Comparing CMAQ Forecasts with a Neural Network Forecast Model for PM2.5 in New York
AbstractHuman health is strongly affected by the concentration of fine particulate matter (PM2.5). The need to forecast unhealthy conditions has driven the development of Chemical Transport Models such as Community Multi-Scale Air Quality (CMAQ). These models attempt to simulate the complex dynamics of chemical transport by combined meteorology, emission inventories (EI’s), and gas/particle chemistry and dynamics. Ultimately, the goal is to establish useful forecasts that could provide vulnerable members of the population with warnings. In the simplest utilization, any forecast should focus on next day pollution levels, and should be provided by the end of the business day (5 p.m. local). This paper explores the potential of different approaches in providing these forecasts. First, we assess the potential of CMAQ forecasts at the single grid cell level (12 km), and show that significant variability not encountered in the field measurements occurs. This observation motivates the exploration of other data driven approaches, in particular, a neural network (NN) approach. This approach makes use of meteorology and PM2.5 observations as model predictors. We find that this approach generally results in a more accurate prediction of future pollution levels at the 12 km spatial resolution scale of CMAQ. Furthermore, we find that the NN is able to adjust to the sharp transitions encountered in pollution transported events, such as smoke plumes from forest fires, more accurately than CMAQ. View Full-Text
- Supplementary File 1:
Supplementary (PDF, 448 KB)
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Lightstone, S.D.; Moshary, F.; Gross, B. Comparing CMAQ Forecasts with a Neural Network Forecast Model for PM2.5 in New York. Atmosphere 2017, 8, 161.
Lightstone SD, Moshary F, Gross B. Comparing CMAQ Forecasts with a Neural Network Forecast Model for PM2.5 in New York. Atmosphere. 2017; 8(9):161.Chicago/Turabian Style
Lightstone, Samuel D.; Moshary, Fred; Gross, Barry. 2017. "Comparing CMAQ Forecasts with a Neural Network Forecast Model for PM2.5 in New York." Atmosphere 8, no. 9: 161.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.