Next Article in Journal
Boosting Electrochemical Nitrogen Reduction Performance over Binuclear Mo Atoms on N-Doped Nanoporous Graphene: A Theoretical Investigation
Next Article in Special Issue
One-Pot Production of RNA in High Yield and Purity Through Cleaving Tandem Transcripts
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation on the Enzymatic Profile of Mulberry Alkaloids by Enzymatic Study and Molecular Docking
Previous Article in Special Issue
Poly (Octadecyl Methacrylate-Co-Trimethylolpropane Trimethacrylate) Monolithic Column for Hydrophobic in-Tube Solid-Phase Microextraction of Chlorophenoxy Acid Herbicides
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 24
Issue 9
10.3390/molecules24091778
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Sample Digestion and Combined Preconcentration Methods for the Determination of Ultra-Low Gold Levels in Rocks

by
Yan-hong Liu
,
Bo Wan
* and
Ding-shuai Xue
State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Institutions of Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(9), 1778; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24091778
Submission received: 27 March 2019 / Revised: 24 April 2019 / Accepted: 2 May 2019 / Published: 8 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modern Sample Preparation Approaches for Separation Science)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The gold abundance in basic rocks, which normally varies between 0.5 and 5 ppb, has served as a very important indicator in many geoscience studies, including those focused on the planetary differentiation, redistribution of elements during the crustal process, and ore genesis. However, because gold is a monoisotopic element that exhibits a nugget effect, it is very difficult to quantify its ultra-low levels in rocks, which significantly limits our understanding of the origin of gold and its circulation between the Earth crust, mantle, and core. In this work, we summarize various sample digestion and combined preconcentration methods for the determination of gold amounts in rocks. They include fire assay, fire assay combined with Te coprecipitation and instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) or laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, fusion combined with Te coprecipitation and anion exchange resins, dry chlorination, wet acid digestion combined with precipitation, ion exchange resins, solvent extraction, polyurethane foam, extraction chromatography, novel solid adsorbents, and direct determination by INAA. In addition, the faced challenges and future perspectives in this field are discussed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Gold is one of the rare elements and precious metals present in the Earth crust with average concentrations in the igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks varying between 0.5 and 5 ppb [1]. Proper quantification of the gold abundances in basic rocks is critical for many leading-edge areas of geoscience, such as planetary differentiation [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10], redistribution of elements during crustal processes [11,12,13,14,15,16,17], and ore genesis [18,19,20,21,22,23]. According to the latest results reported by Brenan and McDonough [10], the metal–silicate partition coefficient of Au is approximately 300, whereas its minimum values measured for Os and Ir in the same experiments are ~107, which differs from the former parameter by at least a factor of 104. The authors concluded that not all highly siderophile elements (HSEs) were affected by the core formation in the same way, and that the abundances of elements such as osmium and iridium required the addition of a late veneer. As an illustration, Figure 1 shows the metal-silicate partition coefficients plotted as functions of the oxygen fugacity. Fischer-Gödde et al. analyzed samples of orogenic peridotite massifs and xenoliths, whose Rh and Au contents revealed the presence of HSEs in the primitive mantle (PM), which differed from that of any known group of chondrites and could be explained by the contributions from meteoritic components detected in ancient lunar impact melt rocks [5]. Figure 2 shows the ratio diagrams of Au/Ir vs. 187Os/188Os and Au/Ir vs. Rh/Ir constructed for the HSEs of the PM and different chondrite classes and groups. In addition, as no explorations conducted during the past 50 years detected deep gold deposits in Earth’s crust, the world is thought to be tottering on the precipice of peak gold [24]. As a result, it is very important to discover large deposits of gold and meet the production demand in the field of gold ore genesis. However, the precise determination of ultra-low gold contents in rocks is an extremely difficult task as compared with detecting other trace elements because gold represents a monoisotopic element and exhibits a nugget effect. The latter requires the analysis of relatively large amounts of rocks to obtain meaningful data, which are still characterized by large deviations. Since gold has only one isotope (197Au), it cannot be quantified by an isotope dilution (ID) method that is very precise for trace element determination and, therefore, requires a simple analytical method for its quantitative recovery during pretreatment.
Although modern analytical techniques such as inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy (GFAAS), and instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) are highly sensitive, their use for the direct determination of gold levels in geological samples is complicated because of the low concentrations of gold and interfering effects of matrix components. To increase the reliability of gold quantitation methods, the major matrix components must be separated first, which can be achieved by proper sample preparation and the preconcentration of gold [25,26,27,28].
Sample digestion and/or preconcentration technologies used for the determination of gold as well as platinum group metals (PGEs) with ppm concentrations were previously reviewed by Perry, Barefoot, Balcerzak, Pyrzynska, Mokhodoeva, Myasoedova, and their co-authors [25,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]; however, methods for the detection of ultra-low gold levels in rocks (which are considerably more complex than ore-grade samples) have not been discussed in detail. This review includes the recent significant contributions to the determination of gold amounts in rocks, especially those focused on sample preparation and the preconcentration of gold prior to its determination. As of today, almost all distributions and parameters of gold in geological samples have been determined by fire assay. To validate them and obtain more data, independent methods such as diisobutyl ketone (DIBK) extraction chromatography and standardization combined with ID ICP-MS cation exchange resin analysis have been developed [5,36]. However, due to the long procedure or expensive spiking, a simple and reliable technique for measuring the contents of gold in rocks must be used. In this work, we describe various sample digestion methods that are often coupled with enrichment techniques and discuss their mutual effects.

2. Dry Digestion Methods

2.1. Fire Assay

Fire assay (FA) and cupellation methods are classical assaying techniques that have been successfully used for the estimation of gold amounts in ores for many centuries [37]. Furthermore, FA has always served as the arbitration method of gold measurement that involves not only the digestion of samples, but also the enrichment of gold and PGEs since it allows the extraction of these precious metals and their separation from base metals in the matrices. The relatively large sample weights used for FA can overcome the nugget effect, which represents its significant advantage. However, the large reagent blanks that result from the large amounts of fluxes introduce significant biases into the determination of ultra-low gold levels. In addition, the uncertainty of the chemical interactions between various flux constituents makes the quality of the obtained results highly dependable on the experience of the analyst.
Lead fire assay (Pb-FA) and nickel sulfide fire assay (NiS-FA) are widely used FA methods. Pb-FA utilized for the collection of Au, Pt, Pd, and Rh is the application of metallurgy in analysis. A simple Pb-FA method has been developed in 1994 for the determination of ultra-low Au, Pt, and Pd contents in rocks by Hall et al. [38]; its limit of detection (LOD) and recovery of gold are 2 ppb and 90%, respectively. The large relative standard deviations (RSD) of 11–55% are likely caused by the sample inhomogeneity rather than by the analytical method. This conclusion is in good agreement with the recoveries of gold ranging from 74–86% at concentrations between 30 and 300 ppb [39]. NiS-FA can be used to collect both PGEs and gold, but its efficiency for gold determination has been very low. Juvonen et al. [40] compared NiS-FA with Pb-FA in terms of their collection efficiencies of Au, Pt, Pd, and Rh and found that the gold recovery of NiS-FA was twice as low as that of Pb-FA at low gold concentrations. Plessen and Erzinger [41] reported that the gold recovery did not exceed 70% when NiS-FA was used to analyze rocks. Although the gold recovery of Pb-FA is better than that of NiS-FA, the environmental pollution and harm to analysts caused by Pb discouraged its further development [42,43]. However, the bottleneck of the analysis of the low gold contents in rocks by NiS-FA consists of the high amounts of reagent blanks and low recovery efficiency of gold.
Many researchers have attempted to solve this problem. In order to lower the reagent blank, Asif and Parry [44] prepared a mini button by reducing the amount of nickel reagent; however, the recovery of gold exhibited a significant reduction. Lu et al. [45] found that FA combined with a Te coprecipitation purification process could lower the NiO blank to 0.24 ppb. In terms of the gold recovery, two specific directions exist: combining NiS-FA with Te coprecipitation to reduce the loss during the acid dissolution process and employing a solid direct determination technology (such as INAA and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICPMS)) to reduce the loss and possible pollution in each process following the FA step.

2.1.1. NiS-FA + Te Coprecipitation

As large amounts of gold and small PGEs contents are lost in the acid solution during the dissolution of the NiS button, a second enrichment step that would not increase the amount of total dissolved solids must be introduced to improve the gold recovery (especially at low concentrations). Jackson et al. [46] applied the Te coprecipitation method to gold analysis for the first time and increased the recovery of gold from ore samples to 90%. Savard et al. [47] obtained the same results for ore samples, but the recovery remained low for rock samples. In addition, although the sample weight in this method was as large as 15 g, the RSD amounted to 20–50% (the reason for this phenomenon is not clearly understood). Oguri et al. [48] obtained high recoveries (>97%) for low gold concentrations by repeating the NiS-FA procedure under the reduced conditions (produced by graphite powders) and Te coprecipitation at the optimal conditions corresponding to a temperature of 210 °C and time of 75 min. In order to lower the reagent blank and simplify the process, a semi-open NiS dissolution system preventing volatile losses was suggested by Gros et al. [49]. In addition, Sun and Sun [50] proposed a novel NiS-FA method involving Fe, which ensured the self-disintegration of the entire assay button into powder without its mechanical crush. When some particular samples are used (such as black shale or samples containing magnetite), conventional NiS-FA is not applicable. Li [51] ignited black shale samples before the NiS-FA step to eliminate organic matter. Juvonen et al. [52] used potassium tartrate as a reducing agent to successfully prepare an assay button during the analysis of samples containing magnetite.

2.1.2. FA + INAA or LA-ICPMS

After a method that used only 0.5 g of nickel was developed (which decreased the button weight to below 1 g), it enabled the direct analysis of small gold-containing buttons by INAA or LA-ICPMS [44]. Asif et al. [53] proposed a simple method based on NiS-FA and INAA to determine the levels of PGEs and gold in samples. However, the LOD of gold was 2 ppb, which made this technique unsuitable for ultra-low gold contents. Bedard and Barnes [54] compared the capacities of FA-ICP-MS and FA-INAA to determine the gold amounts in geological samples and found that for the specimens rich in gold both methods performed adequately; however, for the low-concentration samples (crustal rocks), ICP-MS was preferable. Jarvis et al. [55] established for the first time a method for gold quantitation based on the combination of NiS-FA with LA-ICP-MS having an LOD of 10 ppb. An ultraviolet (UV) laser ablation ICP-MS was used to directly analyze the gold contents in NiS-FA buttons by Jorge et al. [56]. The obtained LOD of gold was as low as 1.7 ppb, and the RSDs were better than 10%. Later, Resano et al. [57,58] ground NiS buttons to obtain more homogeneous samples and used polyethylene wax as a binder to pelletize the resulting powders (possible interferences were eliminated by utilizing a double-focusing sector field mass spectrometer). Resano et al. [59], Vanhaecke et al. [60], and Compernolle et al. [61] discussed the possibility of combining Pb-FA with LA-ICPMS for the analysis of gold in geological samples. Meanwhile, Compernolle et al. [61] reported the absence of significant differences between the results obtained by the standard addition, internal standard, and external standard methods using Pb-FA with LA-ICPMS for gold determination. Table 1 summarizes various FA digestion methods used in literature studies. Figure 3 illustrates the main stages of the four techniques for the gold determination by the NiS-FA method described in several works. Here, number 1 denotes the method that combines NiS-FA alone with ICP-MS according to Plessen and Erzinger [41]. The polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottle is used to store the gold solution. Number 2 denotes the technique that combines the NiS-FA method with Te coprecipitation for gold extraction based on the works of Jackson et al. and Savard et al. [46,47]. Simpler methods that combine NiS-FA with INAA or LA-ICP-MS are represented by numbers 3 and 4, respectively. They are based on the approaches developed by Asif et al. and Jorge et al. [53,56].

2.2. Fusion

Fusion is an effective sample decomposition method that is mainly used to dissolve acid-insoluble substances. In the process of fusion, insoluble samples are converted into sodium compounds that are soluble in water or acids. Fusion is very different from FA, although both techniques are dry digestion methods. In particular, fusion is just a sample digestion method, whereas FA involves both sample digestion and gold enrichment, and its ingredients and process are more complicated. Fusion is rarely used to decompose samples for the determination of gold contents; for this purpose, a sodium peroxide method is most commonly used. The greatest advantages of this technology include the ability to effectively decompose sulfide and refractory minerals and a large sample mass (up to 20 g). However, large contents of sodium peroxide with impurities are difficult to purify, and the contaminations resulting from the interaction of the flux with the crucible wall can negatively affect the course of analysis [62]. Another disadvantage of this method is the formation of gel-like soluble alkaline silicates during fusion that make the solution difficult to analyze.
Due to the absence of gold enrichment, fusion buttons are not suitable for direct testing (such as FA), but must be dissolved and treated by other enrichment techniques. The most common combination technologies utilize ion exchange resins [63,64] and Te co-precipitation [65,66,67]. A summary of various fusion digestion methods is presented in Table 2.

2.2.1. Fusion + Anion Exchange Resin

Enzweiler [63] studied the recovery efficiencies of Pt, Pd, and Au from silicate rocks using a sodium peroxide fusion procedure followed by anion exchange resin separation. The utilized technique was found to be not very efficient: the recovery of gold was as low as 76% due to the formation of hydroxychloro compounds in alkaline solution that were not converted to chloro complexes upon the acidification with HCl that was required for quantitative anion exchange. Later, Dai et al. [64] combined an extra chlorination step with this technique to oxidize PGEs and gold and thus achieve the best retention in the anion resin separation process. However, no valuable data were obtained for gold because of the poor linear regression correlation of the external calibration curve for ICP-MS analysis.

2.2.2. Fusion + Te Coprecipitation

Amosse [65] described a method for the extraction of Pd, Pt, Rh, Ru, Ir, and Au using Se and Te as carriers in the presence of catalyst KI after the fusion with sodium peroxide, sodium potassium carbonate, and potassium hydroxide. The catalyst improved the recovery of Ir from 33% to 97.5%, although it had no effect on the Au recovery efficiency. In order to simply this process, Jin and Zhu [66] used sodium peroxide fusion and Te coprecipitation to measure the PGE and Au levels in geological matrices. The procedural reagent blanks and recovery of Au were 0.044 ppb and 80%, respectively. Qi et al. [67] purified HCl and SnCl2 by Te coprecipitation to further lower the reagent blanks and achieved a good Au recovery of 96.3%.

2.2.3. Fusion of the Residue Formed after Acid Digestion

Another important application of fusion is the ability to recover all gold from the sample residue after acid digestion. Totland et al. [68] used the Na2O2 + Na2CO3 mixture and pure Na2O2 to dissolve the sample residue formed after the HNO3 + HCl + HF + HClO4 microwave digestion process. Jarvis et al. [69], Tsimbalist et al. [70], and Coedo et al. [71] employed the same method to treat the acid-insoluble residue formed after the HNO3 + HCl + HF acid digestion. The insoluble residue of black shale samples produced after BrF3 digestion was melted by KBrF4 [72].

2.3. Dry Chlorination

Chlorine has been the most important gold leaching agent from 1850 to 1900. Afterwards, because of the higher selectivity and lower price of cyanide, the latter gradually replaced chlorine in the gold leaching of sulfide ore. Since that time, little research on the chlorination of gold has been conducted. The advantages of chlorination include very low procedural reagent blanks, high analytical efficiency, and large sample weight. However, the low recovery of gold is a drawback of this method. Nesbitt et al. [73] studied the chlorination mechanism of gold in aqueous solutions and found that the gold particle size was the main factor affecting it. Perry and Van Loon [74] utilized the chlorination process for the determination of ultra-low gold contents in rocks for the first time. A gold recovery of 60% was achieved under the following optimal conditions: 3.5 h, 580 °C, 0.5 g NaCl, and 15 g sample powder. Although the recovery was relatively low, the sensitivity and precision of this technique were comparable or better than those of the FA method. In order to further improve the data precision, Perry et al. [75] attempted to increase the sample weight to 250 g to reduce the nugget effect. Furthermore, chlorination was also used to oxidize PGEs and gold to higher oxidation states that were more strongly absorbed by anion resins [64].

3. Wet Acid Digestion Methods

Wet acid digestion is a widely used sample preparation technique. It is considered an alternative to FA for the extraction of PGEs and gold from geological samples. This method has many advantages, such as simplicity, high speed, low cost, robustness, simple reagent ingredients, low blank, and high degree of sample universality. However, the sample weight used during acid treatment is usually below 10 g, which is smaller than that of the dry digestion methods; as a result, the sampling errors obtained by this technique are large due to the stronger nugget effect. In addition, its efficiency depends on the ratio of the sample weight to the acid volume.
The best acid for gold extraction is aqua regia (aq. reg.) that can dissolve compounds insoluble in HCl or HNO3 alone. The addition of HF, NH4F, Br2, KClO3, or H2O2 significantly increases its strength. HF or NH4F can react with SiO2 to form SiF4 and destroy the silicate structure, which facilitates the quantificational extraction of gold from geological samples. In many studies [37,39,76,77,78,79], it was found that HSEs could not be quantifiably extracted from rocks without desilication. Br2, KClO3, or H2O2 can oxide HCl to produce more chlorine gas, which increases the gold solubility. Normally, an additional preconcentration step must be performed after acid digestion during the analysis of ultra-low gold contents in rocks. The commonly used enrichment methods use precipitation [26,80,81,82,83], ion exchange resins [5,71,81,84,85,86,87,88], solvent extraction [27,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98], polyurethane foam (PUF) [99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130], extraction chromatography [36,131,132,133], and solid adsorbents [134,135,136,137]. Figure 4 shows the common preconcentration methods utilized with wet acid digestion.

3.1. Acid Digestion + Precipitation

A method combining acid digestion with Te coprecipitation was originally used in 1978 to measure the amounts of gold and silver in rocks [80]. Later, Gupta [81] pointed out that Te interfered with the determination of gold and silver during the atomization step; therefore, this method was not suitable for quantifying gold and silver, but could be used to measure the contents of other PGEs instead. In order to prevent the loss of gold during the dissolution of tellurium buttons, acid digestion, Te coprecipitation, and INNA were utilized to determine the gold contents in rocks [82]. The gold recovery and LOD of this method were 96% and 0.7 ppb, respectively. Eller et al. [26] used a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) pressure bomb combined with HNO3, HF, aqua regia, and HClO4 to dissolve rock samples, while Se coprecipitation was performed to preconcentrate gold. The obtained recovery of Au was greater than 98%. Niskavaara and Kontas [83] combined HF and aqua regia acid digestion with Hg coprecipitation to determine the concentrations of Au, Pd, Pt, Rh, Ag, Te, and Se in geological samples. The observed poor precision of gold in the low-concentration samples was likely caused by sample heterogeneity. Table 3 lists various methods for Au preconcentration.

3.2. Acid Digestion + Ion Exchange Resin

• Anion exchange resins
Since gold exists in the form of AuCl4− complex anions under acidic conditions, when an acidic solution containing AuCl4− is passed through an anion exchange resin, AuCl4− is adsorbed on the resin and becomes separated from other basic metals. However, it is difficult to elute the AuCl4− species strongly adsorbed on the anion resin surface. Barredo and Polo [84] developed a method for the analysis of Au, Ag, and Cd in rock samples, which were digested with HF, aqua regia, and HClO4, preconcentrated with Dowex 1-X8 anion resin, and eluted with ammonia solution.
• Cation exchange resins
In contrast to the anion exchange resins, when an acidic solution containing AuCl4− is passed through a cation exchange resin, gold is transported through the resin column in the form of AuCl4- complex anions separated from metal cations. Gupta [81,85] compared the enrichment efficiencies of Dowex 50W-X8 cation exchange resin combined with Te coprecipitation for PGEs and gold. The cation exchange resin method is recommended for the determination of µg/g levels of gold. Based on the results reported by Meisel et al. [86] showing that all PGEs exhibit similar chemical behavior in a chromatographic column, they can be used as the ideal internal standards for the calculation of Rh concentrations. Fischer et al. [5] used a Carius tube filled with inverse aqua regia to dissolve rock samples and Eichrom 50W-X8 cation exchange resin to separate Re, Ir, Ru, Pt, Rh, Pd, and Au from the matrix. The concentrations of monoisotopic Rh and Au elements were calculated by the standardization to the 101Ru and 193Ir signal intensities, and the Ru and Ir concentrations were determined by isotope dilution.
• Chelating resins
Chelating resins contain chelating groups that can selectively adsorb gold and separate it from other matrix elements in solution. They combine the ionization exchange and complexation reactions and, therefore, exhibit good selectivity and strong binding energies as compared with those of the ordinary ion exchange resins. Coedo et al. [71] decomposed geological samples by aqua regia and HF and then separated PGEs and gold using tetraethylenepentamine chelating resin. Wu et al. [87] used YPA4 chelating resin as both the solid phase extractant and chemical modifier to determine the Au, Pd, and Pt contents in geological samples by electrothermal vaporization inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ETV-ICP-AES). The elution of gold from the two chelating resins mentioned above was performed by ashing.
• Chelate absorption resins
Chelate absorption resins combine the high selectivity of chelating resins with the high adsorption efficiency of absorption resins. Spheron Thiol 1000 chelate absorption resin was used to extract low gold levels by Medved et al. [88]. Table 4 summarizes the Au extraction methods using ion exchange resins.

3.3. Acid Digestion + Solvent Extraction/Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction

Solvent extraction (also called liquid-liquid extraction) is a classical method for Au separation and preconcentration characterized by the low reagent blank, high enrichment efficiency, and simple operation. The most widely used solvents for low-level Au determination are methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK) and isobutyl methyl ketone (IBMK).
Terashima [89] established a simple method utilizing aqua regia for sample digestion and MIBK for gold extraction to determine gold concentrations in 60 geological reference materials. As aqua regia only partially interacted with the samples, Terashima et al. [90] adopted aqua regia and HF for dissolving the entire gold content. The obtained results were very close to those of INAA. Normally, the solvent extraction method is used in conjunction with GFAAS. However, the Fe spectral line of 242.4 nm can interfere with the sensitive Au line of 242.8 nm in the determination of Au by GFAAS. In addition, as the polarities of Au and Fe are close, they are always extracted together by the same solvent. Therefore, the elimination of iron impurities from the organic phase is the key to the accurate determination of low gold levels. A two-stage solvent extraction method (using diethyl ether and MIBK) was proposed by Yokohama et al. to prevent iron interference and effectively concentrate gold [27]. The results obtained for reference materials were in good agreement with the INAA data. Ramesh et al. [91] used the Zeeman background correction technology for GFAAS, washed the MIBK organic phase with a wash solution, and centrifuged it twice for the total removal of iron.
Chattopadhyay and Sahoo [92] used the sequential digestion of HBr-Br2 and aqua regia, sequential extraction of IBMK and toluene, and Te coprecipitation enrichment method to determine traces of gold in geological samples. Monteiro et al. [93] examined the stability of gold in IBMK extracts and found that closed polypropylene containers (with absorbance measurement changes of less than 3%) were more suitable than both the open polypropylene and closed glass containers over periods of up to 22 h.
As the liquid-liquid extraction method requires the use of large volumes of organic solvents (which are often toxic), Rezaee et al. [94] introduced a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) method that was highly sensitive, efficient, and powerful for the preconcentration and determination of trace elements. Shamsipur and Ramezani [95] applied the DLLME technology to form an adduct between Victoria Blue dye and AuCl4− using acetone as a dispersant and chlorobenzene as an extractant to determine the ultra-trace amounts of gold by GFAAS. Another DLLME method for the determination of gold traces using dicyclohexylamine as the extractant, acetone as the dispersant, and chloroform as the extraction solvent was established by Kagaya et al. [96]. Calle et al. [97] applied the DLLME technology to preconcentrate the ion pairs formed between AuCl4− and [CH3(CH2)3]4N+ in a microliter-range volume of chlorobenzene using acetone as a disperser solvent for the determination of ultra-low gold contents. Fazelirad et al. [98] used benzyldimethyltetradecyl ammonium chloride dihydrate to form an ion pair with AuCl4−, acetone as the dispersant, and 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([Hmim][PF6]) ionic solution as the extractant for gold extraction. Table 5 lists the solvent extraction/dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction methods for Au preconcentration.

3.4. Acid Digestion + PUF

PUF was originally used for the selective adsorption of gold from 0.2 M HCl solution in 1970 by Bowen [99]. After that, this technology has become widely spread, owing to its excellent adsorption selectivity, high enrichment efficiency, simple operation process, and low analysis cost [100,101]. The mechanism of PUF adsorption may be based on physical adsorption, solvent extraction, or ion exchange. However, the majority of studies support the solvent extraction-based mechanism. Gesser [102], Oren [103], Lo and Chow [104], and Jones et al. [105] examined the PUF adsorption of Ga, Fe, Sn, and Rh, and concluded that PUF was a “solid solvent-extractant”. In addition, a possible cation chelation mechanism was suggested by Hamon based on the results of his detailed studies on the PUF adsorption of Co thiocyanate and salts of several organic acids [106]. However, as shown by Wang et al. [107], the PUF adsorption of gold involved a reduction reaction, indicating that PUF reduced AuCl4− (+3) to Au (0) followed by its deposition on the foam surface (Figure 5). It can be hypothesized that the mechanisms of PUF adsorption are not the same for different compounds.
PUF can be used as a special adsorbent for gold due to its very high selectivity. Schiller [108] compared the adsorption efficiencies of PbS, Fe(OH)3, Al(OH)3, Dowex 1-X8, and PUF toward gold. It was found that quantitative recovery of gold could be achieved within 90 min using PbS and PUF. However, the PUF method is superior to the PbS one in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio during the testing step. With the continuous optimization of various experimental conditions (including those for the pretreatment of PUF [109,110], types and concentrations of the acid digestion reagents and adsorption conditions [111,112,113,114], and elution conditions [115,116]), this method has become one of the main techniques for the enrichment of gold in geological samples [117,118,119,120,121]. To further improve the selectivity and adsorption capacity of PUF, many researchers coated it with organic reagents (such as MIBK and TBP) [122,123,124,125,126], bonded chelating ligands to the PUF matrix [127], and functionally modified it by the ligand coupling [128,129,130] with the PUF skeleton.

3.5. Acid Digestion + Extraction Chromatography

As extraction chromatography represents a chromatographic method, it exhibits the basic characteristics of chromatography. Unlike the commonly used chromatographic techniques, in this method, an inert carrier of organic extractant is supported on the column as the stationary phase for separation, and a solution of various inorganic acids is utilized as the mobile phase. This technology combines the high selectivity of extractants in solvent extraction with the effectiveness of chromatography separation, which significantly reduces the amounts of organic extractants and is less dangerous and easy to operate. In the 1970s, Pohlandt and Steele [131,132] and Bao [133] began to use porous silicon and polytrifluorochloroethylene as an inert carrier for tributyl phosphate extractant to analyze the gold amounts in ore samples and assay grains. Later, Pitcairn and Warwick [36] coated polyacrylamide resin with DIBK to preconcentrate ultra-low gold contents in rocks. The LOD of this method was as low as 0.002 ppb.

3.6. Acid Digestion + Novel Solid Adsorbents

Activated carbon enrichment is a widely used method for gold determination. This technique is very simple, and its separation effect is very strong during pulp application. However, the common elution method involves the direct ashing of activated carbon, which causes the loss of gold and contamination. To solve this problem, a new simple technology was developed by Hassan et al. [134], in which gold was adsorbed on granular activated carbon followed by graphite GFAAS analysis. Other carbon materials such as carbon nanotubes were also used for gold extraction. In order to improve its selectivity and adsorption capacity, Dobrowolski et al. [135] compared the effects of nitric acid, ethylenediamine, and (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane on the modification of carbon nanotubes. The efficiency of analysis can also be improved using a hybrid adsorbent. Xue et al. [136] developed an adsorbent composed of cellulose fibers, activated carbon, and anion exchange resin for the preconcentration and separation of Au, Pd, and Pt in geological samples. Furthermore, in recent years, magnetic nanoparticles have been widely used in sample extraction due to their unique magnetic response, large surface area, and chemically modifiable surface. Ye et al. [137] established an on-line method for the Au, Pd, and Pt determination with 4′-aminobenzo-15-crown-5-ether functionalized magnetic nanoparticles. The obtained LOD of gold was 0.16 ppb. Table 6 summarizes the Au preconcentration methods using PUF/extraction chromatography/novel solid absorbents discussed in this work.

4. Direct Determination Methods

INAA is a reliable multi-element analysis method for the direct quantitative analysis of solid samples. It possesses very high Au sensitivity and is minimally affected by matrix effects. It also allows avoiding losses and contamination during the pre-treatment stage because no digestion or pre-enrichment of the sample is required. Constantin used this technique to determine the gold contents of 82 geochemical reference materials in 2006 and 2009 [28,138] and compared them with the results obtained by other analytical techniques. Table 7 compares various analytical methods commonly used for the gold determination in rocks.

5. Conclusions and Perspectives

In this review, various sample digestion and combined preconcentration methods for the determination of ultra-low gold contents in rocks are summarized. Although some breakthroughs have been achieved in recent years, many important problems remain to be solved, owing to the heterogeneous distribution of gold in rocks, unknown forms of Au in different types of samples, and limited knowledge of the stability of gold compounds. These issues can also create promising opportunities in the study area; thus, future works in this field should focus on the following points:
  • In order to eliminate the nugget effect, the sample weight must be large enough. However, it leads to low digestion efficiency and requires the use of complex operating procedures. Therefore, additional studies must be performed to improve the sample representativeness.
  • Normally, the results obtained by the methods described above exhibit large deviations, which are often attributed to the nugget effect. However, homogeneous reference materials are required to confirm this conclusion.
  • Although FA can attack the entire rock sample, its relatively large reagent blank makes it difficult to determine the low gold content precisely. Wet acid digestion can solve this problem, but aqua regia may partially dissolve the rock samples. The desilication by HF is an effective process; however, it is inconvenient for the use in high-pressure ashers and Carius tubes and may cause a severe interference of 181Ta16O into 197Au determination when ICP-MS is utilized. In addition, the formation of insoluble fluoride compounds may also cause the loss of gold.
  • It should be noted that gold solutions must be analyzed as soon as possible after separation due to the instability of gold in both the HCl and thiourea media. In addition, the memory effect and instrument damage caused by their usage are normally large. Therefore, future research works may focus on the development of suitable media for gold elution and quantitation.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 41703021 and 41403021).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pitcairn, I.K. Background concentrations of gold in different rock types. Appl. Earth Sci. (Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. B) 2011, 120, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Morgan, J.W.; Wandless, G.A.; Petrie, R.K.; Irving, A.J. Composition of The Earth’s Upper Mantle—I. Siderophile Trace Elements in Ultramafic Nodules. Tectonophysics 1981, 75, 47–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mitchell, R.H.; Keays, R.R. Abundance and distribution of gold, palladium and iridium in some spine1 and garnet Iberzolites: Implications for the nature and origin of precious metal-rich intergranular components in the upper mantle. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1981, 45, 2425–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pattou, L.; Lorand, J.P.; Gros, M. Non-chondritic platinum-group element ratios in the Earth’s mantle. Nature 1996, 379, 712–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fischer-Gödde, M.; Becker, H.; Wombacher, F. Rhodium, gold and other highly siderophile elements in orogenic peridotites and peridotite xenoliths. Chem. Geol. 2011, 280, 365–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Maier, W.D.; Peltonen, P.; McDonald, I. The concentration of platinum-group elements and gold in southern African and Karelian kimberlite-hosted mantle xenoliths: Implications for the noble metal content of the Earth’s mantle. Chem. Geol. 2012, 302–303, 119–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lorand, J.P.; Pattou, L.; GROS, M. Fractionation of Platinum-group Elements and Gold in the Upper Mantle: A Detailed Study in Pyrenean Orogenic Lherzolites. J. Petrol. 1999, 40, 957–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lorand, J.P.; Bodinier, J.L.; Dupuy, C. Abundance and distribution of gold in the orogenic-type spinel peridotites from Ariege (Northeastern Pyrenees, France). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1989, 53, 3085–3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Maier, W.D.; Barnes, S.J.; Campbell, I.H. Progressive mixing of meteoritic veneer into the early Earth’s deep mantle. Nature 2009, 460, 620–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Brenan, J.M.; McDonough, W.F. Core formation and metal–silicate fractionation of osmium and iridium from gold. Nat. Geosci. 2009, 2, 798–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cameron, E.M. Archean gold: Relation to granulite formation and redox zoning in the crust. Geology 1988, 16, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cameron, E.M. Scouring of gold from the lower crust. Geology 1989, 17, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cameron, E.M. Derivation of gold by oxidative metamorphism of a deep ductile shear zone: Part 2. Evidence from the Bamble Belt, south Norway. J. Geochem. Explor. 1989, 31, 149–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hofmann, A.; Pitcairn, I.K.; Wilson, A. Gold mobility during Palaeoarchaean submarine alteration. Earth. Planet. Sc. Lett. 2017, 462, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Patten, C.G.C.; Pitcairn, I.K.; Teagle, D.A.H. Hydrothermal mobilisation of Au and other metals in supra-subduction oceanic crust: Insights from the Troodos ophiolite. Ore. Geol. Rev. 2017, 86, 487–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Connors, K.A.; Noble, D.C.; Bussey, S.D. Initial gold contents of silicic volcanic rocks: Bearing on the behavior of gold in magmatic systems. Geology 1993, 21, 937–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Webber, A.P.; Roberts, S.; Taylor, R.N.; Pitcairn, I.K. Golden plumes: Substantial gold enrichment of oceanic crust during ridge-plume interaction. Geology 2013, 41, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pitcairn, I.K. Sources of Metals and Fluids in Orogenic Gold Deposits: Insights from the Otago and Alpine Schists, New Zealand. Econ. Geol. 2006, 101, 1525–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fleet, M.E.; Crocket, J.H.; Liu, M.H. Laboratory partitioning of platinum-group elements (PGE) and gold with application to magmatic sulfide–PGE deposits. Lithos 1999, 47, 127–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hou, Z.Q.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, R. Recycling of metal-fertilized lower continental crust: Origin of non-arc Au-rich porphyry deposits at cratonic edges. Geology 2017, 45, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pitcairn, I.K.; Craw, D.; Teagle, D.A.H. Metabasalts as sources of metals in orogenic gold deposits. Miner. Deposita. 2015, 50, 373–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Patten, C.G.C.; Pitcairn, I.K.; Teagle, D.A.H. Michelle Harris, Mobility of Au and related elements during the hydrothermal alteration of the oceanic crust: Implications for the sources of metals in VMS deposits. Miner. Deposita. 2016, 51, 179–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Boskabadi, A.; Pitcairn, I.K.; Broman, C. Carbonate alteration of ophiolitic rocks in the Arabian–Nubian Shield of Egypt: Sources and compositions of the carbonating fluid and implications for the formation of Au deposits. Int. Geol. Rev. 2017, 4, 391–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kerr, R.A. Is the World Tottering on the Precipice of Peak Gold? Science 2012, 335, 1038–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Perry, B.J.; Barefoot, R.R.; Van Loon, J.C. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for the determination of platinum group elements and gold. Trac-Trend. Anal. Chem. 1995, 14, 388–397. [Google Scholar]
  26. Eller, R.; Alt, F.; Tolg, G. An efficient combined procedure for the extreme trace analysis of gold, platinum, palladium and rhodium with the aid of graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry and total-reflection X-ray fluorescence analysis. Fresenius. Z. Anal. Chem. 1989, 334, 723–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yokoyama, T.; Yokota, T.; Hayashi, S. Determination of trace gold in rock samples by a combination of two-stage solvent extration and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry: The problem of iron interference and its solution. Geochem. J. 1996, 30, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Constantin, M. Determination of Au, Ir and thirty-two other elements in twelve geochemical reference materials by instrumental neutron activation analysis. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2006, 267, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Barefoot, R.R. Determination of the precious metals in geological materials by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1998, 13, 1077–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Barefoot, R.R.; Van Loon, J.C. Recent advances in the determination of the platinum group elements and gold. Talanta 1999, 49, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Balcerzak, M. Sample Digestion Methods for the Determination of Traces of Precious Metals by Spectrometric Techniques. Anal. Sci. 2002, 18, 737–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pyrzynska, K. Recent developments in the determination of gold by atomic spectrometry techniques. Spectrochim. Acta B 2005, 60, 1316–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mokhodoeva, O.B.; Myasoedova, G.V.; Kubrakova, I.V. Sorption Preconcentration in Combined Methods for the Determination of Noble Metals. J. Anal. Chem. 2007, 62, 607–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Myasoedova, G.V.; Mokhodoeva, O.B.; Kubrakova, I.V. Trends in Sorption Preconcentration Combined with Noble Metal Determination. Anal. Sci. 2007, 23, 1031–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Pyrzynska, K. Sorbent materials of separation and preconcentration of gold in environmental and geological samples-A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 741, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pitcairn, I.K.; Warwick, P.E. Method for Ultra-Low-Level Analysis of Gold in Rocks. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 1290–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chow, A.; Beamish, F.E. An experimental evaluation of neutron activation, wet assay and fire assay methods of determining gold in ores. Talanta 1967, 14, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hall, G.E.M.; Pelchat, J.C. Analysis of geological materials for gold, platinum and palladium at low ppb levels by fire assay-ICP mass spectrometry. Chem. Geol. 1994, 115, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hall, G.E.M.; Vaive, J.E.; Coope, J.A. Bias in the analysis of geological materials for gold using current methods. J. Geochem. Explor. 1989, 34, 157–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Juvonen, M.R.; Bartha, A.; Lakomaa, T.M. Comparison of Recoveries by Lead Fire Assay and Nickel Sulfide Fire Assay in the Determination of Gold, Platinum, Palladium and Rhenium in Sulfide Ore Samples. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 2004, 28, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Plessen, H.G.; Erzinger, J. Determination of the Platinum-Group Elements and Gold in Twenty Rock Reference Materials by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) after Pre-Concentration by Nickel Sulfide Fire Assay. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 1998, 22, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cerceau, C.; Carvalho, C.F.; Rabelo, C.S. Recovering lead from cupel waste generated in gold analysis by Pb-Fire assay. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 183, 771–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Porter, K.A.; Kirk, C.; Fearey, D. Elevated Blood Lead Levels Among Fire Assay Workers and Their Children in Alaska, 2010–2011. Public. Health. Rep. 2015, 130, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Asif, M.; Parry, S.J. Elimination of Reagent Blank Problems in the Fire-assay Pre-concentration of the Platinum Group Elements and Gold with a Nickel Sulphide Bead of Less Than One Gram Mass. Analyst 1989, 114, 1057–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lu, C.F.; He, H.L.; Zhou, Z.R.; Zhi, X.X.; Li, B.; Zhang, Q. Determination of platinum-group elements and gold in geochemical exploration samples by nickel sulfide fire assay-ICP-MS, II. Reduction of reagent blank. Rock Miner. Anal. 2002, 21, 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  46. Jackson, S.; Fryer, B.; Gosse, W.; Healey, D.; Longerich, H.; Strong, D. Determination of the precious metals in geological materials by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) with nickel sulphide fire-assay collection and tellurium coprecipitation. Chem. Geol. 1990, 83, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Savard, D.; Barnes, S.J.; Meisel, T. Comparison between Nickel-Sulfur Fire Assay Te Co-precipitation and Isotope Dilution with High-Pressure Asher Acid Digestion for the Determination of Platinum-Group Elements, Rhenium and Gold. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 2010, 34, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Oguri, K.; Shimoda, G.; Tatsumi, Y. Quantitative determination of gold and the platinum-group elements in geological samples using improved NiS fire-assay and tellurium coprecipitation with inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Chem. Geol. 1999, 157, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gros, M.; Lorand, J.P.; Luguet, A. Analysis of platinum group elements and gold in geological materials using NiS fire assay and Te coprecipitation; the NiS dissolution step revisited. Chem. Geol. 2002, 185, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sun, Y.; Sun, M. Nickel sulfide fire assay improved for pre-concentration of platinum-group elements in geological samples: A practical means of ultra-trace analysis combined with inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Analyst 2005, 130, 664–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, C.S.; Chai, C.F.; Li, X.L. Determination of Platinum-Group Elements and Gold in Two Russian Candidate Reference Materials SCHS-1 and SLg-1 by ICP-MS after Nickel Sulfide Fire Assay Preconcentration. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 1998, 22, 195–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Juvonen, R.; Lakomaa, T.; Soikkeli, L. Determination of gold and the platinum group elements in geological samples by ICP-MS after nickel sulphide fire assay: Difficulties encountered with different types of geological samples. Talanta 2002, 58, 595–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Asif, M.; Parry, S.J.; Malik, H. Instrumental neutron activation analysis of a nickel sulphide fire assay button to determine the platinum- group elements and gold. Analyst 1992, 117, 1351–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bédard, L.P.; Barnes, S.J. A comparison of the capacity of FA-ICP-MS and FA-INAA
to determine platinum-group elements and gold in geological samples. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2002, 254, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jarvis, K.E.; Williams, J.G.; Parry, S.J.; Bertalan, E. Quantitative determination of the platinum-group elements and gold using NiS fire assay with laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). Chem. Geol. 1995, 124, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jorge, A.P.S.; Enzweiler, J.; Shibuya, E.K. Platinum-Group Elements and Gold Determination in NiS Fire Assay Buttons by UV Laser Ablation ICP-MS. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 1998, 22, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Resano, M.; McIntosh, K.S.; Vanhaecke, F. Laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry using a double- focusing sector field mass spectrometer of Mattauch–Herzog geometry and an array detector for the determination of platinum group metals and gold in NiS buttons obtained by fire assay of platiniferous ores. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2012, 27, 165–173. [Google Scholar]
  58. Resano, M.; Ruiz, E.G.; McIntosh, K.S.; Vanhaecke, F. Laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-dynamic reaction cell-mass spectrometry for the determination of platinum group metals and gold in NiS buttons obtained by fire assay of platiniferous ores. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2008, 23, 1599–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Resano, M.; Ruiz, E.G.; McIntosh, K.S.; Hinrichs, J. Comparison of the solid sampling techniques laser ablation-ICP-MS, glow discharge-MS and spark-OES for the determination of platinum group metals in Pb buttons obtained by fire assay of platiniferous ores. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2006, 21, 899–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Vanhaecke, F.; Resano, M.; Koch, J. Femtosecond laser ablation-ICP-mass spectrometry analysis of a heavy metallic matrix: Determination of platinum group metals and gold in lead fire-assay buttons as a case study. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2010, 25, 1259–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Compernolle, S.; Wambeke, D.; Raedt, I.D. Evaluation of a combination of isotope dilution and single standard addition as an alternative calibration method for the determination of precious metals in lead fire assay buttons by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta B 2012, 67, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Xue, G. The Analytical Chemistry of Gold; Aerospace Press: Beijing, China, 1990; pp. 74–75. [Google Scholar]
  63. Enzweiler, J.; Potts, P.J. The separation of platinum, palladium and gold from silicate rocks by the anion exchange separation of chloro complexes after a sodium peroxide fusion: An investigation of low recoveries. Talanta 1995, 42, 1411–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dai, X.X.; Koeberl, C.; Fröschl, H. Determination of platinum group elements in impact breccias using neutron activation analysis and ultrasonic nebulization inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry after anion exchange preconcentration. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 436, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Amossé, J. Determination of Platinum-Group Elements and Gold in Geological Matrices by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) after Separation with Selenium and Tellurium Carriers. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 1998, 22, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jin, X.D.; Zhu, H.P. Determination of platinum group elements and gold in geological samples with ICP-MS using a sodium peroxide fusion and tellurium co-precipitation. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2000, 15, 747–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Qi, L.; Gregoire, D.C.; Zhou, M.F. Determination of Pt, Pd, Ru and Ir in geological samples by ID-ICP-MS using sodium peroxide fusion and Te co-precipitation. Geochem. J. 2003, 37, 557–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Totland, M.M.; Jarvis, I.; Jarvis, K.E. Microwave digestion and alkali fusion procedures for the determination of the platinum-group elements and gold in geological materials by ICP-MS. Chem. Geol. 1995, 124, 21–36. [Google Scholar]
  69. Jarvis, I.; Totland, M.M.; Jarvis, K.E. Determination of the platinum-group elements in geological materials by ICP-MS using microwave digestion, alkali fusion and cation-exchange chromatography. Chem. Geol. 1997, 143, 27–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tsimbalist, V.G.; Anoshin, G.N.; Mitkin, V.N.; Razvorotneva, L.L.; Golovanova, N.P. Observations on New Approaches for the Determination of Platinum-Group Elements, Gold and Silver in Different Geochemical Samples from Siberia and the Far East. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 2000, 12, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Coedo, A.G.; Dorado, M.T.; Padilla, I.; Alguacil, F. Preconcentration and matrix separation of precious metals in geological and related materials using metalfix-chelamine resin prior to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 1997, 340, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mitkin, V.N.; Galizky, A.A.; Korda, T.M. Some Observations on the Determination of Gold and the Platinum-Group Elements in Black Shales. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 2000, 24, 227–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nesbitt, C.C.; Milosavljevic, E.B.; Hendrix, J.L. Determination of the Mechanism of the Chlorination of Gold in Aqueous Solutions. Ind. Eng Chem. Res. 1990, 29, 1696–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Perry, B.J.; Van Loon, J.C. Dry-chlorination Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometric Method for the Determination of Platinum Group Elements in Rocks. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1992, 7, 883–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Perry, B.J.; Speller, D.V.; Barefoot, R.R.; Van Loon, J.C. A large sample, dry chlorination, ICP-MS analytical method for the determination of platinum group elements and gold in rocks. Can. J. Appl. Spectrosc. 1993, 38, 131. [Google Scholar]
  76. Ely, J.C.; Neal, C.R.; O’Neill Jr, J.A.; Jain, J.C. Quantifying the platinum group elements (PGEs) and gold in geological samples using cation exchange pretreatment and ultrasonic nebulization inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (USN-ICP-MS). Chem. Geol. 1999, 157, 219–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Dale, C.W.; Burton, K.W.; Pearson, D.G.; Gannoun, A.; Alard, O.; Argles, T.W.; Parkinson, I.J. Highly siderophile element behaviour accompanying subduction of oceanic crust: Whole rock and mineral-scale insights from a high-pressure terrain. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2009, 73, 1394–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Dale, C.W.; Macpherson, C.G.; Pearson, D.J.; Hammond, S.J.; Arculus, R.J. Inter-element fractionation of highly siderophile elements in the Tonga Arc due to flux melting of a depleted source. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2012, 89, 202–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Li, J.; Zhao, P.P.; Liu, J.G. Reassessment of Hydrofluoric Acid Desilicification in the Carius Tube Digestion Technique for Re–Os Isotopic Determination in Geological Samples. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 2015, 39, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Fryer, B.J.; Kerrich, R. Determination of precious metals at ppb-levels in rocks by a combined wetchemical and flameless atomic absorption method. At. Absorpt. Newsletter. 1978, 17, 4–60. [Google Scholar]
  81. Sen Gupta, J.G. Determination of trace and ultra-trace amounts of noble metals in geological and related materials by graphite-furnace atomic-absorption spectrometry after separation by ion-exchange or co-precipitation with tellurium. Talanta 1989, 36, 651–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Elson, C.M.; Chatt, A. Determination of Gold in Silicate Rocks and Ores by Coprecipitation with Tellurium and Neutron Activation. Anal. Chim. Acta 1983, 155, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Niskavaara, H.; Kontas, E. Reductive coprecipitation as a separation method for the determination of gold, palladium, platinum, rhodium, silver, selenium and tellurium in geological samples by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 1990, 231, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Barredo, F.B.; Polo, C.P. The Simultaneous Determination of Gold, Silver and Cadmium at ppb Levels in Silicate Rocks by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry with Electrothermal Atomization. Anal. Chim. Acta 1977, 94, 283–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sen Gupta, J.G. Determination of noble metals in silicate rocks, ores and metallurgical samples by simultaneous multi-element graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry with Zeeman background correction. Talanta 1993, 40, 791–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Meisel, T.; Fellner, N. Moser, J. A simple procedure for the determination of platinum group elements and rhenium (Ru, Rh, Pd, Re, Os, Ir and Pt) using ID-ICP-MS with an inexpensive on-line matrix separation in geological and environmental materials. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2003, 18, 720–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wu, Y.W.; Jiang, Z.C.; Hu, B.; Duan, J.K. Electrothermal vaporization inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry determination of gold, palladium, and platinum using chelating resin YPA4 as both extractant and chemical modifier. Talanta 2004, 63, 585–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Medved, J.; Bujdoš, M.; Matúš, P.; Kubová, J. Determination of trace amounts of gold in acid-attacked environmental samples by atomic absorption spectrometry with electrothermal atomization after preconcentration. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 379, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Terashima, S. Determination of Gold in Sixty Geochemical Reference Samples by Flameless Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 1988, 12, 57–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Terashima, S.; Itoh, S.; Ando, A. Gold in Twenty-Six Janpanese Geochemical Reference Samples. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 1992, 16, 9–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ramesh, S.L.; Sunder Raju, P.V.; Anjaiah, K.V.; Mathur, R. Determination of Gold in Rocks, Ores, and Other Geological Materials by Atomic Absorption Techniques. Atom. Spectrosc. 2001, 22, 263–269. [Google Scholar]
  92. Chattopadhyay, P.; Sahoo, B.N. Modified Decomposition Procedure for the Determination of Gold in Geological Samples by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Analyst 1992, 117, 1481–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Monteiro, M.I.C.; Lavatori, M.P.A.; de Oliveira, N.M.M. Determination of Gold in Ores by Isobutyl Methyl Ketone Extraction and Electrothermal Atomic Absorption Spectrometry: A Stability Study of the Metal in Organic Media. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 2003, 27, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rezaee, M.; Assadi, Y.; Milani Hosseini, M.R.; Aghaee, E.; Ahmadi, F.; Berijani, S. Determination of organic compounds in water using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1116, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Shamsipur, M.; Ramezani, M. Selective determination of ultra trace amounts of gold by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry after dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. Talanta 2008, 75, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kagaya, S.; Takata, D.; Yoshimori, T.; Kanbara, T.; Tohda, K. A sensitive and selective method for determination of gold (III) based on electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry in combination with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction using dicyclohexylamine. Talanta 2010, 80, 1364–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. De La Calle, I.; Pena-Pereira, F.; Cabaleiro, N.; Lavilla, I.; Bendicho, C. Ion pair-based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for gold determination at ppb level in solid samples after ultrasound-assisted extraction and in waters by electrothermal-atomic absorption spectrometry. Talanta 2011, 84, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Fazelirad, H.; Taher, M.A.; Nasiri-Majd, M. GFAAS determination of gold with ionic liquid, ion pair based and ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2014, 29, 2343–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bowen, H.J.M. Absorption by Polyurethane Foams: New Method of Separation. J. Chem. Soc. A 1970, 1082–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lemos, V.A.; Santos, M.S.; Santos, E.S. Application of polyurethane foam as a sorbent for trace metal pre-concentration—A review. Spectrochim. Acta B 2007, 62, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Dmitrienko, S.G.; Zolotov, Y.A. Polyurethane foams in chemical analysis: Sorption of various substances and its analytical applications. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2002, 71, 159–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Gesser, H.D. Open-Cell Polyurethane Foam Sponge as a “Solvent Extractor” for Gallium and Iron. Sep. Sci. 1976, 11, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Oren, J.J. The solvent extraction of Fe(III) from acidic chloride solutions by open cell polyurethane foam sponge. Can. J. Chem. 1979, 57, 2023–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. LQ, V.S.K.; Chow, A. Extraction of Tin by Use of Polyurethane Foam. Talanta 1981, 28, 157–164. [Google Scholar]
  105. Jones, L.; Nel, I.; Koch, K.R. Polyurethane Foams as Selective Sorbents for Noble Metals. Anal. Chim. Acta 1986, 182, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hamon, R.F. The Cation-Chelation Mechanism of Metal-Ion Sorption by Polyurethanes. Talanta 1982, 29, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wang, H.Y.; Liu, Y.H.; Xue, D.S. Synthesis of Amino Polyurethane Foam and Its Application in Trace Gold Enrichment in Geological Samples. Rock. Miner. Anal. 2016, 35, 409–414. [Google Scholar]
  108. Schiller, P. Determination of Trace Amounts of Gold in Natural Sweet Waters by Non-destructive Activation Analysis after Preconcentration. Anal. Chim. Acta 1971, 54, 364–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Han, J.F. Discussion on the Ability of Different Acid - base Concentration for Foam Plastics to Rich Gold. Anhui. Chem. Ind. 2017, 43, 50–54. [Google Scholar]
  110. Moawed, E.A. Effect on the Chromatographic Behavior of Gold of the Process Used to Acid-Wash Polyurethane Foam. Chromatographia 2008, 67, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wu, J.; Zhang, M.J.; Xiong, Y.X. Determination of Trace Gold in Geological Samples Combining Foam Adsorption Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry with Closed Water Bath Dissolution. J. Central China Normal. Univ. 2017, 51, 626–637. [Google Scholar]
  112. Zheng, L. Determination of Gold in Geochemical Samples by Foam Adsorption-Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Low Carbon World. 2016, 3, 218–219. [Google Scholar]
  113. Hu, X.C. Determination of Trace Gold in Geochemical Samples by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS X-2): Foam Adsorption Separation. Technol. Outlook 2015, 23, 140. [Google Scholar]
  114. Saeed, M.M.; Ghaffar, A. Adsorption Syntax of Au (III) on Unloaded Polyurethane Foam. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 1998, 232, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Liu, X.L.; Wen, T.Y.; Sun, W.J. Determination of Au and Pt in Geological Samples by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry with Concentrate and Extraction by Foam Plastics and Thiourea. Rock. Miner. Anal. 2013, 32, 576–580. [Google Scholar]
  116. He, Z.L. Determination of Trace Gold in Geochemical Samples by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry with Thiourea Adsorbed by Foam. Xinjiang Nonferrous Metal. 2016, 6, 49–50. [Google Scholar]
  117. Chen, K. Determination of Gold in Geological Samples by Foam Adsorption Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Chem. Manag. 2018, 2, 208–209. [Google Scholar]
  118. Peng, Z.J. Determination of Trace Gold by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry with Foam Absorption. Guangdong Chem. 2015, 15, 222–223. [Google Scholar]
  119. Han, K.Y. Study on Determination of Trace Gold in Carbonate Rocks. Acad. BBS 2017, 272. [Google Scholar]
  120. Xiong, Z.C. Spectrometric Determination of Trace Gold in Rocks and Soils with Polyurethane Foam. Rock. Miner. Anal. 1984, 4, 364–367. [Google Scholar]
  121. Gu, T.X.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, C.S.; Yan, W.D. Preparation and Certification of High-Grade Gold Ore Reference Materials (GAu 19-22). Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 2001, 25, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Braun, T.; Farag, A.B. Chemical Enrichment and Separation of Gold in the Tributylphosphate-Thiourea-Perchloric acid system. Anal. Chim. Acta 1973, 65, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Braun, T.; Huszar, E. Separation of Trace Amounts of Cobalt from Nickel in the Tri-n-Octylamine-Hydrochloric Acid System. Anal. Chim. Acta 1973, 64, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Yan, M.C.; Wang, C.S.; Cao, Q.X. Eleven Gold Geochemical Reference Samples (GAu 8-18). Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 1995, 19, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. El-Shahawi, M.S.; Bashammakh, A.S.; Al-Sibaai, A.A. Solid phase preconcentration and determination of trace concentrations of total gold (I) and/or (III) in sea and wastewater by ion pairing impregnated polyurethane foam packed column prior flame atomic absorption spectrometry. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2011, 100, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Bashammakh, A.S.; Bahhafi, S.O.; Al-Shareef, F.M.; El-Shahawi, M.S. Development of an Analytical Method for Trace Gold in Aqueous Solution Using Polyurethane Foam Sorbents: Kinetic and Thermodynamic Characteristic of Gold (III) Sorption. Anal. Sci. 2009, 25, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. El-Shahat, M.F.; Moawed, E.A.; Farag, A.B. Chemical enrichment and separation of uranyl ions in aqueous media using novel polyurethane foam chemically grafted with different basic dyestuff sorbents. Talanta 2007, 71, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Xue, D.S.; Wang, H.Y.; Liu, Y.H. Cytosine-functionalized polyurethane foam and its use as a sorbent for the determination of gold in geological samples. Anal. Methods. 2016, 8, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Moawed, E.A.; Zaid, M.A.A.; El-Shahat, M.F. The chromatographic behavior of group (IIB) metal ions on polyurethane foam functionalized with 8-hydroxyquinoline. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 378, 470–478. [Google Scholar]
  130. Moawed, E.A.; Moawed, M.F. Synthesis, characterization of low density polyhydroxy polyurethane foam and its application for separation and determination of gold in water and ores samples. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 788, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Pohlandt, C.; Steele, T.W. Separation of the non-volatile noble metals by reversed-phase extraction chromatography. Talanta 1972, 19, 839–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Pohlandt, C.; Steele, T.W. Chromatographic determination of matte-leach separation and noble metals in residues. Talanta 1974, 21, 919–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Bao, G.M. Determination of Trace Gold in Ores by Extraction Layer-Atom Absorption Method. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 1977, 6, 428–431. [Google Scholar]
  134. Hassan, J.; Shamsipur, M.; Karbasi, M.H. Single granular activated carbon microextraction and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry determination for trace amount of gold in aqueous and geological samples. Microchem. J. 2011, 99, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Dobrowolski, R.; Mróz, A.; Dąbrowska, M.; Olszański, P. Solid sampling high-resolution continuum source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry for gold determination in geological samples after preconcentration onto carbon nanotubes. Spectrochim. Acta B 2017, 132, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Xue, D.S.; Wang, H.Y.; Liu, Y.H.; Shen, P. Multicolumn solid phase extraction with hybrid adsorbent and rapid determination of Au, Pd and Pt in geological samples by GF-AAS. Miner. Eng. 2015, 81, 149–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Ye, J.J.; Liu, S.X.; Tian, M.M. Preparation and characterization of magnetic nanoparticles for the on-line determination of gold, palladium, and platinum in mine samples based on flow injection micro-column preconcentration coupled with graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Talanta 2014, 118, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Constantin, M. Trace Element Data for Gold, Iridium and Silver in Seventy Geochemical Reference Materials. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 2009, 33, 115–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 24 01778 g001 550
Figure 1. Metal-silicate partition coefficients as functions of the oxygen fugacity. Reprinted with permission from [10].
Figure 1. Metal-silicate partition coefficients as functions of the oxygen fugacity. Reprinted with permission from [10].
Molecules 24 01778 g001
Molecules 24 01778 g002 550
Figure 2. Ratio diagrams of Au/Ir vs. 187Os/188Os and Au/Ir vs. Rh/Ir constructed for the PM and different chondrite classes and groups. The HSE composition determined for the PM model is similar to those of ordinary (OC) and enstatite (EL) chondrites, but differs from the compositions of carbonaceous (CC) and Rumuruti (R) chondrites. Reprinted with permission from [5].
Figure 2. Ratio diagrams of Au/Ir vs. 187Os/188Os and Au/Ir vs. Rh/Ir constructed for the PM and different chondrite classes and groups. The HSE composition determined for the PM model is similar to those of ordinary (OC) and enstatite (EL) chondrites, but differs from the compositions of carbonaceous (CC) and Rumuruti (R) chondrites. Reprinted with permission from [5].
Molecules 24 01778 g002
Molecules 24 01778 g003 550
Figure 3. Main stages of the gold determination by the NiS-FA method.
Figure 3. Main stages of the gold determination by the NiS-FA method.
Molecules 24 01778 g003
Molecules 24 01778 g004 550
Figure 4. Common preconcentration methods used with wet acid digestion.
Figure 4. Common preconcentration methods used with wet acid digestion.
Molecules 24 01778 g004
Molecules 24 01778 g005 550
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscopy images of (a) PUF, (b) PUF-NH2, and (c) PUF-NH2 adsorbed Au. Reprinted with permission from [107].
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscopy images of (a) PUF, (b) PUF-NH2, and (c) PUF-NH2 adsorbed Au. Reprinted with permission from [107].
Molecules 24 01778 g005
Table
Table 1. A summary of various FA digestion methods.
Table 1. A summary of various FA digestion methods.
Sample Weight/gCollector/FluxSeparation TechniqueDetection TechniqueLOD/ppbReference
10–30Pb/Na2CO3, Na2B4O7, SiO2, flour(C)ICP-MS2[38]
50NiS/Na2CO3, Na2B4O7, CaF2ICP-MS0.023[41]
15NiS/Na2CO3, Na2B4O7, SiO2Te coprecipitationICP-MS1.69[46]
15NiS/Na2CO3, Na2B4O7, SiO2Te coprecipitationICP-MS0.484[47]
20NiS/Na2CO3, Na2B4O7, SiO2duplicate NiS-FA and Te coprecipitationICP-MS0.053[48]
20NiS/Na2CO3, Li2B4O7, SiO2Te coprecipitationICP-MS0.33[49]
10NiS/Na2CO3, Na2B4O7INAA2[53]
10–15
50		NiS/Na2CO3, Na2B4O7
Pb/Na2CO3, NaOH, Na2B4O7, SiO2, C		UV-LA-ICP-MS
FS-LA-ICP-MS		1.7
4		[54,60]
Table
Table 2. A summary of various fusion digestion methods.
Table 2. A summary of various fusion digestion methods.
Sample Weight/gCrucibleFluxSeparation TechniqueDetection TechniqueLOD/ppbReference
0.5zirconiumNa2O2Anion resinGFAAS-[63]
1.0graphiteNa2O2Anion resinUSN-ICP-MS+NAAppt/-[64]
1–20zirconiumNa2O2/NaKCO3/KOHSe-Te coprecipitationICP-MS0.58[65]
1–20
2		Corundum
Corundum		Na2O2
Na2O2		Te coprecipitation
Te coprecipitation		ICP-MS
ICP-MS		0.007
0.32		[66,67]
Table
Table 3. Preconcentration of Au by various precipitation methods.
Table 3. Preconcentration of Au by various precipitation methods.
Sample Weight/gDigestionDissolutionSeparation TechniqueDetection TechniqueLOD/ppbReference
2–5Teflon beakerHF + aq.reg.Te coprecipitationGFAAS-[81]
0.3–1.3Teflon beakerHNO3 + HF + HClO4 + HClTe coprecipitationINAA0.7[82]
0.5–1.5PTFE bombHNO3 + HF + aq.reg. + HClO4 + HClSe coprecipitationGFAAS/TXRF0.2/1.2[26]
0.5Borosilicate tubeHCl + HNO3Hg coprecipitationGFAAS0.3[83]
Table
Table 4. Various methods for the preconcentration of Au by ion exchange resins.
Table 4. Various methods for the preconcentration of Au by ion exchange resins.
Sample Weight/gDigestionDissolutionSeparation TechniqueDetection TechniqueLOD/ppbReference
2-HNO3 + HCl + HClO4 + HFAnion exchange resinGFAAS0.2[84]
5Teflon beakerHF + aq.reg. + HNO3 + HClCation exchange resinGFAAS-[85]
2Carius tube/HPA-sHCl + HNO3Cation exchange resinICP-MS-[5]
0.25Microwave digestionaq.reg. + HF + HClO4Chelating resinFI-ICP-MS1.2[71]
0.05–1.5Mild heatingHNO3 + HClO4 + HFChelating resinETV-ICP-AES0.075[87]
5–10-aq.reg.Chelating sorbentGFAAS0.5[88]
Table
Table 5. Methods for the preconcentration of Au by solvent extraction/dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction.
Table 5. Methods for the preconcentration of Au by solvent extraction/dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction.
Sample Weight/gDigestionDissolutionSeparation TechniqueDetection TechniqueLOD/ppbReference
0.1–2.0Borosilicate beakerHNO3 + HClMIBKGFAAS-[89]
0.5–2.0Teflon beakeraq.reg. + HFMIBKGFAAS-[90]
1PFTE beakerHClO4 + HF + aq.reg.diethyl ether + MIBKGFAAS0.13[27]
10Glass beakeraq.reg.MIBKGFAAS0.1[91]
5–10Borosilicate beakerHBr + Br2IBMKGFAAS15[92]
10Erlenmeyer flaskHCl + HNO3IBMKGFAAS0.2[93]
0.2-aq.reg.DLLMEGFAAS0.005[95]
0.003–0.03Eppednorf vailHNO3 + HClDLLMEGFAAS1.5[97]
0.02-HNO3 + HCl + HFDLLMEGFAAS0.002[98]
Table
Table 6. Methods for the preconcentration of Au by PUF/extraction chromatography/novel solid absorbents.
Table 6. Methods for the preconcentration of Au by PUF/extraction chromatography/novel solid absorbents.
Sample Weight/gDigestionDissolutionSeparation TechniqueDetection TechniqueLOD/ppbReference
10Polypropylene beakeraq.reg.PUFGFAAS0.23[115]
10–20-aq.reg.MIBK-loaded PUFGFAAS-[124]
4Teflon potHNO3 + HF + HCl + aq.reg.DIBK-loaded CG71 resinICP-MS0.002[36]
0.2Microwave vesselaq.reg.Single granular carbonGFAAS0.9[134]
0.5Microwave vesselaq.reg.Modified carbon nanotubesSS-HR-CS-GFAAS0.002[135]
10PFA vesselaq.reg.hybrid adsorbentGFAAS0.008[136]
5–10Hot-plateaq.reg.magnetic nanoparticlesFI-column-GFAAS0.16[137]
Table
Table 7. Various analytical methods commonly used for the gold determination in rocks.
Table 7. Various analytical methods commonly used for the gold determination in rocks.
Sample Weight/gDissolutionSeparation TechniqueDetection TechniqueLOD/ppbReference
15NiS/Na2CO3, Na2B4O7, SiO2Te coprecipitationICP-MS0.484[47]
1–20Na2O2Te coprecipitationICP-MS0.007[66]
0.5–1.5HNO3 + HF + aq.reg. + HClO4 + HClSe coprecipitationGFAAS/TXRF0.2/1.2[26]
2HCl + HNO3Cation exchange resinICP-MS-[5]
0.02HNO3 + HCl + HFDLLMEGFAAS0.002[98]
10aq.reg.PUFGFAAS0.23[115]
4HNO3 + HF + HCl + aq.reg.DIBK-loaded CG71 resinICP-MS0.002[36]
0.2aq.reg.Single granular carbonGFAAS0.9[134]
5–10aq.reg.magnetic nanoparticlesFI-column-GFAAS0.16[137]
1–3--INAA~0.1[138]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.-h.; Wan, B.; Xue, D.-s. Sample Digestion and Combined Preconcentration Methods for the Determination of Ultra-Low Gold Levels in Rocks. Molecules 2019, 24, 1778. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24091778

AMA Style

Liu Y-h, Wan B, Xue D-s. Sample Digestion and Combined Preconcentration Methods for the Determination of Ultra-Low Gold Levels in Rocks. Molecules. 2019; 24(9):1778. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24091778

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yan-hong, Bo Wan, and Ding-shuai Xue. 2019. "Sample Digestion and Combined Preconcentration Methods for the Determination of Ultra-Low Gold Levels in Rocks" Molecules 24, no. 9: 1778. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24091778

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop