Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Crypthecodinium cohnii High-Cell-Density Fed-Batch Cultivations
Previous Article in Journal
Ordered Changes in Methane Production Performance and Metabolic Pathway Transition of Methanogenic Archaea under Gradually Increasing Sodium Propionate Stress Intensity
Previous Article in Special Issue
High-Level Secretory Production of Recombinant E2-Spy Antigen Protein via Combined Strategy in Pichia pastoris
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Continuous Secretion of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Based on Escherichia coli Biofilm

1
College of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
2
School of Chemical Engineering and Energy, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2024, 10(4), 202; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10040202
Submission received: 8 February 2024 / Revised: 31 March 2024 / Accepted: 1 April 2024 / Published: 9 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Microbial Protein Synthesis)

Abstract

:
Human epidermal growth factor (hEGF) holds significant importance in the fields of medicine and cosmetics. Therefore, it becomes imperative to develop a highly efficient fermentation system for hEGF production. In this study, a stable hEGF-secreting expression strain was created by integrating the hEGF gene into the genome of Escherichia coli (E. coli) BL21, and an immobilized fermentation system was developed based on biofilm to facilitate continuous hEGF production. After optimization of fermentation conditions and gene dosage, the production of hEGF was increased from 13.9 mg/L to 52.4 mg/L in free-cell fermentation. Moreover, genetic modifications targeting dgcC, csgD, bcsA, and bcsB proved to enhance biofilm formation. When the bcsB was overexpressed in BL21-hEGF-C5, the biofilm-forming ability was enhanced by 91.1% and the production of hEGF was increased by 28% in biofilm-immobilized continuous fermentation. In conclusion, this study successfully confirms the feasibility of continuous hEGF production through the biofilm system of E. coli, providing valuable insights for the development of other proteins in the field of continuous biomanufacturing.

1. Introduction

hEGF exhibits potent abilities to stimulate epithelial cell proliferation, differentiation, and tissue repair [1]. These remarkable functions have rendered it invaluable for therapeutic interventions in many diseases and for the formulation of cosmetics. Genetic engineering has been employed to achieve large-scale production of hEGF. By harnessing the power of genetic manipulation techniques, researchers can engineer host organisms to express hEGF in substantial quantities [2,3,4].
E. coli has become the favored host expression system for recombinant protein production owing to its advantageous features, such as efficient gene manipulation and ease of culture [5]. However, the intracellular environment of E. coli often leads to the production of insoluble aggregates such as inclusion bodies, and achieving extracellular production of recombinant proteins could overcome this obstacle [6]. Signal peptides play an important role in protein secretion, and previous investigations have demonstrated that the secretion efficiency and production of hEGF were enhanced by employing diverse signaling peptides in E. coli [7,8]. Another critical factor that demands attention is gene dosage, which has been observed to positively correlate with increased protein production in a specific range [9].
Conventional free-cell fermentation is widely used for hEGF production in E. coli, which has inherent limitations such as shear and other unfavorable conditions affecting cell viability, the inability of the cells to be repeatedly utilized, high production costs, and a long fermentation period. However, the implementation of an immobilized fermentation system based on biofilm offers a promising solution to overcome these challenges and enhance hEGF production. Biofilm refers to an organized and structured community of cells that proliferate and persist as cohesive units during their growth and development [10]. The extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) produced by microorganisms play a crucial role in the formation of biofilms, rendering them cohesive and viscoelastic [11]. Compared with free-cell fermentation, biofilm-immobilized fermentation offers advantages such as high cell density, a short fermentation period, high metabolic activity, recycled cells, and greater tolerance to environmental factors such as heavy metals, pH fluctuations, and temperature changes [12,13]. Biofilm-immobilized fermentation has found successful applications in the production of small-molecule chemicals such as ethanol and butanol [14], but its application in the field of macromolecular protein synthesis needs to be further studied and developed. Previously, we used plasmid expression of hEGF and established a continuous fermentation process for hEGF production based on biofilms. However, the production of hEGF was affected during long-term fermentation because of plasmid loss.
In this study, we engineered a stable expression system for hEGF production by integrating the hEGF gene into the genome of E. coli BL21. Building upon this foundation, we employed genetic manipulation techniques to express key genes involved in biofilm formation, ultimately yielding highly efficient strains capable of biofilm formation. Leveraging the advantages offered by biofilms, we successfully achieved continuous and sustained secretion of hEGF (Figure 1). By integrating biofilm formation mechanisms and harnessing the intrinsic capabilities of microbial communities, we have established a novel platform for the production of hEGF. This approach offers improved stability, enhanced production rates, and the potential for continuous secretion. Our findings contribute to the advancement of biofilm-based fermentation systems and highlight their potential for the production of complex biomolecules.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains and Plasmids

E. coli BL21(DE3) was used in this study. All strains and plasmids used in this work are listed in Table 1. Primers used in this study are listed in Table S1. To achieve efficient expression of hEGF in E. coli BL21(DE3), the CRISPR technology was employed. Each hEGF expression cassette was integrated at a specific locus of the E. coli BL21(DE3) genome.
Locus of hEGF gene integration were yjjM, yddE, yfbL, arpA, and yjcF. Each integration event generated a distinct strain capable of hEGF expression, denoted as BL21-hEGF-C1, BL21-hEGF-C2, BL21-hEGF-C3, BL21-hEGF-C4, and BL21-hEGF-C5, indicating the presence of 1 to 5 copies of the hEGF expression cassette. The hEGF expression cassette with T7 promoter and T7 terminator, derived from the hEGF expression plasmid pET30a-hEGF [15], was amplified and characterized. To generate the donor DNA for CRISPR-mediated integration, two homologous arms, each approximately 500 base pairs in length, were selected upstream and downstream of the targeted insertion site. The hEGF expression cassette was ligated with the upstream and downstream homologous arms using overlap PCR, yielding the donor DNA required for the integration process.
To facilitate the formation of biofilms, the genes responsible for biofilm development, namely, dgcC, csgD, bcsA, and bcsB, were amplified from the genomic DNA of E. coli MG1655. Each of the biofilm genes was cloned into either the pET28a or pBbE1a expression plasmid using the ClonExpress II One Step Cloning Kit C112 (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), and they were then introduced into BL21-hEGF-C5. By incorporating each of the biofilm genes into strain BL21-hEGF-C5, strains BL21-hEGF-dgcC, BL21-hEGF-csgD, BL21-hEGF-bcsA, BL21-hEGF-bcsB, and BL21-hEGF-pBb-bcsB were generated.

2.2. Media and Growth Conditions

Before the fermentation conditions were optimized, strains were inoculated into 5 mL Luria-Bertani (LB) liquid medium and cultured at 37 °C and 200 rpm for 12 h to obtain seed culture. Following this, the 2 mL seed culture was transferred to 200 mL Terrific Broth (TB) liquid medium in 500 mL conical flasks and grown at 37 °C to OD600 of 0.6–0.8. The cells were then induced with 1 mM isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (S11086, Yuanye Bio-Technology, Shanghai, China) at 25 °C and 200 rpm.
The LB medium comprised 5 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L tryptone, and 10 g/L NaCl, and the TB medium contains 11.8 g/L tryptone, 23.6 g/L yeast extract, 9.4 g/L K2HPO4, 2.2 g/L KH2PO4, and 4 mL/L glycerol. Solid media were prepared by adding 1.5% (w/v) agar.
For strains expressing the biofilm gene using the pET28a plasmid, cultivation was performed with 50 μg/mL of kanamycin (P659139, Aladdin, West Palm Beach, FL, USA). For strains expressing the biofilm gene using the pBbE1a plasmid, cultivation was performed with 100 μg/mL of ampicillin.

2.3. Fermentation and Analytical Methods

In free-cell fermentation, a single colony was chosen and transferred to 5 mL LB liquid medium at 37 °C and 200 rpm for 12 h to obtain seed culture. Subsequently, the seed culture was transferred to TB medium (the 50 mg/mL kanamycin for strains contained biofilm gene expressing plasmid pET28a, and the 100 mg/mL ampicillin for strains contained biofilm gene expressing plasmid pBbE1a) at 1% (v/v) inoculum. This culture was further incubated at 37 °C and 200 rpm. Once the optical density (OD600) reached a range of 0.6 to 0.8, the inducer IPTG was added to the culture. The fermentation process was then continued in a shaker at 25 °C. For biofilm-based immobilized fermentation, 40 g/L of cotton fibers were placed within a conical flask and sterilized at 115 °C for 20 min with the fermentation medium. At the end of each batch, the fermentation broth was replaced by a fresh fermentation medium and other procedural steps remained consistent with free-cell fermentation.
In this study, the secretion of hEGF was the focus of analysis. To determine the presence and quantity of hEGF in the culture medium, the supernatant obtained after centrifugation was subjected to two analytical techniques: polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
For qualitative assessment of hEGF in the supernatant, SDS-PAGE was employed. The supernatant was mixed with a 4× SDS loading buffer, and the resulting mixture was subjected to a heat treatment at 95 °C for 5 min. The prepared samples were subsequently loaded onto a protein gel, which was prepared according to the instructions provided by the Tricine-SDS-PAGE Gel Preparation Kit (C641100, Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). Gel electrophoresis was performed according to the instructions of the Tricine-SDS-PAGE Gel Preparation Kit, and the standard of hEGF (105-04B, Prime Gene, Shanghai, China) was loaded into the seventh lane with a volume of 10 µL of 30 mg/L. The gel was then visualized using a gel imaging system to identify the presence of the target band corresponding to hEGF, and the results were recorded for further analysis.
To determine the expression level of hEGF more quantitatively, HPLC was employed. The analysis utilized an Agilent 300SB-C18 (USA) analytical column with dimensions of 4.6 × 250 mm. The mobile phases employed were mobile phase A, consisting of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in water, and mobile phase B, consisting of 0.1% TFA in acetonitrile (CAN). A gradient elution method was employed, commencing with a mixture of 90% A and 10% B, gradually transitioning to 100% B over a period of 38 min. A volume of 50 µL of fermentation broth supernatant was injected into the HPLC system for detection of hEGF production. The analysis was conducted at an operating temperature of 25 °C, with a detection wavelength set at 280 nm. The flow rate of the mobile phase was maintained at 0.8 mL/min. This HPLC method allowed for the determination of hEGF expression levels and provided quantifiable data for further evaluation and comparison.

2.4. Characterization of Biofilm Formation

In the experimental procedure, a 96-well plate was utilized to culture the strains in LB medium for 48 h, facilitating the formation of biofilms on the bottom surface of each well. Following this, the cells were fixed using a 4% paraformaldehyde solution to preserve the integrity of the biofilm structure. To visualize and quantify the biofilms, the fixed cells were subjected to staining with a crystal violet solution (A100528, Sangon Biotech). Subsequently, the excess staining solution was carefully removed by gently washing the wells with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The amount of 150 μL of 33% glacial acetic acid solution was added to each well in order to dissolve the crystal violet bound by the biofilm cells. To obtain quantitative data, the absorbance of each well was measured using a microplate reader, specifically at a wavelength of 570 nm (A570). This measurement reflected the amount of crystal violet dye retained by the biofilm cells and provided a means of assessing the biofilm formation and growth.

2.5. Congo Red Assay

The bacterial strain was cultured in an LB medium, and the cells present in the fermentation broth were collected through centrifugation. Subsequently, the cells were washed twice with PBS buffer to remove contaminants, followed by adding 1 mL of PBS buffer to the cells, and they were thoroughly mixed. Then, 10 μL of a Congo Red solution (A600324, Sangon Biotech), with a concentration of 10 mg/mL, was introduced to the cell suspension. The resulting mixture was incubated in a shaker at 150 rpm and 25 °C for 10 min. The purpose of this incubation was to allow for the interaction between the Congo Red dye and the bacteria. To separate the cells from the supernatant, the mixture was subjected to centrifugation. The resulting supernatant was analyzed by scanning at full wavelength, capturing the spectral profile. Specifically, the residual amount of Congo Red in the supernatant was determined by measuring the absorbance at a wavelength of 485 nm (OD485).
Furthermore, the Congo Red binding ratio, denoted as CR%, was calculated using the following equation:
C R % = 1 O D 485 O D 485 ( P B S + C R )
In this equation, OD485 represents the absorbance of the sample at 485 nm, while OD485(PBS+CR) represents the absorbance of a control solution consisting of PBS and Congo Red without any microbial cells at 485 nm.
By observing the combining effect of Congo Red and the bacteria, it becomes possible to characterize whether the overexpression of specific genes can enhance the biofilm formation ability of the strains by increasing the amount of cellulose. This assessment helps to elucidate the impact of gene expression on the biofilm-forming capacity of the strains under investigation.

2.6. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope

The biofilm formation on the carrier was visualized through a confocal laser scanning microscope, a powerful imaging technique. The strains were cultured in an LB medium, and the optical density of the bacterial cell suspensions was determined. To ensure standardized conditions, the suspensions were adjusted to a final OD600 value of 1.0 by adding sterilized water. For the experimental setup, the laser confocal petri dish (J04121, JingAn Biological, Shanghai, China) was utilized. The amount of 4 mL of LB liquid medium and 400 μL of the appropriately diluted bacterial solution were added to the petri dish. The petri dish was then incubated at a temperature of 28 °C for 48 h, allowing sufficient time for biofilm development to occur. After the designated incubation period, the culture medium was carefully drained, and the cells were fixed using a 4% paraformaldehyde solution to preserve their morphology and structure. To facilitate staining and visualization of the biofilm, a solution of DAPI dye (C1006, Beyotime, Shanghai, China), which specifically binds to DNA, was added to the fixed cells. After staining, the samples underwent an additional wash step with PBS buffer to remove excess dye. Subsequently, the prepared samples were subjected to analysis using a laser confocal microscope.

3. Results

3.1. Screening Results of High Production Strain

In our previous work, hEGF was expressed and secreted from E. coli BL21(DE3) with the pET30a plasmid and pelB signal peptide; the production of hEGF reached 24 mg/L in a shake flask [15]. To avoid the problem of plasmid loss during the long-term continuous fermentation, the hEGF gene was integrated into the genome of E. coli BL21(DE3) through CRISPR gene editing technology. Five specific sites within the BL21(DE3) genome, namely, yjjM, yddE, yfbL, arpA, and yjcF, were selected for iterative integration of multiple-copy hEGF genes. Genome-integrated expression strains were generated, which harbored 1–5 copies of the hEGF gene and were named BL21-hEGF-C1, BL21-hEGF-C2, BL21-hEGF-C3, BL21-hEGF-C4, and BL21-hEGF-C5, respectively.
Gene dosage on hEGF production was evaluated. Figure 2a illustrates the results obtained through SDS-PAGE analysis, which revealed the presence of protein bands in the five strains that corresponded in size to the expected hEGF standard size of 6.2 kilodaltons, suggesting that the five strains were successful in secreting hEGF. The gray value of the target protein bands increased as the copy number increased, indicating that the production of hEGF increased with the copy number. The quantification of hEGF secretion levels in the recombinant strains was accomplished using HPLC. The results showed that the recombinant strain BL21-hEGF-C5 had the highest hEGF production, reaching 29.6 mg/L at 96 h, which was 2.13 times higher than that of BL21-hEGF-C1 (13.9 mg/L) (Figure 2b).
To further increase the secretory expression of hEGF, a single-factor optimization experiment was conducted to obtain the conditions favorable for the recombinant strain BL21-hEGF-C5. It has been observed that an increase in temperature during induction adversely affects protein folding and that low-temperature induction attenuates bacterial metabolic activity, thereby reducing the likelihood of protein misfolding [17]. The induction temperatures of 20 °C, 25 °C, 30 °C, and 35 °C were compared in this study. The result showed that the production of hEGF was significantly higher at 20 °C. Furthermore, high concentrations of IPTG have been found to have toxic effects on bacteria [18]. Therefore, the concentration of IPTG was compared at 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mM. The result showed that the production of hEGF was significantly higher at 0.5 mM IPTG. Furthermore, the specification of shake flasks and the volume of medium were investigated for hEGF production. These results showed that a 500 mL flask with a baffle, containing 100 mL of TB medium was the best condition for hEGF production (Figure 3c,d). The use of flasks with baffles and appropriate reduction of medium loading increased the amount of dissolved oxygen. Increased dissolved oxygen favors cell growth and enhances protein expression, ultimately leading to increased hEGF production. Through careful consideration and optimization of these variables, the production of hEGF experienced an increase of 77.0%, elevating the yield from 29.6 mg/L to 52.4 mg/L (Figure 3e).

3.2. Effect of Gene Modification on Biofilm Formation

In order to improve the biofilm-forming ability and construct a continuous fermentation process based on biofilms, biofilm-related genes of dgcC, csgD, bcsA, and bcsB were overexpressed in BL21-hEGF-C5. The biofilm-forming ability was measured by crystal violet staining in 96 microtiter plates. The experimental results showed that the overexpression of these genes enhanced the formation of biofilm by actively promoting cellular aggregation and adhesion. Specifically, the overexpression of bcsA and bcsB genes demonstrated a pronounced influence on biofilm formation, leading to more substantial enhancements compared to the other genes tested. Compared to the strain BL21-hEGF-C5, recombinant strains BL21-hEGF-bcsB and BL21-hEGF-pBb-bcsB exhibited significantly increased biofilm formation by 91.1% and 80.2%, respectively (Figure 4). Recombinant strains BL21-hEGF-dgcC, BL21-hEGF-csgD, and BL21-hEGF-bcsA demonstrated enhanced biofilm formation by 63.9%, 68.2%, and 74.6%, respectively.
Congo red is a widespread amyloid-binding dye that binds to curli as well as cellulose [19]. Higher amounts of curli and cellulose mean that the strain was more able to form biofilm. In this study, recombinant strains were stained by Congo Red dye, which observed that the color of the bacterial cells is redder and the supernatant is clearer compared with the strain BL21-hEGF-C5 (Figure 5). These results highlight that the overexpression of dgcC, csgD, bcsA, and bcsB genes enhanced cellulose synthesis, leading to increased binding ratio of the modified strains to Congo Red compared to the control strain, Congo Red binding of the modified strains was 1.27 to 1.95 times higher than that of the control strain BL21-hEGF-C5 (Table 2). Overexpression of dgcC, csgD, bcsA, and bcsB genes enhanced biofilm formation by promoting the synthesis of cellulose.
Further analysis using a confocal laser scanning microscope demonstrated that the modified strains had more biofilms in 96-well plates than the control strain, indicating increased biofilm formation and significant cellular aggregation. In contrast, the control strain displayed a lower adhesion amount and a more dispersed state within the 12-well plates (Figure 6). These findings support the notion that the modified strains possessed stronger adhesion capabilities, with the overexpression of bcsA and bcsB genes particularly contributing to a significantly enhanced biofilm formation ability.

3.3. Effects of Overexpression of Biofilm-Related Genes on hEGF Secretion

Biofilm formation represents a multifaceted process with the potential to impact various aspects of cellular physiology and metabolism [20]. Therefore, the influence of overexpressing biofilm-related genes on hEGF production and strain growth were evaluated first through conventional free-cell fermentation. The engineered strains successfully secreted hEGF, and the production of hEGF reached the highest level at 48 h. Overall, overexpression of biofilm-related genes did not significantly reduce hEGF production, and in particular, overexpression of the csgD and bcsB genes increased hEGF secretion to some extent (Figure 7a). Specifically, the strains BL21-hEGF-csgD and BL21-hEGF-bcsB exhibited hEGF production levels of 60.4 mg/L and 62.6 mg/L, respectively. These values represented an increase of 15.3% and 19.5% compared to the control strain BL21-hEGF-C5, which produced hEGF at a level of 52.4 mg/L. These findings highlight the potential of manipulating biofilm-related genes to modulate hEGF production in the context of free-cell fermentation, but the mechanisms of regulation need to be further explored.

3.4. Production of hEGF by Biofilm-Immobilized Continuous Fermentation

Biofilm-immobilized continuous fermentation was conducted to assess the capability of recombinant strains for continuous hEGF production. The evaluation of bacterial adsorption onto the surface of the immobilized carrier serves as an indicator of the efficiency of bacterial cell immobilization. Compared with the conventional free-cell fermentation, the OD600 values of the fermentation broth were substantially reduced during the biofilm-immobilized continuous fermentation, this means all strains were successfully adsorbed on the carrier with a good immobilization effect (Figure 8a). Compared with the strain BL21-hEGF-C5, biofilm-forming strains showed significantly lower OD600 values of fermentation broth during biofilm-immobilized continuous fermentation, indicating a higher degree of modified strain absorption onto the carrier surface, suggesting the effectiveness of the biofilm-related gene modification. The turbidity of the fermentation broth gradually increased in the first few batches and then stabilized. In the initial batch of immobilized fermentation, all strains exhibited low cell density in the fermentation broth, primarily due to the adsorption state of cells. In the second batch, the biofilm developed to a relatively mature stage, leading to a significant increase in cell density within the fermentation broth. In subsequent batches, the trend of cell density changes remained relatively consistent, indicating the establishment of a consistent and stable biofilm structure. During each batch of immobilized fermentation, the density of bacteria in the fermentation broth initially increased, followed by a noticeable decline due to continuous cell adsorption onto the carrier surface. The best immobilized of all the strains were BL21-hEGF-bcsA and BL21-hEGF-bcsB. In the fifth, sixth, and seventh batches of immobilized fermentation, the number of bacteria in the fermentation broth of BL21-hEGF-bcsA and BL21-hEGF-bcsB strains exhibited a reduction compared to previous batches. This reduction in free cells implies that the overexpression strains carrying the bcsA and bcsB genes demonstrated increased stability in immobilization, becoming less susceptible to desorption as the batches progressed. These findings highlight the successful immobilization and sustained stability of the modified strains, specifically those overexpressing the bcsA and bcsB genes, in the immobilized fermentation system.
The results depicted in Figure 8b exhibit a decreasing trend in hEGF production initially; followed by a stabilization phase as the fermentation batch number increased. This trend provides compelling evidence of the feasibility of employing the modified strains for immobilized continuous production; emphasizing the potential of this approach. Biofilm formation is considered to be a protected growth pattern for microorganisms to adapt to harsh environments [21]. Compared to the control strain; the modified strains were more capable of hEGF production. Further details can be found in Table 3; which presents a comprehensive overview of hEGF secretion by the modified strains relative to the control strain. Across seven batches of immobilized continuous fermentation; the average hEGF production levels of strains BL21-hEGF-dgcC; BL21-hEGF-csgD; BL21-hEGF-bcsA; BL21-hEGF-bcsB; and BL21-hEGF-pBb-bcsB were 41.2 mg/L; 47.5 mg/L; 44.2 mg/L; 49.2 mg/L; and 46.4 mg/L; respectively. These values increased by 7.2%, 23.8%, 14.5%, 28.0%, and 20.6%, respectively; compared with the control strain BL21-hEGF-C5 (38.6 mg/L). These findings highlight the superior performance of the modified strains overexpressing dgcC; csgD; bcsA; and bcsB genes in continuous hEGF production compared to the control strain. BL21-hEGF-bcsB had the highest yield of hEGF; and the potential it showed in immobilized continuous production was due to the formation of more biofilms.
Moreover, the results obtained from scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as depicted in Figure 9, reveal that the modified strains formed more extensive biofilms on the cotton fiber carrier. This observation indicates that an increased biofilm presence facilitated continuous hEGF production.

4. Discussion

Secretory production of hEGF in E. coli has been developed using traditional batch fermentation. Here, to further improve the production efficiency, the present study aims to develop a continuous hEGF secretion system based on biofilm formation. In our previous study, plasmid-expressing strains for hEGF production were constructed. However, one of the limitations of plasmid-based expression systems was that the plasmids were prone to loss over time, rendering them unsuitable for sustained, long-term production. To overcome this challenge, the present study took a different approach by expressing hEGF genes through multiple genomic integrations to obtain long-term gene stability and sustainability of hEGF production. A recombinant strain expressing five-copy genome-integrated hEGF genes was constructed, and it gave the best hEGF production. After fermentation optimization, it produced 52.4 mg/L of hEGF, much higher than the previous plasmid-based production of 24 mg/L [15]. Cellulose is one of the major constituents of the biofilm matrix. To enhance biofilm formation in E. coli, the potential cellulose-forming genes bcsA, bcsB, dgcC, and csgD were incorporated into the BL21-hEGF-C5 strain. The catalytic subunit of cellulose synthetase, encoded by bcsA, forms a catalytically active complex along with periplasmic proteins anchored to the cell membranes, encoded by bcsB. This complex is responsible for the synthesis and transport of cellulose [22]. Moreover, the dgcC gene, encoding the diguanylate cyclase, serves as a facilitator for promoting cellulose synthesis. Increased c-di-GMP levels lead to increased cellulose synthesis and biofilm formation, and csgD is an important component of the c-di-GMP signaling network and a master regulator of biofilms [23]. Crystal violet staining, Congo Red assay, and confocal laser scanning microscopy all indicated that cellulose production was increased and biofilm formation was enhanced after overexpression of these genes. Finally, by employing the immobilized continuous fermentation technique, we were able to examine the productivity and stability of continuous hEGF secretion by the modified strains. The results showed that the modified strains successfully achieved continuous production of hEGF. In immobilized continuous fermentation, the modified strains produced more hEGF than the control strain.
While the highest reported production of hEGF by E. coli has reached 506 mg/L in a 50 L high-density fermenter, here an average production of 49.2 mg/L of hEGF was obtained by immobilized continuous fermentation in flasks. Considering the existing gaps between the achieved hEGF production level and the reported levels, subsequent scale-up fermentation using large fermenters will be carried out. Large fermenters offer improved control over fermentation conditions such as pH and dissolved oxygen, providing more favorable fermentation processes. With these improved controls, it is anticipated that hEGF production can be significantly increased in the future.

5. Conclusions

In this study, a stable hEGF secretion system was constructed using E. coli as the host. Building upon this achievement, the study further developed highly efficient E. coli strains capable of robust biofilm formation, enabling the realization of immobilized continuous fermentation for hEGF production. This innovative approach harnessed the advantages offered by biofilms, ultimately leading to the establishment of an immobilized continuous fermentation system based on biofilm.
By integrating the concepts of stable hEGF expression, efficient biofilm formation, and immobilized continuous fermentation, this study introduces a novel framework for the production of hEGF and offers insights into the advancement of continuous biomanufacturing technologies for diverse proteins.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fermentation10040202/s1 Table S1. Primers used in this study. Figure S1. Elution profile. (a) hEGF standard (25 mg/L); (b) BL21-hEGF-C5 (37 mg/L); (c) BL21 (DE3).

Author Contributions

Methodology, C.Z., Z.W. and D.L.; Validation, C.Z.; Formal analysis, D.L.; Investigation, C.Z., J.L., Y.L., S.L., M.L. and D.Z.; Resources, D.L. and H.Y.; Data curation, C.Z., Z.W. and D.L.; Writing – original draft, C.Z.; Writing – review & editing, C.Z., Z.W. and D.L.; Supervision, D.L. and H.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2021YFC2101204), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (grant nos. BK20202002 and BK20190035), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 22178172).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank Sheng Yang (Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China) for generously providing the CRISPR plasmids used in this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Qiang, W.; Zhou, T.; Lan, X.; Zhang, X.; Guo, Y.; Noman, M.; Du, L.; Zheng, J.; Li, W.; Li, H.; et al. A New Nanoscale Transdermal Drug Delivery System: Oil Body-Linked Oleosin-hEGF Improves Skin Regeneration to Accelerate Wound Healing. J. Nanobiotechnology 2018, 16, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kwong, K.W.Y.; Ng, A.K.L.; Wong, W.K.R. Engineering Versatile Protein Expression Systems Mediated by Inteins in Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Park, S.A.; Bhatia, S.K.; Park, H.A.; Kim, S.Y.; Sudheer, P.D.V.N.; Yang, Y.-H.; Choi, K.-Y. Bacillus subtilis as a Robust Host for Biochemical Production Utilizing Biomass. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2021, 41, 827–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wu, M.; Ruan, J.; Ye, X.; Zhao, S.; Tang, X.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Zhong, B. P25 Gene Knockout Contributes to Human Epidermal Growth Factor Production in Transgenic Silkworms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pontrelli, S.; Chiu, T.-Y.; Lan, E.I.; Chen, F.Y.-H.; Chang, P.; Liao, J.C. Escherichia coli as a Host for Metabolic Engineering. Metab. Eng. 2018, 50, 16–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Choi, J.H.; Lee, S.Y. Secretory and Extracellular Production of Recombinant Proteins Using Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 64, 625–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Indriyani, A.; Anggraeni, N.I.; Sriwidodo, S.; Maksum, I.P. Optimization Extracellular Secretion of Recombinant Human Epidermal Growth Factor (hEGF) in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) pD881-OmpA-hEGF by Using Response Surface Method (RSM). Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 10, 1824–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sriwidodo, S.; Maksum, I.P.; Riswanto, N.; Rostinawati, T.; Subroto, T. Extracellular Secretion Recombinant of Human Epidermal Growth Factor (hEGF) Using Pectate Lyase B (PelB) Signal Peptide in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 8, 33–40. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yang, Z.; Zhang, Z. Engineering Strategies for Enhanced Production of Protein and Bio-Products in Pichia pastoris: A Review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 182–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Karygianni, L.; Ren, Z.; Koo, H.; Thurnheer, T. Biofilm Matrixome: Extracellular Components in Structured Microbial Communities. Trends Microbiol. 2020, 28, 668–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ferrando, D.; Toubiana, D.; Kandiyote, N.S.; Nguyen, T.H.; Nejidat, A.; Herzberg, M. Ambivalent Role of Calcium in the Viscoelastic Properties of Extracellular Polymeric Substances and the Consequent Fouling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes. Desalination 2018, 429, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lan, T.-Q.; Wei, D.; Yang, S.-T.; Liu, X. Enhanced Cellulase Production by Trichoderma viride in a Rotating Fibrous Bed Bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 133, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Morikawa, M. Beneficial Biofilm Formation by Industrial Bacteria Bacillus subtilis and Related Species. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2006, 101, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mohsin, M.Z.; Omer, R.; Huang, J.; Mohsin, A.; Guo, M.; Qian, J.; Zhuang, Y. Advances in Engineered Bacillus subtilis Biofilms and Spores, and Their Applications in Bioremediation, Biocatalysis, and Biomaterials. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 2021, 6, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, M.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, C.; Zhi, K.; Liu, S.; Sun, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, J.; Liu, D. Continuous Production of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Using Escherichia coli Biofilm. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 855059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Q.; Sun, B.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, S. A Modified pCas/pTargetF System for CRISPR-Cas9-Assisted Genome Editing in Escherichia coli. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2021, 53, 620–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gasser, B.; Saloheimo, M.; Rinas, U.; Dragosits, M.; Rodríguez-Carmona, E.; Baumann, K.; Giuliani, M.; Parrilli, E.; Branduardi, P.; Lang, C.; et al. Protein Folding and Conformational Stress in Microbial Cells Producing Recombinant Proteins: A Host Comparative Overview. Microb. Cell Factories 2008, 7, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Dvorak, P.; Chrast, L.; Nikel, P.I.; Fedr, R.; Soucek, K.; Sedlackova, M.; Chaloupkova, R.; de Lorenzo, V.; Prokop, Z.; Damborsky, J. Exacerbation of Substrate Toxicity by IPTG in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) Carrying a Synthetic Metabolic Pathway. Microb. Cell Factories 2015, 14, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yakupova, E.I.; Bobyleva, L.G.; Vikhlyantsev, I.M.; Bobylev, A.G. Congo Red and Amyloids: History and Relationship. Biosci. Rep. 2019, 39, BSR20181415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mahto, K.U.; Kumari, S.; Das, S. Unraveling the Complex Regulatory Networks in Biofilm Formation in Bacteria and Relevance of Biofilms in Environmental Remediation. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2022, 57, 305–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yin, W.; Wang, Y.; Liu, L.; He, J. Biofilms: The Microbial “Protective Clothing” in Extreme Environments. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Castiblanco, L.F.; Sundin, G.W. Cellulose Production, Activated by Cyclic Di-GMP through BcsA and BcsZ, is a Virulence Factor and an Essential Determinant of the Three-Dimensional Architectures of Biofilms Formed by Erwinia amylovora Ea1189. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 90–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tsai, M.-H.; Liang, Y.-H.; Chen, C.-L.; Chiu, C.-H. Characterization of Salmonella Resistance to Bile during Biofilm Formation. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2020, 53, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Graphical illustration of the continuous secretion system of hEGF in this study.
Figure 1. Graphical illustration of the continuous secretion system of hEGF in this study.
Fermentation 10 00202 g001
Figure 2. Effect of gene dosage on hEGF secretion. (a) SDS-PAGE results of recombinant strains. Lane 1 was Marker, with a sample volume of 5 µL; lanes 2–6 were modified strains, with a sample volume of 20 µL; lane 7 was the standard of hEGF with a sample volume of 10 µL of 30 mg/L; lane 9 was the control strain BL21(DE3), with a sample volume of 20 µL. (b) Production of hEGF was secreted from a recombinant strain.
Figure 2. Effect of gene dosage on hEGF secretion. (a) SDS-PAGE results of recombinant strains. Lane 1 was Marker, with a sample volume of 5 µL; lanes 2–6 were modified strains, with a sample volume of 20 µL; lane 7 was the standard of hEGF with a sample volume of 10 µL of 30 mg/L; lane 9 was the control strain BL21(DE3), with a sample volume of 20 µL. (b) Production of hEGF was secreted from a recombinant strain.
Fermentation 10 00202 g002
Figure 3. Effect of fermentation conditions on hEGF secretion. (a) Effect of induction temperatures on hEGF secretion; (b) effect of IPTG concentration on hEGF secretion; (c) specification effect of shake flasks on hEGF secretion; (d) effect of medium volume on hEGF secretion; (e) hEGF secretion after the optimization of fermentation conditions.
Figure 3. Effect of fermentation conditions on hEGF secretion. (a) Effect of induction temperatures on hEGF secretion; (b) effect of IPTG concentration on hEGF secretion; (c) specification effect of shake flasks on hEGF secretion; (d) effect of medium volume on hEGF secretion; (e) hEGF secretion after the optimization of fermentation conditions.
Fermentation 10 00202 g003
Figure 4. Crystal violet staining-based quantification of biofilm biomass. Strains were inoculated into a 96-well plate and incubated at 28 °C for 48 h; the cells were stained with CV, and the absorbance was determined using a microplate reader at A 570. These values represent the biofilm formation of the strains in the well plates, with higher values indicating more biofilm biomass.
Figure 4. Crystal violet staining-based quantification of biofilm biomass. Strains were inoculated into a 96-well plate and incubated at 28 °C for 48 h; the cells were stained with CV, and the absorbance was determined using a microplate reader at A 570. These values represent the biofilm formation of the strains in the well plates, with higher values indicating more biofilm biomass.
Fermentation 10 00202 g004
Figure 5. Binding assay of Congo Red with biofilm matrix. (a) Congo Red adsorption with different strains overexpressing biofilm-related genes; (b) residual amount of Congo Red in the supernatant, measured as absorbance at 485 nm.
Figure 5. Binding assay of Congo Red with biofilm matrix. (a) Congo Red adsorption with different strains overexpressing biofilm-related genes; (b) residual amount of Congo Red in the supernatant, measured as absorbance at 485 nm.
Fermentation 10 00202 g005
Figure 6. The results of confocal laser scanning microscope. Strains were inoculated into the laser confocal petri dish, incubated at 28 °C for 48 h, and then photographed after DAPI staining.
Figure 6. The results of confocal laser scanning microscope. Strains were inoculated into the laser confocal petri dish, incubated at 28 °C for 48 h, and then photographed after DAPI staining.
Fermentation 10 00202 g006
Figure 7. Effect of overexpression of biofilm-related genes on the strains. (a) Effect on hEGF secretion; (b) effect on strain growth.
Figure 7. Effect of overexpression of biofilm-related genes on the strains. (a) Effect on hEGF secretion; (b) effect on strain growth.
Fermentation 10 00202 g007
Figure 8. Biofilm-immobilized continuous fermentation. (a) Comparison of adsorption of the strains in immobilized continuous fermentation; (b) comparison of hEGF secretion of the strains in immobilized continuous fermentation.
Figure 8. Biofilm-immobilized continuous fermentation. (a) Comparison of adsorption of the strains in immobilized continuous fermentation; (b) comparison of hEGF secretion of the strains in immobilized continuous fermentation.
Fermentation 10 00202 g008
Figure 9. SEM image of the carrier in immobilized continuous fermentation. Biofilm on the carrier after immobilized continuous fermentation; image taken by SEM. Scale bar, 20 μm.
Figure 9. SEM image of the carrier in immobilized continuous fermentation. Biofilm on the carrier after immobilized continuous fermentation; image taken by SEM. Scale bar, 20 μm.
Fermentation 10 00202 g009
Table 1. Strains and plasmids used in this study.
Table 1. Strains and plasmids used in this study.
Strains or PlasmidsRelevant CharacteristicsSources
StrainsE. coli BL21(DE3)Host strainInvitrogen
BL21-hEGF-C1Genome-integrated expression of hEGF in one locusThis study
BL21-hEGF-C2Genome-integrated expression of hEGF in two lociThis study
BL21-hEGF-C3Genome-integrated expression of hEGF in three lociThis study
BL21-hEGF-C4Genome-integrated expression of hEGF in four lociThis study
BL21-hEGF-C5Genome-integrated expression of hEGF in five lociThis study
BL21-hEGF-dgcCPlasmid-based expression of dgcCThis study
BL21-hEGF-csgDPlasmid-based expression of csgDThis study
BL21-hEGF-bcsAPlasmid-based expression of bcsAThis study
BL21-hEGF-bcsBPlasmid-based expression of bcsBThis study
BL21-hEGF-pBb-bcsB *Plasmid-based expression of bcsBThis study
PlasmidspET30a-PelB-hEGFhEGF expression[15]
pCasCRISPR editing[16]
pTargetCRISPR editing[16]
pET28aExpression vectorInvitrogen
pBbE1aExpression vector[15]
pET28a-dgcCPlasmid-based expression of dgcCThis study
pET28a-csgDPlasmid-based expression of csgDThis study
pET28a-bcsAPlasmid-based expression of bcsAThis study
pET28a-bcsBPlasmid-based expression of bcsBThis study
pBbE1a-bcsBPlasmid-based expression of bcsB[15]
* Compared with other modified strains overexpressing biofilm-related genes in this study, the strain used plasmid pBbE1a to express bcsB.
Table 2. Congo Red binding ratio of strains overexpressing biofilm-related genes.
Table 2. Congo Red binding ratio of strains overexpressing biofilm-related genes.
StrainsCongo Red Binding Ratio
BL21-hEGF-C50.37
BL21-hEGF-dgcC0.51
BL21-hEGF-csgD0.47
BL21-hEGF-bcsA0.69
BL21-hEGF-bcsB0.72
BL21-hEGF-pBb-bcsB0.51
Table 3. hEGF secretion of the modified strains compared to the control strain.
Table 3. hEGF secretion of the modified strains compared to the control strain.
StrainshEGF Secretion of the Modified Strains Compared to the Control Strain (%)
1st2nd3rd4th5th6th7thAverage
BL21-hEGF-dgcC−3.58.410.28.97.710.38.77.2
BL21-hEGF-csgD8.820.333.927.030.421.824.123.8
BL21-hEGF-bcsA3.824.518.113.914.515.311.714.5
BL21-hEGF-bcsB16.524.536.732.732.229.624.128.0
BL21-hEGF-pBb-
bcsB
11.519.226.425.320.421.020.420.6
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, C.; Liao, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, S.; Li, M.; Zhang, D.; Wang, Z.; Liu, D.; Ying, H. Continuous Secretion of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Based on Escherichia coli Biofilm. Fermentation 2024, 10, 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10040202

AMA Style

Zhang C, Liao J, Li Y, Liu S, Li M, Zhang D, Wang Z, Liu D, Ying H. Continuous Secretion of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Based on Escherichia coli Biofilm. Fermentation. 2024; 10(4):202. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10040202

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Chong, Jinglin Liao, Yuancong Li, Shuli Liu, Mengting Li, Di Zhang, Zhenyu Wang, Dong Liu, and Hanjie Ying. 2024. "Continuous Secretion of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Based on Escherichia coli Biofilm" Fermentation 10, no. 4: 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10040202

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop