Next Article in Journal
Consequences of BMPR2 Deficiency in the Pulmonary Vasculature and Beyond: Contributions to Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Next Article in Special Issue
Proteomics Analysis Reveals Non-Controlled Activation of Photosynthesis and Protein Synthesis in a Rice npp1 Mutant under High Temperature and Elevated CO2 Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
24-Epibrassinolide Ameliorates Endogenous Hormone Levels to Enhance Low-Temperature Stress Tolerance in Cucumber Seedlings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Proteomic and Biochemical Changes during Senescence of Phalaenopsis ‘Red Dragon’ Petals
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 9
10.3390/ijms19092498
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Changes in the Proteome of Medicago sativa Leaves in Response to Long-Term Cadmium Exposure Using a Cell-Wall Targeted Approach

by
Annelie Gutsch
1,2,
Salha Zouaghi
1,
Jenny Renaut
1,
Ann Cuypers
2,
Jean-Francois Hausman
1 and
Kjell Sergeant
1,*
1
Environmental Research and Innovation, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, 5, avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, Esch-sur-Alzette, 4362 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
2
Agoralaan building D, Hasselt University, Campus Diepenbeek, Centre for Environmental Science, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(9), 2498; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092498
Submission received: 4 August 2018 / Revised: 20 August 2018 / Accepted: 21 August 2018 / Published: 24 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Proteomic Research 2.0)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Accumulation of cadmium (Cd) shows a serious problem for the environment and poses a threat to plants. Plants employing various cellular and molecular mechanisms to limit Cd toxicity and alterations of the cell wall structure were observed upon Cd exposure. This study focuses on changes in the cell wall protein-enriched subproteome of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) leaves during long-term Cd exposure. Plants grew on Cd-contaminated soil (10 mg/kg dry weight (DW)) for an entire season. A targeted approach was used to sequentially extract cell wall protein-enriched fractions from the leaves and quantitative analyses were conducted with two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D DIGE) followed by protein identification with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) time-of-flight/time of flight (TOF/TOF) mass spectrometry. In 212 spots that showed a significant change in intensity upon Cd exposure a single protein was identified. Of these, 163 proteins are predicted to be secreted and involved in various physiological processes. Proteins of other subcellular localization were mainly chloroplastic and decreased in response to Cd, which confirms the Cd-induced disturbance of the photosynthesis. The observed changes indicate an active defence response against a Cd-induced oxidative burst and a restructuring of the cell wall, which is, however, different to what is observed in M. sativa stems and will be discussed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Pollution of soil, water and air is one of the serious issues of recent decades. Amongst others, contamination with heavy metals is of great concern due to their stability in the ecosystem. Contaminated sites are inaccessible for humans in the context of urbanization, biomass- and food-production, which poses a major problem and exacerbates the already limited availability of soil. Cadmium (Cd) is one of the most common pollutants in the environment with a high degree of genotoxicity [1]. Plants exposed to Cd suffer from an impairment of physiological and biochemical processes. They show limited growth and chlorosis and Cd leads to oxidative stress by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) [2]. Cadmium interferes with photosynthesis by reducing the chlorophyll content, depressing the photosynthetic rate and induces direct damage to photosynthetic enzymes in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. Thereby, it was shown that Cd interferes more profoundly with the activity of photosystem II than photosystem I [3,4]. Cadmium can displace calcium (Ca) in photosystem II, thus inhibiting the formation of a functional complex and preventing photoactivation [5].
The plant cell wall is a dynamic cell-surrounding structure, which provides mechanical support and rigidity. It consists of cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, as well as phenolic compounds. Proteins responsible for intercellular communication and interaction between the cell and the environment are imbedded in the cell wall. Those proteins make about 10% of the cell wall mass and their tightly regulated enzymatic reactions can alter the cell wall structure and properties [6,7], not only during plant development, but also during plant defence responses to biotic and abiotic stress [8,9]. Pectin methylesterase (PME), a cell wall protein, de-esterifies the pectic polysaccharide homogalacturonan (HG) creating binding sites for Ca2+. Bound Ca mediates the bridging between two HG molecules to form a stable gel (egg-box structure) [10,11]. In the presence of Cd, PME showed an enhanced activity and the degree of low-methylesterified pectin in the cell wall increases concurrently with the deposition of Cd. By having the same charge, Cd2+ can bind pectin and displace Ca2+ as the cross-linking ion in the egg-box structure [12,13,14]. Additionally, Cd exposure has been shown to enhance lignification of the cell wall through an increased activity of cell wall-bound peroxidases, which causes cell wall stiffening and growth inhibition [15,16]. Such Cd-induced alterations of the cell wall structure indicate that the cell wall is part of the defence mechanisms set-up by the plant and that those structural changes limit further translocation of Cd, thus, keeping cytosolic Cd concentrations low.
The plant cell wall proteome has been studied in different species including dicots and monocots. To date, the Arabidopsis thaliana cell wall proteome is the most comprehensive [17]. Yet, the leaf apoplastic proteome including cell wall proteins remains much less studied [18] and information about cell wall proteins that change in abundance due to a treatment is underrepresented in the current scientific literature [19,20]. However, comparative cell wall proteome studies in leaves already provided information on how the cell wall proteome changes when exposed to various stresses [21,22]. To understand the mechanisms that take place in the cell wall during exposure to environmental constrains, it is important to unravel the cell wall proteome, its involvement in stress detection and response as well as its role in maintaining cell wall integrity.
Medicago sativa, commonly known as alfalfa, is an important forage legume and often used for research on cell wall development and stress adaptation [23,24]. Contrary to most research, in the present study M. sativa plants were exposed to realistic Cd concentrations for a long-term period, which makes the here-obtained results relevant for agricultural practices. Relative quantitative changes of the cell wall protein-enriched subproteome from leaves were investigated using 2D DIGE, which not only enables relative quantification but also visualizes different protein isoforms and modified proteins caused by Cd exposure [25]. A protocol for the enrichment of cell wall proteins was recently developed for M. sativa stems [26] and used in the current study on M. sativa leaves. The number of cytosolic contaminants in the different cell wall protein-enriched fractions remain low, which facilitates an accurate understanding of the leaf cell wall proteome. Although M. sativa proteins can be identified based on homology with M. truncatula proteins, as performed in a recent study [27], the combination of a search against the NCBI database and the M. sativa nucleotide database enlarges the number of identified proteins and the sequence coverage of the identified proteins, giving more comprehensive results. To our knowledge, this is the first study of the cell wall proteome of M. sativa leaves after long-term exposure to Cd.

2. Results

Cell wall protein-enriched fractions were obtained by subsequently using three different buffers of increasing ionic strength containing CaCl2, ethylene glycol-bis[β-aminoethyl ether]-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid (EGTA) or LiCl, to extract proteins with various wall-binding affinities. Using a targeted extraction protocol, the contamination with cytosolic proteins is low. However, several proteins involved in photosynthesis were identified and quantitative changes in these proteins are consistent throughout the fractions and replicates. As photosynthetic proteins are highly abundant in leaves and as Cd affects photosynthesis, they are included in the results and discussion.
A principle component analysis (PCA) on the gel-based spot intensity data analysed with the SameSpots software (TotalLab) revealed a clear distinction between control and Cd-exposed samples in the three cell wall protein-enriched fractions (Figure 1).
After manual and statistical evaluation of all detected spots, 306 spots showed a significant abundance change in response to Cd exposure (fold-change ≥ 1.2, ANOVA p-value ≤ 0.05) and were picked for identification. All mass spectra (MS) and MS/MS data that resulted in the protein identifications using the MASCOT server are provided in Table S1. Out of the total number of significantly changed spots, in 212 a single protein was identified and those were considered for biological interpretation. Based on the prediction for the subcellular localization with TargetP, 163 (76.9%) of these proteins are predicted to be secreted. Thirty seven are targeted to the chloroplast and 12 do not have a predicted subcellular target site. These predictions are mostly coherent with those from DeepLoc (Table S2), whereby DeepLoc distinguished the different locations after a protein has entered the secretory pathway as the most important change compared to TargetP. However, ongoing research in our lab indicates that DeepLoc predictions are not always reliable and vacuolar proteins are designates as extracellular and vice versa. Therefore, we based ourselves on TargetP in the results and in the discussion. In the CaCl2 fraction, 65 spots gave a significant identification of a single protein, of which 22 are of lower abundance and 43 are of higher abundance in response to Cd-exposure. Most proteins were identified in the EGTA fraction. Here, 93 proteins were found to increase (55 proteins) or decrease (38 proteins) in abundance. In the LiCl fraction a total number of 54 proteins were identified, of which 19 decreased and 35 increased in abundance. All proteins were clustered according to their predicted biological function to gain better insight on their physiological role and how this can be related to the plant’s response during Cd exposure (Figure 2). A complete list of all spots containing a single protein identification and, therefore, considered for biological interpretation is provided in Table S2, including statistical values obtained by the SameSpots software (TotalLab, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) and their biological function. This information is summarised in Table 1. In several spots the same nominal protein was identified, however, the observation that it was identified at a different pI and/or molecular weight indicates that this concerns proteoforms. An example of this is a C-terminal truncation of eight amino acids from chitinase (e.g., the spots EGTA 1225 and 1279) that is probably determining for its subcellular location. The observation of a semi-tryptic peptide, corresponding to a cleavage in the middle of the papain family cysteine protease active domain in the spot EGTA 1971 (Table S1) indicates that the degradation of this protein increases in Cd-exposed plants. In the spot LiCl 1250 the same protein was identified but this time with a semi-tryptic peptide corresponding to the start of the active domain, after removal of the N-terminal inhibitor domain. These observations are confirmed by the position of the spots on the gel (Figure S1). Only by using a protein-based method, gel-based or gel-free, such proof of post-translational events can be obtained.
A large part of the higher abundant proteins are involved in plant defence (Figure 2). Another class of proteins with higher abundance upon Cd exposure have a designated function in oxidation-reduction processes. This classification includes different peroxidase isoforms present in all three fractions, plus a plastocyanin-like domain protein identified in the EGTA fraction (Table 1). Likewise, some proteins involved in carbohydrate metabolic processes and proteolysis are found to be of higher abundance. A minor part has a nutrient reserve function (rhicadhesin receptor, auxin-binding protein ABP19a) or is involved in photosynthesis (photosystem I reaction centre subunit II) (Table 1).
The functions assigned to proteins with a decreasing abundance are more diverse in the CaCl2 and EGTA fraction (Figure 2). Proteins identified in the LiCl fraction were only classified in cell wall modification (47%) or nutrient reserve (53%) (Figure 2). In those 19 spots only three different proteins were identified, namely auxin-binding protein ABP19a, stem 28 kDa glycoprotein, and polygalacturonase non-catalytic protein (Table S2). Most proteins of lower abundance in the CaCl2 fraction are involved in photosynthesis (oxygen-evolving enhancer protein, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO) small chain and PS II oxygen-evolving enhancer protein) (Table S2). Photosynthetic proteins are highly abundant in leaves. As expected, the highest percentage of proteins that are not predicted to be cell wall localized is found in the CaCl2 fraction. It must be noted that no spot corresponding to RuBisCO large chain, the main component of the leaf proteome, is present. This protein makes up more than 50% of the total leaf protein content and masking of lower abundant proteins by RubisCO large chain seems to be avoided using the here applied protocol for cell wall protein enrichment. Of the identified proteins, only the function of the plant/F18G18-200 protein, containing a DUF642 conserved domain, identified in the CaCl2 and EGTA fraction remains unknown. The protein shows a decreased abundance in response to Cd and a secretion signal peptide was detected.
Generally, if the same protein was identified in different spots, their changes in abundance were consistent with a comparable fold-change. However, spots containing auxin-binding protein ABP19a changed in different directions in the LiCl fraction (Table S2, spot 181 down and spot 1516 up) and were found to be less abundant in the CaCl2 fraction. Although the abundance of distinct isoforms of this protein is differently influenced by Cd exposure, the spectra of these proteins are identical and no hint was found to explain the observed dissimilarity. On the other side, of all spots containing CAP (cysteine-rich secretory protein, antigen 5) in the CaCl2 fraction (Table S2, spot 3105 and spots 3028, 3030, 3031, 3034, 3037, 3081, and 3095), only spot 3105 has a decreased abundance. All of these spots contain a CAP most homologous to Medicaco truncatula CAP gi: 357446161. Nonetheless, only in spot 3028 the N-terminal peptide, after removal of the signal peptide, is QDSQADYVNAHNEAR, corresponding to contig 56,806 of M. sativa. In the other spots QDSQADYVNAHNDAR is identified as an N-terminal peptide corresponding to the contigs 111,668 and 1437 (Table S1). When calculating the pI of the translated contigs, the position on the gel confirms that spot 3028 is more acidic than the others (Figure 3).
A number of spots in the EGTA fraction contain eukaryotic aspartyl protease family proteins. Some of these spots are of lower intensity after Cd-exposure (spot 956, 961, 962, 964, 978, and 983), while others are of higher intensity (904, 911, 917, 948, 955, 2239, and 2240, Table S2 and Figure S1). Based on the spectra and the matched peptide sequences (Table S1), it was found that aspartyl protease proteins with a decreasing abundance are predicted to be secreted, while those that are of increasing abundance have a chloroplast transit peptide. The distinction can also be observed on the gel images as the chloroplastic aspartyl proteases are acidic and thus cluster on the left side of the gel (Figure S1).
The secreted aspartyl proteases (EGTA fraction spot 956, 961, 962, 964, 978, and 983) can be divided into three groups according to their location on the gel: (1) 978, 983; (2) 956; and (3) 961, 962, 964 (Figure S1). The M. sativa contigs corresponding to those spots were blasted against the NCBI database and split into two different groups. Spots 978 and 983 (corresponding to contig 4015) show homology to the M. truncatula sequence XP_003594399.1, while the contigs corresponding to the remaining spots show the highest homology to the M. truncatula sequence XP_013459881.1. Those M. truncatula sequences only have a sequence identity of 37%. However, both proteins carry the same conserved domain (pepsin_retropepsin_like superfamily) and no functional differences could be found in the literature.
The larger groups of spots with the same functional annotation were dissected, for instance, in 29 spots different chitinase proteins were identified. These can be divided in five groups based on the most homologous M. truncatula protein. This grouping is in agreement with the calculated pI and molecular weight of the different spots. In the spots 1279, 2259, 1225, and 2249 of the EGTA fraction, a class I chitinase (gi:1800141) was identified. Surprisingly, the identified protein lacks the eight C-terminal amino acids as shown by the identification of the peptide at m/z 2683.19 (Table S1). Similar observations have been conducted before [28] and may relate to the fact that the protein is actually vacuolar and only removal of the C-terminal octopeptide allows the protein to be secreted [29]. Of the chitinase-containing spots, those spots that are matched to the gi:357443753 (spot 1399, 1416, 1419, and 2508) have the highest fold change (Table S2). No clear functional differences between the chitinases could be found during this analysis.
In addition to sequence variants, signal sequences and the cleavage of activation/inhibition sequences, other post-translational modifications were also observed during MS analysis. Among these, α-β didehydrophenylalanine, as a potentially structure-determining modification, was identified in the β-subunit of polygalacturonase [25].

3. Discussion

The current study shows the impact of long-term Cd exposure on the M. sativa leaf subproteome, enriched in cell wall proteins. Identified proteins were clustered according to their biological function using Blast2Go (Figure 2) and those assignments as well as the number of proteins showing an increased or decreased abundance upon Cd exposure are comparable with results from a similar study on M. sativa stems [30]. In both studies, results confirm that the enrichment obtained with the used protocol is better than that obtained with comparable protocols, but not 100% and several non-apoplastic proteins, mainly chloroplast targeted, were identified most prominent in the CaCl2 fraction (Figure 2) [30]. Those proteins will also be discussed as they are highly abundant in leaves and coherent, significant changes in abundance were observed between replicates and fractions in response to Cd exposure.
After planting, strong growth inhibition of Cd-exposed plants was observed at the end of the first growth cycle and coincided with the visual observation of leaf senescence. These phenotypical differences between Cd-exposed and control plants disappeared during the second growth cycle and no differences in appearance were observed at a later maturation state. Overall, long-term Cd exposure did not have any morphological impact on the leaves of M. sativa. Leaves from control and Cd-exposed plants had a rather heterogeneous appearance, due to which no leaf was representative for any of the conditions. Furthermore to attain the amount of leaf material needed, four to five grams for each replicate, all leaves from young to old were sampled. The visual observation of limited impact of long-term Cd exposure is supported by the fact that the average plant biomass taken from five replicates at the end of the experiment was not significantly different between Cd-exposed (120.32 ± 4.67 g) and control plants (110.65 ± 3.78 g) [30]. Although long-term experiments as presented here are rather scarce, the high sensitivity of initial growth stages followed by a low impact of the applied stress in adult plants was observed before for other plant species [15,31,32]. Obviously, plants do acquire a new steady-state when they are subjected to a constant severe but non-lethal stress [33].

3.1. Cd-Induced Degradation of Photosynthetic Proteins

Throughout all three cell wall protein-enriched fractions a decreasing abundance of photosynthetic proteins was revealed (Table 1). Among others, RuBisCO small chain was less abundant in Cd-exposed plants as well as subunits of photosystem I and II. The Cd-induced decreased abundance of photosynthetic proteins was recently reported in M. sativa stems after long-term Cd exposure when analysing cell wall protein-enriched fractions using 2D DIGE [30]. Likewise as in leaves, RuBisCO small chain, as well as a subunit of photosystem I, were less abundant in M. sativa stems when exposed to Cd. The fact that Cd is disrupting photosynthesis and that it causes oxidative stress in plants by ROS production is well known [2,34]. Reactive oxygen species are able to oxidise proteins, destining the oxidised protein for degradation, which goes together with an increasing protease activity [35,36]. Here, we observed that Cd induces a higher abundance of chloroplastic aspartyl protease isoforms in the EGTA fraction. The protein was identified before in leaf tissue of Cd-exposed A. thaliana [37] and its homology with cnd41-like proteins implies its function in senescence and nutrient recovery. Aspartyl proteases are implicated in degradation or processing of proteins and their occurrence during stress responses is established. They might have a crucial function in protein turn-over to prevent the accumulation of deactivated proteins, thereby increasing the pool of available amino acids, needed for the synthesis of defence-related proteins [38]. They are involved in RuBisCO degradation and degradation of chloroplastic proteins [39,40,41]. An increased abundance of this protease in M. sativa leaves correlates with the observed decreased abundance of photosynthetic proteins. Oxygen radicals, which appear during Cd exposure cause enhanced degradation of proteins involved in photosynthesis and impair the physiological processes in leaves. The increased abundance of a 70 kDa stromal heat shock protein (CaCl2 spot 2402) likewise indicates that there is an increased need for protein refolding in the chloroplast.
A second group of spots in the EGTA fraction contains isoforms of aspartyl protease, which are of lower abundance in Cd-exposed plants. The proteins identified in these spots are predicted to be secreted (Table S2). Although no unambiguous function is established for secreted aspartyl proteases, they have been identified before, for instance in the pollen cell wall [42]. Functional studies have implicated them in the defence against biotic stresses [43] and the Arabidopsis homolog AED1 was recently proposed to be part of a homeostatic feedback mechanism regulating the systemic acquired resistance (SAR) response [44]. This link between SAR, a salicylic acid-regulated process, and the here-observed limited effect of long-term Cd exposure confirms previous studies, wherein salicylic acid application is shown to alleviate Cd-induced growth inhibition [45].
The only photosynthetic protein found with an increasing abundance is the photosystem I reaction centre subunit II (CaCl2 fraction spot 3075, Table S2). The position of this spot is, however, at too low a pI and molecular weight, providing a further indication for increasing protein degradation in the chloroplast.

3.2. Cd Influences the Abundance of Proteins Related to the Cell Wall Structure

Pectinesterase/pectinesterase inhibitor proteins are identified in three spots (Table S2, CaCl2 fraction spot 2175 and EGTA fraction spot 989, 1007). The abundance of these proteins decreases in Cd-exposed plants. PMEs and their inhibitor are expressed as a single polypeptide and get subsequently processed by cleavage between the inhibitor and active domain. Our MS data do not confirm that the inhibitor domain is cut from the PME domain. However, the position on the 2D gel matches with what is predicted for the active protein and are at the same position as those found in M. sativa stems [30]. In the latter study, cleavage between the inhibitor and the active domain was confirmed based on MS data, indicating that in leaves the inhibitor domain was also cleaved and thus the protein activated. However, the abundance of PME increased in M. sativa stems in response to long-term Cd exposure [30].
PME catalyses the demethylesterification of HG in plant cell walls. Those demethylated, acidic HG molecules form bridges between each other mediated by Ca2+ ions (egg-box structure) and confer rigidity to the cell wall [10,46]. Cadmium ions have the same charge (Cd2+) and can displace Ca2+ as cross linker in the pectin egg-box structure. During Cd exposure a higher abundance of PME was found in several studies and an enhanced activity demonstrated [14,16]. Changes in HG pattern in response to Cd have been investigated together with a preferential allocation of Cd in the cell wall [12,47,48]. Thus, the cell wall structure changes during Cd exposure and the sequestration of Cd in the cell wall protects the cytosol. In a recent study on the cell wall composition in M. sativa stems upon long-term Cd exposure, the most significant changes appeared in the pectin fraction towards a higher abundance of HG upon Cd exposure and an increased activity of PME in response to Cd was determined (Gutsch et al., submitted). This suggests a high demethylation degree, which creates binding sites for Cd and immobilize it in the cell wall. Opposite to what is observed in M. sativa stems [30], Cd exposure led to a decreasing abundance of PME in leaves, which would lead to a low demethylation degree of HG. The methylation degree of pectin has an influence on the cell wall structure and, furthermore, limits the accessibility for pectin-degrading enzymes, such as polygalacturonases [49]. In response to long-term Cd exposure, the structural changes in the pectin network of the leaf cell wall seem to be different from those anticipated in the stems of M. sativa in response to Cd [30] and an organ-specific influence of Cd on the cell wall can be assumed. Together with so-far-unpublished data (Gutsch et al., submitted), the structural changes, which are observed in the stems of M. sativa, promote the creation of binding sites for Cd in the stem cell wall as a direct response to the applied stress. In this matter, the leaf cell wall plays probably a minor role in the retention of Cd but more data on the structural changes would be needed to draw a more comprehensive conclusion.
Polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein 1 and polygalacturonase non-catalytic protein or β-subunit are involved in pectin degradation. Conflicting data on the function of the latter has been obtained. Overexpression of the polygalacturonase non-catalytic β-subunit in rice resulted in a decreased pectin content and a higher susceptibility to abiotic stress due to lower cell adhesion [50]. On the other hand, during fruit ripening in tomato, it limits the extent of pectin solubilisation and depolymerization [51]. In the present study, a lower abundance occurred in the M. sativa leaf subproteome enriched in cell wall proteins (Table 1), as was previously reported in M. sativa stems [30]. However, a quantitative change in the abundance of β-subunit of polygalacturonase is not necessarily correlated with a change in polygalacturonase activity [52]. The functional linkage between these two polygalacturonase subunits remains to be solved as contradictory data exist. Furthermore, polygalacturonase inhibitor showed a decreasing abundance in our study. It can be speculated that this decreased abundance is a cross reaction to the lower abundance of polygalacturonase non-catalytic protein in order to keep the polygalacturonase activity in the cell wall stable. So far, polygalacturonase inhibitor has only been described during the defence against pathogen attacks by inhibiting the fungal polygalacturonase [53,54]. Those proteins have a specific binding site to interact with pectin in the plant cell wall, which is furthermore influenced by methylesterification patterns in the pectin network [55]. Their function in the alteration of the plant cell wall structure in response to abiotic stress remains unclear.
Various peroxidase isoforms were highly abundant in the leaves of Cd-exposed M. sativa (Table 1). Previous studies on M. sativa stems [30] and poplar leaves gave similar results [56]. Peroxidases are involved in oxidation-reduction and lignification processes in the cell wall [57]. Using H2O2 molecules as a co-substrate, peroxidases catalyse the oxidation of monolignols, which then cross-link to form lignin [58] and increasing peroxidase activity was positively correlated with the degree of cell wall lignification [59]. Cadmium enhances H2O2 accumulation in plants and increased peroxidase abundance and activity, leading to cell wall lignification, cell wall stiffening and growth impairment [15,60,61]. Oxidative stress might also be responsible for the accumulation of carboxyl-terminal peptidase (Table 1). The protein contains two DUF domains (239 and 4409). The Arabidopsis homolog was found to be responsive to ROS and confers enhanced tolerance to oxidative stress [62]. The same protein was found to have a role in cell wall modification, influencing nutrient transport by modification of root endodermal barriers [63].

3.3. Enhanced Accumulation of Defence Proteins as a Response to Cd

Different defence related proteins were identified in M. sativa leaves (Table 1). Their increased accumulation due to Cd exposure underline the strong defence response of the plant, which had been reported before when plants were exposed to heavy metals [30,37,56,64]. Most prevalent, we identified different chitinase isoforms throughout all three fractions (Table S2), which is consistent with previous findings in M. sativa stems [30], where several chitinase isoforms increased in abundance upon long-term Cd-exposure. A study on different plant species exposed to different metals indicates that a metal-specific chitinase-expression profile may exist [65]. Although such metal-specific functions of chitinases remain uncertain, an increased abundance of chitinases has been proposed as a marker for the induction of a SAR-response. Despite the small impact of long-term Cd exposure on biomass production [30], it appears to have a significant negative impact on the presence of proteins classified as having a nutrient reserve function (Figure 2), which was also reported in M. sativa stems [30]. This may indicate that the plants are capable of maintaining growth under the conditions used in this study, but are not capable of establishing reserves. It must, however, be mentioned that multiple functions are attributed to these nutrient reserve proteins and that the observed decreased abundance may have other consequences [66].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Treatment

M. sativa (cv Giulia) seeds were inoculated with Sinorhizobium meliloti and sown in May 2015 on Cd-polluted soil (10 mg/kg soil DW added as CdSO4) and uncontaminated soil. The used soil was prepared as one batch (2/3 potting soil mixed with 1/3 sand (w/w)) before splitting in two conditions. For each condition 12 times 12 pots were planted. The plants were kept in the greenhouse until flowering stage was reached (July) and a first cut was done as during agricultural cultivation of M. sativa. Subsequently, plants were kept outside to avoid insect infestation. After a re-growing period till the pre-flowering stage was reached, plants were put back into the greenhouse for one more week before sampling was done on the 10th of September. No temperature or day cycle control was done during the experiment and no fertilizer was applied. A pool of leaves was sampled in four replicates for each condition and directly frozen in liquid nitrogen. All samples were kept at −80 °C until further use.

4.2. Cell Wall Protein Enrichment

Cell wall protein-enriched fractions were obtained as described elsewhere [25] by using subsequently three different buffers with increasing ionic strength to extract also tightly bound proteins. Following the extraction, all three protein fractions (CaCl2, ethylene glycol-bis(β-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid [EGTA], LiCl) were concentrated with Amicon Ultra 15 10 K (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) by centrifugation (4700× g, 4 °C) to an approximate volume of 200 µL. Subsequently, the ReadyPrep 2D Cleanup kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used to desalt the samples following the manufacturer’s instruction. Cleaned samples were solubilized in labelling buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 2% w/v 3-[(3-Cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), 30 mM Tris) and the protein concentrations determined using the Bradford method (Bradford reagent, Bio-Rad).

4.3. Quantitative Protein Analysis and Identification

A 2D DIGE was undertaken to compare protein abundances between conditions in the three different fractions. Therefore, 50 µg of protein from each sample were labelled with either Cy3 or Cy5 and a dye swap was applied to avoid a possible effect of preferential labelling. An internal standard composed of 25 μg protein from each replicate (four biological replicates from control and cadmium, respectively) was labelled with Cy2 for each fraction (CaCl2, EGTA, LiCl). Labelled samples were mixed, 9 µL Servalyte pH 3–10 (Serva Electrophoresis GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) and 2.7 µL Destreak Reagent (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) were added. The volumes were adjusted with lysis buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% w/v CHAPS) to 450 µL. Samples were loaded onto Immobiline™ DryStrip 3–10 NL, 24 cm (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) overnight, followed by isoelectric focusing (IEF): (1) constant 100 V for 4 h; (2) linear gradient up to 1000 V for 4 h; (3) constant 1000 V for 5 h; (4) linear gradient up to 10,000 V for 6 h; and (5) constant 10,000 V until a total of 80,000 volt hours were reached. IEF-strips were equilibrated in equilibration buffer (Serva Electrophoresis GmbH) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 2D HPE™ Large Gels NF-12.5% (Serva Electrophoresis GmbH) were used for the second dimension and were run on a HPE tower system following the manufacturer’s instruction. After fixation (15% ethanol v/v, 1% w/v citric acid), three images from each of the gels were acquired using different wavelengths for the different labelling dyes (Cy2 488 nm, Cy3 532 nm, Cy5 642 nm) (Typhoon FLA 9500, GE Healthcare). SameSpots software v4.5 (TotalLab, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) was used for the relative quantitative image analysis. Since the same internal standard is run on each gel of a fraction, alignment and normalisation with the internal standard allows comparison of the spots between repetitions. All statistical analyses were automatically done by the software. A spot was chosen for protein identification if a treatment effect was reported (fold-change ≥ 1.2, ANOVA p-value ≤ 0.05, Table S3 for spot volumes), if the spot was matched on all replicates and after manual validation.
Selected spots (Figure 3 and Figure S1) were picked with an Ettan Spot Picker (GE Healthcare) and digested prior to MS/MS analyses as described before [25]. Mass spectra were acquired with 5800 MALDI TOF/TOF (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA). The ten most abundant peaks were automatically selected for fragmentation and spectra submitted to an in-house MASCOT server (Matrix Science, Available online: www.matrixscience.com) for database-dependent identifications. A first search was performed against the NCBInr database limited to Viridiplantae (3,334,509 sequences) and a second one against M. sativa sequences downloaded from the Samuel Roberts Noble website (Available online: plantgrn.noble.org/AGED (675,756 sequences, 304,231,576 residues)) [67]. The search parameters were as follows: mass tolerance 100 ppm, fragment mass tolerance 0.5 Da, cysteine carbamidomethylation as fixed modification, methionine oxidation, double oxidation of tryptophan, and tryptophan to kynurenine as variable modification. When at least two peptides passed the MASCOT-calculated 0.05 threshold score of 40, proteins were considered as identified. Additionally, if a high-quality spectrum was not matched to a protein, the interpretation was done manually and search parameters adjusted (semitryptic, single amino acid change, and post-translational modification) to increase the sequence coverage of identified proteins. After manual validation of the identifications, the subcellular location was predicted with the TargetP server using the standard search parameters (Available online: http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP) [68]. Only proteins with a predicted signal peptide have been considered as cell wall proteins as done in current literature [17,69]. To validate the predicted subcellular location, a second location prediction was undertaken using DeepLoc [70]. In some cases predictions were corrected after literature research. The Blast2Go software was used to gather information about the biological function of the identified proteins as well as the available literature.

5. Conclusions

M. sativa plants were exposed to Cd (10 mg/kg soil DW) in a long-term experiment and the leaf cell wall protein-enriched subproteome was analysed. In total, 212 identified proteins changed significantly in response to Cd and a major part of these identified proteins is involved in defence responses, underlining the importance of the general defence machinery in response to Cd and linking the observations in this study with knowledge on the SAR response. Cell wall proteins related to oxidation-reduction processes are highly abundant in Cd-exposed plants and might counteract the Cd-induced oxidative burst in the plant. Germin-like proteins, although classified as nutrient reserve, may also contribute. Interestingly, Cd provokes tissue-specific alterations in the pectin network of the cell wall in M. sativa leaves and stems [30]. The leaf cell wall seems to be less involved in the assumed cell wall-promoted binding of Cd as a protective mechanism.
About 18% of the identified proteins are targeted to the chloroplast and their relative abundance decreases upon Cd exposure concomitantly with an increase in chloroplastic, proteolytic proteins. Therefore, the increased protein degradation in the chloroplast confirms interference of Cd with the photosynthetic activity of plants. Nonetheless, Cd-exposed plants showed no difference in biomass production or in the growth at the moment of sampling in comparison to control plants, which suggests that the plants established a new metabolic steady-state during the long-term stress exposure. The important decrease in proteins with nutrient reserve function, however, indicates that the plants are weakened and may perform worse than control plants when exposed to secondary stresses.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/9/2498/s1. Table S1. Complete MASCOT protein identification data of picked spots (xls 819 KB). Table S2. The table contains all identified proteins from each fraction and their abundance change due to Cd exposure. Fold change and p-values were obtained using the SameSpots software (TotalLab). Functional classification of each protein was determined using Blast2Go. Subcellular localization was predicted with TargetP and DeepLoc (docx 37 KB). Figure S1. 2D DIGE images from the cell wall protein-enriched EGTA and LiCl fractions of M. sativa leaves (docx. 2.118 KB). Table S3. All spots and corresponding volumes (relative and normalized) are given as detected with SameSpots software (TotalLab) including statistical parameters automatically calculated by the software. Spots that were selected for identification are indicated (xlsx 536 KB).

Author Contributions

A.G., K.S., J.-F.H. and A.C. designed the experiment. S.Z. performed all the experimental work and data analysis and K.S. contributed to the protein identification and quantification. J.R. supplied and managed the technical equipment. A.G. and K.S. performed the data interpretation and drafted the manuscript which was critically revised and approved for submission by all the other authors.

Funding

This work was supported by the FNR and FWO and is part of the bilateral project CadWALL (FNR/FWO project INTER/FWO/13/14).

Acknowledgments

We specially thank Sébastien Planchon for his technical support during the 2D DIGE experiment and the following quantitative analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

2D DIGETwo-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis
CaCalcium
CdCadmium
DWDry weight
HGHomogalacturonan
kDaKilo Dalton
MALDIMatrix-assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization
MSMass spectrum
MWMolecular weight
PCAPrincipal component analysis
PMEPectin methylesterase
ROSReactive oxygen species
RuBisCORibulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxidase
SARSystemic acquired resistance
TOFTime of flight

References

  1. Kovalchuk, O.; Titov, V.; Hohn, B.; Kovalchuk, I. A sensitive transgenic plant system to detect toxic inorganic compounds in the environment. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 568–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Di Toppi, L.S.; Gabbrielli, R. Response to cadmium in higher plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1999, 41, 105–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chugh, L.K.; Sawhney, S.K. Photosynthetic activities of Pisum sativum seedlings grown in presence of cadmium. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1999, 37, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, Y.; Jiang, X.; Li, K.; Wu, M.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, L.; Chen, G. Photosynthetic responses of Oryza sativa L. seedlings to cadmium stress: Physiological, biochemical and ultrastructural analyses. Biometals 2014, 27, 389–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Faller, P.; Kienzler, K.; Krieger-Liszkay, A. Mechanism of Cd2+ toxicity: Cd2+ inhibits photoactivation of Photosystem II by competitive binding to the essential Ca2+ site. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2005, 1706, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cassab, G.I. Plant Cell Wall Proteins. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1998, 49, 281–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Fry, S.C.; Smith, R.C.; Renwick, K.F.; Martin, D.J.; Hodge, S.K.; Matthews, K.J. Xyloglucan endotransglycosylase, a new wall-loosening enzyme activity from plants. Biochem. J. 1992, 282, 821–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Qin, Q.; Bergmann, C.W.; Rose, J.K.C.; Saladie, M.; Kolli, V.S.K.; Albersheim, P.; Darvill, A.G.; York, W.S. Characterization of a tomato protein that inhibits a xyloglucan-specific endoglucanase. Plant J. 2003, 34, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Bradley, D.J.; Kjellbom, P.; Lamb, C.J. Elicitor- and wound-induced oxidative cross-linking of a proline-rich plant cell wall protein: A novel, rapid defense response. Cell 1992, 70, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Caffall, K.H.; Mohnen, D. The structure, function, and biosynthesis of plant cell wall pectic polysaccharides. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 1879–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Krzesłowska, M. The cell wall in plant cell response to trace metals: Polysaccharide remodeling and its role in defense strategy. Acta Physiol. Plant 2011, 33, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vollenweider, P.; Cosio, C.; Günthardt-Goerg, M.S.; Keller, C. Localization and effects of cadmium in leaves of a cadmium-tolerant willow (Salix viminalis L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2006, 58, 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Parrotta, L.; Guerriero, G.; Sergeant, K.; Cai, G.; Hausman, J.-F. Target or barrier? The cell wall of early- and later-diverging plants vs. cadmium toxicity: Differences in the response mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Douchiche, O.; Soret-Morvan, O.; Chaïbi, W.; Morvan, C.; Paynel, F. Characteristics of cadmium tolerance in “Hermes” flax seedlings: Contribution of cell walls. Chemosphere 2010, 81, 1430–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chaoui, A.; El Ferjani, E. Effects of cadmium and copper on antioxidant capacities, lignification and auxin degradation in leaves of pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedlings. C. R. Biol. 2005, 328, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Paynel, F.; Schaumann, A.; Arkoun, M.; Douchiche, O.; Morvan, C. Temporal regulation of cell-wall pectin methylesterase and peroxidase isoforms in cadmium-treated flax hypocotyl. Ann. Bot. 2009, 104, 1363–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Albenne, C.; Canut, H.; Jamet, E. Plant cell wall proteomics: The leadership of Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Haslam, R.P.; Downie, A.L.; Raveton, M.; Gallardo, K.; Job, D.; Pallett, K.E.; John, P.; Parry, M.A.J.; Coleman, J.O.D. The assessment of enriched apoplastic extracts using proteomic approaches. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2003, 143, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ndimba, B.K.; Chivasa, S.; Hamilton, J.M.; Simon, W.J.; Slabas, A.R. Proteomic analysis of changes in the extracellular matrix of Arabidopsis cell suspension cultures induced by fungal elicitors. Proteomics 2003, 3, 1047–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Tran, H.T.; Plaxton, W.C. Proteomic analysis of alterations in the secretome of Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cells subjected to nutritional phosphate deficiency. Proteomics 2008, 8, 4317–4326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Meng, X.; Song, T.; Fan, H.; Yu, Y.; Cui, N.; Zhao, J.; Meng, K. A comparative cell wall proteomic analysis of cucumber leaves under Sphaerotheca fuliginea stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2016, 38, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dani, V.; Simon, W.J.; Duranti, M.; Croy, R.R.D. Changes in the tobacco leaf apoplast proteome in response to salt stress. Proteomics 2005, 5, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Printz, B.; Guerriero, G.; Sergeant, K.; Audinot, J.-N.; Guignard, C.; Renaut, J.; Lutts, S.; Hausman, J.-F. Combining-Omics to Unravel the Impact of Copper Nutrition on Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Stem Metabolism. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 407–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Verdonk, J.C.; Hatfield, R.D.; Sullivan, M.L. Proteomic analysis of cell walls of two developmental stages of alfalfa stems. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sergeant, K.; Printz, B.; Gutsch, A.; Behr, M.; Renaut, J.; Hausman, J.-F. Didehydrophenylalanine, an abundant modification in the β subunit of plant polygalacturonases. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Printz, B.; Morais, R.D.S.; Wienkoop, S.; Sergeant, K.; Lutts, S.; Hausman, J.-F.; Renaut, J. An improved protocol to study the plant cell wall proteome. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Xiong, J.; Sun, Y.; Yang, Q.; Tian, H.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Chen, M. Proteomic analysis of early salt stress responsive proteins in alfalfa roots and shoots. Proteome Sci. 2017, 15, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Neuhaus, J.-M.; Pietrzak, M.; Boller, T. Mutation analysis of the C-terminal vacuolar targeting peptide of tobacco chitinase: Low specificity of the sorting system, and gradual transition between intracellular retention and secretion into the extracellular space. Plant J. 1994, 5, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Stigliano, E.; Di Sansebastiano, G.P.; Neuhaus, J.M. Contribution of chitinase A’s C-terminal vacuolar sorting determinant to the study of soluble protein compartmentation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 11030–11039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gutsch, A.; Keunen, E.; Guerriero, G.; Renaut, J.; Cuypers, A.; Hausman, J.-F.; Sergeant, K. Long-term cadmium exposure influences the abundance of proteins that impact the cell wall structure in Medicago sativa stems. Plant Biol. J. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Peralta-Videa, J.R.; De la Rosa, G.; Gonzalez, J.H.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L. Effects of the growth stage on the heavy metal tolerance of alfalfa plants. Adv. Environ. Res. 2004, 8, 679–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, C.Q.; Song, H. Calcium protects Trifolium repens L. seedlings against cadmium stress. Plant Cell Rep. 2009, 28, 1341–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gratão, P.L.; Monteiro, C.C.; Antunes, A.M.; Peres, L.E.P.; Azevedo, R.A. Acquired tolerance of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Micro-Tom) plants to cadmium-induced stress. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2008, 153, 321–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Schützendübel, A.; Polle, A. Plant responses to abiotic stresses: Heavy metal-induced oxidative stress and protection by mycorrhization. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 1351–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Romero-Puertas, M.C.; Palma, J.M.; Gómez, M.; Río, L.A.D.E.L.; Sandalio, L.M. Cadmium causes the oxidative modification of proteins in pea plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 677–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Sandalio, L.M.; Dalurzo, H.C.; Gómez, M.; Romero-Puertas, M.C.; del Río, L.A. Cadmium-induced changes in the growth and oxidative metabolism of pea plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52, 2115–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Semane, B.; Dupae, J.; Cuypers, A.; Noben, J.P.; Tuomainen, M.; Tervahauta, A.; Kärenlampi, S.; van Belleghem, F.; Smeets, K.; Vangronsveld, J. Leaf proteome responses of Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to mild cadmium stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 167, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Simões, I.; Faro, C. Structure and function of plant aspartic proteinases. Eur. J. Biochem. 2004, 271, 2067–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Bhalerao, R.; Keskitalo, J.; Sterky, F.; Erlandsson, R.; Björkbacka, H.; Birve, S.J.; Karlsson, J.; Gardeström, P.; Gustafsson, P.; Lundeberg, J.; et al. Gene expression in autumn leaves. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 430–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kato, Y.; Murakami, S.; Yamamoto, Y.; Chatani, H.; Kondo, Y.; Nakano, T.; Yokota, A.; Sato, F. The DNA-binding protease, CND41, and the degradation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase in senescent leaves of tobacco. Planta 2004, 220, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Parrott, D.L.; McInnerney, K.; Feller, U.; Fischer, A.M. Steam-girdling of barley (Hordeum vulgare) leaves leads to carbohydrate accumulation and accelerated leaf senescence, facilitating transcriptomic analysis of senescence-associated genes. New Phytol. 2007, 176, 56–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Radlowski, M.; Kalinowski, A.; Adamczyk, J.; Krolikowski, Z.; Bartkowiak, S. Proteolytic activity in the maize pollen wall. Physiol. Plant. 1996, 98, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xia, Y.; Suzuki, H.; Borevitz, J.; Blount, J.; Guo, Z.; Patel, K.; Dixon, R.A.; Lamb, C. An extracellular aspartic protease functions in Arabidopsis disease resistance signaling. EMBO J. 2004, 23, 980–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Breitenbach, H.H.; Wenig, M.; Wittek, F.; Jorda, L.; Maldonado-Alconada, A.M.; Sarioglu, H.; Colby, T.; Knappe, C.; Bichlmeier, M.; Pabst, E.; et al. Contrasting roles of the apoplastic aspartyl protease apoplastic, enhanced disease susceptibility1-dependent1 and legume lectin-like protein1 in Arabidopsis systemic acquired resistance. Plant Physiol. 2014, 165, 791–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Liu, Z.; Ding, Y.; Wang, F.; Ye, Y.; Zhu, C. Role of salicylic acid in resistance to cadmium stress in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2016, 35, 719–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Micheli, F. Pectin methylesterases: Cell wall enzymes with important roles in plant physiology. Trends Plant Sci. 2001, 6, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ramos, I.; Esteban, E.; Lucena, J.J.; Gárate, A. Cadmium uptake and subcellular distribution in plants of Lactuca sp. Cd-Mn interaction. Plant Sci. 2002, 162, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Douchiche, O.; Driouich, A.; Morvan, C. Spatial regulation of cell-wall structure in response to heavy metal stress: Cadmium-induced alteration of the methyl-esterification pattern of homogalacturonans. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wolf, S.; Mouille, G.; Pelloux, J. Homogalacturonan methyl-esterification and plant development. Mol. Plant 2009, 2, 851–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Liu, H.H.; Ma, Y.; Chen, N.; Guo, S.; Liu, H.H.; Guo, X.; Chong, K.; Xu, Y. Overexpression of stress-inducible OsBURP16, the β subunit of polygalacturonase 1, decreases pectin content and cell adhesion and increases abiotic stress sensitivity in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 1144–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Watson, C.F.; Zheng, L.; DellaPenna, D. Reduction of tomato polygalacturonase β subunit expression affects pectin solubilization and degradation during fruit ripening. Plant Cell 1994, 6, 1623–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tucker, G.A.; Robertson, N.G.; Grierson, D. The conversion of tomato-fruit polygalacturonase isoenzyme 2 into isoenzyme 1 in vitro. Eur. J. Biochem. 1981, 115, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Favaron, F.; D’Ovidio, R.; Alghisi, P. Purification and molecular charecterisation of a soybean polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein. Planta 1994, 195, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. De Lorenzo, G.; Ferrari, S. Polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins in defense against phytopathogenic fungi. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002, 5, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Spadoni, S.; Zabotina, O.; di Matteo, A.; Mikkelsen, J.D.; Cervone, F.; de Lorenzo, G.; Mattei, B.; Bellincampi, D. Polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein interacts with pectin through a binding site formed by four clustered residues of arginine and lysine. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 557–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kieffer, P.; Schröder, P.; Dommes, J.; Hoffmann, L.; Renaut, J.; Hausman, J.F. Proteomic and enzymatic response of poplar to cadmium stress. J. Proteom. 2009, 72, 379–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Loix, C.; Huybrechts, M.; Vangronsveld, J.; Gielen, M.; Keunen, E.; Cuypers, A. Reciprocal interactions between cadmium-induced cell wall responses and oxidative stress in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Passardi, F.; Penel, C.; Dunand, C. Performing the paradoxical: How plant peroxidases modify the cell wall. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. McDougall, G.J. Changes in cell wall-associated peroxidases during the lignification of flax fibres. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 3385–3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chaoui, A.; Jarrar, B.; El Ferjani, E. Effects of cadmium and copper on peroxidase, NADH oxidase and IAA oxidase activities in cell wall, soluble and microsomal membrane fractions of pea roots. J. Plant Physiol. 2004, 161, 1225–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Radotic, K.; Ducic, T.; Mutavdzic, D. Changes in peroxidase activity and isoenzymes in spruce needles after exposure to different concentrations of cadmium. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2000, 44, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Luhua, S.; Ciftci-Yilmaz, S.; Harper, J.; Cushman, J.; Mittler, R. Enhanced tolerance to oxidative stress in transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing proteins of unknown function. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 280–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Li, B.; Kamiya, T.; Kalmbach, L.; Yamagami, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Shigenobu, S.; Sawa, S.; Danku, J.M.C.; Salt, D.E.; Geldner, N.; et al. Role of LOTR1 in nutrient transport through organization of spatial distribution of root endodermal barriers. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, 758–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chen, Z.; Yan, W.; Sun, L.; Tian, J.; Liao, H. Proteomic analysis reveals growth inhibition of soybean roots by manganese toxicity is associated with alteration of cell wall structure and lignification. J. Proteomics 2016, 143, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Békésiová, B.; Hraška, Š.; Libantová, J.; Moravčíková, J.; Matušíková, I. Heavy-metal stress induced accumulation of chitinase isoforms in plants. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2008, 35, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bernier, F.; Berna, A. Germins and germin-like proteins: Plant do-all proteins. But what do they do exactly? Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2001, 39, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. The Alfalfa Gene Index and Expression Atlas Dadabase. Available online: http://plantgrn.noble.org/AGED/SearchGene.jsp (accessed on 1 January 2015).
  68. Emanuelsson, O.; Nielsen, H. Predicting subcellular localization of proteins based on their N-terminal amino acid sequence. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 300, 1005–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Duruflé, H.; Clemente, H.; Balliau, T.; Zivy, M.; Dunand, C.; Jamet, E. Cell wall proteome analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana mature stems. Proteomics 2017, 17, 1600449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Armenteros, J.; Sønderby, C.; Sønderby, S.; Nielsen, H.; Winther, O. Deep Loc: prediction of protein subcellular localization using deep learning. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 3387–3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 19 02498 g001 550
Figure 1. PCA analysis of the gel-based spot intensity data from the three cell wall protein-enriched fractions. (A) CaCl2; (B) EGTA; (C) LiCl. Statistical analysis was done with SameSpots software (TotalLab). Blue dots represent the four biological replicates of the control. Pink dots represent the four biological replicates of Cd-exposed samples. Grey and red numbers correspond to spot numbers considered for the statistical analysis.
Figure 1. PCA analysis of the gel-based spot intensity data from the three cell wall protein-enriched fractions. (A) CaCl2; (B) EGTA; (C) LiCl. Statistical analysis was done with SameSpots software (TotalLab). Blue dots represent the four biological replicates of the control. Pink dots represent the four biological replicates of Cd-exposed samples. Grey and red numbers correspond to spot numbers considered for the statistical analysis.
Ijms 19 02498 g001
Ijms 19 02498 g002 550
Figure 2. Functional classification of proteins present in cell wall protein-enriched fractions from M. sativa leaves after long-term exposure to Cd. M. sativa plants were exposed to Cd (10 mg/kg soil DW) for an entire season. Quantitative analysis based on four replicates were done with 2D DIGE comparing Cd-exposed samples to control samples and identified proteins clustered according to their predicted function using Blast2Go. (A) Functional classes of lower abundant proteins; and (B) functional classes of higher abundant proteins.
Figure 2. Functional classification of proteins present in cell wall protein-enriched fractions from M. sativa leaves after long-term exposure to Cd. M. sativa plants were exposed to Cd (10 mg/kg soil DW) for an entire season. Quantitative analysis based on four replicates were done with 2D DIGE comparing Cd-exposed samples to control samples and identified proteins clustered according to their predicted function using Blast2Go. (A) Functional classes of lower abundant proteins; and (B) functional classes of higher abundant proteins.
Ijms 19 02498 g002
Ijms 19 02498 g003 550
Figure 3. Illustration of 2D DIGE from the cell wall protein-enriched CaCl2 fraction from leaves of M. sativa. Extractions were performed in four replicates. Proteins were pre-labelled with different CyDye to enable relative quantitative protein analysis. Labelled samples were loaded onto ImmobilineTM DryStrip 3–10 NL, 24 cm (GE Healthcare) followed by migration on HPETM Large Gel NF-12.5% (Serva Electrophoresis GmbH). Indicated spots were selected for picking based on statistical parameters calculated by the SameSpots software (TotalLab). Images of 2D DIGE from EGTA and LiCl fractions are provided in Figure S1. MW = molecular weight.
Figure 3. Illustration of 2D DIGE from the cell wall protein-enriched CaCl2 fraction from leaves of M. sativa. Extractions were performed in four replicates. Proteins were pre-labelled with different CyDye to enable relative quantitative protein analysis. Labelled samples were loaded onto ImmobilineTM DryStrip 3–10 NL, 24 cm (GE Healthcare) followed by migration on HPETM Large Gel NF-12.5% (Serva Electrophoresis GmbH). Indicated spots were selected for picking based on statistical parameters calculated by the SameSpots software (TotalLab). Images of 2D DIGE from EGTA and LiCl fractions are provided in Figure S1. MW = molecular weight.
Ijms 19 02498 g003
Table
Table 1. Summary of all identified proteins in cell wall protein-enriched fractions from M. sativa leaves, which changed significantly in abundance after long-term Cd exposure. The table is based on all identifications provided in Table S2. The targeted location was predicted with TargetP. C: chloroplast; S: secretory pathway; /: any other location.
Table 1. Summary of all identified proteins in cell wall protein-enriched fractions from M. sativa leaves, which changed significantly in abundance after long-term Cd exposure. The table is based on all identifications provided in Table S2. The targeted location was predicted with TargetP. C: chloroplast; S: secretory pathway; /: any other location.
Protein IdentificationNCBI Identification *Nr. of Spots Wherein the Protein Was IdentifiedTargetP
Lower Abundant in Cd-Exposed Plants
Carbohydrate Metabolic Process
Sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatasegi|3574611431C
Cell wall modification
Pectinesterase/pectinesterase inhibitorgi|3575047993S
Polygalacturonase non-catalytic proteingi|92233597910S
Polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein 1gi|3746344281/
Defence
Cystatingi|740583771/
Nod factor-binding lectin-nucleotide phosphohydrolasegi|3575085874S
Pathogenesis-related thaumatin family proteingi|9223678461S
CAP, cysteine-rich secretory protein, antigen 5gi|3574461611S
Nutrient reserve
Auxin-binding protein ABP19agi|35751396911S
Germin-like protein subfamily 3 member 1gi|5021564241S
Stem 28 kDa glycoproteingi|35751353912S
Oxidation-reduction process
1-cys peroxiredoxin PER1gi|9223957951C
Photosynthesis
Chlorophyll a-b binding protein 2gi|32935551C
Oxygen-evolving enhancer proteingi|9223313716C
Ribose-5-phosphate isomerase Agi|3575122714C
Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small chaingi|39146015C
Photosystem I reaction centre subunit IV Agi|9224025071C
Photosystem II oxygen-evolving enhancer proteingi|9223368911C
Proteolysis
Eukaryotic aspartyl protease family proteingi|9223792886S
Secondary metabolites
Lactoylglutathione lyase-like proteingi|9223886141/
Unknown
Plant/F18G18-200 proteingi|9223952636S
Higher Abundant in Cd-Exposed Plants
Carbohydrate metabolic process
Glucan endo-1,3-β-glucosidasegi|35747406111S
Glycoside hydrolase, family 17gi|872404711/
Glycoside hydrolase family 18 proteingi|3574540313S
Defence
Allergen Pru protein, putativegi|9224019277S
Chitinase (Class Ib)/Heveingi|9223296996S
Chitinase/Hevein/PR-4/Wheatwin2gi|92234723310S
Chitinasegi|3574437534S
Class I chitinasegi|18001415S
Disease resistance response proteingi|9223250152S or/
Pathogenesis-related protein 1gi|5485921S
Pathogenesis-related thaumatin family proteingi|9223380214S
Plant basic secretory protein (BSP) family proteingi|9224075172S
Pre-hevein-like proteingi|73812051/
Stromal 70 kDa heat shock-related proteingi|8215954331C
CAP, cysteine-rich secretory protein, antigen 5gi|3574461617S
Nutrient reserve
Auxin-binding protein ABP19agi|3575139691S
Rhicadhesin receptorgi|3575116652S
Oxidation-reduction process
Anionic peroxidase swpb3 proteingi|9223803111S
Class III peroxidasegi|35747637110S
Peroxidasegi|5373177S
Peroxidase family proteingi|3574484311S
Peroxidase1bgi|9715603S
Peroxidase2gi|1399252810S
Plastocyanin-like domain proteingi|9223350202S
Photosynthesis
Photosystem I reaction centre subunit IIgi|3574808411C
Proteolysis
Carboxyl-terminal peptidasegi|9223363312S
Eukaryotic aspartyl protease family proteingi|92232749714C
Papain family cysteine proteasegi|3574377152S
Polyubiquitingi|6950634256/
Subtilisin-like serine proteasegi|9223331181S
* The given NCBI identification is representative, more than one identifier was assigned to the same protein. A complete protein identification list including all NCBI identification numbers is provided in Table S2.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gutsch, A.; Zouaghi, S.; Renaut, J.; Cuypers, A.; Hausman, J.-F.; Sergeant, K. Changes in the Proteome of Medicago sativa Leaves in Response to Long-Term Cadmium Exposure Using a Cell-Wall Targeted Approach. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2498. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092498

AMA Style

Gutsch A, Zouaghi S, Renaut J, Cuypers A, Hausman J-F, Sergeant K. Changes in the Proteome of Medicago sativa Leaves in Response to Long-Term Cadmium Exposure Using a Cell-Wall Targeted Approach. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(9):2498. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092498

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gutsch, Annelie, Salha Zouaghi, Jenny Renaut, Ann Cuypers, Jean-Francois Hausman, and Kjell Sergeant. 2018. "Changes in the Proteome of Medicago sativa Leaves in Response to Long-Term Cadmium Exposure Using a Cell-Wall Targeted Approach" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 9: 2498. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092498

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop