Next Article in Journal
Sulfonitric Treatment of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes and Their Dispersibility in Water
Previous Article in Journal
An Investigation of Surface Corrosion Behavior of Inconel 718 after Robotic Belt Grinding
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis and Experimental Validation of a Piezoelectric Harvester with Enhanced Frequency Bandwidth
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Orientation Dependence of Elastic and Piezoelectric Properties in Rhombohedral BiFeO3

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212003, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
3
Center of Collaboration and Innovation, Jiangxi University of Technology, Nanchang 330098, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2018, 11(12), 2441; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11122441
Submission received: 18 October 2018 / Revised: 28 November 2018 / Accepted: 30 November 2018 / Published: 2 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Piezoelectric Materials and Devices)

Abstract

:
Through a coordinate transformation approach, crystal orientation dependences of elastic and piezoelectric properties at room temperature have been investigated in a three-dimensional space for rhombohedral bismuth ferrite (BiFeO3). Elastic constants (stiffnesses) c11′, c12′, c13′ and piezoelectric constants d15′, d31′, d33′ along arbitrary orientations were obtained based on crystalline asymmetry characteristics of 3m point group BiFeO3. Parameters along specific orientations obtaining the largest values were presented. The max c11′ = 213 × 109 N/m2 could be achieved in planes with ϕ = 0° and 90°. The max c12′ = c13′ = 132.2 × 109 N/m2 could be achieved along directions at θ = 13° and θ = 77° inside three mirror planes, respectively. The max d15′ = 27.6 × 1012 C/N and the max d31′ = 12.67 × 1012 C/N could be both obtained along directions at θ = 69° inside mirror planes. The max d33′ = 18 × 1012 C/N could be obtained at θ = 0°, along the spontaneous polarization axis. By adopting optimal directions, the elastic and piezoelectric parameters of BiFeO3 could be significantly enhanced which shows applications for the growth of BeFeO3 films with preferred orientations and enhanced properties.

1. Introduction

Bismuth ferrite (BiFeO3) was first actively pursued as a room temperature single-phase multiferroic material for its coexistence of magnetic order and electric order, high Curie point, and G-type antiferromagnetic Neel point [1,2,3,4]. Then, as BiFeO3 exhibits good ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties, it was also studied as a piezoelectric phase to combine other magnetostrictive phase to form composite multiferric with tailored properties, such as BiFeO3-CoFe2O4 [5], BiFeO3-CuFe2O4 [6], etc., which shows potential technical applications in multi-state magnetoelectric memories [7], weak magnetic fields detectors [8], and other novel sensors [9,10]. As a lead-free piezoelectric material, BiFeO3 could be highly applied in piezoelectric MEMS devices because of the spontaneous polarization of as high as 100 μC/cm2 [11] and the high Curie temperature [3]. Besides, BiFeO3 thin films are reported to have lower dielectric constants than Pb-based piezoelectric materials which could generate high electromechanical coupling abilities [12,13]. On raising piezoelectric constants of BiFeO3, previous studies were focused on doping transition metals such as Sm, Yb, Ho in A site and Sc, In in B site of BiFeO3, piezoelectric constants d33 of up to ~20–~50 pC/N were achieved [14,15]. Most piezoelectrics have asymmetrical crystal structures, which result high anisotropy of parameters of the materials. Piezoelectric thin films with preferred orientations can obtaion enhanced or decreased properties compared with grain random distributed materials [16,17]. This also applies to doped BiFeO3 with unchanged crystal structures. Whether the properties will be enhanced or decreased is strongly determined by asymmetry characteristics of crystal, i.e., the point groups. The crystal structure of BiFeO3 below 1100 K belongs to a rhombohedral system with point group of 3m [18]. It is meaningful to have a precise description of properties-orientation relations to guide further experimental works. In this research, using the coordinate transformation method, we investigated the orientation dependences of elastic and piezoelectric parameters of rhombohedral BiFeO3 with the 3m point group. Precise relations between values of parameters and arbitrary orientations were given, and orientations along which the maximum and minimum of these parameters could be obtained were specified. The result shows applications for the growth of BiFeO3 films with an oriented structure and enhanced properties.

2. Methods

The Curie point and the antiferromagnetic Neel point of BiFeO3 are 1100 [3] and 640 K [4], respectively. Below the Curie point, BiFeO3 is a member of rhombohedral crystal system with point group of 3m [18]. For this type of crystal, the asymmetrical characteristics lie in such a way that it has a threefold rotation axis along the c-axis (also the spontaneous polarization axis, displacements of Bi relative to O in rhombohedral BiFeO3 [19,20], also can be denoted as [111]-axis using coordinate with oxygen octahedra in perovskite Bi framework) and three mirror planes which are 120° apart (two of them are parallel to a- and b-axes, respectively). Because of α = β = 90° and γ = 120° for rhombohedral BiFeO3 crystal, the physical orthogonal coordinate system does not coincide rightly with a-, b-, and c-axes. The chosen coordinate system in this study is as follows: X-axis and Z-axis are chosen along a-axis and c-axis (i.e., X||a, Z||c), respectively; Y-axis is determined by using the right-hand rule, which is perpendicular to a-axis and at a 30° angle with b-axis (Figure 1).
To determine the anisotropy of properties originating from asymmetry of crystals, we use the coordinate system transformation method that is related to transforming the property tensors to obtain values in any arbitrary direction. It contains two-step rotations to reach a desired direction from the original coordinate system. Firstly, rotation through a clockwise angle ϕ about the Z-axis, the original orthogonal coordinates XYZ can be changed into a set of new coordinates X’Y’Z (Z||Z); secondly, rotation through a clockwise angle θ about the X-axis; the coordinate system X’Y’Z can be changed into another set of coordinates X”Y”Z” (X”||X). The transformation matrices AZ and AX corresponding to the first and the second rotations are
A Z = ( cos ϕ sin ϕ 0 sin ϕ cos ϕ 0 0 0 1 )
A X = ( 1 0 0 0 cos θ sin θ 0 sin θ cos θ )
N and M are [6 × 6] bond strain transformation matrices. aij represents the element in row i and column j in transformation matrices A, the matrices N and M are
N = ( a 11 2 a 12 2 a 13 2 a 12 a 13 a 13 a 11 a 11 a 12 a 21 2 a 22 2 a 23 2 a 22 a 23 a 23 a 21 a 21 a 22 a 31 2 a 32 2 a 33 2 a 32 a 33 a 33 a 31 a 31 a 32 2 a 21 a 31 2 a 22 a 32 2 a 23 a 33 a 22 a 33 + a 32 a 23 a 23 a 31 + a 33 a 21 a 21 a 32 + a 31 a 22 2 a 31 a 11 2 a 32 a 12 2 a 33 a 13 a 32 a 13 + a 12 a 33 a 33 a 11 + a 13 a 31 a 31 a 12 + a 11 a 32 2 a 11 a 21 2 a 12 a 22 2 a 13 a 23 a 12 a 23 + a 22 a 13 a 13 a 21 + a 23 a 11 a 11 a 22 + a 21 a 12 )
M = ( a 11 2 a 12 2 a 13 2 2 a 12 a 13 2 a 11 a 13 2 a 11 a 12 a 21 2 a 22 2 a 23 2 2 a 22 a 23 2 a 21 a 23 2 a 21 a 22 a 31 2 a 32 2 a 33 2 2 a 32 a 33 2 a 31 a 33 2 a 31 a 32 a 21 a 31 a 22 a 32 a 23 a 33 a 22 a 33 + a 32 a 23 a 23 a 31 + a 33 a 21 a 21 a 32 + a 31 a 22 a 11 a 31 a 12 a 32 a 13 a 33 a 32 a 13 + a 12 a 33 a 33 a 11 + a 13 a 31 a 31 a 12 + a 11 a 32 a 11 a 21 a 12 a 22 a 13 a 23 a 12 a 23 + a 22 a 13 a 13 a 21 + a 23 a 11 a 11 a 22 + a 21 a 12 )
The elastic constants, including the compliance sij (i, j = 1–6) (m2/N) and the stiffness cij (i, j = 1–6) (N/m2), are defined by Hooke’s Law containing the relations between the strain x and the stress X, (x) = (s) (X) and (X) = (c) (x). The piezoelectric coefficient dij (i = 1–3, j = 1–6) (C/N), relates polarization P, to stress X in the relation of (P) = (d) (X). For a three-dimensional space coordinate system, all physical quantities are presented in matrix forms. Matrices of elastic stiffnesses cij and piezoelectric constants dij are presented in [6 × 6] and [3 × 6] rank tensors, respectively. According to Euler’s rotation laws, physical quantity matrices in a new orientation are obtained by two-step product operations with transformation matrices A, N, and M [21,22].
( c ) = M X M Z ( c ) M Z t M X t
( d ) = A X A Z ( d ) N Z t N X t
The symbols ‘′’ and ‘t’ represent parameters in the new coordinate system and transpose matrix, respectively. The key to calculate Equations (5) and (6) is using the right original matrices (at θ = ϕ = 0°) which are obtained from Neumann’s principle changing with different point groups. The original matrices of (c) and (d) for 3m point group can be obtained from Ref. [20]. The elastic stiffnesses cij of BiFeO3 at room temperature were obtained from Refs. [23,24]. The piezoelectric constants dij of BiFeO3 at room temperature were obtained from Refs. [24,25]. Three-dimensional and two-dimensional representation graphs of parameters were drawn using Maple 18, a mathematical software program.

3. Results and Discussion

In both three-dimensional and two-dimensional graphs, the distance between a point and the original point represents the absolute value of the relative physical quantity in the relative direction. Orientational dependences of elastic constants cij were obtained by calculating (c′) in Equation (5) using data of five independent elastic constants (c11, c12, c13, c33, and c44) for rhombohedral BiFeO3. Figure 2a shows the three-dimensional representation of the first term elastic constant c11′. In the geometry in Figure 2a, moderate changes of c11′ could be observed with rhombohedral BiFeO3 crystal rotating to different (θ, ϕ). The max c11′ = 213 × 109 N/m2 is along ϕ = 0° and 90° (also see Figure 2b); while the min c11′ = 188 × 109 N/m2 is along ϕ = 45° and 135° with a 11.7% decrease from the maximum. It also indicates that along principle axes of rhombohedral BiFeO3, the max c11′ could be obtained.
Figure 3a shows the three-dimensional representation of the second term elastic stiffness c12′ of rhombohedral BiFeO3. The geometry exhibits rotation symmetry in that by rotating through the Z-axis about 120° it coincides with each other, and by rotating through the Z-axis about 60° the rotated and original shapes are axisymmetric about the Z-axis. This is because to the symmetry elements of rhombohedral BiFeO3 are three mirror-planes 120° apart from each other. Figure 3b shows the cross-section plots of c12′ in XOZ plane at ϕ = 0° or 120°. Plot in Figure 3c at ϕ = 60° is axisymmetric with the plot of Figure 3b about the Z-axis. The max c12′ = 132.3 × 109 N/m2 can be obtained at θ = 13° when ϕ = 0° and 120°, θ = −13° when ϕ = 60°. This indicates the three maximums exist in the mirror plane of rhombohedral BiFeO3, but they are at an angle to the spontaneous polarization axis. The min c12′ = 49 × 109 N/m2 can be obtained at θ = −77°.
Figure 4a shows the three-dimensional representation of the second term elastic stiffness c13′ of rhombohedral BiFeO3. Unlike c12′, large c13′ is found along the transverse directions, rather than the longitudinal directions. Symmetrical lobes of c13′ also are along mirror planes, as shown in Figure 4b,c. The max c13′ = 132 × 109 N/m2 can be obtained at θ of 77° inside mirror planes. The min c13′ = 44.6 × 109 N/m2 can be obtained at θ of –13°. Values of c11′, c12′, and c13 of rhombohedral BiFeO3 along several chosen orientations are shown in Table 1.
Orientational dependences of piezoelectric constants dij were obtained by calculating (d′) in Equation (6) using data of four independent elastic constants (d15, d22, d31, and d33) for rhombohedral BiFeO3. Figure 5a shows the three-dimensional representation of shear piezoelectric constant d15′. There are three pairs of lobes in the geometry shape of d15′. Each pairs are along mirror planes of 3m BiFeO3, and two components of each pairs are centrosymmetric to the origin point. d15′ with large values could be obtained along orientations inside there lobes and it tends to be zero outside these lobes showing very evident spatial anisotropy. Figure 5b shows a cross-sectional plot of piezoelectric constant d15′ at ϕ = 0°, 120°, and 240° (Figure 5c is the relative plot at ϕ = 60°). The max d15′ = 27.6 × 10−12 C/N could be obtained at θ = 69° inside mirror planes.
The transverse piezoelectric constant d31′ of rhombohedral BiFeO3 exhibits characteristics quite similar to that of d31′, shown in Figure 6. The max d31′ = 12.67 × 10−12 C/N could also be obtained at θ = 69° inside mirror planes, which is about three times larger than d31 = 4.5 × 10−12 C/N along the [001]-axis. Notably, the transverse piezoelectric constant d31′ tends to be small along the spontaneous polarization axis ([001]-axis in this study). The result is in accordance with transverse piezoelectric stress constant values e31 (unit C/m2, e = d·c, where d and c are piezoelectric constant and elastic stiffness, respectively) of epitaxial BiFeO3 films with various preferred orientations, e31 along the spontaneous polarization axis and at a tilt 54.7° were −1.3 and −3.5 C/m2, respectively, which is also about three times larger [26].
Figure 7a shows the three-dimensional representation of longitudinal piezoelectric constant d33′ of rhombohedral BiFeO3. Symmetrical lobes of d33′ also can be found along mirror planes. The max d33′ = 18 × 10−12 C/N could be obtained at θ = 0° along the spontaneous polarization axis. The cross-sectional two-dimensional plots in X’OZ planes are shown in Figure 7b,c. The value of d33′ along [100] and [010] is 13 × 10−12 C/N. The result in this study is quite in accordance with d33 value of BiFeO3 crystal measured by Raman scattering, which is d33 = 16 × 10−12 C/N [27]. For epitaxial BiFeO3 films, because of another measurement method applied (i.e., piezoelectric force microscopy, PFM) and strain from the substrates, values of d33 of epitaxial BiFeO3 films tend to be larger, in a range of 20–60 × 10−12 C/N. However, experimental results showed epitaxial BiFeO3 films with oriented structure has about four times the enhancement of longitudinal piezoelectric constant compared with polycrystalline BiFeO3 films [28,29], which are generally in line with our results. Values of d15′, d31′, and d33′ of rhombohedral BiFeO3 along several chosen orientations are summarized in Table 1.
From the orientation dependences of elastic and piezoelectric parameters investigated in this study, it can be found that the spatial anisotropy of cij and dij are related closely with the asymmetrical characteristics of rhombohedral BiFeO3 crystal with the 3m point group. As there is a rotation axis that is also the c-axis, several parameters tend to produce extreme values along this direction: c11 and d33 have the max values while d15 and d31 have the min values. Also, as there are three mirror planes locate at ϕ = 0°, 60° (240°), and 120°, respectively (see Figure 8a–c, also denoting them with Miller index of (010), ( 1 ¯ 10 ), and (100), respectively), the main lobes of several parameters are along the mirror planes: c12, c13, and all piezoelectric constants investigated. It also should be noted that Maxima directions are at a certain angle with the main crystalline axes, which may be attributed to the intrinsic lattice effects, which also appear in other piezoelectrics like BaTiO3 [30] and LiNbO3 [31]. The values of these parameters along arbitrary orientations were given in this study (some are listed in Table 1), which provides precise predictions for values of parameters with changing orientations. Table 1 also indicates that as a lead-free piezoelectric material, BiFeO3 has smaller elastic stiffnesses (larger elastic compliances) than tetragonal BaTiO3, and it has piezoelectric constants in the same level with those of KNbO3 [32,33]. Furthermore, the largest values of these parameters were given in this study, which shows applications for the growth of BiFeO3 films with oriented structure and enhanced properties.

4. Conclusions

Using the coordinate transformation method, the elastic and piezoelectric parameters at room temperature of rhombohedral BiFeO3 with the 3m point group along arbitrary orientations have been investigated. Several conclusions were obtained through this study:
(1) The max elastic stiffness c11′ = 213 × 109 N/m2 lies in planes with ϕ = 0° and 90°. The max elastic stiffness c12′ = c13′ = 132.2 × 109 N/m2 lie in directions at θ = 13° and θ = 77° inside three mirror planes, respectively.
(2) The max piezoelectric constant d15′ = 27.6 × 1012 C/N and the max piezoelectric constant d31′ = 12.67 × 1012 C/N could both be obtained at θ = 69° inside three mirror planes. The max piezoelectric constant d33′ = 18 × 1012 C/N could be obtained at θ = 0°, along the spontaneous polarization axis.
(3) The elastic and piezoelectric parameters of BiFeO3 along arbitrary orientations were presented, and by adopting optimal directions these parameters could be significantly enhanced, which shows applications for the growth of BeFeO3 films with oriented structures and enhanced properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.J. and Y.G.; Methodology, F.X.; Formal Analysis, C.Y.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, G.J.; Writing-Review & Editing, G.J.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (No. 51873083), the Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering (Sichuan University) (No. sklpme2018-4-27), the Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province (No. 2015-XCL-028), the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX17_1831, SJCX18_0759) and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province in China (grant number BK20140517).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (No. 51873083), the Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering (Sichuan University) (No. sklpme2018-4-27), the Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province (No. 2015-XCL-028), the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX17_1831, SJCX18_0759) and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province in China (grant number BK20140517).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhu, J.; Yin, Z.; Fu, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.; You, J.; Li, X.; Meng, J.; Liu, H.; et al. Epitaxial integration of tetragonal BiFeO3 with silicon for nonvolatile memory applications. J. Cryst. Growth 1998, 459, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lu, J.; Günther, A.; Schrettle, F.; Mayr, F.; Krohns, S.; Lunkenheimer, P.; Pimenov, A.; Travkin, V.D.; Mukhin, A.A.; Loidl, A. On the room temperature multiferroic BiFeO3: Magnetic, dielectric and thermal properties. Eur. Phys. J. B 2010, 75, 451–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ren, X.; Fan, H.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Z. Flexible lead-free BiFeO3/PDMS-based nanogenerator as piezoelectric energy harvester. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface 2011, 8, 26190–26197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sobhan, M.; Xu, Q.; Katoch, A.; Anariba1, F.; Kim, S.S.; Wu, P. O2 sensing dynamics of BiFeO3 nanofibers: Effect of minor carrier compensation. Nanotechnology 2015, 26, 175501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wu, J.; Wang, J. Multiferroic behavior and impedance spectroscopy of bilayered BiFeO3/CoFe2O4 thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 105, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kumar, M.; Yadav, K.L. Synthesis of nanocrystalline xCuFe2O4-(1-x)BiFeO3 magnetoelectric composite by chemical method. Mater. Lett. 2007, 61, 2089–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nan, C.W.; Bichurin, M.I.; Dong, S.X.; Viehland, D.; Srinivasan, G. Multiferroic magnetoelectric composites: Historical perspective, status, and future directions. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 031101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, T.; Scholl, A.; Zavalichell, F.; Lee, K.; Barry, M.; Doran, A.; Cruz, M.P.; Chu, Y.H.; Ederer, C.; Spaldin, N.A.; et al. Electrical control of antiferromagnetic domains in multiferroic BiFeO3 films at room temperature. Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Park, T.J.; Papaefthymiou, G.C.; Viescas, A.J.; Moodenbaugh, A.R.; Wong, S.S. Size-dependent magnetic properties of single-crystalline multiferroic BiFeO3 nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 766–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Palkar, V.R.; John, J.; Pinto, R. Observation of saturated polarization and dielectric anomaly in magnetoelectric BiFeO3 thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shvartsman, V.V.; Kleemann, W.; Haumont, R.; Kreisel, J. Large bulk polarization and regular domain structure in ceramic BiFeO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 172115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, J.X.; Xiang, B.; He, Q.; Seidel, J.; Zeches, R.J.; Yu, P.; Yang, S.Y.; Wang, C.H.; Chu, Y.H.; Martin, L.W.; et al. Large field-induced strains in a lead-free piezoelectric material. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Kanno, I.; Kotera, H.; Wasa, K. Measurement of transverse piezoelectric properties of PZT thin films. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2003, 107, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zheng, T.; Wu, J. Effects of site engineering and doped element types on piezoelectric and dielectric properties of bismuth ferrite lead-free ceramics. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 11326–11334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xue, X.; Tan, G.; Ren, H.; Xia, A. Structural, electric and multiferroic properties of Sm-doped BiFeO3 thin films prepared by the sol-gel process. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 6223–6228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Park, S.E.; Shrout, T.R. Ultrahigh strain and piezoelectric behavior in relaxor based ferroelectric single crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 1997, 82, 1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sabolsky, E.M.; James, A.R.; Kwon, S.; Trolier-McKinstry, S.; Messing, G.L. Piezoelectric properties of <001> textured Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–PbTiO3 ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 2551–2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kumar, A.; Rai, R.C.; Podraza, N.J.; Denev, S.; Ramirez, M.; Chu, Y.H.; Martin, L.W.; Ihlefeld, J.; Heeg, T.; Schubert, J.; et al. Linear and nonlinear optical properties of BiFeO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 121915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Neaton, J.B.; Ederer, C.; Waghmare, U.V.; Spaldin, N.A.; Rabe, K.M. First-principles study of spontaneous polarization in multiferroic BiFeO3. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 71, 014113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, J.H.; Oak, M.A.; Choi, H.J.; Sonc, J.Y.; Jang, H.M. Rhombohedral–orthorhombic morphotropic phase boundary in BiFeO3-based multiferroics: First-principles prediction. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 1667–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Newnham, R.E. Properties of Materials. Anisotropy, Symmetry, Structure; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jian, G.; Wong, C.P. Orientation dependence of magnetoelectric coefficient in BaTiO3/CoFe2O4. AIP Adv. 2017, 7, 075307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shang, S.L.; Sheng, G.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.Q.; Liu, Z.K. Elastic properties of cubic and rhombohedral BiFeO3 from first-principles calculations. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 052102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dong, H.; Chen, C.; Wang, S.; Duan, W.; Li, J. Elastic properties of tetragonal BiFeO3 from first-principles calculations. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 182905. [Google Scholar]
  25. Graf, M.; Sepliarsky, M.; Machado, R.; Stachiotti, M.G. Dielectric and piezoelectric properties of BiFeO3 from molecular dynamics simulations. Solid State Commun. 2015, 218, 10–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ujimoto, K.; Yoshimura, T.; Ashida, A.; Fujimura, N. Direct piezoelectric properties of (100) and (111) BiFeO3 epitaxial thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 102901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rovillain, P.; Cazayous, M.; Sacuto, A.; Lebeugle, D.; Colson, D. Piezoelectric measurements on BiFeO3 single crystal by Raman scattering. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2009, 321, 1699–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kariya, K.; Yoshimura, T.; Murakami, S.; Fujumura, N. Enhancement of piezoelectric properties of (100)-oriented BiFeO3 films on (100) LaNiO3/Si. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 53, 09PA14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kariya, K.; Yoshimura, T.; Murakami, S.; Fujumura, N. Piezoelectric properties of (100) oriented BiFeO3 thin films on LaNiO3. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 53, 08NB02. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Damjanovic, D.; Brem, F.; Setter, N. Crystal orientation dependence of the piezoelectric d33 coefficient in tetragonal BaTiO3 as a function of temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 652–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yue, W.; Jian, J.Y. Crystal orientation dependence of piezoelectric properties in LiNbO3 and LiTaO3. Opt. Mater. 2003, 23, 403–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jian, G.; Shao, H.; Zhang, C.; Yan, C.; Zhao, N.; Song, B.; Wong, C.P. Orientation dependence of magnetoelectric coefficient in 1-3-type BaTiO3/CoFe2O4. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2018, 449, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Y.; Jiang, Y.J. Anisotropy of Physical Properties of Materials: Orientation Dependences of Macroscopic Physical Properties of Single Crystals and Polycrystalline Ceramics; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Illustration of the crystal structure of BiFeO3 (R3C space group, 3m point group). Lattice constants: a = b = 0.56 nm, c = 1.395 nm; α = β = 90°, γ = 120°. The chosen crystallographic coordinate system: X||a, Z||c, Ya. The angle between Y and b-axis is 30°.
Figure 1. Illustration of the crystal structure of BiFeO3 (R3C space group, 3m point group). Lattice constants: a = b = 0.56 nm, c = 1.395 nm; α = β = 90°, γ = 120°. The chosen crystallographic coordinate system: X||a, Z||c, Ya. The angle between Y and b-axis is 30°.
Materials 11 02441 g001
Figure 2. (a) Schematic diagram of elastic stiffness c11 by the experimental data of BiFeO3; (b) elastic stiffness c11 of BiFeO3 in XOZ plane (also applies to YOZ plane, unit GPa).
Figure 2. (a) Schematic diagram of elastic stiffness c11 by the experimental data of BiFeO3; (b) elastic stiffness c11 of BiFeO3 in XOZ plane (also applies to YOZ plane, unit GPa).
Materials 11 02441 g002
Figure 3. (a) Schematic diagram of elastic stiffness c12 by the experimental data of BiFeO3; (b) elastic stiffness c12 of BiFeO3 in XOZ plane at ϕ = 0°; (c) elastic stiffness c12 of BiFeO3 in XOZ plane at ϕ = 60° (unit GPa).
Figure 3. (a) Schematic diagram of elastic stiffness c12 by the experimental data of BiFeO3; (b) elastic stiffness c12 of BiFeO3 in XOZ plane at ϕ = 0°; (c) elastic stiffness c12 of BiFeO3 in XOZ plane at ϕ = 60° (unit GPa).
Materials 11 02441 g003
Figure 4. (a) Schematic diagram of elastic stiffness c13 by the experimental data of BiFeO3; (b) elastic stiffness c13 of BiFeO3 in XOZ plane at ϕ = 0°; (c) elastic stiffness c13 of BiFeO3 in XOZ plane at ϕ = 60° (unit GPa).
Figure 4. (a) Schematic diagram of elastic stiffness c13 by the experimental data of BiFeO3; (b) elastic stiffness c13 of BiFeO3 in XOZ plane at ϕ = 0°; (c) elastic stiffness c13 of BiFeO3 in XOZ plane at ϕ = 60° (unit GPa).
Materials 11 02441 g004
Figure 5. (a) Schematic diagram of piezoelectric constant d15 by the experimental data of BiFeO3; (b) piezoelectric constant d15 of BiFeO3 in XOZ plane at ϕ = 0°; (c) piezoelectric constant d15 of BiFeO3 in XOZ plane at ϕ = 60° (unit 1012 C/N).
Figure 5. (a) Schematic diagram of piezoelectric constant d15 by the experimental data of BiFeO3; (b) piezoelectric constant d15 of BiFeO3 in XOZ plane at ϕ = 0°; (c) piezoelectric constant d15 of BiFeO3 in XOZ plane at ϕ = 60° (unit 1012 C/N).
Materials 11 02441 g005
Figure 6. Schematic diagram of piezoelectric constant d31 by the experimental data of BiFeO3 (unit 1012 C/N).
Figure 6. Schematic diagram of piezoelectric constant d31 by the experimental data of BiFeO3 (unit 1012 C/N).
Materials 11 02441 g006
Figure 7. (a) Schematic diagram of piezoelectric constant d33 by the experimental data of BiFeO3; (b) piezoelectric constant d33 of BiFeO3 in XOZ plane at ϕ = 0°; (c) piezoelectric constant d33 of BiFeO3 in XOZ plane at ϕ = 60° (unit 1012 C/N).
Figure 7. (a) Schematic diagram of piezoelectric constant d33 by the experimental data of BiFeO3; (b) piezoelectric constant d33 of BiFeO3 in XOZ plane at ϕ = 0°; (c) piezoelectric constant d33 of BiFeO3 in XOZ plane at ϕ = 60° (unit 1012 C/N).
Materials 11 02441 g007
Figure 8. Crystalline planes of BiFeO3 at various rotation angles: (a) ϕ = 0°, along a- and c-axes, Miller index (010)-plane; (b) ϕ = 60°, along c-axis, Miller index (1(-)10)-plane; (c) ϕ = 120°, along b- and c-axes, Miller index (100)-plane. The three planes are also the three mirror symmetry planes.
Figure 8. Crystalline planes of BiFeO3 at various rotation angles: (a) ϕ = 0°, along a- and c-axes, Miller index (010)-plane; (b) ϕ = 60°, along c-axis, Miller index (1(-)10)-plane; (c) ϕ = 120°, along b- and c-axes, Miller index (100)-plane. The three planes are also the three mirror symmetry planes.
Materials 11 02441 g008
Table 1. Comparison of elastic stiffness cij (GPa) and piezoelectric constant dij (10−12 C/N) and their extremums along chosen orientations among BiFeO3 (3m), tetragonal BaTiO3 (4mm), and KNbO3 (m2m) [28,29] #.
Table 1. Comparison of elastic stiffness cij (GPa) and piezoelectric constant dij (10−12 C/N) and their extremums along chosen orientations among BiFeO3 (3m), tetragonal BaTiO3 (4mm), and KNbO3 (m2m) [28,29] #.
Crystal||[nkl][100][010][001]MaxMinCrystal||[nkl][100][010][001]MaxMin
BFc11213188213213188BTc11 [28]271271271271271
BFc12494911113244.6BTc12 [28]152152179179152
BFc131111114913244.6
BFd1525.909.827.60BTd15 [29]39239203920
KNd15 [29]2062062120621
BFd3111.904.512.670BTd31 [29]00−34.50−34.5
KNd31 [29]0019.519.50
BFd33131318180BTd33 [29]202085.6157.820
KNd33 [29] 029.359.30
# The symbols BF, BT, and KN represent BiFeO3, BaTiO3, and KNbO3, respectively.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jian, G.; Xue, F.; Guo, Y.; Yan, C. Orientation Dependence of Elastic and Piezoelectric Properties in Rhombohedral BiFeO3. Materials 2018, 11, 2441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11122441

AMA Style

Jian G, Xue F, Guo Y, Yan C. Orientation Dependence of Elastic and Piezoelectric Properties in Rhombohedral BiFeO3. Materials. 2018; 11(12):2441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11122441

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jian, Gang, Fei Xue, Yuhang Guo, and Chao Yan. 2018. "Orientation Dependence of Elastic and Piezoelectric Properties in Rhombohedral BiFeO3" Materials 11, no. 12: 2441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11122441

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop