Analysis of Variance of the Effects of a Project’s Location on Key Issues and Challenges in Post-Disaster Reconstruction Projects
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Resourcing Challenges
2.2. Challenges in Community Participation
2.3. Poorly Funded Reconstruction
2.4. Preliminary Assessment
2.5. Lack of Coordination
2.6. Corruption
2.7. Build Back Better/Safer
2.8. Policies
2.9. Quality of Works
2.10. Land Ownership Issues
2.11. Shortage of Technical Staff
3. Research Methodology
4. Results
5. Identification of the Issues and Challenges
Issues and Challenge by Project Location
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- ADB. 2005. An Initial Assessment of the Impact of the Earthquake and Tsunami of December 26, 2004 on South And Southeast Asia. Manila: Asian Development Bank. [Google Scholar]
- Adu-Boateng, K., and B. M. Oppong. 2011. Post Disaster Reconstruction Activities: A Case Study in Ghana. In Disaster Management and Human Health Risk II. Edited by C. A. Brebbia, A. J. Kassab and E. A. Divo. New Forest: WIT Press. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, Iftekhar. 2011. An Overview of Post-Disaster Permanent Housing Reconstruction in Developing Countries. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment 2: 148–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Attarzadeh, Iman, and Siew Hock Ow. 2008. Project Management Practices: The Criteria for Success or Failure. Communications of the IBIMA 1: 234–41. [Google Scholar]
- Baldauf, A., H. Reisinger, and W. C. Moncrief. 1999. Examining Motivations to Refuse in Industrial Mail Surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society 41: 345–53. [Google Scholar]
- Boen, Teddy. 2006. Building A Safer Aceh, Reconstruction of Houses, One Year after the Dec. 26, 2004 Tsunami. In 40th Anniversary of Trisakti University, “Answering the Challenges in Today’s Civil Engineering”. Jakarta: Trisakti University. [Google Scholar]
- Bornstein, Lisa, Gonzalo Lizarralde, Kevin A. Gould, and Colin Davidson. 2013. Framing Responses to Post-Earthquake Haiti: How Representations of Disasters, Reconstruction and Human Settlements Shape Resilience. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment 4: 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- BRR. 2006. Aceh and Nias: Two Years after the Tsunami. Jakarta: Badan Rekonstruksi and Rehabilitasi, Indonesia BRR and Partners. [Google Scholar]
- Canny, Bill. 2005. A Review of Ngo Coordination in Aceh Post Earthquake/Tsunami. Geneva: International Council of Voluntary Agencies (ICVA). [Google Scholar]
- Chang, Yan, Suzanne Wilkinson, Regan Potangaroa, and Erica Seville. 2010. Resources and Capacity: Lessons Learned from Post-Disaster Reconstruction Resourcing in Indonesia, China and Australia. Paper presented at the Construction, Building and Real Estate Research Conference of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, Paris, France, September 2–3; Paris: RICS. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, Yan, Suzanne Wilkinson, David Brunsdon, Erica Seville, and Regan Potangaroa. 2011a. Identifying Factors Affecting Resource Availability for Post Disaster Reconstruction: A Case Study in China. Construction Management and Economics 29: 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Yan, Suzanne Wilkinson, David Brunsdon, Erica Seville, and Regan Potangaroa. 2011b. Donor-Driven Resource Procurement for Post-Disaster Reconstruction: Constraints and Actions. Habitat International 35: 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CRS. 2011. How-to Guide: Managing Post-Disaster (Re)-Construction Projects. Edited by Annika Grafweg. Baltimore: Catholic Relief Services. [Google Scholar]
- Davidson, Colin H., Cassidy Johnson, Gonzalo Lizarralde, Nese Dikmen, and Alicia Sliwinski. 2007. Truths and Myths about Community Participation in Post-Disaster Housing Projects. Habitat International 31: 100–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doocy, Shannon, and Yuri Gorokhovich. 2008. An Integrated Approach to Natural Disaster Assessment. Paper presented at Solutions to Coastal Disasters 2008, Oahu, HI, USA, April 13–16; Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers. [Google Scholar]
- EPC, TCG, and LLC. 2004. Participatory Planning Guide for Post-Disaster Reconstruction. Ahmedabad: EPC-Environmental Planning Collaborative. [Google Scholar]
- Field, A. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 3rd ed. London: SAGE publications Ltd. [Google Scholar]
- Freeman, Paul K. 2007. Allocation of Post-Disaster Reconstruction Financing to Housing. Building Research & Information 32: 37–41. [Google Scholar]
- GAO. 2011. Haiti Reconstruction: Factors Contributing to Delays in USAID Infrastructure Construction. Available online: http://www.gao.gov/assets/590/586701.pdf (accessed on 21 November 2017).
- George, D., and M. Mallery. 2010. SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 17.0. Boston: Pearson. [Google Scholar]
- Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen, and Mahmood Hosseini. 2007. Post-Bam Earthquake: Recovery and Reconstruction. Natural Hazards 44: 229–41. [Google Scholar]
- Gharaati, Mehran, and Colin Davidson. 2008. Who Knows Best? An Overview of Reconstruction after the Earthquake in Bam. Paper presented at the 4th International I-REC Conference: Building Resilience: Achieving Effective Post-Disaster Reconstruction, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, April 30–May 2. [Google Scholar]
- Hager, Marka, Sarah Wilson, Thomas H. Pollak, and Patrick Michael Rooney. 2003. Response Rates for Mail Surveys of Nonprofit Organizations: A Review and Empirical Test. Response 32: 252–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hidayat, Benny, and Charles Egbu. 2010. A Literature Review of the Role of Project Management in Post-Disaster Reconstruction. Paper presented at 26th Annual ARCOM Conference, Leeds, UK, September 6–8. [Google Scholar]
- Hosseini, M., and Y. O. Izadkhah. 2008. Lessons Learnt from Shelter Actions and Reconstruction of Bam after the Destructive Earthquake of December 26, 2003. Paper presented at the 14 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October 12–17. [Google Scholar]
- Ibrahim, Maggie. 2010. Post-Disaster Housing Reconstruction in A Conflict Affected District, Batticaloa, Sri Lanka: Reflecting on the Climate Management Approach. Strengthening Climate Resilience Discussion Paper 6. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies. [Google Scholar]
- Kamani-Fard, Asal, Mohd Hamdan Ahmad, and Dilshan Remaz Ossen. 2012. The Sense of Place in the New Homes of Post-Bam Earthquake Reconstruction. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment 3: 220–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karunasena, Gayani, and Raufdeen Rameezdeen. 2010. Post-Disaster Housing Reconstruction: Comparative Study of Donor vs Owner-Driven Approaches. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment 1: 173–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kennedy, Jim, Joseph Ashmore, Elizabeth Babister, and Ilan Kelman. 2008. The Meaning of ‘Build Back Better’: Evidence From Post-Tsunami Aceh and Sri Lanka. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 16: 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keraminiyage, Kaushal, Suranga Jayasena, Dilanthi Amaratunga, and Richard Haigh, eds. 2008. Post Disaster Recovery Challenges in Sri Lanka. Salford: CIB (International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction). [Google Scholar]
- Kopaei, Mehran Gharaati. 2009. Knowledge Transfer in Post-Disaster Reconstruction: The Problem of Post-Post-Disaster Reconstruction. Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. [Google Scholar]
- Lyons, Michal. 2009. Building Back Better: The Large-Scale Impact of Small-Scale Approaches to Reconstruction. World Development 37: 385–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mannakkara, Sandeeka, and Suzanne Wilkinson. 2013. Build Back Better Principles for Post-Disaster Structural Improvements. Structural Survey 31: 314–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mannakkara, Sandeeka, Suzanne Wilkinson, and Tinu Rose Francis. 2014. ‘Build Back Better’ Principles for Reconstruction. Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moloney, Anastasia. 2014. Haitians Still Homeless, ‘Suffering in Despair’ 4 Years after Quake-Amnesty. Available online: http://news.trust.org//item/20140113063728-6lwyr/ (accessed on 21 November 2017).
- NAPA. 2006. Why Foreign Aid to Haiti Failed. Washington: International Affairs Series, National Academy of Public Administration. [Google Scholar]
- Nazara, Suahasil, and Budy P Resosudarmo. 2007. Aceh-Nias Reconstruction and Rehabilitation: Progress and Challenges at the End of 2006. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. [Google Scholar]
- Ochiai, Chiho, and Rajib Shaw. 2009. Reconstruction In Urban Areas In Aceh. In Urban Risk Reduction: An Asian Perspective. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1, pp. 233–52. [Google Scholar]
- Ophiyandri, Taufika, Dilanthi Amaratunga, Chaminda Pathirage, and Kaushal Keraminiyage. 2013. Critical Success Factors for Community-Based Post-Disaster Housing Reconstruction Projects in the Pre-Construction Stage in Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment 4: 236–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, Ronald, and Kristin Little. 2004. Project Performance Assessment Report El Salvador Earthquake Reconstruction Project. Washington: Sector and Thematic Evaluations Group Operations Evaluation Department, World Bank. [Google Scholar]
- Perera-Mubarak, Kamakshi N. 2012. Reading ‘stories’ of Corruption: Practices and Perceptions of Everyday Corruption in Post-Tsunami Sri Lanka. Political Geography 31: 368–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Randall, Jonathan, and Emma Jowett. 2010. Green Recovery and Reconstruction: Training Toolkit for Humanitarian Aid. The Green Recovery and Reconstruction Toolkit (GRRT). San Francisco: World Wildlife Fund, Inc. and American National Red Cross. [Google Scholar]
- Rotimi, James O. B., Jason Le, and Suzanne Wilkinson. 2006. The Regulatory Framework For Effective Post- Disaster Reconstruction In New Zealand. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Post-Disaster Reconstruction: Meeting Stakeholder Interests, Florence, Italy, May 17–18. [Google Scholar]
- Shaw, Judith, and Iftekhar Ahmed. 2010. Design and Delivery of Post-Disaster Housing Resettlement Programs: Case Study from Sri Lanka and India. Available online: http://mams.rmit.edu.au/2ulsye0lkgb5z.pdf (accessed on 21 November 2017).
- Shaw, Rajib, and Katsuihciro Goda. 2004. From Disaster to Sustainable Civil Society: Kobe Experience. Disasters 28: 16–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Silva, Jo Da. 2010. Lessons from Aceh: Key Considerations in Post-Disaster Reconstruction. Disasters Emergency Committee, ARUP. Warwickshire: Practical Action Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Soelaksono, Arwin. 2009. NGO and Donor Coordination to Speeds up Reconstruction and Avoid NGO Competition. Paper presented at the 4th Anual International Workshop & Expo on Sumatra Tsunami and Recovery in Banda Aceh, Kobe, Japan, November 23–25. [Google Scholar]
- Steinberg, Florian. 2007. Housing Reconstruction and Rehabilitation in Aceh and Nias, Indonesia-Rebuilding Lives. Habitat International 31: 150–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Caiyu, and Jiuping Xu. 2011. Estimation of Time for Wenchuan Earthquake Reconstruction in China. Journal of Construction Engineering And Management 137: 179–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Chunling, and Ran Bi. 2010. Study on Disaster Reconstruction Project Performance Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Analytic Network Process. Paper presented at 2010 International Symposium on Computer, Communication, Control and Automation (3CA), Taipei, Taiwan, May 5–7. [Google Scholar]
- Seneviratne, Krisanthi, David Baldry, and Chaminda Pathirage. 2013. Disaster Knowledge Factors in Managing Disasters Successfully. International Journal of Strategic Property Management 14: 376–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNDP. 2007. Building Disaster Resilient Communities: Good Practices and Lessons Learned. Available online: http://www.unisdr.org/files/596_10307.pdf (accessed on 21 November 2017).
- United Nations. 2008. Transitional Settlement and Reconstruction after Natural Disasters, Field Edition. New York: United Nations. [Google Scholar]
- Von Meding, J. K., L. Oyedele, and D. J. Cleland. 2009. Developing NGO Competencies in Post-Disaster Reconstruction: A Theoretical Framework. Disaster Advances 2: 36–45. [Google Scholar]
- Wardak, Zabihullah Sadiqi, Vaughan Coffey, and Bambang Trigunarsyah. 2011. Post-Disaster Housing Reconstruction: Challenges for Community Participation. Paper presented at the International Conference on Building Resilience: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Disaster Risk Reduction, and the Development of Sustainable Communities, Heritance Kandalama, Sri Lanka, July 18–22. [Google Scholar]
- Wardak, Zabihullah Sadiqi, Vaughan Coffey, and Bambang Trigunarsyah. 2012. Rebuilding Housing after a Disaster: Factors for Failure. Paper presented at the 8th Annual International Conference of the International Institute for Infrastructure, Renewal and Reconstruction (IIIRR), Kandy, Sri Lanka, August 5–7. [Google Scholar]
- World Bank. 2004. Project Performance Assessment Report: Armenia Earthquake Reconstruction Project. Washington: Sector and Thematic Evaluation Group Operations Evaluation Department, World Bank. [Google Scholar]
- Ye, Yaoxian, and Norio Okada. 2002. Integrated Relief And Reconstruction Management Following A Natural Disaster. Paper presented at the Second Annual IIASA-DPRI Meeting, Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Megacity Vulnerability and Resilience, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, July 29–31. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, Yi-lin, and Jin-e Zhou. 2010. Research on the Application of CM-Agent Model in Public Projects of Post-Disaster Reconstruction. Paper presented at 2010 International Conference on Logistics Systems and Intelligent Management (ICLSIM), Harbin, China, January 9–10. [Google Scholar]
- Zuo, Kelvin, Regan Potangaroa, Suzanne Wilkinson, and James O.B. Rotimi. 2009. A Project Management Prospective in Achieving a Sustainable Supply Chain for Timber Procurement in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 2: 386–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
No | Disaster | List of Authors |
---|---|---|
1 | Tsunami, Aceh, 2004 | (ADB 2005; Boen 2006; BRR 2006; Canny 2005; Kennedy et al. 2008; Nazara and Resosudarmo 2007; Silva 2010; Soelaksono 2009; Steinberg 2007) |
2 | Tsunami, Sri Lanka, 2004 | (Ibrahim 2010; Karunasena and Rameezdeen 2010; Lyons 2009; Perera-Mubarak 2012; Shaw and Ahmed 2010) |
3 | Earthquake, Bam, 2005 | (Ghafory-Ashtiany and Hosseini 2007; Kamani-Fard et al. 2012; Kopaei 2009) |
4 | Earthquake, Wenchuan, 2008 | (Chang et al. 2011b; Sun and Xu 2011; Sun and Bi 2010; Yin and Zhou 2010) |
5 | Earthquake, Haiti, 2010 | (Bornstein et al. 2013; GAO 2011; Moloney 2014; NAPA 2006) |
No | Designation of Respondents | Frequency | (%) |
1 | Project/Construction Manager | 93 | 55.4% |
2 | Architect/Urban Planner | 11 | 6.5% |
3 | Quantity Surveyor | 1 | 0.6% |
4 | Civil/Structural Engineer | 4 | 2.4% |
5 | Client/project owner | 7 | 4.2% |
6 | M&E Engineer | 4 | 2.4% |
7 | Consultant/Technical Advisor | 17 | 10.1% |
8 | Project Coordinator/Officer | 15 | 8.9% |
9 | Director | 5 | 3.0% |
10 | Other | 11 | 6.5% |
No | Length of Experience | Frequency | (%) |
1 | I am not (no direct experience in PDR Projects) | 11 | 6.5% |
2 | Less than 5 years | 72 | 42.9% |
3 | 6–10 years | 41 | 24.4% |
4 | 11–15 years | 24 | 14.3% |
5 | 16–20 years | 9 | 5.4% |
6 | More than 20 years | 11 | 6.5% |
No | List of PDR Projects Location | Frequency | (%) |
1 | Aceh and Nias, Indonesia reconstruction, tsunami, and earthquake | 28 | 16.7% |
2 | Bagh, Pakistan reconstruction, earthquake | 12 | 7.1% |
3 | Haiti reconstruction, earthquake | 19 | 11.3% |
4 | Ormoc and Tacloban, Philippines reconstruction, typhoon Haiyan | 66 | 39.3% |
5 | Nepal reconstruction, earthquake | 26 | 15.5% |
6 | Other | 17 | 10.1% |
No | Type of Organisation | Frequency | (%) |
1 | Government/Local Authorities | 19 | 11.3% |
2 | Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs)—Local | 22 | 13.1% |
3 | International NGOs (INGOs) | 110 | 65.5% |
4 | Private Firms/Designers | 5 | 3.0% |
5 | Contractor Firms | 3 | 1.8% |
6 | Consultants | 2 | 1.2% |
7 | Intergovernmental Organisation | 7 | 4.2% |
Total | 168 | 100% |
Issues and Challenges in Post-Disaster Reconstruction Projects | Mean | SD | t-Value | Sig. (2-Tailed) | Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Community Participation | 3.786 | 1.045 | 3.5446 | 0.001 | 1 |
Assessment | 3.744 | 1.174 | 2.6954 | 0.008 | 2 |
Funding | 3.726 | 1.146 | 2.5578 | 0.011 | 3 |
Quality of work | 3.690 | 1.142 | 2.1613 | 0.032 | 4 |
Corruption | 3.625 | 1.207 | 1.3421 | 0.181 | 5 |
Coordination | 3.601 | 1.122 | 1.1688 | 0.244 | 6 |
‘Build back Better’ principles | 3.571 | 1.166 | 0.7938 | 0.428 | 7 |
Resources | 3.542 | 1.060 | 0.5094 | 0.611 | 8 |
Land ownership | 3.482 | 1.153 | −0.2008 | 0.841 | 9 |
Policies | 3.458 | 1.104 | −0.4890 | 0.625 | 10 |
Shortage of technical staff | 3.387 | 1.072 | −1.3676 | 0.173 | 11 |
Issues and Challenges in PDR Projects | Mean Score (N = 168) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aceh & Nias | Bagh | Haiti | Ormoc & Tacloban | Nepal | Others | |
Policies | 3.143 | 3.583 | 3.105 | 3.879 | 3.115 | 3.176 |
Assessment | 3.750 | 3.667 | 3.526 | 3.955 | 3.654 | 3.353 |
Land ownership | 3.786 | 3.667 | 3.368 | 3.500 | 3.231 | 3.294 |
Resources | 3.643 | 3.583 | 3.211 | 3.773 | 3.038 | 3.588 |
Community Participation | 3.750 | 3.500 | 3.789 | 3.985 | 3.577 | 3.588 |
Funding | 4.036 | 3.667 | 3.526 | 3.955 | 3.231 | 3.353 |
Coordination | 3.536 | 3.333 | 3.474 | 3.803 | 3.538 | 3.353 |
‘Build back Better’ principles | 3.393 | 3.833 | 3.474 | 3.803 | 3.346 | 3.235 |
Quality of work | 3.643 | 3.750 | 3.684 | 3.803 | 3.500 | 3.588 |
Corruption | 4.036 | 3.750 | 3.632 | 3.788 | 2.923 | 3.294 |
Shortage of technical staff | 3.393 | 3.583 | 3.158 | 3.667 | 3.000 | 3.000 |
No | Issues and Challenges in PDR Projects | Sum of Squares | df | F | Sig. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Policies | Between Groups | 21.419 | 5 | 3.807 | 0.003 * |
Within Groups | 182.289 | 162 | ||||
Total | 203.708 | 167 | ||||
2 | Assessment | Between Groups | 6.710 | 5 | 0.974 | 0.436 |
Within Groups | 223.284 | 162 | ||||
Total | 229.994 | 167 | ||||
3 | Land ownership | Between Groups | 5.500 | 5 | 0.823 | 0.535 |
Within Groups | 216.447 | 162 | ||||
Total | 221.946 | 167 | ||||
4 | Resources | Between Groups | 12.535 | 5 | 2.318 | 0.046 * |
Within Groups | 175.173 | 162 | ||||
Total | 187.708 | 167 | ||||
5 | Community Participation | Between Groups | 5.429 | 5 | 0.995 | 0.423 |
Within Groups | 176.857 | 162 | ||||
Total | 182.286 | 167 | ||||
6 | Funding | Between Groups | 15.676 | 5 | 2.493 | 0.033 * |
Within Groups | 203.729 | 162 | ||||
Total | 219.405 | 167 | ||||
7 | Coordination | Between Groups | 5.129 | 5 | 0.810 | 0.544 |
Within Groups | 205.151 | 162 | ||||
Total | 210.280 | 167 | ||||
8 | ‘Build back Better’ principles | Between Groups | 8.678 | 5 | 1.287 | 0.272 |
Within Groups | 218.465 | 162 | ||||
Total | 227.143 | 167 | ||||
9 | Quality of work | Between Groups | 2.064 | 5 | 0.310 | 0.907 |
Within Groups | 215.841 | 162 | ||||
Total | 217.905 | 167 | ||||
10 | Corruption | Between Groups | 21.334 | 5 | 3.113 | 0.010 * |
Within Groups | 222.041 | 162 | ||||
Total | 243.375 | 167 | ||||
11 | Shortage of technical staff | Between Groups | 13.063 | 5 | 2.367 | 0.042 * |
Within Groups | 178.788 | 162 | ||||
Total | 191.851 | 167 |
Issues and Challenges in PDR Projects | Project Location | Project Location | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|
Policies | Aceh and Nias, Indonesia | Ormoc and Tacloban, Philippines | 0.029 * |
Nepal | 0.027 * | ||
Resources | Ormoc and Tacloban, Philippines | Nepal | 0.031 * |
Funding | - | - | - |
Corruption | Aceh and Nias, Indonesia | Nepal | 0.008 * |
Ormoc and Tacloban, Philippines | 0.021 * | ||
Shortage of technical staff | - | - | - |
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ismail, D.; Majid, T.A.; Roosli, R. Analysis of Variance of the Effects of a Project’s Location on Key Issues and Challenges in Post-Disaster Reconstruction Projects. Economies 2017, 5, 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies5040046
Ismail D, Majid TA, Roosli R. Analysis of Variance of the Effects of a Project’s Location on Key Issues and Challenges in Post-Disaster Reconstruction Projects. Economies. 2017; 5(4):46. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies5040046
Chicago/Turabian StyleIsmail, Dzulkarnaen, Taksiah A. Majid, and Ruhizal Roosli. 2017. "Analysis of Variance of the Effects of a Project’s Location on Key Issues and Challenges in Post-Disaster Reconstruction Projects" Economies 5, no. 4: 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies5040046
APA StyleIsmail, D., Majid, T. A., & Roosli, R. (2017). Analysis of Variance of the Effects of a Project’s Location on Key Issues and Challenges in Post-Disaster Reconstruction Projects. Economies, 5(4), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies5040046