Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Carrier-Free Paclitaxel–Curcumin Nanoparticles: The Role of Curcuminoids
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Fabrication of Artificial Stem Cell Niches
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Multiscale Partition-Based Kolmogorov–Sinai Entropy for the Complexity Assessment of Heartbeat Dynamics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Multivariate and Multiscale Physiological Signal Analysis

1
Department of Information Engineering, University of Florence, Via Santa Marta 3, 50139 Florence, Italy
2
Bioengineering and Robotics Research Centre “E. Piaggio” and Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 1, 56122 Pisa, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2022, 9(12), 814; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120814
Submission received: 6 December 2022 / Accepted: 14 December 2022 / Published: 16 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Multivariate Physiological Signal Analysis)
Physiological systems are characterized by complex dynamics and nonlinear behaviors due to their intricate structural organization and regulatory mechanisms. Moreover, the optimization of physiological states and functions involves the continuous dynamic interaction of feedback mechanisms across different spatio-temporal scales. For this reason, advanced multivariate and multiscale approaches to biomedical signal analysis could strongly increase the information detectable from physiological signal monitoring, constituting a promising avenue to improve the knowledge of biological regulation in healthy and pathological states [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Moreover, thanks to the latest advances in technology that have provided miniaturized and high-performance acquisition systems, a synchronized multichannel recording of multiple signals—even in wearable and wireless mode—is currently possible. This Special Issue, therefore, focuses on original research papers dealing with computational methodologies for processing multivariate signals and the study of information across multiple time scales to characterize specific physiological states through linear and nonlinear interactions between components of the system. Research studies proposing novel multivariate or multiscale quantifiers and applying pattern-recognition algorithms to heterogeneous physiological data are presented in this sense.
In recent decades, multivariate and multiscale analyses have found fertile ground in the characterization of cardiovascular dynamics. It is clear, in fact, that processing more leads of the same systems or more signals from different organs and looking at the fractal properties of physiological dynamics can provide an undoubtedly more complete picture of the widespread phenomena of cardiovascular system complexity [1,7]. Such approaches will enhance the performance obtained through the analysis of cardiovascular signals in a completely non-invasive modality in characterizing aging and diagnosing cardiovascular diseases [8,9,10,11], and in the monitoring of emotions and mood disorders, which are strongly linked to changes in autonomic dynamics [12,13,14].
In the current Special Issue, multiscale partition-based Kolmogorov–Sinai (MKSE) entropy was presented [15]. The MKSE algorithm was used for the discrimination of elderly and young subjects in a resting state (by using the Fantasia dataset [16,17]) and the recognition of pathological dynamics due to congestive heart failure (CHF) and atrial fibrillation (AT) from a healthy condition (NS) (by using the MIT-BIH and Congestive Heart Failure RR datasets [17,18]). Statistical results showed that the MSKE method allowed for significantly discerning different conditions by cardiac dynamics, reporting a decrease in complexity in aging and cardiovascular diseases. These findings were consistent with previous studies; however, the proposed approach had the advantage of not requiring the tuning of embedding dimension value or other tolerances.
Frassineti et al. applied several multiscale entropy algorithms to heartbeat series of newborns to identify abnormal autonomic nervous system dynamics associated with seizures [19]. The multiscale approach applied to both sample entropy and fuzzy entropy algorithms [20,21] showed that it was possible to statistically discern seizure and seizure-free patients by using the Helsinki University public dataset [22]. The ictal events could not be detected by using the same entropy analyses at a single scale.
One of the most effective treatments for supraventricular arrhythmia is radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA). This technique involves ablating abnormal electrical pathways in atrial tissues after analyzing intracardiac electrograms (EGMs). In [23], a new approach was proposed for a reliable estimation of electrical sources, accounting for the data uncertainty while analyzing EGMs. Starting from multivariate signals given by multiple catheter locations, the position of the electrical source was estimated through a multinomial distribution to model the activation probability of each sensor, recognizing the most probable path through a robust maximum-likelihood estimation.
In the early diagnosis of stenosis, a comprehensive study of acoustic pressure, flow fluctuations, and sound features related to stenosis progression was reported in [24]. The authors highlighted a relevant relationship between the severity level of stenosis progression and the frequency content of high-turbulence pressure fluctuations. Furthermore, their findings demonstrated that acoustic spatial-frequency maps could be used to assess the distance of the stenosis with respect to the measurement point.
Dresp-Langley et al. presented a multivariate analysis to investigate signals derived from multiple sensors located in a wireless wearable system to perform a non-invasive tracking of hand movements over time [25]. After a step-by-step statistical analysis, skill-specific differences were revealed in the functional organization of grip forces during the performance of complex precision tasks by individuals with varying expertise levels. Distinct co-variation patterns were identified in locally produced grip force signals acquired from sensors located in the middle, ring, and small fingers and the palm of the dominant hand. The results obtained were consistent with previous neuroimaging studies about grip force representations in the human brain.
Looking at the previous scientific literature, multivariate analysis of physiological signs is commonly linked to the application of pattern recognition algorithms in order to discern different conditions and predict the onset of pathological states or possible exacerbations.
In this Special Issue, two articles reported on machine learning models applied to multivariate datasets. The first study presented a machine learning approach for estimating mechanical ventilation parameters in treating various respiratory health concerns [26]. The proposed model was based on inverse mapping of artificial neural networks and used the Graded Particle Swarm Optimizer, a novel variant of the particle swarm optimization. Data from canine and feline patients at the University of Georgia College of Veterinary Medicine were used to train and test the machine learning approach. The findings showed that the proposed model could predict the mechanical ventilation parameters for several respiratory conditions.
Finally, Bizzego et al. used a multivariate dataset of six different physiological signals (electrocardiogram, electromyogram, electrodermal activity, photoplethysmogram, respiration, and acceleration) to test the performance of Deep Neural Networks (DNN) to recognize the signal type [27]. The signals in the dataset were collected from 232 subjects using four different acquisition devices. The signal types were optimally classified by the DNN (the performance was worse only for the respiratory signal, possibly due to the low number of samples), and the DNN features were used to train a support vector machine (SVM) model for the device recognition. Overall values of 0.638 and 0.609 were obtained for the multi-class Matthew Correlation Coefficient on the training and testing partitions, respectively.
In conclusion, the contributions to this Special Issue allowed a journey into various interesting scientific fields of application, where multivariate and multiscale approaches to data analysis can unveil features and dynamics inaccessible by using standard approaches based on single-channel or single-scale analyses. A common concept is evident from the studies: the multiplicity of information with different natures and observation scales can create a holistic vision of the problem to be described. These two approaches could be considered either as separate or as a whole. Each of these, taken separately, offers an enhancement of the level of the problem description and a deeper investigation of the phenomenon behind the measurements themselves. When they are considered together, the research space becomes more complex, requiring a structured strategy of analysis that has to be supported by a dedicated mathematical fashion and a clear vision of the implicit consequences that it will bring, not only in terms of the correctness of the formal results but also in the meanings assigned to the physiological processes that are the true sources of the information analyzed.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cerutti, S.; Hoyer, D.; Voss, A. Multiscale, multiorgan and multivariate complexity analyses of cardiovascular regulation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2009, 367, 1337–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ahmed, M.U.; Mandic, D.P. Multivariate multiscale entropy analysis. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 2011, 19, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Korhonen, I.; Mainardi, L.; Loula, P.; Carrault, G.; Baselli, G.; Bianchi, A. Linear multivariate models for physiological signal analysis: Theory. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 1996, 51, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Starck, J.L.; Murtagh, F.D.; Bijaoui, A. Image Processing and Data Analysis: The Multiscale Approach; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldberger, A.L.; Amaral, L.A.; Hausdorff, J.M.; Ivanov, P.C.; Peng, C.K.; Stanley, H.E. Fractal dynamics in physiology: Alterations with disease and aging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 2466–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Dürichen, R.; Pimentel, M.A.; Clifton, L.; Schweikard, A.; Clifton, D.A. Multitask Gaussian processes for multivariate physiological time-series analysis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2014, 62, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Costa, M.; Goldberger, A.L.; Peng, C.K. Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 068102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ahmed, M.U.; Mandic, D.P. Multivariate multiscale entropy: A tool for complexity analysis of multichannel data. Phys. Rev. E 2011, 84, 061918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Peng, C.K.; Havlin, S.; Hausdorff, J.; Mietus, J.; Stanley, H.; Goldberger, A. Fractal mechanisms and heart rate dynamics: Long-range correlations and their breakdown with disease. J. Electrocardiol. 1995, 28, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gao, J.; Hu, J.; Liu, F.; Cao, Y. Multiscale entropy analysis of biological signals: A fundamental bi-scaling law. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Nardelli, M.; Scilingo, E.P.; Valenza, G. Multichannel Complexity Index (MCI) for a multi-organ physiological complexity assessment. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 2019, 530, 121543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bhattacharyya, A.; Tripathy, R.K.; Garg, L.; Pachori, R.B. A novel multivariate-multiscale approach for computing EEG spectral and temporal complexity for human emotion recognition. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 21, 3579–3591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Leistedt, S.J.; Linkowski, P.; Lanquart, J.P.; Mietus, J.; Davis, R.B.; Goldberger, A.L.; Costa, M.D. Decreased neuroautonomic complexity in men during an acute major depressive episode: Analysis of heart rate dynamics. Transl. Psychiatry 2011, 1, e27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Nardelli, M.; Lanata, A.; Bertschy, G.; Scilingo, E.P.; Valenza, G. Heartbeat complexity modulation in bipolar disorder during daytime and nighttime. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Scarciglia, A.; Catrambone, V.; Bonanno, C.; Valenza, G. A Multiscale Partition-Based Kolmogorov–Sinai Entropy for the Complexity Assessment of Heartbeat Dynamics. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Iyengar, N.; Peng, C.; Morin, R.; Goldberger, A.L.; Lipsitz, L.A. Age-related alterations in the fractal scaling of cardiac interbeat interval dynamics. Am. J. Physiol.-Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 1996, 271, R1078–R1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Goldberger, A.L.; Amaral, L.A.; Glass, L.; Hausdorff, J.M.; Ivanov, P.C.; Mark, R.G.; Mietus, J.E.; Moody, G.B.; Peng, C.K.; Stanley, H.E. PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: Components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation 2000, 101, e215–e220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Moody, G. A new method for detecting atrial fibrillation using RR intervals. Comput. Cardiol. 1983, 10, 227–230. [Google Scholar]
  19. Frassineti, L.; Lanatà, A.; Olmi, B.; Manfredi, C. Multiscale Entropy Analysis of Heart Rate Variability in Neonatal Patients with and without Seizures. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Richman, J.S.; Moorman, J.R. Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. Am. J. Physiol.-Heart Circ. Physiol. 2000, 278, H2039–H2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chen, W.; Wang, Z.; Xie, H.; Yu, W. Characterization of surface EMG signal based on fuzzy entropy. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2007, 15, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Stevenson, N.J.; Tapani, K.; Lauronen, L.; Vanhatalo, S. A dataset of neonatal EEG recordings with seizure annotations. Sci. Data 2019, 6, 190039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Koneshloo, A.; Du, D.; Du, Y. An Uncertainty Modeling Framework for Intracardiac Electrogram Analysis. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Khalili, F.; Gamage, P.T.; Taebi, A.; Johnson, M.E.; Roberts, R.B.; Mitchell, J. Spectral Decomposition of the Flow and Characterization of the Sound Signals through Stenoses with Different Levels of Severity. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dresp-Langley, B.; Nageotte, F.; Zanne, P.; Mathelin, M.D. Correlating grip force signals from multiple sensors highlights prehensile control strategies in a complex task-user system. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Oruganti Venkata, S.S.; Koenig, A.; Pidaparti, R.M. Mechanical ventilator parameter estimation for lung health through machine learning. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bizzego, A.; Gabrieli, G.; Esposito, G. Deep neural networks and transfer learning on a multivariate physiological signal Dataset. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lanata, A.; Nardelli, M. Advances in Multivariate and Multiscale Physiological Signal Analysis. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 814. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120814

AMA Style

Lanata A, Nardelli M. Advances in Multivariate and Multiscale Physiological Signal Analysis. Bioengineering. 2022; 9(12):814. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120814

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lanata, Antonio, and Mimma Nardelli. 2022. "Advances in Multivariate and Multiscale Physiological Signal Analysis" Bioengineering 9, no. 12: 814. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120814

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop