Next Article in Journal
Fatty Acid β-Oxidation Is Essential in Leptin-Mediated Oocytes Maturation of Yellow Catfish Pelteobagrus fulvidraco
Next Article in Special Issue
The Type 3 Deiodinase: Epigenetic Control of Brain Thyroid Hormone Action and Neurological Function
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Waterlogging-Sensitive and Waterlogging-Tolerant Chrysanthemum morifolium Cultivars under Waterlogging Stress and Reoxygenation Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Vast Complexity of the Epigenetic Landscape during Neurodevelopment: An Open Frame to Understanding Brain Function
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms19051456
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Epigenetics of Subcellular Structure Functioning in the Origin of Risk or Resilience to Comorbidity of Neuropsychiatric and Cardiometabolic Disorders

by
Carlos Manuel Zapata-Martín del Campo
,
Martín Martínez-Rosas
and
Verónica Guarner-Lans
*
Department of Psychiatry, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología “Ignacio Chávez”, Ciudad de México 14080, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(5), 1456; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051456
Submission received: 28 March 2018 / Revised: 4 May 2018 / Accepted: 9 May 2018 / Published: 14 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epigenetics of Neurodevelopmental Disorders)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Mechanisms controlling mitochondrial function, protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and nuclear processes such as telomere length and DNA repair may be subject to epigenetic cues that relate the genomic expression and environmental exposures in early stages of life. They may also be involved in the comorbid appearance of cardiometabolic (CMD) and neuropsychiatric disorders (NPD) during adulthood. Mitochondrial function and protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum are associated with oxidative stress and elevated intracellular calcium levels and may also underlie the vulnerability for comorbid CMD and NPD. Mitochondria provide key metabolites such as nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+), ATP, α-ketoglutarate and acetyl coenzyme A that are required for many transcriptional and epigenetic processes. They are also a source of free radicals. On the other hand, epigenetic markers in nuclear DNA determine mitochondrial biogenesis. The ER is the subcellular organelle in which secretory proteins are folded. Many environmental factors stop the ability of cells to properly fold proteins and modify post-translationally secretory and transmembrane proteins leading to endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress. ER functioning may be epigenetically determined. Chronic ER stress is emerging as a key contributor to a growing list of human diseases, including CMD and NPD. Telomere loss causes chromosomal fusion, activation of the control of DNA damage-responses, unstable genome and altered stem cell function, which may underlie the comorbidity of CMD and NPD. The length of telomeres is related to oxidative stress and may be epigenetically programmed. Pathways involved in DNA repair may be epigenetically programmed and may contribute to diseases. In this paper, we describe subcellular mechanisms that are determined by epigenetic markers and their possible relation to the development of increased susceptibility to develop CMD and NPD.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Epigenetic modifications to DNA such as methylation and/or histone modifications including phosphorylation, lysine and arginine methylation or acetylation are potentially important mechanisms underlying the relations between the genome and environmental exposures. They might be responsible for the comorbid susceptibility to cardiometabolic and neuropsychiatric disorders (CMD and NPD) [1,2]. The term comorbidity refers to the presence of one or more coexistent diseases in addition to a primary disorder. CMD are among the most important causes of premature death and chronic disability in the world [3], and NPD (including mental and psychotropic substance abuse diseases) are the main causes of years lived with disability worldwide [4]. The association between CMD and NPD diseases is bidirectional; neuropsychiatric symptoms are commonly present in patients with chronic systemic diseases [5], and different types of psychiatric disorders including stress-related disorders, depression, emotional incontinence, delusions and hallucinations are frequently observed after the occurrence of CMD, particularly coronary artery disease [5,6]. NPD (mainly stress-related disorders) are independent risk factors to develop CMD including coronary artery disease, often triggering the disease [7]. Subcellular structures may play a role in the vulnerability to this comorbidity acting as pathological centers for the appearance of common disorders and/or in their comorbid and probably genetic or epigenetic genesis. In this paper, we support the epigenetic contribution of the mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and nucleus in the development of the comorbid process of CMD and NPD.
Biochemical signals contribute to the establishment of specific transcriptional programs, thus regulating the appearance of epigenetic cues. The ways in which cell signaling pathways can interact with epigenetic elements appear to be varied and complex. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and Ca2+ might mediate the integration of subcellular organelles and epigenetic cues. There are also ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes that might be altered when mitochondria are not working correctly. These remodeling complexes modulate different chromatin configurations and gene expression. Several biochemical signaling pathways that include mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), the wingless-related integration site pathway (Wnt), Notch, Janus kinases (JAKs)-signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins (STATs), the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway, nuclear factor kappa-light chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) and protein kinase A (PKA) pathways have also been found to participate in the integration of cell signaling and epigenetics [8]. In addition, complexes that were first described in the fruit fly such as the protein polycomb group (PcG) and the trithorax group (TrxG) have also been associated with different covalent histone modifications. The PcG and TrxG proteins represent two of the most important epigenetic regulators. Integration of cell signaling and epigenetics is beginning to be considered as the next step for the comprehension of many complex processes [8].
Modifications of the genomic expression of proteins controlling mitochondrial function, protein folding in the ER and nuclear processes such as telomere length determination and DNA repair might be, in part, the basis of the common susceptibility (or resilience) to develop CMD and NPD. Particularly, adverse early life experiences significantly contribute to the possibility of developing CMD and NPD later in life in when adulthood is reached [9]. Neurodegenerative diseases have many known environmental risk factors, and there is evidence that early life exposure can increase the risk of the condition later in life. In a similar manner, there are known effects of maternal nutrition on metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk in the offspring when they reach adulthood [10]. Neurodegenerative diseases might influence more than one generation since inhibitors of histone-modifying enzymes can cause DNA methylation changes that are inherited and associated with disease phenotypes [2,10]. This is an area of research that is likely to grow and yield interesting insights in the near future [11]. Furthermore, epigenetics is a new area for the development of new alternatives that may return the chromatin to the initial state before being remodeled by environmental factors [12,13,14,15,16]. Challenges for modifying epigenetic cues are related to the comorbidity of CMD and NPD including lifestyle changes, non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments [9]. DNA modifications might function as novel biological biomarkers of exposure, risk or progression of disease. In this paper, we describe subcellular mechanisms that are determined by epigenetic markers and their possible relation to the development of increased susceptibility or resilience to develop CMD and NPD. The information discussed is summarized in Table 1.

2. Mitochondria

Mitochondria constitute central players in cellular energetic metabolism since they generate most of the cellular ATP. Besides, they participate in the response to ROS, sensing of nutrients and in crosstalk with the nucleus [47,48,49,50,51]. Mitochondria also play an important role in functions such as apoptosis, control of cytosolic Ca2+ levels, lipid homeostasis, steroid synthesis, generation of Fe-S (iron-sulfur) centers, heme synthesis, innate immune response and metabolic cell signaling [47,48,49,50,51].
Through the generation of metabolites by the tricarboxylic acid cycle, mitochondria participate in epigenetic alterations, mitochondria-nuclear signaling, biogenesis, fission/fusion and mitophagy. Mitochondria and nucleus inter-communicate, and this crosstalk is central to integrate mitochondrial functions with other cellular structures, in proper nuclear functions and in determining the way in which the environmental factors impact the cell [19].

2.1. Mitochondria/ Nuclear DNA Interactions

The evolution of the eukaryotic cell was dramatically changed by the endosymbiosis of an energy-limited ancient cell with an oxidative α-proteobacterium about two billion years ago. Energy delivery for the metabolic process was significantly increased by this process, and the nucleus-mitochondria interactions began [47,48,49,50,51]. Energy production by mitochondria contributed to providing the ATP required for improved cell functions. For the next 1.2 billion years, the nucleus-cytosol specialized in structure, while energy production was mostly the business of mitochondria. High energy was provided by phosphorylation by ATP, acetylation by acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA), deacetylation by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) and methylation by S-adenosyl-methionine [47,48,49,50,51] and a discrete amount delivered by glycolysis, except for the erythrocyte, for which glycolysis is the unique source. This subcellular specialization rendered the possibility of multicellularity [17,18], species radiation [18] and environmental adaptation.
At the same time, the nucleus acquired mechanisms for regulating mitochondrial growth and replication [17,18]. Additional mechanisms had to evolve to allow for the coordinated expression of the mitochondrial genes, which were exchanged with nuclear DNA, according to the nuclear requirements of energy for growth and reproduction [17,18]. Thus, inter-chromosomal coordinated transcriptional regulation was the result.

2.2. Cross-Talk between Mitochondria and Nucleus and Epigenetic Marks in Nuclear DNA

There is increasing evidence that suggests a mitochondrial role in modulating the epigenome. Mitochondria provide key metabolites such as NAD+, ATP, α-ketoglutarate and acetyl-CoA that are necessary for numerous transcriptional and epigenetic processes [52,53,54]. Moreover, epigenetic markers in nuclear DNA also determine mitochondrial biogenesis (Figure 1).

2.3. Mitochondria Determine Epigenetic Modification Reactions

Phosphorylation-dephosphorylation reactions were the first post-translational modifications that appeared in the regulation of DNA-protein interactions. The main mechanism for generating ATP was substrate phosphorylation in non-photosynthetic organisms before the availability of free oxygen in the biosphere. After the generation of free oxygen by photosynthesis, oxidative phosphorylation became the main system for generating ATP [17,18,55,56]. Thus, mitochondria became the most effective providers of the ATP needed for protein modifications. ATP concentrations increase when substrates are abundant, leading to increased phosphorylation of histones (Figure 1). The proteins would then be repelled from the sugar-phosphate backbone of the DNA, which is negatively charged by the phosphate group; rendering the chromatin less dense for DNA transcription and replication. Phosphorylation is also used to regulate energy availability in relation to enzyme activities, signal transduction pathways and the transcriptional apparatus [17,18].
When carbohydrates and/or fats are plentiful, protein acetylation increases. The positive charge of histones is neutralized by acetylation of lysines, diminishing protein affinity for DNA. Transcription, replication and cell proliferation are increased when histones are acetylated (Figure 1). In contrast, in conditions such as fasting-starvation where carbohydrates and fats are limited, acetyl-CoA levels are reduced; acetylation diminishes; the chromatin condenses; and cellular gene expression, replication and proliferation are stopped. In mammalian cells, citrate derived from glucose through the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle provides the carbon for acetyl-CoA destined for histone acetylation [17,18].
Reduced energy supplies in conditions such as fasting, in addition to reducing acetyl-CoA levels, also diminish the availability of reducing equivalents, resulting in the oxidation of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) to NAD+. Since starvation produces NAD+, it activates histone deacetylases known as sirtuins to deacetylate the DNA-binding proteins (Figure 1). The change from glycolysis to oxidative phosphorylation may also be mediated by the cytosolic NAD+/NADH levels through sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) (Figure 1). This elevates the positive charge of the chromatin proteins, having as a consequence, chromatin condensation, and inhibition of transcription, replication, growth and proliferation [17,18].
Phosphorylation or acetylation are less versatile for chromatin regulation than DNA methylation. Gene expression and replication in response to energy availability and nutrient supply are also regulated through another macromolecular modification system constituted by S-adenosyl-l-methionine methylation. DNA methylation increases macromolecular interactions by van der Waals forces, diminishing transcription. DNA methylation is also influenced by changes in redox states [57], which may also alter recognition by methyl-binding proteins and therefore alter epigenetic regulation [57]. Mitochondria act as redox sensors modifying energy states in response to the chemical environment and levels of endogenous metabolites, including iron, succinate and ascorbate.

2.4. Mitochondrial Biogenesis Is Determined by the Epigenetic Program

Epigenetic programming by environmental factors regulates the biogenesis of mitochondria, which undergo repeated cycles of fission and fusion [58]. These processes mix the mitochondrial inner and outer membranes, combine mitochondria matrices and reallocate the mitochondrial DNAs. The mammalian mitochondrial fusion machinery involves three major proteins, mitofusins 1 and 2 and the optic atrophy-1 protein [59,60,61], while the mitochondrial fission machinery involves dynamin-related protein 1, mitochondrial fission factor and fission protein 1 [62,63,64,65].
The increase in mitochondrial biogenesis is promoted by acetylation of forkhead transcription factors (FOXOs) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha (PCG-1α) [18] (Figure 1). PCG1α constitutes the main regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis, and as a result of its activation, targets such as nuclear erythroid-related factors 1 and 2 (Nrf1, Nrf2) and mitochondrial transcription factor A (Tfam) are induced [23]. Sirt1 deacetylates FOXOs and PCG1α when glucose is abundant and cytosolic NAD+ is reduced, rendering these molecules inactive and inhibiting mitochondrial biogenesis (Figure 1). Glucose catabolism by glycolysis reduces cytosolic NAD+ to NADH, while fatty acid oxidation leaves cytosolic NAD+ oxidized, promoting biogenesis [18].

2.5. Mitochondrial Biogenesis in Neuropsychiatric and Cardiometabolic Disorders

Many common disorders, including neurodegenerative diseases, type-2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, have been associated with altered organellar regulation and mitochondrial dysfunction [19,61,66]. The association of numerous chronic diseases and mitochondrial dysfunction may reflect exogenous insults and deleterious effect of the environmental on mitochondrial vulnerability [19]. Altered mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial fusion and fission processes have been associated with diseases [58]. In addition, each mammalian cell contains hundreds of mitochondria and thousands of mitochondrial DNAs. When mutations surge in mitochondrial DNA, they lead to a state known as heteroplasmy in which there is a mixed population of normal and mutant DNAs. When heteroplasmic cells divide, the two types of DNAs are distributed at random into the daughter cells, generating a genetic drift toward either pure mutant or wild type. In the long term, segregation of the mutant mitochondrial DNAs results in pure mutant or normal populations, termed homoplasmic cells [67,68]. As the percentage of mutant mitochondrial DNAs increases, mitochondrial energetic function decreases. When energy output is not enough for normal tissue function, symptoms of diseases appear, and apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, or necrosis determine the course of the disease [17,68].
Mitochondria possess a self-destruction system, the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mtPTP) (Figure 1). As the biochemical health of the mitochondria declines, energy production is reduced, there is increased production of ROS, and Ca2+ is released into the cytosol. Calcium taken up by the mitochondrion results in cytochrome c being released and mtPTP activated. When mtPTP is activated, it opens a channel in the mitochondrial inner membrane, the negative electrical potential (ΔP) is lost and the cell initiates programmed cell death (apoptosis) (Figure 1) [17].
Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress have been associated with major psychiatric disorders, including bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, autism, attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder and Alzheimer’s dementia. Mitochondrial dysfunction might induce the vulnerability of brain cells to other disease-specific factors. The impairment in their function may be region specific, and cell susceptibility might vary among different brain cells. Although mitochondrial dysfunction could also be a consequence of habits often found in psychiatric patients such as smoking, drug abuse and disturbed eating and sleeping [69], mitochondrial dysfunctions may be involved in the pathophysiology of many diseases. Moreover, mitochondria could contribute to the process of neural apoptosis [25,70]. Redox-proteomics and epigenomics could also explain the important role of oxidative damage in most psychiatric disorders and could drive towards the identification of targets for the development of new drugs [71].
The expression of mitochondrial genes and nuclear genes that alter mitochondrial number and function are determined by glucocorticoids in neurons [52,53] and thus are linked to anxiety disorders. Glucocorticoid receptors linked to mitochondrial membranes are commonly associated with regulation of the membrane potential [72,73]. Early life stress leads to oxidative stress, increasing glutamate transmission and resulting in mitochondrial damage [74,75].
The pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases, including myocardial ischemia, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, might also be due to malfunction of the mitochondria [76]. Mitochondria, by regulating metabolic and energy homeostasis, show important changes in type 2 diabetes patients and in obese subjects. Since epigenetic regulation plays a pivotal role in mitochondrial biogenesis, function and dynamics, it has been proposed to participate in the development of these conditions. Exercise, a non-pharmacological treatment for diabetes and obesity, changes DNA methylation of the promoter of PGC1α to facilitate the gene expression that is responsible for mitochondrial biogenesis and function [23]. In conditions where nutrient or energy depletion is present, including fasting, exercise or calorie restriction, the level of cAMP and the ratio of AMP/ATP increase, initiating the signaling cascades of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA)/cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB), AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and Sirt1, which can activate PGC1α [23].
Mitochondrial DNA damage, increased production of ROS and respiratory chain dysfunction play critical roles in atherogenesis by affecting endothelial function, vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation or apoptosis [77,78]. Hypercholesterolemia, hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia and aging, which constitute atherosclerosis risk factors, induce mitochondrial dysfunction [77]. Mitochondria are the main intracellular source of ROS, and these species significantly contribute to the initiation and development of atherosclerotic lesions. Mitochondria are also the main targets, when there is an excess ROS triggering inflammatory responses and cell death. Mitochondrial biogenesis and the mitochondrial antioxidant system counteract the effects of ROS. Moreover, mitochondrial abundance is regulated in response to diet and ROS production [77,78]. Mitochondrial damage and lipoperoxidation may be the main mechanisms by which hypercholesterolemia causes the formation of the atherosclerotic lesion [78].
Plaque rupture, which may result in myocardial infarction, stroke and ischemic/reperfusion damage, might also be favored by mitochondrial dysfunction that results in apoptosis. Impaired mitochondrial integrity predisposes to vascular cell growth [79].
Summarizing, mitochondrial function is associated with oxidative stress and excess calcium levels and may also underlie the comorbidity of CMD and NPD. Mitochondria provide key metabolites such as NAD+, ATP, α-ketoglutarate and acetyl-CoA that are co-substrates required for numerous transcriptional and epigenetic processes (Figure 1). Increased mitochondrial calcium concentration causes cytochrome c release and altered membrane potential that eventually trigger cellular death programs (Figure 1). They are an important source of free radicals. Moreover, epigenetic markers in nuclear DNA determine mitochondrial biogenesis. In addition to crosstalk with the nucleus, mitochondria influence the functioning of other organelles, as will be discussed in the next sections. ROS generated through mitochondrial dysfunction accelerate ER malfunction and may promote telomere shortening.

3. Endoplasmic Reticulum

The state in which the proteome is kept in functional balance in an organism is protein homoeostasis or proteostasis. Maintaining proteostasis requires the correct functioning of processes such as protein synthesis, degradation and folding. The ER is the subcellular organelle in which proteins are synthesized and folded. Many environmental factors stop the ability of cells to properly fold proteins and modify post-translationally secretory and transmembrane proteins. When this happens, there is an accumulation of misfolded or unfolded proteins in this organelle, leading to ER stress. Cells undergoing ER-stress must restore the protein-folding capacity to survive [80].
When unfolded or misfolded proteins accumulate in the ER, an intracellular signaling pathway called the unfolded protein response (UPR) induces processes that try to restore ER homeostasis. The UPR transmits information to the cytosol and nucleus, leading to the upregulation of genes encoding ER chaperones, heat shock proteins (HSP) and initiation of the ER quality control system (Figure 2). Ubiquitously present small HSP show anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory activities, protecting cells from stress through their chaperone activity [80].
ER stress, inflammation and oxidative stress pathways are linked in pathological conditions [81,82]. When ER stress persists, a terminal UPR program leads the cell to self-destruction. In fact, any intervention that alters basic cellular functions related to proteostasis, including protein synthesis, degradation or folding, has an impact on proteotoxicity and may reduce proteostasis collapse.
Chronic ER stress and defects in UPR signaling are emerging as key contributors to a growing list of human diseases, including CMD, NPD and neurodegenerative diseases [27,28]. The correct folding of proteins and in the formation of disulfide bonds, which determine the normal structure and function of many proteins, depend on the depletion by reductive stress of mitochondrial ROS. Levels of cellular disulfide bonds decrease in many cells when the mitochondrial oxidant production is inhibited [83]. Reductive stress leads to the loss of disulfide bond formation and induces the UPR of the ER. UPR pathways aim to restore homeostasis by activating genes involved in protein folding [84].
Epigenetic markers and their inheritance can contribute to proteostasis-related phenotypes determined by the response to stress of the ER across generations [26]. The epigenetic markers on ER stress might contribute to metabolic diseases. Hyperlipidemia, hyperhomocysteinemia, hyperglycemia and inflammatory cytokines trigger the response of the ER leading to the UPR activation (Figure 2). ER stress activates NF-κB of activated B cells and JNK, with downstream effects on inflammatory recruitment, phosphorylation of insulin receptor signaling intermediates (to worsen insulin resistance), lipogenesis and oxidative stress, thus contributing to metabolic syndrome, obesity and diabetes [85], which are risk factors for CMD.
The deficient expression of chaperones, protein quality control pathways and HSP is one of the pathophysiological pathways involved in heart diseases [29]. There are many protein aggregation cardiomyopathies, skeletal muscle myopathies and cataracts that have been related to reduction of stress and incorrect folding of proteins [32]. The ER-initiated apoptosis and UPR participate in the pathophysiology of various cardiovascular diseases, including ischemic heart disease, the development of atherosclerosis and plaque rupture. Apoptotic signaling, which includes induction of the pro-apoptotic transcriptional factor C/EBP homologous protein, activation of JNK and cleavage of caspase-12, is initiated by prolonged and severe ER stress [30,31]. Lipid metabolism is also modulated by activation of the UPR pathways by controlling the transcriptional regulation of lipogenesis. Excess adipose mass and obesity are a product of increased de novo lipogenesis and triglyceride storage in the adipose tissue, which are risk factors for cardiovascular disease [86].
ER stress may also contribute to neurodegeneration in a range of neurodegenerative disorders. Proteostasis collapse and the accumulation of proteotoxic aggregates comprise also a key signature of age-related human neurodegenerative diseases including Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Machado–Joseph disease [34,87]. The UPR involves an ER membrane-bound transcription factor known as the cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB3) protein, which changes the glucocorticoid response by modulating the expression of the glucocorticoid receptors, particularly in the brain. CREB3-deficient mice show a diminished stress response with low levels of anxiety and low circulating corticosterone levels. These mice also have decreased dendritic branching in the hippocampus, consistent with increased glucocorticoid receptor responses [88].
In summary, the ER is the subcellular organelle in which cellular proteins are folded. Many environmental factors stop the ability of cells to properly fold proteins and modify post-translationally secretory and transmembrane proteins, leading to ER stress and oxidative stress. The ER generates ROS during protein overload. When the stress situation that initiated the UPR pathways remains unresolved, it results in impaired redox homeostasis and oxidative stress via protein overload, influencing mitochondrial functions (Figure 2). ROS generated by the ER target ER-resident proteins, enzymes, chaperones and calcium channels (Figure 2). ER based-calcium channels release calcium into the cytosol. Increased cytosolic calcium and calcium entry into mitochondria stimulate mitochondrial metabolism to produce more ROS [83,84]. Among proteins that may be abnormally folded, the DNA repair machinery and the shelterin proteins that protect form telomere shortening may be included [89] (Figure 2), as will be discussed in the next section. The increased protein folding demand, calcium and ROS signaling integrate with UPR pathways and can potentially lead to inflammatory responses [83,84]. ER functioning may be epigenetically determined. Chronic ER stress is emerging as a key contributor to a growing list of human diseases, including CMD and NPD.

4. Nucleus

The nucleus is the organelle in which DNA is packed, forming highly organized complex coiled structures that finally form chromosomes. Chromosomes have at their ends, structures called telomeres. The length of telomeres is related to oxidative stress and may be epigenetically programmed. Oxidative stress is in part a consequence of mitochondrial activity and is increased when ER stress is present (Figure 3). ROS also cause malfunction in the nucleus including responses such as telomere shortening and damage to DNA repair proteins [89]. Chromosomal fusion, activation of DNA damage checkpoint responses, genome instability and impaired stem cell function are some of the consequences of telomere function loss, which may underlie the comorbidity of CMD and NPD. Pathways involved in DNA repair may be epigenetically programmed and may contribute to diseases. When ER stress is present, incorrect folding of proteins might include DNA repair enzymes, thus increasing DNA damage and telomere length, conserving enzymes that prevent telomere shortening.

4.1. Telomeres

Telomeres are regions of repetitive nucleotide sequences of TTAGGG associated with a complex of proteins known as shelterin that constitute the telomeric chromatin in human cells [36] (Figure 3). The ends of the chromosome are protected from deterioration or from fusion with neighboring chromosomes by these proteins. Chromosomal fusion, activation of DNA damage checkpoint responses, genome instability and impaired stem cell function are the consequences of the loss of telomere function. When telomeres shorten, the enzymes that duplicate DNA cannot continue their duplication up to the end of a chromosome, and therefore, the telomeric region is reduced in length by each replication. However, the telomeres are protected by shelterin protecting proteins, as well as by the RNA that encodes for telomeric DNA. Telomeres are replenished by the enzyme telomerase reverse transcriptase [36,37]. Telomere length shortening is age-related and is associated with oxidative stress [89].
Mammalian telomeres and sub-telomeric regions are organized in nucleosomes, which have many epigenetic modifications including DNA hypermethylation and trimethylation, which are a characteristic of heterochromatin. These chromatin modifications are important regulators of mammalian telomeres. Thus, telomeric chromatin is dynamic and re-programmable. These heterochromatin markers are used in the regulation of telomere length and structural integrity. The deletion of epigenetic regulators causes telomere-length control impairment and telomere shortening to an undesirable length [36,37].
In addition to methylation, telomeric regions and subtelomeric histone 3 and histone 4 are underacetylated. The heterochromatic state at telomeres and subtelomeres is determined by histone acetylation levels and causes telomere elongation and gene expression regulation at subtelomeres. Thus, histone acetylation is linked to telomere length stability [38].
Telomere length is influenced by personality traits and psychological symptoms. The mechanisms through which these psychological factors impact telomere length remain to be elucidated. However, individual differences in health behaviors, cardiovascular or inflammatory processes and acute stress responses do not appear to be the main pathways of action [90]. The long-term effect of chronic stress appears to accelerate telomere shortening and thus affect the psychological profile of individuals. Stress experiences lead to molecular alterations that result in reduced telomere length, accelerated cellular aging or epigenetic changes, thus affecting gene expression. Additionally, environmental influences modulate the effects of stress or pain on the genome by reducing resilience factors or increasing vulnerability factors of negative environmental influences. Epigenetic changes direct the expression of the genome across the lifespan and may shape vulnerability and resilience factors implicated in chronic pain conditions [40].
Early mortality and an increased risk of developing physical diseases typical of the elderly are associated with many neuropsychiatric illnesses. Several neuropsychiatric diseases such as major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and possibly schizophrenia and anxiety disorders are associated with accelerated cellular aging, telomere length shortening in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and altered basal telomerase activity [91,92]. Stress during early stages of life and recent stress induce shortening of telomere length [93,94,95,96]. However, conflicting reports exist, and no conclusions can yet be made [39].
Among the emerging biological risk factors for CMD is shortened telomere length. Accelerated telomere shortening is associated with cardiovascular risk factors such as age, gender, obesity, smoking, sedentary life-style, excessive alcohol intake and even mental stress. Telomere shortening can often be caused by adopting an unhealthy lifestyle. Aging, degenerative disease and stress are potential regulators of telomere length. As with the aging process, CMD, most notably atherosclerosis, diabetes, as well as insulin resistance are found to be closely associated with telomere shortening, and patients with diabetes mellitus complications have a shorter leukocyte telomere length [97]. Almost all patients with coronary artery disease have shortened telomeres. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is associated with longer leukocyte telomere length, and studies investigating hypertension have reported both shorter and longer leukocyte telomere length than found in normotensive control subjects [41]. Studies have also shown that suppression of the oxidative stress slows down this shortening process. Telomere shortening was highly accelerated in the regions that were easily prone to atherosclerosis. Increased cellular turnover may result in cellular senescence associated with telomere shortening and may participate in coronary atherogenesis [97]. Furthermore, telomere length appears to be a potential biomarker of coronary artery disease [97] and cardiovascular aging [98]. However, pitfalls in the methodology of leukocyte telomere length quantification have limited its use as a marker [99].

4.2. DNA Reparation

DNA repair in the nucleus takes place via two main pathways: nucleotide excision repair (NER) and base excision repair (BER). Ultraviolet-induced and large DNA lesions induced by many chemicals are corrected by NER. This pathway has been better characterized than BER, and proteins participating directly or indirectly in this process have been described. Most of the oxidative lesions in DNA are repaired by BER, which constitutes a highly-conserved pathway throughout evolution. It is responsible for repairing most of the endogenous DNA damage including alkylations, oxidations, deaminations and depurinations, as well as single-strand breaks. Thus, BER removes frequently-produced lesions and maintains genomic integrity. Several enzymes participate in BER such as a glycosylase that initiates it, an apurinic/apyrimidinic-endonuclease or apurinic/apyrimidinic-lyase that cleaves the DNA backbone, polymerase b, the flap endonuclease and proliferating cell nuclear antigen [100].
Other pathways of DNA repair include: (a) O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase that repairs the naturally-occurring mutagenic DNA lesion consisting of O6-methylguanine substituting guanine, (b) mismatch repair and (c) double-strand break repair via homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining. Positive and negative effects on lifespan and stress resistance have been found by elevating the level of expression of DNA repair genes in Drosophila melanogaster, depending on the genes overexpressed, the length and nature of stress, and, in some cases depending also on gender (sex) of the organism [101]. There is much less knowledge on the DNA repair pathways in mitochondria, although oxidative stress is present in them at a higher level [68,102].
The BER pathway is important for maintaining both the genetic stability and the methylation status of regions of DNA where a cytosine nucleotide is followed by a guanine nucleotide (CpG sites), which are central components of epigenetic regulation in vertebrates [42]. One of the most common DNA lesions produced by reactive oxygen species during oxidative stress is the oxidative modification of heterocyclic bases. One of these products is 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (OG). It produces an erroneous pairing with adenine that results in G to T and C to A substitutions in the DNA. It is corrected mainly by DNA 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1 (OGG1). OG was considered as an initiator of mutagenesis, but it is now considered as an epigenetic cue (Figure 3). When OG is present in G-rich regulatory elements in the promoters of some genes such as vascular endothelial growth factor, tumor necrosis factor α and SIRT1, it increases transcription via activation of the BER pathway [103]. Hence, BER substrates have recently been found to be epigenetic markers and to modulate transcription factor recognition/binding [43,103].
Repair mechanisms have been studied in neurons, especially to compare them to the mechanisms involved in rapidly reproducing cells such as cancer cells [104]. Damaged genomic DNA may contribute to the pathophysiology of different mental illnesses [105]. Decreased repair mechanisms in neurons are associated with aging and the coexistence of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s [104].
Different neuropsychiatric disorders show substantially high levels of oxidative DNA damage in the brain accompanied with morphological and functional alterations [105]. An elevated level of DNA damage was observed in patients with depression. Furthermore, single nucleotide polymorphisms of BER genes may modulate the risk of this disease [106]. DNA damage and DNA repair also participate in the etiopathology of schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders [45]. Panic disorder is an anxiety disease characterized by sudden attacks of intense fear accompanied by high oxidative stress, which might induce DNA damage. However, no changes in DNA repair mechanisms have appeared in this disease; in particular, OGG1 remains unaltered in this disorder [107]. Exercise training influences brain function, the extent of neurogenesis and the expression of OGG1 and SIRT1. Exercise is also associated with increased hippocampal function. SIRT1 level/activity is inversely correlate with OGG1 levels [108].
The discovery that BER is an active pathway for DNA demethylation in the brain provides a possibility by which previously pathological neurons may be reprogrammed to play a more favorable role [109]. BER proteins are involved in maintaining neuronal cell genome integrity, but there is inconclusive data regarding their role in providing protection against oxidative damage in neurodegenerative disorders [110]. Much hope is now being placed in agents targeting epigenetic processes [110].
Regarding CMD, DNA damage and oxidative stress coexist in the setting of coronary artery disease. Smoking, diabetes mellitus and other risk factors associated with atherogenesis could induce DNA damage [111,112]. Aggravation of the disease is caused by deterioration of DNA repair mechanisms. DNA strand breaks, mutations of single bases, modified bases (including oxidation) or DNA adducts are among the most common DNA damages found in this condition. There is also activation of DNA repair mechanisms including DNA strand break repair, BER and mismatch repair in the atherosclerotic plaques. DNA damage is present in all cells within the atherosclerotic plaque, including circulating cells and cells of the vessel wall. Plaque progression and instability might be promoted by double-stranded breaks and favor cell senescence, apoptosis and inflammation. DNA damage in vascular smooth muscle has little effect on atherogenesis, but it modifies plaque phenotype, and in advanced lesions, it inhibits fibrous cap areas [111,112]. Inhibiting DNA damage in atherosclerosis may be a novel target to promote plaque stability [96,113].
In addition, nuclear and mitochondrial DNA damage can be found in many inherited and acquired vascular diseases. Persistent DNA damage and lesions are found in multiple cell types. In turn, DNA repair mechanisms are activated by DNA damage in many vascular and endothelial diseases [46].

5. Possible Interventions to Promote the Modification of Epigenetic Cues that Alter Subcellular Functioning

In contrast to genetic mutations, the plasticity of epigenetic changes renders them potential targets for prevention or reversion by lifestyle, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions [9]. Several approaches that have been proposed for reversion of epigenetic cues in some CMD, particularly coronary artery disease and some NPD, in concrete stress-related disorders, have been recently described [9]. Epigenetics is a new challenge area for the development of new therapies that may return the chromatin to the state before being remodeling by environmental factors [12,13,14,15,16]. The reversing of histone modifications may help return altered phenotypes associated with diseases including NPD and CMD [114,115]. The use of natural compounds has been found to modify epigenetic cues [9]. Several drugs with a potential capacity to modulate the epigenetic machinery have been proposed [116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123]. These drugs modulate the activity of histone-modifying enzymes that are related to DNA methylation and could slow, stop or even revert the long-term effects that increase the risk for these diseases [124,125,126]. The area of study of epigenetic therapies is still in its beginnings, and novel effective alternatives will soon appear with the accumulation of experimental data and testing for clinical use.

6. Conclusions

Throughout human lifespan and particularly during early life, environmental factors determine epigenetic alterations that in turn define structural and functional changes in sub-cellular structures such as the mitochondria, the ER and the nucleus in cells composing different tissues. Epigenetic alterations in the nervous and cardiovascular systems might participate in the development of risk or resilience to NPD and CMD. Better knowledge of the beneficial or deleterious mechanisms induced by epigenetic alterations during early life upon sub-cellular structure functioning might allow for the development of better, more effective and safe preventive or therapeutic alternatives. Regarding this issue, several new pharmacological agents acting to revert or diminish the molecular alterations induced by environmental factors are currently being tested. Thus, epigenetic modulation of cellular organelles including mitochondrial biogenesis and function, of endoplasmic reticulum stress and of processes happening in the nucleus such as determination of telomere length and DNA repair might participate in the simultaneous increases in susceptibility or resilience to develop CMD and NPD.

Author Contributions

C.M.Z.-M.d.C. proposed and directed the paper and revised the manuscript. M.M.-R. designed the figures and tables and reviewed the paper. V.G.-L. structured, wrote and revised the paper.

Funding

This paper has received no funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

Acetyl CoAAcetyl Coenzyme A
AMPKAMP-Activated Protein Kinase
ATPAdenosine Triphosphate
BDBipolar Disorder
BERBase Excision Repair
Ca2+Calcium Ion
cAMPCyclic Adenosine Monophosphate
CMDCardiometabolic Disorders
CpGCytosine Phosphate Guanine
CREBcAMP Response Element-Binding Protein
DNADeoxyribonucleic Acid
EREndoplasmic Reticulum
Fe-SIron-Sulfur Centers
FOXOsForkhead Transcription Factors
HspHeat Shock Proteins
JNKc-Jun N-Terminal Kinase
MDDMajor Depressive Disorder
mtPTPMitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore
NAD+β-Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide
NADHReduced Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide
NERNucleotide Excision Repair
NF-κBNuclear Factor Kappa-Light Chain Enhancer of Activated B Cells
NPDNeuropsychiatric Disorders
OGG18-Oxoguanine Glycosylase-1
PCG1αPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor gamma Coactivator 1 Alpha
PKAcAMP-Dependent Protein Kinase
PTSDPost-Traumatic Stress Disorder
ROSReactive Oxygen Species
SIRT1Sirtuin 1
UPRUnfolded Protein Response

References

  1. Nakatochi, M.; Ichihara, S.; Yamamoto, K.; Naruse, K.; Yokota, S.H.; Asano, H.; Matsubara, T.; Yokota, M. Epigenome-wide association of myocardial infarction with DNA methylation sites at loci related to cardiovascular disease. Clin. Epigenet. 2017, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lu, H.; Liu, X.; Deng, Y.; Qing, H. DNA methylation, a hand behind neurodegenerative diseases. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2013, 5, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Roth, G.A.; Johnson, C.; Abajobir, A.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abera, S.F.; Abyu, G.; Murray, C. Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes, 1990 to 2015. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017, 70, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Whiteford, H.A.; Ferrari, A.J.; Degenhardt, L.; Feigin, V.; Vos, T. The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: An analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0116820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Duric, V.; Clayton, S.; Leong, M.L.; Yuan, L.L. Comorbidity factors and brain mechanisms linking chronic stress and systemic illness. Neural Plasticity 2016, 5460732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bankier, B.; Januzzi, J.L.; Littman, A.B. The high prevalence of multiple psychiatric disorders in stable outpatients with coronary heart disease. Psychosom. Med. 2004, 66, 645–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Roest, A.M.; Martens, E.J.; de Jonge, P.; Denollet, J. Anxiety and risk of incident coronary heart disease: A meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 56, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Arzate-Mejía, R.G.; Valle-García, D.; Recillas-Targa, F. Signaling epigenetics: Novel insights on cell signaling and epigenetic regulation. IUBMB Life 2011, 63, 881–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zapata-Martín del Campo, C.M.; Martínez-Rosas, M.; Guarner-Lans, V. Epigenetic Programming of Synthesis, Release, and/or Receptor Expression of Common Mediators Participating in the Risk/Resilience for Comorbid Stress-Related Disorders and Coronary Artery Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Babenko, O.; Kovalchuk, I.; Metz, G.A. Epigenetic programming of neurodegenerative diseases by an adverse environment. Brain Res. 2012, 1444, 96–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Jia, H.; Morris, C.D.; Williams, R.M.; Loring, J.F.; Thomas, E.A. HDAC inhibition imparts beneficial transgenerational effects in Huntington’s disease mice via altered DNA and histone methylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E56–E64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. El Osta, A.; Brasacchio, D.; Yao, D.; Pocai, A.; Jones, P.L.; Roeder, R.G.; Cooper, M.E.; Brownlee, M. Transient high glucose causes persistent epigenetic changes and altered gene expression during subsequent normoglycemia. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 2409–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Brasacchio, D.; Okabe, J.; Tikellis, C.; Balcerczyk, A.; George, P.; Baker, E.K.; Calkin, A.C.; Brownlee, M.; Cooper, M.E.; El-Osta, A. Hyperglycemia induces a dynamic cooperativity of histone methylase and demethylase enzymes associated with gene-activating epigenetic marks that coexist on the lysine tail. Diabetes 2009, 58, 1229–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pirola, L.; Balcerczyk, A.; Tothill, R.W.; Haviv, I.; Kaspi, A.; Lunke, S.; Ziemann, M.; Karagiannis, T.; Tonna, S.; Kowalczyk, A.; et al. Genome-wide analysis distinguishes hyperglycemia regulated epigenetic signatures of primary vascular cells. Genome Res. 2011, 21, 1601–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Takizawa, F.; Mizutani, S.; Ogawa, Y.; Sawada, N. Glucose-independent persistence of PAI-1 gene expression and H3K4 tri-methylation in type 1 diabetic mouse endothelium: Implication in metabolic memory. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 433, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vecellio, M.; Spallotta, F.; Nanni, S.; Colussi, C.; Cencioni, C.; Derlet, A.; Bassetti, B.; Tilenni, M.; Carena, M.C.; Farsetti, A.; et al. The histone acetylase activator pentadecylidenemalonate 1b rescues proliferation and differentiation in human cardiac mesenchymal cells of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes 2014, 63, 2132–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wallace, D.C. A mitochondrial paradigm of metabolic and degenerative diseases, aging, and cancer: A dawn for evolutionary medicine. Ann. Rev. Genet. 2005, 39, 359–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wallace, D.C.; Fan, W. Energetics, epigenetics, mitochondrial genetics. Mitochondrion 2010, 10, 12–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Shaughnessy, D.T.; McAllister, K.; Worth, L.; Haugen, A.C.; Meyer, J.N.; Domann, F.E.; Van Houten, B.; Mostoslavsky, R.; Bultman, S.J.; Baccarelli, A.A.; et al. Mitochondria, energetics, epigenetics, and cellular responses to stress. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 1271–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Devall, M.; Mill, J.; Lunnon, K. The mitochondrial epigenome: A role in Alzheimer’s disease? Epigenomics 2014, 6, 665–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Mulder, H.; Ling, C. Mitochondrial dysfunction in pancreatic beta-cells in Type 2 diabetes. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2009, 297, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Rocha, M.; Apostolova, N.; Herance, J.R.; Rovira-Llopis, S.; Hernandez-Mijares, A.; Victor, V.M. Perspectives and potential applications of mitochondria-targeted antioxidants in cardiometabolic diseases and type 2 diabetes. Med. Res. Rev. 2014, 34, 160–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cheng, Z.; Almeida, F.A. Mitochondrial alteration in type 2 diabetes and obesity. An epigenetic link. Cell Cycle 2014, 13, 890–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fillmore, N.; Mori, J.; Lopaschuk, G.D. Mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation alterations in heart failure, ischaemic heart disease and diabetic cardiomyopathy. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171, 2080–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Marazziti, D.; Baroni, S.; Picchetti, M.; Landi, P.; Silvestri, S.; Vatteroni, E.; Catena Dell’Osso, M. Psychiatric disorders and mitochondrial dysfunctions. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2012, 16, 270–275. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Li, C.H.; Casanueva, O. Epigenetic inheritance of proteostasis and ageing. Essays Biochem. 2016, 60, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Oakes, S.A.; Papa, F.R. The role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in human pathology. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2015, 10, 173–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Fu, X.L.; Gao, D.S. Endoplasmic reticulum proteins quality control and the unfolded protein response: The regulative mechanism of organisms against stress injuries. Biofactors 2014, 40, 569–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Chen, Y.; Arrigo, A.P.; Currie, R.W. Heat shock treatment suppresses angiotensin II-induced activation of NF-kappaB pathway and heart inflammation: A role for IKK depletion by heat shock? Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2004, 287, H1104–H1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mozzini, C.; Cominacini, L.; Garbin, U.; Fratta Pasini, A.M. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress, NRF2 Signalling and Cardiovascular Diseases in a Nutshell. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2017, 19, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Minamino, T.; Kitakaze, M. ER stress in cardiovascular disease. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2010, 48, 1105–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kannan, S.; Muthusamy, V.R.; Whitehead, K.J.; Wang, L.; Gomes, A.V.; Litwin, S.E.; Kensler, T.W.; Abel, E.D.; Hoidal, J.R.; Rajasekaran, N.S. Nrf2 deficiency prevents reductive stress-induced hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc. Res. 2013, 100, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xie, H.B.; Cammarato, A.; Rajasekaran, N.S.; Zhang, H.; Suggs, J.A.; Lin, H.C.; Bernstein, S.I.; Benjamin, I.J.; Golic, K.G. The NADPH metabolic network regulates human αB-crystallin cardiomyopathy and reductive stress in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Doyle, K.M.; Kennedy, D.; Gorman, A.M.; Gupta, S.; Healy, S.J.M.; Samali, A. Unfolded proteins and endoplasmic reticulum stress in neurodegenerative disorders. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2011, 15, 2025–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gapp, K.; Woldemichael, B.T.; Bohacek, J.; Mansuy, I.M. Epigenetic regulation in neurodevelopment and neurodegenerative diseases. Neuroscience 2014, 264, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Blasco, M.A. The epigenetic regulation of mammalian telomeres. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wong, L.H. Epigenetic regulation of telomere chromatin integrity in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Epigenomics 2010, 2, 639–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Dan, J.; Yang, J.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, A.; Liu, L. Roles for Histone Acetylation in Regulation of Telomere Elongation and Two-cell State in Mouse ES Cells. J. Cell Physiol. 2015, 230, 2337–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lindqvist, D.; Epe, E.S.; Mellonc, S.H.; Penninx, B.W.; Révészd, D.; Verhoeven, J.E.; Reus, V.I.; Lin, J.; Mahanb, L.; Hough, C.M.; et al. Psychiatric disorders and leukocyte telomere length: Underlying mechanisms linking mental illness with cellular aging. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2015, 55, 333–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sibille, K.T.; Witek-Janusek, L.; Mathews, H.L.; Fillingim, R.B. Telomeres and epigenetics: Potential relevance to chronic pain. Pain 2012, 153, 1789–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Nilsson, P.M.; Tufvesson, H.; Leosdottir, M.; Melander, O. Telomeres and cardiovascular disease risk: An update 2013. Transl. Res. 2013, 162, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bellacosa, A.; Drohat, A.C. Role of base excision repair in maintaining the genetic and epigenetic integrity of CpG sites. DNA Repair 2015, 32, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Moore, S.P.; Toomire, K.J.; Strauss, P.R. DNA modifications repaired by base excision repair are epigenetic. DNA Repair 2013, 12, 1152–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Fleming, A.M.; Ding, Y.; Burrows, C.J. Oxidative DNA damage is epigenetic by regulating gene transcription via base excision repair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 2604–2609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Markkanen, E.; Meyer, U.; Dianov, G.L. DNA Damage and Repair in Schizophrenia and Autism: Implications for Cancer Comorbidity and Beyond. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Uryga, A.; Gray, K.; Bennett, M. DNA Damage and Repair in Vascular Disease. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2016, 78, 45–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Cheng, Z.; Ristow, M. Mitochondria and metabolic homeostasis. Antioxid. Redox Signal 2013, 19, 240–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Papadopoulos, V.; Miller, W.L. Role of mitochondria in steroidogenesis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 26, 771–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Suen, D.F.; Norris, K.L.; Youle, R.J. Mitochondrial dynamics and apoptosis. Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 1577–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Tait, S.W.; Green, D.R. Mitochondria and cell signalling. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 807–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zemirli, N.; Arnoult, D. Mitochondrial anti-viral immunity. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012, 44, 1473–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Cyr, A.R.; Domann, F.E. The redox basis of epigenetic modifications: From mechanisms to functional consequences. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011, 15, 551–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Donohoe, D.R.; Bultman, S.J. Metaboloepigenetics: Interrelationships between energy metabolism and epigenetic control of gene expression. J. Cell Physiol. 2012, 227, 3169–3177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Martinez-Pastor, B.; Cosentino, C.; Mostoslavsky, R. A tale of metabolites: The cross-talk between chromatin and energy metabolism. Cancer Discov. 2013, 3, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lane, N. Oxygen: The Molecule That Made the World; Oxford: Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 1–384. ISBN 978-0-19-860783-0. [Google Scholar]
  56. Lane, N. Power, Sex, Suicide: Mitochondria and the Meaning of Life; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 1–368. ISBN 0192-80481-2. [Google Scholar]
  57. Hitchler, M.J.; Domann, F.E. Metabolic defects provide a spark for the epigenetic switch in cancer. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2009, 47, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chan, D.C. Fusion and Fission: Interlinked Processes Critical for Mitochondrial Health. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2012, 46, 265–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Chen, H.; Chomyn, A.; Chan, D.C. Disruption of fusion results in mitochondrial heterogeneity and dysfunction. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 26185–26192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Chen, H.; Detmer, S.A.; Ewald, A.J.; Griffin, E.E.; Fraser, S.E.; Chan, D.C. Mitofusins Mfn1 and Mfn2 coordinately regulate mitochondrial fusion and are essential for embryonic development. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 160, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Cipolat, S.; Martins de Brito, O.; Dal Zilio, B.; Scorrano, L. OPA1 requires mitofusin 1 to promote mitochondrial fusion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 15927–15932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Gandre-Babbe, S.; van der Bliek, A.M. The novel tail-anchored membrane protein Mff controls mitochondrial and peroxisomal fission in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19, 2402–2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. James, D.I.; Parone, P.A.; Mattenberger, Y.; Martinou, J.C. hFis1, a novel component of the mammalian mitochondrial fission machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 36373–36379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Smirnova, E.; Griparic, L.; Shurland, D.L.; van der Bliek, A.M. Dynamin-related protein Drp1 is required for mitochondrial division in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 2001, 12, 2245–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Yoon, Y.; Krueger, E.W.; Oswald, B.J.; McNiven, M.A. The mitochondrial protein hFis1 regulates mitochondrial fission in mammalian cells through an interaction with the dynamin-like protein DLP1. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2003, 23, 5409–5420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Fariss, M.W.; Chan, C.B.; Patel, M.; Van Houten, B.; Orrenius, S. Role of mitochondria in toxic oxidative stress. Mol. Interv. 2005, 5, 94–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Van Houten, B.; Woshner, V.; Santos, J.H. Role of mitochondrial DNA in toxic responses to oxidative stress. DNA Repair 2006, 5, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Wallace, S.S. Base excision repair: A critical player in many games. DNA Repair 2014, 19, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Toker, L.; Agam, G. Mitochondrial dysfunction in psychiatric morbidity: Current evidence and therapeutic prospects. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2015, 11, 2441–2447. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  70. Streck, E.; Gonçalves, C.L.; Furlanetto, C.B.; Scaini, G.; Dal-Pizzol, F.; Quevedo, J. Mitochondria and the central nervous system: Searching for a pathophysiological basis of psychiatric disorders. Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr. 2014, 36, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Andreazza, A.C. Combining redox-proteomics and epigenomics to explain the involvement of oxidative stress in psychiatric disorders. Mol. Biosyst. 2012, 8, 2503–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Zhang, L.; Zhou, R.; Li, X.; Ursano, R.J.; Li, H. Stress-induced change of mitochondria membrane potential regulated by genomic and non-genomic GR signaling: A possible mechanism for hippocampus atrophy in PTSD. Med. Hypotheses 2006, 66, 1205–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Picard, M.; Juster, R.P.; McEwen, B.S. Mitochondrial allostatic load puts the ‘gluc’ back in glucocorticoids. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2014, 10, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Atlante, A.; Calissano, P.; Bobba, A.; Giannattasio, S.; Marra, E.; Passarella, S. Glutamate neurotoxicity, oxidative stress and mitochondria. FEBS Lett. 2001, 497, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Toya, S.; Takatsuru, Y.; Kokubo, M.; Amano, I.; Shimokawa, N.; Koibuchi, N. Early-life-stress affects the homeostasis of glutamatergic synapses. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2014, 40, 3627–3634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Marín-García, J. Mitochondrial DNA repair: A novel therapeutic target for heart failure. Heart Fail. Rev. 2016, 21, 475–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Shen, G.X. Mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress and diabetic cardiovascular disorders. Cardiovasc. Hematol. Disord. Drug Targets 2012, 12, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Vilne, B.; Skogsberg, J.; Foroughi, A.H.; Talukdar, H.A.; Kessler, T.; Björkegren, J.L.M.; Schunkert, H. Network analysis reveals a causal role of mitochondrial gene activity in atherosclerotic lesion formation. Atherosclerosis 2017, 267, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Madamanchi, N.R.; Runge, M.S. Mitochondrial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 2007, 100, 460–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Hetz, C.; Chevet, E.; Oakes, S.A. Proteostasis control by the unfolded protein response. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17, 829–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Görlach, A.; Bertram, K.; Hudecova, S.; Krizanova, O. Calcium and ROS: A mutual interplay. Redox Biol. 2015, 6, 260–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Chaudhari, N.; Talwar, P.; Parimisetty, A.; Lefebvre d’Hellencourt, C.; Ravanan, P. A molecular web: Endoplasmic reticulum stress, inflammation, and oxidative stress. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Yang, Y.; Song, Y.; Loscalzo, J. Regulation of the protein disulfide proteome by mitochondria in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 10813–10817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Walter, P.; Ron, D. The unfolded protein response: From stress pathway to homeostatic regulation. Science 2011, 334, 1081–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Guarner, V.; Rubio-Ruiz, M.E. Low-grade systemic inflammation connects aging, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Interdiscip. Top. Gerontol. 2015, 40, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Basseri, S.; Austin, R.C. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and lipid metabolism: Mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Biochem. Res. Int. 2012, 2012, 841362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Shah, S.Z.; Zhao, D.; Khan, S.H.; Yang, L. Unfolded protein response pathways in neurodegenerative diseases. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2015, 57, 529–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Penney, J.; Mendell, A.; Zeng, M.; Tran, K.; Lymer, J.; Turner, P.V.; Choleris, E.; MacLusky, N.; Lu, R. LUMAN/CREB3 is a key regulator of glucocorticoid-mediated stress responses. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2017, 439, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Von Zglinicki, T. Role of oxidative stress in telomere length regulation and replicative senescence. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2000, 908, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Starnino, L.; Busque, L.; Tardif, J.C.; D’Antono, B. Psychological Profiles in the Prediction of Leukocyte Telomere Length in Healthy Individuals. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0165482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Verhoeven, J.E.; van Oppen, P.; Révész, D.; Wolkowitz, O.M.; Penninx, B.W.J.H. Depressive and Anxiety Disorders Showing Robust, but Non-Dynamic, 6-Year Longitudinal Association with Short Leukocyte Telomere Length. Am. J. Psychiatry 2016, 173, 617–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Zou1, Y.; Leong, W.; Yao, M.; Hu, X.; Lu, S.; Zhu, X.; Chen, L.; Tong, J.; Shi, J.; Gilson, E.; et al. Test anxiety and telomere length: Academic stress in adolescents may not cause rapid telomere erosion. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 10836–10844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Shalev, I. Early life stress and telomere length: Investigating the connection and possible mechanisms: A critical survey of the evidence base, research methodology and basic biology. Bioessays 2012, 34, 943–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Lopizzo, N.; Tosato, S.; Begni, V.; Tomassi, S.; Cattane, N.; Barcella, M.; Turco, G.; Ruggeri, M.; Riva, M.A.; Pariante, C.M.; et al. Transcriptomic analyses and leukocyte telomere length measurement in subjects exposed to severe recent stressful life events. Transl. Psychiatry 2017, 7, e1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Monaghan, P. Organismal stress, telomeres and life histories Organismal stress, telomeres and life histories. J. Exp. Biol. 2014, 217, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Robles, T.F.; Carroll, J.E.; Bai, S.; Bridget, M.; Reynolds, B.M.; Esquivel, S.; Repetti, R.L. Emotions and Family Interactions in Childhood: Associations with Leukocyte Telomere Length. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2016, 63, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Bhattacharyya, J.; Mihara, K.; Bhattacharjee, D.; Mukherjee, M. Telomere length as a potential biomarker of coronary artery disease. Indian J. Med. Res. 2017, 145, 730–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Fyhrquist, F.; Saijonmaa, O. Telomere length and cardiovascular aging. Ann. Med. 2012, 44 (Suppl. S1), S138–S142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Hoffmann, J.; Spyridopoulos, I. Telomere length in cardiovascular disease: New challenges in measuring this marker of cardiovascular aging. Future Cardiol. 2011, 7, 789–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Dexheimer, T. DNA Repair Pathways and Mechanisms. In DNA Repair of Cancer Stem Cells; Mathews, L., Cabarcas, S., Hurt, E., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 19–32. ISBN 978-9400745896. [Google Scholar]
  101. Shaposhnikov, M.; Proshkina, E.; Shilova, L.; Zhavoronkov, A.; Moskalev, A. Lifespan and Stress Resistance in Drosophila with Overexpressed DNA Repair Genes. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Bohra, V.A.; Stevnsnerb, T.; Souza-Pintoa, N.C.de. Mitochondrial DNA repair of oxidative damage in mammalian cells. Gene 2002, 286, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Fleming, A.M.; Burrows, C.J. 8-Oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, friend and foe: Epigenetic-like regulator versus initiator of mutagenesis. DNA Repair 2017, 56, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Fishel, M.L.; Vasko, M.R.; Kelley, M.R. DNA repair in neurons: So if they don’t divide what’s to repair? Mutat. Res. 2007, 614, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Raza, M.U.; Tufan, T.; Wang, Y.; Hill, C.; Zhu, M.Y. DNA Damage in Major Psychiatric Diseases. Neurotox. Res. 2016, 30, 251–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Czarny, P.; Kwiatkowski, D.; Toma, M.; Kubiak, J.; Sliwinska, A.; Talarowska, M.; Szemraj, J.; Maes, M.; Galecki, P.; Sliwinski, T. Impact of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of Base Excision Repair Genes on DNA Damage and Efficiency of DNA Repair in Recurrent Depression Disorder. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017, 54, 4150–4159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Cengiz, M.; Bayoglu, B.; Alansal, N.O.; Cengiz, S.; Dirican, A.; Kocabasoglu, N. Pro198Leu polymorphism in the oxidative stress gene, glutathione peroxidase-1, is associated with a gender-specific risk for panic disorder. Int. J. Psychiatry Clin. Pract. 2015, 19, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Sarga, L.; Hart, N.; Koch, L.; Britton, S.; Hajas, G.; Boldogh, I.; Ba, X.; Radak, Z. Aerobic endurance capacity affects spatial memory and SIRT1 is a potent modulator of 8-oxoguanine repair. Neuroscience 2013, 252, 326–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Gavin, D.P.; Chase, K.A.; Sharma, R.P. Active DNA demethylation in post-mitotic neurons: A reason for optimism. Neuropharmacology 2013, 75, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Mantha, A.K.; Sarkar, B.; Tell, G. A short review on the implications of base excision repair pathway for neurons: Relevance to neurodegenerative diseases. Mitochondrion 2014, 16, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Mahmoudi, M.; Mercer, J.; Bennett, M. DNA damage and repair in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc. Res. 2006, 71, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Vakonaki, E.; Tsarouhas, K.; Spandidos, D.A.; Tsatsakis, A.M. Complex interplay of DNA damage, DNA repair genes, and oxidative stress in coronary artery disease. Anatol. J. Cardiol. 2016, 16, 939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Gray, K.; Kumar, S.; Figg, N.; Harrison, J.; Baker, L.; Mercer, J.; Littlewood, T.; Bennett, M. Effects of DNA damage in smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 2015, 116, 816–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Gorenne, I.; Kumar, S.; Gray, K.; Figg, N.; Yu, H.; Mercer, J.; Bennett, M. Vascular smooth muscle cell sirtuin 1 protects against DNA damage and inhibits atherosclerosis. Circulation 2013, 127, 386–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Vinci, M.C.; Polvani, G.; Pesce, M. Epigenetic programming and risk: The birthplace of cardiovascular disease? Stem Cell Rev. 2013, 9, 241–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Takigawa-Imamura, H.; Sekine, T.; Murata, M.; Takayama, K.; Nakazawa, K.; Nakagawa, J. Stimulation of glucose uptake in muscle cells by prolonged treatment with scriptide, a histone deacetylase inhibitor. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2003, 67, 1499–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Galmozzi, A.; Mitro, N.; Ferrari, A.; Gers, E.; Gilardi, F.; Godio, C.; Cermenati, G.; Gualerzi, A.; Donetti, E.; Rotili, D.; et al. Inhibition of class I histone deacetylases unveils a mitochondrial signature and enhances oxidative metabolism in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. Diabetes 2013, 62, 732–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Crosson, C.E.; Mani, S.K.; Husain, S.; Alsarraf, O.; Menick, D.R. Inhibition of histone deacetylase protects the retina from ischemic injury. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 3639–3645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Lenoir, O.; Flosseau, K.; Ma, F.X.; Blondeau, B.; Mai, A.; Bassel-Duby, R.; Ravassard, P.; Olson, E.N.; Haumaitre, C.; Scharfmann, R. Specific control of pancreatic endocrine beta- and delta-cell mass by class IIa histone deacetylases HDAC4, HDAC5, and HDAC9. Diabetes 2011, 60, 2861–2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Cencioni, C.; Spallotta, F.; Martelli, F.; Valente, S.; Mai, A.; Zeiher, A.M.; Gaetano, C. Oxidative stress and epigenetic regulation in ageing and age-related diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 17643–17663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Lewis, E.C.; Blaabjerg, L.; Storling, J.; Ronn, S.G.; Mascagni, P.; Dinarello, C.A.; Mandrup-Poulsen, T. The oral histone deacetylase inhibitor ITF2357 reduces cytokines and protects islet beta cells in vivo and in vitro. Mol. Med. 2011, 17, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Tedong, L.; Madiraju, P.; Martineau, L.C.; Vallerand, D.; Arnason, J.T.; Desire, D.D.; Lavoie, L.; Kamtchouing, P.; Haddad, P.S. Hydro-ethanolic extract of cashew tree (Anacardium occidentale) nut and its principal compound, anacardic acid, stimulate glucose uptake in C2C12 muscle cells. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2010, 54, 1753–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Halili, M.A.; Andrews, M.R.; Labzin, L.I.; Schroder, K.; Matthias, G.; Cao, C.; Lovelace, E.; Reid, R.C.; Le, G.T.; Hume, D.A.; et al. Differential effects of selective HDAC inhibitors on macrophage inflammatory responses to the Toll-like receptor 4 agonist LPS. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2010, 87, 1103–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Luna Ortiz, P.; Guarner, V.; Farías, J.M.; Hernández-Pacheco, G.; Martínez, M. Importance of metabolic memory in the development of vascular complications in diabetic patients. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2016, 30, 1369–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Shi, Y.; Lan, F.; Matson, C.; Mulligan, P.; Whetstine, J.R.; Cole, P.A.; Casero, R.A. Histone demethylation mediated by the nuclear amine oxidase homolog LSD1. Cell 2004, 119, 941–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Tsukada, Y.; Fang, J.; Erdjument-Bromage, H.; Warren, M.E.; Borchers, C.H.; Tempst, P.; Zhang, Y. Histone demethylation by a family of JmjC domain-containing proteins. Nature 2006, 439, 811–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 19 01456 g001 550
Figure 1. Crosstalk between the mitochondria and the nucleus resulting in epigenetic markers. Green arrows correspond to signals emitted by mitochondria to influence the nucleus and therefore altering the telomeres, the nucleosome and the DNA. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) mediate damage. Free fatty acids (FFA) and glucose lead to phosphorylation and acetylation of histones. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) regulates sirtuins that are histone deacetylases. The blue arrow corresponds to signaling from the nucleus to mitochondrial biogenesis. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha (PCG1α) and forkhead transcription factors (FOXO) regulate mitochondrial biogenesis. The red arrows correspond to the pathway leading to cell death. Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mtPTP) activation leads to apoptosis.
Figure 1. Crosstalk between the mitochondria and the nucleus resulting in epigenetic markers. Green arrows correspond to signals emitted by mitochondria to influence the nucleus and therefore altering the telomeres, the nucleosome and the DNA. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) mediate damage. Free fatty acids (FFA) and glucose lead to phosphorylation and acetylation of histones. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) regulates sirtuins that are histone deacetylases. The blue arrow corresponds to signaling from the nucleus to mitochondrial biogenesis. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha (PCG1α) and forkhead transcription factors (FOXO) regulate mitochondrial biogenesis. The red arrows correspond to the pathway leading to cell death. Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mtPTP) activation leads to apoptosis.
Ijms 19 01456 g001
Ijms 19 01456 g002 550
Figure 2. Crosstalk between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the nucleus and mitochondria. The brownish arrows indicate signals coming from ER and the green arrow the signal from the nucleus to ER. ROS mediate the loss of calcium homeostasis that influences the crosstalk between the mitochondria and nucleus. Inflammatory factors enhance the unfolded protein response (UPR) generated by ER stress.
Figure 2. Crosstalk between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the nucleus and mitochondria. The brownish arrows indicate signals coming from ER and the green arrow the signal from the nucleus to ER. ROS mediate the loss of calcium homeostasis that influences the crosstalk between the mitochondria and nucleus. Inflammatory factors enhance the unfolded protein response (UPR) generated by ER stress.
Ijms 19 01456 g002
Ijms 19 01456 g003 550
Figure 3. Epigenetic markers that lead to DNA transcription alterations and to telomere length determination. Blue arrows represent pathways to DNA and telomeres and to their regulatory mechanisms; green and brownish arrows represent the damaging effect of ROS produced by mitochondria and ER-altering DNA repairing mechanism, histone functioning and telomere length.
Figure 3. Epigenetic markers that lead to DNA transcription alterations and to telomere length determination. Blue arrows represent pathways to DNA and telomeres and to their regulatory mechanisms; green and brownish arrows represent the damaging effect of ROS produced by mitochondria and ER-altering DNA repairing mechanism, histone functioning and telomere length.
Ijms 19 01456 g003
Table
Table 1. Epigenetics in subcellular structures and possible related neuropsychiatric and cardiometabolic disorders.
Table 1. Epigenetics in subcellular structures and possible related neuropsychiatric and cardiometabolic disorders.
Subcellular StructureEpigenetics and the StructureRelated Disorders
MitochondriaCrosstalk with nucleus:
-Leaves epigenetic markers through the generation of metabolites by the tricarboxylic
acid cycle [17,18,19].
-Regulates mitochondrial biogenesis through acetylation of FOXOs and PCG-1α [17,18,19].		-neurodegenerative diseases:
Alzheimer’s disease [20].
-metabolic diseases:
type 2 diabetes mellitus [21,22].
-cardiovascular diseases: myocardial ischemia, cardiomyopathy and heart failure [23,24].
-psychiatric disorders: bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, autism, attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder [25].
Endoplasmic ReticulumExpression of chaperones and heat shock proteins that prevent unfolding or misfolding of proteins is a target of epigenetic markers [26].-metabolic diseases: metabolic syndrome, obesity and diabetes [27,28].
-cardiovascular diseases: aggregation cardiomyopathies [29,30,31,32,33].
-neurodegenerative diseases: Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and
Machado–Joseph disease [34,35].
NucleusTelomeresTelomeres are rich in epigenetic markers that determine their shortening [36,37,38].-psychiatric disorders: chronic stress, pain, MDD, BD, PTSD, schizophrenia,
anxiety disorders [39,40].
-cardiovascular diseases: coronary heart disease, left ventricular hypertrophy [41].
DNA ReparationThe BER pathway is important for maintaining both the genetic stability and the methylation status [42,43,44].Psychiatric disorders; schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorders [45].
The BER substrate, 8-oxoguanine, is an epigenetic marker modulating transcription factor recognition/binding [44].Cardiovascular diseases:
atherosclerosis, vascular smooth muscle cell dysfunction [46].
Abbreviations: FOXOs, forkhead transcription factors; PCG-1α, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha; MDD, major depressive disorder; BD, bipolar disorder; PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder; BER, base excision repair.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zapata-Martín del Campo, C.M.; Martínez-Rosas, M.; Guarner-Lans, V. Epigenetics of Subcellular Structure Functioning in the Origin of Risk or Resilience to Comorbidity of Neuropsychiatric and Cardiometabolic Disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1456. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051456

AMA Style

Zapata-Martín del Campo CM, Martínez-Rosas M, Guarner-Lans V. Epigenetics of Subcellular Structure Functioning in the Origin of Risk or Resilience to Comorbidity of Neuropsychiatric and Cardiometabolic Disorders. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(5):1456. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051456

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zapata-Martín del Campo, Carlos Manuel, Martín Martínez-Rosas, and Verónica Guarner-Lans. 2018. "Epigenetics of Subcellular Structure Functioning in the Origin of Risk or Resilience to Comorbidity of Neuropsychiatric and Cardiometabolic Disorders" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 5: 1456. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051456

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop