Next Article in Journal
Experimental Testing of an Approach to Establishing Combined Toxicity of Ternary Nanoparticle Mixtures
Next Article in Special Issue
Advances in Clostridial and Related Neurotoxins
Previous Article in Journal
Microglial FABP4-UCP2 Axis Modulates Neuroinflammation and Cognitive Decline in Obese Mice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel Putative Transposable Element Associated with the Subtype E5 Botulinum Toxin Gene Cluster of Neurotoxigenic Clostridium butyricum Type E Strains from China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 8
10.3390/ijms23084355
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Detection of VAMP Proteolysis by Tetanus and Botulinum Neurotoxin Type B In Vivo with a Cleavage-Specific Antibody

by
Federico Fabris
1,
Petra Šoštarić
2,
Ivica Matak
2,
Thomas Binz
3,
Anna Toffan
4,
Morena Simonato
5,
Cesare Montecucco
1,5,
Marco Pirazzini
1,6,* and
Ornella Rossetto
1,5,6,*
1
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Via Ugo Bassi 58/B, 35131 Padova, Italy
2
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Šalata 11, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
3
Institute of Cellular Biochemistry, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
4
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale dell’Università 10, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
5
Institute of Neuroscience, Italian Research Council, University of Padova, Via Ugo Bassi 58/B, 35131 Padova, Italy
6
Interdepartmental Research Center of Myology CIR-Myo, University of Padova, Via Ugo Bassi 58/B, 35131 Padova, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(8), 4355; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084355
Submission received: 22 March 2022 / Revised: 8 April 2022 / Accepted: 12 April 2022 / Published: 14 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Clostridial and Related Neurotoxins)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tetanus and Botulinum type B neurotoxins are bacterial metalloproteases that specifically cleave the vesicle-associated membrane protein VAMP at an identical peptide bond, resulting in inhibition of neuroexocytosis. The minute amounts of these neurotoxins commonly used in experimental animals are not detectable, nor is detection of their VAMP substrate sensitive enough. The immune detection of the cleaved substrate is much more sensitive, as we have previously shown for botulinum neurotoxin type A. Here, we describe the production in rabbit of a polyclonal antibody raised versus a peptide encompassing the 13 residues C-terminal with respect to the neurotoxin cleavage site. The antibody was affinity purified and found to recognize, with high specificity and selectivity, the novel N-terminus of VAMP that becomes exposed after cleavage by tetanus toxin and botulinum toxin type B. This antibody recognizes the neoepitope not only in native and denatured VAMP but also in cultured neurons and in neurons in vivo in neurotoxin-treated mice or rats, suggesting the great potential of this novel tool to elucidate tetanus and botulinum B toxin activity in vivo.

1. Introduction

Tetanus (TeNT) and Botulinum Neurotoxins (BoNTs) form the large family of Clostridial Neurotoxins (CNT), the deadly bacterial exotoxins made by anaerobic and sporogenic Clostridium species [1]. C. tetani produces one single TeNT, whereas several phylogenetically distinct clostridia, including C. botulinum, butyricum, baratii, and argentinense, produce eight different BoNT serotypes. These toxins are indicated with an alphabetical letter (BoNT/A through/G and BoNT/X) and are further subclassified as subtypes (numerals appended to the serotype) [1,2,3].
CNT display lethal doses in the low ng/kg range, and thus are the most poisonous substances discovered so far [4]. This potency derives from the ability of CNT to enter selectively into nerve terminals and to cleave one (or more) neuronal SNARE (Soluble NSF Attachment protein Receptors) proteins, i.e., VAMP-1/2, SNAP-25 or syntaxin-1A/1B. These three proteins form the heterotrimeric complex, known as the SNARE complex, which is responsible for synaptic vesicle fusion with the presynaptic plasma membrane and neurotransmitter release [5,6]. SNARE cleavage by CNT prevents the formation of the complex or causes its dysfunction, thereby inhibiting neurotransmission.
BoNTs bind to and enter within both motor and autonomic peripheral cholinergic neurons, where they block the release of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, causing the flaccid paralysis of botulism [1,7]. Accordingly, minute amounts of BoNT/A1 are used, with great success and safety, to treat neurological conditions caused by hyperactivity of nerve terminals and in aesthetic medicine [8]. Conversely, TeNT undergoes a retroaxonal transport and it is released within the spinal cord and brain stem, where it blocks neurotransmission of inhibitory interneurons causing excitatory disbalance and spastic paralysis, which is the main symptom of tetanus [9,10,11]. Tetanus can be prevented by a very effective vaccine [9,11], whereas no vaccine has yet been approved for BoNTs, perhaps due to the rarity of botulism and the extensive use of BoNT/A1 in human therapy [12,13].
The metalloprotease activity of CNT against SNARE proteins is sufficient to cause the cardinal symptoms of tetanus and botulism. The identification of VAMP-1/2 as the targets of TeNT and BoNT/B [14] rapidly led to the discovery of the other BoNT substrates, i.e., SNAP-25 for BoNT/A, BoNT/C, and BoNT/E [15,16], and VAMP-1/2 for BoNT/D, BoNT/F, and BoNT/G [17,18,19]. BoNT/C is unique as it also cleaves syntaxin-1A/1B [20], although its toxic effect is primarily due to SNAP-25 proteolysis [21].
Different experimental techniques have been developed to track SNARE cleavage as a readout to monitor CNT activity in cell and neuronal culture [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30], in animal tissues [21,31,32], as well as for CNT detection in biological isolates [33,34,35,36,37,38]. A particularly convenient and versatile method is the use of antibodies against specific portions of VAMP, SNAP-25, or syntaxin, which can be used in cell-based assays via Western blotting [22,24,26,28,39,40,41,42], and by fluorescence microscopy [21,29,31,32,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52].
Depending on the specific antigen used to elicit host immunization, different antibodies recognizing different portions of the SNARE proteins have been developed and detect CNT proteolytic activity very specifically. Some antibodies recognize the intact SNARE protein, and their signal decreases after cleavage [53,54,55]. Other antibodies recognize both the entire and the truncated form of the SNARE protein and are useful to evaluate CNT activity by Western blotting in a ratiometric manner [21,24,40,56,57,58,59,60,61]. Particularly useful are those antibodies recognizing the SNARE protein only after cleavage by a specific toxin because of the development of in vitro detection assays [62,63,64,65] and to track CNT activity in vivo, although this is thus far restricted to the BoNT/A- or BoNT/E-truncated forms of SNAP-25 [21,31,32,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,66,67,68]. These antibodies have the advantage of providing a signal that increases in parallel with the progressive CNT proteolytic activity in tissues where it is ineffective, monitoring a decreasing signal.
Here, we describe the development of a polyclonal antibody specific for segment 77-89 of mouse VAMP-2 (dubbed Ab-VAMP77), which selectively recognizes VAMP-1/2 only after TeNT and BoNT/B cleavage that occurs at the same single site [8,14]. Notably, Ab-VAMP77 detects the proteolytic activity of TeNT and BoNT/B, but not the one elicited by BoNT/D or BoNT/G, in neuronal cultures. More importantly, it raises a robust signal in motor axon terminals at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) after BoNT/B injection and in the brain stem after injection of TeNT. Ab-VAMP77 represents a novel and effective tool to visualize the proteolytic activity of these two toxins in vitro and in vivo.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Generation of the Polyclonal Antibody Specific for TeNT and BoNT/B Cleavage of VAMP

VAMP-1 and -2 are integral proteins with a single transmembrane domain spanning the synaptic vesicle membrane [69,70]. VAMP-1 and VAMP-2 are protein isoforms differing significantly only in the 20 N-terminal residues, and for the remaining part are highly conserved among vertebrate and invertebrate animals [71] (Supplementary Figure S1). This cytosolic portion contains the alpha-helical domain (SNARE motif) that coil-coils with two similar domains of SNAP-25 and one of syntaxin to form the SNARE complex involved in neuroexocytosis (Figure 1A) [5]. All the CNT targeting VAMP cleave single and specific peptide bonds within the SNARE-motif (Figure 1B). TeNT and BoNT/B cleave the identical peptide bond Q78F79 in VAMP-1 and Q76F77 in VAMP-2 (with human VAMP numbering), leaving the truncated form of VAMP on the SV membrane. Notably, due to the high conservation of the two proteins, the same truncated VAMP-1 and VAMP-2 are expected to be generated in all the animal species used in the lab except for the rat and chicken VAMP-1, which are resistant to TeNT and BoNT/B cleavage [8,72] (Figure 1C).
An antibody specific to BoNT/B and TeNT cleaved VAMP, but not to the intact protein, is an invaluable tool for visualizing the action of these toxins in vivo. For this purpose, the peptide FETSAAKLKRKYW-C corresponding to the N-terminus of cleaved VAMP-2 bearing a C-terminal Cysteine was conjugated to Keyhole limpet hemocyanin, used as an immunogenic carrier (Figure 1D,E). The rabbit was immunized and, after boosting injections, scheduled blood samplings were undertaken. Sera were eventually pooled and used for affinity purification. To this end, the C-terminal Cysteine was replaced by biotin for a fast coupling to a streptavidin-agarose resin, which allowed a very fast and efficient affinity purification of the antibody (Supplementary Figure S2).

2.2. Ab-VAMP77 Detects, with High Specificity, TeNT and BoNT/B Cleavage in Primary Neuronal Cultures

Neuronal cultures are widely employed to dissect the mechanism of action of CNTs. In addition, after the identification of SNARE proteins as specific targets of CNTs, TeNT and BoNTs became major tools to study the exo–endocytosis apparatus within neurons, as well as other cell types [8,73]. Moreover, neuronal cultures are used as a screening platform to assess potential CNT inhibitors [12].
A very convenient model to assay the specificity of antibodies in detecting cleavage by TeNT and BoNT/B is Cerebellar Granule Neurons (CGNs), a primary neuronal culture that is highly susceptible to CNTs [68]. We thus intoxicated CGNs for 12 h with four CNTs targeting VAMP: TeNT, BoNT/B, BoNT/D, and BoNT/G, and monitored their protease activity via Western blotting and imaging (Figure 2A). The proteolytic activity of TeNT can be monitored with a VAMP-2 specific commercial antibody that provides a decreasing signal upon cleavage. As shown in Figure 2B, 50 pMolar TeNT causes the complete disappearance of VAMP-2, with 5 pMolar being almost equipotent. At variance, 0.5 and 0.05 pMolar TeNT do not apparently cause a decrease in the signal, indicating that these two concentrations of TeNT are not sufficient to mediate cleavage of VAMP-2. However, when the same samples were stained with Ab-VAMP77, a clear band appeared at 0.5 pMolar and a fainter band was still visible in the 0.05 pMolar sample. This result indicates that Ab-VAMP77, by providing a rising rather than a decreasing signal, is much more sensitive than anti-intact VAMP antibody when detecting the TeNT-mediated VAMP-2 proteolysis. The same enhanced sensitivity is also observed after VAMP-2 cleavage by BoNT/B (Figure 2B). Intact VAMP is not recognized Ab-VAMP77, indicating its selectivity only for cleaved VAMP. This is of fundamental importance for in vivo studies.
We next tested Ab-VAMP77 in neurons treated with BoNT/D or BoNT/G, as they generate two different cleaved-VAMP N-termini containing or not the linear epitope. In fact, BoNT/D cleaves peptide bond K61L62 in VAMP-1, K59L60 in VAMP-2 (human VAMP numbering), upstream of the TeNT-BoNT/B cleavage site and BoNT/G cleaves the A83A84 bond in VAMP-1, A81A82 in VAMP-2 (human numbering) included in the antigenic peptide (Supplementary Figure S3A). BoNT/D is very potent in CGNs and cleaved all the VAMP-2 already at fMolar concentration (Supplementary Figure S3B), while BoNT/G has an activity more similar to BoNT/B and thus required a nMolar range for complete cleavage (Supplementary Figure S3C). In both cases, Ab-VAMP77 did not recognize the truncated VAMPs at any toxin concentration (Supplementary Figure S3B,C), including those causing complete cleavage (Figure 2C).
Comparable results were obtained when VAMP-2 cleavage was monitored by immunostaining. As shown in Figure 2D, control CGNs stained with the antibody against the whole protein displayed the typical punctuate accumulation of VAMP-2 at the level of presynaptic boutons, whilst Ab-VAMP77 did not produce any detectable signal. When treated with increasing concentrations of TeNT and BoNT/B, the signal of intact VAMP-2 progressively faded away (Figure 2E,F), and eventually disappeared almost completely. The antibody against cleaved VAMP displayed the opposite pattern, i.e., it increased proportionally to the concentration of TeNT and BoNT/B. As shown in the insets, the signal remained almost exclusively confined at the level of the puncta, coherently with previous observations reporting that after SNARE cleavage by CNT, synaptic vesicles accumulate at the presynaptic level [22,74,75]. Notably, when the signal given by Ab-VAMP77 was merged with the signal of the residual intact VAMP, the two signals displayed clearly segregated staining (Supplementary Figure S4). This is consistent with the fact that the two antibodies spot distinct and mutually exclusive populations of VAMP-2 corresponding to the intact and the cleaved one. Again, in spite of a complete cleavage of VAMP-2, Ab-VAMP77 was unable to detect VAMP cleavage products after BoNT/D and BoNT/G treatment (Supplementary Figure S3D,E).
Altogether, these results indicate that Ab-VAMP77 can detect the cleavage of VAMP by TeNT and BoNT/B with high specificity and selectivity, which are maintained both when VAMP is denatured as well as when the epitope is fixed and in native conformation, consistent with the fact that the antibody was raised with a linear peptide and that the epitope is sequential rather than conformational. Ab-VAMP77 does not bind intact VAMP. At variance, Gray et al. developed a monoclonal antibody using the same FETSAAKLKRKYW peptide that recognizes TeNT-BoNT/B-cleaved VAMP, but also the intact protein [64]. At the same time, our finding is in agreement with the results obtained by von Berg et al., who developed a monoclonal antibody against a similar, yet shorter, peptide (FETSAAKL) that recognized specifically the cleaved, but not the intact form of VAMP [35]. It is tempting to suggest that our immunization protocol has favored an immune response specific to the very N-terminus of the peptide, raising antibodies that, similarly to that of von Berg et al., are specific to the TeNT-BoNT/B newly generated epitope in VAMP. At variance, Gray et al. might have selected a monoclonal antibody recognizing another part of the peptide, which remains exposed for binding both in intact and TeNT-BoNT/B-cleaved VAMP. Concurrently with this possibility, the Gray et al. antibody fails to detect VAMP after BoNT/G cleavage [64].

2.3. The Antibody against Cleaved VAMP Specifically Detects the Activity of BoNT/B at the Neuromuscular Junction

We next tested whether Ab-VAMP77 can detect BoNT/B activity in vivo within motor axon terminals at the NMJ. For this purpose, we injected a sub-lethal amount of BoNT/B (or saline as a control) between the ears of mice to provide a local intoxication of the Levator Auris Longus (LAL) muscles. LAL muscles originate from the cranial midline and extend toward the external ears, and consist of a few layers of myofibers making them very convenient for NMJ imaging [76,77,78]. After 48 h from the injection, we collected the two LAL and stained one muscle with an antibody recognizing the intact form of VAMP-1, i.e., the major VAMP form expressed at the adult NMJ [55], and the other one with Ab-VAMP77 (Figure 3A). Both samples were also stained with an antibody against the vesicular Acetylcholine Transporter (v-AchT), used as a marker of synaptic vesicles. As expected, LAL muscles injected with saline displayed clear presynaptic staining for intact VAMP-1 that colocalized with v-AchT, but no signal for cleaved-VAMP, indicating that Ab-VAMP77 does not bind intact VAMP-1 in vivo (Figure 3B). Conversely, the LAL muscles injected with BoNT/B displayed very bright and robust staining only with the antibody against cleaved-VAMP and only at the presynaptic level where it completely colocalized with v-AchT (Figure 3C), consistent with the fact that the antibody recognized an epitope associated with the synaptic vesicles. In keeping with the results on cultured CGNs, Ab-VAMP77 failed to recognize VAMP proteolysis operated by both BoNT/D (Figure 3D) and BoNT/G (Figure 3E). Importantly, it also failed to detect BoNT/B activity when injected in rats that, like chickens, express a VAMP-1 resistant to BoNT/B owing to a point mutation at the toxin cleavage site [72] (Supplementary Figure S5). This control experiment, based on a natural knock-in, further proves the high selectivity of Ab-VAMP77 for BoNT/B proteolytic activity in vivo, which is also maintained when the epitope is in its native conformation.

2.4. The Antibody against Cleaved-VAMP Specifically Detects the Activity of TeNT in the Central Nervous System

The strategy to exploit the protease activity as an amplifying factor to track down the tissue distribution of CNT has been instrumental in showing that BoNT/A action also acts in the CNS [79,80,81]. Notably, an antibody recognizing the BoNT/A-cleaved SNAP-25 was widely used to show that, upon intramuscular or subcutaneous injection, the toxin moves from the injection site via intra-axonal retrograde transport, reaching different areas of the CNS in an active form [43,44,45,47,48,50] even two synapses away from the injection site [46]. Therefore, we decided to test whether Ab-VAMP77 can detect the cleavage of VAMP via TeNT in the CNS. We opted for a model of local tetanus generated by injecting a sub-lethal amount of TeNT at the level of the LAL muscles, thereby causing a spastic paralysis confined to the muscles of the ears [11]. Two days after injection, we collected the brain stem and made cryoslices of the facial nucleus. As shown in Figure 4A, Ab-VAMP77 raised a very strong and bright, yet extremely confined staining for cleaved VAMP at the level of the seven dorsomedial and seven ventromedial subnuclei (7DM and 7VM) [82], the areas populated by the motor efferents innervating the LAL muscles. Of note, as shown by the magnification, in this case the signal also appeared as rounded varicosities, once again consistent with staining of presynaptic puncta. Moreover, it was restricted to areas deprived of the staining of intact VAMP-2 with little, if any, colocalization, again indicating that the two antibodies specifically recognize two distinct populations of VAMP. The same experiment performed in rats gave a similar result, although in this case the toxin was injected in the whisker pad and, accordingly, the signal appeared in a different area of the facial nucleus, i.e., the seven lateral and the seven dorsolateral subnuclei (7L and 7DL) [82], where the motor neurons commanding the muscles responsible for whiskers’ movements reside. Notably, in this case the signal also appeared less intense (Figure 4B), probably due to an overall reduced activity of TeNT compared to mice.

3. Conclusions

Clostridial neurotoxins are biochemical scalpels that surgically block neurotransmission at nerve terminals [8,83,84]. Not only the whole toxins, but also their isolated catalytic domains that are genetically expressed, transfected, or microinjected within target cells have been widely used to study the role of specific SNARE proteins in membrane fusion events, in neurons, in other cell types, and even in animal hosts naturally unsusceptible to their uptake [85,86,87,88,89]. Their use associated with modern biotechnologies still represents a reliable, efficient, and definitely convenient method to block neuroexocytosis in several biological systems [90,91]. Among them, TeNT and BoNT/B and their derivatives, which cleave the identical peptide bond in VAMP-1/2/3, are widely used. Here, we generated a polyclonal antibody recognizing the cleaved form of VAMP in a very specific and sensitive manner. This novel biochemical tool can be used both in Western blot and in immunofluorescence on cultured neurons, which we feel safe to extend to virtually any cell type TeNT or BoNT/B can be used on. This antibody can thus be used to image the in vivo proteolytic activity of TeNT and BoNT/B with high specificity using fluorescence microscopy. Compared to a recent report describing the properties of antibodies generated against the same linear epitope used here [64], Ab-VAMP77 does not bind intact VAMP and recognizes, in a very selective manner, the cleaved VAMP generated by TeNT and BoNT/B, but not those generated by other VAMP-cleaving toxins. Such specificity was also reported with a monoclonal antibody used to develop in vitro cleavage-based immunoassays to detect CNT in biological isolates [35], but our work led to the development of an antibody suitable for the detection of VAMP cleavage by BoNT/B at the neuromuscular junction and by TeNT in the central nervous system. This paves the way to future studies aimed at elucidating the action of these two toxins (or of their catalytic subunits) in vivo that was thus far not possible.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Antibodies, Toxins and Reagents

Botulinum Neurotoxins type B, D, and G were produced in E. coli (strain M15pREP4) as fusion proteins with a C-terminal StrepTag and purified on StrepTactin-Superflow matrix (IBA GmbH, Gottingen, Germany) as previously described [21,92]. Tetanus Neurotoxin was purified from C. tetani cultures [93]. Toxins were kept at −80 °C and diluted in complete culture medium for physiological solution plus 0.2% gelatin prior to use. Primary antibodies: anti-VAMP77 was produced in rabbit in this study (see below); anti-VAMP-1 was produced in our laboratory as previously described [32,94]; anti-v-AChT (guinea pig polyclonal 139 105) and anti-VAMP-2 (mouse monoclonal 104 211) were from Synaptic System (Gottingen, Germany). Secondary antibodies for immunofluorescence (anti-mouse, antirabbit, anti-guinea pig) conjugated to Alexa fluorophores were from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Secondary antibodies for Western blotting (anti-mouse, antirabbit) conjugated to HRP were from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA, USA). Where not indicated, reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

4.2. Anticleaved-VAMP Antibody Production and Purification

A New Zealand white rabbit was immunized by subcutaneous injection with the peptide FETSAAKLKRKYWC coupled to KLH [38]. This peptide corresponds to amino acids 77-89 of mouse VAMP-2 with an additional C-terminal cysteine to link the peptide to KLH. Following the primary subcutaneous immunization on day 0, booster intra-muscular injections were performed on days 32 and 60. For each injection, 500 µg of KLH-peptide conjugate were mixed with the non-mineral oil-based adjuvant MontanideTM ISA 763 VG (Seppic, Cedex, France). Rabbit serum was collected on day 120, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until antibody purification.
For purification, 5 mg of peptide FETSAAKLKRKYK-(biotin)-NH2 (Caslo, Copenhagen, Denmark) was mixed with 500 µL of an agarose resin conjugated with Streptavidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. 20,359) and incubated into a disposable polypropylene column (cat. 29,922 from Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) overnight at 4 °C in agitation for peptide–biotin–streptavidin coupling. The next day, the resin was extensively rinsed with PBS and then incubated (overnight at 4 °C) with the immune serum (previously ultracentrifuged for 15 min at 40,000 rpm at 4 °C to eliminate fat and blood cell debris). After overnight incubation, the resin was washed with 10 volumes of PBS. The antibodies were eventually eluted by the addition of 10 volumes (250 uL each) of glycine 0.1 M, pH 3.0. These fractions were collected in tubes containing 50 µL of Tris 1 M pH 7.4 to buffer the glycine solution. Protein concentration was assessed with Nanodrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Aliquots were then stored at −80 °C until use.

4.3. Cerebellar Granules Neurons Cultures

CGNs were prepared from 4–5-day-old rat pups as described in [68]. Cerebella were collected, mechanically disrupted, and enzymatically dissociated with trypsin in presence of DNase I. Cells were then plated in precoated (poly-l-lysine, 50 μg/mL) plastic 24 well plates or cover glasses at a cell density of 4 × 105 or 2 × 105 cells per well, respectively. Cultures were grown for at least 6 days at 37 °C, 5% CO2, BME supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 25 mM KCl, 2 mM glutamine, and 50 μg/mL gentamicin. To block the proliferation of non-neuronal cells, cytosine arabinoside (10 μM) was added to the culture medium 18–24 h after plating.

4.4. Intoxication of CGNs with CNT

Seven days after CGNs preparation, cells were treated with indicated doses of either BoNT/B, BoNT/D, BoNT/G, or TeNT for 12 h in a complete culture medium. Cells plated on plastic were then directly lysed on the wells with Laemmli Sample Buffer (LSB) (Hepes 10 mM, NaCl 150 mM, SDS 1%, EDTA 4 mM, protease and phosphatase inhibitors) supplemented with mercaptoethanol and bromophenol blue, and collected for Western Blot analysis. Cells lysed in LSB were loaded onto NuPage 4–12% Bis-Tris gels for SDS-PAGE electrophoresis in MOPS buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, B0001) and then proteins were transferred onto Protran nitrocellulose membranes and saturated for 1 h in PBS-T (PBS, 0.1% Tween 20) supplemented with 5% non-fat dried milk (PanReac Applichem GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany). Incubation with primary antibodies (intact VAMP-2 1:2000; Ab-VAMP77 1:2000) was performed overnight at 4 °C. Membranes were then washed with PBS-T and incubated at 4 °C with the appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:5000) for 90 min. After extensive washings, signals were revealed with LuminataTM using an Uvitec gel doc system (Uvitec, Cambridge, UK).
CGNs plated on cover glasses were washed with PBS and then fixed in 4% PFA in PBS for 15 min at room temperature for immunofluorescence analysis. PFA was quenched in 50 mM NH4Cl PBS for 15 min. Neurons were then incubated for 3 min using 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for membrane permeabilization. Thereafter, cells were washed with PBS followed by 1 h of saturation (0.5% BSA in PBS) and incubated with primary antibodies (intact VAMP-2 1:200; VAMP77 1:200 diluted in PBS with 3% BSA) overnight at 4 °C. CGNs were then washed with PBS three times and incubated for 2 h at room temperature with appropriate secondary antibodies (1:200 diluted in PBS 3% BSA). After extensive washes with PBS, coverslips were finally mounted using Mounting Medium (Dako; Santa Clara, CA; USA) for fluorescence microscopy inspection.

4.5. Intramuscular Injection of BoNTs and TeNT

CD1 mice weighing 25–30 g were anesthetized with gaseous isoflurane and then injected with a sublethal dose of either BoNT/B (0.2 ng/kg) or BoNT/D (0.01 ng/kg) or BoNT/G (5 ng/kg) or TeNT (2 ng/kg), or vehicle (0.9% NaCl with 0.2% gelatin) at the level of the neck between the LAL muscles. Animals were then checked every 4 h. Mice treated with BoNTs were directly euthanized by cervical dislocation. The LAL muscles were directly collected and immediately fixed in 4% PFA for 30 min at room temperature. TeNT-treated mice were instead intracardiac perfused with PBS and immediately after with 4% PFA, and the brain stem was then collected and post-fixed for 1 h.
For rat experiments, male Wistar Han rats (University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia), 3–4 months old, 350–450 g weights were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (70/7 mg·kg−1 i.p.), and then injected with a sublethal dose of BoNT/B (1 ng/kg) at the level of the gastrocnemius, or TeNT (0.1 ng/kg) in right whisker pad. The contralateral muscles were instead injected with vehicle (0.9% NaCl with saline 0.2% gelatin). After 48 h (BoNT/B) or 7 days (TeNT), rats were intracardiac perfused with PBS and immediately after with 4% PFA in PBS. Brain stems and solei were dissected and post-fixed for 1 h in 4% PFA in PBS.
LAL muscles from mice were used as a whole-mount preparation while the gastrocnemius from rats was separated in bundles of 10–20 myofibers under a dissection microscope.
For immunofluorescence staining, LAL and gastrocnemius muscle bundles were washed with PBS and quenched in 50 mM NH4Cl in PBS for 20 min, then permeabilized and saturated in blocking solution (15% goat serum, 2% BSA, 0.25% gelatine, 0.20% glycine, 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 90 min. The muscles were then incubated with primary antibodies (v-AchT 1:500; intact VAMP-1 1:500; VAMP77 1:500) in blocking solution for 72 h at 4 °C, washed three times in PBS, and incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies (1:200 diluted in PBS 0.5% Triton X-100) for 2 h at room temperature. After extensive washes with PBS, the whole LAL and gastrocnemius bundles were mounted on coverslips using Mounting Medium (Dako) for fluorescence microscopy inspection.
Brain stems were frozen in OCT compound (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA, USA), cryosliced in 30 µm slices and left to dry at least for 12 h. Then, they were quenched in 50 mM NH4Cl in PBS for 20 min, saturated and permeabilized for 1 h in blocking solution, and then added to primary antibodies (intact VAMP-2 1:500; VAMP77 1:500) in blocking solution overnight at 4 °C. Slices were then extensively washed and incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies (1:200 diluted in PBS 0.5% Triton X-100) for 90 min at room temperature. After extensive washes with PBS, slices were mounted on coverslips using Mounting Medium (Dako) for fluorescence microscopy inspection.

4.6. Microscopy

Samples from both neuronal culture and in vivo experiments were analyzed with a Leica SP5 Confocal microscope with a 40× HCX PL APO NA 1.4 oil immersion objective. Laser excitation line, power intensity, and emission range were chosen to minimize signal bleed-through. Laser excitation line, power intensity, and emission range were chosen according to each fluorophore in different samples to minimize bleed-through. Raw images were processed with ImageJ without altering the intensity of the signals.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23084355/s1.

Author Contributions

C.M., O.R., and M.P. conceived the project. F.F., P.Š., and I.M. performed and evaluated the experiments. T.B. produced and purified the recombinant toxins used in this study. A.T. immunized the rabbit and performed the blood sampling. M.P. and O.R. wrote the paper with contributions of C.M. and F.F. Conceptualization: C.M., O.R., and M.P.; methodology: F.F., P.Š., M.S., and I.M.; data curation: F.F., P.Š., and I.M.; original draft preparation: M.P. and O.R.; review and editing: C.M.; funding acquisition: C.M., O.R., and M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the University of Padova with the “Progetto DOR 025271” (M.P.) and “Progetto DOR 205071” (O.R.), and by the Croatian Science Foundation project: HRZZ-UIP-2019-04Fs-8277.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Mice and Rabbits were handled by specialized personnel under the Veterinary Service of the Local Sanitary Service (ULSS 16-Padova) and the local officers of the Italian Ministry of Health. All experiments were performed in accordance with the Italian laws and policies (D.L. n° 26/2014 14 March 2014) and with the guidelines established by the European Community Council Directive n° 2010/63/UE and approved by the ethical committee and by the animal welfare coordinator of the OPBA, University of Padova and IZSV. All procedures are specified in the projects approved by the Italian Ministry of Health (authorization n° 81/2017, n°474/2019, and n° 265/2021). Rats were handled by specialized personnel and in accordance with international ethical directives for work on laboratory animals (Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes) and in accordance with the current Croatian Animal Protection Act (NN 102/17) and the Ordinance on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (NN 55/13 with substitution 39/17 and 116/19).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data are contained in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rossetto, O.; Pirazzini, M.; Montecucco, C. Botulinum neurotoxins: Genetic, structural and mechanistic insights. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 12, 535–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Peck, M.W.; Smith, T.J.; Anniballi, F.; Austin, J.W.; Bano, L.; Bradshaw, M.; Cuervo, P.; Cheng, L.W.; Derman, Y.; Dorner, B.G.; et al. Historical Perspectives and Guidelines for Botulinum Neurotoxin Subtype Nomenclature. Toxins 2017, 9, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Smith, T.; Williamson, C.H.D.; Hill, K.; Sahl, J.; Keim, P.; Relman, D.A.; Collier, R.J. Botulinum Neurotoxin-Producing Bacteria. Isn’t It Time that We Called a Species a Species? mBio 2018, 9, e01469-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Rossetto, O.; Montecucco, C. Tables of Toxicity of Botulinum and Tetanus Neurotoxins. Toxins 2019, 11, 686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Sutton, R.B.; Fasshauer, D.; Jahn, R.; Brunger, A.T. Crystal structure of a SNARE complex involved in synaptic exocytosis at 2.4 A resolution. Nature 1998, 395, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rizo, J. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Neurotransmitter Release. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2022, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Johnson, E.A.; Montecucco, C. Botulism. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2008, 91, 333–368. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pirazzini, M.; Rossetto, O.; Eleopra, R.; Montecucco, C. Botulinum Neurotoxins: Biology, Pharmacology, and Toxicology. Pharmacol. Rev. 2017, 69, 200–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yen, L.M.; Thwaites, C.L. Tetanus. Lancet 2019, 393, 1657–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Popoff, M.R. Tetanus in animals. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2020, 32, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Megighian, A.; Pirazzini, M.; Fabris, F.; Rossetto, O.; Montecucco, C. Tetanus and tetanus neurotoxin: From peripheral uptake to central nervous tissue targets. J. Neurochem. 2021, 158, 1244–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pirazzini, M.; Rossetto, O. Challenges in searching for therapeutics against Botulinum Neurotoxins. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2017, 12, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rao, A.K.; Sobel, J.; Chatham-Stephens, K.; Luquez, C. Clinical Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Botulism, 2021. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2021, 70, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Schiavo, G.; Benfenati, F.; Poulain, B.; Rossetto, O.; Polverino de Laureto, P.; DasGupta, B.R.; Montecucco, C. Tetanus and botulinum-B neurotoxins block neurotransmitter release by proteolytic cleavage of synaptobrevin. Nature 1992, 359, 832–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schiavo, G.; Santucci, A.; Dasgupta, B.R.; Mehta, P.P.; Jontes, J.; Benfenati, F.; Wilson, M.C.; Montecucco, C. Botulinum neurotoxins serotypes A and E cleave SNAP-25 at distinct COOH-terminal peptide bonds. FEBS Lett. 1993, 335, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Blasi, J.; Chapman, E.R.; Link, E.; Binz, T.; Yamasaki, S.; Camilli, P.D.; Sudhof, T.C.; Niemann, H.; Jahn, R. Botulinum neurotoxin A selectively cleaves the synaptic protein SNAP-25. Nature 1993, 365, 160–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schiavo, G.; Shone, C.C.; Rossetto, O.; Alexander, F.C.; Montecucco, C. Botulinum neurotoxin serotype F is a zinc endopeptidase specific for VAMP/synaptobrevin. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 11516–11519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schiavo, G.; Rossetto, O.; Catsicas, S.; Polverino de Laureto, P.; DasGupta, B.R.; Benfenati, F.; Montecucco, C. Identification of the nerve terminal targets of botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A, D, and E. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 23784–23787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schiavo, G.; Malizio, C.; Trimble, W.S.; Polverino de Laureto, P.; Milan, G.; Sugiyama, H.; Johnson, E.A.; Montecucco, C. Botulinum G neurotoxin cleaves VAMP/synaptobrevin at a single Ala-Ala peptide bond. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 20213–20216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Blasi, J.; Chapman, E.R.; Yamasaki, S.; Binz, T.; Niemann, H.; Jahn, R. Botulinum neurotoxin C1 blocks neurotransmitter release by means of cleaving HPC-1/syntaxin. EMBO J. 1993, 12, 4821–4828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zanetti, G.; Sikorra, S.; Rummel, A.; Krez, N.; Duregotti, E.; Negro, S.; Henke, T.; Rossetto, O.; Binz, T.; Pirazzini, M. Botulinum neurotoxin C mutants reveal different effects of syntaxin or SNAP-25 proteolysis on neuromuscular transmission. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Neale, E.A.; Bowers, L.M.; Jia, M.; Bateman, K.E.; Williamson, L.C. Botulinum neurotoxin A blocks synaptic vesicle exocytosis but not endocytosis at the nerve terminal. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 147, 1249–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wictome, M.; Newton, K.A.; Jameson, K.; Dunnigan, P.; Clarke, S.; Gaze, J.; Tauk, A.; Foster, K.A.; Shone, C.C. Development of in vitro assays for the detection of botulinum toxins in foods. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 1999, 24, 319–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Keller, J.E.; Cai, F.; Neale, E.A. Uptake of botulinum neurotoxin into cultured neurons. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 526–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dong, M.; Tepp, W.H.; Johnson, E.A.; Chapman, E.R. Using fluorescent sensors to detect botulinum neurotoxin activity in vitro and in living cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 14701–14706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Nuss, J.E.; Ruthel, G.; Tressler, L.E.; Wanner, L.M.; Torres-Melendez, E.; Hale, M.L.; Bavari, S. Development of cell-based assays to measure botulinum neurotoxin serotype A activity using cleavage-sensitive antibodies. J. Biomol. Screen. 2010, 15, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kiris, E.; Nuss, J.E.; Burnett, J.C.; Kota, K.P.; Koh, D.C.; Wanner, L.M.; Torres-Melendez, E.; Gussio, R.; Tessarollo, L.; Bavari, S. Embryonic stem cell-derived motoneurons provide a highly sensitive cell culture model for botulinum neurotoxin studies, with implications for high-throughput drug discovery. Stem Cell Res. 2011, 6, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Restani, L.; Giribaldi, F.; Manich, M.; Bercsenyi, K.; Menendez, G.; Rossetto, O.; Caleo, M.; Schiavo, G. Botulinum neurotoxins A and E undergo retrograde axonal transport in primary motor neurons. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1003087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pellett, S. Progress in cell based assays for botulinum neurotoxin detection. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2013, 364, 257–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Rust, A.; Doran, C.; Hart, R.; Binz, T.; Stickings, P.; Sesardic, D.; Peden, A.A.; Davletov, B. A Cell Line for Detection of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type B. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Meunier, F.r.A.; Lisk, G.; Sesardic, D.; Dolly, J.O. Dynamics of motor nerve terminal remodeling unveiled using SNARE-cleaving botulinum toxins: The extent and duration are dictated by the sites of SNAP-25 truncation. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2003, 22, 454–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Duregotti, E.; Zanetti, G.; Scorzeto, M.; Megighian, A.; Montecucco, C.; Pirazzini, M.; Rigoni, M. Snake and Spider Toxins Induce a Rapid Recovery of Function of Botulinum Neurotoxin Paralysed Neuromuscular Junction. Toxins 2015, 7, 5322–5336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Barr, J.R.; Moura, H.; Boyer, A.E.; Woolfitt, A.R.; Kalb, S.R.; Pavlopoulos, A.; McWilliams, L.G.; Schmidt, J.G.; Martinez, R.A.; Ashley, D.L. Botulinum neurotoxin detection and differentiation by mass spectrometry. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005, 11, 1578–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Thirunavukkarasu, N.; Johnson, E.; Pillai, S.; Hodge, D.; Stanker, L.; Wentz, T.; Singh, B.; Venkateswaran, K.; McNutt, P.; Adler, M.; et al. Botulinum Neurotoxin Detection Methods for Public Health Response and Surveillance. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2018, 6, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. von Berg, L.; Stern, D.; Pauly, D.; Mahrhold, S.; Weisemann, J.; Jentsch, L.; Hansbauer, E.-M.; Müller, C.; Avondet, M.A.; Rummel, A.; et al. Functional detection of botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A to F by monoclonal neoepitope-specific antibodies and suspension array technology. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Hobbs, R.J.; Thomas, C.A.; Halliwell, J.; Gwenin, C.D. Rapid Detection of Botulinum Neurotoxins-A Review. Toxins 2019, 11, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Caratelli, V.; Fillo, S.; D’Amore, N.; Rossetto, O.; Pirazzini, M.; Moccia, M.; Avitabile, C.; Moscone, D.; Lista, F.; Arduini, F. Paper-based electrochemical peptide sensor for on-site detection of botulinum neurotoxin serotype A and C. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 183, 113210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kegel, B.; Behrensdorf-Nicol, H.A.; Bonifas, U.; Silberbach, K.; Klimek, J.; Krämer, B.; Weisser, K. An in vitro assay for detection of tetanus neurotoxin activity: Using antibodies for recognizing the proteolytically generated cleavage product. Toxicol. In Vitro 2007, 21, 1641–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Whitemarsh, R.C.; Tepp, W.H.; Bradshaw, M.; Lin, G.; Pier, C.L.; Scherf, J.M.; Johnson, E.A.; Pellett, S. Characterization of botulinum neurotoxin a subtypes 1 through 5 by investigation of activities in mice, in neuronal cell cultures, and in vitro. Infect. Immun. 2013, 81, 3894–3902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Whitemarsh, R.C.; Tepp, W.H.; Johnson, E.A.; Pellett, S. Persistence of botulinum neurotoxin a subtypes 1-5 in primary rat spinal cord cells. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zanetti, G.; Azarnia Tehran, D.; Pirazzini, M.; Binz, T.; Shone, C.C.; Fillo, S.; Lista, F.; Rossetto, O.; Montecucco, C. Inhibition of botulinum neurotoxins interchain disulfide bond reduction prevents the peripheral neuroparalysis of botulism. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2015, 98, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zanetti, G.; Mattarei, A.; Lista, F.; Rossetto, O.; Montecucco, C.; Pirazzini, M. Novel Small Molecule Inhibitors That Prevent the Neuroparalysis of Tetanus Neurotoxin. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Antonucci, F.; Rossi, C.; Gianfranceschi, L.; Rossetto, O.; Caleo, M. Long-distance retrograde effects of botulinum neurotoxin A. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 3689–3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Restani, L.; Antonucci, F.; Gianfranceschi, L.; Rossi, C.; Rossetto, O.; Caleo, M. Evidence for Anterograde Transport and Transcytosis of Botulinum Neurotoxin A (BoNT/A). J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 15650–15659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Caleo, M.; Spinelli, M.; Colosimo, F.; Matak, I.; Rossetto, O.; Lackovic, Z.; Restani, L. Transynaptic Action of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A at Central Cholinergic Boutons. J. Neurosci. 2018, 38, 10329–10337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Restani, L.; Novelli, E.; Bottari, D.; Leone, P.; Barone, I.; Galli-Resta, L.; Strettoi, E.; Caleo, M. Botulinum neurotoxin A impairs neurotransmission following retrograde transynaptic transport. Traffic 2012, 13, 1083–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Matak, I. Evidence for central antispastic effect of botulinum toxin type A. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 177, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Matak, I.; Rossetto, O.; Lackovic, Z. Botulinum toxin type A selectivity for certain types of pain is associated with capsaicin-sensitive neurons. Pain 2014, 155, 1516–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Matak, I.; Riederer, P.; Lackovic, Z. Botulinum toxin’s axonal transport from periphery to the spinal cord. Neurochem. Int. 2012, 61, 236–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Matak, I.; Bach-Rojecky, L.; Filipović, B.; Lacković, Z. Behavioral and immunohistochemical evidence for central antinociceptive activity of botulinum toxin A. Neuroscience 2011, 186, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Cai, B.B.; Francis, J.; Brin, M.F.; Broide, R.S. Botulinum neurotoxin type A-cleaved SNAP25 is confined to primary motor neurons and localized on the plasma membrane following intramuscular toxin injection. Neuroscience 2017, 352, 155–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Rhéaume, C.; Cai, B.B.; Wang, J.; Fernández-Salas, E.; Aoki, K.R.; Francis, J.; Broide, R.S. A Highly Specific Monoclonal Antibody for Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A-Cleaved SNAP25. Toxins 2015, 7, 2354–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Pirazzini, M.; Rossetto, O.; Bolognese, P.; Shone, C.C.; Montecucco, C. Double anchorage to the membrane and intact inter-chain disulfide bond are required for the low pH induced entry of tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins into neurons. Cell Microbiol. 2011, 13, 1731–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sun, S.; Suresh, S.; Liu, H.; Tepp, W.H.; Johnson, E.A.; Edwardson, J.M.; Chapman, E.R. Receptor binding enables botulinum neurotoxin B to sense low pH for translocation channel assembly. Cell Host Microbe 2011, 10, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Peng, L.; Adler, M.; Demogines, A.; Borrell, A.; Liu, H.; Tao, L.; Tepp, W.H.; Zhang, S.-C.; Johnson, E.A.; Sawyer, S.L.; et al. Widespread Sequence Variations in VAMP1 across Vertebrates Suggest a Potential Selective Pressure from Botulinum Neurotoxins. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Keller, J.E.; Neale, E.A. The role of the synaptic protein snap-25 in the potency of botulinum neurotoxin type A. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 13476–13482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Keller, J.E.; Neale, E.A.; Oyler, G.; Adler, M. Persistence of botulinum neurotoxin action in cultured spinal cord cells. FEBS Lett. 1999, 456, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Fischer, A.; Mushrush, D.J.; Lacy, D.B.; Montal, M. Botulinum neurotoxin devoid of receptor binding domain translocates active protease. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Pellett, S.; Tepp, W.H.; Clancy, C.M.; Borodic, G.E.; Johnson, E.A. A neuronal cell-based botulinum neurotoxin assay for highly sensitive and specific detection of neutralizing serum antibodies. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 4803–4808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Wang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Dong, M.; Sun, S.; Chapman, E.R.; Jackson, M.B. Syntaxin requirement for Ca2+-triggered exocytosis in neurons and endocrine cells demonstrated with an engineered neurotoxin. Biochemistry 2011, 50, 2711–2713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Pier, C.L.; Chen, C.; Tepp, W.H.; Lin, G.; Janda, K.D.; Barbieri, J.T.; Pellett, S.; Johnson, E.A. Botulinum neurotoxin subtype A2 enters neuronal cells faster than subtype A1. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Jones, R.G.; Ochiai, M.; Liu, Y.; Ekong, T.; Sesardic, D. Development of improved SNAP25 endopeptidase immuno-assays for botulinum type A and E toxins. J. Immunol. Methods 2008, 329, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wild, E.; Bonifas, U.; Klimek, J.; Trösemeier, J.H.; Krämer, B.; Kegel, B.; Behrensdorf-Nicol, H.A. In vitro potency determination of botulinum neurotoxin B based on its receptor-binding and proteolytic characteristics. Toxicol. In Vitro 2016, 34, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Gray, B.; Cadd, V.; Elliott, M.; Beard, M. The in vitro detection of botulinum neurotoxin-cleaved endogenous VAMP is epitope-dependent. Toxicol. In Vitro 2018, 48, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Mechaly, A.; Diamant, E.; Alcalay, R.; Ben David, A.; Dor, E.; Torgeman, A.; Barnea, A.; Girshengorn, M.; Levin, L.; Epstein, E.; et al. Highly Specific Monoclonal Antibody Targeting the Botulinum Neurotoxin Type E Exposed SNAP-25 Neoepitope. Antibodies 2022, 11, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Costantin, L.; Bozzi, Y.; Richichi, C.; Viegi, A.; Antonucci, F.; Funicello, M.; Gobbi, M.; Mennini, T.; Rossetto, O.; Montecucco, C.; et al. Antiepileptic Effects of Botulinum Neurotoxin E. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Coelho, A.; Oliveira, R.; Rossetto, O.; Cruz, C.D.; Cruz, F.; Avelino, A. Intrathecal administration of botulinum toxin type A improves urinary bladder function and reduces pain in rats with cystitis. Eur. J. Pain 2014, 18, 1480–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Azarnia Tehran, D.; Pirazzini, M. Preparation of Cerebellum Granule Neurons from Mouse or Rat Pups and Evaluation of Clostridial Neurotoxin Activity and Their Inhibitors by Western Blot and Immunohistochemistry. Bio-Protocol 2018, 8, e2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Trimble, W.S.; Cowan, D.M.; Scheller, R.H. VAMP-1: A synaptic vesicle-associated integral membrane protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 4538–4542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Baumert, M.; Maycox, P.R.; Navone, F.; De Camilli, P.; Jahn, R. Synaptobrevin: An integral membrane protein of 18,000 daltons present in small synaptic vesicles of rat brain. EMBO J. 1989, 8, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Südhof, T.C.; Baumert, M.; Perin, M.S.; Jahn, R. A synaptic vesicle membrane protein is conserved from mammals to Drosophila. Neuron 1989, 2, 1475–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Patarnello, T.; Bargelloni, L.; Rossetto, O.; Schiavo, G.; Montecucco, C. Neurotransmission and secretion. Nature 1993, 364, 581–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Rossetto, O.; Seveso, M.; Caccin, P.; Schiavo, G.; Montecucco, C. Tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins: Turning bad guys into good by research. Toxicon 2001, 39, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mellanby, J.; Beaumont, M.A.; Thompson, P.A. The effect of lanthanum on nerve terminals in goldfish muscle after paralysis with tetanus toxin. Neuroscience 1988, 25, 1095–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hunt, J.M.; Bommert, K.; Charlton, M.P.; Kistner, A.; Habermann, E.; Augustine, G.J.; Betzt, H. A post-docking role for synaptobrevin in synaptic vesicle fusion. Neuron 1994, 12, 1269–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Juzans, P.; Comella, J.X.; Molgo, J.; Faille, L.; Angaut-Petit, D. Nerve terminal sprouting in botulinum type-A treated mouse levator auris longus muscle. Neuromuscul. Disord. NMD 1996, 6, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Comella, J.X.; Molgo, J.; Faille, L. Sprouting of mammalian motor nerve terminals induced by in vivo injection of botulinum type-D toxin and the functional recovery of paralysed neuromuscular junctions. Neurosci. Lett. 1993, 153, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Negro, S.; Lessi, F.; Duregotti, E.; Aretini, P.; La Ferla, M.; Franceschi, S.; Menicagli, M.; Bergamin, E.; Radice, E.; Thelen, M.; et al. CXCL12alpha/SDF-1 from perisynaptic Schwann cells promotes regeneration of injured motor axon terminals. EMBO Mol. Med. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mazzocchio, R.; Caleo, M. More than at the neuromuscular synapse: Actions of botulinum neurotoxin A in the central nervous system. Neurosci. Rev. J. Bringing Neurobiol. Neurol. Psychiatry 2015, 21, 44–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Caleo, M.; Schiavo, G. Central effects of tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins. Toxicon 2009, 54, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Matak, I.; Lackovic, Z. Botulinum toxin A, brain and pain. Prog. Neurobiol. 2014, 119-120, 39–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Paxinos, G.; Keith, B.J.; Franklin, M. Paxinos and Franklin’s the Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  83. Binz, T. Clostridial neurotoxin light chains: Devices for SNARE cleavage mediated blockade of neurotransmission. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2013, 364, 139–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Schiavo, G.; Matteoli, M.; Montecucco, C. Neurotoxins affecting neuroexocytosis. Physiol. Rev. 2000, 80, 717–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Lang, J.; Regazzi, R.; Wollheim, C.B. Clostridial Toxins and Endocrine Secretion: Their Use in Insulin-Secreting Cells. In Bact. Toxins; WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co: Weinheim, Germany, 1997; pp. 217–240. [Google Scholar]
  86. Eisel, U.; Reynolds, K.; Riddick, M.; Zimmer, A.; Niemann, H.; Zimmer, A. Tetanus toxin light chain expression in Sertoli cells of transgenic mice causes alterations of the actin cytoskeleton and disrupts spermatogenesis. EMBO J. 1993, 12, 3365–3372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sweeney, S.T.; Broadie, K.; Keane, J.; Niemann, H.; O’Kane, C.J. Targeted expression of tetanus toxin light chain in Drosophila specifically eliminates synaptic transmission and causes behavioral defects. Neuron 1995, 14, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Pasti, L.; Zonta, M.; Pozzan, T.; Vicini, S.; Carmignoto, G. Cytosolic calcium oscillations in astrocytes may regulate exocytotic release of glutamate. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Yamamoto, M.; Wada, N.; Kitabatake, Y.; Watanabe, D.; Anzai, M.; Yokoyama, M.; Teranishi, Y.; Nakanishi, S. Reversible Suppression of glutamatergic neurotransmission of cerebellar granule cells in vivo by genetically manipulated expression of tetanus neurotoxin light chain. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 6759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Hilton, B.J.; Husch, A.; Schaffran, B.; Lin, T.-c.; Burnside, E.R.; Dupraz, S.; Schelski, M.; Kim, J.; Müller, J.A.; Schoch, S.; et al. An active vesicle priming machinery suppresses axon regeneration upon adult CNS injury. Neuron 2022, 110, 51–69.e57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Liu, Q.; Sinnen, B.L.; Boxer, E.E.; Schneider, M.W.; Grybko, M.J.; Buchta, W.C.; Gibson, E.S.; Wysoczynski, C.L.; Ford, C.P.; Gottschalk, A.; et al. A Photoactivatable Botulinum Neurotoxin for Inducible Control of Neurotransmission. Neuron 2019, 101, 863–875.e866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Rummel, A.; Mahrhold, S.; Bigalke, H.; Binz, T. The HCC-domain of botulinum neurotoxins A and B exhibits a singular ganglioside binding site displaying serotype specific carbohydrate interaction. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 51, 631–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Schiavo, G.; Montecucco, C. Tetanus and botulism neurotoxins: Isolation and assay. Methods Enzym. 1995, 248, 643–652. [Google Scholar]
  94. Rossetto, O.; Gorza, L.; Schiavo, G.; Schiavo, N.; Scheller, R.H.; Montecucco, C. VAMP/synaptobrevin isoforms 1 and 2 are widely and differentially expressed in nonneuronal tissues. J. Cell Biol. 1996, 132, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 23 04355 g001 550
Figure 1. Generation of the Ab-VAMP77 antibody. (A) Scheme showing the three SNARE proteins involved in neuroexocytosis that form the SNARE complex by coil-coiling their SNARE motifs, one from the vesicular VAMP-1/2 (blue), two from the membrane-anchored SNAP-25 (pink), and one from the integral membrane protein syntaxin-1A/1B (red). (B) Scheme showing the peptide bonds cleaved by the VAMP-specific CNT used in this study, which generate specific new N-termini to VAMP (shown is human VAMP-2). (C) Alignment of VAMP-1/2 showing that the FETSAAKLKRKYW peptide (pink) exposed by BoNT/B and TeNT is in all the main animal species used in research. The green residues indicate cleavage sites of TeNT and BoNT/B in VAMP-1 and VAMP-2. Red residues indicate the mutation responsible for VAMP-1 resistance to TeNT and BoNT/B in rat and chicken. (D) Scheme showing the generation of immunogenic carrier by chemical conjugation of the C-terminal Cysteine to the Keyhole limpet Hemocyanin. (E) the peptide-KLH complex was injected into a rabbit, and at the scheduled time point the blood was collected for the ensuing purification of peptide-specific IgGs.
Figure 1. Generation of the Ab-VAMP77 antibody. (A) Scheme showing the three SNARE proteins involved in neuroexocytosis that form the SNARE complex by coil-coiling their SNARE motifs, one from the vesicular VAMP-1/2 (blue), two from the membrane-anchored SNAP-25 (pink), and one from the integral membrane protein syntaxin-1A/1B (red). (B) Scheme showing the peptide bonds cleaved by the VAMP-specific CNT used in this study, which generate specific new N-termini to VAMP (shown is human VAMP-2). (C) Alignment of VAMP-1/2 showing that the FETSAAKLKRKYW peptide (pink) exposed by BoNT/B and TeNT is in all the main animal species used in research. The green residues indicate cleavage sites of TeNT and BoNT/B in VAMP-1 and VAMP-2. Red residues indicate the mutation responsible for VAMP-1 resistance to TeNT and BoNT/B in rat and chicken. (D) Scheme showing the generation of immunogenic carrier by chemical conjugation of the C-terminal Cysteine to the Keyhole limpet Hemocyanin. (E) the peptide-KLH complex was injected into a rabbit, and at the scheduled time point the blood was collected for the ensuing purification of peptide-specific IgGs.
Ijms 23 04355 g001
Ijms 23 04355 g002 550
Figure 2. The Ab-VAMP77 polyclonal antibody detects VAMP-1/2 cleavage by TeNT and BoNT/B in neuronal culture with high efficiency and toxin selectivity. (A) Scheme showing the experimental readout used to evaluate the specificity of Ab-VAMP77 in rat CGNs. (B) Representative Western blotting showing the high sensitivity of Ab-VAMP77 compared to a conventional antibody at low TeNT (left) and BoNT/B (right) concentrations. The NC samples are control neurons not treated with any toxin. (C) Representative Western blotting showing that Ab-VAMP77 binds only to a cleaved fragment of VAMP specifically generated by BoNT/B and TeNT, but not by BoNT/D nor BoNT/G. (D) Control CGNs showing the typical punctuate pattern (inset) of VAMP-2 (green) staining at presynaptic level, and no signal for Ab-VAMP77 in the absence of TeNT or BoNT/B treatment. (E,F) Immunofluorescence analysis showing that at increasing concentration of TeNT (E) or BoNT/B (F) the signal of intact VAMP-2 (green) fades away, whereas the signal of Ab-VAMP77 (red) progressively increases yet maintains the typical punctuate pattern (insets) in both cases. Scale bars in (D–F) are 100 µm.
Figure 2. The Ab-VAMP77 polyclonal antibody detects VAMP-1/2 cleavage by TeNT and BoNT/B in neuronal culture with high efficiency and toxin selectivity. (A) Scheme showing the experimental readout used to evaluate the specificity of Ab-VAMP77 in rat CGNs. (B) Representative Western blotting showing the high sensitivity of Ab-VAMP77 compared to a conventional antibody at low TeNT (left) and BoNT/B (right) concentrations. The NC samples are control neurons not treated with any toxin. (C) Representative Western blotting showing that Ab-VAMP77 binds only to a cleaved fragment of VAMP specifically generated by BoNT/B and TeNT, but not by BoNT/D nor BoNT/G. (D) Control CGNs showing the typical punctuate pattern (inset) of VAMP-2 (green) staining at presynaptic level, and no signal for Ab-VAMP77 in the absence of TeNT or BoNT/B treatment. (E,F) Immunofluorescence analysis showing that at increasing concentration of TeNT (E) or BoNT/B (F) the signal of intact VAMP-2 (green) fades away, whereas the signal of Ab-VAMP77 (red) progressively increases yet maintains the typical punctuate pattern (insets) in both cases. Scale bars in (D–F) are 100 µm.
Ijms 23 04355 g002
Ijms 23 04355 g003 550
Figure 3. The Ab-VAMP77 polyclonal antibody detects VAMP cleavage by BoNT/B at the neuromuscular junction. (A) Scheme showing the staining of the two LAL muscles collected after injection of either saline or BoNT/B (top panel) or of either BoNT/D or BoNT/G (bottom panel) and the following immunostaining of one LAL with an antibody against intact VAMP-1 (top panels) or with the Ab-VAMP77 antibody (bottom panels). In both cases, the muscles were also stained for the vesicular protein marker v-AchT. (B–E) Representative images of whole-mount LAL muscles injected with either saline (B) or BoNT/B (C) or BoNT/D (D) or BoNT/G (E) stained for intact VAMP-1 (red in top panels) or cleaved VAMP (red in bottom panels). The right panels of each condition show the merge with v-AchT (green). Scale bar = 25 μm.
Figure 3. The Ab-VAMP77 polyclonal antibody detects VAMP cleavage by BoNT/B at the neuromuscular junction. (A) Scheme showing the staining of the two LAL muscles collected after injection of either saline or BoNT/B (top panel) or of either BoNT/D or BoNT/G (bottom panel) and the following immunostaining of one LAL with an antibody against intact VAMP-1 (top panels) or with the Ab-VAMP77 antibody (bottom panels). In both cases, the muscles were also stained for the vesicular protein marker v-AchT. (B–E) Representative images of whole-mount LAL muscles injected with either saline (B) or BoNT/B (C) or BoNT/D (D) or BoNT/G (E) stained for intact VAMP-1 (red in top panels) or cleaved VAMP (red in bottom panels). The right panels of each condition show the merge with v-AchT (green). Scale bar = 25 μm.
Ijms 23 04355 g003
Ijms 23 04355 g004 550
Figure 4. The Ab-VAMP77 polyclonal antibody detects VAMP cleavage by TeNT in the brain stem. The TeNT was injected either at the level of the LAL in the mouse (A) or at the level of the whisker pad in rats (B) and then the cleavage of VAMP was evaluated in the brain stem with an antibody against intact VAMP-2 (green) and Ab-VAMP77 (red). The bottom panels in (A,B) show a magnification of the white-squared area. Scale bar = 40 μm.
Figure 4. The Ab-VAMP77 polyclonal antibody detects VAMP cleavage by TeNT in the brain stem. The TeNT was injected either at the level of the LAL in the mouse (A) or at the level of the whisker pad in rats (B) and then the cleavage of VAMP was evaluated in the brain stem with an antibody against intact VAMP-2 (green) and Ab-VAMP77 (red). The bottom panels in (A,B) show a magnification of the white-squared area. Scale bar = 40 μm.
Ijms 23 04355 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fabris, F.; Šoštarić, P.; Matak, I.; Binz, T.; Toffan, A.; Simonato, M.; Montecucco, C.; Pirazzini, M.; Rossetto, O. Detection of VAMP Proteolysis by Tetanus and Botulinum Neurotoxin Type B In Vivo with a Cleavage-Specific Antibody. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4355. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084355

AMA Style

Fabris F, Šoštarić P, Matak I, Binz T, Toffan A, Simonato M, Montecucco C, Pirazzini M, Rossetto O. Detection of VAMP Proteolysis by Tetanus and Botulinum Neurotoxin Type B In Vivo with a Cleavage-Specific Antibody. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(8):4355. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084355

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fabris, Federico, Petra Šoštarić, Ivica Matak, Thomas Binz, Anna Toffan, Morena Simonato, Cesare Montecucco, Marco Pirazzini, and Ornella Rossetto. 2022. "Detection of VAMP Proteolysis by Tetanus and Botulinum Neurotoxin Type B In Vivo with a Cleavage-Specific Antibody" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 8: 4355. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084355

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop