Next Article in Journal
Chirality on Amorphous High-Tg Polymeric Nanofilms: Optical Activity Amplification by Thermal Annealing
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of PLA Film Incorporated with ZnO Nanoparticle on the Quality Attributes of Fresh-Cut Apple
Previous Article in Special Issue
Citrus Pectin-Derived Carbon Microspheres with Superior Adsorption Ability for Methylene Blue
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

N-Doped TiO2-Coated Ceramic Membrane for Carbamazepine Degradation in Different Water Qualities

1
The Water Research Center, School of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
2
Department of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, I-67100 L’Aquila, Italy
3
The Surface Analysis Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK
4
School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2017, 7(8), 206; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7080206
Submission received: 31 May 2017 / Revised: 21 July 2017 / Accepted: 28 July 2017 / Published: 31 July 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials for Water Treatment)

Abstract

:
The photocatalytic degradation of the model pollutant carbamazepine (CBZ) was investigated under simulated solar irradiation with an N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 photocatalytic membrane, using different water types. The photocatalytic membrane combines photocatalysis and membrane filtration in a single step. The impact of each individual constituent such as acidity, alkalinity, dissolved organic matter (DOM), divalent cations (Mg2+ and Ca2+), and Cl on the degradation of CBZ was examined. CBZ in water was efficiently degraded by an N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 membrane. However, elements added to the water, which simulate the constituents of natural water, had an impact on the CBZ degradation. Water alkalinity inhibited CBZ degradation mostly due to increase in pH while radical scavenging by carbonate was more dominant at higher values (>200 mg/L as CaCO3). A negative effect of Ca2+ addition on photocatalytic degradation was found only in combination with phosphate buffer, probably caused by deposition of CaHPO4 or CaHPO4·2H2O on the catalyst surface. The presence of Cl and Mg2+ ions had no effect on CBZ degradation. DOM significantly inhibited CBZ degradation for all tested background organic compounds. The photocatalytic activity of N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 membranes gradually decreased after continuous use; however, it was successfully regenerated by 0.1% HCl chemical cleaning. Nevertheless, dissolution of metals like Al and Ti should be monitored following acid cleaning.

1. Introduction

Public health concerns, increased worldwide environmental awareness and improved analytical and technological capabilities are the main driving forces in improving water quality. The use of solar irradiation to directly convert photons into photochemical energy is considered a sustainable approach to deliver water disinfection efficiently and economically [1]. The semiconductors activated by sunlight irradiation (i.e., photocatalysis), present an attractive technology for disinfection and pollutant degradation in water [2,3]. Photocatalysis can be implemented for numerous applications and products as self-cleaning surfaces, systems for treatment of air and water, sterilization, and hydrogen production [4].
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is one of the most commonly studied nano photocatalysts for removing/breaking-down contaminants (e.g., pharmaceuticals, pesticides, antibiotics, endocrine-disrupting compounds) in water [3]. The TiO2 based advanced oxidation process (AOP), is used for oxidation of a broad range of contaminants by the very reactive, short-lived and non-selective hydroxyl radicals. Among the various configurations for photocatalytic reactors (e.g., packed bed, fluidized bed, falling film, nanotube Array-Based Reactor), photocatalytic membrane reactors (PMR) can benefit from combined membrane filtration and photocatalysis in a single step. In the thin-film PMR hybrid configuration (as opposed to PMR with catalyst suspended), the catalyst is coated on or within the membrane pore matrix, and stimulated by direct exposure to light [5,6]. When designing a photocatalytic reactor for water treatment, water composition must be considered among the operational parameters to ensure treatment efficiency and corresponding optimization. The chemical composition of different water types can vary significantly and therefore it is crucial to understand the impact of the dominant species on the photocatalytic process. The presence of anions (e.g., bicarbonate and chloride), cations (e.g., calcium, magnesium), and natural organic matter (NOM) can enhance or suppress the photocatalytic efficiency through mechanisms such as competition for surface adsorption or for hydroxyl radicals and light screening by organic substances [2]. Conflicting results have been reported by various researchers on the effect of ions and NOM on the photocatalytic activity, mainly due to the differences in experimental system, experimental design, and conditions [7,8]. For example, carbonate/bicarbonate anions react with the hydroxyl radical to transform to species that are selective and thus less desirable than the corresponding anion radicals. However, at high concentrations these radicals may also prove significant in the photocatalytic reaction due to their stability and longer lifetime [9]. Another route to inhibit the photocatalytic process is the adsorption of ions at the active sites, which depends on the species concentration as well as type, solution pH, and the isoelectric point (IEP) of the catalyst. Natural organic matter (NOM) in water can enhance the photocatalytic reaction through its photosensitization properties [10] or inhibit by scavenging of surface generated hydroxyl radicals [11].
This study uses α-Al2O3 microfiltration (MF) membranes as a substrate for highly efficient N-doped TiO2 coating activated by UV-visible light. The characterization and impact of physical parameters as pore size, wavelengths, flow-rate, and permeability of the N-doped TiO2-coated membrane reactor have been reported by Horovitz et al. [12]. Membrane porous structure enabled improved mass transfer of reactants to the catalytic surface as a consequence of in-pore convection and enhanced diffusion. The modification of the nanomaterial by nitrogen facilitated more efficient utilization of solar irradiation. From a practical standpoint of process operation of fixed-film PMR on-site, it is vital to consider factors like water quality, membrane regeneration, and membrane fouling.
The goal of this study was to demonstrate the impact of typical parameters in water quality on the degradation efficacy of the organic micro-pollutant model compound, carbamazepine (CBZ), using N-doped TiO2 coated MF membrane. The effect of water quality parameters on the photocatalytic activity (PCA) were examined by discrete addition of selected dissolved species present in the water at various concentrations. Moreover, for practical applications, regeneration of the photocatalytic membrane was investigated by subjecting the membranes to standard membrane chemical cleaning after continuous use.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Effect of Water pH

Figure 1 illustrates the efficiency of N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 membranes towards degradation of 1 mg/L CBZ, at various pH ranges (6–7, and 8.5) relevant to natural water and in natural surface water sampled from Lake Kinneret (Sea of Galilee, Israel). The water pH was adjusted by 1 mM phosphate buffer saline (PBS) to obtain a pH range between 6 and 7, and by 2 mM borate buffer saline (BBS) to obtain a pH value of 8.5. The pH of Lake Kinneret water was measured to be 8.5 and the most significant measured water quality parameters were: alkalinity (84 mg/L as CaCO3), hardness (280 mg/L as CaCO3), chlorides (310 mg/L Cl), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC, 4 mg/L). Photocatalytic activity was in the following order: pH = 7 > pH = 8.5 = pH = 6 > Lake Kinneret. CBZ degradation was significantly inhibited in Lake Kinneret water as opposed to buffered deionized water (DI) water at the same pH (8.5), with ~44% decrease in reaction rate. These results were expected according to the inhibiting effect found in the literature for water containing alkalinity, NOM, and other species [13]. Several water dissolved species are examined for their impact on the photocatalytic process in the following sections. The differences in CBZ removal at pH 6 and 8.5 are not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
The ionization state of the photocatalytic surface (i.e., N-doped TiO2 film) is protonated under acidic conditions and deprotonated under alkaline conditions. The isoelectric point (IEP), where the total negative and positive charge on the surface is zero, of TiO2 nano-particles (Degussa P25) is at pH ~ 6.3 [14] while the IEP of pure α-Al2O3 is at 8.75–9.1 [15]. Nevertheless, N-doped TiO2 surface coverage on Al2O3 membrane was reported in our previous study to be ~80%, therefore the TiO2 coating determines the surface charge [12]. Zhou et al. reported IEPs of 6.1 and 4.0 for α-Al2O3 and TiO2-modified α-Al2O3 membranes, respectively [16]. Similar values were found by Zhang et al. for Al2O3-TiO2 composite membranes, with IEPs ranging from 6.1 to 4.1, with increase in TiO2 content. Therefore, it can be assumed that N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 will be mostly negatively charged at pH > 6 [17].
Water pH can affect the electrostatic interaction between the catalyst and organic molecules. For instance, TiO2-mediated photocatalytic degradation of 2-chlorophenol decreased with increasing pH values [18,19]. At pH below the IEP, chlorophenols and their transformation products are generally negatively and neutrally charged, while the surface of TiO2 is net positively charged, and can result in adsorption of chlorophenols and enhance photocatalytic degradation. However, in other studies, chlorophenols were insignificantly adsorbed onto TiO2 due to competition with water for adsorption sites and therefore, alkaline conditions improved photocatalytic efficiency for degradation of chlorophenols [20,21].
At low pH values, the positive holes are the main oxidation species, and at neutral or high pH hydroxyl radicals (OH·) are the dominant species. Consequently, as the pH level rises more available hydroxyl ions on the catalyst surface result in formation of additional OH· [3,22,23,24]. Avisar et al. found that the PCA of CBZ was enhanced at high pH using N-doped TiO2 photo-catalytic thin films on glass surfaces [2]. Conversely, Achilleos et al. found that TiO2 photocatalytic degradation of CBZ was the highest at ambient pH (~5.9) and reduced at acidic or alkaline conditions (pH 3–10) with a more pronounced reduction under alkaline conditions [25]. Vogna et al., however, showed that the degradation of CBZ, under UV/H2O2, was not affected by varying the pH solution between values ranging from of 2 to 8 [26]. As CBZ is neutral at a wide pH range (see Table 5), the generation of oxidative species on the photocatalytic surface is probably a result of pH change via surface charge. The difficulties in interpretation of the CBZ rate constant at various pH values may be attributed to complexity in quantifying the zeta potential for coated porous membrane and in determining the interactions between the substrate (α-Al2O3 membrane coated with N-doped TiO2) and CBZ. Nevertheless, even though the porous membrane surface is negatively charged while CBZ is neutral, slightly alkaline or acidic pH values reduced the rate constant in comparison to neutral pH.
Control experiments showed negligible effect of irradiation on CBZ degradation (i.e., using uncoated Al2O3 membranes) after 120 min exposure (<1%, see inset in Figure 1). In addition, N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 membrane was found to be superior to TiO2-coated Al2O3 membrane towards CBZ photocatalytic degradation. Detailed discussion on the advantage of N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 compared to unmodified TiO2-coated Al2O3 can be found in our previous work by Horovitz et al. [12].

2.2. Water Hardness

The effect of water hardness (i.e., addition of Ca2+ and Mg2+ in solution) on PCA of N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 membrane is presented in Figure 2 and was examined under the following conditions:
  • Addition of 120 mg/L Ca2+ to DI water spiked by 1 mg/L CBZ and pH = 7 adjusted by 1 mM PBS.
  • Addition of 120 mg/L Ca2+ to DI water spiked by 1 mg/L CBZ and pH = 8.5 adjusted by 2 mM BBS. Phosphate buffer could not be used in this case due to the precipitation of CaPO4.
  • Addition of 120 mg/L Mg2+ to DI water spiked by 1 mg/L CBZ and pH = 8.5 adjusted by 2 mM BBS. Borate buffer was used to create identical conditions to those in the experiment with calcium.
Without divalent cations (Mg2+ and Ca2+), the lower reaction rate constants at alkaline pH compared to neutral pH are presented in Section 2.1. At pH = 7, addition of Ca2+ resulted in ~30% decrease in reaction rate constant, while at pH 8.5, addition of divalent cations did not impact CBZ rate constants, compared to the control at the respective pH. Table 1 shows Ca2+ and Mg2+ concentrations measured before and after the photocatalytic degradation experiments, at pH 7 and 8.5. At pH 7 and 8.5, a decrease in ~20% Ca2+ concentration was observed after the experiments were completed; while at pH = 8.5, no significant change was detected in Mg2+ concentration. Calcium disappearance may indicate adsorption onto the negatively charged membrane surface due to electrostatic forces. Interestingly, accumulation of Ca2+ on the catalytic surface affected CBZ degradation only at pH 7 (adjusted by phosphate buffer). The steep decline in reaction rate constant in the presence of Ca2+ at neutral pH may be related to the presence of PBS. Hydrated phosphate ions are attracted to the hydrated TiO2 surface by hydrogen bridges and when adsorbed at the catalyst surface can serve as mediators for adsorption of Ca2+ [27,28,29]. To examine the presence of precipitation formed, the sample was exposed to a solution containing CaSO4·2H2O (120 mg/L Ca2+) and 1 mM phosphate buffer (pH = 7 adjusted using NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4) in DI water. The solution was recirculated through the membrane inside the filtration cell at a flow rate of 0.5 L/h, with continuous irradiation for 2 h. Afterwards, the sample was removed and packed in a glass container without rinsing with DI water or drying. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis presented the following results, as shown in Figure 3: Calcium and phosphorous were found to be present with very similar concentrations, the Ca/P ratio being 1.06. The binding energy of the Ca 2p and P 2p peaks were 347.6 eV and 133.8 eV respectively. These peak positions correspond to calcium phosphate and show excellent agreement with the values given by Chusuei et al. [29]. The exact phase of calcium phosphate cannot be distinguished from the XPS core level spectra [29], but the Ca/P ratio of 1.06 would suggest di-calcium phosphate (CaHPO4 or CaHPO4·2H2O) rather than tri-calcium phosphate (Ca3(PO4)2). Therefore, a much denser layer of CaHPO4 or CaHPO4·2H2O precipitate as opposed to calcium sorption alone may be detrimental to photocatalytic active sites.
An additional experiment performed at pH 7 in the presence of Ca2+ but in the absence of phosphate buffer (i.e., pH adjusted by titration with NaOH/HCl) (data not shown), strengthened the hypothesis regarding the interaction between phosphate and Ca2+. No inhibiting effect on reaction rate was found at these conditions (without phosphate addition); however, the pH was not stable throughout the experiment (i.e., H+ generation by OH· radical production from water and radical attack on CBZ).
Magnesium and calcium are found naturally in water and are the main source of water hardness. These ions may inhibit pollutant degradation during photocatalysis [30,31]. Gupta et al. reported that Ca2+ (up to 200 mg/L) inhibited (~20%, at pH 6.4) the photocatalytic degradation of a mixture of methyl red (anionic) and crystal violet (cationic) dyes via Ag-doped TiO2 [32]. Furthermore, crystal violet, did not color the photocatalyst during photocatalysis. Thus, Ca2+ interferes with dye adsorption to the surface of the catalyst, in a way that inhibits the degradation process. Shirazi et al. found that Mg2+ and Ca2+ reduced CBZ degradation using TiO2/UV (at pH 7) by 7% and 20%, respectively [33]. Similarly Kashif and Ouyang, demonstrated a significant decrease in phenol degradation using TiO2/UV in the presence of Mg2+ and Ca2+ (at pH 5) [34]. The authors attributed this to the formation of phenol complexes that are difficult to degrade compared to phenol. Another study, however, showed that Mg2+ addition had negligible effects on glyphosphate degradation by TiO2 suspension [24].
In another study, Li et al. showed that the presence of Ca2+ or Mg2+ (at pH 7) greatly enhanced humic acid (HA) photocatalytic oxidation rate in a TiO2 suspension [35]. More than 2.5 h was needed to remove >90% of HA from solution without addition of Ca2+ or Mg2+, compared to less than 1 h with cation addition. At neutral pH, the catalyst and humic acid are both negatively charged, thus Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions may serve to neutralize the catalyst and the HA charges, reducing the repulsion between the two species. Additionally, Selvam et al. demonstrated that addition of Mg2+ (200 mg/L, pH = 4) enhanced 4-fluorophenol degradation by TiO2 suspension due to charge separation increase by Mg2+ conversion to Mg+, by accepting the electron from the conduction band [36]. To conclude, the current study showed that both the hardness cations in water (Ca2+ or Mg2+) and the pH are critical parameters to determine the CBZ degradation efficacy via PMR.

2.3. Effect of Dissolved Organic Matter (DOM)

The PCA of CBZ by N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 membrane was examined with the addition of DOM. Suwannee River Natural Organic Matter (SRNOM, 4 and 8 mg/L), Suwannee River Humic Acid (SRHA) (8 mg/L) and Suwannee River Fulvic Acid (SRFA) (8 mg/L), were separately added to buffered DI water spiked with 1 mg/L CBZ. The pH was adjusted to 7 by 1 mM PBS. The percentage decrease in reaction rate constant for each case is summarized in Table 2.
Increase in SRNOM concentration (4 to 8 mg/L) resulted in decrease in reaction rate constant (11% to 24%, respectively). Furthermore, a ~40% decrease in reaction rate constant was obtained with SRHA and SRFA. As the light screening effect of water absorbance in the presence of DOM was insignificant (<<1% decrease in incident irradiance for wavelength range between 256–500 nm), perhaps the detrimental effect of aromatic DOM, is due to competition of the various DOMs for OH· radicals.
In general, the presence of background DOM can enhance or inhibit photo-degradation, depending on the experimental conditions. Humic substances (HS) readily absorb light, inducing formation of reactive oxygen species as OH·, singlet oxygen, hydrogen peroxide, peroxy radicals, and solvated electrons. For example, Minero et al. studied the photochemical degradation of organophosphorus pesticides in the presence of HS that served as sensitizers or precursors for generation of photo-reactants. As a result, the photolysis of atrazine increased three fold under solar irradiation (with 10 ppm organic carbon) [37]. Okamura and Sugiyama demonstrated that natural HS from river waters and natural soils accelerated irgarol UVA photodegradation [38]. Cid et al. found an increase in TiO2/UV-mediated reduction of Cr (VI) to Cr (III) in the presence of HA, due to direct oxidation of HA by positive holes on the surface of TiO2, decreasing electron-hole recombination and increasing the electrons available for reduction of chromium [39].
On the other hand, organic matter can reduce the photodegradation rate. Selli et al. [40] showed a decrease in photocatalytic degradation (by 18% and 30%) of tetrachloroethene by TiO2 in the presence of HA (5 and 10 mg/L, respectively). The aromatic nature of humic acids (i.e., electron-rich molecules) is responsible for their tendency to act as photosensitizers. Upon excitation, photosensitizer at the semiconductor surface may inject an electron into the catalysts conduction band, initiating photocatalytic degradation [41]. Nienow et al. reported a greater inhibition effect in the presence of SRHA compared to SRFA on the degradation of lindane by UV/H2O2 [42]. Autin et al. found that the presence of organic compounds in the solution affected the OH· scavenging rate as a function of concentration and nature of the compounds. Therefore, an increase of the UV dose is required for metaldehyde degradation via UV/H2O2 or UV/TiO2 to overcome the scavenging effect [43].

2.4. Effect of Chloride

The PCA of CBZ by N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 membrane was examined at different chloride concentrations (100, 250, and 500 mg/L Cl). Chloride was added from a stock solution of sodium chloride (NaCl) to a buffered DI water containing 1 mg/L CBZ. As shown in Table 3, negligible effect of increasing chloride concentrations on the degradation rate constant of CBZ was observed.
Although Cl addition to the treated solution did not result in either a positive or negative effect on CBZ photocatalytic oxidation, both effects were reported in the literature. Makita and Harata investigated the influence of Cl in seawater on photocatalytic decolorization of rhodamine B dye [44]. The maximum decolorization rate was found at moderate Cl concentration (2.0 wt %), presumably promoted by efficient production of Cl and OH· in addition to reduction in electron-hole recombination. Similarly, Yuan et al. found that Cl concentration between 0–200 mM enhanced the decolorization of azo dye, however further addition of Cl significantly decreased the reaction rate [45].
Chloride may react with the positive holes on the photocatalytic surface to produce chloride radicals (Equation (1)). The scavenging of OH· by Cl, according to Equation (2), is initiated only at acidic water pH due to the transformation of ClOH· into Cl· which is reversible [46,47].
Cl + h + Cl
Cl + OH · ClOH · + H + Cl · + H 2 O
A number of studies demonstrated the inhibiting effect of Cl on photocatalytic processes. Piscopo et al. investigated the influence of pH (5–6), and chloride ([Cl] < 0.02 mol/L) on the degradation of benzamine by a suspension of TiO2 [48]. The predominant species at the experimental pH was suggested as Ti(OH2)+, thus Cl competing with benzamine for active sites on the catalyst decreased benzamine degradation. Similarly, Zhang et al., showed that competition of Cl for TiO2 active sites led to lower efficiency in photocatalytic reactions [17]. Okamoto et al. explained the inhibiting effect of Cl by its competition with oxygen for electrons, which reduces superoxide radicals formation therefore blocking the chain reaction for hydroxyl radical production [49].

2.5. Effect of Alkalinity

Alkalinity is defined as the capability of water to neutralize acids, and acts as a buffer to maintain a steady pH in natural water systems. Alkalinity is mostly comprised of bicarbonate (HCO3), carbonate (CO32−) and hydroxide (OH). These ions may enter ground and surface water as the water flows over rocks, soils, and plants. Bicarbonate as well as carbonate anions deactivate OH· according to Equations (3) and (4) [50].
HCO 3 + HO · H 2 O + C O 3 ·
CO 3 2 + HO · H O + C O 3 ·
The effect of water alkalinity on PCA of CBZ by N-doped TiO2-coated membranes in the presence of different bicarbonate concentrations (50, 100, 200, and 300 mg/L as CaCO3) is presented in Figure 4. Stock solution of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) was used to increase water alkalinity. The pH value was naturally sustained within 7 < pH < 8.5 by bicarbonate.
The degradation rate of CBZ was negatively affected only at moderate alkalinity concentrations of 100 mg/L as CaCO3 (122 mg/L HCO3), with a decrease of 14% in reaction rate constant. At 200 mg/L as CaCO3 the reaction rate decreased drastically by 34%, while higher concentration of bicarbonate showed a minor additional decrease. Two simultaneous effects may occur: (1) bicarbonate scavenging effect on hydroxyl radicals and (2) increasing concentration of bicarbonate and consequently increasing carbonate radical anions which can contribute to CBZ degradation. Measurements of alkalinity concentration before and after the photocatalytic reaction showed a decrease of 15–25 mg/L as CaCO3 from initial concentration for all the concentrations examined, suggesting bicarbonate ions participate in the reaction.
As was shown in Section 2.1, an increase in pH value from neutral to 8.5 resulted in a decrease of ~25% in the CBZ degradation rate constant. As alkalinity is the cause of pH increase, the negative effect of bicarbonate may be partially ascribed to the change in pH rather than hydroxyl radical scavenging alone. Similarly, Pelaez et al., demonstrated that the addition of 50 mg/L Na2CO3 (pH = 10.3) inhibited microcystin-LR (MC-LR) degradation under visible light-activated TiO2 photocatalyst [51]. Phosphate buffer was used to reduce solution pH and allow differentiating between the negative contribution of alkaline pH and the presence of HCO3/CO32−. No significant change in initial degradation rate of MC-LR was found at modified pH of 7.1. However, when increasing the Na2CO3 concentration to 150 mg/L in buffered solution, a reduction of 80% in the initial reaction rate was obtained compared to a concentration of 50 mg/L. Consequently, although carbonate and bicarbonate are scavengers of radicals, another phenomenon may occur by increasing the negative charge on the catalyst surface, when pH > PZC, thus impacting the degradation rate by inhibiting surface reactions. The equilibrium between bicarbonate and carbonate is pH dependent: the predominant ion at neutral water pH is bicarbonate, while at pH > 10 carbonate is the main ion [52]. Lair et al. [53] reported that carbonate inhibited both adsorption on TiO2 and the photocatalytic degradation rate of naphthalene. The inhibiting effect of both carbonate and bicarbonate ions was due to the scavenging of OH·. However, bicarbonate was found to scavenge 50-times less OH· than carbonate. Hence bicarbonate, which is common in natural waters (pH 6.5–8.5), is less inhibiting than other parameters (e.g., pH, NOM) at low concentrations.
In contrast, Hu et al. demonstrated that an increase in concentration of bicarbonate (over 500 mg/L NaHCO3, pH 9) led to an increase in TiO2-mediated degradation of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) [54]. The explanation relied on the significantly higher concentration of HCO3 and CO32− compared to SMX; therefore, interacting more strongly with the catalyst and decreasing electron-hole recombination. In addition, as CO3· are more stable with longer lifetime than OH·, these radicals are not limited to TiO2 surface reactions only and may diffuse and react in the bulk solution. However, carbonate radicals have a less positive oxidation potential compared to hydroxyl radicals and are highly selective to the drug target, and this may be significant for the differentiation between degradation kinetics of SMX compared to CBZ in photocatalysis.

2.6. Summary of Water Quality Results

The range of values tested for alkalinity, chlorides, pH levels, and organic matter represent the values typical of natural water as reviewed in the literature. The pH values of natural water (ground or surface water) typically vary between 6 to 8.5 [55], while alkalinity varies between 200–300 mg/L as CaCO3 [56]. NOM concentrations in surface and ground water are in the range of 2–8 mg C/L, depending on the type of soil or substrate [57]. The range of chlorides examined in this study were in accordance with the maximum contaminant level for chloride in drinking water [58]. A maximum concentration of 120 mg/L calcium was used corresponding to a total hardness of 300 mg/L as CaCO3. The upper range of hardness values was chosen to correspond to the total hardness value found for Lake Kinneret (Sea of Galilee, Israel) [59]. Magnesium (Mg2+), present also in natural water and especially significant in groundwater, was examined at an equivalent concentration to Ca2+ for comparison between the divalent cations.
A summary of all the water quality parameters examined and their impact on the photocatalytic degradation reaction rate, is presented in Table 4.
A previous study showed six main by-product compounds identified following photocatalytic degradation for CBZ using N-doped TiO2 after prolonged irradiation [60]. The identified compounds revealed two pathways to CBZ degradation: hydroxylation of CBZ at the 10 position following formation of 10,11-epoxycarbamazepine (V) or OH· attack on the aromatic ring leading to hydroxylated derivatives (III, IV) (i.e., OH· addition) [61,62]. However, these pathways were identified at extended irradiation times, and pathways for CBZ degradation could differ at short irradiation times and for different water chemistries, as in the current study.

2.7. Membrane Regeneration by Chemical Cleaning

Photocatalytic membranes may be subjected to a reduction in PCA due to saturation of active sites by organic and inorganic substances in water. Although photocatalytic surfaces have a potential self-cleaning ability, removing organics adsorbed to the catalyst by exposing the coated surface to prolonged irradiation can be impractical. Moreover, self-cleaning will not be effective for overcoming the inorganic salt precipitation on the catalytic surface.
Regeneration in activity of N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 membranes was examined by subjecting the membranes to chemical cleaning after continuous use. Three typical cleaning agents were examined: citric acid (2%), HCl (0.1%) as an inorganic foulant cleaning agents and NaOH (0.1%) as an organic foulant cleaning agent. To determine whether the cleaning agents chosen had a detrimental effect on photocatalytic coating, newly coated photocatalytic membranes were tested for initial PCA. Afterwards, each membrane was soaked in a different cleaning solution for 2 h, following flushing with DI water to remove cleaning agent residuals and finally tested for PCA. From the results presented in Figure 5 no detrimental effect on PCA was observed for 0.1% w/w HCl and 0.1% w/w NaOH. However, an inconsistent trend was observed for membranes cleaned by 2% w/w citric acid with a reduction in PCA in some cases that can perhaps be attributed to the organic nature of the acid, as citric acid can adsorb to the photocatalytic surface and subsequently reduce PCA. Membranes cleaned by 0.1% w/w HCl showed a significant increase in PCA with up to 30% increase in reaction rate constant. This increase can be due to removal of contaminants either from the deposition procedure or from the membrane manufacturing process. Membranes treated with 0.1% w/w NaOH showed no change in their initial PCA.
Regeneration of the N-doped TiO2-coated membranes was evaluated after 8 h of continuous use by immersing the used membranes in the cleaning agents following thorough rinsing with DI water and finally a PCA test. Figure 6 presents the percentage increase or decrease in reaction rate constant, k, for uncleaned and cleaned used membranes. The uncleaned membrane showed a gradual decrease in PCA with continuous use (up to 30% after 8 h continuous operation). The cleaned membranes represent individual membranes cleaned after 8 h operation. Out of the five membranes cleaned by citric acid three showed a decrease of 10–24% in PCA, confirming the results on new (unused) membranes. Membranes cleaned by 0.1% NaOH did not regenerate and remained at ~30% lower PCA with the exception of one membrane. All membranes were successfully regenerated by 0.1% HCl with an increase in PCA ranging between 5–45%. Although sodium hydroxide did not show regeneration of PCA in laboratory controlled experiments, it can still prove efficient in organic fouling removal under real conditions.
Little literature can be found on catalyst regeneration and reuse by chemical cleaning. Reduction in PCA with long-term use was reported by Rao et al. and attributed to adsorption of reactants and by products to the catalyst. Chemical cleaning by hypochlorite after biological fouling successfully regenerated the immobilized TiO2 to its initial efficiency [63]. Nakano et al. showed a decrease in porous TiO2/SiO2 catalyst activity gradually with time, when used for dinitrophenol degradation in a fixed bed reactor under solar light [64]. They attributed the decrease in activity to fouling by adhesion of metals to the catalytic surface due to the change in the catalyst color from white to brown. The regeneration of the PCA was examined by inserting the fouled catalyst in citric acid, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, and deionized water for one week. The catalytic activity after regeneration showed no recovery of the catalyst for samples dipped in DI water. However, all acids showed a significant PCA recovery while hydrochloric acid cleaning was found the most efficient with ~90% recovery. Miranda-García et al. evaluated four different strategies for regeneration of TiO2-coated glass spheres, used for photocatalytic degradation of 15 organic contaminants [65]. Fouling of the catalyst was observed after consecutive treatment cycles, requiring longer reaction time. The regeneration treatments employed were H2O2/UV, NaOH, NH4OH, and calcination (at 400 °C). Effective regeneration of PCA was achieved after treating with H2O2/UV or calcination while NaOH was found to partially remove the catalyst layer.
The Al2O3 membranes purchased from the manufacturer did not fit the experimental flow-cell dimensions, thus they were pre-cut in a local workshop prior to applying the photocatalytic coating; therefore, exposing the periphery. Membrane integrity after cleaning was determined by ICP-OES analysis. Membranes were first immersed in DI water followed by soaking in 0.1% w/w HCl solution for 2 and 12 h. The acidic environment after 2 and 12 h resulted in dissolution of ~3 mg/L Al and ~7 mg/L Al, respectively. These results lead to the conclusion that future research on cleaning conditions is required. After confirming the photocatalytic membrane’s regeneration by HCl, the optimization should consider three aspects: cleaning duration (shorter exposure time), acid concentration (reducing concentration), acid type and pre-cutting membranes by the manufacturer rather than at a local workshop.

2.8. Surface Analysis

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of the N-doped TiO2 coated 800 nm pore size alumina membrane are shown in Figure 7. A lower magnification micrograph is given in Figure 7a and a higher magnification image shown in Figure 7b. It can be seen from the SEM images, that the membrane is comprised of large particles, decorated with smaller particulates, typically in the range of 1 to 5 µm in diameter. The N-doped TiO2 coating did not exhibit a morphology that enabled it to be clearly identified from the SEM images. However, the GAXRD diffractogram given in Figure 7d, clearly shows the presence of the nanocrystalline anatase based coating on the α-alumina membrane. The average grain size of the coating was calculated to be 17 nm (from the (200) reflection at 2θ = 48.05°).
XPS spectra were recorded from several coated membranes, deposited with nominally the same sol-gel process. The nitrogen concentration in the N-doped TiO2 coating varied between 0.2 and 0.4 at%. A typical peak fitted N 1s spectrum is shown in Figure 7c. The spectrum was fitted with four components, labelled N 1s1 to N 1s4. The low intensity of the N 1s peak limits the reliability of the peak fit. Nevertheless, some general comments can be made. The strongest component, N 1s3 at around 400 eV component occurs on many surfaces due to the presence of N-containing organic contamination [66] but a peak at a similar binding energy was attributed to interstitial NO species in the bulk [67].The N 1s4 component with a binding energy between 401.5–402.0 eV is associated with surface contamination [66]. The two lower energy peaks, N 1s1 and N 1s2, occur at binding energies between 397.5 and 399.0 eV. Peaks with such binding energies are generally ascribed to the presence of interstitial N species [68,69,70]. There is no N peak at a binding energy at around 396 eV, attributable to substitutional N [66]. Hence, in these N-doped TiO2 coatings, the N is present as interstitial rather than substitutional species.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Carbamazepine as a Model Pollutant

Carbamazepine, an antiepileptic drug, is one of the most frequently detected compounds in the aquatic environment owing to its resistance to biodegradation [62,71]. Carbamazepine is hydrophobic, a neutrally charged drug, relatively polar and does not adsorb readily to soils and sediments [72]. The persistence of CBZ in the environment led to its use as a marker contaminant in groundwater [73]. The physical and chemical data of CBZ are shown in Table 5:

3.2. Chemicals and Reagents

A stock solution of carbamazepine (>99% purity, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was prepared by dissolving in deionized (DI) water (Direct-Q3 UV system, Millipore-France, Molsheim, France) at a concentration of 50 mg/L. Stock solutions of A—0.1 M sodium phosphate monobasic and B—0.1 M sodium phosphate dibasic from Sigma Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany) were used for the preparation of a pH 6 (A:B = 87.12:12.3 respectively, volumetric ratio) and 7 (A:B = 39:61 respectively, volumetric ratio) buffers at concentration of 1 mM at room temperature. Stock solutions of 225 mL boric acid (50 mM)—Stock A and 7.5 mL sodium tetra-borate (50 mM)—Stock B from Sigma Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany) were used to form 2 mM borate buffer at pH = 8.5.
Alkalinity of the water was achieved by using NaHCO3 (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany). Chloride was added by dissolved NaCl (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany). Calcium was added by dissolved CaSO4·2H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany). Magnesium was added by dissolved MgSO4 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MN, USA). Suwannee River natural organic matter (SRNOM), Suwannee River Humic Acid (SRHA) and Suwannee River Fulvic Acid (SRFA) (International Humic Substances Society-IHSS, St. Paul, MN, USA) were used, individually, to simulate dissolved organic matter. The listed above DOMs were dissolved in DI water to a concentration of 500 mg/L at pH 10 (adjusted by NaOH) following filtration through a 0.45 μm cellulose acetate filter, and used as stock solutions for the experiments.
Membrane regeneration experiments were conducted using citric acid (Gadot Biochemical Industries Ltd., Haifa Bay, Israel), hydrochloric acid 32% (Bio Lab Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel) and sodium hydroxide (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, analytical grade).

3.3. Deposition Technique

N-doped TiO2 coating was deposited by the sol-gel method as previously described [12], onto a commercial flat α-Al2O3 MF membrane with a nominal pore size of 800 nm (Nanostone Water, formerly KSM Water GmbH, Halberstadt, Germany). The effective filtration area of the membrane is 2.2 × 4.2 cm2, and the membrane thickness is 6.6 mm. In brief, the sol solution composed of isopropanol, tetrabutyl orthotitanate, triethanolamine, and ammonium hydroxide was applied by a drop-coating (0.12 mL cm−2 volume to membrane area), followed by annealing at 450 °C for 1 h.

3.4. Photocatalytic Activity of N-Doped TiO2-Coated Al2O3 Membrane

The PCA experiments were conducted using a custom-made filtration cell, enclosing the coated membrane. A detailed description and schematic drawing of the system set-up can be found in our previous work [12,77]. In brief, 200 mL of feed solution containing CBZ (DI water, 1 mg/L, with/without additives) was recirculated through the pressurized filtration cell for 30 min for equilibration, without irradiation. Afterwards, the feed solution was recirculated through, at a flow rate of 0.5 L/h, with continuous solar simulated irradiation for 2 h. The system was operated in a dead-end filtration mode. A 300 W ozone-free Xe lamp solar simulator (Newport, RI, USA) was used to achieve a consistent irradiation intensity of ~770 W/m2 (integrated between 280–700 nm wavelengths) throughout the experiments. Carbamazepine was detected and quantified by High Performance Liquid Chromatography following a method reported by Horovitz et al. [12]. The degradation rate of CBZ was fitted with the Langmuir-Hinshelwood (L-H) kinetics model [13,72], which was simplified to an apparent first order equation due to the low pollutant concentration (1 mg/L) as follows:
k = l n ( C t C o ) / t
where C0 is the initial CBZ concentration after equilibration in the dark and Ct is the concentration after t minutes of irradiation (mg/L). k is the apparent reaction rate constant (min−1) for CBZ.

3.5. Water Analysis

Concentrations of chloride, alkalinity, and total hardness were measured by titration (HACH digital titrator, model 16,900, Loveland, CO, USA), methods 8206, 8203, and 8213, respectively. The dissolved organic carbon (DOC) fraction was determined according to a method reported by Avisar et al. [2]. The obtained DOC level was ~50% of the SRNOM concentration used.

3.6. Surface Characterization

The SEM micrographs were acquired with a Quanta FEG 200 microscope by FEI, operating in a high vacuum environment with a beam voltage of 20 keV. Glancing angle X-ray diffraction (GAXRD) data was recorded using a Panalytical X’Pert diffractometer employing a glancing angle attachment at an incident angle of 1°. The X-ray source was Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å, 40 mA, 45 kV) and the diffractograms were recorded over a 2Θ range of 10–65°. The average grain size was calculated using the Scherrer equation:
D = k λ β c o s θ
where D is the average grain size, k is the shape factor (a constant, given a value of 0.9), λ is the X-ray wavelength, β is the full width half maximum of the XRD peak and θ is the peak Bragg angle. It was assumed that peak broadening was due to grain size effects only.
XPS analysis was carried out using a Thetaprobe instrument (Thermo Fisher, East Grinstead, UK) employing Al Kα X-rays (hν = 1486.6 eV) at a power of 140 W and an X-ray spot size of 400 µm. The electron analyser was operated in a constant energy mode at a pass energy of 50 eV for the high resolution elemental spectra. Charge correction was based on adventitious carbon at 285.0 eV. Curve fitting was undertaken using the manufacturer’s Avantage software v4.74, after subtraction of a Shirley background and quantification was performed using instrument modified Wagner sensitivity factors.

4. Conclusions

N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 membrane showed a high potential to remove carbamazepine, a persistent pharmaceutical compound, from deionized water, under simulated solar irradiation. Investigating the effect of different water constituents on the photocatalytic oxidation provided important information regarding the potential efficiency of the process when treating water with different characteristics. The results indicate that the highest degradation rate of CBZ was observed at a neutral pH. When the pH level became acidic or basic the reaction rate decreased. Addition of Ca2+ and Mg2+ at alkaline conditions had no significant effect on CBZ degradation. However, presence of Ca2+ at neutral pH adjusted by phosphate buffer resulted in ~30% decrease in photocatalytic degradation. This result suggests that calcium hardness in combination with phosphate ions in the water resulted in deposition of CaHPO4 or CaHPO4·2H2O CaPO4 precipitate on the catalyst surface, thus screening the active sites. In the presence of three different DOMs tested, CBZ photocatalytic degradation was inhibited. Bicarbonate ions inhibit photocatalytic oxidation by N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 by two different routes: (i) low alkalinity concentration—bicarbonate-mediated water pH increase, (ii) high alkalinity concentration—hydroxyl radical scavenging by the bicarbonate to produce carbonate radicals. The presence of Cl ions had no effect on CBZ degradation. The N-doped TiO2 coated onto an Al2O3 membrane showed durability in PCA when exposed to chemical cleaning agents (citric acid, HCl, and NaOH). The regeneration of membrane PCA after continuous use was achieved by using HCl. Nevertheless, dissolution of metals such as Al and Ti should be monitored following acid cleaning. Membrane integrity after exposure to the cleaning agents should be thoroughly investigated before use in the field.

Acknowledgments

This research received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme, FP7, under grant agreement no. 245513-2 (“NATIOMEM: Nano-structured N-doped TiO2 photocatalytic membranes for water treatment” collaborative project).

Author Contributions

All research partners: Mamane, Avisar, Lozzi, Baker, Grilli and the research students conceived and designed the photocatalytic experiments and interpreted the results; Lozzi developed and optimized the coating method and delivered the coated ceramic membranes; Enbal Luster (student of Avisar and Mamane) and Inna Horovitz (student of Avisar and Mamane) performed the photocatalytic experiments and water quality analysis in Mamane Laboratory (PMR); and developed and analyzed methods for CBZ analysis and degradation products in Avisar’s Laboratory; Luster and Horovitz wrote the paper; Baker and Grilli performed and interpreted all the SEM, XPS, and GAXRD diffractograms. PMR was designed by partners in Natiomem.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, X.; Li, C.; Grätzel, M.; Kostecki, R.; Mao, S.S. Nanomaterials for renewable energy production and storage. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 7909–7937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Avisar, D.; Horovitz, I.; Lozzi, L.; Ruggieri, F.; Baker, M.; Abel, M.-L.; Mamane, H. Impact of water quality on removal of carbamazepine in natural waters by N-doped TiO2 photo-catalytic thin film surfaces. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 244, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Malato, S.; Fernández-Ibáñez, P.; Maldonado, M.; Blanco, J.; Gernjak, W. Decontamination and disinfection of water by solar photocatalysis: Recent overview and trends. Catal. Today 2009, 147, 1–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fujishima, A.; Rao, T.N.; Tryk, D.A. Titanium dioxide photocatalysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 2000, 1, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Zhou, B.; Chen, H.; Wang, Z.; Cai, W. A TiO2-nanotube-array-based photocatalytic fuel cell using refractory organic compounds as substrates for electricity generation. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 10314–10316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mozia, S. Photocatalytic membrane reactors (PMRs) in water and wastewater treatment. A review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 73, 71–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ahmed, S.; Rasul, M.; Martens, W.N.; Brown, R.; Hashib, M. Advances in heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of phenols and dyes in wastewater: A review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011, 215, 3–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Bhatkhande, D.S.; Pangarkar, V.G.; Beenackers, A.A. Photocatalytic degradation for environmental applications–A review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2002, 77, 102–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hu, C.; Guo, J.; Qu, J.; Hu, X. Photocatalytic degradation of pathogenic bacteria with AgI/TiO2 under visible light irradiation. Langmuir 2007, 23, 4982–4987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Welker, M.; Steinberg, C. Rates of humic substance photosensitized degradation of microcystin-LR in natural waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 3415–3419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Doll, T.E.; Frimmel, F.H. Removal of selected persistent organic pollutants by heterogeneous photocatalysis in water. Catal. Today 2005, 101, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Horovitz, I.; Avisar, D.; Baker, M.A.; Grilli, R.; Lozzi, L.; Di Camillo, D.; Mamane, H. Carbamazepine degradation using a N-doped TiO2 coated photocatalytic membrane reactor: Influence of physical parameters. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 310, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Doll, T.E.; Frimmel, F.H. Photocatalytic degradation of carbamazepine, clofibric acid and iomeprol with P25 and Hombikat UV100 in the presence of natural organic matter (NOM) and other organic water constituents. Water Res. 2005, 39, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liao, H.; Reitberger, T. Generation of free OHaq radicals by black light illumination of Degussa (evonik) P25 TiO2 aqueous suspensions. Catalysts 2013, 3, 418–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mullet, M.; Fievet, P.; Reggiani, J.; Pagetti, J. Surface electrochemical properties of mixed oxide ceramic membranes: Zeta-potential and surface charge density. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 123, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhou, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Hu, X.; Larbot, A.; Persin, M. Electrokinetic characterization of the Al2O3 ceramic MF membrane by streaming potential measurements. Desalination 2009, 235, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, W.; An, T.; Cui, M.; Sheng, G.; Fu, J. Effects of anions on the photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic degradation of reactive dye in a packed-bed reactor. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2005, 80, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kormann, C.; Bahnemann, D.; Hoffmann, M.R. Photolysis of chloroform and other organic molecules in aqueous titanium dioxide suspensions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1991, 25, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ku, Y.; Leu, R.-M.; Lee, K.-C. Decomposition of 2-chlorophenol in aqueous solution by UV irradiation with the presence of titanium dioxide. Water Res. 1996, 30, 2569–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mills, A.; Morris, S.; Davies, R. Photomineralisation of 4-chlorophenol sensitised by titanium dioxide: A study of the intermediates. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1993, 70, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schmelling, D.C.; Gray, K.A.; Kamat, P.V. The influence of solution matrix on the photocatalytic degradation of TNT in TiO2 slurries. Water Res. 1997, 31, 1439–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Matthews, R.W. Photo-oxidation of organic material in aqueous suspensions of titanium dioxide. Water Res. 1986, 20, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tang, W.; Zhang, Z.; An, H.; Quintana, M.; Torres, D. TiO2/UV photodegradation of azo dyes in aqueous solutions. Environ. Technol. 1997, 18, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, S.; Cao, G. Photocatalytic degradation of organophosphorus pesticides using floating photocatalyst TiO2·SiO2/beads by sunlight. Solar Energy 2005, 79, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  25. Achilleos, A.; Hapeshi, E.; Xekoukoulotakis, N.; Mantzavinos, D.; Fatta-Kassinos, D. UV-A and solar photodegradation of ibuprofen and carbamazepine catalyzed by TiO2. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2010, 45, 1564–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vogna, D.; Marotta, R.; Andreozzi, R.; Napolitano, A.; d’Ischia, M. Kinetic and chemical assessment of the UV/H2O2 treatment of antiepileptic drug carbamazepine. Chemosphere 2004, 54, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Damen, J.; Ten Cate, J.; Ellingsen, J. Induction of calcium phosphate precipitation by titanium dioxide. J. Dent. Res. 1991, 70, 1346–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kang, S.A.; Li, W.; Lee, H.E.; Phillips, B.L.; Lee, Y.J. Phosphate uptake by TiO2: Batch studies and NMR spectroscopic evidence for multisite adsorption. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 364, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Chusuei, C.C.; Goodman, D.; Van Stipdonk, M.; Justes, D.; Loh, K.; Schweikert, E. Solid–Liquid Adsorption of Calcium Phosphate on TiO2. Langmuir 1999, 15, 7355–7360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tsuru, T.; Hironaka, D.; Yoshioka, T.; Asaeda, M. Effect of divalent cations on permeate volume flux through porous titania membranes. Desalination 2002, 147, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abrahamse, A.; Lipreau, C.; Li, S.; Heijman, S. Removal of divalent cations reduces fouling of ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 323, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gupta, A.; Pal, A.; Sahoo, C. Photocatalytic degradation of a mixture of Crystal Violet (Basic Violet 3) and Methyl Red dye in aqueous suspensions using Ag+ doped TiO2. Dyes Pigments 2006, 69, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shirazi, E.; Torabian, A.; Nabi-Bidhendi, G. Carbamazepine Removal from Groundwater: Effectiveness of the TiO2/UV, Nanoparticulate Zero-Valent Iron, and Fenton (NZVI/H2O2) Processes. Clean-Soil Air Water 2013, 41, 1062–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kashif, N.; Ouyang, F. Parameters effect on heterogeneous photocatalysed degradation of phenol in aqueous dispersion of TiO2. J. Environ. Sci. 2009, 21, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, X.; Fan, C.; Sun, Y. Enhancement of photocatalytic oxidation of humic acid in TiO2 suspensions by increasing cation strength. Chemosphere 2002, 48, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Selvam, K.; Muruganandham, M.; Muthuvel, I.; Swaminathan, M. The influence of inorganic oxidants and metal ions on semiconductor sensitized photodegradation of 4-fluorophenol. Chem. Eng. J. 2007, 128, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Minero, C.; Pramauro, E.; Pelizzetti, E.; Dolci, M.; Marchesini, A. Photosensitized transformations of atrazine under simulated sunlight in aqueous humic acid solution. Chemosphere 1992, 24, 1597–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Okamura, H.; Sugiyama, Y. Photosensitized degradation of Irgarol 1051 in water. Chemosphere 2004, 57, 739–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lucia, d.C.C.; Maria, d.C.; Grande, M.A.; Acosta, E.O.; Ginzberg, B. Removal of Cr (VI) and humic acid by heterogeneous photocatalysis in a laboratory reactor and a pilot reactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 9468–9474. [Google Scholar]
  40. Selli, E.; Baglio, D.; Montanarella, L.; Bidoglio, G. Role of humic acids in the TiO2-photocatalyzed degradation of tetrachloroethene in water. Water Res. 1999, 33, 1827–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vinodgopal, K.; Kamat, P.V. Environmental photochemistry on surfaces. Charge injection from excited fulvic acid into semiconductor colloids. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1992, 26, 1963–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nienow, A.M.; Bezares-Cruz, J.C.; Poyer, I.C.; Hua, I.; Jafvert, C.T. Hydrogen peroxide-assisted UV photodegradation of Lindane. Chemosphere 2008, 72, 1700–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Autin, O.; Hart, J.; Jarvis, P.; MacAdam, J.; Parsons, S.A.; Jefferson, B. The impact of background organic matter and alkalinity on the degradation of the pesticide metaldehyde by two advanced oxidation processes: UV/H2O2 and UV/TiO2. Water Res. 2013, 47, 2041–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Makita, M.; Harata, A. Photocatalytic decolorization of rhodamine B dye as a model of dissolved organic compounds: Influence of dissolved inorganic chloride salts in seawater of the Sea of Japan. Chem. Eng. Process. 2008, 47, 859–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yuan, R.; Ramjaun, S.N.; Wang, Z.; Liu, J. Photocatalytic degradation and chlorination of azo dye in saline wastewater: Kinetics and AOX formation. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 192, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mopper, K.; Zhou, X. Hydroxyl radical photoproduction in the sea and its potential impact on marine processes. Science 1990, 250, 661–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Vione, D.; Falletti, G.; Maurino, V.; Minero, C.; Pelizzetti, E.; Malandrino, M.; Ajassa, R.; Olariu, R.-I.; Arsene, C. Sources and sinks of hydroxyl radicals upon irradiation of natural water samples. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 3775–3781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Piscopo, A.; Robert, D.; Weber, J.V. Influence of pH and chloride anion on the photocatalytic degradation of organic compounds: Part I. Effect on the benzamide and para-hydroxybenzoic acid in TiO2 aqueous solution. Appl. Catal. B 2001, 35, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Okamoto, K.-I.; Yamamoto, Y.; Tanaka, H.; Itaya, A. Kinetics of heterogeneous photocatalytic decomposition of phenol over anatase TiO2 powder. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1985, 58, 2023–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Buxton, G.V.; Greenstock, C.L.; Helman, W.P.; Ross, A.B. Critical review of rate constants for reactions of hydrated electrons, hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl radicals (OH/O in aqueous solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 513–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pelaez, M.; Armah, A.; O’Shea, K.; Falaras, P.; Dionysiou, D.D. Effects of water parameters on the degradation of microcystin-LR under visible light-activated TiO2 photocatalyst. Water Res. 2011, 45, 3787–3796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kumar, A.; Mathur, N. Photocatalytic degradation of aniline at the interface of TiO2 suspensions containing carbonate ions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 300, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lair, A.; Ferronato, C.; Chovelon, J.-M.; Herrmann, J.-M. Naphthalene degradation in water by heterogeneous photocatalysis: An investigation of the influence of inorganic anions. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2008, 193, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hu, L.; Flanders, P.M.; Miller, P.L.; Strathmann, T.J. Oxidation of sulfamethoxazole and related antimicrobial agents by TiO2 photocatalysis. Water Res. 2007, 41, 2612–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hem, J.D. Study and Interpretation of the Chemical Characteristics of Natural Water; Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 1985; Volume 2254.
  56. Chakoumakos, C.; Russo, R.C.; Thurston, R.V. Toxicity of copper to cutthroat trout (Salmo clarki) under different conditions of alkalinity, pH, and hardness. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1979, 13, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jermann, D.; Pronk, W.; Meylan, S.; Boller, M. Interplay of different NOM fouling mechanisms during ultrafiltration for drinking water production. Water Res. 2007, 41, 1713–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Nas, B.; Berktay, A. Groundwater quality mapping in urban groundwater using GIS. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 160, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Serruya, C.; Edelstein, M.; Pollingher, U.; Serruya, S. Lake Kinneret sediments: Nutrient composition of the pore water and mud water exchanges. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1974, 19, 489–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mamane, H.; Horovitz, I.; Lozzi, L.; Di Camillo, D.; Avisar, D. The role of physical and operational parameters in photocatalysis by N-doped TiO2 sol–gel thin films. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 257, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wiegman, S.; Termeer, J.A.; Verheul, T.; Kraak, M.H.; de Voogt, P.; Laane, R.W.; Admiraal, W. UV absorbance dependent toxicity of acridine to the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 908–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kosjek, T.; Andersen, H.R.; Kompare, B.; Ledin, A.; Heath, E. Fate of carbamazepine during water treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 6256–6261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Rao, K.V.S.; Subrahmanyam, M.; Boule, P. Immobilized TiO2 photocatalyst during long-term use: Decrease of its activity. Appl. Catal. B 2004, 49, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nakano, K.; Obuchi, E.; Takagi, S.; Yamamoto, R.; Tanizaki, T.; Taketomi, M.; Eguchi, M.; Ichida, K.; Suzuki, M.; Hashimoto, A. Photocatalytic treatment of water containing dinitrophenol and city water over TiO2/SiO2. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 34, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Miranda-García, N.; Suárez, S.; Maldonado, M.I.; Malato, S.; Sánchez, B. Regeneration approaches for TiO2 immobilized photocatalyst used in the elimination of emerging contaminants in water. Catal. Today 2014, 230, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Baker, M.; Fakhouri, H.; Grilli, R.; Pulpytel, J.; Smith, W.; Arefi-Khonsari, F. Effect of total gas pressure and O2/N2 flow rate on the nanostructure of N-doped TiO2 thin films deposited by reactive sputtering. Thin Solid Films 2014, 552, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Di Valentin, C.; Pacchioni, G.; Selloni, A.; Livraghi, S.; Giamello, E. Characterization of paramagnetic species in N-doped TiO2 powders by EPR spectroscopy and DFT calculations. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 11414–11419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Asahi, R.; Morikawa, T. Nitrogen complex species and its chemical nature in TiO2 for visible-light sensitized photocatalysis. Chem. Phys. 2007, 339, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sun, J.; Qiao, L.; Sun, S.; Wang, G. Photocatalytic degradation of Orange G on nitrogen-doped TiO2 catalysts under visible light and sunlight irradiation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 155, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Sathish, M.; Viswanathan, B.; Viswanath, R.; Gopinath, C.S. Synthesis, characterization, electronic structure, and photocatalytic activity of nitrogen-doped TiO2 nanocatalyst. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 6349–6353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Andreozzi, R.; Marotta, R.; Pinto, G.; Pollio, A. Carbamazepine in water: Persistence in the environment, ozonation treatment and preliminary assessment on algal toxicity. Water Res. 2002, 36, 2869–2877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Martínez, C.; Fernández, M.; Santaballa, J.; Faria, J. Kinetics and mechanism of aqueous degradation of carbamazepine by heterogeneous photocatalysis using nanocrystalline TiO2, ZnO and multi-walled carbon nanotubes–anatase composites. Appl. Catal. B 2011, 102, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ruzicka, K.; Zessner, M.; Blaschke, A.P.; Fenz, R.; Clara, M.; Kroiss, H. Evaluating the success of sewer reconstruction by using carbamazepine as anthropogenic marker in groundwater. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 63, 727–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zhang, Y.; Geißen, S.-U.; Gal, C. Carbamazepine and diclofenac: removal in wastewater treatment plants and occurrence in water bodies. Chemosphere 2008, 73, 1151–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Margot, J.; Kienle, C.; Magnet, A.; Weil, M.; Rossi, L.; De Alencastro, L.F.; Abegglen, C.; Thonney, D.; Chèvre, N.; Schärer, M. Treatment of micropollutants in municipal wastewater: Ozone or powdered activated carbon? Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 461, 480–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Wishart, D.S.; Knox, C.; Guo, A.C.; Shrivastava, S.; Hassanali, M.; Stothard, P.; Chang, Z.; Woolsey, J. DrugBank: A comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, D668–D672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Grilli, R.; Di Camillo, D.; Lozzi, L.; Horovitz, I.; Mamane, H.; Avisar, D.; Baker, M. Surface characterisation and photocatalytic performance of N-doped TiO2 thin films deposited onto 200 nm pore size alumina membranes by sol–gel methods. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 159, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Carbamazepine (CBZ) degradation (C0 = 1 mg/L) as a function of pH (6, 7, and 8.5) in buffered deionized (DI) water and in Lake Kinneret water (pH 8.5) by N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 membrane under irradiation (The inset depicts: CBZ degradation by uncoated Al2O3, TiO2-coated Al2O3 and N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 membranes).
Figure 1. Carbamazepine (CBZ) degradation (C0 = 1 mg/L) as a function of pH (6, 7, and 8.5) in buffered deionized (DI) water and in Lake Kinneret water (pH 8.5) by N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 membrane under irradiation (The inset depicts: CBZ degradation by uncoated Al2O3, TiO2-coated Al2O3 and N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 membranes).
Nanomaterials 07 00206 g001
Figure 2. CBZ degradation by N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 membranes, without (no additive) and with addition of 120 mg/L Ca2+ (pH 7 and 8.5) and 120 mg/L Mg2+ (pH 8.5).
Figure 2. CBZ degradation by N-doped TiO2-coated Al2O3 membranes, without (no additive) and with addition of 120 mg/L Ca2+ (pH 7 and 8.5) and 120 mg/L Mg2+ (pH 8.5).
Nanomaterials 07 00206 g002
Figure 3. XPS core level spectra for (a) Ca 2p and (b) P 2p from an N-doped TiO2 coating deposited on an 800 nm pore size membrane exposed to CaSO4·2H2O (120 mg/L Ca2+) and 1 mM phosphate buffer solution.
Figure 3. XPS core level spectra for (a) Ca 2p and (b) P 2p from an N-doped TiO2 coating deposited on an 800 nm pore size membrane exposed to CaSO4·2H2O (120 mg/L Ca2+) and 1 mM phosphate buffer solution.
Nanomaterials 07 00206 g003
Figure 4. Degradation rate constant of CBZ (C0 = 1 mg/L) as a function of water alkalinity.
Figure 4. Degradation rate constant of CBZ (C0 = 1 mg/L) as a function of water alkalinity.
Nanomaterials 07 00206 g004
Figure 5. Initial reaction rate constant versus rate constant after 2 h immersion in: 0.1% HCl, 0.1% NaOH or 2% citric acid.
Figure 5. Initial reaction rate constant versus rate constant after 2 h immersion in: 0.1% HCl, 0.1% NaOH or 2% citric acid.
Nanomaterials 07 00206 g005
Figure 6. Percentage increase/decrease in k for uncleaned membrane and membranes cleaned by 2% (w/w) citric acid, 0.1% (w/w) NaOH and 0.1% (w/w) HCl after 8 h of continuous use.
Figure 6. Percentage increase/decrease in k for uncleaned membrane and membranes cleaned by 2% (w/w) citric acid, 0.1% (w/w) NaOH and 0.1% (w/w) HCl after 8 h of continuous use.
Nanomaterials 07 00206 g006
Figure 7. Material characterization results of the N-doped TiO2 coated membrane: (a,b) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images; (c) a peak fitted XPS N 1s spectrum; (d) glancing-angle X-ray diffraction (GAXRD) diffractogram showing the presence of the nanocrystalline anatase based coating and the underlying α-alumina membrane.
Figure 7. Material characterization results of the N-doped TiO2 coated membrane: (a,b) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images; (c) a peak fitted XPS N 1s spectrum; (d) glancing-angle X-ray diffraction (GAXRD) diffractogram showing the presence of the nanocrystalline anatase based coating and the underlying α-alumina membrane.
Nanomaterials 07 00206 g007
Table 1. Concentrations of Ca2+ and Mg2+ during the photocatalytic experiment.
Table 1. Concentrations of Ca2+ and Mg2+ during the photocatalytic experiment.
Phase of ExperimentCa2+ 120 mg/LMg2+ 120 mg/L
pH = 7pH = 8.5pH = 8.5
Initial118.8 ± 4118.8 ± 4121 ± 2
Final97.1 ± 0.796.4 ± 1117.8 ± 0.5
Table 2. Percent decrease in carbamazepine (CBZ) degradation rate constant (k) in the presence of Suwannee River Natural Organic Matter (SRNOM) (4 and 8 mg/L), Suwannee River Humic Acid (SRHA) (8 mg/L) and Suwannee River Fulvic Acid (SRFA) (8 mg/L).
Table 2. Percent decrease in carbamazepine (CBZ) degradation rate constant (k) in the presence of Suwannee River Natural Organic Matter (SRNOM) (4 and 8 mg/L), Suwannee River Humic Acid (SRHA) (8 mg/L) and Suwannee River Fulvic Acid (SRFA) (8 mg/L).
Rate Constant Change with DOM4 mg/L SRNOM8 mg/L SRNOM8 mg/L SRHA8 mg/L SRFA
% decrease in k11244037
Table 3. CBZ degradation rate constants at different Cl concentrations.
Table 3. CBZ degradation rate constants at different Cl concentrations.
[Cl]No Additive100 mg/L250 mg/L500 mg/L
k (min−1)0.0082 ± 0.000190.0088 ± 0.00060.0082 ± 0.000050.0086 ± 0.0011
Table 4. Summary of water type and composition effect on photocatalytic degradation reaction rate.
Table 4. Summary of water type and composition effect on photocatalytic degradation reaction rate.
Water TypepHAlkalinity (mg/L as CaCO3)Hardness (mg/L as CaCO3)Ca2+ (mg/L)Mg2+ (mg/L)Chlorides (mg/L Cl)DOC (mg/L)% Increase/Decrease in k
Lake Kinneret8.58430548413104.2−44
DI + Magnesium8.5---120--−2.3
DI + Calcium8.5-300120----
DI + Calcium7-300120---30.5
DI + Chloride7----100-8.4
7----250-1.6
7----500-7.2
DI + Alkalinity750-----−1.5
7100-----−14.4
7200-----−33.8
7300-----−48
DI + SRNOM7-----4−11
7-----8−24
DI + SRFA7-----8−37
DI + SRHA7-----8−40
Table 5. Main physicochemical properties of CBZ.
Table 5. Main physicochemical properties of CBZ.
Structure and Formula Nanomaterials 07 00206 i001
C15H12N2O
References
Molecular weight236.3 g/mol[74]
LogK (octanol-water)2.45[74,75]
pKa13.9[25,75]
Elimination half-life25–65 h[74,76]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luster, E.; Avisar, D.; Horovitz, I.; Lozzi, L.; Baker, M.A.; Grilli, R.; Mamane, H. N-Doped TiO2-Coated Ceramic Membrane for Carbamazepine Degradation in Different Water Qualities. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7080206

AMA Style

Luster E, Avisar D, Horovitz I, Lozzi L, Baker MA, Grilli R, Mamane H. N-Doped TiO2-Coated Ceramic Membrane for Carbamazepine Degradation in Different Water Qualities. Nanomaterials. 2017; 7(8):206. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7080206

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luster, Enbal, Dror Avisar, Inna Horovitz, Luca Lozzi, Mark A. Baker, Rossana Grilli, and Hadas Mamane. 2017. "N-Doped TiO2-Coated Ceramic Membrane for Carbamazepine Degradation in Different Water Qualities" Nanomaterials 7, no. 8: 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7080206

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop