Next Article in Journal
Niche and Range Shifts of Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus Suggest That the Latecomer Shows a Greater Invasiveness
Previous Article in Journal
The Susceptibility of Bemisia tabaci Mediterranean (MED) Species to Attack by a Parasitoid Wasp Changes between Two Whitefly Strains with Different Facultative Endosymbiotic Bacteria
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 14
Issue 10
10.3390/insects14100809
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Deciphering the Chemical Fingerprint of Astragalus membranaceus: Volatile Components Attractive to Bruchophagus huonchili Wasps

by
Chaoran Zhang
1,
Penghua Bai
2,
Jie Kang
1,
Tian Dong
1,
Haixia Zheng
1 and
Xianhong Zhang
1,*
1
College of Plant Protection, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China
2
Institute of Plant Protection, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin 300384, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(10), 809; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14100809
Submission received: 20 August 2023 / Revised: 10 October 2023 / Accepted: 10 October 2023 / Published: 12 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Pest and Vector Management)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Bruchophagus huonchili is a serious threat to the yield and quality of the Chinese medicinal herb Astragalus membranaceus seeds. Plant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are essential signaling substances for herbivorous insects when searching for host plants and mating partners. In this study, we collected and identified the VOCs emitted from A. membranaceus pods and evaluated the attraction of individual and combined compounds to B. huonchili. Our results showed that specific concentrations of five VOCs (cis-β-ocimene, hexyl acetate, hexanal, decanal, and β-caryophyllene) attract B. huonchili wasps. Moreover, our findings revealed that three formulations exhibited strong attraction to B. huonchili in Y-tube olfactometer assays and in the field. This study suggests that a blend with specific VOCs and ratios emitted from A. membranaceus could be used as attractants in traps for B. huonchili monitoring in the field.

Abstract

Bruchophagus huonchili is a pest that poses a serious threat to the yield and quality of Astragalus membranaceus seeds. In this study, we employed solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to identify volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in A. membranaceus pods during the pod-filled period. Additionally, we utilized a Y-tube olfactometer to measure the behavioral response of B. huonchili to different individual VOCs and specific VOC-based formulations. The most effective formulations were further evaluated for their effectiveness in attracting wasps in the field. Our findings revealed that A. membranaceus pods emit 25 VOCs, including green leaf volatiles (GLVs) and terpenoid and aromatic compounds. Among these compounds, five were found to be most attractive to B. huonchili at the following concentrations: 10 µg/µL cis-β-ocimene, 500 µg/µL hexyl acetate, 100 µg/µL hexanal, 1 µg/µL decanal, and 10 µg/µL β-caryophyllene, with respective response rates of 67.65%, 67.74%, 65.12%, 67.57%, and 66.67%. In addition, we evaluated 26 mixed VOC formulations, and three of them were effective at attracting B. huonchili. Furthermore, field experiments showed that one of the formulations was significantly more effective than the others, which could be used for monitoring B. huonchili populations.

1. Introduction

The genus Bruchophagus (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) contains five species that negatively affect the seeds of the Chinese medicinal herb Astragalus membranaceus. One of them, Bruchophagus huonchili (Liao et Fan), has become a significant threat to the yield and quality of A. membranaceus seeds in recent years. Adult female wasps lay their eggs beneath the seed coat inside the pods, and the hatched larvae feed on the seeds, resulting in a consistent annual seed damage rate of 25% [1]. The difficulty in detecting adult wasp oviposition and larval damage makes chemical control a challenging task, and there are currently no registered pesticides available for controlling B. huonchili (http://www.chinapesticide.org.cn/ (accessed on 11 June 2023)). Moreover, the application of pesticides poses a risk of pesticide residue, which may affect the medicinal value of A. membranaceus. Therefore, finding an effective, feasible, and environmentally friendly measure to manage B. huonchili wasps is crucial for the sustainable development of the A. membranaceus industry.
Plant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are essential signaling substances for herbivorous insects in searching for and locating their hosts, influencing insect host location, feeding, oviposition, mating, and other behaviors [2,3,4,5]. For example, female and male wasps of Cotesia glomerata (L.), Cotesia marginiventris (Cresson), Microplitis rufiventris (Kokujev), and Microplitis mediator (Haliday) were strongly attracted to herbivore-induced plant volatiles [6]. Also, Bruchophagus roddi (Gussakovsky) is a monophagous pest of alfalfa that attacks developing seeds and can recognize the host–plant volatile hexyl acetate antennally, which in turn stimulates behavioral activity [7]. The pea volatile cis-β-ocimene strongly attracts mated Cydia nigricana (Fabricius) females, which shows the importance of this VOC in their host location process [8].
Volatiles emitted by plants are usually diverse and complex blends [9,10,11]. The perception of blends of plant volatiles, rather than their individual components, plays a pivotal role in herbivorous insects during host-plant recognition [12,13]. Moreover, the volatiles released by plants, which encompass varied components, and their respective proportions (essentially the plant’s chemical fingerprint), which can lure herbivorous insects, are pivotal in the realm of pest surveillance and management [13,14,15,16,17,18]. For instance, a lure made from a mixture of 300 μg/μL of 2-hexanal and 180 μg/μL benzaldehyde had a high trapping success for Callosobruchus chinensis (Linnaeus) in the field [18]. Anfora et al. [16] found that a six-component synthetic lure, which approximated the ratio of components released by two grape varieties (Trebbiano and Sangiovese), was attractive and stimulated oviposition of the grapevine moth Lobesia botrana (Denis and Schiffermüller).
Bruchophagus huonchili is an oligophagous pest that specifically targets and feeds on A. membranaceus seeds, initiating oviposition within the seed pods during the pod-filled period. The exact mechanism that these wasps employ to locate A. membranaceus pods for oviposition remains, however, a mystery. Gaining insight into the plant’s chemical fingerprint and the volatiles that lure these wasps is essential for devising efficient pest control strategies. Our study aims to explore the behavioral response of B. huonchili wasps to various plant volatiles and component formulations, potentially contributing to the creation of effective and eco-friendly strategies for monitoring B. huonchili. By uncovering the specific volatile compounds and their optimal combinations that guide the wasps to their host plants, targeted and environmentally friendly control measures can be developed to reduce crop damage and improve agricultural productivity. Moreover, understanding the mechanisms and key factors involved in the attraction and oviposition behavior of B. huonchili wasps holds significant implications for sustainable pest management.
In this study, we employed solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to collect and identify the volatiles released by green A. membranaceus pods, aiming at revealing their chemical fingerprint. We used a Y-tube olfactometer to gauge the attractiveness of individual and combined VOCs to B. huonchili. Field trapping experiments were carried out to pinpoint the volatile components and their proportions that hold the greatest allure for B. huonchili wasps. Our study aims to identify the volatile components and their proportions that have a strong allure for these insects. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to the broader understanding of plant-insect interactions and provide valuable insights for the study of other pest species and the development of innovative pest control approaches.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insects and Plants

Astragalus membranaceus has been growing for three years at Wujiabao Village of Taigu District, Dahuhui Village in Wuzhai County and Zhuangwanggou Village in Jing Le County, Shanxi Province. The pods of A. membranaceus were collected from the field during the pod-filling period for olfactometer experiments with B. huonchili wasps and volatile extraction (Figure 1).
During peak occurrence (June to August 2021), B. huonchili wasps were obtained from A. membranaceus pods in the experimental farmlands. The emerged adult wasps were reared indoors on honey water at a temperature of 25 ± 3 °C and 50–60% humidity. Newly emerged wasps (0–24 h) were isolated and identified as B. huonchili according to key characteristics [19]. Observations were made daily for adult emergence and the emerged adults were used in Y-tube olfactometer bioassays.

2.2. Volatile Compound Extraction and Identification

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was used to collect volatiles from fresh A. membranaceus pods at the pod filling period collected from the field [18]. A total weight of 2 g of A. membranaceus pods was placed in a small glass bottle (8 × 20 cm) into which purified air entered through a Teflon tube. Room air was pumped through activated charcoal into the glass bottle at a flow rate of 350 mL/min. Air was pulled out of the bottle through a trapping filter containing 300 mg of 80 mesh Porapak-Q adsorbent (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) and entered an activated charcoal filter on the opposite side of the bottle. Volatile compounds were collected in the Porapak-Q traps for 4 h and eluted with 1 mL of GC-grade hexane at room temperature under natural light conditions. There were three replicates. After each collection, the samples were stored at −80 °C before analysis [20].
Volatile extracts were analyzed by GC-MS using a Trace ISQ (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a DB-5MS column (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and coupled to 5975C MS. Helium was used as a carrier gas at 1.00 mL/min. The oven temperature was 50 °C for 5 min and then rose to 270 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min. The final temperature was held for 5 min. The components of the collected volatiles were identified by aligning their mass spectra with the benchmark compounds from the NIST2011 library and the quantification was evaluated using the peak area normalization method [20].

2.3. Compounds Tested

Eight out of the twenty-five volatile compounds found in A. membranaceus pods were selected to test for their attractiveness to B. huonchili wasps (Table 1). Test solutions were prepared at concentrations of 1, 10, 100, and 500 µg/µL, using paraffin oil (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) as the solvent.

2.4. Behavioral Assays

2.4.1. Single-Component Behavioral Assay

To determine the attractiveness of individual volatiles from green A. membranaceus pods to B. huonchili wasps, a Y-tube olfactometer with a common glass tube (16 cm long with 20 mm diameter) and two lateral glass arms (10 cm long and 20 mm in diameter) (Bio-Olfactometer Company, Beijing, China) was used. Before the experiment, the olfactometer and silicone tubing were cleaned with 75% ethanol and dried with an air blower. The Y-tube olfactometer, gas flowmeter (Beijing Institute of Labor Protection, Beijing, China), filter bottle containing distilled water and activated carbon, and air sampler were connected in sequence using silicone tubing. The device was powered by an air pump, and the air passed through activated carbon and distilled water for filtration and humidification. The airflow in each arm was adjusted to 300 mL/min.
Before assessing the attraction of individual and combined VOCs to B. huonchili, a control experiment was conducted. In the control experiment, 10 μL of paraffin oil was applied to a filter paper strip and placed in each arm. The results showed that B. huonchili wasps distributed equivalent numbers in each arm in the absence of plant volatiles, which demonstrated that the Y-tube olfactometer was suitable for measuring the response rates of B. huonchili to different volatiles and component formulations.
The concentrations of the eight VOCs tested were 1, 10, 100, and 500 µg/µL diluted by paraffin oil. During the test, 10 μL of the VOCs were applied to a filter paper strip and placed in one of the testing arms, while a filter paper strip containing the same volume of paraffin oil was placed in the other arm as a control. Bruchophagus huonchili wasps (1 day old) were released individually at the base of the common arm of the Y-tube. The insect’s choice between the test arm and the control arm was observed and recorded. An insect was considered to have chosen the odor source or the control if it entered the respective arm and stayed there for more than 30 s within 5 min. If the insect did not make a choice within 5 min, it was considered unresponsive to the volatile. The filter paper strips were changed after every two insects were tested, and the position of the odor sources was then switched. Each concentration was repeated at least thirty times for wasps choosing either of the arms. The olfactometer was cleaned with ethanol, rinsed with distilled water, and placed in a 180 °C oven for 2 h to eliminate interference when changing different VOCs and concentrations.
The percent response rate of B. huonchili wasps was calculated as follows: 100% × [(wasps that chose the treatment arm)/(wasps that chose the treatment arm + wasps that chose the control arm)] [21].

2.4.2. Multi-Component Behavioral Assay

To investigate the attraction of multi-component formulations to B. huonchili wasps, we selected five VOCs and concentrations with high attraction, which included 10 µg/µL cis-β-ocimene, 500 µg/µL hexyl acetate, 100 µg/µL hexanal, 1 µg/µL decanal, and 10 µg/µL β-caryophyllene, diluted by paraffin oil. The contents and proportion of each multi-component formulation were made according to the GC-MS results (Table 2). The total volume of each formulation was 10 μL and 10 μL of paraffin oil was used as a control. The behavioral assay method used was the same as described in Section 2.4.1.

2.5. Field Trapping Experiment

The three most attractive formulations of B. huonchili in the Y-tube assays (Formulations 6, 10, and 20; see Section 3) were selected and tested for insect attraction in two fields of A. membranaceus located in Huhui Village, Wuzhai County, and Wanggou Village, Jingle County. Yellow sticky traps baited with lure cores (Pherobio Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China) were used in the experiment. During the experiment, prepared lure cores containing 20 µL of different attractants were placed in the center of yellow sticky traps as treatments, and lure cores made with an equal volume of liquid paraffin oil (Beijing Ruihengjun’an Technology Co., Ltd. Beijing, China) were used as controls. Yellow sticky traps were hung in the field on 17 July and 23 July 2021, with the traps placed 10 cm above the top of the A. membranaceus plants and at a distance of 20 m between each other (Figure 2). Yellow sticky traps were collected on 22 and 28 July 2021. The wasps on the sticky traps were identified and the number of trapped wasps was counted. Each treatment was repeated three times.

2.6. Data Analyses

We used SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) statistical software for all data analyses. The data on the percent response rate of B. huonchili wasps in the Y-tube olfactometer bioassay at different concentrations of each stimulus were analyzed using Chi-square (χ2) tests. The number of B. huonchili wasps captured on yellow sticky traps is presented as the mean ± standard error and was analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey multiple comparison test to compare between the control and the three different VOC formulations, with the level of significance set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Volatile Compound Extraction and Identification

In this study, 25 volatile compounds were identified from A. membranaceus pods during the pod-filling period [22], including green leaf volatiles (GLVs) and terpenoid and aromatic compounds (Table 3). For example, GLVs, such as hexyl acetate and hexanal, were detected in the volatile blends. Cis-β-ocimene and terpinolene, two common terpenoid volatiles, were also identified from the pods. From these results, eight volatiles were selected for Y-tube behavioral assays, which included ethyl palmitate, isopentyl isovalerate, cis-β-ocimene, 1-octen-3-ol, hexyl acetate, hexanal, decanal, and β-caryophyllene. These compounds were selected because they were the major components of the blend, constituting about 67% of the emitted volatiles.

3.2. Behavioral Assays

3.2.1. Single-Component Behavioral Assay

The results showed that 10 µg/µL cis-β-ocimene, 500 µg/µL hexyl acetate, 100 µg/µL hexanal, 1 µg/µL decanal, and 10 µg/µL β-caryophyllene attracted 67.65% (χ2 = 4.235, p = 0.040), 67.74% (χ2 = 3.903, p = 0.048), 65.12% (χ2 = 3.903, p = 0.047), 67.57% (χ2 = 4.568, p = 0.033), and 66.67% (χ2 = 4.000, p = 0.046) of B. huonchili wasps, respectively (Figure 3A–E). However, 1 µg/µL (χ2 = 10.800, p = 0.001) and 10 µg/µL (χ2 = 7.529, p = 0.006) hexyl acetate, 500 µg/µL 1-octen-3-ol (χ2 = 14.286, p < 0.001), and isoamyl isovalerate (χ2 = 9.000, p = 0.003) exhibited repellent effects on B. huonchili wasps (Figure 3B,F,H). In addition, the four concentrations of ethyl palmitate had no effects on B. huonchili wasps (p > 0.05) (Figure 3G).

3.2.2. Multi-Component Behavioral Assay

Out of the 26 formulations tested (see Table 2), B. huonchili wasps were attracted to formulations 6, 10, and 20, with the highest percent attraction of 73.07% for formulation 6 (χ2 = 7.410, p = 0.006), followed by 66.66% attraction for formulation 10 (χ2 = 4.333, p = 0.037), and 65.12% attraction for formulation 20 (χ2 = 3.930, p = 0.047) (Figure 4). None of the other formulations had an effect on B. huonchili behavior (p > 0.05).

3.3. Field Trapping Experiment

In the field, formulation 6 showed the highest wasp-attracting effect, capturing fourteen times and seventeen times more wasps/trap than the controls on 22 and 28 July, respectively, in the field of Huhui Village and nine times and ten times more wasps/trap than the controls on 22 and 28 July, respectively, in field of Wanggou Village (Table 4). The second best formulation was formulation 20, with wasp-attracting effects 6–11 times greater than the controls (Table 4). There was no significant difference in attractiveness between formulations 20 and 10 (Table 4).

4. Discussion

Plant volatiles have a unique chemical fingerprint composed of specific concentrations and ratios, which plays a crucial role in their life activities, such as long-distance host searching, nutrition supplementation, mating, and oviposition, of herbivorous insects [3,4,23,24]. Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) are widely used methods for extracting and identifying these plant volatiles. For instance, Jing et al. [25] successfully analyzed the herbivore-induced plant volatiles emitted from tea leaves and induced by Ectropis obliqua (Prout) using these methods, and Zhang et al. [26] found that the middle and lower leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana (Linnaeus) emitted higher amounts of (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol than the upper leaves using SPME and GC-MS. In this study, a total of 25 VOCs were identified from A. membranaceus pods during the drum pod-filled period, including GLVs, such as hexanal, which are also detected in the pods of Vigna radiate (Wilczek) and soybean (Glycine max (Linnaeus)) [18,27]. In addition, cis-β-ocimene and terpinolene, two common terpenoid volatiles, were identified from the A. membranaceus pod headspace samples. GLVs and terpenoid volatiles are commonly emitted from healthy plants and herbivore-induced plants, which can provide important signals in plant-herbivore interactions [3,4].
Plant volatiles can have either attractive or repellent effects on insects, with the effectiveness depending on their concentration. For instance, Li et al. [28] reported that Microplitis mediator (Haliday) is strongly attracted to 10 µg/µL β-ionone, but when the concentration reached 100 µg/µL, β-ionone showed repellency to male wasps. Similarly, compared with the control, Chouioia cunea Yang was not attracted to nonadecane at high and low doses, whereas it was more attracted to nonadecane at an intermediate dose [21]. Also, Aphidius colemani (Viereck) had a significant preference for benzaldehyde at 50 ng and 10 ng doses and a negative response at a higher dose of 1 μg [29]. In our study, we identified the optimal concentrations of eight VOCs from A. membranaceus pods that are attractive to B. huonchili wasps. These VOCs were commonly found in these host plants and can be purchased from commercial suppliers, making them suitable as potential attractants. Among the eight VOCs, five were found to be most attractive to B. huonchili at the following concentrations: 10 µg/µL cis-β-ocimene, 500 µg/µL hexyl acetate, 100 µg/µL hexanal, 1 µg/µL decanal, and 10 µg/µL β-caryophyllene, with respective response rates of 67.65%, 67.74%, 65.12%, 67.57%, and 66.67%.
Although a single VOC could attract B. huonchili wasps, plants usually emit complex VOC blends and perception of these blends, rather than their individual components, by herbivorous insects plays a pivotal role in host plant recognition [9,10,11,12,13]. Based on the GC results, the optimal ratio of hexyl acetate:hexanal:decanal:β-caryophyllene was 521:128:23:17 (formulation 6), which showed strong effects on B. huonchili behavior, reaching 73.03% attraction. The attraction of B. huonchili wasps to formulation 6 was higher than to each of the single components. Similarly, Zhu et al. [30] showed that a 1:22:5 mixture of ethanol, acetic acid, and phenethyl alcohol from ripe mango is more attractive to Drosophila melanogaster (Meigen) than any of the single components. A 10:24:6:0.2 mixture of palm oil ester, linoleic acid ethyl ester, linoleic acid methyl ester, and linoleic acid from wheat bran fermentation products increased the attraction and oviposition of house flies, Musca domestica (L.), compared to each individual component [31].
In addition, many terpenoids emitted from plants have behavioral effects on insects. For instance, Chelonus insularis (Cresson) female parasitoids were attracted to the binary blend of α-pinene and α-copaene [32]. Aphytis melinus (DeBach) females showed positive chemotaxis toward d-limonene and cis-β-ocimene [33]. In our study, both Y-tube olfactometer assays and field experiments showed that the formulations 6 (hexyl acetate + hexanal + decanal + β-caryophyllene), 10 (β-caryophyllene + hexanal + decanal), and 20 (cis-β-ocimene + β-caryophyllene) were attractive to B. huonchili wasps. All three formulations contained terpenoid compounds, i.e., either cis-β-ocimene or β-caryophyllene, indicating their importance as host-plant attractants for B. huonchili.
In conclusion, we identified specific concentrations and ratios of the VOCs cis-β-ocimene, hexyl acetate, hexanal, decanal, and β-caryophyllene from A. membranaceus pods that are attractive to B. huonchili wasps. Our study revealed three multi-component formulations (formulations 6, 10, and 20) containing five A. membranaceus VOCs that attracted B. huonchili in Y-tube olfactometer assays and in the field. One of them (formulation 6, which is composed of hexyl acetate, hexanal, decanal, and β-caryophyllene) showed to be the most attractive of the three formulations, making it a good candidate for use as a lure for monitoring B. huonchili wasps.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Z. and P.B.; Data curation, C.Z. and P.B.; Formal analysis, C.Z., H.Z. and X.Z.; Investigation, C.Z. and P.B.; Methodology, C.Z., P.B., J.K. and T.D.; Validation, C.Z., J.K. and T.D.; Visualization, J.K. and T.D.; Writing—original draft, C.Z.; Writing—review and editing, C.Z., P.B., H.Z. and X.Z. Funding Acquisition, H.Z. and X.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Key Research and Development Plan of Shanxi Province (No. 201803D221004-8), the Special Project of Modern Agricultural Industrial Technology System (No. CARS-08-G10), the Research and Demonstration of Key Green Technology for High Quality of Coarse Cereals in Northwest Shanxi (No. 201703D211002-8) and China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (No. CARSCARS-21).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Green, T.W.; Palmbald, I.G. Effects of insect seed predators on Astragalus cibarius and Astragalus utahensis (Leguminosae). Ecology 1975, 56, 1435–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dötterl, S.; David, A.; Boland, W.; Silberbauer-Gottsberger, L.; Gottsberger, G. Evidence for behavioral attractiveness of methoxylated aromatics in a dynastid scarab beetle pollinated araceae. J. Chem. Ecol. 2012, 38, 1539–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Turlings, T.C.J.; Erb, M. Tritrophic interactions mediated by herbivore-induced plant volatiles: Mechanisms, ecological relevance, and application potential. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2018, 63, 433–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guo, H.; Wang, C.Z. The ethological significance and olfactory detection of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in interactions of plants, herbivorous insects, and parasitoids. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2019, 13, 161–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, B.; Dong, W.Y.; Li, H.M.; D’Onofrio, C.; Bai, P.H.; Chen, R.P.; Yang, L.L.; Wu, J.N.; Wang, X.; Wang, B.; et al. Molecular basis of (E)-β-farnesene-mediated aphid location in the predator Eupeodes corollae. Curr. Biol. 2022, 32, 951–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, H.; Gaylord, D.; Degen, T.; Zhou, G.X.; Laplanche, D.; Henryk, L.; Turling, T.C.J. Combined use of herbivore-induced plant volatiles and sex pheromones for mate location in braconid parasitoids. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Light, D.M.; Kamm, J.A.; Buttery, R.G. Electroantennogram response of alfalfa seed chalcid, Bruchophagus roddi (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) to host- and nonhost-plant volatiles. J. Chem. Ecol. 1992, 18, 333–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gunda, T.; Rangar, H.R.; Helmut, S.; Geir, K.K. Pea plant volatiles guide host location behaviour in the pea moth. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2014, 8, 109–122. [Google Scholar]
  9. McCormick, A.C.; Unsicker, S.B.; Gershenzon, J. The specificity of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in attracting herbivore enemies. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Visser, J.H. Host odor perception in phytophagous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1986, 31, 121–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schiestl, F.P. The evolution of floral scent and insect chemical communication. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13, 643–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bruce, T.J.; Pickett, J.A. Perception of plant volatile blends by herbivorous insects–finding the right mix. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 1605–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xiu, C.L.; Pan, H.S.; Liu, B.; Luo, Z.X.; Williams, L.; Yang, Y.Z.; Lu, Y.H. Perception of and behavioral responses to host plant volatiles for three Adelphocoris Species. J. Chem. Ecol. 2019, 45, 779–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kessler, A.; Baldwin, I.T. Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emission in nature. Science 2001, 291, 2141–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cha, D.H.; Nojima, S.; Hesler, S.P.; Zhang, A.; Linn, C.E., Jr.; Roelofs, W.L.; Loeb, G.M. Identification and field evaluation of grape shoot volatiles attractive to female grape berry moth (Paralobesia viteana). J. Chem. Ecol. 2008, 34, 1180–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Anfora, G.; Tasin, M.; De Cristofaro, A.; Ioriatti, C.; Lucchi, A. Synthetic grape volatiles attract mated Lobesia botrana females in laboratory and field bioassays. J. Chem. Ecol. 2009, 35, 1054–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Oseiowusu, J.; Vuts, J.; Caulfield, J.C.; Woodcock, C.M.; Withall, D.M.; Hooper, A.M.; Birkett, M.A. Identification of semiochemicals from cowpea, Vigna unguiculata, for low-input management of the legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata. J. Chem. Ecol. 2020, 46, 288–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, H.M.; Bai, P.H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.M.; Hui, Q.; Zheng, H.X.; Zhang, X.H. Attraction of bruchid beetles Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) to host plant volatiles. J. Integr. Agric. 2020, 19, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fan, Y.; Yang, C.Q.; Lv, X.M. Study on Bruchophagus huonchili. In Chinese Entomology towards the 21st Century, Proceedings of the 2000 Academic Annual Academic Conference of the Chinese Entomology Society, Yichang, China, 18–21 October 2000; China Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 2000; pp. 1122–1126. [Google Scholar]
  20. Song, C.F.; Ma, L.; Zhang, J.Y.; Xue, Z.S.; Yan, X.Z.; Hao, C. Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) to volatiles from a non-host plant, Geranium, Pelargonium × hortorum (Geraniaceae). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 5982–5992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, M.; Yang, Y.X.; Yao, Y.H.; Xiang, W.F.; Han, J.Y.; Wang, Y.H.; Bai, P.H.; Wang, J.; Zhu, G.P.; Man, L.; et al. Isolation and identification of attractants from the pupae of three Lepidopteran species for the parasitoid Chouioia Cunea Yang. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 1920–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mduruma, Z.O.; Nchimbi-Msolla, S.; Reuben, S.O.W.M.; Misangu, R.N. Evaluation of maturity characteristics and of yield components. Tanzan. J. Agric. Sci. 1998, 1, 131–140. [Google Scholar]
  23. Xu, H.; Turlings, T.C.J. Plant volatiles as mate-finding cues for insects. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhou, S.Q.; Jander, G. Molecular ecology of plant volatiles in interactions with insect herbivores. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 449–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jing, T.T.; Du, W.K.; Gao, T.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, N.; Zhao, M.Y.; Jin, J.Y.; Wang, J.M.; Schwab, W.; Wan, X.C.; et al. Herbivore-induced DMNT catalyzed by CYP82D47 plays an important role in the induction of JA-dependent herbivore resistance of neighboring tea plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 1178–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, Y.Q.; Fu, X.M.; Wang, F.Y.; Yang, Z.Y. Spatial differences in (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol production preferentially reduces Spodoptera litura larva attack on the young leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Sci. 2016, 252, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. O’Neill, B.F.; Zangerl, A.R.; Delucia, E.H.; Berenbaum, M.R. Olfactory preferences of Popillia japonica, Vanessa cardui, and Aphis glycines for Glycine max grown under elevated CO2. Environ. Entomol. 2010, 4, 1291–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, R.J.; Shan, S.; Song, X.; Khashaveh, A.; Wang, S.N.; Yin, Z.X.; Lu, Z.Y.; Dhiloo, K.H.; Zhang, Y.J. Plant volatile ligands for male-biased MmedOBP14 stimulate orientation behavior of the parasitoid wasp Microplitis mediator. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 223, 1521–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Goelen, T.; József, V.; Sobhy, I.S.; Wackers, F.; John, C.C.; Michael, A.B.; Hans, R.; Hans, J.; Bart, L. Identification and application of bacterial volatiles to attract a generalist aphid parasitoid: From laboratory to greenhouse assays. Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 930–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhu, J.; Park, K.C.; Baker, T.C. Identification of odors from overripe mango that attract vinegar flies, Drosophila melanogaster. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29, 899–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tang, R.; Zhang, F.; Kone, N.; Chen, J.H.; Zhu, F.; Han, R.C.; Lei, C.L.; Kenis, M.; Huang, L.Q.; Wang, C.Z. Identification and testing of oviposition attractant chemical compounds for Musca domestica. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ortiz-Carreon, F.R.; Rojas, J.C.; Cisneros, J.; Malo, E.A. Herbivore-induced volatiles from maize plants attract Chelonus insularis, an egg-larval parasitoid of the fall armyworm. J. Chem. Ecol. 2019, 45, 326–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mohammed, K.; Agarwal, M.; Li, B.; Newman, J.; Liu, T.; Ren, Y. Evaluation of d-limonene and β-ocimene as attractants of Aphytis melinus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), a parasitoid of Aonidiella aurantia (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) on Citrus spp. Insects 2020, 110, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Insects 14 00809 g001
Figure 1. The pods of Astragalus membranaceus during pod filling period in the field.
Figure 1. The pods of Astragalus membranaceus during pod filling period in the field.
Insects 14 00809 g001
Insects 14 00809 g002
Figure 2. Design of field experiment to test the attraction of Bruchophagus huonchili to different formulations of volatiles. The red circles represent the traps baited with formulation 6, the purple circles represent the traps baited with formulation 10, the green circles represent the traps baited with formulation 20, and the black circles represent the control traps. The distance between the two lure cores was 20 m, and each treatment was replicated three times.
Figure 2. Design of field experiment to test the attraction of Bruchophagus huonchili to different formulations of volatiles. The red circles represent the traps baited with formulation 6, the purple circles represent the traps baited with formulation 10, the green circles represent the traps baited with formulation 20, and the black circles represent the control traps. The distance between the two lure cores was 20 m, and each treatment was replicated three times.
Insects 14 00809 g002
Insects 14 00809 g003
Figure 3. Responses of Bruchophagus huonchili wasps to eight volatiles emitted from Astragalus membranaceus pods in a Y-tube olfactometer. (A) Cis-β-ocimene, (B) Hexyl acetate, (C) Hexanal, (D) Decanal, (E) β-Caryophyllene, (F) 1-Octen-3-ol, (G) Ethyl Palmitate, and (H) Isoamyl isovalerate attraction. Volatiles were tested at concentrations of 1 μg/μL, 10 μg/μL, 100 μg/μL, and 500 μg/μL. * indicates a significant difference compared with the control group as analyzed by χ2 tests (p < 0.05), ** indicates p < 0.01.
Figure 3. Responses of Bruchophagus huonchili wasps to eight volatiles emitted from Astragalus membranaceus pods in a Y-tube olfactometer. (A) Cis-β-ocimene, (B) Hexyl acetate, (C) Hexanal, (D) Decanal, (E) β-Caryophyllene, (F) 1-Octen-3-ol, (G) Ethyl Palmitate, and (H) Isoamyl isovalerate attraction. Volatiles were tested at concentrations of 1 μg/μL, 10 μg/μL, 100 μg/μL, and 500 μg/μL. * indicates a significant difference compared with the control group as analyzed by χ2 tests (p < 0.05), ** indicates p < 0.01.
Insects 14 00809 g003
Insects 14 00809 g004
Figure 4. Responses of Bruchophagus huonchili wasps to multi-component volatile formulations. * indicates a significant difference compared with the control group as analyzed by χ2 tests (p < 0.05), ** indicates p < 0.01.
Figure 4. Responses of Bruchophagus huonchili wasps to multi-component volatile formulations. * indicates a significant difference compared with the control group as analyzed by χ2 tests (p < 0.05), ** indicates p < 0.01.
Insects 14 00809 g004
Table 1. List of standard compounds tested for Bruchophagus huonchili attraction.
Table 1. List of standard compounds tested for Bruchophagus huonchili attraction.
Standard
Compound		CASPurity (%)Source
Ethyl palmitate628-97-798Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China)
Isoamyl isovalerate659-70-198Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China)
Cis-β-ocimene13877-91-398Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China)
1-Octen-3-ol3391-86-498Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China)
Hexyl acetate142-92-799Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China)
Hexanal66-25-197Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China)
Decanal112-31-297Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China)
β-Caryophyllene87-44-580Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China)
Table 2. Composition of the 26 formulations tested for Bruchophagus huonchili attraction.
Table 2. Composition of the 26 formulations tested for Bruchophagus huonchili attraction.
Formula No.CompositionContent (µL)
1Cis-β-ocimene + Hexyl acetate + Hexanal + Decanal + β-Caryophyllene26 + 521 + 128 + 23 + 17
2Cis-β-ocimene + Hexyl acetate + Hexanal + Decanal26 + 521 + 128 + 23
3Cis-β-ocimene + Hexyl acetate + Hexanal + β-Caryophyllene26 + 521 + 128 + 17
4Cis-β-ocimene + Hexyl acetate + Decanal + β-Caryophyllene26 + 521 + 23 + 17
5Cis-β-ocimene + Hexanal + Decanal + β-Caryophyllene26 + 128 + 23 + 17
6Hexyl acetate + Hexanal + Decanal + β-Caryophyllene521 + 128 + 23 + 17
7Cis-β-ocimene + Hexyl acetate + Hexanal26 + 521 + 128
8Cis-β-ocimene + Hexyl acetate + Decanal26 + 521 + 23
9Cis-β-ocimene + Hexyl acetate + β-Caryophyllene26 + 521 + 17
10Cis-β-ocimene + Hexanal + Decanal26 + 128 + 23
11Cis-β-ocimene + Hexanal + β-Caryophyllene26 + 128 + 17
12Cis-β-ocimene + Decanal + β-Caryophyllene26 + 23 + 17
13Hexyl acetate + Hexanal + Decanal521 + 128 + 23
14Hexyl acetate + Hexanal + β-Caryophyllene521 + 128 + 17
15Hexyl acetate + Decanal + β-Caryophyllene521 + 23 + 17
16Hexanal + Decanal + β-Caryophyllene128 + 23 + 17
17Cis-β-ocimene + Hexyl acetate26 + 521
18Cis-β-ocimene + Hexanal26 + 128
19Cis-β-ocimene + Decanal26 + 23
20Cis-β-ocimene + β-Caryophyllene26 + 17
21Hexyl acetate + Hexanal521 + 128
22Hexyl acetate + Decanal521 + 23
23Hexyl acetate + β-Caryophyllene521 + 17
24Hexanal + Decanal128 + 23
25Hexanal + β-Caryophyllene128 + 17
26Decanal + β-Caryophyllene23 + 17
Table 3. Volatile compounds and their relative amounts emitted from Astragalus membranaceus pods.
Table 3. Volatile compounds and their relative amounts emitted from Astragalus membranaceus pods.
ChemicalsCASRetention
Tim (min)		Relative
Content (%)
Cis-β-ocimene13877-91-314.0312.49
Hexyl acetate142-92-713.311.96
1-Octen-3-ol3391-86-412.1110.11
Hexanal66-25-15.929.37
Decanal112-31-220.549.21
β-Caryophyllene87-44-527.788.75
Ethyl palmitate628-97-743.958.06
Isoamyl isovalerate659-70-114.116.17
2-Methylbutyl2-methylbutyrate2445-78-516.733.45
1,4-Dichlorobenzene106-46-713.363.29
Hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane541-05-96.342.22
2-Pentylfuran3777-69-312.441.97
Naphthalene91-20-319.741.73
8-Fluoro-1-octanol111-87-515.57160
Ethanol64-17-55.921.48
(S)-(-)-2-Methyl-1-butanol1565-80-64.461.07
Methyl heptanoate106-73-014.311.07
Tetradecamethylcycloheptasiloxane107-50-629.240.99
1-Heptanol111-70-615.030.95
Cyclohexene110-83-816.050.82
Benzyl alcohol100-51-6990.78
Leaf alcohol928-96-17.630.70
Methyl isovalerate556-24-12.810.66
Methyl hexanoate106-70-710.960.58
Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane556-67-212.180.53
Table 4. Effects of three host-plant volatile formulations on Bruchophagus huonchili captures in the field.
Table 4. Effects of three host-plant volatile formulations on Bruchophagus huonchili captures in the field.
Formulation No.Mean ± SE Number of Wasps Captured in
Huhui Village 1		Mean ± SE Number of Wasps Captured in
Wanggou Village 1
22 July28 July22 July28 July
6171.67 ± 7.80 a202.67 ± 8.74 a77.33 ± 7.51 a83.33 ± 6.49 a
10115.33 ± 9.96 b124.33 ± 16.18 b44.67 ± 1.20 b51.33 ± 4.98 b
20138.67 ± 5.21 b105.67 ± 9.94 b48.67 ± 2.60 b50.00 ± 2.52 b
Control12.33 ± 0.88 c11.67 ± 0.33 c8.67 ± 0.88 d8.33 ± 0.33 c
1 Different letters within a column indicate significant differences as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD tests (p < 0.05). Each treatment was repeated three times.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, C.; Bai, P.; Kang, J.; Dong, T.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, X. Deciphering the Chemical Fingerprint of Astragalus membranaceus: Volatile Components Attractive to Bruchophagus huonchili Wasps. Insects 2023, 14, 809. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14100809

AMA Style

Zhang C, Bai P, Kang J, Dong T, Zheng H, Zhang X. Deciphering the Chemical Fingerprint of Astragalus membranaceus: Volatile Components Attractive to Bruchophagus huonchili Wasps. Insects. 2023; 14(10):809. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14100809

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Chaoran, Penghua Bai, Jie Kang, Tian Dong, Haixia Zheng, and Xianhong Zhang. 2023. "Deciphering the Chemical Fingerprint of Astragalus membranaceus: Volatile Components Attractive to Bruchophagus huonchili Wasps" Insects 14, no. 10: 809. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14100809

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop