Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Small Molecule Identification with MOLGEN and Mass Spectrometry
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
CASMI—The Small Molecule Identification Process from a Birmingham Perspective
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Metabolites 2013, 3(2), 412-439; doi:10.3390/metabo3020412

CASMI: And the Winner is . . .

Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 133, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
IPB: Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Department of Stress and Developmental Biology, Weinberg 3, DE-06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 7 April 2013 / Revised: 14 May 2013 / Accepted: 16 May 2013 / Published: 24 May 2013
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [639 KB, 29 May 2013; original version 24 May 2013]   |  


The Critical Assessment of Small Molecule Identification (CASMI) Contest was founded in 2012 to provide scientists with a common open dataset to evaluate their identification methods. In this review, we summarize the submissions, evaluate procedures and discuss the results. We received five submissions (three external, two internal) for LC–MS Category 1 (best molecular formula) and six submissions (three external, three internal) for LC–MS Category 2 (best molecular structure). No external submissions were received for the GC–MS Categories 3 and 4. The team of Dunn et al. from Birmingham had the most answers in the 1st place for Category 1, while Category 2 was won by H. Oberacher. Despite the low number of participants, the external and internal submissions cover a broad range of identification strategies, including expert knowledge, database searching, automated methods and structure generation. The results of Category 1 show that complementing automated strategies with (manual) expert knowledge was the most successful approach, while no automated method could compete with the power of spectral searching for Category 2—if the challenge was present in a spectral library. Every participant topped at least one challenge, showing that different approaches are still necessary for interpretation diversity. View Full-Text
Keywords: mass spectrometry; metabolite identification; small molecule identification; contest; metabolomics; non-target identification; unknown identification mass spectrometry; metabolite identification; small molecule identification; contest; metabolomics; non-target identification; unknown identification

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Schymanski, E.L.; Neumann, S. CASMI: And the Winner is . . .. Metabolites 2013, 3, 412-439.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Metabolites EISSN 2218-1989 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top