Next Article in Journal
Vegetation Effects on Phosphorus Runoff from Headwater Catchments in a Cool-Temperate Region with Landslides, Northern Japan
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Different Thinning Intensities on Carbon Storage in Pinus koraiensis Middle-Aged Plantations in Northeast China
Previous Article in Journal
Review of Predator Emitted Volatile Organic Compounds and Their Potential for Predator Detection in New Zealand Forests
Previous Article in Special Issue
Using Limit Value Constraint Theory to Better Understand the Self-Thinning Rule of Forest
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Neighborhood Tree Position and Size Had Hierarchical Effects on Korean Pine Growth at Different Opening Degree Levels

1
College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
2
Mudanjiang Branch, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Mudanjiang 157041, China
3
Forest Management Institute, Jilin Academy of Forestry, Changchun 130033, China
4
Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management-Ministry of Education, Harbin 150080, China
5
State Forestry and Grassland Administration Engineering Technology Research Center of Korean Pine, Harbin 150040, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2024, 15(2), 228; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020228
Submission received: 5 December 2023 / Revised: 18 January 2024 / Accepted: 22 January 2024 / Published: 24 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Silviculture and Management Strategy in Coniferous Forests)

Abstract

:
Certain fluctuations were found when using the opening degree index to evaluate the effects of the adjacent broadleaved trees on the under-canopy target Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc.) trees in a mixed forest of planted Korean trees and natural broadleaved trees. The fluctuations were probably caused by the different positions and sizes of the adjacent broadleaved trees over the target Korean pine trees. For the purpose of clarifying this issue, the effect of the position and size (marked by height and diameter) of the neighborhood broadleaved trees on the height and diameter growth of Korean pine trees under the canopy in a secondary forest at different opening degree levels was studied. Generally, the mean DBH (diameter at breast height) and mean height of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy were higher when the adjacent broadleaved trees were located on the north or east sides of the target P. koraiensis trees than when they were located on the south or west sides. This was the case at all opening degree levels except the 0.5 opening degree level, where no significant difference was observed among the growth indexes of Korean pine trees based on the different positions of neighborhood trees. The mean DBH and height of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy decreased with the increase in the DBH and height of the adjacent broadleaved trees at all orientations and at all opening degree levels, but only those of the Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees on the south side in the 12.6–13.5 m height range and those with adjacent broadleaved trees on most sides in the 18.6–21.0 cm and 13.6–14.5 m height ranges at opening degree levels of K = 2.0, 1.5, and 1.0 reached a significant level of difference; whereas those of most Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees on the south and west sides in the height range of 11.6–12.5 m and DBH ranges of 13.6–16 cm and 16.1–18.5 cm, as well as the ones with adjacent broadleaved trees on most sides in the DBH range of 18.6–21.0 cm and the height range of 13.6–14.5 m at the opening degree level of K = 0.5, reached a significant level of difference, with a few exceptions. In conclusion, the broadleaved trees with a large diameter, great height, and a south or west orientation of the target P. koraiensis trees had a negative impact on their growth, but influence intensities changed at different opening degree levels.

1. Introduction

Most secondary forests, which occupy 59% of the world’s forests and 70% of the world’s natural forests [1], are the consequence of primary forest destruction and constitute a major concern in forest management around the world, especially in terms of the restoration and rehabilitation of secondary forests to near the level primary ones [2,3,4,5,6]. Typically, secondary forests in the humid temperate forest zone in the Changbai Mountains and the Lesser Xing’an Mountains in Northeast China are derived mainly from the long-term destruction of the zonal climax, with the primary mixed forest being of Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis Sieb. Et Zucc.) accompanied by broadleaved deciduous tree species like Fraxinus mandshurica Rupr. And Acer mono Maxim., etc. [3,6,7]. This secomdary forest occupies more than 99% of the natural forest area (which occupies 82% of total forest area) in this forest zone. Therefore, the restoration and rehabilitation of the close-climax mixed forest of Korean pine and broadleaved species from the secondary forests in this area has caused serious concern since the 1950s [3,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Stimulated by this concern, the approach of “planting conifer and preserving broadleaved trees”, i.e., artificially planting Korean trees on the sites with natural, regenerated broadleaved trees or being able to regenerate broadleaved trees, was developed, and a great establishment of mixed forests composed of the planted Korean pine trees and natural broadleaved trees has been achieved with this approach [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16].
Considering that previous studies on such mixed forests have mainly been focused on planting (regeneration) issues during the establishment period and based on stand density or canopy density (at the stand level), with a lower precision level [13,14,15,16], our team conducted research on the growth promotion of the planted Korean pine trees during the post-planting period based on opening degree (at the individual tree level), with a higher precision level [8,9,17]. The opening degree is a quantitative index calculated as the sum of the ratio of the distances to heights, which the distance are the ones between the target tree and its nearest four upper-neighborhood trees, and the heights are the ones of the nearest four upper-neighborhood trees [8,18]. Our previous studies have certified that the opening degree is an effective index for quantitatively evaluating and regulating the growth of Korean pine trees under the secondary forest canopy [8,9]; the diameter and height growth of the Korean pine trees increased along with the enlargement of the opening degree, and K = 1.0 or K = 2.0 are the better treatments if the regulation rotation is about 5 or 10 years [8,9]. Meanwhile, we found that the quantitative regulation effect has some fluctuations that may be caused by the uneven size and different positions of the neighborhood trees around the target Korean pine trees as the index was developed in a relatively uniform forest type of Picea wilsonii Mast. with good application effect [18], but our study forest is composed of several tree species with different sizes and crown properties. These fluctuations may impact the precision of the quantitative regulation activities; therefore, how the type of influencing pattern of the adjacent broadleaved trees’ position and size impacts the growth of the target Korean pine trees at different opening degree levels should be elucidated for more precision regulation and to promote the growth of the target Korean pine trees.
This study was designed for the above issue, taking P. koraiensis individuals as the objective test trees and investigating the effect of the position and size (marked by height and diameter) of their neighborhood broadleaved trees on their height and diameter growth based on the effect primarily evaluated using the opening degree index. The results could provide reasonable reference for the precise application of the opening degree index in regulating the relationship between P. koraiensis trees, either planted or naturally regenerated, with their adjacent broadleaved trees in a secondary forest. It could also provide a method of simplifying the opening degree index, allowing for the wide application of the research results to similar forest scenarios around the world.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Sites and Its Basic Habitat Conditions

The investigation sites were in Shanhetun Forest Enterprise located in Wuchang City (44°03′34″–44°38′34″ N, 127°28′18″–128°14′36″ E), Heilongjiang Province, China; Maoershan University Forests of Northeast Forestry University located in Shangzhi City (45°21′–45°25′ N, 127°30′–127°34′ E), Heilongjiang Province, China; and Fangzheng Forest Enterprise located in Fangzheng County (45°33′16″–46°9′48″ N, 128°13′41″–129°33′20″ E), Heilongjiang Province, China. They are, respectively, located on the northwest ridge, west extended ridge, and southwest ridge of the Zhangguangcai Range in the Changbai Mountains, with a 2.5–2.9 °C mean annual temperature, 2100–2500 °C ≥ 10 °C accumulated temperature, 550–750 mm mean annual rainfall, and zonal dark-brown soil. The vegetation in this area belongs to the Changbai Mountains flora, and the natural secondary forest in these areas is the typical type derived from the zonal climax primary forest mixed with Korean pine and broadleaved tree species. The main secondary forest types are poplar–birch mixed forest (mainly Populus davidiana Dode or/and Betula platyphylla Suk.), precious hardwood mixed forest (mainly F. mandshurica, Juglans mandshurica Maxim., Phellodendron amurense Rupr., and Tilia amurensis Rupr.), Mongolian oak forest (mainly Quercus mongolica Fisch. Ex Turcz. mixed with some birch and poplar species), and hard shaw forest (F. mandshurica, J. mandshurica, Acer spp., Ulmus spp., Tilia spp., etc.); the main plantation types are P. koraiensis, P. sylvestris L. var. mongolica Litv., and Larix gmelinii (Rupr.) Rupr. (or L. olgensis Henry).
The plots in Shanhetun are located at the secondary forest at the Little Mopanshan area in Shahezi Forest Farm; the plots in Maoershan are located at secondary forest in the Taiping Working Circle in the Maoershan University Forests of Northeast Forestry University; and the plots in Fangzheng are located at the secondary forest at the Fangzheng side of junction between Fangzheng and Linkou County along the S206 road, which belongs to Fangzheng Forest Enterprise. The Korean pine trees were planted under the canopy with a planting density of 2500 trees/ha (spacing 2 m × 2 m), basically with 2–2-type seedlings. The plot sites selected were relatively flat, with a gentle incline of less than 10 degrees, but in order to reduce the influence of the slope, sampling plots were set on the four slope aspects with east, south, west, and north orientations. The soil porosity, organic matter, available nitrogen, available potassium, available phosphorus, and total nitrogen in the 0–10 cm soil layer in Maoershan area are higher than those in Shanhetun and Fangzheng, but there is no evident difference with other soil properties in the 0–10 cm layer and with all soil properties in 11–20 cm layer. The basic stand status and species compositions are shown in Table 1 and Table 2 based on the plot investigation data.

2.2. Study Methods

2.2.1. Plot and Line Investigation Methods

The basic stand situations were investigated by sampling plots at the four slope directions of east, west, south, and north, selected in each investigation area. The size of each sampling plot was 20 m × 20 m = 400 m2, repeated 3 times in each slope aspect, with at least 20 m distance between the plots; 12 plots in each area and, in total, 36 plots in the tree sites were investigated. The species, diameter, and height of the broadleaved trees, whose DBH (diameter at breast height) are ≥4 cm, and the DBH and height of all Korean pine trees were measured and recorded. The stand density, mean DBH, mean height of broadleaved trees and Korean pine trees, and the broadleaved species compositions for each plot were calculated with these data (Table 1 and Table 2).
For evaluating the effects of opening degree, (1) the DBH and height of 30 selected P. koraiensis trees, along with a snakelike line in each plot, were measured and recorded; the species, DBH, and height of the nearest broadleaved trees in the four orientations of east, west, south, and north around the selected target Korean pine trees, as well as the distance between them, were also measured and recorded; (2) in addition, a straight line was set in each slope aspect, and 100 Korean pine trees along with the straight line were selected, along with the same items as above for Korean pine trees, and their surrounding broadleaved trees were also measured and recorded. In total, 130, 520, and 1560 Korean pine trees were measured at each slope aspect, each site, and the three investigation sites as the target trees for opening degree evaluation, as well as for position and size effect certification of the neighborhood broadleaved trees.

2.2.2. Calculation and Statistics of the Data

The opening degree (K) of P. koraiensis trees was calculated based the above related data according to the method described by Cong et al., Shen et al., and Luo et al. [8,9,18] as calculated by Equation (1). K was defined as the sum of the ratio of the distance from the reference tree (target tree) to the nearest neighbor trees in each quadrat to the height of these neighbor trees; the longer the distance and the lower the height for the nearest neighbor trees, the larger the K and the more favorable the growth of the reference tree.
K = ι = 1 4 ( c t g α ι ) = ι = 1 4 ( d / h ) ι
where i is the neighbor tree number, and d and h is the distance and height of one of the four trees nearest to a reference tree, respectively.
Four opening degree levels were divided: the range of K = 0.5 was 0.3–0.7; K = 1.0 was 0.8–1.2; K = 1.5 was 1.3–1.7; and K = 2.0 was 1.8–2.2.
Four ranks of DBH and height range of the adjacent broadleaved trees of the target Korean pine trees were divided as 11.0–13.5 cm, 13.6–16.0 cm, 16.1–18.5 cm, 18.6–21.0 cm and 10.5–11.5 m, 11.6–12.5 m, 12.6–13.5 m, and 13.6–14.5 m, respectively. Within each opening degree level, the DBH and height of the target Korean pine trees were listed, respectively, according to the position of their neighborhood broadleaved trees, i.e., listed for their adjacent broadleaved trees located at east, south, west, or north side (orientation), respectively (as shown in Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7, Table 8, Table 9, Table 10, Table 11, Table 12, Table 13 and Table 14). The DBH and height of the target Korean pine trees were calculated as the mean and standard error, and their significant differences were tested.

2.2.3. ANOVA and Significant Difference Test

All data were processed and analyzed using Excel 2013. We calculated the mean, standard error, etc., and analyzed the correlations with SPSS17.0.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of the Position of Adjacent Broadleaved Trees on Growth of Pinus koraiensis Trees under the Canopy

3.1.1. Effect of Position of Adjacent Broadleaved Trees on Diameter Growth of Pinus koraiensis Trees under the Canopy

Generally, the average DBH (diameter at breast height) of Pinus koraiensis trees under the canopy of the secondary forest in the three investigation sites was higher when the adjacent broadleaved trees were located to the north or east sides of the P. koraiensis trees than when the adjacent broadleaved trees were located to the south or west sides at all DBH and height ranges and all opening degree levels (p < 0.05); however, there was no significant difference among the four orientations of adjacent broadleaved trees for the DBH ranges of 18.6–21.0 cm and 16.1–18.5 cm and the height ranges of 12.6–13.5 m and 13.6–14.5 m of the adjacent broadleaved trees in the case of the opening degree K = 0.5 (p > 0.05) (Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8).
In the case of the opening degree K = 2.0, the average DBH of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy of the secondary forest was higher where the adjacent broadleaved trees were located on the north or east sides of the P. koraiensis trees than when the adjacent broadleaved trees were located on the south or west sides in all DBH and height ranges in the Shanhetun and Maoershan site (Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8); the same is true of the Fangzheng site (Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6 and Table 8), with just two exceptions: there was no significant difference among the DBHs when the adjacent broadleaved trees were located on the south, west, and north sides for the DBH range of 11.0–13.5 cm; or when the adjacent broadleaved trees were located on the east, south, and north sides for the DBH range of 13.6–16.0 cm (Table 7); however, even so, the DBH of Korean pine trees with north-side broadleaved trees was higher than that of Korean pine trees with south- or west-side broadleaved trees in the DBH range of 11.0–13.5 cm. The DBH of Korean pine trees with north- or east-side broadleaved trees was higher than that of Korean pine trees with south-side broadleaved trees in the DBH range of 13.6–16.0 cm; this still conformed to the above trend but did not reach a significant level.
In the case of the opening degree K = 1.5, the general trends for the average DBH of P. koraiensis trees in the three areas were similar to those for K = 2.0 (Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8) but with more exceptions; there was no significant difference among the DBHs of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees located on the east, west, and north sides in the DBH range of 11.0–13.5 cm in the Shanhetun site and 13.6–16.0 cm in the Maoershan site, the east, south, and west sides in the DBH range of 16.1–18.5 cm in the Maoershan site, and DBH ranges of 11.0–13.5 cm, 13.6–16.0 cm, and 16.1–18.5 cm in the Fangzheng site. There was also no significant difference among the DBHs with adjacent broadleaved trees located on the east, south, and north sides in the height range of 12.6–13.5 m in the Shanhetun site and 10.5–11.5 m and 11.6–12.5 m in the Fangzheng site; the east, south, and west sides in the height ranges of 12.6–13.5 m and 13.6–14.5 m in the Maoershan site; and 13.6–16.0 cm and 16.1–18.5 cm in the Fangzheng site. Similarly, at K = 2.0, the DBHs of the Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees located on the east and/or north sides were larger than those of the Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees located to the south or west, but this difference did not reach a significant level.
In the case of the opening degree K = 1.0, the general trends for the average DBH of P. koraiensis trees in the three areas were similar to those for K = 2.0 (Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8), without any exception.
In the case of the opening degree K = 0.5, the average DBHs of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy of the secondary forest were higher with adjacent broadleaved trees located on the north or east sides of P. koraiensis trees than those with adjacent broadleaved trees located on the south or west sides in the first and second DBH and height ranges in the three areas, but there was no significant difference among the DBHs of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees located on the four sides in the third and forth DBH and height ranges in the three areas (Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8), with several exceptions; i.e., there was no significant difference among the DBHs of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees located on the east, west, and north sides in the DBH range of 11.0–13.5 cm and on the south, west, and north sides in the height range of 10.5–11.5 m in the Fangzheng site; the DBHs of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees located on the south side in the DBH range of 16.1–18.5 cm and the height range of 12.6–13.5 m in the Fangzheng site were significantly lower than those with broadleaved trees on other sides.

3.1.2. Effect of the Position of Adjacent Broadleaved Trees on Height Growth of Pinus koraiensis Trees under the Canopy

Generally, the average height of the P. koraiensis trees under the canopy of the secondary forest at the three investigation sites was higher when the adjacent broadleaved trees were located on the north or east sides of the P. koraiensis trees than when the adjacent broadleaved trees were located on the south or west sides in all DBH and height ranges, but there were many more exceptions compared with those for the average DBH of P. koraiensis trees. On the other hand, the results were similar in that there were no significant difference in height among the four orientations of adjacent broadleaved trees in the DBH ranges of 18.6–21.0 cm and 16.1–18.5 cm and height range of 12.6–13.5 m and 13.6–14.5 m of the adjacent broadleaved trees in the case of the opening degree K = 0.5 (Table 9, Table 10, Table 11, Table 12, Table 13 and Table 14).
In the case of the opening degree K = 2.0, the average height of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy of the secondary forest were higher when the adjacent broadleaved trees were located on the north or east sides of P. koraiensis trees than where the adjacent broadleaved trees were located on the south or west sides in all DBH and height ranges in the Shanhetun and Fangzheng sites (Table 9, Table 10, Table 13 and Table 14); the same was true in the Maoershan site (Table 11 and Table 12) only in the DBH range of 11.0–13.5 cm and the height rang of 10.5–11.5 m, with the exceptions of equal or lower heights for Korean trees with east-side broadleaved trees in the DBH range of 13.6–16.0 cm or the height range of 11.6–12.5 m; lower heights for Korean trees with north-side or east-side broadleaved trees in the DBH range of 16.1–18.5 cm or the height range of 12.6–13.5 m; and lower heights for Korean trees with east- and north-side broadleaved trees in the DBH range of 18.6–21.0 cm and the height range of 13.6–14.5, even though some of these differences did not reach a significant level.
In the case of the opening degree K = 1.5, the average heights of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy of secondary forest were higher when the adjacent broadleaved trees were located on the north or east side of P. koraiensis trees than when the adjacent broadleaved trees were located on the south or west side in all DBH and height ranges in the three areas (Table 9, Table 10, Table 11, Table 12, Table 13 and Table 14), with just two exceptions: equal heights were found for Korean trees with north-side broadleaved trees in the DBH range of 13.6–16.0 cm, and a lower height was found for Korean trees with north-side broadleaved trees in the DBH range of 16.1–18.5 cm. However, many of the height differences in the case of the opening degree K = 1.5 did not reach a significant level.
In the case of the opening degree K = 1.0, the general trends for the average height of P. koraiensis trees in the three areas were similar to those for K = 1.5 (Table 9, Table 10, Table 11, Table 12, Table 13 and Table 14), without any exceptions. Many of the height differences also did not reach a significant level.
In the case of the opening degree K = 0.5, the average height of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy of secondary forest were higher when the adjacent broadleaved trees were located on the north or east side of P. koraiensis trees than when the adjacent broadleaved trees were located on the south or west side in the first and second DBH and height ranges in the three areas, but no significant difference was found among the DBHs of Korean pine trees when the adjacent broadleaved trees were located on the four sides in the third and fourth DBH and height ranges in the three areas (Table 9, Table 10, Table 11, Table 12, Table 13 and Table 14), with just one exception: a low height was found for Korean pine trees when the adjacent broadleaved trees were located on the east side in the DBH range of 13.6–16.0 cm (Table 11).

3.2. Effect of the Size of Adjacent Broadleaved Trees on Growth of Pinus koraiensis Trees under the Canopy

3.2.1. Effect of the Size of Adjacent Broadleaved Trees on DBH Growth of Pinus koraiensis Trees under the Canopy

Generally, the average DBH of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy of the secondary forest in the three investigation sites decreased with the increase in the DBH and height ranges of the adjacent broadleaved trees when the broadleaved trees were located in all directions from P. koraiensis trees at all opening degree levels, and its growth difference reached a significant level when the broadleaved tree size was in the DBH range of 18.6–21.0 cm and the height range of 13.6–14.5 m for most directions of broadleaved trees from P. koraiensis trees, especially on the south or/and west side; others did not reach significant levels (Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8).
In the case of the opening degree K = 2.0, the growth difference in the average DBH of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy began to reach a significant level when the broadleaved trees were located to the south of P. koraiensis trees in the DBH range of 16.1–18.5 cm and the height range of 12.6–13.5 m in the Maoershan and Fangzheng sites, but not in the Shanhetun site; whereas it reached a significant level when the broadleaved trees were located on the south and west sides of P. koraiensis trees in the DBH range of 18.6–21.0 cm and the height range of 13.6–14.5 m in the three areas, with the exception of there being no significant difference in the height range of 13.6–14.5 m in the Shenhetun site and the west side in the height range of 13.6–14.5 in the Maoershan site (Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8). The growth difference in the average DBH of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy also reached a significant level where the broadleaved trees were located on the east side of P. koraiensis trees in the DBH range of 18.6–21.0 cm and the height range of 13.6–14.5 m in the Maoershansite (Table 5 and Table 6).
In the case of the opening degree K = 1.5, the growth difference in the average DBH of Korean pine trees under the canopy reached a significant level when the broadleaved trees were located on the south and west side of P. koraiensis trees in the DBH range of 18.6–21.0 cm and the height range of 13.6–14.5 m in the three areas, without exception (Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8).
In the case of the opening degree K = 1.0, the growth difference in the average DBH of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy began to reach a significant level when the broadleaved trees were located on the south side of P. koraiensis trees in the DBH range of 16.1-18.5 cm and the height range of 12.6–13.5 m in the Fangzheng site and the DBH range of 16.1–18.5 cm in the Maoershan site, as well as on the west side of P. koraiensis trees in the height range of 12.6–13.5 m in the Maoershan site; whereas it reached a significant level when the broadleaved trees were located on the south and west side of P. koraiensis trees in the DBH range of 18.6–21.0 cm and the height range of 13.6–14.5 m in the three areas, without exception (Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8). The growth difference in the average DBH of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy also reached a significant level when the broadleaved trees were located on the east side of P. koraiensis trees in the DBH range of 18.6–21.0 cm and the height range of 13.6–14.5 m in the Shanhetun site (Table 3 and Table 4).
In the case of the opening degree K = 0.5, the growth difference in the average DBH of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy began to reach a significant level when the broadleaved trees were located on the south and west side of P. koraiensis trees in the DBH range of 13.6–16.0 cm and the height range of 11.6–12.5 m in the Shenhetun and Maoershan sites but not in the Fangzheng site; it reached a significant level when the broadleaved trees were located on the south, west, and east sides of P. koraiensis trees in the DBH ranges of 16.1–18.5 cm and 18.6–21.0 cm and the height ranges of 12.6–13.5 m and 13.6–14.5 m in the Shenhetun site; in the four orientations from P. koraiensis trees in the DBH ranges of 16.1–18.5 cm and 18.6–21.0 cm and the height ranges of 12.6–13.5 m and 13.6–14.5 m in the Maoershan area (Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6), but only where they were on the south side of P. koraiensis trees in the DBH range of 16.1–18.5 cm and the height range of 12.6–13.5 m; and on the south and west sides of P. koraiensis trees in the DBH range of 18.6–21.0 cm and the height range of 13.6–14.5 m in the Fangzheng site (Table 7 and Table 8).

3.2.2. Effect of the Size of Adjacent Broadleaved Trees on Height Growth of Pinus koraiensis Trees under the Canopy

Generally, the average height of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy of the secondary forest at the three investigating sites decreased with the increase in the DBH and height range of the adjacent broadleaved trees when the broadleaved trees were located in all directions from P. koraiensis trees at all opening degree levels, and its growth difference reached a significant level when the broadleaved tree size was in the DBH range of 18.6–21.0 cm and the height range of 13.6–14.5 m, with most directions of broadleaved trees to P. koraiensis trees, and when the broadleaved tree size was in the DBH range of 16.1–18.5 cm and the height range of 12.6–13.5 m, with a south and/or west direction from broadleaved trees to P. koraiensis trees, except for the Shanhetun site and the Maoershan site in some cases; others did not reach a significant level (Table 9, Table 10, Table 11, Table 12, Table 13 and Table 14).
In the case of the opening degree K = 2.0, the growth difference in the average height of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy began to reach a significant level when the broadleaved trees were located to the south of P. koraiensis trees in the DBH ranges of 13.6–16.0 cm and 16.1–18.5 cm in the Maoershan and Fangzheng sites and in the height range of 12.6–13.5 m in the Fangzheng site, and reached a significant level when the broadleaved trees were located on the south and west side of P. koraiensis trees in the DBH range of 18.6–21.0 cm and the height range of 13.6–14.5 m in the Maoershan and Fangzheng sites (Table 9, Table 10, Table 11, Table 12, Table 13 and Table 14), with the exception of there being no significant difference at these DBH and height ranges in the Shenhetun site, instead of the east and/or north side (Table 9 and Table 10).
In the case of the opening degree K = 1.5, the growth difference in the average height of Korean pine trees under the canopy reached a significant level when the broadleaved trees were located on the south and west side of P. koraiensis trees in the DBH range of 18.6–21.0 cm and the height range of 13.6–14.5 m in the three areas, with the exception of the west side in the height range of 13.6–14.5 m in the Shanhetun site, the east side in the DBH range of 18.6–21.0 cm in the Fangzheng site, and the north side in the DBH range of 18.6–21.0 cm in the Maoershan site; a significant level as also reached when the broadleaved trees were located on the south and/or west side of P. koraiensis trees in the DBH range of 16.1–18.5 cm and the height range of 12.6–13.5 m in the three areas (Table 9, Table 10, Table 11, Table 12, Table 13 and Table 14).
In the case of the opening degree K = 1.0, the growth difference in the average height of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy reached a significant level when the broadleaved trees were located on the south side of P. koraiensis trees in the Shenhetun site, the south and west sides of P. koraiensis trees in the Maoershan site, and the south, west, and east sides of P. koraiensis trees in the Fangzheng site in the DBH ranges of 16.1–18.5 cm and 18.6–21.0 cm and the height ranges of 12.6–13.5 m and 13.6–14.5 m (Table 9, Table 10, Table 11, Table 12, Table 13 and Table 14), as well as on the east side of P. koraiensis trees in the height range of 13.6–14.5 m in the Maoershan site (Table 11 and Table 12) and the north side of P. koraiensis trees in the DBH range of 18.6–21.0 cm and the height range of 13.6–14.5 m in the Fangzheng site (Table 13 and Table 14).
In the case of the opening degree K = 0.5, the growth difference in the average height of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy began to reach a significant level when the broadleaved trees were located on the west side in the Maoershan site and the south and west sides in the Fangzheng site in the DBH range of 13.6–16.0 cm and the height range of 11.6–12.5 m, and they reached a significant level when the broadleaved trees were located on the south, west, and east sides of P. koraiensis trees in the DBH ranges of 16.1–18.5 cm and 18.6–21.0 cm and the height ranges of 12.6–13.5 m and 13.6–14.5 m in the Shenhetun and Fangzheng sites (Table 9, Table 10, Table 11, Table 12, Table 13 and Table 14), but there was almost no significant level difference at the K = 0.5 level in the Maoershan site (Table 9 and Table 10), probably because all of the DBH and height ranges at the K = 0.5 opening degree level caused the greatest suppression of normal growth in all Korean pine trees.

4. Conclusions

To promote the growth of planted P. koraiensis trees and regulate the species relationships in a mixed forest of P. koraiensis trees and naturally regenerated broadleaved trees, a quantitative regulation approach based on an opening degree index has been developed and has proven effective and feasible [8,9], but for more precision and better operational utilization of the approach, the possible factors influencing its effects needed to be checked, and the position and size of neighborhood broadleaved trees were considered to be factors of this type and were checked in this research.

4.1. Effect of Adjacent Broadleaved Tree Position on Growth of Pinus koraiensis Trees under the Canopy

The growth of Korean pine trees increased along with the enlargement of the opening degree [8,9], and, if the tending cutting interval is about 5 years and the age of the Korean pine tree is younger than 15–20 years, then the best opening degree is K = 1.0 < 2.0 [8]; if the tending cutting interval is about 10 years and the age of the Korean pine tree is older than 15–20 years, then the best opening degree is K = 2.0 and higher [9]. The opening degree is actually a quantitative measurement of the micro-space as well as the light environment of the target trees and is similar to the forest gap to some extent, and there is also the discovery that the plant growth in the gap is increased with gap size enlargement [16,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Some studies have also referred to the effect of the within-gap position; for example, the regenerated seedlings of P. thunbergii were distributed not in the center of the thinning gaps but at the north, west, and east edges of the gaps [20], and the photosynthesis capacity of 35-year-old Korean pine trees increased from the edge area to the center area of the gaps [21,22], but another study showed that the maximum net photosynthetic rate of the needles of Korean pine trees growing in the center of the gap was higher than in the transition and edge area [24]. Young trees of different tree species would be distributed in different position within the gaps [23], and the seedling survival, growth, and biomass accumulation were influenced by the within-gap position; the net photosynthetic rates of the Manchurian walnut were higher in gap centers and transitions than those at gap edges [25]. Our object trees of concern are different to those in these studies; our concern was the relative position of the neighborhood broadleaved trees to the target Korean pine trees, not the target tree position on the gaps as in the above studies [20,21,22,23,24,25], but the issues explored are similar. Our study results show that the mean DBH and height of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy were higher when the adjacent broadleaved trees were located to the north or east sides of P. koraiensis trees than when the adjacent broadleaved trees were located in the south or west sides of P. koraiensis trees for almost all opening degree levels (different gap size) except for K = 0.5 (small gap size); i.e., when the opening degree were bigger (here, bigger than 1.0), the effect of the orientation of neighborhood broadleaved trees on the light needs of the target P. koraiensis trees was bigger and should be considered when regulating the micro-habitat of the Korean pine trees—in other words, removing the interference trees on the south or/and west side; however, when the opening degree was smaller to a certain extent (here, 0.5), the light entrance to the stands was small, and the effect of the orientation of the broadleaved trees on the light needs of P. koraiensis trees was no longer significant and need not being considered when regulating the micro-habitat of the Korean pine trees.

4.2. Effect of Adjacent Broadleaved Tree Size on Growth of Pinus koraiensis Trees under the Canopy

Plant size is one of the main factors that determine the plant–plant interaction and it may change in response to neighborhood plants of either the same species or another species. Among the 330 papers related to this issue, 46.1% referred to plant growth, including height, diameter, biomass, and productivity [26]. Large trees control a large proportion of habitat resources; thus, the smaller neighborhood trees are denied these contested resources, especially the light resources in a mixed forest [26,27,28]. Crown size was strongly influenced by tree bole size, and crown radius was strongly dependent on tree DBH [28]. A few studies have been found which consider the influence of neighborhood tree size on the growth of the target Korean pine trees; Chen Dong et al. determined that the crown area of the neighborhood trees had a bigger influence on the young target Korean pine trees, and Wang Shuli et al. indicated that the height of the neighborhood upper trees had a significant influence on the growth of the target Korean pine trees [12]. This can be understood through the formula of the opening degree; when the horizontal distance from P. koraiensis trees to broadleaved trees was constant, the height of the broadleaved trees was greater and the opening degree was smaller, showing that the ability of P. koraiensis trees to receive light was worse and that the adjacent broadleaved trees affected the good light environment in the forest. In addition, the height and DBH of adjacent broadleaved trees reflects the size of the crown; this also changed the entry of light into the forest to affect the growth of P. koraiensis trees. No former study referring to the influence of the height and DBH of adjacent broadleaved trees on the individual growth situation of Korean pine trees has been found to account for size related to the opening degree and orientation to the target trees. Our study on the effect of the position, height range, and DBH range of adjacent broadleaved trees on the growth of the height and DBH of P. koraiensis trees was conducted at different opening degrees in different plots and showed that the mean DBH and height of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy decreased significantly with the increase in the DBH and height of the adjacent broadleaved trees when the broadleaved trees were located on the south or west sides of the P. koraiensis trees, but not when the broadleaved trees were located on the north or east sides.
In conclusion, the position and size of the adjacent broadleaved trees affected the growth of P. koraiensis trees to a certain degree: (1) south- and/or west-side adjacent broadleaved trees had a greater impact than north- and east-side trees on the diameter and height growth of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy in secondary forests; (2) the size (marked by DBH and height) of the adjacent broadleaved trees had a negative impact on the diameter and height growth of P. koraiensis trees under the canopy in secondary forests but only reached a significant level when it reached a large range and/or a low opening degree level. Therefore, the effect of the orientation and size of broadleaved trees on the growth of P. koraiensis trees should be considered in the case of a large opening degree but does not need to be considered when the opening degree is too small.
In terms of management implications, during the actual production process in forestry for P. koraiensis trees planted under a canopy, we should not only consider the opening degree but also the impact of various factors on the growth of P. koraiensis trees. P. koraiensis trees are recommended to be planted under an adjacent broadleaved tree with a smaller DBH and a lower tree height, and the appropriate removal of broadleaved trees located to the south and west sides should be undertaken during thinning cutting to provide good light conditions for the growth of P. koraiensis trees.
This study is of great significance to the regeneration and reconstruction of P. koraiensis tree in secondary forests. More than 1.2 million ha of mixed forest composed of planted Korean pine trees and natural broadleaved trees has been established, but much more such secondary forest (14.3 million ha estimated based on the data from the ninth national forest resource inventory of China) needs to be changed into this type of mixed forest. Therefore, these research results offer a firm perspective for practical applications.

Author Contributions

X.M., P.Z. and H.S. conceived the entire idea; X.M., C.L., Y.L. and H.W. performed the experiment and conducted the statistical analyses, created figures, and wrote the entire manuscript; and X.M., H.W., P.Z. and H.S. worked on the final revision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31972950), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFD2201002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32271857), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2572023CT02), and the Heilongjiang Touyan Innovation Team Program (Technology Development Team for High-efficient Silviculture of Forest Resources).

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors give many thanks to the local engineering technicians for their help with fieldwork.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020: Main Report; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bauhus, J.; Klaus Puettmann, K.; Messier, C. Silviculture for old-growth attributes. For. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 258, 525–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, S.R. Ecological Restoration Principle and Techniques of Natural Forests; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2011. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Sirolli, H.; Torrella, S.A. The role of secondary forest in the survival and growth of native species: Tree planting field experiment in the delta of the Paran’a River (Argentina). For. Ecol. Manag. 2023, 546, 21329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brown, H.C.A.; Appiah, M.; Berninger, F.A. Old timber plantations and secondary forests attain levels of plant diversity and structure similar to primary forests in the West African humid tropics. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 518, 120271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Qi, L.; Zhao, F.Q.; Sun, J. An integrated multi-scale approach to restoring a degraded secondary forest ecosystem: A case study in the Changbai Mountains, northeastern China. Ecol. Engin. 2018, 125, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yu, D.P.; Zhou, W.M.; Zhou, L.; Dai, L.M. Exploring the history of the management theory and technology of broad-leaved Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc.) forest in Changbai Mountain Region, Northeast China. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2019, 30, 1426–1434. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. Cong, J.; Shen, H.L.; Yang, W.H.; Fan, S.H.; Zhang, Q. Effect of microenvironmental quantitative regulation ongrowth of Korean pine trees planted under secondary forest. J. For. Res. 2011, 22, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shen, H.L.; Cong, J.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, Q.; Fang, S.H.; Yang, W.H.; Liu, S.R. Effect of opening degree regulation on diameter and height increment and above ground biomass of Korean pine trees planted under secondary forest. Chin. J. App. Ecol. 2011, 22, 2781–2791. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, D.K.; Zhou, X.F.; Ding, B.Y. Research on natural secondary forest in Heilongjiang province—The management approach of planting conifers and conservation deciduous trees. J. North-East. For. Inst. 1984, 12, 1–12. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, D.K.; Zhou, X.F.; Ding, B.Y.; Hu, Z.C.; Zhu, N.; Wang, Y.H.; Zhao, H.X.; Ju, Y.G.; Jin, Y.Y. Research on natural secondary forest in Heilongjiang province—The dynamic management system. J. North-East. For. Inst. 1985, 13, 1–18. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, Q.; Fan, S.H.; Shen, H.L. Research and development on the growth environment of the young trees of Pinus koraiensis in Pinus koraiensis broadleaved mixed forest. For. Res. 2003, 16, 216–224. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, J.Q.; Wang, Y.S. Effect analysis of release cutting for young growth of artificial Korean pine forest. Chin. J. App. Eclo. 1991, 2, 8–13. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Li, X.; Dai, H.C.; Zhang, Y.P.; Guo, X.F.; Pang, Y.W.; Liu, H.T.; Fan, Z.H. Plantation of Korean pine under secondary forest and its regulation. Chin. J. App. Ecol. 1993, 4, 364–367. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Yu, L.Z.; Zhu, J.J.; Wu, Z.Z.; Lu, Z.M.; Zhao, F.J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S.L.; Li, J.; Han, Y.H.; Wang, D.; et al. Interspecific relation and adjustment technique for artificial broad-leaved Korean pine forest. J. Northeast For. Uni. 2008, 36, 5–8. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Xu, R.; Mu, C.C.; Li, W.S.; Wu, Y.X. Effect of different crown thinning intensities on Korean pine forest formed by planting conifers and protecting broad-leaved species. J. Northeast For. Uni. 2010, 38, 30–33. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, W.; Li, B.; Ma, X.; Saha, S.; Wu, H.; Zhang, P.; Shen, H. Physiological and Biochemical Traits of Needles Imply That Understory Light Conditions in the Growing Season May Be Favorable to Pinus koraiensis Trees. Forests 2023, 14, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Luo, Y.H.; Chen, Q.C.; Zhang, P.Y. The spatial pattern of coniferous forest in xinglongshan mountain and its strategies in using sun light energy. Acta Ecol. Snica 1984, 4, 10–20. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, Z.M.; Xue, L. A review on effects of forest gap. World For. Res. 2016, 29, 48–53. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. Song, X.Z.; Xiao, W.F. Research advances of microsites and regeneration within canopy gap. Sci. Silvae Sin. 2006, 42, 114–119. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  21. Tian, B.Y.; Mu, C.C.; Li, J.X.; Ye, L. Study on the photosynthetic adaptability of Pinus koraiensis to the forest gaps in different sizes and at various positions of the Betula platyphylla secondary forest in the Xiaoxing’an mountains. J. Cent. South Uni. For. Technol. 2022, 42, 159–170. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, J.X.; Mu, C.C.; Tian, B.Y.; Ye, L. Effects of gap sizes and within-gap positions on the photosynthetic capacity of Pinus koraiensis in Quercus mongolica forests in Xiaoxing’an Mountains. J. Nanjing For. Uni. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2022, 46, 159–168. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Schnake, D.K.; Forrester, J.; Sánchez Meador, A.J.; Mladenoff, D.J.; Lorimer, C.G. Tree regeneration and spatial patterning among midtolerant tree species following gap-based harvesting in a temperate hardwood forest. Front. For. Glob. Chang. 2023, 6, 1144091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, X.N.; Wang, Y.H.; Yang, Z.H.; Liu, T.; Mu, C.C. Photosynthesis adaption in Korean pine to gap size and position within Populus davidiana forests in Xiaoxing’anling, China. J. For. Res. 2022, 33, 1517–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lu, D.L.; Zhu, J.J.; Wang, X.Y.; Hao, G.Y.; Wang, G.G. A systematic evaluation of gap size and within-gap position effects on seedling regeneration in a temperate secondary forest, Northeast China. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 490, 119140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, M.H.; Du, Z.; Pan, H.L.; Yan, C.F.; Xiao, W.F.; Lei, J.P. Effects of neighboring woody plants on target trees with emphasis on effects of understorey shrubs on overstorey physiology in forest communities: A mini-review. Community Ecol. 2012, 13, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aarssen, L.W. Body size and fitness in plants: Revisiting the selection consequences of competition. Perspect. Plant Eco. Evol. Syst. 2015, 17, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Thorpe, H.C.; Astrup, R.; Trowbridge, A.; Coates, K.D. Competition and tree crowns: A neighborhood analysis of three boreal tree species. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 259, 1586–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. The basic stand status in the three investigation sites.
Table 1. The basic stand status in the three investigation sites.
Sampling SitesUpper Layer Broadleaved TreesUnder-Canopy Korean Pines Trees
Age (Year)Density (Trees/ha)Mean Height (m)Mean DBH (cm)Age (Year)Density (Trees/ha)Mean Height (m)Mean DBH (cm)
Shanhetun30–6076312.5515.671814502.352.35
Maoershan30–60125012.1715.571812502.632.82
Fangzheng30–60102512.7015.801811802.582.47
Table 2. Tree species composition of broadleaved species in different sampling plots.
Table 2. Tree species composition of broadleaved species in different sampling plots.
Sampling SitesSlope AspectsTree Species Composition
ShanhetunEastern slope3(Ulmus pumila) 2(Acer mono) 2(Betula platyphylla) 1(Fraxinus mandshurica) 1(Phellodendron amurense) + (Populus davidiana) + (Rhamnus davurica) + (Maackia amurensis)
Southern slope3(Betula platyphylla) 2(Fraxinus mandshurica) 2(Juglans mandshurica) 2(Tilia amurensis) + (Quercus mongolica) + (Phellodendron amurense) + (Maackia amurensis) + (Ulmus pumila)
Western slope2(Populus davidiana) 2(Tilia amurensis) 2(Ulmus pumila) 1(Juglans mandshurica) 1(Fraxinus mandshurica) 1Quercus mongolica) + (Maackia amurensis) + (Rhamnus davurica) + (Phellodendron amurense)
Northern slope3(Ulmus pumila) 2(Tilia amurensis) 2(Quercus mongolica) 1(Acer mono) 1(Fraxinus mandshurica) + (Phellodendron amurense) + (Maackia amurensis) + (Populus davidiana)
MaoershanEastern slope5(Tilia amurensis) 2(Fraxinus mandshurica) 1(Acer mono) 1(Quercus mongolica) + (Ulmus pumila) + (Betula platyphylla) + (Juglans mandshurica) + (Populus davidiana)
Southern slope4(Fraxinus mandshurica) 2(Phellodendron amurense) 2(Betula platyphylla) 1(Ulmus pumila) + (Quercus mongolica) + (Juglans mandshurica) + (Tilia amurensis) + (Populus davidiana)
Western slope4(Betula platyphylla) 2(Tilia amurensis) 1(Ulmus pumila) 1(Fraxinus mandshurica) 1(Juglans mandshurica) + (Quercus mongolica) + (Acer mono) + (Phellodendron amurense)
Northern slope4Tilia amurensis) 2(Quercus mongolica) 2(Acer mono) 1(Maackia amurensis) + (Ulmus pumila) + (Phellodendron amurense) + (Populus davidiana) + (Juglans mandshurica)
FangzhengEastern slope4(Fraxinus mandshurica) 2(Ulmus pumila) 1(Maackia amurensis) 1(Phellodendron amurense) 1(Larix gmelinii) + (Juglans mandshurica) + (Rhamnus davurica) + (Tilia amurensis)
Southern slope4(Betula platyphylla) 2(Fraxinus mandshurica) 1(Phellodendron amurense) 1(Populus davidiana) 1(Larix gmelinii) + (Acer mono) + (Quercus mongolica) + (Tilia amurensis)
Western slope5(Tilia amurensis) 1(Fraxinus mandshurica) 1(Juglans mandshurica) 1(Betula platyphylla) 1(Maackia amurensis) + (Phellodendron amurense) + (Ulmus pumila) + (Pinus koraiensis)
Northern slope4(Tilia amurensis) 2(Ulmus pumila) 1(Quercus mongolica) 1(Acer mono) 1(Maackia amurensis) + (Larix gmelinii) + (Juglans mandshurica) + (Fraxinus mandshurica)
Note: Counting the species composition according to the number of plants, 34.9%–25.0% is referred to as 3; 24.9%–15.0% is referred to as 2; 14.9%–5.0% is referred to as 1; 4.9%–2.0% is referred to as +; and <1.9% is referred to as −.
Table 3. Diameter at breast height (DBH) of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the DBH range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Shanhetun investigation site.
Table 3. Diameter at breast height (DBH) of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the DBH range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Shanhetun investigation site.
Opening
Degree
(K)
Adjacent Broadleaved Tree Positions Relative to the Target Korean Pine TreesDBH Range of Adjacent Broadleaved Trees Arround the Target Korean Pine Trees
11.0–13.5 (cm)13.6–16.0 (cm)16.1–18.5 (cm)18.6–21.0 (cm)
K = 2.0East side2.76 ± 0.023 aA2.59 ± 0.026 aA2.48 ± 0.025 aA2.37 ± 0.023 aA
South side2.63 ± 0.012 bA2.52 ± 0.015 bA2.40 ± 0.026 bA2.21 ± 0.008 bB
West side2.67 ± 0.012 bA2.48 ± 0.028 bA2.39 ± 0.011 bA2.22 ± 0.028 bB
North side2.75 ± 0.017 aA2.62 ± 0.021 aA2.51 ± 0.016 aA2.39 ± 0.022 aA
K = 1.5East side2.66 ± 0.021 aA2.58 ± 0.014 aA2.51 ± 0.021 aA2.39 ± 0.031 aA
South side2.48 ± 0.016 bA2.46 ± 0.023 bA2.44 ± 0.019 bA2.13 ± 0.016 bB
West side2.57 ± 0.019 aA2.49 ± 0.026 bA2.43 ± 0.026 bA2.23 ± 0.024 bB
North side2.61 ± 0.015 aA2.65 ± 0.024 aA2.58 ± 0.033 aA2.40 ± 0.018 aB
K = 1.0East side2.52 ± 0.014 aA2.47 ± 0.025 aA2.36 ± 0.025 aA2.12 ± 0.056 aB
South side2.32 ± 0.022 bA2.28 ± 0.028 bA2.22 ± 0.029 bA2.03 ± 0.034 bB
West side2.36 ± 0.024 bA2.28 ± 0.033 bA2.24 ± 0.018 bA2.06 ± 0.025 bB
North side2.48 ± 0.019 aA2.39 ± 0.017 aA2.31 ± 0.014 aA2.26 ± 0.037 cA
K = 0.5East side2.32 ± 0.035 aA2.24 ± 0.034 aA2.14 ± 0.028 aB2.08 ± 0.043 aB
South side2.21 ± 0.025 bA2.11 ± 0.024 bB2.07 ± 0.023 aB2.04 ± 0.045 aB
West side2.27 ± 0.026 bA2.17 ± 0.035 bB2.10 ± 0.035 aB2.06 ± 0.032 aB
North side2.35 ± 0.019 aA2.26 ± 0.017 aA2.16 ± 0.042 aA2.09 ± 0.016 aB
Note: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the DBHs of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations (positions) of east, south, west, and north within the same opening degree level. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the DBHs of Korean pine trees along with the DBH ranges of the adjacent broadleaved trees at the same orientations (positions) of the adjacent broadleaved trees relative to the target Korean pine trees.
Table 4. DBH of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the height range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Shanhetun investigation site.
Table 4. DBH of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the height range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Shanhetun investigation site.
Opening Degree
(K)
Adjacent Broadleaved Tree Positions Relative to the Target Korean Pine TreesHeight Range of Adjacent Broadleaved Trees Arround the Target Korean Pine Trees
10.5–11.5 (m)11.6–12.5 (m)12.6–13.5 (m)13.6–14.5 (m)
K = 2.0East side2.76 ± 0.011 aA2.62 ± 0.018 aA2.45 ± 0.016 aA2.33 ± 0.013 aA
South side2.66 ± 0.006 bA2.55 ± 0.023 bA2.39 ± 0.014 bA2.24 ± 0.009 bA
West side2.66 ± 0.009 bA2.52 ± 0.013 bA2.37 ± 0.009 bA2.25 ± 0.015 bA
North side2.73 ± 0.009 aA2.63 ± 0.015 aA2.47 ± 0.006 aA2.31 ± 0.019 aA
K = 1.5East side2.63 ± 0.011 aA2.53 ± 0.028 aA2.46 ± 0.022 aA2.31 ± 0.026 aA
South side2.52 ± 0.023 bA2.45 ± 0.016 bA2.40 ± 0.025 aA2.18 ± 0.012 bB
West side2.47 ± 0.008 bA2.39 ± 0.017 bA2.28 ± 0.009 bA2.15 ± 0.012 bB
North side2.61 ± 0.032 aA2.52 ± 0.033 aA2.42 ± 0.019 aA2.29 ± 0.028 aA
K = 1.0East side2.49 ± 0.023 aA2.48 ± 0.032 aA2.38 ± 0.033 aA2.13 ± 0.029 aB
South side2.33 ± 0.053 bA2.29 ± 0.027 bA2.21 ± 0.024 bA2.04 ± 0.035 bB
West side2.38 ± 0.024 bA2.31 ± 0.016 bA2.22 ± 0.027 bA2.06 ± 0.026 bB
North side2.51 ± 0.035 aA2.42 ± 0.023 aA2.29 ± 0.016 aA2.20 ± 0.024 aA
K = 0.5East side2.35 ± 0.024 aA2.26 ± 0.024 aA2.13 ± 0.028 aB2.10 ± 0.018 aB
South side2.24 ± 0.027 bA2.10 ± 0.025 bB2.09 ± 0.035 aB2.06 ± 0.015 aB
West side2.29 ± 0.036 bA2.11 ± 0.013 bB2.10 ± 0.024 aB2.06 ± 0.032 aB
North side2.37 ± 0.041 aA2.25 ± 0.024 aA2.16 ± 0.015 aA2.11 ± 0.024 aA
Note: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the DBHs of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations (positions) of east, south, west, and north within the same opening degree level. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the DBHs of Korean pine trees along with the height ranges of the adjacent broadleaved trees at the same orientations (positions) of the adjacent broadleaved trees relative to the target Korean pine trees.
Table 5. DBH of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the DBH range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Maoershan site.
Table 5. DBH of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the DBH range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Maoershan site.
Opening Degree
(K)
Adjacent Broadleaved Tree Positions Relative to the Target Korean Pine TreesDBH Range of Adjacent Broadleaved Trees Arround the Target Korean Pine Trees
11.0–13.5 (cm)13.6–16.0 (cm)16.1–18.5 (cm)18.6–21.0 (cm)
K = 2.0East side3.56 ± 0.021 aA3.45 ± 0.024 aA3.32 ± 0.032 aA3.11 ± 0.025 aA
South side3.11 ± 0.014 bA3.01 ± 0.025 bA2.76 ± 0.022 bB2.66 ± 0.023 bB
West side3.03 ± 0.009 bA2.87 ± 0.011 bA2.64 ± 0.019 bA2.43 ± 0.011 bA
North side3.54 ± 0.018 aA3.42 ± 0.018 aA3.21 ± 0.016 aA2.87 ± 0.014 bB
K = 1.5East side3.36 ± 0.055 aA3.15 ± 0.045 aA2.87 ± 0.039 aA2.43 ± 0.051 aB
South side3.05 ± 0.048 bA2.81 ± 0.029 bA2.76 ± 0.044 aA2.37 ± 0.035 bB
West side3.18 ± 0.036 bA3.01 ± 0.033 aA2.80 ± 0.048 aA2.39 ± 0.035 bB
North side3.45 ± 0.043 aA3.24 ± 0.058 aA3.02 ± 0.028 bA2.76 ± 0.047 aA
K = 1.0East side3.31 ± 0.026 aA3.23 ± 0.025 aA3.11 ± 0.035 aA2.98 ± 0.026 aA
South side3.15 ± 0.016 bA3.01 ± 0.027 bA2.54 ± 0.032 bB2.38 ± 0.035 bB
West side3.06 ± 0.019 bA2.91 ± 0.037 bA2.66 ± 0.022 bB2.43 ± 0.025 bB
North side3.28 ± 0.032 aA3.19 ± 0.029 aA2.98 ± 0.027 aA2.87 ± 0.019 aA
K = 0.5East side2.94 ± 0.036 aA2.72 ± 0.009 aA2.43 ± 0.036 aB2.28 ± 0.034 aB
South side2.72 ± 0.027 bA2.54 ± 0.012 bB2.37 ± 0.024 aB2.18 ± 0.045 aB
West side2.76 ± 0.024 bA2.56 ± 0.015 bB2.34 ± 0.035 aB2.11 ± 0.029 aB
North side2.89 ± 0.034 aA2.69 ± 0.021 aA2.44 ± 0.019 aB2.24 ± 0.017 aB
Note: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the DBHs of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations (positions) of east, south, west, and north within the same opening degree level. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the DBHs of Korean pine trees along with the DBH ranges of the adjacent broadleaved trees at the same orientations (positions) of the adjacent broadleaved trees relative to the target Korean pine trees.
Table 6. DBH of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the height range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Maoershan site.
Table 6. DBH of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the height range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Maoershan site.
Opening Degree
(K)
Adjacent Broadleaved tree Positions Relative to the Target Korean Pine TreesHeight Range of Adjacent Broadleaved Trees Arround the Target Korean Pine Trees
10.5–11.5 (m)11.6–12.5 (m)12.6–13.5 (m)13.6–14.5 (m)
K = 2.0East side3.52 ± 0.017 aA3.43 ± 0.032 aA3.30 ± 0.023 aA3.09 ± 0.019 aA
South side3.26 ± 0.026 bA3.13 ± 0.012 bA2.91 ± 0.008 bB2.77 ± 0.017 bB
West side3.14 ± 0.012 bA2.97 ± 0.019 bA2.78 ± 0.022 bA2.61 ± 0.027 bA
North side3.51 ± 0.019 aA3.39 ± 0.026 aA3.17 ± 0.013 aA2.96 ± 0.015 aA
K = 1.5East side3.42 ± 0.038 aA3.19 ± 0.037 aA2.96 ± 0.023 aA2.51 ± 0.022 aB
South side3.16 ± 0.032 bA3.01 ± 0.031 bA2.86 ± 0.033 aA2.49 ± 0.026 aB
West side3.12 ± 0.029 bA3.05 ± 0.045 bA2.86 ± 0.036 aA2.31 ± 0.038 aB
North side3.38 ± 0.051 aA3.21 ± 0.023 aA3.19 ± 0.018 bA2.87 ± 0.033 bA
K = 1.0East side3.35 ± 0.025 aA3.25 ± 0.034 aA3.15 ± 0.026 aA3.01 ± 0.024 aA
South side3.13 ± 0.035 bA3.09 ± 0.054 bA2.58 ± 0.036 bA2.36 ± 0.036 bB
West side3.11 ± 0.023 bA2.99 ± 0.026 bA2.66 ± 0.015 bB2.39 ± 0.045 bB
North side3.29 ± 0.018 aA3.23 ± 0.027 aA2.99 ± 0.024 aA2.88 ± 0.025 aA
K = 0.5East side2.91 ± 0.032 aA2.75 ± 0.013 aA2.45 ± 0.023 aB2.25 ± 0.035 aB
South side2.77 ± 0.033 bA2.55 ± 0.012 bB2.40 ± 0.019 aB2.19 ± 0.026 aB
West side2.74 ± 0.043 bA2.57 ± 0.027 bB2.38 ± 0.026 aB2.15 ± 0.035 aB
North side2.92 ± 0.018 aA2.68 ± 0.038 aA2.41 ± 0.037 aB2.22 ± 0.024 aB
Note: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the DBHs of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations (positions) of east, south, west, and north within the same opening degree level. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the DBHs of Korean pine trees along with the height ranges of the adjacent broadleaved trees at the same orientations (positions) of the adjacent broadleaved trees relative to the target Korean pine trees.
Table 7. DBH of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the DBH range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Fangzheng site.
Table 7. DBH of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the DBH range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Fangzheng site.
Opening Degree
(K)
Adjacent Broadleaved tree Positions Relative to the Target Korean Pine TreesDBH Range of Adjacent Broadleaved Trees Arround the Target Korean Pine Trees
11.0–13.5 (cm)13.6–16.0 (cm)16.1–18.5 (cm)18.6–21.0 (cm)
K = 2.0East side2.83 ± 0.018 aA2.71 ± 0.023 aA2.62 ± 0.024 aA2.43 ± 0.043 aB
South side2.71 ± 0.027 bA2.67 ± 0.031 aA2.36 ± 0.031 bB2.24 ± 0.022 bB
West side2.68 ± 0.025 bA2.54 ± 0.038 bA2.44 ± 0.019 bA2.19 ± 0.029 bB
North side2.76 ± 0.012 bA2.68 ± 0.041 aA2.59 ± 0.033a A2.48 ± 0.023 aA
K = 1.5East side2.75 ± 0.008 aA2.66 ± 0.015 aA2.56 ± 0.025a A2.48 ± 0.023 aA
South side2.71 ± 0.014 aA2.63 ± 0.021 aA2.50 ± 0.028 aA2.24 ± 0.016 bB
West side2.69 ± 0.022 aA2.58 ± 0.009 aA2.49 ± 0.013 aA2.28 ± 0.018 bB
North side2.86 ± 0.016 bA2.78 ± 0.018 bA2.69 ± 0.006 bA2.60 ± 0.026 aA
K = 1.0East side2.76 ± 0.035 aA2.66 ± 0.036 aA2.53 ± 0.025 aA2.41 ± 0.025 aA
South side2.66 ± 0.019 bA2.57 ± 0.027 bA2.38 ± 0.018 bB2.27 ± 0.034 bB
West side2.61 ± 0.028 bA2.52 ± 0.022 bA2.39 ± 0.009 bA2.19 ± 0.013 bB
North side2.72 ± 0.031 aA2.63 ± 0.017 aA2.54 ± 0.032 aA2.44 ± 0.022 aA
K = 0.5East side2.44 ± 0.035 aA2.36 ± 0.033 aA2.27 ± 0.017 aA2.18 ± 0.034 aA
South side2.31 ± 0.026 bA2.28 ± 0.024 bA2.19 ± 0.023 bB2.15 ± 0.024 aB
West side2.39 ± 0.022 aA2.31 ± 0.028 bA2.27 ± 0.026 aA2.16 ± 0.015 aB
North side2.41 ± 0.016 aA2.37 ± 0.019 aA2.31 ± 0.035 aA2.28 ± 0.019 aA
Note: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the DBHs of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations (positions) of east, south, west, and north within the same opening degree level. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the DBHs of Korean pine trees along with the DBH ranges of the adjacent broadleaved trees at the same orientations (positions) of the adjacent broadleaved trees relative to the target Korean pine trees.
Table 8. DBH of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the height range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Fangzheng site.
Table 8. DBH of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the height range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Fangzheng site.
Opening Degree
(K)
Adjacent Broadleaved Tree Positions Relative to the Target Korean Pine TreesHeight Range of Adjacent Broadleaved Trees Arround the Target Korean Pine Trees
10.5–11.5 (m)11.6–12.5 (m)12.6–13.5 (m)13.6–14.5 (m)
K = 2.0East side2.80 ± 0.016 aA2.69 ± 0.013 aA2.59 ± 0.023 aA2.48 ± 0.016 aA
South side2.68 ± 0.012 bA2.61 ± 0.011 bA2.53 ± 0.027 aA2.26 ± 0.011 bB
West side2.69 ± 0.033 bA2.58 ± 0.031 bA2.46 ± 0.012 bA2.23 ± 0.018 bB
North side2.79 ± 0.025 aA2.71 ± 0.026 aA2.62 ± 0.029 aA2.50 ± 0.026 aA
K = 1.5East side2.74 ± 0.016 aA2.69 ± 0.027 aA2.58 ± 0.033 aA2.49 ± 0.019 aA
South side2.72 ± 0.026 aA2.68 ± 0.036 aA2.44 ± 0.019 bB2.32 ± 0.018 bB
West side2.66 ± 0.019 bA2.59 ± 0.012 bA2.51 ± 0.027 bA2.28 ± 0.024 bB
North side2.79 ± 0.023 aA2.71 ± 0.019 aA2.62 ± 0.025 aA2.55 ± 0.035 aA
K = 1.0East side2.74 ± 0.035 aA2.68 ± 0.036 aA2.56 ± 0.025 aA2.44 ± 0.025 aA
South side2.65 ± 0.019 bA2.56 ± 0.027 bA2.41 ± 0.018 bB2.30 ± 0.034 bB
West side2.59 ± 0.028 bA2.55 ± 0.022 bA2.42 ± 0.009 bA2.21 ± 0.013 bB
North side2.68 ± 0.031 aA2.66 ± 0.017 aA2.57 ± 0.032 aA2.47 ± 0.022 aA
K = 0.5East side2.48 ± 0.035 aA2.38 ± 0.033 aA2.33 ± 0.017 aA2.20 ± 0.034 aA
South side2.30 ± 0.026 bA2.31 ± 0.024 aA2.23 ± 0.023 bB2.19 ± 0.024 aB
West side2.36 ± 0.022 bA2.29 ± 0.028 aA2.28 ± 0.026 aA2.18 ± 0.015 aB
North side2.39 ± 0.016b A2.35 ± 0.019 aA2.29 ± 0.035 aA2.24 ± 0.019 aA
Note: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the DBHs of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations (positions) of east, south, west, and north within the same opening degree level. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the DBHs of Korean pine trees along with the height ranges of the adjacent broadleaved trees at the same orientations (positions) of the adjacent broadleaved trees relative to the target Korean pine trees.
Table 9. Height of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the DBH range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Shanhetun site.
Table 9. Height of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the DBH range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Shanhetun site.
Opening Degree
(K)
Adjacent Broadleaved Tree Positions Relative to the Target Korean Pine TreesDBH Range of Adjacent Broadleaved Trees Arround the Target Korean Pine Trees
11.0–13.5 (cm)13.6–16.0 (cm)16.1–18.5 (cm)18.6–21.0 (cm)
K = 2.0East side2.74 ± 0.005 aA2.58 ± 0.027 aA2.60 ± 0.033 aB2.36 ± 0.051 aB
South side2.69 ± 0.023 bA2.58 ± 0.027 aA2.56 ± 0.036 bA2.44 ± 0.010 bA
West side2.73 ± 0.029 aA2.58 ± 0.027 aA2.46 ± 0.037 cA2.32 ± 0.018 aA
North side2.74 ± 0.006 aA2.62 ± 0.038 bA2.54 ± 0.006 bA2.29 ± 0.030 cB
K = 1.5East side2.48 ± 0.032 aA2.41 ± 0.034 aA2.37 ± 0.032 aA2.31 ± 0.035a A
South side2.46 ± 0.026 aA2.39 ± 0.028 aA2.28 ± 0.019 bB2.24 ± 0.051 bB
West side2.32 ± 0.041 bA2.29 ± 0.036 bA2.26 ± 0.033 bA2.19 ± 0.029 bB
North side2.56 ± 0.029 aA2.47 ± 0.042 aA2.41 ± 0.044 aA2.39 ± 0.033 aA
K = 1.0East side2.71 ± 0.024 aA2.65 ± 0.026 aA2.53 ± 0.026 aA2.43 ± 0.015 aA
South side2.55 ± 0.031 bA2.48 ± 0.013 bA2.26 ± 0.023 bB2.17 ± 0.019 bB
West side2.66 ± 0.014 aA2.54 ± 0.009 bA2.46 ± 0.021 aA2.37 ± 0.042 aA
North side2.69 ± 0.016 aA2.61 ± 0.023 aA2.57 ± 0.034 aA2.42 ± 0.044 aA
K = 0.5East side2.31 ± 0.023 aA2.27 ± 0.016 aA2.21 ± 0.019 aA2.14 ± 0.023 aA
South side2.26 ± 0.024 bA2.22 ± 0.023 bA2.18 ± 0.021 aA2.13 ± 0.028 aA
West side2.24 ± 0.018 bA2.18 ± 0.043 bA2.15 ± 0.025 aA2.11 ± 0.015 aA
North side2.34 ± 0.032 aA2.28 ± 0.027 aA2.21 ± 0.032 aA2.16 ± 0.029 aA
Note: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the heights of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations (positions) of east, south, west, and north within the same opening degree level. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the heights of Korean pine trees along with the DBH ranges of the adjacent broadleaved trees at the same orientations (positions) of the adjacent broadleaved trees relative to the target Korean pine trees.
Table 10. Height of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations (positions) along with the height range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Shanhetun site.
Table 10. Height of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations (positions) along with the height range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Shanhetun site.
Opening Degree
(K)
Adjacent Broadleaved Tree Positions Relative to the Target Korean Pine TreesHeight Range of Adjacent Broadleaved Trees Arround the Target Korean Pine Trees
10.5–11.5 (m)11.6–12.5 (m)12.6–13.5 (m)13.6–14.5 (m)
K = 2.0East side2.69 ± 0.018 aA2.56 ± 0.019 aA2.48 ± 0.035 aA2.41 ± 0.037 aA
South side2.61 ± 0.032 bA2.54 ± 0.015 aA2.49 ± 0.024 aA2.42 ± 0.019 aA
West side2.67 ± 0.012 aA2.58 ± 0.033 aA2.49 ± 0.009 aA2.36 ± 0.023 bA
North side2.73 ± 0.023 aA2.68 ± 0.026 bA2.54 ± 0.017 bA2.31 ± 0.045 bB
K = 1.5East side2.52 ± 0.032 aA2.46 ± 0.034 aA2.41 ± 0.032 aA2.36 ± 0.035 aA
South side2.50 ± 0.026 aA2.43 ± 0.028 aA2.38 ± 0.019 aA2.24 ± 0.051 bB
West side2.41 ± 0.041 bA2.37 ± 0.036 bA2.31 ± 0.033 bA2.26 ± 0.029 bA
North side2.54 ± 0.029 aA2.45 ± 0.042 aA2.39 ± 0.044 aA2.35 ± 0.033 aA
K = 1.0East side2.73 ± 0.028 aA2.61 ± 0.025 aA2.56 ± 0.024 aA2.44 ± 0.015 aA
South side2.54 ± 0.029 bA2.47 ± 0.026 bA2.28 ± 0.016 bB2.29 ± 0.024 bB
West side2.68 ± 0.031 aA2.52 ± 0.017 bA2.49 ± 0.018 aA2.33 ± 0.025 aA
North side2.70 ± 0.018 aA2.59 ± 0.032 aA2.56 ± 0.016 aA2.42 ± 0.032 aA
K = 0.5East side2.33 ± 0.017 aA2.28 ± 0.028 aA2.25 ± 0.013 aA2.15 ± 0.035 aB
South side2.24 ± 0.041 bA2.23 ± 0.035 bA2.21 ± 0.014 aA2.13 ± 0.025 aA
West side2.25 ± 0.025 bA2.20 ± 0.019 bA2.18 ± 0.027 aA2.12 ± 0.012 aA
North side2.36 ± 0.028 aA2.30 ± 0.021 aA2.23 ± 0.018 aA2.18 ± 0.019 aA
Note: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the heights of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations (positions) of east, south, west, and north within the same opening degree level. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the heights of Korean pine trees along with the height ranges of the adjacent broadleaved trees at the same orientations (positions) of the adjacent broadleaved trees relative to the target Korean pine trees.
Table 11. Height of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the DBH range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Maoershan site.
Table 11. Height of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the DBH range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Maoershan site.
Opening Degree
(K)
Adjacent Broadleaved Tree Positions Relative to the Target Korean Pine TreesDBH Range of Adjacent Broadleaved Trees Arround the Target Korean Pine Trees
11.0–13.5 (cm)13.6–16.0 (cm)16.1–18.5 (cm)18.6–21.0 (cm)
K = 2.0East side2.88 ± 0.042 aA2.76 ± 0.041 aA2.66 ± 0.026 aA2.48 ± 0.028 aB
South side2.65 ± 0.034 bA2.54 ± 0.035 bB2.48 ± 0.019 bB2.42 ± 0.018 aB
West side2.61 ± 0.031 bA2.57 ± 0.052 bA2.54 ± 0.033 bA2.41 ± 0.022 aB
North side2.73 ± 0.029 bA2.69 ± 0.039 aA2.62 ± 0.024 aA2.58 ± 0.033 bA
K = 1.5East side2.79 ± 0.014 aA2.70 ± 0.008 aA2.64 ± 0.021 aA2.58 ± 0.033 aA
South side2.76 ± 0.028 aA2.65 ± 0.023 aA2.45 ± 0.021 bB2.36 ± 0.023 bB
West side2.65 ± 0.013 bA2.60 ± 0.017 aA2.51 ± 0.011 bB2.43 ± 0.018 bB
North side2.81 ± 0.009 aA2.76 ± 0.016 bA2.68 ± 0.034 aA2.46 ± 0.016 bB
K = 1.0East side2.76 ± 0.025 aA2.68 ± 0.019 aA2.62 ± 0.014 aA2.48 ± 0.023 aB
South side2.54 ± 0.029 bA2.49 ± 0.017 bA2.31 ± 0.024 bB2.26 ± 0.034 bB
West side2.69 ± 0.014 bA2.58 ± 0.023 bA2.33 ± 0.027 bB2.31 ± 0.032 bB
North side2.72 ± 0.034 aA2.66 ± 0.043 aA2.54 ± 0.016 aA2.46 ± 0.021 aA
K = 0.5East side2.65 ± 0.019 aA2.56 ± 0.024 aA2.45 ± 0.023 aA2.37 ± 0.024 aA
South side2.62 ± 0.016 aA2.57 ± 0.029 aA2.43 ± 0.015 aB2.35 ± 0.025 aB
West side2.55 ± 0.023 bA2.44 ± 0.013 bB2.39 ± 0.027 aB2.33 ± 0.026 aB
North side2.64 ± 0.032 aA2.61 ± 0.037 aA2.46 ± 0.035 aB2.40 ± 0.035 aB
Note: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the heights of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations (positions) of east, south, west, and north within the same opening degree level. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the heights of Korean pine trees along with the DBH ranges of the adjacent broadleaved trees at the same orientations (positions) of the adjacent broadleaved trees relative to the target Korean pine trees.
Table 12. Height of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the height range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Maoershan site.
Table 12. Height of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the height range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Maoershan site.
Opening Degree
(K)
Adjacent Broadleaved Tree Positions Relative to the Target Korean Pine TreesHeight Range of Adjacent Broadleaved Trees Arround the Target Korean Pine Trees
10.5–11.5 (m)11.6–12.5 (m)12.6–13.5 (m)13.6–14.5 (m)
K = 2.0East side2.79 ± 0.033 aA2.68 ± 0.027 aA2.61 ± 0.032 aA2.53 ± 0.034 aA
South side2.63 ± 0.028 bA2.59 ± 0.025 bA2.52 ± 0.046 aA2.40 ± 0.026 bB
West side2.61 ± 0.012 bA2.58 ± 0.033 bA2.56 ± 0.038 aA2.44 ± 0.026 bB
North side2.86 ± 0.017 aA2.79 ± 0.029 aA2.69 ± 0.019 bA2.59 ± 0.017 aA
K = 1.5East side2.82 ± 0.025 aA2.72 ± 0.025 aA2.62 ± 0.016 aA2.56 ± 0.022 aA
South side2.77 ± 0.013 aA2.68 ± 0.018 aA2.58 ± 0.027 bA2.41 ± 0.025 bB
West side2.64 ± 0.012 bA2.61 ± 0.013 aA2.57 ± 0.034 bA2.45 ± 0.033 bB
North side2.81 ± 0.017 aA2.77 ± 0.028 aA2.65 ± 0.018 aA2.58 ± 0.028 aA
K = 1.0East side2.74 ± 0.024 aA2.66 ± 0.028 aA2.63 ± 0.028 aA2.45 ± 0.017 aB
South side2.56 ± 0.033 bA2.51 ± 0.015 bA2.35 ± 0.033 bB2.29 ± 0.024 bB
West side2.70 ± 0.016 aA2.55 ± 0.024 bA2.37 ± 0.036 bB2.35 ± 0.017 bB
North side2.75 ± 0.014 aA2.61 ± 0.026 aA2.58 ± 0.018 aA2.51 ± 0.019 aA
K = 0.5East side2.66 ± 0.025 aA2.58 ± 0.035 aA2.47 ± 0.034 aA2.35 ± 0.034 aA
South side2.59 ± 0.009 bA2.60 ± 0.026 aA2.44 ± 0.013 aB2.36 ± 0.014 aB
West side2.58 ± 0.024 bA2.48 ± 0.027 bB2.43 ± 0.024 aB2.32 ± 0.017 aB
North side2.61 ± 0.015 bA2.65 ± 0.016 aA2.42 ± 0.017 aB2.39 ± 0.025 aB
Note: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the heights of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations (positions) of east, south, west, and north within the same opening degree level. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the heights of Korean pine trees along with the height ranges of the adjacent broadleaved trees at the same orientations (positions) of the adjacent broadleaved trees relative to the target Korean pine trees.
Table 13. Height of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the DBH range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Fangzheng site.
Table 13. Height of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the DBH range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Fangzheng site.
Opening Degree
(K)
Adjacent Broadleaved Tree Positions Relative to the Target Korean Pine TreesDBH Range of Adjacent Broadleaved Trees Arround the Target Korean Pine Trees
11.0–13.5 (cm)13.6–16.0 (cm)16.1–18.5 (cm)18.6–21.0 (cm)
K = 2.0East side2.80 ± 0.041 aA2.77 ± 0.034 aA2.69 ± 0.018 aA2.56 ± 0.029 aB
South side2.79 ± 0.036 aA2.60 ± 0.026 bB2.52 ± 0.035 bB2.48 ± 0.035 bB
West side2.66 ± 0.022 bA2.58 ± 0.024 bA2.48 ± 0.047 bB2.41 ± 0.034 bB
North side2.84 ± 0.025 aA2.76 ± 0.018 aA2.66 ± 0.027 aA2.57 ± 0.012 aA
K = 1.5East side2.81 ± 0.023 aA2.75 ± 0.044 aA2.70 ± 0.037 aA2.62 ± 0.028 aB
South side2.76 ± 0.028 aA2.71 ± 0.024 aA2.67 ± 0.046 aA2.46 ± 0.019 bB
West side2.66 ± 0.029 bA2.61 ± 0.035 bA2.50 ± 0.027 bB2.47 ± 0.038 bB
North side2.79 ± 0.033 aA2.71 ± 0.025 aA2.65 ± 0.025 aA2.61 ± 0.024 aA
K = 1.0East side2.81 ± 0.026 aA2.77 ± 0.013 aA2.62 ± 0.024 aB2.52 ± 0.052 aB
South side2.75 ± 0.021 aA2.69 ± 0.024 bA2.51 ± 0.022 bB2.44 ± 0.046 aB
West side2.64 ± 0.014 bA2.58 ± 0.022 bA2.41 ± 0.012 bB2.33 ± 0.026 bB
North side2.78 ± 0.011 aA2.71 ± 0.019 aA2.64 ± 0.026 aA2.49 ± 0.022 aB
K = 0.5East side2.66 ± 0.026 aA2.54 ± 0.023 aA2.44 ± 0.019 aA2.36 ± 0.015 aA
South side2.51 ± 0.031 bA2.42 ± 0.016 bB2.37 ± 0.011 aB2.31 ± 0.025 aB
West side2.53 ± 0.022 bA2.42 ± 0.027 bB2.40 ± 0.015 aB2.33 ± 0.022 aB
North side2.62 ± 0.025 aA2.54 ± 0.031 aA2.43 ± 0.027 aA2.39 ± 0.037 aA
Note: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the heights of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations (positions) of east, south, west, and north within the same opening degree level. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicate a significant differences at the 0.05 level among the heights of Korean pine trees along with the DBH ranges of the adjacent broadleaved trees at the same orientations (positions) of the adjacent broadleaved trees relative to the target Korean pine trees.
Table 14. Height of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the height range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Fangzheng site.
Table 14. Height of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations along with the height range of the adjacent broadleaved trees around the target Korean pine trees in the Fangzheng site.
Opening Degree
(K)
Adjacent Broadleaved Tree Positions Relative to the Target Korean Pine TreesHeight Range of Adjacent Broadleaved Trees Arround the Target Korean Pine Trees
10.5–11.5 (m)11.6–12.5 (m)12.6–13.5 (m)13.6–14.5 (m)
K = 2.0East side2.81 ± 0.033 aA2.76 ± 0.024 aA2.66 ± 0.026 aA2.54 ± 0.037 aA
South side2.80 ± 0.028 aA2.71 ± 0.018 aA2.58 ± 0.016 bB2.44 ± 0.027 bB
West side2.69 ± 0.036 bA2.61 ± 0.022 bA2.46 ± 0.034 cB2.39 ± 0.015 bB
North side2.85 ± 0.019 aA2.79 ± 0.026 aA2.68 ± 0.022 aA2.57 ± 0.022 aA
K = 1.5East side2.79 ± 0.028 aA2.71 ± 0.024 aA2.66 ± 0.016 aA2.51 ± 0.023 aB
South side2.77 ± 0.013 aA2.69 ± 0.034 aA2.60 ± 0.025 aA2.41 ± 0.036 bB
West side2.61 ± 0.017 bA2.56 ± 0.017 bA2.45 ± 0.038 bB2.39 ± 0.024 bB
North side2.79 ± 0.014 aA2.72 ± 0.035 aA2.65 ± 0.019 aA2.59 ± 0.016 aA
K = 1.0East side2.79 ± 0.026 aA2.79 ± 0.013 aA2.65 ± 0.024 aB2.55 ± 0.052 aB
South side2.72 ± 0.021 aA2.64 ± 0.024 bA2.51 ± 0.022 bB2.48 ± 0.046 aB
West side2.65 ± 0.014 bA2.60 ± 0.022 bA2.44 ± 0.012 bB2.34 ± 0.026 bB
North side2.76 ± 0.011 aA2.74 ± 0.019 aA2.66 ± 0.026 aA2.48 ± 0.022 aB
K = 0.5East side2.65 ± 0.026 aA2.55 ± 0.023 aA2.45 ± 0.019 aA2.34 ± 0.015 aA
South side2.53 ± 0.031 bA2.45 ± 0.016 bB2.41 ± 0.011 aB2.29 ± 0.025 aB
West side2.52 ± 0.022 bA2.41 ± 0.027 bB2.39 ± 0.015 aB2.30 ± 0.022 aB
North side2.61 ± 0.025 aA2.57 ± 0.031 aA2.43 ± 0.027 aB2.35 ± 0.037 aB
Note: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the heights of Korean pine trees with adjacent broadleaved trees at different orientations (positions) of east, south, west, and north within the same opening degree level. Different uppercase letters in the same row indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level among the heights of Korean pine trees along with the height ranges of the adjacent broadleaved trees at the same orientations (positions) of the adjacent broadleaved trees relative to the target Korean pine trees.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, X.; Lin, C.; Luo, Y.; Wu, H.; Zhang, P.; Shen, H. Neighborhood Tree Position and Size Had Hierarchical Effects on Korean Pine Growth at Different Opening Degree Levels. Forests 2024, 15, 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020228

AMA Style

Ma X, Lin C, Luo Y, Wu H, Zhang P, Shen H. Neighborhood Tree Position and Size Had Hierarchical Effects on Korean Pine Growth at Different Opening Degree Levels. Forests. 2024; 15(2):228. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020228

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Xiao, Cunxue Lin, Ye Luo, Haibo Wu, Peng Zhang, and Hailong Shen. 2024. "Neighborhood Tree Position and Size Had Hierarchical Effects on Korean Pine Growth at Different Opening Degree Levels" Forests 15, no. 2: 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020228

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop