Next Article in Journal
Ecological Environmental Effects and Their Driving Factors of Land Use/Cover Change: The Case Study of Baiyangdian Basin, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Exopolysaccharides of Fungal Origin: Properties and Pharmaceutical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study on the Performance-Influencing Factors of an Aviation Heavy-Oil Two-Stroke Direct-Injection Ignition Engine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Organizational Agility and Sustainable Manufacturing Practices in the Context of Emerging Economy: A Mediated Moderation Model
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Processes
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/pr10122647
processes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Systematic Review on Biosurfactants Contribution to the Transition to a Circular Economy

by
Elena Simina Lakatos
1,2,
Lucian Ionel Cioca
3,
Andrea Szilagyi
1,2,*,
Mariana Gratiela Vladu
4,
Roxana Mădălina Stoica
4 and
Misu Moscovici
4
1
Institute for Research in Circular Economy and Environment “Ernest Lupan”, 400609 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Robotics and Product Management, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3
Faculty of Engineering, Industrial Engineering and Management Department, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550024 Sibiu, Romania
4
National Institute for Chemical Pharmaceutical Research and Development—ICCF, Vitan Avenue 112, 031299 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2022, 10(12), 2647; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10122647
Submission received: 2 November 2022 / Revised: 28 November 2022 / Accepted: 3 December 2022 / Published: 8 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Circular Economy and Efficient Use of Resources (Volume II))
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Since they are more environmentally acceptable than their chemically synthesized counterparts, biosurfactants are used in a wide range of environmental applications. However, less research has been done on biosurfactants within the context of the circular economy, despite their theoretical potential to fulfill a number of circular economy ambitions, including closing the consumption loop, regenerating natural systems, and maintaining resource value within the system. Hence, the main objective of this review is to identify and analyze the contributions of biosurfactants to the implementation of the circular economy. A final sample of 30 papers from the Web of Science database was examined. We identified five broad categories of contributions: waste stream-derived production, combating food waste, strengthening soil health, and improving the efficiency of water resources. We concluded that, while manufacturing biosurfactants from waste streams can reduce production costs, optimizing yield remains a contentious issue that complicates the adoption of biosurfactants into the circular economy framework.

1. Introduction

Biosurfactants are amphiphilic compounds found on the surfaces of microbial cells that contain polar and non-polar moieties that allow them to form micelles that assemble at the interface of fluids with different polarity (e.g., water and oil), thus reducing surface pressure. Their structure may include glycolipids, mycolic corrosive, polysaccharide–lipid composite, lipoprotein/lipopeptide, phospholipids, or the microbial cell’s own surface. Biosurfactants are produced by a variety of microorganisms such as yeast, fungi, or specific bacterial strains [1,2,3].
Chemically synthesized surfactants (from petroleum derivatives) have environmental restrictions due to their toxicity and lack of biodegradability. As a consequence of these concerns, interest in biosurfactants as non-toxic and biodegradable substitutes has increased significantly. Hence, what makes biosurfactants particularly important in the context of global efforts toward sustainable development is that, from an ecological standpoint, they are non-toxic, biodegradable, and exhibit greater effectiveness under a variety of extreme conditions, such as temperature, pH, salinity, and show environmental acceptability when compared to chemical surfactants [4,5].
In the 1960s, hydrocarbon breakdown operators began to utilize biosurfactants more frequently, and their uses have grown considerably over the last five decades as an improved alternative for surfactant compounds, particularly in the food industry. Nowadays, it is projected that every year, over 10 million tons of compound surfactants and microbial biosurfactants are delivered [2,6].
Biosurfactants have numerous environmental applications, including oil spill bioremediation and dispersion, increased oil recovery, and crude oil transfer. Other possible biosurfactant applications include the food, cosmetic, medicinal, and agricultural industries. These compounds also have a propensity for being multifunctional agents: wetting agents, antibacterial agents, emulsifiers, or anti-adhesive agents [7,8].
However, increasing the volume of sustainable biosurfactant production requires an integrated economic process that includes waste reduction, reuse, and recycling. Circular economy could be a viable option, since it would allow for the development of a new technology-oriented economy with high employment potential and low environmental impact by using biobased feedstock instead of imported fossil fuels to produce materials, chemicals, and energy. This is particularly important, because aside from minimizing the environmental and economic implications of waste disposal, one current global challenge toward sustainability is to recover as much energy and materials as possible from waste streams, thereby adopting a circular economy with the greatest potential added value [9].
Despite the significant potential that biosurfactants hold in the process of shifting toward a circular economy (e.g., using waste as a source of raw materials to create the bio-surfactant, oil recovery, bioremediation, etc.), their contribution to this issue is currently underexplored in the literature. The notion of green economics [10,11] and unconventional sources of biosurfactants [12,13] have received the majority of attention in published articles on this topic thus far, as opposed to the circular economy concept itself. In light of these observations, this review has the following goals:
  • Identify and assess the role that biosurfactants play in the circular economy.
  • Develop future research directions that take into account biosurfactants integration in the circular economy framework.

2. Main Characteristics of Biosurfactants

The majority of biosurfactants generated are glycolipids. They are sugar-aliphatic acid or long-chain hydroxyaliphatic acid compounds. The association is made by methods of collecting either the ether or the ester. Rhamnolipids, sophorolipids, and trehalolipids are the most well-known glycolipids.
Microbial oxidation of alkanes results in the formation of fatty acids [14]. Microorganisms produce complicated fatty acids with OH groups and alkyl branches in addition to linear chain acids. Phospholipids are essential components of microbial membranes [15]. Phospholipid levels rise when hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria thrive on alkaline substrates. Lipoproteins and lipopeptides, on the other hand, refer to decapeptide antibiotics (gramicidins) and lipopeptide antibiotics, respectively (polymyxins). They have a lipid attached to a polypeptide chain [16]. Figure 1 depicts the main types of biosurfactants based on their molecular mass.
Biosurfactants are mostly created by aerophilic microorganisms in aqueous media using carbon sources like hydrocarbon, polysaccharides, lipids, and oil derived from bacteria [17,18,19]: (Pseudomonas, Bacillus, and Acinetobacter), fungus (Aspergillus and Fusarium), or yeast (Candida and Pseudozyma).
Several environmental and operational factors, such as the carbon and nitrogen source, carbon to nitrogen ratio, minerals, metabolic regulators (inhibitors and inducers), or salinity, have an impact on the synthesis of biosurfactants [20]. Nevertheless, carbon substrate is critical in biosurfactant creation and has a substantial impact on yield and quality, which can be split into the following categories: carbohydrates, hydrocarbons, vegetable oils, and hydroxyl compounds, usually polyols [21]. Hydrocarbons have traditionally been the favored substrates for the manufacture of biosurfactants and bioemulsifiers. The usage of hydrophobic substrates is thought to cause the synthesis of biosurfactants, making the hydrophobic substrates more accessible to the producing microbial cell. Water-soluble substrates, on the other hand, have been used [22]. Because monophasic fermentations are simpler than biphasic fermentations, they are less expensive and are favored as a substrate over hydrocarbons. Furthermore, hydrocarbon-containing substrates are unsuitable for a wide range of applications, including those in the food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical industries. Fats, oils, glycerol, and carbohydrates are examples of non-hydrocarbon substrates. Carbohydrates and vegetable oils are two of the most commonly used substrates for biosurfactant synthesis [22,23].
Due to the complexity of the down-stream processing and high expenses required in microbial cultivation to biosurfactant recovery (cultivation, production, purification, and recovery), industrial-scale biosurfactant manufacturing is still in its infancy compared to their counterparts, surfactants of petrochemical origin (Table 1).
In most biotechnological processes, raw materials are expected to account for 30–40% of overall production costs. As a result, it is preferable to employ low-priced raw materials to lower this expense. One of the large-scale options being investigated is the use of low-cost (organic-rich) raw materials derived from agro-waste or industrial waste as substrates for biosurfactant manufacturing [4]. Although genetic engineering can boost biosurfactant output, consumers remain generally reluctant to the usage of genetically modified species [27,28].
Nonetheless, despite continuous improvement of fermentation processes, the most promising breakthrough in the field of biosurfactants is expected to occur on the molecular level: future advances in genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics will enable to further elucidate the complete biosynthetic pathways and their regulation, as well as provide more insights into general lipid metabolism of producing strain. For example, regarding glycolipids, it is still unclear how they are regulated, as well as how glycolipid production relates to overall lipid metabolism. The type of carbon source may affect the glycolipid biosynthesis process’ choice of lipid metabolic pathway [29]. Additionally, high carbon-to-nitrogen ratios, nitrogen exhaustion, stress conditions, and high cell densities are other characteristics that support high levels of production [30].

3. Circular Economy and Biosurfactants

By lowering material intake, increasing product usability, and reducing waste generation, a circular economy aims at decoupling economic growth from resource use. Closing the loops seeks to address the issues of resource scarcity, biochemical fluxes, and climate change while providing communities with regenerative and restorative benefits. When compared to sustainability, circularity is a much more recent approach, with a greater focus on reducing system inputs, enhancing and preserving natural resources, effectively managing finite resources, and lowering overall risks [31,32]. The circular economy can be applied at a microeconomic level (individual consumers), macroeconomic level (industrial parks), and macroeconomic level (locality, region, country, etc.). Hence, the framework for a circular economy not only diminishes the number of raw materials used within the system but also creates opportunities for sustainable consumption, waste management, and innovation across all industries, as well as for human development and increased well-being for everyone [33,34].
The circular economy and biosurfactants are linked by the concept of exploiting waste to produce valuable material. Since biosurfactants may be synthesized from waste, they contribute to closing the consumption loop, leaving less waste behind and, as a result, minimizing the production’s carbon footprint [35]. Using biosurfactants in industry benefits both the circular economy and sustainability goals, as well as economic operators. From an economical standpoint, using waste for biosurfactant synthesis has various advantages, including reduced processing costs and the ubiquitous availability of many less expensive or renewable substrates. From a circular perspective, the product becomes more environmentally friendly and resource efficient while retaining its core functioning features. The creation of biosurfactants, however, faces several difficulties in regard with the biological source, and research [36,37] has demonstrated that these issues can be addressed by further examining various microbes and plants as substitute sources.
Consequently, we can discuss a synergistic link between biosurfactants and the circular economy: waste processing in the circular bioeconomy produces an equilibrium among industrial processes, economic prosperity, and environmental security while enhancing resource allocation. Furthermore, biosurfactants’ enhanced production from inexpensive and renewable sources, as well as their stability and biodegradability, demonstrate their contribution to improving sustainability and circular bioeconomy [20].

4. Methodology

In order to generate new insights, ideas, or models, a systematic review must integrate all empirical facts on a subject that satisfy a set of predetermined criteria. The core of a systematic review is using an explicit and reproducible procedure to identify all the studies that fulfill the predetermined eligibility requirements. We considered the following exclusion criteria during the screening process, since the purpose of this study is to analyze the contributions that biosurfactants bring to the implementation of the circular economy and to suggest future research areas in this area:
  • Papers published in conferences, patents, technical reports, book chapters;
  • Papers that did not clearly define their data sources or with unclear methodology; Papers not published in English;
  • Papers published before 2010;
  • Papers that are not relevant to the stated objectives.
The methodological approach is depicted in Figure 2. The preliminary search yielded a number of 75 papers. We considered alternate concepts for the circular economy keyword, such as green economy or sustainability, to maximize our chances of retrieving all relevant publications that meet the predefined criteria. A final sample of 30 papers was obtained after applying all the aforementioned criteria and performing the complete paper screening. The relevant papers are listed in Appendix A along with their source, keywords, and year of publication.

5. Results

After evaluating the sample of papers comprised in Appendix A, we managed to identify and analyze what are the main contributions of biosurfactants in a circular economy. We concluded on 5 types of contributions: waste stream-derived production, combating food waste, increasing water resource efficiency, soil bioremediation, and boosting soil health. Table 2 summarizes these findings, and highlights the associated circular economy principle, as well as papers from the final sample demonstrating the respective contribution of biosurfactants.
From a broad perspective, the sample analyzed revealed that in a circular economy context, biosurfactants have a number of benefits that enable their usage in highly polluted environments. According to the literature [40,45], there are three methods to employ biosurfactants: as a crude extract, pure biosurfactants, or as a product of microorganisms that produce biosurfactants.
Concerning the first contribution, waste stream-derived production, a range of low-cost waste materials were examined as substrates for the manufacture of biosurfactants in recent years. Worldwide, millions of tons of hazardous and non-hazardous waste are produced each year. For instance, in the European Union, each person produced 4.8 tons of garbage in 2020. Throughout the European Union in 2020, 31.3% of waste was disposed of in landfills, while 39.2% of waste was recycled [68]. Numerous industries are heavily burdened financially by the price of treating and disposing of these wastes, which may quickly exhaust available resources. Better waste management is therefore urgently required [12]. This led to the continuous development of an efficient cost-cutting strategy for biosurfactants connected with efficient waste management [69]. Hence, there is a huge potential for producing biosurfactants from a variety of affordable, renewable industrial wastes in order to close the loop of consumption and production [70]. Waste produced from several sources, including oil, agro-industries (lactic whey, molasses), distilleries, and others, has been successfully used as a feedstock for the manufacturing of biosurfactant [42].
Another important aspect to point out from our analysis is that the selection and accessibility of substrate are significant issues in the environmentally acceptable synthesis of biosurfactants. However, numerous efforts have been made to satisfy the demand for inexpensive substrates for the manufacturing of biosurfactants. In this context, there is a great potential, as substrates for the synthesis of biosurfactants were greatly enhanced by agro-industrial and food waste. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus licheniformis, Halobacteriaceae archaeon, and other common microbial species have been effectively used to produce biosurfactant from agro-industrial waste, including maize steep liquor, date molasses, orange peel, and sugarcane bagasse. Another eloquent example is the case of frying oil. Large amounts of frying oil are generated for usage in the domestic market and in the food sector. When cultivated on used olive oil or used sunflower oil, Pseudomonas strains grew effectively. Olive oil was found to be a better substrate for cell growth and biosurfactant synthesis [71]. All of these solutions reduce waste while also providing a way to profit from the biosurfactant market [20].
Concerning the third contribution, a consistent idea from the sample analysis is that biosurfactants can boost the efficacy of water resources. Bio-based surfactants can be employed to improve the treatment of heavy metal-contaminated soil and water. Biosurfactants also have applicability as biocomposite agents and bio-adsorbent in the context of wastewater treatment [36,72]. Moreover, oil leaking into the ocean is a serious issue that threatens to damage coasts. The problem of oil spills may benefit from biosurfactants since they may be less harmful and tenacious than synthetic surfactants. According to Chakrabarty [73], Pseudomonas aeruginosa’s emulsifier can spread oil into tiny droplets that can speed up biodegradation [74].
Finally, biosurfactants contribute to the circular economy by being employed for soil remediation and overall soil health improvement, thereby assisting in nature’s regeneration. Bioremediation is an emerging method that incorporates biological degradation or removal of organic pollutants under controlled environmental circumstances. In this way, toxic contaminants are reduced, degraded, detoxified, mineralized, and transformed as part of the bioremediation mechanism [42]. It has been demonstrated that the presence of higher doses of rhamnolipid promotes the degradation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soils [62]. Furthermore, several studies [3,62] suggest that the application of biosurfactants can enhance soil health. Pseudomonas and Burkholderia species-derived biosurfactants may be employed as secure biopesticides. These insecticides can be made using any type of surfactant, including cationic, anionic, anionic, and amphoteric ones. Surfactants are used by agronomists to increase the antibacterial activity of microorganisms. The significance of surfactants in enhancing insecticidal abilities has been demonstrated by several in vitro and in situ investigations [75].
From a practical standpoint, based on the study sample analyzed, we note that the use of agro-industrial waste and food by-product streams as renewable resources for starting fermentation feedstock is the best strategy in terms of potential to lower the price of biosurfactants [76]. Among the earliest suggested applications of biosurfactants were enhanced oil recovery and bioremediation. Additionally, the application of biosurfactants in the circular economy context has taken on increasing prominence as novel formulations are sought to venture the cosmetics, pharmaceutical, and food industries. A summary of the main practical applications identified is presented in Table 3.
Therefore, two major interaction mechanisms underlie biosurfactant environmental applications in the circular economy. First, the presence of biosurfactants increases the bioavailability of the substrate. Secondly, by enhancing its hydrophobicity, it improves interaction with the cell surface, facilitating hydrophobic substrates to associate with bacterial cells [79,80]. Finally, another important insight obtained from the study sample is that the ability of microorganisms to create biosurfactants in situ is still largely unexplored, as the majority of the reported investigations were carried out in a laboratory setting.

6. Discussion

6.1. Further Research Directions

As an overarching observation, there are many potential uses for biosurfactants due to their better biocompatibility and microbial biodegradability. This is especially the case when there has been significant environmental intervention, such as in the decontamination of oil-polluted areas, tertiary petroleum recovery, crop protection, and the cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries [80]. As a result, it is not surprising that a number of studies have been conducted in order to uncover the synthesis of such chemicals with potential applications in bioremediation, agriculture, and industry [45]. The preceding section demonstrated that biosurfactants can be an enabler for the transition to a circular economy through their various applications in accordance with the circular economy system: closing the resource loop, regenerating natural systems, and even preserving resource value within the system.
Although producing biosurfactants from waste streams lowers production costs, optimizing yield remains an important field of research due to the heterogeneity in producing strains and desired products [10]. Therefore, engineered processes for improving waste to biosurfactant production have to be further developed. For example, in order to increase the production and quality of the biosurfactant product, strategies including green chemistry and genetically engineered microorganisms are applied. Even though pretreatment of renewable substrates facilitates organism growth, caution must be taken to preserve the nutritional benefits of such substrates, since the product must be high quality and quantity in order to open up a wide range of industrial prospects for surface active agents of microbial origin. There is still a lot of potential for wastes from the dairy, animal fat, and food processing industries [69]. Furthermore, another aspect to consider for future research is that high biosurfactant concentrations must be employed with caution due to their biocidal activity and potential enzymatic inhibition, which hinders the remediation process and reduces microbial diversity [80].
Concerning the food industry, we believe that biosurfactants should be crucial components for the future modern agriculture, since producing food requires a significant quantity of energy, and the technological processes generate a sizable amount of waste. The potential to connect agro-industrial ecosystems and use environmentally friendly processes would result in a bio-based circular economy for biosurfactant production. Nonetheless, in order to achieve such a desirable state, future research should tackle these renewable substrates and processes. To enhance current processes and meet the needs of industrial production systems, improved experimental setups can be developed [35,81].

6.2. Limitations

Due to its qualitative nature, this review presents a series of limitations. Although the study selection procedure was documented to assure reproducibility and transparency, the researcher bias can always affect how studies are categorized. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were outlined in the study in order to address this issue. Another limitation might be the decision to exclusively examine journal publications, which excludes the gray literature that could have brought additional insights. Additionally, it is possible that the literature evaluation we completed omitted a number of papers, case studies, or exploratory studies that are relevant to the research’s goals. Such a limitation could be caused by the construction of the database query, as we selected publications based on the literal use of the concepts circular economy and provided only two alternative terms (sustainability and green economy).

7. Conclusions

The goal of this review was to identify and analyze biosurfactant contributions to the implementation of the circular economy, as well as to establish future research areas for better biosurfactant integration in the circular economy circuit. From a theoretical approach, this paper updated the role of biosurfactants in the transition to a circular economy. In terms of practical implications, the current findings provide insights for industrial entities dealing with waste processing, particularly organic waste, as bio-surfactants can be used to achieve organizational or national-level sustainability or circular economy goals.
The widespread application of biosurfactants stimulates research that makes use of these molecules on various technological fronts. A wide range of environmental activities, including the oil industry for the recovery of oils and the bioremediation of ecosystems, can use biosurfactants in order to shift towards a circular economy. Nevertheless, in order to broaden the industrial applicability of biosurfactants in the waste management sector, feasibility studies to determine if waste streams or industrial by-products are viable substrates for biosurfactant production must be conducted in the coming years. As a result, the production of biosurfactants can become economically viable through the use of low-cost substrates, the conception of ideal production conditions for various bioproducts, the development of new purification techniques, and the consolidation of high-yield strains. Pursuing purified products for high-value niche markets may also be a step towards achieving a circular economy [40,82]. To conclude, we affirm that biosurfactants present the potential for improving management alternatives for protecting and conserving our renewable and natural resources. The sample of papers analyzed revealed a synergic relationship between the circular economy and biosurfactants, such that the growing use of biosurfactants this will safeguard the diversity of different ecosystems, as well as the water supply, soil fertility, and pollution levels.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S.L., L.I.C., M.G.V. and M.M.; methodology, E.S.L., A.S. and R.M.S.; validation, L.I.C., M.G.V. and M.M.; formal analysis, E.S.L.; investigation, A.S.; resources, L.I.C.; data curation, E.S.L.; writing—original draft preparation, E.S.L. and A.S.; writing—review and editing, M.G.V., R.M.S. and M.M.; visualization, L.I.C.; supervision, L.I.C. and M.M.; project administration, L.I.C.; funding acquisition, L.I.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant of the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CCCDI-UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2021-3528/731PED-2022within PNCDI III.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. Final sample of papers included in the review.
Table A1. Final sample of papers included in the review.
No.AuthorsArticle TitleSource TitleKey WordsPublication Year
1Ambaye, TG; Formicola, F; Sbaffoni, S; Franzetti, A; Vaccari, MInsights into rhamnolipid amendment towards enhancing microbial electrochemical treatment of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soilChemosphereBiosurfactants; Bioelectrochemical system; Circular economy; Illumina; Remediation; Current density2022
2Zhang, Y; Placek, TL; Jahan, R; Alexandridis, P; Tsianou, MRhamnolipid Micellization and Adsorption PropertiesInternational journal of molecular sciencesbiosurfactant; green surfactant; rhamnolipid; self-assembly; formulation; bioremediation; sustainability2022
3Kee, SH; Ganeson, K; Rashid, NFM; Yatim, AFM; Vigneswari, S; Amirul, AA; Ramakrishna, S; Bhubalan, KA review on biorefining of palm oil and sugar cane agro-industrial residues by bacteria into commercially viable bioplastics and biosurfactantsFuelPolyhydroxyalkanoates; Biosurfactant; Palm oil; Agro-industrial waste; Circular economy; Sugar cane2022
4Hollenbach, R; Delavault, A; Gebhardt, L; Soergel, H; Muhle-Goll, C; Ochsenreither, K; Syldatk, CLipase-Mediated Mechanoenzymatic Synthesis of Sugar Esters in Dissolved Unconventional and Neat Reaction SystemsAcs sustainable chemistry and engineeringbiocatalysis; solvent-free; transesterification; glycolipid; lipase; biosurfactants2022
5Martinez, M; Rodriguez, A; Gea, T; Font, XA Simplified Techno-Economic Analysis for Sophorolipid Production in a Solid-State Fermentation ProcessEnergiessolid-state fermentation; sophorolipids; waste; biosurfactant; techno-economic analysis2022
6Kachrimanidou, V; Alimpoumpa, D; Papadaki, A; Lappa, I; Alexopoulos, K; Kopsahelis, NCheese whey utilization for biosurfactant production: evaluation of bioprocessing strategies using novel Lactobacillus strainsBiomass conversion and biorefineryBiosurfactants; Lactobacilli; Cheese-whey; Bioprocessing strategies; Bioreactors2022
7Sarubbo, LA; Silva, MDC; Durval, IJB; Bezerra, KGO; Ribeiro, BG; Silva, IA; Twigg, MS; Banat, IMBiosurfactants: Production, properties, applications, trends, and general perspectivesBiochemical engineering journalBiosurfactant; Microorganisms; Environmental sustainability; Green technology; Industrial applications2022
8Abd El-Malek, F; Rofeal, M; Zabed, HM; Nizami, AS; Rehan, M; Qi, XHMicroorganism-mediated algal biomass processing for clean products manufacturing: Current status, challenges, and future outlookFuelAlgal biomass; Microbial fermentation; Sustainability; Value-added products; Biorefinery2022
9Khodavirdipour, A; Chamanrokh, P; Alikhani, MY; Alikhani, MSPotential of Bacillus subtilis Against SARS-CoV-2-A Sustainable Drug Development PerspectiveFrontiers in microbiologyBacillus subitilis; biosurfactant; COVID-19; drug development; surfactin2022
10Sharma, P; Gaur, VK; Gupta, S; Varjani, S; Pandey, A; Gnansounou, E; You, SM; Ngo, HH; Wong, JWCTrends in mitigation of industrial waste: Global health hazards, environmental implications, and waste-derived economy for environmental sustainabilityScience of the total environmentEnvironmental sustainability; Waste-derived economy; Bioplastic; Biosurfactants; Organic waste2022
11Duquet, F; Nada, AA; Rivallin, M; Rouessac, F; Villeneuve-Faure, C; Roualdes, SInfluence of Bio-Based Surfactants on TiO2 Thin Films as Photoanodes for Electro-PhotocatalysisCatalystsTiO2 thin film; bio-based surfactant; electro-photocatalysis; hydrogen2021
12Kachrimanidou, V; Papadaki, A; Lappa, I; Papastergiou, S; Kleisiari, D; Kopsahelis, NBiosurfactant Production from Lactobacilli: an Insight on the Interpretation of Prevailing Assessment MethodsApplied biochemistry and biotechnologyBiosurfactants; Lactobacilli; Surface tension; Cheese-whey; Screening2022
13Hu, XM; Subramanian, K; Wang, HM; Roelants, SLKW; Soetaert, W; Kaur, G; Lin, CSK; Chopra, SSBioconversion of Food Waste to produce Industrial-scale Sophorolipid Syrup and Crystals: dynamic Life Cycle Assessment (dLCA) of Emerging BiotechnologiesBioresource technologyLife Cycle Assessment; Sustainable Processes; Waste Valorization; Biosurfactants; Sophorolipids2021
14Vieira, IMM; Santos, BLP; Ruzene, DS; Silva, DPAn overview of current research and developments in biosurfactantsJournal of industrial and engineering chemistryBiosurfactant; Surfactant; Microorganism; Sustainability2021
15Janek, T; Gudina, EJ; Polomska, X; Biniarz, P; Jama, D; Rodrigues, LR; Rymowicz, W; Lazar, ZSustainable Surfactin Production by Bacillus subtilis Using Crude Glycerol from Different WastesMoleculesBacillus subtilis; biosurfactant; surfactin; lipopeptides; industrial wastes; crude glycerol2021
16Sonnabend, M; Aubin, SG; Schmidt, AM; Leimenstoll, MCSophorolipid-Based Oligomers as Polyol Components for Polyurethane SystemsPolymerspolyurethane; polyol; bio-based; sophorolipid-based polyols; hydroxyl fatty acid-based polyols; platform chemicals2021
17Castelein, M; Verbruggen, F; Van Renterghem, L; Spooren, J; Yurramendi, L; Du Laing, G; Boon, N; Soetaert, W; Hennebel, T; Roelants, S; Williamson, AJBioleaching of metals from secondary materials using glycolipid biosurfactantsMinerals engineeringSophorolipids; Bioleaching; Heavy metal recovery; Fayalite; Copper2021
18Hu, XM; Subramanian, K; Wang, HM; Roelants, SLKW; To, MH; Soetaert, W; Kaur, G; Lin, CSK; Chopra, SSGuiding environmental sustainability of emerging bioconversion technology for waste-derived sophorolipid production by adopting a dynamic life cycle assessment (dLCA) approachEnvironmental pollutionSophorolipids; Biosurfactants; Life cycle assessment; Dynamic life cycle assessment; Feedstock optimization; In-situ separation2021
19Chebbi, A; Franzetti, A; Castro, FD; Tovar, FHG; Tazzari, M; Sbaffoni, S; Vaccari, MPotentials of Winery and Olive Oil Residues for the Production of Rhamnolipids and Other Biosurfactants: A Step Towards Achieving a Circular Economy ModelWaste and biomass valorizationWinery wastes; Olive oil wastes; Circular economy; Rhamnolipids; Biosurfactants; Agricultural wastes2021
20Martinez-Arcos, A; Moldes, AB; Vecino, XAdding value to secondary streams of corn wet milling industryCyta-journal of foodCorn stream; nutritional supplement; biosurfactants; circular economy2021
21Drakontis, CE; Amin, SDesign of sustainable lip gloss formulation with biosurfactants and silica particlesInternational journal of cosmetic sciencesustainability; lip gloss; rheometer; Aerosil; silica particles; biosurfactants; rhamnolipids; sophorolipids; silicone oil; cosmetic formulation2020
22Singh, R; Glick, BR; Rathore, DRole of textile effluent fertilization with biosurfactant to sustain soil quality and nutrient availabilityJournal of environmental managementTextile effluent; Biosurfactant; Soil health; Triticum aestivum; Capsicum annum2020
23Hruzova, K; Patel, A; Masak, J; Matatkova, O; Rova, U; Christakopoulos, P; Matsakas, LA novel approach for the production of green biosurfactant from Pseudomonas aeruginosa using renewable forest biomassScience of the total environmentRhamnolipid; Biosurfactants; Pseudomonas; Wood hydrolysate; Organosolv fractionation2020
24Sadhukhan, J; Dugmore, TIJ; Matharu, A; Martinez-Hernandez, E; Aburto, J; R26ahman, PKSM; Lynch, JPerspectives on Game Changer Global Challenges for Sustainable 21st Century: Plant-Based Diet, Unavoidable Food Waste Biorefining, and Circular EconomySustainabilitybiorefinery and bioeconomy; food waste and circular economy; zero hunger zero poverty; sustainable food; food policy; vegan protein; 2020
25Jimenez-Penalver, P; Koh, A; Gro28ss, R; Gea, T; Font, XBiosurfactants from Waste: Structures and Interfacial Properties of Sophorolipids Produced from a Residual Oil CakeJournal of surfactants and detergentsBiosurfactant; Critical micelle concentration; Emulsion; LC-MS; Sophorolipids; Waste2020
26Soare, M. G., Lakatos, E. S., Ene, N., Malo, N., Popa, O., and Babeanu, N. The potential applications of Bacillus sp. And Pseudomonas sp. Strains with antimicrobial activity against phytopathogens, in waste oils and the bioremediation of hydrocarbonsCatalystsantimicrobial activity; biosurfactants; emulsion index; sunflower oil; hydrocarbons2019
27Lu, Y; Zhu, YL; Xu, ZH; Liu, QXPseudo-Gemini Biosurfactants with CO2 Switchability for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)Tenside surfactants detergentsBiosurfactants; pseudo-gemini surfactants; CO2 switchable compounds; enhanced oil recovery (EOR); oil-water separation2019
28Etchegaray, A; Coutte, F; Chataigne, G; Bechet, M; dos Santos, RHZ; Leclere, V; Jacques, PProduction of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens OG and its metabolites in renewable media: valorization for biodiesel production and p-xylene decontaminationCanadian journal of microbiologyBacillus sp.; sustainability; lipopeptides; biosurfactants; environmental decontamination; circular bioeconomy2017
29Franzetti, A; Gandolfi, I; Raimondi, C; Bestetti, G; Banat, IM; Smyth, TJ; Papacchini, M; Cavallo, M; Fracchia, LEnvironmental fate, toxicity, characteristics, and potential applications of novel bioemulsifiers produced by Variovorax paradoxus 7bCT5Bioresource technologyBiosurfactant; Bioemulsifiers; Crude oil; Environmental sustainability2012
30Dreja, M; Vockenroth, I; Plath, NBiosurfactants-Exotic Specialties or Ready for Application?Tenside surfactants detergentsBiosurfactants; Sustainability; Surface Tension; Wetting; Detergents2012

References

  1. Fenibo, E.O.; Douglas, S.I.; Stanley, H.O. A Review on Microbial Surfactants: Production, Classifications, Properties and Characterization. J. Adv. Microbiol. 2019, 18, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Roy, A. A Review on the Biosurfactants: Properties, Types and its Applications. J. Fundam. Renew. Energy Appl. 2017, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dhiman, V.; Giri, A.; Pant, D. Pollutants Bioremediation Using Biosurfactants: A Novel Approach for Improving Soil Health. In Soil Health and Environmental Sustainability; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 489–502. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jain, R.M.; Mody, K.; Joshi, N.; Mishra, A.; Jha, B. Effect of unconventional carbon sources on biosurfactant production and its application in bioremediation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 62, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Makkar, R.S.; Cameotra, S.S. Biosurfactant production by microorganisms on unconventional carbon sources. J. Surfactants Deterg. 1999, 2, 237–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Boxley, C.J.; Pemberton, J.E.; Maier, R.M. Rhamnolipids and related biosurfactants for cosmetics. Inform 2015, 26, 207. [Google Scholar]
  7. Banat, I.M.; Makkar, R.S.; Cameotra, S.S. Potential commercial applications of microbial surfactants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 53, 495–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Franzetti, A.; Gandolfi, I.; Fracchia, L.; Van Hamme, J.; Gkorezis, P.; Marchant, R.; Banat, I. Biosurfactant Use in Heavy Metal Removal from Industrial Effluents and Contaminated Sites. Biosurfactants 2014, 159, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Manga, E.B.; Celik, P.A.; Cabuk, A.; Banat, I.M. Biosurfactants: Opportunities for the development of a sustainable future. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 56, 101514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mgbechidinma, C.L.; Akan, O.D.; Zhang, C.; Huang, M.; Linus, N.; Zhu, H.; Wakil, S.M. Integration of green economy concepts for sustainable biosurfactant production—A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 364, 128021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Debnath, B.; Sardar, M.; Gharami, S.; Das, A. Application of biosurfactants in the food industry: Supply chain and green economy perspectives. In Green Sustainable Process for Chemical and Environmental Engineering and Science; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 633–647. [Google Scholar]
  12. Makkar, R.; Cameotra, S. An update on the use of unconventional substrates for biosurfactant production and their new applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 58, 428–434. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nitschke, M.; Costa, S.G.V.A.O.; Haddad, R.; Gonçalves, L.A.G.; Eberlin, M.N.; Contiero, J. Oil Wastes as Unconventional Substrates for Rhamnolipid Biosurfactant Production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa LBI. Biotechnol. Prog. 2005, 21, 1562–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Rehn, H.J.; Reiff, I. Mechanisms and occurrence of microbial oxidation of long-chain alkanes. Adv. Biochem. Eng. 1981, 19, 175–216. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rahman, P.K.; Gakpe, E. Production, Characterisation and Applications of Biosurfactants—Review. Biotechnol. 2008, 7, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rosenberg, E.; Ron, E.Z. High- and low-molecular-mass microbial surfactants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 52, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Malkapuram, S.T.; Sharma, V.; Gumfekar, S.P.; Sonawane, S.; Sonawane, S.; Boczkaj, G.; Seepana, M.M. A review on recent advances in the application of biosurfactants in wastewater treatment. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 48, 101576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hommel, R.K. Formation and physiological role of biosurfactants produced by hydrocarbon-utilizing microorganisms. Physiol. Biodegrad. Microorg. 1997, 1, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Karlapudi, A.P.; Venkateswarulu, T.; Tammineedi, J.; Kanumuri, L.; Ravuru, B.K.; Dirisala, V.R.; Kodali, V.P. Role of biosurfactants in bioremediation of oil pollution—A review. Petroleum 2018, 4, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kashif, A.; Rehman, R.; Fuwad, A.; Shahid, M.K.; Dayarathne, H.N.P.; Jamal, A.; Aftab, M.N.; Mainali, B.; Choi, Y. Current advances in the classification, production, properties and applications of microbial biosurfactants—A critical review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 306, 102718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mouafo, T.H.; Mbawala, A.; Ndjouenkeu, R. Effect of different carbon sources on biosurfactants’ production by three strains of Lactobacillus spp. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 5034783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Campos, J.M.; Stamford, T.L.M.; Sarubbo, L.A.; De Luna, J.M.; Rufino, R.D.; Banat, I. Microbial biosurfactants as additives for food industries. Biotechnol. Prog. 2013, 29, 1097–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Stoimenova, E.; Vasileva-Tonkova, E.; Sotirova, A.; Galabova, D.; Lalchev, Z. Evaluation of Different Carbon Sources for Growth and Biosurfactant Production by Pseudomonas fluorescens Isolated from Wastewaters. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C 2009, 64, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pereira, J.F.; Gudiña, E.J.; Costa, R.; Vitorino, R.; Teixeira, J.A.; Coutinho, J.A.; Rodrigues, L.R. Optimization and characterization of biosurfactant production by Bacillus subtilis isolates towards microbial enhanced oil recovery applications. Fuel 2013, 111, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Moldes, A.; Rodríguez-López, L.; Rincón-Fontán, M.; López-Prieto, A.; Vecino, X.; Cruz, J. Synthetic and Bio-Derived Surfactants Versus Microbial Biosurfactants in the Cosmetic Industry: An Overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Banat, I.M.; Franzetti, A.; Gandolfi, I.; Bestetti, G.; Martinotti, M.G.; Fracchia, L.; Smyth, T.J.; Marchant, R. Microbial biosurfactants production, applications and future potential. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87, 427–444. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Markande, A.R.; Patel, D.; Varjani, S. A review on biosurfactants: Properties, applications and current developments. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 330, 124963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rivera, D.; Urbina, M.M.; López, V.E.L.Y. Advances on research in the use of agro-industrial waste in biosurfactant production. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 35, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Jezierska, S.; Claus, S.; Van Bogaert, I. Yeast glycolipid biosurfactants. FEBS Lett. 2017, 592, 1312–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Rath, S.; Srivastava, R.K. Biosurfactants Production and Their Commercial Importance. Environ. Agric. Microbiol. 2021, 197–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lakatos, E.; Yong, G.; Szilagyi, A.; Clinci, D.; Georgescu, L.; Iticescu, C.; Cioca, L.-I. Conceptualizing Core Aspects on Circular Economy in Cities. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Szilagyi, A.; Cioca, L.-I.; Bacali, L.; Lakatos, E.-S.; Birgovan, A.-L. Consumers in the Circular Economy: A Path Analysis of the Underlying Factors of Purchasing Behaviour. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pacurariu, R.L.; Vatca, S.D.; Lakatos, E.S.; Bacali, L.; Vlad, M. A Critical Review of EU Key Indicators for the Transition to the Circular Economy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Geissdoerfer, M.; Savaget, P.; Bocken, N.M.; Hultink, E.J. The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Mohanty, S.S.; Koul, Y.; Varjani, S.; Pandey, A.; Ngo, H.H.; Chang, J.-S.; Wong, J.W.C.; Bui, X.-T. A critical review on various feedstocks as sustainable substrates for biosurfactants production: A way towards cleaner production. Microb. Cell Factories 2021, 20, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Akbari, S.; Abdurahman, N.H.; Yunus, R.M.; Fayaz, F.; Alara, O.R. Biosurfactants—A new frontier for social and environmental safety: A mini review. Biotechnol. Res. Innov. 2018, 2, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Reiling, H.; Thanei-Wyss, U.; Guerra-Santos, L.H.; Hirt, R.; Käppeli, O.; Fiechter, A. Pilot plant production of rhamnolipid biosurfactant by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1986, 51, 985–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Velenturf, A.P.; Purnell, P. Principles for a sustainable circular economy. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 27, 1437–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kee, S.H.; Ganeson, K.; Rashid, N.F.M.; Yatim, A.F.M.; Vigneswari, S.; Amirul, A.-A.A.; Ramakrishna, S.; Bhubalan, K. A review on biorefining of palm oil and sugar cane agro-industrial residues by bacteria into commercially viable bioplastics and biosurfactants. Fuel 2022, 321, 124039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sarubbo, L.A.; Maria da Gloria, C.S.; Durval, I.J.B.; Bezerra, K.G.O.; Ribeiro, B.G.; Silva, I.A.; Twigg, M.S.; Banat, I.M. Biosurfactants: Production, properties, applications, trends, and general perspectives. Biochem. Eng. J. 2022, 181, 108377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. El-Malek, F.A.; Rofeal, M.; Zabed, H.M.; Nizami, A.-S.; Rehan, M.; Qi, X. Microorganism-mediated algal biomass processing for clean products manufacturing: Current status, challenges and future outlook. Fuel 2021, 311, 122612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sharma, P.; Gaur, V.K.; Gupta, S.; Varjani, S.; Pandey, A.; Gnansounou, E.; You, S.; Ngo, H.H.; Wong, J.W. Trends in mitigation of industrial waste: Global health hazards, environmental implications and waste derived economy for environmental sustainability. Sci. Total. Environ. 2021, 811, 152357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Janek, T.; Gudiña, E.; Połomska, X.; Biniarz, P.; Jama, D.; Rodrigues, L.; Rymowicz, W.; Lazar, Z. Sustainable Surfactin Production by Bacillus subtilis Using Crude Glycerol from Different Wastes. Molecules 2021, 26, 3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hu, X.; Subramanian, K.; Wang, H.; Roelants, S.L.; To, M.H.; Soetaert, W.; Kaur, G.; Lin, C.S.K.; Chopra, S.S. Guiding environmental sustainability of emerging bioconversion technology for waste-derived sophorolipid production by adopting a dynamic life cycle assessment (dLCA) approach. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 269, 116101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vladu, M.-G.S.; Lakatos, E.S.; Ene, N.; Dalanaj, N.M.; Popa, O.; Babeanu, N. The Potential Applications of Bacillus sp. And Pseudomonas sp. Strains with Antimicrobial Activity against Phytopathogens, in Waste Oils and the Bioremediation of Hydrocarbons. Catalysts 2019, 9, 959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jiménez-Peñalver, P.; Koh, A.; Gross, R.; Gea, T.; Font, X. Biosurfactants from Waste: Structures and Interfacial Properties of Sophorolipids Produced from a Residual Oil Cake. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2019, 23, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ferronato, N.; Rada, E.C.; Gorritty Portillo, M.A.; Cioca, L.I.; Ragazzi, M.; Torretta, V. Introduction of the circular economy within developing regions: A comparative analysis of advantages and opportunities for waste valorization. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 230, 366–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hollenbach, R.; Delavault, A.; Gebhardt, L.; Soergel, H.; Muhle-Goll, C.; Ochsenreither, K.; Syldatk, C. Lipase-Mediated Mechanoenzymatic Synthesis of Sugar Esters in Dissolved Unconventional and Neat Reaction Systems. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 10192–10202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Martínez, M.; Rodríguez, A.; Gea, T.; Font, X. A Simplified Techno-Economic Analysis for Sophorolipid Production in a Solid-State Fermentation Process. Energies 2022, 15, 4077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kachrimanidou, V.; Alimpoumpa, D.; Papadaki, A.; Lappa, I.; Alexopoulos, K.; Kopsahelis, N. Cheese whey utilization for biosurfactant production: Evaluation of bioprocessing strategies using novel Lactobacillus strains. Biomass- Convers. Biorefinery 2022, 12, 4621–4635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kachrimanidou, V.; Papadaki, A.; Lappa, I.; Papastergiou, S.; Kleisiari, D.; Kopsahelis, N. Biosurfactant Production from Lactobacilli: An Insight on the Interpretation of Prevailing Assessment Methods. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 194, 882–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hu, X.; Subramanian, K.; Wang, H.; Roelants, S.L.; Soetaert, W.; Kaur, G.; Lin, C.S.K.; Chopra, S.S. Bioconversion of Food Waste to produce Industrial-scale Sophorolipid Syrup and Crystals: Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment (dLCA) of Emerging Biotechnologies. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 337, 125474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Martínez-Arcos, A.; Moldes, A.B.; Vecino, X. Adding value to secondary streams of corn wet milling industry. CyTA—J. Food 2021, 19, 675–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sadhukhan, J.; Dugmore, T.I.; Matharu, A.; Martinez-Hernandez, E.; Aburto, J.; Rahman, P.K.; Lynch, J. Perspectives on “game changer” global challenges for sustainable 21st century: Plant-based diet, unavoidable food waste biorefining, and circular economy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Khodavirdipour, A.; Chamanrokh, P.; Alikhani, M.Y.; Alikhani, M.S. Potential of Bacillus subtilis Against SARS-CoV-2–A Sustainable Drug Development Perspective. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 718786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Vieira, I.M.M.; Santos, B.L.P.; Ruzene, D.S.; Silva, D.P. An overview of current research and developments in biosurfactants. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2021, 100, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Castelein, M.; Verbruggen, F.; Van Renterghem, L.; Spooren, J.; Yurramendi, L.; Du Laing, G.; Boon, N.; Soetaert, W.; Hennebel, T.; Roelants, S.; et al. Bioleaching of metals from secondary materials using glycolipid biosurfactants. Miner. Eng. 2021, 163, 106665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Drakontis, C.E.; Amin, S. Design of sustainable lip gloss formulation with biosurfactants and silica particles. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2020, 42, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Q. Pseudo-Gemini Biosurfactants with CO2 Switchability for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR). Tenside Surfactants Deterg. 2019, 56, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dreja, M.; Vockenroth, I.; Plath, N. Biosurfactants—Exotic Specialties or Ready for Application? Tenside Surfactants Deterg. 2012, 49, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, Y.; Placek, T.L.; Jahan, R.; Alexandridis, P.; Tsianou, M. Rhamnolipid Micellization and Adsorption Properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ambaye, T.G.; Formicola, F.; Sbaffoni, S.; Franzetti, A.; Vaccari, M. Insights into rhamnolipid amendment towards enhancing microbial electrochemical treatment of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil. Chemosphere 2022, 307, 136126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Duquet, F.; Nada, A.A.; Rivallin, M.; Rouessac, F.; Villeneuve-Faure, C.; Roualdes, S. Influence of Bio-Based Surfactants on TiO2 Thin Films as Photoanodes for Electro-Photocatalysis. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sonnabend, M.; Aubin, S.; Schmidt, A.; Leimenstoll, M. Sophorolipid-Based Oligomers as Polyol Components for Polyurethane Systems. Polymers 2021, 13, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chebbi, A.; Franzetti, A.; Castro, F.D.; Tovar, F.H.G.; Tazzari, M.; Sbaffoni, S.; Vaccari, M. Potentials of Winery and Olive Oil Residues for the Production of Rhamnolipids and Other Biosurfactants: A Step towards Achieving a Circular Economy Model. Waste Biomass- Valoriz. 2021, 12, 4733–4743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hrůzová, K.; Patel, A.; Masák, J.; Maťátková, O.; Rova, U.; Christakopoulos, P.; Matsakas, L. A novel approach for the production of green biosurfactant from Pseudomonas aeruginosa using renewable forest biomass. Sci. Total. Environ. 2019, 711, 135099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Franzetti, A.; Gandolfi, I.; Raimondi, C.; Bestetti, G.; Banat, I.M.; Smyth, T.J.; Papacchini, M.; Cavallo, M.; Fracchia, L. Environmental fate, toxicity, characteristics and potential applications of novel bioemulsifiers produced by Variovorax paradoxus 7bCT5. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 108, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Eurostat. Eurostat Data on Total Waste Generation. 2022. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Waste_statistics (accessed on 10 November 2022).
  69. Satpute, S.K.; Płaza, G.A.; Banpurkar, A.G. Biosurfactants’ Production from Renewable Natural Resources: Example of Innovativeand Smart Technology in Circular Bioeconomy. Manag. Syst. Prod. Eng. 2017, 25, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Singh, P.; Patil, Y.; Rale, V. Biosurfactant production: Emerging trends and promising strategies. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 126, 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Makkar, R.S.; Cameotra, S.S.; Banat, I.M. Advances in utilization of renewable substrates for biosurfactant production. AMB Express 2011, 1, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Fu, F.; Wang, Q. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 407–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chakrabarty, A. Genetically-manipulated microorganisms and their products in the oil service industries. Trends Biotechnol. 1985, 3, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mulligan, C.N. Environmental applications for biosurfactants. Environ. Pollut. 2005, 133, 183–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Gayathiri, E.; Prakash, P.; Karmegam, N.; Varjani, S.; Awasthi, M.K.; Ravindran, B. Biosurfactants: Potential and Eco-Friendly Material for Sustainable Agriculture and Environmental Safety—A Review. Agronomy 2022, 12, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cecconet, D.; Capodaglio, A.G. Sewage Sludge Biorefinery for Circular Economy. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wang, H.; Roelants, S.L.; To, M.H.; Patria, R.D.; Kaur, G.; Lau, N.S.; Lau, C.Y.; NA Van Bogaert, I.; Soetaert, W.; Lin, C.S. Starmerella bombicola: Recent advances on sophorolipid production and prospects of waste stream utilization. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2018, 94, 999–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Quraishi, M.; Bhatia, S.; Pandit, S.; Gupta, P.; Rangarajan, V.; Lahiri, D.; Varjani, S.; Mehariya, S.; Yang, Y.-H. Exploiting Microbes in the Petroleum Field: Analyzing the Credibility of Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR). Energies 2021, 14, 4684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pacwa-Płociniczak, M.; Płaza, G.A.; Piotrowska-Seget, Z.; Cameotra, S.S. Environmental Applications of Biosurfactants: Recent Advances. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 633–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Eras-Muñoz, E.; Farré, A.; Sánchez, A.; Font, X.; Gea, T. Microbial biosurfactants: A review of recent environmental applications. Bioengineered 2022, 13, 12365–12391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yaashikaa, P.; Kumar, P.S.; Saravanan, A.; Varjani, S.; Ramamurthy, R. Bioconversion of municipal solid waste into bio-based products: A review on valorisation and sustainable approach for circular bioeconomy. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 748, 141312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Twigg, M.S.; Tripathi, L.; Zompra, A.; Salek, K.; Irorere, V.U.; Gutierrez, T.; Spyroulias, G.A.; Marchant, R.; Banat, I.M. Identification and characterisation of short chain rhamnolipid production in a previously uninvestigated, non-pathogenic marine pseudomonad. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 8537–8549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Processes 10 02647 g001 550
Figure 1. Main types of biosurfactants by molecular mass.
Figure 1. Main types of biosurfactants by molecular mass.
Processes 10 02647 g001
Processes 10 02647 g002 550
Figure 2. Methodological approach.
Figure 2. Methodological approach.
Processes 10 02647 g002
Table
Table 1. Differences between biosurfactants and surfactants.
Table 1. Differences between biosurfactants and surfactants.
Comparison CriteriaSurfactant
(Petrochemical Origin)		Biosurfactant
(Microbial Origin)
CostsLow, suitable as enhanced oil recovery (EOR) [24], which needs significant volumes of low-priced surfactantsHigh productions cost, suitable for low volume and high costs products (cosmetics industry) [25]
Environmental impactHigh toxicity
Low biodegradability
Low environmental compatibility		Low toxicity,
High biodegradability,
High environmental compatibility
Industrial applicabilityUsed in a variety of products requiring very high volume of surfactants
domestic and industrial applications [26]		Not yet widely employed in industrial production because they require expensive substrates with relatively poor productivities, limiting their commercial usage
Table
Table 2. Main contribution of biosurfactants to the circular economy.
Table 2. Main contribution of biosurfactants to the circular economy.
Biosurfactant ContributionCircular Economy PrincipleSource
Waste stream-derived productionClosing the loop
To coexist in a sustainable manner, society and the biophysical environment must both be seen as open systems. Resources should be removed and restored to the ecosystem at rates that are below the Earth’s ability to replenish and absorb them [38].		[39,40,41,42]
Eliminate waste and pollution
In a circular economy, waste must be regarded as a design defect of our consumption system. A requirement for any design in a circular economy is that the materials re-enter the economy after being used, thus converting the take-make-waste system from linear to circular.		[43,44,45,46]
Combating food wasteMaintaining resource value within the system
Shifting away from producer-driven consumerism and replacing it with provisioning systems that enable responsible, demand-driven resource use in addition to increasing sharing, service, and experience-based consumption [47].		[48,49,50,51,52,53,54]
Increasing water resource efficiencyReduce and decouple resource use
Reinforce resource sufficiency, efficiency and dematerialization through policies and actions that disconnect wellbeing from unsustainable resource use.		[55,56,57,58,59,60]
Soil bioremeditation
Boosting soil health		Regenerate nature
Instead of perpetually deteriorating nature, we must use practices that allow nature to repair soils, increase biodiversity, and replenish biological materials in the earth.		[61,62,63,64,65,66,67]
Table
Table 3. Biosurfactants input to industry from a circular economy perspective.
Table 3. Biosurfactants input to industry from a circular economy perspective.
Type of BiosurfactantPotential Circular Economy-Focused Application in the Industry Sources
GlycolipidsEnhancing microbial electrochemical treatment of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil through rhamnolipids[62]
Crude microbial bioremediation of offshore marine oil[45,59]
Merging industrial waste streams or by-products to sophorolipids fermentation has mutually beneficial effects as these inputs are abundantly available, and using waste streams for sophorolipid production improves recycling and reusing, achieving effective waste management[77]
Treatment of heavy metal contaminated wastewater[8,57]
Efficient recovery of residual oil from intensive exploited reservoirs[78]
Enhancing the bioavailability of hydrocarbons through trehalolipids[79]
LipopetidesLipopetides act as bioremediation agents for soils, surface water, groundwater, and waste streams contaminated with hydrophobic organic compounds, such as metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, hence they are linked to an improvement in soil quality, which is essential for the development of crops.[43,40]
Crude oil remediation by bioelectrokinetic technique[8,40]
Treatment of heavy metal contaminated soil[71]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lakatos, E.S.; Cioca, L.I.; Szilagyi, A.; Vladu, M.G.; Stoica, R.M.; Moscovici, M. A Systematic Review on Biosurfactants Contribution to the Transition to a Circular Economy. Processes 2022, 10, 2647. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10122647

AMA Style

Lakatos ES, Cioca LI, Szilagyi A, Vladu MG, Stoica RM, Moscovici M. A Systematic Review on Biosurfactants Contribution to the Transition to a Circular Economy. Processes. 2022; 10(12):2647. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10122647

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lakatos, Elena Simina, Lucian Ionel Cioca, Andrea Szilagyi, Mariana Gratiela Vladu, Roxana Mădălina Stoica, and Misu Moscovici. 2022. "A Systematic Review on Biosurfactants Contribution to the Transition to a Circular Economy" Processes 10, no. 12: 2647. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10122647

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop