara, K. Dinuclear Nickel(I) and Palladium(I) Complexes for Highly Active Transformations of Organic Compounds. Molecules 2018, 23, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lin, C.-Y.; Power, P.P. Complexes of Ni(I): A “rare” oxidation state of growing importance. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 5347–5399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Schley, N.D.; Fu, G.C. Nickel-Catalyzed Negishi Arylations of Propargylic Bromides: A Mechanistic Investigation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 16588–16593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Miyazaki, S.; Koga, Y.; Matsumoto, T.; Matsubara, K. A new aspect of nickel-catalyzed Grignard cross-coupling reactions: Selective synthesis, structure, and catalytic behavior of a T-shape three-coordinate nickel(I) chloride bearing a bulky NHC ligand. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 1932–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Davies, C.J.E.; Page, M.J.C.; Ellul, E.; Mahon, M.F.; Whittlesey, M.K. Ni(I) and Ni(II) ring-expanded N-heterocyclic carbene complexes: C–H activation, indole elimination and catalytic hydrodehalogenation. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 5151–5153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, K.; Conda-Sheridan, M.; Cooke, S.R.; Louie, J. N-Heterocyclic Carbene Bound Nickel(I) Complexes and Their Roles in Catalysis. Organometallics 2011, 30, 2546–2552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Klein, A.; Kaiser, A.; Sarkar, B.; Wanner, M.; Fiedler, J. The Electrochemical Behaviour of Organonickel Complexes: Mono-, Di- and Trivalent Nickel. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 965–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, X.; Xie, X.; Liu, Y. Nickel-catalyzed cyclization of alkyne-nitriles with organoboronic acids involving anti-carbometalation of alkynes. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 5815–5820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Cao, Z.-C.; Xie, S.-J.; Fang, H.; Shi, Z.-J. Ni-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling of Dimethyl Aryl Amines with Arylboronic Esters under Reductive Conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 13575–13579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Szatkowski, L.; Hall, M.B. Dehalogenation of chloroalkanes by nickel(I) porphyrin derivatives, a computational study. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 16869–16877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lim, C.-H.; Kudisch, M.; Liu, B.; Miyake, G.M. C–N Cross-Coupling via Photoexcitation of Nickel–Amine Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 7667–7673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lin, X.; Phillips, D.L. Density Functional Theory Studies of Negishi Alkyl–Alkyl Cross-Coupling Reactions Catalyzed by a Methylterpyridyl-Ni(I) Complex. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3680–3688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Phapale, V.B.; Guisán-Ceinos, M.; Buñuel, E.; Cárdenas, D.J. Ni-Catalyzed Cascade Cyclization–Kumada Alkyl–Alkyl Cross-Coupling. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 12681–12688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jones, G.D.; Martin, J.L.; McFarland, C.; Allen, O.R.; Hall, R.E.; Haley, A.D.; Brandon, R.J.; Konovalova, T.; Desrochers, P.J.; Pulay, P.; et al. Ligand redox effects in the synthesis, electronic structure, and reactivity of an alkyl-alkyl cross-coupling catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13175–13183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ren, H.; Li, G.-F.; Zhu, B.; Lv, X.-D.; Yao, L.-S.; Wang, X.-L.; Su, Z.-M.; Guan, W. How Does Iridium(III) Photocatalyst Regulate Nickel(II) Catalyst in Metallaphotoredox-Catalyzed C–S Cross-Coupling? Theoretical and Experimental Insights. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 3858–3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Inatomi, T.; Fukahori, Y.; Yamada, Y.; Ishikawa, R.; Kanegawa, S.; Koga, Y.; Matsubara, K. Ni(I)–Ni(III) cycle in Buchwald–Hartwig amination of aryl bromide mediated by NHC-ligated Ni(I) complexes. Cat. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 1784–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zarate, C.; Yang, H.; Bezdek, M.J.; Hesk, D.; Chirik, P.J. Ni(I)-X Complexes Bearing a Bulky α-Diimine Ligand: Synthesis, Structure, and Superior Catalytic Performance in the Hydrogen Isotope Exchange in Pharmaceuticals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 5034–5044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Charboneau, D.J.; Brudwig, G.W.; Hazari, N.; Lant, H.M.C.; Saydjari, A.K. Development of an Improved System for the Carboxylation of Aryl Halides through Mechanistic Studies. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 3228–3241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Howell, J.A.S.; Lovatt, J.D.; McArdle, P.; Cunningham, D.; Mainome, E.; Gottlieb, H.E.; Goldschmidt, Z. The effect of fluorine, trifluoromethyl and related substitution on the donor properties of triarylphosphines towards [Fe(CO)4]. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 1998, 1, 118–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Howell, J.A.S.; Fey, N.; Lovatt, J.D.; Yates, P.C.; McArdle, P.; Hursthouse, M.B.; Light, M.E. Effect of fluorine and trifluoromethyl substitution on the donor properties and stereodynamical behaviour of triarylphosphines. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1999, 17, 3015–3028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zuccaccia, D.; Belpassi, L.; Rocchigiani, L.; Tarantelli, F.; Macchioni, A. A Phosphine Gold(I) π-Alkyne Complex: Tuning the Metal−Alkyne Bond Character and Counterion Position by the Choice of the Ancillary Ligand. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 3080–3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kolter, M.; Böck, K.; Karaghiosoff, K.; Koszinowski, K. Anionic Palladium(0) and Palladium(II) Ate Complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 13244–13248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cutillas, N.; Martínez, A.; Yellol, G.S.; Rodríguez, V.; Zamora, A.; Pedreño, M.; Donaire, A.; Janiak, C.; Ruiz, J. Anticancer C,N-Cycloplatinated(II) Complexes Containing Fluorinated Phosphine Ligands: Synthesis, Structural Characterization, and Biological Activity. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 13529–13535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jakab, A.; Dalicsek, Z.; Holczbauer, T.; Hamza, A.; Pápai, I.; Finta, Z.; Timári, G.; Soós, T. Superstable Palladium(0) Complex as an Air- and Thermostable Catalyst for Suzuki Coupling Reactions. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 1, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Korenaga, T.; Ko, A.; Uotani, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Sakai, T. Synthesis and Application of 2,6-Bis(trifluoromethyl)-4-pyridyl Phosphanes: The Most Electron-Poor Aryl Phosphanes with Moderate Bulkiness. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10703–10707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stark, M.J.; Shaw, M.J.; Fadamin, A.; Rath, N.P. Synthesis, structural characterization and catalytic activity of indenyl complexes of ruthenium bearing fluorinated phosphine ligands. J. Organomet. Chem. 2017, 847, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dible, B.R.; Sigman, M.S.; Arif, A.M. Oxygen-Induced Ligand Dehydrogenation of a Planar Bis-μ-Chloronickel(I) Dimer Featuring an NHC Ligand. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 3774–3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nagao, S.; Matsumoto, T.; Koga, Y.; Matsubara, K. Monovalent Nickel Complex Bearing a Bulky N-Heterocyclic Carbene Catalyzes Buchwald-Hartwig Amination of Aryl Halides under Mild Conditions. Chem. Lett. 2011, 40, 1036–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Matsubara, K.; Fukahori, Y.; Inatomi, T.; Tazaki, S.; Yamada, Y.; Koga, Y.; Kanegawa, S.; Nakamura, T. Monomeric Three-Coordinate N-Heterocyclic Carbene Nickel(I) Complexes: Synthesis, Structures, and Catalytic Applications in Cross-Coupling Reactions. Organometallics 2016, 35, 3281–3287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Laskowski, C.A.; Bungum, D.J.; Baldwin, S.M.; Del Ciello, S.A.; Iluc, V.M.; Hillhouse, G.L. Synthesis and Reactivity of Two-Coordinate Ni(I) Alkyl and Aryl Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 18272–18275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Clarke, M.L.; Ellis, D.; Mason, K.L.; Orpen, A.G.; Pringle, P.G.; Wingad, R.L.; Zaher, D.A.; Baker, R.T. The electron-poor phosphines P{C6H3(CF3)2-3,5}3 and P(C6F5)3 do not mimic phosphites as ligands for hydroformylation. A comparison of the coordination chemistry of P{C6H3(CF3)2-3,5}3 and P(C6F5)3 and the unexpectedly low hydroformylation activity of their rhodium complexes. Dalton Trans. 2005, 7, 1294–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 16 (Revision A.03); Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hasegawa, T. Understanding of the intrinsic difference between normal- and perfluoro-alkyl compounds toward total understanding of material properties. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2015, 627, 64–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Pollice, R.; Chen, P. Origin of the immiscibility of alkanes and perfluoroalkanes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 3489–3506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jafarpour, L.; Stevens, E.D.; Nolan, S.P. A sterically demanding nucleophilic carbene: 1,3-Bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene). Thermochemistry and catalytic application in olefin metathesis. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 606, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Crystal Structure; Version. 4.2: Crystal Structure Analysis Package; Rigaku Co.: Tokyo, Japan, 2015; pp. 196–8666.
  42. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT—Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Cryst. 2015, A71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Cryst. 2015, C71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Not available.
Molecules 24 03222 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Previously reported mononuclear Ni(I)-NHC halide complexes [8].
Scheme 1. Previously reported mononuclear Ni(I)-NHC halide complexes [8].
Molecules 24 03222 sch001
Molecules 24 03222 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Reaction of dinickel(I) complex 1 with phosphines.
Scheme 2. Reaction of dinickel(I) complex 1 with phosphines.
Molecules 24 03222 sch002
Molecules 24 03222 g001a 550Molecules 24 03222 g001b 550
Figure 1. ORTEP drawing of (a) 2a and (b) 2c (50% probability of thermal ellipsoids. Hydrogen atoms and solvent molecule (THF in the crystal of 2c) are omitted for clarity). Views of space-filling model of 2c from (c) the side and (d) the bottom are illustrated (pink: Br; gray: C; light green: F; orange: P; light yellow: Ni).
Figure 1. ORTEP drawing of (a) 2a and (b) 2c (50% probability of thermal ellipsoids. Hydrogen atoms and solvent molecule (THF in the crystal of 2c) are omitted for clarity). Views of space-filling model of 2c from (c) the side and (d) the bottom are illustrated (pink: Br; gray: C; light green: F; orange: P; light yellow: Ni).
Molecules 24 03222 g001aMolecules 24 03222 g001b
Molecules 24 03222 g002 550
Figure 2. Kohn–Sham orbitals of SOMO corresponding to a density isosurface value of 0.02 au in (a) 2a and (b) 2c obtained from single-point DFT calculation with B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level using the crystallographic coordinates.
Figure 2. Kohn–Sham orbitals of SOMO corresponding to a density isosurface value of 0.02 au in (a) 2a and (b) 2c obtained from single-point DFT calculation with B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level using the crystallographic coordinates.
Molecules 24 03222 g002
Molecules 24 03222 g003 550
Figure 3. Redox behavior of NiBr(IPr)(PPh3) (2a) (blue line) and 2c (red line) in THF with Bu4NPF6 (working electrode: Pt; counter electrode: Pt; scan rate: 100 mV·s−1).
Figure 3. Redox behavior of NiBr(IPr)(PPh3) (2a) (blue line) and 2c (red line) in THF with Bu4NPF6 (working electrode: Pt; counter electrode: Pt; scan rate: 100 mV·s−1).
Molecules 24 03222 g003
Molecules 24 03222 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Kumada–Tamao–Corriu coupling of aryl bromides using 2a–2c as catalysts.
Scheme 3. Kumada–Tamao–Corriu coupling of aryl bromides using 2a–2c as catalysts.
Molecules 24 03222 sch003
Molecules 24 03222 g004 550
Figure 4. Crystal packing views from the (010) planes depicted using crystallographic data of (a) 2a and (b) 2c (pink: Br; gray: C; light green: F; red: O; orange: P; light yellow: Ni). Short contacts that are shorter than van der Waals radii are addressed as red lines. A blue dashed line in (b) highlighted a layer where many contacts containing F atoms (light green) are gathered.
Figure 4. Crystal packing views from the (010) planes depicted using crystallographic data of (a) 2a and (b) 2c (pink: Br; gray: C; light green: F; red: O; orange: P; light yellow: Ni). Short contacts that are shorter than van der Waals radii are addressed as red lines. A blue dashed line in (b) highlighted a layer where many contacts containing F atoms (light green) are gathered.
Molecules 24 03222 g004
Table
Table 1. Representative bond lengths and angles of 2a and 2c.
Table 1. Representative bond lengths and angles of 2a and 2c.
2a2c
Lengths (Å)Ni(1)–Br(1)2.301(1)2.3016(8)
Ni(1)–P(1)2.201(1)2.182(1)
Ni(1)–C(1)1.918(5)1.936(3)
Angles (°)C(1)–Ni(1)–Br(1)138.4(1)137.1(1)
C(1)–Ni(1)–P(1)114.9(1)113.5(1)
Br(1)–Ni(1)–P(1)106.44(4)109.29(4)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Matsubara, K.; Fujii, T.; Hosokawa, R.; Inatomi, T.; Yamada, Y.; Koga, Y. Fluorine-Substituted Arylphosphine for an NHC-Ni(I) System, Air-Stable in a Solid State but Catalytically Active in Solution. Molecules 2019, 24, 3222. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24183222

AMA Style

Matsubara K, Fujii T, Hosokawa R, Inatomi T, Yamada Y, Koga Y. Fluorine-Substituted Arylphosphine for an NHC-Ni(I) System, Air-Stable in a Solid State but Catalytically Active in Solution. Molecules. 2019; 24(18):3222. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24183222

Chicago/Turabian Style

Matsubara, Kouki, Takahiro Fujii, Rion Hosokawa, Takahiro Inatomi, Yuji Yamada, and Yuji Koga. 2019. "Fluorine-Substituted Arylphosphine for an NHC-Ni(I) System, Air-Stable in a Solid State but Catalytically Active in Solution" Molecules 24, no. 18: 3222. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24183222

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop