Next Article in Journal
Impacts of Environmental Policies on Global Green Trade
Next Article in Special Issue
Collaborative Organization Models for Sustainable Development in the Agri-Food Sector
Previous Article in Journal
Adapting a Circular Economy in Regional Strategies of the European Union
Previous Article in Special Issue
When Unfair Trade Is Also at Home: The Economic Sustainability of Coffee Farms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bioactive and Antimicrobial Properties of Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) under Microwave Cooking

by
Ahmad Mohammad Salamatullah
*,
Mohammed Saeed Alkaltham
,
Khizar Hayat
*,
Mohammed Asif Ahmed
,
Shaista Arzoo
,
Fohad Mabood Husain
and
Abdulhakeem Alzahrani
Department of Food Science & Nutrition, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(3), 1519; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031519
Submission received: 14 December 2020 / Revised: 27 January 2021 / Accepted: 27 January 2021 / Published: 1 February 2021

Abstract

:
Fruits and vegetables constitute a considerable amount of antioxidants and among them eggplant is a rich source of polyphenol compounds. This study investigated the bioactive and antimicrobial properties of eggplant under different degree of microwave cooking. The eggplant was cooked for 7 min (light cooked), 10 min (medium cooked), and 15 min (high cooked). The highest total polyphenol content was observed in the light cooked eggplant sample (27.35 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g dry weight (DW)) followed by high cooked sample (26.10 mg GAE/g DW), while the lowest total polyphenol content (2.79 mg GAE/g DW) was obtained for the uncooked (control) sample. The total polyphenol content of the samples ranged in the following order; light cooked > high cooked > medium cooked > uncooked. The 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging of eggplant ranged between 16.16% (control) and 47.88% (high cooked). The highest reducing power was exhibited by the light cooked (absorbance 1.708) eggplant sample followed by the high cooked (absorbance 1.597), while the lowest reducing power was shown by uncooked sample (absorbance 0.389). Moreover, antimicrobial studies showed that light cooked eggplant sample demonstrated broad-spectrum inhibition of growth in Gram-positive as well as Gram-negative bacteria and Candida albicans. Slightly lower antimicrobial potential was exhibited by medium cooked eggplant sample while no antibacterial or antifungal activity was recorded for the extract of high cooked eggplant sample. Microwave cooking might be a method to enhance the antioxidant and antimicrobial potential of eggplant.

1. Introduction

Fruits and vegetables constitute influential amount of antioxidants [1]. Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) is a rich source of polyphenol compounds which lead it to be among the top ten vegetables having oxygen radical absorbance capacity [2,3]. Human body contains two defense systems, which include antioxidant enzymes like catalase, peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase and dietary antioxidants like ascorbic acid and tocopherol [4]. Polyphenol compounds are found in most parts of the eggplant, including calyx, leaf, peel, pulp, and stem [5]. Most common polyphenol in eggplant pulp is chlorogenic acid, which constitutes 70% to 90% of all the polyphenol contents [6,7,8].
Previous studies demonstrated that quality and quantity of polyphenols present in the eggplant were not sustainable and they were either noticeably decreased or increased by cooking, cultivar, and environment [9,10]. The upsurge in antioxidant activity of some vegetables after cooking might be due to the reasons such as the production of stronger radical-scavenging antioxidants, suppression of the oxidation capacity of antioxidants, or the thermal destruction of cell walls and sub cellular compartments which liberate more amounts of antioxidant components [11].
In general, boiling, steaming, and frying are three common cooking practices which have drastic effects on the sustainability of polyphenol contents [12]. In Middle East, deep frying is the most commonly used cooking method of eggplant. It is a dehydration process and the simultaneous heat and mass transfer between oil, food, and air, which leads to a series of physical and chemical changes in the foodstuff [13]. Deep frying also increases the calorie contents of meal and sometime reduces the total polyphenol contents related to the thermos-stability of the phenolic fraction [14,15]. Furthermore, eggplant capable of absorbing large amounts of frying oils, can lead to their oxidation [16]. Lipid oxidation is a series of reactions producing a number of harmful breakdown products [17]. Sustainability of phenolic contents during cooking depends on various factors such as cooking time, ratio between water and vegetable, and surface size [18]. A cooking method could be preferred for each vegetable to preserve the polyphenol contents [14].
Over a period of numerous decades, the microwave heating has gained the popularity in the area of food processing due to its capability to achieve high heating rates, safe handling, substantial reduction in cooking time, and easiness in operation, and a little maintenance [19]. In a study on cv. Agria potatoes, the researchers investigated the change in the phenolic constituents during microwave baking at different microwave level. They reported that the phenolic compounds were retained at a decent level when samples were cooked at 500 W [20]. Another study assessed the effects of different cooking methods such as boiling, steaming, and microwaving on the nutritional and physical properties of carrots, cauliflowers, and sweet potatoes. The authors had reported that as compared to boiling and steaming the losses in ascorbic acid concentrations were least in microwaving and it also preserved carotenoids and increased the total phenolics [21]. It has also been found to increase the total phenolic content of carrots [22,23].
In addition to the antioxidant properties, Solanum melongena has also been reported for its antimicrobial action against various pathogenic bacteria and fungi [24]. Presence of compounds such as caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and flavonoids, such as nasunin, are responsible for a sustainable antimicrobial potential of the eggplant.
Previous studies demonstrated that the heat treatment either increased or decreased the antioxidant capacity and total phenolic content in eggplant [25,26]. However, very little information is available in the literature regarding the total polyphenol contents, antioxidant activity, and antimicrobial potential of microwave cooked eggplant. Vegetables comprise several hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidant compounds and it is important to evaluate their antioxidant activity. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to investigate the effects of different degrees of microwave cooking of eggplant on its total polyphenol content, total flavonoid content, antimicrobial activity, and the antioxidant activity in terms of DPPH (2,2-dipheny-l-picrylhydrazyl), and reducing power.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microwave Cooking and Sample Preparation

The black long-shaped eggplants with intermediate size were purchased from a local market in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The whole eggplant was pierced and placed in a household microwave oven. The heating of the eggplant was performed at 900 W for three different times as, 7 min (5 min heating and then the sample was turned and heated for another 2 min), 10 min (7 min heating, then after turning the sample, it was heated for another 3 min), and 15 min (10 min heating and then 5 min heating after turning the sample). These samples were termed as light cooked, medium cooked, and high cooked, respectively. All these samples were prepared in triplicates. The unheated eggplant was used as a control. After cooking, the samples were cooled to room temperature (23 °C) and then they were peeled off with knife and cut into uniform pieces of 1 cm thickness. The samples were then freeze-dried (Alpha 1–4 LDPlus, Christ; Osterode, Germany) for 72 h at −50 °C and 0.05 mbar pressure. The dried samples (moisture content 7% on dry basis) were ground into powder and the material which passed through 60 mesh sieve was stored in air-tight plastic bags at room temperature for further use.

2.2. Extraction

The eggplant sample (2 g) was extracted with 20 mL of 80% ethanol employing ultrasound extraction for 45 min at 23 °C. The mixture was then centrifuged at 3000× g for 10 min at room temperature. The supernatant was then filtered using a Whatman filter paper number 2. The extract was stored at 4 °C for further use.

2.3. Total Polyphenol Content

Total polyphenol content (TPC) was estimated using Folin–Ciocalteu method according to the procedure suggested by Hayat [27]. Briefly, 0.025 mL of eggplant extract was added to 0.125 mL of undiluted Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and then 1.5 mL distilled water was added to the mixture. The mixture was shaken at room temperature for 1 min and then 0.375 mL of 20% sodium carbonate was added. The final volume of the mixture was prepared to 2.5 mL by adding 0.475 mL water. The prepared mixture was incubated for 30 min at room temperature and then detection of the phenols was achieved spectroscopically at 760 nm. The TPC was expressed as milligram gallic acid equivalent per gram dry weight of the sample (mg GAE/g DW).

2.4. Total Flavonoid Content

Total flavonoid content (TFC) was estimated according to the method suggested by Hayat [27]. Briefly, 0.25 mL of eggplant extract was mixed with 1 mL of water and then 0.075 mL of each 5% (w/v) sodium nitrite and 10% (w/v) aluminum chloride were added. Mixture was incubated for 5 min at room temperature and then 0.5 mL of 1 M sodium hydroxide and 0.6 mL of water was added. Finally, the mixture was than vortexed and absorbance was measured spectroscopically at 510 nm. Blank was prepared without extract. TFC was expressed as milligram catechin equivalent per gram dry weight of the sample (mg CE/g DW).

2.5. DPPH Scavenging

The free radical scavenging capacity of the extract was determined using DPPH according to the method suggested by Noreen et al., [28] with some modifications. An aliquot of extract (0.13 mL) and 0.1 mM DPPH solution (prepared in methanol) was mixed and allowed to rest in the dark for 30 min and the control was also prepared in the same manner but ethanol was used instead of extract. Ethanol was used as a blank. The absorbance was measured spectroscopically at 510 nm. The scavenging percentage was calculated as
DPPH scavenging % = Acontrol − Asample/Acontrol × 100

2.6. Reducing Power

The ferric reducing power of the sample was determined according to the method of Hayat et al., [29]. The eggplant extract (0.5 mL) was mixed with 1.25 mL of phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.6) and 1.25 mL of potassium ferricyanide and then incubated at 50 °C for 20 min. Trichloroacetic acid (1.25 mL) was added after incubating the sample, and then the mixture was centrifuged at room temperature for 10 min at 3000× g. Finally, 1.25 mL of aliquot was taken from the supernatant, to which 1.25 mL water and 0.25 mL of ferric chloride was added, respectively. Blank was prepared without extract. The absorbance was recorded at 700 nm.

2.7. Antimicrobial Activity

Agar well diffusion assay was performed with test pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Candida albicans) to determine the growth inhibition at the tested concentrations of extracts [30]. Briefly, Mueller Hinton agar (MHA) plates were spread with 0.1 mL of appropriately diluted (2.5 × 10−6 CFU/mL) freshly grown cultures. Agar wells were loaded with 1000 µg/mL concentration of the extracts. Solvent (5% DMSO) and Mueller Hinton broth (MHB) were used as control. Plates were incubated for 18–24 h at 37 °C to check the inhibition of growth around the wells. All the samples were analyzed in triplicates.

2.8. Sugar Analysis

Sugars were extracted according to the method of Lo Scalzo et al. [14] with slight modifications. Eggplant powder 150 mg in 15 mL of 80% methanol (v/v) was sonicated for 15 min then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm. The supernatant was collected then another 15 mL of 80% methanol were added, and then the sonication and centrifugation process was repeated as earlier. The supernatant was collected, combined, and the volume was made up to the mark with 80% methanol in a 50 mL volumetric flask. The sample was filtered through a 0.45 µm syringe filters before injection to an HPLC. Sugars were analyzed using Shimadzu prominence LC-10AB pump (Kyoto, Japan), using a mobile phase of 80% aqueous acetonitrile at an isocratic flow rate of 1 mL/min. Sugars were separated with a Shimadzu LC-NH2 column (15 × 4.6 mm), and identified with RID-10A Shimadzu detector. Sugars in eggplant samples were identified by comparing their peak retention time with those of standards and quantified using Shimadzu LabSolutions, Lcsolution workstation V 1.22. All the samples were analyzed in duplicates.

2.9. HPLC Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

The quantification of phenolic compounds (tannic acid, resorcinol, 1,2-dihydroxybenzene, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, vanillin, acetyl salicylic acid, 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid, salicylic acid, and quercetin) in eggplant samples were determined using HPLC with the method described previously with slight modifications [31]. The HPLC system Shimadzu, prominence (Kyoto, Japan) equipped with LC-20AB binary pump and a variable Shimadzu SPD-10A UV detector was used for the analysis. The column employed was Zorbax SB-C18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and the mobile phase Milli Q water (1.0% Acetic acid, A) and MeOH (B) was used at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The binary gradient program used was 0–10 min 15–30% B; 10–20 min 30–40% B; 20–30 min 40–50% B; 30–41 min 50–60% B; 41–45 min 15% B. The injection volume was 10 µL, and the detector was set at 280 nm. Compounds in eggplant samples were identified by comparing their peak retention time with those of standards. All the samples were analyzed in duplicates.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

All the experiments (TPC, TFC and antioxidant activities) were performed in triplicate and the results were expressed as means ± SD (standard deviation). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a significance level of p ≤ 0.05 was used to analyze the differences among the treatment groups and if significant differences were found then a post-hoc analysis using Duncan’s multiple range tests was performed by SAS (Version 9.2, 2000–2008; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). For antimicrobial studies Student’s t-test was performed to determine the significance between control and test sample groups.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Microwave Cooking on Total Polyphenol Content of Eggplant

As shown in Figure 1, the microwave cooking significantly (p < 0.05) changed the total polyphenol content (TPC) of eggplant. The highest TPC was observed in the light cooked eggplant (27.35 mg GAE/g DW) followed by the high cooked sample (26.10 mg GAE/g DW). However, statistically there was no significant difference in the TPC of these samples. Medium cooked sample exhibited significantly lower TPC than light- and high cooked samples but the lowest total polyphenol content (2.79 mg GAE/g DW) was obtained for the uncooked (control) sample. In a study, the TPC of the raw eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) was found to be 298.5 mg GAE/100 g DW which is almost in accordance with the values obtained in our study [32]. Kaur et al., [33] determined the TPC of different varieties of eggplant which ranged from 244.28 to 2990.64 mg GAE/100 g DW. The results of our study showed that the microwave cooking significantly increased the TPC of eggplant. Many studies described that microwave heating can increase the TPC of the plant samples and this was attributed to the release of phenolic compounds from plant matrix on microwave [29,34,35]). In contrary, a 27% loss in total polyphenol content was recorded for an optimized microwave cooking process of courgette but it was still lower than that by conventional cooking (40%) [36]. The TPC of eggplant was decreased by grilling at a temperature below 65 °C [37].

3.2. Effect of Microwave Cooking on Total Flavonoid Content of Eggplant

The effect of microwave cooking on total flavonoid content (TFC) of eggplant is shown in Figure 2. In a similar way like TPC, the TFC of eggplant was significantly increased in microwave cooked eggplant samples. The TFC of the microwave cooked samples ranged in the following order light cooked > high cooked > medium cooked. There was no significant difference between the TFC of light cooked (19.27 mg CE/g DW) and high cooked samples (19.12 mg CE/g DW) while the uncooked sample exhibited significantly lowest TFC (p < 0.05) among all the samples. The flavonol contents were increased in eggplants after frying, grilling, and baking process [25]. Microwave cooking alone or in combination with steaming improved the total flavonoid content of sweet potatoes [38].

3.3. Effect of Microwave Cooking on DPPH Scavenging of Eggplant

The DPPH scavenging of the eggplant as affected by microwave cooking is shown in Figure 3. At a concentration of 5 mg/mL the DPPH scavenging of eggplant ranged between 16.16% (control) and 47.88% (high cooked). No significant difference was noted for the DPPH scavenging capacity of high cooked and light cooked (46.24%) eggplant while medium cooked eggplant sample exhibited a significantly different (p < 0.05) DPPH scavenging potential (34.70%). Such outcomes could be due to the complexity of the chemical reactions during microwave cooking process. Some of the phenolic compounds like chlorogenic acids go under degradation, autoxidation, and polymerization during roasting process which in turn could decrease the total polyphenol content and the antioxidant activity of the plant samples [39,40]. On the other hand, such degradation may also involve the release of some other bioactive compounds like hydroxycinnamates and quinic acid [41]. Furthermore, due to high temperature during prolonged cooking, the Maillard reaction takes place, producing a number of compounds which can contribute to the antioxidant activity of the product [42]. Consequently, all of the compounds that appear during roasting process could either compensate for the loss of some substances or even contribute towards the increase in antioxidant activity [43] The grilled eggplant presented a higher antioxidant activity than that of the raw fruits [44]. In another study, the antioxidant activity of purple eggplant was decreased while the white eggplant was increased upon microwave cooking as compared to the raw fruits [45]. The DPPH scavenging was increased with the increase of temperature when the eggplants were grilled at a temperature between 65 °C and 95 °C and this increase was ascribed to the collapsed cells, inter-tissue cracks, and thin intracellular bonds around the middle area of the eggplant fruits [37]. Microwave processing usually better retains the constituents of fruits and vegetables and increases their antioxidant activity [46].

3.4. Effect of Microwave Cooking on Reducing Power of Eggplant

The ferric ion reducing power of raw and microwave cooked eggplant is shown in Figure 4. The reducing power of eggplant samples showed a similar trend as that of the DPPH scavenging. All the samples were tested at a concentration of 1 mg/mL and the microwave cooked samples showed a significantly higher reducing power than the uncooked sample. The highest reducing power was exhibited by the light cooked (absorbance (Abs) = 1.708) eggplant sample followed by high cooked (Abs = 1.597) one, while the lowest reducing power was shown by the uncooked sample (0.389). The results of reducing power and DPPH scavenging echoed the trend of TPC and TFC of the eggplant samples which showed that the antioxidant capacity of the samples was in a part due to their phenolic contents. The antioxidant activity and the chlorogenic acid content were increased in the grilled eggplants as compared to the raw sample [14]. Total phenolic content and antioxidant activity was increased in heat treated eggplants as compared to the raw samples [47,48]. The reducing power of the fried, grilled and baked eggplants was improved as compared to the raw eggplant sample [25].

3.5. Antimicrobial Activity

Extracts of uncooked and microwave cooked eggplants were assessed for their antimicrobial activity against bacterial and fungal pathogens (Table 1). At 1 mg/mL concentration of the extracts, the highest antimicrobial activity was demonstrated by the light cooked sample. The extract of light cooked sample showed the inhibition zones of 16, 19, 15, 18, and 20 mm against S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and C. albicans, respectively. Slightly lower zones of bacterial growth inhibition were observed with the extract of medium cooked sample while no antimicrobial activity was recorded for the extract of the high cooked sample. Uncooked sample extract demonstrated both antibacterial and anticandidal activity but it was less than the light and medium cooked sample. Antibiotics (Imipenem and ceftazidime) and antifungal (Nystatin) agents were used as positive control for assessing the antibacterial activity. Our results clearly showed that the antimicrobial potential was enhanced at low and medium microwave cooking as compared to the uncooked eggplant sample. This is a significant finding indicating that microwave cooking can increase the antimicrobial potential of the eggplant.

3.6. Sugar Analysis

The concentration of fructose, glucose and sucrose in eggplant were analyzed and reported in Table 2. Glucose and fructose are predominant reducing sugars in eggplant samples, and their concentrations were higher than that of sucrose. In accordance with a previous study reported by Lo Scalzo et al., [14], the simple sugar content generally was quite stable after microwave cooking. Sugar content found are in the range of 1–18% in control, where as in the range of 2.3–17%, 2–18% and 2.6–18% in light, medium, and high cooked eggplant samples, respectively. Hansan et al. [49] reported sugar content in eggplant in the range of 20–30%.

3.7. HPLC Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

The average quantities of phenolic compounds detected in eggplant samples are reported in Table 3, and the phenolic compounds Figure 5 which were not detected had not been listed in Table 3. The HPLC results showed the lowest concentration of the phenolic compounds in uncooked (raw) eggplant (Figure 6) as compared to those of the cooked eggplant samples (Figure 7) and these results are similar to the aforementioned antioxidant activity results of the eggplant samples. Light cooked sample had the highest phenolic compounds (2.8 g/100 g) compared to the medium cooked (2.3 g/100 g) and high cooked (1.6 g/100 g) samples.
Chlorogenic acid was the predominant phenolic compound in cooked eggplant samples; similar results are reported by [50,51,52]. Chlorogenic acid peak area average in the HPLC chromatogram were of 41.3% for light cooked, 34.4% for medium cooked, and 24.2% for high cooked eggplant samples. For all samples the Chlorogenic acid peak area in the chromatogram account for about 90% of the total peak area. These results are in agreement with the findings of Plazas et al., [53].

4. Conclusions

The effect of microwave cooking was investigated on the phenolic content, and antioxidant and antimicrobial potential of eggplant. Microwave cooking showed a profound effect on the eggplant and its TPC, TFC and antioxidant activity were increased significantly. The highest TPC, TFC, DPPH, and reducing power were exhibited by the light cooked sample while the lowest values were observed for the uncooked eggplant sample. Further, we observed that the antimicrobial potential was enhanced at low and medium cooking. Thus, it is envisaged that microwave cooking can be method to reap the maximum health benefits of eggplant. Exploring the exact mechanism for the increase of total phenols and antioxidant activity of eggplant by microwave cooking can be the spice for next study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.S., K.H., and M.S.A.; methodology, A.M.S., M.A.A., and K.H.; software, K.H. and F.M.H.; validation, A.M.S., M.S.A., and S.A.; formal analysis, K.H., F.M.H., M.A.A., and S.A; investigation, A.M.S. and A.A.; resources, A.M.S.; data curation, K.H. and A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.S., K.H., and M.S.A.; writing—review and editing, F.M.H., S.A., M.A.A., and A.A.; visualization, S.A. and K.H.; supervision, A.M.S. and K.H.; project administration, A.M.S. and M.S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this work through research group no (RG-1441-360).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cömert, E.D.; Mogol, B.A.; Gökmen, V. Relationship between color and antioxidant capacity of fruits and vegetables. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2020, 2, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gürbüz, N.; Uluişik, S.; Frary, A.; Frary, A.; Doğanlar, S. Health benefits and bioactive compounds of eggplant. Food Chem. 2018, 268, 602–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Niño-Medina, G.; Urías-Orona, V.; Muy-Rangel, M.D.; Heredia, J.B. Structure and content of phenolics in eggplant (Solanum melongena)—A review. South African J. Bot. 2017, 111, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kalpna, R.; Mital, K.; Sumitra, C. Vegetable and fruit peels as a novel source of antioxidants. J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 5, 63–71. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jung, E.J.; Bae, M.S.; Jo, E.K.; Jo, Y.H.; Lee, S.C. Antioxidant activity of different parts of eggplant. J. Med. Plant Res. 2011, 5, 4610–4615. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gramazio, P.; Prohens, J.; Plazas, M.; Andújar, I.; Herraiz, F.J.; Castillo, E.; Knapp, S.; Meyer, R.S.; Vilanova, S. Location of chlorogenic acid biosynthesis pathway and polyphenol oxidase genes in a new interspecific anchored linkage map of eggplant. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Plazas, M.; López-Gresa, M.P.; Vilanova, S.; Torres, C.; Hurtado, M.; Gramazio, P.; Andújar, I.; Herráiz, F.J.; Bellés, J.M.; Prohens, J. Diversity and relationships in key traits for functional and apparent quality in a collection of eggplant: Fruit phenolics content, antioxidant activity, polyphenol oxidase activity, and browning. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 8871–8879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kalogeropoulos, N.; Chiou, A.; Mylona, A.; Ioannou, M.S.; Andrikopoulos, N.K. Recovery and distribution of natural antioxidants (α-tocopherol, polyphenols and terpenic acids) after pan-frying of Mediterranean finfish in virgin olive oil. Food Chem. 2007, 100, 509–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Achouri, A.; Boye, J.I.; Belanger, D. Soybean isoflavones: Efficacy of extraction conditions and effect of food type on extractability. Food Res. Int. 2005, 38, 1199–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Naczk, M.; Shahidi, F. Extraction and analysis of phenolics in food. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1054, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Morales, F.J.; Babbel, M.-B. Antiradical efficiency of Maillard reaction mixtures in a hydrophilic media. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 2788–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gunathilake, K.; Ranaweera, K.; Rupasinghe, H. Effect of different cooking methods on polyphenols, carotenoids and antioxidant activities of selected edible leaves. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Teruel, M.d.R.; Gordon, M.; Linares, M.B.; Garrido, M.D.; Ahromrit, A.; Niranjan, K. A comparative study of the characteristics of French fries produced by deep fat frying and air frying. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, E349–E358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lo Scalzo, R.; Fibiani, M.; Francese, G.; D’Alessandro, A.; Rotino, G.L.; Conte, P.; Mennella, G. Cooking influence on physico-chemical fruit characteristics of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Food Chem. 2016, 194, 835–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Yamaguchi, M.; Yoshida, H.; Hirose, F.; Inoue, Y.H.; Hayashi, Y.; Yamagishi, M.; Nishi, Y.; Tamai, K.; Sakaguchi, K.; Matsukage, A. Ectopic expression of BEAF32A in the Drosophila eye imaginal disc inhibits differentiation of photoreceptor cells and induces apoptosis. Chromosoma 2001, 110, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ali, H.S.; Ramadan, M.T.; Ragab, G.H.; Kamil, M.M.; Eissa, H.A. Optimizing browning capacity of eggplant rings during storage before frying. J. Am. Sci. 2011, 7, 579–592. [Google Scholar]
  17. Koh, E.; Surh, J. Food types and frying frequency affect the lipid oxidation of deep frying oil for the preparation of school meals in Korea. Food Chem. 2015, 174, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Volden, J.; Borge, G.I.A.; Hansen, M.; Wicklund, T.; Bengtsson, G.B. Processing (blanching, boiling, steaming) effects on the content of glucosinolates and antioxidant-related parameters in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. ssp. botrytis). LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 42, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, M.; Tang, J.; Mujumdar, A.S.; Wang, S. Trends in microwave-related drying of fruits and vegetables. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 17, 524–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Barba, A.A.; Calabretti, A.; D’Amore, M.; Piccinelli, A.L.; Rastrelli, L. Phenolic constituents levels in cv. Agria potato under microwave processing. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 41, 1919–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Buratti, S.; Cappa, C.; Benedetti, S.; Giovanelli, G. Influence of cooking conditions on nutritional properties and sensory characteristics interpreted by e-senses: Case-study on selected vegetables. Foods 2020, 9, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Natella, F.; Belelli, F.; Ramberti, A.; Scaccini, C. Microwave and traditional cooking methods: Effect of cooking on antioxidant capacity and phenolic compounds content of seven vegetables. J. Food Biochem. 2010, 34, 796–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Faller, A.L.K.; Fialho, E. The antioxidant capacity and polyphenol content of organic and conventional retail vegetables after domestic cooking. Food Res. Int. 2009, 42, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. AL-Janabi, A.A.H.S.; AL-Rubeey, S.A.H. Detection of antimicrobial activity of solanum melogena L. (Egg plant) against pathogenic microorganisms. Pharmacogn. J. 2010, 2, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Arkoub-Djermoune, L.; Boulekbache-Makhlouf, L.; Zeghichi-Hamri, S.; Bellili, S.; Boukhalfa, F.; Madani, K. Influence of the thermal processing on the physico-chemical properties and the antioxidant activity of a solanaceae vegetable: Eggplant. J. Food Qual. 2016, 39, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kim, R. A study of physiological activities of the thermal treated eggplant on the skin. KSBB J. 2016, 31, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Hayat, K. Impact of drying methods on the functional properties of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) leaves. Sci. Lett. 2020, 8, 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  28. Noreen, H.; Semmar, N.; Farman, M.; McCullagh, J.S.O. Measurement of total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of aerial parts of medicinal plant Coronopus didymus. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2017, 10, 792–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hayat, K.; Zhang, X.; Chen, H.; Xia, S.; Jia, C.; Zhong, F. Liberation and separation of phenolic compounds from citrus mandarin peels by microwave heating and its effect on antioxidant activity. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 73, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alajmi, M.F.; Alam, P.; Rehman, M.T.; Husain, F.M.; Khan, A.A.; Siddiqui, N.A.; Hussain, A.; Kalam, M.A.; Parvez, M.K. Interspecies anticancer and antimicrobial activities of genus solanum and estimation of rutin by validated UPLC-PDA Method. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. He, J.; Yin, T.; Chen, Y.; Cai, L.; Tai, Z.; Li, Z.; Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; Ding, Z. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of edible flowers of Pyrus pashia. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 17, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sukprasansap, M.; Sridonpai, P.; Phiboonchaiyanan, P.P. Eggplant fruits protect against DNA damage and mutations. Mutat. Res. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2019, 813, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kaur, C.; Nagal, S.; Nishad, J.; Kumar, R.; Sarika. Evaluating eggplant (Solanum melongena L) genotypes for bioactive properties: A chemometric approach. Food Res. Int. 2014, 60, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hayat, K.; Abbas, S.; Hussain, S.; Shahzad, S.A.; Tahir, M.U. Effect of microwave and conventional oven heating on phenolic constituents, fatty acids, minerals and antioxidant potential of fennel seed. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 140, 111610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. AL Juhaimi, F.; Musa Özcan, M.; Ghafoor, K.; Babiker, E.E. The effect of microwave roasting on bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity and fatty acid composition of apricot kernel and oils. Food Chem. 2018, 243, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Douiri-Bedoui, I.; Abdellaoui, H.; Alexa, R.; Jacolot, P.; Druon, C.; Tessier, F.J.; Laguerre, J.-C. Optimization of microwave cooking of courgette in terms of nutrient preservation and energy consumption. Procedia Food Sci. 2011, 1, 805–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Uchida, K.; Tomita, H.; Takemori, T.; Takamura, H. Effects of grilling on total polyphenol content and antioxidant capacity of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 202–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Cao, Y.; Xia, W.; Jiang, Q. Application of simultaneous combination of microwave and steam cooking to improve nutritional quality of cooked purple sweet potatoes and saving time. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2016, 36, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wongsa, P.; Khampa, N.; Horadee, S.; Chaiwarith, J.; Rattanapanone, N. Quality and bioactive compounds of blends of Arabica and Robusta spray-dried coffee. Food Chem. 2019, 283, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Perrone, D.; Farah, A.; Donangelo, C.M. Influence of coffee roasting on the incorporation of phenolic compounds into melanoidins and their relationship with antioxidant activity of the brew. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 4265–4275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wei, F.; Tanokura, M. Coffee in Health and Disease Prevention; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; ISBN 978-0-12-409517-5. [Google Scholar]
  42. Pastoriza, S.; Rufián-Henares, J.A. Contribution of melanoidins to the antioxidant capacity of the Spanish diet. Food Chem. 2014, 164, 438–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ludwig, I.A.; Bravo, J.; De Peña, M.P.; Cid, C. Effect of sugar addition (torrefacto) during roasting process on antioxidant capacity and phenolics of coffee. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 51, 553–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Das, S.; Raychaudhuri, U.; Falchi, M.; Bertelli, A.; Braga, P.C.; Das, D.K. Cardioprotective properties of raw and cooked eggplant (Solanum melongena L). Food Funct. 2011, 2, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zaro, M.J.; Ortiz, L.C.; Keunchkarian, S.; Chaves, A.R.; Vicente, A.R.; Concellón, A. Chlorogenic acid retention in white and purple eggplant after processing and cooking. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 64, 802–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Guo, Q.; Sun, D.-W.; Cheng, J.-H.; Han, Z. Microwave processing techniques and their recent applications in the food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 67, 236–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. del Pilar Ramírez-Anaya, J.; Samaniego-Sánchez, C.; Castañeda-Saucedo, M.C.; Villalón-Mir, M.; de la Serrana, H.L.-G. Phenols and the antioxidant capacity of Mediterranean vegetables prepared with extra virgin olive oil using different domestic cooking techniques. Food Chem. 2015, 188, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chumyam, A.; Whangchai, K.; Jungklang, J.; Faiyue, B.; Saengnil, K. Effects of heat treatments on antioxidant capacity and total phenolic content of four cultivars of purple skin eggplants. Sci. Asia 2013, 39, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hanson, P.M.; Yang, R.-Y.; Tsou, S.C.S.; Ledesma, D.; Engle, L.; Lee, T.-C. Diversity in eggplant (Solanum melongena) for superoxide scavenging activity, total phenolics, and ascorbic acid. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2006, 19, 594–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mennella, G.; Lo Scalzo, R.; Fibiani, M.; D’Alessandro, A.; Francese, G.; Toppino, L.; Acciarri, N.; de Almeida, A.E.; Rotino, G.L. Chemical and bioactive quality traits during fruit ripening in eggplant (S. melongena L.) and allied species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 11821–11831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Prohens, J.; Whitaker, B.D.; Plazas, M.; Vilanova, S.; Hurtado, M.; Blasco, M.; Gramazio, P.; Stommel, J.R. Genetic diversity in morphological characters and phenolic acids content resulting from an interspecific cross between eggplant, Solanum melongena, and its wild ancestor (S. incanum). Ann. Appl. Biol. 2013, 162, 242–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Stommel, J.R.; Whitaker, B.D. Phenolic acid content and composition of eggplant fruit in a germplasm core subset. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2003, 128, 704–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Plazas, M.; Prohens, J.; Cuñat, A.; Vilanova, S.; Gramazio, P.; Herraiz, F.; Andújar, I. Reducing capacity, chlorogenic acid content and biological activity in a collection of scarlet (Solanum aethiopicum) and gboma (S. macrocarpon) eggplants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 17221–17241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Effect of microwave cooking on total polyphenol content of eggplant. Different letters on each data are for statistically significant difference, (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Effect of microwave cooking on total polyphenol content of eggplant. Different letters on each data are for statistically significant difference, (p < 0.05).
Sustainability 13 01519 g001
Figure 2. Effect of microwave cooking on total flavonoid content of eggplant. Different letters on each data are for statistically significant difference, (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Effect of microwave cooking on total flavonoid content of eggplant. Different letters on each data are for statistically significant difference, (p < 0.05).
Sustainability 13 01519 g002
Figure 3. Effect of microwave cooking on DPPH scavenging eggplant. Different letters on each data are for statistically significant difference, (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effect of microwave cooking on DPPH scavenging eggplant. Different letters on each data are for statistically significant difference, (p < 0.05).
Sustainability 13 01519 g003
Figure 4. Effect of microwave cooking on reducing power of eggplant. Different letters on each data are for statistically significant difference, (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Effect of microwave cooking on reducing power of eggplant. Different letters on each data are for statistically significant difference, (p < 0.05).
Sustainability 13 01519 g004
Figure 5. HPLC chromatogram of standard compounds.
Figure 5. HPLC chromatogram of standard compounds.
Sustainability 13 01519 g005
Figure 6. HPLC chromatogram of uncooked eggplant.
Figure 6. HPLC chromatogram of uncooked eggplant.
Sustainability 13 01519 g006
Figure 7. HPLC chromatogram of light cooked eggplant.
Figure 7. HPLC chromatogram of light cooked eggplant.
Sustainability 13 01519 g007
Table 1. Antimicrobial activity of the extracts of microwave cooked and uncooked eggplant samples on dry weight basis. Data is presented as mean ± standard deviation. * denotes significance at p ≤ 0.05. ND = Not detected.
Table 1. Antimicrobial activity of the extracts of microwave cooked and uncooked eggplant samples on dry weight basis. Data is presented as mean ± standard deviation. * denotes significance at p ≤ 0.05. ND = Not detected.
S. NoSampleZone of Inhibition (mm)
S. aureusL. monocytogenesE. coliP. aeruginosaC. albicans
1.Control11 ± 1.314 ± 1.713 ± 0.911 ± 0.513 ± 1.7
2.low16 ± 1.0 *19 ± 0.5 *15 ± 2.118 ± 1.0 *20 ± 0.7 *
3.medium14 ± 0.613 ± 0.814 ± 1.315 ± 1.4 *16 ± 0.9 *
4.highNDNDNDNDND
5.Imipenem20 ± 2.0 *22 ± 1.5 *---
6.Ceftazidime--19 ± 0.6 *20 ± 1.5 *-
7.Nystatin----22 ± 1.8 *
Table 2. Sugar analysis (dry weight basis).
Table 2. Sugar analysis (dry weight basis).
Samples/SugarsFructose (g/100 g)Glucose (g/100 g)Sucrose (g/100 g)
Control18.17 ± 0.2317.27 ± 0.190.933 ± 0.09
Light cooked17.27 ± 0.1115.9 ± 0.172.3 ± 0.16
Medium cooked18.13 ± 0.2117.3 ± 0.132.0 ± 0.13
High cooked18.17 ± 0.1917.17 ± 0.212.6 ± 0.17
Table 3. HPLC results (mg/100 g dry weight) of the phenolic compounds in eggplant.
Table 3. HPLC results (mg/100 g dry weight) of the phenolic compounds in eggplant.
Phenolic CompoundUncookedLight CookedMedium CookedHigh Cooked
Tannic Acid53.5 ± 0.13---
Resorcinol8.7 ± 0.09210.5 ± 0.23206.5 ± 0.31124 ± 0.51
1,2-Dihydroxy Benzene5.7 ± 0.15---
Chlorogenic Acid17 ± 0.112543 ± 1.072119.5 ± 1.031490.5 ± 1.13
Caffeic Acid1.5 ± 0.219.1 ± 0.11--
Vanillin0.45 ± 0.0744.2 ± 0.1334 ± 0.0923 ± 0.11
Total86.85 ± 0.762806.8 ± 1.542360 ± 1.431637.5 ± 1.64
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salamatullah, A.M.; Alkaltham, M.S.; Hayat, K.; Ahmed, M.A.; Arzoo, S.; Husain, F.M.; Alzahrani, A. Bioactive and Antimicrobial Properties of Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) under Microwave Cooking. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1519. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031519

AMA Style

Salamatullah AM, Alkaltham MS, Hayat K, Ahmed MA, Arzoo S, Husain FM, Alzahrani A. Bioactive and Antimicrobial Properties of Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) under Microwave Cooking. Sustainability. 2021; 13(3):1519. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031519

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salamatullah, Ahmad Mohammad, Mohammed Saeed Alkaltham, Khizar Hayat, Mohammed Asif Ahmed, Shaista Arzoo, Fohad Mabood Husain, and Abdulhakeem Alzahrani. 2021. "Bioactive and Antimicrobial Properties of Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) under Microwave Cooking" Sustainability 13, no. 3: 1519. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031519

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop