1. Introduction
Natural forests have a complex species composition and stand structure compared to planted forests. Therefore, the optimization of forests is often carried out through the management of existing stands to optimize them into a composite, near-natural, mixed heterogeneous stand structure, with the intention of adapting the stand structure and improving the forest quality while enhancing its ecological services [
1,
2,
3]. Forest growth models are crucial to management because they provide information for harvest schedules by predicting future timber yields. Among them, the transition matrix growth model has been widely used in the management optimization of uneven-aged forests [
4,
5]. Due to the uncertainty of the age of uneven-aged forests and the complexity of the stand structure, it is difficult to make long-term forest dynamics predictions for them. However, the transition matrix growth model uses vectors to represent the forest diameter distribution, meanwhile simultaneously predicting the change in the diameter structure distribution of uneven-aged forests using a probability transition matrix [
6,
7]. The variable parameter matrix model has been proposed since it can consider multiple types of variation (e.g., spatial, site, climate, and environmental variability). Liang et al. (2015) [
8] suggest replacing the fixed-parameter model with a variable constrained by stand factors, resulting in variable parameter matrix models that are more comprehensive, accurate, and robust for a wider range of applications [
8].
The forest structure can be described by the arrangement of trees across a landscape and their associated characteristics. The forest structure mainly includes the spatial structure and non-spatial structure. The forest spatial structure is the most representative modifiable factor and, to some extent, determines the stability and development of the forest. The spatial forest structure has been identified as a key to the management of uneven-aged forests [
9,
10,
11]. Mingling, a uniform angle, and dominance indices are the common parameters that can be used to quantify and analyze the stand spatial structure. Diameter class diversity is also very important for forest management optimization as an important aspect of stand structural diversity. Some traditional diversity indices have been widely used in forest management to quantify stand structural diversity, including Simpson and Shannon size diversity indices and Pielou and Simpson evenness indices [
12,
13]. The rational management of the stand structure can improve stand quality, diversity, and stability by continuously optimizing the distribution pattern, the spatial dominance of tree sizes, and competition among trees.
Currently, models for optimizing the stand spatial structure have been used in the study of natural and plantation forests. A stand spatial structure optimization model is a multi-objective optimization approach that uses selective cutting to remove a certain number of trees to adjust the stand structure to the optimal state and maximize the function of the stand [
14,
15]. In the 1980s, research on the optimization model of the spatial structure of forest stands began and, according to the current research status, a comprehensive harvest index P was proposed based on the spatial structure parameters of forest stands to optimize the spatial structure of four case studies in northeast China [
16]. Li et al. [
17] developed bivariate thinning priority indices based on tree neighbor–spatial relationships. They used these indices to parameterize thinning in Korean pine–broadleaved mixed forests in northeast China and pine–oak mixed forests in northwest China. Dong et al. [
18] present a tree-level harvest planning tool that considers four neighborhood-based structural indices (species mingling, diametric differentiation, horizontal spatial pattern, and crowdedness of trees) while concurrently recognizing other operational constraints, using a simulated annealing algorithm, and applied this approach to four 1 ha mapped stands in northeast China.
In mixed uneven aged stands, forest management should optimize the spatial distribution, diameter distribution, and species richness in ways that resemble those found in natural stands. In this study, a transition matrix growth model was used to optimize the spatial structure of stands and to compare and analyze growth changes in the stand structure in the next cycle after optimization. This study investigated the following problems: (1) the selection of the optimal timber harvest according to optimizing the stand spatial structure with a variable transition matrix growth model for broadleaf forests, and (2) applying the model to four different mixed broadleaved forests to optimize dynamic structure management, comparing the changes in each parameter before and after optimization to determine the optimal harvesting scheme.
4. Discussion
It is difficult to summarize the essential characteristics of stand structure into one precise concept, as stand structure itself is not a quantifiable indicator. It is a very broad concept that encompasses many factors at different levels and, as it is governed by ecological processes, it is highly dynamic with [
35]. Traditionally, stand structure characteristics can be described by a set of stand structural variables, such as species composition, tree height, diameter class distribution, stand density, biomass, and stand volume, most of which are related to forest yield [
36]. However, stand spatial structure characteristics are ignored in such descriptions of stand structural characteristics. Tree growth and mortality, stand competition, and natural regeneration in a forest are affected by and affect the spatial arrangement of tree characteristics, thus altering stand structure characteristics [
37]. The stand structure is formed by complex interactions between natural ecological processes at long time scales and at local (small) spatial scales. Thus, the stand structure is a high-level generalization and measure of stand conditions at the measurement time during forest dynamic change [
38].
In this study, we demonstrated that broadleaf mixed forests in the Maoershan Forest Farm of the Heilongjiang Province showed an overall aggregated distribution. The number of homogeneous trees in the moderate and strong degree mixed stands was high, and the uniform angle index increased and then decreased, indicating that the stand spatial structure changed over time.
Zhao et al. [
23] show that the uniform angle index showed a small trend of increasing and decreasing over time because the long-term natural regeneration of the stand resulted in the distribution of trees in some plots tending towards an aggregated distribution. Peet et al. [
37] show that the competitive pressure between trees increased, and the trees growing in a more competitive environment had a higher mortality with the tree growth. The results from our study are consistent with these findings. The distance between trees gradually widened, and the distribution between surviving trees became more and more uniform. Related studies have shown that the diameter and height size diversity of stands increase with stand development, which is consistent with this study [
32,
38].
Stand structural diversity is also a goal of forest management as it is an important indicator of forest ecosystem diversity, which should also consider temporal trends related to forest succession [
39,
40]. The basis for maintaining and increasing the biodiversity of forest ecosystems is to improve the diversity and complexity of the stand structure. To predict stand growth and evaluate forest management activities, measures of stand structural diversity are important [
41,
42]. Diameter class diversity is important for the health and stability of forest ecosystems as an important component of forest structural diversity [
25,
26]. Stand diversity can be assessed and used to guide forest management by describing the number and richness of trees based on species richness and abundance indices. In undisturbed primary forests, the values of the diameter diversity indices increase and then decrease within a small range [
40,
43]. As the trees grow, especially some large trees, the diameter at breast height (
DBH) increases, creating new classes that contribute to the increase in the diameter diversity indices [
39,
44]. When these large trees grow to the over-mature diameter class, they begin to experience natural old age or are disturbed by natural factors, with the death of some trees, and decreases in the diameter class diversity [
41,
42,
43,
45]. The zonal vegetation within this study is mainly a Korean pine–broadleaved mixed forest, a typical natural secondary forest in the mountainous areas of eastern northeast China formed after years of different degrees of human disturbance and various forest protection measures. As a result, stand diameter class diversity is showing a gradually increasing trend over time.
Forest growth and yield models, as well as optimization models, are needed to achieve the goals set for forest management [
46]. Transition matrix growth models are widely used in forestry, especially for uneven-aged forests whose diameter transition probability has a complex nonlinear relationship with the stand variables, where stand growth is necessarily limited by the stand conditions, and variable parameter matrix growth models are more robust to predict future changes in forest growth dynamics [
47]. He et al. compared index changes before and after harvesting at different harvest intensities [
26]. Diameter class diversity increased at harvest intensities of 20%–30%, but decreased at harvest intensities of 40%, indicating that low and medium harvest intensities could improve the stand diameter class diversity. Previous studies have shown that intensities of 20% and 30% reflect the current status of forest management practices in northeast China, whereas intensities of 10% and 40% are somewhat underestimated or overestimated compared to the actual range [
18,
46]. The results of our study also show that a simulated harvest intensity close to 25.0% resulted in the minimization of the objective optimization function, and the optimized simulated stand spatial structure index and diameter class diversity index increased between 2% and 18.8%. Adjusting stand diameter classes to improve the stand density reduces competitive pressure among trees, changes horizontal spatial patterns, and increases light conditions, thus promoting regenerating tree growth.
In our study, we selected the optimal timber harvest according to optimizing the stand spatial structure with a variable transition matrix growth model for broadleaf forests. The next cycle of stand diameter distribution was brought closer to the reasonable distribution. The stand spatial structure was brought closer to the ideal stand spatial structure through optimal harvesting by optimally adjusting the diameter class diversity and spatial structure with an interval adjustment period of 5 years. Applying the variable transition matrix growth model to optimize the stand spatial structure predicts the simultaneous optimization of the stand spatial structure from different aspects. These theoretically calculated potential maxima of stand spatial structure indicators can be used in optimizing the spatial structure of forest stands.
The methods used in this study are potentially valuable for managing natural, mixed, and heterogeneous forests. However, the stand structure characteristics of natural forests are more complex, and there are many influential factors. The optimization function constructed in this study mainly considered the diameter distribution, diameter class diversity, and spatial structure characteristics of stands. The dynamic growth optimization adjustment of stands is a transitional process and requires long-term management adjustment; 5 years is not a long time in the growth of trees, hence the small differences which can be considered in the subsequent study of the vertical structure of natural forests and added to the stand spatial structure optimization model.
5. Conclusions
Our results showed that from 2015 to 2020, each diameter class diversity index, generally, did not change much. There were small differences with a gradually increasing trend, especially in the Margalef, Shannon, and Simpson indices. The reason is that the diameter class diversity indices increased with the growth of trees and the increase in the number of recruited trees. Meanwhile, 80% of the plots had a clumped distribution, which was not conducive to tree growth. Some plots had a low degree of mixing and an uneven distribution of diameter classes, whereas the diameter class uniformity index increased and then decreased with time. The stand spatial structure had to be adjusted during stand optimization, as it was somewhat different from the ideal spatial structure of natural mixed forests.
We propose a new methodology to optimize the stand spatial structure with a transition matrix growth model for four broadleaf forests, and the proposed method is universal and can be easily applied to other stands. The results showed that the optimal harvesting intensities of the allocated trees were all ~25.0% [plot 6 (24.3%), plot 10 (25.5%), plot 11 (24.5%), and plot 18 (25.0%)]. The objective optimization function was minimized, and the stand spatial structure index and diameter class diversity index improved after optimization between 2% and 18.8%. The objective function value (F-index) was improved between 12.8% (Plot 10) and 28.3% (Plot 18).