Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Explicit Models for Different Photovoltaic Technologies
Next Article in Special Issue
Service Continuity of PV Synchronous Buck/Buck-Boost Converter with Energy Storage
Previous Article in Journal
Reversible Heat Pump–Organic Rankine Cycle Systems for the Storage of Renewable Electricity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Installation, Commissioning and Tests of Four Fast Switching Units of up to 20 kA for the JT-60SA Nuclear Fusion Experiment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Multifunctional Dynamic Voltage Restorer for Power Quality Improvement

1
Department of Electrical Power Engineering, FEECS, VSB, Technical University of Ostrava, 70800 Ostrava, Czech Republic
2
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50370 Wroclaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2018, 11(6), 1351; https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061351
Submission received: 27 February 2018 / Revised: 12 May 2018 / Accepted: 21 May 2018 / Published: 25 May 2018

Abstract

:
Power quality is a major concern in electrical power systems. The power quality disturbances such as sags, swells, harmonic distortion and other interruptions have an impact on the electrical devices and machines and in severe cases can cause serious damages. Therefore it is necessary to recognize and compensate all types of disturbances at an earliest time to ensure normal and efficient operation of the power system. To solve these problems, many types of power devices are used. At the present time, one of those devices, Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) is the most efficient and effective device used in power distribution systems. In this paper, design and modeling of a new structure and a new control method of multifunctional DVRs for voltage quality correction are presented. The new control method was built in the stationary frame by combining Proportional Resonant controllers and Sequence-Decouple Resonant controllers. The performance of the device and this method under different conditions such as voltage swell, voltage sag due to symmetrical and unsymmetrical short circuit, starting of motors, and voltage distortion are described. Simulation result show the superior capability of the proposed DVR to improve power quality under different operating conditions and the effectiveness of the proposed method. The proposed new DVR controller is able to detect the voltage disturbances and control the converter to inject appropriate voltages independently for each phase and compensate to load voltage through three single-phase transformers.

1. Introduction

With the increasing amount of sensitive devices (power electronic devices) that are quite sensitive to power quality disturbances in the supply network, the problem of compensation of power quality disturbances is ever increasing. Power quality disturbances are categorized into voltage sags, voltage swells, transients, harmonics, interruptions etc. They can cause many technical problems (such as overheating, mis-operation, early aging of the devices, etc.) and financial losses to the power system operators and their customers. There are different ways to improve power quality such as Distribution STATic synchronous COMpensator (DSTATCOM), Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR), Active Filter (AF), Unified Power Quality Conditioner (UPQC), etc. Among these, the DVR is one of the most effective and cost-efficient devices which can used in power distribution system.
Using DVR in the distribution system for power quality improvement has been analyzed and proposed through many publications [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. References [9,17] introduced studies using a DVR for mitigating voltage sag due to starting of the induction motor and asynchronous motor, respectively. In [6,7], a DVR is used to mitigate balanced voltage sags/swells. The performance of the DVR under different voltage sag conditions due to the different types of short circuit faults in the power system is presented in [5,13]. In other works, a DVR not only mitigates voltage sags/swells but also performs harmonics compensation [6,15], where the DVR is controlled and designed to perform one or several functions. It is the motivation of this paper where the authors focus on design and control algorithms of the DVR with multi-functional capabilities, which can solve all the cases mentioned above with efficiency, accuracy and fast response time.
In [8], we presented a double-loop controller using proportional integral (PI) controllers in the rotating frame. In this research, PI controllers are able to achieve a good performance both for balanced and unbalanced voltage sags. The disadvantage of this method is that the controller is designed in the rotating frame so that it requires the transformation from three-phase system to theαβ coordinate system and in consequence back to the rotating system and inversely. Consequently, the control method is effective, but its structure is complex. In [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28], proportional resonant (PR) controllers in a stationary frame were presented. Compared with PI controllers, the complexity of PR controllers is reduced considerably, combined with its good performance. However, in case when only one symmetrical sequence needs to be compensated, the PR controllers lose their advantage because they cannot regulate positive- or negative-sequence components separately [29,30]. To alleviate the disadvantage of PR controllers, a sequence-decoupled resonant (SDR) controller is presented, which can deal with each sequence component individually [29].
In this paper, a new control method of DVRs is proposed. A double-loop controller was built in the stationary frame [30] by combining the PR controller for the current controller and the SDR controller for the voltage controller. This method has a simple structure and all the advantages of PR and SDR controllers. Compared with the method which we proposed in [8], the performance of this method is characterized by higher accuracy, lower distortion in terms of compensating for unbalanced voltage sag/swell and distorted voltage.
The paper is arranged as follows: Section 2 introduces the most common power quality problems with the corresponding identifying characteristics and its causes. A detailed configuration of the DVR is described in Section 3, and the proposed new control method is presented in Section 4. A multifunctional DVR is modeled using MATLAB-Simulink and tested for voltage swell, voltage sag due to motor starting, symmetrical and unsymmetrical short-circuit and voltage distortions, which are presented in Section 5. Finally, discussions and conclusions are given in Section 6.

2. Most Common Power Quality Problems

Although the problems described in this section are well known, for the sake of completeness, we review shortly here the fundamentals of power quality problems. Power quality can be defined as the ability of the power system to provide their customers with an uninterrupted flow of energy at ideal sinusoidal waveform. Various power quality problems can be categorized as voltage sags, swells, harmonics, transients, interruption considered are the most common power quality problems in electrical distribution systems. Common power quality problems are described briefly below, following [2,14,15].
Voltage sag or a dip is short duration reduction of amplitude, that occurs when the RMS of the voltage decreases between 10 to 90 percent of nominal voltage for one-half cycle to one minute. It is one of most frequent disturbances in distribution systems. It is caused by faults in the power system, transformer energizing or by the starting of large induction motors, among other causes.
Voltage swell is the opposite to voltage sag, it happens when the RMS of voltage increases between 10 to 80 percent of the nominal voltage for one-half cycle to one minute. It is not as common as voltage sag. The main causes for voltage swells are switching of large capacitors or start/stop of heavy loads, among other causes.
Interruption is defined as a reduction in voltage or current to less than 10 percent of nominal, not exceeding 60 s in length. Sustained interruptions happen when the supply voltage or current falls to zero for more than 1 min. These are the result of faults, equipment failure, control malfunction or improper breaker tripping.
Harmonics are the waves with frequencies that are the integral multiple of the frequency of reference wave (at which supply system is designed to operate).
Transients are defined as a short duration surge of electrical energy in power system caused by a sudden change of state. There are two types of transients: impulse and oscillatory. The main causes for harmonic distortion are rectifiers and, in general, all non-linear loads.

3. Multifunctional Dynamic Voltage Restorer

3.1. Configuration and Components

The DVR is a power-electronic-converter-based device capable of protecting sensitive loads from most supply-side disturbances [11]. A DVR is installed in a distribution system between the supply and a sensitive load feeder at the so-called point of common coupling (PCC). Its primary function is to rapidly inject/absorb additional energy in the system in order to avoid any power disruption to that load event of disturbances in the system. The general structure of a DVR consists of a booster transformer, a harmonic filter, a voltage source converter (VSC), and an energy storage (Figure 1).

3.1.1. Injection/Booster Transformer

The injected voltage is supplied into the distribution system through an injection transformer. It connects the DVR to the distribution system via HV-winding and transforms the injected compensating voltage generated by the voltage source converter (VSC) to the supply voltage after the detection of any disturbance by the controller. In addition, the injection transformer serves the purpose of isolating the DVR circuit from the system. For compensating unbalanced voltage sags, three single-phase transformers can be used, however, this increases the size and cost of the DVR. To select a suitable injection transformer into the DVR, the MVA rating, the primary winding voltage and current ratings, the turn-ratio and the short–circuit impedance values of transformers are required.

3.1.2. Harmonic Filter

The main task of the harmonic filter is to keep the harmonic voltage content generated by the VSC at the permissible level. The filter is placed to damp the switching harmonics generated by the PWM control of VSC.

3.1.3. DC-Link and Energy Storage Unit

The main function of these energy storage units is to provide the desired real power during the voltage sag. Two types of systems are considered; the first where energy is taken from the incoming supply through a shunt converter, and the second where energy storage devices such as flywheels, batteries, superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) and super capacitors are used [3]. The energy storage devices have the advantage of fast response.

3.1.4. The Voltage Source Converter

A VSC is a power electronic system that consists of a storage device and switching devices, which converts the dc voltage from the energy storage unit to a controllable three phase ac voltage. The inverter switches are normally fired using a sinusoidal pulse width modulation (PWM) scheme. In a multifunctional DVR, the VSC can be operated with unbalanced switching functions for three phases, and deal with each phase independently. Normally the VSC is not only used for voltage sag/swell compensation, but also for other power quality issues, e.g., flicker and harmonics [3].

3.2. Compensation Techniques

For the proposed DVR, the pre-sag compensation method is chosen because it is the best compensation strategy to restore controlled pre-sag magnitude without phase change. The diagram of this technique is shown in Figure 2. The magnitude and the angle of the injected voltage are:
| V i n j | = V L 2 + V S 2 2 V L V S cos ( θ L θ S )
θ i n j = tan 1 ( V L sin θ L V S sin θ S V L cos θ L V S cos θ S )
However, the disadvantage of this method is that the injected active power is not controlled so high capacity energy storage is required.

3.3. Operation Modes of DVR

The DVR has three modes of operation: protection mode, standby mode (during steady state), and injection/boost mode (during sag/swell). In protection mode, the DVR is protected from the overcurrent on the load side due to short-circuit on the load or large inrush current. The DVR can be isolated from the system by using the by-pass switches as shown in Figure 1. In standby mode, no switching of semiconductors occurs and the load current will pass through the transformer primary winding. In boost (Injection) mode, when the voltage disturbance occurs in the supply is detected, the DVR will be injected a compensation voltage through the voltage injection transformer.

4. Control Techniques of DVR

In general, the process control of DVR includes three steps: (1) Detection of voltage sag/swell occurrence in the system; (2) Comparison with the reference value; and (3) Generation of gate pulses to the voltage source inverter (VSI) to generate the DVR output voltages which compensates/absorbs the voltage sag/swell.

4.1. Grid Synchronization Techniques

Synchronization to the supply voltages is very important in order to control the DVR. It keeps an output signal synchronized with a reference input signal in frequency and phase. Synchronization methods have been developed and presented in many publications [16,17,18]. The most often used synchronization method in engineering applications, the phase-locked loop (PLL) has been used in this paper.
Figure 3 shows the block diagram of three phase PLL. It consists of three blocks: the phase detector (PD), loop filter (LF) and voltage-controller oscillator (VCO). The input signal is voltage at PCC bus. The phase detector generates an output signal proportional to the phase difference between the input signal and the signal generates by the voltage-controller oscillator (VCO). It may contain high-frequency components. The loop filter is a low-pass filters, it is used to suppress high frequency components. The loop filter provides control signal to voltage controlled oscillator which work as an integrator. The structure of the PLL is present in Figure 4.
Assume the input voltage is given by:
v A = V sin ( ω t + φ ) = V sin ( θ )
The output signal from Clarke transformation block can be expressed by:
v α = V sin ( θ ) v β = V cos ( θ )
The output signal from Park transformation block, where the αβ frame transforms to the dq frame corresponds to the following transformation matrix:
[ V d V q ] = [      cos ( θ )       sin ( θ ) sin ( θ )        cos ( θ ) ] [ V α V β ] = [      cos ( θ )       sin ( θ ) sin ( θ )        cos ( θ ) ] [ V sin ( θ ) V cos ( θ ) ] = [      V sin ( θ θ ) V cos ( θ θ ) ]
Typically, this block is constituted of a first-order low-pass filter or a PI controller [16]. The output of the PI controller is the inverter output frequency that is integrated to obtain inverter phase angle θ. The PI regulator of the LF will set the angular position of the dq reference frame to make Vd = 0 in the steady state, which means that the PLL will be active when the difference between grid phase angle and inverter phase angle is reduced to zero.

4.2. Sag/Swell Detection Techniques

Voltage sag/swell phenomena are necessary to detect the starting point, the end point, sag depth and phase shift. There are many different methods for detecting voltage sag, swell, such as peak value, root mean square (RMS), Fourier transform, wavelet transforms and space vector method. Among a number of methods, space vector control is the most effective method which is used widely in DVR applications. In this method, the three phase voltages Vabc are transformed into a two-dimensional voltage Vdq which in turn can be transferred into magnitude and angle. The voltage magnitude and angle shift information is compared with the reference value in the dq frame, which had to be transformed back to the three-phase frame:
| V e r r , d q | = ( V r e f , d V P C C , d ) 2 + ( V r e f , q V P C C , q ) 2
| V e r r , d q | > V t h r e s h o l d
If the voltage dip contains a phase jump, it will lead to a reduction in both the d- and q-components. Details of this case are described in [17]. The structure of the voltage sag/swell detector is shown in Figure 5. The proposed method can detect the change in the state of the supply (start, end points, and phase jump) with low time delay.

4.3. Control Techniques

The control system is very important in a DVR, with the requirements of fast response for voltage sags and variations in the supplied load. The main purpose of the control system is to maintain the voltage magnitude of the sensitive load, where DVR is used, under system disturbances. There are three main voltage controllers used, the feed-forward (open loop), feedback (closed loop) and multi-loop controller, and other controllers based on “artificial intelligence”, such as artificial neural networks (ANN), fuzzy logic (FL) and space vector pulse width modulation (SVPWM) for special conditions. The feed-forward voltage controller is the primary option for the DVR, because of its simplicity and fast response. The disadvantage of the open loop controller is the high steady state error. The feedback controller has the advantage of accurate response, but it is complex and causes time-delays. Multi-loop control is used with an outer voltage loop to control the DVR voltage and inner loop to control the load current. This method has the strengths of feed-forward and feedback control strategies, it can improve the system dynamic response rate, shortening the time of compensation significantly [1,2,3].

4.3.1. Current controller

In [8], we proposed the PI controller to control current. The equivalent transfer function of a PI controller is defined as:
G P I ( s ) = k P + k I s
The ideal PR controller is defined as [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]:
G P R ( s ) = G P I + ( s ) + G P I ( s ) = k P + k I s j ω 1 + k P + k I s + j ω 1 = 2 k P + 2 k I s s 2 + ω 1 2 = K P + K I s s 2 + ω 1 2
For the non-ideal integrators with G P I ( s ) = K I / ( 1 + ( s / ω b ) ) , the transfer function of PR controller takes the form:
G P R ( s ) = K P + K I ω b s s 2 + 2 ω b . s + ω 1 2
where ω c is cut-off frequency ( ω b < < ω 1 ). The diagram of ideal and non-ideal of PR controllers are illustrated in Figure 6a,b. The application of this method in the current controller is presented in Figure 6c.
In order to design to compensate the harmonic, the current controller transfer function becomes:
G P R ( s ) = h K P h + h K I h ω c s s 2 + 2 ω c . s + h 2 ω 1 2
or in an ideal controller:
G P R ( s ) = h K P h + h K I h s s 2 + h 2 ω 1 2

4.3.2. Voltage controller

In [29], Wang et al., presented the application of an SDR controller for three-phase grid connected inverters. They proposed the structure of practical SDR which is presented in Figure 7a,b with two groups of equations for regulating both sequence components:
y α 1 + ( s ) = 1 s [ ω b ( K I . e α ( s ) y α 1 + ( s ) ) ω 1 . y β 1 + ( s ) ] y β 1 + ( s ) = 1 s [ ω b ( K I . e β ( s ) y β 1 + ( s ) ) + ω 1 . y α 1 + ( s ) ]
y α 1 ( s ) = 1 s [ ω b ( K I . e α ( s ) y α 1 ( s ) ) + ω 1 . y β 1 ( s ) ] y β 1 ( s ) = 1 s [ ω b ( K I . e β ( s ) y β 1 ( s ) ) ω 1 . y β 1 ( s ) ]
The detail of method was presented in [29], hence it is not introduced here. In our studies, we apply this method for voltage controller with inputs are the error between v i n j * and v i n j and the output are the desired currents i f α * and i f β * of VSC in the stationary frame (see Figure 7c).
Finally, we propose the new double loop controller designed in stationary frame by combining a PR controller and a SDR controller. The structure diagram of this controller is shown in Figure 8. In this method, the three-phase voltages of the grid are sensed and transformed to two-phase system (αβ) in the stationary reference frame. Then, the positive sequence and the negative sequence components are extracted. Positive sequence grid voltage vector is compared against the positive sequence load voltage command vector. The process of the negative sequence controller is similar. The proposed controller performs in stationary frame so that its structure is simpler than the double-loop controller using the PI controllers in rotating frame which was presented in [8].
In the proposed control method, the process variable is not only injection voltage but also injection current. The output of voltage controller are the reference currents in the stationary frame i f α * i f α * and i f β * i f β * which are used as an input variables in the current controller to control the injection voltage. The current controller can regulate the injected currents and improve response and proper operation of the voltage controller to restore the load voltage. The proposed new controller is able to detect the voltage disturbances and control the converter to inject appropriate voltages independently for each phase and compensate to load voltage through three single-phase transformers.

5. Simulation

5.1. Modeling and Simulation

The proposed multifunctional DVR is implemented in MATLAB-Simulink for mitigating of balanced, unbalanced voltage sag/swell, fluctuations and distortions voltage. The simulations are based on the real power system as shown in Figure 9 and the details of the system parameters are given below:
  • Source:
    • 115 kV, 50 Hz, Ssc = 250 MVA.
    • Transmission line:
    • R = 1.309 Ω, L = 9.24 mH.
    • Transformers:
    • T1: 25 MVA, 110/6.3 kV, Y/D1, Uk = 11.5%
    • T2: 2800 kVA, 6.3/0.63 kV, D/Yn11, Uk = 5.8%.
    • Load: 16.87 MW, 11.24 MVAr
  • Sensitive load:
    • 1975 kW motor, 0.63 kV, rated speed 1000 rpm.
The DVR is designed to protect the sensitive loads at voltage level 6.3 kV and its parameters are as listed below:
  • Energy storage:
  • Power rating: 1400 kVA, VDC = 700 V
  • Injection transformer: 3 single-phase transformers, 1500 kVA, 0.63/6.3 kV, Uk = 5%.
  • Filter:
  • Lf = 7109 mH, Cf = 6942 μC.
  • Switches: IGBT
  • Switching frequency: 5 kHz.
The parameters of the controller are shown in Table 1, where Kp and Ki are the proportional gain and integral gain of the phase-locked loop, KP-SDR and KI-SDR are the proportional gain and integral gain of the sequence-decouple resonant controllers, KP-PR and KPR are the proportional gain and integral gain of the proportional resonant controllers respectively.

5.2. Results and Discussion

5.2.1. Case 1: Three Phase Balanced Voltage Sag

The balanced voltage sag at PCC due to three phase short circuit occurs in the power system, the voltage decreased to 50% from 1.00 s to 1.10 s. Figure 10 shows the simulated waveforms for the grid voltages, the injection voltages of DVR and the load voltages during the sag event.
Before the sag, the DVR is in the standby state waiting for the sag detection. It can be observed that the DVR compensates the balanced sag rapidly when the grid-side voltage sag happens. By this simulation, the perfect performance of the grid synchronization algorithm and the control strategy is shown.

5.2.2. Case 2: The Unbalanced Voltage Sag

In this case study, from 1.00 s to 1.10 s, a phase to phase short circuit (between phase A and C) occurred in the power system, the voltage at PCC reduced to 35% in phase A, and to 28% in phase C and increased slightly by 10% in phase B respectively to the reference pre-sag voltage and the phase angle jump of grid voltage. The results of this simulation are shown in Figure 11. Observe that the DVR quickly injects the necessary voltage components, with correct both magnitude and phase angle to maintain balanced load voltages. It is shown that the DVR can detect and mitigate the voltage sag in different phases independently and inject the compensation energy through three single-phase transformers to correct the grid voltage.
Figure 12 shows the difference of α,β components between v i n j * and v i n j in the stationary frame. Compared with the double loop controller using PI controller that was presented in [8], this difference is significantly smaller. It means that, in case of unbalanced voltage sag, this controller is more accurate than the old one.

5.2.3. Case 3: Voltage Sags Due to Starting of a Motor

A typical cause of voltage sags is caused by starting a large three-phase motor. The characteristics of voltage sags depend on various factors, such as motor rating, the method of starting and system’s power supply capacity. In this paper, the test system is simulated in the case of starting 1975 kW induction motor. The motor is started at 1.50 s by closing motor starting contactor. The three phase voltage sag RMS waveform of grid voltage is shown in Figure 13. Voltage sag caused by starting motor is unbalanced and drops down to 20% of its nominal value.
Figure 14 shows the simulated waveform of the grid voltage, injected voltage of the DVR and load voltage when starting motor. The DVR generated unbalanced three phase voltages for each phase to compensate grid voltage unbalance. As a result, the voltage sag is fully compensated, the load voltage is maintained balanced and constant.

5.2.4. Case 4 and Case 5: Balanced and Unbalanced Voltage Swells

From the technical point of view, the DVR should mitigate voltage swells in the same way as it mitigates voltage sags. The detection technique is based on the difference between the magnitude and phase angle of grid voltage and load voltage. The VSC generates the missing voltage through the transformer for compensation. However, it is completely different from the viewpoint of the energy handling capability. In the case of voltage sags, the DVR supplies an active power to the load but in the case of voltage swells, the DVR must absorb the power from the grid.
In the case of balanced and unbalanced voltage swell, a swell has occurred at 1.00 s of the duration 0.1 s. Figure 15 and Figure 16 present the simulation results of the grid voltage, injected voltage of the DVR and load voltage. The information on the voltage at PCC and load voltage is presented in Table 2 and Table 3. When voltage swell occurs, the grid voltage increased by 18%, the DVR compensates so the load voltage increased below 4%. In such way the swell doesn’t influence the operation of the load. We can see, that the DVR has successfully maintained the load voltage is spite of balanced or unbalanced swells.

5.2.5. Case 6: Fluctuations and Distortions of Voltages

In this simulation, the fluctuations and distortions of voltages caused by switching on and off the capacitor at HV side of the distribution transformer, were created for the duration of 1.0 s to 1.4 s.
The voltage waveform of grid voltage, injected voltage of the DVR and load voltage are shown in Figure 17. The THD (Total Harmonic Distortion) of the voltage at PCC is 4.01% (measured for 10 cycles’ interval after switching on the capacitor, see Figure 18) and decreased to 1.66% at load side. It can be observed that the load sides voltages are maintained and sinusoidal waveforms are kept almost intact.
The differences of α,β components between the desired voltage injection v i n j * and the designed voltage injection v i n j in the stationary frame are shown in Figure 19. These values are very small so that in this case, this control method is better than the double loop controller using PI controller was presented in [8].

6. Discussion and Conclusions

For improving the compensation abilities of power quality disturbances such as sags, swells, harmonic distortion and other interruptions that have an impact on electrical devices and machines and in severe cases can cause serious damage, a novel structure with an advanced controller has been presented in this paper. The proposed DVR has the unique ability to compensate balanced and unbalanced voltage sags and swells and other utility voltage disturbances due to a double loop-controller that is able to detect the voltage disturbances and control the converter to inject appropriate voltages independently for each phase and compensate to load voltage through three single-phase transformers. The DVR was described in detail, with its configuration, its sag/swell detection voltage techniques, grid synchronization techniques and control techniques. The numerical simulation results under several conditions, balanced and unbalanced voltage sags and swells, fluctuations and distortions are presented.
Although the techniques used in this paper, such as grid synchronization, sag/swell detection and compensation techniques are not new, the presented control technique is a new approach. From among many existing solutions for the construction of DVRs, the optimal method was chosen to detect the power quality problems, generate the reactive power and compensate the voltage in order to ensure the normal operation of the sensitive load during the disturbance that occurs in the system. The process of compensation is perfect if only all parts work correctly and synchronously. For example, if the controller operates correctly but the detection is late or incorrect, it will be lead to the inaccuracy of voltage compensation.
The advantage of the proposed DVR is its solution for all the most common power quality problems with a short reaction time to restore the voltage. In all case studies, the time from the point when the voltage disturbance in the supply is detected to the point when the load voltage is restored is always less than ½ cycle. This ensures that all devices which the DVR protects operate normally.
Compared with the control method based on PI controllers which we had proposed in [8], the complexity of this method is reduced and as the simulation shows, it is characterized by higher accuracy, lower distortion in terms of compensating for unbalanced voltage sag/swell and in case of distorted voltages. The results demonstrate that the proposed DVR is capable of compensating efficiently most power quality problems, as well as harmonics in the grid voltage. It also provides a fast dynamic response and has the advantage of simple structure and high accuracy of compensation.

Author Contributions

D.V.T. and R.G. conceived and designed the DVR idea and performed the experiments; Z.L. designed simulation algorithms and wrote the paper.

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by the SGS grant from VSB–Technical University of Ostrava (No. SP2018/61) and by the project TUCENET (No. LO1404).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

Nomenclature

v g The grid voltage at PCC (Point of Common Coupling).
v L The load voltage.
v L * The reference voltage.
v i n v The voltage of the VSC (Voltage Source Converter).
i f The current of the VSC.
v i n v * The voltage reference of the VSC.
i f * The current reference of the VSC.
v i n j The voltage injection by the DVR.
v i n j * The reference of voltage injection.
i i n j The current injection by the DVR.
u d c The DC-link voltage.
G P I Transfer function of Proportional Integral controller.
G P R Transfer function of Proportional Resonant controller.
a b c Expressed in three-phase frame.
α β Expressed in the stationary frame.
d q Expressed in the rotating frame.
E(s)Input value.
Y(s)Output value.
ω 1 Fundamental frequency (rad/s).
ω b The cut-off frequency (rad/s).

References

  1. Mohammed, S.A.; Cerrada, A.G.; Abdel-Moamen, M.A.; Hasanin, B. Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) System for Compensation of Voltage Sags State-of-the-Art Review. Int. J. Comput. Eng. Res. 2013, 3, 177–183. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pal, R.; Gupta, S. State of the Art: Dynamic Voltage Restorer for Power Quality Improvement. Electr. Comput. Eng. 2015, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. El-Gammal, M.A.; Abou-Ghazala, A.Y.; El-Shennawy, T.I. Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) for Voltage Sag Mitigation. Int. J. Electr. Eng. Inform. 2011, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mohammed, S.A.; Cerrada, A.G.; Abdel-Moamen, M.A.; Hasanin, B. Conventional dynamic voltage restorer for mitigation of voltage sag in power distribution systems. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Technol. 2013, 6, 415–425. [Google Scholar]
  5. Saeed, A.M.; Aleem, S.H.; Ibrahim, A.M.; Balci, M.E.; El-Zahab, E.E. Power conditioning using dynamic voltage restorers under different voltage sag types. J. Adv. Res. 2015, 7, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Resmi, R.; Reshmi, V.; Jacob, J. Mitigation of Voltage Sag Swell and Harmonics by Dynamic Voltage Restorer using Matrix Converter. Int. J. Adv. Res. Electr. Electron. Instrum. Eng. 2013, 2, 297–304. [Google Scholar]
  7. Devaraju, T.; Reddy, V.C.; Kumar, M.V. Performance of DVR under Different Voltage Sag and Swell Conditions. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2010, 5, 56–64. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tien, D.V.; Gono, R.; Leonowicz, Z.; Trinh, T.D.; Martirano, L. Advanced Control of the Dynamic Voltage Restorer for Mitigating Voltage Sags in Power Systems. Adv. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2018, 16, 36–45. [Google Scholar]
  9. Khanh, B.Q.; Lian, J.; Ramachandran, B.; Srivastava, S.; Cartes, D. Mitigating voltage sags due to DOL starting of three phase asynchronous motors using dynamic voltage restorer (DVR). In Proceedings of the IEEE PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition 2012, Orlando, FL, USA, 7–10 May 2012. [Google Scholar]
  10. Nguyen, P.T.; Saha, T.K. Dynamic Voltage Restorer against Balanced and Unbalanced Voltage Sags: Modelling and Simulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Denver, CO, USA, 6–10 June 2004. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, B.; Illindala, M. Operation and control of a dynamic voltage restorer using transformer coupled H-bridge converters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2006, 21, 1053–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fitzer, C.; Barnes, M.; Green, P. Voltage sag detection technique for a dynamic voltage restorer. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2004, 40, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Duy, T.T.; Tien, D.V.; Gono, R.; Leonowicz, Z. Mitigating Voltage Sags due to short circuits using Dynamic Voltage Restorer. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering, Florence, Italy, 7–10 June 2016; pp. 2671–2676. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dugan, R.C.; Granaghan, M.F.; Santoso, S.; Beaty, H.W. Electrical Power Systems Quality, 2nd ed.; McGraw Hill: New York City, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bollen, M.H.J. Understanding Power Quality Problems—Voltage Sags and Interruptions; IEEE Press: Piscataway, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  16. Teodorescu, R.; Liserre, M.; Rodriguez, P. Grid Converters for Photovoltaic and Wind Power Systems; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2011; ISBN 978-0-470-05751-3. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nielsen, J.G. Design and Control of a Dynamic Voltage Restorer; Aalborg University: Aalborg, Denmark, 2002; ISBN 90-77017-83-6. [Google Scholar]
  18. Midtsund, T. Control of Power Electronic Converters in Distributed Power Generation Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, X.; Lv, H.; Sun, Q.; Mi, Y.; Gao, P. A Proportional Resonant Control Strategy for Efficiency Improvement in Extended Range Electric Vehicles. Energies 2017, 10, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zammit, D.; Staines, C.S.; Apap, M. Comparison between PI and PR Current Controllers in Grid Connected PV Inverters. Int. J. Electr. Electron. Sci. Eng. 2014, 8, 221–226. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yi, H.; Zhuo, F.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhan, W. Comparison Analysis of Resonant Controllers for Current Regulation of Selective Active Power Filter with Mixed Current Reference. J. Power Electron. 2013, 13, 861–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zmood, D.N.; Holmes, D.G. Stationary frame current regulation of PWM inverters with zero steady-state error. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2003, 18, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zmood, D.N.; Holmes, D.G.; Bode, G.H. Frequency domain analysis of three-phase linear current regulator. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2001, 37, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yuan, X.; Merk, W.; Stemmler, H.; Allmeling, J. Stationary frame generalized integrators for current control of active power filters with zero steady-state error for current harmonics of concern under unbalanced and distorted operating conditions. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2002, 38, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Teodorescu, R.; Blaabjerg, F.; Liserre, M.; Loh, P.C. Proportional resonant controllers and filters for grid-connected voltage-source converters. IEE Proc. Electr. Power Appl. 2006, 153, 750–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Teodorescu, R.; Blaabjerg, F.; Borup, U.; Liserre, M. A new control structure for grid-connected PV inverters with zero steady-state error and selective harmonic compensation. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, USA, 22–26 February 2004; pp. 580–586. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yepes, A.G.; Freijedo, F.D.; Doval-Gandoy, J.; Lopez, O.; Malvar, J.; Fernandez-Comesana, P. Effects of Discretization Methods on the Performance of Resonant Controllers. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2010, 25, 1692–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yepes, A.G. Digital Resonant Current Controlrs for Voltage Source Converters. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang, F.; Benhabib, M.C.; Duarte, J.L.; Hendrix, M.A. Sequence-Decoupled Resonant Controller for Three-phase Grid-connected Inverters. In Proceedings of the Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition 2009, Washington, DC, USA, 15–19 February 2009; pp. 121–127. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hwang, J.G.; Lehn, P.W.; Winkelnkemper, M. A Generalized Class of Stationary Frame-Current Controllers for Grid-Connected AC-DC Converters. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2010, 25, 2742–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Configuration of DVR in the power distribution system.
Figure 1. Configuration of DVR in the power distribution system.
Energies 11 01351 g001
Figure 2. Phasor diagram of the pre-sag compensation technique.
Figure 2. Phasor diagram of the pre-sag compensation technique.
Energies 11 01351 g002
Figure 3. Phase locked loop to synchronize the DVR to the supply voltages.
Figure 3. Phase locked loop to synchronize the DVR to the supply voltages.
Energies 11 01351 g003
Figure 4. The structure diagram of PLL.
Figure 4. The structure diagram of PLL.
Energies 11 01351 g004
Figure 5. The structure of the voltage sags/swells Detector.
Figure 5. The structure of the voltage sags/swells Detector.
Energies 11 01351 g005
Figure 6. The block diagram of PR controller: (a) ideal controller; (b) non-ideal controller; and (c) controller considering both positive and negative sequence components in the stationary frame.
Figure 6. The block diagram of PR controller: (a) ideal controller; (b) non-ideal controller; and (c) controller considering both positive and negative sequence components in the stationary frame.
Energies 11 01351 g006
Figure 7. The block diagram of SDR controller for regulating: (a) positive sequence components; (b) negative sequence components; and (c) proposed voltage controller both sequence components in the stationary frame.
Figure 7. The block diagram of SDR controller for regulating: (a) positive sequence components; (b) negative sequence components; and (c) proposed voltage controller both sequence components in the stationary frame.
Energies 11 01351 g007
Figure 8. The structure diagram of double loop controller in the stationary frame.
Figure 8. The structure diagram of double loop controller in the stationary frame.
Energies 11 01351 g008
Figure 9. The MATLAB-Simulink model of our test system.
Figure 9. The MATLAB-Simulink model of our test system.
Energies 11 01351 g009
Figure 10. Case 1-Balanced voltage sag: grid voltage, injected voltage of the DVR and load voltage.
Figure 10. Case 1-Balanced voltage sag: grid voltage, injected voltage of the DVR and load voltage.
Energies 11 01351 g010
Figure 11. Case 2-Unbalanced voltage sag: grid voltage, injected voltage of the DVR and load voltage. DVR voltage injection restored the grid voltage almost perfectly for the load.
Figure 11. Case 2-Unbalanced voltage sag: grid voltage, injected voltage of the DVR and load voltage. DVR voltage injection restored the grid voltage almost perfectly for the load.
Energies 11 01351 g011
Figure 12. Case 2-Comparison of the difference between v i n j * and v i n j in stationary frame.
Figure 12. Case 2-Comparison of the difference between v i n j * and v i n j in stationary frame.
Energies 11 01351 g012
Figure 13. The RMS waveform of grid voltage due to starting motor.
Figure 13. The RMS waveform of grid voltage due to starting motor.
Energies 11 01351 g013
Figure 14. Case 3-Voltage sag due to starting motor: grid voltage, injected voltage of the DVR and load voltage. The load voltage is restored less than ½ cycles.
Figure 14. Case 3-Voltage sag due to starting motor: grid voltage, injected voltage of the DVR and load voltage. The load voltage is restored less than ½ cycles.
Energies 11 01351 g014
Figure 15. Case 4: Balanced voltage swell: grid voltage, injected voltage of the DVR and load voltage.
Figure 15. Case 4: Balanced voltage swell: grid voltage, injected voltage of the DVR and load voltage.
Energies 11 01351 g015
Figure 16. Case 5-Unbalanced voltage swell: grid voltage, injected voltage of the DVR and load voltage.
Figure 16. Case 5-Unbalanced voltage swell: grid voltage, injected voltage of the DVR and load voltage.
Energies 11 01351 g016
Figure 17. Case 6-Fluctuations and distortions voltages: grid voltage, injected voltage of the DVR and load voltage. The sinusoidal waveforms obtained two cycles after the disturbance occurs.
Figure 17. Case 6-Fluctuations and distortions voltages: grid voltage, injected voltage of the DVR and load voltage. The sinusoidal waveforms obtained two cycles after the disturbance occurs.
Energies 11 01351 g017
Figure 18. Case 6-FFT analysis of grid voltage and load voltage in case of fluctuations and distortions of voltages.
Figure 18. Case 6-FFT analysis of grid voltage and load voltage in case of fluctuations and distortions of voltages.
Energies 11 01351 g018
Figure 19. Case 6-Comparison of the difference between v i n j * and v i n j in stationary frame in case of fluctuations and distortions voltages.
Figure 19. Case 6-Comparison of the difference between v i n j * and v i n j in stationary frame in case of fluctuations and distortions voltages.
Energies 11 01351 g019
Table 1. Parameters of the controller.
Table 1. Parameters of the controller.
ParameterVoltage ControllerCurrent Controller
KP-SDRKI-SDRKP-PRKI-PR
The positive sequence39.6490.10381.45390.0057
The negative sequence6.60820.01731.45390.0057
PLLKp = 0.2908; Ki = 2.7688 × 10−4
Table 2. RMS Voltage of Case 4-Balanced Voltage Swell.
Table 2. RMS Voltage of Case 4-Balanced Voltage Swell.
Voltage at PCC before Swell (V)Balanced Voltage Swell at PCC (V)Load Voltage during Swell (V)
632077506680
Table 3. RMS Voltage of Case 5-Unbalanced Voltage Swell.
Table 3. RMS Voltage of Case 5-Unbalanced Voltage Swell.
Voltage at PCC before Swell (V)Balanced Voltage Swell at PCC (V)Load Voltage during Swell (V)
63207450 5950 55506500

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tien, D.V.; Gono, R.; Leonowicz, Z. A Multifunctional Dynamic Voltage Restorer for Power Quality Improvement. Energies 2018, 11, 1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061351

AMA Style

Tien DV, Gono R, Leonowicz Z. A Multifunctional Dynamic Voltage Restorer for Power Quality Improvement. Energies. 2018; 11(6):1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061351

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tien, Dung Vo, Radomir Gono, and Zbigniew Leonowicz. 2018. "A Multifunctional Dynamic Voltage Restorer for Power Quality Improvement" Energies 11, no. 6: 1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061351

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop