Next Article in Journal
Effects of OsCDPK1 on the Structure and Physicochemical Properties of Starch in Developing Rice Seeds
Next Article in Special Issue
The Potential of Combining Tubulin-Targeting Anticancer Therapeutics and Immune Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
The Proposal of Molecular Mechanisms of Weak Organic Acids Intake-Induced Improvement of Insulin Resistance in Diabetes Mellitus via Elevation of Interstitial Fluid pH
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mapping the Contact Sites of the Escherichia coli Division-Initiating Proteins FtsZ and ZapA by BAMG Cross-Linking and Site-Directed Mutagenesis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 10
10.3390/ijms19103245
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

γ-Tubulin–γ-Tubulin Interactions as the Basis for the Formation of a Meshwork

by
Catalina Ana Rosselló
,
Lisa Lindström
,
Greta Eklund
,
Matthieu Corvaisier
and
Maria Alvarado Kristensson
*
Molecular Pathology, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, 20502 Malmö, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(10), 3245; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103245
Submission received: 6 September 2018 / Revised: 2 October 2018 / Accepted: 16 October 2018 / Published: 19 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Regulatory Mechanisms of Tubulin-Like Proteins)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In cytoplasm, protein γ-tubulin joins with various γ-tubulin complex proteins (GCPs) to form a heterotetramer γ-tubulin small complex (γ-TuSC) that can grow into a ring-shaped structure called the γ-tubulin ring complex (γ-TuRC). Both γ-TuSC and γ-TuRC are required for microtubule nucleation. Recent knowledge on γ-tubulin with regard to its cellular functions beyond participation in its creation of microtubules suggests that this protein forms a cellular meshwork. The present review summarizes the recognized functions of γ-tubulin and aims to unite the current views on this protein.

1. Introduction

Microtubules are highly enriched in a family of GTPases called the tubulins. In humans, there are five known tubulin isoforms: α-tubulin, β-tubulin, γ-tubulin, δ-tubulin, and ε-tubulin [1]. Among the members of the tubulin GTPase superfamily, only the α-, β-, and γ-tubulins are ubiquitous, implying that these proteins perform essential cellular functions that might be conserved throughout the eukaryotes. The first tubulin genes were discovered in the 1970s [2], and since then several genes coding for α- and β-tubulin have been described. In humans, α- and β-tubulin are encoded by 19 genes (10 and 9 genes, respectively) (http://genome.ucsc.edu/) [3]. Subsequent research identified γ-tubulin as a regulator of microtubule assembly in the fungus Aspergillus nidulans [4]. In eukaryotes, the number of genes encoding for α- and for β-tubulin varies considerably, whereas the number encoding γ-tubulin ranges from 1 to 3, with two genes found in mammals and up to three genes in flowering plants [3]. The disparity in the number of genes encoding the various members of the tubulin family suggests that part of the fine tuning of the functions of α-tubulin and β-tubulin in microtubules is the result of the variation in the expression of different α- and β-tubulin genes in the different tissues, but, because there are fewer TUBG genes, γ-tubulin has to perform housekeeping functions that are more conserved among the species.
In eukaryotes, the α-, β-, and γ-tubulins work together in the formation of microtubules. Heterodimers of α- and β-tubulin assemble microtubules, and two main complexes containing γ-tubulin—the γ-tubulin small complex (γ-TuSC) and the γ-tubulin ring complex (γ-TuRC)—assist in microtubule nucleation [5,6,7]. In humans, γ-TuSC consists of two γ-tubulin molecules in combination with one γ-tubulin complex protein 2 (GCP2) and with one GCP3. γ-TuSCs, together with additional GCPs, form the larger complex γ-TuRC. γ-TuSC and γ-TuRC are found in cytoplasm and centrosomes and are also associated with cellular membranes [8,9,10,11].
Here, we review and discuss the possible functions of γ-tubulin as a cellular meshwork based on recent advances in the field.

2. γ-Tubulin Is an Essential Protein

To date, nothing is known about a species that lacks γ-tubulin, and about half of the studied species contain a single TUBG gene [3]. In mice, TUBG1 is the predominantly expressed gene, although TUBG2 is expressed up to the blastocyst stage during embryonic development and in the brain [8]. The TUBG2-knockout mice are viable and fertile, but exhibit some defects, including abnormalities in their circadian rhythm and in painful stimulation [8]. In contrast, the TUBG1-knockout mice survive to the morula/blastocyst stage. Cells from cultured TUBG−/− embryos show cell division arrest with unaligned and abnormally condensed chromosomes [8]. Additionally, in such embryonic cells, the microtubules are stable and the mitotic spindles are deformed and abnormal, carrying condensed and unaligned chromosomes, and the cells contain only one pericentrin (a centrosomal marker) rich center. These characteristics suggest that they have defects in the microtubules dynamics and centrosome duplication. Interestingly, TUBG1−/− embryos contain parental γ-tubulin 1 that is progressively diluted during the division of the fertilized egg. These embryos also express γ-tubulin 2, but the protein is not present in the centrosomes [8], which may result in disorganized spindles and the subsequent impairment of both nuclear division and centrosome replication (Figure 1). Inasmuch as similar phenotypes have been reported in other systems, the TUBG genes are considered essential [8,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21].
Although γ-tubulin was regarded as a low-abundant protein when first discovered [17], today it is known that γ-tubulin is ubiquitously expressed in mammalian cells and appears in abundance in all cellular compartments [8,9,11,14,23,24,25,26,27]. In human and mouse cell lines, targeting the TUBG1 and TUBG2 with a single-guide (sg) or with short interference (si) RNA techniques induces a 50% drop in the levels of γ-tubulin protein, which leads to apoptotic death (Figure 1) [13,14,24,28]. The live imaging of TUBG sgRNA-expressing cells has demonstrated that when the levels of γ-tubulin decrease, cells divide normally for several days but subsequently they arrest in the interphase and die [14].
Based on previous work, it is surprising that the concomitant knockdown of both TUBG genes arrest cells in interphase and not in mitosis [8,15,16,17,19,21]. A plausible explanation for this effect is that the level of unconsumed parental γ-tubulin present in TUBG sgRNA-expressing cells is sufficient to aid execution of both interphase and mitosis, but, because each cell division halves the amount of γ-tubulin, the resulting γ-tubulin levels in the offspring cells cannot suffice to support interphase and thus the cells die in interphase. In contrast, in TUBG1−/− embryos, the amounts of parental γ-tubulin 1 and the expressed γ-tubulin 2 are enough to permit interphase progression, but, as the levels of parental γ-tubulin 1 drop, there is a concomitant decrease in the centrosome-associated pool of γ-tubulin, which results in mitotic failure [8]. Consequently, cell division in TUBG-knockdown cells will continue as long as the inherited γ-tubulin pool is sufficient to allow the execution of the following interphase [14], whereas cell division in TUBG1−/− embryos will proceed as long as the inherited centrosome-associated γ-tubulin pool is adequate for the execution of the subsequent mitosis (Figure 1) [8].

3. Is γ-Tubulin a Sticky Protein or a Meshwork?

Despite considerable progress in understanding the functions and location of γ-tubulin, the views regarding their functions have broadened. Initial genetic and biochemical experiments suggested that cellular γ-tubulin is either soluble or is associated with the following cellular structures: microtubule-organizing centers (centrosomes in animal cells and spindle pole bodies in fungi), the mitotic spindle, the kinetochore, midbodies, and microtubule arrays [29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Different studies have found that part of the soluble γ-tubulin pool is in a complex with chaperonin containing TCP-1 (CCT), which is involved in the correct folding of tubulins [36,37]; part of it is in a complex with pericentrin, a cytosolic and pericentriolar matrix (PCM) protein [38]; and the rest of γ-tubulin is organized in either γ-TuSCs or γ-TuRCs [5,6,7]. Notably, γ-tubulin is detected in all biochemically divided fractions of cells and has, therefore, been considered to simply represent the contamination caused by the sticky nature of the protein.
A number of studies in recent years have broadened this view of γ-tubulin [9,10,11,14,23,24,25,26,27,28,39,40,41,42,43]. In some cell lines and primary cells, a pool of γ-tubulin in the nuclear compartment [27,44,45] has been detected and found to be associated with Rad51, C53, GCP2, GCP3, E2F1, and lamin B1 [23,24,25,26,27,28]. Moreover, γ-tubulin affects the proper positioning and biogenesis of the Golgi apparatus, and it is also associated with endosomes and the endoplasmic reticulum [9,11,14]. Together, the reported data demonstrate that γ-tubulin is associated with all of the following: the nucleus, the Golgi, the endoplasmic reticulum, the mitochondria, the centrosomes, and the cytoplasm [9,10,11,14,25,27,44,45,46].
Within the PCM, γ-tubulin–pericentrin complexes form strings [38]. γ-Tubulin produced by bacteria assembles in vitro a meshwork of threads called γ-strings that support the formation of lamin B3 protofilaments [28]. Additionally, nuclear assembly experiments using extracts of Xenopus laevis eggs and mammalian cell lines have demonstrated that a nuclear boundary of γ-strings at the transition between cytosolic and chromatin-associated γ-tubulin serves as a supporting scaffold for the formation of the lamina and for the recruitment of the nuclear membrane [28]. An in vivo analysis of zebrafish embryos and in vitro experiments have shown that part of the cellular γ-tubulin pool is folded into γ-strings by the chaperonin CCT [39]. Experiments on the plant Arabidopsis thaliana have confirmed and further clarified the structure of γ-strings [43]. γ-Strings are 4 to 6 nm in diameter [14,28,39,43] and, in animal cells, span from the cytosolic compartment through the membranes and into the chromatin [14,28].
The γ-tubules represent another cellular structure that consists of γ-tubulin (Figure 2). γ-Tubules were first described as filaments formed upon the overexpression of γ-tubulin in monkey kidney Cos cells [47]. A recent characterization of γ-tubules in mammalian cells demonstrated that γ-tubulin assembles γ-tubules, which are cytosolic fibers containing γTuRCs and pericentrin [13]. In addition to γ-tubules and γ-strings, other γ-tubulin-rich structures are the centrosomes. In summary, the mentioned observations imply that γ-tubulin in mammalian cells is associated with all cellular compartments and, due to its self-polymerizing features, can be further organized in PCM, γ-strings, and γ-tubules. The cited findings also suggest that the sticky nature of γ-tubulin is the result of the self-polymerizing ability of the protein in combination with its presence in all cellular compartments.

The γ-Tubulin Meshwork

Within an animal cell, the self-polymerizing ability of γ-tubulin results in the formation of γ-strings, and γ-tubules, and the γ-strings associated with the centrosome, which suggests that these components are interlinked to form a cellular meshwork in both the cytosol (including all cellular organelles) and the nuclear compartment.
Z-stack images captured by Airyscan super-resolution microscopy, a technique known to improve the signal-to-noise detection of the faintest signals emitted by thin γ-strings (Ø 4–6 nm), were analyzed and, thereafter, 3D-skeleton images were generated by applying a 3D thinning algorithm to locate the centerlines (skeleton) of the structures in the input images [49]. This approach demonstrated that links are established between γ-strings, γ-tubules, and centrosomes (Figure 2). Considering that interlinking between filaments is the key to the formation of a skeleton, we propose that cellular γ-tubulin forms a meshwork.

4. The Functions and Dynamics of the γ-Tubulin Meshwork

It is known that the functions of cytoskeletal and nucleoskeletal networks include providing form and mechanical support for a cell, organizing the genome, and assisting in signal transduction, cell movement, cellular transport, and cell–cell interactions [50]. However, how does the γ-tubulin meshwork contribute to cellular homeostasis?

4.1. Providing Form and Mechanical Support, and Assisting in the Movement and Positioning of Organelles

It is plausible that centrosomes, γ-strings, and γ-tubules provide cells with mechanical support in various ways. In dividing cells, two centrioles are embedded in the PCM to form a centrosome. Interfering with γ-tubulin affects the centrosome duplication, which suggests that, in the PCM, γ-tubulin gives the parental centrioles with the mechanical support required for the formation of offspring centrioles [15,21,51]. Moreover, the PCM constitutes an important site that regulates the nucleation and the dynamics of microtubules and actin filaments during mitosis (i.e., a bipolar mitotic spindle ensures the strict segregation of sister chromatids between daughter cells) and also during interphase [30,52,53]. Furthermore, a boundary of γ-strings at the transition between the cytoplasm and the chromatin supports the formation of the lamina, and the recruitment of nuclear membranes, assuring the formation of a nuclear envelope around the chromatin [28]. In mitochondria and the Golgi apparatus, γ-strings produce a structuring scaffold that aids to the shaping and positioning of these organelles [11,14]. In addition, it is possible that membrane-associated γ-strings provide nucleating sites for microtubules, which would facilitate the movement and positioning of organelles in the cytoplasm. This notion is supported by a study showing that, in yeast cells, the Leu387Pro mutation in γ-tubulin influences nuclear positioning [54].
Considering γ-tubules, these structures are approximately 25 nm in diameter and are most abundant in non-dividing cells, in which higher protein levels of the γ-tubulin protein are found in the cytoplasm [25,26,27,45,55]. Thus, a cell may control the cytosolic location of γ-tubulin through the formation of cytosolic γ-tubules. However, the centrosome is not a prerequisite for γ-tubule formation [13], although γ-tubules are found emanating from centrosomes at sites where the nuclear envelope is folded, and two γ-tubules are interlaced, to produce a macro-γ-tubule (Figure 3a,b). The creation of macro-γ-tubules may influence the shape of the nuclear envelope, a deduction that supports the role of γ-tubules as elements that alter the shape of the nuclear compartment.

4.2. Assisting in Signal Transduction, and Organizing the Genome

There is substantial evidence that the γ-tubulin meshwork regulates the G1-to-S transition [24,25,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64], mitotic progression [65], and cytokinesis [66], effects that are achieved by harboring of various proteins involved in the signal transduction pathways that coordinate cell cycle progression. Additionally, the PCM acts as a signal hub that brings together various checkpoint proteins [24,25,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67]. A more detailed review of the involvement of γ-tubulin in signal transduction has recently been published [22].
The spatial organization of the genome regulates gene expression [68], and both genome organization and gene expression may be controlled by the γ-tubulin meshwork. In this context, γ-tubulin binds to the DNA on the same DNA binding motif as E2 promoter-binding factor (E2F), which results in that the retinoblastoma (RB1) and γ-tubulin proteins moderate each other´s expression by binding to their respective gene promoters. Thus, the reduction of the levels of the γ-tubulin protein results in an up-regulation of the expression of the RB1 protein [24,25]. This suggests that RB1 and γ-tubulin may complement each other in the regulation of gene expression, where the lack of activity/expression of one protein may be compensated for by an increase in activity/expression of the other protein. Indeed, the RB1/γ-tubulin regulatory network controls E2Fs [25], which transcriptional activities are necessary to induce the expression of the target genes that are essential for centrosome duplication and DNA replication [69]. Interestingly, in addition to interacting with E2Fs, RB1 modifies the structure and organization of chromatin by recruiting remodeling factors, including histone deacetylases, members of the chromatin remodeling complex SWI/SNF, and DNA methyltransferase [70,71,72], which indicates the potential involvement of γ-tubulin in the recruitment of DNA-remodeling factors.
Considering that γ-strings are present in the double membranes of the nuclear envelope and of the mitochondria [14,28], as well as in the chromatin, and that lamin B is capable of nucleating on γ-strings, it is tempting to speculate on the possible mechanisms by which the γ-tubulin meshwork can assist in signal transduction and genome organization. A confocal microscopy analysis of fixed human U2OS osteosarcoma cells revealed that two γ-tubules are connected through the nuclear compartment and thereby link both sides of the cytosol (Figure 3a,c). A closer analysis of Z-stack images captured with a confocal microscope showed that, at the γ-tubule connecting site inside the nuclear compartment, the chromatin is less dense and appears to have holes (Figure 3c). Chromatin-dense areas or domains can also be seen in the vicinity of γ-tubulin (Figure 3c). These findings agree with the possibility that cytosolic γ-tubules serve as structural docking sites for nuclear γ-tubulin, resulting in the remodeling of the genome and in the formation of docking sites that might be used for the recruitment of chromatin-remodeling factors.

4.3. The Dynamics of the γ-Tubulin Meshwork

The γ-tubulin meshwork changes in a cell-cycle-dependent manner. In the G1 phase, most of the γ-tubulin pool is in the cytosol, and part of this cytosolic pool creates γ-tubules (Figure 2) [13]. The formation of γ-tubules is determined by a GTP-dependent balance between γ-tubules and γ-tubulin [13]. However, at the G1–S transition, the number of cytosolic γ-tubules is reduced, and there is a subsequent accumulation of γ-tubulin in the nuclear compartment and the PCM [13,21,25]. In the S phase, the inherited centrosome and genome duplicate synchronously. At the onset of mitosis, the two centrosomes ensure the assembly of a bipolar mitotic spindle and the strict segregation of sister chromatids between daughter cells. In addition, a boundary of γ-strings ensures the formation of the nuclear envelope around chromatin [28].
Studies of murine NIH3T3 embryonic fibroblasts and human U2OS osteosarcoma cells have identified a bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS) on the C terminus of γ-tubulin [55]. Notably, SadB kinases (e.g., mSADB and hSAD1/BRSK1) mediate the phosphorylation of γ-tubulin on Ser385, a residue that is near the NLS and also occurs in the starting region of a motif, which is commonly found in DNA-binding proteins and is called a helix-loop-helix [22]. The phosphorylation levels of γ-tubulin on Ser385 induce a conformational change to unmask the NLS, which leads to the nuclear accumulation of γ-tubulin [21,23,24,25,26,27,55]. The DNA-binding ability of the C terminus of γ-tubulin is also important for the association of the protein with mitochondrial DNA [14,25]. Moreover, early in the S-phase, SadB kinases mediate the phosphorylation of γ-tubulin on Ser131 [21,51,55]. The phosphorylation levels of γ-tubulin on Ser131 regulate the recruitment of γ-tubulin at the nascent centriole and facilitate the accessibility of SadB to Ser385 [55]. Another biochemical modification that affects the γ-tubulin meshwork is the BRCA1-dependent ubiquitination of γ-tubulin, which regulates the centrosome number [73].
In contrast to γ-strings, which are static structures, γ-tubules vary in length and nucleate on cytosolic γ-tubulin foci together with pericentrin, GCP2, GCP3, GCP5, and GCP6. γ-Tubules are affected by the following: the methodology used for fixation of cells; treatment with cold, colcemid, taxol, citral dimethyl acetal (CDA), and dimethyl fumarate (DMF); and the expression of γ-tubulin mutants that affect the GTPase domain of γ-tubulin [13,48]. Intriguingly, both the citral analogue CDA and the approved drug DMF bind to the GTPase domain of γ-tubulin, which affects the length of γ-tubules, the nuclear activity of γ-tubulin, and the respiratory capacity of mitochondria [14,56,74]. Accordingly, in human U2OS osteosarcoma cells, mutations in the GTP/magnesium-interacting residue Cys13 of γ-tubulin are cytotoxic [13,14,75,76]. These observations strongly suggest that the GTPase domain of γ-tubulin is essential for the dynamics of the γ-tubulin meshwork. The where and when of the self-polymerizing ability of γ-tubulin is most likely regulated by GTP acting together with phosphorylation-dependent changes in the conformation of γ-tubulin.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Recent advances support the notion that γ-tubulin is the main component of a cellular meshwork that plays a major role in cell survival. The aim of the present review is to unite recent findings in this field with previous knowledge of the protein to summarize the known functions of γ-tubulin in cellular homeostasis, and also to speculate on the possible roles and organization of the meshwork. Nonetheless, further insights are still needed to elucidate the mechanical signals affecting the spatial organization of the γ-tubulin meshwork and the molecules controlling the dynamics of this meshwork. Importantly, γ-tubulin is related to several human diseases. Levels of γ-tubulin are increased in various tumors, and inhibition of the GTPase activity of γ-tubulin in RB1-deficient tumor cells impedes tumor growth [24,25,56,77,78,79,80,81,82]. Mutations in the TUBG genes have also been found to cause brain malformations [54,83]. Finally, DMF is a γ-tubulin inhibitor used to treat multiple sclerosis and psoriasis, both of which are autoimmune diseases [56,74,84,85]. Consequently, knowledge concerning the γ-tubulin meshwork is required to highlight the potential roles of γ-tubulin in diseases and development, and to aid in the discovery of novel therapeutic regimens that target the activity of γ-tubulin.

Funding

This research was funded by the Swedish Cancer Society (grant number CAN2016/369), Skane University Hospital in Malmö Cancer Research Fund (grant number 20151209), the Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation (grant number PR2016-0084), and the Crafoordska Foundation (grant number 20180670).

Acknowledgments

The authors apologize for not citing many studies concerning γ-tubulin due to space limitations. The authors thank M. Trulsson for support with the Airyscan super-resolution microscope, and Patricia Ödman for editorial assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

γ-TuSCγ-Tubulin small complex
γ-TuRCγ-Tubulin ring complex
siRNAShort interference RNA
sgRNASingle-guide RNA
CCTChaperonin-containing TCP-1
DMFDimethyl fumarate
CDACitral dimethyl acetal
NLSNuclear localization signal
PCMPericentriolar matrix
GCPγ-Tubulin complex protein
E2FE2 promoter-binding factor
RB1Retinoblastoma protein

References

  1. Dutcher, S.K. The tubulin fraternity: α to Eta. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2001, 13, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cleveland, D.W.; Kirschner, M.W.; Cowan, N.J. Isolation of separate mRNAs for α- and β-tubulin and characterization of the corresponding in vitro translation products. Cell 1978, 15, 1021–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Findeisen, P.; Muhlhausen, S.; Dempewolf, S.; Hertzog, J.; Zietlow, A.; Carlomagno, T.; Kollmar, M. Six subgroups and extensive recent duplications characterize the evolution of the eukaryotic tubulin protein family. Genome Biol. Evol. 2014, 6, 2274–2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Weil, C.F.; Oakley, C.E.; Oakley, B.R. Isolation of MIP (microtubule-interacting protein) mutations of Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1986, 6, 2963–2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Moritz, M.; Zheng, Y.; Alberts, B.M.; Oegema, K. Recruitment of the γ-tubulin ring complex to drosophila salt-stripped centrosome scaffolds. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 142, 775–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Moritz, M.; Braunfeld, M.B.; Sedat, J.W.; Alberts, B.; Agard, D.A. Microtubule nucleation by γ-tubulin-containing rings in the centrosome. Nature 1995, 378, 638–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zheng, Y.; Wong, M.L.; Alberts, B.; Mitchison, T. Nucleation of microtubule assembly by a γ-tubulin-containing ring complex. Nature 1995, 378, 578–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yuba-Kubo, A.; Kubo, A.; Hata, M.; Tsukita, S. Gene knockout analysis of two γ-tubulin isoforms in mice. Dev. Biol. 2005, 282, 361–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hehnly, H.; Doxsey, S. Rab11 endosomes contribute to mitotic spindle organization and orientation. Dev. Cell 2014, 28, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Draberova, E.; Sulimenko, V.; Vinopal, S.; Sulimenko, T.; Sladkova, V.; D’Agostino, L.; Sobol, M.; Hozak, P.; Kren, L.; Katsetos, C.D.; et al. Differential expression of human γ-tubulin isotypes during neuronal development and oxidative stress points to a γ-tubulin-2 prosurvival function. FASEB J. 2017, 31, 1828–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Rios, R.M.; Sanchis, A.; Tassin, A.M.; Fedriani, C.; Bornens, M. Gmap-210 recruits γ-tubulin complexes to cis-golgi membranes and is required for golgi ribbon formation. Cell 2004, 118, 323–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, T.; Birsoy, K.; Hughes, N.W.; Krupczak, K.M.; Post, Y.; Wei, J.J.; Lander, E.S.; Sabatini, D.M. Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome. Science 2015, 350, 1096–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Lindstrom, L.; Alvarado-Kristensson, M. Characterization of γ-tubulin filaments in mammalian cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2018, 1865, 158–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lindstrom, L.; Li, T.; Malycheva, D.; Kancharla, A.; Nilsson, H.; Vishnu, N.; Mulder, H.; Johansson, M.; Rossello, C.A.; Alvarado Kristensson, M. The gtpase domain of γ-tubulin is required for normal mitochondrial function and spatial organization. Commun. Biol. 2018, 1, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ruiz, F.; Beisson, J.; Rossier, J.; Dupuis-Williams, P. Basal body duplication in paramecium requires γ-tubulin. Curr. Biol. 1999, 9, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sobel, S.G.; Snyder, M. A highly divergent γ-tubulin gene is essential for cell growth and proper microtubule organization in saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 1995, 131, 1775–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Oakley, B.R.; Oakley, C.E.; Yoon, Y.; Jung, M.K. γ-Tubulin is a component of the spindle pole body that is essential for microtubule function in aspergillus nidulans. Cell 1990, 61, 1289–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sunkel, C.E.; Gomes, R.; Sampaio, P.; Perdigao, J.; Gonzalez, C. γ-Tubulin is required for the structure and function of the microtubule organizing centre in drosophila neuroblasts. EMBO J. 1995, 14, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Horio, T.; Uzawa, S.; Jung, M.K.; Oakley, B.R.; Tanaka, K.; Yanagida, M. The fission yeast γ-tubulin is essential for mitosis and is localized at microtubule organizing centers. J. Cell Sci. 1991, 99 Pt 4, 693–700. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pastuglia, M.; Azimzadeh, J.; Goussot, M.; Camilleri, C.; Belcram, K.; Evrard, J.L.; Schmit, A.C.; Guerche, P.; Bouchez, D. γ-Tubulin is essential for microtubule organization and development in arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 1412–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Alvarado-Kristensson, M.; Rodriguez, M.J.; Silio, V.; Valpuesta, J.M.; Carrera, A.C. SADB phosphorylation of γ-tubulin regulates centrosome duplication. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11, 1081–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Alvarado-Kristensson, M. γ-Tubulin as a signal-transducing molecule and meshwork with therapeutic potential. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2018, 3, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Draberova, E.; D’Agostino, L.; Caracciolo, V.; Sladkova, V.; Sulimenko, T.; Sulimenko, V.; Sobol, M.; Maounis, N.F.; Tzelepis, E.; Mahera, E.; et al. Overexpression and nucleolar localization of γ-tubulin small complex proteins gcp2 and gcp3 in glioblastoma. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2015, 74, 723–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ehlen, A.; Rossello, C.A.; von Stedingk, K.; Hoog, G.; Nilsson, E.; Pettersson, H.M.; Jirstrom, K.; Alvarado-Kristensson, M. Tumors with nonfunctional retinoblastoma protein are killed by reduced γ-tubulin levels. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 17241–17247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hoog, G.; Zarrizi, R.; von Stedingk, K.; Jonsson, K.; Alvarado-Kristensson, M. Nuclear localization of γ-tubulin affects E2F transcriptional activity and s-phase progression. FASEB J. 2011, 25, 3815–3827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Horejsi, B.; Vinopal, S.; Sladkova, V.; Draberova, E.; Sulimenko, V.; Sulimenko, T.; Vosecka, V.; Philimonenko, A.; Hozak, P.; Katsetos, C.D.; et al. Nuclear γ-tubulin associates with nucleoli and interacts with tumor suppressor protein c53. J. Cell. Physiol. 2012, 227, 367–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lesca, C.; Germanier, M.; Raynaud-Messina, B.; Pichereaux, C.; Etievant, C.; Emond, S.; Burlet-Schiltz, O.; Monsarrat, B.; Wright, M.; Defais, M. DNA damage induce γ-tubulin-rad51 nuclear complexes in mammalian cells. Oncogene 2005, 24, 5165–5172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Rossello, C.A.; Lindstrom, L.; Glindre, J.; Eklund, G.; Alvarado-Kristensson, M. γ-Tubulin coordinates nuclear envelope assembly around chromatin. Heliyon 2016, 2, e00166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lajoie-Mazenc, I.; Tollon, Y.; Detraves, C.; Julian, M.; Moisand, A.; Gueth-Hallonet, C.; Debec, A.; Salles-Passador, I.; Puget, A.; Mazarguil, H.; et al. Recruitment of antigenic γ-tubulin during mitosis in animal cells: Presence of γ-tubulin in the mitotic spindle. J. Cell Sci. 1994, 107 Pt 10, 2825–2837. [Google Scholar]
  30. Khodjakov, A.; Rieder, C.L. The sudden recruitment of γ-tubulin to the centrosome at the onset of mitosis and its dynamic exchange throughout the cell cycle, do not require microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 146, 585–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Julian, M.; Tollon, Y.; Lajoie-Mazenc, I.; Moisand, A.; Mazarguil, H.; Puget, A.; Wright, M. γ-Tubulin participates in the formation of the midbody during cytokinesis in mammalian cells. J. Cell Sci. 1993, 105 Pt 1, 145–156. [Google Scholar]
  32. Piel, M.; Nordberg, J.; Euteneuer, U.; Bornens, M. Centrosome-dependent exit of cytokinesis in animal cells. Science 2001, 291, 1550–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Joshi, H.C.; Palevitz, B.A. γ-Tubulin and microtubule organization in plants. Trends Cell Biol. 1996, 6, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Binarova, P.; Hause, B.; Doležel, J.; Draber, P. Association of γ-tubulin with kinetochore/centromeric region of plant chromosomes. Plant J. 1998, 14, 751–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hughes, S.E.; Beeler, J.S.; Seat, A.; Slaughter, B.D.; Unruh, J.R.; Bauerly, E.; Matthies, H.J.; Hawley, R.S. Gamma-Tubulin is required for bipolar spindle assembly and for proper kinetochore microtubule attachments during prometaphase I in Drosophila Oocytes. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yaffe, M.B.; Farr, G.W.; Miklos, D.; Horwich, A.L.; Sternlicht, M.L.; Sternlicht, H. Tcp1 complex is a molecular chaperone in tubulin biogenesis. Nature 1992, 358, 245–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Moudjou, M.; Bordes, N.; Paintrand, M.; Bornens, M. γ-Tubulin in mammalian cells: The centrosomal and the cytosolic forms. J. Cell Sci. 1996, 109 Pt 4, 875–887. [Google Scholar]
  38. Dictenberg, J.B.; Zimmerman, W.; Sparks, C.A.; Young, A.; Vidair, C.; Zheng, Y.; Carrington, W.; Fay, F.S.; Doxsey, S.J. Pericentrin and γ-tubulin form a protein complex and are organized into a novel lattice at the centrosome. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 141, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Pouchucq, L.; Lobos-Ruiz, P.; Araya, G.; Valpuesta, J.M.; Monasterio, O. The chaperonin CCT promotes the formation of fibrillar aggregates of γ-tubulin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2018, 1866, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Batzenschlager, M.; Masoud, K.; Janski, N.; Houlne, G.; Herzog, E.; Evrard, J.L.; Baumberger, N.; Erhardt, M.; Nomine, Y.; Kieffer, B.; et al. The GIP γ-tubulin complex-associated proteins are involved in nuclear architecture in arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Xue, J.Z.; Woo, E.M.; Postow, L.; Chait, B.T.; Funabiki, H. Chromatin-bound xenopus DPPA2 shapes the nucleus by locally inhibiting microtubule assembly. Dev. Cell 2013, 27, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yokoyama, H.; Koch, B.; Walczak, R.; Ciray-Duygu, F.; Gonzalez-Sanchez, J.C.; Devos, D.P.; Mattaj, I.W.; Gruss, O.J. The nucleoporin MEL-28 promotes RanGTP-dependent γ-tubulin recruitment and microtubule nucleation in mitotic spindle formation. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Chumova, J.; Trogelova, L.; Kourova, H.; Volc, J.; Sulimenko, V.; Halada, P.; Kucera, O.; Benada, O.; Kucharova, A.; Klebanovych, A.; et al. γ-Tubulin has a conserved intrinsic property of self-polymerization into double stranded filaments and fibrillar networks. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2018, 1865, 734–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Korver, W.; Guevara, C.; Chen, Y.; Neuteboom, S.; Bookstein, R.; Tavtigian, S.; Lees, E. The product of the candidate prostate cancer susceptibility gene ELAC2 interacts with the γ-tubulin complex. Int. J. Cancer 2003, 104, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Andersen, J.S.; Lyon, C.E.; Fox, A.H.; Leung, A.K.; Lam, Y.W.; Steen, H.; Mann, M.; Lamond, A.I. Directed proteomic analysis of the human nucleolus. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Larsson, V.J.; Jafferali, M.H.; Vijayaraghavan, B.; Figueroa, R.A.; Hallberg, E. Mitotic spindle assembly and γ-tubulin localisation depend on the integral nuclear membrane protein samp1. J. Cell Sci. 2018, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Shu, H.B.; Joshi, H.C. γ-Tubulin can both nucleate microtubule assembly and self-assemble into novel tubular structures in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 1995, 130, 1137–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Alvarado-Kristensson, M. A simple and fast method for fixation of cultured cell lines that preserves cellular structures containing γ-tubulin. MethodsX 2018, 5, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lee, T.C.; Kashyap, R.L.; Chu, C.N. Building skeleton models via 3-D medial surface axis thinning algorithms. CVGIP: Gr. Models Image Process. 1994, 56, 462–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ananthakrishnan, R.; Ehrlicher, A. The forces behind cell movement. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2007, 3, 303–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Carrera, A.C.; Alvarado-Kristensson, M. SADB kinases license centrosome replication. Cell. Cycle 2009, 8, 4005–4006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Farina, F.; Gaillard, J.; Guerin, C.; Coute, Y.; Sillibourne, J.; Blanchoin, L.; Thery, M. The centrosome is an actin-organizing centre. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 18, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, W.; Chen, L.; Ding, Y.; Jin, J.; Liao, K. Centrosome separation driven by actin-microfilaments during mitosis is mediated by centrosome-associated tyrosine-phosphorylated cortactin. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121, 1334–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Poirier, K.; Lebrun, N.; Broix, L.; Tian, G.; Saillour, Y.; Boscheron, C.; Parrini, E.; Valence, S.; Pierre, B.S.; Oger, M.; et al. Mutations in TUBG1, DYNC1H1, KIF5C AND KIF2A cause malformations of cortical development and microcephaly. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Eklund, G.; Lang, S.; Glindre, J.; Ehlen, A.; Alvarado-Kristensson, M. The nuclear localization of γ-tubulin is regulated by SADB-mediated phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 21360–21373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lindstrom, L.; Villoutreix, B.O.; Lehn, S.; Hellsten, R.; Nilsson, E.; Crneta, E.; Olsson, R.; Alvarado-Kristensson, M. Therapeutic targeting of nuclear γ-tubulin in RB1-negative tumors. Mol. Cancer Res. 2015, 13, 1073–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hinchcliffe, E.H.; Miller, F.J.; Cham, M.; Khodjakov, A.; Sluder, G. Requirement of a centrosomal activity for cell cycle progression through G1 into S phase. Science 2001, 291, 1547–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Balczon, R.; Simerly, C.; Takahashi, D.; Schatten, G. Arrest of cell cycle progression during first interphase in murine zygotes microinjected with anti-pcm-1 antibodies. Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 2002, 52, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Matsumoto, Y.; Maller, J.L. A centrosomal localization signal in cyclin E required for CDK2-independent S phase entry. Science 2004, 306, 885–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Srsen, V.; Gnadt, N.; Dammermann, A.; Merdes, A. Inhibition of centrosome protein assembly leads to p53-dependent exit from the cell cycle. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 174, 625–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Mikule, K.; Delaval, B.; Kaldis, P.; Jurcyzk, A.; Hergert, P.; Doxsey, S. Loss of centrosome integrity induces p38-p53-p21-dependent g1-s arrest. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Cheng, J.; Turkel, N.; Hemati, N.; Fuller, M.T.; Hunt, A.J.; Yamashita, Y.M. Centrosome misorientation reduces stem cell division during ageing. Nature 2008, 456, 599–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Ferguson, R.L.; Maller, J.L. Centrosomal localization of cyclin e-CDK2 is required for initiation of DNA synthesis. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, 856–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Nayak, T.; Edgerton-Morgan, H.; Horio, T.; Xiong, Y.; De Souza, C.P.; Osmani, S.A.; Oakley, B.R. γ-Tubulin regulates the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome during interphase. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 190, 317–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Muller, H.; Fogeron, M.L.; Lehmann, V.; Lehrach, H.; Lange, B.M. A centrosome-independent role for γ-turc proteins in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Science 2006, 314, 654–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Gromley, A.; Jurczyk, A.; Sillibourne, J.; Halilovic, E.; Mogensen, M.; Groisman, I.; Blomberg, M.; Doxsey, S. A novel human protein of the maternal centriole is required for the final stages of cytokinesis and entry into S phase. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 161, 535–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Hemerly, A.S.; Prasanth, S.G.; Siddiqui, K.; Stillman, B. Orc1 controls centriole and centrosome copy number in human cells. Science 2009, 323, 789–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Fedorova, E.; Zink, D. Nuclear architecture and gene regulation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1783, 2174–2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Meraldi, P.; Lukas, J.; Fry, A.M.; Bartek, J.; Nigg, E.A. Centrosome duplication in mammalian somatic cells requires E2F and CDK2-cyclin a. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999, 1, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  70. Brehm, A.; Miska, E.A.; McCance, D.J.; Reid, J.L.; Bannister, A.J.; Kouzarides, T. Retinoblastoma protein recruits histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nature 1998, 391, 597–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Dunaief, J.L.; Strober, B.E.; Guha, S.; Khavari, P.A.; Alin, K.; Luban, J.; Begemann, M.; Crabtree, G.R.; Goff, S.P. The retinoblastoma protein and BRG1 form a complex and cooperate to induce cell cycle arrest. Cell 1994, 79, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Robertson, K.D.; Ait-Si-Ali, S.; Yokochi, T.; Wade, P.A.; Jones, P.L.; Wolffe, A.P. Dnmt1 forms a complex with Rb, E2FL and HDAC1 and represses transcription from E2f-responsive promoters. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Starita, L.M.; Machida, Y.; Sankaran, S.; Elias, J.E.; Griffin, K.; Schlegel, B.P.; Gygi, S.P.; Parvin, J.D. Brca1-dependent ubiquitination of γ-tubulin regulates centrosome number. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24, 8457–8466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Loewe, R.; Valero, T.; Kremling, S.; Pratscher, B.; Kunstfeld, R.; Pehamberger, H.; Petzelbauer, P. Dimethylfumarate impairs melanoma growth and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 11888–11896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Lowe, J.; Li, H.; Downing, K.H.; Nogales, E. Refined structure of α β-tubulin at 3.5 a resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 313, 1045–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Aldaz, H.; Rice, L.M.; Stearns, T.; Agard, D.A. Insights into microtubule nucleation from the crystal structure of human γ-tubulin. Nature 2005, 435, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Caracciolo, V.; D’Agostino, L.; Draberova, E.; Sladkova, V.; Crozier-Fitzgerald, C.; Agamanolis, D.P.; de Chadarevian, J.P.; Legido, A.; Giordano, A.; Draber, P.; et al. Differential expression and cellular distribution of γ-tubulin and βIII-tubulin in medulloblastomas and human medulloblastoma cell lines. J. Cell. Physiol. 2010, 223, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Cho, E.H.; Whipple, R.A.; Matrone, M.A.; Balzer, E.M.; Martin, S.S. Delocalization of γ-tubulin due to increased solubility in human breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2010, 9, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Maounis, N.F.; Draberova, E.; Mahera, E.; Chorti, M.; Caracciolo, V.; Sulimenko, T.; Riga, D.; Trakas, N.; Emmanouilidou, A.; Giordano, A.; et al. Overexpression of γ-tubulin in non-small cell lung cancer. Histol. Histopathol. 2012, 27, 1183–1194. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  80. Dementyeva, E.; Kryukov, F.; Kubiczkova, L.; Nemec, P.; Sevcikova, S.; Ihnatova, I.; Jarkovsky, J.; Minarik, J.; Stefanikova, Z.; Kuglik, P.; et al. Clinical implication of centrosome amplification and expression of centrosomal functional genes in multiple myeloma. J. Transl. Med. 2013, 11, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Niu, Y.; Liu, T.; Tse, G.M.; Sun, B.; Niu, R.; Li, H.M.; Wang, H.; Yang, Y.; Ye, X.; Wang, Y.; et al. Increased expression of centrosomal α, γ-tubulin in atypical ductal hyperplasia and carcinoma of the breast. Cancer Sci. 2009, 100, 580–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Katsetos, C.D.; Reddy, G.; Draberova, E.; Smejkalova, B.; Del Valle, L.; Ashraf, Q.; Tadevosyan, A.; Yelin, K.; Maraziotis, T.; Mishra, O.P.; et al. Altered cellular distribution and subcellular sorting of γ-tubulin in diffuse astrocytic gliomas and human glioblastoma cell lines. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2006, 65, 465–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Bahi-Buisson, N.; Poirier, K.; Fourniol, F.; Saillour, Y.; Valence, S.; Lebrun, N.; Hully, M.; Bianco, C.F.; Boddaert, N.; Elie, C.; et al. The wide spectrum of tubulinopathies: What are the key features for the diagnosis? Brain 2014, 137, 1676–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Linker, R.A.; Gold, R. Dimethyl fumarate for treatment of multiple sclerosis: Mechanism of action, effectiveness, and side effects. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2013, 13, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Mrowietz, U.; Asadullah, K. Dimethylfumarate for psoriasis: More than a dietary curiosity. Trends Mol. Med. 2005, 11, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 19 03245 g001 550
Figure 1. The levels and location of γ-tubulin protein that influences the proliferation capacity of mammalian cells. Schematic representation [22] showing how changes in the levels of the γ-tubulin protein (γ-tubulin 1 and γ-tubulin 2) in different cell compartments affect a proliferating cell. Cells with γ-tubulin levels of >50% divide normally, whereas those with levels of <50% arrest in interphase and ultimately die of apoptosis. Thereafter, selective depletion of γ-tubulin 1 protein reduces the pool of centrosome-associated protein, which leads to mitotic arrest due to impaired centrosome duplication and aberrant mitotic spindles.
Figure 1. The levels and location of γ-tubulin protein that influences the proliferation capacity of mammalian cells. Schematic representation [22] showing how changes in the levels of the γ-tubulin protein (γ-tubulin 1 and γ-tubulin 2) in different cell compartments affect a proliferating cell. Cells with γ-tubulin levels of >50% divide normally, whereas those with levels of <50% arrest in interphase and ultimately die of apoptosis. Thereafter, selective depletion of γ-tubulin 1 protein reduces the pool of centrosome-associated protein, which leads to mitotic arrest due to impaired centrosome duplication and aberrant mitotic spindles.
Ijms 19 03245 g001
Ijms 19 03245 g002 550
Figure 2. γ-Strings, γ-tubules, and centrosomes are interlinked to form a cellular meshwork. To determine whether γ-tubules are interconnected with centrosomes and γ-strings, and to capture the faintest signals emitted by thin γ-strings (Ø 4–6 nm), an Airyscan super-resolution microscopy was performed to reveal the details in the γ-tubulin meshwork. The U2OS cells were fixed, and endogenous γ-tubulin was immunostained with an anti-γ-tubulin antibody [48]. The sequential Airyscan super-resolution images were collected at 0.2-μm intervals. A 3D thinning algorithm was applied to the Z-stack images to find the centerlines (skeleton) of structures in the input images [49]. The projection of the obtained Z-stack-tagged skeleton is shown (3D Z-stack skeleton). The 3D Z-stack skeleton images illustrate γ-strings that emanated from both γ-tubules and centrosomes interlinking the meshwork [13]. White boxes indicate the areas magnified in the inset. The final figure is a schematic representation of the interlinking that γ-strings establish between γ-tubules and centrosomes. The white arrowheads, and white arrow, and the yellow arrow point out centrosomes, γ-tubules, and γ-strings, respectively. The illustrated images are representative of at least six experiments. Scale bar: 1 μm.
Figure 2. γ-Strings, γ-tubules, and centrosomes are interlinked to form a cellular meshwork. To determine whether γ-tubules are interconnected with centrosomes and γ-strings, and to capture the faintest signals emitted by thin γ-strings (Ø 4–6 nm), an Airyscan super-resolution microscopy was performed to reveal the details in the γ-tubulin meshwork. The U2OS cells were fixed, and endogenous γ-tubulin was immunostained with an anti-γ-tubulin antibody [48]. The sequential Airyscan super-resolution images were collected at 0.2-μm intervals. A 3D thinning algorithm was applied to the Z-stack images to find the centerlines (skeleton) of structures in the input images [49]. The projection of the obtained Z-stack-tagged skeleton is shown (3D Z-stack skeleton). The 3D Z-stack skeleton images illustrate γ-strings that emanated from both γ-tubules and centrosomes interlinking the meshwork [13]. White boxes indicate the areas magnified in the inset. The final figure is a schematic representation of the interlinking that γ-strings establish between γ-tubules and centrosomes. The white arrowheads, and white arrow, and the yellow arrow point out centrosomes, γ-tubules, and γ-strings, respectively. The illustrated images are representative of at least six experiments. Scale bar: 1 μm.
Ijms 19 03245 g002
Ijms 19 03245 g003 550
Figure 3. Connecting both sides of the cytoplasm with the nuclear compartment. (a–c) U2OS cells were treated with 30 J/m2 UV light and incubated for 5 minutes before fixation. Endogenous γ-tubulin and lamin B were detected by confocal immunofluorescence microscopy (Zeiss LSM 700 Axio Observer microscope with a Plan-Apochromat 63× NA 1.40 oil immersion objective) using an anti-γ-tubulin and an anti-lamin B antibody. Nuclei were detected with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride (DAPI) [48]. (a) Sequential fluorescence Z-stack images showing the γ-tubulin meshwork, the lamina (laminB), and chromatin. White arrowheads follow two γ-tubules that meet in the nuclear compartment. The images were collected at 0.4 μm intervals. The white box indicates the area magnified in the micrograph in panel (b). (b) The magnified area (micrograph) and a cartoon depicting two γ-tubules that produce a macro-γ-tubule by nucleating on a centrosome. The γ-tubulin molecules form strings (γ-strings) and γ-tubules. (c) Z-stack showing average intensity projection of the collected images in panel (a). The white box indicates the area magnified in the inset. Dense chromatin domains in the inset are designated with a dashed borderline and yellow arrowheads show less dense chromatin domains. Yellow boxes represent colocalized pixel maps (CM) of the indicated channels of the areas magnified in the inset. White areas in the maps denote pixels colocalized between channels [13]. Black boxes are schematic representations of the structures shown in the fluorescence images. The images in (a–c) are representative of at least six experiments. Scale bars: 10 μm.
Figure 3. Connecting both sides of the cytoplasm with the nuclear compartment. (a–c) U2OS cells were treated with 30 J/m2 UV light and incubated for 5 minutes before fixation. Endogenous γ-tubulin and lamin B were detected by confocal immunofluorescence microscopy (Zeiss LSM 700 Axio Observer microscope with a Plan-Apochromat 63× NA 1.40 oil immersion objective) using an anti-γ-tubulin and an anti-lamin B antibody. Nuclei were detected with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride (DAPI) [48]. (a) Sequential fluorescence Z-stack images showing the γ-tubulin meshwork, the lamina (laminB), and chromatin. White arrowheads follow two γ-tubules that meet in the nuclear compartment. The images were collected at 0.4 μm intervals. The white box indicates the area magnified in the micrograph in panel (b). (b) The magnified area (micrograph) and a cartoon depicting two γ-tubules that produce a macro-γ-tubule by nucleating on a centrosome. The γ-tubulin molecules form strings (γ-strings) and γ-tubules. (c) Z-stack showing average intensity projection of the collected images in panel (a). The white box indicates the area magnified in the inset. Dense chromatin domains in the inset are designated with a dashed borderline and yellow arrowheads show less dense chromatin domains. Yellow boxes represent colocalized pixel maps (CM) of the indicated channels of the areas magnified in the inset. White areas in the maps denote pixels colocalized between channels [13]. Black boxes are schematic representations of the structures shown in the fluorescence images. The images in (a–c) are representative of at least six experiments. Scale bars: 10 μm.
Ijms 19 03245 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rosselló, C.A.; Lindström, L.; Eklund, G.; Corvaisier, M.; Kristensson, M.A. γ-Tubulin–γ-Tubulin Interactions as the Basis for the Formation of a Meshwork. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3245. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103245

AMA Style

Rosselló CA, Lindström L, Eklund G, Corvaisier M, Kristensson MA. γ-Tubulin–γ-Tubulin Interactions as the Basis for the Formation of a Meshwork. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(10):3245. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103245

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rosselló, Catalina Ana, Lisa Lindström, Greta Eklund, Matthieu Corvaisier, and Maria Alvarado Kristensson. 2018. "γ-Tubulin–γ-Tubulin Interactions as the Basis for the Formation of a Meshwork" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 10: 3245. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103245

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop