Next Article in Journal
Keggin-Type Heteropoly Salts as Bifunctional Catalysts in Aerobic Baeyer-Villiger Oxidation
Previous Article in Journal
Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Si3N4-Fe3Si Composites Prepared by Gas-Pressure Sintering
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Modified Porous SiO2-Supported Cu3(BTC)2 Membrane with High Performance of Gas Separation

1
Key Laboratory for EOR Technology (Ministry of Education), Northeast Petroleum University, XuefuRoad 99, Daqing 163318, China
2
Mechanical Science and Engineering College, Northeast Petroleum University, XuefuRoad 99, Daqing 163318, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Inorganic Synthesis & Preparative Chemistry, Jilin University, QianjinRoad 2699, Changchun 130012, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2018, 11(7), 1207; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11071207
Submission received: 12 June 2018 / Revised: 7 July 2018 / Accepted: 11 July 2018 / Published: 13 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Porous Materials)

Abstract

:
The structures and applications of metal-organic framework materials (MOFs) have been attracting great interest due to the wide variety of possible applications, for example, chemical sensing, separation, and catalysis. N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine is grafted on a porous SiO2 disk to obtain a modified porous SiO2 disk. A large-scale, continuous, and compact Cu3(BTC)2 membrane is prepared based on a modified porous SiO2 disk. The chemical structure, surface morphology, thermal stability, mechanical stability, and gas separation performance of the obtained Cu3(BTC)2 membrane is analyzed and characterized by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and a gas separation experiment. The results show that the prepared Cu3(BTC)2 membrane has an intact morphology with its crystal. It is continuous, compact, and intact, and has good thermal stability and mechanical stability. The result of the gas separation experiment shows that the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane has a good selectivity of hydrogen and can be used to recover and purify hydrogen.

1. Introduction

During the past few decades, the development of membrane materials has drawn research interests in both research-oriented and industrial applications [1,2,3]. The membrane is a barrier, which can selectively control some materials to pass through and make other substances not. As a result, the membrane can be used to separate mixtures [4,5,6]. Compared with traditional separation methods, the separation-based membrane has the advantage of energy saving and efficiency. Traditionally, the development and application of membranes involve documentation of the polymer membrane because it has disadvantages of short life, low working temperature, and lower chemical stability and selectivity, but researchers need to explore some new membrane materials that have stable performance and are more conducive to separation [7,8,9]. Metal-organic framework materials (MOFs) have become excellent candidates for membrane fabrication because they have diverse structures, uniform pore size, permanent porosity, and high thermal and chemical stability. The membrane separation is mainly based on the molecular-size sieve, which also can separate some materials that can react with the membrane through the method of adsorption and diffusion. The MOF membrane has developed quickly, because scientists can control the pore size easily by changing the metal ions and organic ligands while also modifying the surface of their pores through some approaches. Although more MOF membranes have been successfully synthesized, how to make the membrane have higher gas permeability as well as higher selectivity also offers more challenges [10,11,12].
A convenient, low-cost, and universal technique of preparing MOF membranes is essential for exploring the relationships between their structures and properties [13,14,15]. Metal-ligand coordination bonding interactions between the MOF membrane and substrate is the most widely used strategy to construct MOF composite membranes. To date, all reported methods of preparing MOF membranes have been limited to specific MOF membranes and specific surface-functionalized substrates, producing some limited methods due to the high cost [16,17,18,19]. Thus, far, there are few reports on the preparation of large-scale continuous compact MOF membranes with low cost.
Hydrogen is the most ideal source of energy known at present. It has many advantages, such as higher heat, wide sources, and no pollution of products. Its most attractive prospect is to replace fossil fuel as a power source for vehicles, which can significantly reduce the exhaust of air pollutants such as CO2, CO, NOx and more: removal at the source eliminates the greenhouse effect and haze threat to mankind and realizes the potential of low carbon and environmental protection [20,21]. However, due to its high production cost, difficultly of storage, transport complications and other shortcomings, its extensive popularization and application has been hindered. Presently, the main use of hydrogen is an important chemical raw material, such as ammonia gas and methanol [22,23]. The main sources of hydrogen used in the industry are coal (dry distillation, gasification of coke oven gas, gas), and petroleum or natural gas (converted to CO + H2 syngas) and other fossil fuels [24,25]. These methods obviously do not get pure hydrogen. During actual industrial production, to obtain high-purity hydrogen, the above hydrogen containing gas (CO + H2) is converted to an H2 + CO2 mixture first, and then the purity of hydrogen is higher than 99% by the method of pressure variable absorption and membrane separation [26,27]. The source of hydrogen is very wide, such as the gas in the ammonia plant, the by-product coke oven gas of the coking plant, the by-product hydrogen in the chlor alkali factory and more. Generally, they are discharged into the atmosphere as exhaust gases. This causes great waste and pollution. Science can take the appropriate method to reduce the production cost of hydrogen and promote the production cost of hydrogen [28,29,30]. Based on this background, the authors can adsorb and separate these mixtures (CO2, CH4 and H2) to recycle hydrogen. This study uses the Cu3(BTC)2 composite membrane to purify hydrogen, because Cu3(BTC)2 is a mature MOF, which has a regular pore structure, good thermal stability, and chemistry. The structures and applications of Cu3(BTC)2 membranes have been attracting great interest because of the wide variety of possible applications, for example, chemical sensing, separation, catalysis, and electromagnetism [31,32,33]. Concurrently, the SiO2 substrate has a high gas flux as a very good supporting role [34,35]. It is beneficial to separate and purify hydrogen and has a long service life. It is feasible for large-scale commercial applications.
The Cu3(BTC)2 membrane is synthesized to be used to separate and purify hydrogen on the SiO2 disk modified by N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine. The method of preparing the MOF membrane or zeolite membrane using an organosiloxane agent modified base has been previously reported [36,37,38,39,40]. The XRD shows that the prepared Cu3(BTC)2 membrane has an intact morphology with its crystal, and the SEM shows that it is continuous, compact, and intact, while having a good thermal stability and mechanical stability. The separation factors of the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane for H2/CO2, H2/N2, H2/CH4 is 10.07, 10.20 and 11.34. The results show that Cu3(BTC)2 membrane has a good selectivity for hydrogen and can be used for recovery of hydrogen.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Porous SiO2 disks (diameter = 2.0 cm) were purchased from the Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Company (Shanghai, China). Ethanol (C2H5OH) and N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine (C8H22N2O3Si), Cupric nitrate (Cu(NO3)2·3H2O) and trimesic acid (H3BTC) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All products were used as received.

2.2. Pretreatment of the SiO2 Disk

The porous SiO2 disk (diameter = 2.0 cm) was soaked into the mixed solution of the concentrated sulfuric acid and the hydrogen peroxide with the volume ratio of 6:4 for 5 h making the surface completely oxidized. To follow, the porous SiO2 disk was taken out and placed into the beaker of 50 mL. 30 mL of deionized water was added into the beaker. The solution in the beaker was conducted by ultrasonic treatment for 10 minutes and poured out. The washing process was repeated three times. The porous SiO2 disk was dried at 120 °C for 2 h.

2.3. Surface Modification of the SiO2 Disk with N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine

N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine (1 mL) and alcohol (50 mL) were added to the beaker and hydrolyzed for ten minutes. The oxidized porous SiO2 disk slice was placed horizontally at the bottom of the beaker and stirred for 24 h at 25 °C. Following the reaction, the SiO2 disk was washed with anhydrous ethanol repeatedly to remove the N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine which was not functionalized. Then the functionalized porous SiO2 disk was dried in a vacuum.

2.4. Synthetic Cu3(BTC)2 Membrane with the Modified SiO2 Disk

The MOF membranes were prepared by means of the hydrothermal method. The MOF membrane chosen was Cu3(BTC)2. Then, 0.7 g of cupric nitrate was dissolved in 19.2 mL of distilled water and solution A was obtained. Similarly, 0.336 g trimesic acid was dissolved in 19.2 mL ethanol and solution B was obtained. Solution B was then poured into solution A and stirred for 1 h. The mixed solution was poured into the Teflon-lined autoclave. The substrate of the functional porous SiO2 disk was placed in the Teflon-lined autoclave with tweezers at 100 °C for 3 d [41]. Then, the membrane was washed several times with ethanol and dried at 25 °C. The Cu3(BTC)2 crystals adhered to the membrane surface were washed away with ethanol and the dried MOF membrane based on the functional porous SiO2 disk was prepared by air-drying. A schematic diagram of the whole synthesis process is shown in Figure 1.

2.5. Characterization of the Cu3(BTC)2 Membranes

The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed using a DTG-60 thermal analyzer system (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) at the heating rate of 10 °C min−1 to 900 °C in a dried air atmosphere. The air flow rate was 30 mL min−1. Samples were loaded in a platinum pan. The FTIR spectra (KBr Sigma, Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were measured using a IRAFFINITY-1 Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Nakagyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan). Samples were packed firmly to obtain transparent films. PXRD studies were performed using a D/MAX2550 diffractometer (Riguku Corporation, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) using Cu-Ka radiation, 40 kV, 200 mA with a scanning rate of 0.3° min−1 (2θ). Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) analysis was performed on a JSM 6700 (JEOS Corporation, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan).

2.6. Low-Pressure N2 Sorption Measurements

Nitrogen sorption experiments were performed at 77 K up to 1 bar using a manometric sorption analyzer Autosorb iQ MP (Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, FL, USA). Prior to sorption analysis, the sample was evacuated at 150 °C for 10 h using a turbomolecular vacuum pump. Specific surface areas were calculated from nitrogen adsorption data by multipoint Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis. Pore size distributions were calculated from the N2 adsorption isotherms using a quenched solid density functional theory (nitrogen on carbon, slit pore) method which gave the least fitting error.

2.7. The Gas Separation Test

Prior to gas permeation measurements, the membranes were sealed in modules and swept by using Ar (sweep gas) and detecting gas. Meanwhile, the modules were heated to 80 °C and held for 1 h, then cooled to room temperature. Regarding both single component and mixture permeation, the permeate side and the feed side pressure were both set to 1 bar. Concerning mixture permeation, both feed gas and sweep gas rates were 80 mL min−1. A soap-film flow meter was used to measure the flux of the gas and the volume ratio of the mixture gas. This assembly is shown in Figure 2.

3. Results

3.1. The FTIR of the Modified SiO2 Disk

The FTIR spectra of the produced porous SiO2 disk and the modified porous SiO2 disk, demonstrated that the N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine groups were grafted onto the porous SiO2 disk surface, as presented in Figure 3. Regarding the case of the porous SiO2 disk, the sharp band at 3450 cm−1 corresponded to the presence of silanol groups (Si–OH) on the silica surface. The absorption bands at 1645 cm and 1080 cm−1 were related to the bending vibration of H2O and the isolated terminal silanol (Si–OH) groups, respectively. Following modification with N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine, the absorption of water and the Si–OH absorption peak intensity decreased, which was due to the surface of the porous SiO2 hydroxyl (–OH) and N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine condensation reaction reducing the number. This changed the degree of bonding of the porous SiO2 surface to water, that is, the bonding density with hydrogen to produce hydrogen changes. The characteristic absorption peak after N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine appeared at 2980 cm−1 due to the asymmetric stretching of the C–H bond in the aminopropyl group, indicating that N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine had been grafted onto the porous SiO2 surface.

3.2. The XRD of the Cu3(BTC)2 Membranes

Figure 4 is the XRD spectrum of the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane (black) and the Cu3(BTC)2 powder (red). Figure 4 shows the apex position of the XRD peak of the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane was the same as the highest position of the XRD spectrum of the Cu3(BTC)2 powder. The phenomenon illustrates that the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane is a pure phase composed of Cu3(BTC)2 crystal.

3.3. The TGA of the Cu3(BTC)2 Membranes

The TGA was conducted to investigate the thermal stability of the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane. The results illustrate that the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane, at 63 °C, had a weight loss of 5%, which was the adsorbed water, and the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane was stable in the air to 310 °C, showing its good thermal stability. The thermogravimetric curve is shown in Figure 5.

3.4. The Low-Pressure N2 Sorption Measurements and the Pore Size of the Cu3(BTC)2 Membranes

The low-pressure N2 sorption measurements and the pore size of the Cu3(BTC)2 membranes were revealed by nitrogen sorption isotherm measurement at 77 K (Figure 6). The samples both were activated and degassed 10 h at 150 °C and measured from 0 to 1 bar (1 bar = P0). The result of the Cu3(BTC)2 membranes exhibited a type I isotherm, which is a typical feature of microporous materials. The BET surface area was evaluated, and pore diameter was consistent with those previously reported, indicating that the m as 1550 m2 g−1. The pore size was calculated by appropriate fitting of the density functional theory model to the isotherm yields, which was a value of 1.0 nm for the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane. BET surface area and pore diameter were consistent with those previously reported, indicating that the membrane material had the same adsorption performance as the powder material [42].

3.5. The SEM of the Cu3(BTC)2 Membranes

The characterizations of the morphology of before and after the SiO2 disk were modified and the modified porous SiO2 disk supporting the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane was conducted after defining the structural information and thermal stability of this membrane. The SEM of the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane is shown in Figure 7. It can be observed that there were many small holes on the surface of the SiO2 disk (Figure 7a). Results following modification of the SiO2 disk (Figure 7b) were the same as before modification (Figure 7a). The modification of the SiO2 disk with the organosiloxane agent did not affect its permeability. The results show that the modified SiO2 disk had the same permeability for H2, CO2, N2 and CH4, and were all 1.90 × 10−6 mol m−2 s−1 Pa−1. Thus, the modified base without Cu3(BTC)2 membrane was not selective for H2, CO2, N2 and CH4. The obtained Cu3(BTC)2 membrane was composed of numerous octahedron crystals inlaid and stacked to form a uniform and dense continuous defect-free membrane structure. The scale of the microscope was 200 µm, and the membrane was continuously dense. When the scale was made gradually smaller/the magnification was gradually increased, the positive octahedral structure of the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane became increasingly obvious but the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane was composed of several positive octahedral crystals intercalated and stacked to form a uniformly dense continuous defect-free membrane.

3.6. The Gas Separation Test of Cu3(BTC)2 Membrane

The permeability of the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane to four components of H2, N2, CO2 and CH4 was evaluated. The dynamic diameter of the four gas molecules of H2, CO2, N2 and CH4 and the specific results of the membrane permeability to these four gases are listed in Table 1.
The separation experiments of the H2/CO2, H2/CH4 and H2/N2 mixed gases by Cu3(BTC)2 membrane were conducted to investigate the two-component gas separation of the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane. Separation test results of various mixed gases at 298 K and 0.1 MPa are shown in Table 2. These are test results of single component permeable flow and test results of two-component permeable flow. The separation factor and the ideal separation factor calculated according to the results are also shown in Table 2.

3.7. Mechanical Stability of Cu3(BTC)2 Membrane

To study the mechanical properties of the synthesized Cu3(BTC)2 membrane, the gas separation performance of H2/CO2 (red), H2/N2 (black), H2/CH4 (blue) with the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane was tested repeatedly under 298 K and 0.1 MPa. Among them, red is powder, black is membrane, and blue is methane. The results show that the separation factor of the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane, the synthesized membrane reproducibility, was not obviously changed after 24 h of repeated tests. The mechanical properties were strong, and the utilization rate was high (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

4.1. Preparation of the MOF Membrane

Here, we report a convenient and universal method to prepare MOF membranes by hydrothermal method. First, the porous SiO2 disk is soaked in the mixed solution of the concentrated sulfuric acid and the hydrogen peroxide with a volume ratio of 6:4 for 5 h, which gets hydroxyl on the surface of the completely oxidized porous SiO2 disk. Then the oxidized porous SiO2 disk was modified by N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine. The FTIR spectra of the modified porous SiO2 disk demonstrated that many amino groups existed on the surface of the modified porous SiO2 disk, which could be used to grow MOF membrane. The MOF membrane used was Cu3(BTC)2. The stable 3D structure of the Cu3(BTC)2 was formed by these secondary structural units interlaced with each other, and the 3D structure had a square aperture with a regular aperture of about 1 nm. The results of N2 adsorption show that the specific surface area of BET was about 1550 m2/g [42]. The XRD illustrates that the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane was a pure phase composed of Cu3(BTC)2 crystals (Figure 2).

4.2. The Morphology and the Stability of the Cu3(BTC)2 Membrane

The TGA was conducted to investigate the thermal stability of the modified porous SiO2disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane. The results show that the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane was at 63 °C with a weight loss of 5% (the adsorbed water), and the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane was stable in the air to 300 °C, showing its good thermal stability. The thermogravimetric curve is shown in Figure 5. The characterizations of the morphology of the SiO2 disk and the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane was conducted after defining the structural information and thermal stability of this membrane. The SEM of the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane is shown in Figure 7. It can be observed that the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane was a thin, compact, and continuous membrane, closely attached to the modified SiO2 substrate. Viewed through the scanning electron microscope, the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane also showed that the intergrowth-crystallized octahedral architectures merged tightly. To study the mechanical properties of the synthesized Cu3(BTC)2 membrane, the gas separation performance of the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane was tested repeatedly under 298 K and 0.1 MPa. The results show that the separation factor of the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane, the synthesized membrane reproducibility, was not obviously changed after 24 h of repeated testing. The mechanical properties were strong, and the utilization rate was high (Figure 8).

4.3. The Gas Separation Performance of Cu3(BTC)2 Membrane

The dynamic diameter of the four gas molecules of H2, N2, CO2 and CH4 and the specific results of the membrane permeability to these four gases are listed in Table 1. It can be observed that the order of the flow of the four gases through the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane was H2 > N2 > CH4 > CO2, and the flow rate was 1.61 × 10−7 mol m−2 s−1 Pa−1, 1.84 × 10−8 mol m−2 s−1 Pa−1, 1.98 × 10−8 mol m−2 s−1 Pa−1 and 1.69 × 10−8 mol m−2 s−1 Pa−1, respectively. Based on the ideal separation coefficient formula a = JA/JB, the ideal separation factor of H2/CO2, H2/N2, H2/CH4 were 9.53, 8.75 and 8.13, respectively. It was higher than the corresponding Knudsen diffusion coefficient (4.69 H2/CO2, 3.74 H2/N2, and 2.83 H2/CH4) and was also much larger than the ideal separation factor that was reported to separate the same gas through the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane [42]. This preliminarily determines that the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane synthesized in this study are suitable for the separation of H2 in the mixed components of H2/CO2, H2/N2, H2/CH4. Since the pore size of the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane was about 1 nm, which was bigger than the dynamic diameters of H2, CO2, N2 and CH4 molecules (Table 1). Thus, there was no effect on H2 by the molecular sieve points from the other gases. The Cu3(BTC)2 structure contained many Cu elements for the adsorption of CO2, N2 and CH4 gases providing the active site and the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane by chemical adsorption to gas diffusion the effect of separation, as far as the authors are aware. According to reports in the literature, Cu3(BTC)2 for CO2, N2 and CH4 adsorption enthalpy is far greater than H2, and the preparation of the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane nitrogen adsorption performance showed the same as the previous preparation of fission material adsorption performance. Thus, in this study, some adsorption properties of the MOF powder could be on behalf of the MOF-related adsorption properties of the membrane [43,44,45,46]. Therefore, the separation of two-component gas is investigated. The separation experiments of the H2/CO2, H2/N2, H2/CH4 mixed gases by Cu3(BTC)2 membrane was conducted to investigate the two-component gas separation of the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane. Separation test results of various mixed gases at 298 K and 0.1 MPa are listed in Table 2. There are test results of single component permeable flow, and two-component permeable flow. The separation factor and the ideal separation factor calculated according to the results are also listed in Table 2. Looking at Table 2, it can be observed that the flow of H2 in the mixed gas is 1.61 × 10−7 mol m−2 s−1 Pa−1, many times higher than the flow of other gases. This phenomenon illustrates that the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane has the function of separating and purifying H2 and can be used to separate and purify H2 in the mixture of H2/CO2, H2/N2, H2/CH4. The flow of H2 in the two-component gas is also much higher than that of the other components, it can be obtained through the calculation of the separation factors of the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane for the H2/CO2, H2/N2, H2/CH4 components are 10.07, 10.20 and 11.34 in the condition of 298 K and 0.1 MPa. These values are higher than the corresponding Knudsen values. This phenomenon illustrates that the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane can be used in gas separation and has a good performance of gas separation.

5. Conclusions

This work is the first report of the synthesis of modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membranes. The obtained functioned porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membranes have crystal phases that coincide with Cu3(BTC)2 crystals with a high thermal stability and intact morphology. Additionally, the performances of the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane for the separation of hydrogen and other gases were evaluated and the separation factor of each group of experience was calculated in detail. It was found that the membrane has a good separation performance for hydrogen and can be used in hydrogen recovery in industry. This Cu3(BTC)2 membrane fabrication method is simple and convenient and can be readily applied to a variety of other material compositions to produce functional membranes with diverse micropore structures, thus opening a host of opportunities for the development of new functional MOFs.

Author Contributions

All authors made critical contributions to the collection and interpretation of data. M.B. and G.W. conceived and designed the experiments; D.G. and Y.W. performed the experiments; C.L., K.W. wrote the paper.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (No. NSFC-51574085) and the Scientific Research Staring Foundation of Northeast Petroleum University (rc201716).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kraytsberg, A.; Ein-Eli, Y. Review of advanced materials for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Energy Fuels 2014, 28, 7303–7330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, S.; Li, X.; Wu, H.; Tian, Z.; Xin, Q.; He, G.; Guiver, M.D. Advances in high permeability polymer-based membrane materials for CO2 separations. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1863–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bernardo, P.; Drioli, E.; Golemme, G. Membrane gas separation: A review/state of the art. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 4638–4663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Padaki, M.; Murali, R.S.; Abdullah, M.S.; Misdan, N.; Moslehyani, A.; Kassim, M.A.; Ismail, A.F. Membrane technology enhancement in oil–water separation: A review. Desalination 2015, 357, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, X.Y.; Vinh-Thang, H.; Ramirez, A.A.; Rodrigue, D.; Kaliaguine, S. Membrane gas separation technologies for biogas upgrading. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 24399–24448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, S.; Lin, X.; Ou, R.; Liu, H.; Zhang, X.; Simon, G.P.; Wang, H. Highly crosslinked, chlorine tolerant polymer network entwined graphene oxide membrane for water desalination. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 1533–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kitagawa, S. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5415–5418. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jiang, W.L.; Ding, L.G.; Yao, B.J.; Wang, J.C.; Chen, G.J.; Li, Y.A.; Dong, Y.B. A MOF-membrane based on the covalent bonding driven assembly of a NMOF with an organic oligomer and its application in membrane reactors. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 13564–13567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Xiang, F.; Marti, A.M.; Hopkinson, D.P. Layer-by-layer assembled polymer/MOF membrane for H2/CO2 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 556, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lin, Y.S. Metal organic framework membranes for separation applications. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2015, 8, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Adatoz, E.; Avci, A.K.; Keskin, S. Opportunities and challenges of MOF-based membranes in gas separations. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 152, 207–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, Y.; Feng, X.; Yuan, S.; Zhou, J.; Wang, B. Challenges and recent advances in MOF–polymer composite membranes for gas separation. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 896–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Campbell, M.G.; Sheberla, D.; Liu, S.F.; Swager, T.M.; Dincă, M. Cu3(hexaiminotriphenylene)2: An electrically conductive 2D metal–organic framework for chemiresistive sensing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 4349–4352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Al-Janabi, N.; Hill, P.; Torrente-Murciano, L.; Garforth, A.; Gorgojo, P.; Siperstein, F.; Fan, X. Mapping the Cu-BTC metal–organic framework (HKUST-1) stability envelope in the presence of water vapour for CO2 adsorption from flue gases. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 281, 669–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kim, H.K.; Yun, W.S.; Kim, M.B.; Kim, J.Y.; Bae, Y.S.; Lee, J.; Jeong, N.C. A Chemical route to activation of open metal sites in the copper-based metal–organic framework materials HKUST-1 and Cu-MOF-2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10009–10015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fu, J.; Das, S.; Xing, G.; Ben, T.; Valtchev, V.; Qiu, S. Fabrication of COF-MOF composite membranes and their highly selective separation of H2/CO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 7673–7680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Denny, M.S.; Cohen, S.M. In situ modification of metal–organic frameworks in mixed-matrix membranes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 9029–9032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sorribas, S.; Kudasheva, A.; Almendro, E.; Zornoza, B.; de la Iglesia, Ó.; Téllez, C.; Coronas, J. Pervaporation and membrane reactor performance of polyimide based mixed matrix membranes containing MOF HKUST-1. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015, 124, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Seoane, B.; Coronas, J.; Gascon, I.; Benavides, M.E.; Karvan, O.; Caro, J.; Gascon, J. Metal–organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: A solution for highly efficient CO2 capture. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2421–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Sevilla, M.; Mokaya, R. Energy storage applications of activated carbons: Supercapacitors and hydrogen storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 1250–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dutta, S. A review on production, storage of hydrogen and its utilization as an energy resource. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 1148–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sharma, S.; Ghoshal, S.K. Hydrogen the future transportation fuel: From production to applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 43, 1151–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tremel, A.; Wasserscheid, P.; Baldauf, M.; Hammer, T. Techno-economic analysis for the synthesis of liquid and gaseous fuels based on hydrogen production via electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2015, 40, 11457–11464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Singh, S.; Jain, S.; Venkateswaran, P.S.; Tiwari, A.K.; Nouni, M.R.; Pandey, J.K.; Goel, S. Hydrogen: A sustainable fuel for future of the transport sector. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 51, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Uusitalo, V.; Väisänen, S.; Inkeri, E.; Soukka, R. Potential for greenhouse gas emission reductions using surplus electricity in hydrogen, methane and methanol production via electrolysis. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 134, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shan, X.; Qian, Y.; Zhu, L.; Lu, X. Effects of EGR rate and hydrogen/carbon monoxide ratio on combustion and emission characteristics of biogas/diesel dual fuel combustion engine. Fuel 2016, 181, 1050–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, F.; Zhao, P.; Niu, M.; Maddy, J. The survey of key technologies in hydrogen energy storage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 14535–14552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, Q.; Li, L.; Tan, W.; Sun, Y.; Wang, H.; Ma, J.; Zhao, X. Exceptional high selectivity of hydrogen/methane separation on a phosphonate-based MOF membrane with exclusion of methane molecules. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 9797–9800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hu, Y.; Dong, X.; Nan, J.; Jin, W.; Ren, X.; Xu, N.; Lee, Y.M. Metal–organic framework membranes fabricated via reactive seeding. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 737–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Nenoff, T.M. Hydrogen purification: MOF membranes put to the test. Nat. Chem. 2015, 7, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Wang, N.; Ji, S.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, C.; Li, J.R. Metal–organic framework/poly (vinyl alcohol) nanohybrid membrane for the pervaporation of toluene/n-heptane mixtures. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 489, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dolgopolova, E.A.; Brandt, A.J.; Ejegbavwo, O.A.; Duke, A.S.; Maddumapatabandi, T.D.; Galhenage, R.P.; Chandrashekhar, M. Electronic Properties of Bimetallic Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs): Tailoring the Density of Electronic States through MOF Modularity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 5201–5209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gu, Z.G.; Zhang, J. Epitaxial growth and applications of oriented metal–organic framework thin films. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Van Gestel, T.; Hauler, F.; Bram, M.; Meulenberg, W.A.; Buchkremer, H.P. Synthesis and characterization of hydrogen-selective sol–gel SiO2 membranes supported on ceramic and stainless steel supports. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 121, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sun, J.; Bi, H.; Su, S.; Jia, H.; Xie, X.; Sun, L. One-step preparation of GO/SiO2 membrane for highly efficient separation of oil-in-water emulsion. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 553, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, A.; Dou, W.; Caro, J. Steam-stable zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-90 membrane with hydrogen selectivity through covalent functionalization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 15562–15564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Huang, K.; Dong, Z.; Li, Q.; Jin, W. Growth of a ZIF-8 membrane on the inner-surface of a ceramic hollow fiber via cycling precursors. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 10326–10328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Xie, Z.; Yang, J.; Wang, J.; Bai, J.; Yin, H.; Yuan, B.; Duan, C. Deposition of chemically modified α-Al2O3 particles for high performance ZIF-8 membrane on a macroporous tube. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 5977–5979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kida, K.; Fujita, K.; Shimada, T.; Tanaka, S.; Miyake, Y. Layer-by-layer aqueous rapid synthesis of ZIF-8 films on a reactive surface. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 11128–11135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bux, H.; Feldhoff, A.; Cravillon, J.; Wiebcke, M.; Li, Y.S.; Caro, J. Oriented zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 membrane with sharp H2/C3H8 molecular sieve separation. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 2262–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lu, C.; Ben, T.; Xu, S.; Qiu, S. Electrochemical synthesis of a microporous conductive polymer based on a Metal-Organic Framework thin film. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2014, 53, 6454–6458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ben, T.; Lu, C.; Pei, C.; Xu, S.; Qiu, S. Polymer-supported and free-standing metal-organic framework membrane. Chem. A Eur. J. 2012, 18, 10250–10253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wu, D.; Guo, X.; Sun, H.; Navrotsky, A. Thermodynamics of methane adsorption on copper HKUST-1 at low pressure. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 2439–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hamon, L.; Jolimaitre, E.; Pirngruber, G.D. CO2 and CH4 separation by adsorption using Cu-BTC metal–organic framework. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 7497–7503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Koh, H.S.; Rana, M.K.; Wong-Foy, A.G.; Siegel, D.J. Predicting methane storage in open-metal-site metal–organic frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 13451–13458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mao, Y.; Li, J.; Cao, W.; Ying, Y.; Sun, L.; Peng, X. Pressure-assisted synthesis of HKUST-1 thin film on polymer hollow fiber at room temperature toward gas separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 4473–4479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The process of preparing MOF membranes.
Figure 1. The process of preparing MOF membranes.
Materials 11 01207 g001
Figure 2. Schematic of gas separation process.
Figure 2. Schematic of gas separation process.
Materials 11 01207 g002
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of the porous SiO2 disk (a) and the modified porous SiO2 disk (b).
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of the porous SiO2 disk (a) and the modified porous SiO2 disk (b).
Materials 11 01207 g003
Figure 4. XRD spectra of Cu3(BTC)2 powder (red) and the prepared Cu3(BTC)2 membrane (black).
Figure 4. XRD spectra of Cu3(BTC)2 powder (red) and the prepared Cu3(BTC)2 membrane (black).
Materials 11 01207 g004
Figure 5. TGA curve of the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane.
Figure 5. TGA curve of the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane.
Materials 11 01207 g005
Figure 6. N2 sorption isotherms (a) and the pore size (b) of Cu3(BTC)2 membrane.
Figure 6. N2 sorption isotherms (a) and the pore size (b) of Cu3(BTC)2 membrane.
Materials 11 01207 g006
Figure 7. SEM of the prepared samples, with porous SiO2 disk (a), the modified porous SiO2 disk (b) and the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane (cf).
Figure 7. SEM of the prepared samples, with porous SiO2 disk (a), the modified porous SiO2 disk (b) and the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane (cf).
Materials 11 01207 g007
Figure 8. The separation factor of the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane change with the time: H2/CO2 (red), H2/N2 (black), H2/CH4 (blue).
Figure 8. The separation factor of the Cu3(BTC)2 membrane change with the time: H2/CO2 (red), H2/N2 (black), H2/CH4 (blue).
Materials 11 01207 g008
Table 1. The permeable flow of the single component gas through the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane in 298 K and 0.1 MPa.
Table 1. The permeable flow of the single component gas through the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane in 298 K and 0.1 MPa.
GasKinetic Diameter (nm)Permeance (mol m−2 s−1 Pa−1)
H20.291.61 × 10−7
CO20.331.69 × 10−8
N20.361.84 × 10−8
CH40.381.98 × 10−8
Table 2. The permeable flow of the single component gas and mixed component gas through the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane and the separation factor in 298 K and 0.1 MPa.
Table 2. The permeable flow of the single component gas and mixed component gas through the modified porous SiO2 disk-supported Cu3(BTC)2 membrane and the separation factor in 298 K and 0.1 MPa.
GasSingle Component Flow in Mixed Gas
(10−6 mol m−2 s−1 Pa−1)
Single Component Flow
(10−6 mol m−2 s−1 Pa−1)
Separation FactorIdeal Separation Factor
H20.1480.16110.208.75
N20.01450.0184
H20.1520.16111.348.13
CH40.01340.0198
H20.1430.16110.079.53
CO20.01420.0169

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, C.; Wang, G.; Wang, K.; Guo, D.; Bai, M.; Wang, Y. Modified Porous SiO2-Supported Cu3(BTC)2 Membrane with High Performance of Gas Separation. Materials 2018, 11, 1207. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11071207

AMA Style

Lu C, Wang G, Wang K, Guo D, Bai M, Wang Y. Modified Porous SiO2-Supported Cu3(BTC)2 Membrane with High Performance of Gas Separation. Materials. 2018; 11(7):1207. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11071207

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Chunjing, Gang Wang, Keliang Wang, Daizong Guo, Mingxing Bai, and Ying Wang. 2018. "Modified Porous SiO2-Supported Cu3(BTC)2 Membrane with High Performance of Gas Separation" Materials 11, no. 7: 1207. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11071207

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop