Next Article in Journal
Differential Cytotoxicity of Curcumin-Loaded Micelles on Human Tumor and Stromal Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vitro/In Vivo Translation of Synergistic Combination of MDM2 and MEK Inhibitors in Melanoma Using PBPK/PD Modelling: Part I
Previous Article in Journal
cd1 Mutation in Drosophila Affects Phenoxazinone Synthase Catalytic Site and Impairs Long-Term Memory
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of a Sensitive Screening Method for Simultaneous Determination of Nine Genotoxic Nitrosamines in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients by GC-MS
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 20
10.3390/ijms232012360
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effects of Genistein at Different Concentrations on MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells and BJ Dermal Fibroblasts

by
Magda Aleksandra Pawlicka
*,
Szymon Zmorzyński
,
Sylwia Popek-Marciniec
and
Agata Anna Filip
Department of Cancer Genetics with Cytogenetic Laboratory, Medical University of Lublin, Radziwiłłowska 11 Street, 20-080 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(20), 12360; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012360
Submission received: 31 August 2022 / Revised: 26 September 2022 / Accepted: 13 October 2022 / Published: 15 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Strategies in the Development of New Therapies, Drug Substances and Drug Carriers 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aimed to evaluate the safety and potential use of soy isoflavones in the treatment of skin problems, difficult-to-heal wounds and postoperative scars in women after the oncological treatment of breast cancer. The effects of different concentrations of genistein as a representative of soy isoflavonoids on MCF-7 tumor cells and BJ skin fibroblasts cultured in vitro were assessed. Genistein affects both healthy dermal BJ fibroblasts and cancerous MCF-7 cells. The effect of the tested isoflavonoid is closely related to its concentration. High concentrations of genistein destroy MCF-7 cancer cells, regardless of the exposure time, with a much greater effect on reducing cancer cell numbers at longer times (48 h). Lower concentrations of genistein (10 and 20 μM) increase the abundance of dermal fibroblasts. However, higher concentrations of genistein (50 μM and higher) are detrimental to fibroblasts at longer exposure times (48 h). Our studies indicate that although genistein shows high potential for use in the treatment of skin problems, wounds and surgical scars in women during and after breast cancer treatment, it is not completely safe. Introducing isoflavonoids to treatment requires further research into their mechanisms of action at the molecular level, taking into account genetic and immunological aspects. It is also necessary to conduct research in in vivo models, which will allow for eliminating adverse side effects of therapy.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer is a malignant tumor of the mammary gland originating from epithelial tissue and is also the most common malignant tumor in women [1]. In 2020, female breast cancer surpassed lung cancer as the most commonly diagnosed cancer, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases (11.7% of total cancers) [2]. Depending on the type of cancer, stage of the disease and patient’s condition, different treatment methods are applied [3,4]. The most used method is local or radical surgery supplemented with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy [5]. There are also trials of novel treatments with fewer side effects, e.g., photodynamic therapy [6]. Although these methods show great promise, at this point they are rarely used due to the high cost of therapy. Modern medicine allows for breast reconstructive surgery, which can be performed during subtraction surgery or at another time [7]. However, regardless of the decision made by the surgeon and the patient, surgery is usually followed by an extensive scar. A complementary treatment used to eliminate the remaining cancer cells can also adversely affect postoperative wound healing and proper scar formation, which is not only an aesthetic defect but can also impede mobility and be painful. Therefore, it is essential to implement as soon as possible a therapy supporting these two processes [8]. Several preparations are available for the treatment of scars, but few of them have been sufficiently tested for safety in oncology patients. Many active substances can potentially stimulate ongoing tumorigenesis in tissues, but there is a lack of scar treatment products that would be safe for oncological patients but effective at the same time.
Soy isoflavonoids are classified as phytoestrogens, plant equivalents of female hormones [9,10]. Soy phytoestrogens, especially genistein and daidzein, in their structure and action resemble the female hormone estradiol [11]. Therefore, applied topically, they could bind to estrogen receptors in the skin and thus show a direct effect on the changes occurring in its cells [12,13]. The action of phytoestrogens on the skin and wound healing has been supported by numerous studies [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. These compounds primarily affect the production of collagen, elastin and hyaluronic acid [23]. They also show strong soothing and anti-inflammatory properties. As flavonoid substances are characterized by strong anti-free solid radical properties, they also inhibit the activity of enzymes from the metalloproteinase class (MMP-1 and MMP-3), which are activated under the influence of UV radiation. Metalloproteinase MMP-1 breaks down collagen fibers, whereas MMP-3 breaks down the proteins responsible for proper communication between the epidermis and the dermis [33].
The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and potential use of soy isoflavones in the treatment of skin problems, difficult-to-heal wounds and postoperative scars in women after oncological treatment of breast cancer. Therefore, a study was conducted to analyze the effects of different concentrations of genistein, as a representative of soy isoflavonoids, on MCF-7 cancer cells and BJ dermal fibroblasts.

2. Results

Figure 1 and Figure 2 show the cytotoxic effects of genistein at different concentrations after 24 h and 48 h on tumor cells MCF-7 and non-tumor cells BJ in MTT test. After 24 h of treatment, genistein was cytotoxic for MCF-7 cells in concentrations over 80 μM and for BJ cells at its highest concentration (200 μM). It could also be observed that genistein at lower concentrations stimulated fibroblast growth. Treatment with genistein 50, 80, 100, 150 and 200 μM for 48 h, induced cytotoxicity in both non-tumor BJ and tumor MCF-7 cells.
Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the influence of different concentrations of genistein after 24 h or 48 h on apoptosis of tumor MCF-7 cells and non-tumor BJ cells. After 24 h, among MCF-7 tumor line, apoptotic cells are observed at concentration as low as 20 μM. At genistein concentrations of 50 μM and higher, a reduction in the number of viable cells is observed. Among the cells of the non-tumor BJ line, apoptotic cells are observed only at a concentration of 150 μM. At lower concentrations of genistein, an increased number of viable fibroblasts can be observed. After 48 h incubation of MCF-7 cells with genistein, apoptosis and a significant decrease in the number of viable cells is observed from a concentration of 20 μM. For this exposure time, the BJ fibroblast population is reduced already at genistein concentrations of 50 μM.
Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the impact of different concentrations of genistein on viability of tumor MCF-7 cells and non-tumor BJ cells. A reduction in the number of MCF-7 tumor cells above the genistein 20 μM concentration was observed at both exposure times. In the fibroblast population, at 24 h genistein exposure, a decrease in cell number was observed only at a concentration of 150 and 200 μM. When BJ line cells were incubated with genistein for 48 h, a significant decrease in population size was observed as low as 50 μM concentration.
Gene expression analysis showed that all genistein concentrations resulted in change of all gene expression (Figure 7). Genistein at a concentration of 20 μM also strongly stimulated the expression of the MKI67 in the MCF-7 line and mildly stimulated its expression in fibroblasts. The highest concentration of genistein negatively affected the expression of the MKI67 in both tumor cells and dermal fibroblasts. Genistein at concentrations of 10 and 20 μM increased BIRC5 gene expression in the BJ line, while at the highest concentration, it strongly decreased it. The lowest concentration of phytoestrogen also increased the expression of the BIRC5 gene in the tumor line, while concentrations of 20 and 50 μM decreased it. The lowest concentration of genistein strongly stimulated AKT1 expression in the BJ line, while the other concentrations resulted in decreased expression. All concentrations of genistein decreased AKT1 expression, with a decreasing expression in proportion to increasing concentrations. It was observed that genistein increased BCL2 expression in fibroblasts at all concentrations, with the strongest at a concentration of 10 μM. The lowest concentration of the phytoestrogen gently increased the expression of the analyzed gene, while the other concentrations caused a decrease.

3. Discussion

The tests performed clearly indicate that genistein affects both healthy dermal BJ fibroblasts and cancerous MCF-7 cells. The effect of the tested isoflavonoid is closely related to its concentration. The authors’ study indicates that high concentrations of genistein destroy MCF-7 cancer cells, regardless of the exposure time, with a much greater effect reduces cancer cell numbers at longer times (48 h). Lower concentrations of genistein (10 and 20 μM) increase the abundance of dermal fibroblasts. However, higher concentrations of genistein (50 μM and higher) prove to be detrimental to fibroblasts at longer exposure times (48 h).
The results of the MCF-7 cell assay are in line with those of Kabała et al., who used two cancer lines, MCF-7 and MDA-MV-231 in their research. The conducted study showed a high dose-dependent effect in cell viability assays. The IC50 value was 47.5 μM for genistein. Isoflavonoid-induced apoptosis was dose- and time-dependent for both cell lines, with isoflavonoids being more active on MCF-7 cells [34].
Choi also conducted similar studies et al. When MCF-7 cells were treated with 50, 100, 150 and 200 μM of genistein for 24, 48 or 72 h, cell growth was significantly decreased in a concentration-dependent manner. After 48 h of treatment with 50 μM genistein, genistein-induced apoptosis features were observed in MCF-7. This observation is based on the finding that the expression of B-cell lymphoma protein 2 (Bcl-2) was decreased, whereas the expression of Bcl-2-related X protein (Bax) was induced by genistein. BCL2 gene family includes genes associated with regulation of apoptosis; BCL2 protein itself acts as antiapoptotic factor, while BAX is proapoptotic one [34]. The results of their study suggested that the induction of apoptosis by genistein was associated with the modulation of estrogen receptor-α (ERα) and cyclin D1 expression, which resulted in the inhibition of MCF-7 cells proliferation [35].
An important problem in the use of isoflavonoids in cancer therapy turns out to be the maximum physiological concentrations of the tested compounds. This problem was addressed by Tsuboy et al., who found that the maximum concentration of genistein that can be achieved in tissues is 30 μM [36]. Tsuboy et al. also determined that only supraphysiological levels of Gen (50 and 100 μM) were cytotoxic to these cell lines; concentrations of 10 and 25 μM did not induce apoptosis or significant changes in the expression of the genes. Positive results were found only in cell cycle analysis: G0/G1. Therefore, despite the lack of induction of apoptosis, genistein at physiologically relevant serum concentrations still exerts chemopreventive effects through cell cycle modulation [36].
The use of soy isoflavonoids for skin problems after cancer treatment therefore requires studies on lower concentrations of genistein. Uifălean at al. conducted such a study and showed that at relatively low concentrations (1.56–13.06 µM), genistein stimulated the cell growth of MCF-7, in contrast with control, while higher concentrations of this compound had an inhibitory effect. The inhibitory effects of genistein are due to various molecular mechanisms: high doses of isoflavones (typically > 20 µM Gen) have been shown to stimulate apoptosis, inhibit cell proliferation and survival, and have antioxidant and angiogenesis inhibitory effects in breast cancer cells. In the present authors’ study, the MTT assay indicated mild stimulation of tumor cell proliferation at a genistein concentration of 10 μM [37]. Therefore, the safest achievable systemic concentration of genistein that will have a beneficial effect on wound healing and scar formation after cancer treatment while at the same time not stimulating cancer cells may be 20 μM.
There are several papers in which authors have analyzed the molecular mechanisms and basic signaling pathways involved in both the stimulatory and inhibitory effects of genistein [37,38,39,40,41,42]. Lavigne et al. analyzed gene expression patterns in MCF-7 line cells treated with physiological (1 and 5 μM) and pharmacological (25 μM) concentrations of genistein. Studies using oligonucleotide microarrays showed that genistein alters the expression of genes belonging to a broad spectrum of pathways, including the estrogen pathway and the p53 pathway. TP53 gene encodes proteins that are important for DNA damage repair and apoptosis. At doses of 1 and 5 μM, genistein induced an expression pattern suggestive of increased mitogenic activity, confirming the proliferative response to genistein observed in the MCF-7 cell cultures we conducted, while at a dose of 25 μM, genistein induced a pattern that likely contributes to increased apoptosis, decreased proliferation and reduced total cell number [38], which is also consistent with the cell culture results I obtained.
In their study, Sreenivasa et al. showed that genistein inhibits the growth of MCF-7 cell line in a dose-dependent manner. The genistein-induced growth inhibition is accompanied by a reduction in the number of mitotic cells and overexpression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF1, leading to cell cycle arrest. In addition, telomere length was significantly reduced in genistein-treated cancer cells. The analysis of a number of apoptosis-related genes showed the inhibition of Akt activity without affecting the level of Akt protein expression, as well as decreased expression of the pro-apoptotic gene BAD. The expression of one of the genes belonging to this group, AKT1, was also analyzed in our study. AKT1 is one of 3 closely related serine/threonine-protein kinases (AKT1, AKT2 and AKT3) called the AKT kinase, which regulate many processes including metabolism, proliferation, cell survival, growth, and angiogenesis. This is mediated through serine and/or threonine phosphorylation of a range of downstream substrates. The results of our study suggest a reduction in its expression at all tested genistein concentrations. Based on our own and other authors’ results, we can conclude that the inhibition of cell division by genistein is mediated in part by a decrease in telomere length, a decrease in mitotic divisions and inhibition of Akt activation, leading to the induction of apoptosis [39].
The antiproliferative effect of genistein on MCF-7 cells and the molecular mechanisms involved in this effect were also analyzed by Prietsch et al. Their study showed that genistein induced phosphatidylserine externalization and LC3A/B immunopositivity in MCF-7 cells, indicating apoptosis and cell death by autophagy. Genistein increased the proapoptotic BAX/Bcl-2 ratio threefold and induced a 20-fold reduction in anti-apoptotic survivin (BIRC-5). The reduced expression of the BIRC-5 gene was also consistent with our analysis [40].
Chen et al. found that genistein inhibited MCF-7 cell proliferation and induced cell apoptosis through the inactivation of IGF-1R and p-Akt and decreased the Bcl-2/Bax protein ratio. These results suggest that genistein inhibited cell proliferation by inactivating the IGF-1R-PI3 K/Akt pathway and reducing mRNA and protein expression of Bcl-2/Bax [41,42].

4. Materials and Methods

The MCF-7 human breast cancer cells, media, trypsin and DMSO were purchased from the ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA), respectively, for use in the present study. BJ human skin fibroblasts were a gift from the Department of Synthesis and Chemical Technology of Medicinal Products in Medical University of Lublin. All plasticware used for cell culture were purchased from Sarsted (Nümbrecht, Germany). Insulin, Genistein, Trypan Blue Solution and Annexin V-Cy3TM Apoptosis Detection Kit were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). The Antibiotic-Antimycotic was purchased from Thermo-Fisher (Waltham, MA, USA). The Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) was purchased form Biomed. The Cell Proliferation Kit (MTT) was purchased from Roche Diagnostics GmbH (Hong Kong, China), respectively. Genistein was dissolved in DMSO (final concentration of 0.1% in medium).
The MCF-7 human breast cancer cells and BJ human skin fibroblasts were maintained in The Department of Cancer Genetics of Medical University in Lublin. The MCF-7 cells were cultured in EMEM (Eagle’s medium), supplemented with 10% FBS, human recombinant insulin (0.01 mg/mL) and antibiotics (50 U/mL penicillin and 50 μg/mL streptomycin). The BJ cells were cultured in EMEM (Eagle’s medium), supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics (10,000 U/mL of penicillin, 10,000 µg/mL of streptomycin, and 25 µg/mL of Gibco Amphotericin B). Both of cultures were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.
Cytotoxicity was examined using MTT assay. Cells were plated at 2.5–5 × 105 cells/well in a 96-well tissue culture plate and incubated for 24 h following which they were exposed to genistein solutions at concentrations of 10, 20, 50, 80, 100, 150 and 200 μM and DMSO solutions at concentration of 10% and 15%. Following incubation for 24 and 48 h, the plated cells were incubated with MTT (final concentration 0.5 mg/mL) for 4 h at 37 °C. Then the Solubilization solution was added into each well (100 μL). The plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C, 5% CO2, so that the complete dissolution of formazan was achieved. The absorbance of MTT formazan was determined at 570 nm using a microplate ELISA reader.
The apoptosis was detected using Annexin V-Cy3TM Apoptosis Detection Kit. Cells were plated at 0.5–1.0 × 106 cells/ml on Petri dishes and incubated for 24 h following witch they were exposed to genistein solutions at concentrations of 10, 20, 50, 80 and 100 μM and DMSO solution at concentration of 10%. Following incubation for 24 h, cells were washed three times using binding buffer solution. Then, double label staining solution (AnnCy3 and 6-CFDA) was added to Petri dishes covered in aluminum foil. Cells were incubated for 10 min at room temperature and washed five times with binding buffer to remove excess label from the cells. Following that, the binding buffer was added to the cells and the dishes were covered with a coverslip and observed under a florescence microscope, using the correct filter and light source, and then photographed.
To quantify the percentage of cells that underwent apoptosis, a trypan blue assay was additionally performed. Cells were plated at 0.5–1.0 × 106 cells/ml on Petri dishes and incubated for 24 h after which they were exposed to genistein solutions at concentrations of 10, 20, 50, 80 and 100 μM and DMSO solution at a of 10%. Following incubation for 24 h, the cells were detached from the plates with trypsin solution. An equal amount of trypan blue was added to the cell pellet and incubated for 2 min at room temperature. The suspension was then applied to a primary slide, covered with a coverslip and observed under the microscope. The number of dead stained cells per 100 total cells was then calculated.
Expression of EGFR, BCL2, MKI7, BIRC5 and AKT1 genes was measured using SYBR Green PCR Mastermix (Thermo Scientific), in duplicate in 96-well plates using the 7500 Real-Time PCR System from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA, USA). The results were then analyzed using the 7500 System software (Applied Biosystems). Each reaction was normalized to GAPDH reporter gene expression, and relative expression was calculated using the ΔΔCt method [43]. The sequences of the primers used are listed in Table 1.

5. Conclusions

Our studies indicate that despite the high potential of genistein for use in the treatment of skin problems, wounds, and surgical scars in women during and after breast cancer treatment, it cannot be recognized as totally safe. Soy isoflavonoids are substances with very high biological activity, so their introduction into treatment requires further studies on their mechanisms of action at the molecular level considering genetic and immunological aspects. It is also necessary to conduct studies in in vivo models. This will allow for the elimination of possible side effects due to adverse effects on the body or therapy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.P.; Data curation, M.A.P.; Formal analysis, M.A.P.; Funding acquisition, A.A.F.; Investigation, M.A.P.; Methodology, A.A.F., S.Z. and S.P.-M.; Project administration, M.A.P.; Resources, S.Z., S.P.-M. and A.A.F.; Software, S.Z. and S.P.-M.; Supervision, A.A.F.; Visualisation, M.A.P.; Writing—original draft, M.A.P.; Writing—review & editing, A.A.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting and reported results available at e-mail address [email protected].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Makki, J. Diversity of Breast Carcinoma: Histological Subtypes and Clinical Relevance. Clin. Med. Insights Pathol. 2015, 8, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Health Estimates 2020: Deaths by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region, 2000–2019. 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates/ghe-leading-causes-of-death (accessed on 16 October 2021).
  3. Krzemieniecki, K.; Komorowski, K.; Wysocki. Interna Szczeklika. Podręcznik Chorób Wewnętrznych; Medycyna praktyczna: Cracow, Poland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Krzakowski, M.; Potemski, P.; Warzocha, K. Onkologia kliniczna tom 2; Via Medica: Gdansk, Poland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  5. McDonald, E.; Clark, A.; Tchou, J.; Zhang, P.; Freedman, G. Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Breast Cancer. J. Nucl. Med. Febr. 2016, 57, 9S–16S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Gamal, H.; Tawfik, W.; Fahmy, H.M.; El-Sayyad, H.H. Breakthroughs of using Photodynamic Therapy and Gold Nanoparticles in Cancer Treatment. In Proceedings of the 021 IEEE International Conference on Nanoelectronics, Nanophotonics, Nanomaterials, Nanobioscience & Nanotechnology (5NANO), Kottayam, Kerala, India, 29–30 April 2021; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Somogyi, R. Breast reconstruction. Can. Fam. Physician 2018, 64, 424–432. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gass, J.; Mitchell, S.; Hanna, M. How do breast cancer surgery scars impact survivorship? Findings from a nationwide survey in the United States. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Jabłońska, B.; Brańka, J.; Lampe, P. Od Halsteda do leczenia oszczędzającego, czyli krótka historia chirurgii raka gruczołu piersiowego. Postępy Nauk. Med. 2011, 1, 29–32. [Google Scholar]
  10. Křížová, L.; Dadáková, K.; Kašparovská, J.; Kašparovský, T. Isoflavoes. Molecules 2019, 24, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Kim, Y.M.; Huh, J.S.; Lim, Y.; Cho, M. Soy Isoflavone Glycitin (4′-Hydroxy-6-Methoxyisoflavone-7-D-Glucoside) Promotes Human Dermal Fibroblast Cell Proliferation and Migration via TGF-β Signaling. Phytother. Res. 2015, 29, 757–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Czerpak, R.; Pietryczuk, A.; Jabłońska-Trypuć, A.; Obrębska, K. Aktywność biologiczna izoflawonoidów i ich znaczenie terapeutyczne i kosmetyczne. Borgis. Postępy Fitoter. 2009, 2, 113–121. [Google Scholar]
  13. Irrera, N.; Pizzino, G.; D’Anna, R.; Vaccaro, M.; Arcoraci, V.; Squadrito, F.; Altavilla, D.; Bittol, A. Dietary Management of Skin Health: The Role of Genistein. Nutrients 2017, 9, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Chin, G.S.; Liu, W.; Steinbrech, D.; Hsu, M.; Levinson, H.; Longaker, M.T. Cellular signaling by tyrosine phosphorylation in keloid and normal human dermal fibroblasts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2000, 106, 1532–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cao, C.; Li, S.; Dai, X.; Chen, Y.; Feng, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, J. Genistein inhibits proliferation and functions of hypertrophic scar fibroblasts. Burns 2009, 35, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jurzak, M.; Adamczyk, K.; Antończak, P.; Garncarczyk, A.; Kuśmierz, D.; Latocha, M. Evaluation of genistein ability to modulate CTGF mRNA/protein expression, genes expression of TGFβ isoforms and expression of selected genes regulating cell cycle in keloid fibroblasts in vitro. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2014, 71, 972–986. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Jurzak, M.; Adamczyk, K. Influence of genistein on c-Jun, c-Fos and Fos-B of AP-1 subunits expression in skin keratinocytes, fibroblasts and keloid fibroblasts cultured in vitro. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2013, 70, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Sienkiewicz, P.; Surazyński, A.; Pałka, J.; Miltyk, W. Nutritional concentration of genistein protects human dermal fibroblasts from oxidative stress-induced collagen biosynthesis inhibition through IGF-I receptor-mediated signaling. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2008, 65, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Park, E.; Lee, S.M.; Jung, I.K.; Lim, Y.; Kim, J.H. Effects of genistein on early-stage cutaneous wound healing. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 410, 514–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Emmerson, E.; Campbell, L.; Ashcroft, G.S.; Hardman, M.J. The phytoestrogen genistein promotes wound healing by multiple independent mechanisms. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2010, 321, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Marini, H.; Polito, F.; Altavilla, D.; Irrera, N.; Minutoli, L.; Calò, M.; Adamo, E.B.; Vaccaro, M.; Squadrito, F.; Bitto, A. Genistein aglycone improves skin repair in an incisional model of wound healing: A comparison with raloxifene and oestradiol in ovariectomized rats. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2010, 160, 1185–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Polito, F.; Marini, H.; Bitto, A.; Irrera, N.; Vaccaro, M.; Adamo, E.B.; Micali, A.; Squadrito, F.; Minutoli, L.; Altavilla, D. Genistein aglycone, a soy-derived isoflavone, improves skin changes induced by ovariectomy in rats. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 165, 994–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kloska, A.; Jakóbkiewicz-Banecka, J.; Narajczyk, M.; Banecka-Majkutewicz, Z.; Węgrzyn, G. Effects of flavonoids on glycosaminoglycan synthesis: Implications for substrate reduction therapy in Sanfilippo disease and other mucopolysaccharidoses. Metab. Brain Dis. 2011, 26, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Isoherranen, K.; Punnonen, K.; Jansen, C.; Uotila, P. Ultraviolet irradiation induces cyclooxygenase-2 expression in keratinocytes. Br. J. Dermatol. 1999, 140, 1017–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Iovine, B.; Iannella, M.L.; Gasparri, F.; Monfrecola, G.; Bevilacqua, M.A. Synergic Effect of Genistein and Daidzein on UVB-Induced DNA Damage: An Effective Photoprotective Combination. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011, 2011, 692846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wang, Y.N.; Wu, W.; Chen, H.C.; Fang, H. Genistein protects against UVB-induced senescence-like characteristics in human dermal fibroblast by p66Shc down-regulation. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2010, 58, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kessel, B. Alternatives to estrogen for menopausal women. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1998, 217, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Izumi, T.; Saito, M.; Obata, A.; Arii, M.; Yamaguchi, H.; Matsuyama, A. Oral intake of soy isoflavone aglycone improves the aged skin of adult women. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. Tokyo 2007, 53, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Silva, L.A.; Ferraz Carbonel, A.A.; de Moraes, A.R.B.; Simões, R.S.; Sasso, G.R.D.S.; Goes, L.; Nunes, W.; Simões, M.J.; Patriarca, M.T. Collagen concentration on the facial skin of postmenopausal women after topical treatment with estradiol and genistein: A randomized double-blind controlled trial. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2017, 33, 845–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Patriarca, M.T.; Barbosa de Moraes, A.R.; Nader, H.B.; Petri, V.; Martins, J.R.; Gomes, R.C.; Soares, J.M., Jr. Hyaluronic acid concentration in postmenopausal facial skin after topical estradiol and genistein treatment: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial of efficacy. Menopause 2013, 20, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Moraes, A.B.; Haidar, M.A.; Soares Júnior, J.M.; Simões, M.J.; Baracat, E.C.; Patriarca, M.T. The effects of topical isoflavones on postmenopausal skin: Double-blind and randomized clinical trial of efficacy. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2009, 146, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wei, H.; Saladi, R.; Lu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Palep, S.R.; Moore, J.; Phelps, R.; Shyong, E.; Lebwohl, M.G. Isoflavone genistein: Photoprotection and clinical implications in dermatology. J. Nutr. 2003, 133 (Suppl. 1), 3811S–3819S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Sharifi-Rad, J.; Quispe, C.; Imran, M.; Rauf, A.; Nadeem, M.; Gondal, T.A.; Ahmad, B.; Atif, M.; Mubarak, M.S.; Sytar, O. Genistein: An Integrative Overview of Its Mode of Action, Pharmacological Properties, and Health Benefits. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 3268136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kabała-Dzik, A.; Rzepecka-Stojko, A.; Kubina, R.; Iriti, M.; Wojtyczka, R.D.; Buszman, E.; Stojko, J. Flavonoids, bioactive components of propolis, exhibit cytotoxic activity and induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7—A comparative study. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2018, 64, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Choi, E.J.; Jung, J.Y.; Kim, G.H. Genistein inhibits the proliferation and differentiation of MCF-7 and 3T3-L1 cells via the regulation of ERα expression and induction of apoptosis. Exp. Ther. Med. 2014, 8, 454–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Tsuboy, M.S.; Marcarini, J.C.; de Souza, A.O.; de Paula, N.A.; Dorta, D.J.; Mantovani, M.S.; Ribeirol, L.R. Genistein at Maximal Physiologic Serum Levels Induces G0/G1 Arrest in MCF-7 and HB4a Cells, But Not Apoptosis. J. Med. Food. 2014, 17, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Uifălean, A.; Schneider, S.; Gierok, P.; Ionescu, C.; Iuga, C.A.; Lalk, M. The Impact of Soy Isoflavones on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells Using a Global Metabolomic Approach. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Lavigne, J.A.; Takahashi, Y.; Chandramouli, G.V.R.; Liu, H.; Perkins, S.N.; Hursting, S.D.; Wang, T.T.Y. Concentration-dependent effects of genistein on global gene expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells: An oligo microarray study. Breast. Cancer Res. Treat. 2008, 110, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chinni, S.R.; Alhasan, S.A.; Multani, A.S.; Pathak, S.; Sarkar, F.H. Pleotropic effects of genistein on MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2003, 12, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Prietsch, R.F.; Monte, L.G.; da Silva, F.A.; Beira, F.T.; del Pino, F.A.B.; Campos, V.F.; Collares, T.; Pinto, L.S.; Spanevello, R.M.; Gamaro, G.D.; et al. Genistein induces apoptosis and autophagy in human breast MCF-7 cells by modulating the expression of proapoptotic factors and oxidative stress enzymes. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2014, 390, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, J.; Lin, C.; Yong, W.; Ye, Y.; Huang, Z. Calycosin and genistein induce apoptosis by inactivation of HOTAIR/p-Akt signaling pathway in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 35, 722–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, J.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ye, Y.; Ge, B.; Chen, J. Genistein induces apoptosis by the inactivation of the IGF-1R/p-Akt signaling pathway in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Food Funct. 2015, 6, 995–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 12360 g001 550
Figure 1. Cytotoxic effect of genistein at different concentrations after 24 h and 48 h on tumor MCF-7 cells in MTT test. Results are the mean ± SD of n = 5. * Statistically significant (p < 0.05; ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test compared with control group). Cells cultured with 0.1% DMSO were considered Control (+). Cells cultured with 15% DMSO were considered as Control (−).
Figure 1. Cytotoxic effect of genistein at different concentrations after 24 h and 48 h on tumor MCF-7 cells in MTT test. Results are the mean ± SD of n = 5. * Statistically significant (p < 0.05; ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test compared with control group). Cells cultured with 0.1% DMSO were considered Control (+). Cells cultured with 15% DMSO were considered as Control (−).
Ijms 23 12360 g001
Ijms 23 12360 g002 550
Figure 2. Cytotoxic effect of genistein at different concentrations after 24 h and 48 h on non-tumor BJ cells in MTT test. Results are the mean ± SD of n = 5. * Statistically significant (p < 0.05; ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test compared with control group). Cells cultured with 0.1% DMSO were considered Control (+). Cells cultured with 15% DMSO were considered as Control (−).
Figure 2. Cytotoxic effect of genistein at different concentrations after 24 h and 48 h on non-tumor BJ cells in MTT test. Results are the mean ± SD of n = 5. * Statistically significant (p < 0.05; ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test compared with control group). Cells cultured with 0.1% DMSO were considered Control (+). Cells cultured with 15% DMSO were considered as Control (−).
Ijms 23 12360 g002
Ijms 23 12360 g003 550
Figure 3. Induction of apoptosis by genistein at different concentrations in tumor MCF-7 cell lines in fluorescent microscope (magnification 400×). Cells were stained with annexin-Cy3.18 (AnnCy3) and 6-Carboxyfluorescein diacetate (6-CFDA). AnnCy3 binds to phosphatidylserine present in the outer leaflet of plasma membrane of cells starting the apoptotic process. The binding is observed as red fluorescence. 6-CFDA is used to measure viability. When this non-fluorescent compound enters living cells, esterases hydrolyze it, producing fluorescent compound 6-carboxyfluorescein (6-CF). This appears as green fluorescence. Cells cultured with 0.1% DMSO were considered as Control (+). Cells cultured with 15% DMSO were considered as Control (−).
Figure 3. Induction of apoptosis by genistein at different concentrations in tumor MCF-7 cell lines in fluorescent microscope (magnification 400×). Cells were stained with annexin-Cy3.18 (AnnCy3) and 6-Carboxyfluorescein diacetate (6-CFDA). AnnCy3 binds to phosphatidylserine present in the outer leaflet of plasma membrane of cells starting the apoptotic process. The binding is observed as red fluorescence. 6-CFDA is used to measure viability. When this non-fluorescent compound enters living cells, esterases hydrolyze it, producing fluorescent compound 6-carboxyfluorescein (6-CF). This appears as green fluorescence. Cells cultured with 0.1% DMSO were considered as Control (+). Cells cultured with 15% DMSO were considered as Control (−).
Ijms 23 12360 g003
Ijms 23 12360 g004 550
Figure 4. Induction of apoptosis by genistein at different concentrations in non-tumor BJ cell lines in fluorescent microscope (magnification 400×). Cells were stained with annexin-Cy3.18 (AnnCy3) and 6-Carboxyfluorescein diacetate (6-CFDA). AnnCy3 binds to phosphatidylserine present in the outer leaflet of plasma membrane of cells starting the apoptotic process. The binding is observed as red fluorescence. 6-CFDA is used to measure viability. When this non-fluorescent compound enters living cells, esterases hydrolyze it, producing fluorescent compound 6-carboxyfluorescein (6-CF). This appears as green fluorescence. Cells cultured with 0.1% DMSO were considered Control (+). Cells cultured with 15% DMSO were considered Control (−).
Figure 4. Induction of apoptosis by genistein at different concentrations in non-tumor BJ cell lines in fluorescent microscope (magnification 400×). Cells were stained with annexin-Cy3.18 (AnnCy3) and 6-Carboxyfluorescein diacetate (6-CFDA). AnnCy3 binds to phosphatidylserine present in the outer leaflet of plasma membrane of cells starting the apoptotic process. The binding is observed as red fluorescence. 6-CFDA is used to measure viability. When this non-fluorescent compound enters living cells, esterases hydrolyze it, producing fluorescent compound 6-carboxyfluorescein (6-CF). This appears as green fluorescence. Cells cultured with 0.1% DMSO were considered Control (+). Cells cultured with 15% DMSO were considered Control (−).
Ijms 23 12360 g004
Ijms 23 12360 g005 550
Figure 5. Percentage of viable MCF7 cells [%] in trypan blue exclusion assay after treatment with genistein at different concentration [μM]. Results are the mean ± SD of n = 3. * Statistically significant (p < 0.05; ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test compared with control group). Cells cultured with 0.1% DMSO were considered Control (+). Cells cultured with 15% DMSO were considered Control (−).
Figure 5. Percentage of viable MCF7 cells [%] in trypan blue exclusion assay after treatment with genistein at different concentration [μM]. Results are the mean ± SD of n = 3. * Statistically significant (p < 0.05; ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test compared with control group). Cells cultured with 0.1% DMSO were considered Control (+). Cells cultured with 15% DMSO were considered Control (−).
Ijms 23 12360 g005
Ijms 23 12360 g006 550
Figure 6. Percentage of viable BJ cells [%] in trypan blue exclusion assay after treatment with genistein at different concentration [μM]. Results are the mean ± SD of n = 3. * Statistically significant (p < 0.05; ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test compared with control group). Cells cultured with 0.1% DMSO were considered Control (+). Cells cultured with 15% DMSO were considered Control (−).
Figure 6. Percentage of viable BJ cells [%] in trypan blue exclusion assay after treatment with genistein at different concentration [μM]. Results are the mean ± SD of n = 3. * Statistically significant (p < 0.05; ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test compared with control group). Cells cultured with 0.1% DMSO were considered Control (+). Cells cultured with 15% DMSO were considered Control (−).
Ijms 23 12360 g006
Ijms 23 12360 g007 550
Figure 7. Analysis of gene expression in MCF-7 and BJ cells treated with genistein at different concentrations 10, 20 and 50 μM) after 24 h Results are the mean value SD of n = 2. * Statistically significant (p < 0.05 ANOVA Friedman along with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test compared with control group). Cells cultured with 0,1% DMSO were considered as Control (+). Cells cultured with 15% DMSO were considered as Control (−).
Figure 7. Analysis of gene expression in MCF-7 and BJ cells treated with genistein at different concentrations 10, 20 and 50 μM) after 24 h Results are the mean value SD of n = 2. * Statistically significant (p < 0.05 ANOVA Friedman along with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test compared with control group). Cells cultured with 0,1% DMSO were considered as Control (+). Cells cultured with 15% DMSO were considered as Control (−).
Ijms 23 12360 g007
Table
Table 1. Sequences of primers.
Table 1. Sequences of primers.
GeneForward SequenceReverse SequenceProduct Size
(bp)
BCl2ATCGCCCTGTGGATGACTGAGTGCCAGGAGAAATCAAACAGAGGC140
MKI67GAAAGAGTGGCAACCTGCCTTCGCACCAAGTTTTACTACATCTGCC151
EGFRAACACCCTGGTCTGGAAGTACGTCGTTGGACAGCCTTCAAGACC106
AKT1TGGACTACCTGCACTCGGAGAAGTGCCGCAAAAGGTCTTCATGG154
BIRC5CCACTGAGAACGAGCCAGACTTGTATTACAGGCGTAAGCCACCG115
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pawlicka, M.A.; Zmorzyński, S.; Popek-Marciniec, S.; Filip, A.A. The Effects of Genistein at Different Concentrations on MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells and BJ Dermal Fibroblasts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12360. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012360

AMA Style

Pawlicka MA, Zmorzyński S, Popek-Marciniec S, Filip AA. The Effects of Genistein at Different Concentrations on MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells and BJ Dermal Fibroblasts. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(20):12360. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012360

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pawlicka, Magda Aleksandra, Szymon Zmorzyński, Sylwia Popek-Marciniec, and Agata Anna Filip. 2022. "The Effects of Genistein at Different Concentrations on MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells and BJ Dermal Fibroblasts" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 20: 12360. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012360

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop