Next Article in Journal
Isospora and Lankesterella Parasites (Eimeriidae, Apicomplexa) of Passeriform Birds in Europe: Infection Rates, Phylogeny, and Pathogenicity
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Targeted NGS Assay for the Detection of Respiratory Pathogens including SARS-CoV-2 in Felines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evidence for Bartonella quintana in Lice Collected from the Clothes of Ethiopian Homeless Individuals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Pradofloxacin for Treatment of Bartonella henselae in Experimentally Inoculated Cats

by
Michael R. Lappin
1,* and
Ronan Fitzgerald
2
1
Center for Companion Animal Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
2
Elanco Animal Health, Innovation Way, Greenfield, IN 46140, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2024, 13(4), 336; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13040336
Submission received: 1 March 2024 / Revised: 27 March 2024 / Accepted: 31 March 2024 / Published: 18 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Expanding Clinical Spectrum of Bartonelloses)

Abstract

:
Bartonella henselae is associated with numerous clinical syndromes in people. Cats are the definitive hosts for B. henselae, develop high levels of bacteremia, and are associated with human infections, particularly in the presence of Ctenocephalides felis. Several antibiotic protocols used for the treatment of B. henselae infection in cats have failed to clear bacteremia. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a high-dose pradofloxacin protocol to eliminate B. henselae bacteremia. Bartonella henselae infection was initiated in 8 cats by intravenous inoculation of infected feline blood and then pradofloxacin was administered at 7.5 mg/kg, PO, twice daily for 28 days, starting 12 weeks after inoculation. Complete blood cell counts were performed prior to pradofloxacin administration and then every 2 weeks for 10 weeks. Bartonella PCR assay was performed prior to pradofloxacin administration and approximately every 2 weeks for 10 weeks and then weekly for 4 weeks. Methylprednisolone acetate (5 mg/kg) was administered by intramuscular injection to all cats on week 10. The cats remained normal and none developed a hematocrit, platelet count, lymphocyte count, or neutrophil count outside of the normal reference ranges. In the one month prior to pradofloxacin administration, all cats were PCR-positive for Bartonella DNA on at least two of four sample dates; after pradofloxacin administration, all cats were negative for B. henselae DNA in blood on all nine sample dates. The protocol appears to be safe and failure to amplify B. henselae DNA from the blood after the administration of pradofloxacin and one dose of methylprednisolone acetate suggests either an antibiotic effect or the organism was cleared spontaneously.

1. Introduction

Bartonella henselae is the most common cause of cat scratch disease and other clinical syndromes including endocarditis and peliosis hepatis in people [1]. Cats develop high levels of B. henselae bacteremia which are associated with human infections, particularly in the presence of Ctenocephalides felis, likely as a result of contact with infected flea frass [1,2,3]. Multiple clinical and laboratory abnormalities have been associated with Bartonella spp. in some cats. Fever, cardiac abnormalities, and hyperglobulinemia are some of the most common [1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Several antibiotic protocols used for the treatment of B. henselae infection in cats, including doxycycline, azithromycin, or enrofloxacin administered alone, have failed to clear bacteremia in treated cats [3,4,10,11]. This may relate to the intracellular phase of the organism and the spectrum, dose, or duration of the antibiotics that were prescribed.
Pradofloxacin is a third-generation fluoroquinolone, approved for use in cats (and also for dogs in some countries) [12,13]. This fluoroquinolone displays dual targeting of two bacterial enzymes in contrast to the preferred target (DNA gyrase) of the other fluoroquinolones approved for cats in some countries (enrofloxacin, marbofloxacin, orbifloxicin) and so has increased activity against some bacteria. When grown in the presence of three antibiotics, B. henselae isolates from a human and a cat were less likely to develop resistance to pradofloxacin, when compared to azithromycin or enrofloxacin [14]. In addition, the administration of pradofloxacin has not been associated with the retinal degeneration in cats that has resulted from administration of some of the other quinolones [15]. However, in the United States, the pradofloxacin drug label (7.5 mg/kg, PO, once daily) states that some cats treated at 3X and 5X the label dose for 21 days showed evidence of reversible bone marrow abnormalities (https://animaldrugsatfda.fda.gov/adafda/app/search/public/document/downloadFoi/901) (accessed on 14 April 2023).
Since B. henselae is a human pathogen, in some situations (such as in the homes of immunosuppressed people) it might be desirable to eliminate bacteremia in cats. While pradofloxacin has been used in combination with doxycycline in several case reports [6,7,8], no study has assessed the safety and efficacy of a high-dose pradofloxacin protocol to eliminate B. henselae from the blood of experimentally infected cats.

2. Materials and Methods

The study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of a contract research facility (protocol # 170.029) and was monitored by the United States Department of Agriculture. In a separate study, infection with the CSU Bh1 strain of B. henselae was initiated in 8 young adult (12–16 months of age), mixed sex (4 male; 4 female), specific pathogen-free cats by intravenous inoculation of 1 mL of infected feline blood over 1 min; the number of organisms administered was unknown. A total of 12 weeks after inoculation, the cats were transferred to the study described here. Before B. henselae inoculation, these healthy cats had been housed in a vector-free research facility without flea control since birth and were negative for feline leukemia virus antigen, feline immunodeficiency virus antibodies, and Bartonella spp. antibodies, as well as Bartonella spp. DNA and hemoplasma DNA by PCR assay. In both studies, Bartonella spp. antibodies were detected by a previously reported ELISA using B. henselae as the antigen source and Bartonella spp. DNA was amplified as previously described [3,4].
This strain of B. henselae had previously been tested for pradofloxacin susceptibility, using the E-test in the laboratory of a collaborator and the drug was shown to have a mean inhibitory concentration of 0.016 µg/mL. Pradofloxacin was administered at 7.5 mg/kg, PO, twice daily for the first 4 weeks of the current study and methylprednisolone acetate was administered at 5 mg/kg by intramuscular injection on week 10 (Table 1). Blood was collected for complete blood cell count, Bartonella spp. PCR assay, and Bartonella spp. IgG titer prior to administration of pradofloxacin, approximately every 2 weeks for 10 weeks, and then weekly for 4 weeks.

3. Results

In the previous study, each of the cats developed detectable Bartonella spp. IgG titers and each had been intermittently positive for B. henselae DNA in blood samples after the IV inoculation. In the six weeks prior to entering this study, Bartonella spp. IgG was detected in every serum sample and Bartonella spp. DNA (4) was amplified from the blood of each cat at least once using this conventional PCR assay (Table 1).
Vomiting, diarrhea, hyporexia, or other clinical signs were not noted by the research facility during the pradofloxacin administration period. While complete ocular examinations were not performed in this study, no clinical evidence of blindness was noted. After starting the administration of pradofloxacin, B. henselae DNA was not amplified in any of the blood samples, before or after administration of methylprednisolone acetate. One cat with a maximal Bartonella spp. IgG titer of 1:128 was intermittently seronegative after starting pradofloxacin administration (7 of 11 samples) and was still seronegative at the end of the study on Week 14. Another cat with a maximal IgG titer of 1:64 was negative the last five sample collections of the study.
The complete blood cell data was normally distributed and so mean and standard deviation results over time are presented in Table 2. While mean neutrophil counts decreased over time during and after administration of pradofloxacin, none of the individual cats ever developed neutropenia. After administration of glucocorticoids on Week 10, 7 of 8 cats developed neutrophil counts >7 × 103 on Week 12, but as noted previously in Table 1, B. henselae DNA was not amplified from the blood of any of the cats. None of the individual cats developed anemia or thrombocytopenia during the study. Lymphopenia was not detected in any cat prior to administration of methylprednisolone acetate. However on week 12, 6 of 8 cats had lymphopenia.

4. Discussion

The pradofloxacin protocol used in this study appeared to be well-tolerated in these eight cats. While complete ocular examinations were not performed, there was no evidence of blindness during the study or by the adoptive owners of the cats. Evidence published to date suggests that the ocular safety index of pradofloxacin is high [15]. The E-test MIC of pradofloxacin for this strain of B. henselae suggested that the antibiotic could be effective for clearing bacteremia.
Bartonella henselae DNA was not amplified from any cat after administration of pradofloxacin, even when tested for four weeks after the administration of a dose of methylprednisolone acetate. These results and the fact that two cats became seronegative as well, suggest that this pradofloxacin protocol was associated with clearance of the organism, however, these results should be interpreted carefully as results from an untreated control group are not reported as all of the cats needed to be shown to be negative prior to adoption to private homes. The neutrophilia noted after administration of the glucocorticoid was most likely related to decreased margination of neutrophils rather than activation of the infection. Our laboratory has previously had B. henselae infected cats that appeared to have spontaneously limited bacteremia; thus, it is possible that the cats described may have become PCR-negative without the administration of the antibiotic. In addition, in this study, the combination of culture and PCR was not used to assess for bacteremia [1,16] and this combination may be more sensitive for detection of B. henselae infection.
Since cats rarely clear Bartonella spp. bacteremia spontaneously in the short term, the results described here are most likely from administration of pradofloxacin. Whether a treatment effect or spontaneous clearance, both are very positive results when assessed from a public health perspective. It has been proven that administration of imidacloprid topically or by collar can block the transmission of the CSU Bh1 strain [3,17]. If flea control is administered consistently to lessen reinfection, the results of this study suggest that B. henselae bacteremia can ultimately be limited by cats even without antibiotic therapy.
The natural route of B. henselae infection is via exposure to infected C. felis. Since there may be factors that affect B. henselae infection that are imparted by the fleas and since there are multiple strains of B. henselae and other Bartonella spp. that infect cats, further data with this pradofloxacin protocol should be gathered from cats infected by fleas and in cats with natural infections.

5. Conclusions

Pradofloxacin at twice the label dose in the United States administered for 28 days appeared to be safe for use in this small group of cats. In addition, since the treated cats became negative for B. henselae DNA by PCR assay and remained negative after the administration of methylprednisolone acetate, this protocol may likely be effective for limiting bacteremia with this Bartonella spp. This protocol could be considered rather than relinquishment if the cat is housed in the home of a severely immune-suppressed person while additional studies are being performed in cats infected by exposure to C. felis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R.L. and R.F.; methodology, M.R.L.; software, M.R.L.; validation, M.R.L.; formal analysis, M.R.L.; investigation, M.R.L.; resources, M.R.L. and R.F.; data curation, M.R.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.R.L.; writing—review and editing, M.R.L. and R.F.; supervision, M.R.L.; project administration, M.R.L.; funding acquisition, M.R.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Bayer Animal Health, the company that owned pradofloxacin at the time the research was performed. The product is now owned by Elanco Animal Health.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The work was approved by Bayer Animal Health and by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the research facility ((protocol # 170.029) and was monitored by the United States Department of Agriculture.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data in this study are presented herein.

Acknowledgments

An abstract of this paper was sponsored by Bayer Animal Health in the framework of the 14th CVBD World Forum Symposium. The authors thank Melissa Brewer, Jennifer Hawley, and Arianne Morris, the research associates of the Center for Companion Animal Studies at Colorado State University, for performing the assays utilized in this study. Nandhakumar Balakrishnan in Edward Breitschwerdt’s research group at North Carolina State University provided the E-test determination of the pradofloxacin MIC for this strain of B. henselae.

Conflicts of Interest

RF was an employee of Bayer Animal Health, the sponsor of this work. However, all experiments and assays were performed independently at Colorado State University.

References

  1. Breitschwerdt, E.B. Bartonellosis, One Health and all creatures great and small. Vet. Dermatol. 2017, 28, 96-e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Brunt, J.; Guptill, L.; Kordick, D.L.; Kudrak, S.; Lappin, M.R. Association of Feline Practitioners 2006 panel report on diagnosis, treatment and prevention of Bartonella species infections. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2006, 8, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bradbury, C.A.; Lappin, M.R. Evaluation of topical application of 10% imidacloprid-1% moxidectin to prevent Bartonella henselae transmission from cat fleas. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2010, 236, 869–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lappin, M.R.; Breitschwerdt, E.; Brewer, M.; Hawley, J.; Hegarty, B.; Radecki, S. Prevalence of Bartonella species DNA in the blood of cats with and without fever. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2009, 11, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Whittemore, J.C.; Hawley, J.R.; Radecki, S.V.; Steinberg, J.D.; Lappin, M.R. Bartonella species antibodies and hyperglobulinemia in privately owned cats. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2012, 26, 639–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hui, J.; Ryan, K.A.; Rademacher, N.; Neupane, P.; Breitschwerdt, E.B. Osteomyelitis associated with Bartonella henselae infection in a young cat. JFMS Open Rep. 2022, 8, 20551169221124910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nivy, R.; Lavi-Ginzberg, Y.; de Sousa, K.C.M.; Golani, Y.; Kuzi, S.; Nachum-Biala, Y.; Harrus, S. Treatment of a cat with presumed Bartonella henselae-associated immune-mediated hemolytic anemia, fever, and lymphadenitis. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2022, 36, 1106–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wheatley, M.A.; Shamoun, J.; Maggi, R.; Breitschwerdt, E.B.; Sommer, S.L.; Cullen, J.M.; Stowe, D.M. Eosinophilic pericardial effusion and pericarditis in a cat. JFMS Open Rep. 2023, 9, 20551169231213498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Williams, M.; Rao, S.; Braff, J.; Buch, J.S.; Chandrashekar, R.; Lappin, M.R. Associations between presence of Bartonella species deoxyribonucleic acid and complete blood cell count and serum biochemical changes in client-owned cats. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2022, 36, 532–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Greene, C.E.; McDermott, M.; Jameson, P.H.; Atkins, C.L.; Marks, A.M. Bartonella henselae infection in cats: Evaluation during primary infection, treatment, and rechallenge infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1996, 34, 1682–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Lappin, M.R.; Miller, W.; Sellins, D. Effect of doxycycline or orbifloxacin administration on Bartonella spp. and Hemoplasma assay results in naturally exposed cats. Intern. J. Appl. Res. Vet. Med. 2012, 10, 225–228. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lees, P. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and therapeutics of pradofloxacin in the dog and cat. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013, 36, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sykes, J.E.; Blondeau, J.M. Pradofloxacin: A novel veterinary fluoroquinolone for treatment of bacterial infections in cats. Vet. J. 2014, 201, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Biswas, S.; Maggi, R.G.; Papich, M.G.; Keil, D.; Breitschwerdt, E.B. Comparative activity of pradofloxacin, enrofloxacin, and azithromycin against Bartonella henselae isolates collected from cats and a human. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 617–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Messias, A.; Gekeler, F.; Wegener, A.; Dietz, K.; Kohler, K.; Zrenner, E. Retinal safety of a new fluoroquinolone, pradofloxacin, in cats: Assessment with electroretinography. Doc. Ophthalmol. 2008, 116, 177–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Drummond, M.R.; Lania, B.G.; Diniz, P.P.V.P.; Gilioli, R.; Demolin, D.M.R.; Scorpio, D.G.; Breitschwerdt, E.B.; Velho, P.E.N.F. Improvement of Bartonella henselae DNA detection in cat blood samples by combining molecular and culture methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56, e01732-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lappin, M.R.; Davis, W.L.; Hawley, J.R.; Brewer, M.; Morris, A.; Stanneck, D. A flea and tick collar containing 10% imidacloprid and 4.5% flumethrin prevents flea transmission of Bartonella henselae in cats. Parasites Vectors 2013, 6, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Bartonella spp. ELISA titers and PCR assay results in experimentally inoculated cats before and after the administration of pradofloxacin.
Table 1. Bartonella spp. ELISA titers and PCR assay results in experimentally inoculated cats before and after the administration of pradofloxacin.
Week−6−30 a246810 b11121314
Cat 1204881922048204810242048204810242048204810241024
Cat 2256204810241024512512512512256256128128
Cat 3645125125125125121024512512128128256
Cat 4256512128640064064000
Cat 551251212812812825625625651210245121024
Cat 612812864000646464000
Cat 716,3842048512256512102410245121024256128512
Cat 84096409610245122561281024256256128128128
The cats were inoculated with Bartonella henselae IV, 12 weeks prior to entering this study. Samples with the titers in bold were also positive for B. henselae DNA by PCR assay. a Pradofloxacin administered at 7.5 mg/kg, PO, twice daily for 28 days. b Methylprednisolone acetate administered at 5 mg/kg, IM, once.
Table 2. Mean and standard deviation () results of select complete blood cell count findings in 8 cats with Bartonella henselae infection.
Table 2. Mean and standard deviation () results of select complete blood cell count findings in 8 cats with Bartonella henselae infection.
WeekHematocrit Platelet #/µLNeutrophil #/µLLymphocyte #/µL
038.88 (3.18)521.1 (145.4)7.56 (2.08)5.8 (1.07)
240.5 (4.5)538.25 (189.2)5.3 (1.85)5.83(1.62)
440.25 (3.26)469 (198.9)4.37 (1.4)5.93 (2.12)
839.9 (3)473.88 (110.1)4.975 (1.5)4.55 (1.0)
1240.1 (3.1)380.1 (90.1)10.28 (1.9)1.25 (0.2)
Normal28 to 43200 to 5002 to 71.5 to 6
# = number × 103.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lappin, M.R.; Fitzgerald, R. Pradofloxacin for Treatment of Bartonella henselae in Experimentally Inoculated Cats. Pathogens 2024, 13, 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13040336

AMA Style

Lappin MR, Fitzgerald R. Pradofloxacin for Treatment of Bartonella henselae in Experimentally Inoculated Cats. Pathogens. 2024; 13(4):336. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13040336

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lappin, Michael R., and Ronan Fitzgerald. 2024. "Pradofloxacin for Treatment of Bartonella henselae in Experimentally Inoculated Cats" Pathogens 13, no. 4: 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13040336

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop