Next Article in Journal
Mechanism of Morphology Development in HDGEBA/PAMS Hybrid Thermosets: Monte Carlo Simulation and LSCM Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Performance of Concentrically Loaded RC Wall-like Columns Upgraded with Innovative Hybrid NSM/CFRP System
Previous Article in Journal
Biopolymer-Based Wound Dressings with Biochemical Cues for Cell-Instructive Wound Repair
Previous Article in Special Issue
Restrained Shrinkage of High-Performance Ready-Mix Concrete Reinforced with Low Volume Fraction of Hybrid Fibers
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Analysis of Bonding Mechanisms of Various Implants and Adhesives in Laminated Oak-Wood Elements

Polymers 2022, 14(24), 5373; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14245373
by Andrija Novosel, Tomislav Sedlar, Josip Miklečić, Hrvoje Turkulin, Luka Lučić, Goran Mihulja and Vjekoslav Živković *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Polymers 2022, 14(24), 5373; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14245373
Submission received: 12 November 2022 / Revised: 29 November 2022 / Accepted: 3 December 2022 / Published: 8 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer Composites for Structural Strengthening)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

L39 strike ‘the most’

L40 ‘are affordable and low in weight’

L43 strike ‘therefore’. The preceding sentences to not set up the following one; for example no mention of glulam until then.

L45  redundant mention of cross-section.

L75 strike ‘another’

L78-83j. This doesn’t seem needed to me.

L84. Planing – the use of a plane

L100. Just ‘oak’. Oak-wood is not common usage

L103 mechanism? Was this really investigated?

L107 rober

L126-129 this is background/justification and belongs in the previous section if needed – you already mentioned face milling.

L181 “Reference”

Results and discussion. In general, I think the “Results’ section is too long (about ½ the paper) and the discussion too short, in part because there is discussion in the Results section and in part because some of the results are more detailed than they need to be. I suggest 1) move the parts of the results that are in the discussion to the discussion, and 2) double-checking that all the results points need to be explicitly mentioned.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

thank you for your comments. All the responds and further explanations are attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

thank you for your comments. Attached please find all the responses and clarifications.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop