Next Article in Journal
A High-Performance Supercapacitor Based on Hierarchical Template-Free Ni/SnO2 Nanostructures via Hydrothermal Method
Previous Article in Journal
Quality Evaluation of New Types of Layered Composites for Flooring Materials
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 17
Issue 8
10.3390/ma17081893
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of ZrO2 Content on the Formation of Sr-Enriched Phosphates in Al2O3/ZrO2 Nanocomposites for Bone Tissue Engineering

by
Fabio Caixeta Nunes
1,*,
Sarah Ingrid Pinto Santos
2,
Luiz Alberto Colnago
3,
Peter Hammer
4,
Julieta Adriana Ferreira
5,
Carlos Eduardo Ambrósio
2 and
Eliria Maria Jesus Agnolon Pallone
1,6
1
Postgraduate Programme in Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering (FZEA), University of São Paulo (USP), Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil
2
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering (FZEA), University of São Paulo (USP), Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil
3
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, EMBRAPA Instrumentation, Rua Quinze de Novembro, 1500/1501, São Carlos 13561-206, SP, Brazil
4
Institute of Chemistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara 14800-900, SP, Brazil
5
Fundação Hermínio Ometto, Fundação Hermínio Ometto (FHO), Av. Dr. Maximiliano Baruto, 500, Araras 13607-339, SP, Brazil
6
Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering (FZEA), University of São Paulo (USP), Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(8), 1893; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17081893
Submission received: 5 March 2024 / Revised: 26 March 2024 / Accepted: 28 March 2024 / Published: 19 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Biomaterials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study investigates the profound impact of the ZrO2 inclusion volume on the characteristics of Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposites, particularly influencing the formation of calcium phosphates on the surface. This research, aimed at advancing tissue engineering, prepared nanocomposites with 5, 10, and 15 vol% ZrO2, subjecting them to chemical surface treatment for enhanced calcium phosphate deposition sites. Biomimetic coating with Sr-enriched simulated body fluid (SBF) further enhanced the bioactivity of nanocomposites. While the ZrO2 concentration heightened the oxygen availability on nanocomposite surfaces, the quantity of Sr-containing phosphate was comparatively less influenced than the formation of calcium phosphate phases. Notably, the coated nanocomposites exhibited a high cell viability and no toxicity, signifying their potential in bone tissue engineering. Overall, these findings contribute to the development of regenerative biomaterials, holding promise for enhancing bone regeneration therapies.

1. Introduction

The utilization of synthetic biomaterials for biomedical applications presents a potential alternative, particularly in scenarios involving a substantial increase in bone tissue lesions and implants [1,2]. Ceramic nanocomposites, for example, are ceramic materials that incorporate nanoscale reinforcements, such as nanoparticles or nanofibers dispersed in a matrix. This joining is responsible for some property improvements, which can increase the mechanical resistance, thermal stability, bioactivity, and other desirable properties. Typically, these nanocomposites are applied in a wide range of applications, such as structural materials, energy systems, electronics, biomaterials, and others [3].
Several processing techniques are employed to obtain nanostructured alumina oxide-based nanocomposites, including traditional methods such as sol–gel, chemical vapor deposition, precipitation, and mixing oxides using ball milling, among others. Currently, advancements in the field of nanotechnology involve various processing technologies, such as the fabrication of functional materials using galvanostatic anodic oxidation, atomic layer deposition, electrospinning, and plasma processing, among others [4,5,6,7]. Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposites, for example, have a high mechanical and wear resistance when compared to other ceramic biomaterials [8,9,10]. However, these materials interact minimally with host tissues due to their bioinert nature [11,12,13].
Combining Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposites with bioactive materials aims to enhance the biological activity of these materials. These combinations use surface activation methods such as biomimetic coating [14], a method that consists of immersing a substrate in simulated body fluid (SBF) [14,15,16,17]. Incubation enables the formation of calcium phosphate phases of biological interest that are deposited on the bioinert surface of the nanocomposite, increasing the bioactivity of the system [18,19]. This enhancement in bioactivity may render the material more susceptible to interacting with the surrounding biological environment, thereby improving the response in relation to tissue formation [19].
Calcium phosphates are bioceramics that resemble the inorganic components of bones [20,21]. Calcium phosphate phases exhibit distinct degradation rates and solubility, enabling greater adaptability with the desired application for these materials [22,23,24]. The biological performance of these calcium phosphates phases stems especially from the structural arrangement of the ions of each phase governing the physicochemical properties of the phosphates [21,25]. Thus, the bioactivity of calcium phosphates is based on their crystallinity, stability, solubility, and mechanical properties [21,25,26].
A strategy to improve the physical and biological characteristics of calcium phosphates is cationic ion incorporation [27]. Strontium ions (Sr2+), for example, are common dopants in calcium phosphates, modifying their solubility, inducing osteoblast proliferation, inhibiting osteoclast reabsorption, and increasing their biological activity [28,29,30]. Therefore, enriching the SBF solution is a viable method for incorporating Sr2+ ions during incubation, stimulating the replacement of Ca2+ by Sr2+ in the phosphate structure [31,32].
Modifications to surface properties are crucial for enhancing the interaction between the bioactive layer of phosphates to be deposited during biomimetic coating and the surface of the nanocomposite [18,33]. These modifications, encompassing surface energy, roughness, wettability, and surface area, among others, are also significantly influenced by the composition of the ceramic substrate [34,35,36,37,38].
Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposites, in particular, can be influenced by the quantity of nanometric inclusions of ZrO2 in the Al2O3 matrix, affecting their mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties [8,9]. Furthermore, the addition of ZrO2 may induce the formation of calcium phosphates and Sr-containing phosphates [18,33,34]. Despite the potential of Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposites, limited research has addressed the influence of varying ZrO2 concentrations on phosphate formation, particularly in nanocomposites. Therefore, the main goal of this study is to investigate the effect of ZrO2 concentrations on the formation of calcium and strontium phosphates on the surfaces of Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposites, aiming to enhance their bioactivity for bone tissue regeneration applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemical

Nanocomposites were prepared using commercial powders of Al2O3 AKP-53 (99.99% purity, Sumitomo Chemical, Tokio, Japan) and ZrO2 stabilized with 3.0% of yttrium mol (99.99% purity, Nanostructured Materials Inc., Katy, TX, USA).

2.2. Obtention of Nanocomposites and Surface Treatment

To prepare the powders, Al2O3 and ZrO2 suspensions were individually prepared in an alcoholic medium using a ball mill. Then, ZrO2 suspensions were dripped in 5 (A5Z), 10 (A10Z), and 15% (A15Z) proportions in volume in three agitated Al2O3 suspensions [18,39]. After drying the three suspensions, the resulting powders were molded into a cylindrical shape of 8 mm in diameter and 4 mm in height using isostatic pressing (200 MPa). Then, the nanocomposites were calcined at 400 °C for 1 h and sintered at 1500 °C for 2 h. The relative density of the nanocomposites was determined using Archimedes’ Principle (ASTM C373-88 2006) as a function of the theoretical density values of Al2O3 (3.98 g/cm3) and ZrO2 (5.84 g/cm3) [40].
To enhance the wettability and roughness of the nanocomposites, their surfaces were treated with a 5 mol/L phosphoric acid aqueous solution (H3PO4) for four days in a thermostatic bath at 90 °C [18]. Subsequently, the nanocomposites were rinsed with distilled water and dried at room temperature for 72 h. The treatment with H3PO4 can influence both wettability and roughness by activating functional sites that promote the deposition of phosphates [24].

2.3. Characterizations before Biomimetic Coating

The surfaces of the treated nanocomposites underwent chemical characterization using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to assess the impact of ZrO2 inclusions and their correlation with the coated nanocomposites. XPS analysis was conducted utilizing a commercial spectrometer (UNI-SPECS UHV System) with a pressure lower than 5 × 10−7 Pa. The Al Kα line (hν = 1254.6 eV) served as the ionization source, and the analyzer energy was set to 15 eV. Inelastic noise from O 1s, C 1s, Zr 3d, Al 2p, and P 2p wide scan spectra was subtracted using the Shirley method. The composition of the surface layer (<5 nm) was determined based on the relative proportions of spectrum areas, corrected by the Scofield atomic sensitivity factors (±5%). Spectra were deconvoluted using CasaXPS, version 2.3.26, employing a Voigtian function with Gaussian (70%) and Lorentzian (30%) combinations to assign the components of the nanocomposites’ chemical structure in accordance with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) guidelines [41]. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) ranged between 1.2 and 2.1 eV. Energy scale calibration was achieved using the C 1s hydrocarbon (CC-H) component at 285.0 eV, ensuring a peak position accuracy of ±0.1 eV.

2.4. Characterizations after Biomimetic Coating

The nanocomposites were biomimetically coated using a 5× concentrated SBF solution enriched with 1 mmol/L of Sr2+ ions [31,42,43]. For this, the nanocomposites were immersed in a solution at 36.5 °C under agitation at 60 rpm for 14 days in an orbital shaker incubator (Marconi, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil) according to the procedure adopted by Barrere et al. (2002) [14]. Solution exchanges and pH measurements were performed every three days (pH meter WTW pH 3210). Then, the nanocomposites were washed with distilled water and dried at room temperature for 72 h.
The calcium phosphates formed on the surfaces of the nanocomposites were identified using X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan, model Miniflex 600). A range between 20.0 and 42.5° was chosen as it contains peaks referring to calcium phosphates [19] and strontium [43,44]. To treat the data, the baseline of XRD diffractograms was adjusted using a Savitzky–Golay filter in OriginPro 9.0. The second derivative of each curve was obtained to aid peak deconvolution. Deconvoluted analytical curves were obtained using the Gaussian function (R2 > 0.99) in OriginPro 9.0 after normalization using the 35.0° peak (which refers to Al2O3). Based on the deconvoluted curves, calcium and strontium phosphate phases on the surfaces of the nanocomposites were identified based on Miller indices (hkl), according to the Joint Committee for Powder Diffraction database Studies (JCPDS) [45]. The identification of these phases was assisted using Crystallographica Search Match® 3.1.
The phosphate functional groups on the surfaces of the nanocomposites were characterized by Fourier transform infrared absorption spectroscopy (FTIR Spectrometer, Vertex 70 Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) with a 4 cm−1 resolution. The 1000–1650 cm−1 range was chosen for its higher incidence of absorption bands attributed to calcium phosphates [46,47,48]. FTIR spectrum baselines were corrected (by the Savitzky–Golay filter) and normalized from a common band between the compositions (653 cm−1), attributed to the stretching vibration of Al–O and Zr–O functional groups [35]. Preceding the tests, the coated nanocomposites were subjected to a 24 h drying process at 100 °C to ensure the removal of any excess surface moisture. The semi-quantification of the absolute areas was calculated using the same conditions for all the samples.

2.5. Cytotoxicity Assays

This study received approval from the Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, according to the ethical committee protocol number: CEUA 5442150419 (ID 001195). The rabbit mesenchymal stem cells (rMSCs) utilized in this research were supplied by the Laboratory of Stem Cells and Gene Therapies at the Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo.
The cell viability seeded on coated Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposites was evaluated using the MTT (3-dimethylthiazol-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) assay, an indirect colorimetric method. In this experiment, the MTT assay was performed seeding the cells in the medium containing the nanocomposites. Six samples were used for each condition. The test was adapted from ISO 10993-5 to work with rMSCs [49]. The rMSCs were cultured in a DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% L-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% MEM nonessential amino acids, and 0.4% amphotericin B in a humidified incubator at 5% CO2 and 37.5 °C. A density of 5 × 103 cells was seeded in each well of a 96-well microplate in 100 µL of medium for 24 h before the treatments, except for the control.
Meanwhile, A5Z, A10Z, and A15Z were incubated for 24 h in the medium to be used for the treatment the next day. Control viable cells received the standard medium, which was not incubated with the nanocomposites. After 24 h, each well was incubated for 2 h in 1 mg/mL MTT/PBS. During this time, viable cells produced formazan crystals that were dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) for 5 min, and absorbance was measured at 570 nm in a spectrophotometer (BMG LABTECH, FLUOstar OPTIMA, Saitama, Japan).

2.6. Adhesion and Proliferation of rMSCs

To evaluate the interaction between cells and nanocomposites, rMSCs were cultured with the nanocomposites in a 24-well plate at a density of 5 × 105 cells in a DMEM culture medium supplemented as previously described. The culture medium was replaced every 48 h, and cell morphology and proliferation were observed and recorded daily by light microscopy until cells reached 80% confluence. Then, the cell-enriched nanocomposites were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 24 h and dehydrated in a range of ethanol concentrations (40, 60, 80, and 100%). The nanocomposites were then dried at room temperature and evaluated via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan, model TM 3000). At least three samples of each composition were used.

2.7. Statistical Analyses

Composition viability was compared using one-way ANOVA analysis (p < 0.05), followed by the Dunnett test for multiple comparisons between each treatment and the 100% viability control. Statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism (version 6.0). Pearson correlations were performed in Origin Pro 9.0.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Nanocomposites

The nanocomposites A5Z, A10Z, and A15Z showed 97.30 ± 0.15, 98.26 ± 0.37, and 98.33 ± 0.69% (%TD) relative density values, respectively, suggesting that processing led to high particle packing and consolidation [12].
Figure 1 shows the high-resolution XPS exploratory spectra used to determine the atomic concentration (at.%) of the elements on the surface (<5 nm) of the treated nanocomposites (Table 1).
No significant differences can be observed in the positions of spectrum orbital peaks as a function of the increase in ZrO2 volume. All compositions contained abundant carbon (C) content due to aliphatic hydrocarbon residues in the environment [50].
Figure 2 illustrates Al/Zr and Al/P ratios. The Al/Zr ratio expectedly decreased as the ZrO2 inclusion volume increased.
Although it was impossible to observe an evident upward or downward trend in Al/P ratios as a function of ZrO2 percentages, all compositions contained phosphorus (P) due to the H3PO4 treatment. The A10Z composition showed a lower Al/P ratio, suggesting significant modification of its surface.
Figure 3 shows the XPS deconvoluted curves.
The nanocomposites had a peak attributed to O 1s of the ZrO2 phase at 529.2 eV and a peak attributed to Al2O3 at 530.5 eV. The –OH and –PO4 groups showed the highest binding energy at 531.3 eV and the contaminating oxidized carbon groups refer to O–C at 532.3 eV and O–C=O at 533.5 eV, respectively (Figure 3). Increasing the ZrO2 volume slightly reduced the absolute areas of the O 1s orbital (rZrO2 vol/Absolute area O 1s = −0.96) and increasing the ZrO2 percentage raised the absolute area of –OH and –PO4 groups, which may suggest a greater tendency toward calcium phosphate formation after biomimetic coating. Table 2 details the position of the orbital peaks and their respective absolute areas for each composition.
The Zr 3d spectra showed increasing absolute peak areas with higher ZrO2 percentages, indicating the influence of ZrO2 volume on the surface chemistry. Conversely, the Al 2p spectra exhibited a downward trend in the total absolute area as the ZrO2 percentage increased, suggesting that the chemical treatment of the nanocomposite surfaces more significantly impacted ZrO2 than Al2O3.
Overall, these findings suggest that the addition of ZrO2 influences the surface chemistry and composition of the nanocomposites, particularly regarding calcium phosphate formation and the distribution of ZrO2 and Al2O3 phases. Further investigations into the implications of these surface modifications on biological interactions, such as cell adhesion and proliferation, would provide valuable insights into the suitability of these nanocomposites for biomedical applications.

3.2. Characterization of Nanocomposites after Biomimetic Coating

Figure 4 depicts the deconvoluted XRD curves obtained from the A15Z nanocomposite surface.
The A15Z composition was specifically chosen to exemplify the curves resulting from the deconvolution of the diffractograms, with a consistent methodology applied across all studied conditions. These curves facilitated the identification of phases present on the nanocomposite surfaces following biomimetic coating, with key peaks of each phase pinpointed and phosphate phases characterized based on their profile and position (see Table 3).
Percentage areas were subsequently calculated utilizing the hkl diffraction patterns of each phase in accordance with JCPDS standards [45]. Identification of phases on the nanocomposite surfaces, particularly phosphate phases, is crucial for understanding their potential in biomedical applications.
In general, α-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP) was predominantly assigned to the (202), (151), (132), (241), and (170) planes. Despite not exhibiting a clear correlation with the increase in ZrO2 volume, the presence of α-TCP is noteworthy due to its high solubility and osteoconduction capacity [20,25].
Conversely, β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) was identified in the (024), (128), (1010), and (3012) planes, notable for its high resorption rate and thermostability [51,52]. While the A10Z composition displayed a greater abundance of this phase, its percentage decreased significantly with higher volumes of ZrO2 inclusion.
The tetracalcium phosphate (TTCP) phase was detected in planes such as (040), (−121), (−151), (232), and (−311), exhibiting a Ca/P ratio of 2.0, higher than other phases, including hydroxyapatite (Ca/P = 1.67). TTCP is biologically relevant due to its bioresorbability and filling capacity [53], with the A5Z composition showing higher percentages of this phase compared to others, potentially enhancing the nanocomposite’s bioactive properties.
Hydroxyapatite (HAp) formation was evident in the (211), (002), (112), (300), and (310) planes, with its formation increasing proportionally with the volume of ZrO2 inclusions, displaying a significant Pearson correlation (rZrO2 vol/HAp = 0.99). As highlighted by Dorozhkin (2018), the chemical stability in aqueous media and the osteointegration capacity of HAp contribute to its strong chemical affinity with nanocomposite surfaces [22], rendering it bioactive, biocompatible, and osteoconductive [25].
The emergence of strontium phosphate (SrP) and strontium-hydroxyapatite (Sr-HAp) phases indicated the incorporation of Sr2+. SrP displayed a slight upward trend with higher ZrO2 amounts, observed in planes such as (211), (221), (333), and (312), while Sr-HAp was identified in the (130), (211), (300), and (310) planes. Particularly, HAp formation significantly correlates with ZrO2 inclusions, showcasing its potential for enhanced osseointegration and bioactive properties. The incorporation of Sr2+ is evident in SrP and Sr-HAp phases, exhibiting varying trends with ZrO2 concentration. The highest ZrO2 concentration reduces Sr-Hap. Notably, Ca and Sr hydroxyapatites collectively constitute ~60.0%, suggesting promising biomedical application prospects.
The FTIR spectra (Figure 5) reveal absorption bands attributed to phosphate functional groups in the HAp phase [48,54], alongside bands associated with α-TCP [55], β-TCP [32,56,57,58], and TTCP phases [55].
The presence of HPO42− [46,59,60], PO43− [61], and CO32− [32,62,63] ions in the spectra suggests their roles as precursors in calcium phosphate formation and their impact on crystallinity and solubility, with higher ZrO2 percentages correlating with increased calcium phosphate formation on nanocomposite surfaces, but not necessarily influencing Sr-containing phosphate formation.
An analysis of total absolute phosphate areas from the FTIR spectra and the partial areas of each phase from XRD diffractograms in Figure 6 reveals that increasing the volume of inclusions correlates with a higher number of formed phosphates.
It was observed that there are significant correlations between different phosphate phases, such as Sr-HAp and SrP, α-TCP and β-TCP, and Sr-HAp and HAp, suggesting interdependencies in their formation. Despite this, the volume of ZrO2 did not significantly influence the formation of phosphate phases containing Sr2+. Phosphates exhibit versatility in incorporating various ionic species, including Sr2+ ions, which can alter their structural characteristics and biological properties, stimulating biomineralization and bone tissue formation crucial for bone regeneration [29,56].

3.3. Cell Viability, Adhesion, and Proliferation of rMSCs

The morphological analysis in Figure 7 indicates the formation of a bioactive layer on nanocomposite surfaces, influenced by the incorporation of Sr2+ ions and potentially affected by factors such as the incubation time, pH, and ionic concentration of the SBF solution [16,43,64].
Regarding the investigation of the biocompatibility of the Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposites, non-cytotoxicity was observed after 24 h. All the samples showed no significant differences among them, and the cell viability was above ~70%. Surface modification of the nanocomposites before the biomimetic coating facilitated the deposition of calcium phosphates, which also enhanced cell attachment. The cells demonstrated strong attraction and adhesion to the surface of the nanocomposites. Notably, upon contact with the biomaterial, the cells adopted a fusiform shape with multiple cytoplasmic processes, which interconnected with both neighboring cells and the surface of the biomaterial [64].
It is recognized that further research will be required to comprehensively investigate the adhesion, migration, and morphological changes of the cells, which may be related to their potential osteogenic differentiation. In future studies, our team plans to investigate in detail the dynamic interactions between MSCs and the biomaterial surface, as supported by various studies [65,66,67]. Moreover, as the nanocomposites are dense, the microenvironment of interaction is restricted to the nanocomposite surface. It is expected that further treated and coated nanocomposites with different processing and geometries will be explored, including porous materials. In addition, nanocomposites are presented as an attractive option for the development of novel bone regeneration therapies.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study highlights the influence of ZrO2 inclusions on the formation of calcium phosphates on Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposite surfaces. Varying the quantity of ZrO2 inclusions within the Al2O3 matrix profoundly impacts the nanocomposites’ bioactivity, promoting the formation of different phases of calcium phosphates and Sr-containing calcium phosphates of biological interest. Furthermore, the nanocomposites demonstrated promise for bone tissue engineering, as indicated by their cell viability and bioactivity. Moving forward, further research should optimize ZrO2 inclusion levels and explore different shapes to enhance the performance of nanocomposites in bone regeneration therapies.

Author Contributions

Methodology, F.C.N. and S.I.P.S.; Validation, P.H. and J.A.F.; Investigation, F.C.N., S.I.P.S., L.A.C. and J.A.F.; Resources, L.A.C., C.E.A. and E.M.J.A.P.; Data curation, F.C.N., S.I.P.S. and P.H.; Writing—original draft, F.C.N.; Writing—review & editing, S.I.P.S., P.H., J.A.F. and E.M.J.A.P.; Visualization, L.A.C., P.H. and J.A.F.; Supervision, C.E.A. and E.M.J.A.P.; Project administration, C.E.A. and E.M.J.A.P.; Funding acquisition, C.E.A. and E.M.J.A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of grants 2022/05031-0, 2022/10604-0, 2021/09869-6 and 2021/12694-3 from the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP). This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001. This publication was funded by Fundação de Estudos Agrários Luiz de Queiroz (Fealq) and University of São Paulo (USP).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, (CEUA 5442150419 (ID 001195), 06/2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Luiz Alberto Colnago was employed by the company Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, EMBRAPA Instrumentation. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gaddam, A.; Brazete, D.S.; Neto, A.S.; Nan, B.; Fernandes, H.R.; Ferreira, J.M.F. Robocasting and Surface Functionalization with Highly Bioactive Glass of ZrO2 Scaffolds for Load Bearing Applications. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 105, 1753–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, M.; Xu, P.; Lei, B. Engineering Multifunctional Bioactive Citrate-Based Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 19, 511–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Palmero, P. Structural Ceramic Nanocomposites: A Review of Properties and Powders’ Synthesis Methods. Nanomaterials 2015, 5, 656–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Poznyak, A.; Knörnschild, G.; Karoza, A.; Norek, M.; Pligovka, A. Peculiar Porous Aluminum Oxide Films Produced via Electrochemical Anodizing in Malonic Acid Solution with Arsenazo-I Additive. Materials 2021, 14, 5118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Poznyak, A.A.; Knörnschild, G.H.; Pligovka, A.N.; Larin, T.D. Anodic alumina prepared in aqueous solutions of chelating complex zinc and cobalt compounds. Tech. Phys. 2022, 67, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cuevas, A.L.; Dominguez, A.; Zamudio-García, J.; Vega, V.; González, A.S.; Marrero-López, D.; Prida, V.M.; Benavente, J. Optical and Electrochemical Properties of a Nanostructured ZnO Thin Layer Deposited on a Nanoporous Alumina Structure via Atomic Layer Deposition. Materials 2024, 17, 1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Phan, N.T.T.; Sato, M.; Kobayashi, T. Silica Scaling Inhibition in Water Treatment Process Using Fibrous Al2O3-Nylon 6 Adsorbents. Fibers 2024, 12, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abbas, M.K.G.; Ramesh, S.; Tasfy, S.F.H.; Lee, K.Y.S. A State-of-the-Art Review on Alumina Toughened Zirconia Ceramic Composites. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 37, 106964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ravikumar, K.; Sarkar, D.; Basu, B. ZrO2-Toughened Al2O3 Composites with Better Fracture and Wear Resistance Properties. J. Biomater. Appl. 2017, 32, 1174–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Benalcázar-Jalkh, E.B.; Bergamo, E.T.P.; Campos, T.M.B.; Coelho, P.G.; Sailer, I.; Yamaguchi, S.; Alves, L.M.M.; Witek, L.; Tebcherani, S.M.; Bonfante, E.A. A Narrative Review on Polycrystalline Ceramics for Dental Applications and Proposed Update of a Classification System. Materials 2023, 16, 7541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cavalu, S.; Ratiu, C.; Ponta, O.; Simon, V.; Rugina, D.; Miclaus, V.; Akin, I.; Goller, G. Improving osseointegration of alumina/zirconia ceramic implants by fluoride surface treatment. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 2014, 9, 797–808. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ojaimi, C.L.; Ferreira, J.A.; Santos, F.A.; Chinelatto, A.L.; Pallone, E.M.J.A.; Chinelatto, A.S.A. Mechanical Characterisation and Hydrothermal Degradation of Al2O3-15 vol% ZrO2 Nanocomposites Consolidated by Two-Step Sintering. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 16128–16136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ho, K.-N.; Chen, L.-W.; Kuo, T.-F.; Chen, K.-S.; Lee, S.-Y.; Wang, S.-F. Surface Modification of Zirconia Ceramics through Cold Plasma Treatment and the Graft Polymerization of Biomolecules. J. Dent. Sci. 2023, 18, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Barrere, F.; van Blitterswijk, C.A.; de Groot, K.; Layrolle, P. Influence of Ionic Strength and Carbonate on the Ca-P Coating Formation from SBF×5 Solution. Biomaterials 2002, 23, 1921–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kokubo, T.; Matsushita, T.; Takadama, H.; Kizuki, T. Development of Bioactive Materials Based on Surface Chemistry. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 29, 1267–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yilmaz, B.; Pazarceviren, A.E.; Tezcaner, A.; Evis, Z. Historical Development of Simulated Body Fluids Used in Biomedical Applications: A Review. Microchem. J. 2020, 155, 104713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sousa, L.M.R.; Virgens Santana, M.; Silva, B.P.; Marques, T.O.; Peña-Garcia, R.R.; Hidalgo, A.A.; Vega, M.L.; Viana, B.C.; Stocco, T.D.; Vasconcellos, L.M.R.; et al. Surface Modification of Ti6Al7Nb Alloy by Al2O3 Nanofilms and Calcium Phosphate Coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2023, 456, 129249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Santos, K.H.; Ferreira, J.A.; Osiro, D.; Conceição, G.J.A.; Filho, R.B.; Colnago, L.A.; Pallone, E.M.J.A. Influence of Different Chemical Treatments on the Surface of Al2O3/ZrO2 Nanocomposites during Biomimetic Coating. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 4272–4279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sartori, T.A.I.C.; Ferreira, J.A.; Osiro, D.; Colnago, L.A.; Pallone, E.M.J.A. Formation of Different Calcium Phosphate Phases on the Surface of Porous Al2O3-ZrO2 Nanocomposites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 38, 743–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Arjunan, A.; Baroutaji, A.; Robinson, J.; Praveen, A.S.; Pollard, A.; Wang, C. Future Directions and Requirements for Tissue Engineering Biomaterials. Encycl. Smart Mater. 2022, 1, 195–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hou, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, Z.; Luo, X.; Wang, T.; Zhao, X.; Lu, B.; Chen, F.; Zheng, L. Calcium Phosphate-Based Biomaterials for Bone Repair. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dorozhkin, S.V. Calcium Orthophosphate (CaPO4)-Based Bioceramics: Preparation, Properties, and Applications. Coatings 2022, 12, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bohner, M.; Santoni, B.L.G.; Döbelin, N. β-Tricalcium Phosphate for Bone Substitution: Synthesis and Properties. Acta Biomater. 2020, 113, 23–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lavagnini, I.R.; Campos, J.V.; Osiro, D.; Ferreira, J.A.; Colnago, L.A.; Pallone, E.M.J.A. Influence of Alumina Substrates Open Porosity on Calcium Phosphates Formation Produced by the Biomimetic Method. Prog. Biomater. 2022, 11, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Eliaz, N.; Metoki, N. Calcium Phosphate Bioceramics: A Review of Their History, Structure, Properties, Coating Technologies and Biomedical Applications. Materials 2017, 10, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mosas, K.K.A.; Chandrasekar, A.R.; Dasan, A.; Pakseresht, A.; Galusek, D. Recent Advancements in Materials and Coatings for Biomedical Implants. Gels 2022, 8, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Furukawa, A. The Formation of Strontium Apatites through Alkaline Hydrolysis of Strontium Hydrogen Phosphate and Their Crystallographic Characterization. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 21848–21861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Olivier, F.; Rochet, N.; Delpeux-Ouldriane, S.; Chancolon, J.; Sarou-Kanian, V.; Fayon, F.; Bonnamy, S. Strontium Incorporation into Biomimetic Carbonated Calcium-Deficient Hydroxyapatite Coated Carbon Cloth: Biocompatibility with Human Primary Osteoblasts. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 116, 111192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yan, M.-D.; Ou, Y.-J.; Lin, Y.-J.; Liu, R.-M.; Fang, Y.; Wu, W.-L.; Zhou, L.; Yao, X.; Chen, J. Does the Incorporation of Strontium into Calcium Phosphate Improve Bone Repair? A Meta-Analysis. BMC Oral Health 2022, 22, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pelepenko, L.E.; Marciano, M.A.; Francati, T.M.; Bombarda, G.; Bessa Marconato Antunes, T.; Sorrentino, F.; Martin, R.A.; Boanini, E.; Cooper, P.R.; Shelton, R.M.; et al. Can Strontium Replace Calcium in Bioactive Materials for Dental Applications? J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2022, 110, 1892–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nguyen, T.-D.T.; Jang, Y.-S.; Lee, M.-H.; Bae, T.-S. Effect of Strontium Doping on the Biocompatibility of Calcium Phosphate-Coated Titanium Substrates. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 2019, 17, 228080001982651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ressler, A.; Cvetnić, M.; Antunović, M.; Marijanović, I.; Ivanković, M.; Ivanković, H. Strontium Substituted Biomimetic Calcium Phosphate System Derived from Cuttlefish Bone. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2019, 108, 1697–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Faga, M.G.; Vallée, A.; Bellosi, A.; Mazzocchi, M.; Thinh, N.N.; Martra, G.; Coluccia, S. Chemical Treatment on Alumina–Zirconia Composites Inducing Apatite Formation with Maintained Mechanical Properties. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 32, 2113–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Macan, J.; Sikirić, M.D.; Deluca, M.; Bermejo, R.; Baudin, C.; Plodinec, M.; Salamon, K.; Čeh, M.; Gajović, A. Mechanical Properties of Zirconia Ceramics Biomimetically Coated with Calcium Deficient Hydroxyapatite. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2020, 111, 104006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Santos, K.H.; Ferreira, J.A.; Osiro, D.; Carvalho, R.A.; Alberto Colnago, L.; Alves Júnior, C.; Pallone, E.M.J.A. Influence of the Cold Plasma Treatment on the Al2O3/ZrO2 Nanocomposites Surfaces. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 531, 147206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Belwanshi, M.; Jayaswal, P.; Aherwar, A. A Study on Tribological Effect and Surface Treatment Methods of Bio-Ceramics Composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 44, 4131–4137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cunha, W.; Carvalho, O.; Henriques, B.; Silva, F.S.; Özcan, M.; Souza, J.C.M. Surface Modification of Zirconia Dental Implants by Laser Texturing. Lasers Med. Sci. 2022, 37, 77–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cavalu, S.; Banica, F.; Simon, V.; Akin, I.; Goller, G. Surface Modification of Alumina/ Zirconia Ceramics Upon Different Fluoride-Based Treatments. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2013, 11, 402–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chinelatto, A.S.A.; Chinelatto, A.L.; Ojaimi, C.L.; Ferreira, J.A.; Pallone, E.M.J.A. Effect of Sintering Curves on the Microstructure of Alumina–Zirconia Nanocomposites. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 14669–14676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. ASTM C373-88; Standard Test Method for Water Absorption, Bulk Density, Apparent Porosity, and Apparent Specific Gravity of Fired Whiteware Products. American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2006; pp. 1–2.
  41. NIST: Atomic Spectra Database Lines Form; National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST): Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2018.
  42. Abdel-Fattah, W.I.; El-Sayed, E.-S.M.; Talaat, M.S.; Adawy, A. Comparative Study of Sr+2 and Zn+2 Incorporation in the Biomimetic Coating of a Prosthetic Alloy. Open Biomater. 2011, 3, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nunes, F.C.; Maia, M.A.; Santos, K.H.; Conceição, G.J.A.; Ferreira, J.A.; Pallone, E.M.J.A. Influence of Sr2+ in Calcium Phosphates Formation on the Surface of Al2O3/ZrO2 Nanocomposites. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 30685–30690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Silva, A.D.R.; Rigoli, W.R.; Mello, D.C.R.; Vasconcellos, L.M.R.; Pallone, E.M.J.A.; Lobo, A.O. Porous Alumina Scaffolds Chemically Modified by Calcium Phosphate Minerals and Their Application in Bone Grafts. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2018, 16, 562–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Joint Committee For Powder Diffraction Studies (JCPDS); International Center for Diffraction Data; American Society for Testing and Materials. Powder Diffraction File; Card Numbers: 09-432, 09-348, 09-169, 25-1137, 85-502, 89-5631, and 70-5511; ICDD: Square, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  46. Koutsopoulos, S. Synthesis and Characterization of Hydroxyapatite Crystals: A Review Study on the Analytical Methods. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002, 62, 600–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Santos, K.H.; Ferreira, J.A.; Osiro, D.; Conceição, G.J.A.; Colnago, L.A.; Alves Júnior, C.; Pallone, E.M.J.A. Plasma Surface Treatments of Al2O3/ZrO2 Nanocomposites and Their Influence on the Formation and Adhesion of Calcium Phosphates. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 456, 552–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Taylor, E.A.; Mileti, C.J.; Ganesan, S.; Kim, J.H.; Donnelly, E. Measures of Bone Mineral Carbonate Content and Mineral Maturity/Crystallinity for FT-IR and Raman Spectroscopic Imaging Differentially Relate to Physical–Chemical Properties of Carbonate-Substituted Hydroxyapatite. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2021, 109, 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. ISO 10993-5; Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 5: Tests for In Vitro Cytotoxicity. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [CrossRef]
  50. Aina, V.; Bergandi, L.; Lusvardi, G.; Malavasi, G.; Imrie, F.E.; Gibson, I.R.; Cerrato, G.; Ghigo, D. Sr-Containing Hydroxyapatite: Morphologies of HA Crystals and Bioactivity on Osteoblast Cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2013, 33, 1132–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Yuan, Z.; Bi, J.; Wang, W.; Sun, X.; Wang, L.; Mao, J.; Yang, F. A Novel Synthesis Method and Properties of Calcium-Deficient Hydroxyapatite/α-TCP Biphasic Calcium Phosphate. J. Biomater. Appl. 2022, 36, 1712–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Somers, N.; Jean, F.; Lasgorceix, M.; Preux, N.; Delmotte, C.; Boilet, L.; Petit, F.; Leriche, A. Fabrication of Doped β-Tricalcium Phosphate Bioceramics by Direct Ink Writing for Bone Repair Applications. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2023, 43, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Arıcı, Ş.; Kaçmaz, E.G.; Kamali, A.R.; Ege, D. Influence of Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotubes on Physicochemical Properties of Bone Cements. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 293, 126961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Collin, M.S.; Sharma, A.; Bhattacharya, A.; Sasikumar, S. Synthesis of Strontium Substituted Hydroxyapatite by Solution Combustion Route. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2021, 98, 100191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rey, C.; Marsan, O.; Combes, C.; Drouet, C.; Grossin, D.; Sarda, S. Characterization of Calcium Phosphates Using Vibrational Spectroscopies. In Advances in Calcium Phosphate Biomaterials; Springer Series in Biomaterials Science and Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 229–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Boanini, E.; Gazzano, M.; Nervi, C.; Chierotti, M.R.; Rubini, K.; Gobetto, R.; Bigi, A. Strontium and Zinc Substitution in β-Tricalcium Phosphate: An X-ray Diffraction, Solid State NMR and ATR-FTIR Study. J. Funct. Biomater. 2019, 10, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ravi, N.D.; Balu, R.; Sampath Kumar, T.S. Strontium-Substituted Calcium Deficient Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization, and Antibacterial Properties. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 95, 2700–2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Spirandeli, B.R.; Ribas, R.G.; Amaral, S.S.; Martins, E.F.; Esposito, E.; Vasconcellos, L.M.R.; Campos, T.M.B.; Thim, G.P.; Trichês, E.S. Incorporation of 45S5 Bioglass via Sol-Gel in β-TCP Scaffolds: Bioactivity and Antimicrobial Activity Evaluation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 131, 112453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Horváthová, R.; Müller, L.; Helebrant, A.; Greil, P.; Müller, F.A. In Vitro Transformation of OCP into Carbonated HA under Physiological Conditions. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2008, 28, 1414–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Geng, Z.; Cui, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhu, S.; Liang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.; He, X.; Yu, X.; Wang, R.; et al. Strontium Incorporation to Optimize the Antibacterial and Biological Characteristics of Silver-Substituted Hydroxyapatite Coating. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 58, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Veiga, A.; Castro, F.; L Oliveira, A.; Rocha, F. High Efficient Strategy for the Production of Hydroxyapatite/Silk Sericin Nanocomposites. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2020, 96, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. AL-Wafi, R.; Jafer, R.; Yahia, I.S.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Al-ghamdi, M.A.; El-Naggar, A.M. Fast and Easy Synthesis of Novel Strontium Apatite Nanostructured Phase: Structure, Spectroscopy, and Dielectric Analysis. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 17153–17159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Karampour, H.; Parsa, M.A.; Moghadam, A.H.; Pourhasan, B.; Ashiri, R. Facile Solution-Based Synthesis of Impurity-Free Hydroxyapatite Nanocrystals at Ambient Conditions. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 16, 656–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Vidane, A.S.; Nunes, F.C.; Ferreira, J.A.; Fukumasu, H.; Freitas, S.H.; Pallone, E.M.J.A.; Ambrósio, C.E. Biocompatibility and interaction of porous alumina-zirconia scaffolds with adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells for bone tissue regeneration. Heliyon 2023, 9, e20128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Vidane, A.S.; Zomer, H.D.; Oliveira, B.M.M.; Guimarães, C.F.; Fernandes, C.B.; Perecin, F.; Silva, L.A.; Miglino, M.A.; Meirelles, F.V.; Ambrósio, C.E. Reproductive Stem Cell Differentiation: Extracellular Matrix, Tissue Microenvironment, and Growth Factors Direct the Mesenchymal Stem Cell Lineage Commitment. Reprod. Sci. 2013, 20, 1137–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Carvalho, A.; Cangueiro, L.; Oliveira, V.; Vilar, R.; Fernandes, M.H.; Monteiro, F.J. Femtosecond laser microstructured Alumina toughened Zirconia: A new strategy to improve osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 435, 1237–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Inui, T.; Haneda, S.; Sasaki, M.; Furuoka, H.; Ito, M.; Yanagawa, M.; Hiyama, M.; Tabata, Y.; Sasaki, N. Enhanced chondrogenic differentiation of equine bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in zirconia microwell substrata. Res. Vet. Sci. 2019, 125, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 17 01893 g001
Figure 1. XPS spectra of the treated Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposites.
Figure 1. XPS spectra of the treated Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposites.
Materials 17 01893 g001
Materials 17 01893 g002
Figure 2. Al/Zr and Al/P ratios of the treated Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposites surfaces.
Figure 2. Al/Zr and Al/P ratios of the treated Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposites surfaces.
Materials 17 01893 g002
Materials 17 01893 g003
Figure 3. Variations in O 1s, Zr 3d, Al 2p, and P 2p for treated Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposite surfaces.
Figure 3. Variations in O 1s, Zr 3d, Al 2p, and P 2p for treated Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposite surfaces.
Materials 17 01893 g003
Materials 17 01893 g004
Figure 4. Diffractogram of the A15Z coated surface showing its deconvoluted curves, in which each phosphate phase is shown in a different color.
Figure 4. Diffractogram of the A15Z coated surface showing its deconvoluted curves, in which each phosphate phase is shown in a different color.
Materials 17 01893 g004
Materials 17 01893 g005
Figure 5. FTIR absorbance spectrum of the coated surfaces.
Figure 5. FTIR absorbance spectrum of the coated surfaces.
Materials 17 01893 g005
Materials 17 01893 g006
Figure 6. Total and partial area of phosphate phases on coated Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposites surfaces.
Figure 6. Total and partial area of phosphate phases on coated Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposites surfaces.
Materials 17 01893 g006
Materials 17 01893 g007
Figure 7. (a) SEM analysis without rMSCs, (b) SEM analysis with seeded rMSCs, and (c) MTT assay (24 h) of coated Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposites. * The experimental group compared with the control group, p > 0.05.
Figure 7. (a) SEM analysis without rMSCs, (b) SEM analysis with seeded rMSCs, and (c) MTT assay (24 h) of coated Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposites. * The experimental group compared with the control group, p > 0.05.
Materials 17 01893 g007
Table 1. Atomic composition (±5%) of the Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposites surfaces.
Table 1. Atomic composition (±5%) of the Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposites surfaces.
Element% Atomic Composition (±5%)
A5ZA10ZA15Z
Oxygen (O 1s)44.643.844.3
Carbon (C 1s)17.722.719.8
Zirconium (Zr 3d)1.01.73.0
Aluminum (Al 2p)33.825.528.7
Phosphorus (P 2p)2.96.44.2
Table 2. Peak positions and absolute areas of O 1s, Zr 3d, Al 2p, and P 2p in treated Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposite surfaces.
Table 2. Peak positions and absolute areas of O 1s, Zr 3d, Al 2p, and P 2p in treated Al2O3/ZrO2 nanocomposite surfaces.
A5ZA10ZA15Z
AssignmentsPos.Abs. AreaPos.Abs. AreaPos.Abs. Area
O 1sZrO2529.145448.7529.5614,284.5529.4722,754.4
Al2O3530.4372,827.2530.5258,935.4530.3948,952.7
–PO4, –OH531.0340,612.1531.2939,953.0531.1241,779.6
O–C532.2721,968.1532.3518,900.7532.3215,607.3
O–C=O533.463671.0533.414098.8533.504086.2
Zr 3dZr 3d5/2182.264639.1182.257236.8182.1512,317.5
Zr 3d3/2184.233063.2184.604778.5184.528133.2
Al 2pAl 2p74.5920,052.774.5813,766.274.5715,049.3
P 2pH3PO4134.013226.4133.987429.3134.084452.1
C 1sC–H284.9316,721.9284.9018,490.9284.8516,619.6
C–O286.702401.2286.734151.9286.663114.0
O–C=O288.431452.6288.751412.0288.77805.2
Table 3. Percentage area (%) under XRD diffractogram deconvoluted curves of coated surfaces in the A5Z, A10Z, and A15Z samples and their assignments. Peak values attributed to the substrates were not included for percentage areas.
Table 3. Percentage area (%) under XRD diffractogram deconvoluted curves of coated surfaces in the A5Z, A10Z, and A15Z samples and their assignments. Peak values attributed to the substrates were not included for percentage areas.
Phosphates PhasesA5ZA10ZA15Z
α-TCP17.2625.3620.64
β-TCP4.827.824.64
TTCP15.814.575.81
HAp16.4121.4727.46
Sr-HAp44.2138.8239.28
Sr-Phosphate1.491.962.17
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nunes, F.C.; Santos, S.I.P.; Colnago, L.A.; Hammer, P.; Ferreira, J.A.; Ambrósio, C.E.; Pallone, E.M.J.A. Impact of ZrO2 Content on the Formation of Sr-Enriched Phosphates in Al2O3/ZrO2 Nanocomposites for Bone Tissue Engineering. Materials 2024, 17, 1893. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17081893

AMA Style

Nunes FC, Santos SIP, Colnago LA, Hammer P, Ferreira JA, Ambrósio CE, Pallone EMJA. Impact of ZrO2 Content on the Formation of Sr-Enriched Phosphates in Al2O3/ZrO2 Nanocomposites for Bone Tissue Engineering. Materials. 2024; 17(8):1893. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17081893

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nunes, Fabio Caixeta, Sarah Ingrid Pinto Santos, Luiz Alberto Colnago, Peter Hammer, Julieta Adriana Ferreira, Carlos Eduardo Ambrósio, and Eliria Maria Jesus Agnolon Pallone. 2024. "Impact of ZrO2 Content on the Formation of Sr-Enriched Phosphates in Al2O3/ZrO2 Nanocomposites for Bone Tissue Engineering" Materials 17, no. 8: 1893. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17081893

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop