Next Issue
Volume 4, June
Previous Issue
Volume 3, December
 
 

Chemosensors, Volume 4, Issue 1 (March 2016) – 5 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
2168 KiB  
Article
Turn on Fluorescent Probes for Selective Targeting of Aldehydes
by Ozlem Dilek and Susan L. Bane
Chemosensors 2016, 4(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors4010005 - 11 Mar 2016
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 8566
Abstract
Two different classes of fluorescent dyes were prepared as a turn off/on sensor system for aldehydes. Amino derivatives of a boron dipyrromethene (BDP) fluorophore and a xanthene-derived fluorophore (rosamine) were prepared. Model compounds of their product with an aldehyde were prepared using salicylaldehyde. [...] Read more.
Two different classes of fluorescent dyes were prepared as a turn off/on sensor system for aldehydes. Amino derivatives of a boron dipyrromethene (BDP) fluorophore and a xanthene-derived fluorophore (rosamine) were prepared. Model compounds of their product with an aldehyde were prepared using salicylaldehyde. Both amino boron dipyrromethene and rosamine derivatives are almost non-fluorescent in polar and apolar solvent. However, imine formation with salicylaldehyde on each fluorophore increases the fluorescence quantum yield by almost a factor of 10 (from 0.05 to 0.4). These fluorophores are therefore suitable candidates for development of fluorescence-based sensors for aldehydes. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

1942 KiB  
Review
Chemical Vapour Deposition of Gas Sensitive Metal Oxides
by Stella Vallejos, Francesco Di Maggio, Tahira Shujah and Chris Blackman
Chemosensors 2016, 4(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors4010004 - 01 Mar 2016
Cited by 50 | Viewed by 10013
Abstract
This article presents a review of recent research efforts and developments for the fabrication of metal-oxide gas sensors using chemical vapour deposition (CVD), presenting its potential advantages as a materials synthesis technique for gas sensors along with a discussion of their sensing performance. [...] Read more.
This article presents a review of recent research efforts and developments for the fabrication of metal-oxide gas sensors using chemical vapour deposition (CVD), presenting its potential advantages as a materials synthesis technique for gas sensors along with a discussion of their sensing performance. Thin films typically have poorer gas sensing performance compared to traditional screen printed equivalents, attributed to reduced porosity, but the ability to integrate materials directly with the sensor platform provides important process benefits compared to competing synthetic techniques. We conclude that these advantages are likely to drive increased interest in the use of CVD for gas sensor materials over the next decade, whilst the ability to manipulate deposition conditions to alter microstructure can help mitigate the potentially reduced performance in thin films, hence the current prospects for use of CVD in this field look excellent. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical Vapor Sensing)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

2683 KiB  
Article
Gas Sensing Studies of an n-n Hetero-Junction Array Based on SnO2 and ZnO Composites
by Anupriya Naik, Ivan Parkin and Russell Binions
Chemosensors 2016, 4(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors4010003 - 04 Feb 2016
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 6691
Abstract
A composite metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) sensor array based on tin dioxide (SNO2) and zinc oxide (ZnO) has been fabricated using a straight forward mechanical mixing method. The array was characterized using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, Raman spectroscopy and [...] Read more.
A composite metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) sensor array based on tin dioxide (SNO2) and zinc oxide (ZnO) has been fabricated using a straight forward mechanical mixing method. The array was characterized using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. The array was evaluated against a number of environmentally important reducing and oxidizing gases across a range of operating temperatures (300–500 °C). The highest response achieved was against 100 ppm ethanol by the 50 wt% ZnO–50 wt% SnO2 device, which exhibited a response of 109.1, a 4.5-fold increase with respect to the pure SnO2 counterpart (which displayed a response of 24.4) and a 12.3-fold enhancement with respect to the pure ZnO counterpart (which was associated with a response of 8.9), towards the same concentration of the analyte. Cross sensitivity studies were also carried out against a variety of reducing gases at an operating temperature of 300 °C. The sensors array showed selectivity towards ethanol. The enhanced behaviour of the mixed oxide materials was influenced by junction effects, composition, the packing structure and the device microstructure. The results show that it is possible to tune the sensitivity and selectivity of a composite sensor, through a simple change in the composition of the composite. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical Vapor Sensing)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

285 KiB  
Editorial
Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Chemosensors in 2015
by Chemosensors Editorial Office
Chemosensors 2016, 4(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors4010002 - 22 Jan 2016
Viewed by 3335
Abstract
The editors of Chemosensors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the following reviewers for assessing manuscripts in 2015. [...] Full article
1527 KiB  
Article
Building Selectivity for NO Sensing in a NOx Mixture with Sonochemically Prepared CuO Structures
by Max R. Mullen and Prabir K. Dutta
Chemosensors 2016, 4(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors4010001 - 23 Dec 2015
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4788
Abstract
Several technologies are available for decreasing nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from combustion sources, including selective catalytic reduction methods. In this process, ammonia reacts with nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). As the stoichiometry of the two reactions is different, electrochemical sensor systems [...] Read more.
Several technologies are available for decreasing nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from combustion sources, including selective catalytic reduction methods. In this process, ammonia reacts with nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). As the stoichiometry of the two reactions is different, electrochemical sensor systems that can distinguish between NO and NO2 in a mixture of these two gases are of interest. Since NO and NO2 can be brought to equilibrium, depending on the temperature and the surfaces that they are in contact with, the detection of NO and NO2 independently is a difficult problem and has not been solved to date. In this study, we explore a high surface area sonochemically prepared CuO as the resistive sensing medium. CuO is a poor catalyst for NOx equilibration, and requires temperatures of 500 C to bring about equilibration. Thus, at 300 C, NO and NO2 retain their levels after interaction with CuO surface. In addition, NO adsorbs more strongly on the CuO over NO2. Using these two concepts, we can detect NO with minimal interference from NO2, if the latter gas concentration does not exceed 20% in a NOx mixture over a range of 100–800 ppm. Since this range constitutes most of the range of total NOx concentrations in diesel and other lean burn engines, this sensor should find application in selective detection of NO in this combustion application. A limitation of this sensor is the interference with CO, but with combustion in excess air, this problem should be alleviated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical Vapor Sensing)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Previous Issue
Next Issue
Back to TopTop