Next Article in Journal
Intelligent Polymers for Multi-Functional Applications: Mechanical and Electrical Aspects
Next Article in Special Issue
Profitability of Chemically Cross-Linked Collagen Scaffold Production Using Bovine Pericardium: Revaluing Waste from the Meat Industry for Biomedical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Super-Tough and Biodegradable Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) Transparent Thin Films Toughened by Star-Shaped PCL-b-PDLA Plasticizers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Properties of Bovine Collagen as Influenced by High-Pressure Processing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Scaffold Chemical Model Based on Collagen—Methyl Methacrylate Graft Copolymers

by
Yulia L. Kuznetsova
1,
Ksenya S. Gushchina
1,
Karina S. Lobanova
1,
Victoria O. Chasova
1,
Marfa N. Egorikhina
2,
Alexandra O. Grigoreva
1,
Yulia B. Malysheva
1,
Daria A. Kuzmina
1,
Ekaterina A. Farafontova
2,
Daria D. Linkova
2,
Yulia P. Rubtsova
2 and
Luydmila L. Semenycheva
1,*
1
Faculty of Chemistry, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, 23, Gagarin Ave., 603022 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
2
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Privolzhsky Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 603005 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(12), 2618; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122618
Submission received: 15 May 2023 / Revised: 1 June 2023 / Accepted: 5 June 2023 / Published: 8 June 2023

Abstract

:
Polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) in aqueous collagen (Col) dispersion was studied in the presence of tributylborane (TBB) and p-quinone: 2,5-di-tert-butyl-p-benzoquinone (2,5-DTBQ), p-benzoquinone (BQ), duroquinone (DQ), and p-naphthoquinone (NQ). It was found that this system leads to the formation of a grafted cross-linked copolymer. The inhibitory effect of p-quinone determines the amount of unreacted monomer, homopolymer, and percentage of grafted poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). The synthesis combines two approaches to form a grafted copolymer with a cross-linked structure—“grafting to” and “grafting from”. The resulting products exhibit biodegradation under the action of enzymes, do not have toxicity, and demonstrate a stimulating effect on cell growth. At the same time, the denaturation of collagen occurring at elevated temperatures does not impair the characteristics of copolymers. These results allow us to present the research as a scaffold chemical model. Comparison of the properties of the obtained copolymers helps to determine the optimal method for the synthesis of scaffold precursors—synthesis of a collagen and poly(methyl methacrylate) copolymer at 60 °C in a 1% acetic acid dispersion of fish collagen with a mass ratio of the components collagen:MMA:TBB:2,5-DTBQ equal to 1:1:0.015:0.25.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In modern medicine, bioengineered structures involving cellular technologies are applied to restore damaged tissues. The task of creating a good tissue equivalent is to find the right balance between creating conditions for the regeneration of this tissue and restoring its main functions [1]. The composition of such a structure includes three necessary components: scaffold, signaling factors, and cells, commonly referred to as the triad of tissue engineering [2]. There are specific requirements for scaffolds:
  • The scaffold should be biodegradable so that no additional surgical intervention is required to remove the implant, and, in an ideal case, the degradation rate should correspond to the formation rate of new tissue [3,4];
  • The scaffold and its decomposition products should be biocompatible and not cause particular mutagenic, carcinogenic, or cytotoxic effects [4,5,6];
  • The qualities of the implanted scaffold should correspond to the properties of the recipient’s natural tissue [7];
  • The scaffold must have an interconnected network of pores, which will ensure the possibility of its colonization by cells and circulation of gases and liquids and, ultimately, causes tissue growth in all directions [2,8];
  • The scaffold should have properties that ensure the attachment, migration, and proliferation of cells [9];
  • The scaffold should have optimal bioengineering qualities that will allow the material to restore damaged tissues and organs, simulating physiological processes in the replaced biostructures [10,11,12].
For the formation of most tissues when creating scaffolds, natural (collagen, chitosan, alginate, agarose, fibrin, fibronectin) and synthetic (poly-α-hydroxyesters, in particular polylactic acid, polyglycolic acid, their mixture, polyethylene glycol) polymers or hydrogels formed by covalent or ionic cross-linking of water-soluble natural and synthetic polymers are used [13,14,15,16].
The disadvantages of synthetic scaffolds are the lack of cellular recognition and sometimes low biocompatibility. Biopolymers such as collagen or fibronectin have numerous advantages in tissue engineering, such as low toxicity, low immunogenicity, and biodegradability. Natural polymers are preferable in forming the scaffold because sections of molecules capable of binding to cell receptors are preserved. However, their use as scaffolds is often complicated because they do not have sufficient strength and elasticity and have a fibrillar rather than three-dimensional structure [17,18,19,20]. Natural polymers are given that structure by copolymerization with other natural [21,22,23,24,25,26] or synthetic polymers [27,28,29,30,31] to eliminate mentioned disadvantages.
Organoborane compounds are used to synthesize grafted copolymers [32,33,34]. Tributyl borane makes it possible to obtain copolymers of collagen and poly(methyl methacrylate) [32,33], triethyl borane–copolymer of collagen and poly(butyl acrylate) [34], and the combination of triethyl borane and p–quinone—a copolymer of starch and poly(methyl acrylate) [35]. At the same time, alkylborane in the composition of various initiators makes it possible to obtain grafted copolymers both by “grafting from” [32,33,34] or “grafting to” [35]. Under certain conditions, the grafted copolymer can be obtained by combing both approaches. In this case, the resulting product must have a cross-linked structure required in scaffold technologies. This was first implemented in our work [36], which involved the synthesis of gelatin and methyl methacrylate copolymers in the presence of tributylborane and 2,5-di-tert-butyl-p-benzoquinone. In this case, the chain begins to grow on the borated collagen (“grafting from”) and breaks off on the borated collagen (“grafting to”).
This work aimed to create a chemical model of scaffold construction based on graft-copolymers of collagen and methyl methacrylate using tributyl borane and p-quinones. For this, it was necessary to complete the following tasks:
  • Obtain copolymers of methyl methacrylate and fish collagen in the presence of tributyl borane and several p-quinones differing in their structure and reactivity, in addition to the previously obtained data [36];
  • Characterize the obtained products using the methods of gel-penetrating chromatography and scanning electron microscopy;
  • Evaluate the propensity of copolymers for biodegradation under the action of enzymes in comparison with collagen to understand the prospects of their use as precursors of scaffolds;
  • Conduct a cytotoxicity examination;
  • Form a chemical model of scaffold construction based on collagen and methyl methacrylate graft-copolymers using tributyl borane and p-quinones.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Collagen dispersion in acetic acid (Mn = 244 kDa, Mw = 279 kDa, Mz = 304 kDa, and PDI = 1.14) was obtained using the process described in [37]. The methods used to purify organic solvents and MMA were outlined in [38]. NQ (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA) and DQ (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA) were used without preliminary purification. BQ and 2,5-DTBQ were synthesized by oxidation of the corresponding hydroquinone. All p-quinones were purified via recrystallization from petroleum ether. The purity of all substances used was monitored by NMR spectroscopy.

2.2. Synthesis of TBB

TBB was synthesized by reacting BF3∙Et2O with 1-butyl bromide over magnesium shavings in diethyl ether by the method outlined in [39]. 11B NMR (128 MHz, CDCl3) was conducted with a value of δ 86.7.

2.3. Polymerization Procedure

Thirty mL of 1% Col solution was placed in a three-necked flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer and reflux condenser, and it was heated in a water bath to 60 °C in an argon atmosphere. A solution of TBB in heptane was placed in a vacuum ampoule. The required TBB volume (0.08 g (0.015 mol.%)) was taken with an argon-filled syringe and poured into a collagen solution with intensive stirring. The mixture was kept for 30 min. After that, a degassed solution containing 0.3 mL of MMA and 0.25 (0.15, 0.35, 2.5) mol.% of p-quinone (2,5-DTBQ, DQ, BQ, and NQ) was added to the reaction flask. The reaction mixture was kept for 3 h.

2.4. Determination of the Unreacted Monomer

Unreacted MMA was measured via Knopp bromination as described in [39].
MAA concentration was determined by:
X , % = a b   ×   M 200 m ,
a, b—volumes of Na2S2O3 expended on the probe and blank titration, respectively, mL; M—MAA molecular weight (MW), g/mole; m—copolymer probe mass, g.

2.5. Enzymatic Hydrolysis

The enzymatic hydrolysis of copolymers was carried out using collagenase, thrombin (Renam NPO, Moscow, Russia), and pancreatin (Hubei Maxpharm Industries Co, Ltd., Wuhan, China) with proteolytic activity of 2 U/mg.
The hydrolysis of collagenase was implemented in this work as outlined in [36].
For thrombin and pancreatin hydrolysis, 1 M NaOH was added to the solution to neutralize any acid, with the solution subsequently brought to the required volume with distilled water. The hydrolysis was carried out by adding the enzyme to the resulting mixture at a mass ratio of copolymer to an enzyme of 103:1. Samples (1 mL) were taken at regular intervals (1, 10, 30, 60 min, and 3 days) after the addition of the enzyme. To interrupt the hydrolysis, 1 mL of 4% acetic acid solution was added to the samples.
The mixtures from each hydrolysis were filtered out. The remaining PMMA was concentrated and analyzed using size-exclusion chromatography (SEC).

2.6. Size-Exclusion Chromatography

The aqueous dispersion of Col and PMMA copolymer was analyzed on an LC-20 HPLC system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a low-temperature light-scattering detector ELSD-LT II with the LC-Solutions-GPC software module. Measurements were performed at the following conditions: the column—Tosoh Bioscience TSKgel G3000SWxl (Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan) with a 5.0 μm pore size; column temperature—30 °C; the eluent—0.5 M acetic acid solution with the 0.8 mL/min flow rate. Narrow disperse dextran standards with an MW range of 1–410 kDa (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) were used for calibration.
Graft-PMMA driven out by enzymatic hydrolysis from a copolymer was analyzed on a Prominence LC-20VP system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with the following conditions: column—Tosoh Bioscience (polystyrene-divinylbenzene gel, 106 and 105 Å pore size) (Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan); column temperature—40 °C; eluent—tetrahydrofuran with a 0.7 mL/min flow rate. A differential refractometer and a UV detector (λ = 254 nm) were used as a detector. Calibration was performed using narrow dispersion of PMMA standards.

2.7. Scanning Electron Microscopy

The surface of collagen and copolymer samples was studied using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) JSM-IT300LV (JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Japan) with an electron probe diameter of 4 nm (operating voltage 30 kV) by using detectors of low-energy secondary electrons in a low-vacuum mode to prevent the samples from charging. The sponges for the electron microscope were obtained via freeze-drying. The pore size of freeze-dried samples was determined from micrographs using a scale bar.

2.8. NMR Spectroscopy

1H NMR spectra were recorded on Agilent DD2 400 instrument. Chemical shifts (δ) are given in ppm relative to the solvent reference as an internal standard (δ 7.26 ppm for CDCl3).

2.9. Cytotoxicity Examination via MTT Assay

Human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) of 4–6 passages were used to study the samples. An active, morphologically homogeneous culture was used, which adheres well to plastic. The immunophenotype of the culture cells corresponded to the immunophenotype of mesenchymal cells. The sustainability of the culture was more than 97%. HDF with a density of 10 thousand per 1 cm2 was seeded into the wells of a flat-bottomed 96-well tablet in DMEM/F12 growth medium, with antibiotics (penicillin, 100 units/mL; streptomycin, 100 μg/mL) and 10% inactivated calf embryonic serum. Then, they were cultivated under standard conditions for one day. After 24 h, even growth of typical fibroblast-like cells in the form of a subconfluent monolayer was recorded in all wells. After 24 h of cultivation, the growth medium above the cells was replaced with the studied solutions.
The MTT assay is a colorimetric method based on the reaction of the recovery of the tetrazolium dye 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide into insoluble formazan. The formazan concentration reflected in the optical density was measured using a Sunrise tablet reader (Austria) at a wavelength of 540 nm.
The test samples in the form of films brought to a constant mass in a vacuum cabinet were placed in a prepared growth medium (DMEM/F12 with antibiotics and 2% calf embryonic serum). Samples were placed in a CO2 incubator for 24 h under standard conditions (temperature—37 °C; CO2 concentration—5%). After 24 h of incubation, the extract was taken from the studied samples, and a series of dilutions with the growth medium was prepared in the ratios 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, and 1:8.
Various concentrations of the extract were added to the culture of HDF sown in a 96-well tablet. Each was performed in 8 dexterities (8 holes). The sample tablet was placed in a CO2 incubator for 72 h.
After 72 h, 20 μL of a solution of MTT (5 mg/mL in a phosphate-buffered solution) was added to each well. Then, the cells were incubated with MTT for 3 h in a CO2 incubator. After 3 h of incubation, the supernatant was selected and replaced with an equal volume of DMSO solution. The optical density (OD) was recorded at 540 nm on a tablet reader.
The relative growth intensity (RGI) was calculated according to the following formula:
RGI , % = average   OD   in   test   culture average   OD   in   control × 100 .
The RGI of the experimental series was compared with the RGI of the control, taking it to 100%.
The severity of cytotoxicity was ranked as follows:
  • RGI 100%—rank 0;
  • RGI 99–75%—rank 1 corresponds to the absence of cytotoxicity;
  • RGI 74–50%—rank 2 corresponds to a mild degree of cytotoxicity;
  • RGI 49–25%—rank 3 corresponds to an average degree of cytotoxicity;
  • RGI 24–0%—rank 4 corresponds to high cytotoxicity [40].

3. Results and Discussion

To create a chemical model of scaffold construction based on collagen and methyl methacrylate copolymers using tributyl borane and p-quinones, it was necessary, in addition to the previously obtained data [33,36,39], to synthesize copolymers in the presence of tributyl borane and some p-quinones differing in their structure and reactivity, and evaluate their parameters as materials for scaffolds. As in previously published studies, copolymers were synthesized under varying temperature conditions—25 °C, 45 °C, and 60 °C. It is known [41] that fish collagen undergoes denaturation and gradually turns into its analog—gelatin. The properties of gelatin in comparison with collagen in catalytic processes (enzymatic catalysis of protein hydrolysis) and its functional properties in hybrid hydrogel scaffolds differ slightly [42,43,44,45,46]. In this regard, we conducted research including a temperature of synthesis at 60 °C when part of the collagen can turn into gelatin. It was taken into consideration when interpreting the results.
For this research, collagen–PMMA copolymers (Col–co–PMMA) were synthesized using the following p-quinones: 2,5-di-tert-butyl-p-benzoquinone Polymers 15 02618 i001, p-benzoquinone Polymers 15 02618 i002, duroquinone Polymers 15 02618 i003, and p-naphthoquinone Polymers 15 02618 i004.
The obtained material was studied in detail in the example of 2,5-DTBQ. The mass ratio of collagen and MMA used for synthesis is 1:1. The amount of TBB is equivalent to the number of hydroxyproline units contained in collagen because it was shown in previous works [33,36] that the maximum ratio of grafted MMA was due to the boration reaction of the hydroxyl group of hydroxyproline. The concentration of 2,5-DTBQ in MMA is 0.25 mol.%, which was commonly used in the synthesis of (co)polymers in the presence of the alkylborane–quinone system [47]. As shown in Table 1, the conversion of the monomer does not depend much on temperature and is slightly higher at a synthesis temperature of 60 °C (calculated from unreacted monomer).
The molecular weight (MW) determined by the GPC method and the morphology of freeze-dried samples were determined for the copolymers. In addition, enzymatic hydrolysis of copolymer samples with pancreatin and thrombin enzymes was carried out, with molecular weight characteristics controlled during the process. The results of hydrolysis were compared with those for collagen. It was not possible to estimate the MW parameters of the formed copolymer because the molecular weight distribution (MWD) curves of the samples (Figure 1, curves 2–4) differ little from the MWD curves of collagen (Figure 1, curve 1). We suppose, when preparing highly diluted copolymer solutions for analysis, in this case, unreacted collagen remains in the filtrate during filtration, and the copolymer does not pass through the filter with a pore size of 0.45 μm due to the cross-linked structure. A similar result was observed in [36] when studying the MW characteristics of gelatin copolymers.
Further experiments have confirmed this. The analysis of hydrolysates becomes possible because the cross-linked structure is broken in contrast to the copolymer from synthesis. MWD curves of copolymer hydrolysates in the case of pancreatin (Figure 2) and even more so in the presence of thrombin (Figure 3) confirm the formation of a grafted copolymer. When hydrolyzed by pancreatin, the high-molecular mode gradually disappears (Figure 2), and only corresponding low-molecular fractions of collagen remain, which are not hydrolyzed with values of ~20 kDa and ~10 kDa [33,48]. If we compare the obtained results of copolymer hydrolysis with those for collagen [48], then a noticeable decrease in the rate of copolymer hydrolysis occurs, although results are identical in three days. It is well known that proteolytic enzymes break down protein bonds created by arginine and lysine [49]. When synthetic fragments are added to the collagen molecule, they do not affect the breakdown of peptide molecules by those same bonds. Nevertheless, steric difficulties caused by grafted synthetic fragments onto collagen slow down this process. The MWD curves of copolymers hydrolyzed by thrombin do not undergo noticeable changes over time (Figure 3). The inertia of the copolymer to thrombin hydrolysis is because the active center of the globular protein thrombin, unlike pancreatin, is unable to approach the peptide bond of the copolymer.
The morphology of copolymers obtained at different temperatures, shown in Figure 4b–d, varies significantly compared to the morphology of collagen (Figure 4a). The collagen sponge has clear outlines of collagen fibers and formed pores (Figure 4a), and the morphology of the copolymer sponges clearly shows the denser contours of the collagen matrix due to the grafted synthetic fragments of the copolymer (Figure 4b–d). The pore size of the copolymers is different for different temperatures: the copolymer synthesized at 25 °C has a pore size close to collagen ~20 μm (Figure 4b). When the synthesis temperature rises to 45 °C (Figure 4b), the pore size varies from 30 to 100 μm; this can be explained by the disruption of the bonds of individual collagen α-chains and the formation of their chaotic intermolecular interactions due to partial denaturation of the protein in the copolymer. As a result, the resulting cross-linked structure changes. In the copolymer synthesized at 60 °C, the pore size is leveled to ~40 μm (Figure 4d).
The analysis of the literature and the obtained results suggest the formation of a copolymer as follows. The processing of collagen with TBB leads to the formation of borated collagen following the Scheme 1:
The release of butane was confirmed earlier by chromatography–mass spectrometry [33]. Borated collagen can initiate the polymer chain addition of MMA in two distinct manners: reversible inhibition (Scheme 2) or via the well-known scheme due to the separation of hydrogen atoms by radicals formed during the oxidation of TBB by residual oxygen [50]. The resultant growth radicals interact with p-quinone through a radical substitution process on the boron atom, forming a cross-linked polymer structure (Scheme 3). Thus, the growth of the grafted chain begins (“grafting from”) and ends (“grafting to”) on collagen.
The cytotoxicity parameter is essential to apply the obtained copolymers as a basis for the scaffolds. Evaluation of cytotoxicity allows for predicting the prospects of synthesized copolymers for use in biomedical purposes. All the copolymers obtained were examined for cytotoxicity using the MTT assay. The data of the analysis results of Sample I—collagen, MMA, TBB, and 2,5-DTBQ (60 °C); Sample II—collagen, MMA, TBB, and 2,5-DTBQ (45 °C); and Sample III—collagen, MMA, TBB, and 2,5-DTBQ (25 °C) are presented in Table 2.
Table 2 shows that the Col–co–PMMA samples do not have any cytotoxicity or only have a slight amount. Sample I and its dilutions showed Rank 1 cytotoxicity, with the RGI level remaining consistent at an average of 82.74 ± 1.35%. Sample II also exhibited Rank 1 cytotoxicity in its extract and 1:1 dilution but showed a slight degree of cytotoxicity in subsequent dilutions (1:2–1:8). Conversely, Sample III exhibited a little bit of cytotoxicity (Rank 2) when tested in its 1:1 and 1:2 dilutions. No cytotoxicity was observed in its dilutions of 1:4 and 1:8 (Rank 1). Notably, when examining cells cultured with Samples II and III, a thin film-like layer with wave-like folds was observed in the subcellular layer (Figure 5). It is possible that these copolymers spontaneously form such structures upon contact with cells or their waste products.
Summarizing the data obtained above, we can conclude that from the point of view of the biomedical application, the collagen and PMMA copolymer synthesized at a temperature of 60 °C is the most promising.
Col–co–PMMA copolymers were synthesized using the TBB–2,5-DTBQ initiation system with varying p-quinone percentages relative to MMA (0.15 mol.%, 0.25 mol.%, 0.35 mol.%, and 2.5 mol.%) to examine the impact of 2,5-DTBQ on the qualities of the copolymer under the current temperature. The amount of unreacted monomer and homopolymer and the proportion of grafted polymer relative to the initial MMA are presented in Table 3. When the concentration of p-quinone is higher, more chain transfer acts are likely to occur (Scheme 3). This results in the release of butyl radicals into the reaction mixture, which increases the yield of the homopolymer and reduces the proportion of grafted PMMA.
According to the results of the cytotoxicity assessment, Sample IV (a copolymer containing 0.15 mol.% of 2,5-DTBQ) is not toxic. The cytotoxicity rank of the extract and its dilutions varied from 0 to 1 (Table 4). Notably, diluting to 1:8, the RGI was significantly higher than 100%. The latter indicates that low concentrations of copolymer stimulate cell growth. Sample V, which contained 0.35 mol.% of 2,5-DTBQ, showed similar cytotoxicity to Sample I. Nonetheless, when the extract of Sample V was diluted, it increased RGI (Table 4). The results obtained in the study of Sample VI (a copolymer containing 2.5 mol.% of 2,5-DTBQ) differed sharply from the results of Samples I–V. The extract and its 1:1 dilution showed pronounced cytotoxicity corresponding to Rank 3. The toxicity is likely caused by unreacted p-quinone. As the extract was diluted, the copolymer became less toxic. At dilutions of 1:4 and 1:8, the toxicity level was Rank 1. However, even at high dilutions, Sample VI still had toxicity, as evidenced by affected cells observed under the microscope (Figure 6).
Thus, Samples I and IV synthesized with low concentrations of p-quinone—0.25 mol.% and 0.15 mol.%, respectively—are the most promising for use in scaffold technologies (Figure 7). For further studies, the concentration of p-quinone equal to 0.25 mol.% was chosen since it allows to obtain more branched polymer and, at the same time, does not influence the toxicity effect.
To confirm the concepts put forward at a quinone concentration of 0.25 mol.%, Col–co–PMMA copolymers were synthesized using the following p-quinones: BQ, DQ, and NQ. The amount of unreacted monomer, homopolymer, and the proportion of grafted polymer depends on the structure of p-quinone (Table 5). Thus, in the presence of the weakest inhibitors [51]—2,5-DTBQ and DQ—the proportion of grafted PMMA is ~40%; a more potent inhibitor, NQ, leads to a copolymer containing 20% PMMA. An increase in the proportion of grafted PMMA and an insignificant amount of homopolymer is present using the most potent inhibitor (BQ) we associate with the course of controlled polymerization characteristic of the alkylborane–p-quinone system [47].
The GPC method was ineffective in analyzing copolymers synthesized with BQ, DQ, and NQ due to the formation of a cross-linked structure, which is similar to copolymers synthesized with 2,5-DTBQ (Figure 1). After the hydrolysis of copolymers by collagenase, the most effective collagen destruction enzyme [52], a water-insoluble polymer, is isolated from the grafted copolymer in a separate phase during the day, which was filtered and analyzed by NMR and GPC methods. 1H NMR spectra have shown a wide signal at 3.6 ppm in all samples belonging to the methoxy group of polymethyl methacrylate. The MWD of PMMA (Figure 8) obtained after the hydrolysis of copolymers by collagenase also depends on the inhibitory effect of the p-quinone used in the synthesis. The higher the rate constant of the reaction of the growth radical with p-quinone, the shorter the chains of the grafted PMMA (Scheme 3) and the lower the molecular weight. The inhibitory effect of quinone decreases in the following order: BQ, NQ, 2,5-DTBQ, and DQ [51]. In the same sequence, the molecular weight of the grafted PMMA isolated after collagenase hydrolysis increases (Figure 8). This result provides further evidence that PMMA was indeed grafted onto collagen.
The morphology of copolymers using the next p-quinones—BQ, DQ, and NQ (Figure 9b–d), similar to the copolymer synthesized in the presence of 2,5-DTBQ (Figure 4d)—differs only in the pore size. So, the pore size in the case of 2,5-DTBQ is ~40 μm (Figure 4d), BQ is ~20 μm, DQ is ~65 μm, and NQ is ~30 μm. The pore sizes are in strict accordance with the inhibitory effect of p-quinones [51]: the shorter the polymer chain of the grafted PMMA (Scheme 3), the shorter the “cross-linking” and the smaller the pore size of the freeze-dried sample. For PMMA synthesized in the presence of the alkylborane–p-quinone system, there is a strict correspondence of the molecular weights of polymers with the inhibitory action of p-quinones [47].
After analyzing Samples VII–IX (Col-co-PMMA in the presence of TBB–p-quinone system using NQ (Sample VII), DQ (Sample VIII), and BQ (Sample IX)), it was discovered that the extracts had some level of toxicity. However, upon dilution, the degree of toxicity varied in different ways (Table 6). Based on the results, Sample VII was Rank 3 for cytotoxicity and remained cytotoxic even after being diluted. Sample VIII had a lower level of cytotoxicity, Rank 2, and the cytotoxic effect decreased to Rank 1 after dilution (Table 6). Sample IX was ranked 2 for cytotoxicity, and a dilution of 1:1—Rank 3. It is worth noting that the RGI values for the extract and its 1:1 dilution were close to the boundary between Ranks 2 and 3. However, with further dilution, the cytotoxic effect of the copolymer decreased until it reached 0. When diluted at ratios of 1:4 or 1:8, the RGI showed an over 100% increase in cell proliferation due to the low content of copolymer.

4. Conclusions

Thus, polymerization of MMA in the aqueous dispersion of collagen in the presence of tri-n-butyl borane and p-quinone (2,5-DTBQ, BQ, DQ, and NQ) leads to the formation of a grafted cross-linked copolymer of collagen and poly(methyl methacrylate). The quantity of unreacted monomer, homopolymer, and the proportion of grafted PMMA depends on the inhibitory effect of p-quinone, which is consistent with the data obtained for (co)polymers of alkyl(meth)acrylates and styrene in the presence of the alkylborane–p-quinone system. These copolymers tend to biodegrade when exposed to certain enzymes, are non-toxic, and promote the growth of cells. At the same time, collagen denaturation occurring at high temperatures does not worsen the obtained characteristics. Based on the results, we can present our research as a chemical model of scaffolds. By comparing the copolymer characteristics with the composition of the polymerizing mixture and synthesis conditions, we determined that the optimal method for synthesizing the scaffold precursor involves creating a collagen and PMMA copolymer at 60 °C in a 1% acetic acid dispersion of fish collagen, with a mass ratio of components: collagen:MMA:TBB:2,5-DTBQ equal to 1:1:0.015:0.25.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L.K.; data curation and methodology, Y.L.K., L.L.S. and M.N.E.; validation, K.S.G., K.S.L., V.O.C., A.O.G., Y.B.M., D.A.K., E.A.F., D.D.L. and Y.P.R.; data curation, Y.L.K. and L.L.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L.K. and K.S.G.; writing—review and editing, Y.L.K., L.L.S. and M.N.E.; visualization, K.S.G.; supervision, M.N.E.; project administration, Y.L.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (research project No. 22-23-20091).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Sampling of biomaterial and obtaining a cell culture with its subsequent use for in vitro studies was approved by the local ethical committee FSBEI HE PRMU MOH Russia (Nizhny Novgorod, Russia) (approved by the local ethics committee on 10 March 2021, protocol No. 5). The cell cultures used in the study were obtained at the FSBEI HE PRMU MOH Russia biotechnology laboratory and were used only for research in the laboratory. We have not used the cultures for commercial purposes or shared them with third parties or other institutions.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ozbolat, I.T.; Hospodiuk, M. Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials 2016, 76, 321–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Sundar, G.; Joseph, J.; John, A.; Abraham, A. Natural collagen bioscaffolds for skin tissue engineering strategies in burns: A critical review. Int. J. Polym. Mater. 2021, 70, 593–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Puppi, D.; Chiellini, F. Biodegradable polymers for biomedical additive manufacturing. Appl. Mater. Today 2020, 20, 100700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bracaglia, L.G.; Smith, B.T.; Watson, E.; Arumugasaamy, N.; Mikos, A.G.; Fisher, J.P. 3D printing for the design and fabrication of polymer-based gradient scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2017, 56, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fioretta, E.S.; Motta, S.E.; Lintas, V.; Loerakker, S.; Parker, K.K.; Baaijens, F.P.; Volkmar, F.; Simon, P.H.; Emmert, M.Y. Next-generation tissue-engineered heart valves with repair, remodelling and regeneration capacity. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2021, 18, 92–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jung, O.; Smeets, R.; Hartjen, P.; Schnettler, R.; Feyerabend, F.; Klein, M.; Wegner, N.; Walther, F.; Stangier, D.; Henningsen, A. Improved In Vitro Test Procedure for Full Assessment of the Cytocompatibility of Degradable Magnesium Based on ISO 10993-5/-12. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Hussey, G.S.; Dziki, J.L.; Badylak, S.F. Extracellular matrix-based materials for regenerative medicine. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 159–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rodrigues, M.; Kosaric, N.; Bonham, C.A.; Gurtner, G.C. Wound healing: A cellular perspective. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 665–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Asadian, M.; Chan, K.V.; Norouzi, M.; Grande, S.; Cools, P.; Morent, R.; De Geyter, N. Fabrication and Plasma Modification of Nanofibrous Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Spang, M.T.; Christman, K.L. Extracellular matrix hydrogel therapies: In vivo applications and development. Acta Biomater. 2018, 68, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ambekar, R.; Kandasubramanian, B. Progress in the Advancement of Porous Biopolymer Scaffold: Tissue Engineering Application. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 6163–6194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, F.M.; Liu, X. Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 53, 86–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Dinescu, S.; Albu Kaya, M.; Chitoiu, L.; Ignat, S.; Kaya, D.A.; Costache, M. Collagen-Based Hydrogels and Their Applications for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. In Polymers and Polymeric Composites: A Reference Series; Mondal, M., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 1643–1664. ISBN 978-3-319-77829-7. [Google Scholar]
  14. Szymczyk-Ziółkowska, P.; Łabowska, M.B.; Detyna, J.; Michalak, I.; Gruber, P. A review of fabrication polymer scaffolds for biomedical applications using additive manufacturing techniques. Biocybern. Biomed. Eng. 2020, 40, 624–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Spicer, C.D. Hydrogel scaffolds for tissue engineering: The importance of polymer choice. Polym. Chem. 2020, 11, 184–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Do, A.V.; Khorsand, B.; Geary, S.M.; Salem, A.K. 3D printing of scaffolds for tissue regeneration applications. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2015, 4, 1742–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Yoon, D.M.; Fisher, J.P. Natural and Synthetic Polymeric Scaffolds. In Biomedical Materials, 2nd ed.; Narayan, R., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 257–283. ISBN 978-3-030-49205-2. [Google Scholar]
  18. Reddy, M.S.B.; Ponnamma, D.; Choudhary, R.; Sadasivuni, K.K. A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds. Polymers 2021, 13, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vedadghavami, A.; Minooei, F.; Mohammadi, M.H.; Khetani, S.; Rezaei, A.; Mashayekhan, S.; Sanati-Nezhad, A. Manufacturing of hydrogel biomaterials with controlled mechanical properties for tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater. 2017, 62, 42–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nistor, M.T.; Vasile, C.; Chiriac, A.P. Hybrid collagen-based hydrogels with embedded montmorillonite nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2015, 53, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lohrasbi, S.; Mirzaei, E.; Karimizade, A.; Takallu, S.; Rezaei, A. Collagen/cellulose nanofiber hydrogel scaffold: Physical, mechanical and cell biocompatibility properties. Cellulose 2020, 27, 927–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Semenycheva, L.L.; Egorikhina, M.N.; Chasova, V.O.; Valetova, N.B.; Kuznetsova, Y.L.; Mitin, A.V. Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Marine Collagen and Fibrinogen Proteins in the Presence of Thrombin. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Goodarzi, H.; Jadidi, K.; Pourmotabed, S.; Sharifi, E.; Aghamollaei, H. Preparation and in vitro characterization of cross-linked collagen–gelatin hydrogel using EDC/NHS for corneal tissue engineering applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 126, 620–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, J.; Ma, X.; Fan, D.; Zhu, C.; Deng, J.; Hui, J.; Ma, P. Synthesis and characterization of hyaluronic acid/human-like collagen hydrogels. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 43, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Skopinska-Wisniewska, J.; Kuderko, J.; Bajek, A.; Maj, M.; Sionkowska, A.; Ziegler-Borowska, M. Collagen/elastin hydrogels cross-linked by squaric acid. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 60, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Moxon, S.R.; Corbett, N.J.; Fisher, K.; Potjewyd, G.; Domingos, M.; Hooper, N.M. Blended alginate/collagen hydrogels promote neurogenesis and neuronal maturation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 104, 109904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, K.; Sun, J.; Guo, Z.; Yang, J.; Wei, D.; Tan, Y.; Guo, L.; Luo, H.; Fan, H.; Zhang, X. Methacrylamide-modified collagen hydrogel with improved anti-actin-mediated matrix contraction behavior. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 7543–7555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lan, W.; Xu, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, L.; Huang, D.; Wei, X.; Chen, W. Biomimetic polyvinyl alcohol/type II collagen hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2020, 31, 1179–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ji, Q.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Ma, Q.; Teng, L.; Qiu, L. Hydrosoluble collagen based biodegradable hybrid hydrogel for biomedical scaffold. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2020, 31, 2199–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bao, Z.; Gao, M.; Fan, X.; Cui, Y.; Yang, J.; Peng, X.; Nian, R. Development and characterization of a photo-cross-linked functionalized type-I collagen (Oreochromis niloticus) and polyethylene glycol diacrylate hydrogel. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 155, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ullah, K.; Khan, S.A.; Murtaza, G.; Sohail, M.; Manan, A.; Afzal, A. Gelatin-based hydrogels as potential biomaterials for colonic delivery of oxaliplatin. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 556, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kojima, K.; Iguchi, S.; Kajima, Y.; Yoshikuni, M. Grafting of Methyl Methacrylate onto Collagen Initiated by Tributylborane. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1983, 28, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kuznetsova, Y.L.; Morozova, E.A.; Sustaeva, K.S.; Markin, A.V.; Mitin, A.V.; Batenykin, M.A.; Salomatina, E.V.; Shurygina, M.P.; Gushchina, K.S.; Pryazhnikova, M.I.; et al. Tributylborane in the synthesis of graft copolymers of collagen and polymethyl methacrylate. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2022, 71, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Uromicheva, M.A.; Kuznetsova, Y.L.; Valetova, N.B.; Mitin, A.V.; Semenycheva, L.L.; Smirnova, O.N. Synthesis of grafted polybutyl acrylate copolymer on fish collagen. Proceed. Uni. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 11, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ludin, D.V.; Zaitsev, S.D.; Kuznetsova, Y.L.; Markin, A.V.; Mochalova, A.E.; Salomatina, E.V. Starch-graft-poly(methyl acrylate) copolymer: The new approach to synthesis and copolymer characterization. J. Polym. Res. 2017, 24, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kuznetsova, Y.; Gushchina, K.; Sustaeva, K.; Mitin, A.; Egorikhina, M.; Chasova, V.; Semenycheva, L. Grafting of Methyl Methacrylate onto Gelatin Initiated by Tri-Butylborane—2,5-Di-Tert-Butyl-p-Benzoquinone System. Polymers 2022, 14, 3290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Semenycheva, L.L.; Astanina, M.V.; Kuznetsova, J.L.; Valetova, N.B.; Geras’kina, E.V.; Tarankova, O.A. Method for Producing of Acetic Dispersion of High Molecular Fish Collagen. WO2016056949A1, 14 April 2016. [Google Scholar]
  38. Armarego, W.L.E.; Chai, C.L.L. Purification of Laboratory Chemicals, 7th ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2013; p. 1014. ISBN 978-0-12-382161-4. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kuznetsova, Y.L.; Sustaeva, K.S.; Mitin, A.V.; Zakharychev, E.A.; Egorikhina, M.N.; Chasova, V.O.; Farafontova, E.A.; Kobyakova, I.I.; Semenycheva, L.L. Graft Polymerization of Acrylamide in an Aqueous Dispersion of Collagen in the Presence of Tributylborane. Polymers 2022, 14, 4900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shanmugam, S.; Gopal, B. Antimicrobial and cytotoxicity evaluation of aliovalent substituted hydroxyapatite. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 303, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schrieber, R.; Gareis, H. Gelatin Handbook. Theory and Industrial Practice; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2007; p. 347. ISBN 978-3-527-61096-9. [Google Scholar]
  42. Arif, M.M.; Khan, S.M.; Gull, N.; Tab, T.A.; Zia, S.; Khan, R.U.; Awais, S.M.; Butt, M.A. Polymer-based biomaterials for chronic wound management: Promises and challenges. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 598, 120270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shah, B.M.; Palakurthi, S.S.; Khare, T.; Khare, S.; Palakurthi, S. Natural proteins and polysaccharides in the development of micro/nano delivery systems for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 165, 722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yang, J.; An, X.; Liu, L.; Tang, S.; Cao, H.; Xu, Q.; Liu, H. Cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and their derivatives as multi-components of bio-based feedstocks for 3D printing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 250, 116881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Schweizer, T.A.; Shambat, S.M.; Haunreiter, V.D.; Mestres, C.A.; Weber, A.; Maisano, F.; Zinkernagel, A.S.; Hasse, B. Polyester Vascular Graft Material and Risk for Intracavitary Thoracic Vascular Graft Infection. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 2448–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chasova, V.; Semenycheva, L.; Egorikhina, M.; Charykova, I.; Linkova, D.; Rubtsova, Y.; Fukina, D.; Koryagin, A.; Valetova, N.; Suleimanov, E. Cod Gelatin as an Alternative to Cod Collagen in Hybrid Materials for Regenerative Medicine. Macromol. Res. 2022, 30, 212–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kuznetsova, Y.L.; Chesnokov, S.A.; Zaitsev, S.D.; Dodonov, V.A. Photopolymerization of methyl methacrylate in the presence of the tri-n-butylborane–p-quinone system. Vysokomol. Soed. Ser. B 2010, 52, 498–505. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  48. Semenycheva, L.L.; Egorikhina, M.N.; Chasova, V.O.; Valetova, N.B.; Podguzkova, M.V.; Astanina, M.V.; Kuznetsova, Y.L. Enzymatic hydrolysis of collagen by pancreatin and thrombin as a step in the formation of scaffolds. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2020, 69, 164–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Laurens, N.; Engelse, M.A.; Jungerius, C.; Löwik, C.W.; Van Hinsbergh, V.W.M.; Koolwijk, P. Single and combined effects of αvβ3- and α5β1-integrins on capillary tube formation in a human fibrinous matrix. Angiogenesis 2009, 12, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Liu, S.; Zheng, Z.; Li, M.; Wang, X. Effect of oxidation progress of tributylborane on the grafting of polyolefins. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 125, 3335–3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Simándi, T.L.; Tüdös, F. Kinetics of radical polymerization—XLV. Steric effects in the radical reactivity of quinones. Eur. Polym. J. 1985, 21, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sukhikh, S.; Noskova, S.; Ivanova, S.; Ulrikh, E.; Izgaryshev, A.; Larichev, T.; Kozlova, O.; Prosekov, A.; Babich, O. Comparative Analysis of Collagen-Containing Waste Biodegradation, Amino Acid, Peptide and Carbohydrate Composition of Hydrolysis Products. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. MWD of (1) collagen and Col–co–PMMA obtained in the presence of the alkylborane–p-quinone initiating system at a temperature of (2) 25 °C; (3) 45 °C; (4) 60 °C.
Figure 1. MWD of (1) collagen and Col–co–PMMA obtained in the presence of the alkylborane–p-quinone initiating system at a temperature of (2) 25 °C; (3) 45 °C; (4) 60 °C.
Polymers 15 02618 g001
Figure 2. Enzymatic hydrolysis by pancreatin of Col–co–PMMA obtained in the presence of the alkylborane–p-quinone initiating system at a temperature of (a) 25 °C; (b) 45 °C; (c) 60 °C.
Figure 2. Enzymatic hydrolysis by pancreatin of Col–co–PMMA obtained in the presence of the alkylborane–p-quinone initiating system at a temperature of (a) 25 °C; (b) 45 °C; (c) 60 °C.
Polymers 15 02618 g002aPolymers 15 02618 g002b
Figure 3. Enzymatic hydrolysis by thrombin of Col–co–PMMA obtained in the presence of the alkylborane–p-quinone initiating system at a temperature of (a) 25 °C; (b) 45 °C; (c) 60 °C.
Figure 3. Enzymatic hydrolysis by thrombin of Col–co–PMMA obtained in the presence of the alkylborane–p-quinone initiating system at a temperature of (a) 25 °C; (b) 45 °C; (c) 60 °C.
Polymers 15 02618 g003aPolymers 15 02618 g003b
Figure 4. SEM images of the morphology of (a) collagen and Col–co–PMMA synthesized in the presence of the TBB–2,5-DTBQ system at a temperature of (b) 25 °C; (c) 45 °C; (d) 60 °C.
Figure 4. SEM images of the morphology of (a) collagen and Col–co–PMMA synthesized in the presence of the TBB–2,5-DTBQ system at a temperature of (b) 25 °C; (c) 45 °C; (d) 60 °C.
Polymers 15 02618 g004
Scheme 1. Boration of collagen at hydroxyl groups of hydroxyproline units.
Scheme 1. Boration of collagen at hydroxyl groups of hydroxyproline units.
Polymers 15 02618 sch001
Scheme 2. Reversible dissociation of borated hydroxyproline units in collagen.
Scheme 2. Reversible dissociation of borated hydroxyproline units in collagen.
Polymers 15 02618 sch002
Scheme 3. The assumed mechanism of polymerization of collagen and MMA in the presence of the alkylborane–p-quinone system.
Scheme 3. The assumed mechanism of polymerization of collagen and MMA in the presence of the alkylborane–p-quinone system.
Polymers 15 02618 sch003
Figure 5. Representative micrographs of HDF culture with Col–co–PMMA samples: (a) synthesized at 45 °C; (b) synthesized at 25 °C; (c) control, a growth media without copolymer.
Figure 5. Representative micrographs of HDF culture with Col–co–PMMA samples: (a) synthesized at 45 °C; (b) synthesized at 25 °C; (c) control, a growth media without copolymer.
Polymers 15 02618 g005
Figure 6. Representative micrographs of HDF culture with (a) control, a growth media without copolymer; (b) Sample VI (Extract 1:0); (c) Sample VI (Extract 1:4).
Figure 6. Representative micrographs of HDF culture with (a) control, a growth media without copolymer; (b) Sample VI (Extract 1:0); (c) Sample VI (Extract 1:4).
Polymers 15 02618 g006
Figure 7. Representative micrographs of HDF culture with (a,c) control, a growth media without copolymer; (b) Sample I (Extract 1:0); (d) Sample IV (Extract 1:0)—fragments of the copolymer are visualized on the cells in the form of dark grains.
Figure 7. Representative micrographs of HDF culture with (a,c) control, a growth media without copolymer; (b) Sample I (Extract 1:0); (d) Sample IV (Extract 1:0)—fragments of the copolymer are visualized on the cells in the form of dark grains.
Polymers 15 02618 g007
Figure 8. MWD of PMMA isolated as a result of enzymatic hydrolysis by collagenase of Col–co–PMMA obtained in the presence of the alkylborane–p-quinone system using: (1) 2,5-DTBQ; (2) BQ; (3) DQ; (4) NQ.
Figure 8. MWD of PMMA isolated as a result of enzymatic hydrolysis by collagenase of Col–co–PMMA obtained in the presence of the alkylborane–p-quinone system using: (1) 2,5-DTBQ; (2) BQ; (3) DQ; (4) NQ.
Polymers 15 02618 g008
Figure 9. SEM images of the morphology of (a) collagen and Col–co–PMMA synthesized in the presence of the TBB–p-quinone system using: (b) BQ; (c) DQ; (d) NQ.
Figure 9. SEM images of the morphology of (a) collagen and Col–co–PMMA synthesized in the presence of the TBB–p-quinone system using: (b) BQ; (c) DQ; (d) NQ.
Polymers 15 02618 g009
Table 1. The amount of MMA conversion, unreacted monomer, homopolymer, and the proportion of grafted PMMA in Col–co–PMMA synthesized in the presence of the TBB–2,5-DTBQ system.
Table 1. The amount of MMA conversion, unreacted monomer, homopolymer, and the proportion of grafted PMMA in Col–co–PMMA synthesized in the presence of the TBB–2,5-DTBQ system.
MonomerT, °CUnreacted Monomer, %MMA Conversion, %The Yield of PMMA Homopolymer, %The Proportion of Grafted PMMA in the Copolymer, %
MMA253862835
4538621131
6017831441
Table 2. Evaluation of cytotoxicity of Col–co–PMMA samples.
Table 2. Evaluation of cytotoxicity of Col–co–PMMA samples.
Sample ISample IISample III
ODRGI, %RankODRGI, %RankODRGI, %Rank
Control 0:10.340 ± 0.006100.00000.500 ± 0.014100.00000.415 ± 0.009100.0000
Extract 1:00.291 ± 0.00885.66210.384 ± 0.02376.66410.255 ± 0.00661.3512
Extract 1:10.289 ± 0.00684.86110.448 ± 0.02989.42510.280 ± 0.00567.4092
Extract 1:20.266 ± 0.00278.23710.334 ± 0.02866.78920.277 ± 0.00866.8432
Extract 1:40.275 ± 0.00580.92610.357 ± 0.02771.37320.319 ± 0.01676.8581
Extract 1:80.281 ± 0.00482.68910.331 ± 0.02966.16520.342 ± 0.01182.3781
Table 3. The amount of unreacted monomer, homopolymer, and the proportion of grafted PMMA in Col–co–PMMA synthesized in the presence of the TBB–2,5-DTBQ system.
Table 3. The amount of unreacted monomer, homopolymer, and the proportion of grafted PMMA in Col–co–PMMA synthesized in the presence of the TBB–2,5-DTBQ system.
The Concentration of p-Quinone, mol.%Unreacted Monomer, %The Yield of PMMA Homopolymer, %The Proportion of Grafted PMMA in the Copolymer, %
0.1516644
0.25171441
0.3543833
2.50215215
Table 4. Evaluation of cytotoxicity of Col–co–PMMA samples with different concentrations of 2,5-DTBQ.
Table 4. Evaluation of cytotoxicity of Col–co–PMMA samples with different concentrations of 2,5-DTBQ.
Sample IVSample VSample VI
ODRGI, %RankODRGI, %RankODRGI, %Rank
Control 0:10.417 ± 0.012100.00000.308 ± 0.009100.00000.269 ± 0.014100.0000
Extract 1:00.317 ± 0.00876.01910.232 ± 0.01475.13210.119 ± 0.00144.2493
Extract 1:10.350 ± 0.02583.93310.270 ± 0.01887.62710.116 ± 0.00243.0433
Extract 1:20.450 ± 0.044108.00400.293 ± 0.00994.92910.194 ± 0.00872.1242
Extract 1:40.356 ± 0.01985.46210.313 ± 0.015101.62300.239 ± 0.00788.8681
Extract 1:80.584 ± 0.044139.95800.297 ± 0.01296.43010.232 ± 0.01586.1321
Table 5. The amount of unreacted monomer, homopolymer, and the proportion of grafted PMMA in Col–co–PMMA synthesized in the presence of the alkylborane–p-quinone system.
Table 5. The amount of unreacted monomer, homopolymer, and the proportion of grafted PMMA in Col–co–PMMA synthesized in the presence of the alkylborane–p-quinone system.
p-QuinoneUnreacted Monomer, %The Yield of PMMA Homopolymer, %The Proportion of Grafted PMMA in the Copolymer, %
2,5-DTBQ171441
BQ0349
DQ33339
NQ651020
Table 6. Evaluation of cytotoxicity of Col–co–PMMA samples using the alkyl borane–p-quinone system (NQ, DQ, and BQ).
Table 6. Evaluation of cytotoxicity of Col–co–PMMA samples using the alkyl borane–p-quinone system (NQ, DQ, and BQ).
Sample VIISample VIIISample IX
ODRGI, %RankODRGI, %RankODRGI, %Rank
Control 0:10.386 ± 0.009100.00000.309 ± 0.013100.00000.269 ± 0.005100.0000
Extract 1:00.110 ± 0.00228.56230.184 ± 0.00759.52120.144 ± 0.00353.6712
Extract 1:10.098 ± 0.00125.32430.294 ± 0.01395.52610.114 ± 0.00342.6583
Extract 1:20.089 ± 0.00222.95940.313 ± 0.016101.33400.267 ± 0.02299.3950
Extract 1:40.106 ± 0.00227.36430.274 ± 0.00988.63710.374 ± 0.019138.9870
Extract 1:80.223 ± 0.00957.86920.292 ± 0.01294.37910.319 ± 0.015118.5870
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kuznetsova, Y.L.; Gushchina, K.S.; Lobanova, K.S.; Chasova, V.O.; Egorikhina, M.N.; Grigoreva, A.O.; Malysheva, Y.B.; Kuzmina, D.A.; Farafontova, E.A.; Linkova, D.D.; et al. Scaffold Chemical Model Based on Collagen—Methyl Methacrylate Graft Copolymers. Polymers 2023, 15, 2618. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122618

AMA Style

Kuznetsova YL, Gushchina KS, Lobanova KS, Chasova VO, Egorikhina MN, Grigoreva AO, Malysheva YB, Kuzmina DA, Farafontova EA, Linkova DD, et al. Scaffold Chemical Model Based on Collagen—Methyl Methacrylate Graft Copolymers. Polymers. 2023; 15(12):2618. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122618

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kuznetsova, Yulia L., Ksenya S. Gushchina, Karina S. Lobanova, Victoria O. Chasova, Marfa N. Egorikhina, Alexandra O. Grigoreva, Yulia B. Malysheva, Daria A. Kuzmina, Ekaterina A. Farafontova, Daria D. Linkova, and et al. 2023. "Scaffold Chemical Model Based on Collagen—Methyl Methacrylate Graft Copolymers" Polymers 15, no. 12: 2618. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122618

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop