Next Article in Journal
Microscale Simulation on Mechanical Properties of Al/PTFE Composite Based on Real Microstructures
Previous Article in Journal
Acoustic Performance of Resilient Materials Using Acrylic Polymer Emulsion Resin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Stereocomplexation in Copolymer Networks Incorporating Enantiomeric Glycerol-Based 3-Armed Lactide Oligomers and a 2-Armed ɛ-Caprolactone Oligomer

Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Chiba Institute of Technology, 2-17-1, Tsudanuma, Narashino, Chiba 275-0016, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2016, 9(7), 591; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070591
Submission received: 24 May 2016 / Revised: 6 July 2016 / Accepted: 12 July 2016 / Published: 19 July 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Biomaterials)

Abstract

:
The reactions of enantiomeric glycerol-based 3-armed lactide oligomers (H3DLAO and H3LLAO) and a diethylene glycol-based 2-armed ɛ-caprolactone oligomer (H2CLO) with hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) produced polyesterurethane copolymer networks (PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs 100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100) with different feed ratios of stereocomplex (sc) lactide oligomer (H3scLAO = H3DLAO + H3LLAO, H3DLAO/H3LLAO = 1/1) and H2CLO. Thermal and mechanical properties of the copolymer networks were compared with those of a simple homochiral (hc) network (PEU-3DLAO) produced by the reaction of H3DLAO and HDI. X-ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimetric analyses revealed that sc crystallites are formed without any hc crystallization for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs, and that PEU-3DLAO is amorphous. The melting temperatures of sc crystallites for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs were much higher than that of hc crystallites of H3DLAO. The polarized optical microscopic analysis revealed that the nucleation efficiency is enhanced with increasing feed of H3scLAO fraction, whereas the spherulite growth rate is accelerated with increasing feed H2CLO fraction over 100/0-50/50 networks. PEU-3scLAO/2CLO 100/0 (i.e., PEU-3scLAO) exhibited a higher tensile strength and modulus than PEU-3DLAO. The elongation at break and tensile toughness for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs increased with an increasing feed amount of H2CLO.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Stereocomplex (sc) formation between enantiomeric poly(l-lactide) (PLLA) and poly(d-lactide) (PDLA) has garnered a great deal of attention because it is one of the most effective methods to enhance the properties of PLLA and PDLA [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. The sc crystallites are reported to show a melting temperature (Tm) approximately 50 °C higher than that of the homochiral (hc) crystallites [5]. Since the first report on sc-polylactide (PLA) by Ikada et al. [4], it has proven to be one of the most effective methods to enhance the properties of PLAs, including mechanical performance [7], thermal stability [6] and hydrolysis resistance [9]. It is known that a linear sc-PLA with a weight-average molecular weight (Mw) not higher than 5 × 104 has a high stereocomplexation ability, which is brittle, and that a linear sc-PLA with a Mw not lower than 1 × 105 displays a higher tensile strength and modulus than the corresponding hc-PLA, while it has a relatively lower stereocomplexation ability, leading to the formation of hc crystallines along with sc crystallites [7]. Accordingly, a great deal of effort has been devoted to develop useful preparation methods, such as repeated casting [10], utilization of supercritical carbon dioxide [11] and annealing [12,13] for improving the sc efficiency. Recently, Bao et al. proposed a simple approach to generate pure sc-PLA by melt-blending PLLA and PDLA at low temperatures (160–210 °C), where only sc crystallites can grow [14,15]. However, sc-PLA has a weak melt memory to re-form sc crystallites after complete melting, and the ability to restore sc-PLA decreases with increasing molecular weight [16]. Therefore, sc-PLA derivatives, having a variety of macromolecular architectures, such as stereo-block copolymers having linear [17,18,19,20], cyclic [21], brush [22], and star-shaped [23,24,25] structures, and polymer blends having cyclic [26], comb-shaped [27], star-shaped [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42] and dendritic [43] structures, have been applied to improve the melt-stability of sc-PLA. Regarding star-shaped sc-PLAs, Biela et al. reported an enhanced melt stability of star-shaped sc-PLA with 13-arms or more [28]. Isono et al. reported that solvent cast samples of 3-, 4- and 5-armed star shaped PLAs, having both PLLA and PDLA arms, formed sc-crystals without any homochiral crystallization [23]. Tsuji and Yamashita reported highly-accelerated sc crystallization by blending star-shaped 4-armed stereo diblock PLAs with PDLA and PLLA cores [40]. More recently, we reported that polyesterurethane copolymer networks (PEU-4scLAO/2CLOs) incorporating pentaerythritol-based enantiomeric 4-armed star-shaped lactide oligomers (H4LLAO and H4DLAO) and a diethylene glycol-based 2-armed ε-caprolactone oligomer (H2CLO) have excellent melt stability and tensile toughness [44]. The high melt stability is attributable to the fact that a melted l-lactide (LLA) oligomer segment is relatively close to the position of melted d-lactide (DLA) oligomer segment, because both the segments are incorporated in the polymer network. It is an interesting subject whether the high melt stability is reduced or not by changing the 4-armed enantiomeric lactide oligomers to 3-armed oligomers.
In this study, two enantiomeric 3-armed lactide oligomers (H3LLAO and H3DLAO) were prepared by the ring-opening polymerizations of LLA and DLA, initiated at the three hydroxy groups of glycerol, and crosslinked with H2CLO using hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) to produce polyesterurethane copolymer networks (PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs) with various feed ratios of stereocomplex lactide oligomer (H3scLAO, that is a mixture of equal parts of H3LLAO and H3DLAO) and H2CLO (Scheme 1). The influences of the feed ratio of (H3LLAO + H3DLAO)/H2CLO on the sc-formation, thermal and mechanical properties of the resulting networks were investigated. Our attention is focused on the stereocomplexation ability and tensile properties of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs compared with those of PEU-4scLAO/2CLOs.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Glycerol (GC) and 1,1,2-trichloroethane (TCE) were purchased from Kanto Chemical Co. Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). Hydroxy-terminated 2-armed ɛ-caprolactone oligomer (H2CLO) of which the catalogue name is polycaprolactone diol with a number-averaged molecular weight (Mn) ~2000 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (St. Louis, MO, USA). The H2CLO is a diethylene glycol-initiated 2-armed ɛ-caprolactone oligomer with a degree of polymerization per arm of m = ca. 8.4 (Scheme 1). Hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) and ɛ-caprolactone (CL) were purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Chlorobenzene was purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Tin (II) bis(2-ethylhexanoate) (Sn(Oct)2) was purchased from KISHIDA CHEMICAL Co. Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). l-lactide (LLA, >99%) and d-lactide (DLA, >99%) were purchased from Musashino Chemical Laboratory, Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). All the reagents were used without further purification.

2.2. Syntheses of H3LLAO and H3DLAO

A typical synthetic procedure of H3LLAO with a theoretical degree of polymerization of lactate unit (i.e., a half of lactide) per arm, n = 15, in this study is as follows: GC (0.378 g, 4.10 mmol), LLA (13.30 g, 92.28 mmol) and chlorobenzene (60 mL) were put into a nitrogen purged three-necked flask. The mixture was heated to 150 °C, and then Sn(Oct)2 (137 mg, 0.338 mmol) was added into the flask. The resulting mixture was stirred at 150 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere for 24 h. Hexane (500 mL) was added to the cooled reaction mixture with stirring, and then the supernatant was decanted off. This process was three times repeated and the separated precipitate was filtered, dried at 80 °C in a vacuum oven to give H3LLAO as a white powder (yield: 12.9 g, 94%). The degree of polymerization (n) per arm measured by 1H-NMR method was 17.8. H3DLAO was also synthesized as a white powder in 95% yield by the same procedure as that of H3LLAO except to use DLA instead of LLA. The value of n for H3DLAO was 15.2.

2.3. Synthesis of PEU-3scLAO/2CLO

A typical synthetic procedure of PEU-3scLAO/2CLO 75/25 is as follows: A solution of H3LLAO (1.05 g, 0.266 mmol), H3DLAO (1.04 g, 0.308 mmol), H2CLO (0.690 g, 0.345 mmol) and HDI (0.243 g, 1.45 mmol) in TCE (60 mL) was poured into a petri dish (diameter: 97 mm) made of poly(tetrafluoroethylene). The molar ratio of OH/NCO in the mixture was fixed to 1/1.2. The mixture was dried at 60 °C for 24 h, and then 130 °C for 4 h in an electric oven. The obtained PEU-3scLAO/2CLO with the feed weight ratio of (H3LLAO + H3DLAO)/H2CLO 75/25 (thickness: ca. 0.3 mm) was peeled off from the petri dish. PEU-3scLAO/2CLO (100/0, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100) films were also prepared by a similar method. PEU-3scLAO/2CLO 100/0 and PEU-3scLAO/2CLO 0/100 were also abbreviated as PEU-3scLAO and PEU-2CLO, respectively. The reaction products of H3DLAO with HDI (PEU-3LLAO) and a stereocomplex of H3LLAO and H3DLAO (H3scLAO) were also prepared by a similar method for comparison.

2.4. Characterization and Measurements

Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectra were recorded on a Bruker AV-400 (400 MHz) (Madison, WI, USA) using CDCl3 and tetramethylsilane as a solvent and an internal standard, respectively.
Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded at room temperature in the range from 4000 to 700 cm−1 on a Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan) FT-IR 8400s by the attenuated total reflectance (ATR) method. The IR spectra were acquired using 50 scans at a resolution of 4 cm−1. Degree of swelling (Ds) was measured by dipping a film (10 × 5 × 0.3 mm3) in chloroform, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) or ethanol at room temperature for 2 days according to the following equation: D s ( wt % ) = 100 ( w 1 w 0 ) / w 0 , where w0 is the initial weight of the film and w1 is the weight of the swollen film after dipping. In addition, the film dipped in chloroform for 3 days was dried at 40 °C in a vacuum oven for 24 h, and the weight reduction percentage by the chloroform extraction was calculated by the equation: Weight reduction percentage (%) = 100 ( w 0 w 2 ) / w 0 ; where w2 is the weight of the dried film.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed at ambient temperature on a Rigaku (Tokyo, Japan) RINT-2100 X-ray diffractometer at a scanning rate of 2.0° min−1, using Cu Kα radiation (wavelength, λ = 0.154 nm) at 40 kV and 14 mA. All scans were in the range 5° ≤ 2θ ≤ 30° at a scanning rate of 1.0° min−1 and a step size of 0.01°.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were performed on a Perkin-Elmer (Waltham, MA, USA) Diamond DSC in a nitrogen atmosphere. The as-prepared samples (8–12 mg) were heated from −100 °C to 200 °C at a heating rate of 20 °C·min−1, held at the temperature for 3 min to eliminate a thermal history of the sample, and then cooled to −100 °C at a cooling rate of 100 °C·min−1. After being held at −100 °C for 3 min, the second heating scan was monitored at a heating rate of 20 °C·min−1. Glass transition temperature (Tg,x), cold crystallization temperature (Tc,x), enthalpy of cold crystallization (∆Hc,x), melting temperature (Tm,x) and enthalpy of melting (∆Hm,x) for each component (x = LAO or CLO) were determined from the first and second heating curves. The crystallinities (χc,xs) of hc or sc oligolactide crystallites and oligocaprolactone crystallites were calculated using the following equation:
χ c , x ( % ) = ( Δ H m , x w Δ H m , x 0 ) × 100
where w is the weight fraction of (H3LLAO + H3DLAO) and Δ H m , x 0 is enthalpy of 100% crystalline hc-PLA (93 J·g−1) or sc-PLA (142 J·g−1) in case of x = LAO [5,23], and w is the weight fraction of H2CLO and Δ H m , x 0 is enthalpy of 100% crystalline PCL (139 J·g−1) in case of x = CLO [45].
Morphology of fractured surfaces of the copolymer networks was observed by field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), using a Hitachi S-4700 machine (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). All samples were fractured after immersion in liquid nitrogen for about 5 min. The fracture surfaces were sputter-coated with gold to provide enhanced conductivity.
Polarized optical microscopy was performed on an Olympus BXP polarizing microscope equipped with a Japan High-tech hot-stage RH-350 and a Sony CCD-IRIS color video camera. After a sample was heated to 220 °C on the hot-stage and held at 220 °C for 10 min, it was cooled to a specified temperature (120–150 °C) at a cooling rate of 50 °C·min−1 and the growing of spherulites was monitored over time at that temperature.
Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) of the rectangular plates (40 × 8 × 0.3 mm3) was performed on a Rheolograph Solid instrument (Toyo Seiki Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) under an atmosphere of air with a chuck distance of 20 mm, a frequency of 1 Hz and a heating rate of 2 °C·min−1, based on ISO 6721-4:1994 (Plastics-Determination of dynamic mechanical properties, Part 4: Tensile vibration−Non-resonance method).
The 5% weight loss temperature (T5) was measured on a Shimadzu TGA-50 thermogravimetric analyzer. A sample of about 5 mg was heated from room temperature to 500 °C at a heating rate of 20 °C·min−1 in a nitrogen purge stream at a flow rate of 50 mL·min−1.
Tensile testing of rectangular specimens (length 45 mm, width 7 mm, thickness 0.3 mm) was performed at 25 °C using a Shimadzu Autograph AG-1, based on the standard method for testing the tensile properties of plastics (JIS K7161:1994 (ISO527-1:1993)). Span length and testing speed were 25 mm and 3 mm·min−1, respectively. Five specimens were tested for each set of samples, and the mean values and the standard deviation were calculated.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Polymer Network Formation of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs

H3LLAO or H3DLAO were synthesized by the ring-opening polymerization of LLA or DLA initiated at three hydroxy groups of GC at a lactide/hydroxy ratio of 7.5 (Scheme 1). Figure 1 shows 1H-NMR spectrum of H3LLAO in CDCl3. Methine proton signals (Hc and Hc′) of repeating and terminal lactate units of H3LLAO were separately observed at δ 5.18 and 4.36 ppm, respectively. The two signals overlapped with the methine (Ha) and methylene (Hb) proton signals of the GC moiety, respectively. Additionally, methyl proton signals (Hd and Hd′) of repeating and terminal lactate units of H3LLAO were closely observed at δ 1.59 and 1.49 ppm, respectively. The degree of polymerization (n) of lactate unit (i.e., half of lactide) per arm for H3LLAO was calculated to be 17.8, based on the integral ratio of Ha,c/Hb,c′. The n value measured by the same 1H-NMR method for H3DLAO was 15.2. Although the n value of H3LLAO was a slightly higher than that of H3DLAO, the difference should not be attributed to a difference of LLA and DLA but to experimental error, because the n value evaluated by 1H-NMR method deviates by ca. 15% in several experiments. If the n values of H3LLAO and H3DLAO were lower than 15, the stereocomplexation ability becomes worse [44]. Conversely, if the n values were much higher than 15, the subsequent crosslinking reaction becomes difficult because of a much lower terminal hydroxy content. The molecular weights calculated from the n values (17.8 and 15.2) for H3LLAO and H3DLAO were 3940 and 3378, respectively. These values were used for calculation of their feed amounts for the reaction with HDI. PEU-3scLAO/2CLO films were prepared by the crosslinking reaction of H3LLAO, H3DLAO, H2CLO and HDI (Scheme 1). In addition, an uncrosslinked sc-H3LLAO/H3DLAO blend (H3scLAO) was prepared for comparison. As the H3scLAO was obtained as a white powder, the formation of network structure was very important to produce a tough film. In addition, the crosslinking by urethane linkages is important to not spoil the biodegradable and biocompatible properties of the polyester segments [46,47].
Figure 2 shows FT-IR spectra of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs compared with those of H3LLAO, H3DLAO and HDI. The FT-IR spectrum of H3LLAO was substantially similar to that of H3DLAO. The weak band at 3530 cm−1 due to O–H stretching vibration (νO–H) observed for H3LLAO and the strong band due to NCO stretching vibration (νNCO) at 2250 cm−1 observed for HDI were almost nonexistent for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs. Although absorption bands characteristic of urethane bond for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs are not so strong because the fraction of urethane bonds formed in the polymer network is slight, new absorption bands of N−H stretching vibration (νN–H) and N−H bending vibration (δN−H) certainly appeared at 3350 and 1535 cm−1, respectively. The band of urethane C=O stretching vibration (νC=O) overlapped with the ester νC=O band of the lactide oligomer (LAO) and caprolactone oligomer (CLO) segments of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs at ca. 1745 cm−1. These results suggest that the reaction of hydroxy group of H3LLAO/H3DLAO and isocyanate group of HDI proceeded smoothly to generate a polymer network having bridged urethane linkages.
The formation of polymer networks for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50 and 25/75) were also confirmed by swelling and extraction experiments. Figure 3 shows Ds values of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs dipped in chloroform, DMF or ethanol for 2 days. The Ds increased with increasing CLO fraction, indicating that crosslinking density decreases with increasing feed of 2-armed H2CLO. In the case of using ethanol, the Ds values (13%–62%) in ethanol were much lower than those in chloroform and DMF, suggesting that the network has a low affinity toward ethanol. Furthermore, the weight reduction percentages of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50 and 25/75) after extracted with chloroform for 3 days were 1.64%, 2.51%, 2.39% and 16.7%, respectively. The fact that 25/75 network had a slightly higher weight reduction percentage than the other networks should be caused by the extraction of branched polymers, with a higher fraction of H2CLO-based moiety. PEU-3scLAO/2CLO 0/100 (i.e., PEU-2CLO) completely dissolved in chloroform because the sample is a linear polymer.

3.2. Stereocomplex Formation in PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs

Figure 4 shows XRD profiles of H3LLAO, H3DLAO, PEU-3DLAO and PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs. The XRD patterns of H3LLAO and H3DLAO exhibited diffraction peaks of hc crystals at 2θ values of 16.4°–16.5°, 18.6°–18.9° and 22.0°–22.2° in a similar manner to PLLA and PDLA [5,6,48]. The peaks characteristic of hc crystallines did not appear for PEU-3DLAO, suggesting that the formation of a polymer network by urethane linkages prevented the hc crystallization. A similar suppression of crystallization of hc LAO chains by crosslinking was observed for the polymer network prepared by the crosslinking reaction of H4LLAO or H4DLAO with methylenediphenyl 4,4′-diisocyanate [44]. PEU-3scLAO/2CLO exhibited diffraction peaks at 2θ values of 11.6°–12.2°, 20.4°–21.2° and 23.7°–23.8°, characteristic of sc crystallites [5,49]. No diffraction peaks due to the hc crystallites were observed in the XRD profiles of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs, suggesting that sc crystallites were selectively formed without the formation of hc crystallites. A similar result was also observed for the previously reported PEU-4scLAO/2CLO [44]. PEU-3scLAO/2CLO 0/100 (i.e., PEU-2CLO) displayed diffraction peaks at 2θ values at 21.3° and 23.6° corresponds to the (001) and (200) planes of oligocaprolactone (CLO) crystallites, respectively [50]. The XRD profile of PEU-3scLAO/2CLO 25/75 exhibited diffraction peaks ascribed to both sc-LAO and CLO crystallites. However, we could not determine the precise crystallinities of the sc-LAO and CLO crystals in PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs 75/25, 50/50 and 25/75, because their XRD peaks are closely observed.
Table 1 summarizes the data estimated from the first heating DSC curves for H3DLAO, PEU-3DLAO, H3scLAO and PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100). The first heating DSC curves are also shown in Figure S1 of the Supplementary Materials. H3DLAO exhibited a Tg,LAO and a Tm,LAO of hc crystals at 59.9 °C and 118.0 °C, respectively. PEU-3DLAO showed only a Tg,LAO at 64.7 °C, whose value was higher than that of H3DLAO. This result suggests that the formation of a polymer network disturbed the chain mobility. The fact that no Tm,LAO was observed for PEU-3DLAO indicates that the hc polymer networks are amorphous, which in agreement with the results of XRD. Among the as-prepared samples, only H3scLAO displayed a Tc,LAO at 88.9 °C (∆Hc,LAO = −31.2 J·g−1), implying that the sc-crystallization was not completed during the sample preparation. Considering that the as-prepared H3scLAO is a powder sample, it is supposed that imperfect sc-crystallites are precipitated after mixing of H3LLAO and H3DLAO in TCE. PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50 and 25/75) displayed the Tm,LAO at 173.1–178.5 °C, which were much higher than the Tm,LAO (118.0 °C) of H3DLAO, and were a little lower than the Tm,LAO (186.5 °C) based on sc crystals of H3scLAO. The χc,LAOs (24%–30%) of sc-crystallites for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50 and 25/75) were comparable to those (28.2%) for H3scLAO. The χc,LAO for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs did not largely reduce with an increasing CLO fraction, indicating that sc crystallization is not totally disturbed by the presence of CLO moiety. Additionally, the Tm,LAO (173.1–178.5 °C) for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs was a little lower than the already-reported Tm,LAO (179.5–180.3 °C) for PEU-4scLAO/2CLOs [44]. This result may be attributable to a possibility that the three arm lengths of H3LLAO (or H3DLAO) are not the same, but those of H4LLAO (or H4DLAO) are almost the same, considering that the reactivity of hydroxy groups adjacent to methylene and methine in glycerol, which was used as a core molecule of the former, vary from each other, and that the reactivity of hydroxy groups in pentaerythritol for the latter does not vary. On the other hand, the χc,LAO (23.9%–29.6%) for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs was a little higher than the already-reported χc,LAO (12.1%–22.5%) for PEU-4scLAO/2CLOs, suggesting that a lower crosslinking density for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs leads to a higher chain mobility, facilitating the crystallization. We could not observe clear Tg,LAOs in the first heating DSC thermograms of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (75/25, 50/50 and 25/75).
Table 2 summarizes the data evaluated from the second heating DSC curves of all the samples after cooling at a rate of 100 °C·min−1 from 200 °C to −100 °C. The second heating DSC curves are also shown in Figure S2 of the Supplementary Materials. The fact that the values of ∆Hc,LAO and ∆Hm,LAO were close to each other indicates that the sample before the second heating is almost amorphous. The Tc,LAOs and Tm,LAOs of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs were observed at 69–92 °C and 175–183 °C, respectively. The Tm,LAOs estimated from the second heating scans were comparable to those (173–179 °C) from the first heating scans, indicating that almost the same sc-crystallites are regenerated after melting at 200 °C. It is noteworthy that PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50 and 25/75) showed no Tc,LAOs and Tm,LAOs based on hc crystallites. This is probably caused by the possibility that a melted LLA oligomer segment is relatively close to the position of a melted DLA oligomer segment, because both the segments are incorporated in the polymer network. The Tm,LAO (176.6 °C) and χc,LAO (16.4%) for PEU-3scLAO/2CLO 100/0 were lower than those (186.5 °C and 26.6%) of H3scLAO, respectively, implying that the urethane crosslinking disturbed the sc crystallization to some extent. The fact that the χc,LAO of PEU-3scLAO/2CLO 75/25 was higher than that of the 100/0 sample indicates that the incorporation of CLO segments enhanced cold crystallization of LAO segments.
Figure 5 shows FE-SEM images of the fractured surfaces of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs. Although the surface of PEU-3scLAO/2CLO 100/0 (i.e., PEU-3scLAO) was rough, probably because of the formation of sc-crystallites, it was homogeneous in a similar manner to that of PEU-2CLO. The compatibility between the LAO and CLO components for PEU-3scLAO/2CLO 75/25 is better than that for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs 50/50 and 25/75, as is obvious from the presence of many domains having a size of several micron (μm) for the latter. It is supposed that the reaction of H3LLAO, H3DLAO, H2CLO and HDI was not completed in a homogeneous TCE solution, and 3scLAO-rich branched polymers phase-separated from 2CLO-rich branched polymers after evaporation of TCE for the 50/50 and 25/75 networks. It is considered that several holes for the 25/75 sample are caused by the pull-out of LAO domains during the fracturing of the sample.
Figure 6 shows polarized optical microscope images of the PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs, which were independently held at a specified temperature (120, 130, 140 or 150 °C) after being melted at 220 °C. The holding time at each crystallization temperature was 10 min for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs 100/0, 75/25 and 50/50. As no crystallites were observed at a holding time of 10 min for PEU-3scLAO/2CLO 25/75, the photographs at a holding time of 50 min were shown in the figure. For all of the PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs, the crystallization temperature where the largest total volume of sc-LAO crystallites are formed was 120 °C, and the sc-LAO crystallization was suppressed with increasing temperature until 150 °C. Regarding the effect of the LAO/CLO ratio, the largest number of sc-LAO spherulites was formed for the 100/0 sample, and the number decreased with increasing CLO fraction. On the other hand, sc-LAO spherulites with the biggest size were formed for the 50/50 sample, and the size was reduced with increasing LAO fraction. In case of the 25/75 sample, the nucleation rate is very slow, and the size of spherulites after 50 min was comparable to that for 75/25. These results indicate that the nucleation efficiency is enhanced with increasing LAO fraction, and the spherulite growth rate is accelerated with increasing CLO fraction over 100/0–50/50. The incorporating of flexible CLO fraction may facilitate the movement of LAO segments to sc-LAO crystalline growth edges. Regarding the enhancement of nucleation efficiency, the encounter between LLAO and DLAO segments may be made easier with decreasing CLO fraction.

3.3. Thermal and Mechanical Properties of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs

Figure 7 shows DMA curves of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100). The peak temperatures of loss moduli (E″s) corresponding to Tgs for PEU-3scLAO and PEU-2CLO were 51.7 and −51.4 °C. The E″ peak temperature (−26.8 °C) for PEU-3scLAO/2CLO 75/25 was much higher than that for PEU-2CLO, suggesting that the LAO and CLO segments are compatibilized in agreement with the results of FE-SEM. The E″ peak temperatures (−49.0 and −51.4 °C) for CLO-rich phase of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs 50/50 and 25/75 were close to that (−51.4 °C) of PEU-2CLO, whereas we could not observe the E″ peak temperatures related to the LAO-rich phase because the DMA measurements stopped at around 40 °C due to melting of the CLO segment, suggesting that the CLO segments are phase-separated, in agreement with the FE-SEM. The storage modulus (E′) of PEU-3scLAO dropped at around 45 °C due to a glass transition of the LAO-segment. The E′ of PEU-2CLO was reduced at around −50 °C due to a glass transition of the CLO segment, and dropped at around 30 °C due to melting of the CLO segment. The fact that PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs 50/50 and 25/75 exhibited similar E′ curves to PEU-2CLO reflects that the CLO segments are phase-separated. On the other hand, when the E′ values at the same temperature are compared, the E′ of PEU-3scLAO/2CLO 75/25 was lower than that of PEU-3scLAO, and higher than that of PEU-2CLO, in agreement with the fact that the LAO and CLO segments in PEU-3scLAO/2CLO 75/25 are compatibilized.
Figure 8 shows TGA curves of H3LLAO, H3DLAO, H2CLO, PEU-3DLAO and PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100). The T5 for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs increased with increasing CLO fraction in agreement with the fact that the T5 (297.7 °C) of H2CLO was much higher than those (173.0 and 188.0 °C) of H3LLAO and H3DLAO. There is little difference in T5 between PEU-3DLAO and PEU-3scLAO in agreement with the fact that there is little difference in thermal stability between sc-PLA and PLLA or PDLA [8]. PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (75/25, 50/50 and 25/75) showed two-step thermodegradation curves, which are caused by the decomposition of LAO and CLO components.
Figure 9 shows typical stress-strain curves of PEU-3DLAO and PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100). Strain (elongation) at break and initial slope (tensile modulus) for PEU-3scLAO were much lower and higher than those of PEU-2CLO, respectively, in agreement with the fact that LAO segment is much stiffer than CLO segment. Maximal stress and tensile modulus for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs decreased, and elongation at break inversely increased with increasing CLO fraction. As the toughness is defined as the energy needed to break a sample of unit area and unit length (J·m−3), it is given by the area under the stress-strain curve [44]. From the stress-strain curves shown in Figure 9, it is obvious that the toughnesses of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100) are much higher than that of PEU-3scLAO. The maximal stress of PEU-3scLAO was certainly higher than those of PEU-3DLAO, as is shown in the enlarged graph of Figure 9. The fact that the maximal stress of PEU-3scLAO/2CLO 50/50 was lower than that of the 25/75 sample may be related to the phase-separated morphology and/or low χc,CLO of the 50/50 sample (Figure 5 and Table 1).
Table 3 summarizes tensile strength, modulus and elongation at break in addition to tensile toughness, which was calculated from the area of a stress-strain curve. Tensile strength (54.7 MPa), tensile (Young’s) modulus (2.37 GPa), and elongation at break (2.98%) of PEU-3scLAO were a little higher than those (42.9 MPa, 2.21 GPa, and 2.26%) of PEU-3DLAO. These results are in agreement with the fact that a linear sc-PLA film with Mw from 1 × 105 to 1 × 106 surpassed the corresponding PLLA or PDLA films in tensile strength, Young’s (tensile) modulus and elongation at break [5,7]. It is noteworthy that the tensile strength and modulus of PEU-3scLAO are much higher than those (45 MPa and 1820 MPa) of sc-PLA with Mw 1.3 × 106 [5] and those (34.7 MPa and 1695 MPa) of PEU-4scLAO/2CLO 100/0 (i.e., PEU-4scLAO) [44]. Although tensile strength and modulus of PEU-3scLAO/2CLO decreased with increasing CLO fraction, elongation at break and tensile toughness significantly increased with CLO fraction. It is known that a linear sc-PLA with a Mw not higher than 5 × 104 has a high stereocomplexation ability, which is brittle, and that a linear sc-PLA with a Mw not lower than 1 × 105 displays a higher tensile strength and modulus than the corresponding hc-PLA does, while it has a relatively lower stereocomplexation ability [7]. In a similar manner, although H3scLAO with a molecular weight of ca. 4000 had a high sc-LAO crystallinity, it was a powder sample, which hardly ever becomes a tough film. The macromolecular architecture for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs is effective to prepare tough films from 3-armed LLA and DLA oligomers, which have a high stereocomplexation ability. As the crosslinked resins in this study are not suitable for the material recycling, and are expected to be used as biomaterials, we plan to investigate the biocompatibility and biodegradability behavior in the future.

4. Conclusions

The stereocomplex formation, thermal and mechanical properties of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100) prepared by reactions of H3LLAO, H3DLAO and H2CLO with HDI were compared with those of H3scLAO, PEU-3DLAO. Although H3scLAO was obtained as a powder sample, PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs and PEU-3DLAO became relatively tough films. The formation of network structure by reactions of the hydroxy and isocyanate groups for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs was confirmed by the FT-IR analysis, extraction and swelling experiments using chloroform. XRD analysis revealed that sc crystallites are preferentially formed for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs and H3scLAO, while hc crystallites are formed for H3LLAO and H3DLAO, and that PEU-3DLAO is amorphous. The melting temperatures of sc crystallites for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs were much higher than those of hc crystallites of H3LLAO and H3DLAO, while the values were slightly lower than that of H3scLAO. Although cold crystallization temperatures for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs were not observed during the first heating scan, but the temperatures were observed during the second heating scans after cooling at a rate of 100 °C·min−1 from 200 °C. No melting temperatures of hc crystallites were observed for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs in the first and second heating DSC curves. The polarized optical microscopic analysis revealed that the nucleation efficiency was enhanced with increasing LAO fraction, whereas the spherulite growth rate was accelerated with increasing CLO fraction over 100/0–50/50 networks. The change of E″ peak temperatures measured by DMA was in agreement with the compatibilizaion for PEU-3scLAO/2CLO 75/25 and phase-separated morphology of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs 50/50 and 25/75. Tensile strength, modulus and elongation at break of PEU-3scLAO were higher than those of PEU-3DLAO, sc-PLA and PEU-4scLAO. Elongation at break and tensile toughness for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs increased with increasing CLO fraction. It was noteworthy that the PEU-3scLAO based on 3-armed lactide oligomers exhibited much better tensile properties than the PEU-4scLAO based on 4-armed lactide oligomers without any reduction of the high stereocomplexation ability and melt stability. The sc copolymer networks in this study are expected to be used as biodegradable and biocompatible materials requiring better tensile properties than those of PLA or sc-PLA.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/9/7/591/s1. Figure S1: The first heating DSC curves of H3LLAO, PEU-3DLAO, H3scLAO and PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100); Figure S2: The second heating DSC curves of H3scLAO and PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100).

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Chiba Institute of Technology. We are grateful to Ryusuke Osada of Material Analysis Center at the Chiba Institute of Technology for assisting in the XRD analysis reported here.

Author Contributions

M.S. conceived and designed the experiments; A.S. and S.K. performed the experiments; A.S. and S.K. analyzed the data; T.S. and N.T. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; M.S. wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, Z.; Tan, B.H.; Lin, T.; He, C. Recent advances in stereocomplexation of enantiomeric PLA-based copolymers and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Xie, L.; Xu, H.; Li, Z.M.; Hakkarainen, M. Structural hierarchy and polymorphic transformation in shear-induced shish-kebab of stereocomplex poly(lactic acid). Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2016, 37, 754–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wei, X.F.; Bao, R.Y.; Cao, Z.Q.; Yang, W.; Xie, B.H.; Yang, M.B. Stereocomplex crystallite network in asymmetric PLLA/PDLA blends: Formation, structure, and confining effect on the crystallization rate of homocrystallites. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 1439–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ikada, Y.; Jamshidi, K.; Tsuji, H.; Hyon, S.H. Stereocomplex formation between enantiomeric poly(lactides). Macromolecules 1987, 20, 904–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tsuji, H. Poly(lactide) stereocomplexes: Formation, structure, properties, degradation, and applications. Macromol. Biosci. 2005, 5, 569–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fukushima, K.; Kimura, Y. Stereocomplexed polylactides (Neo-PLA) as high-performance bio-based polymers: Their formation, properties, and application. Polym. Int. 2006, 55, 626–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tsuji, H.; Ikada, Y. Stereocomplex formation between enantiomeric poly(lactic acid)s. XI. Mechanical properties and morphology of solution-cast films. Polymer 1999, 40, 6699–6708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tsuji, H.; Fukui, I. Enhanced thermal stability of poly(lactide)s in the melt by enantiomeric polymer blending. Polymer 2003, 44, 2891–2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tsuji, H. In vitro hydrolysis of blends from enantiomeric poly(lactide)s Part 1. Well-stereo-complexed blend and non-blended films. Polymer 2000, 41, 3621–3630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tsuji, H.; Yamamoto, S. Enhanced stereocomplex crystallization of biodegradable enantiomeric poly(lactic acid)s by repeated casting. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2011, 296, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Purnama, P.; Kim, S.H. Stereocomplex formation of high-molecular-weight polylactide using supercritical fluid. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 1137–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fujita, M.; Sawayanagi, T.; Abe, H.; Tanaka, T.; Iwata, T.; Ito, K.; Fujisawa, T.; Maeda, M. Stereocomplex formation through reorganization of poly(l-lactic acid) and poly(d-lactic acid) crystals. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 2852–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Na, B.; Zhu, J.; Lv, R.; Ju, Y.; Tian, R.; Chen, B. Stereocomplex formation in enantiomeric polylactides by melting recrystallization of homocrystals: Crystallization kinetics and crystal morphology. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bao, R.Y.; Yang, W.; Jiang, W.R.; Liu, Z.Y.; Xie, B.H.; Yang, M.B.; Fu, Q. Stereocomplex formation of high-molecular-weight polylactide: A low temperature approach. Polymer 2012, 53, 5449–5454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bao, R.Y.; Yang, W.; Jiang, W.R.; Liu, Z.Y.; Xie, B.H.; Yang, M.B. Polymorphism of racemic poly(l-lactide)/Poly(d-lactide) blend: Effect of melt and cold crystallization. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 3667–3674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tsuji, H.; Ikada, Y. Stereocomplex formation between enantiomeric poly(lactic acids). 9. Stereocomplexation from the melt. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 6918–6926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yui, N.; Dijkstra, P.J.; Feijen, J. Stereo block copolymers of L- and d-lactides. Makromol. Chem. 1990, 191, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, L.; Zhong, Z.; Jeu, W.H.; Dijkstra, P.J.; Feijen, J. Crystal structure and morphology of poly(l-lactide-b-d-lactide) diblock copolymers. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 8641–8646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hirata, M.; Kobayashi, K.; Kimura, Y. Synthesis and properties of high-molecular-weight stereo di-block polylactides with nonequivalent d/l ratios. J. Polym. Sci. Part. A Polym. Chem. 2010, 48, 794–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hirata, M.; Kobayashi, K.; Kimura, Y. Enhanced stereocomplexation by enantiomer adjustment for stereo diblock polylactides with non-equivalent d/l ratios. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2010, 211, 1426–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sugai, N.; Yamamoto, T.; Tezuka, Y. Synthesis of orientationally isomeric cyclic stereoblock polylactides with head-to-head and head-to-tail linkages of the enantiomeric segments. ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1, 902–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Isono, T.; Kondo, Y.; Ozawa, S.; Chen, Y.; Sakai, R.; Sato, S.; Tajima, K.; Kakuchi, T.; Satoh, T. Stereoblock-like brush copolymers consisting of poly(l-lactide) and poly(d‑lactide) side chains along poly(norbornene) backbone: Synthesis, stereocomplex formation, and structure−property relationship. Macromolecule 2014, 47, 7118–7128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Isono, T.; Kondo, Y.; Otsuka, I.; Nishiyama, Y.; Borsali, R.; Kakuchi, T.; Satoh, T. Synthesis and stereocomplex formation of star-shaped stereoblock polylactides consisting of poly(l‑lactide) and poly(d‑lactide) arms. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 8509–8518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shao, J.; Tang, Z.; Sun, J.; Li, G.; Chen, X. Linear and four-armed poly(l-lactide)-block-poly(d-lactide) copolymers and their stereocomplexation with poly(lactide). J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2014, 52, 1560–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Han, L.; Shan, G.; Bao, Y.; Pan, P. Exclusive stereocomplex crystallization of linear and multiarm star-shaped high-molecular-weight stereo diblock poly(lactic acid)s. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 14270–14279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shin, E.J.; Jones, A.E.; Waymouth, R.M. Stereocomplexation in cyclic and linear polylactide blends. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 595–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fukushima, K.; Pratt, R.C.; Nederberg, F.; Tan, J.P.K.; Yang, Y.Y.; Waymouth, R.M.; Hedrick, J.L. Organocatalytic approach to amphiphilic comb-block copolymers capable of stereocomplexation and self-assembly. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9, 3051–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Biela, T.; Duda, A.; Penczek, S. Enhanced melt stability of star-shaped stereocomplexes as compared with linear stereocomplexes. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 3710–3713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hiemstra, C.; Zhong, Z.; Li, L.; Dijkstra, P.J.; Feijen, J. In-situ formation of biodegradable hydrogels by stereocomplexation of PEG-(PLLA)8 and PEG-(PDLA)8 star block copolymers. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7, 2790–2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Nagahama, K.; Fujiura, K.; Enami, S.; Ouchi, T.; Ohya, Y. Irreversible Temperature-responsive formation of high-strength hydrogel from an enantiomeric mixture of starburst triblock copolymers consisting of 8-arm PEG and PLLA or PDLA. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2008, 46, 6317–6332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shaver, M.P.; Cameron, D.J.A. Tacticity control in the synthesis of poly(lactic acid) polymer stars with dipentaerythritol cores. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 3673–3679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tan, B.H.; Hussain, H.; Lin, T.T.; Chua, Y.C.; Leong, Y.W.; Tjiu, W.W.; Wong, P.K.; He, C.B. Stable dispersions of hybrid nanoparticles induced by stereocomplexation between enantiomeric poly(lactide) star polymers. Langmuir 2011, 27, 10538–10547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Calucci, L.; Forte, C.; Buwalda, S.J.; Dijkstra, P.J. Solid-state NMR study of stereocomplexes formed by enantiomeric star-shaped PEGPLA copolymers in water. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 7288–7295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shao, J.; Sun, J.; Bian, X.; Cui, Y.; Li, G.; Chen, X. Investigation of poly(lactide) stereocomplexes: 3-Armed poly(l-lactide) blended with linear and 3-armed enantiomers. J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 9983–9991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Buwalda, S.J.; Calucci, L.; Forte, C.; Dijkstra, P.J.; Feijen, J. Stereocomplexed 8-armed poly(ethylene glycol)−poly(lactide) star block copolymer hydrogels: Gelation mechanism, mechanical properties and degradation behavior. Polymer 2007, 53, 2809–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shao, J.; Sun, J.; Bian, X.; Cui, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Li, G.; Chen, X. Modified PLA homochiral crystallites facilitated by the confinement of PLA stereocomplexes. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 6963–6971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Purnama, P.; Jung, Y.; Kim, S.H. Melt stability of 8-arms star-shaped stereocomplex polylactide with three-dimensional core structures. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2013, 98, 1097–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sakamoto, Y.; Tsuji, H. Stereocomplex crystallization behavior and physical properties of linear 1-arm, 2-arm, and branched 4-arm poly(l-lactide)/poly(d-lactide) blends: Effects of chain directional change and branching. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2013, 214, 776–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tsuji, H.; Suzuki, M. Hetero-stereocomplex crystallization between star-shaped 4-arm poly(l-2-hydroxybutanoic acid) and poly(d-lactic acid) from the melt. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2014, 215, 1879–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tsuji, H.; Yamashita, Y. Highly accelerated stereocomplex crystallization by blending star-shaped 4-armed stereo diblock poly(lactide)s with poly(d-lactide) and poly(l-lactide) cores. Polymer 2014, 55, 6444–6450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tsuji, H.; Tamai, K.; Kimura, T.; Kubota, A.; Tahahashi, A.; Kuzuya, A.; Ohya, Y. Stereocomplex- and homo-crystallization of blends from 2-armed poly(l-lactide) and poly(d-lactide) with identical and opposite chain directional architectures and of 2-armed stereo diblock poly(lactide). Polymer 2016, 96, 167–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, W.; Zhang, D.; Bai, G.; Guo, Y.; Hu, Z. Stable stereocomplex micelles from Y-shaped amphiphilic copolymers MPEG–(scPLA)2: Preparation and characteristics. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 20761–20771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fan, X.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, D.; Sun, Y.; Li, Z.; He, C. Novel linear-dendritic-like amphiphilic copolymers: Synthesis and self-assembly characteristics. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 4069–4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shibata, M.; Katoh, M.; Takase, H.; Shibita, A. Stereocomplex formation in stereoblock copolymer networks composed of 4-armed star-shaped lacide oligomers and a 2-armed ɛ-caprolactone oligomer. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 4123–4132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Crescenzi, V.; Manzini, G.; Calzolari, G.; Borri, C. Thermodynamics of fusion of poly-β-propiolactone and poly-ɛ-caprolactone. Comparative analysis of the melting of aliphatic polylactone and polyester chains. Eur. Polym. J. 1972, 8, 449–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kucharczyk, P.; Pavelková, A.; Stloukal, P.; Sedlarík, V. Degradation behaviour of PLA-based polyesterurethanes under abiotic and biotic environments. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2016, 129, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, Q.; Cheng, S.; Li, Z.; Xu, K.; Chen, G.Q. Characterization, biodegradability and blood compatibility of poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate] based poly(ester-urethane)s. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2009, 90, 1162–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hoogsteen, W.; Postema, A.R.; Pennings, A.J.; Brinke, G.T.; Zugenmaier, P. Crystal structure, conformation and morphology of solution-spun poly(l-lactide) fibers. Macromolecules 1990, 23, 634–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cartier, L.; Okihara, T.; Lotz, B. Triangular polymer single crystals: Stereocomplexes, twins, and frustrated structures. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 6313–6322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pant, H.R.; Neupane, M.P.; Pant, B.; Panthia, G.; Oh, H.J.; Lee, M.H.; Kim, H.Y. Fabrication of highly porous poly (ɛ-caprolactone) fibers for novel tissue scaffold via water-bath electrospinning. Colloids Surf. B 2011, 88, 587–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Synthesis route of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs.
Scheme 1. Synthesis route of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs.
Materials 09 00591 sch001
Figure 1. 1H-NMR spectrum of H3LLAO in CDCl3.
Figure 1. 1H-NMR spectrum of H3LLAO in CDCl3.
Materials 09 00591 g001
Figure 2. FT-IR spectra of H3LLAO, H3DLAO, PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100) and HDI. For PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs, longitudinally enlarged spectra at the wavelength region from 3100 to 3600 cm−1 are also shown in the figure.
Figure 2. FT-IR spectra of H3LLAO, H3DLAO, PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100) and HDI. For PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs, longitudinally enlarged spectra at the wavelength region from 3100 to 3600 cm−1 are also shown in the figure.
Materials 09 00591 g002
Figure 3. Degree of swelling for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100) in chloroform, DMF or ethanol.
Figure 3. Degree of swelling for PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100) in chloroform, DMF or ethanol.
Materials 09 00591 g003
Figure 4. XRD profiles of H3LLAO, H3DLAO, PEU-3DLAO and PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100).
Figure 4. XRD profiles of H3LLAO, H3DLAO, PEU-3DLAO and PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100).
Materials 09 00591 g004
Figure 5. FE-SEM images of the fractured surfaces of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100).
Figure 5. FE-SEM images of the fractured surfaces of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100).
Materials 09 00591 g005
Figure 6. Polarized optical microscope images of the PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100) held at a specified temperature for 10 or 50 min after melted at 220 °C.
Figure 6. Polarized optical microscope images of the PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100) held at a specified temperature for 10 or 50 min after melted at 220 °C.
Materials 09 00591 g006
Figure 7. DMA curves of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100).
Figure 7. DMA curves of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100).
Materials 09 00591 g007
Figure 8. TGA curves of H3LLAO, H3DLAO, H2CLO, PEU-3DLAO and PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100).
Figure 8. TGA curves of H3LLAO, H3DLAO, H2CLO, PEU-3DLAO and PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100).
Materials 09 00591 g008
Figure 9. Stress-strain curves of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100).
Figure 9. Stress-strain curves of PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100).
Materials 09 00591 g009
Table 1. Data collected from the first heating DSC curves of H3DLAO, PEU-3DLAO, H3scLAO and PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100).
Table 1. Data collected from the first heating DSC curves of H3DLAO, PEU-3DLAO, H3scLAO and PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100).
SampleTg,LAO (°C)Tm,CLO (°C)Hm,CLO (J·g−1)χc,C/LO (%)Tc,LAO (°C)Hc,LAO (J·g−1)Tm,LAO (°C)Hm,LAO (J·g−1)χc,LAO (%)
H3DLAO59.9----0118.022.223.9
PEU-3DLAO64.7----0-00
H3scLAO45.3---88.9–31.2186.540.128.2
PEU-3scLAO/2CLO
100/065.9----0178.131.523.8
75/25--00-0173.127.427.7
50/50(–45.2) 1−31.71.672.6-0176.519.429.6
25/75(–45.5) 136.07.728.0-0178.58.4625.6
0/100-53.130.523.8-----
1 Tg,CLO.
Table 2. Data collected from the second heating DSC curves of H3DLAO, PEU-3DLAO, H3scLAO and PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100).
Table 2. Data collected from the second heating DSC curves of H3DLAO, PEU-3DLAO, H3scLAO and PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100).
SampleTg,LAO (°C)Tm,CLO (°C)Hm,CLO (J·g−1)χc,CLO (%)Tc,LAO (°C)Hc,LAO (J·g−1)Tm,LAO (°C)Hm,LAO (J·g−1)χc,LAO (%)
H3DLAO35.0----0-00
PEU-3DLAO58.9----0-00
H3scLAO47.8---88.9−31.6186.537.826.6
PEU-3scLAO/2CLO
100/042.3---90.4−25.9176.621.716.4
75/25--0068.5−21.0176.921.121.3
50/5056.9-0091.8−12.9174.612.919.7
25/75(−32.7) 136.618.619.481.3−3.85183.32.106.3
0/100(−42.8) 135.722.217.3-----
1 Tg,LAO of MH-4scLAO/2CLO overlapped with Tm,CLO.
Table 3. Tensile properties of PEU-3DLAO and PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100).
Table 3. Tensile properties of PEU-3DLAO and PEU-3scLAO/2CLOs (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100).
SampleTensile Strength (MPa)Tensile Modulus (MPa)Elongation at Break (%)Tensile Toughness (MJ·m−3)
PEU-3DLAO42.9 ± 3.02214 ± 1872.26 ± 0.320.62 ± 0.25
PEU-3scLAO/2CLO
100/054.7 ± 3.62374 ± 2622.98 ± 0.790.41 ± 0.24
75/2513.3 ± 0.5163 ± 1666.8 ± 4.76.98 ± 0.69
50/503.37 ± 0.4226.3 ± 2.092.3 ± 8.42.36 ± 0.46
25/7511.3 ± 0.917.3 ± 2.5378 ± 2724.2 ± 3.3
0/10010.4 ± 0.9136 ± 13726 ± 11356.8 ± 10.9

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shibita, A.; Kawasaki, S.; Shimasaki, T.; Teramoto, N.; Shibata, M. Stereocomplexation in Copolymer Networks Incorporating Enantiomeric Glycerol-Based 3-Armed Lactide Oligomers and a 2-Armed ɛ-Caprolactone Oligomer. Materials 2016, 9, 591. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070591

AMA Style

Shibita A, Kawasaki S, Shimasaki T, Teramoto N, Shibata M. Stereocomplexation in Copolymer Networks Incorporating Enantiomeric Glycerol-Based 3-Armed Lactide Oligomers and a 2-Armed ɛ-Caprolactone Oligomer. Materials. 2016; 9(7):591. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070591

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shibita, Ayaka, Seina Kawasaki, Toshiaki Shimasaki, Naozumi Teramoto, and Mitsuhiro Shibata. 2016. "Stereocomplexation in Copolymer Networks Incorporating Enantiomeric Glycerol-Based 3-Armed Lactide Oligomers and a 2-Armed ɛ-Caprolactone Oligomer" Materials 9, no. 7: 591. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9070591

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop