Next Article in Journal
Comparison between Exhaustive and Equilibrium Extraction Using Different SPE Sorbents and Sol-Gel Carbowax 20M Coated FPSE Media
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of D Modification Sites by Integrating Heterogeneous Features in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structure-Based Identification of Potent Natural Product Chemotypes as Cannabinoid Receptor 1 Inverse Agonists
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Generation of Quality Hit Matter for Successful Drug Discovery Projects

by
Jóhannes Reynisson
School of Chemical Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Molecules 2019, 24(3), 381; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24030381
Submission received: 17 January 2019 / Accepted: 18 January 2019 / Published: 22 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hit Generation and Verification for Novel Lead Compounds)
A drug discovery project needs a number of components for its success. From the point of view of many medicinal chemists, tractable hit matter is one of the most important parts in such a project. Without quality hits the projects grind to a halt and no further progress is possible, no matter how promising the modulation of the said biological target is for a novel therapeutic approach. This is obviously a very frustrating experience for all of the scientists involved and often the projects are simply discontinued. Perhaps borne out of this frustration an array of different screening approaches have been developed to mitigate the problem of no or poor quality hit matter, i.e., the more techniques available for hit generation the better since each approach has its strengths and weaknesses. In this special issue “Hit Generation and Verification for Novel Lead Compounds” (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules/special_issues/novel_lead_compounds), the focus was on this crucial part of the drug discovery pathway and it is pertinent to keep in mind that the chain is as strong as its weakest link.
In the special issue a range of different hit generation methods were reported such as the marriage of the classical methods of natural products with structure based virtual screening, which were successfully reported to identify cannabinoid receptor 1 inverse agonists for treating obesity [1] and the generation of potent inhibitors of tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1, a promising anticancer target [2]. A fragment based screen was reported against the FIXa target for blood anticoagulation [3], high content screen using zebrafish for cardiovascular issues focusing on the Fgf/Ras/Mapk activity was reported [4] and finally an in vitro/in silico method was introduced for the modulation of the Partial PPARγ receptor for the treatment of diabetes [5]. Additionally, more classical structural activity relationships studies were reported such as cationic non-peptic small molecules as membrane disruptors as antimicrobial agents [6] and the synthesis of proanthocyanidin derivatives as generally interesting bioactive compounds [7]. Lastly, two reports on the anticancer compound class thieno [2,3-b] pyridines were introduced where two major issues of small molecular drug discovery were addressed, the lack of aqueous solubility [8] and the identification of the molecular targets modulated by the molecules [9]. In the reported projects either natural products, and their derivatives, or synthetic small molecules are used as screening collections, i.e., very different regions of chemical space are explored. In general, the concept of chemical space is now well established and many researchers involved in drug discovery projects apply these ideas [10,11]. Traditionally, the volume of chemical space is reduced by molecular descriptors, such as molecular weight and lipophilicity (log P), and undesirable chemical moieties where molecules are excluded from further consideration, shown graphically in Figure 1 [12,13,14,15,16].
Known Drug Space (KDS) is a concept used to navigate chemical space to identify biologically benign volumes of small molecules as potential drug candidates [18,19,20]. E.g., frequency of atoms types and different substitution patterns can be derived and used as designing concepts [21,22,23,24]. KDS is defined as all small molecules in clinical use [25]. It has been shown that KDS has wider parameters in terms of both molecular descriptors and unwanted molecular moieties, resulting in a larger volume in chemical space compared to drug-like compounds, as shown in Figure 1 [26,27,28]. It is therefore clear that a more focused definition of biologically active compounds based on their physicochemical parameters would benefit the identification of quality hit matter enormously. This would have a beneficial knock-on effect on the drug discovery pathway where many of the problems of bio-incompatibility will simply not be encountered. Currently, novel molecular descriptors derived from the density functional theory are being developed as well as an index, Known Drug Index, to improve our navigational skills in chemical space [17,29,30].

Acknowledgments

The guest editor thanks all of the authors for their contributions to this special issue, all the reviewers for their hard work in evaluating the manuscripts, and Derek J. McPhee, the editor-in-chief of Molecules as well as the editorial staff of this journal, especially Genie Lu, Section Managing Editor, for their kind help in making this special issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pandey, P.; Roy, K.K.; Liu, H.; Ma, G.; Pettaway, S.; Alsharif, W.F.; Gadepalli, R.S.; Rimoldi, J.M.; McCurdy, C.R.; Cutler, S.J.; et al. Structure-Based Identification of Potent Natural Product Chemotypes as Cannabinoid Receptor 1 Inverse Agonists. Molecules 2018, 23, 2630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Salomatina, O.V.; Popadyuk, I.I.; Zakharenko, A.L.; Zakharova, O.D.; Fadeev, D.S.; Komarova, N.I.; Reynisson, J.; Arabshahi, H.J.; Chand, R.; Volcho, K.P.; et al. Novel Semisynthetic Derivatives of Bile Acids as Effective Tyrosyl-DNA Phosphodiesterase 1 Inhibitors. Molecules 2018, 23, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wei, Q.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, S.; Zheng, X.; Meng, F.; Yuan, J.; Xu, Y.; Huang, C. Fragment-Based Lead Generation of 5-Phenyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide Derivatives as Leads for Potent Factor Xia Inhibitors. Molecules 2018, 23, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Saydmohammed, M.; Vollmer, L.L.; Onuoha, E.O.; Maskrey, T.; Gibson, G.; Watkins, S.C.; Wipf, P.; Vogt, A.; Tsang, M. A High-Content Screen Reveals New Small-Molecule Enhancers of Ras/Mapk Signaling as Probes for Zebrafish Heart Development. Molecules 2018, 23, 1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Christensen, L.P.; El-Houri, R.B. Development of an In Vitro Screening Platform for the Identification of Partial PPARγ Agonists as a Source for Antidiabetic Lead Compounds. Molecules 2018, 23, 2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jiménez, A.; García, P.; de la Puente, S.; Madrona, A.; Camarasa, M.J.; Pérez-Pérez, M.; Quintela, J.; Portillo, F.P.; San-Félix, A. A Novel Class of Cationic and Non-Peptidic Small Molecules as Hits for the Development of Antimicrobial Agents. Molecules 2018, 23, 1513. [Google Scholar]
  7. Higashino, Y.; Okamoto, T.; Mori, K.; Kawasaki, T.; Hamada, M.; Nakajima, N.; Saito, A. Regioselective Synthesis of Procyanidin B6, A 4-6-Condensed (+)-Catechin Dimer, by Intramolecular Condensation. Molecules 2018, 23, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zafar, A.; Pilkington, L.I.; Natalie, A.; Haverkate, N.A.; van Rensburg, M.; Leung, E.; Kumara, S.; Denny, W.A.; Barker, D.; Alsuraifi, A.; et al. Investigation into Improving the Aqueous Solubility of the Thieno[2,3-b]pyridine Anti-Proliferative Agents. Molecules 2018, 23, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zafar, A.; Sari, S.; Leung, E.; Pilkington, L.I.; van Rensburg, M.; Barker, D.; Reynisson, J. GPCR Modulation of Thieno[2,3-b]pyridine Anti-Proliferative Agents. Molecules 2017, 22, 2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Opassi, G.; Gesù, A.; Massarotti, A. The hitchhiker’s guide to the chemical-biological galaxy. Drug Dis. Today 2018, 23, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Siramshetty, V.B.; Preissner, R. Drugs as habitable planets in the space of dark chemical matter. Drug Dis. Today 2018, 23, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lipinski, C.A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B.W.; Feeney, P.J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 46, 3–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ghose, A.K.; Viswanadhan, V.N.; Wendoloski, J.J. A knowledge-based approach in designing combinatorial or medicinal chemistry libraries for drug discovery. 1. A qualitative and quantitative characterization of known drug databases. J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Veber, D.F.; Johnson, S.R.; Cheng, H.Y.; Smith, B.R.; Ward, K.W.; Kopple, K.D. Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2615–2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Beall, J.B.; Walters, M.A. Chemical con artists foil drug discovery. Nature 2014, 513, 481–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Beall, J.B.; Holloway, G.A. New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 2010, 2719–2740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Eurtivong, C.; Reynisson, J. The Development of a Weighted Index to Optimise Compound Libraries for High Throughput Screening. Mol. Inf. 2018, 37, 1800068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, E.J.; Matuszek, A.M.; Yu, B.; Reynisson, J. Theoretical investigations into the role of aryl nitrenium ions’ stability on their mutagenic potential. Aust. J. Chem. 2011, 67, 910–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ren, L.; Reynisson, J.; Perera, C.O.; Hemar, Y. The physicochemical properties of a new class of anticancer fungalpolysaccharides: A comparative study. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 97, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, F.; Logan, G.; Reynisson, J. Wine Compounds as a Source for HTS Screening Collections. A Feasibility Study. Mol. Inf. 2012, 31, 847–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ilardi, E.A.; Vitaku, E.; Njardarson, J.T. An In-Pharm-ative Educational Poster Anthology Highlighting the Therapeutic Agents That Chronicle Our Medicinal History. J. Chem. Educ. 2013, 90, 1403–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ilardi, E.A.; Vitaku, E.; Njardarson, J.T. Data-Mining for Sulfur and Fluorine: An Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals To Reveal Opportunities for Drug Design and Discovery. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 2832–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vitaku, E.; Smith, D.T.; Njardarson, J.T. Analysis of the Structural Diversity, Substitution Patterns, and Frequency of Nitrogen Heterocycles among U.S. FDA Approved Pharmaceuticals. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 10257–10274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Smith, B.R.; Eastman, C.M.; Njardarson, J.T. Beyond C, H, O, and N! Analysis of the Elemental Composition of U.S. FDA Approved Drug Architectures. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 9764–9773. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mirza, A.; Desai, R.; Reynisson, J. Known Drug Space as a Metric in Determining the Boundaries of Drug-Like Chemical Space. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 5006–5011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Axerio-Cilies, P.; Castañeda, I.P.; Mirza, A.; Reynisson, J. Investigation of the incidence of ‘‘undesirable’’ molecular moieties for high-throughput screening compound libraries in marketed drug compounds. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 1128–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bade, R.; Chan, H.-F.; Reynisson, J. Characteristics of Known Drug Space. Natural Products, their Derivatives and Synthetic Drugs. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 5646–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Drew, K.L.M.; Baiman, H.; Khwaounjoo, P.; Yu, B.; Reynisson, J. Size estimation of chemical space: How big is it? J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2012, 64, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Matuszek, A.M.; Reynisson, J. Defining Known Drug Space Using DFT. Mol. Inf. 2016, 35, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zafar, A.; Reynisson, J. Hydration Free Energy as a Molecular Descriptor in Drug Design: A Feasibility Study. Mol. Inf. 2016, 35, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A graphical representation of chemical space reduced with undesirable moieties and molecular descriptors in defining drug-likeness. Known drug space occupies larger volume in chemical space [17].
Figure 1. A graphical representation of chemical space reduced with undesirable moieties and molecular descriptors in defining drug-likeness. Known drug space occupies larger volume in chemical space [17].
Molecules 24 00381 g001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reynisson, J. Generation of Quality Hit Matter for Successful Drug Discovery Projects. Molecules 2019, 24, 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24030381

AMA Style

Reynisson J. Generation of Quality Hit Matter for Successful Drug Discovery Projects. Molecules. 2019; 24(3):381. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24030381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reynisson, Jóhannes. 2019. "Generation of Quality Hit Matter for Successful Drug Discovery Projects" Molecules 24, no. 3: 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24030381

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop