sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainable Innovation, Social Responsibility and Governance in the Agri-Food Value Chains

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainability in Geographic Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2022) | Viewed by 37043

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Law, Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy
Interests: agrifood systems; innovation; sustainability; corporate social responsibility; value chains
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences,University of Perugia, Perugia 06123, Italy
Interests: agrifood value chains; innovation; sustainability; governance models; cooperation

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Law, Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy
Interests: agrifood; social responsibility; value creation; rural development policy
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the agri-food sector, innovation is a strategic driver that makes it possible to create internal economies (i.e., to reduce production costs) (Rama, 1996, 2008; Grunert et al., 1997; Capitanio et al., 2010; Marotta et al., 2017; Nazzaro et al., 2020), and to address societal challenges (Roucan-Kane et al., 2011). Moreover, at present the agri-food companies must be able to meet citizen-consumers’ needs, increasingly attentive to important issues such as the food–health relationship, the fight against climate change, the depletion of natural resources, hydrogeological instability, and the loss of the landscape (Traill and Meulenberg, 2002; Marotta and Nazzaro, 2012, 2020). In order to satisfy these new kinds of needs, the innovation process in food supply chains has become necessary and has oriented the choices of companies towards investments in sustainable innovations and social responsibility. The use of these innovations has made it possible to improve the quality and safety of food products and to make production processes more sustainable, in order to reduce the consumption of materials, the CO2 emissions, and more generally, the environmental impacts. Moreover, process and product innovation in food systems are also being channeled toward the enhancement of the health characteristics of food as a critical dimension of sustainability (Lindgreen et al., 2018). Therefore, the sustainable innovations have pushed companies to base their competitiveness on new business models driven increasingly by socially responsible behaviors (Gallego-Alvarez et al., 2011; Marotta et al., 2017; Nazzaro et al., 2020).
At same time, in order to respond effectively to new questions from citizen-consumers, it is necessary that all companies in the same supply chain act according to socially responsible criteria, adopting sustainable innovations. Indeed, citizen-consumers evaluate foods as a whole, keeping in mind all the choices and operations that take place within the value chain, starting from the raw materials used up to the transformation process that leads to the realization of the final product (Ahumada and Villalobos, 2009). This raises specific coordination issues which have to be defined and solved in order to increase the degree of sustainability of the whole chains.
Therefore, it is necessary to create new coordination methods among different phases of the value chain, which therefore stimulates the reconsideration of governance models among the different actors (Karantininis et al., 2010; Martino, 2010). Generally, governance refers to a set of rules governing transactions between the parties to an exchange—some of which are defined by law, others by social conventions.
Starting from these considerations, the analysis of sustainable innovations, social responsibility strategies, and contractual relationships as tools for value chains creation in the agri-food sector seems to be a field that is still under exploration, leaving plenty of room for further research.
Therefore, this Special Issue will offer findings that address the topic of sustainable innovations and social responsibility in agri-food value chains and the coordination problems within them. Manuscripts describing new research, new summaries, and new theories are welcome.

Prof. Giuseppe Marotta
Prof. Gaetano Martino
Prof. Concetta Nazzaro
Guest Editors

References:

  1. Rama, R. Les multinationales et l'innovation Localisation des activités technologiques de l'agro-alimentaire. Économie rurale1996, 231(1), 62-68.
  2. Rama, R. Nature and determinants of product innovation in a competitive environment of changing vertical relationships. In Handbook of innovation in the food and drink industry. CRC Press, 2008, 69-98.
  3. Grunert, K. G., Harmsen, H., Meulenberg, M., Kuiper, E., Ottowitz, T., Declerck, F., Traill, B. & Göransson, G. A framework for analysing innovation in the food sector. In Products and process innovation in the food industry. Springer, Boston, MA. 1997, 1-37.
  4. Capitanio, F., Coppola, A., & Pascucci, S. Product and process innovation in the Italian food industry. Agribusiness, 2010, 26(4), 503-518.
  5. Marotta, G., Nazzaro, C., & Stanco, M. How the social responsibility creates value: models of innovation in Italian pasta industry. International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, 2017, 9(2-3), 144-167.
  6. Nazzaro, C., Stanco, M., & Marotta, G. The Life Cycle of Corporate Social Responsibility in Agri-Food: Value Creation Models. Sustainability2020, 12(4), 1287.
  7. Roucan-Kane, M., Gray, A. W., & Boehlje, M. Approaches for selecting product innovation projects in US food and agribusiness companies. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review2011, 14, 51-68.
  8. Traill, W. B., & Meulenberg, M.. Innovation in the food industry. Agribusiness: an International Journal, 2002, 18(1), 1-21.
  9. Marotta, G., & Nazzaro, C. Responsabilità sociale e creazione di valore nell’impresa agroalimentare: nuove frontiere di ricerca. Economia agro-alimentare, 2012, 1, 13-54.
  10. Marotta, G., & Nazzaro, C. Public goods production and value creation in wineries: a structural equation modelling. British Food Journal, 2020
  11. Lindgren, E., Harris, F., Dangour, A. D., Gasparatos, A., Hiramatsu, M., Javadi, F., Hiramatsu, M., Firouzeh Javadi, F., Loken, B., Murakami, M., Scheelbeek, P., Haines, A. , Sustainable food systems—a health perspective. Sustainability science, 201813(6), 1505-1517.
  12. Gallego‐Álvarez, I., Prado‐Lorenzo, J. M., & García‐Sánchez, I. M. Corporate social responsibility and innovation: A resource‐based theory. Management Decision, 2011, 49(10), 1709-1727
  13. Nazzaro, C., Lerro, M., Stanco, M., & Marotta, G. Do consumers like food product innovation? An analysis of willingness to pay for innovative food attributes. British Food Journal, 2019, 121(6), 1413-1427.
  14. Ahumada, O., & Villalobos, J. R. Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review. European journal of Operational research, 2009, 196(1), 1-20.
  15. Karantininis, K., Sauer, J., & Furtan, W. H. Innovation and integration in the agri-food industry. Food Policy2010, 35(2), 112-120.
  16. Martino, G. Trust, contracting, and adaptation in agri-food hybrid structures. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 2010, 1(4), 305-317.
  17. Triguero, A., Fernández, S., & Sáez-Martinez, F. J. Inbound open innovative strategies and eco-innovation in the Spanish food and beverage industry. Sustainable Production and consumption2018, 15, 49-64.
  18. Cuerva, M. C., Triguero-Cano, Á., & Córcoles, D. Drivers of green and non-green innovation: empirical evidence in Low-Tech SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 68, 104-113.
  19. Zilberman, D., Lu, L., & Reardon, T. Innovation-induced food supply chain design. Food Policy2019, 83, 289-297.

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • innovation
  • sustainability
  • social responsibility
  • transaction costs
  • governance
  • value chains

Published Papers (11 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 1614 KiB  
Article
Sustainability Strategies and Contractual Arrangements in the Italian Pasta Supply Chain: An Analysis under the Neo Institutional Economics Lens
by Stefano Ciliberti, Marcello Stanco, Angelo Frascarelli, Giuseppe Marotta, Gaetano Martino and Concetta Nazzaro
Sustainability 2022, 14(14), 8542; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148542 - 12 Jul 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2274
Abstract
Contracts represent key governance mechanisms along the supply chain to pursue collective sustainable strategies in line with new citizen-consumers’ preferences for sustainable products. Adopting an embedded multiple case study approach, this paper explores and analyzes 11 cases of contractual relationships between Italian semolina [...] Read more.
Contracts represent key governance mechanisms along the supply chain to pursue collective sustainable strategies in line with new citizen-consumers’ preferences for sustainable products. Adopting an embedded multiple case study approach, this paper explores and analyzes 11 cases of contractual relationships between Italian semolina and pasta producers and farmers in order to investigate whether sustainability strategies affect the design of contracts and the related consequences. Findings reveal that different sustainability strategies correspond to different design and combinations of (both monetary and nonmonetary) contractual incentives aimed to centralize property and decision rights. What emerges is that stronger sustainability strategies entail a higher degree of buyers’ control over strategic investments (such as land and seeds) as well as wider provision of technical assistance and knowledge and innovation transfer toward farmers. Therefore, mutual gains seem at stake, even if socio-economic implications of the shift in decisional and control rights from farmers toward buyers shall be neglected, to ensure a better coherence with the farm to fork strategy and sustainable development goals. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1027 KiB  
Article
How Inclusive Is Inclusive? A Critical Analysis of an Agribusiness Initiative in Kenya
by Celina Schelle and Benno Pokorny
Sustainability 2021, 13(19), 10937; https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910937 - 1 Oct 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2867
Abstract
Inclusive agribusiness considers social and environmental goals in global value chains in agribusiness. However, not all small-scale farmers may be able to benefit from such arrangements. To find out about possible reasons for exclusion, this study investigates an agribusiness initiative in coastal Kenya [...] Read more.
Inclusive agribusiness considers social and environmental goals in global value chains in agribusiness. However, not all small-scale farmers may be able to benefit from such arrangements. To find out about possible reasons for exclusion, this study investigates an agribusiness initiative in coastal Kenya employing organic contract farming by applying a mixed-methods research design based on household sampling of the recruitment procedure, as well as interviews with the farmers and company representatives. The findings suggest that sustainability standards may impede small-scale farmers’ participation in agribusiness. Specifically, the implementation of organic certification, essential for the functionality of the company business models, contributes most to small-scale farmer exclusion. Companies, clients, and, most importantly, certifiers should be aware of this problem and look for appropriate measures to overcome this unwanted effect of standard-setting in inclusive businesses. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 671 KiB  
Article
Production Contracts and Food Quality: A Transaction Cost Analysis for the Italian Durum Wheat Sector
by Angelo Frascarelli, Stefano Ciliberti, Gustavo Magalhães de Oliveira, Gabriele Chiodini and Gaetano Martino
Sustainability 2021, 13(5), 2921; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052921 - 8 Mar 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 1981
Abstract
Agribusiness firms requiring a consistent supply of high quality agricultural raw materials have increasingly adopted production contracts to coordinate their supply chains. The present work is aimed to shed light on the role played by sources of asset specificity and uncertainty related to [...] Read more.
Agribusiness firms requiring a consistent supply of high quality agricultural raw materials have increasingly adopted production contracts to coordinate their supply chains. The present work is aimed to shed light on the role played by sources of asset specificity and uncertainty related to quality strategies in the diffusion of contractual arrangements within the Italian durum wheat sector. To this purpose, factor analyses and probit regressions are estimated in data collected among durum wheat producers. The findings confirm that the role of asset specificity is negligible in presence of staple crops. Moreover, they reveal that experience, transparency and technological stability are all relevant aspects that reduce uncertainty and, in turn, trigger the adoption of production contracts as a governance solution for durum wheat. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1011 KiB  
Article
Collaborative Organization Models for Sustainable Development in the Agri-Food Sector
by Salvatore Ammirato, Alberto Michele Felicetti, Massimiliano Ferrara, Cinzia Raso and Antonio Violi
Sustainability 2021, 13(4), 2301; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042301 - 20 Feb 2021
Cited by 23 | Viewed by 3905
Abstract
It is widely recognized that the adoption of collaborative organization models in the agri-food sector can help farmers in rural areas to reach sustainable development goals. In any case, a holistic and coherent view of sustainability, organizational models and supporting technologies in the [...] Read more.
It is widely recognized that the adoption of collaborative organization models in the agri-food sector can help farmers in rural areas to reach sustainable development goals. In any case, a holistic and coherent view of sustainability, organizational models and supporting technologies in the agri-food sector is still not present in the scientific literature. With this paper, we aim to fill this gap and to propose a framework that is useful to help scholars and practitioners in analyzing and designing sustainable Collaborative Networks in the agri-food sector Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2409 KiB  
Article
Bioactive and Antimicrobial Properties of Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) under Microwave Cooking
by Ahmad Mohammad Salamatullah, Mohammed Saeed Alkaltham, Khizar Hayat, Mohammed Asif Ahmed, Shaista Arzoo, Fohad Mabood Husain and Abdulhakeem Alzahrani
Sustainability 2021, 13(3), 1519; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031519 - 1 Feb 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3786
Abstract
Fruits and vegetables constitute a considerable amount of antioxidants and among them eggplant is a rich source of polyphenol compounds. This study investigated the bioactive and antimicrobial properties of eggplant under different degree of microwave cooking. The eggplant was cooked for 7 min [...] Read more.
Fruits and vegetables constitute a considerable amount of antioxidants and among them eggplant is a rich source of polyphenol compounds. This study investigated the bioactive and antimicrobial properties of eggplant under different degree of microwave cooking. The eggplant was cooked for 7 min (light cooked), 10 min (medium cooked), and 15 min (high cooked). The highest total polyphenol content was observed in the light cooked eggplant sample (27.35 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g dry weight (DW)) followed by high cooked sample (26.10 mg GAE/g DW), while the lowest total polyphenol content (2.79 mg GAE/g DW) was obtained for the uncooked (control) sample. The total polyphenol content of the samples ranged in the following order; light cooked > high cooked > medium cooked > uncooked. The 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging of eggplant ranged between 16.16% (control) and 47.88% (high cooked). The highest reducing power was exhibited by the light cooked (absorbance 1.708) eggplant sample followed by the high cooked (absorbance 1.597), while the lowest reducing power was shown by uncooked sample (absorbance 0.389). Moreover, antimicrobial studies showed that light cooked eggplant sample demonstrated broad-spectrum inhibition of growth in Gram-positive as well as Gram-negative bacteria and Candida albicans. Slightly lower antimicrobial potential was exhibited by medium cooked eggplant sample while no antibacterial or antifungal activity was recorded for the extract of high cooked eggplant sample. Microwave cooking might be a method to enhance the antioxidant and antimicrobial potential of eggplant. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 656 KiB  
Article
When Unfair Trade Is Also at Home: The Economic Sustainability of Coffee Farms
by Daniel Grandisky Lerner, Helder Marcos Freitas Pereira, Maria Sylvia Macchione Saes and Gustavo Magalhães de Oliveira
Sustainability 2021, 13(3), 1072; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031072 - 21 Jan 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4535
Abstract
This paper addresses the issue of unfair trade practices, investigating the drivers of the differences between farm-gate and free-on-board (FOB) prices in the most important Arabica coffee producing countries worldwide: Brazil, Guatemala, Colombia, Honduras, Peru, and Ethiopia. Our study looks at those differences [...] Read more.
This paper addresses the issue of unfair trade practices, investigating the drivers of the differences between farm-gate and free-on-board (FOB) prices in the most important Arabica coffee producing countries worldwide: Brazil, Guatemala, Colombia, Honduras, Peru, and Ethiopia. Our study looks at those differences taking into account the literature on governance in agri-food chains, with a focus on each country’s domestic market. We performed panel-corrected standard error (PCSE) estimates in ICO and World Bank data, covering the period from 2007 to 2016. In the paper we analyze (i) property rights as a proxy of transaction costs, once it brings more transparency and support to negotiations; (ii) access to electricity as a proxy of supporting infrastructure in communication and information activities, and (iii) quality of roads and quality of ports as proxies of transportation infrastructure. Our results show that heterogeneity in institutions and infrastructure are key in explaining the differences between farm-gate and FOB prices. The transaction costs derived from institutional failures and infrastructure gaps, lead to the use of intermediaries in the coffee supply chain, and this reduces the margin for coffee farmers. Actions that aim to reduce these inefficiencies bring more transparency and lower transaction costs, thereby directly contributing to the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1946 KiB  
Article
Climate Variation—A Perceived Drag on Rural Business Performance
by Timothy Clune and Ana Horta
Sustainability 2020, 12(24), 10285; https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410285 - 9 Dec 2020
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3519
Abstract
The financial capacity of the Australian agriculture sector to capture the benefits of the growing food and fibre demands of the burgeoning global population has been questioned, particularly in the face of a projected climate change impacts. This paper reports on the first [...] Read more.
The financial capacity of the Australian agriculture sector to capture the benefits of the growing food and fibre demands of the burgeoning global population has been questioned, particularly in the face of a projected climate change impacts. This paper reports on the first phase of a multi-stage project that seeks to understand the causes of rural business failure, illustrated through the metaphorical voice of the farmer. It has been constructed in three parts comprising an overview of the rationale for the consideration of the rural business failure as it is understood by the operators of stressed rural businesses; description of the method and results; and thirdly, the implications of the results and direction for future research. This paper reports on the analysis of responses of approximately 33,000 clients collected as part of the Rural Financial Counselling Services (RFCS) during the period 2012–2016. A key finding of the paper is the perception that climate variation is the primary cause for the hardship experienced; that is, in the absence of the variable climate operators would not have found themselves in need of the RFCS. However, this result necessarily requires a more objective review before consideration as the basis of new policy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 680 KiB  
Article
Boosting Sustainable Innovation in Densely Populated Areas: A Milieux Innovateurs Approach
by Yari Vecchio, Felice Adinolfi, Claudia Albani, Luca Bartoli and Marcello De Rosa
Sustainability 2020, 12(21), 9131; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219131 - 3 Nov 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1958
Abstract
This paper deals with innovation adoption, with the purpose of analyzing the uptake of sustainable innovations among young farms working in urban and periurban contexts. Our hypothesis is that innovative milieus (IM) play a fundamental role in boosting sustainable innovation. In order to [...] Read more.
This paper deals with innovation adoption, with the purpose of analyzing the uptake of sustainable innovations among young farms working in urban and periurban contexts. Our hypothesis is that innovative milieus (IM) play a fundamental role in boosting sustainable innovation. In order to analyze the uptake of sustainable innovation, we will make reference to the two logics of the IM approach: the logics of interactions and the logics of learning. The former is focused on the socio-institutional domain, more precisely on relational assets and coordination mechanisms activated by the farms. The latter makes reference to the profile of innovation adopted and on various impacts innovation have under economic, social and environmental points of view. A questionnaire has been submitted to young farms participating to the Oscar Green Coldiretti Awards. In total, three dimensions of innovation are taken into account: economic, social and environmental. Data are processed through statistical tools aiming at describing the diversified set of interaction-learning mechanisms. Results evidence different innovative milieus which pave the way to diversified paths of innovation with different degree of sustainability and impacts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 2587 KiB  
Article
Educated Millennials and Credence Attributes of Food Products with Genetically Modified Organisms: Knowledge, Trust and Social Media
by Carlo Russo, Mariarosaria Simeone and Maria Angela Perito
Sustainability 2020, 12(20), 8534; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208534 - 15 Oct 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2895
Abstract
In this paper, we investigated educated millennials’ evaluation of credence attributes in food products containing genetically modified organisms (GMO products). Our goal is to assess whether beliefs about GMO products are determined by scientific knowledge alone or if they are affected by other [...] Read more.
In this paper, we investigated educated millennials’ evaluation of credence attributes in food products containing genetically modified organisms (GMO products). Our goal is to assess whether beliefs about GMO products are determined by scientific knowledge alone or if they are affected by other factors such as trust in information providers and use of social media. The focus on millennials is motivated by the increasing relevance of this social group in the public debate and by their extensive use of social media. We surveyed a sample of 215 Italian college students, confronting them with questions about safety, environmental impact and ethical issues in GMO product consumption. Using an ordered probit regression model, we found that educated millennials build their beliefs using a mix of scientific knowledge and trust in information providers. The role of the two drivers depended on the issue considered. Scientific knowledge drove beliefs in health claims, while trust in information providers was a driving factor in almost all claims. After controlling for trust effects, we did not find evidence of impact of confidence in the reliability of traditional and social media on beliefs. This result contradicts previous literature. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 958 KiB  
Article
Sustainable Collective Innovation in the Agri-Food Value Chain: The Case of the “Aureo” Wheat Supply Chain
by Marcello Stanco, Concetta Nazzaro, Marco Lerro and Giuseppe Marotta
Sustainability 2020, 12(14), 5642; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145642 - 14 Jul 2020
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 4096
Abstract
This paper contributes to the theoretical debate in agri-food economics on sustainable innovations. Specifically, it aims to define an interpretative model of sustainable innovation processes conceived at the supply chain level, and the determinants promoting these processes. The paper also proposes a best [...] Read more.
This paper contributes to the theoretical debate in agri-food economics on sustainable innovations. Specifically, it aims to define an interpretative model of sustainable innovation processes conceived at the supply chain level, and the determinants promoting these processes. The paper also proposes a best practice of sustainable collective innovation, namely the “Aureo” wheat supply chain. Sustainable collective innovation requires the commitment and involvement of all actors of the agri-food supply chain, while its effectiveness depends on the governance models adopted. The study findings validate the proposed theoretical framework, highlighting several economic, social, and environmental benefits that the process can provide. The results contribute to the debate on the topic, providing useful insights for practitioners and policy-makers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1351 KiB  
Article
Consumers’ Preferences for and Perception of CSR Initiatives in the Wine Sector
by Marcello Stanco and Marco Lerro
Sustainability 2020, 12(13), 5230; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135230 - 27 Jun 2020
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 3966
Abstract
This study explores consumers’ preferences for corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives implemented in the wine sector. Moreover, it investigates consumers’ perception and price premium for four wine certifications related to corporate social responsibility (i.e., SQNPI Sustainable Quality; V.I.V.A. Sustainable Wine; Organic, and Equalitas—Sustainable [...] Read more.
This study explores consumers’ preferences for corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives implemented in the wine sector. Moreover, it investigates consumers’ perception and price premium for four wine certifications related to corporate social responsibility (i.e., SQNPI Sustainable Quality; V.I.V.A. Sustainable Wine; Organic, and Equalitas—Sustainable Wine). Overall 251 regular Italian wine consumers participated in an online survey. Their preferences for 11 CSR initiatives implemented in the wine sector were assessed through a best–worst scaling analysis. The study findings show that the most important CSR initiatives for consumers are “health and food safety”, “sustainable agricultural practices”, and “air pollution”. By contrast, those least important for consumers are “energy consumption”, “sustainable packaging”, and “fair trade”. Consumers expressed a positive perception in terms of CSR performance for all the certifications investigated, while their price premium was higher for wine with Organic certification. The study offers several implications for wineries. Specifically, it suggests the CSR initiatives that wineries may implement to fully meet consumers’ preferences. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop