Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Some Properties of the Fuss–Catalan Numbers
Previous Article in Journal
Remarks on the Warped Product Structure from the Hessian of a Function
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Coefficients of Powers of Bazilević Functions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fourier Series for Functions Related to Chebyshev Polynomials of the First Kind and Lucas Polynomials

1
Department of Mathematics, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 139-701, Korea
2
Department of Mathematics, Sogang University, Seoul 121-742, Korea
3
Graduate School of Education, Konkuk University, Seoul 139-701, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Mathematics 2018, 6(12), 276; https://doi.org/10.3390/math6120276
Submission received: 23 October 2018 / Revised: 19 November 2018 / Accepted: 20 November 2018 / Published: 23 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Special Functions and Applications)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we derive Fourier series expansions for functions related to sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind and of Lucas polynomials. From the Fourier series expansions, we are able to express those two kinds of sums of finite products of polynomials as linear combinations of Bernoulli polynomials.

1. Introduction and Preliminaries

In this paper, we will consider some functions related to sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind and of Lucas polynomials, and derive Fourier series expansions for them. Then, from the Fourier series expansions, we will be able to express those two kinds of sums of finite products of polynomials as linear combinations of Bernoulli polynomials.
Here, we would like to mention the following example as a motivation for studying these kinds of sums of finite products of special polynomials. Let us consider
γ m ( x ) = k = 1 m 1 1 k ( m k ) B k ( x ) B m k ( x ) , ( m 2 ) .
Then, in the same way as we will do in (14) and (17), it is possible to express γ m ( x ) in terms of Bernoulli polynomials by making use of the Fourier series expansion of γ m ( < x > ) (see (11)). Then, unlike the known involved proofs, from this expression, we can easily deduce the famous FPZ-identity (Faber-Pandharipande-Zagier identity) (see [1]) and a variant of the Miki’s identity ([2,3,4,5]). Indeed, from the Fourier series expansion of γ m ( < x > ) , we were able to deduce the following polynomial identity in (2), from which the variant of Miki’s identity and FPZ-identity follow respectively by setting x = 0 and x = 1 2 in the following:
k = 1 m 1 1 2 k 2 m 2 k B 2 k x B 2 m 2 k x + 2 2 m 1 B 1 x B 2 m 1 x = 1 m k = 1 m 1 2 k 2 m 2 k B 2 k B 2 m 2 k x + 1 m H 2 m 1 B 2 m x + 2 2 m 1 B 1 x B 2 m 1 , m 2 ,
where H m = j = 1 m 1 j are the harmonic numbers.
The reader refers to the Introduction of the paper [6] for some details on this.
Along the same line as the present paper, we obtained Fourier series expansions of sums of finite products of functions related to some Appell and some non-Appell polynomials and were able to express those sums of finite products of such polynomials in terms of Bernoulli polynomials as immediate corollaries. Indeed, they had been done for Appell polynomials like Bernoulli and Euler polynomials in [7,8], and, for quite a few non-Appell polynomials, namely Genocchi polynomials, Chebyshev polynomials of the second, third, fourth kinds, and Fibonacci, Legendre and Laguerre polynomials in [9,10,11,12]. Here, we let the reader refer to [13,14] as general references on orthogonal polynomials and to [15,16,17] as some recent papers on Lucas polynomials. As to some related results, we recommend the reader to look at the papers [7,8,12,18,19,20,21,22].
Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind have important applications in approximation theory. Indeed, their roots are used as nodes in polynomial interpolation and the resulting interpolation polynomial gives us a good polynomial approximation to a continuous function under the maximum norm. On the other hand, Lucas polynomials are useful in generating irreducible polynomials of high degree so that they have some applications in coding and cryptography. In addition, Lucas numbers are used in the areas relevant to operational research, statistics and computational mathematics, and allow us to find very large prime numbers in low complexity.
The Chebyshev polynomials T n ( x ) of the first kind and the Lucas polynomials L n ( x ) are respectively given by the recurrence relations as follows (see [13,14,16]):
T n + 2 ( x ) = 2 x T n + 1 ( x ) T n ( x ) , ( n 0 ) , T 0 ( x ) = 1 , T 1 ( x ) = x ,
L n + 2 ( x ) = x L n + 1 ( x ) + L n ( x ) , ( n 0 ) , L 0 ( x ) = 2 , L 1 ( x ) = x .
From (3) and (4), we can easily derive the generating functions for T n ( x ) and L n ( x ) as follows:
F ( t , x ) = 1 x t 1 2 x t + t 2 = n = 0 T n ( x ) t n ,
G ( t , x ) = 2 x t 1 x t t 2 = n = 0 L n ( x ) t n .
The T n ( x ) and L n ( x ) are explicitly given as in the following:
T n ( x ) = n 2 l = 0 n 2 ( 1 ) l 1 n l n l l ( 2 x ) n 2 l , ( n 1 ) ,
L n ( x ) = n l = 0 n 2 1 n l n l l x n 2 l , ( n 1 ) .
It is well known or easily checked from (7) and (8) that the two polynomials are related by
L n ( x ) = 2 i n T n i x 2 , i = 1 .
In terms of the generating function, the Bernoulli polynomials B n ( x ) are given by
t e t 1 e x t = n = 0 B n ( x ) t n n ! .
For any real number x, the fractional part of x is denoted by
< x > = x [ x ] [ 0 , 1 ) ,
where [ x ] indicates the greatest integer x . For any integers m , r , with m 2 , r 1 , we let
α m , r ( x ) = l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r x l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r x l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) ,
where the first and second inner sums run, respectively, over all nonnegative integers i 1 , , i r + 1 , with i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l , and with i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 .
Then, we will consider the functions α m , r ( < x > ) , and derive their Fourier series expansions. From these Fourier series expansions, as a corollary, we can express α m , r ( x ) as a linear combination of Bernoulli polynomials. Indeed, Theorems 1 and 2 are our results for the Fourier expansions of α m , r ( < x > ) , and Theorem 3 is those for the expressions of α m , r ( x ) in terms of Bernoulli polynomials.
Theorem 1.
For any integers m , r with m 2 , r 1 , we let
Δ m , r = m + r r ! l = 0 m 1 2 ( 1 ) l m + r l m + r l l ( m + r 2 l ) r 2 m 2 l .
Assume that Δ m , r = 0 , for some integers m , r . Then, we have the following:
(a) 
l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r < x > l T i 1 ( < x > ) T i r + 1 ( < x > ) l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r < x > l T i 1 ( < x > ) T i r + 1 ( < x > ) = 1 2 r Δ m + 1 , r 1 n = , n 0 1 2 r j = 1 m 2 j ( r + j 1 ) j ( 2 π i n ) j Δ m j + 1 , r + j 1 e 2 π i n x ,
for all x R . Here, the convergence is uniform.
(b) 
l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r < x > l T i 1 ( < x > ) T i r + 1 ( < x > ) l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r < x > l T i 1 ( < x > ) T i r + 1 ( < x > ) = 1 2 r j = 0 , j 1 m 2 j r + j 1 j Δ m j + 1 , r + j 1 B j ( < x > ) ,
for all x R . Here, ( x ) r are the falling factorial polynomials defined by
( x ) r = x ( x 1 ) ( x r + 1 ) , ( r 1 ) , ( x ) 0 = 1 .
Theorem 2.
For any integers m , r with m 2 , r 1 , let Δ m , r be as in (13). Assume that Δ m , r 0 , for some positive integers m , r . Then, we have the following:
(a) 
1 2 r Δ m + 1 , r 1 n = , n 0 1 2 r j = 1 m 2 j ( r + j 1 ) j ( 2 π i n ) j Δ m j + 1 , r + j 1 e 2 π i n x = l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r < x > l T i 1 ( < x > ) T i r + 1 ( < x > ) l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r < x > l T i 1 ( < x > ) T i r + 1 ( < x > ) , f o r x R Z , 1 2 Δ m , r , f o r x Z , a n d m o d d , ( 1 ) m 2 m + r m 2 + r m 2 + r r + 1 2 Δ m , r , f o r x Z , a n d m e v e n .
(b) 
1 2 r j = 0 m 2 j r + j 1 j Δ m j + 1 , r + j 1 B j ( < x > ) = l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r < x > l T i 1 ( < x > ) T i r + 1 ( < x > ) l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r < x > l T i 1 ( < x > ) T i r + 1 ( < x > ) ,
                         for all x R Z ;
1 2 r j = 0 , j 1 m 2 j r + j 1 j Δ m j + 1 , r + j 1 B j ( < x > ) = 1 2 r Δ m , r , f o r x Z , a n d m o d d , ( 1 ) m 2 m + r m 2 + r m 2 + r r + 1 2 Δ m , r , f o r x Z , a n d m e v e n .
Theorem 3.
For any integers m , r with m 2 , r 1 , we let Δ m , r be as in (13). Then, we have the identity
l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r x l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r x l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) = 1 2 r j = 0 m 2 j r + j 1 r 1 Δ m j + 1 , r + j 1 B j ( x ) .
In addition, for any integers m , r with m 2 , r 1 , we put
β m , r ( x ) = l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r x 2 l L i 1 ( x ) L i r + 1 ( x ) + l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r x 2 l L i 1 ( x ) L i r + 1 ( x ) ,
where the first and second inner sums are over all nonnegative integers i 1 , , i r + 1 , with i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l , and with i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 , respectively.
Then, we will derive the Fourier series expansions of the functions β m , r ( < x > ) , and express β m , r ( x ) in terms of Bernoulli polynomials, as an easy corollary to these Fourier series expansions.
In detail, Theorem 4 is our results for the Fourier series expansions of the functions β m , r ( < x > ) , and Theorem 5 is those for the expressions of β m , r ( x ) in terms of Bernoulli polynomials.
Theorem 4.
For any integers m , r with m 2 , r 1 , we let
Ω m , r = 2 r + 1 ( m + r ) r ! l = 0 m 1 2 1 m + r l m + r l l ( m + r 2 l ) r .
Then, we have the following:
(a) 
2 r Ω m + 1 , r 1 n = , n 0 2 r j = 1 m 1 2 π i n j ( r + j 1 ) j 2 j Ω m j + 1 , r + j 1 e 2 π i n x = l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r < x > 2 l L i 1 ( < x > ) L i r + 1 ( < x > ) , + l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r < x > 2 l L i 1 ( < x > ) L i r + 1 ( < x > ) , f o r x R Z , 1 2 Ω m , r , f o r x Z , a n d m o d d , 1 2 Ω m , r + 2 r + 1 m + r m 2 + r m 2 + r r , f o r x Z , a n d m e v e n .
(b) 
2 r j = 0 m r + j 1 j 1 2 j Ω m j + 1 , r + j 1 B j ( < x > ) = l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r < x > 2 l L i 1 ( < x > ) L i r + 1 ( < x > ) + l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r < x > 2 l L i 1 ( < x > ) L i r + 1 ( < x > ) ,
                         for x R Z ;
2 r j = 0 , j 1 m r + j 1 j 1 2 j Ω m j + 1 , r + j 1 B j ( < x > ) = 1 2 Ω m , r , f o r x Z , a n d m o d d , 1 2 Ω m , r + 2 r + 1 m + r m 2 + r m 2 + r r , f o r x Z , a n d m e v e n .
Theorem 5.
For any integers m , r with m 2 , r 1 , let Ω m , r be as in (16). Then, we have the identity
l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r x 2 l L i 1 ( x ) L i r + 1 ( x ) + l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r x 2 l L i 1 ( x ) L i r + 1 ( x ) = 2 r j = 0 m r + j 1 r 1 1 2 j Ω m j + 1 , r + j 1 B j ( x ) .

2. Fourier Series Expansions for Functions Related to the Chebyshev Polynomials of the First Kind

We will start with the next result, which plays a crucial role to our discussion in this section.
Lemma 1.
Let m , r be integers with m 2 , r 1 . Then, we have the identity
l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r x l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r x l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) = 1 2 r 1 r ! T m + r ( r ) ( x ) ,
where the first and second inner sums on the left-hand side are respectively over all nonnegative integers i 1 , , i r + 1 , with i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l , and with i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 .
Proof. 
By differentiating (5) r times, we have
r x r F ( t , x ) = ( t t 3 ) ( 2 t ) r 1 r ! ( 1 2 x t + t 2 ) ( r + 1 ) , ( r 1 ) ,
r x r F ( t , x ) = m = r T m ( r ) ( x ) t m = m = 0 T m + r ( r ) ( x ) t m + r .
Equations (19) and (20) give us
1 1 2 x t + t 2 r + 1 = 1 2 r 1 r ! ( 1 t 2 ) m = 0 T m + r ( r ) ( x ) t m .
On the other hand, using (5) and (21), we observe that
l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) t l = l = 0 T l ( x ) t l r + 1 = ( 1 x t ) r + 1 1 1 2 x t + t 2 r + 1 = ( 1 x t ) r + 1 ( 1 t 2 ) 1 1 2 r 1 r ! m = 0 T m + r ( r ) ( x ) t m .
From (22), we obtain
1 2 r 1 r ! m = 0 T m + r ( r ) ( x ) t m = ( 1 t 2 ) ( 1 x t ) ( r + 1 ) l = 0 i 1 + + i r + 1 = l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) t l = ( 1 t 2 ) j = 0 r + j j x j t j l = 0 i 1 + + i r + 1 = l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) t l = j = 0 r + j j x j t j j = 2 r + j 2 j 2 x j 2 t j × l = 0 i 1 + + i r + 1 = l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x )
= m = 0 l = 0 m r + m l m l x m l i 1 + + i r + 1 = l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) t m m = 2 l = 0 m 2 r + m l 2 m l 2 x m l 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) t m = m = 0 l = 0 m r + l l x l i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) t m m = 2 l = 0 m 2 r + l l x l i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) t m .
By comparing both sides of (23) for m 2 , we get the desired result. □
Remark 1.
Note that, from (23) with m = 0 , 1 , 2 , we have
T r ( r ) ( x ) = 2 r 1 r ! ,
T r + 1 ( r ) ( x ) = 2 r ( r + 1 ) ! x ,
T r + 2 ( r ) ( x ) = 2 r 1 ( r + 2 ) ! 2 x 2 1 r + 1 .
From (7), we note that the rth derivative of T n ( x ) is given by
T n ( r ) ( x ) = n 2 l = 0 n r 2 ( 1 ) l 1 n l n l l 2 n 2 l ( n 2 l ) r x n 2 l r .
Then, combining (18) and (27), we obtain
l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l l x l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r x l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) = 2 m ( m + r ) r ! l = 0 m 2 1 4 l 1 m + r l m + r l l ( m + r 2 l ) r x m 2 l .
As in (12), we let
α m , r ( x ) = l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l l x l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r x l T i 1 ( x ) T i r + 1 ( x ) ,
where m 2 , and r 1 . Now, we will consider the function
α m , r ( < x > ) = l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r < x > l T i 1 ( < x > ) T i r + 1 ( < x > ) l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r < x > l T i 1 ( < x > ) T i r + 1 ( < x > ) ,
which is defined on R and periodic with period 1.
The Fourier series of α m , r ( < x > ) is
n = A n ( m , r ) e 2 π i n x ,
where
A n ( m , r ) = 0 1 α m , r ( < x > ) e 2 π i n x d x = 0 1 α m , r ( x ) e 2 π i n x d x .
For m 2 , r 1 , let us put
Δ m , r = α m , r ( 1 ) α m , r ( 0 ) ,
where we note that
α m , r ( 0 ) = 0 , i f m i s o d d , ( 1 ) m 2 m + r m 2 + r m 2 + r r , i f m i s e v e n .
From (28), (33) and (34), we obtain
Δ m , r = m + r r ! l = 0 m 1 2 ( 1 ) l m + r l m + r l l ( m + r 2 l ) r 2 m 2 l .
It is immediate to see from (18) that
d d x α m , r ( x ) = 1 2 r 1 r ! T m + r ( r + 1 ) ( x ) = 2 ( r + 1 ) α m 1 , r + 1 ( x ) .
In turn, (36) yields the following:
d d x α m + 1 , r 1 ( x ) 2 r = α m , r ( x ) ,
0 1 α m , r ( x ) d x = 1 2 r Δ m + 1 , r 1 ,
α m , r ( 0 ) = α m , r ( 1 ) Δ m , r = 0 .
We are now going to determine the Fourier coefficients A n ( m , r ) .
Case 1: n 0 .
A n ( m , r ) = 0 1 α m , r ( x ) e 2 π i n x d x = 1 2 π i n α m , r ( x ) e 2 π i n x 0 1 + 1 2 π i n 0 1 d d x α m , r ( x ) e 2 π i n x d x = 2 ( r + 1 ) 2 π i n 0 1 α m 1 , r + 1 ( x ) e 2 π i n x d x 1 2 π i n Δ m , r = 2 ( r + 1 ) 2 π i n A n ( m 1 , r + 1 ) 1 2 π i n Δ m , r .
Thus, we have shown the following recursive relation:
A n ( m , r ) = 2 ( r + 1 ) 2 π i n A n ( m 1 , r + 1 ) 1 2 π i n Δ m , r ,
which in turn gives the following expression
A n ( m , r ) = 1 2 r j = 1 m 2 j ( r + j 1 ) j ( 2 π i n ) j Δ m j + 1 , r + j 1 .
Case 2: n = 0 .
A 0 ( m , r ) = 0 1 α m , r ( x ) d x = 1 2 r Δ m + 1 , r 1 .
To proceed further, we recall the following facts about Bernoulli function:
(a) 
for m 2 ,
B m ( < x > ) = m ! n = , n 0 e 2 π i n x ( 2 π i n ) m ,
(b) 
for m = 1 ,
n = , n 0 e 2 π i n x 2 π i n = B 1 ( < x > ) , f o r x R Z , 0 , f o r x Z .
From (41)–(44), we get the next Fourier series expansion of α m , r ( < x > )
1 2 r Δ m + 1 , r 1 n = , n 0 1 2 r j = 1 m 2 j ( r + j 1 ) j ( 2 π i n ) j Δ m j + 1 , r + j 1 e 2 π i n x = 1 2 r Δ m + 1 , r 1 + 1 2 r j = 1 m 2 j r + j 1 j Δ m j + 1 , r + j 1 j ! n = , n 0 e 2 π i n x ( 2 π i n ) j = 1 2 r j = 0 , j 1 m 2 j r + j 1 j Δ m j + 1 , r + j 1 B j ( < x > ) + Δ m , r × B 1 ( < x > ) , f o r x R Z , 0 , f o r x Z .
Evidently, the function α m , r ( < x > ) , ( m 2 , r 1 ) is piecewise C . Moreover, α m , r ( < x > ) is continuous for those integers m , r with Δ m , r = 0 , and discontinuous with jump discontinuities at integers for those integers m , r with Δ m , r 0 . Hence, for Δ m , r = 0 , the Fourier series of α m , r ( < x > ) converges uniformly to α m , r ( < x > ) ; for Δ m , r 0 , the Fourier series of α m , r ( < x > ) converges pointwise to α m , r ( < x > ) , for x R Z , and converges to
1 2 ( α m , r ( 0 ) + α m , r ( 1 ) ) = α m , r ( 0 ) + 1 2 Δ m , r ,
for x Z . Now, from (45), (46), and these observations, we have Theorems 1 and 2 in Section 1. We remark here that Theorem 3 in Section 1 follows immediately from ( b ) of Theorems 1 and 2. Before closing this section, we will illustrate the identity (14), for m = 2 , r = 1 and also for m = 3 , r = 1 . For this, we first note that
T 0 ( x ) = 1 , T 1 ( x ) = x , T 2 ( x ) = 2 x 2 1 , T 3 ( x ) = 4 x 3 3 x ,
B 0 ( x ) = 1 , B 1 ( x ) = x 1 2 , B 2 ( x ) = x 2 x + 1 6 , B 3 ( x ) = x 3 3 2 x 2 + 1 2 x
By (35), we have
Δ 3 , 0 = 2 , Δ 2 , 1 = 12 , Δ 1 , 2 = 6 ,
Δ 4 , 0 = 0 , Δ 3 , 1 = 16 , Δ 2 , 2 = 24 , Δ 1 , 3 = 8
In addition, from (47), we see that
i + j = 3 T i ( x ) T j ( x ) = 12 x 3 8 x , i + j = 2 T i ( x ) T j ( x ) = 5 x 2 2 , i + j = 1 T i ( x ) T j ( x ) = 2 x , i + j = 0 T i ( x ) T j ( x ) = 1 .
Now, we see from (48)–(51) that the identity in (14) for m = 2 , r = 1 and that, for m = 3 , r = 1 correspond respectively to
i + j = 2 T i ( x ) T j ( x ) + 2 x i + j = 1 T i ( x ) T j ( x ) + 3 x 2 i + j = 0 T i ( x ) T j ( x ) i + j = 0 T i ( x ) T j ( x ) = B 0 ( x ) + 12 B 1 ( x ) + 12 B 2 ( x ) = 12 x 2 3 ,
i + j = 3 T i ( x ) T j ( x ) + 2 x i + j = 2 T i ( x ) T j ( x ) + 3 x 2 i + j = 1 T i ( x ) T j ( x ) + 4 x 3 i + j = 0 T i ( x ) T j ( x ) i + j = 1 T i ( x ) T j ( x ) 2 x i + j = 0 T i ( x ) T j ( x ) = 16 B 1 ( x ) + 48 B 2 ( x ) + 32 B 3 ( x ) = 32 x 3 16 x .

3. Fourier Series Expansions for Functions Related to the Lucas Polynomials

The proof for the next lemma will be omitted, as this can be shown just as in the case of Lemma 1.
Lemma 2.
Let m , r be integers with m 2 , r 1 . The following identity holds true:
l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r x 2 l L i 1 ( x ) L i r + 1 ( x ) + l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r x 2 l L i 1 ( x ) L i r + 1 ( x ) = 2 r + 1 r ! L m + r ( r ) ( x ) ,
where the first and second inner sums on the left-hand side are respectively over all nonnegative integers i 1 , , i r + 1 , with i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l , and with i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 .
Remark 2.
The identity in (52) follows from
2 r + 1 r ! m = 0 L m + r ( r ) ( x ) t m = m = 0 l = 0 m r + l r x 2 l i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l L i 1 ( x ) L i r + 1 ( x ) t m + m = 2 l = 0 m 2 r + l r x 2 l i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 L i 1 ( x ) L i r + 1 ( x ) t m .
With m = 0 , 1 , 2 in (53), we obtain
L r ( r ) ( x ) = r ! ,
L r + 1 ( r ) ( x ) = ( r + 1 ) ! x ,
L r + 2 ( r ) ( x ) = ( r + 1 ) ! 2 r + 1 + 1 2 r x 2 + 1 2 r 1 .
We see from (8) that the rth derivative of L n ( x ) is given by
L n ( r ) ( x ) = n l = 0 n r 2 1 n l n l l ( n 2 l ) r x n 2 l r .
Then, combining (52) and (57), we have
l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r x 2 l L i 1 ( x ) L i r + 1 ( x ) + l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r x 2 l L i 1 ( x ) L i r + 1 ( x ) = 2 r + 1 ( m + r ) r ! l = 0 m 2 1 m + r l m + r l l ( m + r 2 l ) r x m 2 l .
For m 2 , and r 1 , as in (15), we let
β m , r ( x ) = l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r x 2 l L i 1 ( x ) L i r + 1 ( x ) + l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r x 2 l L i 1 ( x ) L i r + 1 ( x ) .
Now, we will consider the function
β m , r ( < x > ) = l = 0 m i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l r + l r < x > 2 l L i 1 ( < x > ) L i r + 1 ( < x > ) + l = 0 m 2 i 1 + + i r + 1 = m l 2 r + l r < x > 2 l L i 1 ( < x > ) L i r + 1 ( < x > ) ,
which is defined on R and periodic with period 1. The Fourier series of β m , r ( < x > ) is
n = B n ( m , r ) e 2 π i n x ,
where
B n ( m , r ) = 0 1 β m , r ( < x > ) e 2 π i n x d x = 0 1 β m , r ( x ) e 2 π i n x d x .
For m 2 , and r 1 , we put
Ω m , r = β m , r ( 1 ) β m , r ( 0 ) .
Then, from (58) and (63), we see that
Ω m , r = 2 r + 1 ( m + r ) r ! l = 0 m 1 2 1 m + r l m + r l l ( m + r 2 l ) r ,
where we observe that
β m , r ( 0 ) = 0 , i f m i s o d d , 2 r + 1 m + r m 2 + r m 2 + r r , i f m i s e v e n .
The following can be easily derived from (52):
d d x β m , r ( x ) = 2 r + 1 r ! L m + r ( r + 1 ) ( x ) = r + 1 2 β m 1 , r + 1 ( x ) ,
d d x 2 r β m + 1 , r 1 ( x ) = β m , r ( x ) ,
0 1 β m , r ( x ) d x = 2 r Ω m + 1 , r 1 ,
β m , r ( 0 ) = β m , r ( 1 ) Ω m , r = 0 .
We are now ready to determine the Fourier coefficients B n ( m , r ) .
Case 1: n 0 .
B n ( m , r ) = 0 1 β m , r ( x ) e 2 π i n x d x = 1 2 π i n β m , r ( x ) e 2 π i n x 0 1 + 1 2 π i n 0 1 d d x β m , r ( x ) e 2 π i n x d x = 1 2 π i n r + 1 2 0 1 β m 1 , r + 1 ( x ) e 2 π i n x d x 1 2 π i n Ω m , r = 1 2 π i n r + 1 2 B n ( m 1 , r + 1 ) 1 2 π i n Ω m , r .
Thus, we have derived the following recurrence relation:
B n ( m , r ) = 1 2 π i n r + 1 2 B n ( m 1 , r + 1 ) 1 2 π i n Ω m , r ,
from which we readily have
B n ( m , r ) = 2 r j = 1 m 1 2 π i n j ( r + j 1 ) j 2 j Ω m j + 1 , r + j 1 .
Case 2: n = 0 .
B 0 ( m , r ) = 0 1 β m , r ( x ) d x = 2 r Ω m + 1 , r 1 .
Then, from (72), (73), (43), and (44), we obtain the following Fourier series expansion of β m , r ( < x > ) , which is given by
2 r Ω m + 1 , r 1 n = , n 0 2 r j = 1 m 1 2 π i n j ( r + j 1 ) j 2 j Ω m j + 1 , r + j 1 e 2 π i n x = 2 r Ω m + 1 , r 1 + 2 r j = 1 m r + j 1 j 1 2 j Ω m j + 1 , r + j 1 j ! n = , n 0 e 2 π i n x ( 2 π i n ) j = 2 r j = 0 , j 1 m r + j 1 j 1 2 j Ω m j + 1 , r + j 1 B j ( < x > ) + Ω m , r × B 1 ( < x > ) , f o r x R Z , 0 , f o r x Z .
Note here that Ω m , r > 0 , for any m 2 , r 1 . Thus, β m , r ( < x > ) is piecewise C , and discontinuous with jump discontinuities at integers. Thus, the Fourier series of β m , r ( < x > ) converges pointwise to β m , r ( < x > ) , for x R Z , and converges to
1 2 ( β m , r ( 0 ) + β m , r ( 1 ) ) = β m , r ( 0 ) + 1 2 Ω m , r
for x Z .
This observation together with (74) and (75) yields Theorem 4 in Section 1. Here, we observe that Theorem 5 in Section 1 follows from (b) of Theorem 4.
From (9), we can easily deduce that
2 r + 1 i m α m , r i x 2 = β m , r ( x ) .
In turn, by Theorems 3 and 5, (76) yields the following theorem.
Theorem 6.
For any integers m , r with m 2 , r 1 , we let
Ω m , r = 2 r + 1 ( m + r ) r ! l = 0 m 1 2 1 m + r l m + r l l ( m + r 2 l ) r .
Let m , r be integers with m 2 , r 1 . Then, we have the following identity:
2 r 1 j = 0 m 2 j r + j 1 j Δ m j + 1 , r + j 1 B j i x 2 = i m j = 0 m r + j 1 j 1 2 j Ω m j + 1 , r + j 1 B j ( x ) ,
where Δ m , r and Ω m , r are respectively as in (35) and (64).

4. Conclusions

In general, the connection problem is concerned with determining the coefficients c n m ( k ) in the representation of the product of two polynomials r n ( x ) and s m ( x ) as linear combinations of an arbitrary polynomial sequence p k ( x ) k 0 :
r n ( x ) s m ( x ) = k = 0 n + m c n m ( k ) p k ( x ) .
As a generalization of this and motivated by the example in (1), we considered the problem of representing sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind and those of Lucas polynomials in terms of Bernoulli polynomials. We accomplished this by deriving the Fourier series expansions of the functions related to those two kinds of sums of finite products of polynomials. Finally, we remark here that it is certainly possible to represent such sums of finite products of polynomials by some orthogonal polynomials, which is our ongoing project.

Author Contributions

T.K. and D.S.K. conceived the framework and structured the whole paper; D.S.K. wrote the paper; L.-C.J. and G.-W.J. checked the results of the paper; D.S.K. and T.K. completed the revision of the article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the referees for their comments and suggestions which improved the original manuscript in its present form.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Faber, C.; Pandharipande, R. Hodge integrals and Gromov-Witten theory. Invent. Math. 2000, 139, 173–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Dunne, G.V.; Schubert, C. Bernoulli number identities from quantum field theory and topological string theory. Commun. Number Theory Phys. 2013, 7, 225–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Gessel, I.M. On Miki’s identity for Bernoulli numbers. J. Number Theory 2005, 110, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Miki, H. A relation between Bernoulli numbers. J. Number Theory 1978, 10, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shiratani, K.; Yokoyama, S. An application of p-adic convolutions. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. Ser. A 1982, 36, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Jang, L.C.; Jang, G.-W. Fourier series of sums of products of Bernoulli functions and their applications. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2017, 10, 2798–2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Agarwal, R.P.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, T.; Kwon, J. Sums of finite products of Bernoulli functions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2017, 2017, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Jang, G.-W.; Kwon, J. Sums of finite products of Euler functions. In Advances in Real and Complex Analysis with Applications, 243–260, Trends in Math; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Dolgy, D.V.; Kwon, J. Sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of the third and fourth kinds. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2018, 2018, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Dolgy, D.V.; Park, J.W. Sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of the second and of Fibonacci polynomials. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018, 2018, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Dolgy, D.V.; Park, J.W. Sums of finite products of Legendre and Laguerre polynomials. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2018, 2018, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Jang, L.C.; Jang, G.-W. Sums of finite products of Genocchi functions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2017, 2017, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Andrews, G.E.; Askey, R.; Roy, R. Special functions. In Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications 71; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  14. Beals, R.; Wong, R. Special functions and orthogonal polynomials. In Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 153; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ma, R.; Zhang, W. Several identities involving the Fibonacci numbers and Lucas numbers. Fibonacci Q. 2007, 45, 164–170. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, T.; Zhang, W. Some identities involving Fibonacci, Lucas polynomials and their applications. Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. Roumanie 2012, 55, 95–103. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang, W. Some identities involving the Fibonacci numbers and Lucas numbers. Fibonacci Q. 2004, 42, 149–154. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jang, G.-W.; Dolgy, D.V.; Jang, L.C.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, T. Sums of products of two variable higher-order Fubini functions arising from Fourier series. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2018, 28, 533–550. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T.; Kwon, H.-I.; Kwon, J. Representing sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind and Fibonacci polynomials in terms of Chebyshev polynomials. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2018, 28, 321–335. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim, T.; Dolgy, D.V.; Kim, D.S. Fourier series of sums of products of higher-order Genocchi functions. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2018, 28, 215–230. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Kwon, J.; Jang, G.-W. Sums of finite products of Legendre and Laguerre polynomials by Chebyshev polynomials. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2018, 28, 551–565. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Dogly, D.V.; Jang, G.-W.; Kwon, J. Fourier series of functions related to two variable higher-order Fubini polynomials. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2018, 28, 589–605. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Jang, L.-C.; Jang, G.-W. Fourier Series for Functions Related to Chebyshev Polynomials of the First Kind and Lucas Polynomials. Mathematics 2018, 6, 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6120276

AMA Style

Kim T, Kim DS, Jang L-C, Jang G-W. Fourier Series for Functions Related to Chebyshev Polynomials of the First Kind and Lucas Polynomials. Mathematics. 2018; 6(12):276. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6120276

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Taekyun, Dae San Kim, Lee-Chae Jang, and Gwan-Woo Jang. 2018. "Fourier Series for Functions Related to Chebyshev Polynomials of the First Kind and Lucas Polynomials" Mathematics 6, no. 12: 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6120276

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop