The Prospective Consumers of the Indonesian Green Aviation Initiative for Sustainable Development in Air Transportation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. A New High Tech Product Market Profiling
3. Values and Purchasing Green High Tech Behavior
4. Methodology of Research and Study Sample
5. Results and Discussions
5.1. Results
5.2. Discussions
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Li, Y.; Cui, Q. Carbon neutral growth from 2020 strategy and airline environmental inefficiency: A Network Range Adjusted Environmental Data Envelopment Analysis. Appl. Energy 2017, 199, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, L.; Huang, Y. Exploring the Schemes for Green Climate Fund Financing: International Lessons. World Dev. 2018, 101, 173–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sood, A.; Tellis, G.J. Technological evolution and radical innovation. J. Mark. 2005, 69, 152–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suprapto, M. Niche Applications for Introducing Radically New High-Tech Products to the Market: An Explorative Study. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Gordon, R.; Carrigan, M.; Hastings, G. A framework for sustainable marketing. Mark. Theory 2011, 11, 143–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshi, Y.; Rahman, Z. Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. Int. Strateg. Manag. Rev. 2015, 3, 128–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Do Paco, A.; Raposo, M. “Green” segmentation: An application to the Portuguese consumer market. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2009, 27, 364–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thompson, D.W.; Anderson, R.C.; Hansen, E.N.; Kahle, L.R. Green segmentation and environmental certification: Insights from forest products. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2010, 19, 319–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Pelsmacker, P.; Driesen, L.; Rayp, G. Do Consumers Care About Ethics? Willingness to Pay for Fair-Trade Coffee. J. Consum. Aff. 2005, 39, 363–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doran, C.J. The role of personal values in Fair Trade consumption. J. Bus. Ethics 2009, 84, 549–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, M.; Chassot, S.; Wüstenhagen, R.; Hübner, G. Profiling the green consumer: The role of personal values. In Sustainable Consumption–Towards Action and Impact Abstract Volume. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, Hamburg, Germany, 6–8 November 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Fernando, Y.; Shaharudin, M.S.; Wahid, N.A. Eco-innovation practices: A case study of green furniture manufacturers in Indonesia. Int. J. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2016, 23, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alves, I.M. Green spin everywhere: How greenwashing reveals the limits of the CSR paradigm. J. Glob. Chang. Gov. 2009, 2, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
- Furlow, N.E. Greenwashing in the new millennium. J. Appl. Bus. Econ. 2010, 10, 22. [Google Scholar]
- Aji, H.M.; Sutikno, B. The extended consequence of greenwashing: Perceived consumer skepticism. Int. J. Bus. Inf. 2015, 10, 433–468. [Google Scholar]
- Kardooni, R.; Yusoff, S.B.; Kari, F.B. Renewable energy technology acceptance in Peninsular Malaysia. Energy Policy 2016, 88, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortt, J.R.; van der Duin, P.A. The evolution of innovation management towards contextual innovation. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2008, 11, 522–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tellis, G.J.; Yin, E.; Bell, S. Global consumer innovativeness: Cross-country differences and demographic commonalities. J. Int. Mark. 2009, 17, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slater, S.F.; Mohr, J.J. Successful development and commercialization of technological innovation: Insights based on strategy type. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2006, 23, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ottman, J. The New Rules of Green Marketing: Strategies, Tools, and Inspiration for Sustainable Branding; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Wiser, R.H. Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable energy: A comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 62, 419–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zarnikau, J. Consumer demand for ‘green power’ and energy efficiency. Energy Policy 2003, 31, 1661–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowland, I.; Faughnan, M.; Hoey, L.; Wahala, K.; Williamson, G.; Cassidy, A. Bioavailability of Phyto-oestrogens. Br. J. Nutr. 2003, 89, 838–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gössling, S.; Peeters, P.; Ceron, J.P.; Dubois, G.; Patterson, T.; Richardson, R.B. The eco-efficiency of tourism. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 54, 417–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arkesteijn, K.; Oerlemans, L. The early adoption of green power by Dutch households: An empirical exploration of factors influencing the early adoption of green electricity for domestic purposes. Energy Policy 2005, 33, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diaz-Rainey, I.; Ashton, J.K. Profiling potential green electricity tariff adopters: Green consumerism as an environmental policy tool? Bus. Strategy Environ. 2011, 20, 456–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nadlifatin, R.; Lin, S.C.; Rachmaniati, Y.P.; Persada, S.F.; Razif, M. A pro-environmental reasoned action model for measuring citizens’ intentions regarding ecolabel product usage. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rohan, M.J. A rose by any name? The values construct. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2000, 4, 255–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Young, I.; Hendrick, S.; Parker, S.; Rajić, A.; McClure, J.T.; Sanchez, J.; McEwen, S.A. Knowledge and attitudes towards food safety among Canadian dairy producers. Prev. Vet. Med. 2010, 94, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pietrzak, M.B.; Balcerzak, A.P.; Gajdos, A.; Arendt, L. Entrepreneurial environment at regional level: The case of Polish path towards sustainable socio-economic development. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2017, 5, 190–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lowe, A.C.T.; Corkindale, D.R. Differences in “cultural values” and their effects on responses to marketing stimuli: A cross-cultural study between Australians and Chinese from the People’s Republic of China. Eur. J. Mark. 1998, 32, 843–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y. Understanding Green Purchase: The Influence of Collectivism, Personal Values, and Environmental Attitudes, and the Moderating Effect of Perceived Consumer Effectiveness. Seoul J. Bus. 2011, 17, 65–92. [Google Scholar]
- Stern, P.C.; Dietz, T.; Kalof, L. Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environ. Behav. 1993, 25, 322–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simanaviciene, Z.; Volochovic, A.; Cibinskiene, A. Features of energy saving potential in Lithuanian households. Equilib. Q. J. Econ. Econ. Policy 2016, 11, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simanaviciene, Z.; Virgilijus, D.; Simanavicius, A. Psychological factors influence on energy efficiency in households. Oecon. Copernic. 2017, 8, 671–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwartz, S.H. An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Read. Psychol. Cult. 2012, 2, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwartz, S.H.; Bardi, A. Value hierarchies across cultures taking a similarities perspective. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 2001, 32, 268–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parks, L.; Guay, R.P. Can Personal Values Predict Performance? Evidence in an Academic Setting. Appl. Psychol. 2012, 61, 149–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwartz, S.H.; Bilsky, W. Toward A Universal Psychological Structure of Human Values. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1987, 53, 550–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofstede, G. Asian management in the 21st century. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 2007, 24, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.; Choi, S.M. Antecedents of green purchase behavior: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and PCE. Adv. Consum. Res. 2005, 32, 592–599. [Google Scholar]
- McCarty, J.A.; Shrum, L.J. The Influence of Individualism, Collectivism, and Locus of Control on Environmental Beliefs and Behavior. J. Public Policy Mark. 2001, 20, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Follows, S.B.; Jobber, D. Environmentally responsible purchase behavior: A test of a consumer model. Eur. J. Mark. 2000, 34, 723–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahle, L.R.; Kennedy, P. Using the list of values (LOV) to understand consumers. J. Serv. Mark. 1988, 2, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blackburn, H. Millennials and the adoption of new technologies in libraries through the diffusion of innovations process. Libr. High Technol. 2011, 29, 663–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slater, S.F.; Mohr, J.J.; Sengupta, S. Radical product innovation capability: Literature review, synthesis, and illustrative research propositions. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2014, 31, 552–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.J.; Lee, C.K.; Gon Kim, W.; Kim, J.M. Relationships between lifestyle of health and sustainability and healthy food choices for seniors. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2013, 25, 558–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezvani, Z.; Jansson, J.; Bodin, J. Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda. Transp. Res. D Trans. Environ. 2015, 1, 122–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Axsen, J.; Goldberg, S.; Bailey, J. How might potential future plug-in electric vehicle buyers differ from current “Pioneer” owners? Transp. Res. D Trans. Environ. 2016, 1, 357–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaw, D.; Grehan, E.; Shiu, E.; Hassan, L.; Thomson, J. An exploration of values in ethical consumer decision making. J. Consum. Behav. 2005, 4, 185–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tongco, M.D.C. Purposive Sampling as a Tool for Informant Selection. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2007, 5, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neupane, R.P.; Sharma, K.R.; Thapa, G.B. Adoption of agroforestry in the hills of Nepal: A logistic regression analysis. Agric. Syst. 2002, 72, 177–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alatas, S.H. The Myth of the Lazy Native: A Study of the Image of the Malays, Filipinos and Javanese from the 16th to the 20th Century and Its Function in the Ideology of Colonial Capitalism; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Q. Design of Eco Bags on the Basis of LOHAS and Consumption Behavior. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 2013, 4, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pesek, T.J.; Helton, L.R.; Nair, M. Healing across cultures: Learning from traditions. EcoHealth 2006, 3, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilbert, P.; McEwan, K.; Gibbons, L.; Chotai, S.; Duarte, J.; Matos, M. Fears of compassion and happiness in relation to alexithymia, mindfulness, and self-criticism. Psychol. Psychother. Theory Res. Pract. 2012, 85, 374–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Teixeira, M.A.P.; Bardagi, M.P.; Lassance, M.C.P.; de Oliveira Magalhães, M.; Duarte, M.E. Career adapt-abilities scale—Brazilian form: Psychometric properties and relationships to personality. J. Vocat. Behav. 2012, 80, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, D.L.; Gillaspy, J.A., Jr.; Purc-Stephenson, R. Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychol. Methods 2009, 14, 6–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis; Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.; Wu, A.D.; Zumbo, B.D. The impact of outliers on Cronbach’s coefficient alpha estimate of reliability: Ordinal/rating scale item responses. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 2010, 70, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schumacker, R.E.; Lomax, R.G. A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling; Psychology Press: Hove, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, L.T.; Bentler, P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 1999, 6, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pilelienė, L.; Grigaliūnaitė, V. Colour temperature in advertising and its impact on consumer purchase intentions. Oecon. Copernic. 2017, 8, 657–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robins, R.W.; Fraley, R.C.; Krueger, R.F. (Eds.) Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Arbuckle, J.L. IBM SPSS Amos 19 User’s Guide; Amos Development Corporation: Crawfordville, FL, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Awang, Z. SEM Made Simple: A Gentle Approach to Learning Structural Equation Modeling; MPWS Rich Publication: Bangi, Malaysia, 1 August 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Kot, S. Cost structure in relation to the size of road transport enterprises. Promet Traffic Traffico 2015, 27, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oláh, J.; Bai, A.; Karmazin, G.; Balogh, P.; Popp, J. The role played by trust and its effect on the competiveness of logistics service Providers in Hungary. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cygler, J.; Sroka, W. Coopetition disadvantages: The case of the high tech companies. Eng. Econ. 2017, 28, 494–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schreier, M.; Prügl, R. Extending lead-user theory: Antecedents and consequences of consumers’ lead userness. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2008, 25, 331–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franke, N.; Von Hippel, E.; Schreier, M. Finding commercially attractive user innovations: A test of lead-user theory. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2006, 23, 301–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jotanović, S.R.; Ratković, M.; Zakić, N. Pro-environmental activities of consumers. Pol. J. Manag. Stud. 2017, 16, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thamrin, H.M. From goal orientation to manager performance: A case on managers of shipping company in Indonesia. Pol. J. Manag. Stud. 2016, 13, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowalska, K. Non-Market Factors of Competitiveness of Transport, Freight Forwarding and Logistics Companies. Forum Sci. Oecon. 2014, 2, 5–17. [Google Scholar]
- Androniceanu, A.; Popescu, C.R. An inclusive model for an effective development of the renewable energies public sector. Adm. Manag. Public 2017, 28, 81–96. [Google Scholar]
Variable Labels/Constructs | Questions | Average |
---|---|---|
Holistic health (y11) | I am always concerned about my health and family health. | 5.66 |
Conservation (y12) | I always use environment-friendly products. | 5.20 |
Global social justice (y13) | I shape good moral and take care of other people. | 4.78 |
Sustainable living (y14) | I am very keen on natural environment along with worry about pollution of natural environment. | 5.51 |
Sensitive to group norms and values (y41) | I may demand personalized solutions and quick-response, highly-qualified sales and support when selecting new high tech aircraft and a new renewable energy. | 5.66 |
Having more of local perspective (y42) | I am attracted by high-risk projects like Indonesia Green Aviation Initiative for sustainable development in air transportation. | 5.20 |
Likely to be opinion leaders (y43) | I am motivated by the idea of being a change agent in my reference group to use new high tech aircraft | 4.78 |
Adopting through technology enthusiasts’ endorsements (y44) | I am willing to try new technology in airport transportation if some people begin to use this new service. | 5.51 |
Cost-conscious (y45) | Since there is great gains from adopting innovation in new high tech aircraft and a new renewable energy, I am willing to pay more expensive for the service. | 5.29 |
Well educated (y51) | Being highly educated, I look forward to adopt and use new high tech aircraft and a new renewable energy to achieve a revolutionary improvement. | 3.98 |
Cosmopolitan outlook (y52) | I appreciate the introduction of new high tech aircraft and a new renewable energy as the innovation. | 4.30 |
High involvement outside communities (y53) | My interest in new air transport technology leads me out of narrow circles of peers into broader circles of innovators | 5.44 |
Depending less on group norms (y54) | I am willing to tolerate initial glitches and problems that may accompany the introduction of high tech new aircraft and new renewable energy in air transportation. | 5.98 |
Having greater self-confidence (y55) | If there is a problem with the application of new technology in aircraft and renewable energy, I am willing to develop makeshift solutions to such problems. | 4.67 |
Construct | Loading Factors | Construct | Loading Factors |
---|---|---|---|
Reliability (ρη) = 0.869 X11 ← Universalism X12 ← Universalism X13 ← Universalism X14 ← Universalism X15 ← Universalism X16 ← Universalism X17 ← Universalism X18 ← Universalism | 0.815 0.824 0.819 0.826 0.832 0.821 0.837 0.820 | Reliability (ρη) = 0.779 X25 ← Benevolence X24 ← Benevolence X23 ← Benevolence X22 ← Benevolence X21 ← Benevolence | 0.736 0.844 0.772 0.854 0.873 |
Reliability (ρη) = 0.893 X37 ← Tradition X36 ← Tradition X35 ← Tradition X34 ← Tradition X33 ← Tradition X32 ← Tradition X31 ← Tradition | 0.813 0.778 0.775 0.843 0.864 0.896 0.836 | Reliability (ρη) = 0.824 X44 ← Conformity X43 ← Conformity X42 ← Conformity X41 ← Conformity | 0.827 0.787 0.776 0.804 |
Reliability (ρη) = 0.903 X54 ← Security X53 ← Security X52 ← Security X51 ← Security | 0.864 0.811 0.733 0.791 | Reliability (ρη) = 0.780 y11 ← LOHAS y12 ← LOHAS y13 ← LOHAS y14 ← LOHAS | 0.803 0.780 0.778 0.827 |
Reliability (ρη) = 0.768 y24 ← Traditionalist y23 ← Traditionalist y22 ← Traditionalist y21 ← Traditionalist | 0.804 0.788 0.782 0.812 | Reliability (ρη) = 0.788 y34 ← Career Oriented y33 ← Career Oriented y32 ← Career Oriented y31 ← Career Oriented | 0.786 0.799 0.797 0.821 |
Reliability (ρη) = 0.742 y42 ← Visionaries y43 ← Visionaries y44 ← Visionaries y45 ← Visionaries y41 ← Visionaries | 0.809 0.822 0.809 0.808 0.841 | Reliability (ρη) = 0.972 y51 ← Technology Enthusiast y52 ← Technology Enthusiast y53 ← Technology Enthusiast y54 ← Technology Enthusiast y55 ← Technology Enthusiast | 0.773 0.786 0.804 0.829 0.847 |
Estimate | S.E. | C.R. | P | Conclusion | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOHAS | ← | Universalism | 0.265 | 0.071 | 3.711 | *** | Significant |
LOHAS | ← | Benevolence | 0.125 | 0.079 | 1.589 | 0.112 | Not |
Traditionalist | ← | Tradition | 0.371 | 0.100 | 3.705 | *** | Significant |
Traditionalist | ← | Conformity | 0.301 | 0.104 | 2.894 | 0.004 | Significant |
Career Oriented | ← | Security | 0.551 | 0.143 | 3.846 | *** | Significant |
Technology enthusiast | ← | LOHAS | 0.285 | 0.085 | 3.348 | *** | Significant |
Technology enthusiast | ← | Career oriented | 0.197 | 0.089 | 2.230 | 0.026 | Significant |
Technology enthusiast | ← | Traditionalist | 0.074 | 0.076 | 0.971 | 0.332 | Not |
visionaries | ← | Traditionalist | 0.321 | 0.073 | 4.384 | *** | significant |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Rajiani, I.; Kot, S. The Prospective Consumers of the Indonesian Green Aviation Initiative for Sustainable Development in Air Transportation. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061772
Rajiani I, Kot S. The Prospective Consumers of the Indonesian Green Aviation Initiative for Sustainable Development in Air Transportation. Sustainability. 2018; 10(6):1772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061772
Chicago/Turabian StyleRajiani, Ismi, and Sebastian Kot. 2018. "The Prospective Consumers of the Indonesian Green Aviation Initiative for Sustainable Development in Air Transportation" Sustainability 10, no. 6: 1772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061772
APA StyleRajiani, I., & Kot, S. (2018). The Prospective Consumers of the Indonesian Green Aviation Initiative for Sustainable Development in Air Transportation. Sustainability, 10(6), 1772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061772