Next Article in Journal
Caddisflies (Trichoptera) of Protected Calcareous Fen Habitats: Assemblages, Environmental Drivers, Indicator Species, and Conservation Issues
Previous Article in Journal
Regional β-Diversity of Stream Insects in Coastal Alabama Is Correlated with Stream Conditions, Not Distance among Sites
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 14
Issue 11
10.3390/insects14110848
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Olive Fruit Damage Induced by Invasive Halyomorpha halys

by
Elissa Daher
,
Elena Chierici
,
Stefania Urbani
,
Nicola Cinosi
,
Gabriele Rondoni
*,
Maurizio Servili
,
Franco Famiani
and
Eric Conti
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, 06121 Perugia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(11), 848; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14110848
Submission received: 2 October 2023 / Revised: 23 October 2023 / Accepted: 26 October 2023 / Published: 31 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Pest and Vector Management)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål), is a highly polyphagous invasive species in Europe. This species can puncture fruits, causing fruit deformations and abscissions. Recently, H. halys was detected on olives in Greece and Italy. Injuries are being attributed to this pest by olive growers in northern and central Italy, but studies are necessary to confirm feeding and describe the damage. Here, we evaluated the effect of the artificial infestation of olive trees with different densities of H. halys on fruit drop and characterized the phenolic composition in injured vs. healthy fruits.

Abstract

The brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål), is an invasive species causing economic crop losses. This species was recently detected attacking olive fruits. The aim of this study was to characterize feeding damage. Olive samples were initially collected from a field where H. halys was reported to cause damage to olive fruits. Hence, we conducted a field trial on the Moraiolo variety using sleeve cages to test the effect of H. halys feeding pressure on olive fruit drop and evaluated the effect of feeding on fruit quality. We tested two densities of H. halys (two or eight adults/cage) at two different stages of olive development, pre- and post-pit hardening. High pressure of H. halys before pit hardening caused a significant fruit drop compared to the control. In addition, chemical analysis of damaged and infested fruits revealed higher levels of total phenols compared to healthy fruits. These findings indicate that feeding by H. halys induced a stress response in the plants that could translate in quality variations in the olive drupes.

1. Introduction

The risks imposed by invasive insects increase with climate change and global trading and have been estimated in a minimum of USD 70.0 billion of global losses per year [1,2]. Such losses are the consequence of direct feeding on marketable plant parts [3] and alteration in plant physiology and morphology [4]. In addition, unpredictable ecological effects in the new environment should be considered [5]. When introduced into a new habitat, if they find favorable climatic conditions, invasive species tend to thrive on the expense of indigenous species due to their superior abilities to escape control of natural enemies [6] and to win direct and indirect competition [6,7,8]. The brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB), Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), is an invasive pest originating from Asia, after being accidentally introduced to the United States and Europe [9]. After more than a decade of its presence in Europe [10], major agricultural damages by H. halys were recorded in Italy [9,11], which required emergency measures in support of fruit and vegetable producers [12]. Halyomorpha halys is highly polyphagous with more than 300 hosts [13]; it is a pest of many fruit trees including apples, peaches, nectarines, pears, and grapes [9]. Haye et al. [14] listed olive (Olea europaea L.) as a crop potentially susceptible to H. halys. In fact, adults and juveniles H. halys were recently recorded on cultivated olives in Greece [15,16]. Concerns are increasing, especially after H. halys was reported to be damaging olives in the north of Italy [17]. Despite several sustainable pest control measures being available for olive pests, e.g., Bactrocera oleae Rossi [18,19], they are of limited efficacy against H. halys [20,21]. From its initial introduction point in the north of the country, H. halys has been detected in all Italian regions [11,22,23].
Similar to other phytophagous pentatomids, H. halys feeds on vegetative and reproductive plant parts by inserting the stylets in the tissue while ejecting two different kinds of saliva: readily solidifying saliva and watery saliva [24]. The solidifying saliva, also called sheath saliva, is responsible for the formation of a tubular lining, the so-called stylet sheath, salivary sheath, or salivary cone, while the watery saliva contains enzymes that help digest the plant tissue before ingestion [24,25]. After the extraction of the stylets, the salivary sheath, formed during feeding, remains attached to plant tissue. This type of feeding causes alterations to the surface and the inner part of the attacked fruit and could manifest as scars, discolorations, deformations, or occasional suberification of olive fruits attacked by H. halys [14,15]. In addition, the damage could be divided into two categories; the quantitative damage occurs early in the season, during rapid mitotic growth, leading to yield loss, while qualitative damage takes place during the fruit mesocarp development [9,26].
Halyomorpha halys feeding on fruit crops such as cherry and kiwi caused visible damages, fruit abscission, and reduced marketability. For instance, the damage on kiwi is characterized by green and white damage spots under the skin of kiwifruit while on cherry, scars and fruit drop were recorded [27,28]. On apples, H. halys feeding causes surface discolorations and visible stylet punctures with necrotic areas under the skin, where the same was seen on peaches with gummy areas on the external skin [29]. On olives, H. halys induced suberification in up to 87% of fruits [15]. Feeding by nymphs and adults can cause premature fruit drop [17]. However, to our knowledge, no studies have been conducted to compare the effect of early- or late-season attacks by different densities of H. halys on olive fruit drop and fruit chemistry. Many olive pests cause an abnormal increase in fruit drop, including the olive moth Prays oleae (Bern.) (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) and the olive fruit fly Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) [30,31], and H. halys could represent a potential additional cause of olive fruit losses [14,17].
Here, we first characterized the volatile profiles from olives (Casaliva and Leccino varieties) naturally attacked in the field. Then, we evaluated fruit drop and phenolic compositions in olives (Moraiolo variety) artificially exposed in the field to two densities of H. halys at pre- and post-pit hardening stages.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insects

The colony of H. halys was started from individuals collected from the province of Modena and reared in controlled conditions (25 ± 1 °C, 60 ± 5% relative humidity, and 16 h:8 h light:dark). Individuals were maintained inside mesh cages (Kweekkooi 40 cm × 40 cm × 60 cm, Vermandel, Hulst, The Netherlands). Approximately 30–40 individuals were placed in each cage. A paper towel was placed on the bottom of the cage to provide hygienic support for food. All insect stages were provided with a diet consisting of organic tomato fruits, carrot roots, raw peanuts, sunflower seeds, and green bean pods [32,33]. An upside-down cotton-sealed jar on a Petri dish was used for water supply. The food was replaced every two days and glass jars for water supply were substituted on a weekly basis. For the experiment, reproductive individuals (approx. 3–4 weeks old) were starved 24 h (water provided) in smaller mesh cages (Kweekkooi 30 cm × 30 cm × 30 cm, Vermandel, Hulst, The Netherlands) prior to their transfer to the field.

2.2. Field Surveys in an Olive Orchard Naturally Attacked by Stink Bugs

Field surveys were conducted in an organic olive orchard (Casaliva and Leccino varieties) located in northern Italy (Raffa, Brescia Province, Italy; coordinates of the central area: 45.582036, 10.530811). This orchard was selected because of the presence of several adult and juvenile H. halys on the olives. Samplings were conducted on 5 October 2020. Random olive collection was conducted on both varieties (approximatively 2 kg fruits per variety). Fruits were transferred to the laboratory and observed under a stereomicroscope. Olives were then divided in three groups according to the level of stink bug attack, i.e., “healthy” (no visible damage), “damaged” (only salivary cones were present), or “highly damaged” (with skin depressions, discolorations, and salivary cones). Olive samples were subjected to chemical analyses of the phenolic composition for assessment of the oil quality or molecular analyses for the diagnosis of the putative H. halys attack (see Section 2.4).

2.3. Field Assessment of H. halys Feeding Damage on Olive Fruits

In order to determine the effect of H. halys feeding on olive fruit drop, we conducted a field experiment in one olive orchard managed under integrated pest management systerm (Moraiolo variety) located in central Italy (Umbertide, Perugia Province, Italy; coordinates of the central area: 43.284183, 12.395923). The trial was carried out in two different stages of the fruit development: pre-pit hardening (from 28 July 2021) and post-pit hardening (from 29 September 2021). Due to the particular climatic conditions of the area, the pre-pit hardening was slightly delayed compared to other areas of central Italy, where it usually occurs about two weeks earlier. One branch bearing completely healthy olive fruits, i.e., without any visible injury or pest infestation, was selected. Each selected branch carried an average of 50 or 62 total fruits per branch for the pre- and the post-pit hardening trial, respectively. Two densities of H. halys adults, two (“HH2”) and eight (“HH8”) adults per olive branch, with a 1:1 sex ratio, were tested and compared to the control (no insects; “CNT”). Sleeve cages (75 cm height, 50 cm width) were used for the treatments and control. Cages were made of white tissue net (2 mm holes) to minimize the formation of a microclimate around the isolated branch and to permit aeration, but to also avoid any movement of olive pests to and from the branch.
Starved H. halys adults were transported to the field and were introduced in the cages. Feeding on olives was allowed for 48 h, then the insects were removed and returned to the laboratory. Mesh cages were kept until the end of the trial, i.e., the harvest day (8 November 2021) [26,27]. The cages were checked every two to three weeks and dropped fruits were collected, counted, and analyzed under a stereomicroscope for the presence of the salivary sheaths. When present, the drupes were dissected to investigate the extent of the damage in the mesocarp (pulp) and the endocarp (the pit). Close-ups of the salivary cones and dissected drupes were taken using a digital camera (Olympus) connected to a stereomicroscope.
Cages were randomly distributed among plants and treatments were randomly distributed among cages. For the pre-pit hardening feeding experiment, the number of replicates (cages) per each density were uneven due to unexpected H. halys mortality during the experiment and was five for CNT, four for HH2, and three for HH8. For the post-pit hardening test, all treatments had six replicates. Harvested olives, excluding dropped fruits, were subjected to chemical analyses of the phenolic composition.

2.4. Chemical and Molecular Investigation of H. halys Feeding Damage

Chemical investigations (phenolic composition) were conducted on olives collected in 2020 (Casaliva and Leccino varieties, see Section 2.2; Table S1) and in 2021 (Moraiolo variety, see Section 2.3). Phenols were extracted from the olive pulp according to the procedure described by [34] and modified as follows: 2 g olive pulp was homogenized with 50 mL of the methanol/water (80/20 (v/v) solution containing 20 mg/L of butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and homogenized using an Ultra-Turrax T50 (IKA, Werke, Staufen, Germany) for 1 min at 7000 rpm, then centrifuged at 9000 rpm for 10 min and the supernatant was recovered. The extraction was repeated twice and the extract was concentrated using a rotary evaporator (Buchi Rotavapor R-210, Buchi Italia srl, Cornaredo, Italy) until it reached a final volume of 20 mL. Phenols present in the aqueous extract were recovered via solid-phase extraction (SPE). For this purpose, a Bond Elut Jr-C18 and 1 g cartridges (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) previously activated with 10 mL of methanol and 10 mL of water was used. It was loaded with 2 mL of aqueous extract and the elution was performed with 50 mL of methanol; the eluate was evaporated to dryness using a rotary evaporator. The phenolic extract was solubilized in 1 mL of the methanol/water (50:50 v/v) solution, filtered using a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) syringe filter (0.2 µm) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and injected into HPLC. The analysis of phenols of the extract was carried out according to Selvaggini et al. (2014) by using an HPLC Agilent Technologies system 1100 series (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) composed of a vacuum degasser, a quaternary pump, an autosampler, a thermostated column compartment, a diode array detector (DAD), and a fluorescence detector (FLD) and by also employing a C18 column Spherisorb ODS-1 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size) (Waters S.p.A., Milan, Italy). The phenolic compounds from olive pulp were detected by using a DAD set at a wavelength of 280 nm. The quantitation of phenols was determined by means of single calibration curves for each compound and the results were expressed as mg/g.
Five attacked olives for each of Casaliva and Leccino cultivars that were collected in 2020 were analyzed with PCR to confirm whether the feeding punctures were produced by H. halys. The positive control consisted in five green beans (Phaseoulus vulgaris L.), which were exposed for 12 h to H. halys adult feeding in a laboratory-controlled environment (25 ± 1 °C, 60 ± 5% relative humidity, 16 h:8 h light/dark). Fruits were first individually washed with a 0.1% NaClO solution for 1 min, then rinsed three times with distilled water. The NaClO treatment allows for the removal of degradation of contaminating DNA from the surface without precluding the successful purification of the nucleic acids from the sample [35]. A portion of olive pulp (5 mm diameter × 5 mm length) containing a salivary cone was then collected using a small brass corer. Total DNA was purified from the olive pulp using GenElute Genomic DNA kit (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy), adopting the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR amplification was conducted using procedure and species-specific primers for H. halys (H. halys-For and H. halys-Rev [36]).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

For 2021 field trials, the effect of H. halys density on the percentage of dropped fruits was evaluated by means of generalized linear models for the percentage data (GLMs, Beta distribution), followed by a multiple comparisons procedure and Holm correction (significance level, alpha = 0.05). Fruit weight and phenolic abundance in H. halys-infested drupes were evaluated separately for the pre-pit and post-pit fruit hardening stage by means of linear models (LMs). The data were analyzed in R using packages “betareg” [37] and “emmeans” [38].

3. Results

3.1. Field Surveys in Olive Orchards Naturally Attacked by Stink Bugs

Overall, the percentage of attacked fruits revealed via morphological analysis of the collected olives was 3% for Casaliva and 16% for Leccino. The composition of different phenols was variable in Casaliva and Leccino healthy and damaged olives (results in Table S1). Molecular diagnostics confirmed punctures on olive fruits by H. halys in 60% of the samples (Casaliva) and in 40% of the samples (Leccino). All green bean samples used as the control were positive to H. halys.

3.2. Field Assessment of H. halys Feeding Damage on Olive Fruits

In Moraiolo, the presence of the high density of H. halys (HH8) during the pre-pit hardening stage induced higher fruit drop compared to the low density (HH2) or control (results of GLM followed by a multiple comparisons procedure are reported in Figure 1). Conversely, fruit drop in HH2 did not differ from the control (Figure 1A). When olives were exposed to H. halys attack during the post-pit hardening stage, almost no fruit drop was recorded (Figure 1B). Regardless of the period of attack, fruit weight did not differ among treatments (Figure 1C,D).
In both treatments (HH2 and HH8), the damage caused by H. halys was only detectable under a stereomicroscope, with some fruits exhibiting salivary cones and salivary sheaths as illustrated in Figure 2.

3.3. Chemical and Molecular Investigation of H. halys Feeding Damage

As per Moraiolo variety (2021 field experiment), some phenols as well as the sum of all phenolic fractions were different between olive fruits exposed to high density H. halys adults compared to the control, both in the pre- and post-pit hardening stages (Table 1 and Table 2). Attacks during the pre-pit hardening resulted in higher oleuropein in HH8, compared to HH2 and CNT. Verbascoside was higher in both HH8 and HH2 compared to CNT. The sum of the phenolic fractions was higher in HH8, followed by HH2 and then by CNT. Attacks during the post-hardening resulted in higher oleuropein in HH8 compared to HH2 and CNT. Verbascoside and the total phenolic extractions were higher in HH8 and HH2 compared to CNT.

4. Discussion

Here, we provided a comprehensive assessment of the effect of feeding by H. halys on olives. Olive fruits of Moraiolo were susceptible to fruit drop during the pre-pit hardening stage but not during post-pit hardening stage. The fact that during an early stage of development the feeding injury can cause fruit to abort and eventually drop was found for many plant species, such as apple, peach, and cherry attacked by H. halys [26,28]. Lately, this was observed on olives where feeding by adults H. halys was responsible for more than 66% of olive dropping [17]. The digestive enzymes discharged via saliva [24], with the absence of the endocarp lignification that is supposed to protect the seed [39], could easily harm the seed and lead to abortion. On cherries, H. halys feeding before pit hardening caused 100% abscission in fruits [28]. Nezara viridula L. was found to cause pre-mature dropping of citrus fruits via the same feeding mechanism [40]. In Australia, the stink bug was also associated with high damages to olive fruits [41].
The early stages of fruit development, i.e., flowering and early fruit growth, could also be critical since they coincide with the end of dormancy of H. halys (from April onward) [42]. Although no information is available regarding olive tree, any supposed feeding activity by stink bugs on flowers can cause fruit abortion and yield losses [26,42]. Our study did not cover the flowering stage and early fruiting bodies and further investigation is therefore needed. On the other hand, the olive variety Moraiolo has a relatively high detachment force with respect to other common varieties in central Italy such as Frantoio and Leccino [43]. In this context, the absence of fruit drop during post-pit hardening in Moraiolo should not be generalized to all olive cultivars and further studies are needed to draw conclusions. This study also concerned adult feeding, while nymphs were also shown to attack fruits, including olives [17,27]. Nonetheless, the results obtained contribute to the determination of olive vulnerable development stages, providing useful inputs for pest management decisions against H. halys.
The density of H. halys adults used in the experiment was also a determining factor along with the plant development stage. We observed that only high density caused significant fruit drop, where even a lower density of adults could cause a relevant percentage of dropping fruits [17]. The correlation between density and damage is also demonstrated in other studies conducted on different fruits. For instance, damage by H. halys on kiwi were higher with four adults per cage, rather than two [27]. The same correlation between density of H. halys adults and damage was also observed in blueberries [44]. The findings of these studies could be alarming because in the case of an outbreak of H. halys, accompanied with a high pest population density, a significant olive drop is to be expected.
The feeding injury was not easily detectable on Moraiolo fruits artificially exposed to H. halys because salivary cones were not always detectable under a stereomicroscope. However, the absence of salivary cones from the surface of fruits does not indicate the absence of the attack. In fact, sometimes deposits of the sheath material could be undetectable and sometimes insignificant to non-existent, despite the penetration of the stylets in the plant tissue [25]. Dissections of fallen fruits confirmed the ability of the stink bug to penetrate the mesocarp reaching the pit, enforcing the hypothesis of fruit abortion. On the contrary, visible punctures were observed on the collected fruits from the Leccino and Casaliva varieties. The different damage could be due to many elements: difference in the susceptibility between cultivars, the intensity of the attack, and the stage of development of olives when the infestation occurred. The Leccino and Casaliva fruits were collected late in the season (October 2020), making us assume that a long-term exposure to H. halys attacks until late in the season could have been the cause of the severe fruit deformation observed [28].
From the chemical point of view, fruits exposed to H. halys adults both in the pre-pit and in the post-pit hardening stage reported higher levels of phenolic compounds compared to the controls. Particularly, in pre-pit hardening stage, fruits exposed to the higher density of H. halys showed a greater amount of phenolic compounds compared to both the other treatment and the control. The increases in phenolic content in fruits during their development is also a defense mechanism adopted by the plant against herbivore attacks, and could indicate that the plant is under stress [45,46]. This might explain the amount of phenols in fruits highly damaged by H. halys and especially those in the pre-pit hardening stage. Plants have already been shown to respond to H. halys attacks via the activation of direct and indirect defense mechanisms (e.g., [24,33,47,48,49,50]). The defense mechanism costs the plants a reallocation of resources and could have a negative impact on plant physiology, growth, and productivity [46,51]. Alteration of the phenolic composition due to H. halys feeding was also reported for Istrska belica and Pendolino olive cultivars [52]. The amount of phenols, which includes six different families of compounds, is solidly related to the olive cultivar and fruit stage maturation [53,54,55,56]. One of these fractions, oleuropein, is the main phenolic compound of olive fruits, and its content tends to rise during the growth phase and decreases rapidly during the physiological development of the fruit [55,57,58]. Oleuropein belongs to the secoiridoid compound family, is present throughout the olive tree, and it is responsible for the bitter taste of unripe olives [59]. In addition to oleuropein, other phenolic compounds could be found, including verbascoside. Verbascoside is a heterosidic ester of caffeic acid and hydroxytyrosol and is found in a wide range of species within the Oleaceae family [52,59]. The increase in verbascoside in infested olives at the post-pit hardening stage is in line with its significant role in induced resistance. When Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire larvae were fed with a diet added with verbascoside, their survival and growth decreased in a dose-dependent way [60]. In another study, the compound demonstrated to impair insect growth and mortality of Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) and Drosophila melanogaster Meigen [61]. Nevertheless, many factors could determine the phenol content such as the cultivar and the fruit size [53]. Regarding olives, the progressive development of oleuropein and verbascoside, along with their biochemical interrelation, could imply the presence of a metabolic connection between them. However, the exact causes of this relationship remain to be determined [53].
In conclusion, this study provides an assessment of the effect of H. halys feeding on olives. In the pre-pit hardening stage, H. halys feeding is critical. At the higher density of H. halys tested, damage could be both quantitative and qualitative, as demonstrated by the remarkable fruit drop and morphology of olive fruits and the alteration in oleuropein and verbascoside levels. Considering that hydrophilic phenols are essential for a good quality of virgin olive oil [62], further evaluation of the effect of H. halys attacks on oil quality should be carefully evaluated.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects14110848/s1, Table S1: Phenolic composition (mg/g of fresh weight) of healthy and damaged olive fruits of cultivars Casaliva and Leccino (results are the mean of two independent extractions, each analyzed in duplicate).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.D., S.U., G.R., M.S., F.F. and E.C. (Eric Conti); methodology, E.D., E.C. (Elena Chierici), N.C., S.U., G.R., M.S., F.F. and E.C. (Eric Conti); formal analysis E.D., E.C. (Elena Chierici), S.U. and G.R.; investigation, E.D., E.C. (Elena Chierici), N.C., S.U. and G.R.; writing—original draft preparation, E.D.; writing—review and editing, E.D., E.C. (Elena Chierici), S.U., N.C., G.R., M.S., F.F. and E.C. (Eric Conti); supervision, S.U., G.R., M.S., F.F. and E.C. (Eric Conti). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

GR was funded by H2020-MSCA-GF, Acronym. PESTNET, Grant agreement ID: 101026399.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Gianfranco Comincioli for help with field samplings and Andrea Luchetti for insect rearing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bradshaw, C.J.A.; Leroy, B.; Bellard, C.; Roiz, D.; Albert, C.; Fournier, A.; Barbet-Massin, M.; Salles, J.M.; Simard, F.; Courchamp, F. Massive yet grossly underestimated global costs of invasive insects. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Skendžić, S.; Zovko, M.; Živković, I.P.; Lešić, V.; Lemić, D. Effect of climate change on introduced and native agricultural invasive insect pests in Europe. Insects 2021, 12, 985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Battisti, A.; Benvegnu, I.; Colombari, F.; Haack, R.A. Invasion by the chestnut gall wasp in Italy causes significant yield loss in Castanea sativa nut production. Agric. For. Entomol. 2014, 16, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Reale, L.; Tedeschini, E.; Rondoni, G.; Ricci, C.; Bin, F.; Frenguelli, G.; Ferranti, F. Histological investigation on gall development induced by a worldwide invasive pest, Dryocosmus kuriphilus, on Castanea sativa. Plant Biosyst. 2016, 150, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Snyder, W.E.; Evans, E.W. Ecological Effects of Invasive Arthropod Generalist Predators. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2006, 37, 95–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Oliveira, C.M.; Auad, A.M.; Mendes, S.M.; Frizzas, M.R. Economic impact of exotic insect pests in Brazilian agriculture. J. Appl. Entomol. 2013, 137, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rondoni, G.; Onofri, A.; Ricci, C. Differential susceptibility in a specialised aphidophagous ladybird, Platynaspis luteorubra (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), facing intraguild predation by exotic and native generalist predators. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2012, 22, 1334–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kenis, M.; Auger-Rozenberg, M.A.; Roques, A.; Timms, L.; Péré, C.; Cock, M.J.W.; Settele, J.; Augustin, S.; Lopez-Vaamonde, C. Ecological effects of invasive alien insects. Biol. Invasions 2009, 11, 21–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leskey, T.C.; Nielsen, A.L. Impact of the Invasive Brown Marmorated Stink Bug in North America and Europe: History, Biology, Ecology, and Management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2018, 63, 599–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wermelinger, B.; Wyniger, D.; Forster, B. First records of an invasive bug in Europe: Halyomorpha halys Stål (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), a new pest on woody ornamentals and fruit trees? Mitteilungen-Schweiz. Entomol. Ges. 2008, 81, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bariselli, M.; Bugiani, R.; Maistrello, L. Distribution and damage caused by Halyomorpha halys in Italy. EPPO Bull. 2016, 46, 332–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/465 of 30 March 2020. 2020. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32020R0465&from=EN (accessed on 30 September 2023).
  13. Kriticos, D.J.; Kean, J.M.; Phillips, C.B.; Senay, S.D.; Acosta, H.; Haye, T. The Potential Global Distribution of the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug, Halyomorpha halys, a Critical Threat to Plant Biosecurity. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 1033–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Haye, T.; Gariepy, T.; Hoelmer, K.; Rossi, J.P.; Streito, J.C.; Tassus, X.; Desneux, N. Range expansion of the invasive brown marmorated stinkbug, Halyomorpha halys: An increasing threat to field, fruit and vegetable crops worldwide. J. Pest Sci. 2015, 88, 665–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Damos, P.; Soulopoulou, P.; Thomidis, T. First record and current status of the brown marmorated sting bug Halyomorpha halys damaging peaches and olives in northern Greece. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2020, 60, 323–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Andreadis, S.S.; Gogolashvili, N.E.; Fifis, G.T.; Navrozidis, E.I.; Thomidis, T. First report of native parasitoids of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in Greece. Insects 2021, 12, 984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zapponi, L.; Morten, M.; Chiesa, S.G.; Angeli, G.; Borri, G.; Mazzoni, V.; Sofia, M.; Anfora, G. Brown marmorated stink bug (Halyomorpha halys) feeding damage determines early drop in olive crops. J. Appl. Entomol. 2022, 146, 791–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Daher, E.; Cinosi, N.; Chierici, E.; Rondoni, G.; Famiani, F.; Conti, E. Field and Laboratory Efficacy of Low-Impact Commercial Products in Preventing Olive Fruit Fly, Bactrocera oleae, Infestation. Insects 2022, 13, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Daher, E.; Rondoni, G.; Cinosi, N.; Conti, E.; Famiani, F. Particle Films Combined with Propolis Have Positive Effects in Reducing Bactrocera oleae Attacks on Olive Fruits. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Leskey, T.C.; Lee, D.H.; Short, B.D.; Wright, S.E. Impact of insecticides on the invasive Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae): Analysis of insecticide lethality. J. Econ. Entomol. 2012, 105, 1726–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kuhar, T.P.; Kamminga, K. Review of the chemical control research on Halyomorpha halys in the USA. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 1021–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cianferoni, F.; Graziani, F.; Dioli, P.; Ceccolini, F. Review of the occurrence of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in Italy, with an update of its European and World distribution. Biologia 2018, 73, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rondoni, G.; Chierici, E.; Marchetti, E.; Nasi, S.; Ferrari, R.; Conti, E. Improved Captures of the Invasive Brown Marmorated Stink Bug, Halyomorpha halys, Using a Novel Multimodal Trap. Insects 2022, 13, 527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Peiffer, M.; Felton, G.W. Insights into the saliva of the brown marmorated stink bug Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e88483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Miles, P.W. The Saliva of Hemiptera. Adv. Insect Phys. 1972, 9, 183–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nielsen, A.L.; Hamilton, G.C. Seasonal occurrence and impact of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in tree fruit. J. Econ. Entomol. 2009, 102, 1133–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, J.H.; Avila, G.A.; Zhang, F.; Guo, L.F.; Sandanayaka, M.; Mi, Q.Q.; Shi, S.S.; Zhang, J.P. Field cage assessment of feeding damage by Halyomorpha halys on kiwifruit orchards in China. J. Pest Sci. 2020, 93, 953–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schumm, Z.R.; Alston, D.G.; Spears, L.R.; Manlove, K. Impact of Brown Marmorated Stink Bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) Feeding on Tart Cherry (Rosales: Rosaceae) Quality and Yield in Utah. J. Econ. Entomol. 2020, 113, 2328–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Acebes-Doria, A.L.; Leskey, T.C.; Bergh, J.C. Injury to apples and peaches at harvest from feeding by Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) nymphs early and late in the season. Crop Prot. 2016, 89, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gömez-Caravaca, A.M.; Cerretani, L.; Bendini, A.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, A.; Del Carlo, M.; Compagnone, D.; Cichelli, A. Effects of fly attack (Bactrocera oleae) on the phenolic profile and selected chemical parameters of olive oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 4577–4583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mertoǵlu, G.; Kumrala, N.A. Economic evaluation of different insecticide applications for control of the olive moth, Prays oleae (Bern.), in “Gemlik” olive trees. Acta Hortic. 2018, 1199, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Giovannini, L.; Sabbatini-Peverieri, G.; Marianelli, L.; Rondoni, G.; Conti, E.; Roversi, P.F. Physiological host range of Trissolcus mitsukurii, a candidate biological control agent of Halyomorpha halys in Europe. J. Pest Sci. 2022, 95, 605–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rondoni, G.; Chierici, E.; Giovannini, L.; Sabbatini-Peverieri, G.; Roversi, P.F.; Conti, E. Olfactory responses of Trissolcus mitsukurii to plants attacked by target and non-target stink bugs suggest low risk for biological control. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cirilli, M.; Caruso, G.; Gennai, C.; Urbani, S.; Frioni, E.; Ruzzi, M.; Servili, M.; Gucci, R.; Poerio, E.; Muleo, R. The role of polyphenoloxidase, peroxidase, and β-glucosidase in phenolics accumulation in Olea europaea L. Fruits under different water regimes. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rondoni, G.; Fenjan, S.; Bertoldi, V.; Ielo, F.; Djelouah, K.; Moretti, C.; Buonaurio, R.; Ricci, C.; Conti, E. Molecular detection of field predation among larvae of two ladybird beetles is partially predicted from laboratory experiments. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Valentin, R.E.; Maslo, B.; Lockwood, J.L.; Pote, J.; Fonseca, D.M. Real-time PCR assay to detect brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål), in environmental DNA. Pest Manag. Sci. 2016, 72, 1854–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cribari-Neto, F.; Zeileis, A. Beta Regression in R. J. Stat. Softw. 2010, 34, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lenth, R. Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, Aka Least-Squares Means, R Package Version 1.8.2. 2022. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans (accessed on 27 June 2023).
  39. Rapoport, H.F.; Pérez-López, D.; Hammami, S.B.M.; Agüera, J.; Moriana, A. Fruit pit hardening: Physical measurement during olive fruit growth. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2013, 163, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Futch, S.H.; Childers, C.C.; Mccoy, C.W. Identification of Insect Pests: HS-893/HS142, 11/2002. EDIS 2002, 9, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  41. Spooner-Hart, R.; Tesoriero, L.; Hall, B.H. Field Guide to Olive Pests, Diseases and Disorders in Australia; Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation: Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  42. Rice, K.B.; Bergh, C.J.; Bergmann, E.J.; Biddinger, D.J.; Dieckhoff, C.; Dively, G.; Fraser, H.; Gariepy, T.; Hamilton, G.; Haye, T.; et al. Biology, ecology, and management of brown marmorated stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). J. Integr. Pest Manag. 2014, 5, A1–A13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Farinelli, D.; Tombesi, S. Performance and oil quality of “Arbequina” and four Italian olive cultivars under super high-density hedgerow planting system cultivated in central Italy. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 192, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wiman, N.G.; Parker, J.E.; Rodriguez-Saona, C.; Walton, V.M. Characterizing Damage of Brown Marmorated Stink Bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in Blueberries. J. Econ. Entomol. 2015, 108, 1156–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Dar, S.A.; Rather, B.A.; Wani, A.R.; Ganie, M.A. Resistance against insect pests by plant phenolics and their derivative dompounds. Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett. 2017, 6, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar]
  46. Lattanzio, V.; Lattanzio, V.M.T.; Cardinali, A. Role of phenolics in the resistance mechanisms of plants against fungal pathogens and insects. Phytochemistry 2015, 661, 23–67. [Google Scholar]
  47. Rondoni, G.; Bertoldi, V.; Malek, R.; Djelouah, K.; Moretti, C.; Buonaurio, R.; Conti, E. Vicia faba plants respond to oviposition by invasive Halyomorpha halys activating direct defences against offspring. J. Pest Sci. 2018, 91, 671–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Serteyn, L.; Quaghebeur, C.; Ongena, M.; Cabrera, N.; Barrera, A.; Molina-Montenegro, M.A.; Francis, F.; Ramírez, C.C. Induced systemic resistance by a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium impacts development and feeding behavior of aphids. Insects 2020, 11, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Peterson, H.M.; Ray, S.; Ali, J.G.; Krawczyk, G. Feeding and oviposition by the brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål) induce direct and systemic changes in volatile compound emissions from potted peach and tree of heaven. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2022, 6, 227–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chierici, E.; Sabbatini-Peverieri, G.; Roversi, P.F.; Rondoni, G.; Conti, E. Phenotypic plasticity in an egg parasitoid affects olfactory response to odors from the plant–host complex. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2023, 11, 1233655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Suzuki, N.; Rivero, R.M.; Shulaev, V.; Blumwald, E.; Mittler, R. Abiotic and biotic stress combinations. New Phytol. 2014, 203, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ivancic, T.; Grohar, M.C.; Jakopic, J.; Veberic, R.; Hudina, M. Effect of Brown Marmorated Stink Bug (Halyomorpha Halys Stål.) Infestation on the Phenolic Response and Quality of Olive Fruits (Olea europaea L.). Agronomy 2022, 12, 2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Amiot, M.J.; Fleuriet, A.; Macheix, J.J. Importance and Evolution of Phenolic Compounds in Olive during Growth and Maturation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1986, 34, 823–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Boskou, D.; Blekas, G.; Tsimidou, M. Phenolic compounds in olive oil and olives. Curr. Top. Nutraceutical Res. 2005, 3, 125–136. [Google Scholar]
  55. Malheiro, R.; Casal, S.; Baptista, P.; Pereira, J.A. A review of Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) impact in olive products: From the tree to the table. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 44, 226–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fernández-Poyatos, M.D.P.; Llorent-Martínez, E.J.; Ruiz-Medina, A. Effect of ripening on the phenolic composition and mineral content of three varieties of olive fruits. Foods 2021, 10, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Seçmeler, Ö.; Galanakis, C.M. Chapter 8—Olive Fruit and Olive Oil. In Innovations in Traditional Foods; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2019; pp. 193–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Servili, M.; Selvaggini, R.; Esposto, S.; Taticchi, A.; Montedoro, G.F.; Morozzi, G. Health and Sensory Properties of Virgin Olive Oil Hydrophilic Phenols: Agronomic and Technological Aspects of Production That Affect Their Occurrence in the Oil. J. Chromatogr. 2004, 1054, 113–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Soler-Rivas, C.; Espı, J.C.; Wichers, H.J. Review Oleuropein and Related Compounds. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80, 1013–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Whitehill, J.G.A.; Rigsby, C.; Cipollini, D.; Herms, D.A.; Bonello, P. Decreased emergence of emerald ash borer from ash treated with methyl jasmonate is associated with induction of general defense traits and the toxic phenolic compound Verbascoside. Oecologia 2014, 176, 1047–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Muñoz, E.; Lamilla, C.; Marin, J.C.; Alarcon, J.; Cespedes, C.L. Antifeedant, insect growth regulatory and insecticidal effects of Calceolaria talcana (Calceolariaceae) on Drosophila melanogaster and Spodoptera frugiperda. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 42, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Servili, M.; Montedoro, G. Contribution of phenolic compounds to virgin olive oil quality. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2002, 104, 602–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 14 00848 g001
Figure 1. Effect of Halyomorpha halys density on olive fruit drop (A,B) and fruit weight (C,D) during pre-pit (A,C) or post-pit (B,D) fruit hardening. Tree branches were enveloped in sleeve cages containing 0 (CNT), 2 (HH2), or 8 (HH8) H. halys adults for 48 h. Mean values followed by different letters are significantly different for p ≤ 0.05 according to generalized linear models and multiple comparisons procedure.
Figure 1. Effect of Halyomorpha halys density on olive fruit drop (A,B) and fruit weight (C,D) during pre-pit (A,C) or post-pit (B,D) fruit hardening. Tree branches were enveloped in sleeve cages containing 0 (CNT), 2 (HH2), or 8 (HH8) H. halys adults for 48 h. Mean values followed by different letters are significantly different for p ≤ 0.05 according to generalized linear models and multiple comparisons procedure.
Insects 14 00848 g001
Insects 14 00848 g002
Figure 2. Close-ups of feeding puncture by Halyomorpha halys on olive fruits, with details of the visible feeding puncture (arrow) (A,B), of the feeding tube (salivary sheath) on fruit surface (C), and of the salivary sheath tube (arrow) penetrating the pulp and reaching the endocarp (D).
Figure 2. Close-ups of feeding puncture by Halyomorpha halys on olive fruits, with details of the visible feeding puncture (arrow) (A,B), of the feeding tube (salivary sheath) on fruit surface (C), and of the salivary sheath tube (arrow) penetrating the pulp and reaching the endocarp (D).
Insects 14 00848 g002
Table 1. Phenolic composition (mg/g fresh fruits) of olives treated in pre-pit hardening stage. Means within a row followed by different letters are significantly different for p ≤ 0.05 according to linear model and multiple comparisons procedure.
Table 1. Phenolic composition (mg/g fresh fruits) of olives treated in pre-pit hardening stage. Means within a row followed by different letters are significantly different for p ≤ 0.05 according to linear model and multiple comparisons procedure.
CNTHH2HH8
3,4-DHPEA0.11 ± 0.019 b0.08 ± 0.010 b0.19 ± 0.020 a
p-HPEA0.06 ± 0.0110.06 ± 0.0170.05 ± 0.013
Demethyloleuropeinn.d.n.d.n.d.
Verbascoside1.70 ± 0.099 b3.55 ± 0.555 a4.54 ± 0.615 a
3,4-DHPEA-EDA5.32 ± 0.4786.53 ± 0.8024.42 ± 0.767
Oleuropein8.09 ± 0.355 b7.2 ± 0.510 b12.95 ± 2.188 a
P-HPEA-EDAn.d.n.d.n.d.
Ligustroside1.86 ± 0.1772.35 ± 0.1471.93 ± 0.145
Rutin1.02 ± 0.0451.38 ± 0.1611.25 ± 0.055
(+)-1-Acetoxypinoresinoln.d.n.d.n.d.
(+)-Pinoresinoln.d.n.d.n.d.
Sum of the phenolic fractions18.16 ± 0.123 c21.14 ± 0.631 b25.34 ± 1.55 a
Table 2. Phenolic composition (mg/g fresh fruits) of olives treated in post-pit hardening stage. Means within a row followed by different letters are significantly different according to linear model and multiple comparisons procedure.
Table 2. Phenolic composition (mg/g fresh fruits) of olives treated in post-pit hardening stage. Means within a row followed by different letters are significantly different according to linear model and multiple comparisons procedure.
CNTHH2HH8
3,4-DHPEA0.13 ± 0.0100.11 ± 0.0050.14 ± 0.006
p-HPEA0.07 ± 0.0100.05 ± 0.0160.04 ± 0.003
Demethyloleuropeinn.d.n.d.n.d.
Verbascoside0.95 ± 0.036 b2.37 ± 0.166 a2.17 ± 0.198 a
3,4-DHPEA-EDA4.67 ± 0.7895.64 ± 0.3665.15 ± 0.383
Oleuropein5.99 ± 0.509 b6.44 ± 0.378 b10.10 ± 1.275 a
P-HPEA-EDAn.d.n.d.n.d.
Ligustroside1.43 ± 0.1971.91 ± 0.1701.63 ± 0.087
Rutin0.98 ± 0.1151.15 ± 0.1260.99 ± 0.052
(+)-1-Acetoxypinoresinoln.d.n.d.n.d.
(+)-Pinoresinoln.d.n.d.n.d.
Sum of the phenolic fractions14.21 ± 0.796 b17.68 ± 0.713 a20.22 ± 1.090 a
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Daher, E.; Chierici, E.; Urbani, S.; Cinosi, N.; Rondoni, G.; Servili, M.; Famiani, F.; Conti, E. Characterization of Olive Fruit Damage Induced by Invasive Halyomorpha halys. Insects 2023, 14, 848. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14110848

AMA Style

Daher E, Chierici E, Urbani S, Cinosi N, Rondoni G, Servili M, Famiani F, Conti E. Characterization of Olive Fruit Damage Induced by Invasive Halyomorpha halys. Insects. 2023; 14(11):848. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14110848

Chicago/Turabian Style

Daher, Elissa, Elena Chierici, Stefania Urbani, Nicola Cinosi, Gabriele Rondoni, Maurizio Servili, Franco Famiani, and Eric Conti. 2023. "Characterization of Olive Fruit Damage Induced by Invasive Halyomorpha halys" Insects 14, no. 11: 848. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14110848

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop