Next Article in Journal
Plant Adaptation to Extreme Environments in Drylands—Series II: Studies from Northwest China
Previous Article in Journal
Interacting Sentinel-2A, Sentinel 1A, and GF-2 Imagery to Improve the Accuracy of Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation in a Dry-Hot Valley
Previous Article in Special Issue
Botryosphaeriaceae Species Associated with Stem Canker, Shoot Blight and Dieback of Fraxinus ornus in Italy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Drivers of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus Infections in the Inner-Alpine Valleys of Northwestern Italy

1
Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Torino, Largo P. Braccini 2, I-10095 Grugliasco, Italy
2
Interdepartmental Centre for Innovation in the Agro-Environmental Sector (AGROINNOVA), University of Torino, Largo P. Braccini 2, I-10095 Grugliasco, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2024, 15(4), 732; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15040732
Submission received: 7 March 2024 / Revised: 18 April 2024 / Accepted: 19 April 2024 / Published: 22 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest Pathology and Entomology—Series II)

Abstract

:
Fraxinus excelsior L. (ash) is a key forest tree species challenged by Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (T. Kowalski) Baral, Queloz, Hosoya, the causal agent of ash dieback. The goals of this study were (I) to assess the presence, spatial distribution, and incidence of H. fraxineus in the inner-alpine valleys of northwestern Italy, along with the severity of ash dieback; (II) to model the probability of infection by H. fraxineus based on environmental variables; (III) to reconstruct the direction of provenance of the front of invasion of the pathogen; and (IV) to test whether H. fraxineus has replaced the native relative Hymenoscyphus albidus (Gillet) W. Phillips, a saprobe of ash litter. By combining phytosanitary monitoring and samplings in 20 forest stands, laboratory analyses, and statistical modelling, this study showed that H. fraxineus was present in 65% of stands with an average incidence of 27%, reaching peaks of 80%. Rainfalls were the most relevant drivers of the probability of infection by H. fraxineus, rising up to 80% with the increased precipitation in April and July. Other drivers included elevation, maximal temperatures, latitude, and longitude. The front of invasion likely moved from Italy and/or Switzerland, rather than from France, while the replacement of H. albidus is uncertain.

1. Introduction

Alpine forests are challenged by a variety of biotic, abiotic, and anthropogenetic threats, reducing their ability to provide key ecosystem services. Such threats encompass the onset of epidemics caused by plant pathogens, some of which determine substantial mortality and economic losses [1]; attacks by insect pests [2]; natural or anthropogenic disturbances [3,4]; and climate change [5].
In northwestern Italy, especially in the inner Alps of the Aosta Valley region hosting the highest mountains in Europe, the European or common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L., hereafter referred to as ash) is a companion species growing up to 1400 m a.s.l. in mixed forest stands in association with several broadleaved or conifer species of the genera Acer, Alnus, Carpinus, Castanea, Corylus, Larix, Pinus, Prunus, Tilia, Ulmus, and others [6]. Ash trees are generally not abundant, although they can be prevalent in forest patches of a limited surface area or when they colonize abandoned agricultural fields or grasslands in close proximity to forest stands [6,7]. Ash is scored as a key species for the functioning and conservation of forest ecosystems; hence, its long-term preservation is deemed a priority [8].
A major challenge threatening the conservation of ash in Europe is the “ash dieback” caused by the fungal pathogen Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (T. Kowalski) Baral, Queloz, Hosoya, comb. nov. (an ascomycete formerly described as Chalara fraxinea or H. pseudoalbidus) [9,10]. H. fraxineus was likely introduced to Europe by means of infected plant material from Asia. Ash dieback was first reported in Poland in association with the extensive mortality of ash trees during the early 1990s [9,11]. Since then, H. fraxineus has rapidly spread across most of the geographic distribution area of ash in Europe [12] posing a serious threat to ash and other organisms closely dependent upon the presence of ash [13]. The disease symptoms include the leaves withering and wilting, followed by the onset of necrotic spots on the leaf laminas leading to their progressive deformation. Necrosis may also affect the petioles and rachises of the leaves, whose premature fall subsequently occurs. H. fraxineus may also colonize shoots, twigs, and branches by affecting the cambium, thereby causing sunken areas and cankers visible as longitudinal lesions of the bark. The combination of the fall of the leaves and the desiccation of the branches leads to a progressive crown thinning and loss, resulting in the overall decline of the tree. The crown loss induced by H. fraxineus on ash follows a typical and recognizable pattern, starting from the upper and external sectors and progressing towards the lower and inner portions. This phenomenon is commonly defined as “dieback”, ultimately leading to the death of the tree. Additional symptoms may include a color alteration of the bark in the basal portion of the main stem, which can display the occurrence of lesions.
The impact of ash dieback in Europe has been detrimental, leading to substantial direct and indirect economic losses mainly related to the reduced or zeroed profit from nurseries and productive forests, the costs of the silvicultural or other management operations needed to fell and replace the infected and dead trees, and the depletion of the ecosystem services provided by ash [14,15]. The highest economic losses reported by Hill et al. (2019) [14] were generated by the effects of ash dieback on the ecosystem services. The impact of the disease has achieved relevant magnitude levels as a result of the high incidence of the pathogen, of the severity of the symptoms, and of the substantial mortality affecting ash trees of all ages in forest, plantations, and nurseries [14,16,17]. Indeed, a meta-analysis conducted on data gathered at the European scale reports the peaks of ash mortality reaching approximately 85% in plantations, 70% in forest, and 82% in natural regenerated saplings [17].
The impact of H. fraxineus may be relevant not only for ash as a forest tree species but also for the other species directly associated with ash [8], potentially leading to biodiversity losses and, in the worst case, to the local extinction of some taxa (i.e., leading to an “extinction cascade”) [13]. Some invasive forest pathogens are capable of colonizing newfound hosts or habitats while replacing native species, even congeners, as documented for the invasive vs. native pathogens: Heterobasidion irregulare Garbel. & Otrosina and H. annosum (Fr.) Bref. [18]; Phytophthora ramorum Werres, De Cock & Man in ‘t Veld and P. nemorosa E.M. Hansen & Reeser [19]; and Ophiostoma novo-ulmi Brasier and O. ulmi (Buisman) Nannf. [20]. In the case of H. fraxineus, a similar phenomenon has been reported, with the invasive pathogen replacing the congeneric yet saprobic fungus Hymenoscyphus albidus (Gillet) W. Phillips, a decomposer of ash litter [21] and harmless ash endophyte [22].
The biological cycle of H. fraxineus has been thoroughly investigated [10,16,23,24]. In brief, at the end of summer, the pathogen produces typical pedunculate whitish apothecia in the litter on the rachises and petioles of the ash that fell the previous year. Infectious airborne ascospores are released from the apothecia and infect the green leaves of ash trees. Ascospores represent the main source of inoculum allowing the short and long distance dispersal of H. fraxineus. While it was estimated that most of the ascospores spread up to 2.6 km from their source [25], air turbulence may allow their dissemination at distances of 50–100 km [26,27]. Consequently, the front of the disease can progress rapidly, as reported in previous studies, which identified a spread rate of 30 km/year in Norway [16], 40–50 km/year in central Italy [28], and 50 km/year in France [25,27]. In northern Italy, based on the first report of the pathogen in 2009 in the east (the Friuli region) [29] and on the following detection of the pathogen in the west (the Piedmont region) in 2016 [30], the spread rate was estimated as high as 70 km/year.
The success of biological invasions in forest ecosystems may depend upon several interacting factors, including the site, the host, and the environmental and climatic suitability that fosters the establishment and spread of the pathogen and the expression of the disease symptoms [31]. The applications of modelling and numerical ecology may shed light on the most relevant ecological drivers boosting or hampering biological invasions [32]. In the case of ash dieback, several studies so far have investigated which ecological factors may be favorable, or not, to H. fraxineus (a comprehensive review is presented in [33]). For instance, environmental and silvicultural variables were tested to unravel the putative predisposing condition boosting the onset and impact of the disease in the Czech Republic [34], and a similar approach was used to relate the site, stand, and landscape features to the disease in France [35,36]. A large-scale modelling was aimed at elucidating the role of some environmental and climatic variables on the risk of the natural spread of H. fraxineus at the European level, also including some bordering areas of Africa and Asia [37]. Other studies related the tree host’s age, sex, provenance, and dendrometric features to the severity of the disease, while some research has been conducted to assess the role of forest management practices on ash dieback [38,39,40].
Although relevant information about the European distribution of H. fraxineus and the factors potentially associated with its successful establishment and spread are reported in the literature, there are still relevant geographic sectors for which no information is currently available. This is the case of the inner Alps of the Aosta Valley representing one of the most relevant Alpine sectors, of which 27% is covered by forests [6]. To date, it is still unknown whether ash dieback caused by H. fraxineus is present in that area and which factors might have played a role in the onset of the disease, if any. In addition, any models quantitatively assessing the probability of infection by H. fraxineus based on environmental and site conditions are scanty. Hence, the goals of this work were (I) to assess the presence, spatial distribution, and incidence of H. fraxineus in the inner-alpine valleys of northwestern Italy, along with the severity of ash dieback; (II) to model the probability of infection by H. fraxineus based on topographic, geomorphologic, dendrometric, and climatic variables; (III) to reconstruct the direction of provenance of the front of invasion of the pathogen; and (IV) to test whether a replacement of H. albidus with H. fraxineus has occurred.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Sites and Ash Tree Selection

Based on data about the spatial distribution of ash in the Aosta Valley [6] and on surveys conducted by the Forestry Corps of the Region (Corpo Forestale della Valle d’Aosta-Dipartimento Risorse naturali e Corpo forestale), a total of 20 representative study sites were selected. All sites hosted several hectares of uneven aged forest stands characterized by a mixed tree species composition including broadleaves (Acer spp., Alnus spp., Betula pendula, Castanea sativa, Corylus avellana, Populus tremula, Salix spp., Prunus avium, Quercus pubescens, Robinia pseudoacacia, Sorbus aucuparia, and Tilia spp.) and conifers (Abies alba, Larix decidua, Picea abies, and Pinus sylvestris), where ash was present sporadically, with an abundance generally between 5% and 35%, although reaching 85% in one site. The ash abundance was scored based on the inventory data provided by the Forestry Corps. For each study site, the longitude (x) and latitude (y) (UTM WGS1984 reference system, in m) were recorded with a GPS device (MobileMapper®, Magellan, LA, USA—precision  ±1 m) in the WGS84/UTM projection system. Each study site was assigned to a specific geographic sector (sect) of the Aosta Valley (high, medium, and low sectors) based on the classification reported in [41]. The site elevation (el, in m a.s.l.) was obtained from the Digital Terrain Model (DTM) [42], queried through the Geographic Information System (GIS) software QGIS version 3.4.7 [43], based on the pixel value corresponding to the associated x and y coordinates. The maps to assess the aspect (as, as azimuth, in °) and slope (sl, in %) of the study sites were derived from the DTM, as described in Lione et al. (2017) [32].
Within each study site, a number of ash trees was selected for the assessment of dieback symptoms and for the sampling of plant tissues, based on the following method. The first tree was randomly chosen, then up to 4–8 of its surrounding nearest neighbors growing within a distance radius of 15 m were selected. The dendrometric variables measured for each of the above mentioned ash trees were the diameter at breast height (dbh, in cm), obtained by using a tree caliper; and the tree height (h, in m), assessed through a hypsometer (PM-5/1520 Series, Suunto, Vantaa, Finland). The summary of the geographic (x, y, and sect), geomorphologic (el, sl, and as), and dendrometric (dbh and h) variables of each study site is reported along with the main tree species composition and abundance in Table 1.

2.2. Assessment of Ash Dieback Symptoms and Plant Tissue Samplings

Based on the description of the symptoms of ash dieback [8,12,44], three variables were assessed to score the health status of the selected trees: the crown transparency (crtr, in %), the percentage of leaves displaying necrotic areas on the lamina (pnl, in %), and the number of lesions observed at the stem base (nl, as count). The crown transparency was appraised by using the method reported in [45,46] and as described in [47]. In brief, the crown transparency was visually assessed scoring the loss of leaves (%) in relation to an ideal status where defoliation is absent, with the operator located at a distance from the stem base corresponding to the tree height or at the closest distance allowing a complete view of the crown. The percentage of the leaves showing symptoms of necrosis was assessed by calculating the ratio between the number of symptomatic leaves and the total number of leaves collected per tree. The number of leaves sampled per tree varied between six and thirty, depending on the accessibility of the branches present in the lower portion of the crown, which were excised by using a telescopic tree lopper extendable up to 5 m. Overall, approximately 200 branches were collected from 88.5% of the selected ash trees, while the remaining 11.5% were not sampled. The number of lesions at the base stem was assessed by carefully inspecting the base of the trees and excluding mechanical lesions caused by ungulates or other animals, wounds resulting from the failures of neighboring trees, etc.
The plant tissues were collected from the selected ash trees to conduct the diagnostic analyses targeting H. fraxineus and H. albidus (see Section 2.3). In detail, a total of 107 foliar and 92 wood samples were collected, with the first obtained from the branches excised for the assessment of the percentage of necrotic leaves and the latter in proximity of the basal stem lesions. In the absence of visible lesions, wood chips were randomly excised from the stem. For both symptomatic and asymptomatic ashes, the wood chips of an approximate dimension of 5 × 2 × 0.5 cm were carved with a chisel previously disinfected with a commercial solution of sodium hypochlorite (NaClO). In addition, the litter within a 1.5 m radius from the base of the selected ash trees was carefully inspected to identify and collect the rachises and petioles of F. excelsior harboring apothecia morphologically compatible with those formed by H. fraxineus or H. albidus, based on the description and plates reported in [48].
The samples collected were singly placed in plastic bags (for the foliar samples and wood chips) or 15 mL centrifuge tubes (for the rachises and petioles), immediately transported to the laboratory, and stored at +4 °C prior to further processing. Both the assessments of the ash dieback symptoms and the samplings were conducted between June and September in 2020 and 2021.

2.3. Laboratory Analyses

Laboratory analyses were conducted on the leaves and wood samples to detect the presence of H. fraxineus, H. albidus, or both, through species-specific quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) assays, conducted as described below. The plant tissue fragments to analyze were excised with a sterile scalpel at the interface between the symptomatic and asymptomatic portions of the samples, when symptoms were present. For the samples showing no symptoms, the plant tissues to collect were randomly selected. DNA was extracted from 20 mg of plant tissues obtained after a 24 h lyophilization phase followed by a 30 min grinding step performed with a Tissue Lyser (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) set at 30 Hz. The extraction was carried out using the DNeasy® Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions with minor modifications. Genomic DNA was amplified using the primers and probes for the specific detection of H. fraxineus (Cf-F, Cf-R, and Cf-S) [49] and H. albidus (Halb-F, Halb-R, and Halb-P) [50] (Table 2).
The amplifications were carried out using the thermal cycler Real Time CFX ConnectTM (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) with 96 well-plates (Biorad) sealed with Microseal® B seal adhesive film (Biorad). The reactions were carried out using an SsoAdvanced Universal Probes Supermix 2× (Bio-Rad, USA). The amplification conditions were 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 59 °C for 1 min for the H. fraxineus. After each run, one cycle of the melting curve step was conducted by ramping the temperature from 60 °C to 90 °C. The reactions were carried out in a final volume of 10 μL, with 3 μL of DNA, 0.25 μL of each primer (10 μM), 0.50 μL of the probe (5 μM), and 5 µL of the SsoAdvanced Universal Probes Supermix 2× (Bio-Rad).
The specific amplification conditions for the H. albidus were 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 64 °C for 55 s. The reactions were carried out in a final volume of 10 μL, with 3 μL of DNA, 0.30 μL of each primer (10 μM), 0.15 μL of the probe (10 µM), and 5 µL of the SsoAdvanced Universal Probes Supermix 2× (Bio-Rad). Each 96-well plate was loaded in triplicate with a negative control (RNAse free water), standard DNA, and a positive control (the H. fraxineus DNA strain KNE31P or the H. albidus DNA strain H8945). In order to validate the results of the positive amplifications obtained with the qPCR assay, 13 representative amplicons were sequenced in both directions by BMR Genomics, with primers used for the amplification. By using the BLASTN tool of the NCBI, the obtained sequences were compared with those deposited in GenBank.

2.4. Climatic Characterization of the Study Sites

For all the study sites, the spatial coordinates x, y, and el were stored in a dataset and combined with the corresponding coordinates of the available weather stations included within the Aosta Valley official meteorological network (i.e., the Centro Funzionale e Pianificazione Regione Autonoma Valle d’Aosta). Each study site was characterized by a set of 80 climatic variables, obtained as described below.
Only the official meteorological weather stations providing at least the daily maximum, minimum, and average temperatures, precipitation, and wind speeds were retained. The three-dimensional Euclidean distance d = Δ x 2 + Δ y 2 + Δ e l 2 was calculated [51], with Δ x , Δ y , and Δ e l representing the differences of longitude, latitude, and elevation separating each study site from the retained weather stations. Up to four of the nearest neighboring weather stations with d < 10.5 km were assigned to each sampling site, and the time series of the 10 years preceding the date of the samplings were filtered. From these time series, the monthly average values of the maximum (tmaxi), minimum (tmini), and mean (tmini) temperatures (in °C); cumulated rainfall precipitation (pi) (in mm); and windspeed (wsi) (in m/s) were calculated for months i = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12}, representing the months from January (i = 1) to December (i = 12). The same values were calculated at a seasonal level with i = {fa, sp, su, wi} for fall, spring, summer, and winter, respectively, as reported in [52]. The study sites were combined with the corresponding climatic variables at the monthly and seasonal levels by calculating the spatial weighted averages for all possible values of the index i [53,54] as follows: T m a x i = j = 1 j = n w j t m a x i , j j = 1 j = n w j ;   T m i n i = j = 1 j = n w j t m i n i , j j = 1 j = n w j ;   T m e a n i = j = 1 j = n w j t m e a n i , j j = 1 j = n w j ;   P i = j = 1 j = n w j P i , j j = 1 j = n w j ;   W s i = j = 1 j = n w j w s i , j j = 1 j = n w j , with n representing the number of weather stations assigned to each study site and w as the weight value set to 1 d . The weather stations’ information is reported in Table S1.

2.5. Statistical Analysis and Modelling

The status (I) of each ash tree was binarily scored as infected (I = 1) or uninfected (I = 0) by H. fraxineus, based on the outcomes of the molecular analyses conducted on the plant tissue samples (see Section 3). The average levels of the ash dieback symptoms (i.e., the crown transparency, percentage of necrotic leaves, and number of lesions observed at the stem base, which are crtr, pnl, and nl, respectively) were compared between the infected and uninfected ashes with the Wilcoxon rank sum test [54]. The incidence of the pathogen was assessed as the ratio between the infected trees and the total number of sampled trees (in %).
The putative predictors of the probability of infection by H. fraxineus P r I = 1 [55] (i.e., the response variable) were divided into blocks as follows: the dendrometric variables (dbh, h), the topographical variables (x, y, sect); the geomorphological variables (el, sl); and the climatic variables. For the latter, ten distinct blocks were built, accounting for the five variable types ( T m a x i , T m i n i , T m e a n i , P i , and W s i ) and the two reference timeframes (monthly or seasonal) (i.e., five variable types × two reference timeframes = ten blocks). Unbiased recursive binary partitioning tree models based on conditional inference [56,57,58], hereafter referred to as ctree models, were fitted to the response variable separately for each block of predictors by setting the algorithms as described in Lione et al. (2017, 2020) [32,47]. The p-value associated with each predictor was calculated based on the c-statistics [56,57,58], as reported in [52]. When the ctree identified the significant thresholds resulting from binary splits of the model, for each terminal node the value of the response variable was calculated with the equation f I = 1 m , with f representing the indicator function with the Iverson notation [59] and m the number of the ash trees clustering within the node. The predictors whose p-values were significant (p < 0.05) were preselected for a further modelling step, conducted as described below.
The probability of infection by H. fraxineus was modelled as a function of the preselected variables, included in blocks (see above) or singularly, by fitting the binary logistic regression models [55] as generalized linear models (GLMs) [54]. The β coefficients of each logistic equation based on a number w of the preselected predictor variables v  P r I = 1 = e β 0 + h = 1 h = w β h v h 1 + e β 0 + h = 1 h = w β h v h were assessed with the Wald test [55]. In addition, the corresponding null model was fitted and singularly compared with the other logistic regressions by using the likelihood ratio test (LRT) [54,55] and the values of the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and of its associated weights (AICw) [60,61]. The classification performance of each logistic regression model was assessed by calculating the area under the relative operating characteristic curve (AUC) and its cross-validated 95% confidence interval, whose bounds were compared with the 0.5 threshold [62,63]. The overall assessment score of the models was based on the criteria reported in [47], thus accounting for the significance of the β coefficients, the LRT test, the bounds of the AUC 95% confidence interval, and ranking the performance of the models based on increasing the AICw and AUC values.
The association between the probability of infection by H. fraxineus and the aspect (as) of the study site was tested with a standalone analysis due to the circularity of the predictor [64], by using the method described in [32], based on the application of the Mardia–Watson–Wheeler test [65] and the Rao’s homogeneity test [66].
In order to analyze whether the impact of H. fraxineus resulted in a spatial gradient, the DirGrad algorithm [67] was applied to the incidence of the pathogen, assessed at the site level as the ratio between the infected trees and the total number of sampled trees (%), and to the variables crtr, pnl, and nl, associated with the symptoms of ash dieback assessed as described in Section 2.2. The gradient directions and the prevailing gradient direction were assessed with the criteria considering the sign and the magnitude of the index R, as reported in [67]. The direction from an octant O1 (R < 0) to the opposite O2 (R > 0) is expressed as O1→O2 (∓R) [67]. The same algorithm was used to identify the spatial gradients of the monthly precipitation of April (P4) and July (P7), because these variables were significant predictors of the probability of infection by H. fraxineus in the best performing binary logistic regression model (see Section 3).
The statistical analysis and modelling were conducted with R version 4.0.0 (R Core Team, 2020), with the algorithm DirGrad [67] and the packages binGroup [68], bootstrap [69], circular [70] cvAUC [63], MuMIn [71], partykit [58], and strucchange [57]. The significance cut-off level was set at 0.05 [54]. The 95% confidence intervals (CI95%) were calculated with the method reported in Blaker [72] for the variable expressed as a percentage, while for the other variables the bootstrap Bias Corrected and accelerated (BCa) CI95% were obtained based on DiCiccio and Efron (1996) [73] with the bootstrap algorithm set as described in Lione et al. (2020) [47].

3. Results

3.1. Incidence, Distribution, and Impact of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus

Overall, the phytosanitary survey targeting ash dieback caused by H. fraxineus in the inner-alpine valleys of northwestern Italy covered a region extending approximately 60 km in longitude and 20 km in latitude, corresponding to an area of 1200 km2 with an elevation up to 1483 m a.s.l. The presence of H. fraxineus was detected through the qPCR species-specific assay in 13 out of the 20 study sites (65.0%, 42.2%–84.0% CI95%), attaining an overall incidence (i.e., the percentage of infected ashes) of 27.0% (19.0%–36.4% CI95%) and reaching a maximum value of 80% (Figure 1). Ash trees positive to the pathogen were detected in 20.3% (13.1%–29.1% CI95%) of the cases from wood tissues, and in the remaining 6.7% (3.0%–13.2% CI95%) of the cases from foliar tissues.
The symptoms observed in the field included the crown transparency, leaves displaying necrotic areas on the lamina, and lesions at the stem base. The crown transparency (crtr) attained an overall average of 34.9% (30.3%–39.9% CI95%), but, while the ash trees infected by H. fraxineus displayed crown losses of 47.0% (36.4%–57.8% CI95%), those uninfected showed significantly lower values (30.4%, 25.9%–35.8% CI95%, p = 9.64·10−3). Comparable patterns were observed for the other symptoms. Indeed, the percentage of leaves displaying necrotic areas on the lamina (pnl) achieved an overall mean of 31.1% (24.8%–38.4% CI95%), with infected ash trees reaching an average of 45.8% (31.0%–61.2% CI95%), significantly higher than the 26.3% (20.0%–34.2% CI95%) resulting from uninfected trees (p = 4.72·10−2). Finally, the average number of stem lesions observed was 1.20 (0.95–1.48 CI95%), but, while the ash trees infected by H. fraxineus displayed a mean of 1.67 (1.21–2.25 CI95%), those uninfected attained a significantly lower value of 1.03 (0.75–1.37 CI95%, p = 6.57·10−3).

3.2. Ecological and Environmental Variables Associated with the Probability of Infection by Hymenoscyphus fraxineus

The ecological and environmental variables significantly correlated (p < 0.05) to the probability of infection by H. fraxineus ( P r I = 1 )   that resulted from the ctree models fitting were as follows: the topographical variables latitude (x) and longitude (y); the geomorphological variable elevation (el); and the climatic variables related to the maximum temperature of December ( T m a x 12 ) , the monthly cumulated rainfall precipitation of April P 4 and July P 7 , and the seasonal cumulated rainfall precipitation during the spring P s p . Instead, all the other tested variables did not result in significant c-statistics that produced tree graph splits (p > 0.05). In detail, the significant ctree models showed that at a high latitude and longitude (i.e., in the northeastern sector, x > 358,069 m, y > 506,7384 m) the probability of infection by H. fraxineus was maximal, attaining 75.0% (52.6%–89.6% CI95%), while it dropped significantly (p < 0.05) for those ash trees located in the southern (y ≤ 5,067,384 m) and northwestern (x ≤ 358,069 m, y > 5,067,384 m) sectors, whose P r I = 1 was 17.2% (9.5%–28.6% CI95%) and 10.0% (1.8%–31.6% CI95%), respectively. Ash trees growing in the forest stands whose elevation was below 895 m a.s.l. resulted in a significantly (p = 3.41·10−2) higher probability of infection (46.7%, 29.5%–65.5% CI95%) than those located in the sites at higher altitudes (18.9%, 11.0%–29.4% CI95%). The sites whose maximum temperature in December was on average over 4.1 °C were characterized by ash trees whose probability of infection reached 44.9% (22.2%–59.3% CI95%), significantly surpassing the probability of 10.9% (4.9%–31.3% CI95%) displayed by the trees growing in cooler sites. The analysis conducted on precipitation showed that more abundant rainfalls during the months of April P 4 and July P 7 significantly boosted the likelihood of infection (p < 0.05), with probabilities P r I = 1 at 80.0% (53.5%–94.3% CI95%) in the rainiest locations ( P 4 > 41.2   mm   and   P 7 > 62.3   mm ), decreasing to 26.7% (14.8%–41.1% CI95%) in the sites with high precipitation levels in April ( P 4 > 41.2   mm ) but low rainfalls in July ( P 7 62.3   mm ), and dropping to 9.1% (3.1%–21.0% CI95%) where the two months of April and July were drier ( P 4 41.2   mm and P 7 62.3   mm ). Consistently, spring rainfalls over 161 mm led to a probability P r I = 1 of 51.4% (25.0%–67.5% CI95%), significantly higher (p = 8.61·10−3) than that achieved when precipitation in spring was under the above threshold (14.5%, 7.5%–34.9% CI95%). A detailed list of the statistics resulting from the ctree models is reported in Table S2.
The probability of infection by H. fraxineus modelled as a function of the variables preselected by the ctrees resulted in 10 binary logistic regression models, including the null model (Table 3). All models, except those fitted on the single variables x and P 7 , displayed significant β h coefficients and likelihood ratio test (p < 0.05). A β h < 0 was displayed by the model fitted on elevation el, indicating a negative correlation between altitude and the probability of infection. Conversely, for all the other tested variables, the logistic equations showed positive β h coefficients, thereby indicating that an increasing probability of infection by H. fraxineus is expected with increasing values of the predictors. The AIC values ranged from 110.5 for the model that included both P 4 and P 7 to 124.2 for the model based uniquely on P 7 , corresponding to a maximum AICw of 68.2% and a minimum of 0.1%, respectively. The null model scored values of AIC = 123.2 and AICw = 0.1%. The AUC values ranged from a minimum of 0.50 (0.28–0.72 CI95%) for the null model to 0.75 (0.64–0.87 CI95%) for the model that included both P 4 and P 7 . Excluding the null model and that based on P 7 , all the others showed AUC CI95% with bounds higher than the threshold of 0.5. Based on the criteria considering the highest AICw and AUC values, the best performing binary logistic regression model was based on P 4 and P 7 (Figure 2). The corresponding equation modelled a probability of infection by H. fraxineus close to 0% for ash trees growing in sites whose P 4 and P 7 were approximately around 10 and 40 mm, respectively, which jumped up to 80% when the above values increased to 60 and 80 mm (Figure 2). Instead, all other models based on binary logistic regressions scored worse than the model based on P 4 and P 7 , as shown in detail in Table 3.
The association between the probability of infection by H. fraxineus and the aspect (as) of the study site was not significant based on the results of the Mardia–Watson–Wheeler test (p = 0.967) and of the Rao’s homogeneity test (p = 0.807).
All variables of phytopathological, dendrometric, environmental or climatic interest obtained from this study are available in Table S3.

3.3. Spatial Gradients of the Impact of Hymenoschyphus fraxineus

The application of the DirGrad algorithm showed a decreasing spatial gradient of the incidence of H. fraxineus from north to south (N→S), NE→SW (R = ∓0.43, the prevailing direction), E→W, and SE→NW (Figure 3). Although with different magnitudes of R and prevailing directions, the same decreasing spatial gradients with directions NE→SW, E→W were detected for the crown transparency (crtr), percentage of necrotic leaves (pnl), and number of lesions observed at the stem base of the ash trees (nl). Depending on the variable considered, other directions identified by the algorithm included N→S (nl, pnl), SE→NW (crtr, nl), and S→N (crtr) (Figure 3).
A decreasing spatial gradient was detected for the monthly precipitation of April (P4) with directions NE→SW, E→W, SE→NW, and S→N, with SE→NW as the prevailing direction (R = ∓0.53). Instead, the rainfall of July (P7) displayed a different trend with directions N→S, NW→SE, W→E, and SW→NE, with N→S (R = ∓0.62) as the prevailing direction in this case.
The results obtained from the DirGrad algorithm are reported in Table S4.

3.4. Presence and Distribution of Hymenoschyphus albidus

The molecular analyses based on the species-specific qPCR assays did not detect the presence of H. albidus DNA either in the foliar or in wood samples collected from the monitored ash trees.

4. Discussion

Despite the widespread occurrence of Hymenoschyphus fraxineus in Europe, there are still some areas where its presence, abundance, and impact are still largely unknown. The inner-alpine valleys of northwestern Italy are one such areas, and our study reports for the first time H. fraxineus to be present there in over 65% of the investigated forest stand and with an overall incidence of 27%. Although the above values might look mild, especially if compared with reports from other European regions [14,16,17], peaks of incidence of 80% were observed locally. In addition, the severity of the ash dieback symptoms observed was remarkable, attaining averages as high as 47% for the crown transparency, 46% for the leaves displaying necrotic areas on the lamina, and 1.7 for the average number of lesions observed at the stem base. Nonetheless, no mortality was detected among the sampled ash trees, and in one third of the sampling sites the pathogen was not present. Overall, our data may suggest that the local populations of F. excelsior, or at least some genotypes, could be partially tolerant to the disease; the genotypes of the pathogen present in the area display mild virulence; the ecological and/or environmental conditions are not completely favorable to the disease; or the invasion of H. fraxineus in the region is recent. It should be noted that the above hypotheses are not mutually exclusive, and, even though our experimental design cannot confirm or rule out some of them, for others we gathered clues shedding light on the reasons underlying the observed distribution and impact of ash dieback.
Previous studies focused on the population genetics of ash and on the host–pathogen interaction [12,74,75] reported that some genotypes display some tolerance against H. fraxineus, and that such tolerance is particularly pronounced in 1%–5% of the ash trees. This evidence seems to be confirmed by our empirical observations, showing that neighboring trees growing in the same study sites and under the same environmental conditions could be either infected or uninfected and could be characterized by different levels of the severity of symptoms. For instance, none of the site surveyed for the presence of H. fraxineus showed an incidence of the pathogen attaining 100% or, as previously mentioned, appreciable mortality rates. However, our monitoring targeted a large majority of adult ashes, which are probably less likely to die than younger ones [76]. Unfortunately, no information about the population genetics of ash trees in that region is available; hence, the genetic resistance of the host to ash dieback cannot be either confirmed or excluded based on this study. In addition, to assess whether, and to what extent, a genetic host resistance may have exerted a role in the infection and impact patterns of H. fraxineus, comparative inoculation experiments are needed.
The presence of H. fraxineus explains most of the symptom severity observed during the monitoring of ash dieback in the study area, especially in relation to the crown transparency, percentage of necrotic leaves, and number of lesions at the stem base. Nonetheless, a baseline level of the above symptoms was also detected in uninfected trees, probably due to other biotic or abiotic stressors. For instance, it was recently documented that other fungal species belonging to the family of Botryosphaeriaceae, such as Diplodia fraxini (Fr.) Fr. and D. subglobosa A.J.L. Phillips, Deidda & Linald., may determine disease symptoms similar to dieback on F. excelsior [77,78]. Indeed, many species of that family are well known as endophytes or the latent pathogens of woody plants, whose pathogenic switch and aggressiveness on the host may follow the onset of other conditions of general stress due to climatic factors [79]. However, since our study targeted ash dieback associated with H. fraxineus, no other fungal species were screened through isolation or molecular diagnostics, with the only exception being H. albidus.
Recently, studies focused on the impact of climate change in the Alpine district of northwestern Italy have reported an increased aridity and evapotranspiration trend [80], which has been previously associated with the decline of other forest tree species in the area, such as Pinus sylvestris L. Considering the ecology of ash and, in particular, its need for an adequate water supply [81], aridity may have played a role as stressor contributing to the onset of the baseline symptoms observed. Nonetheless, since infected ash trees displayed a level of symptom severity consistently and significantly higher than those uninfected, the role of H. fraxineus as the causal agent of the decline of ash in the area seems of primary importance.
Prioritizing the conservation efforts in areas where H. fraxineus is more unlikely to rise may be a key strategy to perpetuate the presence and to increase the abundance of ash trees. For this reason, quantitative tools unravelling the relation between the presence of the pathogen and the environmental conditions of the forest stands are needed. Overall, our modelling approach allowed us to test and quantify the effects of a wide set of environmental variables on the probability of infection by H. fraxineus on ash. A total of two dendrometric, three geomorphologic, three topographic, and eighty climatic variables were assessed as potential predictors of the risk of infection. Despite this high number of predictors, our modelling is statistically robust and reliable, because it is based on a mixed approach combining unbiased recursive binary partitioning trees and conditional inference with binary logistic regression, while the circular variables were handled with specific standalone techniques [32,47,52,55,56,57,58,64,67].
The lack of correlation between the probability of infection by H. fraxineus and the dendrometric variables (the diameter at breast height and tree height) suggests that the pathogen can affect ash trees of different ages and positions (i.e., dominant or dominated trees). Other studies have reported that the pathogen can infect its host regardless of the tree age in forest stands as well as in plantations or nurseries [14,16,17], although some reports indicate that larger trees could be less affected than smaller ones [35,82].
Among the geomorphological variables, elevation proved to be inversely correlated with the probability of infection by H. fraxineus, with high risk levels in stands at lower altitudes. Remarkably, our models detected ~900 m a.s.l. as the critical threshold of the elevation to discriminate between a high and low risk of infection, which is a value rather close to the limit of 1000 m a.s.l. estimated by Giongo et al. (2017) [26]. Indeed, in agreement with our results, the latter study showed that in the Eastern Alps the impact of ash dieback was substantially higher in those stands whose altitude was lower than the critical threshold. Since elevation is correlated with other environmental variables, and especially with climate (e.g., temperatures and precipitation) [83], it could be argued that a more thorough understanding of the risk of infection could be achieved by testing climatic variables as potential predictors, which was precisely the goal of our modelling approach. Nonetheless, the elevation of the forest stand is a piece of information that is easy to retrieve or measure, while the climatic characterization of sites may be challenging or impractical to conduct.
Our models showed that the most relevant predictors of the probability of infection by H. fraxineus were the precipitation levels of April and July. Higher precipitation levels were positively correlated to a rising likelihood of infection, with a probability reaching a peak of 80% when such precipitation was maximal. These results are consistent with the information reported in other studies [26,28] and in reviews of previous lines of evidence from the available literature [8,36,37,84]. Indeed, more abundant precipitation, especially during the summer, should boost the infection by H. fraxineus. For instance, in France, ash trees growing under moist conditions or in stands located in more humid topographical positions were associated with a higher severity of ash dieback, especially in relation to the abundance of basal lesions [35]. The role of precipitation may be related to the sporulation pattern of the pathogen, potentially influencing not only the production and release of infectious ascospores but also of conidia, whose role in the biological cycle of the pathogen is pivotal and facilitates gene flow between sympatric strains [85]. The amount of H. fraxineus spores released per day has been positively correlated to the leaf surface moisture [86] that is more likely to be maintained in the rainiest locations, rather than in arid sites. Abundant rainfalls might also promote high humidity in the litter, boosting the ability of H. fraxineus mycelium to survive and further colonize ash tissues, especially those which serve as a substrate for the production of apothecia. Remarkably, H. fraxineus can form apothecia on leaf rachises and petioles of ash not only during the year after leaf fall, but also for up to five growing seasons after the leaves have been dropped [87].
The role of temperature on the risk of infection by H. fraxineus is more controversial. While in the Eastern Alps it was reported that high temperatures combined with high precipitation and humidity levels occurring during the growing season could be favorable to H. fraxineus [26], at the European scale the risk of the natural spread of the pathogen has been associated with lower air temperatures [37]. Another study has clearly shown that high summer temperatures hinder the sporulation potential of H. fraxineus [27]. Our models showed that warming maximum temperatures in December might boost the risk of infection by H. fraxineus. Nevertheless, there is no evidence of a relationship between winter temperatures and the biology of H. fraxineus. In the alpine context, this might be a peculiarity or, more likely, an effect of variable collinearity (e.g., with elevation or precipitation), which may arise when dealing with a large amount of complex ecological data.
The modelling of the spatial gradients showed that the incidence of H. fraxineus and the levels of the symptom severity followed a sizeable and consistent spatial pattern, with the highest values located in the NE and E sectors, followed by the N and SE ones. Conversely, the opposite sectors displayed the lowest values. The coefficients provided by the DirGrad algorithm [67] suggest that the provenance of the front of invasion of H. fraxineus was from the bordering Italian region of Piedmont (i.e., from E and SE) and from Switzerland (i.e., from NE and N). The tree models confirmed this result by identifying the NE sector as that displaying the highest probability of infection by H. fraxineus. It should be noted that the front of invasion of H. fraxineus in Italy likely moved from E to W, namely from Friuli (where the pathogen was first reported in 2009) [29] to Piedmont (where the first report was in 2016) [30]. Conversely, in Switzerland the front has been documented to have moved from the northern areas (in 2008) to the southern cantons bordering with the Aosta Valley (in 2013) (see map in [88]). Hence, it can be hypothesized that the front of invasion in the Aosta Valley derives from a combination of the fronts from Piedmont and Switzerland. It should be noted that the windborne infectious ascospores and the related spread of H. fraxineus seem not to have been hindered by topographic barriers [26], and the prevailing wind direction in the Aosta Valley is from E to W [89]. Hence, although H. fraxineus has been present in France since 2008 [35], its introduction from that country seems rather unlikely. While no historical information is available to confirm the spatial progression of the front of invasion in the western Italian Alps, the spatial gradient is unlikely to depend on environmental variables. Indeed, the most relevant predictors of the risk of infection by H. fraxineus, namely, the combined rainfalls of April and July, do not consistently follow the same spatial pattern of the incidence of the pathogen and of the severity of the symptoms. The presence of a spatial gradient of the incidence of H. fraxineus suggests that the invasion process is still ongoing in the Aosta Valley. As a result, the introduction of the pathogen is relatively recent (probably after 2013–2016 based on the data from Gonthier et al. (2016) and Schoebel et al. (2018) [30,88]).
The attempt to test whether a replacement of H. albidus with H. fraxineus has occurred by following the approach reported in Garbelotto et al. (2022) [18] was not conclusive, since H. albidus was never detected in the study area.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study reports for the first time the presence, spatial distribution, and incidence of H. fraxineus in the inner-alpine valleys of northwestern Italy, along with the severity of ash dieback. The modelling approach used in this work shows that rainfalls are the most relevant and significant predictors to quantify the probability of infection by H. fraxineus, which is boosted by increased precipitation in April and July. Other relevant environmental variables included the elevation, maximal temperatures, latitude, and longitude. The different model equations setting out the above probability are provided. Finally, the front of invasion likely moved from Italy and Switzerland, rather than from France, following a main direction from east to west, while the replacement of H. albidus is uncertain.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/f15040732/s1, Table S1: the weather stations used for the climatic characterization of the study sites; Table S2: the results from the fitting of unbiased recursive binary partitioning tree models based on conditional inference; Table S3: the raw data used for the modelling; Table S4: the decreasing spatial gradients of the incidence and impact of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus and of the monthly precipitation of April and July.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.L. and P.G.; methodology, G.L. and S.P.; software, G.L.; validation, G.L., S.O. and S.P.; formal analysis, G.L., S.P. and P.G.; investigation, G.L., S.O., S.P. and M.G.; resources, P.G.; data curation, G.L. and S.O.; writing—original draft preparation, G.L.; writing—review and editing, P.G.; visualization, G.L., S.O., S.P. and M.G.; supervision, P.G.; project administration, P.G.; and funding acquisition, P.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Commission through the INTERREG V-A Italy–Switzerland Programme 2014–2020, Project MONGEFITOFOR id 540693 (linee guida per il MONitoraggio e la Gestione delle Emergenze FITOsanitarie nelle FOReste delle Alpi centro-occidentali). This research was also partially funded by a grant from the University of Torino (ex 60%).

Data Availability Statement

All data relevant to this study are provided as Supplementary Material.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Forestry Corps of the Autonomous Region of Valle d’Aosta (Struttura Corpo Forestale della Valle d’Aosta), in particular Commander Luca Dovigo and Ivan Rollet, for the technical and logistical support; and the official climatic data provider of the Autonomous Region of Valle d’Aosta (Centro funzionale e pianificazione), in particular Sara Maria Ratto, for the provision of the time series of the climatic variables. The authors also wish to thank Simone Prospero of the Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland, for the useful advice on ash dieback monitoring and samplings and Daniel Rigling (WSL) for providing the reference isolates.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of this study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bendel, M.; Kienast, F.; Bugmann, H.; Rigling, D. Incidence and distribution of Heterobasidion and Armillaria and their influence on canopy gap formation in unmanaged mountain pine forests in the Swiss Alps. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2006, 116, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ferracini, C.; Saitta, V.; Rondoni, G.; Rollet, I. Variables affecting the pine processionary moth flight: A survey in the north-western Italian Alps. Forests 2022, 14, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Smidt, S. Assessment of air pollution stress on forest ecosystems by the example of the northern Tyrolean Limestone Alps. J. Plant Physiol. 1996, 148, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Csilléry, K.; Kunstler, G.; Courbaud, B.; Allard, D.; Lassègues, P.; Haslinger, K.; Gardiner, B. Coupled effects of wind-storms and drought on tree mortality across 115 forest stands from the western Alps and the Jura mountains. Glob. Change Biol. 2017, 23, 5092–5107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Albrich, K.; Rammer, W.; Seidl, R. Climate change causes critical transitions and irreversible alterations of mountain forests. Glob. Change Biol. 2020, 26, 4013–4027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Camerano, P.; Terzuolo, P.G.; Varese, P. I Tipi Forestali della Valle d’Aosta; Compagnia delle Foreste: Arezzo, Italy, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferretti, F.; Alberti, G.; Badalamenti, E.; Campagnaro, T.; Corona, P.; Garbarino, M.; La Mantia, T.; Malandra, F.; Maresi, G.; Morresi, D.; et al. Boschi di Neoformazione in Italia: Approfondimenti Conoscitivi e Orientamenti Gestionali; Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria: Roma, Italy, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pautasso, M.; Aas, G.; Queloz, V.; Holdenrieder, O. European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) dieback–A conservation biology challenge. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 158, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kowalski, T. Chalara fraxinea sp. nov. associated with dieback of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) in Poland. Forest Pathol. 2006, 36, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Queloz, V.; Grünig, C.R.; Berndt, R.; Kowalski, T.; Sieber, T.N.; Holdenrieder, O. Cryptic speciation in Hymenoscyphus albidus. Forest Pathol. 2011, 41, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kowalski, T.; ŁUkomska, A. Studies on Fraxinus excelsior L. dieback in Włoszczowa Forest Unit stands. Acta Agrobot. 2005, 59, 429–440. [Google Scholar]
  12. McKinney, L.V.; Nielsen, L.R.; Collinge, D.B.; Thomsen, I.M.; Hansen, J.K.; Kjær, E.D. The ash dieback crisis: Genetic variation in resistance can prove a long-term solution. Plant Pathol. 2014, 63, 485–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hultberg, T.; Sandström, J.; Felton, A.; Öhman, K.; Rönnberg, J.; Witzell, J.; Cleary, M. Ash dieback risks an extinction cascade. Biol. Conserv. 2020, 244, 108516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hill, L.; Jones, G.; Atkinson, N.; Hector, A.; Hemery, G.; Brown, N. The £15 billion cost of ash dieback in Britain. Curr. Biol. 2019, 29, R315–R316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Petucco, C.; Lobianco, A.; Caurla, S. Economic evaluation of an invasive forest pathogen at a large scale: The case of ash dieback in France. Environ. Model. Assess. 2020, 25, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Timmermann, V.; Børja, I.; Hietala, A.M.; Kirisits, T.; Solheim, H. Ash dieback: Pathogen spread and diurnal patterns of ascospore dispersal, with special enphasis on Norway. EPPO Bull. 2011, 41, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Coker, T.L.R.; Rozsypálek, J.; Edwards, A.; Harwood, T.P.; Butfoy, L.; Buggs, R.J.A. Estimating mortality rates of European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) under the ash dieback (Hymenoscyphus fraxineus) epidemic. Plants People Planet 2019, 1, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Garbelotto, M.; Lione, G.; Martiniuc, A.V.; Gonthier, P. The alien invasive forest pathogen Heterobasidion irregulare is replacing the native Heterobasidion annosum. Biol. Invasions 2022, 24, 2335–2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kozanitas, M.; Osmundson, T.W.; Linzer, R.; Garbelotto, M. Interspecific interactions between the Sudden Oak Death pathogen Phytophthora ramorum and two sympatric Phytophthora species in varying ecological conditions. Fungal Ecol. 2017, 28, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Brasier, C.M.; Buck, K.W. Rapid evolutionary changes in a globally invading fungal pathogen (Dutch elm disease). Biol. Invasions 2001, 3, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. McKinney, L.V.; Thomsen, I.; Kjær, E.; Bengtsson, S.; Nielsen, L. Rapid invasion by an aggressive pathogenic fungus (Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus) replaces a native decomposer (Hymenoscyphus albidus): A case of local cryptic extinction? Fungal Ecol. 2012, 5, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hietala, A.M.; Agan, A.; Nagy, N.E.; Børja, I.; Timmermann, V.; Drenkhan, R.; Solheim, H. The native Hymenoscyphus albidus and the invasive Hymenoscyphus fraxineus are similar in their necrotrophic growth phase in ash leaves. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 892051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gross, A.; Zaffarano, P.L.; Duo, A.; Grünig, C.R. Reproductive mode and life cycle of the ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2012, 49, 977–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gross, A.; Holdenrieder, O.; Pautasso, M.; Queloz, V.; Sieber, T.N. Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus, the causal agent of European ash dieback. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2014, 15, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Grosdidier, M.; Ioos, R.; Husson, C.; Cael, O.; Scordia, T.; Marçais, B. Tracking the invasion: Dispersal of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus airborne inoculum at different scales. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2018, 94, fiy049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Giongo, S.; Longa, C.M.O.; Dal Maso, E.; Montecchio, L.; Maresi, G. Evaluating the impact of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in Trentino (Alps, Northern Italy): First investigations. iForest 2017, 10, 871–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Grosdidier, M.; Ioos, R.; Marçais, B. Do higher summer temperatures restrict the dissemination of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in France? Forest Pathol. 2018, 48, e12426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Migliorini, D.; Luchi, N.; Nigrone, E.; Pecori, F.; Pepori, A.L.; Santini, A. Expansion of ash dieback towards the scattered Fraxinus excelsior range of the Italian peninsula. Biol. Invasions 2022, 24, 1359–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ogris, N.; Hauptman, T.; Jurc, D.; Floreanci, V.; Marsich, F.; Montecchio, L. First report of Chalara fraxinea on common ash in Italy. Plant Dis. 2010, 94, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gonthier, P.; Giordano, L.; Sillo, F.; Martinis, R.; Pasi, V.; Rettori, A.A.; Tantardini, A. Sos cedri e frassini—Passaggio a Nord Ovest. Acer 2016, 6, 25–29. [Google Scholar]
  31. Santini, A.; Ghelardini, L.; De Pace, C.; Desprez-Loustau, M.L.; Capretti, P.; Chandelier, A.; Cech, T.; Chira, D.; Diamandis, S.; Gaitniekis, T.; et al. Biogeographical patterns and determinants of invasion by forest pathogens in Europe. New Phytol. 2013, 197, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lione, G.; Gonthier, P.; Garbelotto, M. Environmental factors driving the recovery of bay laurels from Phytophthora ramorum infections: An application of numerical ecology to citizen science. Forests 2017, 8, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Enderle, R.; Stenlid, J.; Vasaitis, R. An overview of ash (Fraxinus spp.) and the ash dieback disease in Europe. CABI Rev. 2019, 14, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Havrdová, L.; Zahradnik, D.; Romportl, D.; Pešková, V.; Černý, K. Environmental and silvicultural characteristics influencing the extent of ash dieback in forest stands. Baltic For. 2017, 23, 168–182. [Google Scholar]
  35. Marçais, B.; Husson, C.; Godart, L.; Cael, O. Influence of site and stand factors on Hymenoscyphus fraxineus-induced basal lesions. Plant Pathol. 2016, 65, 1452–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Grosdidier, M.; Scordia, T.; Ioos, R.; Marçais, B. Landscape epidemiology of ash dieback. J. Ecol. 2020, 108, 1789–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dal Maso, E.; Montecchio, L. Risk of natural spread of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus with environmental niche modelling and ensemble forecasting technique. Forest Res. 2014, 3, 1000131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Havrdová, L.; Novotná, K.; Zahradník, D.; Buriánek, V.; Pešková, V.; Šrůtka, P.; Černý, K. Differences in susceptibility to ash dieback in Czech provenances of Fraxinus excelsior. Forest Pathol. 2016, 46, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Marciulyniene, D.; Davydenko, K.; Stenlid, J.; Cleary, M. Can pruning help maintain vitality of ash trees affected by ash dieback in urban landscapes? Urban For. Urban Green. 2017, 27, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Klesse, S.; Abegg, M.; Hopf, S.E.; Gossner, M.M.; Rigling, A.; Queloz, V. Spread and severity of ash dieback in Switzerland–tree characteristics and landscape features explain varying mortality probability. Front. For. Glob. Chang. 2021, 4, 645920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cerutti, A.V.; Careggio, P.P.; De Leo, S.; Freydoz, M.C.; Ceragioli, L.; Prinetti, F. Il Territorio e l’uomo in Valle d’Aosta—Parte I; Edizioni AIIG.: Aosta, Italy, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  42. Regione Autonoma Valle d’Aosta. Geoportale SCT—Sistema delle Conoscenze Territoriali—Assessorato Opere Pubbliche, Territorio e Ambiente—Dipartimento Programmazione, Risorse Idriche e Territorio—Pianificazione Territoriale—Ufficio Cartografico. 2013. Available online: https://geoportale.regione.vda.it/ (accessed on 15 February 2024).
  43. QGIS Development Team. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. QGIS 3.10 A Coruña. 2019. Available online: https://qgis.org/en/site/ (accessed on 16 February 2024).
  44. EPPO. PM 7/117 (1) Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus. EPPO Bull. 2013, 43, 449–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Müller, E.; Stierlin, H.R. Sanasilva Tree Crown Photos with Percentages of Foliage Loss; Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow, and Landscape Research: Birmensdorf, Switzerland, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  46. Durrant, D.; Eichhorn, J.; Ferretti, M.; Roskams, P.; Szepesi, A. Manual on Methods and Criteria for Harmonized Sampling, Assessment, Monitoring and Analysis of the Effects of Air Pollution on Forests, Part II, Visual Assessment of Crown Condition; United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  47. Lione, G.; Giordano, L.; Turina, M.; Gonthier, P. Hail-induced infections of the chestnut blight pathogen Cryphonectria parasitica depend on wound size and may lead to severe diebacks. Phytopathology 2020, 110, 1280–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Baral, H.-O.; Bemmann, M. Hymenoscyphus fraxineus vs Hymenoscyphus albidus—A comparative light microscopic study on the causal agent of European ash dieback and related foliicolous, stroma-forming species. Mycology 2014, 5, 228–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chandelier, A.; André, F.; Laurent, F. Detection of Chalara fraxinea in common ash (Fraxinus excelsior) using real time PCR. Forest Pathol. 2010, 40, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Husson, C.; Scala, B.; Caël, O.; Frey, P.; Feau, N.; Ioos, R.; Marçais, B. Chalara fraxinea is an invasive pathogen in France. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2011, 130, 311–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dokmanic, I.; Parhizkar, R.; Ranieri, J.; Vetterli, M. Euclidean distance matrices: Essential theory, algorithms, and applications. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2015, 32, 12–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lione, G.; Brescia, F.; Giordano, L.; Gonthier, P. Effects of seasonality and climate on the propagule deposition patterns of the chestnut blight pathogen Cryphonectria parasitica in orchards of the Alpine district of north western Italy. Agriculture 2022, 12, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mitchell, A. The ESRI Guide to GIS Analysis, Volume 2: Spatial Measurements and Statistics; ESRI Press: Redlands, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  54. Crawley, M.J. The R Book, 2nd ed.; John Wiley and Sons Ltd.: West Sussex, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  55. Hosmer, D.W.; Lemeshow, S. Applied Logistic Regression; Johns Wiley and Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  56. Hothorn, T.; Hornik, K.; Zeileis, A. Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 2006, 15, 651–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zeileis, A.; Leisch, F.; Hornik, K.; Kleiber, C. strucchange: An R package for testing for structural change in linear regression models. J. Stat. Softw. 2002, 7, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hothorn, T.; Zeileis, A. partykit: A modular toolkit for recursive partytioning in R. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2015, 16, 3905–3909. [Google Scholar]
  59. Gerber, H.U.; Leung, B.P.K.; Shiu, E.S.W. Indicator function and Hattendorff theorem. N. Am. Actuar. J. 2003, 7, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wagenmakers, E.J.; Farrell, S. AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2004, 11, 192–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Grueber, C.E.; Nakagawa, S.; Laws, R.J.; Jamieson, I.G. Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: Challenges and solutions. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 24, 699–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Robin, X.; Turck, N.; Hainard, A.; Tiberti, N.; Lisacek, F.; Sanchez, J.C.; Müller, M. pROC: An open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. LeDell, E.; Petersen, M.; van der Laan, M. Computationally efficient confidence intervals for cross-validated area under the ROC curve estimates. Electron. J. Stat. 2015, 9, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pewsey, A.; Neuhäuser, M.; Ruxton, G.D. Circular Statistics in R; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  65. Mardia, K.V. A multi-sample uniform scores test on a circle and its parametric competitor. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B-Stat. Methodol. 1972, 34, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rao, J.S. Large sample tests for the homogeneity of angular data. Sankhya Ser. B 1967, 28, 172–174. [Google Scholar]
  67. Lione, G.; Giraudo, M.; Gonthier, P. Modelling the front dynamics of invasive plant pathogens through the analysis of spatial gradients. J. Plant Pathol. 2024, submitted.
  68. Zhang, B.; Bilder, C.; Biggerstaff, B.; Schaarschmidt, F.; Hitt, B.; binGroup: Evaluation and Experimental Design for Binomial Group Testing. R Package Version 2.2-1. 2018. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=binGroup (accessed on 9 February 2024).
  69. Efron, B.; Tibshirani, R.J. An Introduction to the Bootstrap; Chapman & Hall/CRC: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  70. Agostinelli, C.; Lund, U. R Package ‘Circular’: Circular Statistics (version 0.5-0). 2023. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=circular (accessed on 9 February 2024).
  71. Barton, K.; MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R Package Version 1.43.6. 2019. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.html (accessed on 9 February 2024).
  72. Blaker, H. Confidence curves and improved exact confidence intervals for discrete distributions. Can. J. Stat.-Rev. Can. Stat. 2000, 28, 783–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. DiCiccio, T.J.; Efron, B. Bootstrap confidence intervals. Stat. Sci. 1996, 11, 189–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. McKinney, L.V.; Nielsen, L.R.; Hansen, J.K.; Kjær, E.D. Presence of natural genetic resistance in Fraxinus excelsior (Oleraceae) to Chalara fraxinea (Ascomycota): An emerging infectious disease. Heredity 2011, 106, 788–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. McKinney, L.V.; Thomsen, I.M.; Kjaer, E.D.; Nielsen, L.R. Genetic resistance to Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus limits fungal growth and symptom occurrence in Fraxinus excelsior. Forest Pathol. 2012, 42, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Timmermann, V.; Nagy, N.E.; Hietala, A.M.; Børja, I.; Solheim, H. Progression of ash dieback in Norway related to tree age, disease history and regional aspects. Baltic For. 2017, 23, 150–158. [Google Scholar]
  77. Linaldeddu, B.T.; Bottecchia, F.; Bregant, C.; Maddau, L.; Montecchio, L. Diplodia fraxini and Diplodia subglobosa: The main species associated with cankers and dieback of Fraxinus excelsior in north-eastern Italy. Forests 2020, 11, 883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Linaldeddu, B.T.; Bregant, C.; Montecchio, L.; Brglez, A.; Piškur, B.; Ogris, N. First report of Diplodia fraxini and Diplodia subglobosa causing canker and dieback of Fraxinus excelsior in Slovenia. Plant Dis. 2022, 106, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Slippers, B.; Wingfield, M.J. Botryosphaeriaceae as endophytes and latent pathogens of woody plants: Diversity, ecology and impact. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2007, 21, 90–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Orusa, T.; Borgogno Mondino, E. Exploring short-term climate change effects on rangelands and broad-leaved forests by free satellite data in Aosta Valley (Northwest Italy). Climate 2021, 9, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kerr, G.; Cahalan, C. A review of site factors affecting the early growth of ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). For. Ecol. Manag. 2004, 188, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Erfmeier, A.; Haldan, K.L.; Beckmann, L.M.; Behrens, M.; Rotert, J.; Schrautzer, J. Ash dieback and its impact in near-natural forest remnants–a plant community-based inventory. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Beniston, M. Mountain weather and climate: A general overview and a focus on climatic change in the Alps. Hydrobiologia 2006, 562, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ghelardini, L.; Migliorini, D.; Santini, A.; Pepori, A.L.; Maresi, G.; Vai, N.; Montuschi, C.; Carrari, E.; Feducci, M.; Capretti, P.; et al. From the Alps to the Apennines: Possible spread of ash dieback in Mediterranean areas. In Dieback of European Ash (Fraxinus spp.)—Consequences and Guidelines for Sustainable Management; Vasaitis, R., Enderle, R., Eds.; SLU Service/Repro: Uppsala, Sweden, 2017; pp. 140–149. [Google Scholar]
  85. Fones, H.N.; Mardon, C.; Gurr, S.J. A role for the asexual spores in infection of Fraxinus excelsior by the ash-dieback fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 34638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Burns, P.; Timmermann, V.; Yearsley, J.M. Meteorological factors associated with the timing and abundance of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus spore release. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2022, 66, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kirisits, T. Ascocarp formation of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus on several-year-old pseudosclerotial leaf rachises of Fraxinus excelsior. Forest Pathol. 2015, 45, 254–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Schoebel, C.N.; Prospero, S.; Gross, A.; Rigling, D. Detection of a conspecific mycovirus in two closely related native and introduced fungal hosts and evidence for interspecific virus transmission. Viruses 2018, 10, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Centro Funzionale Regione Autonoma Valle d’Aosta 2024. Vento. Available online: https://cf.regione.vda.it/vento.php (accessed on 16 February 2024).
Figure 1. Map of the spatial distribution and incidence of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in the inner-alpine valleys of northwestern Italy. For site acronyms, see Table 1.
Figure 1. Map of the spatial distribution and incidence of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in the inner-alpine valleys of northwestern Italy. For site acronyms, see Table 1.
Forests 15 00732 g001
Figure 2. Binary logistic regression modelling the probability of infection by Hymenoscyphus fraxineus as a function of the cumulated precipitation of the months of April P 4 and July P 7 (in mm). The probability is indicated on the y-axis and it is expressed as a number in the interval [0–1]. The level of precipitation P 4 is reported on the x-axis (in mm) as a continuous variable, while P 7   is categorized in five classes from 40 to 80 mm, corresponding to distinct curves.
Figure 2. Binary logistic regression modelling the probability of infection by Hymenoscyphus fraxineus as a function of the cumulated precipitation of the months of April P 4 and July P 7 (in mm). The probability is indicated on the y-axis and it is expressed as a number in the interval [0–1]. The level of precipitation P 4 is reported on the x-axis (in mm) as a continuous variable, while P 7   is categorized in five classes from 40 to 80 mm, corresponding to distinct curves.
Forests 15 00732 g002
Figure 3. Windrose directional graph of the descending spatial gradients resulting from the incidence and impact of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus on ash trees in the inner-alpine valleys of northwestern Italy. Directions marked with dots display values of the associated variable higher than those detected in the opposite direction. Variable acronyms are defined as follows: incidence of H. fraxineus (inc), ash crown transparency (crtr), number of lesions observed at the stem base (nl), and percentage of leaves displaying necrotic areas on the lamina (pnl).
Figure 3. Windrose directional graph of the descending spatial gradients resulting from the incidence and impact of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus on ash trees in the inner-alpine valleys of northwestern Italy. Directions marked with dots display values of the associated variable higher than those detected in the opposite direction. Variable acronyms are defined as follows: incidence of H. fraxineus (inc), ash crown transparency (crtr), number of lesions observed at the stem base (nl), and percentage of leaves displaying necrotic areas on the lamina (pnl).
Forests 15 00732 g003
Table 1. Study sites monitored for ash dieback. For each site, the code, location, municipality, geographic, and geomorphologic details are reported along with the corresponding dendrometric characteristics and the abundance of the ash trees. The acronyms are specified in the footnotes.
Table 1. Study sites monitored for ash dieback. For each site, the code, location, municipality, geographic, and geomorphologic details are reported along with the corresponding dendrometric characteristics and the abundance of the ash trees. The acronyms are specified in the footnotes.
Site CodeLocation (Municipality)x 1y 2el  3sect  4sl  5as  6dbh  7h  8ab  9
AEntreves (Courmayeur)341,3165,075,6401307H16.821115.9 (6.2) 10.8 (4.0)20
BChabodey (La Salle)349,0025,066,3171192H43.0526.0 (2.1)9.1 (2.5)15
CLenteney (La Salle)350,4485,065,962851H0.54512.8 (11.7)12.6 (8.7)10
DValsavarenche (Valsavarenche)359,7595,055,8431239H36.42618.7 (2.5)8.8 (2.6)15
EBuillet (Introd)358,5465,060,513979H97.333412.0 (2.2)12.2 (2.8)10
FCourmayeur (Courmayeur)341,7885,074,4151246H39.1956.4 (2.1)7.7 (1.3)10
GVerrand (Pré-Saint-Didier)342,4295,071,6611189H40.021110.9 (4.1)12.1 (3.6)35
HElevaz (Pré-Saint-Didier)341,6795,067,3841273H65.814110.7 (8.5)9.7 (6.3)25
IFenêtre (La Salle)351,2875,066,9441117H73.614912.9 (6.2)11.7 (2.7)35
LDerby (La Salle)351,3245,065,019847H35.35213.2 (7.6)10.9 (4.4)10
MCroix Blanche (Villeneuve)359,7895,061,355886H37.03046.9 (1.4)8.2 (1.5)5
NChessin (Antey-Saint-André)390,4415,070,429785L13.012914.8 (6.1)11.6 (3.3)15
OArbaz (Challand-Saint-Anselme)401,1075,063,8361380L72.51189.1 (5.8)7.0 (1.9)15
PBois de Cretes (Challand-Saint-Anselme)402,0355,061,547900L18.433417.5 (5.2)19.4 (4.0)85
QGrand Brissogne (Brissogne)375,7655,063,8521122M44.77011.2 (7.2)10.0 (3.9)10
RPied de Ville (Valpelline)373,0245,076,9991089M53.734811.2 (5.4)6.1 (1.9)5
SÉtroubles (Étroubles)362,8535,075,4381280M27.118310.3 (7.2)6.4 (2.1)15
TRean (Saint-Marcel)380,7845,065,119836M3.330220.4 (12.5)17.4 (5.0)10
ULa Fabbrica (Valpelline)369,4905,075,094895M46.23076.8 (2.2)9.0 (2.0)10
VPont (Saint-Rémy-en-Bosses)358,0695,075,2981483M20.731922.7 (12.4)17.0 (4.9)20
1 longitude (m, UTM WGS84 zone 32 N); 2 latitude (m, UTM WGS84 zone 32 N); 3 elevation (m a.s.l); 4 sector of the Aosta Valley (H: high, M: medium, L: low); 5 slope (°); 6 aspect (azimuth, °); 7 average diameter at breast height (cm) of the ash trees with corresponding standard deviation in brackets; (°); 8 average tree height (m) of the ash with corresponding standard deviation; and 9 ash abundance (%).
Table 2. Species specific primers and probes used for the qPCR analyses for the specific detection of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus and H. albidus.
Table 2. Species specific primers and probes used for the qPCR analyses for the specific detection of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus and H. albidus.
Primer/Probe
Name
Sequence (5′-3′)References
Cf-FCCCTTGTGTATATTATATTGTTGCTTTAGC[49]
Cf-RGGGTCCTCTAGCAGGCACAGT[49]
Cf-S6FAM-TCTGGGCGTCGGCCTCGG-BHQ1[49]
Halb-FTATATTGTTGCTTTAGCAGGTCGC[50]
Halb-RATCCTCTAGCAGGCACGGTC[50]
Halb-PHEX-CCGGGGCGTTGGCCTCG-BHQ2[50]
Table 3. Binary logistic regressions modelling the probability of infection by Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. For each input variable (see main text for acronyms definition), the associated β h coefficient is reported along with its Wald test p-value (p), except for the null model for which no input variables are included. Asterisks next to the β h mark significant values (p < 0.05). The models’ intercept β 0   and corresponding p-value are reported as well. The outcomes of the likelihood ratio test are indicated as a p-value in the column LRT, with the Akaike Information Criterion and weight (in %) being shown under the heading AIC and AICw, respectively. The area under the relative operating characteristic curve (AUC) and its cross-validated 95% confidence interval are included. The last column reports the ordinal score ranking the overall model performance from 1 (best performance) to 10 (worst performance).
Table 3. Binary logistic regressions modelling the probability of infection by Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. For each input variable (see main text for acronyms definition), the associated β h coefficient is reported along with its Wald test p-value (p), except for the null model for which no input variables are included. Asterisks next to the β h mark significant values (p < 0.05). The models’ intercept β 0   and corresponding p-value are reported as well. The outcomes of the likelihood ratio test are indicated as a p-value in the column LRT, with the Akaike Information Criterion and weight (in %) being shown under the heading AIC and AICw, respectively. The area under the relative operating characteristic curve (AUC) and its cross-validated 95% confidence interval are included. The last column reports the ordinal score ranking the overall model performance from 1 (best performance) to 10 (worst performance).
Input Variableβh(P)β0(P)LRTAICAICWAUC (CI95%)Score
P4, P7 β P 4 * = 7.516   ·   10 2
P = 3.12   ·   10 4
β P 7 * = 5.315   ·   10 2
P = 1.48   ·   10 2
β 0 = 7.478
P = 1.07   ·   10 4
P = 2.37   ·   10 4 110.4668.2%0.75 (0.64–0.87)1
x, y β x * = 3.355   ·   10 5
P = 1.04   ·   10 2
β y * = 1.307   ·   10 4
P = 3.53   ·   10 3
β 0 = 6.759   ·   10 2
P = 3.17   ·   10 3
P = 1.65   ·   10 3 114.359.8%0.71 (0.59–0.84)2
Psp β P s p * = 2.762   ·   10 2
P = 3.41   ·   10 3
β 0 = 5.301
P = 5.38   ·   10 4
P = 1.23   ·   10 3 114.718.2%0.71 (0.59–0.82)3
P4 β P 4 * = 5.988   ·   10 2
P = 5.72   ·   10 3
β 0 = 3.648
P = 4.44   ·   10 4
P = 1.44   ·   10 3 1157.1%0.70 (0.59–0.81)4
T m a x 12 β T m a x 12 * = 2.815   ·   10 1
P = 4.41   ·   10 3
β 0 = 2.210
P = 2.13   ·   10 5
P = 2.27   ·   10 3 115.844.6%0.69 (0.58–0.80)5
y β y * = 9.546   ·   10 5
P = 1.73   ·   10 2
β 0 = 4.848   ·   10 2
P = 1.71   ·   10 2
P = 1.39   ·   10 2 119.110.9%0.64 (0.51–0.76)6
el β e l * = 2.794   ·   10 3
P = 1.92   ·   10 2
β 0 = 1.993
P = 1.16   ·   10 1
P = 1.53   ·   10 2 119.280.8%0.64 (0.51–0.76)7
x β x = 2.124   ·   10 5
P = 7.40   ·   10 2
β 0 = 8.754
P = 4.49   ·   10 2
P = 7.33   ·   10 2 121.950.2%0.64 (0.53–0.76)8
P7 β P 7 = 1.539   ·   10 2
P = 3.36   ·   10 1
β 0 = 1.925
P = 5.37   ·   10 2
P = 3.35   ·   10 1 124.230.1%0.57 (0.44–0.69)9
-
(null model)
- β 0 = 9.985   ·   10 1
P = 6.28   ·   10 6
-123.160.1%0.50 (0.28–0.72)10
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lione, G.; Ongaro, S.; Prencipe, S.; Giraudo, M.; Gonthier, P. Drivers of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus Infections in the Inner-Alpine Valleys of Northwestern Italy. Forests 2024, 15, 732. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15040732

AMA Style

Lione G, Ongaro S, Prencipe S, Giraudo M, Gonthier P. Drivers of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus Infections in the Inner-Alpine Valleys of Northwestern Italy. Forests. 2024; 15(4):732. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15040732

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lione, Guglielmo, Silvia Ongaro, Simona Prencipe, Marianna Giraudo, and Paolo Gonthier. 2024. "Drivers of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus Infections in the Inner-Alpine Valleys of Northwestern Italy" Forests 15, no. 4: 732. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15040732

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop