1. Introduction
“Fitness”, derived from population genetics, is a quantitative indicator that represents a population’s receptive ability in the process of evolution regarding natural selection. In essence, “fitness” can also be used to quantify and describe the adaptability of a population to a specific external environment [
1]. In 1993, John H. Holland, a pioneer in genetic algorithms and echo models, put forward the “complex adaptive system” (CAS) [
2] and introduced the notions of fitness and adaptability into the systems theory as the theoretical basis that explains the complex systems comprising numerous adaptive agents. CAS is a critical breakthrough in the history of epistemology of systematic kinetics and evolutionary law [
3]. Different from the “old three” theories such as systems theory, cybernetics, and information theory and the “new three” theories such as dissipative structure, synergetic, and catastrophe theories CAS suggests that “elements” be replaced with “adaptive agents” and that it is the agents’ adaptation that builds complexity of systems [
4]. Moreover, the fitness improvement of adaptive agent will also promote the adaptability of system, which is the fundamental reason for the evolution of system [
5]. In hidden order, John H. Holland points out the characteristics of “adaptation”, i.e., universality, relativity, interactivity, complexity [
6]. Hence, the theory has been widely used in studies on evolutionary economics [
7,
8], social engineering [
9,
10], and ecological adaptation [
11,
12]. On one hand, the theory is applied to explain interaction between the subjects in the above-mentioned complex system as well as internal mechanism of the system’s continuous evolution and adaptation. On the other hand, it is applied in computer simulations (mainly by SWARM) to simulate the evolution of the system. Urban and rural development system is a typical complex socio-economic system encompassing socio-economic entities including cities, towns, and villages. The explanation and application of CAS theory on this system has been increasing in recent years. For example, the framework of CAS theory is used to explain the formation and evolution of city structure [
13,
14], to explain the evolution of villages and study adaptive development strategy [
15], and to explore paths of adaptive development of small towns in China [
16]. CAS, at its core, relates to the theoretical feasibility and real necessity of the interpretation and analysis on urban–rural development. It acknowledges the intrinsic complexity of systems and addresses proactive behavior of adaptive agents, which agrees with the trending urban planning ideology that fuses “humanism” and “rational thinking”.
While using CAS theory in the explanation and calculation of system’s evolution, the common methods are genetic algorithm [
6] and NK model [
5]. Genetic algorithm is a kind of search algorithm in essence, which solves fitness function to get the optimal solution through iteration [
17]. Compared with genetic algorithm, NK model focuses more on describing the impact of interaction among elements of complex system on overall fitness, and demonstrates the overall fitness landscape of system through calculation of the adaptive agent’s fitness level. It also searches for the development path towards optimal fitness level while identifying the adaptive agent with optimal fitness. At present, the NK model is widely applied in assessing fitness of agents with self-organizing behavior, as well as in exploring paths to elevate fitness of agents, especially in relevant research on regional economic development. The application of NK model in socio-economics has already been realized by many scholars, because the industrial development connection among economic entities is similar to that among members of biological population. The practical examples include Jovanovic’s study on strategy and organizational structure of regional industrial cluster [
18], Levinthal’s study on businesses adaptive development strategy [
19], and Jia Xioahui’s study on adaptive behavior of industrial cluster’s innovative subject [
20].
As mentioned above, CAS theory has been widely applied in explaining the process and mechanism of development in urban and rural areas or in towns and villages. However, during application and calculation of the theory, the fitness evaluation has not yet been directly applied in urban and rural development. At present, application research on NK model in urban and rural development is relatively less, and mainly concentrates on fitness evaluation of socio-economic entities in major cities [
21], such as high-tech zones and clusters of urban innovation industry [
10]. Therefore, in order for CAS theory to play a greater role in both qualitative and quantitative research on urban–rural development, this thesis applies NK model in fitness evaluation of towns during urban–rural development. An emphasis is placed on the study differentiation (and even division) during the development of small towns around the major cities. Furthermore, based on the explanation of this by CAS theory, it employs NK model to assess the fitness level of small towns around the major city, and proposes and categorizes paths to improve the small towns’ fitness, so as to provide evidence for guiding plans and policies for the healthy development of small towns, and to prevent regional sustainable development with major cities at its core from being discontinued and collapsing in the development of small towns. Small towns are not only important economic and social entities in urban and rural development but also the important nodes in the structure of regional economic development.
According to the standard of towns, small towns refer to administrative units with a total population of more than 20,000 and an urban population of more than 10% or a total population of less than 20,000 and urban population of more than 2000 [
22]. In China’s administrative framework with distinct hierarchical characteristics, small towns form the connecting link between urban and rural areas, offering service to the latter and undertaking the industrial spillover from the former. During the period between 1978 and 2015, when the reform and opening-up policy was in full swing, the proportion of urban residents to the national population rose by 38.2%. Compared to the 1978 level when there were 2173 small towns with the population of 2000 and above, the number of small towns in the same scale was increased to 20,515 in 2015 [
23] (as seen in
Figure 1), which accounted for 21.6% of the urban population in China, including 33.3% of migrant workers [
24]. Particularly from 1978 to 1999, the urban population was increased by 210 million nationwide, among which 80 million chose to live in small towns, equating 57.1% of the total migrant population [
25]. However, as the urbanization strategy shifted toward mega-regions and major cities, such factors of production as migrant workers, capital, and land rapidly passed through small towns and flowed into larger cities. Consequently, the small towns had to suffer economic downturn, inefficient public service, and sluggish spatial development. It is especially obvious that the small towns around the major cities were excluded from the flow of production factors.
In China, most of the major cities are undergoing rapid development and high-level clustering. They are vigorously spurring urbanization and thus the factors of production in the peripheral towns and villages in smaller sizes are highly likely to be absorbed by these cities, leading to a wider gap and greater conflicts between urban and rural areas. Similar to many Euro-American countries, some small towns around the major cities in China have already been urbanized by multiple external factors and internal forces. However, it should be noted that a large number of small towns are still struggling on the way to urbanization because at the internal level, there is a lack of initiative, and at the external level, the excessive suppression and absorption of larger cities brings about inefficiency in development and functional operations in small towns, which therefore find it difficult to achieve development and integrate into the urban area. As a result, they fail to fully perform their strategically significant role to support urbanization and connect urban and rural areas. It follows that the small towns at the primary level in China were faced with a continuous decline in their soft power regarding social equality and cultural inheritance as urbanization proceeded and the major cities snatched resource factors from them. This phenomenon, if it continues, is likely to further impede the economic progress in these primary-level towns lacking support and initiative. Consequently, the small towns, failing the villages that they are supposed provide service and assistance for, are exposed to a considerable risk of destroying the foundation of the urbanization development system and the regional economic structure; apart from this, they adversely affect the overall efficiency of harmonious regional development in the urban area, the joint development of grass-roots society depending on the effective integration of resource factors and the urbanization of the entire country.
To a certain extent, these are rational and inevitable problems amidst rapid urbanization, because small towns must make adaptive adjustments to their internal structures according to the changes in external environments. According to Holland’s CAS theory, the underlying reason for the aforementioned problems lies in the adaptive capacity of the small towns. Small towns with high fitness can participate in regional economic division with the driving force of major cities and integrate themselves into the macro-development environment and realize their further development. On the contrary, due to the sustained resource outflows caused by polarization effect of major cities, small towns with low fitness are failure to achieve their own and regional sustainable development. Therefore, the main objective of this paper was to investigate how to evaluate the fitness value of small towns around the major city using NK model, so as to improve the adaptability to promote the sustainable development of small towns themselves and metropolitan area. The study was carried out in Wuhan City, a major city in the central of China.
5. Conclusions
As an important theory and method of complexity science, the CAS theory and NK model for small towns’ fitness value assessment proved to be feasible, especially in the region with high marketization degree and obvious self-organization behavior of the adaptive agent. To elaborate this approach, taking Wuhan City as an example, this paper used NK model to explore the fitness value and the improvement path of small towns in Wuhan. Some conclusions have been drawn.
The results show that it is an appropriate approach for small towns around Wuhan City to improve their fitness by increasing the dominant factors in the process of development and exploring possible measures to control the flow of factors within the small towns. This agrees with the trend of vertical specialization in urban area and guarantees the structural position of villages that play a supplementary role in regional development.
The results also indicate that small towns, under the influence of Wuhan, follow the trend of expanding the space of flow in the process of raising their fitness levels, and integrate factors through interaction with other adaptive agents in such a larger space. It is the most effective and the only path to greater adaptability when the small towns are faced with normal shrinkage in size caused by the universal outflow of resource factors. Therefore, Wuhan, as a major city with multi-center spatial structure, should be guided by urban planning respond to this trend. The spatial integration mode of interaction based on the functional correlations between townships and villages around Wuhan can be a feasible spatial guidance. Networking development will be an effective way for small towns to make full use of resources.
In the current fiscal framework, small towns mainly rely on top–down public input and other self-derived fiscal revenue. Hence, the public input can dramatically increase the center sizes of small towns and even lead to a temporary leap. However, since the input of public finance is limited and the return rates of resources put into small towns largely differ, public policies should accurately target at critical aspects in the future development of Wuhan City. In the new era of labor specialization, we should develop a comprehensive and accurate understanding of the connotation and value of the development of small towns in order to realize a rational specialization structure in China, heightened urban–rural economy, and security and sound development. In a fitness landscape, the path up the hill refers to the process of small towns improving their risk capacity and the overall value in regional specialization so that they can adapt themselves to the rapid urbanization in China, the external environment, and changes in urban areas—e.g., active flow of factors—in order to ultimately achieve sustainable regional development.