Next Article in Journal
Preparation of SBA-15-Supported Metals by Vapor-Phase Infiltration
Next Article in Special Issue
Modern Trends in Bio-Organometallic Ferrocene Chemistry
Previous Article in Journal
Electrodeposited PPy@TiO2 and PEDOT@TiO2 Counter Electrodes for [Co(bpy)3]2+/3+ Redox Mediator-Based Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Novel Ferrocene-Benzofuran Hybrids via Palladium- and Copper-Catalyzed Reactions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Convenient Access to Ferrocene Fused aza-Heterocycles via the Intramolecular Ritter Reaction: Synthesis of Novel Racemic Planar-Chiral 3,4-Dihydroferroceno[c]pyridines and 1H-Ferroceno[c]pyrroles

by
Yuliya S. Rozhkova
*,
Irina V. Plekhanova
,
Alexey A. Gorbunov
and
Yurii V. Shklyaev
*
Institute of Technical Chemistry UB RAS, 3 Akademik Korolev St., 614013 Perm, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2022, 10(11), 214; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10110214
Submission received: 30 October 2022 / Revised: 14 November 2022 / Accepted: 15 November 2022 / Published: 19 November 2022

Abstract

:
An efficient and easy approach to the synthesis of novel racemic planar-chiral 3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridines and 1H-ferroceno[c]pyrroles via the intramolecular Ritter reaction of 2-ferrocenyl-3,3-dimethylbutan-2-ol with nitriles and thiocyanates in the presence of MeSO3H was developed. Aromatic and aliphatic nitriles, phenylacetonitriles, and β-oxonitriles produced exclusively 3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridines. The condensation of 2-ferrocenyl-3,3-dimethylbutan-2-ol with various thiocyanates, including alkyl thiocyanates, benzyl thiocyanate, and ethyl 2-thiocyanatoacetate, yielded not only 3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridines but also 1H-ferroceno[c]pyrroles. The selectivity of these reactions depended on the temperature and the order of addition. The size of substituents at the α-position to the sulfur atom of thiocyanates also had a significant effect on the distribution of products.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

One of the promising areas in the development of modern organometallic chemistry is research in the field of ferrocene. The unique properties of this compound, including specific geometry, high chemical and thermal stabilities, low toxicity, and its ability to be reversibly oxidized, result in a wide spectrum of applications for ferrocene-based compounds. Ferrocene derivatives have attracted a lot of attention in the fields of medicinal chemistry [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] and homogeneous catalysis [10,11,12,13,14]. They are widely applied in material science to create sensors [15,16,17,18,19], electro-optical materials [20,21,22], batteries [18,23], burning rate catalysts for propellants [24,25], molecular machines [26,27], and so on. Thus, the development of new approaches to the synthesis of novel functionalized ferrocene-based compounds is highly desirable.
Reactions of nucleophiles with readily available α-ferrocenyl substituted alcohols FcC(OH)RR’, in which R, R’ = H, Alk, Ar, constitute a synthetically useful and convenient approach to ferrocene-based compounds. A wide range of nucleophiles, including, for example, amines [28,29,30,31], aliphatic alcohols [30,31,32], phenols [29], thiols [28,30,31,33], enamines [34], aldehydes [35], ureas [36], 1,3-dicarbonyl [28,30,31,37,38] and electron-rich aromatic compounds [28,31,39], together with various heterocycles [28,33,37,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47], can be employed. Reactions of FcC(OH)RR’ with nucleophiles proceeds through SN1 mechanism via the formation of thermodynamically stable α-ferrocenyl carbocations FcC+RR’ to provide α-adducts. The generation of α-ferrocenyl carbocations from FcC(OH)RR’ mainly occurs under acidic conditions in the presence of Brønsted or Lewis acids. Oxidative ionization of α-ferrocenyl alcohols [37] and ionization of α-ferrocenylalkyl carbonates FcCH(R)OCOOEt formed in situ from corresponding FcCH(OH)R [29,33] are also used to obtain α-ferrocenyl carbocations.
Surprisingly, although a great deal of research was devoted to the investigation of the reactions of α-ferrocenyl alcohols with a variety of nucleophiles, there were no data in the literature related to investigations of the reactions of these alcohols with nitriles prior to our studies. Due to the great importance of ferrocene-based compounds, together with our established interest in the development of approaches to the synthesis of various aza-heterocycles via intramolecular Ritter reaction, it seemed relevant to try using α-ferrocenyl alcohols as substrates for this transformation.
In our preliminary work, we demonstrated for the first time the application of α-ferrocenyl alkyl alcohols as substrates for Ritter reaction by an example of the reaction of 1-ferrocenyl-2-methylpropan-1-ol [FcCH(OH)CH(CH3)2] with nitriles [48]. It was found that, in most cases, the nitriles were not nucleophilic enough to react with the secondary α-ferrocenyl carbocation FcCH+CH(CH3)2 generated from FcCH(OH)CH(CH3)2 under acidic conditions. Instead, the more reactive tertiary β-ferrocenyl carbocation FcCH2C+(CH3)2, formed by a 1,2-shift of the α-carbocation, readily reacted with nitriles to give the corresponding β-nitrilium cations. The latter underwent intramolecular cyclization with the formation of novel 3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridines. These structures, being analogous of 3,4-dihydroisoquinolines, are assumed to be potentially bioactive compounds and attract sufficient interest in medicinal chemistry. It should be pointed out that the synthetic routes for the preparation of 3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridines to date are limited, and there are only a few reports in the literature on their synthesis [49,50,51,52].
To expand the range of α-ferrocenyl alkyl alcohols suitable to be used as substrates in the intramolecular Ritter reaction, herein we studied the reaction of 2-ferrocenyl-3,3-dimethylbutan-2-ol (1) with nitriles under acidic conditions.

2. Results

In order to demonstrate that 2-ferrocenyl-3,3-dimethylbutan-2-ol (1) could serve as a substrate for the intramolecular Ritter reaction, we first examined the model reaction of alcohol 1 with 4-methylbenzonitrile (2a) in MeSO3H (Table 1). MeSO3H in the amount of eight equivalents was chosen since we earlier showed that it was the most effective for the synthesis of 1-R-3,3-dimethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridines condensation of 1-ferrocenyl-2-methylpropan-1-ol with nitriles under acidic conditions [48].
The reaction of alcohol 1 with 1.2 equivalent of nitrile 2a in the presence of MeSO3H at room temperature provided the desired ferroceno[c]pyridine 3a in 59% yield within 5 h (Table 1, entry 1). In addition, amide 4a (6%) was also isolated. The structure of compound 3a was unambiguously confirmed by X-ray crystallography (Figure 1). Performing the reaction at higher temperatures led to the improved product yield and significantly shorter reaction times (Table 1, entries 2–5). In these cases, 60 °C was found to be the most optimal temperature both in terms of product yield and reaction time, resulting in compound 3a in 73% yield within 15 min (Table 1, entry 3). It turned out that the use of 1.5 equivalent of nitrile 2a did not lead to the improvement in the product yield (Table 1, entry 6). The reaction at 60 °C in DCE or toluene resulted in a longer reaction time and decreased yield of compound 3a compared to the same reaction without solvent (Table 1, entries 7, 8 vs. entry 3). In addition to ferroceno[c]pyridine 3a the inseparable mixtures of alkenes 5 and 6 were also isolated. Reactions of alcohol 1 with nitrile 2a in H2SO4 or CF3COOH at 60 °C also gave product 3a, but in lower yields and after longer reaction times (Table 1, entries 9, 10), indicating that these acids were inferior to MeSO3H when inducing the studied reaction. No reaction occurred when CH3COOH was used, and only starting alcohol 1 along with alkene 5 were isolated in 42% and 32% yields, respectively (Table 1, entry 11). Thus, based on the results obtained, the following reaction conditions were chosen as optimal: MeSO3H, 60 °C, a ratio of 1a/2a = 1:1.2, without solvent.
With the optimized conditions identified, the reaction of alcohol 1 with a variety of nitriles and thiocyanates was further explored.
First, the use of aromatic and aliphatic nitriles 2bt, and β-oxonitriles 2ux, was investigated (Table 2). Alcohol 1 smoothly reacted with benzonitrile (2b) and with ortho-, metha-, and para-substituted benzonitriles containing electron-donating (OMe, 2ce and NH2, 2f) or electron-withdrawing (Br, 2hj or CF3, 2km) substituents within 15–50 min to provide novel ferroceno[c]pyridines 3bf, hm in good to excellent yields (Table 2, entries 2–6, 8–13). In contrast to the other ortho-substituted benzonitriles (2e, j, m), 2-aminobenzonitrile (2g) afforded ferroceno[c]pyridine 3g in a poor yield (Table 2, entry 7). The reaction of 4-nitrobenzonitrile (2n) with alcohol 1 led to a complex mixture of unidentified products with only trace amounts of compound 3n, probably because of a low nucleophilicity of 2n (Table 2, entry 14).
Condensation of alcohol 1 with aliphatic nitriles 2os, including sterically hindered 1-adamantanecarbonitrile (2s), gave ferroceno[c]pyridines 3os within 15–25 min in high yields. According to 1H NMR analysis of the crude residue, 3-methoxypropionitrile (2t) gave a complex mixture of products, none of which could be identified and isolated (Table 2, entry 20).
Alcohol 1 reacted smoothly with β-oxonitriles 2ux to afford products 3ux in 34–87% yields (Table 2, entries 21–24). The NMR spectra clearly indicated that ferroceno[c]pyridines 3ux existed exclusively in the Z-enamine form, which was stabilized by an intramolecular hydrogen bond. That is, the 1H NMR spectra of these compounds in CDCl3 contained resonance signals of CH vinyl protons as singlets in the range of 4.74–5.98 ppm, together with resonance signals of NH protons as broad singlets in the range of 8.23–10.99 ppm. Cross peaks between the CH vinyl proton and H7′ proton or protons of unsubstituted Cp ring in the 2D 1H–1H NOESY spectra confirmed that compounds 3ux existed as Z-isomers with respect to the >C=CH– bond (Figure 2).
Phenylacetonitriles 7ac, like nitriles 2am, os, ux, readily reacted with alcohol 1 to afford the corresponding ferroceno[c]pyridines 8ac. However, products 8ac could not be isolated in a pure form, since they were unstable. These compounds easily oxidized in air at a benzylic position, resulting in ferroceno[c]pyridines 9ac (Table 3).
Purification of the crude residues by silica gel column chromatography, performed immediately after the work-up of the reaction mixtures, afforded products 8ac as the mixtures with oxidized compounds 9ac in ratios of 65:35 to 78:22. Storage of these mixtures at room temperature exposed to air resulted in full conversion of 8ac to 9ac within 1–6 days and isolation of ferroceno[c]pyridines 9ac in 16–35% yields (Table 3, Method A). Similar results in terms of the oxidation time and yields of 9ac were obtained after storing the solutions of crude residues in EtOAc at room temperature exposed to air (Table 3, Method B). The rate of the conversion of compounds 8ac to 9ac strongly depends on the nature of substituents in the aromatic ring of the benzylic fragments. Thus, the oxidation of ferroceno[c]pyridine 8a, containing MeO groups, proceeded much faster than that of 8c with NO2 groups in the aromatic ring of the benzylic fragment (Table 3, entries 1 and 3).
Further, we investigated the reaction of alcohol 1 with thiocyanates 10aj. It turned out that the condensation of alcohol 1 with EtSCN (10a) under optimal conditions gave a mixture of products in a 23:77 ratio, one of which was shown to be ferroceno[c]pyridine 11a and the other one ferroceno[c]pyrrole 12a (Table 4, entry 1). After silica gel column chromatography, compounds 11a and 12a were isolated in 18% and 65% yields, respectively. The structures of products 11a and 12a were unambiguously confirmed by X-ray crystallography (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Only a single diastereomer of ferroceno[c]pyrrole 12a was formed, in which the tert-butyl group occupied exo-position with respect to the iron atom, according to X-ray data. Next, we found that the selectivity of the reaction strongly depended on the temperature and the order of addition of the thiocyanate 10a. The reaction at room temperature led to an excellent selectivity for the formation of ferroceno[c]pyrrole 12a (11a/12a = 5:95), which was isolated in 87% yield (Table 4, entry 2). At the same time, addition of thiocyanate 10a to the solution of alcohol 1 preheated to 60 °C gave a 43:57 mixture of products 11a and 12a, which were isolated in 33% and 53% yields, respectively (Table 4, entry 3). The reaction under similar conditions at 80 °C resulted in a predominant formation of ferroceno[c]pyridine 11a (11a/12a = 74:26), isolated in 57% yield (Table 4, entry 4). Increasing the reaction temperature to 100 or 120 °C provided an even greater selectivity toward ferroceno[c]pyridine 11a, resulting in products 11a and 12a in the ratios of 88:12 and 91:9, respectively (Table 4, entries 5, 6). However, lower yields of compound 11a were obtained compared to the reaction at 80 °C, likely due to its partial decomposition.
Further, we investigated the reaction of alcohol 1 with thiocyanates 10bf both at room temperature and at 80 °C (Table 5). Thiocyanates 10bf, similar to EtSCN (10a), afforded ferroceno[c]pyrroles 12bf as the main products at room temperature, with 11/12 ratios of 16:84 to 2:98, in moderate to good yields, as single diastereomers (Table 5, entries 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11). At 80 °C thiocyanates 10cf reacted with alcohol 1 with a predominant formation of ferroceno[c]pyridines 11cf with ratios of 11cf to 12cf in the range of 67:23 to 92:8 (Table 5, entries 6, 8, 10 and 12). In these cases, products 11cf were isolated in 42–61% yields. When MeSCN (10b) was used, the reaction proceeded with no selectivity to give a 52:48 mixture 11b and 12b, and ferroceno[c]pyridine 11b was obtained only in 35% yield (Table 5, entry 4).
The selectivity of the reaction is influenced by substituents at the α-position to the sulfur atom of thiocyanates 10af. An increase in the substituent size results in a higher selectivity toward ferroceno[c]pyridines 11, versus ferroceno[c]pyrroles 12. For example, in the case of reactions at 80 °C, the most sterically hindered isopropyl thiocyanate (10d) afforded ferroceno[c]pyridine 11d and ferroceno[c]pyrrole 12d in a ratio of 92:8, whereas the reaction with a less sterically constrained MeSCN (12b) gave products 11b and 12b in a ratio of 52:48 (Table 5, entries 8 and 4). When the reaction of alcohol 1 with isopropyl thiocyanate (10d) was carried out at room temperature, 11d/12d ratio was 16:84, while when using MeSCN (12b) under the same conditions, a 2:98 11b/12b ratio was observed (Table 5, entries 7 and 3).
Ethyl 2-thiocyanatoacetate (10g) reacted with alcohol 1 the same way as thiocyanates 10af (Table 6, entries 1, 2). The use of thiocyanate 10g at room temperature led to the formation of a 4:96 mixture of compounds 11g and 12g, which were isolated in 6% and 73% yields, respectively (Table 6, entry 1), whilst at 80 °C products 11g and 12g were formed in a ratio of 59:41, and purification by silica gel column chromatography gave 27% of ferroceno[c]pyridine 11g and 26% of ferroceno[c]pyrrole 12g (Table 6, entry 2). In both cases the 1H NMR spectra of ferroceno[c]pyridine 11g recorded immediately after its isolation indicated that this compound contained trace amounts of ferroceno[c]pyridine 3u with 11g/3u ratios of 99:1 and 96:4, respectively. 1H NMR analyses showed that ferroceno[c]pyridine 11g was very slowly converted to compound 3u when stored at room temperature, both neat and in solution. Compound 3u has not been isolated in a pure form in these cases. The results of the 1H NMR monitoring of the transformation of thioimine 11g to enaminone 3u are performed in Supplementary Materials (Figure S1, Table S1). The formation of ferroceno[c]pyridine 3u likely occurred due to the extrusion of sulfur from thioimine 11g. This reaction is a typical for thioimines, containing CH2C(O)R fragment at the sulfur atom, and is the basis of such a synthetic method as Eschenmoser sulfide contraction [53,54]. The proposed mechanism for the transformation of thioimine 11g to enaminone 3u is performed in Supplementary Materials (Scheme S1).
In contrast to ethyl 2-thiocyanatoacetate (10g), the reactions of alcohol 1 with β-oxothiocyanates 10hj at room temperature did not proceed (Table 6, entries 3, 5, and 7). In these cases the starting alcohol 1 together with alcohol 13 and inseparable mixtures of alkenes 5 and 6 were isolated. Among thiocyanates 10hj only 10i was recovered in 38% yield. According to the 1H NMR analysis of the crude residue, the condensation of 1 with 2-thiocyanatoacetamide (10h) at 80 °C resulted in the formation of a complex mixture of unidentified products, which were not isolated (Table 6, entry 4). Reaction with phenacyl thiocyanate (10i) at 80 °C within 40 min afforded 8% of ferroceno[c]pyridine 3w (Table 6, entry 6), along with a mixture of alkenes 5 and 6 in a 42% overall yield, and 63% of recovered thiocyanate 10i. It should be noted that the yield of the product 3w remained at the same level upon an increase in the reaction time up to 1.5 h. According to the 1H NMR spectrum of the crude residue, 2-oxopropyl thiocyanate (10j) at 80 °C gave trace amounts of ferroceno[c]pyridine 3x, which was not isolated. Only an inseparable mixture of alkenes 5 and 6 in 20% yield together with 38% of starting alcohol 1 were isolated (Table 6, entry 8). Similar to the formation of 3u from 11g, products 3w and 3x, are assumed to be formed via sulfur extrusion from thioimines 11i and 11j, respectively. However, we could neither isolate nor detect ferroceno[c]pyridines 11i and 11j by 1H NMR and GS-MS analysis of the crude residues.
The proposed mechanism for the formation of ferroceno[c]pyridines 3, 8, 11 and ferroceno[c]pyrroles 12 is shown in Scheme 1. The reaction includes initial acid-promoted ionization of starting alcohol 1 with the formation of tertiary α-ferrocenyl carbocation A, which is in an equilibrium with isomeric tertiary β-ferrocenyl carbocation B. The latter reacts with nitriles 2, 7, or 10 to give nitrilium ion C (path a), the intramolecular cyclization of which then provides ferroceno[c]pyridines 3, 8, and 11. Thiocyanates 10, being more nucleophilic than nitriles 2 and 7 because of the influence of an electron-donating sulfur atom, may react not only with carbocation B but also with the less electrophilic α-ferrocenyl carbocation A, to form nitrilium ion D (path b). Subsequent intramolecular cyclization of the intermediate D gives ferroceno[c]pyrroles 12.
The lower electrophilicity of α-ferrocenyl carbocation A compared to β-ferrocenyl carbocation B is due to the extensive delocalization of the positive charge with the participation of the ferrocenyl moiety. At room temperature an equilibrium between carbocations A and B is shifted towards the thermodynamically more stable α-ferrocenyl carbocation A, which explains the predominant formation of ferroceno[c]pyrroles 12 at these conditions. An increase in the reaction temperature shifts the AB equilibrium towards the carbocation B, which causes an increase in the selectivity of the formation of ferroceno[c]pyridines 11.

3. Material and Methods

3.1. General Information

Thin-layer chromatography was performed on commercially available Sorbfil silica gel plates, which were visualized under UV light (254 nm). Column chromatography was performed on silica gel 60 (0.063–0.200 mm, Macherey-Nagel). 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance NEO 400 spectrometer using CDCl3, DMSO-d6, or C6D6 as solvents. Chemical shifts are quoted on the δ scale, parts per million (ppm). The 1H chemical shifts were measured relative to the internal standard HMDSO (δH 0.055 ppm) for CDCl3 and DMSO-d6, or residual C6H6H 7.16 ppm) for C6D6. The 13C chemical shifts were measured relative to the solvent signal (δC 77.16 ppm for CDCl3, δC 39.50 ppm for DMSO-d6, δC 128.06 ppm for C6D6). The 19F chemical shifts were measured relative to the internal standard C6F6. The assignment of primary (CH3), secondary (CH2), tertiary (CH), and quaternary (C) carbon nuclei was made by using DEPT-135 spectra. The signals in the 1H and 13C NMR spectra of compounds 3a, 3ux, 11a, and 12a were assigned based on 2D 1H–13C HSQC, 1H–13C HMBC and 1H–1H NOESY experiments. Copies of NMR spectra for all new compounds are deposited in the Supplementary Materials. Low-resolution mass spectra were obtained with an Agilent 6890N/5975B GC–MS system (column: HP-5ms, 15 or 30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm; helium as a carrier gas, 1 mL/min, electron impact ionization mode (230 °C, 70 eV)) and Agilent 7890B/5977B GC–MS system (column: HP-5ms UI, 30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm; helium as a carrier gas, 1 mL/min, electron impact ionization mode (230 °C, 70 eV)). High-resolution mass spectra were recorded with a Bruker maXis HD UHR-QTOF mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization ion source. Infrared spectra were recorded on a Bruker IFS 66 FT-IR spectrometer. Elemental analysis was carried out on a Vario EL Cube analyzer. Melting points were determined using a PTP apparatus and are uncorrected.
2-Ferrocenyl-3,3-dimethylbutan-2-ol (1), ethyl 2-thiocyanatoacetate (10g) and 2-oxopropyl thiocyanate (10j) were synthesized as described below. 3-Oxo-3-phenylpropanenitrile (2w) [55], 3-oxobutyronitrile 2x [56], propyl thiocyanate (10c) [57], hexyl thiocyanate (10f) [57], 2-thiocyanatoacetamide (10h) [58] and phenacyl thiocyanate (10i) [59] were prepared as previously described. All other chemicals were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification.

3.2. Experimental Procedures and Characterization Data of the New Compounds

3.2.1. Synthesis of 2-Ferrocenyl-3,3-dimethylbutan-2-ol (1)

To a stirred solution of 1-ferrocenyl-2,2-dimethylpropan-1-one [60] (4.05 g, 10 mmol) in Et2O (100 mL) was added dropwise a solution of MeMgI prepared from Mg (2.30 g, 96 mmol) and MeI (7.47 mL, 120 mmol) in Et2O (70 mL). The reaction mixture was refluxed for 5 h and left overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was then cooled in an ice bath, and saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution (150 mL) was slowly added dropwise with vigorous stirring. The phases were separated, and the aqueous phase was extracted with Et2O (40 mL × 3). The combined organic phases were washed with water, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 30:1) to afford pure alcohol 1 (3.50 g, 82%) as a yellow solid; mp 93–93.5 °C (mp 93.5–94 °C (hexane) [61]); Rf 0.43 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 30:1). IR (thin film): 3560, 3102, 3087, 2982, 2958, 2910, 2872, 1479, 1460, 1410, 1390, 1360, 1313, 1217, 1109, 1078, 1036, 1027, 1006, 897, 843, 822, 810, 543, 492, 422 cm−1. NMR data are in agreement with that previously published [62]. MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 286 [M]+ (14), 269 [M–OH]+ (11), 268 [M–H2O]+ (56), 229 [M–t-C4H9]+ (32), 186 [C5H5FeC5H5]+ (100), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (28), 56 [Fe]+ (11). Analysis calculated for C16H22O: C, 67.15; H, 7.75. Found: C, 67.45; H, 7.91.

3.2.2. Synthesis of Ethyl 2-Thiocyanatoacetate (10g) and 2-Oxopropyl Thiocyanate (10j)

The title compounds were synthesized according to the literature procedure [59] with slight modifications.
Compound 10g. Well-ground NH4SCN (2.09 g, 27.5 mmol) was added portionwise to a stirred solution of ethyl 2-bromoacetate (2.8 mL, 25 mmol) in i-PrOH (3 mL), and the resulting mixture was heated under reflux with stirring for 5 h. The reaction mixture was then cooled to room temperature, diluted with water (10 mL) until the complete dissolution of the precipitate, and extracted with EtOAc (10 mL × 3). The combined organic phases were washed with water, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in EtOH (20 mL), and charcoal (2 g) was added. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min, and the charcoal was removed by filtration and washed with EtOH (5 mL). The combined filtrates were concentrated in vacuo to afford pure product 10g (3.25 g, 90%) as a colorless liquid; Rf 0.30 (hexane/EtOAc 5:1). IR (thin film): 2987, 2943, 2161, 1739, 1369, 1306, 1272, 1188, 1024 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 4.28 (q, 2H, J = 7.1 Hz), 3.76 (s, 2H), 1.32 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 166.3 (C), 110.7 (C), 63.0 (CH2), 35.1 (CH2), 14.1 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 145 [M]+ (11), 100 [M–OC2H5]+ (12), 72 [M–CH2SCN]+ (13), 29 [M–C2H5]+ (14). Analysis calculated for C5H7NO2S: C, 41.37; H, 4.86; N, 9.65; S, 22.08. Found: C, 41.62; H, 5.03; N, 9.62, S, 22.22.
Compound10j. Well-ground NH4SCN (2.09 g, 27.5 mmol) was added portionwise to a stirred solution of chloroacetone (2 mL, 25 mmol) in i-PrOH (3 mL), and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 20 h. The reaction mixture was then worked up as described for the preparation of compound 10g to afford pure product 10j (2.03 g, 71%) as a light yellow liquid; Rf 0.20 (hexane/EtOAc 5:1). IR (thin film): 2973, 2847, 2159, 2110, 2057, 1718, 1360, 190, 1157, 575, 563 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 4.02 (s, 2H), 2.34 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 198.7 (C), 111.3 (C), 44.4 (CH2), 28.5 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 115 [M]+ (11), 72 [M–CH3CO]+ (7), 43 [M–CH2SCN]+ (57). Analysis calculated for C4H5NOS: C, 41.72; H, 4.38; N, 12.16; S, 27.84. Found: C, 41.86; H, 4.27; N, 12.23, S, 28.06.

3.2.3. Synthesis of Ferroceno[c]pyridines 3am, os, ux (Table 2)

General Procedure (GP). Nitrile 2am, os, ux (0.42 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of alcohol 1 (100 mg, 0.35 mmol) in MeSO3H (0.18 mL) at room temperature, and the resulting mixture was heated at 60 °C in an oil bath with vigorous stirring for the indicated time (monitored by TLC). The reaction mixture was then cooled to room temperature, neutralized with 10% aq. Na2CO3 solution (3 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (10 mL × 4). The combined organic phases were washed with water, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography.
rac-3,3,4,4-Tetramethyl-1-(4-methylphenyl)-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (3a). The title compound was prepared according to GP using 4-methylbenzonitrile (2a) (0.05 mL, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 15 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave pure compound 3a (98 mg, 73%) as an orange solid; mp 123.5–125 °C (hexane); Rf 0.08 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1); Rf 0.30 (petroleum ether/TEA 100:1). IR (thin film): 3094, 2973, 2928, 2868, 1588, 1560, 1453, 1372, 1361, 1314, 1301, 1175, 1156, 1108, 1141, 1108, 1002, 933, 899, 822, 755, 745, 495, 467 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 7.96 (br d, 2H, J = 8.2 Hz, H2′, H6′), 7.31 (br d, 2H, J = 7.9 Hz, H3′, H5′), 4.45 (d, 2H, J = 1.9 Hz, H5, H6), 4.37 (t, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz, H7), 4.27 (s, 5H, H Cp), 2.41 (s, 3H, 4′-CH3), 1.45 (s, 3H, 4-CH3), 1.44 (s, 3H, 3-CH3), 1.11 (s, 3H, 4-CH3), 0.74 (s, 3H, 3-CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 162.3 (C1), 138.5 (C4′), 135.7 (C1′), 128.3 (C3′, C5′), 127.1 (C2′, C6′), 98.3 (C4a), 71.4 (C7a), 69.4 (5 CH Cp), 66.9 (C5 or C6), 65.7 (C7), 65.4 (C5 or C6), 61.7 (C3), 33.9 (C4), 28.0 (4-CH3), 24.4 (4-CH3), 23.7 (3-CH3), 23.1 (3-CH3), 20.6 (4′-CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 385 [M]+ (35), 370 [M–CH3]+ (100), 342 [M–i-C3H7]+ (5), 329 [M–C4H8]+ (18), 314 [M–C4H8–CH3]+ (11), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (15), 56 [Fe]+ (5). Analysis calculated for C24H27FeN: C, 74.81; H, 7.06; N, 3.64. Found: C, 75.01; H, 7.19; N, 3.56.
rac-3,3,4,4-Tetramethyl-1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (3b). The title compound was prepared according to GP using benzonitrile (2b) (0.043 mL, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 30 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave pure compound 3b (97 mg, 75%) as a red solid; mp 103–105 °C (hexane); Rf 0.10 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1); Rf 0.35 (petroleum ether/TEA 100:1). IR (thin film): 3093, 2973, 2930, 2868, 1592, 1565, 1452, 1372, 1361, 1317, 1302, 1174, 1156, 1108, 1002, 935, 897, 823, 780, 754, 725, 697, 473, 453 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 30 °C): δ 8.06–8.03 (m, 2H), 7.55–7.49 (m, 3H), 4.49 (d, 2H, J = 1.8 Hz), 4.40 (t, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz), 4.30 (s, 5H), 1.46 (s, 3H), 1.45 (s, 3H), 1.11 (s, 3H), 0.78 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 30 °C): δ 162.7 (C), 138.4 (C), 129.2 (CH), 127.9 (2 CH), 127.3 (2 CH), 98.3 (C), 71.3 (C), 69.6 (5 CH), 67.1 (CH), 65.8 (CH), 65.6 (CH), 61.9 (C), 33.9 (C), 28.1 (CH3), 24.7 (CH3), 23.8 (CH3), 23.2 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 371 [M]+ (47), 356 [M–CH3]+ (100), 328 [M–i-C3H7]+ (6), 315 [M–C4H8]+ (22), 300 [M–C4H8–CH3]+ (13), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (9), 56 [Fe]+ (3). Analysis calculated for C23H25FeN: C, 74.40; H, 6.79; N, 3.77. Found: C, 74.70; H, 7.06; N, 3.77.
rac-1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (3c). The title compound was prepared according to GP using 4-methoxybenzonitrile (2c) (0.056 mg, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 40 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave pure compound 3c (108 mg, 77%) as an orange solid; mp 140.5–142 °C (hexane); Rf 0.02 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1); Rf 0.15 (petroleum ether/TEA 100:1). IR (thin film): 3091, 2973, 2933, 2868, 2836, 1608, 1589, 1562, 1513, 1453, 1441, 1372, 1361, 1309, 1251, 1168, 1155, 1108, 1033, 1002, 933, 899, 836, 825, 751, 660, 544, 518, 478, 461 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 60 °C): δ 8.07–8.03 (m, 2H), 7.07–7.03 (m, 2H), 4.45 (d, 2H, J = 1.9 Hz), 4.38 (t, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz), 4.27 (s, 5H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 1.45 (s, 3H), 1.43 (s, 3H), 1.12 (s, 3H), 0.71 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 30 °C): δ 161.9 (C), 160.3 (C), 130.8 (C), 128.8 (2 CH), 113.3 (2 CH), 98.3 (C), 71.4 (C), 69.5 (5 CH), 67.0 (CH), 66.0 (CH), 65.7 (CH), 61.7 (C), 55.1 (CH3), 33.9 (C), 28.5 (CH3), 24.2 (CH3), 24.1 (CH3), 23.0 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 401 [M]+ (38), 386 [M–CH3]+ (100), 371 [M–CH2O]+ (7), 358 [M–i-C3H7 and/or M–CH3–CO]+ (6), 345 [M–C4H8]+ (23), 330 [M–C4H8–CH3]+ (15), 165 (11), 134 (11), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (28), 56 [Fe]+ (8). Analysis calculated for C24H27FeNO: C, 71.83; H, 6.78; N, 3.49. Found: C, 71.64; H, 7.13; N, 3.44.
rac-1-(3-Methoxyphenyl)-3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (3d). The title compound was prepared according to GP using 3-methoxybenzonitrile (2d) (0.051 mL, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 40 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave pure compound 3d (110 mg, 78%) as an orange solid; mp 100–102 °C (hexane); Rf 0.03 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1); Rf 0.20 (petroleum ether/TEA 100:1). IR (thin film): 3094, 2973, 2937, 2869, 2834, 1599, 1568, 1487, 1462, 1435, 1372, 1361, 1305, 1285, 1274, 1238, 1168, 1152, 1108, 1049, 1039, 1002, 948, 882, 824, 802, 791, 755, 742, 697, 663, 534, 516, 473, 449 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 70 °C): δ 7.61 (dt, 1H, J = 7.6, 1.3 Hz), 7.56 (dd, 1H, J = 2.7, 1.5 Hz), 7.41 (t, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.06 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.2, 2.7, 1.0 Hz), 4.47 (d, 2H, J = 1.8 Hz), 4.39 (t, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz), 4.27 (s, 5H), 3.88 (s, 3H), 1.47 (s, 3H), 1.46 (s, 3H), 1.11 (s, 3H), 0.78 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 30 °C): δ 162.5 (C), 158.9 (C), 139.8 (C), 129.0 (CH), 119.9 (CH), 114.9 (CH), 112.7 (CH), 98.3 (C), 71.3 (C), 69.6 (5 CH), 67.1 (CH), 65.8 (CH), 65.6 (CH), 62.0 (C), 55.1 (CH3), 33.9 (C), 28.1 (CH3), 24.6 (CH3), 23.8 (CH3), 23.2 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 401 [M]+ (51), 386 [M–CH3]+ (100), 371 [M–CH2O]+ (6), 358 [M–i-C3H7 and/or M–CH3–CO]+ (6), 345 [M–C4H8]+ (22), 330 [M–C4H8–CH3]+ (12), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (10), 56 [Fe]+ (3). Analysis calculated for C24H27FeNO: C, 71.83; H, 6.78; N, 3.49. Found: C, 72.05; H, H 7.20; N, 3.49.
rac-1-(2-Methoxyphenyl)-3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (3e). The title compound was prepared according to GP using 2-methoxybenzonitrile (2e) (0.051 mL, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 40 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave pure compound 3e (88 mg, 63%) as a brown solid; mp 100–101 °C (hexane); Rf 0.05 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1); Rf 0.25 (petroleum ether/TEA 100:1). IR (thin film): 3096, 2972, 2933, 2869, 2834, 1597, 1494, 1463, 1435, 1372, 1361, 1312, 1267, 1243, 1153, 1117, 1108, 1049, 1027, 1003, 939, 922, 900, 821, 751, 659, 512, 476, 455 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 7.42–7.38 (m, 1H), 7.28 (dd, 1H, J = 7.4, 1.7 Hz), 7.11 (br d, 1H, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.05 (td, 1H, J = 7.4, 1.0 Hz), 4.32 (dd, 1H, J = 2.2, 1.2 Hz), 4.29 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 4.12 (s, 5H), 4.02 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.2 Hz), 3.79 (s, 3H), 1.50 (s, 3H), 1.47 (s, 3H), 1.01 (s, 3H), 1.00 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 162.9 (C), 156.3 (C), 129.6 (C), 129.0 (CH), 128.9 (CH), 119.9 (CH), 111.6 (CH), 97.7 (C), 73.3 (C), 69.2 (5 CH), 66.6 (CH), 64.3 (CH), 64.0 (CH), 61.4 (C), 55.5 (CH3), 34.1 (C), 26.2 (CH3), 26.2 (CH3), 24.4 (CH3), 22.7 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 401 [M]+ (100), 386 [M–CH3]+ (61), 371 [M–CH2O]+ (11), 358 [M–i-C3H7 and/or M–CH3–CO]+ (15), 345 [M–C4H8]+ (50), 330 [M–C4H8–CH3]+ (11), 263 (10), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (9), 56 [Fe]+ (3). Analysis calculated for C24H27FeNO∙0.15C6H14: C, 72.20; H, 7.08; N, 3.38. Found: C, 72.43; H, 7.10; N, 3.05.
rac-4-(3,3,4,4-Tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridin-1-yl)aniline (3f). The title compound was prepared according to GP using 4-aminobenzonitrile (2f) (49 mg, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 50 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 5:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave pure compound 3f (89 mg, 66%) as an orange solid; mp 167.5–169 °C (hexane); Rf 0.02 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 5:1); Rf 0.30 (petroleum ether/TEA 100:1). IR (thin film): 3464, 3433, 3378, 3321, 3204, 3094, 2973, 2931, 2868, 1621, 1609, 1584, 1556, 1518, 1454, 1372, 1361, 1315, 1296, 1171, 1155, 1107, 1002, 834, 754, 660, 504, 470 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 7.88–7.85 (m, 2H), 6.68–6.65 (m, 2H), 5.31 (br s, 2H), 4.44–4.42 (m, 2H), 4.37 (t, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz), 4.26 (s, 5H), 1.44 (s, 3H), 1.39 (s, 3H), 1.12 (s, 3H), 0.65 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 30 °C): δ 161.8 (C), 150.1 (C), 128.6 (2 CH), 126.0 (C), 112.8 (2 CH), 98.4 (C), 71.9 (C), 69.4 (5 CH), 66.6 (CH), 66.3 (CH), 65.4 (CH), 61.4 (C), 33.9 (C), 28.7 (CH3), 24.4 (CH3), 24.0 (CH3), 23.0 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 386 [M]+ (44), 371 [M–CH3]+ (100), 330 [M–C4H8]+ (19), 315 [M–C4H8–CH3]+ (12), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (10), 56 [Fe]+ (4). HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C23H27FeN2, 387.1518; found, 387.1523.
rac-2-(3,3,4,4-Tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridin-1-yl)aniline (3g). The title compound was prepared according to GP using 2-aminobenzonitrile (2g) (49 mg, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 180 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/acetone 15:1) gave pure compound 3g (40 mg, 30%) as an orange oil; Rf 0.20 (petroleum ether/acetone 15:1). IR (thin film): 3452, 3202, 3093, 2973, 2929, 2868, 1613, 1580, 1540, 1450, 1372, 1361, 1308, 1264, 1159, 1108, 1002, 936, 818, 750, 659, 493, 472, 453 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 8.25 (dd, 1H, J = 7.9, 1.6 Hz), 7.14–7.10 (m, 1H), 6.87 (br s, 2H), 6.75 (dd, 1H, J = 8.2, 1.3 Hz), 6.70–6.65 (m, 1H), 4.47 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 4.44 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.2 Hz), 4.33 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.2 Hz), 4.29 (s, 5H), 1.46 (s, 3H), 1.43 (s, 3H), 1.13 (s, 3H), 0.75 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 30 °C): δ 165.3 (C), 148.5 (C), 130.1 (CH), 129.6 (CH), 118.0 (C), 116.0 (CH), 114.0 (CH), 98.1 (C), 71.9 (C), 69.6 (5 CH), 67.3 (CH), 67.1 (CH), 65.5 (CH), 61.6 (C), 33.2 (C), 28.2 (CH3), 24.2 (CH3), 23.8 (CH3), 23.75 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 386 [M]+ (100), 371 [M–CH3]+ (96), 330 [M–C4H8]+ (27), 303 (10), 265 [M–C5H5Fe]+ (11), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (16), 56 [Fe]+ (7). Analysis calculated for C23H26FeN2: C, 71.51; H, 6.78; N, 7.25. Found: C, 71.56; H, 7.17; N, 7.04.
rac-1-(4-Bromphenyl)-3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (3h). The title compound was prepared according to GP using 4-bromobenzonitrile (2h) (76 mg, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 30 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave pure compound 3h (129 mg, 82%) as a brown solid; mp 85–86.5 °C (hexane); Rf 0.12 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1); Rf 0.40 (petroleum ether/TEA 100:1). IR (thin film): 3094, 2974, 2931, 2869, 1588, 1556, 1488, 1452, 1391, 1372, 1361, 1310, 1155, 1108, 1070, 1011, 934, 898, 824, 754, 697, 518, 506, 475, 440 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 8.00–7.99 (m, 2H), 7.68–7.65 (m, 2H), 4.43 (d, 2H, J = 1.8 Hz), 4.34 (t, 1H, J = 1.9 Hz), 4.24 (s, 5H), 1.40 (s, 6H), 1.07 (s, 3H), 0.70 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 161.6 (C), 137.4 (C), 130.8 (2 CH), 129.2 (2 CH), 122.6 (C), 98.2 (C), 70.9 (C), 69.4 (5 CH), 67.1 (CH), 65.6 (CH), 65.5 (CH), 62.0 (C), 33.8 (C), 28.0 (CH3), 24.3 (CH3), 23.6 (CH3), 22.9 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 449 [M]+ (64), 434 [M–CH3]+ (100), 406 [M–i-C3H7]+ (4), 393 [M–C4H8]+ (23), 378 [M–C4H8–CH3]+ (3), 369 [M–HBr]+ (3), 314 (43), 299 (57), 191 (13), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (14), 56 [Fe]+ (5). Analysis calculated for C23H24BrFeN∙0.1C6H14: C, 61.78; H, 5.58; N, 3.05. Found: C, 61.61; H, 5.92; N, 3.05.
rac-1-(3-Bromphenyl)-3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (3i). The title compound was prepared according to GP using 3-bromobenzonitrile (2i) (76 mg, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 40 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave pure compound 3i (125 mg, 80%) as a brown solid; mp 131–132 °C (hexane); Rf 0.03 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1); Rf 0.35 (petroleum ether/TEA 100:1). IR (thin film): 3094, 2974, 2930, 2869, 1591, 1555, 1451, 1372, 1361, 1302, 1186, 1155, 1108, 1070, 999, 937, 902, 870, 824, 791, 756, 738, 709, 692, 518, 474, 453 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 8.23 (t, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz), 7.92 (dt, 1H, J = 7.8, 1.2 Hz), 7.53 (ddd, 1H, J = 7.9, 2.1, 1.1 Hz), 7.29 (t, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 4.35–4.33 (m, 2H), 4.27 (dd, 1H, J = 2.3, 1.4 Hz), 4.23 (s, 5H), 1.49 (s, 3H), 1.46 (s, 3H), 1.10 (s, 3H), 0.81 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): 163.5 (C), 141.4 (C), 132.3 (CH), 131.1 (CH), 129.9 (CH), 126.3 (CH), 122.4 (C), 99.2 (C), 71.9 (C), 70.0 (5 CH), 67.4 (CH), 66.2 (CH), 66.0 (CH), 62.9 (C), 34.7 (C), 28.7 (CH3), 25.2 (CH3), 24.0 (CH3), 23.6 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 449 [M]+ (90), 434 [M–CH3]+ (100), 406 [M–i-C3H7]+ (10), 393 [M–C4H8]+ (48), 378 [M–C4H8–CH3]+ (7), 314 (32), 299 (16), 249 (12), 234 (12), 218 (14), 191 (22), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (25), 56 [Fe]+ (10). Analysis calculated for C23H24BrFeN: C, 61.36; H, 5.37; N, 3.11. Found: C, 61.60; H, 5.39; N, 3.04.
rac-1-(2-Bromphenyl)-3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (3j). The title compound was prepared according to GP using 2-bromobenzonitrile (2j) (76 mg, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 40 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave pure compound 3j (120 mg, 76%) as an orange solid; mp 110–111 °C (hexane); Rf 0.02 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1); Rf 0.20 (petroleum ether/TEA 100:1). IR (thin film): 3095, 2973, 2930, 2868, 1604, 1476, 1452, 1432, 1342, 1372, 1361, 1312, 1193, 1154, 1108, 1086, 1049, 1029, 1021, 1003, 923, 861, 822, 767, 751, 742, 693, 546, 486, 468, 447 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 7.65 (dd, 1H, J = 8.0, 1.1 Hz), 7.51–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.36–7.31 (m, 1H), 4.36 (dd, 2H, J = 2.4, 1.2Hz), 4.32 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 4.17 (s, 5H), 3.90 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.1 Hz), 1.47 (s, 3H), 1.46 (s, 3H), 1.03 (s, 3H), 0.99 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): 163.4 (C), 140.1 (C), 132.3 (CH), 129.51 (C), 129.46 (C), 127.1 (CH), 120.2 (C), 97.8 (C), 71.8 (C), 69.4 (5 CH), 67.0 (CH), 64.4 (CH), 64.1 (CH), 61.8 (C), 34.1 (C), 26.6 (CH3), 25.8 (CH3), 24.4 (CH3), 22.2 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 449 [M]+ (100), 406 [M–i-C3H7]+ (5), 393 [M–C4H8]+ (28), 384 (13), 370 [M–Br]+ (20), 355 [M–CH3–Br]+ (22), 354 [M–CH3–HBr]+ (22), 326 (19), 312 (18), 262 (11), 248 (59), 234 (62), 218 (22), 192 (29), 178 (31), 165 (15), 152 (10), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (18), 56 [Fe]+ (8). Analysis calculated for C23H24BrFeN∙0.2C6H14: C, 62.18; H, 5.78; N, 3.00. Found: C, 62.44; H, 5.63; N, 3.02.
rac-3,3,4,4-Tetramethyl-1-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (3k). The title compound was prepared according to GP using 4-(trifluoromethyl)benzonitrile (2k) (71 mg, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 15 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 50:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave pure compound 3k (117 mg, 76%) as an orange solid; mp 121.5–123 °C (hexane); Rf 0.16 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 50:1); Rf 0.30 (petroleum ether/TEA 100:1). IR (thin film): 3095, 2976, 2934, 2871, 1620, 1594, 1564, 1453, 1373, 1362, 1327, 1313, 1165, 1127, 1107, 1081, 1067, 1018, 1003, 849, 824, 758, 474, 444 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 8.24 (br d, 2H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.87 (br d, 2H, J = 7.9 Hz), 4.50 (d, 2H, J = 1.8 Hz), 4.41 (t, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz), 4.31 (s, 5H), 1.464 (s, 3H), 1.456 (s, 3H), 1.11 (s, 3H), 0.78 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): 161.8 (C), 141.9 (C), 129.3 (q, 2JC,F = 31.8 Hz, C), 127.9 (s, 2 CH), 124.8 (q, 3JC,F = 3.8 Hz, 2 CH), 124.1 (q, 1JC,F = 271.0 Hz, CF3), 98.2 (C), 70.8 (C), 69.5 (5 CH), 67.2 (CH), 65.6 (CH), 65.4 (CH), 62.2 (C), 33.9 (C), 27.9 (CH3), 24.5 (CH3), 23.5 (CH3), 23.0 (CH3). 19F NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 101.5 (s, CF3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 439 [M]+ (88), 424 [M–CH3]+ (60), 396 [M–i-C3H7]+ (8), 383 [M–C4H8]+ (55), 368 (16), 284 (100), 243 (11), 227 (13), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (13), 56 [Fe]+ (3). Analysis calculated for C24H24F3FeN: C, 65.62; H, 5.51; N, 3.19. Found: C, 65.92; H, 5.78; N, 3.11.
rac-3,3,4,4-Tetramethyl-1-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (3l). The title compound was prepared according to GP using 3-(trifluoromethyl)benzonitrile (2l) (0.056 mL, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 30 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 50:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave pure compound 3l (129 mg, 84%) as a brown oil; Rf 0.15 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 50:1); Rf 0.30 (petroleum ether/TEA 100:1). IR (thin film): 3093, 2976, 2931, 2870, 1599, 1574, 1454, 1433, 1373, 1362, 1336, 1296, 1266, 1185, 1166, 1127, 1109, 1095, 1072, 1002, 825, 808, 702, 690, 473, 448 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 8.40–8.39 (m, 1H), 8.33–8.30 (m, 1H), 7.84–7.81 (m, 1H), 7.75–7.71 (m, 1H), 4.49–4.47 (m, 2H), 4.34 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.3 Hz), 4.27 (s, 5H), 1.419 (s, 3H), 1.415 (s, 3H), 1.10 (s, 3H), 0.70 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 161.5 (C), 138.9 (C), 131.0 (CH), 129.1 (CH), 128.8 (q, 2JC,F = 31.6 Hz, C), 125.6 (q, 3JC,F = 3.7 Hz, CH), 124.1 (q, 1JC,F = 272.3 Hz, CF3), 123.5 (q, 3JC,F = 4.2, CH), 98.3 (C), 70.8 (C), 69.4 (5 CH), 67.2 (CH), 65.8 (CH), 65.4 (CH), 62.2 (C), 33.9 (C), 28.2 (CH3), 24.1 (CH3), 23.6 (CH3), 22.7 (CH3). 19F NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 101.6 (s, CF3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 439 [M]+ (100), 424 [M–CH3]+ (44), 396 [M–i-C3H7]+ (17), 383 [M–C4H8]+ (74), 368 [M–C4H8–CH3]+ (11), 284 (59), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (10), 56 [Fe]+ (2). Analysis calculated for C24H24F3FeN: C, 65.62; H, 5.51; N, 3.19. Found: C, 65.99; H, 5.63; N, 3.21.
rac-3,3,4,4-Tetramethyl-1-(2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (3m). The title compound was prepared according to GP using 2-(trifluoromethyl)benzonitrile (2m) (0.056 mL, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 40 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 50:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave pure compound 3m (100 mg, 65%) as brown oil; Rf 0.04 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 50:1); Rf 0.20 (petroleum ether/TEA 100:1). IR (thin film): 3095, 2977, 2932, 2870, 1603, 1580, 1456, 1447, 1373, 1362, 1315, 1264, 1163, 1136, 1109, 1059, 1034, 1003, 823, 768, 683, 545, 449 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 30 °C): δ 7.80–7.76 (m, 2H), 7.65–7.61 (m, 2H), 4.36 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.2 Hz), 4.33 (t, 1H, J = 2.5 Hz), 4.22 (s, 5H), 3.81 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.2 Hz), 1.46 (s, 3H), 1.45 (s, 3H), 1.04 (s, 3H), 0.92 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 162.1 (C), 138.1 (C, broad), 131.7 (CH), 129.8 (CH), 128.0 (CH), 126.3 (q, 2JC,F = 30.6 Hz, C), 126.0 (q, 3JC,F = 4.9 Hz, CH), 123.8 (q, 1JC,F = 274.3 Hz, CF3), 97.8 (C), 72.2 (C), 69.5 (5 CH), 67.2 (CH), 64.1 (CH), 63.7 (CH), 61.7 (C), 34.2 (C), 26.8 (CH3), 25.3 (CH3), 24.5 (CH3), 21.9 (CH3). 19F NMR (376 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 106.7 (s, CF3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 439 [M]+ (100), 424 [M–CH3]+ (10), 396 [M–i-C3H7]+ (19), 383 [M–C4H8]+ (19), 368 [M–C4H8–CH3]+ (2), 284 (22), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (5), 56 [Fe]+ (1). HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C24H25F3FeN, 440.1283; found, 440.1291.
rac-1,3,3,4,4-Pentamethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (3o). The title compound was prepared according to GP using acetonitrile (2o) (0.02 mL, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 15 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave pure compound 3o (82 mg, 76%) as a red oil; Rf 0.07 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1); Rf 0.25 (petroleum ether/TEA 100:1). IR (thin film): 3094, 2972, 2868, 1619, 1465, 1438, 1387, 1373, 1361, 1301, 1164, 1135, 1108, 1027, 1001, 854, 821, 658, 511, 487, 475, 458 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 30 °C): δ 4.46 (t, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz), 4.32 (d, 2H, J = 1.8 Hz), 4.23 (s, 5H), 2.18 (s, 3H), 1.40 (s, 3H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 1.00 (s, 3H), 0.72 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 30 °C): δ 162.5 (C), 97.8 (C), 73.5 (C), 69.2 (5 CH), 66.3 (CH), 65.1 (CH), 63.5 (CH), 61.2 (C), 33.9 (C), 28.2 (CH3), 25.1 (CH3), 23.8 (CH3), 23.6 (CH3), 22.7 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 309 [M]+ (100), 294 [M–CH3]+ (24), 266 [M–i-C3H7]+ (52), 251 [M–i-C3H7–CH3]+ (11), 226 (12), 186 [C5H5FeC5H5]+ (13), 162 (14), 146 (11), 129 (10), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (44), 115 (20), 91 (10), 56 [Fe]+ (19), 42 (12). Analysis calculated for C18H23FeN: C, 69.91; H, 7.88; N, 4.53. Found: C, 69.55; H, 7.89; N, 4.49.
rac-1-Ethyl-3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (3p). The title compound was prepared according to GP using propiononitrile (2p) (0.03 mL, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 20 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 50:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave pure compound 3p (90 mg, 80%) as a red oil; Rf 0.05 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 50:1); Rf 0.10 (petroleum ether/TEA 100:1). IR (thin film): 3095, 2972, 2932, 2870, 1615, 1465, 1442, 1387, 1360, 1287, 1248, 1194, 1158, 1128, 1108, 1028, 1002, 922, 870, 821, 511, 482 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 4.33 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.1 Hz), 4.25 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 4.20 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.1 Hz), 4.15 (s, 5H), 2.50 (qt, 2H, J = 7.6, 3.6 Hz), 1.40 (s, 6H), 1.25 (t, 3H, J = 7.6 Hz), 0.97 (s, 3H), 0.89 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 168.0 (C), 99.0 (C), 73.1 (C), 69.7 (5 CH), 66.9 (CH), 65.0 (CH), 63.7 (CH), 61.4 (C), 34.7 (C), 30.6 (CH2), 27.7 (CH3), 26.3 (CH3), 24.5 (CH3), 23.6 (CH3), 13.1 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 323 [M]+ (100), 308 [M–CH3]+ (18), 280 [M–i-C3H7]+ (34), 267 [M–C4H8]+ (18), 265 [M–i-C3H7–CH3]+ (13), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (20), 56 [Fe]+ (9). HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C19H26FeN, 324.1409; found, 324.1411.
rac-1-Isobutyl-3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (3q). The title compound was prepared according to GP using isovaleronitrile (2q) (0.044 mL, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 15 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave pure compound 3q (92 mg, 75%) as a red oil; Rf 0.07 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1); Rf 0.30 (petroleum ether/TEA 100:1). IR (thin film): 3097, 2969, 2930, 2868, 1613, 1464, 1386, 1372, 1361, 1304, 1259, 1245, 1224, 1194, 1159, 1144, 1135, 1108, 1028, 1002, 862, 821, 754, 510, 447 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 50 °C): δ 4.06 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.1 Hz), 4.00 (s, 6H), 3.96 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 2.49–2.32 (m, 3H), 1.52 (s, 3H), 1.37 (s, 3H), 1.09 (d, 3H, J = 6.2 Hz), 1.06 (d, 3H, J = 6.3 Hz,), 1.01 (s, 3H), 0.97 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6, 50 °C): δ 164.3 (C), 99.2 (C), 74.8 (C), 69.8 (5 CH), 66.8 (CH), 65.0 (CH), 63.6 (CH), 61.9 (C), 46.0 (CH2), 34.9 (C), 28.0 (CH3), 26.8 (CH), 26.3 (CH3), 24.8 (CH3), 24.0 (CH3), 23.2 (CH3), 23.0 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 351 [M]+ (100), 336 [M–CH3]+ (45), 308 [M–i-C3H7]+ (40), 251 (19), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (47), 56 [Fe]+ (12). Analysis calculated for C21H29FeN: C, 71.80; H, 8.32; N, 3.99. Found: C, 71.82; H, 8.73; N, 3.80.
rac-1-(Adamantan-1-yl)methyl)-3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (3r). The title compound was prepared according to GP using 1-adamantaneacetonitrile (2r) (61 mg, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 25 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 50:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave pure compound 3r (113 mg, 73%) as a red solid; mp 137–139.5 °C (MeOH); Rf 0.10 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 50:1); Rf 0.40 (petroleum ether/TEA 100:1). IR (thin film): 3096, 2970, 2902, 2846, 1460, 1387, 1372, 1360, 1314, 1293, 1262, 1208, 1150, 1121, 1108, 1029, 1002, 821, 753, 660, 508, 448 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 4.11 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.2 Hz), 4.01 (s, 5H), 3.99 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.1 Hz), 3.96 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 2.41 (d, 1H, J = 13.0 Hz), 2.35 (d, 1H, J = 13.0 Hz), 2.00–1.90 (m, 6H), 1.76–1.70 (m, 9H), 1.55 (s, 3H), 1.36 (s, 3H), 1.11 (s, 3H), 0.97 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 163.5 (C), 99.3 (C), 76.0 (C), 69.9 (5 CH), 66.9 (CH), 64.70 (CH), 64.68 (CH), 61.9 (C), 50.5 (CH2), 43.8 (3 CH2), 37.6 (3 CH2), 34.7 (C), 34.4 (C), 29.5 (3 CH), 27.6 (CH3), 26.8 (CH3), 25.5 (CH3), 23.8 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 443 [M]+ (100), 428 [M–CH3]+ (11), 400 [M–i-C3H7]+ (33), 385 [M–i-C3H7–CH3]+ (12), 359 (44), 308 [M–Ad]+ (12), 251 (19), 135 [Ad]+ (14), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (33), 56 [Fe]+ (6). Analysis calculated for C28H37FeN∙0.55MeOH: C, 74.37; H, 8.57; N, 3.04. Found: C, 74.73; H, 8.95; N, 3.00.
rac-1-(Adamantan-1-yl)-3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (3s). The title compound was prepared according to GP using adamantane-1-carbonitrile (2s) (68 mg, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 20 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 75:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave pure compound 3s (107 mg, 71%) as an orange oil; Rf 0.10 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 75:1); Rf 0.40 (petroleum ether/TEA 100:1). IR (thin film): 3096, 2970, 2927, 2903, 2848, 1597, 1450, 1370, 1359, 1292, 1250, 1162, 1108, 1002, 820, 758, 475, 456 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 50 °C): δ 4.34 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.1 Hz), 4.04 (t, 1H, J = 2.5 Hz), 4.02 (s, 5H), 4.00 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.1 Hz), 2.22–2.11 (m, 6H), 2.09–2.06 (m, 3H), 1.79 (br t, 6H, J = 3.2 Hz), 1.51 (s, 3H), 1.34 (s, 3H), 1.05 (s, 3H), 0.94 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6, 50 °C): δ 169.3 (C), 100.2 (C), 70.8 (C), 70.1 (5 CH), 67.2 (CH), 66.4 (CH), 63.9 (CH), 60.9 (C), 42.2 (C), 41.8 (3 CH2), 37.7 (3 CH2), 34.6 (C), 29.6 (3 CH), 26.7 (CH3), 26.4 (CH3), 25.1 (CH3), 23.6 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 429 [M]+ (100), 414 [M–CH3]+ (14), 386 [M–C3H7]+ (17), 373 [M–C4H8]+ (37), 294 [M–Ad]+ (11), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (11), 56 [Fe]+ (2). Analysis calculated for C27H35FeN: C, 75.52; H, 8.22; N, 3.26. Found: C, 74.98; H, 8.49; N, 3.04.
rac-Ethyl (Z)-2-(3,3,4,4-Tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridin-1(2H)-ylidene)acetate (3u). The title compound was prepared according to GP using ethyl cyanoacetate 2u (0.045 mL, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 20 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1) gave pure product 3u (79 mg, 59%) as an orange oil; Rf 0.30 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 3288, 3096, 2975, 2930, 2870, 1646, 1602, 1499, 1465, 1442, 1366, 1295, 1187, 1154, 1108, 1072, 1044, 1002, 822, 784, 756, 629, 470 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 8.23 (br d, 1H, NH), 4.84 (s, 1H, H2), 4.53 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.2 Hz, H7′), 4.27 (t, 1H, J = 2.5 Hz, H6′), 4.21 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.2 Hz, H5′), 4.18–4.09 (m, 2H, OCH2CH3, partially overlapped), 4.14 (s, 5H, H Cp), 1.55 (s, 3H, 4′-CH3), 1.37 (s, 3H, 3′-CH3), 1.30 (t, 3H, J = 7.1 Hz, OCH2CH3), 1.06 (s, 3H, 4′-CH3), 0.95 (s, 3H, 3′-CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 170.9 (C1), 160.7 (C1′), 98.3 (C4a’), 78.6 (C2), 74.1 (C7a’), 70.5 (5 CH, Cp), 67.3 (C6′), 66.0 (C5′), 64.2 (C7′), 58.4 (OCH2CH3), 57.5 (C3′), 36.4 (C4′), 28.9 (4′-CH3), 25.8 (3′-CH3), 25.1 (4′-CH3), 23.8 (3′-CH3), 14.9 (OCH2CH3). GC–MS analyses of product 3u indicated the presence of a peak in the chromatogram that, based on its MS spectra, belonged to compound 3o. The latter was likely produced by the thermolysis of the parent compound in the GC instrument injector. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C21H28FeNO2, 382.1464; found, 382.1458.
rac-(Z)-2-(3,3,4,4-Tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridin-1(2H)-ylidene)acetamide (3v). The title compound was prepared according to GP using cyanoacetamide 2v (35 mg, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 30 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/acetone 3:1) followed by recrystallization from hexane gave pure product 3v (42 mg, 34%) as an orange solid, m.p. 147–149 °C (hexane); Rf 0.30 (petroleum ether/acetone 3:1). IR (thin film): 3440, 3326, 3213, 3098, 2972, 2927, 2870, 2856, 1684, 1621, 1572, 1457, 1364, 1337, 1151, 1108, 1002, 823, 756, 666, 507, 471 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3,30 °C): δ 8.80 (br s, 1H, NH), 4.74 (s, 1H, H2), 4.67 (br s, 2H, NH2), 4.47 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.2 Hz, H7′), 4.24 (t, 1H, J = 2.5 Hz, H6′), 4.20 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.2 Hz, H5′), 4.14 (s, 5H, H Cp), 1.55 (s, 3H, 4′-CH3), 1.36 (s, 3H, 3′-CH3), 1.05 (s, 3H, 4′-CH3), 0.94 (s, 3H, 3′-CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 172.9 (C1), 158.9 (C1′), 98.5 (C4a’), 80.0 (C2), 74.4 (C7a’), 70.4 (5 CH, Cp), 66.9 (C6′), 65.9 (C5′), 63.6 (C7′), 57.1 (C3′), 36.3 (C4′), 28.8 (4′-CH3), 25.8 (3′-CH3), 25.1 (4′-CH3), 23.8 (3′-CH3). GC–MS analyses of product 3v indicated the presence of a peak in the chromatogram that, based on its MS spectra, belonged to compound 3o. The latter was likely produced by the thermolysis of the parent compound in the GC instrument injector. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C19H25FeN2O, 353.1311; found, 353.1307.
rac-(Z)-1-Phenyl-2-(3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridin-1(2H)-ylidene)ethan-1-one (3w). The title compound was prepared according to GP using 3-oxo-3-phenylpropanenitrile 2w (61 mg, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 20 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 10:1) gave pure compound 3w (126 mg, 87%) as a red oil; Rf 0.30 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 10:1). IR (thin film): 2975, 2929, 1594, 1580, 1543, 1451, 1438, 1366, 1324, 1304, 1265, 1229, 1153, 1108, 1055, 1026, 1002, 824, 755, 732, 711, 620, 512, 487, 461 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 10.99 (br d, 1H, NH), 7.95–7.91 (m, 2H, H2′’, H6′’), 7.44–7.41 (m, 3H, H3′’, H4′’, H5′’), 5.98 (s, 1H, H2), 4.69 (dd, 1H, J = 2.6, 1.2 Hz, H7′), 4.38 (t, 1H, J = 2.5 Hz, H6′), 4.31 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.2 Hz, H5′), 4.18 (s, 5H, H Cp), 1.57 (s, 3H, 4′-CH3), 1.46 (s, 3H, 3′-CH3), 1.10 (s, 3H, 4′-CH3), 1.03 (s, 3H, 3′-CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 187.2 (C1), 163.2 (C1′), 141.2 (C1′’), 130.4 (C4′’), 128.3 (C3′’, C5′’), 127.0 (C2′’, C6′’), 98.3 (C4a’), 88.0 (C2), 73.5 (C7a’), 70.7 (5 CH, Cp), 67.9 (C6′), 66.6 (C5′), 64.8 (C7′), 57.9 (C3′), 36.3 (C4′), 28.8 (4′-CH3), 25.7 (3′-CH3), 25.0 (4′-CH3), 23.5 (3′-CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 413 [M]+ (100), 370 [M–i-C3H7]+ (19), 348 (42), 308 [M–C(O)C6H5]+ (12), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (9), 56 [Fe]+ (2). HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C25H28FeNO, 414.1420; found, 414.1515.
rac-(Z)-1-(3,3,4,4-Tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridin-1(2H)-ylidene)propan-2-one (3x). The title compound was prepared according to GP using 3-oxobutyronitrile 2x (0.036 mL, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 20 min. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1) gave pure compound 3x (99 mg, 81%) as a red oil, which solidified on long-term standing; mp 158.5–162 °C; Rf 0.20 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 3094, 2974, 2927, 2870, 1603, 1566, 1509, 1449, 1365, 1354, 1317, 1262, 1201, 1153, 1108, 1005, 961, 823, 757, 715, 508, 469 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 10.43 (br s, 1H, NH), 5.28 (s, 1H, H2), 4.55 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.2 Hz, H7′), 4.32 (t, 1H, J = 2.5 Hz, H6′), 4.25 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.1 Hz, H5′), 4.15 (s, 5H, H Cp), 2.07 (s, 3H, 1-CH3), 1.53 (s, 3H, 4′-CH3), 1.39 (s, 3H, 3′-CH3), 1.06 (s, 3H, 4′-CH3), 0.97 (s, 3H, 3′-CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 194.3 (C1), 161.2 (C1′), 98.4 (C4a’), 91.1(C2), 73.2 (C7a’), 70.6 (5 CH, Cp), 67.6 (C6′), 66.4 (C5′), 64.5 (C7′), 57.5 (C3′), 36.2 (C4′), 29.2 (1-CH3), 28.7 (4′-CH3), 25.6 (3′-CH3), 25.1 (4′-CH3), 23.6 (3′-CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 351 [M]+ (100), 308 [M–C(O)CH3) or/and i-C3H7]+ (27), 286 (61), 242 (10), 228 (10), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (9), 56 [Fe]+ (2). HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C20H26FeNO, 352.1358; found, 352.1354.

3.2.4. Synthesis of Ferroceno[c]pyridines 8ac and 9ac (Table 3)

General Procedure 1 (GP1). Phenylacetonitrile 7ac (0.42 mmol) was added to the stirred solution of alcohol 1 (100 mg, 0.35 mmol) in MeSO3H (0.18 mL) at room temperature, and the resulting mixture was heated at 60 °C in an oil bath with vigorous stirring for the indicated time (monitored by TLC). The reaction mixture was then cooled to room temperature, neutralized with 10% aq. Na2CO3 solution (3 mL), and extracted with EtOAc (10 mL × 4). The combined organic phases were washed with water, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and filtered. Method A: Dried organic extract was concentrated in vacuo, and the crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography to obtain a mixture of compounds 8ac and 9ac; the ratios of 8ac and 9ac were determined by NMR 1H immediately after the isolation of the mixed fraction. Storage of this mixture at room temperature exposed to air until full conversion of 8ac to 9ac (monitored by TLC, reaction time 1), followed by purification by silica gel column chromatography, afforded pure compound 9ac. Method B: Dried organic extract was stored at room temperature exposed to air until full conversion of 8ac to 9ac (monitored by TLC, reaction time 1) and then concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography to afford pure compound 9ac.
rac-1-(3,4-Dimethoxybenzyl)-3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (8a) and rac-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)(3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine)methanone (9a). The title compounds were prepared according to GP1 using 3,4-dimethoxyphenylacetonitrile (7a) (74 mg, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 10 min; reaction time 1 = 1 day. Method A: Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/CH2Cl2 3:1–petroleum ether/EtOAc/Et3N 100:5:3) gave an inseparable mixture of 7a, 8a and 9a (108 mg, 7a/8a/9a = 31:54:15; 8a/9a = 78:22). Storage of the mixture of 7a, 8a and 9a at room temperature exposed to air until full conversion of 8a to 9a, followed by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether–petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1), afforded pure compound 9a (39 mg, 24%). Method B: Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether–petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1) gave pure 9a (33 mg, 21%). Data for 8a [spectroscopic data for 8a were obtained only from the mixture of 7a, 8a and 9a]: Rf 0.15 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 5:1). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz, 30 °C): δ 7.04 (d, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz), 7.01–6.94 (m, 2H, overlapped), 4.32–4.24 (m, 3H), 4.00 (s, 5H), 3.78 (s, 3H, overlapped), 3.76 (s, 3H), 3.71 (d, 1H, J = 13.5 Hz), 3.66 (d, 1H, J = 13.5 Hz), 1.42 (s, 3H), 1.40 (s, 3H), 0.96 (s, 3H), 0.93 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 30 °C): 148.5 (C), 147.4 (C), 131.2 (C), 120.7 (CH), 112.2 (CH), 111.9 (CH), 98.0 (C), 72.0 (C, broad), 69.3 (5 CH), 66.8 (CH, broad), 64.2 (CH, broad), 63.8 (CH, broad), 61.2 (C), 55.5 (CH3O), 55.3 (CH3O), 42.5 (CH2), 34.0 (C), 26.5 (CH3), 26.3 (CH3), 24.6 (CH3), 22.9 (CH3); one quaternary carbon peak is missing, probably due to the broadening of the signal. MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 445 [M]+ (100), 402 [M–i-C3H7]+ (13), 364 (10), 294 [M–(CH3O)2C6H3CH2]+ (17), 266 (15), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (9), 56 (2). Data for 9a: red oil; Rf 0.27 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 5:1). IR (thin film): 3085, 2975, 2936, 1658, 1593, 1514, 1463, 1417, 1321, 1274, 1260, 1242, 1209, 1175, 1138, 1117, 1025, 1003, 823, 757, 666, 448 cm−1. 1H NMR(DMSO-d6, 400 MHz, 30 °C): δ 7.82 (dd, 1H, J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz), 7.70 (d, 1H, J = 1.9 Hz), 7.22 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz), 4.51–4.50 (m, 2H), 4.45 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 4.17 (s, 5H), 3.92 (s, 3H), 3.88 (s, 3H), 1.54 (s, 3H), 1.47 (s, 3H), 1.10 (s, 3H), 0.89 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 30 °C): δ 189.9 (C), 163.4 (C), 153.7 (C), 148.5 (C), 127.5 (C), 125.5 (CH), 111.8 (CH), 111.0 (CH), 98.0 (C), 69.5 (5 CH), 67.8 (CH), 65.9 (CH), 64.6 (CH), 62.3 (C), 55.8 (CH3O), 55.4 (CH3O), 34.3 (C), 28.3 (CH3), 25.4 (CH3), 23.2 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 459 [M]+ (100), 444 [M–CH3]+ (13), 403 [M–C4H8]+ (40), 321 [M–(CH3O)2C6H4]+ (13), 306 [M–(CH3O)2C6H4–CH3]+ (19), 294 [M–(CH3O)2C6H3C(O)]+ (21), 237 (17), 165 [(CH3O)2C6H3C(O)]+ (22), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (16), 56 [Fe]+ (3). Analysis calculated for C26H29FeNO3: C, 67.98; H, 6.36; N, 3.05. Found: C, 68.20; H, 6.80; N, 3.15.
rac-1-Benzyl-3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (8b) and rac-Phenyl(3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine)methanone (9b). The title compounds were prepared according to GP1 using phenylacetonitrile (7b) (0.48 mL, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 15 min; reaction time 1 = 2 days. Method A: Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether–petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave, in order of elution, 9b (20 mg, 14%) and an inseparable mixture of 8b and 9b (56 mg, 8b/9b = 89:11); calculated 8b/9b = 66:34. Storage of the mixture of 8b and 9b at room temperature exposed to air until full conversion of 8b to 9b, followed by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether–petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1), afforded pure compound 9b (29 mg, 21%). Overall yield of 9b: 49 mg, 35%. Method B: Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether–petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1) gave pure 9b (33 mg, 24%). Data for 8b [spectroscopic data for 8b were obtained only from the mixture of 8b and 9b]: Rf 0.10 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 7.47–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.40–7.36 (m, 2H), 7.27–7.24 (m, 1H), 4.27–4.25 (m, 3H), 3.97 (s, 5H), 3.79 (d, 1H, J = 13.8 Hz), 3.75 (d, 1H, J = 13.8 Hz), 1.42 (s, 3H), 1.41 (s, 3H), 0.93 (s, 3H), 0.91 (s, 3H). The 13C spectrum of mixture 8b and 9b was complex, including broadening and overlapping of some signals, and it was impossible to clearly assign the peaks corresponding to 8b. MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 385 [M]+ (100), 342 [M–i-C3H7]+ (14), 329 [M–C4H8]+ (10), 304 (11), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (16), 56 [Fe]+ (5). Data for 9b: red solid; mp 120.5–122 °C (hexane); Rf 0.20 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 3086, 2975, 2930, 2868, 1669, 1595, 1458, 1448, 1374, 1362, 1324, 1274, 1225, 1154, 1122, 1108, 1002, 876, 830, 737, 692, 493, 451 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 8.14–8.12 (m, 2H), 7.75–7.71 (m, 1H), 7.65–7.61 (m, 2H), 4.55 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.2 Hz), 4.49 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.2 Hz), 4.46 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 4.18 (s, 5H), 1.55 (s, 3H), 1.48 (s, 3H), 1.09 (s, 3H), 0.91 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 191.2 (C), 163.1 (C), 135.0 (C), 133.3 (CH), 129.8 (2 CH), 128.3 (2 CH), 97.9 (C), 69.3 (5 CH), 67.7 (CH), 65.7 (CH), 64.5 (CH), 62.4 (C), 34.2 (C), 28.0 (CH3), 25.3 (CH3), 23.1 (CH3), 22.9 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 399 [M]+ (100), 384 [M–CH3]+ (13), 343 [M–C4H8]+ (33), 294 [M–CH2C6H5]+ (11), 246 (18), 237 (13), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (19), 56 [Fe]+ (6). HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C24H26FeNO, 400.1358; found, 400.1363.
rac-3,3,4,4-Tetramethyl-1-(4-nitrobenzyl)-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (8c) and rac-(4-Nitrophenyl)(3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine)methanone (9c). The title compounds were prepared according to GP1 using 2-(4-nitrophenyl)acetonitrile (7c) (68 mg, 0.42 mmol); reaction time = 15 min; reaction time 1 = 6 days. Method A: Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/CH2Cl2 1:1–petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave an inseparable mixture of 8c and 9c (41 mg, 8c/9c = 65:35; contaminated with unidentified compounds). Storage of the mixture of 8c and 9c at room temperature exposed to air until full conversion of 8c to 9c, followed by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/CH2Cl2 1:1–petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1), afforded pure compound 9c (25 mg, 16%). Method B: Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/CH2Cl2 1:1–petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1) gave pure compound 9c (21 mg, 14%). Data for 8c [spectroscopic data for 8c were obtained only from the mixture of 8c and 9c, contaminated with identified compounds]: Rf 0.13 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): 7.90–7.88 (m, 2H), 7.14–7.11 (m, 2H), 3.93 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.1 Hz), 3.89 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 3.79 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.1 Hz), 3.77 (s, 5H), 3.63 (d, 1H, J = 14 Hz), 3.57 (d, 1H, J = 14.1 Hz). A great signal overlapping was observed in the region of 0.73–1.16 ppm, and it was impossible to clearly assign the peaks of methyl groups corresponding to 8c. 13C spectrum of mixture 8c and 9c was complex, including overlapping of the some signals, and it was impossible to clearly assign the peaks corresponding to 8c. MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 430 [M]+ (100), 400 [M–C2H6]+ (13), 387 [M–i-C3H7]+ (11), 374 [M–C4H8]+ (10), 294 (14), 263 (10), 237 (10), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (10), 56 [Fe]+ (3). Data for 9c: brown oil; Rf 0.25 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 3105, 3047, 2978, 2926, 2867, 2850, 1677, 1601, 1588, 1527, 1457, 1374, 1362, 1347, 1318, 1273, 1217, 1155, 1122, 1108, 1002, 989, 882, 857, 824, 737, 711, 697, 507, 483, 447 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 8.04–8.01 (m, 2H), 7.77–7.74 (m, 2H), 4.92 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.2 Hz), 4.08 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 4.05 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.2 Hz), 4.00 (s, 5H), 1.44 (s, 3H), 1.35 (s, 3H), 0.95 (s, 3H), 0.89 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 189.9 (C), 163.7 (C), 150.4 (C), 141.1 (C), 131.6 (2 CH), 123.2 (2 CH), 98.7 (C), 70.2 (5 CH), 68.6 (CH), 66.6 (CH), 66.2 (CH), 63.9 (C), 35.0 (C), 29.0 (CH3), 25.7 (CH3), 23.4 (CH3), 23.4 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 444 [M]+ (100), 429 [M–CH3]+ (14), 414 [M–C2H6]+ (10), 388 [M–C4H8]+ (41), 306 (10), 294 (15), 277 (13), 237 (17), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (19), 56 [Fe]+ (4). HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C24H25FeN2O3, 445.1209; found, 445.1208.

3.2.5. Synthesis of Ferroceno[c]pyridines 11ag and Ferroceno[c]pyrroles 12ag (Table 5 and Table 6)

General Procedure 2 (GP2). Thiocyanate 10ag (0.42 mmol) was added to the stirred solution of alcohol 1 (100 mg, 0.35 mmol) in MeSO3H (0.18 mL) at room temperature, and the resulting mixture was stirred at this temperature for the indicated time (monitored by TLC). The reaction mixture was then worked up as described in GP.
General Procedure 3 (GP3). Thiocyanate 10ag (0.42 mmol) was added to the solution of 1 in MeSO3H, and preheated to 80 °C with stirring. The resulting mixture was then stirred at this temperature for 3 min, cooled to room temperature, and worked up as described in GP.
rac-1-(Ethylthio)-3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (11a) and (1R*,Sp*)-1-(tert-Butyl)-3-(ethylthio)-1-methyl-1H-ferroceno[c]pyrrole (12a). The title compounds were prepared according to GP2 (reaction time = 25 min) and GP3 using ethyl thiocyanate (10a) (0.037 mL, 0.42 mmol). GP2: purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/CH2Cl2 1:1–petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave, in order of elution, a mixture of 11a and 12a (6 mg, 5%, 11a/12a = 19:81) and 12a (108 mg, 87%). GP3: purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether–petroleum ether/EtOAc 100:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave, in order of elution, 11a (70 mg, 57%) and a mixture of 11a and 12a (36 mg, 29%, 11a/12a = 22:78). Data for 11a: brown solid; mp 81–83 °C (hexane); Rf 0.61 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 3096, 2971, 2927, 2868, 1580, 1448, 1372, 1361, 1287, 1239, 1151, 1141, 1108, 1097, 1002, 932, 899, 822, 512, 478 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 4.41 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.1 Hz, H7), 4.10 (s, 5H, H Cp), 3.99 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.1 Hz, H5), 3.92 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz, H6), 3.22–3.12 (m, 1H, SCH2CH3), 3.11–3.02 (m, 1H, SCH2CH3), 1.50 (s, 3H, 3-CH3), 1.40 (s, 3H, 4-CH3), 1.28 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz, SCH2CH3), 0.98 (s, 3H, 4-CH3), 0.88 (s, 3H, 3-CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 161.3 (C1), 99.1 (C4a), 75.0 (C7a), 70.5 (5 CH Cp), 66.5 (C6), 65.7 (C5), 64.3 (C3), 63.9 (C7), 35.7 (C4), 29.2 (4-CH3), 25.2 (4-CH3), 24.8 (3-CH3), 24.2 (3-CH3), 22.9 (SCH2CH3), 15.1 (SCH2CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 355 [M]+ (100), 340 [M–CH3]+ (1), 326 [M–C2H5]+ (34), 293 (17), 269 (75), 172 (11), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (12), 117 (22), 56 [Fe]+ (4). Analysis calculated for C19H25FeNS: C, 64.23; H, 7.09; N, 3.94; S, 9.02. Found: C, 64.04; H, 7.36; N, 3.83; S, 8.74. Data for 12a: brown solid; mp 79.5–81.5 °C (hexane); Rf 0.47 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 3096, 2969, 2936, 2908, 2871, 1522, 1451, 1391, 1366, 1299, 1149, 1141, 1106, 1003, 887, 821, 648, 508, 488 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 50 °C): δ 4.08 (dd, 1H, J = 2.3, 0.6 Hz, H4), 4.05 (dd, 1H, J = 2.1, 0.6 Hz, H6), 4.04 (s, 5H, H Cp), 3.87 (t, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz, H5), 3.25–3.16 (m, 1H, SCH2CH3), 3.07–2.98 (m, 1H, SCH2CH3), 1.76 (s, 3H, 1-CH3), 1.30 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz, SCH2CH3), 0.90 (s, 9H, C(CH3)3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6, 50 °C): δ 165.8 (C3), 110.1 (C6a), 90.8 (C3a), 78.5 (C1), 71.0 (C5), 69.8 (5 CH Cp), 62.8 (C6), 57.0 (C4), 37.8 (C(CH3)3), 26.1 (C(CH3)3), 24.5 (SCH2CH3), 23.1 (1-CH3), 15.2 (SCH2CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 355 [M]+ (23), 298 [M–t-C4H9]+ (100), 270 (18), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (6), 56 [Fe]+ (2). Analysis calculated for C19H25FeNS: C, 64.23; H, 7.09; N, 3.94; S, 9.02. Found: C, 63.94; H, 7.32; N, 3.86; S, 8.80.
rac-3,3,4,4-Tetramethyl-1-(methylthio)-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (11b) and (1R*,Sp*)-1-(tert-Butyl)-1-methyl-3-(methylthio)-1H-ferroceno[c]pyrrole (12b). The title compounds were prepared according to GP2 (reaction time = 25 min) and GP3 using methyl thiocyanate (10b) (0.028 mL, 0.42 mmol). GP2: purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/CH2Cl2 1:1–petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave, in order of elution, a mixture of 11b and 12b (33 mg, 28%, 11b/12b = 9:91) and 12b (76 mg, 64%). GP3: purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether–petroleum ether/EtOAc 100:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave, in order of elution, 11b (41 mg, 35%) and a mixture of 11b and 12b (54 mg, 45%, 11b/12b = 14:86). Data for 11b: brown solid; mp 70–74 °C (hexane); Rf 0.61 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 2973, 2924, 1581, 1449, 1372, 1361, 1286, 1241, 1151, 1108, 1097, 1002, 899, 822, 626, 512, 478 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 4.41 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.1 Hz), 4.09 (s, 5H), 3.99 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.2 Hz), 3.92 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 2.40 (s, 3H), 1.52 (s, 3H), 1.40 (s, 3H), 0.98 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.88 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 161.9 (C), 99.1 (C), 74.9 (C), 70.5 (5 CH), 66.6 (CH), 65.7 (CH), 64.4 (C), 63.8 (CH), 35.8 (C), 29.2 (CH3), 27.3 (C), 25.2 (CH3), 24.7 (CH3), 24.3 (CH3), 11.4 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 341 [M]+ (100), 326 [M–CH3]+ (16), 293 (22), 269 (32), 252 (15), 237 (11), 173 (11), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (10), 117 (21), 89 (10), 56 [Fe]+ (4). Analysis calculated for C18H23FeNS: C, 63.35; H, 6.79; N, 4.10; S, 9.39. Found: C, 63.34; H, 6.66; N, 4.04; S, 9.60. Data for 12b: brown solid; mp 97–106.5 °C (hexane); Rf 0.38 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 3079, 2981, 2970, 2953, 2939, 2907, 2871, 1525, 1453, 1364, 1297, 1286, 1144, 1103, 1004, 926, 812, 653, 508, 482 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 50 °C): δ 4.07 (dd, 1H, J = 2.3, 0.7 Hz), 4.05 (dd, 1H, J = 2.2, 0.7 Hz), 4.03 (s, 5H), 3.87 (t, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz), 2.42 (s, 3H), 1.76 (s, 3H), 0.89 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6, 50 °C): δ 166.5 (C), 110.4 (C), 90.5 (C), 78.5 (C), 71.0 (CH), 69.8 (5 CH), 62.9 (CH), 56.9 (CH), 37.7 (C), 26.0 (3 CH3), 23.2 (CH3), 12.7 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 341 [M]+ (23), 284 [M–t-C4H9]+ (100), 269 (10), 218 (14), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (12), 56 [Fe]+ (3). Analysis calculated for C18H23FeNS: C, 63.35; H, 6.79; N, 4.10; S, 9.39. Found: C, 63.13; H, 6.99; N, 4.06; S, 9.05.
rac-3,3,4,4-Tetramethyl-1-(propylthio)-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (11c) and (1R*,Sp*)-1-(tert-Butyl)-1-methyl-3-(propylthio)-1H-ferroceno[c]pyrrole (12c). The title compounds were prepared according to GP2 (reaction time = 25 min) and GP3 using propyl thiocyanate (10c) (0.043 mL, 0.42 mmol). GP2: purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/CH2Cl2 1:1–petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave, in order of elution, a mixture of 11c and 12c (29 mg, 23%, 11c/12c = 24:76) and 12c (97 mg, 75%). GP3: purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether–petroleum ether/EtOAc 100:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave, in order of elution, 11c (68 mg, 53%) and a mixture of 11c and 12c (37 mg, 29%, 11c/12c = 14:86). Data for 11c: brown oil; Rf 0.67 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 3097, 2969, 2930, 2870, 1580, 1449, 1372, 1361, 1286, 1238, 1151, 1141, 1108, 1097, 1002, 932, 899, 822, 512, 478 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 4.43 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.1 Hz), 4.11 (s, 5H), 3.99 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.1 Hz), 3.93 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 3.24–3.09 (m, 2H), 1.70 (h, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 1.49 (s, 3H), 1.40 (s, 3H), 0.98 (s, 3H), 0.96 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz), 0.88 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 161.4 (C), 99.1 (C), 75.0 (C), 70.5 (5 CH), 66.6 (CH), 65.7 (CH), 64.4 (C), 63.9 (CH), 35.7 (C), 30.4 (CH2), 29.2 (CH3), 25.2 (CH3), 24.7 (CH3), 24.2 (CH3), 23.5 (CH2), 13.7 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 369 [M]+ (100), 326 [M–C3H7]+ (38), 293 (20), 269 (70), 252 (7), 172 (11), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (12), 117 (27), 56 [Fe]+ (3). HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C20H28FeNS, 370.1286; found, 370.1288. Data for 12c: brown oil; Rf 0.51 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 3096, 2966, 2935, 2871, 1521, 1453, 1366, 1288, 1149, 1108, 1003, 933, 887, 820, 648, 508, 488 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 4.09 (dd, 1H, J = 2.3, 0.7 Hz), 4.04 (s, 5H), 4.03 (dd, 1H, J = 2.3, 0.7 Hz), 3.85 (t, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz), 3.32–3.26 (m, 1H), 3.07–3.00 (m, 1H), 1.76 (s, 3H), 1.79–1.65 (m, 2H), 0.94–0.90 (m, 12H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 165.9 (C), 110.0 (C), 90.7 (C), 78.4 (C), 71.1 (CH), 69.8 (5 CH), 62.8 (CH), 57.0 (CH), 37.7 (C), 32.0 (CH2), 26.0 (3 CH3), 23.5 (CH2), 23.2 (CH3), 13.5 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 369 [M]+ (19), 312 [M–t-C4H9]+ (100), 270 (24), 204 (5), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (7), 56 [Fe]+ (2). HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C20H28FeNS, 370.1286; found, 370.1287.
rac-1-(Isopropylthio)-3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (11d) and (1R*,Sp*)-1-(tert-Butyl)-3-(isopropylthio)-1-methyl-1H-ferroceno[c]pyrrole (12d). The title compounds were prepared according to GP2 (reaction time = 40 min) and GP3 using isopropyl thiocyanate (10d) (0.044 mL, 0.42 mmol). GP2: purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/CH2Cl2 1:1–petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave, in order of elution, 11d (9 mg, 7%), a mixture of 11d and 12d (30 mg, 23%, 11d/12d = 18:82) and 12d (68 mg, 53%). GP3: purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether–petroleum ether/EtOAc 100:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave, in order of elution, 11d (79 mg, 61%) and a mixture of 11d and 12d (25 mg, 19%, 11d/12d = 70:30). Data for 11d: brown oil; Rf 0.47 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 100:1). IR (thin film): 3097, 2971, 2927, 2866, 1578, 1463, 1449, 1415, 1388, 1372, 1286, 1234, 1151, 1141, 1116, 1108, 1095, 1057, 1035, 1023, 1002, 932, 899, 822, 651, 512, 478 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 4.40 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.1 Hz), 4.19 (hept, 1H, J = 6.8 Hz), 4.10 (s, 5H), 3.99 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.2 Hz), 3.91 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 1.51 (s, 3H), 1.41 (s, 3H), 1.40 (d, 3H, J = 6.6 Hz), 1.35 (d, 3H, J = 6.8 Hz), 0.98 (s, 3H), 0.90 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 161.8 (C), 99.0 (C), 75.0 (C), 70.5 (5 CH), 66.5 (CH), 65.7 (CH), 64.3 (C), 63.9 (CH), 35.6 (C), 33.5 (CH), 29.3 (CH3), 25.1 (CH3), 24.8 (CH3), 24.2 (CH3), 23.4 (CH3), 23.2 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 369 [M]+ (52), 326 [M–i-C3H7]+ (38), 269 (100), 172 (10), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (17), 117 (25), 56 [Fe]+ (5). Analysis calculated for C20H27FeNS: C, 65.04; H, 7.37; N, 3.79; S, 8.68. Found: C, 65.44; H, 7.45; N, 3.57; S, 8.66. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C20H28FeNS, 370.1286; found, 370.1284. Data for 12d: brown oil; Rf 0.50 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 3097, 2966, 2934, 2911, 2868, 1519, 1478, 1451, 1424, 1392, 1382, 1366, 1294, 1241, 1226, 1148, 1108, 1102, 1004, 934, 886, 820, 660, 513, 487 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 4.14 (hept, 1H, J = 6.8 Hz), 4.07 (dd, 1H, J = 2.3, 0.7 Hz), 4.04 (s, 5H), 4.03 (dd, 1H, J = 2.2, 0.8 Hz), 3.85 (t, 1H, J = 2.2 Hz), 1.76 (s, 3H), 1.39 (d, 3H, J = 6.8 Hz), 1.35 (d, 3H, J = 6.9 Hz), 0.91 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 165.9 (C), 109.7 (C), 90.9 (C), 78.6 (C), 71.1 (CH), 69.8 (5 CH), 62.8 (CH), 57.0 (CH), 37.8 (C), 35.3 (CH), 26.1 (3 CH3), 23.6 (CH3), 23.2 (CH3), 23.1 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 369 [M]+ (18), 312 [M–t-C4H9]+ (61), 270 (100), 204 (15), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (14), 56 [Fe]+ (6). HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C20H28FeNS, 370.1286; found, 370.1288.
rac-1-(Benzylthio)-3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (11e) and (1R*,Sp*)-3-(Benzylthio)-1-(tert-butyl)-1-methyl-1H-ferroceno[c]pyrrole (12e). The title compounds were prepared according to GP2 (reaction time = 25 min) and GP3 using benzyl thiocyanate (10e) (62.6 mg, 0.42 mmol). GP2: purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/CH2Cl2 1:1–petroleum ether/EtOAc 50:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave, in order of elution, a mixture of 11e and 12e (80 mg, 55%, 11e/12e = 22:78) and 12e (54 mg, 37%). GP3: purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether–petroleum ether/EtOAc 100:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave, in order of elution, a mixture of starting thiocyanate 10e and 11e (70 mg, 10e/11e = 16:84) and a mixture of 11e and 12e (57 mg, 39%, 11e/12e = 27:73). The mixture of 10e and 11e was additionally chromatographed on silica gel (benzene–benzene/TEA 100:1) to yield pure compound 11e (61 mg, 42%). Data for 11e: brown solid; mp 62.5–67.5 °C; Rf 0.79 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 3086, 3062, 3028, 2972, 2926, 2867, 2855, 1581, 1495, 1450, 1372, 1361, 1287, 1236, 1151, 1108, 1096, 1035, 1002, 932, 898, 823, 759, 700, 512, 477 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 7.42–7.40 (m, 2H), 7.16–7.11 (m, 3H), 7.05–7.01 (m, 1H), 4.44 (dd, 1H, J = 13.6 Hz), 4.40 (d, 1H, J = 13.6 Hz), 4.36 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.1 Hz), 4.05 (s, 5H), 3.97 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.1 Hz), 3.90 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 1.52 (s, 3H), 1.38 (s, 3H), 0.97 (s, 3H), 0.89 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 161.1 (C), 139.9 (C), 129.6 (2 C), 128.5 (2 C), 127.0 (C), 99.1 (C), 74.6 (C), 70.5 (5 CH), 66.7 (CH), 65.8 (CH), 64.6 (C), 63.8 (CH), 35.7 (C), 32.8 (CH2), 29.2 (CH3), 25.2 (CH3), 24.6 (CH3), 24.3 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 417 [M]+ (69), 402 [M–CH3]+ (2), 326 [M–CH2C6H5]+ (40), 269 (100), 132 (9), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (9), 56 [Fe]+ (2). Analysis calculated for C24H27FeNS: C, 69.06; H, 6.52; N, 3.36; S, 7.68. Found: C, 69.13; H, 6.75; N, 3.05; S, 7.83. Data for 12e: brown oil, Rf 0.65 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 3088, 3063, 3029, 2969, 2952, 2909, 2870, 1521, 1495, 1478, 1453, 1392, 1366, 1299, 1225, 1194, 1149, 1103, 1003, 929, 886, 821, 767, 699, 649, 508, 488, 472, 439 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 7.50–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.36–7.31 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.24 (m, 1H), 4.46 (d, 1H, J = 13.6 Hz), 4.41 (dd, 1H, J = 2.2, 0.7 Hz), 4.41 (d, 1H, J = 13.6 Hz), 4.31 (dd, 1H, J = 2.3, 0.7 Hz), 4.26 (t, 1H, J = 2.2 Hz), 4.14 (s, 5H), 1.71 (s, 3H), 0.74 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C): δ 164.3 (C), 138.4 (C), 128.6 (2 CH), 127.9 (2 CH), 126.7 (CH), 108.9 (C), 89.0 (C), 77.5 (C), 70.7 (CH), 69.0 (5 CH), 62.4 (CH), 56.2 (CH), 32.8 (CH2), 25.2 (3 CH3), 22.4 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 417 [M]+ (23), 360 [M–t-C4H9]+ (100), 269 (37), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (7), 56 [Fe]+ (2). HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C24H28FeNS, 418.1286; found, 418.1294.
rac-1-(Hexylthio)-3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine (11f) and (1R*,Sp*)-1-(tert-Butyl)-3-(hexylthio)-1-methyl-1H-ferroceno[c]pyrrole (12f). The title compounds were prepared according to GP2 (reaction time = 40 min) and GP3 using hexyl thiocyanate (10f) (0.065 mL, 0.42 mmol). GP2: purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/CH2Cl2 1:1–petroleum ether/EtOAc 100:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave, in order of elution, a mixture of 11f and 12f (38 mg, 26%, 11f/12f = 22:78) and 12f (94 mg, 65%). GP3: purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether–petroleum ether/EtOAc 200:1–petroleum ether/EtOAc 50:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave, in order of elution, 11f (79 mg, 55%) and a mixture of 11f and 12f (45 mg, 31%, 11f/12f = 42:58). Data for 11f: brown oil; Rf 0.83 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 3097, 2970, 2927, 2857, 1580, 1449, 1372, 1361, 1286, 1240, 1151, 1141, 1108, 1097, 1035, 1002, 932, 899, 822, 512, 478, 453 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 4.44 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.2 Hz), 4.12 (s, 5H), 3.99 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 1.1 Hz), 3.93 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 3.30–3.15 (m, 2H), 1.76–1.69 (m, 2H), 1.52 (s, 3H), 1.45–1.36 (m, 2H, partially overlapped), 1.41 (s, 3H), 1.28–1.22 (m, 4H), 0.99 (s, 3H), 0.90 (s, 3H), 0.88–0.85 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 161.5 (C), 99.1 (C), 75.1 (C), 70.5 (5 CH), 66.6 (CH), 65.7 (CH), 64.4 (C), 63.9 (CH), 35.7 (C), 31.8 (CH2), 30.1 (CH2), 29.2 (CH3), 29.0 (CH2), 28.4 (CH2), 25.2 (CH3), 24.8 (CH3), 24.3 (CH3), 22.9 (CH2), 14.2 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 411 [M]+ (100), 326 [M–C6H13]+ (58), 293 (28), 269 (84), 172 (13), 132 (11), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (15), 117 (29), 56 [Fe]+ (3). HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C23H34FeNS, 412.1756; found, 412.1760. Data for 12f: brown oil; Rf 0.56 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 3096, 2955, 2930, 2871, 2858, 1521, 1478, 1453, 1425, 1391, 1366, 1298, 1286, 1225, 1193, 1149, 1108, 1035, 1003, 933, 887, 820, 648, 508, 487, 472, 439 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 4.11 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 0.7 Hz), 4.06 (s, 5H), 4.04 (dd, 1H, J = 2.3, 0.5 Hz), 3.86 (t, 1H, J = 2.2 Hz), 3.37–3.31 (m, 1H), 3.16–3.09 (m, 1H), 1.81–1.69 (m, 2H, partially overlapped), 1.77 (s, 3H), 1.41–1.33 (m, 2H), 1.27–1.18 (m, 4H), 0.92 (s, 9H), 0.87–0.83 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6, 50 °C): 166.1 (C), 110.1 (C), 90.8 (C), 78.5 (C), 71.1 (CH), 69.9 (5 CH), 62.9 (CH), 57.0 (CH), 37.8 (C), 31.8 (CH2), 30.3 (CH2), 30.2 (CH2), 28.9 (CH2), 26.1 (3 CH3), 23.2 (CH3), 22.9 (CH2), 14.1 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 411 [M]+ (17), 354 [M–t-C4H9]+ (100), 270 (21), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (3), 56 [Fe]+ (1). HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C23H34FeNS, 412.1756; found, 412.1762.
rac-Ethyl 2-((3,3,4,4-Tetramethyl-3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridine)thio)acetate (11g) and (1R*,Sp*)-Ethyl 2-((1-(tert-Butyl)-1-methyl-1H-ferroceno[c]pyrrole)thio)acetate (12g). The title compounds were prepared according to GP2 (reaction time = 1 h) and GP3 (reaction time = 15 min) using ethyl 2-thiocyanatoacetate (10g) (0.064 mL, 0.53 mmol). GP2: purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1) gave, in order of elution, 11g (8 mg, 6%; according to 1H NMR analysis contained ~1% of 3u; 11g/3u = 99:1) and 12g (106 mg, 73%). GP3: purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1) gave, in order of elution, 11g (41 mg, according to 1H NMR analysis contained 4% of 3u; 11g/3u = 96:4; calculated yield of 11g: 27%) and 12g (38 mg, 26%). Data for 11g: brown oil; Rf 0.25 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 3096, 2975, 2927, 2869, 2856, 1739, 1647, 1587, 1463, 1448, 1389, 1372, 1363, 1289, 1261, 1242, 1151, 1108, 1097, 1034, 1002, 933, 899, 823, 744, 712, 627, 583, 512, 479, 453 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 4.36 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.1 Hz), 4.13 (s, 5H), 4.02–3.97 (m, 4H), 3.91 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 3.77 (d, 1H, J = 15.8 Hz), 1.44 (s, 3H), 1.37 (s, 3H), 0.99 (t, 3H, J = 7.1 Hz), 0.95 (s, 3H), 0.85 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6, 30 °C): δ 169.2 (C), 160.2 (C), 99.2 (C), 74.2 (C), 70.6 (5 CH), 66.8 (CH), 65.8 (CH), 64.6 (C), 63.6 (CH), 61.0 (CH2), 35.8 (C), 31.2 (CH2), 29.1 (CH3), 25.2 (CH3), 24.5 (CH3), 24.1 (CH3), 14.3 (CH3). GC–MS analyses of product 11g indicated the presence in the chromatogram of a peak that, based on corresponding MS spectra, belonged to compound 3o. The latter was likely produced by the thermolysis of the parent compound in the GC instrument injector. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C21H28FeNO2S, 414.1185; found, 414.1186. Data for 12g: orange oil, which solidified on long-term standing; mp 51–52.5 °C; Rf 0.32 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 3096, 2973, 2954, 2908, 2871, 1740, 1527, 1478, 1452, 1392, 1367, 1294, 1262, 1226, 1153, 1104, 1032, 1004, 934, 887, 822, 650, 488 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 50 °C): δ 4.07 (s, 5 CH), 4.05 (dd, 1H, J = 2.4, 0.6 Hz), 4.04 (dd, 1H, J = 2.2, 0.7 Hz), 4.00–3.95 (m, 2H), 3.93 (d, 1H, J = 15.7 Hz, partially overlapped), 3.85 (d, 1H, J = 15.8 Hz), 3.86 (t, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz), 1.71 (s, 3H), 0.98 (t, 3H, J = 7.1 Hz), 0.86 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, C6D6, 50 °C): 168.6 (C), 164.8 (C), 110.4 (C), 89.6 (C), 78.7 (C), 71.2 (CH), 70.0 (5 CH), 63.1 (CH), 61.2 (CH2), 57.0 (CH), 37.7 (C), 32.5 (CH2), 25.9 (3 CH3), 23.0 (CH3), 14.2 (CH3). GC–MS analysis of compound 12g indicated the presence of a peak of substance with a molecular mass of 309. MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 309 [M]+ (31), 253 [M–C4H8]+ (60), 252 [M–t-C4H9]+ (100), 211 (8), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (11), 56 [Fe]+ (3). Apparently, this is a 1-(tert-butyl)-1,3-dimethyl-1H-ferroceno[c]pyrrole yielded by the thermolysis of 12g in the GC injector. The proposed mechanism for the thermolysis of ferroceno[c]pyrrole 12g is performed in Supplementary Materials (Scheme S2). HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C21H28FeNO2S, 414.1185; found, 414.1191.

3.2.6. Reaction of Alcohol 1 with 2-Thiocyanatoacetamide (10h) (Table 6, Entries 3, 4)

According to GP2 (reaction time = 48 h) and GP3 using 10h (48 mg, 0.42 mmol). GP2: purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1) gave, in order of elution, an inseparable mixture of alkenes 5 and 6 (13 mg, 14%, 5/6 = 77:23), recovered alcohol 1 (37 mg, 37%) and alcohol 13 (13 mg, 13%). GP3: complex mixture of unidentified products was formed. 3-Ferrocenyl-2,3-dimethylbutan-2-ol (13): yellow solid; mp 61.5–63 °C (hexane); Rf 0.25 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 3348, 2958, 2924, 2871, 2853, 1737, 1710, 1652, 1547, 1462, 1457, 1380, 1138, 1105, 1081, 1026, 1003, 879, 818, 529, 486 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 4.15 (s, 5H), 4.13–4.12 (m, 2H), 4.09–4.08 (m, 2H), 1.37 (s, 6H), 1.21 (br s, 1H), 1.05 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 97.4 (C), 74.4 (C), 68.7 (5 CH), 67.9 (2 CH), 67.3 (2 CH), 41.5 (C), 25.6 (2 CH3), 24.0 (2 CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 286 [M]+ (27), 229 (51), 186 [C5H5FeC5H5]+ (100), 149 (13), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (8), 56 [Fe]+ (2). HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M]+ calculated for C16H22FeO, 286.1015; found, 286.1011.
Data for alkenes 5 and 6 see below.

3.2.7. Reaction of Alcohol 1 with Phenacyl Thiocyanate (10i) (Table 6, Entries 5, 6)

According to GP2 (reaction time = 48 h) and GP3 (reaction time = 40 min) using 10i (74 mg, 0.42 mmol). GP2: purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/CH2Cl2 1:1–petroleum ether/acetone 5:1) gave, in order of elution, an inseparable mixture of alkenes 5 and 6 (17 mg, 18%, 5/6 = 55:45), recovered alcohol 1 (20 mg, 20%), thiocyanate 10i (28 mg, 38%) and alcohol 13 (51 mg, 51%). GP3: purification by silica gel column chromatography (benzene–benzene/TEA 100:1) gave, in order of elution, an inseparable mixture of alkenes 5 and 6 (39 mg, 42%, 5/6 = 91:9), recovered thiocyanate 10i (29 mg, 39%) and a mixture of compound 3w and thiocyanate 10i (31 mg, 3w/10i = 33:67). The mixture of 3w and 10i was additionally chromatographed (benzene–benzene/TEA 100:1) to yield thiocyanate 10i (18 mg, 24%) and pure compound 3w (11 mg, 8%).

3.2.8. Reaction of Alcohol 1 with 2-Oxopropyl Thiocyanate (10j) (Table 6, Entries 7, 8)

According to GP2 (reaction time = 48 h) and GP3 using 10j (0.04 mL, 0.42 mmol). GP2: purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 10:1, 5:1) gave, in order of elution, an inseparable mixture of alkenes 5 and 6 (21 mg, 22%, 5/6 = 56:44) and alcohol 13 (48 mg, 48%). GP3: purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 10:1, 5:1) gave, in order of elution, an inseparable mixture of alkenes 5 and 6 (19 mg, 20%, 5/6 = 94:6), recovered alcohol 1 (38 mg, 38%) and 15 mg of a mixture of unidentified products containing trace amounts of compound 3x according to NMR 1H analysis.

3.2.9. Optimization of the Reaction of Alcohol 1 with 4-Methylbenzonitrile (2a). Representative Examples (Table 1, Entries 1, 10 and 11)

Table 1, entry 1. Nitrile 2a (0.05 mL, 0.42 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of alcohol 1 (100 mg, 0.35 mmol) in MeSO3H (0.18 mL) at room temperature, and the resulting mixture was stirred at this temperature for 5 h. The reaction mixture was then worked up as described in GP. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave, in order of elution, amide 4a (9 mg, 6%) and ferroceno[c]pyridine 3a (79 mg, 59%).
Table 1, entry 10. Nitrile 2a (0.05 mL, 0.42 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of alcohol 1 (100 mg, 0.35 mmol) in CF3COOH (0.21 mL) at room temperature, and the resulting mixture was heated at 60 °C in an oil bath with vigorous stirring for 30 min. The reaction mixture was then worked up as described in GP. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave, in order of elution, inseparable mixture of alkenes 5 and 6 (18 mg, 19%, 5/6 = 20:80) and ferroceno[c]pyridine 3a (55 mg, 41%).
Table 1, entry 11. Nitrile 2a (0.05 mL, 0.42 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of alcohol 1 (100 mg, 0.35 mmol) in CH3COOH (0.16 mL) at room temperature, and the resulting mixture was heated at 60 °C in an oil bath with vigorous stirring for 2.5 h. The reaction mixture was then worked up as described in GP. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1–petroleum ether/TEA 100:1) gave, in order of elution, alkene 5 (30 mg, 32%) and recovered alcohol 1 (42 mg, 42%).
N-(2,3-Dimethyl-3-ferrocenylbutan-2-yl)-4-methylbenzamide (4a): yellow solid; mp 115.5–117 °C (hexane); Rf 0.39 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). IR (thin film): 3419, 3095, 2955, 2925, 2870, 2854, 1667, 1612, 1525, 1496, 1457, 1393, 1374, 1299, 1284, 1261, 1190, 1154, 1143, 1116, 1107, 1039, 1034, 1001, 890, 878, 822, 750, 514, 495, 447 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 7.47–7.44 (m, 2H), 7.15–7.13 (m, 2H), 6.06 (br s, NH), 4.20 (t, 2H, J = 1.8 Hz), 4.18 (s, 5H), 4.15 (t, 2H, J = 1.9 Hz), 2.34 (s, 3H), 1.44 (s, 6H), 1.42 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 166.7 (C), 141.2 (C), 133.8 (C), 129.2 (CH), 126.7 (2 CH), 97.1 (C), 68.9 (5 CH), 67.8 (CH), 67.7 (CH), 59.1 (C), 41.6 (C), 24.1 (2 CH3), 22.7 (2 CH3), 21.5 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 403 [M]+ (6), 227 (65), 176 (21), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (16), 119 [CH3C6H4CO]+ (100), 91 [CH3C6H4]+ (15), 56 [Fe]+ (3). Analysis calculated for C24H29FeNO: C, 71.47; H, 7.25; N, 3.47. Found: C, 71.13; H, 7.66; N, 3.25.
(3,3-Dimethylbut-1-en-2-yl)ferrocene (5): Orange oil. Rf 0.90 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). NMR data are in agreement with that previously published [60]. MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 268 [M]+ (100), 238 [M–C2H6]+ (10), 211 [M–t-C4H9]+ (14), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (19), 56 [Fe]+ (8). Analysis calculated for C16H20: C, 71.66; H, 7.52. Found: C, 71.93; H, 7.58.
(2,3-Dimethylbut-3-en-2-yl)ferrocene (6) [spectroscopic data for 6 were obtained only from the mixture of 5 and 6]: Rf 0.90 (petroleum ether/EtOAc 25:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 4.58–4.57 (m, 2H), 4.16 (s, 5H), 4.11–4.10 (m, 2H), 4.03 (t, 2H, J = 1.9 Hz), 1.61 (t, 3H, J = 1.1 Hz), 1.47 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 30 °C): δ 154.0 (C), 108.6 (CH2), 99.9 (C), 68.5 (5 CH), 66.9 (2 CH), 66.7 (2 CH), 38.8 (C), 27.8 (2 CH3), 20.2 (CH3). MS (EI) m/z (% relative intensity): 268 [M]+ (100), 253 [M–CH3]+ (34), 238 [M–C2H6]+ (26), 227 [M–C3H5]+ (26), 186 [C5H5FeC5H5]+ (10), 121 [C5H5Fe]+ (22), 56 [Fe]+ (7).

3.3. X-ray Diffraction Analysis

Single crystals of compounds 3a, 11a, and 12a suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained by slow crystallization from hexane. X-ray data for 3a, 11a and 12a were collected on an Xcalibur Ruby diffractometer equipped with the CCD detector using the standard procedure (MoK-irradiation, graphite monochromator, ω-scans with 1o step at T = 295(2) K). The empirical absorption correction was introduced by multi-scan method using SCALE3 ABSPACK algorithm [63]. Using OLEX2 [64], the structures were solved with the SHELXS program [65] and refined by the full-matrix least-squares method in the anisotropic approximation for all non-hydrogen atoms with the SHELXL program [66]. Hydrogen atoms were included in the refinement using a rider model with dependent isotropic thermal parameters. Crystallographic data for compounds 3a, 11a, and 12a have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC Nos. 2210002, 2210003, 2210004). Copies of the data can be obtained, free of charge, on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK [fax: +44(0)-1223-336033 or e-mail: [email protected]].
Compound3a (CCDC No. 2210002). C24H27FeN, orange crystal, M = 385.31; crystal data: monoclinic, space group P21/n, a = 10.2339(17) Å, b = 17.372(3) Å, c = 10.952(2) Å, β = 103.462(19)°, V = 1893.59 Å3, Z = 4, dcalc = 1.352 g/cm3, μ(Mo Kα) = 0.803 mm–1; 9378 reflections measured, 4464 unique (Rint = 0.0312) which were used in all calculations. The final wR2 was 0.1299 (all data) and R1 was 0.0473 (I > 2σ(I)).
Compound11a (CCDC No. 2210003). C19H25FeNS, red crystal, M = 355.31; crystal data: monoclinic, space group P21/c, a = 8.8836(13) Å, b = 15.552(2) Å, c = 13.226(2) Å, β = 108.990(17)°, V = 1727.83 Å3, Z = 4, dcalc = 1.366 g/cm3, μ(Mo Kα) = 0.990 mm–1; 12,014 reflections measured, 3989 unique (Rint = 0.0315) which were used in all calculations. The final wR2 was 0.0927 (all data) and R1 was 0.0366 (I > 2σ(I)).
Compound12a (CCDC No. 2210004). C19H25FeNS, red crystal, M = 355.31; crystal data: monoclinic, space group P21/c, a = 7.5335(12) Å, b = 17.276(3) Å, c = 13.931(3) Å, β = 96.182(15)°, V = 1802.56 Å3, Z = 4, dcalc = 1.309 g/cm3, μ(Mo Kα) = 0.949 mm–1; 9501 reflections measured, 4197 unique (Rint = 0.0257) which were used in all calculations. The final wR2 was 0.0987 (all data) and R1 was 0.0380 (I > 2σ(I)).

4. Conclusions

In summary, we demonstrated that 2-ferrocenyl-3,3-dimethylbutan-2-ol was a suitable substrate in the intramolecular Ritter reaction. Condensation of starting alcohol with a variety of nitriles in the presence of MeSO3H yielded novel 3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridines. The reaction of 2-ferrocenyl-3,3-dimethylbutan-2-ol with thiocyanates gave not only 3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridines but also 1H-ferroceno[c]pyrroles. The selectivity of this reaction depended on the temperature, the order of addition, and the size of substituents at the α-position to the sulfur atom of thiocyanates. The simplicity of the procedure and the availability of starting materials make the reaction of 2-ferrocenyl-3,3-dimethylbutan-2-ol with nitriles and thiocyanates very convenient and attractive to the synthesis of variously functionalized ferrocene-fused aza-heterocycles.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/inorganics10110214/s1, Figure S1: 1H NMR (400 MHz) monitoring of the conversion of thioimine 11g to enaminone 3u at rt; Table S1: 1H NMR (400 MHz) monitoring of the conversion of thioimine 11g to enaminone 3u; Scheme S1: Proposed mechanism for the transformation of thioimine 11g to enaminone 3u; Scheme S2: Proposed mechanism for the thermolysis of ferroceno[c]pyrrole 12g; Figures S2–S27, S29, S30, S32, S33 and S35−S97: Copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra for compounds 3am, os, ux, 4, 6, 8ac, 9ac, 10g, j, 11ag, 12ag, 13; Figures S28, S31 and S34: Copies of 19F spectra for compounds 3km; Figures S98–S118: Copies of 2D NMR spectra for compounds 3a,u-x, 11a, 12a.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.V.S. and Y.S.R.; methodology, Y.S.R.; validation, Y.S.R.; formal analysis, Y.S.R.; investigation, I.V.P. and A.A.G.; resources, Y.V.S. and Y.S.R.; data curation, Y.S.R.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.S.R.; writing—review and editing, Y.S.R., I.V.P., A.A.G. and Y.V.S.; supervision, Y.V.S. and Y.S.R.; funding acquisition, Y.V.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (No. 17-03-00546) and Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (No. 122012500098-4).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Top, S.; Tang, J.; Vessières, A.; Carrez, D.; Provote, C.; Jaouen, G. Ferrocenyl hydroxytamoxifen: A prototype for a new range of oestradiol receptor site-directed cytotoxics. Chem. Commun. 1996, 955–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Biot, C.; Glorian, G.; Maciejewski, L.A.; Brocard, J.S. Synthesis and antimalarial activity in vitro and in vivo of a new ferrocene-chloroquine analogue. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 3715–3718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, R.; Chen, H.; Yan, W.; Zheng, M.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Y. Ferrocene-containing hybrids as potential anticancer agents: Current developments, mechanisms of action and structure-activity relationships. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 190, 112109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jaouen, G.; Vessières, A.; Top, S. Ferrocifen type anti cancer drugs. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 8802–8817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Sijongesonke, P.; Blessing, A.A. Ferrocene-based compounds with antimalaria/anticancer activity. Molecules 2019, 24, 3604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Wani, W.A.; Jameel, E.; Baig, U.; Mumtazuddin, S.; Hun, L.T. Ferroquine and its derivatives: New generation of antimalarial agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 101, 534–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Raičević, V.; Radulović, N.; Sakač, M. Toward selective anticancer agents: Ferrocene-steroid conjugates. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 2022, e202100951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sharma, B.; Kumar, V. Has ferrocene really delivered its role in accentuating the bioactivity of organic scaffolds? J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 16865–16921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chellan, P.; Sadler, P.J. Enhancing the activity of drugs by conjugation to organometallic fragments. Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 8676–8688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, D.; Zhang, J.; Dai, L. Chiral oxazolinyl hydroxyl ferrocene catalysts: Synthesis and applications in asymmetric reactions. ChemistrySelect 2020, 5, 9443–9456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhu, J.-C.; Cui, D.-X.; Li, Y.-D.; Jiang, R.; Chen, W.-P.; Wang, P.-A. Ferrocene as a privileged framework for chiral organocatalysts. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 907–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Perez-Sanchez, J.C.; Raquel, P.; Herrera, R.P.; Gimeno, M.C. Ferrocenyl gold complexes as efficient catalysts. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 2022, e202101067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Drusan, M.; Sebesta, R. Enantioselective C-C and C-heteroatom bond forming reactions using chiral ferrocene catalysts. Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 759–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Toma., Š.; Csizmadiová, J.; Mečiarová, M.; Šebesta, R. Ferrocene phosphane-heteroatom/carbon bidentate ligands in asymmetric catalysis. Dalt Trans. 2014, 43, 16557–16579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Beitollahi, H.; Khalilzadeh, M.A.; Tajik, S.; Safaei, M.; Zhang, K.; Jang, H.W.; Shokouhimehr, M. Recent advances in applications of voltammetric sensors modified with ferrocene and its derivatives. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 2049–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Rabti, A.; Raouafi, N.; Merkoçi, A. Bio(sensing) devices based on ferrocene-functionalized graphene and carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2016, 108, 481–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sun, R.; Wang, L.; Yu, H.; Abdin, Z.; Chen, Y.; Huang, J.; Tong, R. Molecular recognition and sensing based on ferrocene derivatives and ferrocene-based polymers. Organometallics 2014, 33, 4560–4573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hu, M.-L.; Abbasi-Azad, M.; Habibi, B.; Rouhani, F.; Moghanni-Bavil-Olyaei, H.; Liu, K.-G.; Morsali, A. Electrochemical applications of ferrocene-based coordination polymers. ChemPlusChem. 2020, 85, 2397–2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pal, A.; Bhatta, S.R.; Thakur, A. Recent advances in the development of ferrocene based electroactive small molecules for cation recognition: A comprehensive review of the years 2010–2020. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 431, 213685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kaur, S.; Kaur, M.; Kaur, P.; Clays, K.; Singh, K. Ferrocene chromophores continue to inspire. Fine-tuning and switching of the second-order nonlinear optical response. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 343, 185–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gallei, M.; Rüttiger, C. Recent trends in metallopolymer design: Redox-controlled surfaces, porous membranes, and switchable optical materials using ferrocene-containing polymers. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 10006–10021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Heck, J.; Dede, M. Ferrocene-based electro-optical materials. In Ferrocenes: Ligands, Materials and Biomolecules; Štěpnička, P., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2008; Chapter 9; pp. 319–392. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jha, B.N.; Singh, N.; Sahay, A.N.; Raghuvanshi, A. Scope of ferrocene in cathodic materials of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs): A review. J. Electron. Mater. 2021, 50, 6073–6086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Amin, B.U.; Yu, H.; Wang, L.; Nazir, A.; Fahad, S.; Haq, F.; Mahmood, S.; Liang, R.; Uddin, M.A.; Lin, T. Recent advances on ferrocene-based compounds and polymers as a burning rate catalysts for propellants. J. Organomet. Chem. 2020, 921, 121368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Usman, M.; Wang, L.; Yu, H.; Haq, F.; Haroon, M.; Ullah, R.S.; Khan, A.; Fahad, S.; Nazir, A.; Elshaarani, T. Recent progress on ferrocene-based burning rate catalysts for propellant applications. J. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 872, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sivaev, I.B. Ferrocene and transition metal bis(dicarbollides) as platform for design of rotatory molecular switches. Molecules 2017, 22, 2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Baroncini, M.; Silvi, S.; Credi, A. Photo- and redox-driven artificial molecular motors. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 200–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Boev, V.I.; Snegur, L.V.; Babin, V.N.; Nekrasov, Y.S. α-Metallocenylalkylation. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1997, 66, 613–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shevaldina, E.V.; Shagina, A.D.; Ponomaryov, A.B.; Moiseev, S.K. One-pot α-ferrocenylalkylation of amines and alcohols with α-ferrocenyl substituted alcohols under acid-free conditions. J. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 880, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Allali, N.; Mamane, V. Al(OTf)3 as a new efficient catalyst for the direct nucleophilic substitution of ferrocenyl alcohol substrates. Convenient preparation of ferrocenyl-PEG compounds. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 2604–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jiang, R.; Chu, X.-Q.; Xu, X.-P.; Wu, B.; Ji, S.-J. Direct C−O bond activation mediated by AcOH: A new metal-free way for α-functionalization of ferrocene alcohols. Aust. J. Chem. 2011, 64, 1530–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jiang, R.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, X.; Shao, J.; Ji, S. Etherification of ferrocenyl alcohol by highly-efficient ytterbium triflate. Chin. J. Chem. 2011, 29, 1887–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shevaldina, E.V.; Opredelennova, K.A.; Chichvarina, O.A.; Spiridonov, Y.Y.; Smol’yakov, A.F.; Dorovatovskii, P.V.; Moiseev, S.K. One-pot acid-free ferrocenylalkylation of azoles with α-ferrocenyl alcohols: Ferrocene-based plant growth regulators and herbicide safeners. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 33, e5228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xiao, M.; Ren, D.; Xu, L.; Li, S.-S.; Yu, L.; Xiao, J. SN1-type alkylation of N-heteroaromatics with alcohols. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 5724–5727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xiao, J.; Zhao, K.; Loh, T.-P. The acid free asymmetric intermolecular α-alkylation of aldehydes in fluorinated alcohols. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 3548–3550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Minić, A.; Novaković, S.B.; Bogdanović, G.A.; Bugarinović, J.P.; Pešić, M.S.; Todosijević, A.; Komatina, D.I.; Damljanović, I.; Stevanović, D. Synthesis and structural characterizations of novel atropoisomeric ferrocene-containing six-membered cyclic ureas. Polyhedron 2020, 177, 114316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xu, X.; Jiang, R.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y.; Ji, S.; Zhang, Y. Cerium ammonium nitrate: An efficient catalyst for carbon–carbon bond formation from ferrocenyl alcohol substrate. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 877–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Noji, M.; Konno, Y.; Ishii, K. Metal triflate-catalyzed cationic benzylation and allylation of 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 5161–5167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Minić, A.; Stevanović, D.; Vukićević, M.; Bogdanović, G.A.; D’hooghe, M.; Radulović, N.S.; Vukićević, R.D. Synthesis of novel 4-ferrocenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolines and 4-ferrocenylquinolines via α-ferrocenyl carbenium ions as key intermediates. Tetrahedron 2017, 73, 6268–6274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Snegur, L.V.; Simenel, A.A.; Rodionov, A.N.; Boev, V.I. Ferrocene modification of organic compounds for medicinal applications. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2014, 63, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rodionov, A.N.; Korlyukov, A.A.; Simenel, A.A. Synthesis, structure of 5,7-dimethyl-3-ferrocenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrazolo-[1,2-a]-pyrazol-4-ium tetrafluoroborate. DFTB calculations of interaction with DNA. J. Mol. Struct. 2022, 1251, 132070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rodionov, A.N.; Snegur, L.V.; Belousov, Y.A.; Korlyukov, A.A.; Simenel, A.A. The nature of ferrocenylalkylating agent in the acid-catalyzed reactions with ferrocenyl(phenyl)methanol. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2021, 70, 1900–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Garbicz, M.; Latos-Grażyński, L. meso-Tetraaryl-21-carbaporphyrin—incorporation of a cyclopentadiene unit into a porphyrin architecture. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2019, 58, 6089–6093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Iurlo, M.; Mengozzi, L.; Rapino, S.; Marcaccio, M.; Perone, R.C.; Masiero, S.; Cozzi, P.; Paolucci, F. New approaches toward ferrocene−guanine conjugates: Synthesis and electrochemical behavior. Organometallics 2014, 33, 4986–4993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ren, D.; Xu, L.; Wang, L.; Li, S.-S. Catalytic Formal Benzylic C−H Bond Functionalization of 2,5-Dialkylfuran Derivatives with Ferrocenyl Alcohols as Alkylation Reagents. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 627–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Snegur, L.V.; Borisov, Y.A.; Kuzmenko, Y.V.; Davankov, V.A.; Ilyin, M.M.; Ilyin Jr., M.M.; Arhipov, D.E.; Korlyukov, A.A.; Kiselev, S.S.; Simenel, A.A. Enantiomeric-enriched ferrocenes: Synthesis, chiral resolution, and mathematic evaluation of CD-chiral selector energies with ferrocene-conjugates. Molecules 2017, 22, 1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Osipova, E.Y.; Ivanova, A.S.; Rodionov, A.N.; Korlyukov, A.A.; Arkhipov, D.E.; Simenel, A.A. Ferrocenylalkylation of 2-mercaptobenzoxazoles. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2016, 65, 2868–2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rozhkova, Y.S.; Plekhanova, I.V.; Gorbunov, A.A.; Stryapunina, O.G.; Chulakov, E.N.; Krasnov, V.P.; Ezhikova, M.A.; Kodess, M.I.; Slepukhin, P.A.; Shklyaev, Y.V. Synthesis of novel racemic 3,4-dihydroferroceno[c]pyridines via the Ritter reaction. Tetrahedron Lett. 2019, 60, 768–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Osgerby, J.M.; Pauson, P.L. Ferrocene Derivatives. Part VIII. Tetrahydropyridoferrocenes. J. Chem Soc. 1961, 4600–4604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Popp, F.D.; Moynahan, E.B. Ferrocene Sutdies. VIII. Pyridoferrocenes. J. Heterocycl Chem. 1974, 11, 267–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Khand, I.U.; Lanez, T.; Pauson, P.L. Ferrocene derivatives. Part 24. Synthesis of dihydro-2-pyrindines and dihydro-3H-2-cyclopent[c]azepines by photolysis of their cyclopentadienyliron derivatives. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1989, 402, 2075–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yasue, R.; Miyauchi, M.; Yoshida, K.A. Planar chiral six-membered cyclic (amino)(ferrocenyl)carbene and its sulfur adduct. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2017, 28, 824–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Braverman, S.; Cherkinsky, M. The Ramberg–Bäcklund rearrangement and the Eschenmoser coupling reaction. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis II, 2nd ed.; Knochel, P., Molander, G.A., Eds.; Elsiver: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; Volume 3, pp. 887–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hussaini, S.R.; Chamala, R.R.; Wang, Z. The Eschenmoser sulfide contraction method and its application in the synthesis of natural products. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 6017–6086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zheng, C.; Zhang, X.; Hussain, M.I.; Huang, M.; Liu, Q.; Xiong, Y.; Zhu, X. One-pot dichlorinative deamidation of primary β-ketoamides. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017, 58, 574–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tanaka, Y.; Saito, T.; Ihara, H. Amidite compound and method for producing polynucleotide using said compound. Eur. Pat. Appl. 2021, 3786173. [Google Scholar]
  57. Benfodda, Z.; Guillen, F.; Arnion, H.; Dahmani, A.; Blancou, H. A new synthesis of alkane and polyfluoroalkanesulfonyl chlorides. Heteroat. Chem. 2009, 20, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shiryaev, A.K.; Moiseev, I.K. Adamantylation of thiocyanatoacetamide and thiocyanatoacetylurea. Rus. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 37, 746–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bisogno, F.R.; Cuetos, A.; Lavandera, I.; Gotor, V. Simple and quick preparation of α-thiocyanate ketones in hydroalcoholic media. Access to 5-aryl-2-imino-1,3-oxathiolanes. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 452–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, R.; Hong, X.; Shan, Z. A novel, convenient access to acylferrocenes: Acylation of ferrocene with acyl chlorides in the presence of zinc oxide. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 636–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rausch, M.D.; Pryde, C.A. Studies on some ferrocenyl ketones and pinacols. J. Organomet. Chem. 1971, 26, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Korb, M.; Mahrholdt, J.; Lang, H. (Planar-Chiral) Ferrocenylmethanols: From anionic homo phospho-Fries rearrangements to α-ferrocenyl carbenium ions. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 2017, 4028–4048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. CrysAlisPro, Agilent Technologies. Version 1.171.37.33. Available online: https://www.agilent.com/cs/library/usermanuals/Public/CrysAlis_Pro_User_Manual.pdf (accessed on 13 November 2022).
  64. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Cryst. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. A Found. Adv. 2008, A64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. C Struct. Chem. 2015, C71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Molecular structure of 3a according to XRD data in the thermal ellipsoids of the 50% probability level (only the (Rp)-enantiomer is shown).
Figure 1. Molecular structure of 3a according to XRD data in the thermal ellipsoids of the 50% probability level (only the (Rp)-enantiomer is shown).
Inorganics 10 00214 g001
Figure 2. Key correlations in 2D 1H–1H NOESY spectra of compounds 3ux.
Figure 2. Key correlations in 2D 1H–1H NOESY spectra of compounds 3ux.
Inorganics 10 00214 g002
Figure 3. Molecular structure of 11a according to XRD data in the thermal ellipsoids of the 50% probability level (only the (Sp)-enantiomer is shown).
Figure 3. Molecular structure of 11a according to XRD data in the thermal ellipsoids of the 50% probability level (only the (Sp)-enantiomer is shown).
Inorganics 10 00214 g003
Figure 4. Molecular structure of 12a according to XRD data in the thermal ellipsoids of the 35% probability level (only the (Sp)-enantiomer is shown).
Figure 4. Molecular structure of 12a according to XRD data in the thermal ellipsoids of the 35% probability level (only the (Sp)-enantiomer is shown).
Inorganics 10 00214 g004
Scheme 1. Proposed reaction mechanism.
Scheme 1. Proposed reaction mechanism.
Inorganics 10 00214 sch001
Table 1. Reaction of alcohol 1 with 4-methylbenzonitrile (2a). Optimization of the reaction conditions 1.
Table 1. Reaction of alcohol 1 with 4-methylbenzonitrile (2a). Optimization of the reaction conditions 1.
Inorganics 10 00214 i001
EntryAcidTemp
(°C)
SolventTimeYield (%) 2
3a5 + 6 [5:6] 3 Other Products
1MeSO3Hrt-5 h59-4a (6)
2MeSO3H40-1.15 h73--
3MeSO3H60-15 min73--
4MeSO3H80-10 min70--
5MeSO3H100-5 min64--
6 4MeSO3H60-15 min68--
7 MeSO3H60DCE 51 h3915 [11:89]-
8 MeSO3H60toluene 540 min5829 [10:90]-
9H2SO4 60-3 h51--
10 CF3COOH 60-30 min4119 [20:80]-
11CH3COOH60-2.5 h-32 61 (42)
1 Reagents and conditions: 1 (0.35 mmol, 1 equiv.), 2a (0.42 mmol, 1.2 equiv.), acid (8 equiv.). 2 Isolated yields after silica gel column chromatography. 3 According to 1H NMR analysis of the fractions of chromatography. 4 1.5 equiv. of 2a. 5 0.5 mL of solvent. 6 Only alkene 5 was isolated.
Table 2. Reaction of alcohol 1 with nitriles 2ax 1.
Table 2. Reaction of alcohol 1 with nitriles 2ax 1.
Inorganics 10 00214 i002
EntryNitrile
2
RTime (min)Product 3Yield
(%) 2
EntryNitrile
2
RTime (min)Product 3Yield
(%) 2
12a4-MeC6H4153a72132m2-CF3C6H4403m65
22bPh303b75142n4-NO2C6H4203ntrace 3,4
32c4-MeOC6H4403c77152oMe153o76
42d3-MeOC6H4403d78162pEt203p80
52e2-MeOC6H4403e63172qCH2i-Pr153q75
62f4-NH2C6H4503f66182rCH2Ad 5253r73
72g2-NH2C6H41803g30192sAd 5203s71
82h4-BrC6H4303h82202tCH2CH2OMe153t4
92i3-BrC6H4403i80212uCH2C(O)OEt203u59
102j2-BrC6H4403j76222vCH2C(O)NH2303v34
112k4-CF3C6H4153k76232wCH2C(O)Ph203w87
122l3-CF3C6H4303l84242xCH2C(O)Me203x81
1 Reagents and conditions: 1 (0.35 mmol, 1 equiv.), 2ax (0.42 mmol, 1.2 equiv.), MeSO3H (0.18 mL, 8 equiv.), 60 °C. 2 Isolated yields after silica gel column chromatography. 3 According to GC–MS analysis of the crude residue. 4 A complex mixture of unidentified products. 5 Ad = Adamant-1-yl.
Table 3. Reaction of alcohol 1 with phenylacetonitriles 7ac 1.
Table 3. Reaction of alcohol 1 with phenylacetonitriles 7ac 1.
Inorganics 10 00214 i003
EntryNitrile 7ArTime (min)Time 1 (days)Product 9Yield (%) 2
Method AMethod
B
17a3,4-(MeO)2C6H310 1 9a2421
27bPh15 2 9b3524
37c4-NO2C6H415 69c1614
1 Reagents and conditions: 1 (0.35 mmol, 1 equiv.), 7ac (0.42 mmol, 1.2 equiv.), MeSO3H (0.18 mL, 8 equiv.), 60 °C; Method A: Storage of the mixtures of 8 and 9 obtained after purification of the crude residues by column chromatography at rt exposed to air. The ratio of 8/9, according to 1H NMR analysis of the fractions of chromatography performed immediately after their isolation: 8a/9a = 78:22; 8b/9b = 66:34; 8c/9c = 65:35. Method B: Storage of the solutions of the crude residues in EtOAc at rt exposed to air. 2 Isolated yields after silica gel column chromatography.
Table 4. Reaction of alcohol 1 with EtSCN (10a) 1.
Table 4. Reaction of alcohol 1 with EtSCN (10a) 1.
Inorganics 10 00214 i004
EntryTemp. (°C) Time (min) 11a:12a 2Yield (%) 3
11a12a
1601023:771865
2rt155:95487
3 4 601043:573353
4 480374:26575
5 41001.588:12535
6 4,6120191:9237
1 Reagents and conditions: 1 (0.35 mmol, 1 equiv.), 10a (0.42 mmol, 1.2 equiv.), MeSO3H (0.18 mL, 8 equiv.). 2 According to 1H NMR analysis of the crude residues. 3 Isolated yields after silica gel column chromatography. 4 Addition of 10a to the solution of 1 in MeSO3H preheated to the indicated temperature. 5 Not isolated in an analytically pure form, only as a mixture with ferroceno[c]pyridine 11a. 6 Considerable tar formation was observed. 7 Not isolated.
Table 5. Reaction of alcohol 1 with thiocyanates 10af 1.
Table 5. Reaction of alcohol 1 with thiocyanates 10af 1.
Inorganics 10 00214 i005
EntryThiocyanate 10RTemp. (°C) Time (min) Products 11, 1211:12 2Yield (%) 3
1112
110aEtrt2511a, 12a5:95487
280374:26575
310bMert2511b, 12b2:98464
480352:48355
510cPrrt2511c, 12c6:94475
680374:26535
710di-Prrt4011d, 12d16:84753
880392:8615
910eCH2Phrt2511e, 12e5:95437
1080367:23425
1110fn-Hexrt4011f, 12f4:96465
1280379:21555
1 Reagents and conditions: 1 (0.35 mmol, 1 equiv.), 10af (0.42 mmol, 1.2 equiv.), MeSO3H (0.18 mL, 8 equiv.). 2 According to 1H NMR analysis of the crude residues. 3 Isolated yields after silica gel column chromatography. 4 Not isolated in an analytically pure form, only as a mixture with corresponding ferroceno[c]pyrrole 12. 5 Not isolated in an analytically pure form, only as a mixture with corresponding ferroceno[c]pyridine 11.
Table 6. Reaction of alcohol 1 with thiocyanates 10gj 1.
Table 6. Reaction of alcohol 1 with thiocyanates 10gj 1.
Inorganics 10 00214 i006
EntryThiocyanate 10RTemp. (°C) TimeProducts (Yield, %) 2
110gEtOrt1 h3u (trace) 3, 11g (6) 3, 12g (73); [11g/12g = 4:96] 4
28015 min3u (trace) 3, 11g (27) 3, 12g (26); [11g/12g = 59:41] 4
310hNH2rt48 h1 (37), 5 + 6 (14) [5/6 = 77:23] 5, 13 (13)
4803 min- 6
510iPhrt48 h1 (20), 5 + 6 (18) [5/6 = 55:45] 5, 10i (38), 13 (51)
68040 min3w (8%), 5 + 6 (42) [5/6 = 91:9] 5, 10i (63)
710jMert48 h5 + 6 (22) [5/6 = 56:44] 5, 13 (48)
8803 min3x (trace) 4, 1 (38), 5 + 6 (20) [5/6 = 96:4] 5
1 Reagents and conditions: 1 (0.35 mmol, 1 equiv.), 10g (0.53 mmol, 1.5 equiv.), 10hj (0.42 mmol, 1.2 equiv.), MeSO3H (0.18 mL, 8 equiv.). 2 Isolated yields after silica gel column chromatography. 3 Isolated as a mixture of 11g and 3u. According to 1H NMR analysis of the fraction of chromatography 11g/3u ratios were found to be 99:1 (entry 1) and 96:4 (entry 2). 4 According to 1H NMR analysis of the crude residues. 5 According to 1H NMR analysis of the fraction of chromatography. 6 A complex mixture of unidentified products.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rozhkova, Y.S.; Plekhanova, I.V.; Gorbunov, A.A.; Shklyaev, Y.V. Convenient Access to Ferrocene Fused aza-Heterocycles via the Intramolecular Ritter Reaction: Synthesis of Novel Racemic Planar-Chiral 3,4-Dihydroferroceno[c]pyridines and 1H-Ferroceno[c]pyrroles. Inorganics 2022, 10, 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10110214

AMA Style

Rozhkova YS, Plekhanova IV, Gorbunov AA, Shklyaev YV. Convenient Access to Ferrocene Fused aza-Heterocycles via the Intramolecular Ritter Reaction: Synthesis of Novel Racemic Planar-Chiral 3,4-Dihydroferroceno[c]pyridines and 1H-Ferroceno[c]pyrroles. Inorganics. 2022; 10(11):214. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10110214

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rozhkova, Yuliya S., Irina V. Plekhanova, Alexey A. Gorbunov, and Yurii V. Shklyaev. 2022. "Convenient Access to Ferrocene Fused aza-Heterocycles via the Intramolecular Ritter Reaction: Synthesis of Novel Racemic Planar-Chiral 3,4-Dihydroferroceno[c]pyridines and 1H-Ferroceno[c]pyrroles" Inorganics 10, no. 11: 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10110214

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop