Next Article in Journal
Toward Value Co-Creation: Increasing Women’s Presence in Management Positions through Competition against a Set Target
Next Article in Special Issue
Risk Assessment System Based on WebGIS for Heavy Metal Pollution in Farmland Soils in China
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Conservation Tillage and Nutrient Management Practices on Soil Fertility and Productivity of Rice (Oryza sativa L.)–Rice System in North Eastern Region of India
Previous Article in Special Issue
Do National Cultural Traits Affect Comparative Advantage in Cultural Goods?
Article Menu
Issue 10 (October) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2017, 9(10), 1829; doi:10.3390/su9101829

Voice Behavior, Supervisor Attribution and Employee Performance Appraisal

1
International Business School, Jinan University, Zhuhai 519070, China
2
School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI 54702, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 21 August 2017 / Revised: 8 October 2017 / Accepted: 9 October 2017 / Published: 12 October 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [859 KB, uploaded 12 October 2017]   |  

Abstract

Employees contribute to the sustainability of organizations in many ways, yet the specific impact of employee voice on employee performance appraisal, as an element of organization sustainability, is not clear. Based on the attribution theory, we present a model to investigate the relationship between employee voice and employee performance appraisal. Using the PLS (Partial Least Squares) method, we test our model’s hypotheses with 273 dyads of supervisor-employee questionnaires administered on a branch of a state-owned enterprise in China. The results show that promotive voice is positively attributed to prosocial motives and constructive motives, while prohibitive voice is not significantly attributed to prosocial motives and constructive motives. The attribution of prosocial motives and constructive motives has a significant and positive effect on employees’ performance appraisal. Moreover, the attribution of prosocial motives and constructive motives fully mediates the relationship between promotive voice and performance appraisal, but has no mediating effects on the relationship between prohibitive voice and performance appraisal. View Full-Text
Keywords: promotive voice; prohibitive voice; prosocial motives; constructive motives; performance appraisal; organization sustainability promotive voice; prohibitive voice; prosocial motives; constructive motives; performance appraisal; organization sustainability
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Su, X.; Liu, Y.; Hanson-Rasmussen, N. Voice Behavior, Supervisor Attribution and Employee Performance Appraisal. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1829.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top