Next Article in Journal
Microstructural Evolution and Strengthening Mechanism of SiC/Al Composites Fabricated by a Liquid-Pressing Process and Heat Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
A Superhydrophilic Aluminum Surface with Fast Water Evaporation Based on Anodic Alumina Bundle Structures via Anodizing in Pyrophosphoric Acid
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Bead Sequence in Underwater Welding
Previous Article in Special Issue
Formation of Nanoporous Mixed Aluminum-Iron Oxides by Self-Organized Anodizing of FeAl3 Intermetallic Alloy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 12
Issue 20
10.3390/ma12203373
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cubic Silver Nanoparticles Fixed on TiO2 Nanotubes as Simple and Efficient Substrates for Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering

by
Robert Ambroziak
1,
Marcin Hołdyński
2,
Tomasz Płociński
3,
Marcin Pisarek
2,* and
Andrzej Kudelski
1
1
Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Pasteur Str. 1, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland
2
Institute of Physical Chemistry Polish Academy of Sciences, Kasprzaka Str. 44/52, 01-224 Warsaw, Poland
3
Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Woloska 141, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(20), 3373; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203373
Submission received: 17 September 2019 / Revised: 10 October 2019 / Accepted: 11 October 2019 / Published: 16 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanostructured Anodic Oxides: Fabrication, Characterization and Application)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this work we show that ordered freestanding titanium oxide nanotubes (TiO2 NT) may be used as substrates for the simple and efficient immobilization of anisotropic plasmonic nanoparticles. This is important because anisotropic plasmonic nanostructures usually give greater spectral enhancement than spherical nanoparticles. The size of the pores in a layer of titanium oxide nanotubes can be easily fitted to the size of many silver plasmonic nanoparticles highly active in SERS (surface-enhanced Raman scattering) spectroscopy (for example, silver nanocubes with an edge length of ca. 45 nm), and hence, the plasmonic nanoparticles deposited can be strongly anchored in such a titanium oxide substrate. The tubular morphology of the TiO2 substrate used allows a specific arrangement of the silver plasmonic nanoparticles that may create many so-called SERS hot spots. The SERS activity of a layer of cubic Ag nanoparticles (AgCNPs) deposited on a tubular TiO2 substrate (AgCNPs@TiO2 NT) is about eight times higher than that of the standard electrochemically nanostructured surface of a silver electrode (produced by oxidation reduction cycling). Furthermore, a super hydrophilic character of the TiO2 nanotubes surface allows for a uniform distribution of AgCNPs, which are deposited from an aqueous suspension. The new AgCNPs@TiO2 NT hybrid layer ensures a good reproducibility of SERS measurements and exhibits a higher temporal stability of the achievable total SERS enhancement factor—one that is far better than standard SERS silver substrates. To characterize the morphology and chemical composition of such evidently improved SERS platforms thus received, we applied microscopic techniques (SEM, and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM)) and surface analytical techniques (Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Raman scattering is an optical effect with efficiency being usually very low. This is due to the fact that Raman scattering is weaker than Rayleigh scattering, by about 10−6–10−7 times. A typical cross-section for Raman scattering is ca. 10−29 cm2 per molecule, whereas typical cross-sections for absorption in ultraviolet and infrared are ca. 10−18 and 10−21 cm2 per molecule, respectively [1]. Therefore, for many decades Raman spectroscopy was not considered as a useful analytical tool. With the discovery of the surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) phenomenon in the 1970s of the last century, it allowed for a huge enhancement of recorded Raman signals for molecules (pyridine) adsorbed on silver with a roughened surface [2,3,4]. When electromagnetic radiation interacts with a nanostructured surface of a metal with a negative real and small positive imaginary dielectric constant (e.g., silver when visible radiation is used), these induce a collective oscillation of surface conduction electrons, called surface plasmons, that leads to enhanced electromagnetic fields at some locations near the surface of the illuminated plasmonic nanostructure [1,5]. The local increase in the intensity of the electric field near illuminated plasmonic nanostructures may cause a significant increase in the efficiency of Raman scattering (for Raman bands with a small Raman shift, this increase is roughly proportional to the fourth power of the field enhancement [1]). In some cases, the nanoresonator-induced increase in the efficiency of the generation of the Raman signal is so large that the Raman scattering cross-section can even be increased up to, e.g., 2 × 10−14 cm2 per molecule [6] (i.e., about 15 orders of magnitude in comparison with normal Raman scattering) which makes it possible to observe the Raman spectra of even a single molecule [6,7,8]. SERS spectroscopy is one of the most sensitive analytical tools available, and is widely used in medicine [9,10,11], forensic science [12], the food industry [13,14,15] and analytical chemistry [16,17,18]. The sensitivity of SERS measurements is strongly dependent on the activity of plasmonic material used as the SERS substrate, and so the fabrication of such plasmonic nanomaterials is an important and rapidly-developing branch of nanotechnology. The quality of the SERS spectra measured strongly depends on the activity and reproducibility of the plasmonic material used as the SERS substrate. Therefore, many groups are working on developing new methods of fabricating SERS substrates. Materials for SERS measurements may be obtained, for example, by nanostructuring the surface of a plasmonic metal, evaporating a plasmonic metal on the nanostructured surface of a non-plasmonic material, or depositing plasmonic nanostructures on the surface of plasmonic or non-plasmonic materials. This last approach, currently being widely investigated, makes it possible to easily create SERS substrates with strongly anisotropic plasmonic nanostructures and many sharp apexes and edges (such plasmonic structures are especially useful for SERS measurements because, for illuminated plasmonic nanoparticles, the highest electromagnetic field enhancement is observed at their sharp apexes and edges [19,20]). What is important here, for anisotropic plasmonic metal nanoparticles (NPs) distribution of intensity gain of the electromagnetic field around NPs is strongly heterogeneous, what was confirmed by DDA method (discrete dipole approximation). The DDA method refers to the exact solution of the problem of light scattering on non-spherical and heterogeneous particles and on periodic particle systems [21] based on Mie theory [22], which states that small spherical nanocrystals should exhibit only a single surface plasmon resonance (SPR), whereas anisotropic particles would have two or more SPR, depending on their shape [23].
In this work, we show that ordered, freestanding titanium oxide nanotubes can be used as efficient and mechanically/chemically stable substrates for the immobilization of plasmonic nanoparticles. Although freestanding titanium oxide nanotubes adorned with spherical plasmonic metals (Ag, Au or Cu) have already been used as SERS substrates [24,25,26], highly anisotropic plasmonic nanostructures have not been successfully deposited on such nanotubular arrays, yet. This substrate due to the appropriate surface geometry and physicochemical properties, guarantee a uniform distribution of anisotropic plasmonic nanoparticles on the surface. The size of the tube in a layer of titanium oxide nanotubes can be easily fitted to the size of the deposited plasmonic nanoparticles; during the electrochemical synthesis of titanium dioxide nanotubes, it is possible to control their size and the thickness of their walls through anodic voltage and electrolyte composition [27,28,29,30]. These factors affect the specific surface morphology of such kind of materials [31,32]. That is why, the deposited plasmonic nanoparticles can fit well in the slits and pores created, and can therefore, be strongly anchored in the nanotubular TiO2 substrate. The tubular morphology of the TiO2 substrate allows a specific arrangement of silver plasmonic nanoparticles that creates many so-called SERS hot spots (mainly narrow slits between the plasmonic nanostructures). Therefore, the surface roughness, size and shape of the nanoparticles are used to decorate TiO2 nanotubes influence on the value of enhancement Raman scattering. Achieving the maximum signal during SERS measurements requires optimization of the mentioned parameters [33]. Thus, conventional materials such as rough surfaces of noble metal electrodes obtained in the oxidation reduction cycle, and colloid nanoparticles are increasingly less important due to the development of nanotechnology. However, interesting issues at the moment concern the possibility to obtain plasmonic nanoparticles immobilized on larger nanoparticles that do not give the SERS spectrum (such as silica nanoparticles) [34], or on nanostructural substrates such as graphene oxide [35], and also to directly making aggregates in solution [36,37] on a macroscopic substrate using molecules that are linkers [37] or even using microfluidic systems [37]. The new solutions for the design and production of SERS active substrates appear all the time in the literature, they lead to the development of simple ways that can provide adequate enhancement of the measured SERS signal and the repeatability of platform production processes. In the present study, for the first time we compare the SERS results of cubic silver nanoparticles fixed on TiO2 nanotubes with reference to the standard silver surface obtained on the basis of oxidation–reduction cycling procedure (standard SERS substrate) [4].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Trisodium citrate dihydrate, silver nitrate, potassium chloride, ethylene glycol and acetone were purchased from POCH S.A. (Gliwice, Poland). Sodium sulphide was acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) with an average molar mass of ca. 4 × 104 g mol−1 was purchased from Fluka (Seelze, Germany). Glycerin and ammonium fluoride were purchased from Chempur (Piekary Slaskie, Poland). Pyridine was purchased from Ubichem (Eastleigh, UK). All of the chemicals were used without further purification or treatment. The water was purified by a Millipore Milli-Q system and had a resistivity of ca. 18 MΩ cm−1. The silver used as a material for electrodes was purchased from the Polish Mint (Warsaw, Poland). Titanium foil of 0.25 mm thick and 99, 5% purity was purchased from Alfa Aesar (Kandel, Germany). It was cut into 1 cm2 round plates. The plates were cleaned ultrasonically with acetone and ethanol, rinsed with deionized (DI) water, and dried in air.

2.2. Synthesis of Silver Cubic Nanoparticles by Skrabalak Method

All cubic silver nanoparticles described in this paper were synthesized using the modified method described by Skrabalak et al. [38]. The modification consisted in increasing the volume of the obtained solution and a slight change in the synthesis temperature. Briefly, 60 mL of glycol was poured into a three-necked flask equipped with a reflux condenser and magnetic stirrer. The solution was heated to 170 °C in one hour, and then 1 mL of a 3 mM Na2S solution and 15 mL of a 180 mM PVP (in respect to the monomer) solution were added. After stabilization of the temperature at 170 °C, 5 mL of a 280 mM solution of AgNO3 was added. All the solutions during the synthesis were prepared in glycol. After the addition of silver nitrate, the color of the reaction mixture changed from transparent through orange and red to dark green. After the last color change, the flask was placed in an ice bath to stop the reaction. The use of sulphides aimed at rapid nucleation on which a layer of reduced silver grows (see Figure 1).
To transfer the nanoparticles from glycol to water, the solution was diluted with acetone 10 times and then centrifuged for 5 min. The supernatant was removed, water was added, and the mixture thus obtained was sonicated for 3 min. The centrifugation and suspension of the nanoparticles was then repeated twice. The mixture of Ag cubic nanoparticles (CNPs) suspended in water was then diluted 10 times as compared to the original solution. These procedures were intended not only to transfer nanoparticles to the water solution but also to remove most non-cubic nanoparticles of larger and smaller sizes than Ag nanoparticles (AgCNPs). When centrifugation was interrupted at the right moment, heavier cubic nanoparticles were deposited at the bottom, while nanoparticles of smaller mass that were spherical remained in the supernatant. Such prepared Ag CNPs nanoparticles were used to characterize them by scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) (FEI Nova NanoSEM 450, Brno, Czech Republic; Hitachi HD-2700, Naka, Japan), and UV-vis methods and to prepare appropriate SERS substrates.

2.3. Preparation of Titanium Oxide Nanotubes Substrates

Array 3646A and Motech LPS—303 power supplies were used for the electrochemical synthesis of TiO2 nanotubes (NT) onto Ti foil (0.25 mm thick) at a constant voltage of 25 V for 2 h in an optimized solution based on a glycerol and water (1:1 v/v) containing 0.8% wt. of NH4F. After anodic oxidation process of the Ti substrate, the samples were rinsed with water (24 h) and dried in air. Subsequently, thermal annealing in air was performed at 450 °C for 2 h to obtain the mechanically stable structure in anatase form [39].

2.4. Deposition of Silver Cubic Nanoparticles on Titanium Oxide Nanotubes

The 200 µL of an AgCNPs suspension was dropped onto the titanium oxide nanotubes (TiO2 NT) surface and allowed to dry overnight. This procedure was repeated once. The resulting substrates were used without any further preparation (see Figure 2).

2.5. Preparation of Electrochemically Nanostructured Silver

Reference SERS-active silver samples (Ag reference) were prepared by the electrochemical roughening of a pure Ag sheet, as in our previous work [33]. The roughening of the silver electrode was carried out in a conventional three-electrode cell with a large platinum sheet as a counter electrode and an Ag/AgCl (0.1 M KCl) electrode as a reference (all potentials are quoted versus this electrode). Five negative-positive oxidation reduction cycles were performed—from −300 to 300 mV at a sweep rate of 5 mV/s. The silver electrode was kept at −300 mV for 30 s and was removed at an open circuit. Finally, it was gently rinsed with water.

2.6. Characterization of Obtained Nanostructures

For the morphological characterization of the samples after their anodization, heat treatment and deposition of AgCNPs, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) examinations were carried out with an FEI Nova NanoSEM 450 instrument (FEI Nova NanoSEM 450, Brno, Czech Republic). SEM images were collected using the through lens detector (TLD) (FEI, Brno, Czech Republic) of secondary electrons at primary beam energy of 10 kV. The STEM studies were performed on samples deposited on a TEM grid (Quantifoil R2/2, 300 Cu mesh, ), using the bright field (BF) contrast mode of the detector (two segment planar solid-state p–n junction) attached under the grid holder, with high acceleration voltage of 30 kV. UV−Vis spectra were made using a Thermo Scientific Evolution 201 spectrophotometer (Waltham, MA, USA). The TEM observations at ultra high resolution were carried out using a Hitachi dedicated STEM 200kV equipped with a Cs corrector. The observations with bright field (BF) and high angle annular dark field (HAADF) detectors, as well as the convergent beam diffraction (CBD), were done to confirm the crystalline structure of the TiO2 phase.

2.7. SERS Measurements

SERS Raman spectra were measured using a Horiba Jobin-Yvon Labram HR800 spectrometer (Longjumeau, France) equipped with a Peltier-cooled CCD detector (1024 × 256 pixels), a 600 groove/mm holographic grating, and an Olympus BX40 microscope (Tokyo, Japan) with a long distance 50× objective. All Raman spectra were recorded using a diode pumped, frequency doubled Nd:YAG laser (532 nm). The 200 µL of 0.05 M pyridine in 0.1 M KCl was applied to the AgCNPs@TiO2 NT substrate, and the measurement itself was performed before the drop dried. For samples without pyridine, the spectra were collected without prior preparation of the substrate. For each substrate, 400 spectra were collected from a square surface with an edge length of 200 µm.
Substrate resistance tests were carried out for cleaning by rinsing with water. For this purpose, the substrate on which the above-described SERS measurements were made was rinsed several times with water from a wash bottle and then the spectra were recorded without pyridine in order to check whether it adsorbed on the surface. The above-described measurements with pyridine were then carried out. These activities were repeated to reach 14 consecutive cleaning cycles.

2.8. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Measurements

The chemical composition and chemical state of the prepared SERS substrates were characterized by Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). For this purpose, a Microlab 350 spectrometer (Thermo Electron) (East Grinstead, UK) was used. The XPS spectra were excited using AlKα (hν = 1486.6 eV, 300 W) radiation as a source. The survey and high resolution spectra were collected with the hemispherical analyzer at constant pass energies of 100 and 40 eV, respectively. The background was corrected using the Shirley model to obtain the XPS signal intensity. An asymmetric Gaussian/Lorentzian function at a constant ratio G/L = 0.3 was used for deconvolution procedure. The determined peak positions were corrected in relation to adventitious carbon C1s at 285.0 eV. Avantage Surface Chemical Analysis software (ver. 5.9904) was used for the data processing. The local Auger spectra were recorded at E = 10 kV, with the step of 1.0 eV.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of AgCNPs@TiO2 NT Hybrid Materials

Characterization of Cubic Silver Nanoparticles and Titanium Oxide Nanotubes

After the synthesis of AgCNPs, UV-Vis spectra, to provide information about the optical properties of the prepared silver nanoparticles (see Figure 3) and STEM imaging (see Figure 4) to characterize their sizes and shapes, were performed. The recorded UV-Vis spectrum was typical for silver cubic nanoparticles [40], with the main surface plasmon resonance (SPR) extinction band at 440 nm. The regular cubic shape of the synthesized silver nanoparticles was confirmed by STEM measurements (see Figure 4). The average size of the nanoparticles was determined based in the image analysis. The histogram (nanoparticle count vs. nanoparticle edge length) presented in Figure 4a (insert) shows that the most probable particle edge length is 45 ± 2 nm. A careful inspection of the AgCNPs morphology revealed that the nanoparticles were coated with a thin film of PVP polymer (polyvinylpyrrolidone) and formed core-shell structures (see Figure 4b). The nanoparticles were permanently coated with PVP which cannot be removed during the applied purification process. PVP polymer was used in this study as a surface stabilizer, growth modifier, and nanoparticle dispersant during the formation of nanoparticles having a specific shape. The polycrystalline nature of the AgCNPs was confirmed by the diffraction pattern obtained from the bulk of the nanoparticles. The electron diffraction images obtained were assigned to the (001) plane of the face-centered cubic silver [41,42]. Such kind of plasmonic nanoparticles may effectively support surface plasmon resonance due to the formation of special sites called “hot spots” that amplify the SERS signal [43,44]. Cubic nanoparticles allowed us to control the plasmon resonance wavelengths from visible light to near IR, because anisotropy provides an additional degree of freedom when compared to spherical nanoparticles. Mainly, the strong LSPR (Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance)effect was localized at corners of AgCNPs [21,45].
Nanotubes grew perpendicular to the titanium substrate and were open at the top and closed at the bottom [46]. The morphology of TiO2 nanotubes can be modified relatively easily by controlling the conditions of anodic oxidation, because there was a direct linear relationship between the anodization voltage and the average diameter of the nanotubes formed. In general, the diameter (from 40 nm (10 V) up to 115 nm (30 V)) and wall thickness (from 10 nm (10 V) up to 24 nm (30 V)) of the nanotubes increased with anodic voltage [39], as did the distance of the gaps between the nanotubes. Changing these parameters caused changes in the degree to which the anodized titanium surface was covered by nanotubes (see Figure 5). The average degree of surface coverage for 25 V nanotubes (used in this work) was 67%, which means that 33% of this area was related to free spaces (surface without nanotubes). The results were obtained on the basis of image analysis (ImageJ software [47]) of SEM images registered at the same magnification, and more details are given here [48].
Figure 6a,b show SEM images of the TiO2 nanotubes (TiO2 NT) after the anodic oxidation procedure at 25 V. The internal diameter of the tubes was about 110 nm, and the wall thickness was about 20 nm [39]. Nanotubes obtained at this voltage were selected for further SERS research. It was related to the fact, that the silver nanoparticles with average size 45 nm after wet deposition were located not only in the spaces between the tubes but also inside them. Therefore, the size of these empty areas (tubes and space between them) can be adjusted to the amount of the Ag cubic nanoparticles.
Usually, such nanostructures obtained by anodic oxidation are found to be amorphous. Therefore, the TiO2 nanotubes were annealed in air at 450 °C in order to change their amorphous structure to a crystalline phase—anatase [39,49], which also led to a transformation of the nanoporous surface towards a hydrophilic surface, as demonstrated by Roguska et al. [39]. The hydrophilic surface promoted the deposition of nanoparticles from aqueous suspension. In addition to physicochemical changes during annealing, we obtained greater mechanical stability of the nanotubes to the titanium substrate by forming the TiO2/Ti barrier layer [49]. After heat treatment, the geometry of the tubes did not change.
Subsequently, cubic silver nanoparticles (AgCNPs) were embedded from an aqueous suspension onto annealed TiO2 NT substrates. Figure 7a,b show SEM images of the resulting hybrid materials—as can be seen in these figures, the nanoparticles were usually deposited in the slits between individual nanotubes or inside the nanotubes. A specific distribution of the AgCNPs may significantly contribute to the enhancement of the Raman signal through the creation of a significant number of SERS hot spots. In the colloid of nanoparticles used for the preparation of the SERS platform there were a small number of spherical agglomerates that could not be removed during the purification process (see Section 2.2). Therefore, large spherical agglomerates will make some contribution to the measured SERS signal [36,50,51]. According to our earlier studies and literature data, we knew that the SERS activity of layers formed from nanoparticles with sharp edges were significantly larger than the SERS activity of the layer formed from spherical nanoparticles [52,53]. Rycenga et al. showed that the SERS enhancement factor generated by silver nanocubes is about three orders of magnitude larger (×103) than the SERS enhancement factor generated by silver nanospheres with a similar size (measurements were carried out for nanocubes of 38 nm in edge length and nanospheres of 35 nm in diameter) [53]. The increase in the diameter of the nanoparticle may also causes intensification in the generated SERS enhancement factor, however, the observed increase is significantly smaller. For example, Sugawa et al. have shown that the increase in the size of Au/Ag nanoparticles by a factor of 2.4 (from 38 to 90 nm)—similar ratio of the sizes of “big” and “small” nanoparticles were observed in our case (see Figure 7)—led to an increase in the SERS enhancement factor by a factor of 6–8 [54]. This means the contribution from the spherical nanoparticles (even larger and when the distances between them are small, below 10 nm) should be significantly smaller than the contribution from the anisotropic nanoparticles. Therefore, one can assume that the SERS signal will be generated mainly by cubic nanoparticles, where the enhanced E-fields are mainly localized at the corners of the nanocubes. What is also important here is that the cubic nanoparticles were small enough to enter the nanotubes and into the spaces between them, but the spherical agglomerates were too big for it.

3.2. XPS and AES Measurements

Qualitative analyses of the chemical composition of the obtained SERS substrates were performed using Auger spectroscopy. The local Auger spectra recorded with a lateral resolution of a few dozen nm, which depended on the diameter of electron beam (see Figure 8). The Auger signals of the deposited AgCNPs onto TiO2 NT support were clearly distinguishable: Ag (MNN), Ti (LMM), O (KLL) and C (KLL). The local Auger spectra, taken from single Ag cubic nanoparticles and from Ag spherical agglomerates, revealed the concentration of these element changes. Such visible differences in Ag concentration can contribute to the formation of SERS active centers, which was also suggested by SEM observations (see Figure 7).
For determination of surface chemistry of the received SERS platforms, the XPS investigations were performed for titanium oxide nanotubes annealed at 450 °C and at the same substrate with embedded AgCNPs. The measured binding energies of the core electrons provide large amount information about the properties of the atoms in the molecules and solids. Accurate measurements of the XPS peak positions provided a lot more detail about the chemistry of the analyzed atoms than was provided by AES spectroscopy.
The XPS spectrum of Ti2p for the annealed NTs at 450 °C exhibited two characteristic peaks, which corresponded to Ti2p3/2 at 458.8 eV and Ti2p1/2 at 464.3 eV, indicating that Ti exists in the form of Ti4+. The separation between the two peaks was 5.54 ± 0.2 eV, which was in agreement with XPS standard data [55] (see Figure 9). A small positive shift equal to +0.2 eV was observed in the Ti2p binding energy (BE) for the sample with the AgCNP deposits. The shifted energy (459.0 eV) was also characteristic for titanium dioxide [55].
Figure 10 presents XPS spectra in the region of the silver Ag3d peaks for the AgCNPs@TiO2 NT and the Ag reference sample after the deconvolution procedure, where the separation energy between the Ag3d5/2 and Ag3d3/2 spectra lines was 6.0 ± 0.2 eV, keeping the ratio of those signals as 3:2, respectively. As can be seen, the binding energy of the Ag3d5/2 of the AgCNPs on TiO2 NT (367.6 eV) shifted by −0.6 eV relative to 368.2 eV for the metallic silver (electrochemically nanostructured Ag—reference sample). The direction and magnitude of the Ag3d peak shift corresponded to the formation of a thin layer of silver oxide (Ag1+) on top of the nanoparticle surfaces, which was consistent with the observations of other authors [56,57]. This was due to the fact that cubic silver nanoparticles were coated with cross-linked PVP polymer (~5 nm thick film), which was confirmed by the STEM microscopic observations (see Figure 4). The second spin-orbit pair of small intensity at higher binding energy values (Ag3d5/2 at 368.7 eV and 368.2 eV) was attributed to the oxidized Ag surface bonded with C–O species for the reference sample and metallic silver for the AgCNPs deposited on TiO2 NT, respectively. However, some literature data suggested that metallic silver was also possible in an analogous system. Kang et al. and Prieto et al. found silver at ~368.3 [58] and 368.1 eV [59], where the average diameter of Ag nanoparticles was 35 nm. However, our XPS results clearly indicate the presence of PVP on the surface of the cubic nanoparticles, which manifested itself by signals of the characteristic functional groups for this kind of polymer, such as: C=O, C–N and C–C [60]. This was due to the fact that the average inelastic mean free path (IMFP) of an electron in metallic silver is around 1.5–2.0 nm [61,62], therefore, the XPS spectra collected came only from the surfaces of the nanoparticles. In the case of a silver electrode, there was no organic layer that would reduce the depth of the beam penetration. This is why the XPS spectrum showed mainly metal, while silver oxide had only a small share in the spectrum. Thus, the presence of PVP polymer revealed the interfacial interaction between Ag NPs and the PVP molecules.

3.3. Raman Measurements

It is worth mentioning that it was also possible to observe the transition from amorphous titanium oxide to anatase using Raman spectroscopy. Figure 11 shows the Raman spectra of TiO2 NT samples before and after heat treatment at 450 °C for 2 h in air. The crystallographic structure of the nanotubes changed during annealing from the amorphous phase, which was very weak in terms of Raman scattering [63], to the anatase phase. The peaks that appeared were assigned to the vibrations in this phase [64].
Following this, the Raman spectra of the samples of TiO2 NT covered with AgCNPs were recorded (see Figure 12a). They showed Raman bands typical for the carbon clusters produced during the carbonization of PVP (especially in the laser beam) [65,66]. The presence of carbon on the analyzed surface was also confirmed by XPS analysis. In these XPS measurements, a characteristic pyrolidone N group (C–N: 400.2 eV) and adequate bonds for PVP: C–C (285.0 eV), C–O/C=O (286.5 eV, 288.5 eV), C–N (286.5 eV) were detected [60].
The spectra recorded for substrates soaked in the pyridine solution (see Figure 12b) showed a difference in the peak gains between the Ag nanoparticles deposited on the TiO2 NT substrate and those on the Ag reference platform. No peaks from pyridine were registered on TiO2 NT suggesting that this substrate alone did not enhance the pyridine spectrum. The most intense pyridine bands at 1004 and 1034 cm−1 originated from the symmetric ring deformation modes (ν1) and (ν12), respectively [67]. Moreover, SERS spectrum measured using cubic silver nanoparticles deposited on TiO2 NTs was characterized by other vibrational bands at ~650 cm−1 (ν6a), ~1220 cm−1 (ν9a), ~1600 cm−1 (ν8a), which originated from vibrations of the aromatic ring of pyridine having A1 symmetry [33,67]. Careful inspection of the obtained SERS spectra revealed also, that the two strongest bands had almost identical intensities for the electrochemically activated surface of silver, which agreed with Zuo and Jogodzinski’s work [67]. A change in the intensity ratio of the breathing doublet mode of pyridine (1004 cm−1/1034 cm−1) for AgCNPs was observed. This was probably related to the fact that AgCNPs were deposited on nanoporous substrates with specific surface development. Therefore, the interaction between silver nanoparticles coated by PVP and titanium oxide contributed to this behavior (changes near the energy of Fermi level). These factors probably influenced a configuration change in the adsorbate (pyridine) depending on the surface chemistry, morphology of the substrates and active size of silver clusters [68,69].
The enhancement coefficient of the SERS spectra for the Ag CNPs@TiO2 NT sample was eight times greater than for the Ag reference sample. From our earlier works, we know that the determined enhancement factor for the reference silver electrode was on the level 4.6 · 105 (the most intense pyridine band—ν1). Thus, the resulting substrate had an enhancement factor of about 3.7 · 106 [33,70]. This enhancement was also more than 10 times greater than the nanotubes of the same diameter (25 V—110 nm) coated with spherical nanoparticles (EF = 1.8 ∙ 105), taking into account our previous research [33,70]. The larger gain in the SERS spectrum measured on the cubic Ag nanoparticles deposited on the nanotubular TiO2 substrates was probably caused by at least two factors: morphological and chemical. First of all, a careful analysis of the SEM data suggested that the Ag cubic nanoparticles (45 ± 2 nm) were distributed relatively homogenously over the nanoporous oxide surface. Moreover, Ag nanoparticles formed three-dimensional agglomerates on TiO2 NT, as seen in the SEM image presented in Figure 7, where additional SERS hot spots may have been formed (a weaker SERS effect in relation to Ag CNPs). SEM observations revealed also that the population of cubic silver nanoparticles was much larger than that of spherical agglomerates. Such morphological changes were not observed for the silver surface after electrochemical activation.
Figure 13 shows the surface morphology of the pure Ag reference sample after a common roughening procedure: Oxidation–reduction cycling (ORC), which led to a morphology having a large specific surface area. Apparently, a more developed surface area of Ag CNPs deposited on the TiO2 NT offered a larger population of active SERS sites, such as slits or narrow cavities. This meant that the higher SERS signal enhancement was a result of the way the Ag deposit distributes itself on the nanotubular substrate.
Secondly, interactions between the nanocubes and nanotubes may increase the final enhancement of the SERS spectrum through what is known as the chemical mechanism—CT (charge transfer) effect [71,72,73]. The CT process is considered to be a resonant Raman-like enhancement associated with the excited state of the molecule–metal system and the charge transfer between the molecule and the metal surface [74]. Therefore, the use of semiconductors such as TiO2 nanotubes may result in an additional spectral amplification due to a charge transfer effect between the semiconductor, metal nanoparticles and adsorbents [71,72,73] and, moreover, between the PVP molecules and metal noble nanoparticles, as was observed by other authors [60]. This phenomenon is usually associated with a reduction in the electron density of the pyrolidone group as a result of a charge-transfer-type interaction between the PVP molecules and surface of the AgCNPs. The sum of these interactions was visible in the XPS titanium spectra, where a shift in the Ti2p3/2 peak of about 0.2 eV was observed for the sample with the silver deposit on the TiO2 NT with respect to the uncoated sample (see Figure 9).
We also found that the reproducibility and temporal stability of the SERS signals intensities was better for the nanoporous titanium oxides substrates with silver deposit than for the standard roughened Ag, which is an important factor for potential applications of such materials. Figure 13 shows that the difference in the signal intensity at 1004 cm−1 for subsequent measurements at a different sample site (offset by 2 microms) was significantly lower for the hybrid layer produced than for the silver nanostructured electrode. In addition, it can be seen that it was possible to register spectra with a similar peak intensity on the Ag reference sampe, but only in characteristic places with the largest amplification parameter. This was not necessarily the case with the prepared substrate, which showed its greater utility in analytical applications. Moreover, as can be seen in Figure 14, for both substrates, the well-known process of a temporal decrease in their SERS activity was observed [57,66]. This deactivation process (usually activated photochemically or by the application of very negative potential) was mainly caused by the incorporation within the bulk metallic phase of very small silver clusters, which were especially active in enhancing the SERS signal by the CT mechanism [57,66]. The deactivation process was significantly more important for the standard SERS substrates (Ag reference) than for the AgCNPs@TiO2 NT hybrid material (see Figure 14). Signal oscillations visible in Figure 14 resulted probably from the measurement method. The spectra were collected from a square area of 40,000 µm, where subsequent measuring points were made from left to right. There were 20 measurement points in one row, which corresponded to the frequency of oscillations shown in Figure 14. In areas with increased peak intensities, larger agglomerates of nanoparticles were likely to be found.
An important factor in the design of active SERS platforms was also the possibility of utilizing them for multiple use. Therefore, Figure 15 shows the change in the intensity of the SERS pyridine signal—a characteristic doublet (breathing mode) in relation to the number of washing cycles of the platform surface (AgCNPs@TiO2 NT) by water. It is clearly visible that the intensity of the measured doublet was practically unchanged. This means that the prepared SERS substrates retained the enhancement parameter at a similar level and had morphological stability during subsequent water washings. Cubic silver nanoparticles were well-placed in the slits between nanotubes and inside of the nanopores, as can be seen in Figure 7. The Figure 15 insert presents also the SERS spectra recorded on the surface of the AgCNPs@TiO2 NT immediately after water washing, without pyridine. It can be observed that after the removal of pyridine, the surface chemistry of the prepared SERS substrate did not change. Only a characteristic spectrum in the initial state is clearly visible, as in Figure 12a.

4. Conclusions

Stable, reproducible and highly active platforms for SERS investigations were obtained using relatively simple electrochemical and chemical procedures. The SERS platform based on TiO2 nanotubes and cubic silver nanoparticles thus obtained increased the SERS signal by a factor of eight as compared with the standard electrochemically nanostructured Ag surface (SERS substrate). Such large enhancement of the SERS signal was a result of specific morphology and surface chemistry of TiO2 nanotubes which fixed on them, Ag cubic nanoparticles. The strong LSPR effect was localized in a short distance between nanoparticles, where the sharp corners played a crucial role. Stability for the received SERS platform in relation to Ag reference sample was also better. It was associated with a distribution of silver nanoparticles on the nanotubes surface, so that there was a significantly greater amount of SERS active places, or “hot spots”. For silver nanoparticles deposited on the TiO2 substrate, a lower deactivation process of the active surface was also observed. Prepared platforms at nanoscale were stable, even after washing them several times by water. This means that they can be used many times in SERS measurements (using the same analyte). All these factors make titanium oxide nanotubes with embedded cubic silver nanoparticles attractive substrates for SERS applications.

Author Contributions

Investigation, R.A., M.H., M.P. and T.P.; project administration, A.K.; supervision, M.P.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Institute of Physical Chemistry Polish Academy of Sciences—Laboratory of Surface Analysis and Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aroca, R. Surface-Enhanced Vibrational Spectroscopy; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Albrecht, M.G.; Creighton, J.A. Anomalously intense raman spectra of pyridine at a silver electrode. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 5215–5217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jeanmaire, D.L.; van Duyne, R.P. Surface raman spectroelectrochemistry part1. Heterocyclic. J. Electroanal Chem. 1977, 84, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fleischmann, M.; Hendra, P.J.; McQuillan, A.J. Raman spectra of pyridine adsorbed at a silver electrode. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1974, 26, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Etchegoin, P.G.; le Ru, E.C. Basic Electromagnetic Theory of SERS, Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: Analytical, Biophysical and Life Science Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Michaels, A.M.; Nirmal, M.; Brus, L.E. Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy of individual rhodamine 6G molecules on large Ag nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9932–9939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nie, S.; Emory, S.R. Probing single molecules and single nanoparticles by surface-enhanced raman scattering downloaded from. Science 1997, 275, 1102–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kneipp, K.; Wang, Y.; Kneipp, H.; Perelman, T.; Lev; Itzkan, I.; Dasari, R.; Feld, M. Single molecule detection using surface-enhanced raman scattering (SERS). Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78, 1667–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sivanesan, A.; Witkowska, E.; Adamkiewicz, W.; Dziewit, Ł.; Kamińska, A.; Waluk, J. Nanostructured silver-gold bimetallic SERS substrates for selective identification of bacteria in human blood. Analyst 2014, 139, 1037–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Villa, J.E.L.; Poppi, R.J. A portable SERS method for the determination of uric acid using a paper-based substrate and multivariate curve resolution. Analyst 2016, 141, 1966–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Cheng, H.W.; Huan, S.Y.; Yu, R.Q. Nanoparticle-based substrates for surface-enhanced Raman scattering detection of bacterial spores. Analyst 2012, 137, 3601–3608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yu, W.W.; White, I.M. Inkjet-printed paper-based SERS dipsticks and swabs for trace chemical detection. Analyst 2013, 138, 1020–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yan, B.; Sun, K.; Chao, K.; Alharbi, N.S.; Li, J.; Huang, Q. Fabrication of a Novel Transparent SERS Substrate Comprised of Ag-nanoparticle Arrays and its Application in Rapid Detection of Ractopamine on Meat. Food Anal. Methods 2018, 11, 2329–2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kumar, S.; Goel, P.; Singh, J.P. Flexible and robust SERS active substrates for conformal rapid detection of pesticide residues from fruits. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 241, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, Z.; Yu, Q.; Li, H.; Mustapha, A.; Lin, M. Standing Gold Nanorod Arrays as Reproducible SERS Substrates for Measurement of Pesticides in Apple Juice and Vegetables. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, N450–N458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gudun, K.; Elemessova, Z.; Khamkhash, L.; Ralchenko, E.; Bukasov, R. Commercial Gold Nanoparticles on Untreated Aluminum Foil: Versatile, Sensitive, and Cost-Effective SERS Substrate. J. Nanomater. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, X.; Dai, Z.; Si, S.; Zhang, X.; Wu, W.; Deng, H.; Wang, F.; Xiao, X.; Jiang, C. Ultrasensitive SERS Substrate Integrated with Uniform Subnanometer Scale “Hot Spots” Created by a Graphene Spacer for the Detection of Mercury Ions. Small 2017, 13, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sivashanmugan, K.; der Liao, J.; Liu, B.H.; Yao, C.K.; Luo, S.C. Ag nanoclusters on ZnO nanodome array as hybrid SERS-active substrate for trace detection of malachite green. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 207, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kottmann, J.P.; Martin, O.J.F.; Smith, D.R.; Schultz, S. Dramatic localized electromagnetic enhancement in plasmon resonant nanowires. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 41, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kudelski, A. Raman spectroscopy of surfaces. Surf. Sci. 2009, 603, 1328–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rycenga, M.; Camargo, P.H.C.; Li, W.; Moran, C.H.; Xia, Y. Understanding the SERS effects of single silver nanoparticles and their dimers, one at a time. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 696–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mie, G. On the optics of turbid media, especially colloidal metal solutions. Ann. Phys. Berlin. 1908, 25, 377–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, D.; Yang, H. Facile synthesis of anisotropic silver nanoparticles and their surface-enhanced Raman scattering properties. J. Mol. Struct. 2014, 1060, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ling, Y.; Zhuo, Y.; Huang, L.; Mao, D. Using Ag-embedded TiO2nanotubes array as recyclable SERS substrate. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 388, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Roguska, A.; Kudelski, A.; Pisarek, M.; Lewandowska, M.; Dolata, M.; Janik-Czachor, M. Raman investigations of TiO2 nanotube substrates covered with thin Ag or Cu deposits. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2009, 40, 1652–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Roguska, A.; Kudelski, A.; Pisarek, M.; Opara, M.; Janik-Czachor, M. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) activity of Ag, Au and Cu nanoclusters on TiO2-nanotubes/Ti substrate. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 8182–8189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Roy, P.; Berger, S.; Schmuki, P. TiO2 nanotubes: Synthesis and applications. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2904–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sulka, G.D.; Kapusta-Kołodziej, J.; Brzózka, A.; Jaskuła, M. Fabrication of nanoporous TiO2 by electrochemical anodization. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 4359–4367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kapusta-Kołodziej, J.; Syrek, K.; Pawlik, A.; Jarosz, M.; Tynkevych, O.; Sulka, G.D. Effects of anodizing potential and temperature on the growth of anodic TiO 2 and its photoelectrochemical properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 396, 1119–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mazierski, P.; Nischk, M.; Gołkowska, M.; Lisowski, W.; Gazda, M.; Winiarski, M.J.; Klimczuk, T.; Zaleska-Medynska, A. Photocatalytic activity of nitrogen doped TiO 2 nanotubes prepared by anodic oxidation: The effect of applied voltage, anodization time and amount of nitrogen dopant. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 196, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Andrzejczuk, M.; Roguska, A.; Pisarek, M.; Hołdyński, M.; Lewandowska, M.; Kurzydłowski, K.J. Morphology of TiO2 nanotubes revealed through electron tomography. Micron 2017, 95, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mosiałek, M.; Nawrat, G.; Szyk-Warszyńska, L.; Żak, J.; Maciej, A.; Radwański, K.; Winiarski, A.; Szade, J.; Nowak, P.; Simka, W. Anodic oxidation of the Ti–13Nb–13Zr alloy. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2014, 18, 3073–3080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pisarek, M.; Holdynski, M.; Roguska, A.; Kudelski, A.; Janik-Czachor, M. TiO2and Al2O3nanoporous oxide layers decorated with silver nanoparticles—active substrates for SERS measurements. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2014, 18, 3099–3109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hahm, E.; Cha, M.G.; Kang, E.J.; Pham, X.H.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, H.M.; Kim, D.E.; Lee, Y.S.; Jeong, D.H.; Jun, B.H. Multilayer Ag-Embedded Silica nanostructure as a surface-enhanced raman scattering-based chemical sensor with dual-function internal standards. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 40748–40755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pham, X.H.; Shim, S.; Kim, T.H.; Hahm, E.; Kim, H.M.; Rho, W.Y.; Jeong, D.H.; Lee, Y.S.; Jun, B.H. Glucose detection using 4-mercaptophenyl boronic acid-incorporated silver nanoparticles-embedded silica-coated graphene oxide as a SERS substrate. Biochip J. 2017, 11, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jun, B.H.; Kim, G.; Baek, J.; Kang, H.; Kim, T.; Hyeon, T.; Jeong, D.H.; Lee, Y.S. Magnetic field induced aggregation of nanoparticles for sensitive molecular detection. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 7298–7303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Mosier-Boss, P. Review of SERS substrates for chemical sensing. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Skrabalak, S.E.; Au, L.; Li, X.; Xia, Y. Facile synthesis of Ag nanocubes and Au nanocages. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 2182–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Roguska, A.; Pisarek, M.; Belcarz, A.; Marcon, L.; Holdynski, M.; Andrzejczuk, M.; Janik-Czachor, M. Improvement of the bio-functional properties of TiO2nanotubes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 388, 775–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Amendola, V.; Bakr, O.M.; Stellacci, F. A study of the surface plasmon resonance of silver nanoparticles by the discrete dipole approximation method: Effect of shape, size, structure, and assembly. Plasmonics 2010, 5, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Abdul, M.; Khan, M.; Kumar, S.; Ahamed, M.; Alrokayan, S.A. Structural and thermal studies of silver nanoparticles and electrical transport study of their thin films. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xia, Y.N.; Sun, Y.G. Shape-controlled synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles. Science 2002, 298, 2176–2179. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang, H.H.; Liu, C.Y.; Wu, S.B.; Liu, N.W.; Peng, C.Y.; Chan, T.H.; Hsu, C.F.; Wang, J.K.; Wang, Y.L. Highly raman-enhancing substrates based on silver nanoparticle arrays with tunable sub-10 nm gaps. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 491–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pisarek, M.; Krajczewski, J.; Hołdyński, M.; Płociński, T.; Krawczyk, M.; Kudelski, A.; Janik-Czachor, M. Titanium (IV) oxide nanotubes in design of active SERS substrates for high sensitivity analytical applications: Effect of Geometrical Factors in Nanotubes and in Ag-n Deposits. In Raman Spectroscopy; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Reguera, J.; Langer, J.; de Aberasturi, D.J.; Liz-Marzán, L.M. Anisotropic metal nanoparticles for surface enhanced Raman scattering. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3866–3885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Macak, J.M.; Schmuki, P. Anodic growth of self-organized anodic TiO2nanotubes in viscous electrolytes. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 52, 1258–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B.; et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Pisarek, M.; Nowakowski, R.; Kudelski, A.; Holdynski, M.; Roguska, A.; Janik-Czachor, M.; Kurowska-Tabor, E.; Sulka, G.D. Surface modification of nanoporous alumina layers by deposition of Ag nanoparticles. Effect of alumina pore diameter on the morphology of silver deposit and its influence on SERS activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 357, 1736–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pisarek, M.; Roguska, A.; Kudelski, A.; Andrzejczuk, M.; Janik-Czachor, M.; Kurzydłowski, K.J. The role of Ag particles deposited on TiO2 or Al 2O3 self-organized nanoporous layers in their behavior as SERS-active and biomedical substrates. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Foti, A.; D’Andrea, C.; Villari, V.; Micali, N.; Donato, M.G.; Fazio, B.; Maragò, O.M.; Gillibert, R.; de la Chapelle, M.L.; Gucciardi, P.G. Optical aggregation of gold nanoparticles for SERS detection of proteins and toxins in liquid environment: Towards ultrasensitive and selective detection. Materials 2018, 11, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Solovyeva, E.V.; Ubyivovk, E.V.; Denisova, A.S. Effect of diaminostilbene as a molecular linker on Ag nanoparticles: SERS study of aggregation and interparticle hot spots in various environments, Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 538, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kołątaj, K.; Krajczewski, J.; Kudelski, A. Silver nanoparticles with many sharp apexes and edges as efficient nanoresonators for shell-isolated nanoparticle-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 12383–12391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rycenga, M.; Kim, M.H.; Camargo, P.H.C.; Cobley, C.; Li, Z.Y.; Xia, Y. Surface-enhanced raman scattering: Comparison of three different molecules on single-crystal nanocubes and nanospheres of silver. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 3932–3939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sugawa, K.; Akiyama, T.; Tanoue, Y.; Harumoto, T.; Yanagida, S.; Yasumori, A.; Tomita, S.; Otsuki, J. Particle size dependence of the surface-enhanced Raman scattering properties of densely arranged two-dimensional assemblies of Au(core)-Ag(shell) nanospheres. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 17, 21182–21189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Briggs, D. Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy C. D. Wanger, W.M. Riggs, L.E. Davis, J.F. Moulder and G. E.Muilenberg Perkin-Elmer Corp., Physical Electronics Division, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA, 1979. 190 pp. $195. Surf. Interface Anal. 1981, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mazierski, P.; Malankowska, A.; Kobylański, M.; Diak, M.; Kozak, M.; Winiarski, M.J.; Klimczuk, T.; Lisowski, W.; Nowaczyk, G.; Zaleska-Medynska, A. Photocatalytically Active TiO2/Ag2O Nanotube Arrays Interlaced with Silver Nanoparticles Obtained from the One-Step Anodic Oxidation of Ti-Ag Alloys. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 2753–2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Han, Y.; Lupitskyy, R.; Chou, T.M.; Stafford, C.M.; Du, H.; Sukhishvili, S. Effect of oxidation on surface-enhanced raman scattering activity of silver nanoparticles: A quantitative correlation. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 5873–5880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kang, S.W.; Kang, Y.S. Silver nanoparticles stabilized by crosslinked poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) and its application for facilitated olefin transport. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 353, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Prieto, P.; Nistor, V.; Nouneh, K.; Oyama, M.; Abd-Lefdil, M.; Díaz, R. XPS study of silver, nickel and bimetallic silver-nickel nanoparticles prepared by seed-mediated growth. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 8807–8813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Collins, G.; Schmidt, M.; McGlacken, G.P.; O’Dwyer, C.; Holmes, J.D. Stability, oxidation, and shape evolution of PVP-capped Pd nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 6522–6530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tanuma, S.; Ichimura, S.; Goto, K.; Kimura, T. Experimental determinations of electron inelastic mean free paths in Silver, Gold, Copper and Silicon from Electron Elastic Peak Intensity Ratios. J. Surf. Anal. 2002, 9, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Doliński, W.; Mróz, S.; Zagórski, M. Determination of the inelastic mean free path of electrons in silver and copper by measurement and calculation of the elastic scattering coefficient. Surf. Sci. 1988, 200, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, W.F.; He, Y.L.; Zhang, M.S.; Yin, Z.; Chen, Q. Raman scattering study on anatase TiO 2 nanocrystals. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2000, 33, 912–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhao, J.; Wang, X.; Sun, T.; Li, L. Crystal phase transition and properties of titanium oxide nanotube arrays prepared by anodization. J. Alloys Compd. 2007, 434–435, 792–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ferrari, A.C.; Robertson, J. Interpretation of Raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, 14095–14106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kudelski, A.; Pettinger, B. SERS on carbon chain segments: Monitoring locally surface chemistry. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000, 321, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zuo, C.; Jagodzinski, P.W. Surface-enhanced raman scattering of pyridine using different metals: Differences and explanation based on the selective formation of α-pyridyl on metal surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 1788–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Temperini, M.L.A.; Sala, D.; Lacconi, G.I.; Gioda, A.S.; Macagno, V.A.; Arvia, A.J. Correlation between SERS of pyridine and electrochemical response of Silver electrodes in halide-free alkaline solutions. Langmuir 1988, 4, 1032–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kaczor, A.; Malek, K.; Baranska, M. Pyridine on colloidal silver. Polarization of surface studied by surface-enhanced raman scattering and density functional theory methods. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 3909–3917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pisarek, M.; Roguska, A.; Kudelski, A.; Hołdyński, M.; Janik-Czachor, M. Self-organized TiO2, Al2O3 and ZrO2 nanotubular layers: Properties and applications. In Comprehensive Guide for Nanocoatings Technology. Volume 3 Properties and Development; Aliofkhazraei, E.M., Ed.; Nova Science: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 435–462. [Google Scholar]
  71. Roguska, A.; Kudelski, A.; Pisarek, M.; Lewandowska, M.; Kurzydłowski, K.J.; Janik-Czachor, M. In situ spectroelectrochemical surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) investigations on composite Ag/TiO2-nanotubes/Ti substrates. Surf. Sci. 2009, 603, 2820–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yang, L.; Wang, W.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Shan, H.; Zhang, M.; Zhu, K.; Lv, J.; He, G.; Sun, Z. Improved SERS performance of single-crystalline TiO2nanosheet arrays with coexposed {001} and {101} facets decorated with Ag nanoparticles. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 242, 932–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Roguska, A.; Kudelski, A.; Pisarek, M.; Opara, M.; Janik-Czachor, M. Raman investigations of SERS activity of Ag nanoclusters on a TiO 2-nanotubes/Ti substrate. Vib. Spectrosc. 2011, 55, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kneipp, K.; Ozaki, Y.; Tian, Z.-Q. Recent Developments in Plasmon-Supported Raman Spectroscopy cover Recent Developments in Plasmon-Supported Raman Spectroscopy; World Scientific: Singapore, 2018. [Google Scholar]
Materials 12 03373 g001 550
Figure 1. Scheme of synthesis of silver nanocubes.
Figure 1. Scheme of synthesis of silver nanocubes.
Materials 12 03373 g001
Materials 12 03373 g002 550
Figure 2. Scheme of preparation surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) substrate based on titanium oxide nanotubes and cubic silver nanoparticles.
Figure 2. Scheme of preparation surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) substrate based on titanium oxide nanotubes and cubic silver nanoparticles.
Materials 12 03373 g002
Materials 12 03373 g003 550
Figure 3. UV–Vis spectrum of cubic silver nanoparticles (AgCNPs).
Figure 3. UV–Vis spectrum of cubic silver nanoparticles (AgCNPs).
Materials 12 03373 g003
Materials 12 03373 g004 550
Figure 4. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image of cubic silver nanoparticles deposited on silicon wafer (a) and TEM microscopic grid (b). The inserts show the histogram of Ag nanoparticles count vs. nanoparticle edge length (a) and the electron diffraction pattern (b).
Figure 4. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image of cubic silver nanoparticles deposited on silicon wafer (a) and TEM microscopic grid (b). The inserts show the histogram of Ag nanoparticles count vs. nanoparticle edge length (a) and the electron diffraction pattern (b).
Materials 12 03373 g004
Materials 12 03373 g005 550
Figure 5. Mean area coverage of TiO2 nanotubes anodized on a Ti surface.
Figure 5. Mean area coverage of TiO2 nanotubes anodized on a Ti surface.
Materials 12 03373 g005
Materials 12 03373 g006 550
Figure 6. Top view of TiO2 nanotubes after anodic oxidation procedure at 25 V in a glycerol-water mixture with ammonium fluoride electrolyte at low (a) and high magnification (b).
Figure 6. Top view of TiO2 nanotubes after anodic oxidation procedure at 25 V in a glycerol-water mixture with ammonium fluoride electrolyte at low (a) and high magnification (b).
Materials 12 03373 g006
Materials 12 03373 g007 550
Figure 7. SEM image of Ag cubic nanoparticles deposited by droplet method on titanium oxide nanotubes at low (a) and high magnification (b).
Figure 7. SEM image of Ag cubic nanoparticles deposited by droplet method on titanium oxide nanotubes at low (a) and high magnification (b).
Materials 12 03373 g007
Materials 12 03373 g008 550
Figure 8. Auger local spectra taken for identification of the chemical composition from a single Ag nanoparticle (gray) and from an Ag agglomerate (black). For comparison, an Ag MNN reference spectrum for metallic Ag is given (red).
Figure 8. Auger local spectra taken for identification of the chemical composition from a single Ag nanoparticle (gray) and from an Ag agglomerate (black). For comparison, an Ag MNN reference spectrum for metallic Ag is given (red).
Materials 12 03373 g008
Materials 12 03373 g009 550
Figure 9. High-resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of Ti2p peaks recorded on titanium dioxide nanotubes annealed at 450 °C (green) and synthesized SERS substrate (violet).
Figure 9. High-resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of Ti2p peaks recorded on titanium dioxide nanotubes annealed at 450 °C (green) and synthesized SERS substrate (violet).
Materials 12 03373 g009
Materials 12 03373 g010 550
Figure 10. The Ag3d XPS spectra after the deconvolution procedure for AgCNPs deposited on titanium oxide nanotubes (TiO2 NT) (AgCNPs@TiO2 NT) (a) and electrochemically activated silver (Ag reference) (b).
Figure 10. The Ag3d XPS spectra after the deconvolution procedure for AgCNPs deposited on titanium oxide nanotubes (TiO2 NT) (AgCNPs@TiO2 NT) (a) and electrochemically activated silver (Ag reference) (b).
Materials 12 03373 g010
Materials 12 03373 g011 550
Figure 11. Raman spectra for TiO2 NT before (black) and after (green) heat treatment at 450 °C in air (2 h).
Figure 11. Raman spectra for TiO2 NT before (black) and after (green) heat treatment at 450 °C in air (2 h).
Materials 12 03373 g011
Materials 12 03373 g012 550
Figure 12. SERS spectra for Ag CNPS deposited on TiO2 nanotubes (violet) without pyridine (a) and with pyridine (b); the SERS reference spectrum for electrochemically activated Ag is also given (blue).
Figure 12. SERS spectra for Ag CNPS deposited on TiO2 nanotubes (violet) without pyridine (a) and with pyridine (b); the SERS reference spectrum for electrochemically activated Ag is also given (blue).
Materials 12 03373 g012
Materials 12 03373 g013 550
Figure 13. Surface morphology of the silver reference sample.
Figure 13. Surface morphology of the silver reference sample.
Materials 12 03373 g013
Materials 12 03373 g014 550
Figure 14. Logarithmic plot of the intensity of the pyridine band at 1004 cm−1 recorded in each of the series of 400 measurements for pyridine adsorbed at AgCNPs@TiO2 NT (violet) and silver electrode (blue).
Figure 14. Logarithmic plot of the intensity of the pyridine band at 1004 cm−1 recorded in each of the series of 400 measurements for pyridine adsorbed at AgCNPs@TiO2 NT (violet) and silver electrode (blue).
Materials 12 03373 g014
Materials 12 03373 g015 550
Figure 15. SERS spectra for Ag CNPS deposited on TiO2 nanotubes with pyridine and without pyridine (insert) after 14 cycles of water washing.
Figure 15. SERS spectra for Ag CNPS deposited on TiO2 nanotubes with pyridine and without pyridine (insert) after 14 cycles of water washing.
Materials 12 03373 g015

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ambroziak, R.; Hołdyński, M.; Płociński, T.; Pisarek, M.; Kudelski, A. Cubic Silver Nanoparticles Fixed on TiO2 Nanotubes as Simple and Efficient Substrates for Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering. Materials 2019, 12, 3373. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203373

AMA Style

Ambroziak R, Hołdyński M, Płociński T, Pisarek M, Kudelski A. Cubic Silver Nanoparticles Fixed on TiO2 Nanotubes as Simple and Efficient Substrates for Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering. Materials. 2019; 12(20):3373. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203373

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ambroziak, Robert, Marcin Hołdyński, Tomasz Płociński, Marcin Pisarek, and Andrzej Kudelski. 2019. "Cubic Silver Nanoparticles Fixed on TiO2 Nanotubes as Simple and Efficient Substrates for Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering" Materials 12, no. 20: 3373. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203373

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop