Next Article in Journal
Economic Analysis of Cellulosic Ethanol Production from Sugarcane Bagasse Using a Sequential Deacetylation, Hot Water and Disk-Refining Pretreatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Hydrodynamic and Hydrographic Modeling of Istanbul Strait
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Using Parallel Genetic Algorithms for Estimating Model Parameters in Complex Reactive Transport Problems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Leaching of Organic Toxic Compounds from PVC Water Pipes in Medina Al-Munawarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

by
Muhammad Mansoor Shaikh
1,2,
Marlia Mohd Hanafiah
1,3,* and
Alfarooq O. Basheer
1
1
Center for Earth Sciences and Environment, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
2
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Taibah University, Medina Al Munawarah-41411, Saudi Arabia
3
Centre for Tropical Climate Change System, Institute of Climate Change, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2019, 7(10), 641; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7100641
Submission received: 8 August 2019 / Revised: 7 September 2019 / Accepted: 9 September 2019 / Published: 20 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Quality Modelling)

Abstract

:
It is well established that the use of synthetic material in water pipes significantly affects the quality of domestic water, especially trace organics that are leached through with the flow of water. In the present study, the migration of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from water pipes manufactured of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) has been investigated using static laboratory conditions and in residential areas. The contact of deionized water with various PVC pipes for three successive test periods of 24, 48, and 72 h duration has been made. Twenty water samples were collected from houses within Medina Al-Munawarah residential area and were analyzed by using solid phase extraction, followed by high resolution gas chromatography with flame ionized detector (GC-FID). The presence of carbon tetrachloride (CTC), toluene, chloroform, styrene, o-xylene, bromoform (BF), dibromomethane (DBM), cis-1,3-dichloropropane (Cis-1,3-DCP), and trans-1,3-dichloropropane (Trans-1,3-DCP) was initially confirmed. The most frequent contaminants found were DBM, CTC, and toluene that were monitored in 55%, 50%, and 45% of samples, respectively. The levels of CTC, Cis-1,3-DCP, and Trans-1,3-DCP were found to exceed the World Health Organization (WHO) limits in 50%, 20%, and 20% of samples, respectively. The migration test indicated that nine of the targeted contaminants occur in a double distilled water sample incubated in pipe in laboratory level experiment. This implies that these components are more likely to migrate from PVC pipe in home plumbing systems network.

1. Introduction

Contamination of drinking water by chemicals can occur at several stages of its journey from source to tap, and to user [1,2]. The plastic materials in water distribution system and household have a great impact on water when in contact with chemical substances. In water distribution system, the most commonly used plastic pipes are polyvinylchloride (PVC), cross-linked polyethylene (PEX), and polyethylene (PE) pipes that can leach organic chemicals with harmful health effects and cause water quality to deteriorate [3,4]. These include oxygenated-compounds ethyl-tertbutyl ether (ETBE), methy-tertbutyl ether (MTBE), and their degradation product tertbutylalcohol (TBA), as well as degradation products of antioxidants, such as 2,4-ditertbutyl phenol (DTBP) and BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene) [5,6,7,8]. A previous study showed that ethyl-tertbutyl ether (ETBE), methy-tertbutyl ether (MTBE), and TBA leached from plastic pipes affects the quality of water [9].
Whelton et al. [10] revealed that 158 contaminants are known to leach from cross-linked polyethylene (PEX) pipes into drinking water. Many other contaminants still remain unknown, and also mixture effect of the chemicals is not well understood. Thus it is suggested that the effects-directed cell-based assays can be a good solution [11,12]. Compounds detected in water pipes can be originated from the household pipe [13,14]. Previous studies on 35 organic contaminants in European water found that the concentrations of the contaminants were up to 4 µg/L [13,15,16]. Pollution of surface water is one of the key environmental harms that can pose significant toxicological concern, although at low concentration [17,18]. Consequently, it is necessary to identify sources and quantities in the drinking water. Identification and monitoring of these contaminants is of critical importance in an attempt to keep the quality of drinking water safe for the health of human beings, and in the interpretation of complex datasets to evaluate water quality. A monitoring program for organic chemicals in water often results in datasets with a large number of parameters, which is often difficult to understand [19,20].
At the city of Medina Al-Munawarah, PVC pipes have been exhaustively used in civil construction of water supply for the last several years. The present study aims to examine the levels of trace volatile hydrocarbons (including halogenated) that are frequently released from PVC pipes used in buildings and houses. The study was done under different stagnation periods to assess the level of these compounds.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals Apparatus and Plastic Pipes

Volatile mega mix standard (30497) for 26 volatile organic compounds was purchased from Restek Company (Bellefonte, Production Assistance (PA), United State of America (USA)). Sodium sulphate, hydrochloric acid, dichloromethane (DCM), methanol, and acetone (Hi-purity) were purchased from Sigma, Aldrich Street. Louis, Missouri (MO), 63178 United State of America (USA) etc. Deionized water was obtained from Milli-Q ultra-pure water system (Merck Millipore) having conductivity < 0.061 micro Siemens (µs).

2.2. Preparation of Standard Solution

A three-point calibration linear graph generated using three different concentrations of working standard solutions, using DCM from the stock standard solutions of volatile organic compounds, was applied for calibration and quantification of gas chromatography with flame ionized detector. Figure 1 illustrates the flowchart of the experiment.

2.3. Samples Preparation and Solid Phase Extraction (SPE)

A solid phase extraction (SPE) manifold from Auto Science (Panamera’s China) operated with vacuum pump (Busch Company, Virginia (VA), United State of America (USA)) was used in this study. Hydrophilic-lipophilic-balanced 6 mL/200 mg column from Star Lab Scientific (Xian City Shaanxi Province, China) was used for SPE. Methylene chloride was used as solvent for elution of adsorbed organics [1,21]. The eluted extract was passed through sodium sulfate to remove water, and was concentrated as needed. The cartridge was rinsed twice with 2.5 mL aliquots of methylene chloride, then was cleaned twice with 2.5 mL of aliquots of methanol in such a way that methanol will not go below the top of the cartridge packing. The cartridge was then rinsed twice with 0.05 M HCl for equilibration. After that, loading of 100 mL sample of pH 2 to the column was done at a rate of 5 mL/min, with a vacuum pressure of 20 psi, dried with oxygen free N2 gas, then attentive volatiles components were eluted with 1 mL of methylene chloride with oven pure Na2SO4. In a similar way, another 100 mL water sample, which was pre-adjusted to pH 12, was weighed down to one more cartridge following a similar process.

2.4. Optimization of Gas Chromatographic

Gas chromatography with flame ionized detector (GC-FID) detector pattern 1300, Mtx-5 analytical columnMxt-5 (Rt × 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm thickness), and integrator, thermo model 1300, (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United State of America (USA)) were used in the analysis. Hydrogen gas was used as the carrier gas at a constant flow of 5 mL.min−1. A total of 2 µL of extract solution that was injected in the split-mode to introduction port at an initial temperature of 280 °C and oven temperature was set at 45 °C for 2 min, raised by 5 °C per min to 280 °C and then held at 280 °C for 10 min were used for the analysis of the targeted VOCs compounds extracted from water [21].

2.5. Extraction of Volatile Organic Compounds from Synthetic Water Samples

Synthetic water containing nine volatile organic compounds was prepared at level of 20 µg/L. Water sample was then subjected to solid phase extraction and elution as described above, and the mixture was analyzed by GC-FID. Table 1 shows the results for recovery tests of synthetic mixtures of organic compounds from water sample.
The GC-FID system was used for the analysis of standard mixture of organic compounds extracted from water using different temperature programs. A reasonable separation for individuals VOCs was obtained as shown in chromatograms in Figure 2 and Figure 3.

2.6. Migration Study Protocol

Three 2 m length pieces of PVC pipes (inner diameter of 32 mm) were used to accumulate the necessary sample quantity for investigation. The pipe was flushed thrice-period through double distilled water, and filled with water and left for stagnation of 24, 48, and 72 h. The stagnated water samples were then extracted using the same procedure as above.

2.7. Applications

After optimization, the above method was applied to analyze water samples collected from the city water supply. Tap water samples from the residential area were collected in brown bottles (1 L) in the morning after 8 h incubation. Then, water was flushed for three minutes, bottles were washed and refilled with same water and kept in an icebox till the transportation to the lab. Water samples were taken from houses constructed with polymeric materials. However, it is difficult to obtain information of the pipe network due to the fixing of these pipes inside the building walls. For migration experimental study, the pipe was new and unused, and the date of manufacturing was between 3 to 5 years old. Water samples were delivered to the laboratory in boxes containing ice to avoid any contamination to the samples’ conditions. The sample spot was calculated to cover up an extensive choice of key site, which reasonably represents the determinate source of water quality in Medina Al-Munawarah. Table 2 shows the total 20 water samples that were collected from four different locations in Medina Al-Munawarah city.

2.8. Linearity, Accuracy Detection Limit, Quantification Limit, and Precision

Excellent linearity with 0.9930 for all investigated VOCs was found for the method suitability test. Accuracy was also assessed by improvement test as depicted in Table 3. The recoveries were found from 92% to 97%. The detection and quantification limits of VOCs, as well as all confirmation results, were presented in Table 3. Accuracy of the technique was expressed as the qualified standard deviations (RDS) obtained, starting from the determination of three SPE in deionized water. A representative group of deionized water shows principles were less than 5.5% for all preferred compounds. These consequences validate the efficiency of SPE technique for the determination of organic compounds migrating from plastic pipes into drinking water.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Volatile Organic Contamination Detected in Tap Water Samples

In the present study, nine VOCs contaminants were identified and quantified in 20 drinking water samples collected from houses of different ages in Medina Al-Munawarah city, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The results disclosed that the VOCs such as carbon-tetrachloride, chloroform, toluene, styrene, xylene, bromoform, DBM, Cis-1,3-DCP, and Trans-1,3-DCP exist in the analyzed samples at inconstant levels. All the results are summarized in Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6 with the summary of statistical data. The numerical data obtained from the volatile organic compounds analysis characterization in this study were evaluated by descriptive statistical analysis (minimum, maximum, mean, range and standard deviation) and samples were compared with the standard limits of the World Health Organization. The occurrence of volatile organic compounds in water from various sources has been evaluated by previous studies [22,23,24]. Various chlorinated solvents, by-products, and unlike levels of oxygenated (ETBE) also have been detected in water samples from accommodation homes network.
Xylene was identified in 35% of water samples and ranged from 0.09 to 8.39 µg/L with mean value of 1.70 μg/L. This fragment was conformed in samples collected from houses of different ages. The xylene concentrations in samples were within the permissible limit confirmed by EPA (1750 μg/L). Xylene mixtures are used to make phthalate, polyester, fiber plasticizers, and layer fabrication.
The minimum and maximum concentration values for CTC in drinking water samples were 6.24 and 19.73 μg/L, respectively. This contaminant was monitored in 50% of water samples, with 50% exceeding the maximum contamination level (MCL) 0.5 μg/L set by EPA. This compound is commonly used in manufacturing of plastic. A previous study conducted in the USA showed CTC in 30 drinking-water samples from a total 945 samples from various cities, found at signify level at maximum concentration of 16 µg/L [25].
Chloroform was detected in 25% of samples with concentration ranged from 0.06–16.42 µg/L, with mean value of 1.90 µg/L. However, the level was in the permissible limit confirmed by WHO (80 µg/L). Chloroform is a chemical used to make other chemicals and a byproduct of chlorinating water. According to Minnesota public drinking water, 29% of drinking water recorded from 1993 to 2016 showed the presence of chloroform with some of the samples exceeding the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) of 20 ppb. The medium level of chloroform detected in public drinking water was at 1.5 ppb [23].
Toluene, another volatile contaminant recorded in 45% of samples varies in concentration from 0.02 to 9.52 µg/L with a mean value of 1.06 µg/L. Toluene is used as a solvent, particularly for coatings, and in the production of polymers. It also occurs as by-product of styrene manufacturer [26]. Approximately 1% of public drinking-water systems in the USA contain toluene level that is above 0.5 µg/L, whereas in Canada, samples from 30 drinking-water contained an average of 2 µg/L of toluene [27]. In an Ontario drinking-water supply, the study shows that concentrations of toluene were up to 0.5 µg/L [28]. The concentration levels of toluene in water samples were under the permissible limit stated by WHO (150 µg/L).
The minimum and maximum concentrations of styrene recorded in water samples vary from 0.03 to 4.21 µg/L. This contaminant was detected in 35% of water samples collected from Medina Al-Munawarah city. The guideline value of this contaminant stated by EPA is 100 µg/L. Styrene is originated from finished drinking-water in the USA and in commercial, charcoal-filtered drinking-water in New Orleans at concentrations of less than 1 µg/L.
The bromoform contaminant identified in drinking water samples was found in 30% of samples and varies in concentration between 0.03 and 0.71 µg/L. Based on the data established from eight Canadian provinces, mean concentrations of bromoform (CHBr3) were usually less than the exposure limit, or just about 0.5 µg/L, and the entity values were less than 10 µg/L. On the other hand, average and maximum bromoform levels exceeded 30 µg/L over this stage.
DBM contaminant noticeable rates and concentration values of 55% of water samples collected are shown in Table 4. The total concentrations were ranged from 0.02 to 1.71 µg/L, with a mean value of 0.186 µg/L. DBM in drinking-water supplies has been identified, and samples were collected in the USA with the concentration ranged from 0.01 to 15 µg/L. In Australia, a maximum concentration of 94 µg/L (DBM) was measured in 15 samples.
Cis-1,3-DCP and Trans-1,3-DCP dominated in 20 drinking water samples in 20% and 35%, each with total concentration ranging from 0.56 to 0.84 µg/L, and 0.41 to 2.5 µg/L, respectively. These two contaminants were found in the USA from 41 out of 1088 water samples and in 10 out of 3949 water samples collected from various sources. Concentration levels of these contaminants in water were found from 1.3 µg//L to 3.4 µg/L. Inhalation of 1,3-dichloropropane at concentration above 6.8 g/m3 was creating problems of gasping, coughing, pain of sub sterna, and extreme distress of respiratory [29].

3.2. Volatile Organic Contamination Migrated from Polyvinylchloride (PVC)

As shown in Table 5, the concentration of targeted VOC migrating from PVC polymeric pipes had a considerable rising tendency among the increase of retention time, suggesting that under long incubation conditions, organic contaminants migration from PVC polymeric pipes would build up fast and tend to deteriorate the quality of water [30,31].
All VOCs contaminants occurring in drinking water samples have been identified in the water leach ability test [32,33]. CTC concentration increases after 5.19 µg/L to 12.64 µg/L at 48 h of incubation [34,35,36]. There was a slight increase of CTC concentration in the deionized water samples after 48 h and 72 h of incubation. Table 6 shows the amount of other leached targeted contaminants from three incubation times ranging from 24.72 ± 1.44 µg/L (chloroform), 5.58 ± 0.29 µg/L (toluene), 0.061 ± 0.03 µg/L (styrene), 0.49 ± 0.09 µg/L (bromoform), 0.57 ± 0.07 µg/L (DBM), 1.98 ± 0.13 µg/L (Cis-1,3-DCP), 2.20 ± 0.13 µg/L (trans-1,3-DCP), and 0.98 ± 0.07 µg/L (o-xylene). The order of the components (higher to lower) were chloroform > CTC > toluene > Trans-1,3-DCP > Cis-1,3-DCP > DBM > bromoform > styrene.
The results indicated that concentrations of volatile organic compounds were released from polymeric plastic pipes [37,38]. The leakage of antioxidant degradation product from polymeric pipes have also been documented [39]. The values of Pearson correlation matrix in Table 7 and Table 8 reveal strong correlations between the concentrations of most of the analyzed contaminants. This trend confirms that leaching components migrate from the same source [40]. Markedly, the concentration of leachable volatile compounds increases with extended stagnant time [41,42]. Even though the levels of some of the organic components identified in this migration experiments are below the permissible limit of MCL, their prolonged exposure can pose danger to human health [35,43].

4. Conclusions

It was found that three different types of PVC pipes examined in this study contribute to significant levels of VOCs contamination compared to other types of plastic pipes that are available in the market. In practice, shorter duration of incubation period is more common for premise with plumbing pipes in inhabited homes compared to the incubation periods of three days (72 h). However, longer duration of incubation periods is more common for newly constructed and not yet-inhabited buildings where the construction is still in progress. Use of different types of PVC pipes produces different levels of VOCs contaminants in drinking water. The present study provides apparent signal pertaining to water contamination due to discharge from polymeric piping and plumbing substances in residential and domestic water distribution systems. It is recommended that materials, chemicals, and processes connected to the home water distribution network are rigorously evaluated before use to determine the potential to cause significant levels of VOCs contamination. In addition, extending the curing period substantially reduced the degree of leaching of these organic contaminants from the PVC pipes into water. However, further work is necessary to investigate different contact periods and elucidate the role of disinfectants in altering leached organic compounds.

Author Contributions

Sampling and Laboratory work, M.M.S.; Analysis, M.M.S.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, M.M.S., A.O.B.; Writing-Review & Editing, M.M.H.; Supervision, M.M.H.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Taibah University for providing facilities to conduct this study. Marlia M. Hanafiah was supported by the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (DIP-2017-006) and the Ministry of Education Malaysia (FRGS/1/2018/WAB05/UKM/02/2).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shaikh, M.M.; Al Suhaimi, A.O.; Hanafiah, M.M.; Ashraf, M.A.; Harun, S.N. Study on migration of phenolic and volatile organic compounds from plastic pipes used in plumbing home networks into tap water. Desalin. Water Treat. 2018, 112, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Richardson, S.D.; Ternes, T.A. Water analysis: Emerging contaminants and current issues. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 2813–2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lithner, D.; Damberg, J.; Dave, G.; Larsson, Å. Leachates from plastic consumer products–screening for toxicity with Daphnia magna. Chemosphere 2009, 74, 1195–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fish, K.E.; Osborn, A.M.; Boxall, J. Characterising and understanding the impact of microbial biofilms and the extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) matrix in drinking water distribution systems. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2016, 2, 614–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Durand, M.; Dietrich, A. Contributions of silane cross-linked PEX pipe to chemical/solvent odours in drinking water. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 55, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kowalska, B.; Kowalski, D.; Rożej, A. Organic compounds migrating from plastic pipes into water. J. Water Supply Res. Technol. Aqua 2011, 60, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lund, V.; Anderson-Glenna, M.; Skjevrak, I.; Steffensen, I.-L. Long-term study of migration of volatile organic compounds from cross-linked polyethylene (PEX) pipes and effects on drinking water quality. J. Water Health 2011, 9, 483–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Skjevrak, I.; Due, A.; Gjerstad, K.O.; Herikstad, H. Volatile organic components migrating from plastic pipes (HDPE, PEX and PVC) into drinking water. Water Res. 2003, 37, 1912–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kelley, K.M.; Stenson, A.C.; Dey, R.; Whelton, A.J. Release of drinking water contaminants and odor impacts caused by green building cross-linked polyethylene (PEX) plumbing systems. Water Res. 2014, 67, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Whelton, A.J.; Nguyen, T. Contaminant migration from polymeric pipes used in buried potable water distribution systems: A review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 43, 679–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Escher, B.I.; Allinson, M.; Altenburger, R.; Bain, P.A.; Balaguer, P.; Busch, W.; Crago, J.; Denslow, N.D.; Dopp, E.; Hilscherova, K. Benchmarking organic micropollutants in wastewater, recycled water and drinking water with in vitro bioassays. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 48, 1940–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Manikam, M.K.; Halim, A.A.; Hanafiah, M.M.; Krishnamoorthy, R.R. Removal of ammonia nitrogen, nitrate, phosphorus and COD from sewage wastewater using palm oil boiler ash composite adsorbent. Desalin. Water Treat. 2019, 149, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Gonzalez, S.; Lopez-Roldan, R.; Cortina, J.-L. Presence of metals in drinking water distribution networks due to pipe material leaching: A review. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2013, 95, 870–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rożej, A.; Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A.; Kowalska, B.; Kowalski, D. Structure and microbial diversity of biofilms on different pipe materials of a model drinking water distribution systems. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 31, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Moralı, U.; Demiral, H.; Şensöz, S. Optimization of activated carbon production from sunflower seed extracted meal: Taguchi design of experiment approach and analysis of variance. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 189, 602–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kumar, R.; Pradhan, A.; Khan, F.A.; Lindström, P.; Ragnvaldsson, D.; Ivarsson, P.; Olsson, P.-E.; Jass, J. Comparative analysis of stress induced gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans following exposure to environmental and lab reconstituted complex metal mixture. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0132896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Loos, R.; Hanke, G.; Umlauf, G.; Eisenreich, S.J. LC–MS–MS analysis and occurrence of octyl-and nonylphenol, their ethoxylates and their carboxylates in Belgian and Italian textile industry, waste water treatment plant effluents and surface waters. Chemosphere 2007, 66, 690–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Banch, T.J.H.; Hanafiah, M.M.; Alkarkhi, A.F.M.; Abu Amr, S.S. Factorial Design and Optimization of Landfill Leachate Treatment Using Tannin-Based Natural Coagulant. Polymers 2019, 11, 1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, B.; Zhao, D.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, S. Multivariate statistical study of organic pollutants in Nanjing reach of Yangtze River. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 169, 1093–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Du, J.; Lai, X.; Yang, N.; Zhai, J.; Kisailus, D.; Su, F.; Wang, D.; Jiang, L. Hierarchically ordered macro− mesoporous TiO2−graphene composite films: Improved mass transfer, reduced charge recombination, and their enhanced photocatalytic activities. ACS Nano 2010, 5, 590–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Demeestere, K.; Dewulf, J.; De Witte, B.; Van Langenhove, H. Sample preparation for the analysis of volatile organic compounds in air and water matrices. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1153, 130–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Grady, S.J.; Casey, G.D. Occurrence and Distribution of Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether and Other Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Regions of the United States, 1993–98; USGS: Denver, CO, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  23. Al-Mudhaf, H.F.; Alsharifi, F.A.; Abu-Shady, A.-S.I. A survey of organic contaminants in household and bottled drinking waters in Kuwait. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 1658–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Al-Raad, A.A.; Hanafiah, M.M.; Naje, A.S.; Ajeel, M.A.; Basheer, A.O.; Aljayashi, T.A.; Toriman, M.E. Treatment of Saline Water Using Electrocoagulation with Combined Electrical Connection of Electrodes. Processes 2019, 7, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Westrick, J.J.; Mello, J.W.N.; Thomas, R.F. The groundwater supply survey. J. Am. Water Work. Assoc. 1984, 76, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Azeem, B.; KuShaari, K.; Man, Z.B.; Basit, A.; Thanh, T.H. Review on materials & methods to produce controlled release coated urea fertilizer. J. Control. Release 2014, 181, 11–21. [Google Scholar]
  27. Otson, R.; Williams, D.T.; Bothwell, P. Volatile organic compounds in water at thirty Canadian potable water treatment facilities [Water pollution, freshwater, sampling, chemical analysis, methods, Canada]. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 1982, 65, 1370–1374. [Google Scholar]
  28. Smillie, R.; Sakuma, T.; Duholke, W. Low molecular weight aromatic hydrocarbons in drinking water. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 1978, 13, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Young, C.L.; Tran, C.A.; Morton, D.W. The critical temperatures of a number of (i)(chloroalkane (C3–C4)+ hydrocarbon (C6–C7)) binary mixtures and (ii)(aromatic halocarbon (chlorobenzene, fluorobenzene, 1, 2-dichlorobenzene, or 1, 3-dichlorobenzene)+ alkane (C8)) binary mixtures. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2017, 62, 2953–2958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dietrich, A.M.; Burlingame, G.A. Critical review and rethinking of USEPA secondary standards for maintaining organoleptic quality of drinking water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 708–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, J.-Y.; Li, S.-P.; Xin, K.-L.; Tao, T. Equilibrium and kinetic modeling of iron adsorption and the effect by chloride, sulfate, and hydroxyl: Evaluation of PVC-U drinking pipes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 23902–23910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rajasärkkä, J.; Pernica, M.; Kuta, J.; Lašňák, J.; Šimek, Z.; Bláha, L. Drinking water contaminants from epoxy resin-coated pipes: A field study. Water Res. 2016, 103, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Shaikh, M.M.; AlSuhaimi, A.; Hanafiah, M.M.; Alshahateet, S.F. Release of organic contaminants migrating from polyvinyl chloride polymeric into drinking water under three successive stagnant periods of time. Desalin. Water Treat. 2019, 149, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Loos, R.; Locoro, G.; Comero, S.; Contini, S.; Schwesig, D.; Werres, F.; Balsaa, P.; Gans, O.; Weiss, S.; Blaha, L. Pan-European survey on the occurrence of selected polar organic persistent pollutants in ground water. Water Res. 2010, 44, 4115–4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fetter, C.W.; Boving, T.; Kreamer, D. Contaminant Hydrogeology; Waveland Press: Long Grove, IL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  36. Filipiak, W.; Filipiak, A.; Sponring, A.; Schmid, T.; Zelger, B.; Ager, C.; Klodzinska, E.; Denz, H.; Pizzini, A.; Lucciarini, P. Comparative analyses of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from patients, tumors and transformed cell lines for the validation of lung cancer-derived breath markers. J. Breath Res. 2014, 8, 027111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Al-Malack, M.H.; Sheikheldin, S.Y.; Fayad, N.M.; Khaja, N. Effect of water quality parameters on the migration of vinyl chloride monomer from unplasticized PVC pipes. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2000, 120, 195–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, Z.-H.; Yin, H.; Dang, Z. Do estrogenic compounds in drinking water migrating from plastic pipe distribution system pose adverse effects to human? An analysis of scientific literature. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 2126–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bucheli-Witschel, M.; Kötzsch, S.; Darr, S.; Widler, R.; Egli, T. A new method to assess the influence of migration from polymeric materials on the biostability of drinking water. Water Res. 2012, 46, 4246–4260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wagner, M.; Oehlmann, J. Endocrine disruptors in bottled mineral water: Total estrogenic burden and migration from plastic bottles. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2009, 16, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bozlaker, A.; Prospero, J.M.; Fraser, M.P.; Chellam, S. Quantifying the contribution of long-range Saharan dust transport on particulate matter concentrations in Houston, Texas, using detailed elemental analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 10179–10187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Maresca, A.; Hyks, J.; Astrup, T.F. Long-term leaching of nutrients and contaminants from wood combustion ashes. Waste Manag. 2018, 74, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Verma, R.; Vinoda, K.; Papireddy, M.; Gowda, A. Toxic pollutants from plastic waste—A review. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2016, 35, 701–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flowchart of the experiment.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the experiment.
Processes 07 00641 g001
Figure 2. Chromatogram of VOCs detected from recovery test. 1-carbontetrachloride, 2-chloroform, toluene, 4-styrene, 5-bromoform, 6-dibromomethane, 7-is-1,3-dichloropropane, 8-trans-1,3-dichloropropane, and 9-O-xylene.
Figure 2. Chromatogram of VOCs detected from recovery test. 1-carbontetrachloride, 2-chloroform, toluene, 4-styrene, 5-bromoform, 6-dibromomethane, 7-is-1,3-dichloropropane, 8-trans-1,3-dichloropropane, and 9-O-xylene.
Processes 07 00641 g002
Figure 3. Chromatogram of analysis of water samples collected from residential area. 1-carbontetrachloride, 2-chloroform, 3-toluene, 4-styrene, 5-bromoform, and 6-dibromomethane.
Figure 3. Chromatogram of analysis of water samples collected from residential area. 1-carbontetrachloride, 2-chloroform, 3-toluene, 4-styrene, 5-bromoform, and 6-dibromomethane.
Processes 07 00641 g003
Table 1. Compounds, amount added, amount found, and % of recovery tests of synthetic mixtures of organic compounds from water sample.
Table 1. Compounds, amount added, amount found, and % of recovery tests of synthetic mixtures of organic compounds from water sample.
CompoundAmount Added (μg/L)Amount Found (μg/L)Recovery (%)
1.Carbon tetrachloride2019.8099
2. Chloroform2019.4597.25
3. Toluene2019.1295.60
4. Styrene2019.3496.70
5. Bromoform2019.5797.85
6. Dibromomethane2019.8595.25
7. Cis-1,3-dichloropropane2019.2296.15
8. Trans-1,3-dichloropropane2018.4292.10
9. O-xlyene2019.7098.50
Table 2. Sample IDs, home year, pipe types, sampling area, and time of samples collection from Medina Al-Munawarah city.
Table 2. Sample IDs, home year, pipe types, sampling area, and time of samples collection from Medina Al-Munawarah city.
Sample IDHome YearPipe TypeSampling AreaTime of Collection
M1 to M52006–2008PVCAl Quoba Street7 a.m. to 9 a.m.
M6 to M102008–2011PEXJableOuhad Street11 a.m. to 1 p.m.
M11 to M152011–2014PEAl Azizia Street2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
M16 to M202014–2017PVCAbdullah Street7 p.m. to 9 p.m.
Table 3. Compounds, average concentration, % RSD, SPK μg/L, % Recovery and MDL µg/L.
Table 3. Compounds, average concentration, % RSD, SPK μg/L, % Recovery and MDL µg/L.
Compounds Average Concentration (μg/L)RSD (%)SPK μg/LRecovery (%)MDL μg/L
Carbon tetrachloride0.6393.10.51280.07
Chloroform0.60710.30.51210.21
Toluene0.6285.60.51260.12
Styrene0.5595.50.51120.10
Bromoform0.5964.90.51190.10
Dibromomethane0.6466.00.51290.13
cis-1,3-DCP 0.5646.70.51130.13
trans-1,3-DCP 0.5085.70.51020.10
O-xylene0.5696.20.51140.12
Table 4. Minimum and maximum concentrations, SD± and allowable limits of the World Health Organization (WHO).
Table 4. Minimum and maximum concentrations, SD± and allowable limits of the World Health Organization (WHO).
LocationXyleneCTCChloroformTolueneStyreneBFDBMCis-1,3-TCPTrans-1,3-TCP
M-01* 0.09
(±0.37)
** 19.73
(±0.37)
** 16.42
(±0.16)
4.33
(±0.12)
* 0.03
(±0.01)
0.05
(±0.01)
0.21
(±0.01)
nd0.45
(±0.02)
M-02ndndnd0.05
(±0.01)
ndnd0.09
(±0.02)
ndnd
M-03nd12.05
(±0.08)
nd0.64
(±0.02)
nd0.06
(±0.01)
0.16
(±0.02)
nd1.18
(±0.05)
M-04ndndndndndndnd0.58
(±0.04)
nd
M-05ndndndndnd* 0.03
(±0.01)
ndndnd
M-06ndndnd* 0.02
(±0.01)
ndnd* 0.06
(±0.01)
nd0.61
(±0.05)
M-07ndndndndndndndnd* 0.41
(±0.01)
M-080.34
(±0.02
16.03
(±0.17)
nd** 9.52
(±0.11)
2.06
(±0.03)
nd0.25
(±0.02)
** 0.84
(±0.04)
1.52
(±0.01)
M-095.63
(±0.06)
6.42
(±0.10)
9.52
(±0.11)
1.31
(±0.01)
3.01
(±0.03)
nd0.39
(±0.01)
* 0.56
(±0.02)
2.23
(±0.03)
M-10nd9.36
(±0.08)
11.10
(±0.12)
1.71
(±0.01)
2.02
(±0.02)
nd0.41
(±0.02)
0.58
(±0.02)
** 2.50 (±0.03)
M-11nd10.93
(±0.11)
ndndndnd0.02
(±0.01)
ndnd
M-127.21
(±0.09)
8.21
(±0.07)
nd0.58
(±0.01)
nd** 0.71
(±0.07)
0.13
(±0.01)
ndnd
M-13nd*6.24
(±0.09)
0.10
(±0.01)
ndndndndndnd
M-14nd15.19
(±0.18)
* 0.06
(±0.01)
ndnd0.15
(±0.01)
** 1.71
(±0.01)
ndnd
M-15** 8.31
(±0.10)
6.24
(±0.10)
ndnd2.56
(±0.02)
0.06
(±0.01)
0.28
(±0.01)
ndnd
M-16ndNdndndndndndndnd
M-17ndNdndndndndndndnd
M-185.32
(±0.06)
ndnd3.12
(±0.03)
** 4.21
(±0.04)
ndndndnd
M-19Ndndndndndndndndnd
M-207.17
(±0.09)
ndndnd4.20
(±0.03)
ndndndnd
WHO Limit17500.508015010080800.500.50
Values are presented in average (n = 3), nd: not detected, *: minimum and **: maximum concentration and standard deviations are given in parenthesis.
Table 5. Incubation time, total concentration (µg/L), and WHO limits of leached VOCs compounds from Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes.
Table 5. Incubation time, total concentration (µg/L), and WHO limits of leached VOCs compounds from Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes.
Analytes24 h48 h72 hWHO Limit
Carbon tetrachloride4.84 ± 0.3511.93 ± 0.713.95 ± 0.210.5
Chloroform8.19 ± 0.429.6 ± 0.616.93 ± 0.4180 EPA
Toluene1.79 ± 0.211.86 ± 0.041.93 ± 0.04150
Styrene0.03 ± 0.010.02 ± 0.010.011 ± 0.01100
Bromoform0.14 ± 0.050.16 ± 0.020.19 ± 0.0280 EPA
Dibromomethane0.07 ± 0.020.14 ± 0.020.36 ± 0.0380 EPA
Cis-dichloropropane0.57 ± 0.080.71 ± 0.030.70 ± 0.020.5 California
Trans-dichloropropane0.42 ± 0.050.63 ± 0.031.15 ± 0.050.5 California
O-xylene0.12 ± 0.030.18 ± 0.010.68 ± 0.031750
Table 6. Concentration (µg/L) range, mean, and standard deviation of VOCs leached from PVC pipes.
Table 6. Concentration (µg/L) range, mean, and standard deviation of VOCs leached from PVC pipes.
AnalytesRangeMean±SD
Carbon tetrachloride4.14–12.647.334.63
Chloroform7.34–10.218.721.44
Toluene1.07–2.0001.660.51
Styrene0.02–0.0400.030.01
Bromoform0.18–0.2100.190.02
Dibromomethane0.09–0.3900.210.16
Cis-dichloropropane 0.65–0.740.700.47
Tans-dichloropropane0.47–1.200.780.38
O-xylene0.15–0.710.350.31
Table 7. Correlation matrix Pearson (n) for VOCs in drinking water samples.
Table 7. Correlation matrix Pearson (n) for VOCs in drinking water samples.
VariablesCTCChloroformTolueneStyreneBromoformDBMCis DCPTraDCPXylene
CTC1
Chloroform0.4891
Toluene0.5480.3041
Styrene−0.0670.1330.3141
Bromoform0.220−0.082−0.066−0.1761
DBM0.5260.1470.044−0.0140.1631
Cis-DCP0.2510.3040.5940.289−0.1670.0981
Tran-DCP0.3700.5840.4320.297−0.1590.1650.7101
O-xylene-0.084−0.035−0.0330.6990.417−0.034−0.060−0.0451
Table 8. Correlation matrix Pearson (n) for VOCs leached from plastic pipes.
Table 8. Correlation matrix Pearson (n) for VOCs leached from plastic pipes.
VariablesCTCChloroformTolueneStyreneBromoformDBMCis DCPTraDCPXylene
CTC1
Chloroform0.9411
Toluene0.5120.7731
Styrene0.1110.4420.9111
Bromoform−0.824−0.967−0.908−06551
DBM−0.399−0.686−0.992−0.9560.8481
Cis-DCP0.5850.276−0.397−0.741−0.0230.5101
Tran-DCP−0.372−0.665−0.988−0.9640.8331.0000.5351
O-xylene−0.541−0.794−0.999−0.8960.9220.9870.3660.9821

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shaikh, M.M.; Mohd Hanafiah, M.; O. Basheer, A. Leaching of Organic Toxic Compounds from PVC Water Pipes in Medina Al-Munawarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Processes 2019, 7, 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7100641

AMA Style

Shaikh MM, Mohd Hanafiah M, O. Basheer A. Leaching of Organic Toxic Compounds from PVC Water Pipes in Medina Al-Munawarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Processes. 2019; 7(10):641. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7100641

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shaikh, Muhammad Mansoor, Marlia Mohd Hanafiah, and Alfarooq O. Basheer. 2019. "Leaching of Organic Toxic Compounds from PVC Water Pipes in Medina Al-Munawarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia" Processes 7, no. 10: 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7100641

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop