Next Article in Journal
The Role of Percent Volume Buried in the Characterization of Copper(I) Complexes for Lighting Purposes
Next Article in Special Issue
m-Carborane as a Novel Core for Periphery-Decorated Macromolecules
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and In Vitro Cytotoxicity and Antibacterial Activity of Novel 1,2,3-Triazol-5-yl-Phosphonates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deboronation-Induced Ratiometric Emission Variations of Terphenyl-Based Closo-o-Carboranyl Compounds: Applications to Fluoride-Sensing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances in π-Conjugated N^C-Chelate Organoboron Materials

1
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, University of Hail, Ha’il 81451, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Basic Sciences, College of Applied and Health Sciences, A’Sharqiyah University, P.O. Box 42, Ibra 400, Sultanate of Oman
3
Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down BA2 7AY, UK
4
Department of Chemistry, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 36, Al-Khod 123, Sultanate of Oman
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(11), 2645; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25112645
Submission received: 17 May 2020 / Revised: 3 June 2020 / Accepted: 4 June 2020 / Published: 6 June 2020

Abstract

:
Boron-containing π-conjugated materials are archetypical candidates for a variety of molecular scale applications. The incorporation of boron into the π-conjugated frameworks significantly modifies the nature of the parent π-conjugated systems. Several novel boron-bridged π-conjugated materials with intriguing structural, photo-physical and electrochemical properties have been reported over the last few years. In this paper, we review the properties and multi-dimensional applications of the boron-bridged fused-ring π-conjugated systems. We critically highlight the properties of π-conjugated N^C-chelate organoboron materials. This is followed by a discussion on the potential applications of the new materials in opto-electronics (O-E) and other areas. Finally, attempts will be made to predict the future direction/outlook for this class of materials.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The continuing development in the area of π-conjugated materials during the last few decades is the result of the combined interdisciplinary research interests of chemists, physicists, and materials scientists [1]. This class of materials provides an excellent platform to merge the features of organics with inorganics to obtain hybrid materials [2,3]. π-Conjugated materials are of considerable interest to academic and industrial researchers compared to conventional inorganic semiconductor materials, which have involve costs and labor-intensive fabrication procedures. The synthetic versatility, solution processability, and ability to tune their photophysical properties render conjugated organic materials as attractive candidates for applications in various domains of materials science [4].
To realize a material with superior optical and electronic properties for real-life applications, one or more strategies, such as ring expansion, π-length extension, and metal or main-group element incorporation into the π-conjugated organic system are being adopted. Among these, the incorporation of a non-carbon dopant is an emerging strategy, as it induces a network of covalent and non-covalent interactions, and allows fine tuning of the frontier orbitals (FOs) and the intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) processes. In the last two decades, a plethora of molecular and polymeric systems incorporating heteroatoms (viz. N, Si, S, Se, B, and P) have been reported with intriguing properties and applications. In particular, research on π-conjugated organoboron materials has seen a tremendous upsurge due to high usability in several real-life applications. Both three and four coordinated B-based conjugated materials have been reported. In this review, we wish to present properties and applications of N^C-chelated tetra-coordinated B-based conjugated oligo- and polymeric materials.

2. Boron-Bridged π-Conjugated Materials: Properties and Features

Boron (B, atomic number = 5, electronic configuration = 1s2 2s2 2p1) is a group 13 element with three valence electrons and two vacant p-orbitals. Depending upon the chelating and auxiliary fragments present, a π-conjugated organic backbone can be attached to the B-center to realize trigonal planar and tetrahedral organoboron compounds. The chelation of organic and inorganic fragments induces rigidity into the framework, along with enhanced π-conjugation and improved photoluminescence (PL) properties [5,6]. Consequently, physio-chemical properties, stability, and applications of the resulting materials can be significantly controlled and tuned by variation of the coordination environments around the B-center.
The trigonal planar B-fragment is considered to be isoelectronic with the carbocation (sp2 hybridization with one unoccupied pz orbital); thus, it is formally electron deficient (Lewis acid). Therefore, when it is incorporated into a π-conjugated framework, there is an overlap between the p orbital of boron and π-orbitals of the organic segment, leading to significant delocalization and PL property modulation [7]. It is interesting that the vacant p-orbital can be both advantageous and detrimental. The benefit of this vacant orbital is that it can be exploited to tune PL properties through Lewis base coordination. On the other hand, low stability against moisture (or other nucleophiles) is also attributed to this vacant orbital. To overcome this challenge, one or more bulky substituents such as 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl (Mes), 2,4,6-tri-iso-propylphenyl (Tip), and 2,4,6-tris(trifluoromethyl)phenyl (FMes) are often employed. These substituents not only modulate electron density over the material but also sterically shield the boron atom and provide kinetic stability towards air and moisture. Overall, a trigonal planar boron system functions as a strong π-acceptor and a σ-donor [8]. Exploiting these features, a number of main/side chain, cyclic, and Lewis acid-base type B-functionalized materials are available with intriguing properties and applications.
As mentioned above, coordination of vacant pz orbital of the B-atom paves a unique way to develop new materials with tunable properties. A range of neutral tetracoordinated organoboranes can be obtained by forming covalent bonds with mono-anionic chelate ligands. Tetracoordinated B-units can act as electron-donating substituents. A large number of chelating ligands based on C, N, and O donors have been synthesized and reported by different groups. Unlike three-coordinated compounds, boron atoms here play a more significant role in tetracoordinated boron compounds with the opportunity to fine tune the properties via modulation of electronic and steric effects. The introduction of a boron atom in tetracoordinated disposition within a conjugated framework enhances the planarity of the host (conjugated) structure, leading to improved charge transfer and other properties [9]. Besides, tetracoordinated organoboron structures possess high stability and rigid structure, leading to high fluorescence quantum yields. B ← N coordinate bond is labile compared to the B-F bond; this feature can be exploited to develop molecular switches with on-off PL properties [10]. In the literature, synthesis, characterization, and applications of numerous C^O- [11], N^O [12], N^N [13], N^C [14], C^C [15], and O^O [16] chelated B-containing π-conjugated materials have appeared. These chelating sites come from pyridine, thiazole, iso-quinoline, pyrimidine/quinoline, pyrazine, imidazole, and other cores.
In this review, we wish to present the features and properties of N^C-chelate tetracoordinated π-conjugated oligomeric and polymeric materials (Figure 1). In the last two decades, such organoboron-functionalized materials have been extensively studied by the research groups led by Wang, Pischel, and Yam, among others. They discovered several new features and properties associated with these materials. In this review we highlight the recent advances in the new area of N^C chelate compounds because these materials display promising PL features and a specific area has not been reviewed previously. Readers interested in related topics are referred to the reviews [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. We have divided this review into five main headings. Following this introduction (Section 1), we have briefly compared the features of tricoordinated and tetracoordinated Boron-bridged π-conjugated materials in Section 2. In Section 3, we have discussed the properties of different N^C-chelate-based organoboron compounds. We have reviewed and compared properties of some classical compounds in conjunction with recent ones. Following this, we have outlined some applications of N^C-chelate π-conjugated oligomeric and polymeric organoboron materials in Section 4. In this section, applications such as O-E, imaging, sensing, and other areas have been covered. At the end, in Section 5, we discuss the opportunities and challenges existing in this area of research.

3. π-Conjugated N^C-Chelate Organoboron Materials

Developed around a decade and a half ago, tetracoordinated N^C-chelate organoboron compounds are a unique class of photoresponsive materials. Figure 2 depicts a simple 2-phenylpyridine (ppy) based N^C donor ligand and the effect on the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy level upon borylation [24]. As is clear, borylation of a ppy ligand causes polarization of the LUMO. For instance, in non-borylated material, pyridine and phenyl rings contributed ~43% and ~55%, respectively to the LUMO level. Upon B-N coordination, the major contribution was from pyridine ring (~74%) indicating the polarization of the orbitals. This, in turn, led to modulated energy levels and stability (viz. destabilization of phenyl π* and the stabilization of pyridine π* orbital) of the compound. In addition, it has also been demonstrated that borylated unit possesses a significantly lower LUMO energy than their non-coordinated counterparts. The replacement of ancillary ligand such as bromine by an aromatic ring such as a thienyl or a phenyl ring has been found to increase the thermal and chemical stability of N^C-chelate organoboron materials [25]. The above-mentioned features motivated researchers to develop new materials with modified C and N-based fully color tunable materials [26,27]. In the subsections below, we discuss properties of different N^C-donor based organoboron compounds.

3.1. 2-Arylpyridine-Derived N^C-Chelates

In 2008, Wang and coworkers discovered that the ppy-BMes2 organoboron compound (1, Figure 3) undergoes intramolecular C-C/C-B bond rearrangement to produce reversible isomerized 1a and an irreversible isomerized 1b (Figure 3) products accompanied by a dramatic change in color [28]. Structure property relationship studies using symmetrical and unsymmetrical systems indicated that a bulky substituent (viz. mesityl) on boron fragment is required to initiate the photoisomerization process. In asymmetrical systems (2, Figure 3), borirane ring formation takes place regioselectively on the less bulky substituent attached to boron (2a; Figure 3). Further thermally assisted transformation produced 4bH-azaborepins (2b; Figure 3) [21]. It has been found that in a multi-borylated π-conjugates systems, isomerization takes place at one boron center only while others remain intact and assist this process via ICT [29]. Despite this fascinating process, the rearranged “dark” products significantly limit their usability for real-life applications [30].
In order to control such process and to increase photochemical stability, several modifications (such as modulation of electronic factors and steric congestion) have been suggested [31,32]. It is shown that the functionalities attached to the chelating/auxiliary units significantly affect the isomerization process [33]. For instance, when a π-conjugated metal acetylide fragment was attached to the pyridine ring, a significant quenching of the photoisomerization (at boron unit) resulted, owing to a low-lying intra-ligand charge transfer (ILCT)/ metal to ligand charge transfer (MLCT) triplet state [34]. On the other hand, conjugation extension using an olefin was found to be an effective strategy as it inhibits photoisomerization (at boron unit) via dissipating energy through the alternative cis-trans isomerization pathway (3 and 4, Figure 4) [31]. This cis–trans isomerization of the olefinic bond has also been found to be modulated by metal chelation in such systems [35]. In contrast to this study, authors found that when a bithienyl unit is attached via an alkynyl ligand, it completely turned off photoisomerization arising from the N,C-chelate boryl core (5 and 6, Figure 4). They attributed this to relatively low-lying π → π* transition state of the bithienyl unit along with its effective competition with the CT transition of the boryl unit [36]. A similar observation was made by Yam et al. [37] Here, the authors merged photoactive diarylethene-functionalized N∧C chelated thienylpyridine with bis-alkynyl borane complexes.
In order to examine the competitive photoisomerization processes, Wang and coworkers [38] prepared a series of cis and trans Pt(II) acetylides containing two photochromic units; i.e., dithienylethene (DTE) and B(ppy)Mes2 (7ac, Figure 5). Interestingly, in such systems, DTE showed preferential reversible photochromism over the boryl unit while the latter enhanced photoisomerization quantum efficiency of the DTE via antenna effect. The quantum efficiency (open → closed) of the system follows the order 7a < 7b < 7c. In order to realize a swift reversible isomerization process, the presence of bulky groups and electron-donating groups has been found to be favorable while the opposite was found for the presence of electron withdrawing groups on the N^C-chelate [39]. Similarly, cyclometallation of the N^C ligands also quenched the photoisomerization process of the B(ppy)Mes2 chromophore [40]. Several other studies have been carried out to obtain an in-depth knowledge of such chromophores and more can be found in references [38,41,42,43,44,45,46].
Through various structural modifications and analogues, it has been established that photoisomerization could also be extended to N^C-chelate in addition to the ppy systems [47]. For instance, in a recent work, Wang and coworkers [47] replaced pyridine by a pyrazole as the N-donor (8, Figure 6) and reported its two-stage photoreactivity. These new systems undergo photoisomerization to produce thermally stable aza borata bisnorcaradienes (8a), which upon prolonged irradiation led to isomerize products 14aH-diazabor-epins or BNN-benzotropilidene (8b). Although irreversible, formation of such interesting isomeric products is rare and opens up new vistas for researchers.

3.2. 2-Arylthiazole and Aminobenzothiadiazole Derived N^C-Chelates

Research work on 2-arylthiazole as the N^C-chelates dates back to 2006 when Yagamuchi and coworkers reported the synthesis and hole mobility properties of mono, di, and oligomeric thienylthiazole-based tetracoordinated B-materials [48]. They found that the incorporation of boryl units into the thienylthiazole core promotes a planar configuration of the π-conjugated framework by intramolecular B-N coordination, which reduces the LUMO level and increases the electron-accepting ability (electron affinity) of the materials. Later they found that the electron affinity along with the thermal stability of the materials can be further improved by replacing thienyl by a C6F4 moiety and by coordination with (C6F5)2B [49]. For example, Figure 7 shows the effect of borylation on thienylthiazole-based N^C-chelates [50]. As can be seen, the LUMO level of the chelated system reduces upon borylation and further dips upon the modification of ancillary ligands. Similarly, Wang and co-workers reported a decrease in HOMO/LUMO energy level (by 0.6 eV) of a conjugated system upon B-N coordination [51].
Benzothiadiazole (BTD) is a well-known strong electron-acceptor and is used to develop high-performance donor-acceptor (D-A) materials. BTD-containing materials often possess low band gaps, intense absorption, and emission that extends to the visible to near infrared (NIR) region, and thus are considered as unique materials for opto-electronics (O-E) and other applications [52]. Besides, it has also been reported that HOMO-LUMO energy levels of N^C-chelate organoboron compounds can be tuned via changing the exocyclic boron substituents [53]. Ingleson and coworkers reported simple routes to realize (N^C-chelate)B(aryl)2 species (915, Figure 8) [54,55]. They found that the incorporation of borylated aryl amine donor units in compound 9 (Ar = C6F5) raised the HOMO level, thereby lowering the band gap (~1.5 eV). Despite the fact that the borylated D−A−D material possesses λmax. > 700 nm, low PL quantum yields was the main drawback to these systems.
An analysis of the molecular structure of such systems indicated the presence of strain arising from the steric bulkiness of the groups attached to the B-center and the BTD unit. Such a strain can lead to the formation of B-N bonds that can be broken reversibly. Based on this idea, Shimogawa et al. [56] reported a near infrared (NIR) emitting Mes2B-substituted BTD material 16 (Figure 9a) having the ability to reversibly form intramolecular B-N coordination bonds. Such reversible bond breaking/formation has a direct effect on the electronic properties and color that are visible to the naked eye. For example, compound 16a, depending upon its bond formation/cleavage exhibited interesting thermo, solvo, and mechanochromism features (Figure 9b–d).

3.3. 2-Arylquinolines-Derived N^C-Chelates

Molecular fluorophores capable of absorbing and emitting light at different wavelengths are highly desirable for OE and bioimaging applications. In this quest, Shaikh et al. [57] reported molecular fluorophores based on 2-arylquinoline chelates (17af, Figure 10). The substituents present on the quinolines or on the boron center control the color of the emission. Because of their intense luminescence covering the whole visible region, the fluorophores were used for the imaging of breast cancer cells (MCF 7). Cell viability assays indicated the safe nature (at 1 μM) of organoboron compounds. Extensive bioimaging studies revealed its potential for targeted imaging. Bachollet et al. [58] carried out an extensive structure–optical property relationship study on bipyridine-based tetracoordinated B-materials (BOBIPYs). The new BOBIPYs showed promising properties, such as solid-state luminescence, blue to green emission, and high quantum yields. One of the derivatives based on compound 18 (Figure 10) has the potential to be used as an imaging probe. Other quinoline-based systems with aggregation-induced emission (AIE) properties have also been reported [59].

3.4. 1-Arylisoquinolines-Derived N^C-Chelates

N^C-chelate organoboron dyes, including those with arylisoquinoline ligands (1920, Figure 11), display high stability in air-equilibrated media, and an excited state intramolecular charge-transfer (ICT) character leading to high Stokes shifts, solvatofluorochromic behavior, and high photochemical stability [60,61]. Pischel and coworkers [61] found that the π-extended system 20ac (Figure 11) exhibits unique two-photon absorption (TPA) properties in the NIR region. In such compounds, the presence of D/A moieties on the termini significantly affected the two-photon absorption cross-section and emission properties. For example, the compound having the donor-π-acceptor (D-π-A) configuration 20a (X = NMe2) showed TPA cross Section 59 GM (960 nm) and 95 GM (700 nm). On the other hand, compound 20b, having the acceptor-π-acceptor (A-π-A) configuration showed TPA cross Section 14 GM (900 nm) and 223 GM (700 nm). The values higher than their non-extended counterpart 20d (20 GM at 710 nm and 13 GM at 840 nm) clearly indicated the usefulness of the extension of the π-conjugation via the alkynyl core.
Similarly to 16a (Figure 9), arylisoquinoline-based borylated compounds 21a and b (Figure 11) exhibited a unique steric hindrance-dependent response against temperature and PL properties. These systems exhibited a different geometry in the ICT excited states and thus acted as molecular thermometers [62]. For instance, 21a has a three-times higher emission quantum yield than the sterically hindered compound. Likewise, the sterically hindered compound showed no temperature effect. In contrast to this, the emission properties of compounds with helicene-type substituents on a borylated arylisoquinoline skeleton 22a and b (Figure 11) were found to be controlled by the electron-donating substituents on the helicene-type cores [63].

4. Applications

Design and development of electronic devices based on conjugated organic materials have seen a huge upsurge in the last few decades. This is due to their synthetic flexibility, excellent film-forming properties, and tunable electronic properties which gained them popularity [64]. As highlighted in the sub-sections above, the PL properties, stability, and applications of B-containing conjugated polymers are greatly determined by the lability of the B-N coordination bond, N^C-donating, π-conjugated cores, and the ancillary ligands. Based on this, several tetradentate B-based small, large, and polymeric π-conjugated materials have been tested for a range of applications. Since we restricted ourselves to N^C based conjugated materials, we highlight some pertinent examples and applications of such materials.

4.1. O-E Applications

4.1.1. Organic Light Emitting Diodes (OLEDs)

For applications as OE components, and sensory or imaging probes, both oligomeric and polymeric systems have been tested. Among these, polymeric materials are favored over oligomeric systems due to manifold benefits. The intense emission extending to the Vis-NIR region, high quantum yield, and charge carrier mobility are some of the important features that make organoborons promising candidates for full-color tunable light emitters [5]. It has been shown that B-N coordination improves EL properties of the luminogens [65]. As discussed before, tetracoordinated B-materials act as electron-donating substituents, and in the presence of a suitable acceptor (such as BT), they create D-A systems with low lying LUMOs. Ingleson and co-workers found that BTD-based D-A materials 23ac (Figure 12) possess low LUMO energy levels, minimally changed HOMO energy levels, far red/NIR emission with solid state quantum yields of up to 34%, and good stability towards moisture [66]. OLEDs fabricated using these materials showed low turn-on and operation voltages. Among the reported compounds, OLED fabricated using 23a showed the maximum external quantum efficiency (EQE) value of 0.46% (Table 1) with the EL emission maxima (λmax) at 678 nm. The EL value improved slightly (0.48%, λmax = 679 nm) upon changing the device architecture (95:5 wt% PF8BT/23a).
Due to their well separated FO, high solid-state quantum efficiency, and small ∆EST, Wang and coworkers [69] fabricated OLEDs based on compound 24 (Figure 12). However, this material failed dramatically and degraded under operational condition, thereby displaying very poor performance. They suggested that such systems undergo photo-oxidation or exciton-driven transformations within OLEDs, and thus N,C-chelate organoboron compounds bearing an amino group are not suitable for use as emitters in OLEDs. However, another study proved this finding wrong. By replacing phenoxazine by a N,N-diphenylamino core (present over ancillary boron) and introducing one or more F-atom on the C-donating ppy yielded high quantum yield (56.4–100%) materials 25ab (Figure 12) with significant delayed fluorescence (Figure 13a,b) [67]. OLEDs that contain dopant 25a (8 wt%) exhibited an EQE value 20.2%, while those fabricated using 25b (25 wt%) showed nearly 27% EQE with high current (~64 and 88 Cd/A) and power efficiency (~67 and 82 lm/W) (Figure 13c,d and Table 1). These values (~27%) are considered as some of the best values for thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) materials-based OLEDs. Fluorination not only improved the OLED performance, but also its stability.
Bipolar molecules are considered as a unique class of materials for OE applications as they can transport both the electrons and holes. Despite the fact that bipolar molecules bearing D and A fragments are well known for their ability to enhance TADF, one main challenge in their use as host material is the compression of the band gap via ICT processes, leading to reduction in the device performance. Fortunately, in tetrahedral N^C coordinated materials, the B-atom acts as a node as it separates the FOs, thereby making TADF materials excellent candidates as colorful emissive materials in OLEDs. Matsio and Asuda [24] reported a twisted organoboron TADF molecule 26 (Figure 12), bearing ppy-BPh2 as the acceptor and a spiro[2,7-dimethylacridan-9,9′-fluorene] (MFAc) as the D units. OLED fabricated using 26 showed EL an emission maxima (λmax) at 494 nm (i.e., intense green color) leading to 22.7% EQE with high current (56.4 Cd/A) and power efficiency (44.3 lm/W, Table 1). On the other hand, devices doped with spiro compounds 27ac (Figure 12) exhibited tunable EL emission color [68]. Clearly, the presence of different N-donating substituents had a marked effect on the emission. For example, a device with dopant 27a exhibits a blue emission (λmax = 468 nm); 27b showed a green emission (λmax = 519 nm); and 27c showed red EL (λmax = 605 nm, Table 1). Recently, Adachi and coworkers found that the OLEDs fabricated using dopant 28 (Figure 12) exhibit a very high efficiency (up to 10.5%), and surpasses the theoretical limit (5%) for conventional fluorescence emitters [70].

4.1.2. Organic Field-Effect Transistors (OFETs)

Organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) have great potential to be developed as next-generation flexible displays, and e-skins. However, compared to p-type semiconductors, a limited number of investigations has been carried out on the n-type materials. Based on the idea that borylation significantly rigidifies the backbone and increases the electron affinity of the resulting materials, new generation OFETs have been developed. For example, Wang and coworkers [71] designed A-π-A type small organic frameworks incorporating indandione and 1,1-dicyanomethylene-3-indandione as acceptors bridged by thienylthiazyl-boron-core (29ac, Figure 14). They found that OFETs fabricated using 29a did not work, which was attributed to the steric hindrance and small size π-core. On the other hand, 29b and 29c based semiconducting layers exhibit high performance. In fact, 29c showed the highest electron mobility value (~1.4 × 10−2 cm2 V−1 s−1) reported for small organoboron molecules. They attributed this high performance to increased interchromophoric interactions imparted by the acceptor units with an extended π-surface. Additionally, devices based on 29c showed much more defined structures and high crystallinity. Besides, control experiments (using C-analogue) indicated that the borylation is an effective way to realize n-type materials [72].
Similar results (structure dependent electron/hole mobilities) were found for semiconductors such as 30 (Figure 14) [73]. It was noted that the transport characteristics (n-type) of fluorinated systems (30b) were much better than non-fluorinated ones (30a). OFETs studies (top gate/bottom contact TGBC configuration) indicated ambipolar transport characteristics of these materials. Because of the coplanar backbone conformation of the polymers, both 30a and 30b show impressive hole and electron mobilities (10−3–10−2 cm2 V−1 s−1), with 30b being more effective (~2×) for electron mobility than 30a. On the other hand, OFET tests indicate a well-defined p-type characteristic for both 31ab (Figure 14). The hole mobilities of 31b and 31a tested by OFETs are 0.059 and 0.035 cm2 V−1 s−1, respectively [74].

4.1.3. Photovoltaics

Oligo and polymeric π-conjugated N^C-chelate organoboron materials have also been tested as component (donor, acceptor, or dye) in bulk heterojunction (BHJs) and dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). As discussed before, science is advancing towards the development of the next-generation organic electronic devices, also called plastic electronics. In the design and development of light to electricity converting devices (solar cells), all-polymer solar cells (all-PSCs) are in great demand. To realize all-PSCs, development of new acceptor materials is one of the most challenging tasks [75]. This is why compared to donor materials, fewer research initiatives have been carried out in the area of acceptor materials.
Fortunately, N^C-chelate organoboron materials fulfill the requirement of promising acceptor materials due to their unique structures and excellent optoelectronic properties [76]. Several tetracoordinate organoboron materials are available with low band gaps and LUMO levels comparable to PC61BM′s LUMO level [72]. While developing materials with high efficiency, Wang and workers [77] found that the electron mobility of a borylated polymer can be significantly modulated by reducing the steric hindrance effect. Using this knowledge, they developed acceptors 32ac (Figure 15) exhibiting power conversion efficiency (PCE) up to 4.95% (Table 2). Similarly, halogenation is an effective strategy to regulate the performance of PV materials. To understand the effect of halogenation on OE properties, Huang and co-workers [76] reported 33 (Figure 15) with different halogens installed on the donor fragment. This arrangement (BDT as acceptor and halogenated CN borane as acceptor) led to weakened ICT transitions. Depending upon the presence and the type of halogen, downshifted energy levels and varying efficiency were observed. For example, polymer 33 (X = Cl, η = 4.10%, Table 2) showed higher efficiency than 33 (X = F, η = 3.65%, Table 2), which in turn were better than non-halogenated 33 (X = H, η = 1.54%, Table 2). A further significant improvement in the efficiency was noted when benzodithiophene fragment from 33 was replaced by a thiophene or 3,4-difluorothiophene 34 (Figure 15) [73]. Good coplanarity, narrow bandgap, downshifted energy levels, and extended absorption profiles (350–800 nm) were some of the features found with 34. A BHJ device fabricated using acceptor 34 (X = F) exhibited a very high PCE (8.42%, Table 2) attributed to the favorable film morphology, balanced charge carriers, and collection among others.
To get in-depth knowledge about different side chains on phase separation morphology and all-PSC device performance, Wang and co-workers [80,81] assessed the performance of regio-random amorphous polymer with large steric hindrance (35, Figure 15). The reported acceptor has been found to possess energy level matching that of several donor materials. leading to high performance devices (Voc = 0.89–1.98 V, Jsc = 10.18–14.24 mA/cm2, FF = 3.78%–6.55%, and PCE = 3.8%–6.6%). Among six donor polymers studied, the active layer containing J91:35 blend showed the most optimal phase separation morphology and the best performance (Figure 16). On the other hand, J51:35 blend exhibits sub-optimal active layer morphology and poor PV performance (Figure 16). These results indicate that the aggregation tendency in solution of polymer donor is the dominant factor in the phase separation of semi-crystalline polymer donor/amorphous polymer acceptor blend in all-PSCs.
To be used as donor materials, a common strategy is to prepare D-A molecular architecture, which offers tunable LUMO/HOMO energy levels as a low FO level is helpful for harvesting sunlight. Since B-N based materials offer such opportunity, Wang et al. [78] compared the efficiency of polymers 36 (Figure 15). Clearly, the replacement of C–C unit by a B ← N unit significantly altered the frontier energy levels and PV performance. They found that control polymer (all carbon analogue) exhibited higher FOs energy levels, which is detrimental for use in BHJ as donor materials. On the other hand, borylation led to reduction in FOs energy levels, delocalization of FMO throughout the structure, and enhancement in the device performance (PCE up to 3.62%, Table 2).
Despite the fact that the conversion efficiency of DSSCs has reached >10%, further improvement is necessary. This is especially because of two reasons: one is practical applications on a commercial scale and the second is to develop metal free dyes. In the quest for metal free dyes, Shimogawa and coworkers [50] prepared a series of D-π-A dyes (37, Figure 17) as DSSC sensitizers, which contain triphenylamine as electron donors (D), bithiophene as π-spacer, boryl-substituted thienylthiazoles as electron acceptors (A), and carboxylic acid derivatives as anchor groups. DSSCs based on 37 exhibited good PCE values (5.1%–6.1%). Based on these results, they replaced the bithiophene unit by diketopyrrolopyrrole to develop D-π-A dyes 38 (Figure 17). DSSCs containing these dyes exhibited high JSC values (≤19.8 mA cm−2) as the absorption of 38 extends into the NIR region. [79]

4.2. Sensing

Due to the highly labile intramolecular N → B-Lewis pair formation dependent PL properties, N^C complexes have also been utilized for the detection of ions in solution and gaseous analytes. In a recent work, Liu et al. [82,83] found that, in the presence of light, red colored BN-functionalized anthracene 39 (Figure 18) rapidly reacts with oxygen to form colorless endoperoxides. Generally, for this type of reaction on typical diarylanthracenes, a photosensitizer is typically required to promote singlet O2 generation. However, 39 did not require any catalyst and exhibited self-sensitizing properties. This high, catalyst-free O2 reactivity was attributed to strong absorption of visible light, the small singlet-triplet gaps, and the release of steric strain upon peroxide formation. In another report, Schraff et al. [84] showed that in triazole-appended boranes, N-B-coordinate bonds are weak in solution and exist in close (coordinated)-open (non-coordinated) forms. The strength of such bonds (close-open equilibria) can be significantly modulated by changing the substituents present on the triazole ring. The same group showed that this process can be used to monitor on/off emission features upon the addition of different anions [85]. Yan et al. [10] exploited the labile nature of the B ← N coordinate bond and developed a fluorescent probe 40 (Figure 18), which selectively detected fluoride anions (F) in organic solvent. The authors proposed that in the presence of F anions a competitive reaction (labile B ← N vs stable B-F bond) takes place leading to the formation of an open form with quenched emission.

4.3. Bioimaging

Bioimaging using a fluorescent chemical probe is an emerging area of research. Several organic, inorganic, and organometallic probes have been reported for the imaging of cellular organelles and biological processes [86,87,88]. Due to their high demand in non-invasive early disease detection and progression, a number of borylated molecular fluorophores have been reported. For example, due to their characteristic features (high chemical and photostability, absorption/emission spanning visible/NIR/FIR regions, biocompatibility, etc.), arylquinolie-based molecular fluorophores emerged as potential candidates [57]. Pischel and coworkers [89] utilized an aryl isoquinoline containing organo-boron N^C chelate dye 41 (Figure 18) for the imaging of the N13 mouse microglial cell line. Moderate absorption co-efficient, large Stokes shift, polarity sensitive fluorescence, and possibility of bioconjugation make them promising imaging probes. Moreover, significant TP absorption cross-sections (up to 61 GM) allow the use of excitation wavelengths in the NIR region (>800 nm). Borylated poly(9,9-dioctylfluorene-alt-benzothiadiazole), 42 (m = 1, Figure 18), is a deep red/near-IR absorbing and highly emissive polymer tested for both OLED and bioimaging applications. [90] Conjugated polymer nanoparticles prepared using pegylated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) encapsulating 42 (m = 1) were found to be bright, photostable, low toxicity bioimaging agents for in vivo optical imaging. This includes, but is not limited to, high signal to background ratios, quantum yield (2.3%), low photobleaching (less than 10%), low toxicity, and preferential accumulation in the liver.

4.4. Others

In addition to the above-mentioned applications, other applications have been reported too. This includes the activation of small molecules [91,92], switchable chiral anions [93], NLO materials [94,95], among others. In a recent example, Wang et al. [96] reported blue fluorescent polymers exhibiting thermally reversible photochromism. These photochromic polymers, based on photochromic boron chromophores, showed monomer-ratio-dependent photoisomerization quantum efficiencies and boron dependent fluorescence quenching efficiency. The developed material can be used as switchable/erasable ink and are promising candidate for optical device applications.

5. Opportunities and Challenges

We highlight the features, properties, and applications of N^C-chelate tetracoordinate π-conjugated borylated materials. As discussed, different types of organic backbone can be utilized as N and C donors in combination with various ancillary ligands to prepare small, medium, and large π-conjugated materials. A thorough review of the literature indicated that a minor change in structure significantly modulates properties; therefore, several new synthetic pathways have been reported. The labile B-N bond formation offers coordination-induced stability to the structure and luminescence enhancement. Complexes such as those based on the phenylpyridine core show interesting reversible “bright” and “dark” photochromic states, while those on pyrazole display rare isomerism (two-stage photoreactivity). Such features can be exploited to develop smart optical devices. Due to their excellent charge transport abilities, especially hole transfer, they are being extensively used for the development of acceptor materials in all-PSCs. Compared to imide and cyano-based polymers, organoboron materials exhibit low performance, which is mainly attributed to the lack of well-designed studies [76]. It is envisioned that the selection of suitable co-units and halogenation at ideal positions are important to further improve the performance [76], which should be considered in future studies.
Some researchers also assessed boron containing complexes as donor materials for BHJs; more research is needed to improve the device performance. Similarly, by modifying π-skeletons, intrinsic D/A fragments, a range of dyes could also be achieved. For the biological applications, it is essential to carry out in vivo studies to explore the pros and cons of the materials in the human body. Besides, to achieve targetability, probes bearing a targeting unit (such as peptides) should also be prepared and assessed.

6. Conclusions

This article provides an overview of π-conjugated N^C-chelate organoboron materials. We delineated the important properties, features, and applications of different classes of such materials. We discussed here the effects of different structural components on the properties of the materials. The examples selected in this article clearly demonstrate that tetracoordinate N^C-chelate organoboron materials are potential candidates for the development of next generation materials. We have also suggested some future directions which might prove helpful for the design and development of new boron-based materials for modern applications.

Funding

This research received no external funding. The APC was funded by MDPI.

Acknowledgments

A.H. acknowledges the Department of Chemistry, University of Hail, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for providing infrastructure support during the preparation of this manuscript. R.A. acknowledges The Research Council (TRC), Oman (project number BFP/RGP/EI/18/076) and A’Sharqiyah University, Oman (ASU-FSFR/CAS/FSHN-01/2019). MSK acknowledges Sultan Qaboos University, Oman (EG/SQU-BP/SCI/CHEM/19/01) and The Research Council (TRC), Oman (BFP/RGP/EI/20/010) for support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tour, J.M. Molecular electronics. Synthesis and testing of components. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 791–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cheng, Y.J.; Yang, S.H.; Hsu, C.S. Synthesis of Conjugated Polymers for Organic Solar Cell Applications. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 5868–5923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Duan, C.; Zhang, K.; Zhong, C.; Huang, F.; Cao, Y. Recent advances in water/alcohol-soluble π-conjugated materials: New materials and growing applications in solar cells. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 9071–9104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Haque, A.; Al-Balushi, R.A.; Al-Busaidi, I.J.; Khan, M.S.; Raithby, P.R. Rise of Conjugated Poly-ynes and Poly(Metalla-ynes): From Design Through Synthesis to Structure-Property Relationships and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 8474–8597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, D.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y. Four-coordinate organoboron compounds for organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs). Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 8416–8433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pang, S.; Mas-Montoya, M.; Xiao, M.; Duan, C.; Wang, Z.; Liu, X.; Janssen, R.A.J.; Yu, G.; Huang, F.; Cao, Y. Adjusting Aggregation Modes and Photophysical and Photovoltaic Properties of Diketopyrrolopyrrole-Based Small Molecules by Introducing B ← N Bonds. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 564–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hertz, V.M.; Bolte, M.; Lerner, H.W.; Wagner, M. Boron-Containing Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Facile Synthesis of Stable, Redox-Active Luminophores. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2015, 54, 8800–8804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Glogowski, M.; Williams, J. Boron Photochemistry: XV. Determination of the Hammett Substituent Constant for the p-Dimesitylboryl Group. J. Organomet. Chem. 1981, 218, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Santos, F.M.; Rosa, J.N.; Candeias, N.R.; Carvalho, C.P.; Matos, A.I.; Ventura, A.E.; Florindo, H.F.; Silva, L.C.; Pischel, U.; Gois, P.M. A Three-Component Assembly Promoted by Boronic Acids Delivers a Modular Fluorophore Platform (BASHY Dyes). Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 1631–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Yan, N.; Wang, F.; Wei, J.; Song, J.; Yan, L.; Luo, J.; Fang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, W.; He, G. Highly emissive B← N unit containing four-coordinate C, N-Chelated organoboron compound for the detection of fluoride ions. Dyes Pigm. 2019, 166, 410–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shi, Y.G.; Wang, J.W.; Li, H.; Hu, G.F.; Li, X.; Mellerup, S.K.; Wang, N.; Peng, T.; Wang, S. A simple multi-responsive system based on aldehyde functionalized amino-boranes. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 1902–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Qi, Y.; Xu, W.; Ding, N.; Chang, X.; Shang, C.; Peng, H.; Liu, T.; Fang, Y. A film-based fluorescent device for vapor phase detection of acetone and related peroxide explosives. Mater. Chem. Front. 2019, 3, 1218–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, X.; Tang, P.; Yu, T.; Su, W.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, H. Two N, N-chelated difluoroboron complexes containing phenanthroimidazole moiety: Synthesis and luminescence properties. Dyes Pigm. 2019, 163, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dhanunjayarao, K.; Sa, S.; Aradhyula, B.P.R.; Venkatasubbaiah, K. Synthesis of phenanthroimidazole-based four coordinate organoboron compounds. Tetrahedron 2018, 74, 5819–5825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nagura, K.; Saito, S.; Fröhlich, R.; Glorius, F.; Yamaguchi, S. N-Heterocyclic Carbene Boranes as Electron-Donating and Electron-Accepting Components of π-Conjugated Systems. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2012, 51, 7762–7766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Oda, S.; Shimizu, T.; Katayama, T.; Yoshikawa, H.; Hatakeyama, T. Tetracoordinate Boron-Fused Double [5] Helicenes as Cathode Active Materials for Lithium Batteries. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 1770–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cinar, M.E.; Ozturk, T. Thienothiophenes, dithienothiophenes, and thienoacenes: Syntheses, oligomers, polymers, and properties. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 3036–3140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wakamiya, A.; Yamaguchi, S. Designs of functional π-electron materials based on the characteristic features of boron. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2015, 88, 1357–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Mellerup, S.K.; Wang, S. Boron-doped molecules for optoelectronics. Trends Chem. 2019, 1, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rao, Y.-L.; Amarne, H.; Wang, S. Photochromic four-coordinate N, C-chelate boron compounds. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2012, 256, 759–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mellerup, S.K.; Wang, S. Isomerization and rearrangement of boriranes: From chemical rarities to functional materials. Sci. China Mat. 2018, 61, 1249–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Huang, Z.; Wang, S.; Dewhurst, R.D.; Ignat’ev, N.V.; Finze, M.; Braunschweig, H. Boron: Its role in energy related research and applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2020, 59, 2–19. [Google Scholar]
  23. Entwistle, C.D.; Marder, T.B. Boron chemistry lights the way: Optical properties of molecular and polymeric systems. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2002, 41, 2927–2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Matsuo, K.; Yasuda, T. Enhancing thermally activated delayed fluorescence characteristics by intramolecular B–N coordination in a phenylpyridine-containing donor-acceptor π-system. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 8723–8726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, Y.; Pang, B.; Meng, H.; Xiang, Y.; Li, Y.; Huang, J. Synthesis of aromatic substituted B ← N embedded units with good stability and strong electron-affinity. Tetrahedron Lett. 2019, 60, 151286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Patil, N.T.; Shaikh, A.C. N, C-Chelate Four-Coordinate Organoborons with Full Colourtunability. U.S. Patent 10,301,330, 28 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang, S.; Amarne, H.Y.; Rao, Y. Boron Compounds and Uses Thereof. U.S. Patent 8,697,872 B2, 15 April 2014. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rao, Y.L.; Amarne, H.; Zhao, S.B.; McCormick, T.M.; Martic, S.; Sun, Y.; Wang, R.Y.; Wang, S. Reversible intramolecular C-C bond formation/breaking and color switching mediated by a N,C-chelate in (2-ph-py)BMes2 and (5-BMes2-2-ph-py)BMes2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12898–12900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Baik, C.; Murphy, S.K.; Wang, S. Switching of a single boryl center in pi-conjugated photochromic polyboryl compounds and its impact on fluorescence quenching. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2010, 49, 8224–8227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rao, Y.L.; Amarne, H.; Chen, L.D.; Brown, M.L.; Mosey, N.J.; Wang, S. Photo- and thermal-induced multistructural transformation of 2-phenylazolyl chelate boron compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 3407–3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Baik, C.; Hudson, Z.M.; Amarne, H.; Wang, S. Enhancing the photochemical stability of N,C-chelate boryl compounds: C-C bond formation versus C=C bond cis,trans-isomerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14549–14559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Novoseltseva, P.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Sauriol, F.; Wang, S. Structural dynamics and stereoselectivity of chiral benzylidene-amine N, C-chelate borane photo-thermal isomerization. Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 2276–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zeng, C.; Yuan, K.; Wang, N.; Peng, T.; Wu, G.; Wang, S. The opposite and amplifying effect of B←N coordination on photophysical properties of regioisomers with an unsymmetrical backbone. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 1724–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Wang, N.; Ko, S.B.; Lu, J.S.; Chen, L.D.; Wang, S. Tuning the photoisomerization of a N^C-chelate organoboron compound with a metal-acetylide unit. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 5314–5323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Baik, C.; Wang, S. Inhibiting olefin cis, trans-photoisomerization and enhancing electron-accepting ability of a diboryl compound by metal chelation. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 9432–9434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Rao, Y.L.; Amarne, H.; Lu, J.S.; Wang, S. Impact of a dithienyl unit on photostability of N,C-chelating boron compounds. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 638–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wong, H.-L.; Wong, W.-T.; Yam, V.W.-W. Photochromic thienylpyridine–bis (alkynyl) borane complexes: Toward readily tunable fluorescence dyes and photoswitchable materials. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1862–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, X.; Shi, Y.; Wang, N.; Peng, T.; Wang, S. Photoisomerization of Pt(II) Complexes Containing Two Different Photochromic Chromophores: Boron Chromophore versus Dithienylethene Chromophore. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 5757–5767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Amarne, H.; Baik, C.; Murphy, S.K.; Wang, S. Steric and electronic influence on photochromic switching of N,C-chelate four-coordinate organoboron compounds. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 4750–4761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rao, Y.-L.; Wang, S. Impact of cyclometalation and π-conjugation on photoisomerization of an N, C-chelate organoboron compound. Organometallics 2011, 30, 4453–4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mellerup, S.K.; Yousefalizadeh, G.; Wang, S.; Stamplecoskie, K.G. Experimental Evidence for a Triplet Biradical Excited-State Mechanism in the Photoreactivity of N,C-Chelate Organoboron Compounds. J. Phys. Chem. A 2018, 122, 9267–9274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hudson, Z.M.; Ko, S.B.; Yamaguchi, S.; Wang, S. Modulating the photoisomerization of N,C-chelate organoboranes with triplet acceptors. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 5610–5613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, N.; Wang, J.; Zhao, D.; Mellerup, S.K.; Peng, T.; Wang, H.; Wang, S. Lanthanide Complexes with Photochromic Organoboron Ligand: Synthesis and Luminescence Study. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 10040–10049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yusuf, M.; Liu, K.; Guo, F.; Lalancette, R.A.; Jäkle, F. Luminescent organoboron ladder compounds via directed electrophilic aromatic C–H borylation. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 4580–4587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Li, F.-P.; Zhu, H.-Y.; Li, Q.-S.; Li, Z.-S. Theoretical study on the regioselective photoisomerization of asymmetric N, C-chelate organoboron compounds. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 8376–8383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Li, Q.-S.; Zhu, H.-Y. Insights into the Photo-induced Isomerization Mechanisms of a N, C-Chelate Organoboron Compound: A Theoretical Study. ChemPhysChem 2020, 21, 510–517. [Google Scholar]
  47. Li, C.; Mellerup, S.K.; Wang, X.; Wang, S. Accessing Two-Stage Regioselective Photoisomerization in Unsymmetrical N, C-Chelate Organoboron Compounds: Reactivity of B (ppz)(Mes) Ar. Organometallics 2018, 37, 3360–3367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wakamiya, A.; Taniguchi, T.; Yamaguchi, S. Intramolecular B–N Coordination as a Scaffold for Electron-Transporting Materials: Synthesis and Properties of Boryl-Substituted Thienylthiazoles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2006, 45, 3170–3173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Job, A.; Wakamiya, A.; Kehr, G.; Erker, G.; Yamaguchi, S. Electronic tuning of thiazolyl-capped pi-conjugated compounds via a coordination/cyclization protocol with B(C6F5)3. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5470–5473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shimogawa, H.; Endo, M.; Taniguchi, T.; Nakaike, Y.; Kawaraya, M.; Segawa, H.; Murata, Y.; Wakamiya, A. D–π–A dyes with an intramolecular B-N coordination bond as a key scaffold for electronic structural tuning and their application in dye-sensitized solar cells. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2017, 90, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Dou, C.; Ding, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, L. Developing Conjugated Polymers with High Electron Affinity by Replacing a C—C Unit with a B← N Unit. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2015, 54, 3648–3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Khan, M.S.; Al-Suti, M.K.; Maharaja, J.; Haque, A.; Al-Balushi, R.; Raithby, P.R. Conjugated Poly-ynes and Poly (metalla-ynes) Incorporating Thiophene-based Spacers for Solar Cell (SC) Applications. J. Organomet. Chem. 2015, 812, 13–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Crossley, D.L.; Goh, R.; Cid, J.; Vitorica-Yrezabal, I.; Turner, M.L.; Ingleson, M.J. Borylated arylamine–benzothiadiazole donor–acceptor materials as low-LUMO, low-band-gap chromophores. Organometallics 2017, 36, 2597–2604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Crossley, D.L.; Cid, J.; Curless, L.D.; Turner, M.L.; Ingleson, M.J. Facile Arylation of Four-Coordinate Boron Halides by Borenium Cation Mediated Boro-desilylation and-destannylation. Organometallics 2015, 34, 5767–5774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Crossley, D.L.; Vitorica-Yrezabal, I.; Humphries, M.J.; Turner, M.L.; Ingleson, M.J. Highly Emissive Far Red/Near-IR Fluorophores Based on Borylated Fluorene–Benzothiadiazole Donor–Acceptor Materials. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 12439–12448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Shimogawa, H.; Yoshikawa, O.; Aramaki, Y.; Murata, M.; Wakamiya, A.; Murata, Y. 4,7-Bis[3-(dimesitylboryl)thien-2-yl]benzothiadiazole: Solvato-, Thermo-, and Mechanochromism Based on the Reversible Formation of an Intramolecular B-N Bond. Chemistry 2017, 23, 3784–3791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Shaikh, A.C.; Ranade, D.S.; Thorat, S.; Maity, A.; Kulkarni, P.P.; Gonnade, R.G.; Munshi, P.; Patil, N.T. Highly emissive organic solids with remarkably broad color tunability based on N,C-chelate, four-coordinate organoborons. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 2015, 51, 16115–16118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bachollet, S.P.; Volz, D.; Fiser, B.; Munch, S.; Ronicke, F.; Carrillo, J.; Adams, H.; Schepers, U.; Gomez-Bengoa, E.; Brase, S.; et al. A Modular Class of Fluorescent Difluoroboranes: Synthesis, Structure, Optical Properties, Theoretical Calculations and Applications for Biological Imaging. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 12430–12438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Zhao, Z.; Chang, Z.; He, B.; Chen, B.; Deng, C.; Lu, P.; Qiu, H.; Tang, B.Z. Aggregation-Induced Emission and Efficient Solid-State Fluorescence from Tetraphenylethene-Based N, C-Chelate Four-Coordinate Organoborons. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 11512–11517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Boscá Mayans, F.; Cuquerella Alabort, M.C.; Fernandes Pais, V.C.; Ros Lao, A.; Pischel, U. Excited-State Pathways of Four-Coordinate N, C-Chelate Organoboron Dyes. ChemPhotoChem 2018, 2, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Domínguez, Z.; Pais, V.N.F.; Collado, D.; Vázquez-Domínguez, P.; Albendín, F.N.; Pérez-Inestrosa, E.; Ros, A.; Pischel, U. π-Extended Four-Coordinate Organoboron N, C-Chelates as Two-Photon Absorbing Chromophores. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 13384–13393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pais, V.F.; Lassaletta, J.M.; Fernandez, R.; El-Sheshtawy, H.S.; Ros, A.; Pischel, U. Organic fluorescent thermometers based on borylated arylisoquinoline dyes. Chemistry 2014, 20, 7638–7645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Domínguez, Z.; López-Rodríguez, R.; Álvarez, E.; Abbate, S.; Longhi, G.; Pischel, U.; Ros, A. Azabora [5] helicene Charge-Transfer Dyes Show Efficient and Spectrally Variable Circularly Polarized Luminescence. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 12660–12668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Yang, J.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, S.; Guo, Y.; Liu, Y. Insight into high-performance conjugated polymers for organic field-effect transistors. Chem 2018, 4, 2748–2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. He, B.; Chang, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, B.; Lu, P.; Kwok, H.S.; Qin, A.; Zhao, Z.; Qiu, H. Impacts of intramolecular B–N coordination on photoluminescence, electronic structure and electroluminescence of tetraphenylethene-based luminogens. Dyes Pigm. 2014, 101, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Crossley, D.; Cade, I.; Clark, E.R.; Escande, A.; Humphries, M.; King, S.; Vitorica-Yrezabal, I.; Ingleson, M.; Turner, M. Enhancing electron affinity and tuning band gap in donor–acceptor organic semiconductors by benzothiadiazole directed C-H borylation. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 5144–5151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Shiu, Y.-J.; Chen, Y.-T.; Lee, W.-K.; Wu, C.-C.; Lin, T.-C.; Liu, S.-H.; Chou, P.-T.; Lu, C.-W.; Cheng, I.-C.; Lien, Y.-J. Efficient thermally activated delayed fluorescence of functional phenylpyridinato boron complexes and high performance organic light-emitting diodes. J. Mat. Chem. C 2017, 5, 1452–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wong, B.Y.; Wong, H.L.; Wong, Y.C.; Chan, M.Y.; Yam, V.W. Air-Stable Spirofluorene-Containing Ladder-Type Bis(alkynyl)borane Compounds with Readily Tunable Full Color Emission Properties. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 15095–15106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mellerup, S.K.; Yuan, K.; Nguyen, C.; Lu, Z.H.; Wang, S. Donor-Appended N,C-Chelate Organoboron Compounds: Influence of Donor Strength on Photochromic Behaviour. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 12464–12472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mamada, M.; Tian, G.; Nakanotani, H.; Su, J.; Adachi, C. The Importance of Excited-State Energy Alignment for Efficient Exciplex Systems Based on a Study of Phenylpyridinato Boron Derivatives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2018, 57, 12380–12384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhao, R.; Min, Y.; Dou, C.; Lin, B.; Ma, W.; Liu, J.; Wang, L. A Conjugated Polymer Containing a B ← N Unit for Unipolar n-Type Organic Field-Effect Transistors. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2020, 2, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Hecht, R.; Kade, J.; Schmidt, D.; Nowak-Krol, A. n-Channel Organic Semiconductors Derived from Air-Stable Four-Coordinate Boron Complexes of Substituted Thienylthiazoles. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 11620–11628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Li, Y.; Meng, H.; Liu, T.; Xiao, Y.; Tang, Z.; Pang, B.; Li, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Lu, X.; et al. 8.78% Efficient All-Polymer Solar Cells Enabled by Polymer Acceptors Based on a B ← N Embedded Electron-Deficient Unit. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1904585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Pang, B.; Tang, Z.; Li, Y.; Meng, H.; Xiang, Y.; Li, Y.; Huang, J. Synthesis of Conjugated Polymers Containing B ← N Bonds with Strong Electron Affinity and Extended Absorption. Polymers 2019, 11, 1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Zhao, C.; Wang, J.; Jiao, J.; Huang, L.; Tang, J. Recent advances of polymer acceptors for high-performance organic solar cells. J. Mat. Chem. C 2020, 8, 28–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Meng, H.; Li, Y.; Pang, B.; Li, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Guo, L.; Li, X.; Zhan, C.; Huang, J. Effects of Halogenation in B ← N Embedded Polymer Acceptors on Performance of All-polymer Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2020, 12, 2733–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zhao, R.; Dou, C.; Xie, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, L. Polymer Acceptor Based on B ← N Units with Enhanced Electron Mobility for Efficient All-Polymer Solar Cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2016, 55, 5313–5317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Zhang, Z.; Ding, Z.; Dou, C.; Liu, J.; Wang, L. Development of a donor polymer using a B ← N unit for suitable LUMO/HOMO energy levels and improved photovoltaic performance. Poly. Chem. 2015, 6, 8029–8035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shimogawa, H.; Endo, M.; Nakaike, Y.; Murata, Y.; Wakamiya, A. D-π-A Dyes with Diketopyrrolopyrrole and Boryl-substituted Thienylthiazole Units for Dye-sensitized Solar Cells with High J SC Values. Chem. Lett. 2017, 46, 715–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Zhang, L.; Ding, Z.; Zhao, R.; Jirui, F.; Ma, W.; Liu, J.; Wang, L. Effect of polymer donor aggregation on the active layer morphology of amorphous polymer acceptor-based all-polymer solar cells. J. Mat. Chem. C 2020, 8, 5613–5619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhao, R.; Lin, B.; Feng, J.; Dou, C.; Ding, Z.; Ma, W.; Liu, J.; Wang, L. Amorphous Polymer Acceptor Containing B← N Units Matches Various Polymer Donors for All-Polymer Solar Cells. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 7081–7088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, K.; Lalancette, R.A.; Jäkle, F. B–N Lewis pair functionalization of anthracene: Structural dynamics, optoelectronic properties, and O2 sensitization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 18170–18173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Liu, K.; Lalancette, R.A.; Jäkle, F. Tuning the structure and electronic properties of B-N fused dipyridylanthracene and implications on the self-sensitized reactivity with singlet oxygen. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 7453–7462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Schraff, S.; Sun, Y.; Pammer, F. Tuning of electronic properties via labile N → B-coordination in conjugated organoboranes. J. Mat. Chem. C 2017, 5, 1730–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Koch, R.; Sun, Y.; Orthaber, A.; Pierik, A.J.; Pammer, F.D. Turn-on Fluorescence Sensors Based on Dynamic Intramolecular N → B-Coordination. Org. Chem. Front. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Haque, A.; Faizi, M.S.H.; Rather, J.A.; Khan, M.S. Next generation NIR fluorophores for tumor imaging and fluorescence-guided surgery: A review. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2017, 25, 2017–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Haque, A.; Al-Balushi, R.A.; Khan, M.S. σ-Acetylide Complexes for Biomedical Applications: Features, Challenges and Future directions. J. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 897, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. DeRosa, C.A.; Fraser, C.L. Tetracoordinate Boron Materials for Biological Imaging; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  89. Fernandes Pais, V.C.; Alcaide, M.M.; Pischel, U. Strongly Emissive and Photostable Four-Coordinate Organoboron N, C Chelates and Their Use in Fluorescence Microscopy. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 15369–15376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Neumann, P.R.; Crossley, D.L.; Turner, M.; Ingleson, M.; Green, M.; Rao, J.; Dailey, L.A. In Vivo Optical Performance of a New Class of Near-Infrared-Emitting Conjugated Polymers: Borylated PF8-BT. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2019, 11, 46525–46535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chen, J.; Lalancette, R.A.; Jäkle, F. Stereoselective ortho borylation of pyridylferrocenes. Organometallics 2013, 32, 5843–5851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chen, J.; Lalancette, R.A.; Jakle, F. Chiral organoborane Lewis pairs derived from pyridylferrocene. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 9120–9129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chen, J.; Murillo Parra, D.A.; Lalancette, R.A.; Jäkle, F. Redox-Switchable Chiral Anions and Cations Based on Heteroatom-Fused Biferrocenes. Organometallics 2015, 34, 4323–4330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Jiménez, C.C.; Enríquez-Cabrera, A.; González-Antonio, O.; Ordóñez-Hernández, J.; Lacroix, P.G.; Labra-Vázquez, P.; Farfán, N.; Santillan, R. State of the Art of Boron and Tin Complexes in Second-and Third-Order Nonlinear Optics. Inorganics 2018, 6, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Mukundam, V.; Sa, S.; Kumari, A.; Das, R.; Venkatasubbaiah, K. B–N coordinated triaryl pyrazole: Effect of dimerization, and optical and NLO properties. J. Mat. Chem. C 2019, 7, 12725–12737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wang, J.; Jin, B.; Wang, N.; Peng, T.; Li, X.; Luo, Y.; Wang, S. Organoboron-based photochromic copolymers for erasable writing and patterning. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 4629–4638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. General structure of N^C-chelate organoboron materials discussed in this review. Ar1 and Ar2 represent aromatic N/C-donating fragments while R represents symmetric or asymmetric ancillary ligands.
Figure 1. General structure of N^C-chelate organoboron materials discussed in this review. Ar1 and Ar2 represent aromatic N/C-donating fragments while R represents symmetric or asymmetric ancillary ligands.
Molecules 25 02645 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of molecular orbital polarization induced by B-N coordination. Reproduced with permission from reference [24].
Figure 2. Schematic representation of molecular orbital polarization induced by B-N coordination. Reproduced with permission from reference [24].
Molecules 25 02645 g002
Figure 3. Photoisomerization and oxidation of symmetric and asymmetric organoboron compound ppy-BMes2 (Mes = mesityl).
Figure 3. Photoisomerization and oxidation of symmetric and asymmetric organoboron compound ppy-BMes2 (Mes = mesityl).
Molecules 25 02645 g003
Figure 4. Photoisomerization processes in alkyne and olefin-containing organoboron compounds.
Figure 4. Photoisomerization processes in alkyne and olefin-containing organoboron compounds.
Molecules 25 02645 g004
Figure 5. Examples of borylated materials in which two photochromic units are separated by cis, trans-Pt(II)-acetylide, and Si-containing spacers.
Figure 5. Examples of borylated materials in which two photochromic units are separated by cis, trans-Pt(II)-acetylide, and Si-containing spacers.
Molecules 25 02645 g005
Figure 6. New generation organoboron compounds with rare two-stage photoreactivity.
Figure 6. New generation organoboron compounds with rare two-stage photoreactivity.
Molecules 25 02645 g006
Figure 7. Effect of merging pyridine with phenyl followed by B-N coordination on the LUMO levels. Reproduced with permission from reference [50].
Figure 7. Effect of merging pyridine with phenyl followed by B-N coordination on the LUMO levels. Reproduced with permission from reference [50].
Molecules 25 02645 g007
Figure 8. Some examples of BTD-containing N^C-chelate organoboron compounds.
Figure 8. Some examples of BTD-containing N^C-chelate organoboron compounds.
Molecules 25 02645 g008
Figure 9. (a) Reversible formation of an intramolecular B-N coordination bond in 16a. (b) Photographs of 16a as an annealed film, yellow crystals, solution in CHCl3, and cast film; (c) thermochromism of 16a in toluene; and (d) yellow crystals of 16a before and after grinding. Reproduced with permission from reference [56].
Figure 9. (a) Reversible formation of an intramolecular B-N coordination bond in 16a. (b) Photographs of 16a as an annealed film, yellow crystals, solution in CHCl3, and cast film; (c) thermochromism of 16a in toluene; and (d) yellow crystals of 16a before and after grinding. Reproduced with permission from reference [56].
Molecules 25 02645 g009
Figure 10. Some examples of 2-arylquinoline-derived N^C-chelates.
Figure 10. Some examples of 2-arylquinoline-derived N^C-chelates.
Molecules 25 02645 g010
Figure 11. Some examples of 1-arylisoquinoline-derived N^C-chelates.
Figure 11. Some examples of 1-arylisoquinoline-derived N^C-chelates.
Molecules 25 02645 g011
Figure 12. Examples of N^C-donating, π-conjugated cores as OLEDs materials.
Figure 12. Examples of N^C-donating, π-conjugated cores as OLEDs materials.
Molecules 25 02645 g012
Figure 13. Absorption (arrow towards left) and emission (arrow towards right) spectra of (a) 25a, and (b) 25b in solid (black), and in toluene (red), DCM (blue), and ACN solution (green) at 298 K. Fabricated TADF OLED of (c) 25a (8 wt%) and (d) 25b (25 wt%) devices. Reproduced with permission from reference [67].
Figure 13. Absorption (arrow towards left) and emission (arrow towards right) spectra of (a) 25a, and (b) 25b in solid (black), and in toluene (red), DCM (blue), and ACN solution (green) at 298 K. Fabricated TADF OLED of (c) 25a (8 wt%) and (d) 25b (25 wt%) devices. Reproduced with permission from reference [67].
Molecules 25 02645 g013
Figure 14. Examples of N^C-donating, π-conjugated cores as OFETs materials.
Figure 14. Examples of N^C-donating, π-conjugated cores as OFETs materials.
Molecules 25 02645 g014
Figure 15. Examples of N^C-donating, π-conjugated cores as BHJ active layers.
Figure 15. Examples of N^C-donating, π-conjugated cores as BHJ active layers.
Molecules 25 02645 g015
Figure 16. All-PSC device performance of compound 35 with different donors [80,81].
Figure 16. All-PSC device performance of compound 35 with different donors [80,81].
Molecules 25 02645 g016
Figure 17. Examples of N^C-donating, π-conjugated cores as DSSC dyes.
Figure 17. Examples of N^C-donating, π-conjugated cores as DSSC dyes.
Molecules 25 02645 g017
Figure 18. Examples of N^C-donating, π-conjugated cores for sensing and bioimaging.
Figure 18. Examples of N^C-donating, π-conjugated cores for sensing and bioimaging.
Molecules 25 02645 g018
Table 1. OLED performances of different π–conjugated N^C-chelate organoboron materials.
Table 1. OLED performances of different π–conjugated N^C-chelate organoboron materials.
Comp. #Device ArchitectureEQE (%)Current Efficiency (Cd/A)Power Efficiency (lm/W)Ref.
23aITO/Plexcore OC/PF8-TFB/PF8-BT/PF8-TFB/23a)/Ba0.46--[66]
23bITO/Plexcore OC/PF8-TFB/PF8-BT/PF8-TFB/23b)/Ba0.14--[66]
23cITO/Plexcore OC/PF8-TFB/PF8-BT/PF8-TFB/23c)/Ba0.13--[66]
25aITO/PEDOT:PSS/TAPC/mCP/mCPCN doped with 25a)/3TPYMB/LiF/Al20.263.9 a66.9 a[67]
25bITO/PEDOT:PSS/TAPC/mCP/mCPCN doped with 25b)/3TPYMB/LiF/Al26.688.2 b81.5 b[67]
26ITO/HAT-CN/α-NPD/CCP/EML/PPF/TPBi/Liq/Al22.756.444.3[24]
27aITO/PEDOT:PSS/27a/MCP/3TPYMB/TmPyPB/LiF/Al1.11.61.0[68]
27bITO/PEDOT:PSS/27b/MCP/3TPYMB/TmPyPB/LiF/Al1.34.83.0[68]
27cITO/PEDOT:PSS/27b/MCP/3TPYMB/TmPyPB/LiF/Al0.91.40.9[68]
a = Peak value at 8 wt% concentration; b = Peak value at 25 wt% concentration; ITO = indium tin oxide; OC = organic conductive; PF8-TFB = poly[(9,9-dioctyl-fluorenyl-2,7-diyl)-co-(4,40-(N-(4-sec-butylphenyl)-diphenylamine)]; PF8-BT = poly[(9,9-di-n-octyl-fluorenyl-2,7-diyl)-alt-(benzo[2,1,3]-thiadiazol-4,8-diyl)]; PEDOT:PSS = poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(styrenesulfonate); TAPC = di-[4-(N,N-ditolylamino) phenyl] cyclohexane; mCP = N,N-dicarbazolyl-3,5-benzene; mCPCN = 9-(3-(9H-carbazol-9-yl)phenyl)-9H-carbazole-3-carbonitrile; 3TPYMB = tris-[3-(3-pyridyl)mesityl]borane; LiF = lithium fluoride; HAT-CN = 1,4,5,8,9,11-hexaaza triphenylenehexacarbonitrile; α-NPD = 4,4′-bis-[N-(1-naphthyl)-N-phenylamino]-1,1′-biphenyl; CCP = 9-phenyl-3,9′-bicarbazole; EML = emission/emitting layer; PPF = 2,8-iso (diphenylphosphoryl) dibenzo[b,d]furan; TPBi = 1,3,5-tris(N-phenylbenzimidazol-2-yl)-benzene; Liq = 8-hydroxyquinoline lithium; MCP = N,N’-dicarbazolyl-3,5-benzene; TmPyPB = 1,3,5-tri[(3-pyridyl)-phen-3-yl]benzene.
Table 2. PV (all-PSCs and DSSCs) performances of selected π-conjugated N^C-chelate organoboron materials.
Table 2. PV (all-PSCs and DSSCs) performances of selected π-conjugated N^C-chelate organoboron materials.
Comp. #Device ArchitectureVoc
(V)
Jsc
(mA/cm−2)
FF
(%)
PCE a
(%)
Ref.
32aITO/PEDOT:PSS/PTB7-Th:32a/Ca/Al0.9211.37484.95[77]
ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PTB7:32a/Ca/Al0.939.05453.71
32cITO/PEDOT:PSS/PTB7-Th:32c/Ca/Al1.080.51220.10
ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PTB7:32c/Ca/Al1.002.48300.63
33ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PBDB-T:33/PDINO/Al0.97 (X = H)
0.95 (X = F)
0.95 (X = Cl)
4.15
8.74
9.19
38.12
43.66
46.55
1.54
3.65
4.10
[76]
34ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PBDB-T:34/PNDIT-F3N/Al0.92 (X = H)
0.92 (X = F)
8.01
13.01
48.7
69.8
3.79
8.42
[73]
36ITO/PEDOT:PSS/36:PC71BM/LiF/Al0.829.8946.13.62[78]
3737/TiO20.51–0.7310.3–14.254–723.9–6.1[50]
3838TBP/TiO2 or
38/TiO2 or
38+DCA-TBP/TiO2 or
38+DCA/TiO2
0.44–0.687.8–19.849–683.2–6.1[79]
a = average PCE value. PDINO = 2,9-Bis[3-(dimethyloxido amino)propyl]anthra[2,1,9-def:6,5,10- d′e′f′]diisoquinoline-1,3,8,10(2H,9H)-tetrone; PNDIT-F3N = poly[[2,7-bis(2-ethylhexyl)-1,2,3,6,7,8-hexahydro-1,3,6,8-tetraoxobenzo[lmn][3,8]phenanthroline-4,9-diyl]-2,5-thiophenediyl[9,9-bis[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-9H-fluorene-2,7-diyl]-2,5-thiophenediyl]; PTB7-Th = poly[4,8-bis(5-(2-ethylhexyl)thiophen-2-yl)benzo [1,2-b:4,5-b’]-dithiophene-co-3-fluorothieno[3,4-b]thiophene-2-carboxylate]; PTB7 = poly({4,8-bis[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy]-benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b’]dithiophene-2,6-diyl}{3-fluoro-2-[(2-ethylhexyl)carbonyl] thieno[3,4-b]thiophenediyl}); PBDB-T= poly[(2,6-(4,8-bis(5-(2-ethylhexyl) thiophen-2-yl)-benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]dithiophene))-alt-(5,5-(1′,3′-di-2-thienyl-5’,7′-bis(2-ethylhexyl)benzo [1′,2′-c:4′,5′-c′]dithiophene-4,8-dione)]; PC71BM = [6,6]-phenyl-C71-butyric acid methyl ester; TiO2 = titanium(IV) oxide or titanium dioxide; DCA = deoxycholic acid; TBP = 4-tert-butylpyridine.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Haque, A.; Al-Balushi, R.A.; Raithby, P.R.; Khan, M.S. Recent Advances in π-Conjugated N^C-Chelate Organoboron Materials. Molecules 2020, 25, 2645. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25112645

AMA Style

Haque A, Al-Balushi RA, Raithby PR, Khan MS. Recent Advances in π-Conjugated N^C-Chelate Organoboron Materials. Molecules. 2020; 25(11):2645. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25112645

Chicago/Turabian Style

Haque, Ashanul, Rayya A. Al-Balushi, Paul R. Raithby, and Muhammad S. Khan. 2020. "Recent Advances in π-Conjugated N^C-Chelate Organoboron Materials" Molecules 25, no. 11: 2645. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25112645

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop