Next Article in Journal
Coordination Compounds of Cu, Zn, and Ni with Dicarboxylic Acids and N Donor Ligands, and Their Biological Activity: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
H-rGO-Pd NPs Nanozyme Enhanced Silver Deposition Strategy for Electrochemical Detection of Glypican-3
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Porphyrin Functionalized Carbon Quantum Dots for Enhanced Electrochemiluminescence and Sensitive Detection of Cu2+
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Simultaneous Determination of Xanthine and Hypoxanthine Using Polyglycine/rGO-Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode

1
School of Health & Social Care, Shanghai Urban Construction Vocational College, Shanghai 201401, China
2
College of Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(3), 1458; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031458
Submission received: 19 December 2022 / Revised: 30 January 2023 / Accepted: 1 February 2023 / Published: 2 February 2023

Abstract

:
A novel electrochemical sensor was developed for selective and sensitive determination of xanthine (XT) and hypoxanthine (HX) based on polyglycine (p-Gly) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE). A mixed dispersion of 7 μL of 5 mM glycine and 1 mg/mL GO was dropped on GCE for the fabrication of p-Gly/rGO/GCE, followed by cyclic voltammetric sweeping in 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution within −0.45~1.85 V at a scanning rate of 100 mV·s−1. The morphological and electrochemical features of p-Gly/rGO/GCE were investigated by scanning electron microscopy and cyclic voltammetry. Under optimal conditions, the linear relationship was acquired for the simultaneous determination of XT and HX in 1–100 μM. The preparation of the electrode was simple and efficient. Additionally, the sensor combined the excellent conductivity of rGO and the polymerization of Gly, demonstrating satisfying simultaneous sensing performance to both XT and HX.

1. Introduction

In biological processes, the functional role of purine bases and their derivatives have been widely investigated for their deep connection to the biochemical reaction in the bodies [1]. As we know, purines are engaged in many metabolic procedures as cofactors and play a crucial role in fundamental bioprocesses. The changes in some pathological conditions can cause changes in purine derivatives in serum and urine, which are vital biochemical markers of some diseases [2]. As displayed in Scheme 1, xanthine (XT) and hypoxanthine (HX) are regarded as major products of deoxynucleotide metabolism and purine nucleotide, and their concentrations in serum and urine are crucial for clinical diagnoses, such as gout, hyperuricemia, leukemia, pneumonia and renal failure [3,4]. In addition, it has been associated with Parkinson’s disease when the concentration of HX in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients is lower than that of healthy individuals [5]. On the other hand, XT is an important intermediate in purine metabolism, and abnormalities can lead to xanthuria. Therefore, quantitative determinations of XT and HX are of great importance in clinical diagnosis and drug therapy.
To date, methods for the determination of XT and HX have been greatly developed, such as high-performance liquid chromatography [6,7], mass spectrometry [8] and capillary electrophoresis [9,10]. Nevertheless, these methods desire complex procedures. The electrochemical method can be an effective alternative for XT and HX sensing as a simple, cost-effective and reliable technique. The performance of an electrochemical sensor is especially based on the unique properties of the chemically modified electrode, such as excellent electrocatalytic activity and good electrical conductivity. However, from the viewpoint of clinical practice, it is still a great challenge to develop a highly sensitive, reliable and low-cost electrochemical-sensing platform for the simultaneous quantification of XT and HX.
Graphene, a desirable material for electrochemical-sensing applications, is a single-layer honeycomb lattice of carbon atoms with a high ability of electron transfer and flexibility and a large specific surface area [11,12]. Treating graphene with a strong oxidizing agent can produce graphene oxide (GO), which contains functional oxygen groups such as hydroxyl, carbonyl and carboxyl groups [13], making it hydrophilic, soluble in water and other solvents and able to form a stable solution [14,15]. However, the synthetic route of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) from GO through the chemical reduction process requires the use of overdosed toxic chemicals. Therefore, much of the literature has reported new methods for the electrochemical synthesis of rGO [16,17,18,19,20]. Compared with other graphene preparation technologies, these methods can synthesize a stable film on the surface of the electrode without any other process [21,22]. Amal Raj et al. electrochemically fabricated rGO-modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) for the simultaneous determination of uric acid, XT, HX and caffeine in human blood serum and urine [1]. Erdogan Kablan et al. synthesized rGO on GCE through a one-step electropolymerization for simultaneous detection of uric acid, XT and HX [23].
In the last few years, polymers as a research hotspot have been widely applied in the preparation of sensors to improve the sensitivity, stability and reproducibility of quantitative analysis [24,25]. Different monomers can be used to synthesize and artificially control the conductive polymers, and different nanomaterials with unique physical and chemical properties can be doped into the formed electro-polymer composites during the polymerization process [26,27]. Mathew et al. developed a poly(amino hydroxy naphthalene sulphonic acid)-modified GCE for the simultaneous determination of XT and HX [28]. Ouyang et al. fabricated poly(amino hydroxy naphthalene sulphonic acid)-modified GCE to simultaneously determine uric acid, dopamine and ascorbic acid [29].
Polyamino acids play an especially important role in drug delivery, environment and sensors [30,31,32]. As polyamino acid, polyglycine (p-Gly) has a good electrocatalytic effect [33,34]. Gilbert et al. prepared p-Gly to determine dopamine and ascorbic acid simultaneously [35]. Thomas et al. constructed a sensor for the quantification of dopamine using a multi-walled carbon nanotube/p-Gly modified carbon paste electrode [36]. Thus, the combination of rGO and p-Gly can take advantage of both the high conductivity of rGO and the electrochemical catalytic role of p-Gly to realize the electrochemical detection of HX and XT.
In this work, by exploiting the advantages of the distinguished electrocatalytic performance of p-Gly and the good electrical conductivity of rGO, a novel high-sensitivity sensor for simultaneous electrochemical quantification of XT and HX was developed using p-Gly/rGO/GCE. The proposed sensor exhibited high sensitivity and satisfying anti-interference ability, good stability and reproducibility.

2. Results

2.1. Characteristics of p-Gly/rGO Film on GCE

Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.0) to prepare p-Gly/rGO film on GCE. Herein, the potential range and the scanning rate are two important factors in preparing the polymer film. With the scanning rate of 100 mV·s−1, experimental results showed the formation of homogeneous and stable p-Gly/rGO film in −0.45~1.85 V. In Figure 1, the oxidation current gradually increased during repeated CVs, indicating that p-Gly has been successfully polymerized. The possible mechanism can be explained as follow: When the potential is applied, the surface of GCE is oxidized; At the same time, the amino group on glycine is activated into free radicals, which are connected to the electrode surface through C–N bond, and the activated amino group and the carboxyl group are condensed on the electrode surface and polymerized to form a p-Gly film [37,38].
SEM is a powerful technique to characterize surface morphology. As displayed in Figure 2, compared with the SEM of bare GCE (Figure 2a), when p-Gly and rGO were deposited on the GCE surface, the p-Gly/rGO could be clearly observed, indicating that p-Gly and rGO have been successfully deposited on GCE (Figure 2b).

2.2. Electrochemical Behavior of XT and HX on p-Gly/rGO/GCE

Figure 3 shows the differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) responses of 20 μM XT and 20 μM HX on different modified electrodes in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.0). All DPV tests were carried out at the step potential of 0.004 V, pulse amplitude of 0.05 V and modulation time of 0.05 s. Compared with those on the bare GCE and rGO/GCE, the oxidation peak currents of XT and HX on p-Gly/rGO/GCE were significantly higher. Additionally, these two oxidation peak potentials on p-Gly/rGO/GCE were more negative than those on bare GCE, implying a decrease of overpotential for both XT and HX on p-Gly/rGO/GCE. Apparently, p-Gly displays an excellent electrocatalytic oxidation ability for the two compounds, and the electrochemical signals of XT and HX can be amplified for the large specific surface area, and excellent conductivity of rGO can accelerate the electron transfer on the electrode surface. The above experimental results confirmed that p-Gly/rGO had good electrocatalytic effects on the oxidation of XT and HX.

2.3. Impact of Scanning Rates

The peak current at different scanning rates (20–200 mV·s−1) was recorded by CV to study the kinetic process of XT and HX on p-Gly/rGO/GCE. Figure 4a shows the CV of 20 μM XT on p-Gly/rGO/GCE at a series of scanning rates. The oxidation peak current significantly increases with an increasing scanning rate. The figure inserted in Figure 4a is the relationship between the oxidation peak current of XT and the scanning rate. In 20–200 mV·s−1, the linear relationship between the oxidation peak current and the scanning rate suggested that the electrochemical reaction of XT on the electrode surface was an adsorption-control process. The linear equation is Ipa (μA) = 2.9250 + 0.1171 ʋ (mV·s−1) (R2 = 0.998). At the same time, Figure 4b shows the CV response curves of 20 μM HX on p-Gly/rGO/GCE at a range of scanning rates. The peak current is proportionate to the scanning rate, and the linear equation is Ipa (μA) = 2.105 + 0.06154 ʋ (mV·s−1) (R2 = 0.997), meaning that the electrochemical reaction of HX is also an adsorption-controlled process [14]. Additionally, with the increase of the scanning rate, the potential of the oxidation peak gradually shifted in the positive direction, denoting that the reaction process of XT and HX on p-Gly/rGO/GCE is a quasi-reversible process.

2.4. Optimization of the Experimental Conditions

For the best performance of p-Gly/rGO/GCE, two main experimental conditions, including the electropolymerization cycles and the pH of the electrolyte, were optimized using DPV.
Polymer-modified electrodes can usually be prepared by electrochemical or chemical methods. In this work, glycine was polymerized to the electrode by electropolymerization, and the thickness of the p-Gly film was adjusted by varying the number of polymerization cycles. As demonstrated in Figure 5a, the peak current of investigated analytes reached its maximal value when the scanning cycles were 10, while the corresponding current decreased as the scanning cycles exceeded 10. Therefore, 10 cycles were selected as the best condition for the preparation of the p-Gly/rGO/GCE.
The pH of PBS can change peak current, which has a remarkable impact on the determination of XT and HX simultaneously. As displayed in Figure 5b, when the pH value varied from 4 to 8, the oxidation current increased and then decreased, reaching its maximum at pH 6.0. Thus, a pH of 6.0 was adjusted in the PBS for the subsequent experiments. Therefore, the optimal parameters of the sensor were pH 6.0 PBS and 10 cycles of polymerization.

2.5. Determination of XT and HX

DPV was used to evaluate the sensitivity of p-Gly/rGO/GCE to XT and HX under optimal conditions. Firstly, the concentration of one substance in the solution was kept constant, while the concentration of the other substance in the solution was gradually changed to measure XT and HX separately. As shown in Figure 6a, the addition concentration of XT was continuously changed (1–120 μM), and every peak was separately measured when 20 μM HX in PBS was kept constant. The results displayed that the peak current value escalated with the addition of XT and was linearly related to XT concentration. The linear equation for the relationship of current value and XT concentrations is Ipa(μA) = 0.2046 + 0.0515CXT (μM) (R2 = 0.997). Similar to the above process, 20 μM XT was kept constant in 0.1 M PBS (pH 6.0), and HX was separately measured in the system. As shown in Figure 6b, when HX increased from 1 to 220 μM, the peak current value continuously increased. The linear equation is Ipa (μA) = −0.01775 + 0.0515CHX (μM) (R2 = 0.994) in the concentration of 1–100 μM, and Ipa (μA) = 3.073 + 0.018CHX (μM) (R2 = 0.994) in the concentration of 100–220 μM.
To simultaneously determine XT and HX, their concentrations in the solution under the same determination conditions were concurrently changed. With increasing concentrations of XT and HX, the peak current values on p-Gly/rGO/GCE increased. In Figure 7, the peak current of XT oxidation is linearly related to its concentration in 1–100 μM, and the equation is Ipa (μA) = −0.013 + 0.0338CXT (μM) (R2 = 0.995), with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.1 μM (S/N = 3). Furthermore, its oxidation peak current is linearly related to the content in 1–100 μM and the equation is Ipa(μA) = 0.7127 + 0.0536CHX (μM) (R2 = 0.994), and the LOD is calculated to be 0.2 μM.
The performance comparison in detecting XT and HX between some reported modified electrodes and p-Gly/rGO/GCE in this work is listed in Table 1. Compared with previous reports, the constructed sensor shows appreciable electrochemical performance.

2.6. Reproducibility, Stability and Interference Tests

Under optimal conditions, the DPV technique was performed to test a mixed solution containing 20 μM XT and 20 μM HX on the same modified electrode five times, and then the differences in the currents were compared (Supplementary Table S1). After five groups of experiments, the relative standard deviation (RSD) of XT and HX was 4.31% and 5.27%, respectively, indicating the desirable reproducibility of the p-Gly/rGO/GCE.
The stability of the electrode was evaluated by measuring the current response of 20 μM XT and 20 μM HX on the same p-Gly/GO/GCE. Afterwards, the electrode was rinsed clean and stored at 4 °C for one week, and then the same electrode was used to measure the same concentrations of XT and HX again. The results show that the peak current measured was basically the same as that obtained by the first determination, implying that the p-Gly/rGO/GCE possessed acceptable stability.
In addition, the anti-interference performance of the was investigated by adding some potentially interfering compounds during the determination of XT and HX (Supplementary Table S2). Under the same optimal conditions, 500 μM of interfering compounds that may exist in beverages, drugs and biological liquids were added into the solutions containing 20 μM XT and 20 μM HX, such as glucose, uric acid, ascorbic acid, citric acid, L-threonine and L-arginine. The recorded signals have no obvious effect on the measured object, indicating the agreeable anti-interference ability of the p-Gly/rGO/GCE.

2.7. Real Sample Analyses

The p-Gly/rGO/GCE was applied to simultaneously detect XT and HX in human serum to demonstrate its practicality. Usually, HX exists in the concentration range of 14–38 μM in healthy human serum [9], while the XT level is lower than 4 μM [43]. The contents of XT and HX in human serum were detected by the standard addition method. Table 2 presents the results, which indicates that the recoveries of analytes are acceptable and the p-Gly/rGO/GCE has high potential in the simultaneous detection of XT and HX in real samples.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Reagents and Apparatus

XT and HX were acquired from Shanghai Hanhong Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Ascorbic acid, GO, and uric acid were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Gly, potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4), sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), sodium chloride (NaCl), potassium nitrate (KNO3), citric acid, glucose, L-threonine, L-arginine and potassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HPO4) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All reagents were analytically pure. Milli-Q water (18.2 MΩ·cm) was applied throughout the whole experiment. All electrochemical experiments were performed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (PBS) at ambient temperature.
The conventional three-electrode system consists of modified electrode p-Gly/rGO/GCE as the working electrode and platinum and Ag/AgCl as the counter electrode and the reference electrode, respectively. The CV and DPV tests were conducted at the CHI660C (Shanghai CH Instruments, Shanghai, China) workstation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL-6700F, Tokyo, Japan) was applied to characterize the morphological features of the prepared p-Gly/rGO/GCE.

3.2. Preparation of p-Gly/rGO/GCE

Prior to use, Al2O3 powder (1 and 0.05 μm) was applied to polish the bare GCE (diameter, 3 mm) on the suede to obtain a mirror-smooth surface. The GCE was alternately rinsed with water and absolute ethanol. Afterwards, it was continuously swept in 0.5 M H2SO4 for 10 cycles (−1.0~1.0 V) to activate the electrode surface. Finally, the bare GCE was cleaned with ultrapure water and then kept at an ambient temperature for later use.
5 mM Gly and 1 mg/mL GO dispersion were uniformly mixed by ultrasound. Then, 7 μL of the mixed dispersion was dropped onto the pretreated GCE. Afterwards, the electrode surface was dried and immersed into 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.0) with CV for 10 continuous sweeps in −0.45~1.85 V at 100 mV·s−1. Finally, the obtained p-Gly/rGO/GCE was rinsed with ultrapure water for future use.

4. Conclusions

In this work, p-Gly/rGO/GCE has been successfully prepared through simple electropolymerization and applied for the determination of XT and HX simultaneously. The p-Gly/rGO/GCE shows good electrocatalytic effect, reproducibility, stability and selectivity in the determination of XT and HX simultaneously due to the synergistic effect between p-Gly and rGO. Additionally, p-Gly/rGO/GCE has been utilized to simultaneously determine XT and HX in human blood serum samples, indicating its high potential in the analysis of real samples.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28031458/s1, Table S1: The reproducibility of p-Gly/rGO/GCE in the determination of mixed solution containing 20 μM XT and 20 μM HX in 0.1 M PBS (pH 6.0); Table S2: The influences on the peak currents of 20 μM XT and 20 μM HX in 0.1 M PBS (pH 6.0) at p-Gly/rGO/GCE.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.W. and L.Z.; methodology, T.W.; software, T.W.; validation, T.W. and L.Z.; formal analysis, L.Z.; investigation, L.Z.; resources, T.W.; data curation, T.W.; writing—original draft preparation, T.W. and L.Z.; writing—review and editing, C.Z. and L.L.; visualization, D.W.; supervision, L.L.; project administration, L.L. and D.D.; funding acquisition, L.L. and D.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The scientific research project of Shanghai Urban Construction Vocational College (No. CJKY202118). APC was sponsored by MDPI.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Amal Raj, M.; Abraham John, S. Simultaneous determination of uric acid, xanthine, hypoxanthine and caffeine in human blood serum and urine samples using electrochemically reduced graphene oxide modified electrode. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 771, 14–20. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhu, D.; Guo, D.; Zhang, L.; Tan, L.; Pang, H.; Ma, H.; Zhai, M. Non-enzymatic xanthine sensor of heteropolyacids doped ferrocene and reduced graphene oxide via one-step electrodeposition combined with layer-by-layer self-assembly technology. Sens. Actuators B 2019, 281, 893–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pierini, G.D.; Robledo, S.N.; Zon, M.A.; Di Nezio, M.S.; Granero, A.M.; Fernández, H. Development of an electroanalytical method to control quality in fish samples based on an edge plane pyrolytic graphite electrode. Simultaneous determination of hypoxanthine, xanthine and uric acid. Microchem. J. 2018, 138, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lavanya, N.; Sekar, C.; Murugan, R.; Ravi, G. An ultrasensitive electrochemical sensor for simultaneous determination of xanthine, hypoxanthine and uric acid based on Co doped CeO2 nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 65, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tohgi, H.; Abe, T.; Takahashi, S.; Kikuchi, T. The urate and xanthine concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid in patients with vascular dementia of the Binswanger type, Alzheimer type dementia, and Parkinson’s disease. J. Neural Transm. Park. Dis. Dement. Sect. 1993, 6, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cooper, N.; Khosravan, R.; Erdmann, C.; Fiene, J.; Lee, J.W. Quantification of uric acid, xanthine and hypoxanthine in human serum by HPLC for pharmacodynamic studies. J. Chromatogr. B 2006, 837, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Farthing, D.; Sica, D.; Gehr, T.; Wilson, B.; Fakhry, I.; Larus, T.; Farthing, C.; Karnes, H.T. An HPLC method for determination of inosine and hypoxanthine in human plasma from healthy volunteers and patients presenting with potential acute cardiac ischemia. J. Chromatogr. B 2007, 854, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rashed, M.S.; Saadallah, A.A.A.; Rahbeeni, Z.; Eyaid, W.; Seidahmed, M.Z.; Al-Shahwan, S.; Salih, M.A.M.; Osman, M.E.; Al-Amoudi, M.; Al-Ahaidib, L.; et al. Determination of urinary S-sulphocysteine, xanthine and hypoxanthine by liquid chromatography–electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2005, 19, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Causse, E.; Pradelles, A.; Dirat, B.; Negre-Salvayre, A.; Salvayre, R.; Couderc, F. Simultaneous determination of allantoin, hypoxanthine, xanthine, and uric acid in serum/plasma by CE. Electrophoresis 2007, 28, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Chen, G.; Chu, Q.; Zhang, L.; Ye, J. Separation of six purine bases by capillary electrophoresis with electrochemical detection. Anal. Chim. Acta 2002, 457, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, Z.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Feng, Y.; Feng, W. Carbon-based functional nanomaterials: Preparation, properties and applications. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2019, 179, 10–40. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhu, Y.; Murali, S.; Cai, W.; Li, X.; Suk, J.W.; Potts, J.R.; Ruoff, R.S. Graphene and graphene oxide: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3906–3924. [Google Scholar]
  13. Das, S.K.; Kc, C.B.; Ohkubo, K.; Yamada, Y.; Fukuzumi, S.; D’Souza, F. Decorating single layer graphene oxide with electron donor and acceptor molecules for the study of photoinduced electron transfer. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 2013–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Neklyudov, V.V.; Khafizov, N.R.; Sedov, I.A.; Dimiev, A.M. New insights into the solubility of graphene oxide in water and alcohols. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 17000–17008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Loguercio, L.; Thesing, A.; Noremberg, B.D.; Lopes, B.V.; Maron, G.K.; Machado, G.; Pope, M.A.; Carreno, N.L.V. Direct laser writing of poly(furfuryl alcohol)/graphene oxide electrodes for electrochemical determination of ascorbic acid. ChemElectroChem 2012, 9, e202200334. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sharma, D.; Kanchi, S.; Sabela, M.I.; Bisetty, K. Insight into the biosensing of graphene oxide: Present and future prospects. Arab. J. Chem. 2016, 9, 238–261. [Google Scholar]
  17. Devadas, B.; Rajkumar, M.; Chen, S.M.; Saraswathi, R. Electrochemically reduced graphene oxide/neodymium hexacyanoferrate modified electrodes for the electrochemical detection of paracetomol. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2012, 7, 3339–3349. [Google Scholar]
  18. Xi, X.; Ming, L. A voltammetric sensor based on electrochemically reduced graphene modified electrode for sensitive determination of midecamycin. Anal. Methods 2012, 4, 3013–3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Palanisamy, S.; Thirumalraj, B.; Chen, S.M.; Wang, Y.T.; Velusamy, V.; Ramaraj, S.K. A facile electrochemical preparation of reduced graphene oxide@polydopamine composite: A novel electrochemical sensing platform for amperometric detection of chlorpromazine. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mutyala, S.; Mathiyarasu, J. A reagentless non-enzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensor presented using electrochemically reduced graphene oxide modified glassy carbon electrode. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 69, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ping, J.; Wang, Y.; Ying, Y.; Wu, J. Application of electrochemically reduced graphene oxide on screen-printed ion-selective electrode. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 3473–3479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Raj, M.A.; John, S.A. Fabrication of electrochemically reduced graphene oxide films on glassy carbon electrode by self-assembly method and their electrocatalytic application. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 4326–4335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Erdogan Kablan, S.; Yilmaz, A.; Kervan, U.; Ozaltin, N.; Nemutlu, E. Electrochemically based targeted metabolomics for uric acid, xanthine, and hypoxanthine in plasma samples for early diagnosis of acute renal failure after cardiopulmonary bypass using rGO-GCE. Talanta 2023, 253, 124005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kumar, D.; Dhakal, G.; Shafi, P.; Sayed, M.; Lee, J.; Lee, Y.; Shim, J. Sulfite food additive electrochemical determination by nucleophilic addition on poly(4-aminodiphenylamine)-4-aminothiophenol-Au composite electrode. Microchem. J. 2022, 181, 107635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Carreno-Vega, O.; Vargas-Zamarripa, M.; Salas, P.; Ramirez-Garcia, G. Poly(allylamine)-copper(II) coordination complex grafted on core@shell upconversion nanoparticles for ultrafast and sensitive determination of the phytohormone salicylic acid in plant extracts. Dalton Trans. 2022, 51, 11630–11640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, G.; Morrin, A.; Li, M.; Liu, N.; Luo, X. Nanomaterial-doped conducting polymers for electrochemical sensors and biosensors. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 4173–4190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jadon, N.; Jain, R.; Sharma, S.; Singh, K. Recent trends in electrochemical sensors for multianalyte detection: A review. Talanta 2016, 161, 894–916. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mathew, M.R.; Kumar, K.G. Poly(amino hydroxy naphthalene sulphonic acid) modified glassy carbon electrode: An effective sensing platform for the simultaneous determination of xanthine and hypoxanthine. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 047519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ouyang, X.X.; Luo, L.Q.; Ding, Y.P.; Liu, B.D.; Xu, D.; Huang, A.Q. Simultaneous determination of uric acid, dopamine and ascorbic acid based on poly(bromocresol green) modified glassy carbon electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2015, 748, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lei, W.; He, P.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Dong, F.; Liu, H. Soft template interfacial growth of novel ultralong polypyrrole nanowires for electrochemical energy storage. Electrochimica Acta 2014, 132, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mîndroiu, M.; Ungureanu, C.; Ion, R.; Pîrvu, C. The effect of deposition electrolyte on polypyrrole surface interaction with biological environment. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 276, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, J.; He, P.; Bai, H.; Lei, H.; Zhang, G.; Dong, F.; Ma, Y. A glassy carbon electrode modified with a nanocomposite consisting of carbon nanohorns and poly(2-aminopyridine) for non-enzymatic amperometric determination of hydrogen peroxide. Microchim. Acta 2016, 183, 3237–3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Koo, A.N.; Lee, H.J.; Kim, S.E.; Chang, J.H.; Park, C.; Kim, C.; Park, J.H.; Lee, S.C. Disulfide-cross-linked PEG-poly(amino acid)s copolymer micelles for glutathione-mediated intracellular drug delivery. Chem. Commun. 2008, 48, 6570–6572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, G.; He, P.; Feng, W.; Ding, S.; Chen, J.; Li, L.; He, H.; Zhang, S.; Dong, F. Carbon nanohorns/poly(glycine) modified glassy carbon electrode: Preparation, characterization and simultaneous electrochemical determination of uric acid, dopamine and ascorbic acid. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016, 760, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gilbert, O.; Kumara Swamy, B.E.; Chandra, U.; Sherigara, B.S. Simultaneous detection of dopamine and ascorbic acid using polyglycine modified carbon paste electrode: A cyclic voltammetric study. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2009, 636, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Thomas, T.; Mascarenhas, R.J.; Swamy, B.E.K.; Martis, P.; Mekhalif, Z.; Sherigara, B.S. Multi-walled carbon nanotube/poly(glycine) modified carbon paste electrode for the determination of dopamine in biological fluids and pharmaceuticals. Colloids Surf. B 2013, 110, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Harisha, K.V.; Kumara Swamy, B.E.; Ebenso, E.E. Poly(glycine) modified carbon paste electrode for simultaneous determination of catechol and hydroquinone: A voltammetric study. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 823, 730–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pashazadeh, S.; Habibi, B. Simultaneous determination of benzenediols isomers using copper nanoparticles/poly (glycine)/graphene oxide nanosheets modified glassy carbon electrode. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 167504–167514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Y.; Tong, L.L. Electrochemical sensor for simultaneous determination of uric acid, xanthine and hypoxanthine based on poly(bromocresol purple) modified glassy carbon electrode. Sens. Actuators B 2010, 150, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hoan, N.T.V.; Minh, N.N.; Trang, N.T.H.; Thuy, L.T.T.; Van Hoang, C.; Mau, T.X.; Vu, H.X.A.; Thu, P.T.K.; Phong, N.H.; Khieu, D.Q. Simultaneous voltammetric determination of uric acid, xanthine, and hypoxanthine using CoFe2O4/reduced graphene oxide-modified electrode. J. Nanomater. 2020, 2020, 9797509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, F.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, C.; Du, Y.; Ye, W. Simultaneous electrochemical determination of uric acid, xanthine and hypoxanthine based on poly(L-arginine)/graphene composite film modified electrode. Talanta 2012, 93, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zen, J.M.; Lai, Y.Y.; Yang, H.H.; Kumar, A.S. Multianalyte sensor for the simultaneous determination of hypoxanthine, xanthine and uric acid based on a preanodized nontronite-coated screen-printed electrode. Sens. Actuators B 2002, 84, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pundir, C.S.; Devi, R. Biosensing methods for xanthine determination: A review. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2014, 57, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Structures of XT and HX: (a) XT and (b) HX.
Scheme 1. Structures of XT and HX: (a) XT and (b) HX.
Molecules 28 01458 sch001
Figure 1. CVs of the electrochemical polymerization of p-Gly/rGO at GCE.
Figure 1. CVs of the electrochemical polymerization of p-Gly/rGO at GCE.
Molecules 28 01458 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) bare GCE and (b) p-Gly/rGO/GCE.
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) bare GCE and (b) p-Gly/rGO/GCE.
Molecules 28 01458 g002
Figure 3. DPV curves of bare GCE, rGO/GCE and p-Gly/rGO/GCE after adding 20 μM XT and 20 μM HX in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.0).
Figure 3. DPV curves of bare GCE, rGO/GCE and p-Gly/rGO/GCE after adding 20 μM XT and 20 μM HX in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.0).
Molecules 28 01458 g003
Figure 4. (a) CVs of p-Gly/rGO/GCE after adding 20 μM XT at the scanning rates of 20–200 mV·s−1 in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.0). Inset: the correlated calibration plot. (b) CVs of p-Gly/rGO/GCE after adding 20 μM HX at the scanning rates of 20–200 mV·s−1 in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.0). Inset: the correlated calibration diagram.
Figure 4. (a) CVs of p-Gly/rGO/GCE after adding 20 μM XT at the scanning rates of 20–200 mV·s−1 in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.0). Inset: the correlated calibration plot. (b) CVs of p-Gly/rGO/GCE after adding 20 μM HX at the scanning rates of 20–200 mV·s−1 in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.0). Inset: the correlated calibration diagram.
Molecules 28 01458 g004
Figure 5. Effects of (a) the electropolymerization cycles and (b) pH values for the oxidation on p-Gly/rGO/GCE with the addition of 40 μM XT and 40 μM HX.
Figure 5. Effects of (a) the electropolymerization cycles and (b) pH values for the oxidation on p-Gly/rGO/GCE with the addition of 40 μM XT and 40 μM HX.
Molecules 28 01458 g005
Figure 6. (a) DPVs of p-Gly/rGO/GCE with 20 μM HX for the determination of 1–120 μM XT in 0.1 M PBS (pH 6.0), (b) 1–220 μM HX with 20 μM XT in 0.1 M PBS (pH 6.0), (c,d) corresponding calibration plots, respectively.
Figure 6. (a) DPVs of p-Gly/rGO/GCE with 20 μM HX for the determination of 1–120 μM XT in 0.1 M PBS (pH 6.0), (b) 1–220 μM HX with 20 μM XT in 0.1 M PBS (pH 6.0), (c,d) corresponding calibration plots, respectively.
Molecules 28 01458 g006
Figure 7. (a) DPVs of the p-Gly/rGO/GCE to simultaneously determine XT and HX in 0.1 M PBS (pH 6.0). (b) The corresponding calibration plots.
Figure 7. (a) DPVs of the p-Gly/rGO/GCE to simultaneously determine XT and HX in 0.1 M PBS (pH 6.0). (b) The corresponding calibration plots.
Molecules 28 01458 g007
Table 1. Comparison of determination performance of XT and HX of p-Gly/rGO/GCE with the recently published literature.
Table 1. Comparison of determination performance of XT and HX of p-Gly/rGO/GCE with the recently published literature.
ElectrodeAnalyteLinear Range (μM)Detection Limit (μM)Reference
rGOXT
HX
10–60
10–60
0.11
0.32
[1]
Poly(bromocresol purple)XT
HX
0.1–100
20–80
0.06
0.12
[39]
CoFe2O4/rGOXT
HX
2–10
2–10
0.650
0.506
[40]
Poly(L-arginine)/grapheneXT
HX
0.1–10
0.2–20
0.05
0.1
[41]
Preanodized nontroniteXT
HX
2.0–40
4.0–30
0.07
0.34
[42]
p-Gly/rGOXT
HX
1–100
1–340
0.1
0.2
This work
Table 2. Simultaneous determination performance of p-Gly/rGO/GCE in human blood serum.
Table 2. Simultaneous determination performance of p-Gly/rGO/GCE in human blood serum.
Serum SampleAnalyteAdded
(μM)
Founded
(μM)
Recovery
(%)
1XT
HX
2018.7
19.1
93.5
95.5
2XT
HX
4040.8
41.2
102
103
3XT
HX
6058.5
60.8
97.5
101.3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, T.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, C.; Deng, D.; Wang, D.; Luo, L. Simultaneous Determination of Xanthine and Hypoxanthine Using Polyglycine/rGO-Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Molecules 2023, 28, 1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031458

AMA Style

Wang T, Zhang L, Zhang C, Deng D, Wang D, Luo L. Simultaneous Determination of Xanthine and Hypoxanthine Using Polyglycine/rGO-Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Molecules. 2023; 28(3):1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031458

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Ting, Lin Zhang, Chengyu Zhang, Dongmei Deng, Dejia Wang, and Liqiang Luo. 2023. "Simultaneous Determination of Xanthine and Hypoxanthine Using Polyglycine/rGO-Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode" Molecules 28, no. 3: 1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031458

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop