Next Article in Journal
DNA Comet Giemsa Staining for Conventional Bright-Field Microscopy
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Size on Ag Nanosphere Toxicity in Macrophage Cell Models and Lung Epithelial Cell Lines Is Dependent on Particle Dissolution
Previous Article in Journal
Asymmetric Dimethylarginine in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (ADMA in COPD)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nanoparticle-Mediated Pulmonary Drug Delivery: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Pulmonary Toxicity of Two Ceria Nanoparticles with the Same Primary Size

1
School of Biological Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
2
CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, CAS Key Laboratory of Nuclear Radiation and Nuclear Energy Technology, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
4
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15(4), 6072-6085; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15046072
Submission received: 12 February 2014 / Revised: 25 March 2014 / Accepted: 27 March 2014 / Published: 10 April 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanotoxicology and Lung Diseases)

Abstract

:
Ceria nanoparticles (nano-ceria) have recently gained a wide range of applications, which might pose unwanted risks to both the environment and human health. The greatest potential for the environmental discharge of nano-ceria appears to be in their use as a diesel fuel additive. The present study was designed to explore the pulmonary toxicity of nano-ceria in mice after a single exposure via intratracheal instillation. Two types of nano-ceria with the same distribution of a primary size (3–5 nm), but different redox activity, were used: Ceria-p, synthesized by a precipitation route, and Ceria-h, synthesized by a hydrothermal route. Both Ceria-p and Ceria-h induced oxidative stress, inflammatory responses and cytotoxicity in mice, but their toxicological profiles were quite different. The mean size of Ceria-p agglomerates was much smaller compared to Ceria-h, thereby causing a more potent acute inflammation, due to their higher number concentration of agglomerates and higher deposition rate in the deep lung. Ceria-h had a higher reactivity to catalyzing the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and caused two waves of lung injury: bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) inflammation and cytotoxicity in the early stage and redox-activity-evoked lipid peroxidation and pro-inflammation in the latter stage. Therefore, the size distribution of ceria-containing agglomerates in the exhaust, as well as their surface chemistry are essential characteristics to assess the potential risks of using nano-ceria as a fuel additive.

1. Introduction

Cerium oxide nanoparticles (nano-ceria) are engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) that possess unique catalytic, optical and anti-oxidant properties [1]. The widespread use of nano-ceria in industry has raised occupational and environmental health concerns over the potential risks of nano-ceria exposure. Therefore, nano-ceria are identified by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development as one of the 13 priority listed representative ENMs for immediate testing [2].
Nano-ceria are used increasingly as an additive to improve the burning efficiency of fuels, reducing fuel consumption, greenhouse gases and particle numbers in vehicle exhaust [3]. Nanoscale ceria could be found in the soot matrix and, thereby, be released into the environment [4]. By using a modeling method, Park et al. predicted that receptors in the car passenger area of a street canyon would be exposed to ceria at a concentration up to 80 ng/m3 in the worst case [5]. The combusted nano-ceria would interact with the carbonaceous aggregates or other co-pollutants in the exhaust, thereby exhibited a toxicological profile different from nano-ceria alone. Therefore, risk-assessment studies should be conducted based on the combusted particulates emitted from engines using nano-ceria-based fuel additives [6]. Furthermore, the toxicity of the combusted nano-ceria should be correlated to their physicochemical properties, so that researchers are able to predict potential risks and design ceria-based additives with minimum toxicity.
However, the physicochemical properties of nano-ceria would be changed during combustion, and the details of the changes remain unknown. For example, the reported crystallite size of nano-ceria in diesel exhaust were quite controversial: ranging from 1–3 nm [6], 5–7 nm [7], up to about 43 nm [4]. There is very limited knowledge about the other physicochemical properties of the combusted ceria (e.g., surface chemistry). The gap makes it difficult to understand the mechanisms underlying the toxic impact from the combusted nano-ceria when considering the hazard posed by the use of nano-ceria as a fuel additive. Alternatively, toxicological assessments of a series of nano-ceria with diverse, but well-defined, nano-properties were conducted in previous studies [5,8,9] to relate the physicochemical properties of nano-ceria to their toxicity.
Recent literature has shown that nano-ceria exposure is associated with pulmonary injury, leading to oxidative stress, inflammation and cytotoxicity [911]. In our previous study, mice were exposed to 0.04, 0.4, 4 and 40 μg of nano-ceria with a mean diameter of 6.6 nm (6.6-Ceria) to explore the pulmonary toxicity of nano-ceria after an acute intratracheal instillation [8]. It was indicated that only the exposure to 40 μg of 6.6-Ceria caused changes in the differential bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid (BALF) cell counts and BALF lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity as an acute inflammatory reaction; the cell counts returned to normal at seven days post-instillation (PI) and did not cause oxidative damage to the lungs; the particle overload in pulmonary macrophages led to multifocal acute alveolitis and pulmonary granulomas at seven days PI and recovered at 28 days PI.
The size of ENMs plays a key role in determining the toxicity of ENMs [12]. Compared with their larger counterparts, smaller ENMs are of a larger number concentration at the same mass concentration and have a higher surface energy and reactivity, greater mobility and greater resistance to systemic clearance. In the present work, we tried to test whether exposure to nano-ceria sized 3–5 nm could cause more severe pulmonary toxicity than 6.6-Ceria did. Mice were intratracheally exposed to two kinds of nano-ceria were are of a similar size, but have different redox activity, and the pulmonary toxicities in terms of oxidative damage, inflammation and histopathological changes were assessed.

2. Results

2.1. Characterization of Nano-Ceria

The two types of nano-ceria were synthesized via precipitation (Ceria-p) or the hydrothermal (Ceria-h) method, respectively. The morphologies of Ceria-p and Ceria-h were studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and the size distributions of their primary particles were very similar, within a range of 3–5 nm (Figure 1A). However, dynamic light scattering (DLS) results showed that the hydrodynamic size of Ceria-p and Ceria-h in phosphate buffer (PBS) were 313 ± 30 nm vs. 1731 ± 165 nm. Therefore, particle agglomeration would occur after Ceria-p and Ceria-h were instilled into the airway, and Ceria-h agglomerates had a significantly larger size distribution compared to Ceria-p agglomerates. X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurement demonstrated that Ceria-p and Ceria-h were the same in the oxidation state of cerium and in the crystalline peaks (Figure 1B,C). In the present work, Ceria-p and Ceria-h both had no detectable fraction of Ce3+ (Figure 1B). However, their redox activities were quite different: the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was catalyzed more efficiently by Ceria-h than by Ceria-p.

2.2. Cytological and Biochemical Assessments of BALF

The intratracheal instillation of either Ceria-p or Ceria-h had no statistically significant effect on the body weight of mice at any time point. However, both treatments caused significant lung inflammation (Figure 2). Cell differential counts in BALF revealed increases in the percentage of neutrophils at 1, 3 and 7 days PI, supporting the presence of pulmonary inflammation. At 1 day PI, the neutrophilic inflammatory responses to Ceria-p were more potent when compared to Ceria-h; but the influx of neutrophils in BALF caused by Ceria-p decreased faster, returning to normal at 28 days PI. Ceria-h triggered substantial inflammation in BALF at 1 day PI, followed by a moderate recruitment of neutrophils throughout the whole experimental period.
Both Ceria-p and Ceria-h exerted cytotoxicities against BALF cells, as evidenced by an increased total protein concentration and LDH activity in BALF. The total protein concentration in BALF showed a significant increase immediately after the instillation in both treatment groups (Figure 3). Ceria-p induced higher BALF protein content at 3 and 7 days PI than Ceria-h did; but at 28 days PI, no significant effect was found in the Ceria-p group, while a modest increase in BALF protein could still be seen in the Ceria-h group. LDH leakage caused by Ceria-p instillation could be seen at 1, 3 and 7 days PI and recovered at 28 days PI. Ceria-h caused LDH leakage could only be seen at 3 and 7 days PI. Both treatments had little effect on the level of acid phosphatase (ACP) in BALF, except for a reduction caused by Ceria-h at 7 days PI.

2.3. Biochemical Analysis of Lung Homogenate

The supernatants of lung homogenates were collected to determine the oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory responses following the acute instillation of either nano-ceria (Figure 4). In the present study, the pulmonary response to the oxidative stress was evaluated by the detection of intracellular markers, including reduced glutathione (GSH), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT). The results suggest that the antioxidant defenses were activated during the acute phase of Ceria-p exposure (1 and 3 days PI), as evidenced by increased levels of GSH and GSH-Px, and these effects could not be measured later. There is no evidence that the anti-oxidative capacities were exhausted during Ceria-p exposure, since no lipid peroxidation was found. The level of pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) exhibited an immediate/early response to Ceria-p: it was upregulated at 1 day PI and returned to normal later.
In contrast, Ceria-h exposure did not deliver any oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory effects to lung tissue immediately after the instillation. However, delayed increases of CAT, GSH-Px, GSH and IL-6 were found during the later stages of the experiment (7 and/or 28 days PI). In spite of the enhanced anti-oxidative capacity, Ceria-h exposure resulted in oxidative damage at 7 and 28 days PI, implying an unbalance between the oxidative stress and anti-oxidative defenses.

2.4. Histopathological Evaluation

The histopathological changes in lung were evaluated with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining in Figure 5. There were pathological changes in the lung tissues of both treatments over the whole experimental period. In the Ceria-p group, particle-laden macrophages could be found at 1 and 3 days PI, increased in number at 7 days PI and then gradually recovered at 28 days (Figure 5B–E); pulmonary granulomas were only occasionally found at 7 days PI, at the peripheral area of the lungs (Figure 5D). While in the Ceria-h group, there were relative less particle-laden macrophages throughout the test, and no further pathological lesion was identified (Figure 5F–I).

3. Discussion

Nano-ceria have recently gained a wide range of applications, which might pose unwanted risks to both the environment and human health. The greatest potential for the environmental discharge of nano-ceria appears to be in their use as a diesel fuel additive. According to the prediction by Park et al., the commercial use of nano-ceria will increase the air-borne nano-ceria, to a level of 80 ng/m3 in the worst case [5]. In the present work, mice were exposed to 40 μg of nano-ceria via a single intratracheal instillation, corresponding to 10,000 times the maximum daily exposure dose for mice [8].
Although the toxic mechanisms for inhaled ENMs were not very clear, the results of older toxicological and epidemiological studies with airborne fine or ultrafine particles can be viewed as the basis for the expanding field of nanotoxicology [13]. Due to their small size, inhaled ENMs could be transported into the deep lung and could not be removed efficiently, leading to particle-overload in lung. In the present work, particle-laden macrophages could be found in the lungs instilled with either Ceria-p or Ceria-h during the whole experimental period. Our results implied that the pulmonary toxicity of nano-ceria was associated with lung particle-overload.
Studies in rodents imply that the excessive burden of insoluble particles of low cytotoxicity would lead to pulmonary inflammation [14]. Oyabu et al. reviewed the reports focusing on particle-overload in lung and concluded that a dose that can induce inflammation is between one and 5 mg/kg [15]. Our previous work also showed that the intratracheal instillation of nano-ceria (with a mean size of 6.6 nm) at a dose of ~1.5 mg/kg (40 μg per mouse) induced moderate and transient inflammation in mouse lung, which recovered by four weeks, whereas 0.15 mg/kg did not cause any inflammation. In the present work, neutrophil inflammation was induced by the exposure to either Ceria-p or Ceria-h at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg (40 μg per mouse). The acute intratracheal instillation of Ceria-p and Ceria-h also influenced the total protein content and LDH leakage in the BALF and induced oxidative stress and inflammatory response in the lung homogenates.
However, there were some differences between the toxicological profiles of Ceria-p and Ceria-h. In general, intratracheal instillation of Ceria-p induced transient inflammatory responses in both BAL cells and lung tissue at the early stage of exposure (one and/or three days PI), which recovered at 7 or 28 days PI. Ceria-h induced initially minor, but more persistent inflammation in BAL cells and delayed lipid peroxidation and pro-inflammation in lung tissue at 28 days PI.
The differences in the initial inflammatory responses may be due to the different agglomeration state of Ceria-p and Ceria-h. The size of agglomerates would determine their deposition in the lung, their ability to cross biological barriers and their cellular internalization [12]. Noël et al. found that the pulmonary toxicity of ENMs might depend not solely on the dimension of the ENMs, but also on the dimension of the ENMs agglomerates [16]. However, in their study, large nano-TiO2 agglomerates (>100 nm) caused acute inflammatory responses; small ones (<100 nm) exerted both cytotoxicity and oxidative stress without apparent neutrophil influx into the airways, because agglomerates smaller than 100 nm could easily escape the pulmonary clearance via phagocytosis [12,17]. In the present work, Ceria-p agglomerates and Ceria-h agglomerates were both larger than 100 nm (313 ± 30 and 1731 ± 165 nm, respectively). Therefore, macrophage phagocytosis was activated in both treatments. Due to the smaller size of Ceria-p agglomerates, there was a larger number concentration of agglomerates in the Ceria-p exposure. Moreover, smaller agglomerates had a higher deposition rate in the deep lung; particle-laden macrophages and granulomas could even be found at the peripheral area of the lungs instilled with Ceria-p. Therefore, Ceria-p caused a more potent particle-overload inflammation at the early stage of exposure.
In the lungs instilled with Ceria-h, oxidative damage was found at seven and 28 days PI, and a pro-inflammatory effect was found at 28 days PI. These delayed responses seemed not to be attributed exclusively to the excessive ENMs burdens in the lung, as particle-laden macrophages were less observed in the Ceria-h treated mice than in the Ceria-p group. ROS generation is identified as one of the major mechanisms by which inhaled ENMs exert adverse biological effects [18,19]. We speculated that the retention of Ceria-h in lung and their capability to generate ROS might also be involved in the pulmonary toxicity of Ceria-h. Although Ceria-h tended to agglomerate, the agglomeration would be gradually reduced in the airway due to the interactions with surfactant proteins or vascular proteins (in the case of a breakdown of the integrity of the alveolar-capillary barrier caused by ENMs exposure) [1,20]. Deagglomerated Ceria-h might be deposited in the BAL area or translocated into the lung interstitium, where it catalyzes the generation of ROS and increases the risk of oxidative damage to lung tissue. Therefore, Ceria-h exposure caused two waves of lung injury: BAL inflammation and cytotoxicity induced by particle overload in the early stage, and pulmonary lipid peroxidation and pro-inflammation in the latter stage. Since the intratracheal instillation of Ceria-h caused a more persistent lung injury compared to Ceria-p, the long-term pulmonary and systemic toxicity of Ceria-h needs further study.
Our results implied that the agglomeration, as well as the surface chemistry plays an important role in the pulmonary toxicity of nano-ceria. Due to agglomeration, Ceria-p did not exert more severe pulmonary toxicity when compared to nano-ceria sized 6.6 nm. Therefore, the characterization of the size distribution of the ceria-contained agglomerates in the exhaust is essential to assess the potential risks of using nano-ceria as a fuel additive. Meanwhile, more attention should be paid to the surface chemistry of nano-ceria after combustion. The ability to reversibly switch between Ce3+ and Ce4+ makes nano-ceria attractive as a fuel additive to reduce the release of greenhouse gases and particles. Meanwhile, nano-ceria are being proven promising for their SOD mimetic activity [21]. It was reported that nano-ceria with a high Ce3+/Ce4+ ratio on the surface could exhibit SOD mimetic activity, whereas nano-ceria with a lower Ce3+/Ce4+ ratio show no SOD mimetic activity [22]. In the present work, Ceria-p and Ceria-h both have no detectable fraction of Ce3+ (Figure 1B), thereby exhibiting negligible SOD mimetic activity (data not shown). The redox activity may also endow nano-ceria with the ability to catalyze the generation of ROS. Our previous work suggested that the oxidative stress caused by nano-ceria exposure at the environmentally relevant concentration would shorten worms’ lifespans [23]. Therefore, surface chemistry is also an important parameter to determine the pulmonary toxicity of the combusted nano-ceria. Unfortunately, so far, there was only very limited and controversial information on the properties of the combusted nano-ceria in the exhaust.

4. Subjects and Methods

4.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Nano-Ceria

The primary particle diameters of the two types of nano-ceria used in the present work were both 3–5 nm. One of the nano-ceria (Ceria-p) was synthesized by a precipitation method [24]. In brief, 1.736 g Ce(NO3)3 was added to NaOH solution (0.4 g NaOH dissolved in 128 mL water) followed by 48 h of magnetic stirring. The resulting white precipitate was collected and washed several times in ultrapure water.
Another type of nano-ceria (Ceria-h) was synthesized by a surfactant-assisted hydrothermal approach [25]. Briefly, 15 mL of 116.7 mmol/L Ce(NO3)3 solution was mixed with 15 mL toluene; then, 22.5 mL of 233.3 mmol/L sodium oleate aqueous was dropped into the above mixture solution with magnetic stirring. The upper layer toluene with cerium precursor was transferred to a 50-mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave with 15 mL deionized water and 0.35 mL tert-butylamine. The sealed autoclave was transferred to a 180 °C oven, held there for 12 h and then cooled to room temperature. Then, the brown supernatant solution with synthesized nano-ceria was precipitated with an adequate volume of ethanol. The precipitate was obtained by centrifugation for 10 min and re-dispersed in 15 mL ultrapure water containing 400 μL of 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA). After centrifuging and washing 3 times, a Ceria-p suspension was obtained.
The physicochemical properties of nano-ceria were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2010, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), dynamic light scattering (DLS, Zetasizer nano-ZS 90, Malvern Instrument, Worcestershire, UK), X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES, 1W1B beamline at Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Beijing, China), and X-ray diffraction (XRD, X’pert PRO MPD, PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands). The ROS generation catalyzed by nano-ceria was determined by the method described by the literature of Heckert [26], using 2,2’-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) as the free radical capture agent. After catching ROS, the ABTS can form a stable blue-green product, cation radicals ABTS+#, which was measured at 405 nm by using a UV-vis spectrophotometer (TU-1901, PGENENAL, Beijing, China). Reactions with nano-ceria were buffered by Tris (100 μM, pH 7.0). The solution containing 100 μM nano-CeO2, 88 mM H2O2 and 100 μM ABTS was added into a 1-cm path length quartz cuvette, and the absorbance at 405 nm was recorded once every 3 s for 10 min.

4.2. Animals

Male CD-1 (ICR) mice (6 weeks old) were purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratories. A commercial pellet diet and deionized water were available ad libitum. After one week of acclimation, mice were randomly divided into 12 groups, with 8 mice per group and housed individually in stainless steel cages under standard laboratory conditions (temperature 23 ± 1 °C, humidity 50% ± 3% and a 12-h light/dark cycle). All the animal experiments were performed with the approval of the Ethics Committee of Animal Care and Experimentation of the National Institute for Environmental Studies, China.

4.3. Intratracheal Instillation of Nano-Ceria

The Ceria-p and Ceria-h were dispersed in ultrapure water at a concentration of 0.8 mg/mL, respectively, and sonicated for 15 min before use. By using a non-surgical intratracheal instillation method [8], mice were intratracheally instilled with 40 μg of either nano-ceria (50 μL of nano-ceria suspension) followed by 800 μL of air in 2 s. The control group was intratracheally instilled with ultrapure water instead of nano-ceria.

4.4. Cytological and Biochemical Analysis of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid

The animals were sacrificed at 1, 3, 7 and 28 days post-instillation (PI). Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed 3 times with sodium phosphate buffer (PBS, pH 7.4, 1 mL for each lavage), and the cells in BALF were collected by centrifugation at 400× g and 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatant was used for biochemical analyses, while the recovered cells from the pellet were resuspended for the macrophage, neutrophil and lymphocyte cell counting with Wright’s staining. The activities of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and acid phosphatase (ACP) in the BALF were analyzed using colorimetric assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). The concentration of total protein (TP) was determined by the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method using a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Incorporated, Rockford, IL, USA) with bovine serum albumin as a standard.

4.5. Biochemical Assay of Lung Homogenates

The lung tissues were separated and homogenized by a glass homogenizer in pre-cooled 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4, v/v = 1/4). The homogenates were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, and the supernatants were aliquoted and stored at −80 °C for the biochemical analysis. The concentrations of malondialdehyde (MDA) and GSH, as well as the activities of SOD, GSH-Px and CAT in the lung homogenates were measured using the reagent kits purchased from Jiancheng Bioengineering Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China, according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Protein levels in the lung homogenates were determined by the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Incorporated, Rockford, IL, USA). The levels of IL-6 in the lung homogenates were determined using commercially available ELISA kits (Wuhan Boster Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China).

4.6. Histopathological Examination

Three pieces of lungs were selected randomly in each group at each time point. The lung tissues were immersed in 10% formaldehyde solution and subsequently embedded into paraffin wax, then sectioned into 5 μm-thick slices and mounted on a glass microscope slide. Then, the slices were stained with HE dye and observed using an optical microscope (Leica DM4000M, Wetzlar, Germany).

4.7. Statistical Analyses

All data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) statistical software for Windows. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test were carried out to illustrate the significant difference between the treatment, and a difference of * p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

In the present work, we investigated the pulmonary toxicities of two kinds of nano-ceria with the same primary size distribution. Both Ceria-p and Ceria-h induced oxidative stress, inflammatory responses and cytotoxicities in mice, but possibly via different mechanisms. The mean size of Ceria-p agglomerates was much smaller compared to Ceria-h, thereby causing more potent, acute inflammation, due to its higher concentration number of agglomerates and higher deposition rate deep in the lung. Ceria-h exposure caused two waves of lung injury: BAL inflammation and cytotoxicity in the early stage and redox-activity-evoked lipid peroxidation, as well as pro-inflammation in the latter stage. Therefore, agglomerates size, as well as the surface chemistry of the combusted nano-ceria in the exhaust are essential characteristics to assess the potential risks of using nano-ceria as a fuel additive.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by National Basic Research Programs of China (973 Program 2011CB933400, 2013CB932703, 2012CB932504) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11275215 and 11275218).
  • Author ContributionsConception and design: Xiao He, Zhiyong Zhang; Administrative support: Zhiyong Zhang, Zhenqiang Wu; Synthesis and characterization of nanoparticles: Peng Zhang, Jing Zhang; Animal experiment and data collection: Lu Peng, Yuanyuan Li, Junzhe Zhang, Yuhui Ma, Yayun Ding; Data analysis and drafting of manuscript: Lu Peng, Xiao He; Critical revisions/Supervision: Xiao He, Zhiyong Zhang, Zhenqiang Wu, Zhifang Chai

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. He, X.; Zhang, H.; Ma, Y.; Bai, W.; Zhang, Z.; Lu, K.; Ding, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Chai, Z. Lung deposition and extrapulmonary translocation of nano-ceria after intratracheal instillation. Nanotechnology 2010, 21, 285103. [Google Scholar]
  2. Simonelli, F.; Marmorato, P.; Abbas, K.; Ponti, J.; Kozempel, J.; Holzwarth, U.; Franchini, F.; Rossi, F. Cyclotron production of radioactive CeO2 nanoparticles and their application for in vitro uptake studies. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci 2011, 10, 44–50. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cassee, F.R.; van Balen, E.C.; Singh, C.; Green, D.; Muijser, H.; Weinstein, J.; Dreher, K. Exposure, health and ecological effects review of engineered nanoscale cerium and cerium oxide associated with its use as a fuel additive. Crit. Rev. Toxicol 2011, 41, 213–229. [Google Scholar]
  4. Batley, G.E.; Halliburton, B.; Kirby, J.K.; Doolette, C.L.; Navarro, D.; McLaughlin, M.J.; Veitch, C. Characterization and ecological risk assessment of nanoparticulate CeO2 as a diesel fuel catalyst. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 2013, 32, 1896–1905. [Google Scholar]
  5. Park, B.; Donaldson, K.; Duffin, R.; Tran, L.; Kelly, F.; Mudway, I.; Morin, J.P.; Guest, R.; Jenkinson, P.; Samaras, Z. Hazard and risk assessment of a nanoparticulate cerium oxide-based diesel fuel additive-a case study. Inhal. Toxicol 2008, 20, 547–566. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cassee, F.R.; Campbell, A.; Boere, A.J.F.; McLean, S.G.; Duffin, R.; Krystek, P.; Gosens, I.; Miller, M.R. The biological effects of subacute inhalation of diesel exhaust following addition of cerium oxide nanoparticles in atherosclerosis-prone mice. Environ. Res 2012, 115, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jung, H.; Kittelson, D.B.; Zachariah, M.R. The influence of a cerium additive on ultrafine diesel particle emissions and kinetics of oxidation. Combust. Flame 2005, 142, 276–288. [Google Scholar]
  8. Xue, L.; He, X.; Li, Y.; Qu, M.; Zhang, Z. Pulmonary toxicity of ceria nanoparticles in mice after intratracheal instillation. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol 2013, 13, 6575–6580. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ma, J.Y.; Zhao, H.; Mercer, R.R.; Barger, M.; Rao, M.; Meighan, T.; Schwegler-Berry, D.; Castranova, V.; Ma, J.K. Cerium oxide nanoparticle-induced pulmonary inflammation and alveolar macrophage functional change in rats. Nanotoxicology 2011, 5, 312–325. [Google Scholar]
  10. Srinivas, A.; Rao, P.J.; Selvam, G.; Murthy, P.B.; Reddy, P.N. Acute inhalation toxicity of cerium oxide nanoparticles in rats. Toxicol. Lett 2011, 205, 105–115. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ma, J.Y.; Mercer, R.R.; Barger, M.; Schwegler-Berry, D.; Scabilloni, J.; Ma, J.K.; Castranova, V. Induction of pulmonary fibrosis by cerium oxide nanoparticles. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol 2012, 262, 255–264. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, B.; He, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Feng, W. Metabolism of nanomaterials in vivo: Blood circulation and organ clearance. Acc. Chem. Res 2013, 46, 761–769. [Google Scholar]
  13. Oberdörster, G.; Oberdörster, E.; Oberdörster, J. Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ. Health Perspect 2005, 113, 823–839. [Google Scholar]
  14. Oberdörster, G. Lung particle overload: Implications for occupational exposures to particles. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol 1995, 21, 123–135. [Google Scholar]
  15. Oyabu, T.; Morimoto, Y.; Hirohashi, M.; Horie, M.; Kambara, T.; Lee, B.W.; Hashiba, M.; Mizuguchi, Y.; Myojo, T.; Kuroda, E. Dose-dependent pulmonary response of well-dispersed titanium dioxide nanoparticles following intratracheal instillation. J. Nanopart. Res 2013, 15, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  16. Noël, A.; Maghni, K.; Cloutier, Y.; Dion, C.; Wilkinson, K.; Hallé, S.; Tardif, R.; Truchon, G. Effects of inhaled nano-TiO2 aerosols showing two distinct agglomeration states on rat lungs. Toxicol. Lett 2012, 214, 109–119. [Google Scholar]
  17. Semmler-Behnke, M.; Takenaka, S.; Fertsch, S.; Wenk, A.; Seitz, J.; Mayer, P.; Oberdörster, G.; Kreyling, W. Efficient elimination of inhaled nanoparticles from the alveolar region: Evidence for interstitial uptake and subsequent reentrainment onto airways epithelium. Environ. Health Perspect 2007, 115, 728–733. [Google Scholar]
  18. Nel, A.; Xia, T.; Mädler, L.; Li, N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 2006, 311, 622–627. [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, N.; Xia, T.; Nel, A.E. The role of oxidative stress in ambient particulate matter-induced lung diseases and its implications in the toxicity of engineered nanoparticles. Free Radic. Biol. Med 2008, 44, 1689–1699. [Google Scholar]
  20. Maynard, A. Experimental determination of ultrafine TiO2 deagglomeration in a surrogate pulmonary surfactant: Preliminary results. Ann. Occup. Hyg 2002, 46, 197–202. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen, J.; Patil, S.; Seal, S.; McGinnis, J. Rare earth nanoparticles prevent retinal degeneration induced by intracellular peroxides. Nat. Nanotechnol 2006, 1, 142–150. [Google Scholar]
  22. Korsvik, C.; Patil, S.; Seal, S.; Self, W.T. Superoxide dismutase mimetic properties exhibited by vacancy engineered ceria nanoparticles. Chem. Commun 2007, 10, 1056–1058. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, H.; He, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, P.; Li, Y.; Ma, Y.; Kuang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Chai, Z. Nano-CeO2 exhibits adverse effects at environmental relevant concentrations. Environ. Sci. Technol 2011, 45, 3725–3730. [Google Scholar]
  24. Patel, C. Room Temperature Synthesis and Systematic Characterization of Ultra-small Ceria Nanoparticles. Master’s Thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA, 1 January 2009. [Google Scholar]
  25. Qiu, N.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Z.; Hu, T.; Liu, P. Tuning ceria nanocrystals morphology and structure by copper doping. Crystal. Growth Des 2011, 12, 629–634. [Google Scholar]
  26. Heckert, E.; Seal, S.; Self, W. Fenton-like reaction catalyzed by the rare earth inner transition metal cerium. Environ. Sci. Technol 2008, 42, 5014–5019. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The physicochemical characteristics of Ceria-p (synthesized via precipitation) and Ceria-h (synthesized via the hydrothermal method). (A) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of Ceria-p and Ceria-h; (B) the X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectra of Ceria-p and Ceria-h; (C) the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Ceria-p and Ceria-h; and (D) the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) catalyzed by Ceria-p and Ceria-h in the presence of hydrogen peroxide; and the form of 2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) cation radical (ABTS+#) was photometrically determined at 405 nm.
Figure 1. The physicochemical characteristics of Ceria-p (synthesized via precipitation) and Ceria-h (synthesized via the hydrothermal method). (A) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of Ceria-p and Ceria-h; (B) the X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectra of Ceria-p and Ceria-h; (C) the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Ceria-p and Ceria-h; and (D) the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) catalyzed by Ceria-p and Ceria-h in the presence of hydrogen peroxide; and the form of 2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) cation radical (ABTS+#) was photometrically determined at 405 nm.
Ijms 15 06072f1
Figure 2. Percentages of macrophage, neutrophil and lymphocyte in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) after intratracheal instillation of Ceria-p and Ceria-h. Values are represented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least 5 mice. At each time point, columns labeled with different lowercase letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 using Tukey’s test.
Figure 2. Percentages of macrophage, neutrophil and lymphocyte in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) after intratracheal instillation of Ceria-p and Ceria-h. Values are represented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least 5 mice. At each time point, columns labeled with different lowercase letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 using Tukey’s test.
Ijms 15 06072f2
Figure 3. The levels of total protein concentration, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and acid phosphatase (ACP) in BALF after intratracheal instillation of Ceria-p and Ceria-h. Values are represented as the mean ± SD. At each time point, columns labeled with different lowercase letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 using Tukey’s test.
Figure 3. The levels of total protein concentration, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and acid phosphatase (ACP) in BALF after intratracheal instillation of Ceria-p and Ceria-h. Values are represented as the mean ± SD. At each time point, columns labeled with different lowercase letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 using Tukey’s test.
Ijms 15 06072f3
Figure 4. Levels of glutathione (GSH), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), malondialdehyde (MDA) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in lung homogenates after intratracheal instillation of Ceria-p and Ceria-h. Values are represented as the mean ± SD. At each time point, columns labeled with different lowercase letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 using Tukey’s test.
Figure 4. Levels of glutathione (GSH), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), malondialdehyde (MDA) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in lung homogenates after intratracheal instillation of Ceria-p and Ceria-h. Values are represented as the mean ± SD. At each time point, columns labeled with different lowercase letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 using Tukey’s test.
Ijms 15 06072f4
Figure 5. Light micrographs of hematoxylin-eosin stained lung tissue slices after intratracheal instillation of Ceria-p and Ceria-h. (A) The lung of mice from the control; (BE) the lung of mice exposed to Ceria-p at 1, 3, 7 and 28 days post-instillation (PI), respectively; (FI) the lung of mice exposed to CeO2-h at 1, 3, 7 and 28 days PI; magnification: original ×200, inset ×400; solid arrow: particle-laden macrophages; hollow arrow: granulomas.
Figure 5. Light micrographs of hematoxylin-eosin stained lung tissue slices after intratracheal instillation of Ceria-p and Ceria-h. (A) The lung of mice from the control; (BE) the lung of mice exposed to Ceria-p at 1, 3, 7 and 28 days post-instillation (PI), respectively; (FI) the lung of mice exposed to CeO2-h at 1, 3, 7 and 28 days PI; magnification: original ×200, inset ×400; solid arrow: particle-laden macrophages; hollow arrow: granulomas.
Ijms 15 06072f5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peng, L.; He, X.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ma, Y.; Ding, Y.; Wu, Z.; Chai, Z.; et al. Comparative Pulmonary Toxicity of Two Ceria Nanoparticles with the Same Primary Size. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 6072-6085. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15046072

AMA Style

Peng L, He X, Zhang P, Zhang J, Li Y, Zhang J, Ma Y, Ding Y, Wu Z, Chai Z, et al. Comparative Pulmonary Toxicity of Two Ceria Nanoparticles with the Same Primary Size. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2014; 15(4):6072-6085. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15046072

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peng, Lu, Xiao He, Peng Zhang, Jing Zhang, Yuanyuan Li, Junzhe Zhang, Yuhui Ma, Yayun Ding, Zhenqiang Wu, Zhifang Chai, and et al. 2014. "Comparative Pulmonary Toxicity of Two Ceria Nanoparticles with the Same Primary Size" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15, no. 4: 6072-6085. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15046072

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop