Next Article in Journal
Oral Charcoal Adsorbents Attenuate Neointima Formation of Arteriovenous Fistulas
Previous Article in Journal
Toxicity of Recombinant Necrosis and Ethylene-Inducing Proteins (NLPs) from Neofusicoccum parvum
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bioaccumulation and Distribution of Indospicine and Its Foregut Metabolites in Camels Fed Indigofera spicata
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Food Safety and Natural Toxins

Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Health and Food Sciences Precinct, Coopers Plains, QLD 4108, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2020, 12(4), 236; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12040236
Submission received: 11 February 2020 / Accepted: 31 March 2020 / Published: 8 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Safety and Natural Toxins)
Natural toxins are poisonous secondary metabolites produced by living organisms, which are typically not harmful to the organisms themselves but can impact on human or animal health when consumed [1,2]. Common sources of such toxins include poisonous plants, fungi, algae, bacteria and marine biotoxins, and the diversity of these biological systems presents challenges to analytical chemists and wide-ranging food safety implications. The propensity for such toxins to be present in both animal feed and human food has led to the introduction of regulations for a small number of the most potent natural toxins, particularly mycotoxins [3]. Implementation of these regulations necessitates the establishment of high-throughput analytical chemistry methods [4], such as LC-MS and GC-MS, with increasingly lower limits of detection, and the production of isotopically labelled analogues as internal standards to increase the reliability of analysis in complex matrices. Thus, this Special Issue focused on the analysis of natural toxins, their incidence from source organisms to food and feed commodities, and implications for food safety.
The impacts of natural toxins present in pasture plants are not limited to grazing livestock but can also be carried through the food chain, with some toxins, such as indospicine, being demonstrated to accumulate in the tissues of grazing animals and cause secondary poisoning in animals consuming meat from these livestock [5,6]. Interestingly, camel feeding trials have demonstrated that indospicine is still detectable by LC-MS/MS analysis 100 days after cessation of feeding Indigofera plants, whereas ruminal metabolites of this toxin have a considerably faster clearance rate [5]. The toxicity of indospicine for humans is uncertain but simple cooking of indospicine-contaminated meat does not degrade this natural toxin, and in vitro studies under human gastrointestinal conditions further demonstrated its stability and release into liquid digesta indicating ready bio-accessibility for absorption in the small intestine [6].
Mycotoxins are natural toxins produced by fungi in a range of food and feed commodities, with potent carcinogenic aflatoxins (particularly aflatoxin B1 or AFB1) being considered of significant risk to human health. Once ingested by animals, AFB1 can be carried into milk as the toxic metabolite aflatoxin M1, with the presence of AFM1 in milk being of particular concern as young children represent a particularly susceptible age group [7]. AFM1 analysis studies have assessed the risk of AFM1 in both liquid and powdered milk marketed in Pakistan, with processed milk shown to have lower AFM1 levels than raw milk [7]. Mycotoxin risk is not only limited to the consumption of cereal grains, but can also occur in pollen as used in food supplements [8], and malting and brewing by-products as used in animal feed [9], and reviews of these products further highlight the potential mycotoxin risks in these novel food and feed products.
Natural toxins produced by bacteria are also of concern. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli is a frequent cause of food poisoning with enormous human health and economic impacts, and rapid and accurate identification is imperative for protection of human health. Detection of the toxin by a newly developed amplified luminescent proximity homogenous assay-linked immunosorbent assay (AlphaLISA) allows for an automated and much more rapid assay of the toxin with increased sensitivity and dynamic range compared to the industry-standard ELISA test [10].
Another class of natural toxins are ciguatoxins (CTXs), marine biotoxins produced by dinoflagellates of the genus Gambierdiscus, with the foodborne disease ciguatera caused by the consumption of contaminated seafood. Analytical studies have examined both CTXs’ tissue distribution in giant clams (Tridacna maxima) exposed to toxic cells of Gambierdiscus polynesiensis, and also detoxification rates after the transfer of clams into clean water [11]. Viscera, flesh, and mantle contained 65%, 25%, and 10% of the toxin burden respectively, with all tissues reaching levels above safety limits, and most concerningly, no toxin elimination was seen within a six day detoxification period.
This Special Issue then contains original contributions that advance our knowledge of the food safety implications of natural toxins. The breadth of the manuscripts demonstrated the diverse sources of natural toxins that can affect food safety, from plant toxins and their accumulation in the meat of grazing livestock, mycotoxins and their presence in grains, brewing by-products, milk and pollen supplements, ciguatoxins in seafood, and Shiga toxins associated with Escherichia coli contamination of foods.

Acknowledgments

The guest editors express their appreciation to all the authors who contributed to this Special Issue. They are also grateful for the rigorous and selfless evaluation of the submitted manuscripts by expert peer reviewers, without which this special issue would not be possible. The valuable editorial support provided by the MDPI management team and staff are also greatly appreciated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO. Natural Toxins in food (Factsheet). 2018. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/natural-toxins-in-food (accessed on 10 February 2020).
  2. Dolan, L.C.; Matulka, R.A.; Burdock, G.A. Naturally occurring food toxins. Toxins 2010, 2, 2289–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); The World Health Organization (WHO). Codex Allimentarius International Food Standards. General standard for contaminants and toxins in food and feed. (Last amended 2019). CODEX STAN. 193–1995. Available online: http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/codex-texts/list-standards/en/ (accessed on 10 February 2020).
  4. Rodríguez, I.; González, J.M.; Botana, A.M.; Sainz, M.J.; Vieytes, M.R.; Alfonso, A.; Botana, L.M. Analysis of natural toxins by liquid chromatography. In Liquid Chromatography: Applications, 2nd ed.; Fanali, S., Haddad, P.R., Poole, C.F., Riekkola, M.-L., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 479–514. [Google Scholar]
  5. Netzel, G.; Tan, E.T.T.; Yin, M.; Giles, C.; Yong, K.W.L.; Al Jassim, R.; Fletcher, M.T. Bioaccumulation and distribution of indospicine and its foregut metabolites in camels fed Indigofera spicata. Toxins 2019, 11, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Sultan, S.; Giles, C.; Netzel, G.; Osborne, S.A.; Netzel, M.E.; Fletcher, M.T. Release of indospicine from contaminated camel meat following cooking and simulated gastrointestinal digestion: Implications for human consumption. Toxins 2018, 10, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Yunus, A.W.; Imtiaz, N.; Khan, H.; Ibrahim, M.N.M.; Zafar, Y. Aflatoxin contamination of milk marketed in Pakistan: A longitudinal study. Toxins 2019, 11, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Kostić, A.Ž.; Milinčić, D.D.; Petrović, T.S.; Krnjaja, V.S.; Stanojević, S.P.; Barać, M.B.; Tešić, Ž.L.; Pešić, M.B. Mycotoxins and mycotoxin producing fungi in pollen: Review. Toxins 2019, 11, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Mastanjević, K.; Lukinac, J.; Jukić, M.; Šarkanj, B.; Krstanović, V.; Mastanjević, K. Multi-(myco)toxins in malting and brewing by-products. Toxins 2019, 11, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Armstrong, C.M.; Ruth, L.E.; Capobianco, J.A.; Strobaugh, T.P.; Rubio, F.M.; Gehring, A.G. Detection of Shiga Toxin 2 produced by Escherichia coli in foods using a novel AlphaLISA. Toxins 2018, 10, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Roué, M.; Darius, H.T.; Ung, A.; Viallon, J.; Sibat, M.; Hess, P.; Amzil, Z.; Chinain, M. Tissue distribution and elimination of ciguatoxins in Tridacna maxima (Tridacnidae, Bivalvia) fed Gambierdiscus polynesiensis. Toxins 2018, 10, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fletcher, M.T.; Netzel, G. Food Safety and Natural Toxins. Toxins 2020, 12, 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12040236

AMA Style

Fletcher MT, Netzel G. Food Safety and Natural Toxins. Toxins. 2020; 12(4):236. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12040236

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fletcher, Mary T., and Gabriele Netzel. 2020. "Food Safety and Natural Toxins" Toxins 12, no. 4: 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12040236

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop