Next Article in Journal
Novel Techniques and Future Perspective for Investigating Critical-Size Bone Defects
Previous Article in Journal
Quantitative Analysis of Core Lipid Production in Methanothermobacter marburgensis at Different Scales
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rylene Dye-Loaded Polymeric Nanoparticles for Photothermal Eradication of Harmful Dinoflagellates, Akashiwo sanguinea and Alexandrium pacificum

1
Department of Chemistry, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea
2
Industry 4.0 Convergence Bionics Engineering, New-Senior’ Oriented Smart Health Care Education Center, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea
3
Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea
4
Department of Oceanography, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2022, 9(4), 170; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9040170
Submission received: 28 February 2022 / Revised: 22 March 2022 / Accepted: 7 April 2022 / Published: 11 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Nanotechnology Applications in Bioengineering)

Abstract

:
In the era of climate changes, harmful dinoflagellate outbreaks that produce potent algal toxins, odor, and water discoloration in aquatic environments have been increasingly reported. Thus, various treatments have been attempted for the mitigation and management of harmful blooms. Here, we report engineered nanoparticles that consist of two different types of rylene derivatives encapsulated in polymeric micelles. In addition, to avoid dissociation of the aggregate, the core of micelle was stabilized via semi-interpenetrating network (sIPN) formation. On two types of the marine red-tide dinoflagellates, Akashiwo sanguinea and Alexandrium pacificum, the nanoparticle uptake followed by fluorescence labeling and photothermal effect was conducted. Firstly, fluorescence microscopy enabled imaging of the dinoflagellates with the ultraviolet chromophore, Lumogen Violet. Lastly, near-infrared (NIR) laser irradiation was exposed on the Lumogen IR788 nanoparticle-treated Ak. Sanguinea. The irradiation resulted in reduced cell survival due to the photothermal effect in microalgae. The results suggested that the nanoparticle, IR788-sIPN, can be applied for potential red-tide algal elimination.

1. Introduction

Polymeric micellar aggregates have been promising nano-carriers for tumor imaging and drug delivery applications [1,2,3]. These polymeric nanoparticles attracted much attention because of their controllable physicochemical properties such as size, surface charge, degradability, and functionalization [4,5]. Above their critical micelle temperature (CMT) and concentration (CMC), the block copolymers can self-assemble into supramolecular structures composed of a hydrophobic core for loading hydrophobic molecules and a hydrophilic shell that can protect from dissociation in the aqueous environment [6,7,8,9].
Among those, a Pluronic® block copolymer consisting of poly(ethylene oxide-b-propylene oxide-b-ethylene oxide) (PEO-b-PPO-b-PEO) has been widely studied as a therapeutic-agent carrier because of its excellent bioavailability [10,11,12]. In aqueous media above its CMT and CMC, Pluronic® can spontaneously form nano-sized core-shell micellar structures having a hydrophobic core composed of PPO segments and a shell dominated by PEO segments. The PEO chain of Pluronic® can form hydrogen bonds with aqueous molecules resulting in a tight shell around the micellar core, which prevents the clearance of hydrophobic molecules from the core [13,14,15,16].
Although Pluronic® has been considered to be a promising drug carrier, these micelles, which have soft cores, are thermodynamically less stable than other polymeric micelles with a solid core such as poly(styrene)-b-poly(ethylene oxide). To stabilize Pluronic® micelle, many stabilization methods have been conducted by other groups focused on PEO and PPO functionalization [17,18,19,20]. Mostly, reported methods not only require complicated organic synthesis routes but also influence the micellization properties of Pluronic® molecules [17]. The innovative method to stabilize Pluronic® micelle has been developed by Petrov et al. via the formation of sIPN in the core of Pluronic F-68 using pentaerythritol tetraacrylate (PETA) as a crosslinker [21]. The interpenetrating networks of poly(PETA) and polyether chains were stabilized Pluronic® micelle from degradation below its CMC or CMT. Thus, the resulting sIPN core firmly holds small molecules within the network.
Among small molecules trapped in the core, the loading of hydrophobic dyes has been widely done using polymeric micelles [22]. In particular, rylene dyes are polyaromatic chromophores with exceptional photophysical properties such as high photostability and intense absorption [23]. Rylene dyes with multiple naphthalene units are known to absorb longer wavelengths up to 1000 nm [24].
Harmful algal blooms (HABs) by cyanobacteria and dinoflagellates in aquatic environments have globally increased in intensity and frequency during the past decade [25,26,27]. HABs cause mass mortalities of farmed fish, leading to severe economic losses [28,29]. Moreover, toxigenic HAB species produce a range of potent algal toxins that impact human health, such as a paralytic toxin, neurotoxin, and amnestic shellfish poison [30]. To mitigate and manage the HABs, several treatments including filtration, flocculation, and degradation are applied in the field [31,32]. However, the currently used physical, chemical, biological, and converged control can achieve temporary and partial effect, but are not sustainable for a long period. Therefore, research on new methods for effective algae removal is needed. A method that has high algae removal efficiency and does not cause secondary pollution is required. In addition, it is necessary to consider situations such as large-scale aquatic environments with large changes in seasonal and hydraulic environmental factors.
As illustrated in Figure 1, polymeric nanoparticles (NPs) were loaded with rylene dyes and stabilized to avoid dissociation of the polymeric micelle. Pluronic® F127, a triblock copolymer consisting of hydrophobic PPO chain and hydrophilic PEO chain, was used as a base for the polymeric micelle with Lumogen® IR788 (IR788) and Lumogen® violet (LV) as loaded moiety [33,34,35,36]. The rylene dye-loaded NP was further stabilized via sIPN within the core of the micelle using a PETA. UV irradiation was used to promote the network formation of crosslinker, holding the PPO core within micelle [37,38]. The effects of LV-sIPN NP and IR788-sIPN NP on two dinoflagellate species such as Ak. Sanguinea and A. pacificum were evaluated after feeding NP in the algal media, and later Ak. sanguinea species was selected for NIR (808 nm) laser irradiation treatment under different exposure conditions.
In addition, most of the previous microalgae studies regarding nanoparticles evaluated the toxicity of NPs themselves, but there has been very little study evaluating the effects to microalgae under IR exposure where the majority of energy is transferred from sunlight in the aquatic environment. Algal media without NP were used as control compared to media containing NP. Two red-tide species were studied as the model species owing to their importance as a primary harmful algal bloom species in the aquatic environment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

2.1.1. Reagents and Solvents for NP

Lumogen violet and IR788 were purchased from BASF (Ludwigshafen, Germany). Pluronic® F127 (MW 12,600) and PETA were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Burlington, MA, USA). Chloroform (99.8%, HPLC grade) was purchased from Samchun (Seoul, Korea), and acetone (99.9%) was purchased from DUKSAN (Ansan, Korea). Ultra-pure water (18 MΩ) purified on a MilliQ-Millipore system (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) that was used throughout the synthesis of NP.

2.1.2. Cell Isolation and Cultures

Two species of dinoflagellates, Ak. sanguinea (Strain AS-USA) and A. pacificum (Strain AP-LOHABE04), were established in clonal cultures using seawater samples collected during blooms from the Chesapeake Bay (USA) in 2015 and from Masan (Korea) Bay in June 2016, respectively. Cells were individually isolated by a capillary pipette, washed five times in sterile seawater, and transferred to polystyrene cell culture plates containing sterile f/2-Si medium under an inverted microscope. Cells were grown in sterile f/2-Si medium with a salinity of 27.5 for Ak. sanguinea and 30 for A. pacificum at 20 °C on a 14:10 light-to-dark cycle of cool-white fluorescent lamps of 80 μmol photons m−2 s−1.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Preparation of Dye Loaded sIPN

To prepare the PETA film, 125 μL of 100 mg/mL PETA stock solution dissolved in chloroform was placed in an empty vial with a micropipette and dried in a fume hood for 24 h at ambient condition. F127 stock solution dissolved in chloroform of 500 mg F127 and Lumogen dye (Lumogen® violet for 0.002%, Lumogen® IR788 for 3% ratio based on F127) were mixed in the other vial. Solvent, chloroform, was evaporated using a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure so that the F127 LV film was prepared. To prepare a 10 wt% F127 solution above CMC [39], the film was hydrated with 4.5 mL ultrapure water. The solution was transferred to a PETA film prepared in advance and agitated at room temperature overnight using an orbital shaker at 200 rpm. The inside of the vial was filled with argon gas. The solution was irradiated using OmniCure series 2000 (Lumen Dynamics, Mississauga, ON, Canada) at 1.5 W/cm2 for 10 min at 50 °C to promote crosslinking of PETA in the micelle core. Dye-loaded sIPN was filtered using 0.2 μm syringe filter (Minisart® Sartorius Stedium, Göttingen, Germany) to remove residual impurities and stored in the clean 20 mL glass vial for further characterization.

2.2.2. CMT Test

The CMT test was done by incubating of sIPN NP at a temperature below its CMT overnight then followed by centrifugation at 4 °C for 10 min at 14,000 rpm using R17 Micro Refrigerated Centrifuge (Hanil Science Industrial, Gimpo, Korea). The supernatant was transferred into a clean tube for further characterization. CMT test was done to evaluate the sIPN formation in the core of micelle. The values of CMT vary depending on temperature and concentration of amphiphilic polymers, and the CMT for a given concentration of F127 in H2O (10 wt%) was 17 °C [40]. Both LV-sIPN NP and IR788-sIPN NP were incubated overnight at 4 °C, a temperature way below CMT. Absorption spectra of the samples were recorded using SpectraMax M2 (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) in a quartz cuvette with a 10 × 10 mm light path (Hellma Analytics, Müllheim, Germany).

2.2.3. Dynamic Light Scattering

To confirm the size distribution of sIPN NPs, Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK) was used. The particle size was measured at 25 °C. The NP solution was diluted to 20 times with water and filtered using a 0.2 μm syringe filter to remove unwanted aggregates. The data are average of three times measurement.

2.2.4. Settling Assay of NP Uptake by Algal Species

We applied the two dinoflagellate species Ak. Sanguinea and A. pacificum in exponential growth phases for the NP uptake experiments. Sterilization of algal culture media was done with Spirit-lamp. Stock cultures of the two species were diluted using a fresh f/2 medium and distributed to the 6-well plates (SPL Life Sciences Co., Pocheon, Korea) to achieve triplicate treatments and controls with initial cell concentrations of 2500 cell mL−1. A 2 μL of LV-sIPN NP was added into triplicate treatments containing each species. The NP and algae solutions were carried out using Lab Companion SKF 2050 Shaker (Jeio Tech, Daejeon, Korea). All experiments were incubated in the dark condition at 20 °C. For determination of cell abundances and uptake rates of LV-sIPN NP, 1 mL subsamples were taken at 0 h and 24 h and fixed with glutaraldehyde (final concentration of 1% v/v). Cell abundance and the proportion of cells containing NP were estimated by scanning triplicate Sedgewick Rafter counting chambers (SR chamber) at ×100 magnification under a Zeiss Axio Imager2 microscope (Carl Zeiss Inc., Oberkochen, Germany) with epifluorescence illumination.

2.2.5. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analysis data herein are represented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. The statistical significance of differences among each experimental group was calculated using analysis of variance, and either a Bonferroni posttest or an unpaired Student’s t-test. All p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant statistically.

2.2.6. SEM Imaging

A 15 mL culture of sIPN NP retained dinoflagellate cells was centrifuged at 3300× g for 1 min and discarded the supernatant. The cells were fixed with glutaraldehyde to achieve a final concentration of 2% and stored at 4 °C for 1 h. The fixed specimen was filtered on 3 μm pore-sized membrane filters and then washed in distilled water for 1 h. After that, the sample was dehydrated in ethanol of 25, 50, 70, 80, 99, and 100% gradient for 12 min at each step. Dehydrated A. pacificum was a critical point dried with liquid CO2 by Leica EM CPD300 and Ak. sanguinea was dried by hexamethyldisilazane. Then cells were coated with gold for 8 min and examined by CX-200 (COXEM Inc., Daejeon, Korea) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for imaging.

2.2.7. NIR Laser Irradiation—Power Variation

An irradiation experiment was conducted irradiating PSU-H-LED 808 nm laser source/machine (Changchun New Industries, Changchun, China) on algae cells. Six well-plate set up after initial counting and counting within time all were the same as the methods used for earlier sets of experiments done in settling assay. Ak. sanguinea was treated with LV-sIPN NP for uptake confirmation and IR788-sIPN NP for photothermal material loading. Both LV-sIPN NP and IR788-sIPN NP were treated at a ratio of 1:4000. Irradiation applying times were counted using stopwatch. Different laser power was performed for the treatment of NP uptake algae cells with a fixed solution. The laser power was adjusted using a radiometer (R2000 from Omnicure, Excelitas Technologies Corp., Waltham, MA, USA). LV-sIPN NP and IR788-sIPN NP were used while the power was 1.5 W/cm2, again only IR788-sIPN NP was applied for the treatment of NP uptake algae cells while varying the power of 1.0 and 0.5 W/cm2.

2.2.8. NIR Laser Irradiation—Time Variation

LV-sIPN NP and IR788-sIPN NP uptake algae samples were irradiated using an 808 nm laser when power was 1.5 W/cm2 and again only IR788-sIPN NP uptake algae samples were irradiated using an 808 nm laser with 1.0 and 0.5 W/cm2 power. Irradiation was done inside a makeshift cold chamber, and irradiation times were set depending on power for 1.5 W/cm2 irradiation times were 15, 20, and 30 min, for both 1.0 W/cm2 and 0.5 W/cm2 power irradiation times were 10, 30, 45, and 60 min.

3. Results and Discussion

To apply the hydrophobic fluorescent dye and photothermal material to red tides, stable polymeric NP was prepared using F127 as described above. To confirm the stability of the prepared dye-loaded sIPN NP, absorbance and fluorescence spectra under the temperature condition under CMT were compared with the spectra at room temperature in water.
Figure 2 shows absorption and fluorescence spectra for LV-sIPN NP and absorption spectra for IR788-sIPN NP, which had less than 5% difference before and after CMT test. As specified in Table S1, after CMT test, the obtained result revealed that both F127 sIPN NPs can maintain their cores at a temperature below the CMT.
After CMT test, though, it became apparent that the optical density (O.D.) value of IR788 micelle drastically decreased up to 91% (Table S1) because of the dissociation of micelle into unimers under CMT, releasing most of the loaded dyes in the process. This release of dye was not observed in IR788-sIPN NP, as proven by an O.D. decrease of only 0.6%, owing to the structurally fixed core of the sIPN.
The hydrodynamic diameters of LV-sIPN NP and IR788-sIPN NP determined by DLS were 20.21 and 25.58 nm, respectively. These results are similar to 22 nm, which calculated values through molecular dynamics simulation [41]. Figure S1 shows the size distribution of LV-sIPN NP, LV-micelle NP, IR788-sIPN NP, and IR788-micelle NP. The particle size of IR788-sIPN NP was larger than that of LV-sIPN NP because quaterrylene IR788 has a 4.8 times larger chemical structure, causing it to form a somewhat larger aggregate. The size of sIPN NPs reported in the previous study was 7 nm [37]. Because the dense core is clearly observed under TEM conditions, the observed size is smaller than the hydrodynamic volume determined by DLS measurements.
Retention of sIPN NP by red-tide algal cells was observed and investigated to determine which dinoflagellate species has higher NP uptake ability. LV-sIPN NP was used as an ideal material for uptake experiment due to easy detection under an epifluorescence microscope as shown in Figure S2. When fluorescence of LV-sIPN NP was observed at the location of the cell identified by the microscope, it was considered that it had taken up NP. To check the uptake pattern of dinoflagellate, 24 h after the NP treatment, the total cell numbers and the number of cells containing NP were counted and compared with the number of cells at 0 h. Figure 3 shows two dinoflagellate species images. Both the dinoflagellate species retained LV-sIPN NP and were clearly distinguished from normal cells in the fluorescence images.
NP used in various fields is a potential hazard that can affect aquatic ecosystems due to their properties such as size and chemical composition. The adsorption or uptake of NP to algae can inhibit photosynthetic processes or cause physical membrane damage [42]. Figure 4 shows the SEM imaging results of dinoflagellate cells treated with sIPN NP. We found that there is no damage to the surface of cells treated with sIPN NP. LV-sIPN-treated algae cells have no difference compared to SEM images of normal cells that have not been treated [43,44].
Figure 5A represents the mean cell number of Ak. sanguinea and A. pacificum during treatment with LV-sIPN NP at 0 h and 24 h under light-to-dark conditions. After 24 h of NP treatment to Ak. sanguinea, the number of cells retained by 64%. The cells containing LV-sIPN NP among living cells were 95% of the total as shown in Figure 5B. While A. pacificum retained by 94% after LV-sIPN NP treatment, it was observed that only 7.93% of cells had uptake of LV-sIPN NP. Ak. sanguinea showed higher uptake ability compared to A. pacificum cells due to ornamented theca on the cell outer layer. We chose Ak. sanguinea for further laser treatment investigation due to higher NP uptake ability.
LV-sIPN and IR788-sIPN NP were applied on Ak. sanguinea and irradiated for 15, 20, and 30 min by 808 nm laser under 1.5 W/cm2 power. The IR788-sIPN NPs solution could reach hyperthermia under 808 nm laser irradiation [45]. In this experiment, the power that can kill cells by generating local heat inside the cells without causing changes in water temperature was selected. Algal cell number decreased with increasing laser-light exposed time. Figure 6 shows decreasing cell number of Ak. sanguinea with NP uptake and without NP as control according to the irradiation time of 808 nm laser with 1.5 W/cm2. Cell number decreased with increasing irradiation time up to 30 min under the same cell concentration. Significant differences in algal cell numbers were observed for irradiation times in cells with different NP uptake.
After 30 min of laser irradiation, the cells of the control group decreased by 7%. Laser irradiation had no significant effect on the control cell due to NP absence. On the other hand, the cell number of the experimental group that was exposed to LV-sIPN NP decreased by 14% after irradiation for 30 min. IR788-sIPN NP showed the highest number of cells decreased compared to both control and LV-sIPN NP, which was 32% with 30 min of irradiation time. This observation suggests that Ak. sanguinea was removed by the material loaded inside the NP. IR788 inside the NP affects microalgae cells as a photothermal material that generates heat by the photoexcitation when it is exposed to NIR wavelength light.
Next, to determine the effect of accumulated light energy on Ak. sanguinea, IR788-sIPN NP-treated Ak. sanguinea cells were irradiated for 10, 30, 45, and 60 min at 808 nm laser with different power, under 1.0 and 0.5 W/cm2. In all cases, algal cell numbers gradually decreased with increasing laser exposed time. Figure 7 shows the effect of laser irradiation on both NP-treated cells and control including cell decrease percentage at different irradiation times. The highest number of cells decreased for the control plate was 8% and 4% for 1.0 and 0.5 W/cm2 with 60 min of irradiation time respectively. In contrast, the experimental group treated with IR788-sIPN NP uptake showed that the number of cells decreased up to 28% and 11%. This trend in cell decrease can be significantly seen after 45 min of irradiation.

4. Conclusions

LV and IR788-sIPN NP, core-stabilized polymeric micelle loaded with rylene dyes, were successfully prepared via self-assembly followed by sIPN formation. The sIPN structure greatly improved the stability of NP as shown by CMT test. Herein, we assessed the uptake ability and effect of LV-sIPN NP and IR788-sIPN NP on marine harmful microalgae Ak. sanguinea and A. pacificum. NP uptake by Ak. sanguinea was found to be higher compared to that of A. pacificum, confirmed by fluorescence image after 24 h light-to-dark conditions. IR788-sIPN NP had an immediate effect on the removal of Ak. sanguinea cells at different laser irradiation times and power than LV-sIPN NP due to the photothermal property of IR788. Therefore, we concluded that IR788-sIPN NP is a highly potent material for red-tide algal eradication. Our next goal is to eliminate algal species taking up IR788-sIPN NP by local heat generated under intense sunlight because solar radiation in the infrared range (longer than 760 nm) is about 40%. To achieve this goal in the future, several aspects in the NP need to be considered such as biodegradation, environmental effect, and aquatic food chains.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/bioengineering9040170/s1, Figure S1: Particle size distribution of (A) LV-sIPN NP, (B) LV-micelle NP, (C) IR788-sIPN NP and (D) IR788-micelle measured by dynamic light scattering, Figure S2: Fluorescence microscopy images of dinoflagellates feeding on LV-sIPN NPs. (A) Akashiwo sanguinea, (B) Alexandrium pacificum. The self-fluorescence of the cell is red and the LV-sIPN NPs are blue, Table S1: Absorbance of LV-sIPN NP, LV-micelle NP, IR788-sIPN NP, and IR788-micelle before and after CMT test.

Author Contributions

S.K. and M.K. (Minseok Kwak) conceived the idea. N.F.T. and M.K. (Mingyeong Kang) performed preparation of NP, cell culture experiments and drafted the manuscript. J.Y. performed cell culture experiments. M.K. (Minseok Kwak) and S.K. contributed to project administration and supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Pukyong National University Research Fund in 2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Hojoon Choi and Hyosung Choi in SEM imaging.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arranja, A.; Schroder, A.P.; Schmutz, M.; Waton, G.; Schosseler, F.; Mendes, E. Cytotoxicity and internalization of Pluronic micelles stabilized by core cross-linking. J. Control. Release 2014, 196, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kabanov, A.V.; Nazarova, I.R.; Astafieva, I.V.; Batrakova, E.V.; Alakhov, V.Y.; Yaroslavov, A.A.; Kabanov, V.A. Micelle formation and solubilization of fluorescent probes in poly (oxyethylene-b-oxypropylene-b-oxyethylene) solutions. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 2303–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Torchilin, V.P. Micellar nanocarriers: Pharmaceutical perspectives. Pharm. Res. 2007, 24, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Oh, K.T.; Bronich, T.K.; Kabanov, A.V. Micellar formulations for drug delivery based on mixtures of hydrophobic and hydrophilic Pluronic® block copolymers. J. Control. Release 2004, 94, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wei, Z.; Hao, J.; Yuan, S.; Li, Y.; Juan, W.; Sha, X.; Fang, X. Paclitaxel-loaded Pluronic P123/F127 mixed polymeric micelles: Formulation, optimization and in vitro characterization. Int. J. Pharm. 2009, 376, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rösler, A.; Vandermeulen, G.W.; Klok, H.-A. Advanced drug delivery devices via self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 270–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nguyen, D.H.; Bae, J.W.; Choi, J.H.; Lee, J.S.; Park, K.D. Bioreducible cross-linked Pluronic micelles: pH-triggered release of doxorubicin and folate-mediated cellular uptake. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym. 2013, 28, 341–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Panyam, J.; Labhasetwar, V. Dynamics of endocytosis and exocytosis of poly (d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles in vascular smooth muscle cells. Pharm. Res. 2003, 20, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bjerk, T.R.; Severino, P.; Jain, S.; Marques, C.; Silva, A.M.; Pashirova, T.; Souto, E.B. Biosurfactants: Properties and applications in drug delivery, biotechnology and ecotoxicology. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, L.; Alexandridis, P. Physicochemical aspects of drug delivery and release from polymer-based colloids. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 5, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Choi, K.Y.; Liu, G.; Lee, S.; Chen, X. Theranostic nanoplatforms for simultaneous cancer imaging and therapy: Current approaches and future perspectives. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 330–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kataoka, K.; Harada, A.; Nagasaki, Y. Block copolymer micelles for drug delivery: Design, characterization and biological significance. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kwon, G.S.; Naito, M.; Kataoka, K.; Yokoyama, M.; Sakurai, Y.; Okano, T. Block copolymer micelles as vehicles for hydrophobic drugs. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 1994, 2, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ferrari, M. Nanovector therapeutics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005, 9, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Peer, D.; Karp, J.M.; Hong, S.; Farokhzad, O.C.; Margalit, R.; Langer, R. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nano-Enabled Med. Appl. 2007, 2, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ryu, J.H.; Lee, S.; Son, S.; Kim, S.H.; Leary, J.F.; Choi, K.; Kwon, I.C. Theranostic nanoparticles for future personalized medicine. J. Control. Release 2014, 190, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, H.K.; Park, T.G. Surface stabilization of diblock PEG-PLGA micelles by polymerization of N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2002, 23, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ishida, O.; Maruyama, K.; Sasaki, K.; Iwatsuru, M. Size-dependent extravasation and interstitial localization of polyethyleneglycol liposomes in solid tumor-bearing mice. Int. J. Pharm. 1999, 190, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pruitt, J.D.; Husseini, G.; Rapoport, N.; Pitt, W.G. Stabilization of Pluronic P-105 micelles with an interpenetrating network of N,N-diethylacrylamide. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 9306–9309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, H.; Lee, Y.S.; Lee, K.D.; Park, S.Y. Development of disulfide core-crosslinked pluronic nanoparticles as an effective anticancer-drug-delivery system. Macromol. Biosci. 2011, 11, 1264–1271. [Google Scholar]
  21. Petrov, P.; Bozukov, M.; Tsvetanov, C.B. Innovative approach for stabilizing poly (ethylene oxide)-b-poly (propylene oxide)-b-poly (ethylene oxide) micelles by forming nano-sized networks in the micelle. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 1481–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rapoport, N. Physical stimuli-responsive polymeric micelles for anti-cancer drug delivery. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 962–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Avlasevich, Y.; Müllen, K. An efficient synthesis of quaterrylenedicarboximide NIR dyes. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 10243–10246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Avlasevich, Y.; Li, C.; Müllen, K. Synthesis and applications of core-enlarged perylene dyes. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 3814–3826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guo, L. Doing battle with the green monster of Taihu Lake. Science 2007, 317, 1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jin, X.; Xu, Q.; Huang, C. Current status and future tendency of lake eutrophication in China. Sci. China Ser. C Life Sci. 2005, 48, 948–954. [Google Scholar]
  27. Choi, H.; Kim, S. Heterocapsa busanensis sp. nov. (Peridiniales, Dinophyceae): A new marine thecate dinoflagellate from Korean coastal waters. Eur. J. Protistol. 2021, 79, 125797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Van Apeldoorn, M.E.; Van Egmond, H.P.; Speijers, G.J.; Bakker, G.J. Toxins of cyanobacteria. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2007, 51, 7–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, Y. Identification of microcystins in waters used for daily life by people who live on Tai Lake during a serious cyanobacteria dominated bloom with risk analysis to human health. Environ. Toxicol. Int. J. 2009, 24, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Oliver, R.L.; Ganf, G.G. Freshwater blooms. In The Ecology of Cyanobacteria; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 149–194. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hall, T.; Hart, J.; Croll, B.; Gregory, R. Laboratory-scale investigations of algal toxin removal by water treatment. Water Environ. J. 2000, 14, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ghernaout, B.; Ghernaout, D.; Saiba, A. Algae and cyanotoxins removal by coagulation/flocculation: A review. Desalination Water Treat. 2010, 20, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Alexandridis, P.; Nivaggioli, T.; Hatton, T.A. Temperature effects on structural properties of Pluronic P104 and F108 PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymer solutions. Langmuir 1995, 11, 1468–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rapoport, N. Stabilization and activation of Pluronic micelles for tumor-targeted drug delivery. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 1999, 16, 93–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kabanov, A.V.; Batrakova, E.V.; Alakhov, V.Y. Pluronic® block copolymers as novel polymer therapeutics for drug and gene delivery. J. Control. Release 2002, 82, 189–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nguyen, V.P.; Kim, H.; Kang, M.; Kwak, M.; Kang, H.W. Application of organic IR788-loaded semi-interpenetrating network dyes for photoacoustic imaging. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 56, 07JF12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kang, M.; Kim, H.; Lee, T.H.; Huh, Y.H.; Kim, Y.S.; Park, S.J.; Jin, J.-O.; Lee, P.C.W.; Kwak, M. Highly photostable rylene-encapsulated polymeric nanoparticles for fluorescent labeling in biological system. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 80, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Oktavia, L.; Jeong, S.M.; Kang, M.; Kim, H.; Lee, T.H.; Zhang, J.; Seo, H.; Lee, J.; Han, D.; An, Y.; et al. Dye encapsulated polymeric nanoprobes for in vitro and in vivo fluorescence imaging in panchromatic range. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 73, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tănase, M.A.; Raducan, A.; Oancea, P.; Diţu, L.M.; Stan, M.; Petcu, C.; Scomoroşcenco, C.; Ninciuleanu, C.M.; Nistor, C.L.; Cinteza, L.O. Mixed pluronic—Cremophor polymeric micelles as nanocarriers for poorly soluble antibiotics—The influence on the antibacterial activity. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bohorquez, M.; Koch, C.; Trygstad, T.; Pandit, N. A study of the temperature-dependent micellization of pluronic F127. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1999, 216, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hwang, J.; Kang, M.; Sari, M.I.; Lee, T.H.; Kim, K.; Choi, Y.K.; Lee, E.; Ryu, J.H.; Baek, S.K.; Ahn, D.J.; et al. Phosphate-functionalized stabilized F127 nanoparticles: Introduction of discrete surface charges and electrophoretic determination of aggregation number. Macromol. Res. 2019, 27, 657–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, X.; Zhang, C.; Tan, L.; Wang, J. Toxicity of Co nanoparticles on three species of marine microalgae. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 236, 454–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jeon, B.S.; Park, M.G. Parvilucifera multicavata sp. nov. (Alveolata, Perkinsozoa), a new parasitoid infecting marine dinoflagellates having abundant apertures on the sporangium. Protist 2020, 171, 125743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Luo, Z.; Yang, W.; Leaw, C.P.; Pospelova, V.; Bilien, G.; Liow, G.R.; Lim, P.T.; Gu, H. Cryptic diversity within the harmful dinoflagellate Akashiwo sanguinea in coastal Chinese waters is related to differentiated ecological niches. Harmful Algae 2017, 66, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Soeriawidjaja, B.F.; Kang, M.; Kim, H.; Yang, H.K.; Kim, J.H.; Kwak, M. Near infrared dye-encapsulated polymeric nanoparticles with enhanced photostability under hyperthermal condition. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2019, 687, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of rylene-dye-loaded NPs uptake to algal cell experiment.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of rylene-dye-loaded NPs uptake to algal cell experiment.
Bioengineering 09 00170 g001
Figure 2. (A) Absorption and fluorescence spectra of 0.002% LV-sIPN NPs and (B) absorption spectra of 3% IR788-sIPN NPs before and after CMT test.
Figure 2. (A) Absorption and fluorescence spectra of 0.002% LV-sIPN NPs and (B) absorption spectra of 3% IR788-sIPN NPs before and after CMT test.
Bioengineering 09 00170 g002
Figure 3. Fluorescence microscopy images of dinoflagellates non-feeding and feeding on LV-sIPN NPs. (A,B) Akashiwo sanguinea, (C,D) Alexandrium pacificum. (A,C) Cells with no NP, (B,D) Cells containing LV-sIPN NPs. The self-fluorescence of the cell is red and the LV-sIPN NPs are blue (arrow). Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 3. Fluorescence microscopy images of dinoflagellates non-feeding and feeding on LV-sIPN NPs. (A,B) Akashiwo sanguinea, (C,D) Alexandrium pacificum. (A,C) Cells with no NP, (B,D) Cells containing LV-sIPN NPs. The self-fluorescence of the cell is red and the LV-sIPN NPs are blue (arrow). Scale bars = 10 μm.
Bioengineering 09 00170 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of LV-sIPN treated algae (A) Akashiwo sanguinea, (B) Alexandrium pacificum.
Figure 4. SEM images of LV-sIPN treated algae (A) Akashiwo sanguinea, (B) Alexandrium pacificum.
Bioengineering 09 00170 g004
Figure 5. Monitoring the uptake for dinoflagellate species, Akashiwo sanguinea and Alexandrium pacificum, after 24 h of LV-sIPN NPs treatment. (A) Effect of LV-sIPN NPs on cell growth. It shows the change in the number of cells immediately after nanoparticle treatment (purple) and after 24 h (hatched purple). As a control, the number of untreated red-tide cells (grey) and the cell number after 24 h of incubation (hatched grey) were also observed. (B) Comparison of LV-sIPN NP uptake rate of dinoflagellate species after 24 h.
Figure 5. Monitoring the uptake for dinoflagellate species, Akashiwo sanguinea and Alexandrium pacificum, after 24 h of LV-sIPN NPs treatment. (A) Effect of LV-sIPN NPs on cell growth. It shows the change in the number of cells immediately after nanoparticle treatment (purple) and after 24 h (hatched purple). As a control, the number of untreated red-tide cells (grey) and the cell number after 24 h of incubation (hatched grey) were also observed. (B) Comparison of LV-sIPN NP uptake rate of dinoflagellate species after 24 h.
Bioengineering 09 00170 g005
Figure 6. Effect of laser irradiation (808 nm) under 1.5 W/cm² on Akashiwo sanguinea treated with LV- and IR788-sIPN NPs at different irradiation time. One-way ANOVA, mean  ±  SEM, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 6. Effect of laser irradiation (808 nm) under 1.5 W/cm² on Akashiwo sanguinea treated with LV- and IR788-sIPN NPs at different irradiation time. One-way ANOVA, mean  ±  SEM, ** p < 0.01.
Bioengineering 09 00170 g006
Figure 7. Change of cell number after laser irradiation under (A) 1.0 and (B) 0.5 W/cm² on Akashiwo sanguinea at different irradiation time. Noted decrease percentage is relative to each non-irradiated control (0 min). One-way ANOVA, mean  ±  SEM, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 7. Change of cell number after laser irradiation under (A) 1.0 and (B) 0.5 W/cm² on Akashiwo sanguinea at different irradiation time. Noted decrease percentage is relative to each non-irradiated control (0 min). One-way ANOVA, mean  ±  SEM, ** p < 0.01.
Bioengineering 09 00170 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tumpa, N.F.; Kang, M.; Yoo, J.; Kim, S.; Kwak, M. Rylene Dye-Loaded Polymeric Nanoparticles for Photothermal Eradication of Harmful Dinoflagellates, Akashiwo sanguinea and Alexandrium pacificum. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 170. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9040170

AMA Style

Tumpa NF, Kang M, Yoo J, Kim S, Kwak M. Rylene Dye-Loaded Polymeric Nanoparticles for Photothermal Eradication of Harmful Dinoflagellates, Akashiwo sanguinea and Alexandrium pacificum. Bioengineering. 2022; 9(4):170. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9040170

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tumpa, Naz Fathma, Mingyeong Kang, Jiae Yoo, Sunju Kim, and Minseok Kwak. 2022. "Rylene Dye-Loaded Polymeric Nanoparticles for Photothermal Eradication of Harmful Dinoflagellates, Akashiwo sanguinea and Alexandrium pacificum" Bioengineering 9, no. 4: 170. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9040170

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop