Next Article in Journal
Cellular and Molecular Targets for Non-Invasive, Non-Pharmacological Therapeutic/Rehabilitative Interventions in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Next Article in Special Issue
Detection of VAMP Proteolysis by Tetanus and Botulinum Neurotoxin Type B In Vivo with a Cleavage-Specific Antibody
Previous Article in Journal
Rheumatoid Arthritis: Pathogenic Roles of Diverse Immune Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Resolution of Two Steps in Botulinum Neurotoxin Serotype A1 Light Chain Localization to the Intracellular Plasma Membrane
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Putative Transposable Element Associated with the Subtype E5 Botulinum Toxin Gene Cluster of Neurotoxigenic Clostridium butyricum Type E Strains from China

1
State Key Laboratory of Pathogens and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing 100071, China
2
Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy
3
National Center for the Control and Evaluation of Medicines, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(2), 906; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020906
Submission received: 6 December 2021 / Revised: 5 January 2022 / Accepted: 11 January 2022 / Published: 14 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Clostridial and Related Neurotoxins)

Abstract

:
Previously, a whole-genome comparison of three Clostridium butyricum type E strains from Italy and the United States with different C. botulinum type E strains indicated that the bont/e gene might be transferred between the two clostridia species through transposition. However, transposable elements (TEs) have never been identified close to the bont/e gene. Herein, we report the whole genome sequences for four neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains that originated in China. An analysis of the obtained genome sequences revealed the presence of a novel putative TE upstream of the bont/e gene in the genome of all four strains. Two strains of environmental origin possessed an additional copy of the putative TE in their megaplasmid. Similar putative TEs were found in the megaplasmids and, less frequently, in the chromosomes of several C. butyricum strains, of which two were neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains, and in the chromosome of a single C. botulinum type E strain. We speculate that the putative TE might potentially transpose the bont/e gene at the intracellular and inter-cellular levels. However, the occasional TE occurrence in the clostridia genomes might reflect rare transposition events.

1. Introduction

Botulism is a disease that affects humans, other mammals, birds and fish. It results from the blockade of neurotransmitter release at the peripheral junctions by the botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT). Of the nine distinct BoNT serotypes that have been identified so far (BoNT/A through H and BoNT/X), BoNT/E is among those that more frequently cause botulism in humans [1].
BoNT/E can be produced by the Clostridium botulinum strains of phylogenetic Group II and atypical strains of neurotoxigenic C. butyricum (phylogenetic Group VI). Clostridia phylogenetic Groups (I through VI) can be considered separate species [2,3].
In Italy, where neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains were originally isolated, those microorganisms have been involved in type E botulism more frequently than C. botulinum strains. Indeed, they have recurrently been recovered from cases of infant and adult intestinal toxemia botulism (a form of botulism resulting from the absorption of BoNT released in the gut by colonizing neurotoxigenic clostridia) and from a suspected case of foodborne botulism due to the ingestion of BoNT in contaminated food [4,5,6,7].
In China, where type E foodborne botulism shows different features from that in other countries because it is more often related to the consumption of contaminated fermented beans and grains rather than contaminated seafood products, as is most frequently the case elsewhere [8], C. butyricum type E strains have been isolated from several outbreaks of foodborne botulism in the 1990s, as well as from the environment [9,10]. It is intriguing that during a more recent investigation of a case of infant botulism in the United Kingdom due to C. butyricum type E infection associated with environmental contamination by pet turtles, the microorganism was also recovered from an open container of turtle feed originally sourced in China [11].
Early genetic studies divided the clinical C. butyricum type E strains isolated in Italy and those recovered in China from clinical and non-clinical (food and environmental) sources into three distinct clonal groups; all strains were shown to carry the bont/e gene in their chromosome and possessed a megaplasmid of sizes ranging from 600 to 800 kb [12,13].
Moreover, based on the bont/e gene sequences, the Italian and Chinese C. butyricum type E strains were predicted to produce two different BoNT/E subtypes, E4 and E5, respectively, differing from each other by 5.1% in amino acid composition [14,15], which is within the 2.6% cut-off value of the amino acid difference required for defining BoNT subtypes [16].
Currently, only three genome sequences are available for as many BoNT/E4-producing C. butyricum strains isolated from infant botulism cases; two in Italy and one in the United States [17,18,19,20]. The genome sequence of the US strain is complete and consists of a chromosome bearing the bont/e gene and two plasmids of 800 and 9 kb [19].
In all three genomes, the bont/e gene is located at the 3′ end of a conserved gene cluster that is flanked by incomplete insertion sequences (ISs’) [17,18,19]. A transposon-associated resolvase (rarA) gene is present downstream of the bont/e gene cluster and the whole genetic region, including the rarA gene, is inserted into a split rarA gene of a genetic lineage different from that of its intact counterpart [17,20]. Similar bont/e gene cluster organization and location in a split chromosomal rarA operon have been observed in several C. botulinum type E strains’ genomes, which suggests that the rarA gene is the target of a possible bont/e gene cluster transposition in different C. butyricum and C. botulinum species [15,17,20].
The purpose of this study was to obtain and compare the whole genome sequences (WGSs) of four Chinese BoNT/E5-producing C. butyricum strains from foodborne botulism outbreaks and environmental sources to better define the genetic diversity in Group VI C. butyricum type E strains and to characterize the composition and organization of their subtype E5 botulinum toxin gene clusters and adjacent regions.
Our results show for the first time the presence of a putative transposable element (TE) at the 3′ end of the bont/e5 gene clusters.

2. Results

2.1. C. butyricum Type E Strains and General Genome Features

Strains LCL 063 and LCL 155 were originally isolated from a clinical sample and fermented soybean paste, respectively, during investigations of distinct foodborne botulism outbreaks in China [9,10,12]. Strains KZ 1886 and KZ 1890 were recovered from soil samples collected from the Weishan Lake area, where type E foodborne botulism outbreaks had occurred [12].
The general features of the WGSs of the four neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E are summarized in Table 1.
The genomes consisted of 4,523,830 to 4,633,810 bp, depending on the strain, with an average GC content of 28.7%, consistent with the low GC content reported for the genus Clostridium [21]. In the genome of the four strains, 4043 to 4232 CDS were identified.
Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) analyses revealed that the 16S rRNA genes of the four isolates showed 99% identity with those of strains of the C. butyricum species, thus confirming that they belong to the C. butyricum species.
The presence of a megaplasmid in each genome sequence was inferred by comparison with the available completed genome sequence of strain CDC 51208, which includes an 820 kb plasmid (pNPD4_2, accession No. CP013238.1). By contrast, the genome sequences generated in this study did not contain any regions showing similarity to the other 9 kb plasmid (pNPD4_1, accession No. CP13240.1) identified in the C. butyricum type E strain CDC 51208 [19], which suggests that the four Chinese C. butyricum type E strains likely do not contain a similar smaller plasmid.
The bont/e gene was confirmed to be located in the chromosomes of strains, as previously indicated by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and Southern blot analyses with specific bont/e gene probes [12,13].
By using the PHAge Search Tool Enhanced Release web server (PHASTER, http://phaster.ca/, accessed on 5 December 2021), the presence of two intact prophages was predicted in all strains, except for strain KZ 1890. Specifically, strain KZ 1886 contained two prophages that exhibited homology with phages infecting C. difficile and Lactococcus. Strains LCL 063 and LCL 155 shared identical prophages that matched the C. difficile phage PhiCD6356 and Paenibacillus virus Lily. Different scaffolds harbored either the prophages or bont/e locus regions, indicating that the prophages and bont/e loci were not physically associated in the three genome sequences.
In addition, the genome annotation by Prokka1.14.6 revealed an enterotoxin gene in each genome sequence generated in this study. The enterotoxin genes showed 100% coverage and 98% to 99% identity with an enterotoxin gene previously identified in the genome sequence of a non-neurotoxigenic C. butyricum strain isolated from a patient with diarrhea [22]. A BLASTN search using this gene sequence as a query revealed a similar enterotoxin gene in the genome sequences of several C. butyricum strains, including the neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E4 strains BL 5262 and Cbu 5521 from Italy and CDC 51208 from the United States, as well as some non-neurotoxigenic C. butyricum strains isolated from infants with necrotizing enterocolitis [23]. Whether this enterotoxin is produced by the neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains and plays a pathogenic role remains to be determined.

2.2. Comparative Genomic Analysis

To evaluate the phylogenetic relationships in the four neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains (LCL 063, LCL 155, KZ 1886 and KZ 1890) and to examine their evolutionary pathway, a phylogenetic tree was built by including in the analysis the genome sequences available in GenBank from three other strains of neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E (CDC 51208, BL 5262, and Cbu 5521), four non-neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains (KNU-L09, CBUT, CFSA3987 and CFSA3989), and a C. botulinum type E strain (Alaska E43). The latter strains were used as references for the respective clostridia species.
All C. butyricum strains clustered together and were grouped into two major clades (Figure 1), one of which (clade 1) included the genomes of the neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains from Italy and the United States while the other (clade 2) consisted of the genomes of the four C. butyricum type E strains from China determined in this study and the non-neurotoxigenic C. butyricum strains. The analysis also confirmed that the clinical and food strains (LCL 063 and LCL 155) were closely related but not identical to the soil strains (KZ 1886 and KZ 1890) [12,13]. As expected, the C. botulinum type E strain Alaska E43 clustered distantly (Figure 1).
Thus, the phylogenetic analysis of the genome sequences revealed that the four neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains from China substantially differed from the C. butyricum type E strains isolated in Italy—as was previously determined by PFGE analyses [12,13]—and from the strain from the United States; by contrast, a closer relationship was found between the four Chinese strain genomes and the genome of non-neurotoxigenic C. butyricum strains from different geographic areas.

2.3. Comparative Analyses of the Bont/e Gene Clusters and Adjacent Regions

The gene organization and structure of the bont/e gene clusters and flanking regions in the four Chinese neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains (LCL 063, LCL 155, KZ 1886 and KZ 1890) are presented in Figure 2.
The ~13 kb bont/e gene clusters were identical in content and arrangement to those in the genome of other BoNT/E-producing clostridia, consisting of the six genes (5′ to 3′) orfX3-orfX2-orfX1 and, in the opposite direction, p47-ntnh-bont/e.
The neurotoxin gene clusters of BoNT/E-producing C. botulinum and C. butyricum strains have been reported to be part of a large gene cassette of ~24 kb that includes six additional conserved genes downstream of the bont/e gene, of which one is an intact rarA gene and the remaining ones are hypothetical genes; this 24 kb gene cassette may be inserted into either a chromosomal rarA gene or a plasmid helicase gene depending on the strain (Figure 2) [17,20].
Accordingly, in the genomes of the four Chinese C. butyricum type E strains in this study, a chromosomal rarA gene was found to be interrupted by an insert region containing the bont/e gene cluster. However, surprisingly, the inserted cassette region was 27 kb (precisely, 26,848 bp) rather than 24 kb, as previously determined in other BoNT/E-producing C. botulinum and C. butyricum strains (Figure 2). The nucleotide sequences of the ~27 kb insert regions carrying the bont/e neurotoxin gene cluster were 100% identical in the four Chinese C. butyricum type E strains.
The analysis of this ~27 kb insert region revealed that it was similar in gene content and arrangement to the ~24 kb insert region described in other BoNT/E-producing clostridia strains [17,20], except for the presence of three additional genes encoding as many different transposases located immediately upstream of the bont/e gene cluster, which is 377-bp bases from the orfX3 gene and accounted for 3087 bp (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Detailed descriptions of the three transposase genes will be provided later in the text.
Using the entire 26,848 bp insert region, related sequences were searched through a BLAST analysis against the database of completely sequenced microbial genomes. The results indicated an 88% coverage rate with 12 completed genomes of BoNT/E-producing strains, including nine C. botulinum type E strains and three strains of neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E (CDC 51208, BL 5262 and Cbu 5521); the sequence encompassing three transposase genes was absent from all covered similarity regions. The most closely related sequence, with a 99.67% identity rate, was found in the plasmid (p12/29) of the C. botulinum type E strain IFR 12/29. A slightly lower identity rate (98.95%) was found in the homologous region in the chromosome of the C. butyricum type E strain CDC 51208, which is nearly identical (coverage 100%, 23760/23761 nucleotide identity) to both homologous regions in the assembled genomes of the Italian C. butyricum type E strains BL 5262 and Cbu 5521.
A fast minimum evolution tree [24] of the insert region sequences from the four Chinese C. butyricum type E strains and additional BoNT/E-producing clostridia is presented in Figure 4.

2.3.1. Bont/e Genes

The bont/e gene (3756 bp) sequences obtained in this study for the Chinese strains (LCL 063, LCL 155, KZ 1886 and KZ 1890) were analyzed using BLAST by query against the nucleotide collection (nr/nt) database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). They were found to be 100% identical to the bont/e5 gene sequences determined previously for the same C. butyricum type E strains [12].
Moreover, the analysis revealed a high coverage (>99%) with 51 sequences, of which 48 were from C. botulinum type E strains and the remaining three were from C. butyricum type E strains (CDC 51208, BL 5256 and Cbu 5521) (Figure S1, Supplementary Materials). The highest identity rate (98.30%) was with the bont/e1 gene sequences of some C. botulinum strains, including those in the plasmids of C. botulinum strains IFR 12/29 and CB 11/1-1. The identity rate with the bont/e4 genes of the C. butyricum strains (CDC 51208, BL 5256 and Cbu 5521) was 97.29%.

2.3.2. RarA Genes

Similarly to other BoNT/E-producing C. butyricum and C. botulinum strains, the C. butyricum type E strains in this study were found to contain two copies of the rarA gene, of which one was split by the insertion of the ~27 kb insert cassette containing the bont/e gene cluster, other genes, and another intact rarA gene (Figure 2). The intact (1245 bp) rarA gene and spliced (reconstructed) (1242 bp) rarA gene sequences of the Chinese strains were quite different from each other, showing only 905/1242 nucleotide identity (72.87%).
A fast minimum evolution tree of the rarA gene sequences from different C. botulinum and C. butyricum type E strains shows that they fall into three clades (Figure 5).
In clade 1, the spliced (reconstructed) rarA gene of the Chinese C. butyricum type E strains shared 100% coverage and identity with an intact rarA gene of the non-neurotoxigenic C. butyricum strains CFSA 3987 and CFSA 3989, both from China. A 99.6% nucleotide identity level (five nucleotides difference) was observed with the spliced (reconstructed) rarA genes in the genomes of the neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains CDC 51208, BL 5256 and Cbu 5521 (Figure 5).
Clade 2 included a class of spliced (reconstructed) rarA genes of the C. botulinum strains Alaska E 43, NCTC 8266 and NCTC 8550, which were similar to the intact rarA genes of C. botulinum type B and F strains Eklund 17 B and 202 F, respectively (Figure 5).
The observed difference between the spliced (reconstructed) rarA genes in clades 1 and 2 confirms that the insertion of the bont/e gene cluster occurred as separate events in the C. butyricum and C. botulinum species, in accordance with previous studies [17].
In clade 3, the intact rarA gene in the 27 kb insert region of the Chinese C. butyricum type E genomes was identical (100% coverage and identity) to the rarA gene sequences in the chromosome of the C. botulinum type E strains Alaska E 43, NCTC 8266 and NCTC 8550, and in the plasmids p12/29, pINGR16-02E1 and pST0210E1 of the C. botulinum type E strains IFR 12/29, INGR16-02E1 and ST0210E1k, respectively. One nucleotide difference (1234/1245 nucleotides, 100% coverage) was observed with the intact rarA gene of the neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains CDC 51208, BL 5256, and Cbu 5521 (Figure 5).
The observation that the intact (inserted) rarA genes of all BoNT/E-producing C. botulinum and C. butyricum strains were almost identical to each other supports the hypothesis of a common source for genetic insert regions [17,20].

2.3.3. Transposase Genes

The genome of the C. butyricum type E strain KZ 1886 contained three transposase genes upstream of the bont/E gene cluster (NODE_1_length_307347) (Figure 6): transposase1 (PIBAPCPA_01466, 1023 bp), transposase2 (PIBAPCPA_01467, 858 bp), and transposase3 (PIBAPCPA_01468, 792 bp). Transposase2 and transposase3 shared 8 bp.
Transposase1 (340 aminoacids) belongs to the IS6 transposase family (K18320) in the KEGG Orthology (KO), and transposase2 (285 aminoacids) and transposase3 (263 amino acids) belong to the ISL3 transposase family (K07485) in the KO.
Two additional transposase genes (PIBAPCPA_00979, 858 bp; PIBAPCPA_00980, 792 bp) showing nucleotide similarities to transposase2 and transposase3, respectively, were also identified in a different scaffold (NODE_67_length_5230) of the genome sequence of strain KZ 1886. The similarity level between PIBAPCPA_01467 and PIBAPCPA_00979 was 84.3% (723/858 nucleotides), whereas the similarity level between PIBAPCPA_01468 and PIBAPCPA_00980 was 80.8% (640/792 nucleotides) (Figure 6).
Likewise, the genome of strain KZ 1890 also included three transposase genes upstream of the bont/E gene cluster (NODE_419_length_3392): transposase1 (HJKLNAAI_03406, 1023 bp), transposase2 (HJKLNAAI_03407, 858 bp), and transposase3 (HJKLNAAI_03408, 792 bp).
In addition, a transposase gene (HJKLNAAI_03980, 858 bp) similar to the transposase2 gene HJKLNAAI_03407 (83.9% identity, 720/858 nucleotides) was present in a different scaffold (NODE_344_length_4393). Another transposase gene showing similarity to the transposase3 gene (HJKLNAAI_03408) was divided into two different scaffolds, NODE_344_length_4393 and NODE_494_length_2643. After manual assembly of this gene, we located it adjacent to the transposase gene (HJKLNAAI_03980) and observed that its nucleotide sequence was highly similar (>99%) to that of the transposase gene PIBAPCPA_00980 of strain KZ 1886.
Finally, the transposase1, transposase2 and transposase3 genes were also identified in the genomes of strains LCL 155 and LCL 063 upstream of the bont/e gene cluster, as in the strains KZ 1886 and KZ 1890. However, no similar transposase genes were found elsewhere in the genomes of those strains (Figure 6).
We then screened the genome sequences of the C. butyricum type E strains CDC 51208, BL 5262 and Cbu 5521 for the presence of transposase genes similar to those identified in the genomes of the Chinese C. butyricum type E strains.
The US C. butyricum type E strain CDC 51208 genome sequence contained no regions with sequences similar to those of any of the three transposase genes of the Chinese strains.
By examining the genome sequence of the Italian C. butyricum type E strain BL 5262, a 1627 bp genetic region comprising two transposase genes similar to transposase2 and transposase3 was detected in the megaplasmid sequence (contig60, 757,653 bp, NZ_ACOM01000001.1), spanning from nucleotides 582337 to 583963. This region shared 99% and 87% similarity levels with the scaffolds (NODE_67_length_5230) and (NODE_1_length_307347) of the genome sequence of strain KZ 1886, which likely corresponded to megaplasmid and chromosomal sequences, respectively. A genetic region identical to that of strain BL 5262 was also found in the genome of the other Italian strain Cbu 5521 (gcontig_1106103650376, 139,815 bp, ABDT01000049.2) spanning from nucleotide 98687 to 100313 (Figure 6).
Furthermore, a similar 1642 bp region containing the transposase2 and transposase3 genes was identified in the megaplasmid (also called chromosome 2) sequence of six non-neurotoxigenic C. butyricum strains (CBUT, 29-1, TK520, TOA, JKY6D1 and KNU-L09) (Figure 6). Those regions shared 99% and 87% similarity with the homologous regions in the megaplasmid and chromosome of strain KZ 1886, respectively. The non-neurotoxigenic C. butyricum strain CBUT contained five additional copies of the transposase2 and transposase3 genetic region, in addition to the copy in the megaplasmid (KDJ93_18275 and KDJ93_18280), dispersed in the chromosome (KDJ93_03675 and KDJ93_03680, KDJ93_03695 and KDJ93_03700, KDJ93_09385 and KDJ93_09390, KDJ93_15250 and KDJ93_15255, and KDJ93_15270 and KDJ93_15275). The six copies of the transposase2 and transposase3 genetic region (1642 bp) were 100% identical to each other. Strain S-45-5 possessed an intact transposase2 gene (DRB99_14020) and an incomplete transposase3 gene (DRB99_14030) in the chromosome (3.81 Mb) (Figure 6).
Concerning the C. botulinum species, the region comprising the transposase2 and transposase3 genes was only identified in the chromosome of the C. botulinum type E strain ATCC 9564, where it was not linked to the bont/e gene cluster. These two transposase genes (ACP51_01210, ACP51_01215) were 100% identical to the transposase2 and transposase3 genes upstream of the bont/e gene cluster in the chromosome of the Chinese neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains.
The chromosomal and plasmid regions containing the transposase2 and transposase3 genes in the Chinese C. butyricum type E strains genome sequences, and those identified in all other analyzed C. butyricum genomes and C. botulinum ATCC 9564 genome, were flanked by inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) similar to each other with only a few nucleotide mutations (Figure S2, Supplementary Materials).
Thus, these findings clearly indicate that the various genetic regions containing the transposase2 and transposase3 genes and surrounded by almost identical ITRs are copies of the same putative TE.
As noted earlier, all four Chinese C. butyricum type E strains analyzed here contained a chromosomal copy of the putative TE which, along with a transposase1 gene, was located upstream of the bont/e gene cluster. Only the soil strains KZ 1886 and KZ 1890 possessed a second copy of the putative TE within the megaplasmid (Figure 6).
Regarding the transposase1 gene, six copies of a gene showing varying similarity levels (99.32–100%) to the one flanking the bont/e gene cluster of the Chinese C. butyricum type E strains were only identified in the genome of the C. botulinum type E strain Beluga, all in CLO.Contig141 (ACSC01000002.1, 3.86 Mb); one of these genes was located upstream of the bont/e gene cluster [17] (Figure 6).

3. Discussion

The four neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains from China that were sequenced in this study are among the rare BoNT-producing strains belonging to species other than C. botulinum. Together with the neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains isolated to date in Italy, India, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States [4,5,6,9,10,11,25,26,27], along with non-neurotoxigenic C. butyricum strains, they form phylogenetic clostridia Group VI.
The comparative analysis of the genome sequences obtained in this study and those available for another three neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains revealed a certain degree of diversity in the BoNT-producing clostridia of Group VI, similar to previous reports for other phylogenetic clostridia groups [28].
The early identification of BoNT/E-producing C. butyricum strains, along with BoNT/F-producing C. barati strains during the 1980s, raised the possibility that bont-encoding genes might be subject to lateral transfer [2].
Over time, bont gene mobility has become increasingly apparent [29], with the latest indirect evidence provided by the findings of putative bont-related genes even in the genome of non-clostridial genera, including Weissella, Enterococcus, Chryseobacterium, Mycobacterium and Actinobacteria [30].
Although the only BoNT producers that have been identified so far are clostridia strains, the possible bont gene transfer to clostridial and even non-clostridial strains is of concern for both public health and biodefense reasons, as BoNT is one of the most poisonous natural substances to humans and animals [31]. Thus, understanding all potential mechanisms underlying bont gene mobilization is important.
From this perspective, WGS analysis has proved to be a powerful tool for predicting bont gene mobility. Regarding the bont/e gene, the results of a WGS analysis of different BoNT/E-producing strains previously suggested that it might be mobile through transposition, even though TEs close to the bont/e gene were never reported, and/or plasmid conjugation [17,20].
Here, for the first time we provide evidence that the bont/e gene cluster of all analyzed Chinese C. butyricum type E strains is preceded at the 5′ end by a putative TE consisting of a genetic region that includes two intact ISL3 transposase genes and flanked at both ends by ITRs. Our WGS data also showed an additional IS6 transposase gene between the putative TE and the bont/e gene cluster.
By searching the available genome sequences, a similar putative TE was only found in the genome of the C. botulinum type E strain ATCC 9564. The genome of another C. botulinum type E strain Beluga contained an IS6 transposase gene upstream of the bont/e gene cluster. These findings reinforce the hypothesis that the bont/e gene of the C. butyricum type E strains might have originated from C. botulinum type E strains through transposition.
TEs, also known as transposons or “jumping genes”, can pick up genomic sequences and by using transposases can allow intracellular and inter-cellular movements of DNA by homologous recombination between similar or identical TEs [32]. The IS6 transposase might be involved in facilitating the integration of TEs at insertion sites.
We identified a second copy of the putative TE in different scaffolds, likely part of the megaplasmid sequence, of the genomes of both soil strains (KZ 1886 and KZ 1890); thus, we hypothesize that, at least in those environmental strains, under certain favorable conditions, the bont/e gene cluster might pass from the chromosome to the megaplasmid and vice versa.
The single copy of the putative TE that was also found within the megaplasmid of several of C. butyricum strains, including the Italian BoNT/E-producing ones, might function as a potential acceptor of the bont/E gene cluster from other strains. However, no bont/e-bearing megaplasmids have yet been identified in C. butyricum strains and curing the megaplasmid of two Italian neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains did not affect the levels of bont/e production [33].
TEs can also be transmitted to other bacteria by the transfer of plasmid DNA [32] but whether the megaplasmids of the C. butyricum strains are conjugable remains unknown.
Finally, the fact that the US strain of neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E CDC 51208 did not carry any copies of the putative TE that we identified in the Chinese C. butyricum type E strains may indicate that the strain has lost it, possibly increasing the stability of the bont/e gene in its genome.Currently, two evolutionary interpretations exist concerning the significance of bont gene acquisition and maintenance in clostridia strains. According to the classic view, bont genes confer an advantage to their clostridia hosts because BoNT production ultimately provides a suitable anaerobic substrate for the spread of clostridia [1]. Recently, a rare chromosomal integration of bont-encoding plasmids has been observed in different clostridia species and has been suggested to facilitate the stable retention of the bont gene in clostridia hosts [34].
By contrast, bont genes could also be regarded as “selfish genes” that tend to propagate themselves in suitable host bacteria, thus persisting over time; in this case, BoNT production would be independent from bacteria proliferation [35].
The findings of our study favor the former hypothesis: in fact, if on one side the identification of a putative TE close to the bont/e gene cluster would support its mobilization within and among bacterial genomes, the presence of putative TE in a few strains of only two clostridia species, C. butyricum and C. botulinum type E, greatly reduces its transfer potential as a selfish gene.
Thus, our results might provide an explanation for the rare isolation of neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strains

The neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains LCL 063, LCL 155, KZ 1886 and KZ 1890 were a kind gift from Professor Shinichi Nakamura of Kanazawa University to Dr Paolo Aureli of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità. Strains were maintained at −80 °C in cryogenic microbank vials (Prolab Diagnostics, Round Rock, TX, USA). Prior to DNA extraction, stock cultures of the strains were transferred to egg yolk agar (EYA) plates and checked for purity after 48 h of incubation at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions (Gas Pack anaerobic jars and AnaeroGen atmosphere generation). The four neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains were confirmed to be positive for the bont/e gene by PCR, as previously described [36].

4.2. DNA Extraction

For DNA extraction, a single colony of each C. butyricum type E strain was selected from EYA plates, inoculated in 9 mL of tryptone–peptone–soy–yeast extract (TPGY) broth, and incubated overnight at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions. Genomic DNA was prepared from 1.5 mL of the overnight TPGY broth cultures of the four strains using the DNEasy Tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions, including a cell lysis step as recommended for Gram-positive bacteria. The quality and quantity of the isolated DNA were estimated using agarose gel electrophoresis and an ultraviolet spectrophotometer.

4.3. Genome Sequencing, Assembly and Annotation

The genomes of strains KZ 1886, KZ 1890, LCL 063 and LCL 155 were sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Softwares Velvet1.2.10 (EMBL-EBI, Cambridge, United Kingdom) and SSPACE-STANDARD-3.0 (Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands) were used to assemble the preprocessed reads, and GapFiller v2.1.1 (University of Udine, Udine, Italy) was used to further fill the gaps. Genome annotation was performed using Prokka1.14.6 (Victorian Bioinformatics Consortium, Carlton, Australia) [37].

4.4. Comparative Genomics

The draft genome sequences generated in this study for each of the four neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E5 strains from China were compared with those publicly available for three neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E4 strains: the Italian strains BL 5262 (accession No. NZ_ACOM00000000.1) and Cbu 5521 (accession No. NZ_ABDT00000000.1) and the US strain CDC 51208 (accession Nos. NZ_CP013239.1; NZ_CP013240.1 and NZ_CP013238.1). The genome sequences of the reference (non-neurotoxigenic) C. butyricum strain KNU-L09 (accession Nos NZ_CP013252.1 and NZ_CP013489.1), CBUT (accession Nos NZ_CP073277.1 and NZ_CP073278.1), CFSA3987 (accession Nos NZ_CP033247.1 and NZ_CP033246.1), CFSA3989 (accession Nos NZ_CP033249.1 and NZ_CP033248.1), and C. botulinum type E strain Alaska E43 (accession No. NZ_CP001078.1) were included in the comparative analyses as representatives of the C. butyricum and C. botulinum species. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between all isolated strains were identified using the kSNP3 software (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA) [38] with the default parameters. The SNPs were used to construct the phylogenetic tree using the maximum likelihood method with RAxML v8.1.6 (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany). A phylogenetic analysis was performed using the maximum likelihood method with RAxML v8.1.6 [39]. The megaplasmid sequences were interfered with by the available closed genome sequence of the neurotoxigenic C. butyricum strain CDC-51208 (820 kb plasmid, pNPD4_2, accession No. CP013238.1).

4.5. Comparative Analyses of the Bont/e Gene Clusters and Adjacent Regions

The contigs obtained through the assembly process for the four neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains were searched through BLAST for the bont/e gene cluster and adjacent genes. A BLAST search with the NCBI nucleotide collection (nr/nt) or whole-genome shotgun contigs (wgs) database was used to identify the homologous bont/e, rarA and transposase genes in other strains.

4.6. Data Deposition

The obtained draft genome sequences were deposited in GenBank with accession Nos: JAJDMT000000000 for strain LCL-155, JAJDMU000000000 for strain LCL-063, JAJDMV000000000 for strain KZ 1890, and JAJDMW000000000 for strain KZ 1886.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23020906/s1.

Author Contributions

T.L. performed comparative genomics and evolutionary analyses and drafted the result section of the manuscript. N.N. performed genome assembly and annotation. A.I. performed bacterial cultures and prepared the DNA samples for WGS. L.Z. contributed to data analysis. H.W. provided technical support for genome sequencing and comparative analysis and critically revised the result section of the manuscript. G.F. conceived the study, contributed to the analysis of the results and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequences generated in this study are available under Genbank accession Nos. JAJDMT000000000; JAJDMU000000000; JAJDMV000000000; and JAJDMW000000000. The sequences can be found at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA770765, accessed on 5 December 2021.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rossetto, O.; Pirazzini, M.; Fabris, F.; Montecucco, C. botulinum neurotoxins: Mechanism of action. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2021, 263, 35–47. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hatheway, C.L. Toxigenic clostridia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1990, 3, 66–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Johnson, E.A. Clostridium botulinum. In Food Microbiology: Fundamentals and Frontiers, 5th ed.; Doyle, M.P., Diez-Gonzalez, F., Hill, C., Eds.; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2019; pp. 487–512. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aureli, P.; Fenicia, L.; Pasolini, B.; Gianfranceschi, M.; McCroskey, L.M.; Hatheway, C.L. Two cases of type E infant botulism caused by neurotoxigenic Clostridium butyricum in Italy. J. Infect. Dis. 1986, 154, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fenicia, L.; Franciosa, G.; Pourshaban, M.; Aureli, P. Intestinal toxaemia botulism in two young people, caused by Clostridium butyricum type E. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1999, 29, 1381–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Fenicia, L.; Da Dalt, L.; Anniballi, F.; Franciosa, G.; Zanconato, S.; Aureli, P. A case of infant botulism due to Clostridium butyricum type E associated with Clostridium difficile colitis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2002, 21, 736–738. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Anniballi, F.; Fenicia, L.; Franciosa, G.; Aureli, P. Influence of pH and temperature on the growth and toxin production by neurotoxigenic strains of Clostridium butyricum type E. J. Food Prot. 2002, 65, 1267–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Fu, S.W.; Wang, C.H. An overview of type E botulism in China. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2008, 21, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meng, X.; Karasawa, T.; Zou, K.; Kuang, X.; Wang, X.; Lu, C.; Wang, C.; Yamakawa, K.; Nakamura, S. Characterization of a neurotoxigenic Clostridium butyricum strain isolated from the food implicated in an outbreak of food-borne type E botulism. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 2160–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Meng, X.; Yamakawa, K.; Zou, K.; Wang, X.; Kuang, X.; Lu, C.; Wang, C.; Karasawa, T.; Nakamura, S. Isolation and characterisation of neurotoxigenic Clostridium butyricum from soil in China. J. Med. Microbiol. 1999, 48, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shelley, E.B.; O’Rourke, D.; Grant, K.; McArdle, E.; Capra, L.; Clarke, A.; McNamara, E.; Cunney, R.; McKeown, P.; Amar, C.F.; et al. Infant botulism due to C. butyricum type E toxin: A novel environmental association with pet terrapins. Epidemiol. Infect. 2015, 143, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, X.; Maegawa, T.; Karasawa, T.; Kozaki, S.; Tsukamoto, K.; Gyobu, Y.; Yamakawa, K.; Oguma, K.; Sakaguchi, Y.; Nakamura, S. Genetic analysis of type E botulinum toxin-producing Clostridium butyricum strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 4992–4997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Franciosa, G.; Scalfaro, C.; Di Bonito, P.; Vitale, M.; Aureli, P. Identification of novel linear megaplasmids carrying a ß-lactamase gene in neurotoxigenic Clostridium butyricum type E strains. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kalb, S.R.; Smith, T.J.; Moura, H.; Hill, K.; Lou, J.; Geren, I.N.; Garcia-Rodriguez, C.; Marks, J.D.; Smith, L.A.; Pirkle, J.L.; et al. The use of Endopep-MS to detect multiple subtypes of botulinum neurotoxins A, B, E, and F. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2008, 278, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Macdonald, T.E.; Helma, C.H.; Shou, Y.; Valdez, Y.E.; Ticknor, L.O.; Foley, B.T.; Davis, S.W.; Hannett, G.E.; Kelly-Cirino, C.D.; Barash, J.R.; et al. Analysis of Clostridium botulinum serotype E strains by using multilocus sequence typing, amplified fragment length polymorphism, variable-number tandem-repeat analysis, and botulinum neurotoxin gene sequencing. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 8625–8634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Peck, M.W.; Smith, T.J.; Anniballi, F.; Austin, J.W.; Bano, L.; Bradshaw, M.; Cuervo, P.; Cheng, L.W.; Derman, Y.; Dorner, B.G.; et al. Historical perspectives and guidelines for botulinum neurotoxin subtype nomenclature. Toxins 2017, 9, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hill, K.K.; Xie, G.; Foley, B.T.; Smith, T.J.; Munk, A.C.; Bruce, D.; Smith, L.A.; Brettin, T.S.; Detter, J.C. Recombination and insertion events involving the botulinum neurotoxin complex genes in Clostridium botulinum types A, B, E and F and Clostridium butyricum type E strains. BMC Biol. 2009, 7, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hassan, K.A.; Elbourne, L.D.; Tetu, S.G.; Johnson, E.A.; Paulsen, I.T. Genome sequence of the neurotoxigenic Clostridium butyricum Strain 5521. Genome Announc. 2014, 2, e00632-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Halpin, J.L.; Hill, K.; Johnson, S.L.; Bruce, D.C.; Shirey, T.B.; Dykes, J.K.; Lúquez, C. Finished whole-genome sequences of Clostridium butyricum toxin subtype E4 and Clostridium baratii toxin subtype F7 strains. Genome Announc. 2017, 5, e01050-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Carter, A.T.; Austin, J.W.; Weedmark, K.A.; Peck, M.W. Evolution of chromosomal Clostridium botulinum type E neurotoxin gene clusters: Evidence provided by their rare plasmid-borne counterparts. Genome Biol. Evol. 2016, 8, 540–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Schleifer, K.H. Phylum XIII. Firmicutes Gibbons and Murray 1978, 5 (Firmacutes [sic] Gibbons and Murray 1978, 5). In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology; De Vos, P., Garrity, G.M., Jones, D., Krieg, N.R., Ludwig, W., Rainey, F.A., Schleifer, K.H., Whitman, W.B., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 19–1317. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kwok, J.S.; Ip, M.; Chan, T.F.; Lam, W.Y.; Tsui, S.K. Draft genome sequence of Clostridium butyricum strain NOR 33234, isolated from an elderly patient with diarrhea. Genome Announc. 2014, 2, e01356-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Cassir, N.; Benamar, S.; La Scola, B. Clostridium butyricum: From beneficial to a new emerging pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2016, 22, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Desper, R.; Gascuel, O. Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on the minimum-evolution principle. J. Comput. Biol. 2002, 9, 687–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chaudhry, R.; Dhawan, B.; Kumar, D.; Bhatia, R.; Gandhi, J.C.; Patel, R.K.; Purohit, B.C. Outbreak of suspected Clostridium butyricum botulism in India. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1998, 4, 506–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Abe, Y.; Negasawa, T.; Monma, C.; Oka, A. Infantile botulism caused by Clostridium butyricum type E toxin. Pediatr. Neurol. 2008, 38, 55–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Dykes, J.K.; Lúquez, C.; Raphael, B.H.; McCroskey, L.M.; Maslanka, S.E. Laboratory investigation of the first case of Clostridium butyricum type E infant botulism in the United States. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 3363–3365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hill, K.K.; Smith, T.J. Genetic diversity within Clostridium botulinum serotypes, botulinum neurotoxin gene clusters and toxin subtypes. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2013, 364, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Nawrocki, E.M.; Bradshaw, M.; Johnson, E.A. Botulinum neurotoxin-encoding plasmids can be conjugatively transferred to diverse clostridial strains. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Poulain, B.; Popoff, M.R. Why are botulinum neurotoxin-producing bacteria so diverse and botulinum neurotoxins so toxic? Toxins 2019, 11, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Arnon, S.S.; Schechter, R.; Inglesby, T.V.; Henderson, D.A.; Bartlett, J.G.; Ascher, M.S.; Eitzen, E.; Fine, A.D.; Hauer, J.; Layton, M.; et al. Botulinum toxin as a biological weapon: Medical and public health management. JAMA 2001, 285, 1059–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Frost, L.S.; Leplae, R.; Summers, A.O.; Toussaint, A. Mobile genetic elements: The agents of open source evolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 722–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Scalfaro, C.; Iacobino, A.; Grande, L.; Morabito, S.; Franciosa, G. Effects of megaplasmid loss on growth of neurotoxigenic Clostridium butyricum strains and botulinum neurotoxin type E expression. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Smith, T.J.; Tian, R.; Imanian, B.; Williamson, C.H.D.; Johnson, S.L.; Daligault, H.E.; Schill, K.M. Integration of complete plasmids containing bont genes into chromosomes of Clostridium parabotulinum, Clostridium sporogenes, and Clostridium argentinense. Toxins 2021, 13, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Benoit, R.M. Botulinum neurotoxin diversity from a gene-centered view. Toxins 2018, 10, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Franciosa, G.; Ferreira, J.L.; Hatheway, C.L. Detection of type A, B, and E botulism neurotoxin genes in Clostridium botulinum and other Clostridium species by PCR: Evidence of unexpressed type B toxin genes in type A toxigenic organisms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1994, 32, 1911–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gardner, S.N.; Slezak, T.; Hall, B.G. kSNP3.0: SNP detection and phylogenetic analysis of genomes without genome alignment or reference genome. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 2877–2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 2688–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. A phylogenetic tree was built by including one strain of C. botulinum type E (Alaska E43), one strain of non-neurotoxigenic C. botulinum type E (KNU-L09), and seven strains of neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E (CDC51208, Cbu5521, BL5262, LCL-063, LCL-155, KZ 1886 and KZ 1890). A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed using the single-nucleotide polymorphisms identified between strains by kSNP3.
Figure 1. A phylogenetic tree was built by including one strain of C. botulinum type E (Alaska E43), one strain of non-neurotoxigenic C. botulinum type E (KNU-L09), and seven strains of neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E (CDC51208, Cbu5521, BL5262, LCL-063, LCL-155, KZ 1886 and KZ 1890). A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed using the single-nucleotide polymorphisms identified between strains by kSNP3.
Ijms 23 00906 g001
Figure 2. Gene arrangement of the DNA cassette containing the bont/e gene cluster. The bont/e gene cluster and flanking regions are indicated for the different strains. Three transposase genes are only present in the four Chinese strains (LCL063, LCL155, KZ 1886 and KZ 1890).
Figure 2. Gene arrangement of the DNA cassette containing the bont/e gene cluster. The bont/e gene cluster and flanking regions are indicated for the different strains. Three transposase genes are only present in the four Chinese strains (LCL063, LCL155, KZ 1886 and KZ 1890).
Ijms 23 00906 g002
Figure 3. DNA insertion site for the 24 or 27 kb DNA cassette containing the bont/e gene cluster. The bont/e gene cluster is inserted into a rarA gene in different neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains. An additional 3078 bp sequence is located immediately upstream of the bont/e gene cluster in the four Chinese C. butyricum type E strains (LCL 063, LCL 155, KZ 1886 and KZ 1890).
Figure 3. DNA insertion site for the 24 or 27 kb DNA cassette containing the bont/e gene cluster. The bont/e gene cluster is inserted into a rarA gene in different neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E strains. An additional 3078 bp sequence is located immediately upstream of the bont/e gene cluster in the four Chinese C. butyricum type E strains (LCL 063, LCL 155, KZ 1886 and KZ 1890).
Ijms 23 00906 g003
Figure 4. Fast minimum evolution trees of the 24 or 27 kb DNA cassette containing the bont/e gene cluster. The analysis included nine strains of C. botulinum type E (FWSKR40E1, FI1111E1, SWKR38E2, IFR12/29, Alaska E43, NCTC 8266, NCTC 8550, INGR16-02E1 and ST0210E1) and seven strains of C. butyricum type E (CDC 51208, Cbu 5521, BL 5262, LCL 063, LCL 155, KZ 1886 and KZ 1890).
Figure 4. Fast minimum evolution trees of the 24 or 27 kb DNA cassette containing the bont/e gene cluster. The analysis included nine strains of C. botulinum type E (FWSKR40E1, FI1111E1, SWKR38E2, IFR12/29, Alaska E43, NCTC 8266, NCTC 8550, INGR16-02E1 and ST0210E1) and seven strains of C. butyricum type E (CDC 51208, Cbu 5521, BL 5262, LCL 063, LCL 155, KZ 1886 and KZ 1890).
Ijms 23 00906 g004
Figure 5. A fast minimum evolution tree of the intact and spliced rarA gene sequences from different C. botulinum and C. butyricum type E strains. Many C. botulinum or C. butyricum strains contain two copies of rarA genes, of which one is intact while the other one is split from the insertion of the bont/e complex genes. Clade 1 is a class of rarA gene homologous to the spliced (reconstructed) rarA gene of Chinese strains. Clade 2 includes the sequences homologous to the spliced rarA gene of C. botulinum E3 strain Alaska E43. Clade 3 is a class of highly homologous rarA genes including the intact rarA genes of Chinese C. butyricum type E strains.
Figure 5. A fast minimum evolution tree of the intact and spliced rarA gene sequences from different C. botulinum and C. butyricum type E strains. Many C. botulinum or C. butyricum strains contain two copies of rarA genes, of which one is intact while the other one is split from the insertion of the bont/e complex genes. Clade 1 is a class of rarA gene homologous to the spliced (reconstructed) rarA gene of Chinese strains. Clade 2 includes the sequences homologous to the spliced rarA gene of C. botulinum E3 strain Alaska E43. Clade 3 is a class of highly homologous rarA genes including the intact rarA genes of Chinese C. butyricum type E strains.
Ijms 23 00906 g005
Figure 6. (A) Schematic diagram of the transposase genes showing the lengths and relative locations of the three transposase genes. (B) Transposase genes (type, position, and copy number) in strains of neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E, non-neurotoxigenic C. butyricum, and neurotoxigenic C. botulinum type E. The blue arrows correspond to transposase2 and transposase3, which make up part of the putative TE.
Figure 6. (A) Schematic diagram of the transposase genes showing the lengths and relative locations of the three transposase genes. (B) Transposase genes (type, position, and copy number) in strains of neurotoxigenic C. butyricum type E, non-neurotoxigenic C. butyricum, and neurotoxigenic C. botulinum type E. The blue arrows correspond to transposase2 and transposase3, which make up part of the putative TE.
Ijms 23 00906 g006
Table 1. General features of the C. butyricum type E genome sequences.
Table 1. General features of the C. butyricum type E genome sequences.
StrainGenome Size
(bp)
G + C Content
(%)
No. of ContigsNo. of Coding SequencesNo. of tRNA Genes
KZ 18864,633,81028.58%152423291
KZ 18904,575,22628.78%986417986
LCL-1554,577,53428.90%227404391
LCL-0634,523,83028.70%473409186
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, T.; Ning, N.; Iacobino, A.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H.; Franciosa, G. Novel Putative Transposable Element Associated with the Subtype E5 Botulinum Toxin Gene Cluster of Neurotoxigenic Clostridium butyricum Type E Strains from China. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020906

AMA Style

Li T, Ning N, Iacobino A, Zhang L, Wang H, Franciosa G. Novel Putative Transposable Element Associated with the Subtype E5 Botulinum Toxin Gene Cluster of Neurotoxigenic Clostridium butyricum Type E Strains from China. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(2):906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020906

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Tao, Nianzhi Ning, Angelo Iacobino, Liangyan Zhang, Hui Wang, and Giovanna Franciosa. 2022. "Novel Putative Transposable Element Associated with the Subtype E5 Botulinum Toxin Gene Cluster of Neurotoxigenic Clostridium butyricum Type E Strains from China" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 2: 906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020906

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop