Next Article in Journal
Climate Change Impact on the Distribution of Forest Species in the Brazilian Amazon
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Development of Chinese Family Businesses: Exploring the Role of Succession Planning in Maintaining Organizational Sustainability from the Perspective of Socioemotional Wealth
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Development of Mining Regions in the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Methane Emission Estimation Tools as a Basis for Sustainable Underground Mining of Gas-Bearing Coal Seams

by
Sergey Sidorenko
1,*,
Vyacheslav Trushnikov
1 and
Andrey Sidorenko
2
1
Faculty of Economics, Saint-Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia
2
JCS Siberian Coal Energy Company, 115054 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(8), 3457; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083457
Submission received: 22 February 2024 / Revised: 11 April 2024 / Accepted: 17 April 2024 / Published: 20 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Circular Economy and Mining Ecology Management)

Abstract

:
Underground coal mining of gas-bearing coal seams is accompanied by the emission of large amounts of methane, which increases with depth. Coal seam methane is not only a major cause of major accidents in coal mines, but is also a greenhouse gas that has a significant negative impact on the Earth’s atmosphere. Analysis of the efficiency of underground coal mining suggests that as the depth of mining increases, the productivity of a longwall decreases by a factor of 3–5 or more, while the specific volume of methane emitted increases manifold and the efficiency of methane management decreases. Effective management of coal seam methane can only be achieved by monitoring its content at key points in a system of workings. Monitoring of methane not only eliminates the risk of explosions, but also lets us assess the effectiveness of using methane management techniques and their parameters to improve efficiency and reduce the cost of methane management (including a methane drainage) for ensuring sustainable underground coal mining. The aim of this article is to develop a software and hardware complex for monitoring methane in a coal mine by creating a simulation model for monitoring methane. The Arduino Uno board and the methane sensor MQ-4 were used for this purpose. In this article, the causes of methane emissions in coal mines, gas control systems, the structure of the mine monitoring system, and the causes of risks and occurrence of accidents in coal mines are considered. As a result of the work, the mathematical model of the methane measurement sensor was developed; the Arduino Uno board developed a simulation system for methane monitoring; and the numerical results of the research are presented in the graphs.

1. Introduction

Coal has long been a significant source of primary energy in the world. In the near future, the major industrialized countries of the world, countries with emerging markets and economies in transition will depend on coal-based energy resources. Coal supplies now cover 25% of the world’s primary energy demand, 40% of global electricity demand and almost 70% of global steel and aluminum energy demand. According to International Energy Agency projections, in emerging markets, energy demand will increase by 93% by 2030; this is mainly due to increased demand in China and India, and coal may become the main energy source, which will meet growing demand [1,2]. However, as reserves were depleted, coal plaques had to be worked out at deep depths with a high gas content in less favorable geological conditions, owing to the continued dependence of enterprises on solid fuel. At the same time, the rest of society demanded and wished to improve the safety of mining conditions and to show greater environmental responsibility for the coal industry [3,4]. Best practices for reducing the frequency of methane-related accidents and explosions—which all too often accompany underground coal mining—include the application of best practices in methane source drainage, refining and recovery; this could also help to protect the environment by reducing greenhouse gas emissions [5,6,7]. Recently, methane has gradually become the subject of research due to its significant contribution to the greenhouse effect. On a 20-year time scale, the global warming potential of methane was 86 times greater than that of carbon dioxide [8,9]. As a result, reducing methane emissions is an effective strategy to slow the rate of climate warming in the short term, and a necessary means to meet the temperature targets of the Paris Agreement [9,10,11].
Mining companies seek to minimize the likelihood of accidents, especially those related to methane explosions. In order to ensure the economic impact of the extraction and sale of raw materials, it is necessary to ensure safe and continuous production. This includes effective risk management. Despite the differences in geological and mining conditions, there are opportunities to significantly reduce the risk of accidents at enterprises mining gas-bearing coal seams [1,12,13].
Safety in the event of accidents and catastrophes is one of the main tasks of the ventilation systems.
As a result of the accident, the ventilation system of the shaft shall provide:
(1)
Prevention of the gases’ spread into the mine;
(2)
Quick and reliable change of direction of ventilation jets;
(3)
Prevention of formation of dangerous concentrations of explosive gases [4,14,15].
Specialized methane monitoring systems were needed to address the problems encountered in the development of gas-bearing coal seams. At that time, the monitoring systems in place in many coal mines were ineffective, as evidenced by the high number of accidents [16,17]. It is necessary to predict the risk of occurrence of dangerous physical processes, which will ensure the effective, uninterrupted operation of the enterprise. Table 1 summarizes quantitative data on the main causes of accidents.
Table 1 shows that a large number of accidents are related to sudden outbursts of coal or gases, sparks and flash fires. In addition, a significant share is related to underground fires. These data indicate that mine atmosphere monitoring, observations and analysis of physical processes are underutilized. Therefore, the aim of the research is to develop a software and hardware complex for monitoring methane in a coal mine [21,22].
Table 2 shows the largest fatal coal mine accidents in the world over the last 20 years. More than 55% of accidents are caused by accumulation of methane.
Thus, the main task of the research can be formulated as follows: the development of a hardware–software complex of methane monitoring in a coal mine. To develop this, it is necessary to solve the following tasks:
  • Analyze the existing technologies of the coal mines’ methane concentration monitoring. To choose and adapt the technology, taking into account the peculiarities of the mine selected as the subject of the study.
  • To develop a hardware–software complex of methane monitoring. The peculiarity of the developed device should be the possibility of spatial diagnostics, which allows real-time monitoring of methane passage along the shaft of a coal mine.
  • To collect the information from the coal mine and build models for predicting the concentration of methane in the mine [25,26,27,28].
The solutions of these tasks allows expansion of the possibilities of diagnostic devices’ application to other areas of the coal industry.

2. Materials and Methods

Following is a description of the technological process. The mining industry de facto includes both underground and open pit methods, or a combination of both. The underground coal mining industry is a mine and the open mine is a mine [29,30]. As of 2022, there are 160 coal-producing enterprises in Russia, including 107 open pit mines and 53 underground mines [2,31].
Almost all work in coal mines is performed by special machines, which differ from each other in many parameters. The choice of special equipment depends on the physical condition of the mined rock [32,33]. In underground coal mining, shearers are mainly used. These cut a coal seam and grind the coal. The destruction of the coal mass is affected by the mechanical properties of coal seam and rock, the thickness and depth of a seam, the gas content, the advance rate, etc. Currently, more than 90% of underground coal production in Russia is carried out with the use of a longwall mining method. The division of the coal seam is carried out by ventilation and transport workings. At the same time, the increased reliability and energy efficiency of coal mine treatment equipment has increased the productivity of coal mines under favorable mining and geological conditions. The most common technology is the retreat mining system, which uses fully mechanized longwall mining [34,35].
Intensive longwall mining is accompanied by a constant increase in the depth of mining operations, which leads to deterioration of mining geological conditions; above all, the frequency of dangerous manifestations of rock pressure increases, as does methane abundance of mine workings, which increases the risk of accidents [36,37,38].
Methane is an explosive gas that presents a hazard in 5–15% of the Voc-Spirit concentrations. Transport, collection or treatment should occur at concentrations not more than 2.5 times below its lower limit or not more than twice its upper limit, because of the explosive nature of methane at such concentrations.
The practice of safe mining at coal-bed methane mining facilities aims to reduce the risk of methane explosion by preventing the occurrence of explosive mixtures and their early dilution to non-hazardous concentrations (using ventilation systems and schemes). Pre-drainage of coal seams is also used [39,40,41].
At present, most of the work of miners is taken over by automatic and automated systems, so there is more and more self-propelled equipment in the mines.
The categorization of gas mines comprises the distribution of coal mines into different hazard levels, which are determined by the level of gas present in coal mines and in mines in general. Underground coal mines are classified by methane content [42].
In the first category, the volume emitted is up to 5 m3/t. The second category implies the presence of methane in sizes from 5 to 10 m3/t. In the third category, methane content ranges from 10 to 15 m3/t. The fourth category (considered to be a supercategory) implies the methane content of the mine greater than 15 m3/t or the presence of sulfur gas emissions. The fifth category is defined as mines with non-hazardous coal and gas emissions. Mines with coal outburst and methane emissions are classified in the sixth category. Figure 1 shows the division of coal mines by methane content [2,43,44].
The productivity of the longwalls is constantly increasing. In that context, the quality requirements for the preparation and development of mining projects and the implementation of occupational safety requirements were being met. Mining planning should be given a greater role, as often the multiple coal seams influence on each other are mined, resulting in a redistribution of rock pressure and a change in the methane content of the formations as they are mined [45,46,47].
In a large number of underground coal mines, at the present time, the schemes for the preparation of the seams are operated by coupled workings, leaving the non-recoverable pillars, which provide a fairly high efficiency and safety of operation in the coal mine [48].
Methane explosion can occur at a volume concentration of 5–15% in a mixture with air, and it is almost 2 times lighter than air. Methane is dangerous because even at high concentrations, coal mine workers cannot detect it on their own, because methane is characterized by an absence of smell and color. Various ventilation systems and gas monitoring systems are used to dilute the methane jet stream in the coal mine to minimum concentrations and safe mining operations [49,50].
It is also known that combustible coal dust is an explosive aerosol, so coal dust increases the explosive properties of methane. Powdered coal or coal dust causes various respiratory diseases, which is a serious occupational hazard. Coal dust is generated by the impact of the drums of a shearer during coal mining, loading, transport of coal and drilling.
Methane explosions have a more negative impact on the material condition of the enterprise, leading to the loss of coal and injuries of miners. Explosions also cause huge emissions of gas and dust in the Earth’s atmosphere. The products isolated due to methane explosions were transported significant distances by wind, so air pollution was added to all the consequences. As a result of coal combustion, the resulting substances are discharged into reservoirs that are placed on the surface, thus polluting the water of the Earth [51,52,53]. That is why early prediction and prevention of methane–air mixtures is important to reduce the impact of coal mines on the Earth’s atmosphere.
Typically, an underground explosion causes a fire and, conversely, an endogenous fire can ignite and detonate methane. In order to predict the possible explosion of a mixture of methane and air in a coal mine, technological mining development systems and bed ventilation systems are put into operation [54,55]. Drainage systems are also used to drain excavated areas and to ensure reliable insulation of waste areas. In order to prevent fires and methane explosions prematurely, it is necessary to operate electrical equipment in an explosion-safe mode, not to allow open fire and sparks, to minimize drilling and blasting operations and to produce all requirements of dust and gas operation of the mine [56,57,58].
To prevent coal mine dust from igniting, the use of irrigation systems, water curtains, as well as rational vent schemes for local workings is required [59,60].
Gas monitoring systems have been used in modern coal mines since the late 20th century. At the same time, enterprises operate different types of information technology-based systems to control the level of methane in coal mines [61,62,63]. Different types of sensors are used to analyze mine atmosphere. Table 3 summarizes the sensors used to measure the indicators, as well as the MAC (maximum allowable concentration) for each indicator [64,65].
Methane monitoring sensors are installed at various locations in the mine, such as a longwall face, roads and ventilation workings, etc. Air sensors are installed in the same place as the methane sensors and additionally in the main ventilation fan shafts. If the gas concentration threshold is exceeded, the power supply is cut off [66,67,68].
The materials presented in Table 4 were used to create the simulation model.
The main task is to develop a software and hardware complex for monitoring methane in underground coal mines by creating a simulation model for monitoring methane in domestic conditions with the help of the Arduino Uno board and the methane sensor MQ-4 [69,70,71]. The specifications of the MQ-4 sensor are presented in Table 5.

3. Results

Mathematical model. The input value for modeling an optoelectronic sensor is the measured gas level, which is the integral transmittance of the gas cell’s optical radiation [24,72,73].
The block diagram of an optoelectronic sensor for measuring methane is shown in Figure 2.
The EOS (electro-optical system) and a photodiode are source for measuring the concentration of methane by a simulated sensor, which in turn is a radiation receiver.
Light and photodiodes are located on the same optical axis. The exit and entrance pupils of both the light and the photodiode are respectively directed to each other. To reduce sensitivity to other gases present, the EOS has the ability to activate a light filter [74,75].
An approach to modeling the EOS of measuring gas concentration consists in calculating the spectral transmittance using the Bouguer–Lambert–Beer law, based on data on the spectral absorption coefficient of a gas mixture [5]:
τ λ = Φ λ Φ 0 λ = e k ( λ ) L C ,
where Φ0(λ)—spectral flux of probing radiation, W; Φ(λ) is the spectral flux of radiation (W) passing through a gas with concentration C (in volume fraction), spectral absorption coefficient of the gas mixture k(λ)(m−1) with an absorption path length L(m).
The following dependence determines the transfer function of the sensor [6]:
τ C = λ 1 λ 2 S i ( λ ) · Φ 0 ( λ ) · τ c f ( λ ) · e k λ L C · 1 N e k i λ L C i d λ λ 1 λ 2 S i ( λ ) · Φ 0 ( λ ) · τ c f ( λ ) d λ ,
where Si(λ) is the spectral sensitivity of the photodetector (photodiode), A/W;  Φ 0 ( λ )  is the spectral flux of the probing radiation of the source (EOS), W; τcf (λ) is the spectral transmittance of the light filter; k(λ)—spectral absorption coefficient of the studied gas, m−1, L—length of the absorbing gas layer, m; C is the concentration of the studied gas; ki(λ)—spectral absorption coefficient of the i-th foreign gas, m−1; Ci is the concentration of the i-th foreign gas [76,77,78].
Based on the transfer function of the EOS of the gas concentration, the sensitivity, the absolute and relative error in measuring the gas concentration, and the detection threshold are estimated.
The sensitivity of the sensor is determined by the slope of the transfer characteristic  S C = τ C . From this ratio, the sensitivity value  Δ C = Δ τ S ( C )  is determined.
For a given sensor signal–noise ratio μ, the minimum recorded change  τ  is 1/μ, and the absolute measurement error and detection threshold are calculated based on the following dependencies [79,80]:
Δ C = 1 μ · S ( C ) ,
L O D = 1 μ · S ( C 0 ) ,
The value of the relative error of the result obtained is defined as—δ = ΔC/C.
Information about the spectral flux emanating from the radiation source, the sensitivity of the photodetector, the absorption coefficient of methane and the calculation of the signal–noise ratio is needed in order to calculate the transfer function value and the measurement deviation of the optoelectronic methane measurement sensor.
The value of the main gas mixture composition’s presence is established, including the replacement of the emitted gases O2 and N2 in the atmosphere during the process of modeling the sensor for determining the level of concentration of the main gases [79,80,81].
The decrease in the concentration of oxygen in the mine atmosphere due to methane emissions is calculated using the following ratio:
C O 2 = 0.21 ( 1 C C H 4 ) ,
and the decrease in nitrogen according to this formula:
C N 2 = 0.70 ( 1 C C H 4 ) ,
The signal–noise ratio at the output of the CTC of the simulated sensor is calculated by the formula:
μ = U c v c U s h
where Ucvc is the useful signal at the CVC output when the input of the photodiode is exposed to radiation from the source (in the absence of an absorbing medium), V; Ush—root-mean-square value of the noise at the CVC output, V.
The CVC output signal can be calculated based on the formula:
U c v c = K c v c · ( I d + I f ) ,
where Id is the dark current of the photodiode, A; If—photocurrent due to external radiation, A; Kcvc—CVC conversion factor, V/A.
The photocurrent generated by the EOS photodiodes is calculated by the formula:
I Φ = k e o c · k L · λ 1 λ 2 S I ( λ ) · F e 0 ( λ ) Δ λ ,
where λ1, λ2 is the spectral range in which radiation is received by the photodiode; SI(λ) is the spectral current sensitivity of the photodetector, A/W; Fe0(λ)—spectral radiation flux from the EOS, W; keos = 0.1—coefficient of efficiency of the optical system; kL is the coefficient that determines the dependence of the photocurrent on the distance l between the EOS and the photodiode (from 0 to 1) [82,83].
From the data given in the technical documentation for optocouplers (EOS-photodiode, we know the coefficient kL) (Figure 3) [84,85,86].
RMS value of the noise at the CVC output Us is described by the expression:
U s = ( U y * ) 2 ( 1 + R O C R ) 2 + 4 π 2 3 ( Δ f ) 2 C e 2 R O C 2 + R O C 2 ( I e * ) 2 + 4 k T R o c · Δ f ,
where  ( U y * ) 2  is the noise spectral density by voltage OA, V2/Hz; R—equivalent resistance, Ω; Roc is the resistance of feedback, Ω; Ce is the equivalent capacitance, F; (Ie*)2 is the total noise current spectral density A2/Hz; k is the Boltzmann’s constant, 1.38064852 × 10−23, J·K−1; T is the photodiode temperature, K; Δf is the bandwidth of the circuit, Hz.
Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6 present research data for sensors of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and methane.
The data obtained as a result of experimental studies on the transfer functions for sensors of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and methane are consistent with the results of the simulation [85,86]. The relative error of modeling the carbon dioxide sensor is less than 5%, carbon monoxide is less than 5% and methane is less than 4%.
A comparative analysis of the calculated values of the signal–noise ratio with experimental data was also carried out.
Thus, based on the significant agreement between the results of modeling the transfer functions and the signal–noise ratio with experimental data, the adequacy of the computer model is confirmed [87,88].
The development of hardware and software systems. To create a simulation model for determining the concentration of methane in the atmosphere, an Arduino UNO board, an analog MQ-4 methane concentration determination sensor, 2 LEDs, a buzzer, 3 220 Ohm resistors, 6 jumper wires and methane concentration determination tool were used. To develop the code for the program for determining the concentration of methane, the Arduino IDE development environment was used.
The scheme of the model is shown in Figure 7.
In the Arduino IDE development environment, the program code for the functioning of the methane monitoring installation was written. The program code looks like this:
#define MQ4pin (0)
#define redLed (12)
#define greenLed (11)
#define buzzer (10)
float sensorValue;
void setup()
{
 Serial.begin (9600);
 Serial.println(“Gas sensor warming up!”);
 Delay (20,000);
}
void loop()
{
 sensorValue = analogRead (MQ4pin);
 if (sensorValue > 300)
 {
  Serial.print (“Methan: “);
  Serial.print (sensorValue);
  Serial.println (“ | Exceedance concenration!”);
  digitalWrite (redLed, HIGH);
  digitalWrite (greenLed, LOW);
  tone (buzzer, 1000, 200);
 }
 else
 {
  Serial.print (“Methan: “);
  Serial.println (sensorValue);
  digitalWrite (redLed, LOW);
  digitalWrite (greenLed, HIGH);
  noTone (buzzer);
   }
 Delay (2000);
}
1. At first, we determine the analog numbers of the Arduino pin to which the MQ-4 methane sensor, red and green LEDs, and the buzzer module are connected. SensorValue—variable for storing MQ-4 sensor values.
#define MQ4pin (0)
#define redLed (12)
#define greenLed (11)
#define buzzer (10)
float sensorValue;
In the setup () function, we activate serial communication with the PC and wait 20 s to warm up the sensor.
void setup () {
 Serial.begin (9600);
 Serial.println (“Gas sensor warming up!”);
 Delay (20,000);
}
2. The serial port monitor when the sensor warms up looks like this (Figure 8):
3. In the loop () function, using the analogRead () function, we read the sensor value and write it to the sensorValue variable.
void loop () {
  sensorValue = analogRead (MQ4pin);
4. Next, check the sensor value for exceeding the concentration threshold. When the concentration is high enough, the sensor detects a value above 300. To track the excess concentration, the “if” statement can be used. If the sensor reading exceeds 300, then in the serial port monitor we display the sensor value with the message “Ex-ceedance concentration!”, the red LED lights up and the buzzer sounds. If the sensor reading is below the concentration limit, then the green LED is on and only the sensor value is displayed on the serial port monitor (Figure 9 and Figure 10). Due to the fact that it is impossible to create real conditions in a coal mine in domestic conditions, the concentration of methane in the atmosphere is very low, so it is necessary to use a third-party source of methane, the methane concentration determination tool in this case. When gas is opened near the sensor, an increase in methane is observed.
if(sensorValue > 300)
 {
  Serial.print (“Methan: ”);
  Serial.print (sensorValue);
  Serial.println (“ | Exceedance concentration!”);
  digitalWrite (redLed, HIGH);
  digitalWrite (greenLed, LOW);
  tone (buzzer, 1000, 200);
 }
 else
 {
  Serial.print (“Methan: ”);
  Serial.println (sensorValue);
  digitalWrite (redLed, LOW);
  digitalWrite (greenLed, HIGH);
  noTone (buzzer);
   }
The value of the sensor shown on the Figure 11 and the results of its functioning, which are shown on the Figure 12 approved the fact that the alarm activation when the methane concentration reaches 300 mol/dm is working correctly.
The pause between the display of sensor readings is 2 s.
  Delay (2000);
}
As a result of the work, a simulation model for monitoring the methane concentration was developed. The values of the sensor, which measures the level of methane in the atmosphere, are displayed in the monitor of the serial port. When the methane level is normal, the green LED lights up; when the concentration limit, which is 300 ppm, is exceeded, the red LED lights up, the buzzer emits a signal and in the serial monitor. In addition to the methane concentration value, the message about exceeding the limit value is displayed—“Exceedance concentration! (Excess concentration!)”.
A hardware–software complex for methane monitoring has been developed using the Arduino Uno platform and the MQ-4 methane level sensor. The developed complex can improve the safety of the works in the coalmines.
The accumulated amount of knowledge and systems for monitoring methane concentrations can be used to ensure the safety of the coal gas-bearing seams exploitation process, as well as for the possible scientific research in this subject area.
It should be noted that, as a result of the work, a patent for the invention “Method for developing a thick flat layer of mineral resources” was issued [89]. Also, the license of the computer program “Assessment of the economic efficiency of using the oil separator in the Arctic zone” registration, using the Arduino platform, was received [90].
Analysis of the literature on the research subject revealed that there are several full-featured products capable of monitoring gas concentration [91,92,93]. The advantages of such developments are a large number of monitoring functions. But the problem is the complexity of implementation of such systems. These systems have a high cost [94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101]. The use of monitoring systems implies changes in every step of the production process. As a result of this work, a prototype including using the Arduino Uno platform and the MQ-4 methane level measurement sensor was created and tested.
Data collection and construction of the predictive model. Data on methane concentration in a coal mine is collected using special gas analyzers that measure the methane content in the air. Hard coal is used as a source of gas. The following algorithm of data collection on the simulator is used:
  • Equipment Setup: Ensure that the analyzer is in good working order and calibrated according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Also make sure that the sensors and probes are clean and ready for use.
  • Safety: All necessary precautions should be taken and safety rules observed before beginning data collection, as methane is a highly explosive gas.
  • Positioning the gas analyzer: The gas analyzer should be placed at the desired point in the mine where the methane concentration is to be measured. This is usually the location where dangerous methane concentrations are most likely to occur.
  • Measurement: After installing the gas analyzer, it is necessary to wait for the readings to stabilize. The gas analyzer can then be used to obtain continuous or periodic measurements of the methane concentration in the mine.
  • Data recording: Methane concentration data obtained should be recorded with the time and location of the measurements. This allows tracking changes in methane concentration in different parts of the mine and analyzing potential hazards.
By performing the above algorithm, the methane concentration data were obtained. The obtained data are presented in Table 6.
The results have shown that the developed hardware–software system will allow us to identify the methane distribution in space. Let us build a predictive model of methane movement and its concentration. To build this model we will use the methods of system analysis presented in [102,103,104,105,106,107]. By conducting a number of experiments and comparing all the data as shown in [108,109], a logarithmic dependence of the methane content was obtained. Thus, the correctness of the developed device is confirmed.

4. Discussion

One of the most important problems in coal mines is the presence of sources of methane; a dangerous gas that can pose a serious threat to the lives and health of miners. Methane, although a mineral also known as natural gas, is highly flammable and can cause explosions and fires in mines. Therefore, methane monitoring in coal mines is critical to ensure worker safety and prevent catastrophic accidents. Highlighting the key aspects of the importance of methane monitoring, we would like to note the following.
First, methane monitoring helps us to detect the concentration of gas in the air in a timely manner. If the concentration exceeds safe limits, it can lead to a fire or explosion. When using modern monitoring systems, even small changes in methane levels can be automatically detected, which allows taking prompt action to prevent emergencies and evacuate employees.
Second, methane monitoring is a key aspect of a coal mine prevention and safety plan. Regular measurements of methane concentrations can identify high hazard areas and take the necessary steps to prevent methane buildup. For example, if high methane levels are detected in a particular area, additional ventilation can be implemented, barriers can be created to prevent the gas from spreading, or work in the area can be temporarily suspended until the situation normalizes.
Third, methane monitoring allows the mine administration to evaluate the effectiveness of the ventilation system and other safety measures. By installing methane sensors in different areas of the mine, the data can be analyzed to determine where additional attention and enhanced safety measures are needed.
However, methane monitoring requires not only the installation of appropriate sensors in mines, but also the training of personnel, as well as the development and implementation of strict protocols and regular inspection of monitoring systems. To reduce the importance of the human factor in recording gas concentrations, it is advisable to use automated systems for collection, storage and decision support. Within the framework of this study a hardware–software complex was developed, which allows gas monitoring without human participation [110,111,112]. Thus, the presence of human factors is minimized. The key feature of the developed complex is the possibility of diagnostics of gas advancement along the mine shaft. As practice has shown, such possibility will allow us to use the ventilation system more rationally. We would like to note that in a number of cases forced ventilation of the mine was carried out in the wrong direction, toward people. The developed complex allows predicting the movement of methane cloud and controlling its movement.
In the literature, there are quite a lot of works in this area, but the presented work is favorably distinguished by the extension of the functionality of monitoring systems [113,114,115,116]. Thus, the presented work can be useful for both specialists in the field of information technology and the organization of mining production.

5. Conclusions

Effective management of coal seam methane, based on monitoring of methane concentrations, creates conditions not only to reduce the risk of methane explosions, but also to improve the efficiency of methane recovery and utilization and minimize methane emissions to the atmosphere. Therefore, continuous efficient monitoring of methane is key to ensuring sustainable underground mining of gas-bearing coal seams.
As a result of this work, research has been conducted on methane monitoring systems in coal mines. Characteristics and structure and technological process of systems for monitoring the atmosphere of coal mines, causes of risks and accidents at coal mines have been studied. Methane detection and prevention systems, existing methane monitoring systems and underground coal mine methane utilization methods, characteristics of different sensors for mine atmosphere detection has been analyzed. The numerical results of the research are presented by the graphs.
A software and hardware system for monitoring methane in coal mines has been developed using the Arduino Uno platform and the MQ-4 methane level measurement sensor. Using a methane monitoring system in coal mines would make it possible to ensure the efficient and safe mining of gas-bearing coal seams using high-performance longwalls.
The presented research is one step toward full-featured control and monitoring system development. Future research will be related to the involve validation of a full-featured monitoring system in the active underground mines.

6. Patents

Sirenko Yu.G., Sidorenko S.A., Denisova A.I., Mironovich M.P. Invention Patent № 2760450, publication date 21 November 2021, request № 2021115475/03 (31 May 2021), «Method for developing a thick flat layer of mineral resources».

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.; methodology, S.S.; software, V.T.; validation, V.T.; formal analysis, V.T.; investigation, V.T.; resources, A.S.; data curation, A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S.; writing—review and editing, S.S.; supervision, V.T.; project administration, S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Sidorenko A.A. was employed by the company JCS SUEK. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Meshkov, A.A.; Kazanin, O.I.; Sidorenko, A.A. Improving the efficiency of the technology and organization of the longwall face move during the intensive flat-lying coal seams mining at the Kuzbass mines. J. Min. Inst. 2021, 249, 342–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kazanin, O.I.; Sidorenko, A.A.; Sidorenko, S.A.; Ivanov, V.V.; Mischo, H. High productive longwall mining of multiple gassy seams: Best practice and recommendations. Acta Montan. Slovaca 2022, 27, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kaledina, N.O.; Malashkina, V.A. Indicator assessment of the reliability of mine ventilation and degassing systems functioning. J. Min. Inst. 2021, 250, 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zorin, I.S.; Lisakov, S.A.; Sidorenko, A.I.; Sypin, E.V. Computer Simulation of the Characteristics of Electro-Optical Sensor for Detecting Flame Combustion and Smoldering in Coal Mines. In Proceedings of the 2019 20th International Conference of Young Specialists on Micro/Nanotechnologies and Electron Devices (EDM), Erlagol, Russia, 29 June–3 July 2019; pp. 306–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yuan, Y.; Zheng, M.; Li, H.; Chen, Y.; Guo, G.; Su, Z.; Huo, W. Delineation of Backfill Mining Influence Range Based on Coal Mining Subsidence Principle and Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 5618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, G.; Wanyan, Q.; Li, Z.; Yi, H.; Ren, F.; Chen, Z.; Liu, Y. A Fractional-Order Creep Model of Water-Immersed Coal. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 12839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Marinina, O.; Nevskaya, M.; Lijuan, Z.; Que, C.T. Analysis of the Influence of Macroeconomic Factors on the Sustainable Development of the Chinese Coal Industry. In Proceedings of the 21st International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2021, Albena, Bulgaria, 26 June–5 July 2021; pp. 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Szopa, S.; Naik, V. Short-lived climate forcers. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S.L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M.I., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 817–922. [Google Scholar]
  9. Shchirova, E.; Tsvetkova, A.; Komendantova, N. Analysis of the possibility of implementing carbon dioxide sequestration projects in Russia based on foreign experience. In Proceedings of the 21st International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2021, Albena, Bulgaria, 26 June–5 July 2021; Volume 21, pp. 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, L.; Sun, Y.; Zheng, S.; Shu, L.; Zhang, X. How efficient coal mine methane control can benefit carbon-neutral target: Evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 424, 138895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Singh, A.; Singh, U.K.; Kumar, D. IoT in mining for sensing, monitoring and prediction of underground mines roof support. In Proceedings of the 2018 4th International Conference on Recent Advances in Information Technology (RAIT), Dhanbad, India, 15–17 March 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  12. Smirnyakov, V.V.; Smirnyakova, V.V.; Pekarchuk, D.S.; Orlov, F.A. Analysis of methane and dust explosions in modern coal mines in Russia. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 2019, 10, 1917–1929. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kabanov, E.I.; Korshunov, G.I.; Kornev, A.V.; Myakov, V.V. Analysis of the causes of methane explosions, flashes and ignitions at coal mines of Russia in 2005–2019. Min. Informational Anal. Bull. 2021, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mittelstädt, P.; Pollmann, N.; Karimzadeh, L.; Kories, H.; Klinger, C. Wastes in Underground Coal Mines and Their Behavior during Mine Water Level Rebound—A Review. Minerals 2023, 13, 1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zubov, V.P.; Phuc, L.Q. Development of resource-saving technology for excavation of flat-lying coal seams with tight roof rocks (on the example of the Quang Ninh coal basin mines). J. Min. Inst. 2022, 257, 795–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vinogradov, E.A.; Nikiforov, A.V.; Kochneva, A.A. Computational fluid dynamics study of ventilation flow paths on longwall panel. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 2019, 10, 1140–1147. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gendler, S.G.; Vasilenko, T.A.; Almukhametova, S.G. Ensuring safe working conditions during the operation of the closed coal storages. Bezop. Tr. Promyshlennosti 2021, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Martirosyan, A.V.; Ilyushin, Y.V. The Development of the Toxic and Flammable Gases Concentration Monitoring System for Coalmines. Energies 2022, 15, 8917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Golovina, E.; Khloponina, V.; Tsiglianu, P.; Zhu, R. Organizational, Economic and Regulatory Aspects of Groundwater Resources Extraction by Individuals (Case of the Russian Federation). Resources 2023, 12, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mishra, R.K.; Janiszewski, M.; Uotinen, L.K.T.; Szydlowska, M.; Siren, T.; Rinne, M. Geotechnical Risk Management Concept for Intelligent Deep Mines. Procedia Eng. 2017, 191, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Marinin, M.A.; Marinina, O.A.; Rakhmanov, R.A. Methodological approach to assessing influence of blasted rock fragmentation on mining costs. Gorn. Zhurnal 2023, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kabanov, E.I.; Korshunov, G.I.; Rodionov, V.A. Expert system based on fuzzy logic for assessment of methane and dust explosion risk in coal mines. Gorn. Zhurnal 2019, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ray, S.K.; Khan, A.M.; Mohalik, N.K.; Mishra, D.; Mandal, S.; Pandey, J.K. Review of preventive and constructive measures for coal mine explosions: An Indian perspective. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2022, 32, 471–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Didmanidze, O.N.; Afanasev, A.S.; Hakimov, R.T. Natural gas methane number and its influence on the gas engine working process efficiency. J. Min. Inst. 2021, 251, 730–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nagornov, D.O.; Kremcheev, E.A.; Kremcheeva, D.A. Research of the condition of regional parts of massif at longwall mining of prone to spontaneous ignition coal seams. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 2019, 10, 876–883. [Google Scholar]
  26. Golovina, E.I.; Grebneva, A.V. Features of groundwater resources management in the transboundary territories (on the example of the Kaliningrad region). Geol. Miner. Resour. Sib. 2022, 85–94. [Google Scholar]
  27. Slastunov, S.V.; Mazanik, E.V.; Sadov, A.P.; Khautiev, A.M.-B. Testing of integrated degasifying treatment technology based on hydraulic splitting of coal seam using surface holes. Min. Inf. Anal. Bull. 2020, 2, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Slastunov, S.; Kolikov, K.; Batugin, A.; Sadov, A.; Khautiev, A. Improvement of Intensive In-Seam Gas Drainage Technology at Kirova Mine in Kuznetsk Coal Basin. Energies 2022, 15, 1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ivanov, V.V.; Dzyurich, D.O. Justification of the technological scheme parameters for the development of flooded deposits of construction sand. J. Min. Inst. 2022, 253, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zolotov, O.I.; Iliushina, A.N.; Novozhilov, I.M. Spatially Distributed System for Monitoring of Fields Technical Condition in Mineral Resources Sector. In Proceedings of the 2021 XXIV International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM), St. Petersburg, Russia, 26–28 May 2021; pp. 93–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kobylkin, S.S.; Kharisov, A.R. Design features of coalmines ventilation using a room-and-pillar development system. J. Min. Inst. 2020, 245, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xue, X.; Wang, C.; Ma, H.; Mao, Q.; Cao, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, G. Self-Derived Wavelet Compression and Self Matching Reconstruction Algorithm for Environmental Data in Complex Space of Coal Mine Roadway. Energies 2022, 15, 7505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Malyshkov, G.B.; Sinkov, L.S.; Nikolaichuk, L.A. Analysis of economic evaluation methods of environmental damage at calculation of production efficiency in mining industry. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2017, 12, 2551–2554. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kovalskii, E.R.; Gromtsev, K.V. Development of the technology of stowing the developed space during mining. J. Min. Inst. 2022, 254, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kozyrev, B.A.; Sizyakov, V.M.; Arsentyev, V.A. Principles of rational processing of red mud with the use of carboxylic acids. Non-Ferr. Met. 2022, 53, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Katysheva, E. Creation of the integrated field model to increase the oil and gas assets management. In Proceedings of the 20th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, Albena, Bulgaria, 18–24 August 2020; Volume 20, pp. 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, Y.; Zhao, S.; Zuo, H.; Hu, X.; Guo, Y.; Han, D.; Chang, Y. Tracking the Vegetation Change Trajectory over Large-Surface Coal Mines in the Jungar Coalfield Using Landsat Time-Series Data. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 5667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aleksandrov, A.N. Simulating the formation of wax deposits in wells using electric submersible pumps. In Advances in Raw Material Industries for Sustainable Development Goals; Aleksandrov, A.N., Kishchenko, M.A., Nguyen, V.T., Eds.; CRC Press: London, UK, 2020; pp. 283–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, T.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, B. Molecular Simulation Study on the Effect of Co-Associated Minerals on Methane Adsorption and Mechanical Properties of Coal. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 12975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shammazov, I.A.; Batyrov, A.M.; Sidorkin, D.I.; Van Nguyen, T. Study of the Effect of Cutting Frozen Soils on the Supports of Above-Ground Trunk Pipelines. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Eremeeva, A.M.; Kondrasheva, N.K.; Khasanov, A.F.; Oleynik, I.L. Environmentally Friendly Diesel Fuel Obtained from Vegetable Raw Materials and Hydrocarbon Crude. Energies 2023, 16, 2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ignatenko; Afanaseva, O. Application of system analysis methods for the research of mining enterprise activity. In Proceedings of the 2023 Sixth International Conference of Women in Data Science at Prince Sultan University (WiDS PSU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 14–15 March 2023; pp. 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fetisov, V.; Shalygin, A.V.; Modestova, S.A.; Tyan, V.K.; Shao, C. Development of a Numerical Method for Calculating a Gas Supply System during a Period of Change in Thermal Loads. Energies 2023, 16, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Asadulagi, M.-A.M.; Pershin, I.M.; Tsapleva, V.V. Research on Hydrolithospheric Processes Using the Results of Groundwater Inflow Testing. Water 2024, 16, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Que, C.T.; Nevskaya, M.; Marinina, O. Coal Mines in Vietnam: Geological Conditions and Their Influence on Production Sustainability Indicators. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cheng, B.; Cheng, X.; Chen, J. Lightweight monitoring and control system for coal mine safety using REST style. ISA Trans. 2014, 54, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhu, Y.; You, G. Monitoring System for Coal Mine Safety Based on Wireless Sensor Network. In Proceedings of the 2019 Cross Strait Quad-Regional Radio Science and Wireless Technology Conference (CSQRWC), Taiyuan, China, 18–21 July 2019; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  48. Pershin, I.M.; Papush, E.G.; Kukharova, T.V.; Utkin, V.A. Modeling of Distributed Control System for Network of Mineral Water Wells. Water 2023, 15, 2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Afanaseva, O.V.; Bezyukov, O.K.; Ignatenko, A.A. Method for assessing the relationship between the characteristics of vibroactivity and the design parameters of a marine diesel. Proc. Eng. Sci. 2023, 5, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zakirova, C.; Sadykova, R.; Stroykov, G.; Zakirov, Z. Formation of the Organizational Structure of Managing a Large Project of Oil Field Development. TEM J. 2021, 10, 1122–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nguyen, V.T.; Pham, T.V.; Rogachev, M.K.; Korobov, G.Y.; Parfenov, D.V.; Zhurkevich, A.O.; Islamov, S.R. A comprehensive method for determining the dewaxing interval period in gas lift wells. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 2023, 13, 1163–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kukharova, T.V.; Ilyukhina, Y.A.; Shestopalov, M.Y. Development of a Methodology for Controlling the Process of Heating Metal Blanks in a Methodical Furnace. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, ElConRus 2022, St. Petersburg, Russia, 25–28 January 2022; pp. 718–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Makarova, A.A.; Mantorova, I.V.; Kovalev, D.A.; Pershin, I.M. Modeling a Production Well Flow Control System Using the Example of the Verkhneberezovskaya Area. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ElConRus), St. Petersburg, Russia, 25–28 January 2022; pp. 760–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, Y.; Tian, Z.; Ye, Q.; Lu, Y. Research Progress of Gel Foam Extinguishing Agent in Coal Mines. Fire 2023, 6, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cui, P.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, K.; Lv, H.; Cao, J.; Wang, W. Classification and Design of Backfill Coal Mining Systems Based on Typical Engineering Cases. Energies 2023, 16, 8074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Duryagin, V.N.; Nguyen, V.T.; Onegov, N.A.; Shamsutdinova, G.T. Investigation of the Selectivity of the Water Shutoff Technology. Energies 2023, 16, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pu, L.; Liu, Y.; Cai, Y.; Sun, Z.; Zhou, X. Study on Active Support Parameters for Surrounding Rock with Ultra-Large Span Open-Off Cut in Thick Coal Seam. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 12804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gendler, S.G.; Gabov, V.V.; Babyr, N.V.; Prokhorova, E.A. Justification of engineering solutions on reduction of occupational traumatism in coal longwalls. Min. Inf. Anal. Bull. 2022, 1, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sathishkumar, N.; Manoj, A.; Muniraj, K.; Naveenkumar, M.; Praveen, C. Safety Monitoring System in Coal Mine Using IoT. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1916, 012196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ilyushin, Y.; Afanaseva, O. Spatial Distributed Control System of Temperature Field: Synthesis and Modeling. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2021, 16, 1491–1506. [Google Scholar]
  61. Łabęda-Grudziak, Z.M. The Disturbance Detection in the Outlet Temperature of a Coal Dust–Air Mixture on the Basis of the Statistical Model. Energies 2022, 15, 7302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Liang, G. Control and communication co-design: Analysis and practice on performance improvement in distributed measurement and control system based on fieldbus and Ethernet. ISA Trans. 2014, 54, 169–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Polekhina, V.S.; Shestopalov, M.Y.; Ilyushin, Y.Y. Identification of Magnetic Field Strength Realisation as a Necessary Solution for High-Quality Metal Synthesis. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, ElConRus 2022, St. Petersburg, Russia, 25–28 January 2022; pp. 831–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhao, E.; Wang, E.; Chen, H. Study on Dynamic Parameters and Energy Dissipation Characteristics of Coal Samples under Dynamic Load and Temperature. Processes 2023, 11, 3326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Huang, Z.; Si, R.; Wen, G.; Jin, S.; Xue, S. Experimental Study on the Isolation Effect of an Active Flame-Proof Device on a Gas Explosion in an Underground Coal Mine. Fire 2023, 6, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Eremeeva, A.M. Method to reduce harmful emissions when diesel locomotives operate in coal mines. In Topical Issues of Rational Use of Natural Resources; Eremeeva, A.M., Kondrasheva, N.K., Korshunov, G.I., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; pp. 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Katysheva, E. Risk management and costs optimization in drilling of oil wells based on the application of smart field tools. In Proceedings of the International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, Albena, Bulgaria, 16–22 August 2021; Volume 21, pp. 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kukharova, T.V.; Ilyushin, Y.V.; Asadulagi, M.-A.M. Investigation of the OA-300M Electrolysis Cell Temperature Field of Metallurgical Production. Energies 2022, 15, 9001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kozyrev, B.A.; Sizyakov, V.M. Heap leaching of red mud by the formate method. Obogashchenie Rud 2021, 4, 40–45. [Google Scholar]
  70. Rogachev, M.K.; Aleksandrov, A.N. Justification of a comprehensive technology for preventing the formation of asphalt-resin-paraffin deposits during the production of highlyparaffinic oil by electric submersible pumps from multiformation deposits. J. Min. Inst. 2021, 250, 596–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li-min, Y.; Anqi, L.; Zheng, S.; Hui, L. Design of monitoring system for coal mine safety based on wireless sensor network. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechtronic and Embedded Systems and Applications, Beijing, China, 12–15 October 2008; pp. 409–414. [Google Scholar]
  72. Lisakov, S.A.; Sidorenko, A.I.; Sipin, E.V.; Pavlov, A.N.; Leonov, G.V. Modeling of Flame Radiation at Burning of Methane-Air Mixtures at Initial Stage of Development. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of Young Specialists on Micro/Nanotechnologies and Electron Devices EDM, Erlagol, Russia, 29 June–3 July 2017; Conference Proceedings. NSTU: Novosibirsk, Russia, 2017; pp. 332–337. [Google Scholar]
  73. Kukharova, T.V.; Utkin, V.A.; Boev, I.V. Observation and Prediction Systems Modeling for Human Mental State. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Multi-Conference on Industrial Engineering and Modern Technologies, FarEastCon 2018, Vladivostok, Russia, 2–4 October 2018; p. 8602831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pershin, I.M.; Papush, E.G.; Malkov, A.V.; Kukharova, T.V.; Spivak, A.O. Operational Control of Underground Water Exploitation Regimes. In Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Control in Technical Systems, CTS 2019, St. Petersburg, Russia, 30 October–1 November 2019; pp. 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ilyushin, Y.; Golovina, E. Stability of temperature field of the distributed control system. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2020, 15, 664–668. [Google Scholar]
  76. Sidorenko, A.A.; Ivanov, V.V.; Sidorenko, S.A. Computer modeling of rock massif stress condition for mining planning on overworked seam. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1661, 012082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Afanasev, P.M.; Bezyukov, O.K.; Ilyushina, A.N.; Pastukhova, E.V. Development of a system for controlling the temperature field of the columns and pipelines of raw gas transportation. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2023, 18, 421–434. [Google Scholar]
  78. Brigadnov, I.A.; Maksarov, V.V.; Olt, J.J. Optimal Acceleration or Braking of Massive Flywheels at the Strength Limit. Mech. Solids 2023, 58, 404–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Iliushina, A.N.; Shatilova, N.A.; Novozhilov, I.M. Development of the Railroad Switch Electric Drive Mathematical Model for the Neural Network. In Proceedings of the 2023 XXVI International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM), Saint Petersburg, Russia, 24–26 May 2023; pp. 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhang, B.; Ma, J.; Khan, M.A.; Repnikova, V.; Shidlovskaya, K.; Barykin, S.; Ahmad, M.S. The Effect of Economic Policy Uncertainty on Foreign Direct Investment in the Era of Global Value Chain: Evidence from the Asian Countries. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Iliushina, A.N.; Novozhilov, I.M. Search of the Optimal Mining Transport Route Applying Parallel Computing Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2023 XXVI International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM), Saint Petersburg, Russia, 24–26 May 2023; pp. 61–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Martirosyan, K.V.; Chernyshev, A.B.; Martirosyan, A.V.; Tatyana, K.V. Formation of the Anterior Heating Function under the Action of Uniformly Distributed Sources. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, EIConRus 2020, St. Petersburg, Russia, 27–30 January 2020; pp. 755–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Asadulagi, M.M. Simulation of the control system for hydrodynamic process with random disturbances. In Topical Issues of Rational Use of Natural Resources—Proceedings of the International Forum-Contest of Young Researchers, 2018, St. Petersburg, Russia, 18–20 April 2018; Asadulagi, M.M., Ioskov, G.V., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; pp. 399–405. [Google Scholar]
  84. Zhao, E.; Wang, E.; Chen, H. Experiments on the Coal Measures Sandstone’s Dynamic Mechanical Parameter Characteristics under the Combined Action of Temperature and Dynamic Load. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 13125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Makarova, A.A.; Mantorova, I.V.; Kovalev, D.A.; Kutovoy, I.N. The Modeling of Mineral Water Fields Data Structure. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ElConRus), St. Petersburg, Russia, 26–28 January 2021; pp. 517–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Vasilev, Y.; Tsvetkova, A.; Stroykov, G. Sustainable development in the Arctic region of the Russian Federation. In Proceedings of the International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, Albena, Bulgaria, 18–24 August 2020; pp. 763–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Maksarov, V.V.; Minin, A.O.; Zakharova, V.P. Ensuring surface quality in almn alloy items during high-frequency wave impact boring. Tsvetnye Met. 2023, 4, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Potseshkovskaya, I.V.; Soroka, A.N. Revitalization of urban industrial areas based on sustainable development principles. In E3S Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2021; Volume 266, p. 08012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sirenko, Y.G.; Sidorenko, S.A.; Denisova, A.I.; Mironovich, M.P. Method for Developing a Thick Flat Layer of Mineral Resources. Patent No. 2760450, 21 November 2021. [Google Scholar]
  90. Sidorenko, S.A.; Kuharova, T.V.; Martirosyan, A.V. Assessment of the Economic Efficiency of Using the Oil Separator in the Arctic Zone. Certificate of Registration of Computer Program 2021669578/69, 27 December 2021. Available online: https://www1.fips.ru/iiss/document.xhtml?faces-redirect=true&id=a1077b54e3fd64efc55007ef72977c80(accessed on 27 December 2021).
  91. Stroykov, G.; Vasilev, Y.N.; Zhukov, O.V. Basic Principles (Indicators) for Assessing the Technical and Economic Potential of Developing Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas Fields. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Shubin, A.A.; Tulin, P.K.; Potseshkovskaya, I.V. The mechanism of underground cavities formation and the methods of their elimination. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 2017, 8, 667–681. [Google Scholar]
  93. Demenkov, P.A.; Trushko, O.V.; Potseshkovskaya, I.V. Numerical experiments on the modeling of compensatory injection for the protection of buildings during tunneling. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2018, 13, 9161–9169. [Google Scholar]
  94. Kong, X.; Li, S.; Wang, E.; Wang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Ji, P.; Shuang, H.; Li, S.; Wei, Z. Experimental and numerical investigations on dynamic mechanical responses and failure process of gas-bearing coal under impact load. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2021, 142, 106579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kong, X.; Zhan, M.; Cai, Y.; Ji, P.; He, D.; Zhao, T.; Hu, J.; Lin, X. Precursor Signal Identification and Acoustic Emission Characteristics of Coal Fracture Process Subjected to Uniaxial Loading. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Eremeeva, A.M.; Ilyushin, Y.V. Automation of the control system for drying grain crops of the technological process for obtaining biodiesel fuels. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 14956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Fetisov, V.; Ilyushin, Y.V.; Vasiliev, G.G.; Leonovich, I.A.; Müller, J.; Riazi, M.; Mohammadi, A.H. Development of the automated temperature control system of the main gas pipeline. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 3092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ma, S.; Cao, J.; Zhang, Q.; Xue, S. Study on the Influence of Gas Desorption Characteristics under High-Pressure Fluid Fracturing of Deep Coal. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 13327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yury, I.; Martirosyan, A. The development of the soderberg electrolyzer electromagnetic field’s state monitoring system. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 3501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Afanaseva, O.; Ilyushin, Y. Analysis and synthesis of distributed icedrill heating control system of mountain reconnaissance drilling rig. In Proceedings of the International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, Albena, Bulgaria, 2–8 July 2018; Volume 18, pp. 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Dmitrieva, D.; Solovyova, V. Russian Arctic Mineral Resources Sustainable Development in the Context of Energy Transition, ESG Agenda and Geopolitical Tensions. Energies 2023, 16, 5145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Viciano-Tudela, S.; Sendra, S.; Parra, L.; Jimenez, J.M.; Lloret, J. Proposal of a Gas Sensor-Based Device for Detecting Adulteration in Essential Oil of Cistus ladanifer. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Khatri, D.; Gladstone, K.; Joysar, Y.; Gupta, P.; Mehendale, N. Design and Development of an Alcohol Detector employing a MQ-3 Gas Sensor and an 8051 Micro-Controller. SSRN Electron. J. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Nikolaev, A.; Romanov, A.; Zaripova, N.A.; Fetisov, V.G. Modeling of flow in field pipeline to confirm effectiveness of insertion of splitting couplings in control of rill-washing corrosion. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 194, 082030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Satsuk, T.P.; Sharyakov, V.A.; Sharyakova, O.L.; Kovalev, D.A.; Vorob’ev, A.A.; Makarova, E.I. Erratum to: Automatic Voltage Stabilization of an Electric Rolling Stock Catenary System. Russ. Electr. Eng. 2021, 92, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Martirosyan, A.V.; Martirosyan, K.V.; Chernyshev, A.B. Investigation of Popov’s Lines’ Limiting Position to Ensure the Process Control Systems’ Absolute Stability. In Proceedings of the 2023 XXVI International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM), Saint Petersburg, Russia, 24–26 May 2023; pp. 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zhang, J.; Jiang, F.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, L. Width design for gobs and isolated coal pillars based on overall burs-tinstability prevention in coal mines. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2016, 8, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Maksarov, V.V.; Klochkov, D.A. Features of the distribution of magnetic induction during magnetic-abrasive processing of synchronizers made of structural alloy steel. Chernye Met. 2023, 7, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ge, L.; Fang, Z.; Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Zeng, W.; Xiao, X. Study of a Small Robot for Mine Hole Detection. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 13249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kazanin, O.I.; Sidorenko, A.A.; Evsiukova, A.A.; Liu, Z. Justification of the longwall panel entries support technology when mining gently inclined coal seams at large depths. Min. Informational Anal. Bull. 2023, 9, 5–21. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Tananykhin, D.S. Scientific and Methodological Support of Sand Management During Operation of Horizontal Wells. Int. J. Eng. 2024, 37, 1274–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Malyshkov, G.B.; Nikolaichuk, L.A.; Sinkov, L.S. Legislative regulation of waste management system development in Russian federation. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 2019, 12, 631–635. [Google Scholar]
  113. Zhu, X.; Yang, H.; Bian, H.; Mei, Y.; Zhang, B.; Xue, P. Multi-Scalar Oblique Photogrammetry-Supported 3D webGIS Approach to Preventive Mining-Induced Deformation Analysis. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 13342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Sun, L.; Li, C.; Xu, Z.; Tai, L.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, X. Mitigating Risks in Coal Mining: Simulation-Based Strategy for Oxidation Zone Control Using Inorganic Paste Backfill at the Working Face Corners. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 13216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Korshunov, G.I.; Eremeeva, A.M.; Seregin, A.S. Justification of reduction in air requirement in ventilation of coal roadways with running diesel engines. MIAB Min. Inf. Anal. Bull. 2022, 47–59. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Shapiro, S.L.; Kopkov, M.P.; Potseshkovskaya, I.V. Problems of the organization of surface and underground space (e.g., historical embankments of Saint Petersburg). In E3S Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2021; Volume 266, p. 03016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Distribution of coal mines with different methane content. Source: Compiled by the author.
Figure 1. Distribution of coal mines with different methane content. Source: Compiled by the author.
Sustainability 16 03457 g001
Figure 2. Structural scheme of the EOS. Source: Compiled by the author.
Figure 2. Structural scheme of the EOS. Source: Compiled by the author.
Sustainability 16 03457 g002
Figure 3. Coefficient definition kL.
Figure 3. Coefficient definition kL.
Sustainability 16 03457 g003
Figure 4. Transfer functions for the CO2 sensors.
Figure 4. Transfer functions for the CO2 sensors.
Sustainability 16 03457 g004
Figure 5. Transfer functions for the CO sensors.
Figure 5. Transfer functions for the CO sensors.
Sustainability 16 03457 g005
Figure 6. Transfer functions for the C2H4 sensors.
Figure 6. Transfer functions for the C2H4 sensors.
Sustainability 16 03457 g006
Figure 7. The scheme of the model. Source: Compiled by the author.
Figure 7. The scheme of the model. Source: Compiled by the author.
Sustainability 16 03457 g007
Figure 8. Serial port monitor when the sensor heats up MQ-4. Source: Compiled by the author.
Figure 8. Serial port monitor when the sensor heats up MQ-4. Source: Compiled by the author.
Sustainability 16 03457 g008
Figure 9. Serial port monitor until the methane threshold sensor values are reached.
Figure 9. Serial port monitor until the methane threshold sensor values are reached.
Sustainability 16 03457 g009
Figure 10. Diagram of the model at a normal value of methane concentration; the green LED lights up. Source: Compiled by the author.
Figure 10. Diagram of the model at a normal value of methane concentration; the green LED lights up. Source: Compiled by the author.
Sustainability 16 03457 g010
Figure 11. Scheme of the model when the threshold value of methane concentration is exceeded by the MQ-4 sensor; the red LED lights up. Source: Compiled by the author.
Figure 11. Scheme of the model when the threshold value of methane concentration is exceeded by the MQ-4 sensor; the red LED lights up. Source: Compiled by the author.
Sustainability 16 03457 g011
Figure 12. Serial port monitor when the sensor exceeds the threshold concentration of methane MQ-4.
Figure 12. Serial port monitor when the sensor exceeds the threshold concentration of methane MQ-4.
Sustainability 16 03457 g012
Table 1. Classification by types of accidents at Russian coal mines [18,19,20].
Table 1. Classification by types of accidents at Russian coal mines [18,19,20].
Main Causes of AccidentsAverage Annual Number of AccidentsProportion (%)
Sudden outbursts of coal or gases13739
Destruction and landslides, accidents in the faces and in the places of mining11232
Underground fires7121
Sparks and flash fires93
Accumulation and collapse of water41
Methane explosion, coal dust explosion41
Other reasons123
Table 2. Largest coal mine accidents in the world over the last 20 years [23,24].
Table 2. Largest coal mine accidents in the world over the last 20 years [23,24].
Sl No.YearCountryMine NameAccident CauseFatality
12004RussiaTayzhinaAccumulation of firedamp47
22004UkraineDonbassAccumulation of firedamp36
32005ChinaShenlong MineAccumulation of firedamp in the shafts to reach the density of explosion and wire sparks induced the blast83
42006ChinaLin Jiazhuang Coal MineExplosion in a sealed of area due to not using explosion-resistant seals54
52006IndiaBhatdee CollieryAccumulation of methane due to incomplete stowing and high amount of coal dust generation, leading to explosion50
62006MéxicoPasta de Conchos MineAccumulation of methane65
72006KazakhstanMittal’s LeninAccumulation of methane41
82007UkraineZasyadkoAccumulation of methane101
92007RussiaYubileynayaA pocket of methane gas exploded as methane drainage was not done39
102007ColombiaNorte de SantanderAccumulation of methane followed by roof fall32
112007RussiaUlyyanovskayaAccumulation of firedamp due to deliberate disabling of a methane detector by the mine management to avoid costly work stoppages108
122009ChinaHeilongjiang MineInadequate ventilation leading to accumulation of methane108
132009IndonesiaSarana Arang SejatiAccumulation of methane with suspected source of ignition being cigarette lighter/generator spark32
142010RussiaRaspadskaya MineBuildup of methane in an unventilated tunnel90
152010ColombiaSan FemandoAccumulation of methane73
162011PakistanSorange MineAccumulation of methane and mine collapse52
172012ChinaXiaojiawan Coal MineAccumulation of methane and carbon monoxide poisoning47
182013ChinaBabao MineGas leakage from seals induced explosion53
192014TurkeySoma Coal Mine, ManisaAccumulation of methane, fire and carbon monoxide poisoning301
202015UkraineZasyadkoAccumulation of methane33
212016RussiaVorkuta MineAccumulation of methane36
222016ChinaJinshangou Coal MineAccumulation of methane32
232017IranZemestan-Yort MineAccumulation of methane and spark generated due to powering of a locomotive using an external battery42
242021RussiaListvyazhnayaAccumulation of methane51
252023KazakhstanKostenkoAccumulation of methane46
Table 3. Basic sensor parameters.
Table 3. Basic sensor parameters.
NameSensorMAC (g/m3)MAC (ppm)
MQ-2Methane0.5%500
MQ-4Methane0.5%500
MQ-7Carbon dioxide0.0017%1.7
MQ-9Propane2.2%2200
MQ-135Carbonic gas2%2000
Table 4. Materials for the simulation model.
Table 4. Materials for the simulation model.
MaterialsNumber of Units
Arduino UNO board1
MQ-4 sensor1
LED2
Buzzer1
Resistor 3 220 Ohm3
Jumper wires6
Methane concentration determination1
Table 5. Specifications of the MQ-4 sensor.
Table 5. Specifications of the MQ-4 sensor.
Device CharacteristicValue
Detecting concentration300 to 10,000 ppm
Power150 mA
Input voltage5 VDC
Digital output voltageTTL digital 0 and 1 (0.1 V and 5 V)
Analog output voltage (relatively clean)0.1 V to 0.3 V
Analog output voltage (highest concentration)4 V
Table 6. Data obtained experimentally.
Table 6. Data obtained experimentally.
TimeSensor Number
1234567891011
1000000000000
2000000000000
300.10000000000
400.10.1000000000
500.10.1000000000
600.30.10.100000000
700.30.10.100000000
800.30.30.10.10000000
900.30.30.10.10000000
1000.30.30.30.10.1000000
1100.30.30.30.10.1000000
1200.30.30.30.30.10.100000
1300.30.30.30.30.10.100000
1400.30.30.30.30.30.10.10000
1500.30.30.30.30.30.10.10000
1600.30.30.30.30.30.30.10.1000
1700.30.30.30.30.30.30.10.1000
1800.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.10.100
1900.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.10.100
2000.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.10.10
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sidorenko, S.; Trushnikov, V.; Sidorenko, A. Methane Emission Estimation Tools as a Basis for Sustainable Underground Mining of Gas-Bearing Coal Seams. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3457. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083457

AMA Style

Sidorenko S, Trushnikov V, Sidorenko A. Methane Emission Estimation Tools as a Basis for Sustainable Underground Mining of Gas-Bearing Coal Seams. Sustainability. 2024; 16(8):3457. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083457

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sidorenko, Sergey, Vyacheslav Trushnikov, and Andrey Sidorenko. 2024. "Methane Emission Estimation Tools as a Basis for Sustainable Underground Mining of Gas-Bearing Coal Seams" Sustainability 16, no. 8: 3457. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083457

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop